brotherhood
trainmen
baltimore
argued
may
decided
june
appeal
district
northern
district
illinois
eastern
division
brotherhood
trainmen
baltimore
burke
williamson
chicago
appellant
ernest
ballard
chicago
appellees
justice
murphy
delivered
opinion
concern
intervention
rights
representatives
railroad
employees
suit
brought
railroad
interstate
commerce
act
origin
suit
found
order
issued
interstate
commerce
commission
may
chicago
junction
case
see
also
chicago
junction
case
commission
approved
purchase
new
york
central
railroad
central
capital
stock
chicago
river
indiana
railroad
river
road
also
authorized
leasing
river
road
properties
chicago
junction
railway
junction
years
thereafter
lessee
option
perpetuity
among
properties
question
trackage
switching
facilities
union
stock
yards
chicago
illinois
connecting
various
trunk
lines
prior
commission
order
practice
trunk
line
railroads
use
power
crews
move
empty
loaded
livestock
cars
tracks
loading
places
union
stock
yards
privilege
moving
cars
railroads
charged
per
car
loaded
empty
commission
made
various
conditions
approval
proposed
transactions
third
condition
provided
present
traffic
operating
relationships
existing
junction
river
road
carriers
operating
chicago
shall
continued
far
matters
within
control
central
condition
still
effect
commission
decision
order
found
valid
binding
parties
proceeding
district
trunk
line
railroads
continued
use
power
crews
moving
livestock
cars
trackage
operated
river
road
paid
river
road
amount
per
car
january
central
river
road
notified
railroads
february
cars
moved
trackage
means
power
crews
river
road
handling
charge
per
outbound
loaded
car
soon
new
practice
went
effect
trunk
line
railroads
appellees
herein
brought
suit
preliminary
permanent
injunctions
interstate
commerce
act
central
river
road
junction
claimed
new
practice
violation
third
condition
commis
sion
order
accordingly
sought
enjoin
defendants
respective
officers
agents
representatives
servants
employees
successors
disobeying
order
especially
third
condition
thereof
force
defendants
permit
move
cars
power
crews
commission
allowed
intervene
party
plaintiff
intervening
complaint
also
prayed
injunction
alleged
violation
third
condition
defendants
employees
stipulation
facts
filed
describing
change
handling
cars
pointed
change
resulted
settlement
river
road
brotherhood
railroad
trainmen
labor
dispute
work
involved
livestock
car
movements
brotherhood
bargaining
agent
railway
labor
act
et
river
road
trainmen
made
demand
based
upon
contract
river
road
trainmen
given
work
moving
switching
livestock
cars
river
road
trackage
brotherhood
threatened
call
strike
unless
demand
met
january
threat
backed
almost
unanimous
strike
vote
trainmen
threat
river
road
made
agreement
brotherhood
shortly
scheduled
strike
hour
result
river
road
trainmen
permitted
move
switch
cars
notice
trunk
line
railroads
change
practice
subsequently
followed
district
thereupon
issued
preliminary
injunction
requested
central
river
road
junction
respective
officers
agents
representatives
employees
successors
restrained
disobeying
commission
order
violating
third
condition
order
commanded
permit
trunk
line
railroads
move
cars
river
road
line
power
crews
concluded
matter
law
facts
relative
labor
dispute
brotherhood
river
road
immaterial
three
days
preliminary
injunction
became
effective
brotherhood
asked
leave
file
special
appearance
purpose
moving
vacate
injunction
dismiss
proceedings
failure
join
brotherhood
members
indispensable
parties
motion
denied
river
road
filed
answer
original
complaint
pointing
changed
arrangement
resulted
labor
dispute
brotherhood
contending
new
practice
violate
commission
order
brotherhood
thereafter
filed
motion
intervene
generally
party
defendant
alleging
primary
purpose
suit
nullify
agreement
river
road
deprive
brotherhood
members
work
performing
agreement
brotherhood
members
therefore
indispensable
parties
contention
made
brotherhood
unconditional
right
intervene
virtue
interstate
commerce
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
following
section
later
added
support
contention
otion
intervene
denied
order
without
opinion
district
allowed
appeal
order
denying
intervention
appellee
railroads
moved
dismiss
appeal
ground
order
final
hence
appealable
brotherhood
entitled
intervene
matter
right
postponed
consideration
question
jurisdiction
review
order
hearing
appeal
upon
merits
ordinarily
absence
abuse
discretion
appeal
lies
order
denying
leave
intervene
intervention
permissive
matter
within
discretion
california
canneries
permissive
nature
intervention
necessarily
implies
intervention
denied
applicant
legally
bound
prejudiced
judgment
might
entered
case
liberty
assert
protect
interests
appropriate
proceeding
adverse
effect
upon
applicant
order
denying
intervention
accordingly
falls
level
