grunewald
argued
decided
may
three
petitioners
convicted
federal
district
violating
conspiring
defraud
preventing
criminal
prosecution
certain
taxpayers
fraudulent
tax
evasion
succeeded
obtaining
prosecution
rulings
bureau
internal
revenue
subsequent
activities
directed
concealing
irregularities
rulings
obtained
indicted
october
held
main
objective
conspiracy
obtain
prosecution
rulings
petitioners
prosecution
barred
statute
limitations
since
agreement
conceal
conspiracy
accomplishment
shown
implied
record
case
part
conspiracy
pp
central
criminal
purposes
conspiracy
attained
subsidiary
conspiracy
conceal
crime
may
implied
circumstantial
evidence
showing
merely
conspiracy
kept
secret
conspirators
took
care
cover
crime
order
escape
detection
punishment
krulewitch
lutwak
pp
record
case
nothing
shown
criminal
conspiracy
carried
secrecy
continuation
secrecy
accomplishment
crime
attempts
cover
crime
began
come
light
pp
duration
conspiracy
lengthened
indefinitely
purpose
statute
limitations
merely
conspiracy
kept
secret
conspirators
take
steps
bury
traces
order
avoid
detection
punishment
central
criminal
purpose
accomplished
pp
petitioner
halperin
also
convicted
counts
indictment
charging
violating
endeavoring
corruptly
influence
certain
witnesses
grand
jury
investigating
matters
involved
conspiracy
trial
answered
certain
questions
manner
consistent
innocence
objection
subjected
revealed
refused
answer
questions
grounds
possible
appearing
grand
jury
subpoena
without
benefit
counsel
without
right
summon
witnesses
without
opportunity
witnesses
testifying
held
circumstances
case
prejudicial
error
trial
judge
permit
halperin
plea
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
raffel
distinguished
pp
reversed
remanded
together
halperin
bolich
also
certiorari
edward
bennett
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
harold
corbin
henry
singer
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
harry
silver
rudolph
stand
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
frank
aranow
john
davis
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
rankin
assistant
attorney
general
olney
beatrice
rosenberg
justice
harlan
delivered
opinion
three
petitioners
convicted
count
indictment
brought
conspiracy
defraud
reference
certain
tax
matters
petitioner
halperin
also
convicted
counts
indictment
charging
violating
endeavoring
corruptly
influence
certain
witnesses
grand
jury
investigating
matters
involved
conspiracy
charged
count
indictment
petitioner
sentenced
five
years
imprisonment
fined
count
counts
halperin
sentenced
two
years
imprisonment
fine
prison
sentences
counts
count
run
concurrently
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
late
judge
frank
dissenting
granted
certiorari
order
resolve
important
questions
relating
statute
limitations
conspiracy
prosecutions
decision
alleged
conflict
decisions
krulewitch
lutwak
use
halperin
prior
claim
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
reasons
discussed
hereafter
conclude
convictions
must
reversed
petitioners
granted
new
trial
october
grand
jury
returned
indictment
count
charged
petitioners
others
conspiring
among
others
defraud
exercise
governmental
functions
administering
internal
revenue
laws
detecting
prosecuting
violations
internal
revenue
laws
free
bribery
unlawful
impairment
obstruction
improper
influence
dishonesty
fraud
corruption
indictment
charged
part
conspiracy
agreement
conceal
acts
conspirators
overt
acts
within
three
years
date
indictment
charged
counts
indictment
charged
petitioners
violating
manner
already
indicated
proofs
trial
presented
sordid
picture
ring
engaged
business
fixing
tax
fraud
cases
use
bribes
improper
influence
general
outline
petitioners
scheme
set
forth
detail
appeals
opinion
follows
two
new
york
business
firms
patullo
modes
gotham
beef
investigation
bureau
internal
revenue
suspected
fraudulent
tax
evasion
intermediaries
firms
established
contact
halperin
new
york
attorney
associates
law
practice
halperin
turn
conducted
negotiations
behalf
firms
grunewald
influential
friend
washington
reported
grunewald
large
cash
fee
undertake
prevent
criminal
prosecution
taxpayers
grunewald
used
influence
bolich
official
bureau
obtain
prosecution
rulings
two
tax
cases
rulings
handed
grunewald
halperin
subsequently
paid
gotham
patullo
subsequent
activities
conspirators
directed
concealing
irregularities
disposition
patullo
gotham
cases
bolich
attempted
bureau
internal
revenue
report
patullo
case
doctored
careful
steps
taken
cover
traces
cash
fees
paid
grunewald
congressional
investigation
started
king
committee
house
representatives
conspirators
felt
threatened
took
steps
hide
traces
thus
bolich
caused
disappearance
certain
records
linking
grunewald
taxpayers
repeatedly
warned
keep
quiet
taxpayers
conspirators
called
brooklyn
grand
jury
halperin
attempted
induce
taxpayers
reveal
conspiracy
grunewald
asked
secretary
talk
grand
jury
attempts
concealment
however
vain
taxpayers
halperin
associates
revealed
entire
