difrancesco
argued
october
decided
december
organized
crime
control
act
grants
right
specified
conditions
appeal
sentence
imposed
upon
dangerous
special
offender
respondent
convicted
federal
racketeering
offenses
trial
federal
district
sentenced
dangerous
special
offender
two
prison
terms
served
concurrently
sentence
previously
imposed
convictions
unrelated
federal
trial
sought
review
dangerous
special
offender
sentences
claiming
district
abused
discretion
imposing
sentences
amounted
additional
imprisonment
respondent
one
year
face
findings
made
dangerous
special
offender
hearing
appeals
dismissed
appeal
double
jeopardy
grounds
held
section
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
pp
section
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
guarantee
multiple
trials
government
appeal
presents
threat
successive
prosecutions
double
jeopardy
clause
offended
martin
linen
supply
accordingly
government
taking
review
respondent
sentence
offend
double
jeopardy
principles
success
might
deprive
respondent
benefit
lenient
sentence
neither
history
sentencing
practices
pertinent
rulings
even
considerations
double
jeopardy
policy
support
proposition
criminal
sentence
pronounced
accorded
constitutional
finality
similar
attaches
jury
verdict
acquittal
double
jeopardy
clause
provide
defendant
right
know
specific
moment
time
exact
limit
punishment
turn
pp
increase
sentence
review
constitute
multiple
punishment
violation
double
jeopardy
clause
argument
defendant
perceives
length
sentence
finally
determined
begins
serve
trial
judge
prohibited
thereafter
increasing
sentence
force
dangerous
special
offender
statute
congress
specifically
provided
sentence
subject
appeal
circumstances
expectation
finality
original
sentence
pp
conclusion
violates
neither
guarantee
multiple
punishment
guarantee
multiple
trials
consistent
opinions
upheld
constitutionality
criminal
proceedings
cf
swisher
brady
pp
blackmun
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
powell
rehnquist
joined
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
white
marshall
stevens
joined
post
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
argued
cause
briefs
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
heymann
victor
stone
edgar
demoyer
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
quin
denvir
laurance
smith
state
public
defender
california
martin
michaelson
american
civil
liberties
union
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
organized
crime
control
act
pub
stat
contains
among
things
definition
dangerous
special
offender
authorizes
imposition
increased
sentence
upon
convicted
dangerous
special
offender
grants
right
specified
conditions
take
sentence
appeals
review
issue
presented
case
whether
authorizing
appeal
violates
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
constitution
jury
trial
district
western
district
new
york
respondent
eugene
difrancesco
convicted
conducting
affairs
enterprise
pattern
racketeering
activity
conspiring
commit
offense
violation
another
jury
trial
different
judge
district
based
indictment
returned
prior
racketeering
indictment
respondent
convicted
damaging
federal
property
violation
unlawfully
storing
explosive
materials
violation
conspiring
commit
offenses
violation
respondent
first
sentenced
march
convictions
later
trial
received
eight
years
charge
damaging
federal
property
five
years
conspiracy
charge
sentences
served
concurrently
one
year
unlawful
storage
charge
served
consecutively
sentences
made
total
nine
years
imprisonment
april
respondent
sentenced
dangerous
special
offender
two
terms
racketeering
counts
upon
convicted
earlier
trial
specified
sentences
served
concurrently
sentences
imposed
march
dangerous
special
offender
charge
sentences
thus
resulted
additional
punishment
year
respondent
appealed
respective
judgments
conviction
appeals
second
circuit
sought
review
sentences
imposed
upon
respondent
dangerous
special
offender
appeals
unanimously
affirmed
judgments
conviction
divided
vote
however
dismissed
government
appeal
double
jeopardy
grounds
two
judges
majority
thus
address
merits
special
offender
issue
third
judge
agreeing
government
appeal
dismissed
based
conclusion
constitutional
grounds
majority
grounds
inapplicable
facts
case
importance
constitutional
question
granted
government
petition
certiorari
confined
single
issue
respondent
filed
ii
earlier
racketeering
trial
evidence
showed
respondent
involved
scheme
rochester
area
responsible
least
eight
fires
ring
collaborated
property
owners
set
fire
buildings
return
shares
insurance
proceeds
insurers
defrauded
approximately
result
fires
second
trial
evidence
showed
respondent
participated
columbus
day
bombings
including
bombing
federal
building
rochester
prior
first
trial
government
accordance
filed
trial
notice
alleging
respondent
dangerous
special
offender
notice
recited
government
intention
seek
enhanced
sentences
racketeering
counts
event
respondent
convicted
trial
respondent
found
guilty
dangerous
special
offender
hearing
pursuant
held
hearing
government
relied
upon
testimony
adduced
trial
upon
public
documents
attested
convictions
respondent
columbus
day
bombings
loansharking
murder
app
defense
offered
evidence
conceded
validity
public
records
objected
consideration
murder
offense
conviction
vacated
appeal
district
made
findings
fact
ruled
respondent
dangerous
special
offender
within
meaning
statute
findings
set
forth
respondent
criminal
record
stated
record
revealed
virtually
continuous
criminal
conduct
past
eight
years
interrupted
relatively
brief
periods
imprisonment
found
addition
respondent
criminal
history
based
upon
proven
facts
reveals
pattern
habitual
knowing
criminal
conduct
violent
dangerous
nature
lives
property
citizens
community
shows
defendant
complete
utter
disregard
public
safety
defendant
virtue
criminal
record
shown
hardened
habitual
criminal
public
must
protected
long
period
possible
way
public
protected
violent
dangerous
criminal
conduct
defendant
