white
weiser
argued
february
decided
june
texas
enacted
senate
bill
one
providing
congressional
redistricting
state
divided
districts
average
deviation
ideal
district
maximum
deviation
ideal
appellees
alleged
reapportionment
violated
constitutional
rights
art
submitted
plan
although
cutting
across
county
lines
generally
followed
district
lines
plan
total
maximum
deviation
shortly
hearing
appellees
submitted
alternatively
plan
scheme
total
maximum
deviation
substantially
disregarded
configuration
districts
using
population
consideration
district
found
unconstitutional
ordered
adoption
plan
compact
contiguous
plans
held
although
percentage
deviations
smaller
invalidated
kirkpatrick
preisler
wells
rockefeller
unavoidable
districts
mathematically
equal
reasonably
possible
argument
variances
justified
necessarily
result
state
attempt
avoid
fragmenting
political
subdivisions
drawing
district
lines
along
existing
political
subdivision
lines
legally
acceptable
kirkpatrick
supra
pp
though
drawing
district
boundaries
way
minimizes
number
contests
present
incumbents
establish
invidiousness
burns
richardson
necessary
decide
whether
state
interest
justify
deviations
since
plan
serves
purpose
well
less
population
variance
pp
population
variances
invidiously
devalue
individual
vote
point
level
size
especially
noticeable
congressional
districts
substantial
populations
pp
plan
greater
extent
plan
eliminating
population
variances
adhered
districting
preferences
state
legislature
primary
jurisdiction
legislative
reapportionment
pp
white
delivered
opinion
part
members
joined
part
ii
burger
douglas
brennan
stewart
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
burger
rehnquist
joined
post
marshall
filed
opinion
concurring
part
part
ii
opinion
post
charles
black
argued
cause
appellant
briefs
crawford
martin
former
attorney
general
texas
john
hill
attorney
general
john
barron
first
assistant
attorney
general
samuel
mcdaniel
lawrence
fischman
argued
cause
appellees
brief
david
rosenberg
douglas
mcguire
filed
brief
appellees
van
henry
archer
et
al
justice
white
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
congressional
reapportionment
state
texas
june
governor
state
texas
signed
law
senate
bill
one
tex
acts
called
providing
congressional
redistricting
state
divided
state
congressional
districts
ensuing
decennium
based
upon
census
figures
absolute
population
equality
among
districts
mean
population
district
districts
created
varied
high
district
low
district
district
exceeded
ideal
district
district
smaller
population
difference
two
districts
persons
total
percentage
deviation
ratio
district
average
deviation
districts
ideal
district
persons
october
appellees
residents
congressional
districts
filed
suit
district
northern
district
texas
appellant
secretary
state
texas
chief
election
officer
state
appellees
alleged
reapportionment
texas
congressional
seats
embodied
violated
rights
art
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
requested
injunction
use
order
requiring
new
apportionment
use
plan
submitted
complaint
elections
plan
appended
appellees
original
complaint
came
called
plan
generally
followed
redistricting
pattern
however
district
lines
adjusted
necessary
achieve
smaller
population
variances
among
districts
plan
created
districts
varying
total
absolute
deviation
largest
smallest
district
persons
district
exceeded
ideal
district
four
ideal
total
percentage
deviation
although
plan
followed
district
lines
possible
order
achieve
maximum
population
equality
plan
cut
across
county
lines
convened
january
several
days
prior
scheduled
hearing
case
appellees
filed
amended
complaint
suggesting
alternative
plan
came
called
plan
plan
unlike
plan
substantially
disregarded
configuration
districts
instead
authors
plan
frankly
admitted
district
found
plan
represented
attempt
attain
lower
deviations
without
regard
consideration
population
districts
plan
varied
population
high
low
difference
persons
largest
district
overpopulated
smallest
underpopulated
total
percentage
deviation
plan
districts
greater
deviations
plan
eight
districts
deviations
equal
found
plan
two
districts
deviations
smaller
plan
january
district
heard
argument
received
evidence
various
depositions
next
day
announced
decision
relying
upon
decision
kirkpatrick
preisler
district
declared
unconstitutional
enjoined
appellant
conducting
permitting
primary
general
elections
based
upon
districts
established
district
ordered
adoption
plan
plan
congressional
districts
state
texas
noting
order
entered
without
prejudice
legislative
executive
branches
state
texas
proceed
consideration
adoption
constitutionally
permissible
plan
congressional
redistricting
called
regular
session
legislature
district