scheme
petitioners
indictment
conviction
followed
first
question
us
whether
prosecution
petitioners
count
indictment
barred
applicable
statute
limitations
indictment
cases
returned
october
therefore
incumbent
government
prove
conspiracy
contemplated
agreement
finally
formulated
still
existence
october
least
one
overt
act
furtherance
conspiracy
performed
date
substantiation
conspiracy
charge
requires
proof
overt
act
must
shown
conspiracy
still
subsisted
within
three
years
prior
return
indictment
least
one
overt
act
furtherance
conspiratorial
agreement
performed
within
period
hence
aspects
crucial
question
determining
whether
statute
limitations
run
scope
conspiratorial
agreement
determines
duration
conspiracy
whether
act
relied
overt
act
may
properly
regarded
furtherance
conspiracy
petitioners
contending
prosecution
barred
limitations
state
object
conspiratorial
agreement
narrow
one
obtain
prosecution
rulings
two
tax
cases
rulings
obtained
october
case
gotham
beef
january
case
patullo
modes
criminal
object
conspiracy
petitioners
say
attained
conspirators
function
ended
argue
therefore
statute
limitations
started
running
later
january
prosecution
therefore
barred
indictment
returned
government
counters
two
principal
contentions
first
urges
even
main
object
conspiracy
obtain
decisions
bureau
internal
revenue
institute
criminal
tax
prosecutions
decisions
obtained
indictment
alleged
proofs
showed
conspiracy
also
included
subsidiary
element
agreement
conceal
conspiracy
fix
tax
cases
end
conspirators
escape
detection
punishment
crime
says
government
nature
conspiracy
outset
conscious
deliberate
agreement
conceal
every
aspect
conspiracy
argued
since
alleged
conspiracy
conceal
clearly
continued
long
main
criminal
purpose
conspiracy
accomplished
since
overt
acts
furtherance
agreement
conceal
performed
well
within
indictment
period
prosecution
timely
second
alternatively
government
contends
central
aim
conspiracy
obtain
taxpayers
merely
prosecution
ruling
absolute
immunity
tax
prosecution
words
objectives
conspiracy
attained
statute
limitations
ran
tax
cases
petitioners
undertook
fix
argument
since
conspiracy
end
since
acts
concealment
may
regarded
least
part
furtherance
objective
conspirators
immunize
taxpayers
tax
prosecution
indictment
timely
reasons
hereafter
given
hold
government
first
contention
must
rejected
second
appeals
accepted
new
trial
must
ordered
think
government
first
theory
agreement
conceal
conspiracy
facts
deemed
part
conspiracy
extend
duration
purposes
statute
limitations
already
rejected
krulewitch
lutwak
krulewitch
question
whether
certain
hearsay
declarations
introduced
one
conspirators
declarations
question
made
one
named
indictment
main
object
conspiracy
transporting
woman
florida
immoral
purposes
accomplished
government
argued
conspiracy
ended
however
since
included
implied
subsidiary
conspiracy
conceal
crime
commission
declarations
therefore
still
furtherance
conspiracy
binding
rejected
government
argument
stated
conspirators
commit
crimes
always
expressly
implicitly
agree
collaborate
conceal
facts
order
prevent
detection
conviction
punishment
thus
government
argument
even
central
criminal
objectives
conspiracy
succeeded
failed
implicit
subsidiary
phase
conspiracy
always
survives
phase
concealment
sole
objective
accept
government
contention
rule
contended
government
results
rule
plausible
arguments
generally
made
conspiracy
cases
statements
offered
evidence
tended
shield
persuaded
adopt
government
implicit
conspiracy
theory
criminal
conspiracy
cases
create
automatically
breach
general
rule
admission
hearsay
evidence
suppose
person
planning
crime
accept
collaborator
one
thought
rely
help
caught
doubt
fact
warrants
inference
conspiracy
purpose
difficult
see
logical
limit
implied
conspiracy
either
duration
means
theory
law
impute
confederates
continuing
conspiracy
defeat
justice
one
conceivably
bound
another
unauthorized
unknown
commission
perjury
bribery
juror
witness
etc
moreover
assumption
indefinitely
continuing
offense
result
indeterminate
extension
statute
limitations
law
implies
agreement
cooperate
defeating
prosecution
must
imply
continues
long
prosecution
possibility
prosecution
possibility
long
conspiracy
defeat
implied
continue
government
urges
us
distinguish
krulewitch
lutwak
ground
cases
attempt
imply
conspiracy
conceal
mere
fact
main
conspiracy
kept
secret
overt
acts
concealment
occurred
contrast
says
government
actual
agreement
conceal
conspirators
charged
proved
express
part
initial
conspiracy
unable
agree
government
record
cases
us
distinguished
basis
crucial
teaching
krulewitch
lutwak
central
criminal
purposes
conspiracy
attained
subsidiary
conspiracy
conceal
may
implied
circumstantial
evidence
showing
merely
conspiracy
kept
secret
conspirators
took
care
cover
crime
order
escape
detection
punishment
stated
allowing
conspiracy
conceal
inferred
implied
mere
overt
acts
concealment
result
great
widening
scope
conspiracy
prosecutions
since
extend
life
conspiracy
indefinitely
acts