thereupon
sentenced
respondent
concurrent
terms
hereinabove
described
app
took
appeal
claiming
district
abused
discretion
imposing
sentences
amounted
additional
imprisonment
respondent
one
year
face
findings
made
dangerous
special
offender
hearing
dismissal
government
appeal
appeals
rested
specifically
upon
conclusion
described
inescapable
subject
defendant
risk
substitution
greater
sentence
upon
appeal
government
place
second
time
jeopardy
life
limb
iii
far
able
ascertain
never
invalidated
act
congress
double
jeopardy
grounds
frequent
occasion
recently
consider
pass
upon
double
jeopardy
claims
raised
various
contexts
see
jorn
colten
kentucky
illinois
somerville
chaffin
stynchcombe
wilson
jenkins
serfass
breed
jones
dinitz
ludwig
massachusetts
martin
linen
supply
lee
arizona
washington
burks
greene
massey
crist
bretz
sanabria
scott
swisher
brady
whalen
illinois
vitale
cited
cases
additions
past
decade
less
numerous
list
double
jeopardy
decisions
past
years
among
earlier
cases
perez
wheat
ex
parte
lange
wall
ball
kepner
green
fong
foo
downum
tateo
clause
important
vital
day
demonstrated
host
recent
cases
application
proved
facile
routine
demonstrated
acknowledged
changes
direction
emphasis
see
scott
supra
overruling
jenkins
supra
burks
overruling
least
part
certain
prior
cases
area
see
also
note
rev
westen
drubel
toward
general
theory
double
jeopardy
rev
nonetheless
following
general
principles
emerge
double
jeopardy
decisions
may
regarded
essentially
settled
general
design
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
described
green
constitutional
prohibition
double
jeopardy
designed
protect
individual
subjected
hazards
trial
possible
conviction
alleged
offense
underlying
idea
one
deeply
ingrained
least
system
jurisprudence
state
resources
power
allowed
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
stated
design
terms
specific
purpose
expressed
various
ways
said
primary
purpose
clause
preserve
finality
judgments
crist
bretz
integrity
judgments
scott
also
said
central
objective
prohibition
successive
trials
barrier
affording
prosecution
another
opportunity
supply
evidence
failed
muster
first
proceeding
burks
swisher
brady
implicit
thought
government
may
reprosecute
gains
advantage
learns
first
trial
strengths
defense
case
weaknesses
see
scott
dissenting
opinion
wilson
still
another
consideration
noted
jeopardy
attaches
judgment
becomes
final
constitutional
protection
also
embraces
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
arizona
washington
quoting
wade
hunter
occasion
stress
placed
upon
punishment
punishment
legally
follow
second
conviction
real
danger
guarded
constitution
ex
parte
lange
guarantee
double
jeopardy
said
consist
three
separate
constitutional
protections
protects
second
prosecution
offense
acquittal
protects
second
prosecution
offense
conviction
protects
multiple
punishments
offense
footnotes
omitted
north
carolina
pearce
acquittal
accorded
special
weight
constitutional
protection
double
jeopardy
unequivocally
prohibits
second
trial
following
acquittal
public
interest
finality
criminal
judgments
strong
acquitted
defendant
may
retried
even
though
acquittal
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
see
fong
foo
innocence
accused
confirmed
final
judgment
constitution
conclusively
presumes
second
trial
unfair
arizona
washington
law
attaches
particular
significance
acquittal
scott
justified
ground
however
mistaken
acquittal
may
unacceptably
high
risk
government
superior
resources
wear
defendant
thereby
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
green
see
also
martin
linen
supply
necessarily
afford
absolute
finality
jury
verdict
acquittal
matter
erroneous
decision
emphasis
original
burks
result
definitely
otherwise
cases
trial
ended
acquittal
long
recognized
government
may
bring
second
prosecution
mistrial
occasioned
manifest
necessity
perez
wheat
see
arizona
washington
illinois
somerville
furthermore
reprosecution
defendant
successfully
moved
mistrial
barred
long
government
deliberately
seek
provoke
mistrial
request
dinitz
similarly
trial
terminated
prior
jury
verdict
defendant
request
grounds
unrelated
guilt
innocence
government
may
seek
appellate
review
decision
even
though
second
trial
necessitated
reversal
see
scott
fortiori
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
government
appeal
ruling
favor
defendant
guilty
verdict
entered
trier
fact
see
wilson
supra
rojas
de
garces
finally
first
trial
ended
conviction
double
jeopardy
guarantee
imposes
limitations
whatever
upon
power
retry
defendant
succeeded
getting
first
conviction
set
aside
emphasis
original
north
carolina
pearce
high
price
indeed
society
pay
every
accused
granted
immunity
punishment
defect
sufficient
constitute
reversible
error
proceedings
leading
conviction
tateo
require
criminal
defendant
stand
trial
successfully
invoked
statutory
right
appeal
upset
first
conviction
act
governmental
oppression
sort
double
jeopardy
clause
intended
protect
scott
however
one
exception
rule
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
retrial
conviction
reversed
insufficiency
evidence
burks
supra
greene
massey
clause
apply
sweep
absolute
burks
right
appeal
criminal
case
absent
explicit
statutory
authority
scott
enactment
first
paragraph
pub
stat
permitting
government
appeal
criminal
case
except
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
necessarily
concluded
congress
intended
remove
statutory
barriers
government
appeals
allow
appeals
whenever
constitution
permit
wilson
see
also
scott
iv
principles
certain
propositions
pertinent
present
controversy
emerge
double
jeopardy
clause
complete
barrier
appeal
prosecution
criminal
case
government
appeal
presents
threat
successive
prosecutions
double
jeopardy
clause
offended
martin
linen
supply
see
also
wilson
scott
supra
follows
government
taking
review
respondent
sentence
offend
double
jeopardy
principles
success
might
deprive
respondent
benefit
lenient
sentence
indeed
wilson
scott
defendant
total
victory