retained
jurisdiction
purposes
considering
plan
might
adopted
legislature
state
texas
congressional
reapportionment
enacted
based
twentieth
decennial
census
conducted
application
appellant
granted
stay
order
district
congressional
elections
therefore
conducted
plan
embodied
noted
probable
jurisdiction
appeal
command
art
representatives
chosen
people
several
elucidated
wesberry
sanders
kirkpatrick
preisler
permit
population
variances
among
congressional
districts
unavoidable
despite
effort
achieve
absolute
equality
justification
shown
see
also
wells
rockefeller
kirkpatrick
wells
invalidated
state
reapportionment
statutes
providing
federal
congressional
districts
total
percentage
deviations
respectively
cases
concluded
deviations
demonstrate
effort
achieve
absolute
equality
sufficiently
justified
percentage
deviations
us
smaller
invalidated
kirkpatrick
wells
agree
district
standards
cases
unavoidable
districts
mathematically
equal
reasonably
possible
plans
demonstrate
much
state
really
dispute
also
kirkpatrick
wells
find
legally
acceptable
argument
variances
justified
necessarily
result
state
attempt
avoid
fragmenting
political
subdivisions
drawing
congressional
district
lines
along
existing
county
municipal
political
subdivision
boundaries
kirkpatrick
preisler
supra
state
asserts
variances
present
nevertheless
represent
efforts
state
promote
relations
policy
frankly
aimed
maintaining
existing
relationships
incumbent
congressmen
constituents
preserving
seniority
members
state
delegation
achieved
house
representatives
disparage
interest
context
state
reapportionment
said
fact
district
boundaries
may
drawn
way
minimizes
number
contests
present
incumbents
establish
invidiousness
burns
richardson
cf
gaffney
cummings
ante
need
decide
whether
state
interest
sufficient
justify
deviations
issue
plan
admittedly
serves
purpose
well
adhering
closely
population
equality
population
variations
therefore
necessary
achieve
asserted
state
goal
district
correct
rejecting
appellant
also
straightforwardly
argues
kirkpatrick
wells
modified
require
small
population
variances
among
congressional
districts
involved
case
justified
state
urged
absent
proof
invidiousness
population
variances
among
districts
violate
art
clear
however
point
level
size
population
variances
import
invidious
devaluation
individual
vote
represent
failure
accord
fair
effective
representation
appellant
concedes
locate
line
differently
kirkpatrick
wells
keeping
mind
congressional
districts
intertwined
freighted
strictly
local
interests
state
legislative
districts
compared
latter
relatively
enormous
percentage
point
variation
representing
almost
people
inclined
disturb
kirkpatrick
wells
particularly
light
mahan
howell
decided
earlier
term
reiterated
wesberry
kirkpatrick
wells
line
cases
continue
govern
congressional
reapportionments
although
holding
rigor
rule
cases
inappropriate
state
reapportionments
challenged
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
ii
district
properly
rejected
plan
plan
remains
question
whether
correctly
chose
implement
latter
plan
adhered
basic
district
configurations
found
adjusted
district
lines
necessary
order
achieve
maximum
population
equality
among
districts
district
plan
contained
generally
counties
equivalent
district
plan
hand
based
entirely
upon
population
considerations
made
attempt
adhere
district
configurations
found
plans
submitted
district
appellees
deciding
unacceptable
district
ordered
implementation
plan
announcing
decision
said
plan
based
solely
population
significantly
compact
contiguous
either
plan
considered
plans
concludes
plan
best
effectuates
principle
one
man
one
vote
enunciated
beginning
recognized
reapportionment
primarily
matter
legislative
consideration
determination
judicial
relief
becomes
appropriate
legislature
fails
reapportion
according
federal
constitutional
requisites
timely
fashion
adequate
opportunity
reynolds
sims
see
also
opinion
stewart
adhered
view
state
legislatures
primary
jurisdiction
legislative
reapportionment
see
maryland
committee
fair
representation
tawes
davis
mann
roman
sincock
burns
richardson
ely
klahr
whitcomb
chavis
minnesota
state
senate
beens
mahan
howell
federal
district
context
legislative
reapportionment
follow
policies
preferences
state
expressed
statutory
constitutional
provisions
reapportionment
plans
proposed
state
legislature
whenever
adherence
state
policy
detract
requirements
federal
constitution
hold
district
similarly
honor
state
policies
context
congressional
reapportionment
fashioning
reapportionment
plan
choosing
among
plans
district
legislative
task
intrude
upon
state
policy
necessary
whitcomb
chavis
supra
clear
plan
greater
extent
plan
adhered
desires
state
legislature
attempting