appealability
statute
practical
necessities
grant
applicant
absolute
right
intervene
order
denying
intervention
becomes
appealable
may
fairly
said
applicant
adversely
affected
denial
way
better
assert
particular
interest
warrants
intervention
instance
since
appeal
subsequent
order
judgment
proceeding
unless
intervene
order
denying
intervention
degree
definitiveness
supports
appeal
therefrom
see
pipe
line
jurisdiction
consider
appeal
order
denying
intervention
thus
depends
upon
nature
applicant
right
intervene
right
absolute
order
appealable
may
judge
merits
matter
one
within
discretion
trial
abuse
discretion
order
appealable
lack
power
review
words
jurisdiction
identified
necessary
incidents
right
intervene
particular
instance
must
therefore
determine
question
jurisdiction
case
examining
character
brotherhood
right
intervene
proceeding
brought
interstate
commerce
act
start
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
applicable
civil
proceeding
type
rule
deals
intervention
right
provides
pertinent
part
timely
application
anyone
shall
permitted
intervene
action
statute
confers
unconditional
right
intervene
representation
applicant
interest
existing
parties
may
inadequate
applicant
may
bound
judgment
action
contrast
rule
concerned
permissive
intervention
reads
follows
timely
application
anyone
may
permitted
intervene
action
statute
confers
condititional
right
intervene
applicant
claim
defense
main
action
question
law
fa
ct
common
exercising
discretion
shall
consider
whether
intervention
unduly
delay
prejudice
adjudication
rights
original
parties
brotherhood
claims
consequence
either
two
federal
interstate
commerce
act
absolute
right
intervene
within
meaning
rule
also
alleges
possesses
absolute
right
within
contemplation
rule
representation
interest
existing
parties
inadequate
possibility
may
bound
judgment
action
real
one
claim
permissive
intervention
rule
made
contention
district
abused
discretion
might
view
interstate
commerce
act
give
brotherhood
absolute
right
intervene
instant
proceeding
within
meaning
rule
set
forth
stat
portion
act
reads
employees
carrier
duly
designated
may
intervene
heard
proceeding
arising
act
affecting
employees
following
considerations
make
obvious
fact
brotherhood
meets
requirements
provision
first
unquestioned
brotherhood
duly
designated
representative
river
road
trainmen
second
right
intervention
granted
representative
applies
proceeding
act
plain
language
extending
reach
proceeding
arising
act
point
however
appellee
railroads
contend
must
confined
proceedings
interstate
commerce
commission
exclusion
proceedings
support
contention
point
fact
whole
primarily
concerned
commission
procedure
organization
fact
emphasized
heading
appears
statutes
large
stat
code
heading
reads
procedure
delegation
duties
rehearings
inference
made
paragraph
concerned
must
limited
heading
general
context
whole
result
contention
phrase
proceeding
arising
act
found
paragraph
rewritten
construction
refer
proceeding
commission
arising
section
sanction
construction
words
true
course
concerned
primarily
organization
commission
ts
subdivi
sions
administrative
disposition
matters
coming
within
agency
jurisdiction
least
ten
twelve
paragraphs
deal
matters
cast
present
form
five
paragraphs
related
exclusively
matters
congress
rewrote
section
enacted
transportation
act
stat
continuing
modifying
previous
provisions
consolidating
including
matters
formerly
scattered
throughout
act
time
however
expressly
recognized
certain
paragraphs
added
entirely
new
paragraphs
went
beyond
purely
administrative
matters
thus
pertinent
mittee
reports
new
paragraph
included
providing
orders
division
individual
commissioner
board
shall
subject
judicial
review
case
full
commission
orders
application
rehearing
made
acted
upon
paragraph
new
paragraph
added
end
section
providing
representatives
employees
carrier
may
intervene
heard
proceedings
arising
part
affecting
employees
language
reports
framers
recognized
obvious
fact
certain
provisions
section
deal
something
might
indicated
heading
heading
fails
refer
matters
framers
section
wrote
text
unusual
fact
heading
reference
general
subject
matter
involved
accurately
referring
subjects
commission
procedure
organization
neglects
reveal
also
deals
judicial
review
administrative
orders
intervention
employee
representatives
headings
titles
meant
take
place
detailed
provisions
text
necessarily
designed
reference
guide
synopsis
text
complicated
prolific
headings
titles
indicate
provisions
genral
manner
attempt
refer
specific
provision
often
ungainly
well
useless
result
matters
text
deviate
falling
within
general
pattern
frequently
unreflected
headings
titles
factors
type
led
wise
rule
title
statute
heading
section
limit
plain
meaning
text
fisher
cranch
cornell
coyne
strathearn
dillon
interpretative
purposes
use
shed