trial
tribunal
terminated
case
manner
allowed
go
free
government
nevertheless
constitutional
challenge
allowed
appeal
double
jeopardy
focus
thus
appeal
relief
requested
task
determine
whether
criminal
sentence
pronounced
accorded
constitutional
finality
conclusiveness
similar
attaches
jury
verdict
acquittal
conclude
neither
history
sentencing
practices
pertinent
rulings
even
considerations
double
jeopardy
policy
support
equation
noted
said
prohibition
multiple
trials
controlling
constitutional
principle
wilson
martin
linen
supply
course
cases
show
even
protection
retrial
absolute
acquittal
prevents
retrial
even
legal
error
committed
trial
ball
law
attaches
particular
significance
acquittal
scott
appeal
sentence
therefore
seem
violation
double
jeopardy
original
sentence
pronounced
treated
way
acquittal
treated
appeal
treated
way
retrial
put
another
way
argument
double
jeopardy
finality
purposes
imposition
sentence
implied
acquittal
greater
sentence
see
van
alstyne
gideon
wake
harsher
penalties
successful
criminal
appellant
yale
agree
government
approach
withstand
analysis
reliance
appeals
may
placed
kepner
misplaced
focus
kepner
undesirability
second
trial
furthermore
fundamental
distinctions
sentence
acquittal
fail
recognize
ignore
particular
significance
acquittal
historically
pronouncement
sentence
never
carried
finality
attaches
acquittal
writs
autre
fois
acquit
autre
fois
convict
protections
retrial
see
wilson
although
distinction
great
importance
early
english
common
law
nearly
felonies
double
jeopardy
principles
originally
limited
punishable
critical
sentences
death
deportation
see
comment
statutory
implementation
double
jeopardy
clauses
new
life
moribund
constitutional
guarantee
yale
gained
importance
sentences
imprisonment
became
common
trial
increase
sentence
long
took
place
term
permitted
practice
thought
violate
double
jeopardy
principle
see
ex
parte
lange
dissenting
opinion
coke
institutes
ed
see
also
commonwealth
weymouth
mass
common
law
important
present
context
double
jeopardy
clause
drafted
protections
mind
see
wilson
green
dissenting
opinion
accounts
established
practice
federal
courts
sentencing
judge
may
recall
defendant
increase
sentence
least
venture
comment
limitation
long
yet
begun
serve
sentence
see
dilorenzo
cert
denied
vincent
cert
denied
thus
may
said
certainty
history
demonstrates
common
law
never
ascribed
finality
sentence
prevent
legislative
body
authorizing
appeal
prosecution
indeed
countries
trace
legal
systems
english
common
law
permit
appeals
see
rev
stat
ii
martin
annual
criminal
code
greenspan
ed
new
zealand
crimes
act
amended
crimes
amendment
act
repr
stat
see
friedland
double
jeopardy
decisions
sentencing
area
clearly
establish
sentence
qualities
constitutional
finality
attend
acquittal
bozza
defendant
convicted
crime
carrying
mandatory
minimum
sentence
fine
imprisonment
trial
however
sentenced
defendant
imprisonment
later
day
judge
recalled
defendant
imposed
fine
imprisonment
held
double
jeopardy
constitution
require
sentencing
game
wrong
move
judge
means
immunity
prisoner
judge
done
twice
put
petitioner
jeopardy
offense
north
carolina
pearce
held
absolute
constitutional
bar
imposition
severe
sentence
reconviction
defendant
successful
appeal
original
judgment
conviction
rule
pearce
permitting
increase
sentence
retrial
part
constitutional
jurisprudence
see
chaffin
stynchcombe
see
also
stroud
rule
finality
applied
pronouncement
sentence
original
sentence
pearce
served
ceiling
one
imposed
retrial
pearce
dealt
imposition
new
sentence
retrial
rather
appeal
difference
conceptual
nicety
north
carolina
pearce
double
jeopardy
considerations
bar
reprosecution
acquittal
prohibit
review
sentence
noted
basic
design
double
jeopardy
provision
bar
repeated
attempts
convict
consequent
subjection
defendant
embarrassment
expense
anxiety
insecurity
possibility
may
found
guilty
even
though
innocent
considerations
however
significant
application
prosecution
statutorily
granted
right
review
sentence
limited
appeal
involve
retrial
approximate
ordeal
trial
basic
issue
guilt
innocence
appeal
taken
promptly
essentially
record
sentencing
defendant
course
charged
knowledge
statute
appeal
provisions
expectation
finality
sentence
appeal
concluded
time
appeal
expired
sure
appeal
may
prolong
period
anxiety
may
exist
finite
period
provided
statute
appeal
ordeal
government
appeal
dismissal
indictment
information
defendant
primary
concern
anxiety
obviously
relate
determination
innocence
guilt
already
behind
defendant
subject
risk
harassed
convicted
although
innocent
furthermore
sentence
characteristically
determined
large
part
basis
information
presentence
report
developed
outside
courtroom
purely
judicial
determination
much
goes
result
inquiry
nonadversary
nature
double
jeopardy
clause
provide
defendant
right
know
specific
moment
time
exact
limit
punishment
turn
congress
established
many
types
criminal
sanctions
defendant
unaware
precise
extent
punishment
significant
periods
time
even
life
yet
sanctions
considered
violative
clause
thus
double
jeopardy
protection
revocation
probation
imposition
imprisonment
see
thomas
cert
denied
situations
probation
parole
may
revoked
sentence
imprisonment
imposed
see
kuck
walden
cert
denied
jones
cert
denied
dunn
app
criminal
sanctions
involve
increase
final
sentence
defendant
aware
original
sentencing
term
imprisonment
later
may
imposed
situation
us
different
critical
respect
respondent
similarly
aware
dangerous
special
offender
sentence
subject
increase
appeal
legitimate
expectations
defeated
sentence
increased
appeal
expectations
defendant
placed
parole
probation
later
revoked
highlights
distinction
acquittals
sentences
north
carolina
pearce
bozza
demonstrate
double
jeopardy
clause
require
sentence
given
degree
finality
prevents
later
increase
critical
difference
acquittal
sentence
acquittal
cases
kepner
fong
foo
require
contrary
result
turn
question
whether
increase
sentence
review
constitutes
multiple
punishment
violation
double
jeopardy