achieve
population
equality
among
districts
duly
enacted
statute
state
texas
established
state
congressional
districts
locations
configurations
found
appropriate
duly
elected
members
two
houses
texas
legislature
often
noted
reapportionment
complicated
process
districting
inevitably
sharp
political
impact
inevitably
political
decisions
must
made
charged
task
see
gaffney
cummings
ante
decisions
made
legislature
pursuit
deemed
important
state
interests
decisions
unnecessarily
put
aside
course
fashioning
relief
appropriate
remedy
held
impermissible
population
variations
congressional
districts
plan
parties
concede
represented
attempt
adhere
districting
preferences
state
legislature
eliminating
population
variances
indeed
plan
achieved
goal
population
equality
greater
extent
plan
despite
existence
plan
district
ordered
implementation
plan
conceded
parties
ignored
legislative
districting
policy
constructed
districts
solely
basis
population
considerations
district
erred
choice
given
alternatives
imposed
plan
different
political
impact
state
implemented
plan
clearly
approximated
reapportionment
plan
state
legislature
satisfying
constitutional
requirements
said
plan
significantly
compact
contiguous
plan
plan
plan
feature
contiguous
districts
even
districts
plan
called
compact
district
preferences
override
whatever
state
goals
embodied
derivatively
plan
remedial
powers
equity
must
adequate
task
unlimited
district
erred
broadly
brushing
aside
state
apportionment
policy
without
solid
constitutional
equitable
grounds
whitcomb
chavis
supra
good
reason
adopting
plan
rather
plan
district
failed
state
course
district
defer
state
policy
fashioning
relief
policy
consistent
constitutional
norms
vulnerable
legal
challenge
district
name
state
policy
refrain
providing
remedies
fully
adequate
redress
constitutional
violations
adjudicated
must
rectified
district
suggest
hold
legislative
policy
districting
preserve
constituencies
congressional
incumbents
unconstitutional
even
undesirable
repeat
said
context
state
legislative
reapportionment
fact
district
boundaries
may
drawn
way
minimizes
number
contests
present
incumbents
establish
invidiousness
burns
richardson
cf
gaffney
cummings
ante
taylor
mckeithen
note
appellees
submitted
plan
district
defended
basis
adhered
state
goals
embodied
eliminating
impermissible
deviations
judgment
district
invalidating
affirmed
adoption
plan
however
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
redistricting
texas
congressional
districts
follows
absolute
variance
variance
district
population
ideal
ideal
subsequent
pretrial
conference
fourteenth
amendment
claims
eliminated
plan
resulted
following
districting
absolute
variance
district
population
ideal
plan
resulted
following
districts
absolute
variance
district
population
ideal
district
entire
discussion
reasons
selecting
plan
follows
defendant
submitted
plan
reapportionment
alternative
plaintiffs
proposed
two
plans
plan
based
significantly
lower
deviation
plan
based
solely
population
significantly
compact
contiguous
either
plan
considered
plans
well
plan
submitted
intervening
plaintiffs
concludes
plan
best
effectuates
principle
one
man
one
vote
enunciated
district
order
also
granted
leave
intervene
van
henry
archer
chairman
bexar
county
republican
party
others
intervenors
appellees
filed
suggested
reapportionment
plan
rejected
district
pressed
district
also
retained
jurisdiction
purpose
extending
impending
february
filing
date
congressional
candidates
event
made
known
district
called
session
legislature
include
congressional
reapportionment
however
governor
refused
call
special
session
legislature
kirkpatrick
preisler
reject
ed
missouri
argument
fixed
numerical
percentage
population
variance
small
enough
considered
de
minimis
satisfy
without
question
nearly
practicable
standard
concluded
unless
population
variances
among
congressional
districts
shown
resulted
despite
effort
state
must
justify
variance
matter
small
prior
passage
texas
house
twice
passed
congressional
reapportionment
bill
lower
deviations
bill
total
deviation
although
bills
ultimately
defeated
senate
passage
house
indeed
existence
indicates
possible
practicable
construct
redistricting
scheme
lower
population
deviations
among
districts
embodied
appellant
earnestly
submits
term
relations
accurate
term
indeed
hard
see
concerned
representation
stigmatize
mere
euphemism
term
brings
parties
representational
relationship
assumptions
seem
congressman
may
like
job
constituency
like
congressman
care
whether
continues
represent
congressman
possibly
learn
know
constituency
well
enough
serve
better
serve
another
constituency
selected
may
young
mathematician
dallas
either
name
appellant
defend
motive
entirely
proper
burden
