canton
harris
argued
november
decided
february
although
respondent
fell
several
times
incoherent
following
arrest
officers
petitioner
city
police
department
officers
summoned
medical
assistance
release
diagnosed
suffering
several
emotional
ailments
requiring
hospitalization
subsequent
outpatient
treatment
time
later
filed
suit
seeking
inter
alia
hold
city
liable
violation
right
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
receive
necessary
medical
attention
police
custody
jury
ruled
favor
claim
upon
basis
evidence
indicating
city
regulation
gave
shift
commanders
sole
discretion
determine
whether
detainee
required
medical
care
suggesting
commanders
provided
special
training
make
determination
summon
care
injured
detainee
district
rejecting
city
motion
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
appeals
ruling
error
submitting
failure
train
claim
jury
held
circuit
precedent
municipality
liable
failure
train
police
force
plaintiff
proves
municipality
acted
recklessly
intentionally
gross
negligence
lack
training
reckless
grossly
negligent
deprivation
persons
constitutional
rights
substantially
certain
result
however
upon
finding
certain
aspects
district
jury
instructions
might
led
jury
believe
find
city
mere
respondeat
superior
theory
jury
verdict
state
basis
ruled
respondent
appeals
reversed
judgment
favor
remanded
case
new
trial
held
writ
certiorari
dismissed
improvidently
granted
basis
respondent
claim
petitioner
failed
preserve
review
principal
issues
since
petition
certiorari
directly
addressed
critical
question
actionability
municipality
failure
train
since
respondent
brief
opposition
neither
raised
objection
petitioner
failed
press
claims
courts
informed
petitioner
arguably
conceded
inadequate
training
actionable
exercise
discretion
deem
defects
waived
oklahoma
city
tuttle
moreover
even
asserted
failure
petitioner
present
claims
makes
fashion
actually
occurred
failure
affect
jurisdiction
pp
municipality
may
certain
circumstances
held
liable
constitutional
violations
resulting
failure
train
employees
pp
petitioner
contention
liability
imposed
municipal
policy
question
unconstitutional
rejected
light
rule
established
case
limited
circumstances
failure
train
allegation
basis
liability
pp
inadequacy
police
training
may
serve
basis
liability
failure
train
relevant
respect
amounts
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
persons
police
come
contact
contrast
appeals
overly
broad
rule
deliberate
indifference
standard
consistent
rule
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
city
liable
unless
municipal
policy
custom
moving
force
behind
constitutional
violation
failure
train
reflects
deliberate
conscious
choice
municipality
failure
properly
thought
actionable
city
policy
monell
satisfied
mere
allegation
training
program
represents
policy
city
responsible
rather
focus
must
whether
program
adequate
tasks
particular
employees
must
perform
whether
inadequate
training
justifiably
said
represent
city
policy
moreover
identified
deficiency
training
program
must
closely
related
ultimate
injury
thus
respondent
must
still
prove
deficiency
training
actually
caused
police
officers
indifference
medical
needs
adopt
lesser
standards
fault
causation
open
municipalities
unprecedented
liability
result
de
facto
respondeat
superior
liability
result
rejected
monell
engage
federal
courts
endless
exercise
municipal
programs
task
ill
suited
undertake
implicate
serious
questions
federalism
pp
although
evidence
presently
record
satisfy
deliberate
indifference
rule
liability
question
whether
respondent
opportunity
prove
case
rule
must
left
appeals
remand
since
standard
proof
district
ultimately
imposed
lesser
one
one
adopted
white
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
brennan
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
parts
ii
iii
scalia
kennedy
joined
except
brennan
filed
concurring
opinion
post
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
scalia
kennedy
joined
post
carter
phillips
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
mark
hopson
scott
gwin
william
hamann
john
coury
david
rudovsky
argued
cause
respondent
brief
emanuella
harris
groves
dexter
clark
benna
ruth
solomon
beate
bloch
richard
willard
filed
brief
international
city
management
association
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
john
powell
steven
shapiro
howard
