lighting
missouri
argued
january
decided
march
missouri
rev
provides
employee
entitled
vote
may
absent
employment
four
hours
opening
closing
polls
election
days
employer
deducts
wages
absence
guilty
misdemeanor
violate
due
process
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
contract
clause
art
federal
constitution
pp
mo
affirmed
appellant
convicted
missouri
state
violation
mo
rev
missouri
affirmed
mo
appeal
affirmed
henry
lamkin
argued
cause
appellant
brief
william
armstrong
louis
portner
thomas
cobbs
also
counsel
john
baty
assistant
attorney
general
missouri
appellee
brief
taylor
attorney
general
arthur
assistant
attorney
general
also
counsel
albert
woll
herbert
thatcher
james
glenn
filed
brief
american
federation
labor
amicus
curiae
supporting
appellee
justice
douglas
delivered
opinion
missouri
statute
mo
rev
first
enacted
designed
end
coercion
employees
employers
exercise
franchise
provides
employee
may
absent
employment
four
hours
opening
closing
polls
without
penalty
employer
among
things
deducts
wages
absence
guilty
misdemeanor
appellant
missouri
corporation
business
louis
november
day
general
elections
missouri
polls
open
one
grotemeyer
employee
appellant
shift
worked
day
thirty
minutes
lunch
rate
pay
hour
requested
four
hours
scheduled
work
day
vote
november
request
refused
grotemeyer
employees
shift
allowed
leave
day
gave
four
consecutive
hours
vote
polls
closed
grotemeyer
left
work
order
vote
return
work
day
paid
hour
half
appellant
found
guilty
fined
penalizing
grotemeyer
violation
statute
judgment
affirmed
missouri
mo
objection
statute
violated
due
process
equal
protection
clauses
fourteenth
amendment
contract
clause
art
liberty
contract
argument
pressed
us
reminiscent
philosophy
lochner
new
york
invalidated
new
york
law
prescribing
maximum
hours
work
bakeries
coppage
kansas
struck
kansas
statute
outlawing
yellow
dog
contracts
adkins
children
hospital
held
unconstitutional
federal
statute
fixing
minimum
wage
standards
women
district
columbia
others
vintage
recent
decisions
make
plain
sit
weigh
wisdom
legislation
decide
whether
policy
expresses
offends
public
welfare
legislative
power
limits
tot
holds
state
legislatures
constitutional
authority
experiment
new
techniques
entitled
standard
public
welfare
may
within
extremely
broad
limits
control
practices
filed
long
specific
constitutional
prohibitions
violated
long
conflicts
valid
controlling
federal
laws
avoided
essence
west
coast
hotel
parrish
nebbia
new
york
olsen
nebraska
lincoln
union
northwestern
california
auto
assn
maloney
west
coast
hotel
parrish
supra
overruling
adkins
children
hospital
supra
held
constitutional
state
law
fixing
minimum
wages
women
present
statute
contains
form
minimum
wage
requirement
difference
purpose
legislation
protection
health
morals
citizen
missouri
legislation
sought
safeguard
right
suffrage
taking
employers
incentive
power
use
leverage
employees
influence
vote
police
power
confined
narrow
category
extends
stated
noble
state
bank
haskell
great
public
needs
protection
right
suffrage
scheme
things
basic
fundamental
semblance
substance
constitutional
objection
missouri
law
employer
must
pay
wages
period
employee
performs
services
course
many
forms
regulation
reduce
net
return
enterprise
yet
gives
rise
constitutional
infirmity
see
queenside
hills
saxl
california
auto
assn
maloney
supra
regulations
business
necessarily
impose
financial
burdens
enterprise
compensation
paid
part
costs
civilization
extreme
cases
conjured
employer
required
pay
wages
period
relation
legitimate
end
cases
await
decision
arise
present
law
infirmity
designed
eliminate
penalty
exercising
right
suffrage
remove
practical
obstacle
getting
vote
public
welfare
broad
inclusive
concept
moral
social
economic
physical
community
one
part
political
another
police
power
adequate
fix
financial
burden
one
adequate
judgment
legislature
time
voting
cost
employee
nothing
may
debatable
one
indeed
conceded
opposition
recent
cases
mean
anything
leave
debatable