defense
fell
upon
facts
herein
brief
appellant
appears
two
plans
passed
house
defeated
senate
may
also
fostered
goal
achieving
lower
population
variances
appellant
contends
authors
legislature
passing
plan
took
account
projected
population
shifts
among
districts
remembering
congressional
districting
plan
effect
least
years
five
congressional
elections
appellant
argues
legislature
might
properly
consider
population
changes
devising
redistricting
plan
kirkpatrick
preisler
recognized
shifts
predicted
high
degree
accuracy
redistricting
may
properly
consider
however
careful
note
mean
open
avenue
subterfuge
findings
population
trends
must
thoroughly
documented
applied
throughout
state
systematic
ad
hoc
manner
ibid
present
case
conclude
texas
attempt
justify
deviations
found
falls
far
short
standard
record
barren
exception
scattered
vague
assertions
deposition
testimony
adequate
documentation
projected
population
shifts
firm
evidence
alleged
shifts
fact
relied
upon
also
suggestion
passage
preceded
dispute
fill
second
district
congressional
seat
state
urge
alleged
goal
justification
deviations
tell
record
whether
fact
resolved
dispute
plan
submitted
possibly
plans
plan
plan
appear
seriously
urged
parties
considered
plans
defended
plan
presented
appellees
merely
took
plan
legislature
adjusted
plan
achieve
greater
equality
present
graphic
manner
legislature
done
disposed
make
attempt
population
equality
brief
appellees
appellees
amended
complaint
explained
plan
follows
legislature
desired
enact
statute
consonant
mandate
article
constitution
plan
made
district
compact
contiguous
nearly
equal
population
district
practicable
taking
account
solely
population
taking
account
social
cultural
economic
factors
including
preservation
incumbent
congressman
enacted
plan
substantially
similar
plan
set
forth
exhibit
annexed
hereto
herewith
incorporated
reference
though
set
forth
length
herein
plan
hereinafter
referred
plan
conceded
also
sought
adherence
county
lines
plan
admittedly
cuts
county
lines
plan
also
achieves
lower
deviations
plan
plan
required
fracture
political
boundaries
order
achieve
population
equality
among
districts
appellant
contend
plan
unacceptable
cutting
county
lines
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
rehnquist
join
concurring
member
kirkpatrick
preisler
wells
rockefeller
decided
thought
constitution
vital
living
charter
nearly
two
centuries
wise
flexibility
key
provisions
read
require
rule
mathematical
exactitude
legislative
reapportionment
moreover
dissenting
opinions
justices
harlan
white
concurring
opinion
justice
fortas
cases
demonstrated
well
exactitude
required
majority
displayed
serious
misunderstanding
practicalities
legislative
reapportioning
processes
nothing
occurred
since
kirkpatrick
wells
reflect
adversely
soundness
view
dissenting
perceptions
indeed
recent
opinions
mahan
howell
gaffney
cummings
ante
white
regester
ante
strengthen
case
attempting
hold
reapportionment
scheme
state
congressional
precision
recent
cases
allowed
modest
variations
theoretical
exactitude
recognition
impracticality
applying
kirkpatrick
rule
well
deference
legitimate
state
interests
however
may
kirkpatrick
virtually
indistinguishable
case
unless
decides
reconsider
decision
follow
accordingly
join
opinion
justice
stewart
joined
justice
harlan
opinion
justice
marshall
concurring
part
join
part
opinion
agree
part
ii
wherein
reverses
district
selection
plan
plan
insofar
determination
rests
upon
fact
plan
comes
closer
plan
achieving
goal
precise
mathematical
equality
see
kirkpatrick
preisler
see
also
wells
rockefeller
whatever
merits
view
legislature
reapportionment
plan
struck
merely
district
boundaries
may
drawn
way
minimizes
number
contests
present
incumbents
burns
richardson
entirely
another
matter
suggest
federal
district
determined
particular
reapportionment
plan
fails
comport
constitutional
requirement
one
man
one
vote
must
drafting
adopting
remedial
plan
give
consideration
apparent
desires
controlling
state
political
powers
opinion
judicial
remedial
process
reapportionment
area
area
fastidiously
neutral
objective
one
free
political
considerations
guided
controlling
constitutional
principle
strict
accuracy
representative
apportionment
district
gave
ample
recognition
legislature
primary
responsibility
area
apportionment
added
redistricting
order
without
prejudice
legislative
executive
branches
state
texas
proceed
consideration
adoption
constitutionally
permissible
plan
congressional
redistricting
called
regular
session
legislature
state
texas
nevertheless
district
failed
adhere
strictly
principle
mathematical
precision
selecting
plan
plan
choice
plan
must
reversed
see
maryland
committee
fair
representation
tawes
ely
klahr
burns
richardson