clause
appeals
found
conclusion
appears
attributable
primarily
extending
appeal
dictum
benz
effect
federal
practice
barring
increase
sentence
trial
service
sentence
begun
constitutionally
based
real
issue
benz
however
whether
trial
judge
power
reduce
defendant
sentence
service
begun
held
trial
power
went
say
gratuitously
however
quotations
textbook
ex
parte
lange
trial
may
increase
sentence
even
though
increase
effectuated
session
defendant
begun
service
sentence
dictum
source
ex
parte
lange
principle
lange
trial
erroneously
imposed
imprisonment
fine
even
though
authorized
statute
impose
one
two
punishments
lange
paid
fine
served
five
days
prison
trial
resentenced
year
imprisonment
fine
paid
defendant
suffered
one
alternative
punishments
power
punish
gone
also
observed
impose
year
imprisonment
maximum
five
days
served
punish
twice
offense
holding
lange
thus
dictum
benz
susceptible
general
application
confine
dictum
benz
lange
specific
context
although
might
argued
defendant
perceives
length
sentence
finally
determined
begins
serve
trial
judge
prohibited
thereafter
increasing
sentence
argument
force
dangerous
special
offender
statute
congress
specifically
provided
sentence
subject
appeal
circumstances
expectation
finality
original
sentence
see
dunsky
constitutionality
increasing
sentences
appellate
review
crim
criminology
guarantee
multiple
punishment
evolved
holdings
plainly
involved
case
ex
parte
lange
demonstrates
defendant
may
receive
greater
sentence
legislature
authorized
double
jeopardy
problem
presented
ex
parte
lange
congress
provided
offense
punishable
fine
imprisonment
even
though
multiple
punishment
see
whalen
concurring
opinion
punishment
authorized
congress
clear
specific
accordingly
violate
guarantee
multiple
punishment
expounded
ex
parte
lange
vi
conclusion
violates
neither
guarantee
multiple
punishment
guarantee
multiple
trials
consistent
opinions
upheld
constitutionality
criminal
proceedings
see
ludwig
massachusetts
see
also
colten
kentucky
swisher
brady
affords
particular
support
indeed
precedent
decision
reach
case
concerned
maryland
scheme
use
master
juvenile
proceeding
master
receiving
evidence
concluded
state
failed
show
beyond
reasonable
doubt
minor
committed
assault
robbery
master
recommendation
juvenile
set
forth
conclusion
state
filed
exceptions
authorized
procedural
rule
minor
responded
motion
dismiss
notice
exceptions
ground
procedural
rule
provision
de
novo
hearing
violated
double
jeopardy
clause
state
courts
denied
relief
federal
habeas
held
maryland
system
violate
clause
important
decision
fact
system
provide
prosecution
second
crack
record
master
closed
additional
evidence
received
juvenile
judge
consent
minor
ibid
also
held
nothing
procedure
unfairly
subjects
defendant
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
second
trial
ibid
burdens
akin
resulting
judge
permissible
request
briefing
argument
following
bench
trial
expense
second
trial
extent
juvenile
judge
makes
supplemental
findings
either
sua
sponte
response
state
exceptions
response
juvenile
exceptions
either
record
record
supplemented
evidence
parties
raise
objection
without
violating
constraints
double
jeopardy
clause
swisher
characterized
proceedings
master
juvenile
judge
continuing
single
process
distinguished
situation
breed
jones
held
juvenile
placed
twice
jeopardy
adjudicatory
finding
juvenile
transferred
adult
criminal
tried
convicted
conduct
like
maryland
system
issue
swisher
subject
defendant
second
trial
maryland
system
course
concerns
master
whereas
concerns
federal
trial
difference
however
constitutional
consequence
federal
trial
power
impose
final
dangerous
special
offender
sentence
subject
appeal
section
indeed
limited
scope
maryland
procedure
swisher
federal
statute
specifies
appeals
may
increase
sentence
trial
abused
discretion
employed
unlawful
procedures
made
clearly
erroneous
findings
appellate
thus
empowered
correct
legal
error
maryland
procedure
involved
swisher
judge
need
find
legal
error
part
master
free
make
de
novo
determination
facts
relating
guilt
innocence
consistent
guarantee
double
jeopardy
held
limited
appellate
review
sentence
authorized
necessarily
constitutional
exaltation
form
substance
avoided
said
double
jeopardy
context
substance
action
controlling
label
given
action
see
martin
linen
supply
wilson
congress
achieved
purpose
slightly
different
statute
whose
constitutionality
unquestionable
congress
might
provided
defendant
found
dangerous
special
offender
receive
specified
mandatory
term
trial
recommend
lesser
sentence
appeals
free
accept
recommendation
reject
scheme
offer
conceivable
base
double
jeopardy
objection
yet
impact
defendant
exactly
possibly
worse
impact
written
double
jeopardy
policy
advanced
approving
one
procedures
declaring
unconstitutional
perhaps
worth
noting
passing
represents
considered
legislative
attempt
attack
specific
problem
criminal
justice
system
tendency
part
trial
judges
mete
light
sentences
cases
involving
organized
crime
management
personnel
challenge
crime
free
society
report
president
commission
law
enforcement
administration
justice
section
congress
response
plea
see
pp
statute
limited
scope
narrowly
focused
problem
identified
example
government
oppression
double
jeopardy
clause
stands
guard
see
scott
observed
elsewhere
sentencing
one
areas
criminal
justice
system
need
reform
see
frankel
criminal
sentences
law
without
order
churgin
curtis
toward
effective
sentencing
system
judge
frankel
observed
basic
problem
present
system
unbridled
power
sentencers
arbitrary
discriminatory
frankel
supra
appellate
review
creates
check
upon
unlimited
power
lead
greater
degree
consistency
sentencing
conclude
withstands
constitutional
challenge
raised
case
us
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
whenever
attorney
charged
prosecution
defendant
alleged
felony
committed
defendant
age
years
reason
believe
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
attorney
reasonable
time
trial
acceptance
plea
guilty
nolo