covering
even
though
done
context
mutually
understood
need
secrecy
constitute
proof
concealment
crime
commission
part
initial
agreement
among
conspirators
every
conspiracy
nature
secret
case
hardly
supposed
men
concert
together
crime
advertise
purpose
world
every
conspiracy
inevitably
followed
actions
taken
cover
conspirators
traces
sanctioning
government
theory
practical
purposes
wipe
statute
limitations
conspiracy
cases
well
extend
indefinitely
time
within
hearsay
declarations
bind
reading
record
us
reveals
facts
case
distinction
actual
implied
conspiracies
conceal
urged
upon
us
government
verbal
tour
de
force
true
krulewitch
lutwak
language
opinions
stressing
fact
implied
agreement
conceal
relied
yet
look
facts
present
cases
see
evidence
government
asks
us
deduce
actual
agreement
conceal
reveals
nothing
beyond
adduced
prior
cases
evidence
first
fact
beginning
conspirators
insisted
secrecy
thus
identities
grunewald
bolich
sedulously
kept
taxpayers
careful
steps
taken
hide
conspiracy
independent
law
firm
also
working
patullo
tax
problems
taxpayers
told
make
sure
books
reflect
large
cash
payments
made
grunewald
secondly
prosecution
rulings
obtained
facts
showing
secrecy
still
maintained
thus
deliberate
attempt
made
make
independent
law
firm
believe
quite
legitimate
efforts
produced
successful
ruling
finally
fact
great
efforts
made
conceal
conspiracy
danger
exposure
appeared
example
bolich
got
rid
certain
records
showing
used
grunewald
hotel
suite
washington
patullo
accountant
persuaded
lie
grand
jury
concerning
check
made
associate
conspirators
grunewald
attempted
persuade
secretary
talk
grand
jury
taxpayers
repeatedly
told
halperin
associates
keep
quiet
find
nothing
involved
krulewitch
criminal
conspiracy
carried
secrecy
continuation
secrecy
accomplishment
crime
desperate
attempts
cover
crime
begins
come
light
agree
case
fall
within
ban
prior
opinions
effect
differentiation
pressed
upon
us
government
one
words
rather
substance
krulewitch
urged
continuing
agreement
conceal
implied
mere
fact
conspiracy
acts
concealment
taken
overt
acts
furtherance
implied
agreement
conceal
today
government
merely
rearranges
argument
acts
concealment
used
circumstantial
evidence
inferred
beginning
actual
agreement
conceal
see
two
arguments
amount
thing
conspiracy
conceal
implied
elements
present
virtually
every
conspiracy
case
secrecy
plus
overt
acts
concealment
shred
direct
evidence
record
show
anything
like
express
original
agreement
among
conspirators
continue
act
concert
order
cover
traces
crime
commission
prior
cases
repeatedly
warned
view
disfavor
attempts
broaden
already
pervasive
nets
conspiracy
prosecutions
important
considerations
policy
behind
warnings
need
detailed
see
jackson
concurring
krulewitch
supra
considerations
policy
govern
holding
today
case
tried
us
typical
example
situation
government
faced
bar
statute
attempting
open
floodgates
krulewitch
warned
accede
proposition
duration
conspiracy
indefinitely
lengthened
merely
conspiracy
kept
secret
merely
conspirators
take
steps
bury
traces
order
avoid
detection
punishment
central
criminal
purpose
accomplished
means
mean
acts
concealment
never
significance
furthering
criminal
conspiracy
vital
distinction
must
made
acts
concealment
done
furtherance
main
criminal
objectives
conspiracy
acts
concealment
done
central
objectives
attained
purpose
covering
crime
thus
government
argues
brief
crime
kidnapping
acts
conspirators
hiding
waiting
ransom
clearly
planned
acts
concealment
aid
conspiracy
kidnap
doubt
acts
concealment
whether
hide
identity
conspirators
action
theretofore
taken
unquestionably
furtherance
initial
conspiracy
think
analogy
valid
kidnappers
hiding
waiting
ransom
commit
acts
concealment
furtherance
objectives
conspiracy
repainting
stolen
car
furtherance
conspiracy
steal
cases
successful
accomplishment
crime
necessitates
concealment
closely
analogous
case
conspiring
kidnappers
cover
traces
main
conspiracy
finally
ended
abandoned
kidnaped
person
take
care
escape
detection
latter
case
acts
covering
indicate
nothing
conspirators
wish
apprehended
concomitant
certainly
every
crime
since
cain
attempted
conceal
murder
abel
lord
hold
therefore
considering
main
objective
conspiracy
obtaining
prosecution
rulings
prosecution
barred
statute
limitations
since
agreement
conceal
conspiracy
accomplishment
shown
implied
evidence
us
part
conspiratorial
agreement
ii
view
case
submitted
jury
also
unable
accept
government
second
theory
avoiding
statute
limitations
theory
main
objective
conspiracy
merely
obtain
initial
prosecution
rulings
obtain
final
immunity
gotham
patullo
criminal
tax
prosecution
immunity
obtained
statute
limitations
run
cases
petitioners
conspired
fix
conspiracy
therefore
end
object
attained
acts
concealment
within
indictment
period
overt
acts
furtherance
conspiracy
prosecution
thus
timely
short
contention
agreement
conceal
protect
taxpayers
rather
conspirators
part
main
conspiracy
rather
subsidiary
appendage
government
first
theory
appeals
accepted