friedman
michael
aaron
avery
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
white
delivered
opinion
case
asked
determine
municipality
ever
liable
constitutional
violations
resulting
failure
train
municipal
employees
hold
certain
circumstances
liability
permitted
statute
april
respondent
geraldine
harris
arrested
officers
canton
police
department
harris
brought
police
station
patrol
wagon
arrived
station
harris
found
sitting
floor
wagon
asked
needed
medical
attention
responded
incoherent
remark
brought
inside
station
processing
harris
slumped
floor
two
occasions
eventually
police
officers
left
harris
lying
floor
prevent
falling
medical
attention
ever
summoned
harris
hour
harris
released
custody
taken
ambulance
provided
family
nearby
hospital
harris
diagnosed
suffering
several
emotional
ailments
hospitalized
one
week
received
subsequent
outpatient
treatment
additional
year
time
later
harris
commenced
action
alleging
many
constitutional
claims
city
canton
officials
among
claims
one
seeking
hold
city
liable
violation
harris
right
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
receive
necessary
medical
attention
police
custody
jury
trial
held
harris
claims
evidence
presented
indicated
pursuant
municipal
regulation
shift
commanders
authorized
determine
sole
discretion
whether
detainee
required
medical
care
tr
addition
testimony
also
suggested
canton
shift
commanders
provided
special
training
beyond
training
make
determination
summon
medical
care
injured
detainee
ibid
app
pet
cert
close
evidence
district
submitted
case
jury
rejected
harris
claims
except
one
claim
city
resulting
failure
provide
medical
treatment
custody
rejecting
city
subsequent
motion
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
district
explained
theory
liability
follows
evidence
construed
manner
favorable
harris
found
jury
demonstrate
city
canton
custom
policy
vesting
complete
authority
police
supervisor
medical
treatment
administered
prisoners
jury
find
evidence
vesting
carte
blanche
authority
police
supervisor
without
adequate
training
recognize
medical
treatment
needed
grossly
negligent
reckless
future
police
misconduct
almost
inevitable
substantially
certain
result
city
petitioned
certiorari
arguing
sixth
circuit
holding
represented
impermissible
broadening
municipal
liability
granted
petition
ii
first
address
respondent
contention
writ
certiorari
dismissed
improvidently
granted
petitioner
failed
preserve
review
principal
issues
argues
brief
respondent
think
clear
enough
petitioner
three
questions
presented
petition
certiorari
encompass
critical
question
us
case
circumstances
inadequate
training
found
policy
actionable
see
pet
cert
petition
addressed
issue
directly
attacking
sixth
circuit
failure
train
theory
inconsistent
precedents
see
also
clear
respondent
conceded
argument
tr
oral
arg
brief
opposition
granting
certiorari
raise
objection
petitioner
failed
press
claims
courts
respondent
contention
claims
made
petitioner
made
fashion
failure
occurred
affect
jurisdiction
respondent
oppose
grant
review
time
based
contention
claims
pressed
dismiss
writ
improvidently
granted
decision
grant
certiorari
represents
commitment
scarce
judicial
resources
view
deciding
merits
questions
presented
petition
louis
praprotnik
quoting
oklahoma
city
tuttle
expressly
admonished
litigants
respondent
position
nonjurisdictional
defects
sort
brought
attention
later
respondent
brief
opposition
petition
certiorari
consider
within
discretion
deem
defect
waived
tuttle
supra
true
petitioner
litigation
posture
respect
questions
presented
consistent
importantly
petitioner
conceded
inadequate
training
means
establishing
municipal
liability
section
reply
brief
petitioner
see
also
petition
rehearing
however
stage
proceedings
petitioner
contested
finding
liability
ground
objections
varying
specificity
opposed
district
jury
instructions
issue
tr
claimed
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
motion
evidence
policy
practice
part
city
den
ying
medical
treatment
prisoners
motion
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
nd
ohio
argued
appeals
basis
finding
policy
denying
medical
treatment
prisoners
case
see
brief
appellant
pp
indeed
petitioner
specifically
contended
sixth
circuit
precedents
permitted
inadequate
training
basis
municipal
liability
facts
similar
see
supra
conflict
decision
tuttle
brief
appellant