contendere
may
sign
file
may
amend
notice
specifying
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
upon
conviction
felony
subject
imposition
sentence
subsection
section
setting
particularity
reasons
attorney
believes
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
case
shall
fact
defendant
alleged
dangerous
special
offender
issue
upon
trial
felony
disclosed
jury
upon
plea
guilty
nolo
contendere
verdict
finding
guilty
defendant
felony
hearing
shall
held
sentence
imposed
sitting
without
jury
shall
fix
time
hearing
notice
thereof
shall
given
defendant
least
ten
days
prior
thereto
shall
permit
counsel
defendant
defendant
represented
counsel
inspect
presentence
report
sufficiently
prior
hearing
afford
reasonable
opportunity
verification
connection
hearing
defendant
shall
entitled
assistance
counsel
compulsory
process
witnesses
appear
hearing
duly
authenticated
copy
former
judgment
commitment
shall
prima
facie
evidence
former
judgment
commitment
appears
preponderance
information
including
information
submitted
trial
felony
sentencing
hearing
much
presentence
report
relies
upon
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
shall
sentence
defendant
imprisonment
appropriate
term
exceed
years
disproportionate
severity
maximum
term
otherwise
authorized
law
felony
otherwise
shall
sentence
defendant
accordance
law
prescribing
penalties
felony
shall
place
record
findings
including
identification
information
relied
upon
making
findings
reasons
sentence
imposed
defendant
special
offender
purposes
section
felony
defendant
committed
felony
furtherance
conspiracy
three
persons
engage
pattern
conduct
criminal
applicable
laws
jurisdiction
defendant
agreed
initiate
organize
plan
finance
direct
manage
supervise
part
conspiracy
conduct
give
receive
bribe
use
force
part
conduct
purposes
paragraphs
subsection
criminal
conduct
forms
pattern
embraces
criminal
acts
similar
purposes
results
participants
victims
methods
commission
otherwise
interrelated
distinguishing
characteristic
isolated
events
defendant
dangerous
purposes
section
period
confinement
longer
provided
felony
required
protection
public
criminal
conduct
defendant
section
reads
full
follows
respect
imposition
correction
reduction
sentence
proceedings
section
chapter
review
sentence
record
sentencing
may
taken
defendant
appeals
review
sentence
taken
shall
taken
least
five
days
expiration
time
taking
review
sentence
appeal
conviction
defendant
shall
diligently
prosecuted
sentencing
may
without
motion
notice
extend
time
taking
review
sentence
period
exceed
thirty
days
expiration
time
otherwise
prescribed
law
shall
extend
time
taking
review
sentence
time
expired
extending
time
taking
review
sentence
shall
extend
time
taking
review
sentence
appeal
conviction
defendant
period
taking
review
sentence
shall
deemed
taking
review
sentence
appeal
conviction
defendant
review
sentence
shall
include
review
whether
procedure
employed
lawful
findings
made
clearly
erroneous
sentencing
discretion
abused
appeals
review
sentence
may
considering
record
including
entire
presentence
report
information
submitted
trial
felony
sentencing
hearing
findings
reasons
sentencing
affirm
sentence
impose
direct
imposition
sentence
sentencing
originally
imposed
remand
sentencing
proceedings
imposition
sentence
except
sentence
may
made
severe
review
sentence
taken
hearing
failure
take
review
imposition
sentence
shall
upon
review
taken
correction
reduction
sentence
foreclose
imposition
sentence
severe
previously
imposed
withdrawal
dismissal
review
sentence
taken
shall
foreclose
imposition
sentence
severe
reviewed
shall
otherwise
foreclose
review
sentence
appeal
conviction
appeals
shall
state
writing
reasons
disposition
review
sentence
review
sentence
taken
may
dismissed
showing
abuse
right
take
review
shall
person
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
amdt
academic
professional
commentary
general
issue
divided
conclusions
prosecution
appeals
sentences
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
see
westen
three
faces
double
jeopardy
reflections
government
appeals
criminal
sentences
rev
stern
government
appeals
sentences
constitutional
response
arbitrary
unreasonable
sentences
crim
rev
dunsky
constitutionality
increasing
sentences
appellate
review
crim
criminology
conclusions
appeals
unconstitutional
see
spence
federal
criminal
code
reform
act
prosecutorial
appeal
sentences
justice
double
jeopardy
md
rev
freeman
earley
difrancesco
government
appeal
sentences
crim
rev
note
rev
report
government
appeal
sentences
bus
lawyer
least
one
time
ago
regarded
answer
constitutional
issue
simply
unclear
low
special
offender
sentencing
crim
reprint
statement
submitted
hearings
et
al
subcommittee
criminal
laws
procedures
senate
committee
judiciary
see
also
aba
standards
criminal
justice
appended
commentary
pp
ed
maximum
punishment
violation
fine
imprisonment
years
plus
specified
forfeitures
section
specifies
maximum
punishment
violation
damage
exceeds
fine
imprisonment
years
maximum
punishment
violation
fine
imprisonment
one
year
section
specifies
maximum
punishment
violation
offense
object
conspiracy
misdemeanor
fine
imprisonment
five
years
applicability
respondent
issue
upon
concurring
judge
rested
conclusion
us
majority
appeals
observed
passing
trial
properly
find
statute
applicable
event
issue
may
considered
reason
remand
summarized
findings
set
forth
conclusion
follows
sum
basis
facts
finds
defendant
age
years
crimes
stands
convicted
committed
defendant
stands
convicted
two
felonies
one
felony
committed
furtherance
conspiracy
felony
conspiracy
conspiracy
substantive
crime
involved
least
four
persons
defendant
conspiracy
substantive
crime
engage
pattern
conduct
criminal
laws
state
new
york
new
york
penal
code
article
defendant
initiate
organize
plan
direct
manage
supervise
least
part
conspiracy
substantive
criminal
acts
confinement
defendant
period
longer
provided
violation
required
protection
public
criminal
conduct
defendant
wherefore
finding
defendant