issues
respects
business
economic
social
affairs
legislative
decision
strike
law
returned
philosophy
lochner
coppage
adkins
cases
classification
voters
free
employees
domination
employers
attempt
deal
evil
one
group
exposed
need
classification
matter
legislative
judgment
american
federation
labor
american
sash
amount
denial
equal
protection
laws
affirmed
footnotes
decisions
contrary
missouri
case
rendered
appeals
kentucky
illinois
central
commonwealth
illinois
people
chicago
cf
zelney
murphy
appellate
division
new
york
people
ford
motor
app
div
appellate
department
superior
california
ballarini
schlage
lock
cal
app
held
accord
missouri
review
legislation
field
see
rev
justice
jackson
dissenting
constitutional
issue
case
vital
present
application
surely
debatable
one
two
state
courts
last
resort
ones
consider
similar
legislation
held
unconstitutional
unreviewed
decisions
intermediate
courts
cited
support
holding
appellant
employed
one
grotemeyer
union
contract
hourly
basis
per
hour
hour
worked
demanded
leave
absence
full
pay
election
day
campaigning
get
vote
stipulated
residence
feet
polling
place
actually
took
five
minutes
vote
appellant
closed
day
work
employees
one
hours
earlier
usual
gave
statutory
four
hours
polls
closed
failure
pay
something
less
hour
half
grotemeyer
work
contract
provide
paid
employer
convicted
crime
statute
set
forth
opinion
sustain
statute
resort
analogy
minimum
wages
laws
seems
farfetched
unconvincing
demonstrate
weakness
rather
strength
state
may
require
payment
minimum
wage
hours
worked
follow
may
compel
payment
time
worked
overlook
distinction
fundamental
confuse
point
issue
speaking
statute
though
applies
industry
sinister
big
obscures
real
principle
involved
statute
plainly
requires
farmers
small
service
enterprises
professional
offices
housewives
domestic
help
employers
allow
employees
time
vote
pay
time
however
require
employee
use
part
time
purpose
legislation
stands
class
uncritically
commended
mere
regulation
practices
field
obtaining
full
free
expression
qualified
voters
polls
fundamental
successful
representative
government
state
rightly
concerns
removal
every
obstruction
right
opportunity
vote
freely
courts
go
far
sustain
legislation
designed
relieve
employees
obligations
private
employers
stand
way
duty
citizens
must
limit
power
shift
whole
voting
burden
voter
someone
else
happens
stand
economic
relationship
getting
vote
business
employers
indeed
regarded
political
abuse
employers
concerned
employees
voting
either
voter
business
state
business
question
incentive
statute
offers
help
swell
vote
require
employees
paid
swell
still
even
better
success
enticement
vote
justify
putting
cost
citizen
discriminatory
character
statute
flagrant
obvious
everybody
paid
voting
rational
basis
state
ordered
paid
others
eludes
need
subsidy
get
vote
reason
apparent
go
one
lives
feet
polling
place
farmer
may
lay
work
let
equipment
idle
several
hours
travels
several
miles
bad
fall
roads
duty
citizen
hired
man
must
also
lose
hand
time
pay
perhaps
plan
forthcoming
pay
farmer
requiring
mortgagee
rebate
proportion
interest
farm
mortgage
vote
differ
principle
way
occurs
doctor
charge
patient
lawyer
client
call
receive
voting
suppose
state
considerable
latitude
offer
inducements
voters
value
franchise
enough
vote
time
even
seem
corrupting
discriminating
ones
perhaps
difficulty
today
decision
rise
valuation
american
citizenship
makes
system
appear
confession
failure
popular
representative
government
undoubtedly
right
every
union
negotiating
employer
bargain
voting
time
without
loss
pay
equally
right
individual
employee
make
part
hire
reason
doubt
large
number
voters
already
voluntary
arrangements
make
absence
voting
without
cost
constitutional
philosophy
sanctions
intervention
state
fix
terms
pay
without
work
may
available
tomorrow
give
constitutional
sanction
terms
employment
less
benevolent
illinois
central
commonwealth
people
chicago
cf
zelney
murphy
people
ford
motor
app
div
ballarini
schlage
lock
cal
app