various
presentations
issues
might
inexact
denied
certiorari
matter
brought
attention
appropriate
stage
proceedings
least
adequate
yield
decision
sixth
circuit
questions
presented
review
sixth
circuit
held
plaintiff
proves
municipality
acting
recklessly
intentionally
gross
negligence
failed
train
police
force
resulting
deprivation
constitutional
rights
substantially
certain
result
permits
municipality
held
liable
actions
petitioner
petition
certiorari
challenged
soundness
conclusion
respondent
inform
us
prior
time
review
granted
petitioner
arguably
conceded
point
consequently
abstain
addressing
question
us
iii
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
decided
municipality
found
liable
municipality
causes
constitutional
violation
issue
respondeat
superior
vicarious
liability
attach
execution
government
policy
custom
inflicts
injury
municipality
may
held
liable
springfield
kibbe
dissenting
quoting
monell
supra
thus
first
inquiry
case
alleging
municipal
liability
question
whether
direct
causal
link
municipal
policy
custom
alleged
constitutional
deprivation
inquiry
difficult
one
one
left
deeply
divided
series
cases
followed
monell
one
principal
focus
decision
today
based
difficulty
defining
contours
municipal
liability
circumstances
petitioner
urges
us
adopt
rule
municipality
found
liable
policy
question
unconstitutional
brief
petitioner
whether
rule
valid
construction
question
left
unresolved
see
louis
praprotnik
supra
brennan
concurring
judgment
oklahoma
city
tuttle
supra
approach
outcome
rather
clear
reverse
remand
case
instructions
judgment
entered
petitioner
little
doubt
face
city
policy
regarding
medical
treatment
detainees
constitutional
policy
city
jailer
shall
person
needing
medical
care
taken
hospital
medical
treatment
permission
supervisor
app
difficult
see
constitutional
guarantees
violated
policy
without
city
automatically
liable
one
employees
happened
apply
policy
unconstitutional
manner
liability
rest
respondeat
superior
claim
case
however
concededly
valid
policy
unconstitutionally
applied
municipal
employee
city
liable
employee
adequately
trained
constitutional
wrong
caused
failure
train
reasons
explained
conclude
courts
appeals
addressed
issue
limited
circumstances
allegation
failure
train
basis
liability
thus
reject
petitioner
contention
unconstitutional
policies
actionable
statute
though
agree
city
liable
inadequate
training
employees
agree
district
jury
instructions
issue
proper
conclude
appeals
provided
overly
broad
rule
municipality
held
liable
failure
train
theory
unlike
question
whether
municipality
failure
train
employees
ever
basis
liability
courts
appeals
agreed
see
supra
substantial
division
among
lower
courts
degree
fault
must
evidenced
municipality
inaction
liability
permitted
hold
today
inadequacy
police
training
may
serve
basis
liability
failure
train
amounts
deliberate
indifference
rights
persons
police
come
contact
rule
consistent
admonition
monell
polk
county
dodson
municipality
liable
policies
moving
force
behind
constitutional
violation
municipality
failure
train
employees
relevant
respect
evidences
deliberate
indifference
rights
inhabitants
shortcoming
properly
thought
city
policy
custom
actionable
justice
brennan
opinion
pembaur
cincinnati
plurality
put
unicipal
liability
attaches
deliberate
choice
follow
course
action
made
among
various
alternatives
city
policymakers
see
also
oklahoma
city
tuttle
opinion
rehnquist
failure
train
reflects
deliberate
conscious
choice
municipality
policy
defined
prior
cases
city
liable
failure
monell
rule
city
liable
unless
municipal
policy
causes
constitutional
deprivation
satisfied
merely
alleging
existing
training
program
class
employees
police
officers
represents
policy
city
responsible
much
may
true
issue
case
like
one
however
whether
training
program
adequate
question
becomes
whether
inadequate
training
justifiably
said
represent
city
policy
may
seem
contrary
common
sense
assert
municipality
actually
policy
taking
reasonable
steps
train
employees
may
happen
light
duties
assigned
specific
officers
employees
need
different
training
obvious
inadequacy
likely
result
violation
constitutional
rights
policymakers
city
reasonably
said
deliberately
indifferent
need
event
failure
provide
proper
training
may
fairly
said
represent
policy
city
responsible
city
may
held
liable
actually
causes
injury
resolving
issue
city
liability