eugene
difrancesco
convicted
two
felony
charges
october
age
years
time
commission
felonies
dangerous
special
offender
within
meaning
sections
title
code
therefore
subject
sentencing
provisions
section
title
code
app
indicated
oral
argument
tr
oral
arg
one
briefs
brief
respondent
well
opinion
appeals
first
case
specifically
sought
review
sentence
inasmuch
statute
enacted
decade
ago
fact
might
said
indicate
either
little
use
special
offender
statute
prosecutorial
concern
constitutionality
federal
trial
judges
imposing
sufficiently
severe
sentences
special
offenders
make
review
unnecessary
definitive
explanation
however
offered
attempt
part
explain
nonuse
statute
speculation
shall
indulge
recital
described
favorite
saying
double
jeopardy
subject
comment
uncritical
professor
westen
provocative
thoughtful
article
three
faces
double
jeopardy
reflections
government
appeals
criminal
sentences
rev
professor
westen
describes
succinctly
way
prohibition
retrial
following
acquittal
based
jury
prerogative
acquit
evidence
course
surely
settled
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
application
fourteenth
amendment
benton
maryland
illinois
vitale
challenge
kepner
based
double
jeopardy
clause
statute
extending
double
jeopardy
protection
philippines
accepted
decision
correctly
stated
relevant
double
jeopardy
principles
see
wilson
principal
dissent
fails
recognize
import
pearce
according
dissent
analytic
similarity
verdict
acquittal
imposition
sentence
requires
conclusion
sentences
may
increased
imposition
without
violating
double
jeopardy
clause
post
thus
imposition
sentence
sentence
permissible
dissent
view
implicit
acquittal
greater
sentence
ibid
precisely
argument
unsuccessfully
advanced
justices
douglas
harlan
pearce
see
douglas
concurring
harlan
concurring
part
dissenting
part
majority
pearce
thus
rejected
notion
imposition
sentence
less
maximum
operates
implied
acquittal
greater
sentence
see
principal
dissent
attempt
distinguish
pearce
grounds
imposition
sentence
followed
retrial
rather
appeal
unconvincing
green
held
defendant
convicted
lesser
included
offense
murder
first
trial
convicted
greater
offense
murder
retrial
thus
conviction
lesser
included
offense
operated
implicit
acquittal
greater
since
defendant
sought
obtained
retrial
case
difference
result
reached
green
pearce
explained
grounds
imposition
sentence
operate
implied
acquittal
greater
sentence
justice
stevens
dissent
reliance
justice
harlan
separate
opinion
pearce
concurring
part
dissenting
part
effect
argues
nothing
pearce
wrongly
decided
inclined
overrule
pearce
somewhat
similar
dicta
present
murphy
massachusetts
plurality
opinion
reid
covert
latter
double
jeopardy
case
read
establishing
sentencing
procedure
indeed
original
bill
introduced
congress
specifically
stated
sentence
considered
final
disposition
review
expiration
time
appeal
measures
relating
organized
crime
hearings
et
al
subcommittee
criminal
laws
procedures
senate
committee
judiciary
congress
however
advised
language
needed
order
preserve
constitutionality
statute
omitted
see
cornell
rev
justice
brennan
justice
white
justice
marshall
justice
stevens
join
dissenting
title
authorizes
appeal
sentence
imposed
federal
district
judge
ground
sentence
lenient
permits
appellate
increase
severity
initial
sentence
holds
violates
neither
prohibition
multiple
punishments
prohibition
multiple
trials
embodied
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
fundamentally
misperceives
appropriate
degree
finality
accorded
imposition
sentence
trial
judge
reaches
erroneous
conclusion
enhancement
sentence
pursuant
unconstitutional
multiple
punishment
respectfully
dissent
acknowledges
must
double
jeopardy
clause
two
principal
purposes
protect
individual
subjected
hazards
trial
possible
conviction
alleged
offense
green
prevent
imposition
multiple
punishments
offense
north
carolina
pearce
overriding
function
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibition
multiple
trials
protect
multiple
punishments
punishment
legally
follow
second
conviction
real
danger
guarded
constitution
ex
parte
lange
wall
unconstitutional
punishment
need
derive
exclusively
second
prosecution
may
stem
imposition
one
sentence
following
single
prosecution
ex
parte
lange
supra
bradley
provide
examples
unconstitutional
multiple
punishments
flowing
single
trial
imprisonment
fine
offense
punishable
either
imprisonment
fine
neither
case
purports
exhaust
reach
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibition
multiple
punishments
indeed
consistently
assumed
increase
severity
sentence
subsequent
imposition
issue
presented
case
also
constitutes
multiple
punishment
violation
double
jeopardy
clause
example
benz
stated
distinction
term
may
amend
sentence
mitigate
punishment
increase
based
upon
ground
increase
penalty
subject
defendant
double
punishment
offense
similarly
reid
covert
stated
swaim
held
president
commanding
officer
power
return
case
increase
sentence
double
jeopardy
provisions
fifth
amendment
applicable
practice
unconstitutional
although
benz
reid
statements
may
dicta
nevertheless
appeals
correctly
stated
lthough
dicta
legally
binding
number
high
authority
sources
offer
impressive
evidence
strength
prevalence
view
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
increase
sentence
imposed
district
brother
rehnquist
recently
noted
double
jeopardy
clause
interpreted
ex
parte
lange
prevents
sentencing
increasing
defendant
sentence
particular
statutory
offense
even
though
second
sentence
within
limits
set
legislature
whalen
dissenting
opinion
ii
repeatedly
said
sentences
may
increased
imposition
without
violating
double
jeopardy
prohibition
multiple
punishments
analytic
similarity
verdict
acquittal
imposition
sentence
requires
conclusion
verdict
acquittal
represents
factfinder
conclusion
evidence
warrant
finding
guilty
martin
linen
supply
similarly
guilty
verdict
murder
charge
jury
permitted
find
defendant
guilty
murder
represents
factfinder
implicit
finding
facts
warrant
