browder
director
dept
corrections
argued
october
decided
january
unsuccessful
efforts
overturn
conviction
direct
appeal
state
collateral
attack
petitioner
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
october
ordered
release
respondent
corrections
director
custody
unless
state
retried
within
days
held
evidentiary
hearing
based
order
habeas
corpus
petition
respondent
motion
dismiss
record
days
entry
order
respondent
moved
stay
conditional
release
order
evidentiary
hearing
district
granted
motion
hearing
ruled
january
writ
habeas
corpus
properly
issued
respondent
immediately
filed
notice
appeal
seeking
review
october
january
orders
appeals
reversed
federal
rule
app
proc
require
notice
appeal
civil
case
filed
within
days
entry
judgment
order
appeal
taken
rule
running
time
filing
appeal
may
tolled
timely
motion
filed
district
pursuant
fed
rule
civ
proc
held
appeals
lacked
jurisdiction
review
original
october
order
respondent
motion
stay
evidentiary
hearing
essence
motion
rehearing
reconsideration
untimely
rule
hence
toll
running
mandatory
jurisdictional
time
limit
rule
pp
october
order
final
purposes
provides
appeal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
final
order
district
discharged
duty
summarily
hear
determine
facts
granting
habeas
corpus
petition
record
absence
evidentiary
hearing
whether
error
render
release
order
nonfinal
pp
habeas
corpus
civil
proceeding
rules
applicable
procedures
set
forth
habeas
corpus
statutes
apply
pendency
proceeding
fed
rule
civ
proc
recognizes
supremacy
procedures
federal
rules
habeas
corpus
statutes
say
nothing
proper
method
obtaining
correction
asserted
errors
judgment
whether
appeal
district
accordingly
timeliness
respondent
motion
governed
rule
pp
powell
delivered
opinion
unanimous
blackmun
filed
concurring
opinion
rehnquist
joined
post
kenneth
flaxman
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
john
kalnins
thomas
meites
frederick
weisberg
raymond
mckoski
assistant
attorney
general
illinois
argued
cause
respondent
brief
william
scott
attorney
general
donald
mackay
melbourne
noel
assistant
attorneys
general
howard
eglit
filed
brief
chicago
council
lawyers
amicus
curiae
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
case
requires
us
decide
whether
appeals
lacked
jurisdiction
review
order
directing
petitioner
discharge
respondent
custody
respondent
appeal
untimely
order
resolve
question
must
consider
applicability
federal
rules
civil
procedure
habeas
corpus
proceedings
conclude
appeals
lacked
jurisdiction
reverse
january
teenage
girl
reported
chicago
police
raped
gave
physical
description
assailants
one
officer
told
another
officer
one
attackers
named
browder
years
old
lived
block
west
monroe
basis
information
investigation
police
focused
petitioner
brother
tyrone
browder
whose
name
files
youth
division
chicago
police
department
telephone
conversation
youth
division
officer
lucille
browder
shifted
officers
suspicions
tyrone
petitioner
browder
agreed
keep
sons
home
police
arrived
talk
four
officers
interviewed
petitioner
brother
denied
knowledge
rape
officers
arrested
brothers
along
two
teenage
negro
males
present
browder
home
four
arrestees
taken
police
station
another
officer
noticed
petitioner
fit
description
assailant
rape
taken
place
january
separate
lineups
complainant
identified
petitioner
assailant
informed
rights
required
miranda
arizona
petitioner
confessed
second
rape
denied
committed
rape
january
trial
january
rape
petitioner
moved
unsuccessfully
suppress
lineup
identification
confession
grounds
unrelated
lawfulness
arrest
petitioner
challenge
direct
appeal
however
petitioner
argued
identification
confession
fruits
unlawful
arrest
effected
without
probable
cause
without
warrant
illinois
intermediate
appellate
invoked
rule
held
petitioner
waived
claim
petitioner
efforts
obtain
review
claim
direct
appeal
illinois
state
collateral
attack
fared
better
petitioner
met
success
last
petitioned
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
october