light
ambiguous
word
phrase
tools
available
resolution
doubt
undo
limit
text
makes
plain
meaning
unmistakable
face
simple
unambiguous
reference
proceeding
arising
act
house
committee
paraphrased
proceedings
arising
part
word
warrant
limiting
reference
allow
intervention
proceedings
arising
proceedings
commission
proceedings
mentioned
arise
act
act
judicial
administrative
proceedings
may
arise
instant
case
ready
illustration
judicial
proceeding
arising
act
suit
nature
authorized
solely
act
hence
proceeding
towhich
right
intervention
may
attach
virtue
perceive
reason
statutory
policy
framers
wished
confine
right
intervention
employee
representatives
ceedings
commission
occasions
may
arise
case
employee
representatives
interest
intervening
original
administrative
proceeding
definite
interest
intervening
subsequent
judicial
proceeding
arising
act
framers
used
language
covers
types
proceedings
unjustified
formulating
policy
see
fit
express
limit
language
way
third
proceeding
arising
act
affects
employees
represented
brotherhood
nothing
make
plainer
fact
direct
injunctive
relief
sought
obtained
employees
appellee
railroads
sued
enjoin
river
road
employees
disobeying
third
condition
commission
order
alleged
condition
required
river
road
employees
permit
railroads
use
power
crews
moving
cars
river
road
line
yet
precisely
subject
matter
conflict
river
road
brotherhood
resulting
insertion
important
provisions
contract
commission
order
require
river
road
employees
forego
operating
livestock
cars
contract
rights
river
road
affected
real
sense
acts
done
employees
performance
contract
obviously
prompted
suit
acts
performed
issuance
injunction
might
give
rise
contempt
action
thus
impossible
say
proceeding
one
employees
within
meaning
since
conditions
satisfied
case
question
remains
whether
brotherhood
thereby
accorded
permissive
absolute
right
intervene
language
terms
intervene
heard
might
construed
giving
discretionary
right
view
indicated
requirements
met
employees
representative
acquires
absolute
right
intervention
statutes
speak
intervention
right
thus
suit
brought
enforce
set
aside
commission
order
commission
parties
interest
proceeding
commission
appear
parties
thereto
right
case
right
intervene
absolute
unconditional
sprunt
son
less
absolute
unconditional
right
intervene
permits
intervention
employees
affected
proceeding
sufficiently
affected
within
meaning
provision
requires
employees
prejudiced
bound
judgment
might
entered
case
situation
relative
river
road
employees
clear
effect
degree
present
however
room
operation
discretion
whether
employees
interests
asserted
defended
proceeding
interests
stake
question
decided
employees
representative
statutory
term
intervene
thus
means
intervene
employees
representative
chooses
rather
intervene
discretion
representative
choose
intervene
may
matter
right
within
meaning
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
case
thus
conclude
gives
brotherhood
absolute
right
intervene
proceeding
making
unnecessary
discuss
whether
extent
brotherhood
right
apart
follows
jurisdiction
consider
appeal
merits
exercise
jurisdiction
reverse
judgment
district
denying
leave
brotherhood
intervene
reversed
footnotes
baltimore
unreported
district
northern
district
illinois
eastern
division
equity
january
approved
commission
order
amended
amendment
germane
case
commission
based
complaint
upon
interstate
commerce
act
authorizes
commission
seek
grants
jurisdiction
federal
district
courts
issue
injunctive
mandatory
relief
restrain
violation
compel
obedience
order
issued
appeal
junction
seventh
circuit
appeals
reversed
decree
junction
holding
junction
control
nothing
acts
complained
appellees
baltimore
chicago
junction
stat
see
also
ex
parte
cutting
credits
commutation
ex
parte
leaf
tobacco
board
trade
engelhard
sons
city
new
york
consolidated
gas
new
york
city
new
york
telephone
appears
code
paragraph
reads
employees
carrier
duly
designated
may
intervene
heard
proceeding
arising
chapter
chapters
title
affecting
employees
words
chapter
refer
part
interstate
commerce
act
et
embodies
original
statute
known
name
prior
division
parts
chapter
relates
part
ii
interstate
commerce
act
originally
known
motor
carrier
act
et
seq
section
part
ii
reference
part
provisions
section
title
shall
apply
proceedings
chapter
chapter
equivalent
part
iii
interstate
commerce
act
deals
water
carriers
et
seq
section
also
part
provisions
section
section
chapter
title
sections
title
shall
apply
full
force
effect
administration
enforcement
chapter
section
referring
proceedings
arising
act
also
affects
judicial
administrative
proceedings
arising
parts
ii
iii
act
see
note
surpa
section
labeled
enforce
orders
payment
money
provides
carrier
fails
obey
commission
order
payment
money
commission
injured
party
may
apply
federal
district
enforcement
order