murder
conviction
thus
retrial
murder
constitutionally
impermissible
green
supra
see
price
georgia
sentencing
convicted
criminal
sufficiently
analogous
determination
guilt
innocence
double
jeopardy
clause
preclude
government
appeals
sentencing
decisions
much
prevents
appeals
judgments
acquittal
sentencing
proceeding
involves
examination
evaluation
facts
defendant
may
entail
taking
evidence
pronouncement
sentence
thus
imposition
sentence
sentence
permissible
sentencing
statute
constitutes
finding
facts
justify
sentence
higher
sentence
unwarranted
acquittals
sentences
trier
fact
makes
factual
adjudication
removes
defendant
burden
risk
charges
acquitted
potential
sentence
receive
unless
basis
according
greater
finality
acquittals
whether
explicit
implicit
sentences
result
untenable
proffers
several
reasons
acquittals
sentences
treated
differently
none
persuasive
first
suggests
historical
evidence
supports
distinction
finality
accorded
verdicts
sentences
ante
observation
writs
autre
fois
acquit
autre
fois
convict
protections
retrial
ante
true
fact
dispose
additional
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
prevent
multiple
punishments
sort
authorized
moreover
practice
increasing
sentence
long
took
place
term
ante
long
defendant
yet
begun
serve
sentence
ante
never
sanctioned
second
posits
government
right
appeal
final
sentence
imposed
trial
judge
different
critical
respect
ante
parole
probation
revocation
extraordinary
statement
overlooks
obvious
differences
proceedings
defendant
knows
sentencing
maximum
length
time
may
serve
maximum
shortened
parole
probation
hand
since
parole
probation
definition
conditional
defendant
notice
outset
breach
conditions
may
result
revocation
beneficial
treatment
worst
defendant
point
view
original
sentence
may
reinstated
furthermore
revocation
parole
probation
results
change
circumstance
subsequent
grant
parole
probation
government
appeal
sentence
predicated
defendant
activity
since
imposition
original
sentence
government
unlikely
present
evidence
activity
third
argues
congress
provided
dangerous
special
offenders
sentenced
specified
mandatory
term
reduced
appeal
appeals
ante
thus
concludes
striking
elevate
form
substance
since
congress
obtained
result
sought
slightly
different
statute
whose
constitutionality
unquestionable
ante
strange
conclusion
must
review
statutes
written
might
written
event
hypothetical
legislation
slightly
different
substantially
different
create
wholly
unprecedented
change
relationship
trial
appellate
courts
long
congress
retains
present
structure
sentences
trial
courts
final
judgments
form
well
substance
law
militate
government
appeals
situation
fourth
apparently
central
refusal
accord
finality
sentences
faulty
characterization
sentencing
phase
criminal
prosecution
although
acknowledges
double
jeopardy
guarantee
least
part
directed
protecting
individual
government
oppression
undue
embarrassment
expense
anxiety
insecurity
green
reaches
startling
conclusion
limited
appeal
ante
exposes
defendant
minimal
incremental
embarrassment
anxiety
determination
innocence
guilt
already
behind
ibid
believe
fundamentally
misunderstands
import
defendant
sentencing
proceeding
suggest
defendants
concerned
much
time
must
spend
prison
whether
record
shows
conviction
say
ordeal
trial
important
obviously
conviction
predicate
time
prison
clearly
defendant
breathe
sigh
relief
found
guilty
indeed
overwhelming
number
criminal
defendants
willing
enter
plea
bargains
order
keep
time
prison
brief
possible
surely
believe
sentencing
phase
merely
incidental
defendants
suffer
acute
anxiety
convicted
defendant
sentencing
phase
certainly
critical
phase
pretend
otherwise
reason
holding
valid
ignore
reality
contrary
view
rests
circular
notion
defendant
expectation
finality
sentence
government
appeal
pursuant
concluded
time
appeal
expired
ante
statute
increases
prolongs
defendant
anxiety
alleviates
conditioning
expectations
logically
extended
reasoning
lead
conclusion
double
jeopardy
clause
permits
government
appeals
verdicts
acquittal
purpose
insulating
verdict
acquittal
proceedings
least
part
concern
defendants
subjected
government
oppression
congress
dispose
objection
statute
authorizing
government
appeal
verdicts
acquittal
view
statute
charge
defendant
knowledge
provisions
thus
eradicate
expectation
finality
acquittal
finally
attempts
differentiate
finality
acquittals
finality
sentences
reliance
north
carolina
pearce
swisher
brady
neither
decision
supports
result
pearce
allowed
imposition
longer
sentence
upon
retrial
following
appellate
reversal
defendant
conviction
holding
rested
ultimately
upon
premise
original
conviction
defendant
behest
wholly
nullified
slate
wiped
clean
pearce
allowed
imposition
longer
sentence
sentencing
followed
retrial
rather
appeal
fact
retrial
gives
trial
power
impose
new
sentence
statutory
maximum
pearce
observed
difference
increases
existing
sentences
imposition
wholly
new
sentences
wholly
new
trials
since
government
argue
entitled
new
trial
pearce
provides
support
enhancement
already
existing
sentence
appeal
reliance
swisher
brady
supra
similarly
misplaced
upheld
maryland
rule
allowing
juvenile
judges
set
aside
proposed
findings
recommendations
masters
hold
de
novo
proceedings
ultimately
lead
harsher
result
juveniles
swisher
critically
different
case
master
maryland
law
authority
adjudicate
facts
impose
sentence
merely
transmit
results
investigation
trial
judge
latter
review
contrast
federal
district
judge
full
power
conduct
trial
conclusion
guilt
innocence
impose
final
sentence
upon
defendant
convicted
merely
provides
government
appellate
rights
convert
judge
imposition
sentence
mere
recommendation
iii
demonstrated
basis
differentiating
finality
acquittals
finality
sentences
submit
punishment
enhanced
appellate
unconstitutional
multiple
punishment
conclude
otherwise
create
exception
basic
double
jeopardy
protection
carried
logical
conclusion
might
prevent
congress
double
jeopardy
grounds
authorizing
government
appeal