theory
case
affirming
convictions
stated
fixers
sell
freedom
criminal
prosecution
tax
frauds
taxpayers
bargained
protection
tax
evasion
prosecution
conspiracy
wholly
unlike
ordinary
illegal
scheme
jury
may
well
inferred
official
announcement
criminal
prosecution
taxpayers
merely
delivery
substantial
installment
appellants
agreed
deliver
huge
sums
paid
statute
limitations
run
favor
taxpayers
time
commission
overt
acts
relied
upon
interval
assurance
continuing
efforts
grunewald
bolich
others
whole
nefarious
business
might
brought
light
followed
revocation
decision
criminally
prosecute
taxpayers
significant
element
proofs
adduced
government
concealment
conspiratorial
acts
necessary
protect
conspirators
conspiracy
prosecution
also
protect
taxpayers
tax
evasion
prosecution
furthermore
agree
appeals
evidence
record
warrant
submission
case
jury
theory
central
object
conspiracy
attained
rather
immunize
taxpayers
completely
prosecution
tax
evasion
thus
continued
many
overt
acts
concealment
occurring
easily
motivated
least
part
purpose
conspirators
deliver
remaining
installments
owing
bargain
wit
safeguarding
continued
vitality
prosecution
rulings
furthermore
evidence
showing
beginning
aim
scheme
restricted
merely
provisional
necessarily
precarious
fixing
taxpayers
troubles
achieved
jury
might
therefore
fairly
infer
part
conspiratorial
agreement
grunewald
bolich
make
continuing
efforts
safeguard
fruits
partial
victories
trying
immunize
prosecution
rulings
change
words
think
jury
infer
evidence
conspirators
prepared
agreed
engage
frauds
bribery
necessary
order
maintain
effect
tentative
rulings
obtained
therefore
jury
found
aim
conspiratorial
agreement
protect
taxpayers
tax
prosecution
overt
acts
occurring
indictment
period
furtherance
aim
affirm
think
however
may
safely
assume
jury
found
agree
appeals
holding
theory
case
adequately
submitted
jury
trial
judge
charge
problem
scope
duration
conspiracy
follows
recall
indictment
among
things
part
conspiracy
defendants
make
continuing
efforts
avoid
detection
prosecution
governmental
body
executive
legislative
judicial
tax
frauds
perpetrated
defendants
use
means
whatsoever
including
limited
influencing
intimidating
impeding
prospective
witnesses
refrain
disclosing
true
facts
words
indictment
alleges
conspiracy
comprehended
within
conspiracy
conceal
true
facts
investigation
investigation
thereafter
eventuate
important
element
first
count
indictment
must
take
consideration
inasmuch
statute
limitations
charge
criminal
conspiracy
three
years
unless
conspiracy
continuing
period
within
three
years
prior
date
indictment
october
overt
act
performed
within
period
crime
alleged
first
count
indictment
outlawed
contention
government
conspiracy
end
taxpayers
advised
criminal
prosecution
recommended
special
agent
office
integral
part
entire
conspiracy
agreement
conceal
acts
conspirators
thereafter
investigation
started
congress
grand
jury
eastern
district
new
york
conspirators
performed
overt
acts
pursuance
original
conspiracy
designed
conceal
true
facts
acts
occurred
within
three
years
prior
date
indictment
issue
necessary
determine
whether
beyond
reasonable
doubt
conclude
conspiracy
nature
described
first
count
indictment
comprehended
agreement
conceal
whether
overt
act
took
place
period
three
years
prior
october
carry
purpose
conspiracy
determine
whether
certain
alleged
overt
acts
furtherance
object
conspiracy
determine
duration
conspiracy
end
patullo
sic
modes
people
gotham
beef
people
received
assurance
prosecution
bureau
internal
revenue
part
conspiracy
continuing
agreement
conceal
acts
done
pursuant
thereto
determining
whether
part
conspiracy
agreement
continue
conceal
illegal
acts
consummation
may
imply
agreement
part
conspiracy
find
evidence
acts
declarations
understanding
agreement
conceal
conspiracy
find
agreement
understanding
conceal
conspiracy
part
conspiracy
defraud
government
afterthought
brought
surface
confronted
grand
jury
king
committee
investigations
must
find
matter
law
defendants
guilty
crime
charged
first
count
indictment
find
evidence
shows
beyond
reasonable
doubt
part
conspiracy
defraud
government
agreement
understanding
conceal
illegal
acts
objective
part
conspiracy
may
find
understanding
part
conspiracy
however
must
additionally
determine
whether
objective
conspiracy
known
defendants
objective
known
originally
part
conspirators
thereafter
existence
conspiracy
scope
conspiracy
extended
include
agreement
conceal
find
defendants
know
expansion
include
agreement
conceal
may
impute
knowledge
found
guilty
crime
charged
count
one
furthermore
convictions
based
finding
overt
acts
concealment
done
single
intention
protecting
conspirators
interests
irrelevant
acts
fact
happened
effect
also
protecting
taxpayers
revocation
prosecution
rulings
overt
acts
prosecution
one
meaningful
within
scope
conspiratorial
agreement
agreement
expressly
impliedly
contemplate
conspiracy
continue
efforts
protect
taxpayers
order
immunize
tax
prosecution
scope
agreement
broadened
retroactively