focus
must
adequacy
training
program
relation
tasks
particular
officers
must
perform
particular
officer
may
unsatisfactorily
trained
alone
suffice
fasten
liability
city
officer
shortcomings
may
resulted
factors
faulty
training
program
see
springfield
kibbe
dissenting
oklahoma
city
tuttle
supra
opinion
rehnquist
may
example
otherwise
sound
program
occasionally
negligently
administered
neither
suffice
prove
injury
accident
avoided
officer
better
training
sufficient
equip
avoid
particular
conduct
claim
made
almost
encounter
resulting
injury
yet
condemn
adequacy
program
enable
officers
respond
properly
usual
recurring
situations
must
deal
plainly
adequately
trained
officers
occasionally
make
mistakes
fact
says
little
training
program
legal
basis
holding
city
liable
moreover
liability
attach
circumstance
identified
deficiency
city
training
program
must
closely
related
ultimate
injury
thus
case
hand
respondent
must
still
prove
deficiency
training
actually
caused
police
officers
indifference
medical
needs
injury
avoided
employee
trained
program
deficient
identified
respect
predicting
hypothetically
officer
acted
circumstances
may
easy
task
factfinder
particularly
since
matters
judgment
may
involved
since
officers
well
trained
free
error
perhaps
might
react
much
like
untrained
officer
similar
circumstances
judge
jury
respective
jobs
adequate
task
adopt
lesser
standards
fault
causation
open
municipalities
unprecedented
liability
virtually
every
instance
person
constitutional
rights
violated
city
employee
plaintiff
able
point
something
city
done
prevent
unfortunate
incident
see
oklahoma
city
tuttle
opinion
rehnquist
thus
permitting
cases
cities
failure
train
employees
go
forward
lesser
standard
fault
result
de
facto
respondeat
superior
liability
municipalities
result
rejected
monell
also
engage
federal
courts
endless
exercise
municipal
programs
exercise
believe
federal
courts
ill
suited
undertake
well
one
implicate
serious
questions
federalism
cf
rizzo
goode
consequently
claims
respondent
alleging
city
failure
provide
training
municipal
employees
resulted
constitutional
deprivation
suffered
cognizable
yield
liability
municipality
city
failure
train
reflects
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
inhabitants
iv
final
question
whether
case
remanded
new
trial
whether
petitioner
suggests
conclude
possible
grounds
respondent
prevail
see
tr
oral
arg
true
evidence
record
meet
standard
liability
set
forth
standard
proof
district
ultimately
imposed
respondent
consistent
sixth
circuit
precedent
lesser
one
one
adopt
today
see
tr
whether
respondent
opportunity
prove
case
deliberate
indifference
rule
adopted
matter
appeals
deal
remand
consequently
reasons
given
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
opinion
join
makes
clear
appeals
free
remand
case
new
trial
footnotes
every
person
color
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
subjects
causes
subjected
citizen
person
within
jurisdiction
thereof
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
shall
liable
party
injured
action
law
suit
equity
proper
proceeding
redress
city
regulation
question
provides
police
officer
assigned
act
jailer
city
police
station
shall
prisoner
found
unconscious
unable
explain
condition
complains
ill
person
taken
hospital
medical
treatment
permission
supervisor
admitting
person
city
jail
app
upholding
harris
failure
train
claim
sixth
circuit
relied
two
previous
decisions
approved
theory
municipal
liability
see
rymer
davis
vacated
remanded
sub
nom
shepherdsville
rhymer
reinstated
hays
jefferson
county
see
louis
praprotnik
springfield
kibbe
los
angeles
heller
oklahoma
city
tuttle
addition
suggesting
city
failure
train
officers
amounted
policy
resulted
denial
medical
care
detainees
respondent
also
contended
city
custom
denying
medical
care
detainees
suffering
emotional
mental
ailments
see
brief
respondent
tr
oral
arg
respondent
described
brief
argument
claim
unconstitutional
custom
appears
little
restatement
policy
claim
see
ibid
however
extent
claim
poses
distinct
basis
city
liability
decline
determine
whether
respondent
contention
custom
existed
alternative
ground
affirmance
custom
claim
passed
appeals
appear
presented
distinct
ground
decision
see
brief
appellee
pp
thus
consider
addition
sixth
circuit
decisions
discussed
supra
courts
appeals
held
failure
train
create
liability
see
spell