district
issued
opinion
order
directing
petitioner
released
custody
unless
state
retried
within
days
hold
evidentiary
hearing
found
basis
petition
respondent
motion
dismiss
record
police
lacked
probable
cause
arrest
petitioner
evening
january
unable
conclude
taint
unlawful
arrest
dissipated
identification
confession
obtained
held
inadmissible
november
days
entry
district
order
respondent
filed
district
motion
stay
execution
writ
habeas
corpus
conduct
evidentiary
hearing
respondent
submitted
record
inadequate
district
erred
granting
writ
without
first
conducting
evidentiary
hearing
determine
fact
petitioner
arrested
without
probable
cause
whether
confession
thereby
tainted
app
respondent
cited
townsend
sain
ex
rel
mcnair
new
jersey
authority
asserted
right
evidentiary
hearing
identify
source
authority
consider
motion
district
nevertheless
entertained
motion
granted
stay
execution
december
december
set
date
evidentiary
hearing
issue
probable
cause
noted
inadequacy
record
raised
respondent
motion
dismiss
concluded
request
evidentiary
hearing
denied
solely
untimely
app
petitioner
moved
immediately
vacate
orders
granting
stay
evidentiary
hearing
ground
lacked
jurisdiction
enter
petitioner
explained
period
time
prescribed
federal
rules
civil
procedure
motion
new
trial
alter
amend
judgment
elapsed
district
longer
ha
jurisdiction
alter
amend
final
order
october
orders
whose
vacatur
sought
void
orders
evidentiary
hearing
held
nevertheless
january
january
district
ruled
writ
habeas
corpus
properly
issued
october
motion
reconsider
therefore
denied
respondent
immediately
filed
notice
appeal
seeking
review
order
october
well
order
january
petitioner
maintained
consistently
appeals
lacked
jurisdiction
review
original
order
granting
relief
since
respondent
notice
appeal
filed
within
days
order
time
appeal
tolled
respondent
untimely
motion
see
supra
even
order
january
construed
denial
relief
judgment
fed
rule
civ
proc
appeal
timely
petitioner
argued
appeals
jurisdiction
review
order
abuse
discretion
respondent
disclaimed
reliance
rule
insisting
instead
order
october
final
order
timely
appeal
taken
final
order
january
appeals
address
question
appellate
jurisdiction
except
observe
cryptic
consider
whether
untimely
appeal
issue
whether
petitioner
confession
admissible
brown
illinois
reversed
district
without
published
opinion
holding
police
probable
cause
arrest
petitioner
judgt
order
reported
rehearing
denied
granted
certiorari
ii
fed
rule
app
proc
notice
appeal
civil
case
must
filed
within
days
entry
judgment
order
appeal
taken
time
limit
mandatory
jurisdictional
robinson
see
also
fallen
coppedge
schaefer
brewing
matton
steamboat
murphy
george
victor
talking
mach
purpose
rule
clear
set
definite
point
time
litigation
shall
end
unless
within
time
prescribed
application
made
advise
prospective
appellees
freed
appellant
demands
construction
statute
defeat
purpose
matton
steamboat
supra
running
time
filing
notice
appeal
may
tolled
according
terms
rule
timely
motion
filed
district
pursuant
rule
rule
respondent
motion
stay
evidentiary
hearing
filed
days
district
order
directing
petitioner
discharged
untimely
civil
rules
see
supra
therefore
toll
running
time
appeal
rule
appeals
therefore
lacked
jurisdiction
review
order
october
respondent
answers
rules
apply
order
october
final
event
federal
rules
civil
procedure
apply
habeas
corpus
proceeding
consider
contentions
appeal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
lies
final
order
district
order
october
purported
final
granted
petitioner
application
writ
habeas
corpus
directed
petitioner
discharged
state
retry
within
days
respondent
contends
however
order
final
order
leaving
nothing
done
enforce
execution
determined
catlin
required
procedures
habeas
corpus
act
completed
time
order
issued
brief
respondent
respondent
cites
decision
townsend
sain
support
contention
october
order
considered
final
order
left
unresolved
statutorily
prescribed
question
whether
evidentiary
hearing
required
brief
respondent