fact
conspirators
took
steps
conspiracy
incidentally
effect
thus
find
judge
charge
left
open
jury
convict
even
though
found
acts
concealment
motivated
purely
purpose
conspirators
cover
already
accomplished
crime
think
fatal
error
facts
record
equivocal
jury
might
easily
concluded
aim
conspiracy
accomplished
overt
acts
concealment
occurring
date
done
pursuant
alleged
conspiracy
hide
conspirators
said
conviction
theory
sustained
circumstances
therefore
essential
judge
charge
clearly
unequivocally
facts
jury
infer
continuing
conspiracy
conceal
conspiracy
whether
actual
implied
incumbent
judge
charge
order
convict
jury
find
central
aim
conspiracy
immunize
taxpayers
tax
prosecution
objective
continued
overt
acts
concealment
proved
trial
least
partly
calculated
aim
since
judge
charge
convictions
count
might
rested
impermissible
ground
conclude
stand
petitioners
must
given
new
trial
count
iii
held
statute
limitations
disposes
conviction
three
petitioners
count
touch
halperin
conviction
counts
violating
counts
halperin
took
stand
defense
trial
contends
government
improperly
allowed
assertion
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
investigating
conspiracy
called
witness
evidence
justify
conviction
counts
reasons
given
hereafter
think
first
contention
well
taken
second
one
untenable
halperin
subpoenaed
brooklyn
grand
jury
investigating
corruption
bureau
internal
revenue
testimony
already
received
grand
jury
patullo
gotham
taxpayers
linked
halperin
ring
halperin
asked
series
questions
grand
jury
including
among
others
questions
whether
knew
max
steinberg
employee
bureau
internal
revenue
charge
count
whether
knew
grunewald
whether
held
delivered
escrow
money
paid
grunewald
gotham
prosecution
ruling
whether
phoned
grunewald
arrange
meeting
one
associates
bolich
halperin
declined
answer
questions
ground
answers
tend
incriminate
fifth
amendment
therefore
entitled
answer
repeatedly
insisted
grand
jury
wholly
innocent
pleaded
fifth
amendment
privilege
advice
counsel
answers
questions
might
furnish
evidence
used
particularly
represented
counsel
witnesses
grand
jury
government
halperin
trial
questions
asked
grand
jury
put
answered
question
way
consistent
innocence
government
allowed
objection
bring
petitioner
pleaded
privilege
grand
jury
questions
later
charge
jury
trial
judge
informed
petitioner
fifth
amendment
plea
taken
reflecting
credibility
inference
guilt
innocence
drawn
therefrom
halperin
thus
allowing
district
relied
raffel
held
defendant
failure
take
stand
first
trial
deny
testimony
incriminating
admission
used
second
trial
take
stand
impugn
credibility
denial
admission
upholding
district
appeals
likewise
relied
raffel
also
one
earlier
decisions
halperin
attacks
rulings
principal
grounds
raffel
distinguishable
present
case
raffel
permitted
trial
erred
refusing
charge
halperin
requested
innocent
man
may
honestly
claim
answers
may
tend
incriminate
case
raffel
impliedly
overruled
johnson
compelling
halperin
testify
grand
jury
already
marked
putative
defendant
violated
constitutional
rights
analogy
rule
weeks
claim
privilege
event
used
find
circumstances
presented
raffel
controlling
permissible
course
elementary
rule
evidence
prior
statements
may
used
impeach
credibility
criminal
defendant
ordinary
witness
done
judge
satisfied
prior
statements
fact
inconsistent
wigmore
evidence
threshold
question
simply
whether
circumstances
case
trial
erred
holding
halperin
plea
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
involved
inconsistency
trial
testimony
permit
use
impeachment
purposes
think
raffel
properly
read
either
dispensing
need
preliminary
scrutiny
judge
establishing
matter
law
prior
claim
privilege
reference
question
later
answered
trial
always
deemed
prior
inconsistent
statement
irrespective
circumstances
claim
privilege
made
issue
decided
raffel
came
certified
question
quite
abstract
form
really
centered
question
whether
defendant
takes
stand
second
trial
continue
take
advantage
privilege
asserted
first
trial
held
effect
criminal
defendant
takes
stand
waives
privilege
completely
becomes
subject
impeaching
credibility
like
witness
waiver
partial
cast
aside
cloak
immunity
may
resume
whenever
may
inconvenient
embarrassing
raffel
focus
question
whether
involved
fact
probative
impeaching
defendant
credibility
words
may
assume
raffel
halperin
case
subject
impeaching
credibility
like
witness
fifth
amendment
plea
grand
jury
carry
form
immunity
voluntarily
took
stand
trial
however
solve
question
whether
particular
circumstances
case
excluded
probative
value
issue
halperin
credibility
negligible
far
outweighed
possible
impermissible
impact
jury
consider
circumstances
present
case
trial
exercise
sound
discretion
refused
permit
line
faced
necessity
deciding
whether
raffel
stripped
vitality
later
johnson
case
supra
otherwise
raffel
need
tarry
long
reiterate
view
two
courts
held
implication
guilt
drawn
halperin
invocation
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
recent
history
meaning
fifth