mcdaniel
haynesworth
miller
app
warren
lincoln
bergquist
county
cochise
wierstak
heffernan
fiacco
rensselaer
gilmere
atlanta
en
banc
rock
mccoy
languirand
hayden
two
courts
appeals
stopped
short
expressly
embracing
rule
instead
implicitly
endorsed
see
colburn
upper
darby
township
lenard
argento
addition
six
current
members
joined
opinions
past
least
implicitly
endorsed
theory
liability
see
oklahoma
city
tuttle
supra
brennan
joined
marshall
blackmun
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
springfield
kibbe
supra
joined
rehnquist
powell
white
dissenting
courts
held
showing
gross
negligence
city
failure
train
employees
adequate
make
claim
see
bergquist
county
cochise
supra
herrera
valentine
common
rule
city
must
exhibit
deliberate
indifference
towards
constitutional
rights
persons
domain
action
failure
train
permissible
see
fiacco
rensselaer
supra
patzner
burkett
wellington
daniels
languirand
hayden
supra
deliberate
indifference
standard
adopt
failure
train
claims
turn
upon
degree
fault
plaintiff
must
show
make
underlying
claim
constitutional
violation
example
never
determined
degree
culpability
must
shown
particular
constitutional
deprivation
asserted
case
denial
due
process
right
medical
care
detention
established
indeed
revere
massachusetts
general
hospital
reserved
decision
question
whether
something
less
eighth
amendment
deliberate
indifference
test
may
applicable
claims
detainees
asserting
violations
due
process
right
medical
care
custody
need
resolve
question
left
open
revere
two
reasons
first
petitioner
conceded
case
comes
us
must
assume
respondent
constitutional
right
receive
medical
care
denied
city
employees
whatever
nature
right
might
see
tr
oral
arg
second
proper
standard
determining
municipality
liable
constitutional
wrongs
turn
underlying
culpability
test
determines
wrongs
occurred
cf
brief
respondent
plurality
opinion
tuttle
explained
must
obviously
one
retreats
far
enough
constitutional
violation
municipal
policy
identified
behind
almost
harm
inflicted
municipal
official
example
police
officer
never
killed
tuttle
oklahoma
city
policy
establishing
police
force
monell
must
taken
require
proof
city
policy
different
kind
latter
example
claim
sent
jury
theory
particular
violation
caused
municipal
policy
cf
also
opinion
brennan
example
city
policymakers
know
moral
certainty
police
officers
required
arrest
fleeing
felons
city
armed
officers
firearms
part
allow
accomplish
task
thus
need
train
officers
constitutional
limitations
use
deadly
force
see
tennessee
garner
said
obvious
failure
properly
characterized
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
also
police
exercising
discretion
often
violate
constitutional
rights
need
training
must
plainly
obvious
city
policymakers
nevertheless
deliberately
indifferent
need
record
indicates
city
train
officers
training
included
instruction
see
app
pet
cert
petitioner
argues
obvious
city
training
insufficient
administer
written
policy
constitutional
question
resolved
remand
see
part
iv
infra
respondent
conceded
much
argument
see
tr
oral
arg
cf
also
oklahoma
city
tuttle
supra
opinion
brennan
justice
justice
scalia
justice
kennedy
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
join
parts
ii
part
iii
opinion
except
see
ante
thus
agree
municipal
policymakers
confronted
obvious
need
train
city
personnel
avoid
violation
constitutional
rights
deliberately
indifferent
need
lack
necessary
training
may
appropriately
considered
city
policy
subjecting
city
liability
decision
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
observes
nly
failure
train
reflects
deliberate
conscious
choice
municipality
policy
defined
prior
cases
city
liable
failure
ante
agree
plaintiff
pressing
failure
train
claim
must
prove
lack
training
cause
constitutional
injury
issue
entails
simply
showing
causation
ante
lesser
requirements
fault
causation
context
open
municipalities
unprecedented
liability
ante
pose
serious
federalism
concerns
ante
single
point
disagreement
majority
thus
small
one
believe
majority
strongly
hints
see
respondent
satisfy
fault
causation
requirements
adopt
today
think
unnecessary
remand
case
appeals
proceedings
case
comes
us
full
trial
respondent
vigorously
pursued
numerous
theories
municipal
liability
including
allegation
city
custom
providing
medical
care
detainees
suffering
emotional
illnesses
respondent
thus
every
opportunity