verdicts
acquittal
result
plainly
impermissible
double
jeopardy
clause
therefore
dissent
section
pertinent
part
review
sentence
record
sentencing
may
taken
defendant
appeals
review
sentence
shall
include
review
whether
procedure
employed
lawful
findings
made
clearly
erroneous
sentencing
discretion
abused
appeals
review
sentence
may
considering
record
including
entire
presentence
report
information
submitted
trial
felony
sentencing
hearing
findings
reasons
sentencing
affirm
sentence
impose
direct
imposition
sentence
sentencing
originally
imposed
remand
sentencing
proceedings
imposition
sentence
except
sentence
may
made
severe
review
sentence
taken
hearing
may
appeal
decisions
criminal
case
authorized
statute
scott
sanges
shall
person
subject
offense
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
amdt
view
double
jeopardy
protection
multiple
punishments
sentence
may
increased
technically
correct
sentence
imposed
distinguish
correction
technically
improper
sentence
always
allowed
see
bozza
dismisses
significance
benz
cited
ex
parte
lange
wall
present
precise
issue
according
benz
gratuitously
ante
opined
true
lange
raised
issue
somewhat
different
benz
lange
decide
question
unconstitutional
multiple
punishment
benz
citation
lange
entirely
appropriate
finality
accorded
sentences
recognized
contexts
berman
sentence
appealable
defendant
notwithstanding
suspension
execution
final
judgment
criminal
case
means
sentence
sentence
judgment
see
corey
suggests
law
attaches
particular
significance
acquittal
ante
quoting
scott
necessarily
afford
absolute
finality
jury
verdict
acquittal
matter
erroneous
decision
ante
quoting
burks
emphasis
original
see
fong
foo
directed
verdict
acquittal
trial
judge
middle
jury
trial
entitled
finality
unreviewable
appeal
even
though
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
explains
part
result
reached
wilson
allowed
appellate
reinstate
guilty
verdict
nullified
trial
judge
dismissal
indictment
wilson
involved
correction
error
law
reinstatement
already
existing
fact
adjudication
however
fact
adjudication
appeals
reinstate
purpose
appeal
increase
defendant
sentence
appellate
make
fact
determination
judgment
defendant
proper
sentence
another
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
prevent
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
defendant
may
found
guilty
green
similar
analysis
applies
respect
sentencing
repeated
attempts
sentencing
likely
produce
unjustifiably
harsh
sentence
repeated
trials
likely
result
unwarranted
guilty
verdict
instances
government
seeks
second
opportunity
present
evidence
presented
first
instance
burks
supra
see
appeals
may
remand
sentencing
proceedings
imposition
sentence
months
ending
june
convictions
district
courts
guilty
plea
plea
nolo
contendere
annual
report
director
administrative
office
courts
view
might
double
jeopardy
bar
government
appeal
sentence
meted
pursuant
guilty
plea
defendants
might
bargain
prosecutors
latter
appellate
rights
possibility
irrelevant
determining
double
jeopardy
consequences
appeal
sentence
imposed
pursuant
plea
bargain
course
acknowledges
verdicts
acquittal
appealable
finality
also
accorded
acquittals
protect
retrials
leading
erroneous
guilty
verdicts
see
supra
reason
allowing
retrials
following
reversal
convictions
rests
legitimate
concern
sound
administration
justice
corresponding
right
accused
given
fair
trial
societal
interest
punishing
one
whose
guilt
clear
obtained
trial
high
price
indeed
society
pay
every
accused
granted
immunity
punishment
defect
sufficient
constitute
reversible
error
proceedings
leading
conviction
tateo
appeals
sentences
government
pursuant
implicate
considerations
identified
tateo
section
authorizes
appeals
sentences
government
view
simply
low
indeed
noted
respondent
sentenced
years
imprisonment
already
begun
serving
sentence
possibility
therefore
respondent
granted
immunity
punishment
moreover
swisher
evidence
introduced
proceeding
master
terminated
unless
juvenile
consented
introduction
additional
evidence
contrast
contemplates
additional
evidentiary
proceedings
connection
appellate
review
sentences
see
nn
supra
similarly
subsequent
fact
adjudication
appeals
district
remand
evidentiary
hearing
pursuant
akin
unconstitutional
second
trial
following
verdict
acquittal
view
double
jeopardy
bar
imposition
additional
punishment
appellate
defendant
completed
service
sentence
imposed
trial
although
outcome
contemplated
presently
drafted
presumably
violate
due
process
event
justice
stevens
dissenting
join
justice
brennan
dissent
also
note
neither
today
opinion
north
carolina
pearce
adequately
responded
justice
harlan
powerful
analysis
double
jeopardy
issue
case
concurring
part
dissenting
part
purported
response
pearce
although
rationale
allowing
severe
punishment
retrial
variously
verbalized
rests
ultimately
upon
premise
original
conviction
defendant
behest
wholly
nullified
clearly
application
question
whether
severe
sentence
may
imposed
prosecutor
behest
original
conviction
nullified
straightforward
analysis
justice
harlan
worthy
emphasis
every
consideration
enunciated
support
decision
green
applies
equal
force
situation
bar
instance
defendant
subjected
risk
receiving
maximum
punishment
determined
legal
process
receive
specified
punishment
less
maximum
see
concept
fiction
implicit
acquittal
greater
offense
applies
equally
greater
sentence
case
determined
former
trial
defendant
offense
certain
limited
degree
badness
gravity
therefore
merited
certain
limited
punishment
matter
policy
practicality
imposition
increased
sentence
retrial
consequences
whether
effected
guise
increase
degree
offense
augmentation
punishment
factors
render
one
route
forbidden
permissible
double
jeopardy
clause
provision
comprehend
sentences
distinguished
offenses
long
established
prisoner
commences
service
sentence
clause
prevents
vacating
sentence
imposing
greater
one
see
benz
ex
parte
lange
wall
agree
justice
brennan
written
today
well
justice
harlan
wrote
respectfully
dissent