amendment
emphasized
anew
one
basic
functions
privilege
protect
innocent
men
griswold
fifth
amendment
today
many
even
better
advised
view
privilege
shelter
wrongdoers
readily
assume
invoke
either
guilty
crime
commit
perjury
claiming
privilege
ullmann
see
also
slochower
board
higher
education
term
said
pp
privilege
serves
protect
innocent
otherwise
might
ensnared
ambiguous
circumstances
pass
issue
credibility
deem
evident
halperin
claim
fifth
amendment
privilege
brooklyn
grand
jury
response
questions
answered
trial
wholly
consistent
innocence
answered
questions
put
grand
jury
way
subsequently
answered
trial
nevertheless
provided
government
incriminating
evidence
mouth
example
stated
grand
jury
knew
grunewald
admission
constituted
link
criminal
conspiracy
true
even
though
entirely
innocent
even
though
friendship
grunewald
reproach
therefore
see
inconsistency
halperin
statement
grand
jury
answering
question
whether
knew
grunewald
tend
furnish
incriminating
evidence
subsequent
testimony
trial
acquaintance
grunewald
free
criminal
elements
thing
also
true
see
claim
privilege
respect
questions
asked
grand
jury
answers
questions
put
trial
conclusions
fortified
number
considerations
surrounding
halperin
claim
privilege
first
halperin
repeatedly
insisted
grand
jury
innocent
pleaded
fifth
amendment
privilege
solely
advice
counsel
second
fifth
amendment
claim
made
grand
jury
halperin
compelled
voluntary
witness
represented
counsel
summon
witnesses
opportunity
witnesses
testifying
factors
crucial
weighing
whether
plea
privilege
inconsistent
later
exculpatory
testimony
questions
nature
tribunal
subjects
witness
questioning
bears
heavily
inferences
drawn
plea
fifth
amendment
see
griswold
supra
innocent
men
likely
plead
privilege
secret
proceedings
testify
without
advice
counsel
without
opportunity
open
proceedings
judicially
supervised
procedure
provide
safeguards
establishing
whole
possibility
merely
partial
truth
finally
important
deem
halperin
plea
fifth
amendment
inconsistent
later
testimony
trial
nature
particular
proceeding
halperin
questioned
grand
jury
quite
evidently
already
considered
potential
defendant
taxpayers
whose
cases
fixed
conspiratorial
ring
already
testified
grand
jury
gave
largely
evidence
later
trial
scheme
thus
essence
already
revealed
halperin
called
testify
circumstances
evident
halperin
faced
possibility
early
indictment
quite
natural
fear
asked
questions
purpose
providing
evidence
thus
quite
consistent
innocence
refuse
provide
evidence
used
government
building
incriminating
chain
many
innocent
men
know
indicted
refuse
help
create
case
circumstances
lack
counsel
assistance
lack
opportunity
prevent
bringing
exculpatory
circumstances
context
superficially
incriminating
acts
occurred
unmindful
question
whether
prior
statement
sufficiently
inconsistent
allowed
go
jury
question
credibility
usually
within
discretion
trial
judge
evidentiary
matter
grave
constitutional
overtones
feel
justified
exercising
supervisory
control
pass
question
particularly
case
dangers
impermissible
use
evidence
far
outweighed
whatever
advantage
government
might
derived
properly
used
jury
followed
judge
instructions
namely
plea
fifth
amendment
relevant
credibility
weight
given
evidence
less
negligible
since
outlined
true
inconsistency
involved
therefore
hardly
affected
government
case
seriously
exclude
matter
completely
hand
danger
jury
made
impermissible
use
testimony
implicitly
equating
plea
fifth
amendment
guilt
light
contemporary
history
far
negligible
weighing
factors
therefore
feel
draw
upon
supervisory
power
administration
federal
criminal
justice
order
rule
matter
cf
mcnabb
hold
circumstances
case
prejudicial
error
trial
judge
permit
petitioner
plea
fifth
amendment
privilege
grand
jury
halperin
must
therefore
given
new
trial
counts
finally
find
substance
halperin
contention
effect
convicted
advising
lawyer
witnesses
grand
jury
right
plead
fifth
amendment
privilege
evidence
halperin
counts
quite
sufficient
make
case
submission
jury
reasons
given
hold
judgments
must
reversed
cases
remanded
district
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
provides
relevant
part
whoever
corruptly
endeavors
influence
intimidate
impede
witness
commissioner
committing
magistrate
grand
petit
juror
officer
discharge
duty
corruptly
influences
obstructs
impedes
endeavors
influence
obstruct
impede
due
administration
justice
shall
fined
imprisoned
five
years
grunewald
bolich
acquitted
counts
paragraph
indictment
alleged
part
conspiracy
defendants
make
continuing
efforts
avoid
detection
prosecution
governmental
body
tax
frauds
perpetrated
defendants
use
means
whatsoever
including
limited
bribery
improper
influence
corruption
government
employees
giving
false
testimony
etc
paragraph
alleged
part
conspiracy
defendants
times
misrepresent
conceal
hide
cause
misrepresented
concealed
hidden
acts
done
pursuant
purposes
said
conspiracy
prosecution
ruling
internal
decision
investigative
branch
bureau
internal
revenue
press
criminal
charges
taxpayer