incentive
adduce
type
proof
necessary
satisfy
deliberate
indifference
standard
adopt
today
rather
remand
context
apply
deliberate
indifference
standard
facts
case
undertaking
analysis
conclude
evidence
record
indicating
city
canton
deliberately
indifferent
constitutional
rights
pretrial
detainees
monell
held
municipal
liability
imposed
municipality
entity
said
responsible
constitutional
violation
committed
one
employees
touchstone
action
government
body
allegation
official
policy
responsible
deprivation
rights
protected
constitution
found
language
rejection
sherman
amendment
congress
strong
indicators
framers
civil
rights
act
intend
municipal
governments
held
vicariously
liable
constitutional
torts
employees
thus
plaintiff
seeking
attach
liability
city
acts
one
employees
may
rest
employment
relationship
alone
fault
causation
acts
omissions
city
must
proved
reaffirms
requirements
today
claim
municipal
liability
predicated
upon
failure
act
requisite
degree
fault
must
shown
proof
background
events
circumstances
establish
policy
inaction
functional
equivalent
decision
city
violate
constitution
without
form
notice
city
opportunity
conform
constitutional
dictates
chooses
failure
train
theory
liability
completely
engulf
monell
imposing
liability
without
regard
fault
moreover
absent
requirement
lack
training
issue
bear
close
causal
connection
violation
constitutional
rights
failure
train
theory
municipal
liability
impose
prophylactic
duties
municipal
governments
remotely
connected
underlying
constitutional
requirements
results
directly
contrary
intent
drafters
central
vice
sherman
amendment
noted
opinion
monell
impose
species
vicarious
liability
municipalities
since
construed
impose
liability
even
municipality
know
impending
ensuing
riot
wherewithal
anything
emphasis
added
moreover
noted
monell
authors
ku
klux
act
intend
create
new
rights
duties
beyond
contained
constitution
thus
referred
reenacting
constitution
cong
globe
edmunds
representative
bingham
author
fourteenth
amendment
saw
purpose
enforcement
constitution
behalf
every
individual
citizen
republic
extent
rights
guaranteed
constitution
app
see
also
chapman
houston
welfare
rights
organization
section
civil
rights
act
provide
substantive
rights
equal
otherwise
introduced
enacted
served
insure
individual
cause
action
violations
constitution
thus
federal
good
government
act
municipalities
rather
creates
federal
cause
action
persons
including
municipalities
deprive
citizens
constitutional
rights
sensitive
concerns
opinion
correctly
requires
high
degree
fault
part
city
officials
omission
unconstitutional
support
liability
municipal
policy
monell
indicates
may
happen
need
different
training
obvious
inadequacy
likely
result
violation
constitutional
rights
policymakers
city
reasonably
said
deliberately
indifferent
need
ante
plaintiff
establish
facts
available
city
policymakers
put
actual
constructive
notice
particular
omission
substantially
certain
result
violation
constitutional
rights
citizens
dictates
monell
satisfied
said
municipality
made
deliberate
choice
follow
course
action
among
various
alternatives
ante
quoting
pembaur
cincinnati
view
shown
need
training
obvious
one
two
ways
first
municipality
fail
train
employees
concerning
clear
constitutional
duty
implicated
recurrent
situations
particular
employee
certain
face
majority
notes
see
ante
constitutional
limitations
established
use
deadly
force
police
officers
present
one
situation
constitutional
duty
individual
officer
clear
equally
clear
failure
inform
city
personnel
duty
create
extremely
high
risk
constitutional
violations
ensue
claim
case
police
officers
inadequately
trained
diagnosing
symptoms
emotional
illness
falls
far
short
kind
obvious
need
training
support
finding
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
part
city
opinion
observes
ante
yet
addressed
precise
nature
obligations
due
process
clause
places
upon
police
seek
medical
care
pretrial
detainees
physically
injured
apprehended
police
see
revere
massachusetts
general
hospital
rehnquist
concurring
thus
clear
constitutional
guideposts
municipalities
area
diagnosis
mental
illness
one
usual
recurring
situations
police
must
deal
ante
lack
training
issue
kind
omission
characterized
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
second
think
municipal
liability
failure
train
may
proper
shown
policymakers
aware
acquiesced