payments
made
cash
order
raise
money
leave
traces
taxpayers
made
unrecorded
sales
profits
unreported
income
large
fees
paid
halperin
associates
petitioner
bolich
also
convicted
count
indictment
charged
two
bureau
internal
revenue
employees
conspiracy
violation
sentenced
three
years
imprisonment
fine
count
prison
sentence
run
concurrently
sentence
count
appeals
held
counts
related
conspiracy
set
aside
separate
fine
count
governing
statute
provided
except
otherwise
expressly
provided
law
person
shall
prosecuted
tried
punished
offense
capital
unless
indictment
found
within
three
years
next
offense
shall
committed
september
statute
limitations
amended
provide
limitation
period
stat
supp
iii
since
amending
statute
terms
made
applicable
offenses
barred
effective
date
september
seem
fact
crucial
date
september
rather
october
words
conspiracy
still
alive
september
barred
however
case
tried
theory
october
crucial
date
treat
opinion
error
course
favorable
petitioners
therefore
harmless
hand
since
hold
petitioners
must
new
trial
error
may
corrected
see
general
lutwak
krulewitch
bollenbach
mcdonald
manton
cousens
agreement
element
conspiracy
rev
sayre
criminal
conspiracy
harv
rev
note
harv
rev
note
rev
support
theory
petitioners
point
evidence
showing
administrative
practice
bureau
internal
revenue
recommendations
prosecute
reviewed
higher
echelon
whereas
determination
prosecution
practical
purposes
end
case
also
emphasize
payment
grunewald
made
terms
escrow
released
money
prosecution
rulings
came
petitioners
urge
acts
concealment
occurring
show
new
separate
agreement
conceal
entered
agreement
charged
indictment
cf
siebricht
view
disposition
case
need
deal
contention
see
supra
see
one
might
cite
example
grunewald
attempt
influencing
secretary
talk
grand
jury
accompanied
offer
pay
expenses
government
krulewitch
theory
argument
justice
jackson
words
law
impute
confederates
continuing
conspiracy
defeat
justice
therefore
confederates
bound
another
unauthorized
unknown
bribery
juror
witness
different
result
achieved
saying
attempted
bribe
witness
evidence
one
infer
actual
conspiracy
defeat
justice
cases
essential
missing
element
showing
act
done
furtherance
prior
criminal
agreement
among
conspirators
delli
paoli
lutwak
supra
krulewitch
supra
bollenbach
see
rettich
mcdonald
tax
evasion
cases
governed
statute
limitations
ed
began
run
last
return
pertaining
year
filed
taxpayers
government
also
suggests
theory
conspiracy
deemed
lasted
indictment
period
theory
central
aim
conspiracy
specifically
fix
tax
troubles
gotham
patullo
engage
continuing
business
fixing
cases
aim
conspiracy
acts
concealment
furtherance
aim
enabling
ring
stay
business
get
new
cases
evidence
supporting
theory
says
government
prosecution
rulings
patullo
gotham
cases
halperin
engaged
negotiations
another
firm
tax
difficulties
although
negotiations
came
nothing
due
disagreement
fee
paid
conspirators
incident
presented
evidence
conspirators
actively
soliciting
future
tax
clients
thus
still
business
accept
theory
government
trouble
theory
never
submitted
jury
overt
act
done
purpose
engaging
new
business
charged
proved
occurred
october
one
purposes
conspiracy
engage
business
fixing
tax
cases
generally
must
deemed
abandoned
investigations
petitioners
started
congress
since
activities
conspirators
consisted
merely
covering
old
ventures
rather
seeking
new
ones
since
indication
intent
resume
operations
investigations
ended
indeed
upon
oral
argument
government
seemed
abandon
theory
indictment
clearly
sufficient
cover
submission
theory
jury
see
supra
one
might
cite
typical
example
incident
record
occurring
november
months
prosecution
ruling
handed
patullo
case
special
agent
working
case
wrote
final
report
stated
patullo
prosecuted
solely
bolich
decision
report
sent
bolich
thereupon
called
chief
conference
section
asked
write
explanatory
memorandum
case
take
little
heat
situation
attempt
doctor
report
might
easily
motivated
fear
purpose
safeguard
prosecution
ruling
change
order
maintain
immunity
taxpayers
negotiations
halperin
associates
taxpayers
never
specific
exactly
accomplished
tenor
discussions
taxpayers
hire
mysterious
influential
man
washington
matter
ended
prosecution
end
case
avoided
matter
settled
civil
way
without
criminal
prosecution
tenor
accountant
gotham
beef
testified
nothing
paid
unless
criminal
prosecution
eliminated
understood
concerned
amount
tax
might
result
way
assessment
either
completely
successful
eliminating
criminal
prosecution
fee
words
little
indication
specific
narrow
end
obtaining
prosecution
rulings
quid
pro
quo
buttressed
fact
taxpayers
well
aware
precarious
nature
rulings
quite
clear
realized
end
danger
criminal
prosecution
thus
patullo
taxpayers
aware
continued
investigation
books
purposes
civil
tax
liability
exposed
constant
danger
tipping
applecart
warned
keep
mouths
shut
payment
made
boys
new
york
one
raise
fuss
phony
deal
put
another
patullo
officer
testified
prosecution
ruling
still
ease
thing
knew
elated
results
still
worried
cooperation
take
care
make
payoff
new
york
boys
time
never
knew
something
else
going
come
two
years
still
thing
referring
payment
new
york
boys
never
felt
sure
anything
civil
settlement
still
made
knew
people
go
pass
everything
going
told
get
money
jury
thus
easily
infer
conspirators
function
end
january
conspiratorial
agreement
contemplated
efforts
immunize
taxpayers
tax
prosecution
mentioned
appeals
unanimous
finding
sufficient
evidence
record
warrant
submission
case
jury
theory
central
objectives
conspiracy
achieved
statute
limitations
ran
charges
judge
frank
dissenting
ground
charge
jury
inadequate
putting
case
jury
basis
view
share
see
infra
agreed
proper
charge
jury
might
infer
conspiracy
still
alive
see
see
supra
grunewald
bolich
also
make
contention
behalf
questions
whether
petitioner
held
escrow
money
subsequently
delivered
grunewald
whether
petitioner
knew
grunewald
whether
petitioner
made
telephone
call
grunewald
relative
appointment
bolich
one
davis
member
conspiracy
whether
petitioner
filed
power
attorney
glover
case
whether
ever
met
one
oliphant
official
treasury
whether
knew
steinberg
whether
knew
tobias
accountant
gotham
beef
whether
ever
met
grunewald
munsey
building
washington
charge
point
follows
cross
examination
one
defendants
government
questioned
defendant
previous
statements
brooklyn
grand
jury
refused
answer
certain
questions
ground
answers
might
tend
incriminate
questions
related
matters
similar
defendant
testified
trial
took
stand
witness
required
take
stand
required
give
testimony
might
tend
incriminate
defendant
takes
stand
defense
trial
proper
interrogate
previous
statements
may
made
oath
concerning
matter
including
assertion
constitutional
privilege
refuse
testify
matters
grand
jury
may
use
evidence
defendant
prior
assertions
fifth
amendment
sole
purpose
ascertaining
weight
choose
give
present
testimony
respect
matters
upon
previously
invoked
privilege
defendant
right
asserting
fifth
amendment
appeared
grand
jury
charge
draw
inference
whatsoever
guilt
innocence
defendant
case
reason
fact
chose
assert
unquestioned
right
invoke
fifth
amendment
previous
occasion
however
proper
government
question
defendant
respect
previous
invocation
fifth
amendment
may
consider
evidence
prior
assertions
fifth
amendment
purpose
ascertaining
weight
choose
give
present
testimony
respect
matters
upon
previously
asserted
constitutional
privilege
considered
determination
guilt
innocence
gottfried
trial
first
ruled
government
petitioner
fifth
amendment
plea
grounds
inconsistency
reflecting
credibility
fact
implication
drawn
record
time
felt
jury
might
use
evidence
purpose
including
drawing
inferences
guilt
innocence
government
first
embarked
method
judge
overruled
objections
words
know
government
position
see
corbin
defense
attorney
witness
compelled
testify
witness
called
grand
jury
answer
refuse
answer
something
ground
answer
question
incriminate
corbin
tend
incriminate
tend
incriminate
witness
make
statement
witness
take
witness
stand
understand
law
witness
stated
compelled
take
stand
witness
voluntarily
takes
stand
asked
previous
proceeding
say
testimony
subject
incriminate
considered
jury
benefit
worth
jury
may
want
give
certified
question
error
require
defendant
raffel
offering
witness
upon
second
trial
disclose
testified
witness
behalf
upon
first
trial
raffel
assumed
defendant
failure
testify
first
trial
used
evidence
guilt
second
trial
stated
trial
judge
might
appropriately
instruct
jury
failure
defendant
take
stand
behalf
taken
admission
truth
testimony
deny
already
indicated
supra
trial
judge
refused
charge
innocent
man
may
honestly
claim
answers
may
tend
incriminate
justice
black
chief
justice
justice
douglas
justice
brennan
join
concurring
concur
reversal
cases
reasons
given
opinion
one
exception
petitioner
halperin
appeared
grand
jury
response
subpoena
declined
answer
certain
questions
relying
provision
fifth
amendment
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
later
trial
halperin
took
stand
testify
behalf
prosecuting
attorney
asked
questions
refused
answer
grand
jury
time
halperin
answered
questions
answers
tended
show
innocent
government
permitted
objection
draw
fact
previously
refused
answer
questions
grand
jury
ground
answers
might
tend
incriminate
conclusion
trial
judge
instructed
jury
halperin
claim
constitutional
privilege
witness
considered
determining
weight
given
testimony
words
whether
halperin
truthful
trustworthy
witness
agree
use
claim
constitutional
privilege
reflect
upon
halperin
credibility
error
like
rest
conclusion
special
circumstances
case
think
special
circumstances
justify
use
constitutional
privilege
discredit
convict
person
asserts
value
constitutional
privileges
largely
destroyed
persons
penalized
relying
seems
peculiarly
incongruous
indefensible
courts
exist
act
constitution
draw
inferences
lack
honesty
invocation
privilege
deemed
worthy
enshrinement
constitution
extent
approval
rule
raffel
vitality
johnson
think
raffel
case
explicitly
overruled