pattern
constitutional
violations
involving
exercise
police
discretion
cases
need
training
may
obvious
outset
pattern
constitutional
violations
put
municipality
notice
officers
confront
particular
situation
regular
basis
often
react
manner
contrary
constitutional
requirements
lower
courts
applied
deliberate
indifference
standard
adopt
today
required
showing
pattern
violations
kind
tacit
authorization
city
policymakers
inferred
see
fiacco
rensselaer
multiple
incidents
required
finding
deliberate
indifference
patzner
burkett
municipality
may
liable
notice
prior
misbehavior
officers
failed
take
remedial
steps
amounting
deliberate
indifference
offensive
acts
languirand
hayden
municipal
liability
failure
train
requires
evidence
least
pattern
similar
incidents
citizens
injured
endangered
wellington
daniels
failure
supervise
gives
rise
liability
however
situations
history
widespread
abuse
may
knowledge
imputed
supervisory
personnel
opinion
recognizes
requirement
see
ante
declines
evaluate
evidence
presented
case
light
new
legal
standard
ante
outset
litigation
respondent
pressed
claim
city
canton
custom
denying
medical
care
pretrial
detainees
emotional
disorders
see
amended
complaint
app
indeed
including
oral
argument
counsel
respondent
continued
assert
respondent
attempting
hinge
municipal
liability
upon
custom
denying
medical
care
certain
class
prisoners
failure
train
police
led
particular
violation
tr
oral
arg
time
respondent
filed
complaint
clear
proof
existence
custom
entailed
showing
practices
permanent
well
settled
constitute
custom
usage
force
law
adickes
kress
see
also
garner
memphis
police
department
discussing
proof
custom
light
monell
whatever
prevailing
standard
time
concerning
liability
failure
train
respondent
thus
every
incentive
adduce
proof
trial
pattern
violations
support
claim
city
unwritten
custom
denying
medical
care
emotionally
ill
detainees
fact
respondent
presented
testimony
witness
indicating
past
incidents
deliberate
indifference
medical
needs
emotionally
disturbed
detainees
circumstance
put
city
actual
constructive
notice
need
additional
training
regard
trial
david
maser
chief
police
city
canton
testified
without
contradiction
tenure
received
complaints
detainees
canton
jails
accorded
proper
medical
treatment
tr
former
officer
cherry
served
jailer
canton
police
department
indicated
never
seek
medical
treatment
persons
emotionally
upset
prospect
arrest
usually
calmed
member
department
spoke
one
family
members
arrived
quite
simply
nothing
record
indicate
city
canton
reason
suspect
failing
provide
kind
training
lead
injuries
kind
let
alone
violations
due
process
clause
none
courts
appeals
already
apply
standard
adopt
today
allow
respondent
take
claim
jury
based
facts
adduced
trial
see
patzner
burkett
supra
summary
judgment
proper
deliberate
indifference
standard
evidence
single
incident
adduced
languirand
hayden
supra
reversing
jury
verdict
rendered
failure
train
theory
evidence
prior
incidents
support
finding
municipal
policymakers
consciously
indifferent
constitutional
rights
wellington
daniels
supra
affirming
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
municipality
deliberate
indifference
standard
evidence
single
incident
presented
trial
cf
fiacco
rensselaer
supra
finding
evidence
deliberate
indifference
sufficient
support
jury
verdict
pattern
similar
violations
shown
trial
allowing
inadequate
training
claim
one
go
jury
based
upon
single
incident
invite
jury
nullification
monell
infer
existence
city
policy
isolated
misconduct
single
officer
hold
city
liable
basis
policy
amount
permitting
precisely
theory
strict
respondeat
superior
liability
rejected
monell
oklahoma
city
tuttle
brennan
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
authors
ku
klux
act
realized
resources
local
government
inexhaustible
grave
step
shifting
resources
particular
areas
constitutional
violations
likely
result
deterrent
power
certainly
taken
basis
isolated
incident
constitution
require
city
canton
provide
detailed
medical
psychological
training
police
officers
station
paramedics
jails
city
services
necessarily
suffer
including
far
direct
implications
protection
constitutional
rights
respondent
evidence
falls
far
short
establishing
high
degree
fault
part
city
required
decision
today
indication
respondent
produce
new
proof
regard
reverse
judgment
appeals
order
entry
judgment
city