respondent
position
confuses
error
nonfinality
fails
distinguish
requirements
habeas
corpus
statutes
procedural
means
correcting
asserted
error
fulfilling
statutory
command
district
discharged
duty
summarily
hear
determine
facts
granting
petition
record
see
walker
johnston
respondent
failure
assert
need
evidentiary
hearing
motion
dismiss
necessarily
deprive
right
assert
absence
hearing
reason
reconsideration
error
appeal
neither
absence
evidentiary
hearing
render
district
order
nonfinal
respondent
correct
theory
finality
order
later
alleged
entered
precipitately
incomplete
hearing
considered
nonfinal
purposes
appeal
confusion
result
litigants
divergent
views
completeness
proceedings
wholly
odds
imperative
jurisdictional
requirements
explicit
unambiguous
since
order
october
final
order
time
appeal
commenced
run
date
respondent
notice
appeal
therefore
untimely
days
unless
respondent
motion
november
tolled
time
appeal
rule
rationale
behind
tolling
principle
rule
traditional
practice
timely
petition
rehearing
tolls
running
appeal
period
operates
suspend
finality
judgment
pending
determination
whether
judgment
modified
alter
adjudication
rights
parties
department
banking
pink
emphasis
supplied
untimely
request
rehearing
effect
respondent
seeks
avoid
conclusion
motion
untimely
civil
rules
therefore
toll
time
appeal
appellate
rule
asserting
motion
based
rule
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
applicable
habeas
proceeding
respondent
failure
rely
particular
rule
making
motion
suffice
make
federal
rules
inapplicable
respondent
insistence
motion
based
federal
rules
rather
habeas
corpus
statutes
townsend
sain
supra
parallels
theory
nonfinality
october
order
reflects
failure
recognize
habeas
corpus
statutes
prescribe
postjudgment
procedures
pendency
habeas
proceeding
procedure
indeed
set
habeas
corpus
statutes
fed
rule
civ
proc
recognizes
supremacy
statutory
procedures
federal
rules
procedures
say
nothing
proper
method
obtaining
correction
asserted
errors
judgment
whether
appeal
district
respondent
asserts
motion
november
timely
filed
within
period
allowed
appeal
case
dieter
relying
upon
dieter
respondent
misconceives
holding
case
followed
healy
held
timely
motion
rehearing
criminal
case
toll
running
time
appeal
dieter
healy
rule
governed
timeliness
motion
rehearing
government
criminal
case
effect
motion
time
allowed
appeal
instead
traditional
virtually
unquestioned
practice
dictated
timely
petition
rehearing
render
original
judgment
nonfinal
purposes
appeal
therefore
toll
time
appeal
dieter
supra
quoting
healy
supra
absent
rule
specifying
different
time
limit
petition
rehearing
criminal
case
considered
timely
filed
within
original
period
review
civil
case
however
timeliness
motion
rehearing
reconsideration
governed
rule
rule
allows
days
rule
follows
traditional
virtually
unquestioned
practice
requiring
motion
timely
toll
time
appeal
respondent
maintained
throughout
federal
rules
civil
procedure
wholly
inapplicable
habeas
think
mistaken
assumption
well
settled
habeas
corpus
civil
proceeding
fisher
baker
ex
parte
tom
tong
see
heflin
perhaps
recognition
differences
general
civil
litigation
habeas
corpus
proceedings
see
harris
nelson
federal
rules
civil
procedure
apply
habeas
proceedings
extent
practice
proceedings
set
forth
statutes
heretofore
conformed
practice
civil
actions
fed
rule
civ
proc
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
harris
considered
whether
discovery
procedure
authorized
fed
rule
civ
proc
available
habeas
corpus
proceeding
concluded
intended
scope
federal
rules
civil
procedure
history
habeas
corpus
procedure
make
clear
rule
must
read
exclude
application
rule
habeas
corpus
proceedings
thompson
ins
hand
assumed
without
discussion
rules
applied
proceeding
admission
citizenship
habeas
corpus
proceeding
applicability
civil
rules
qualified
rule
although
occasion
hold
rules
applicable
habeas
corpus
proceedings
courts
appeals
uniformly
held
assumed
rothman
hunter
thomas
motion
new
trial
custodian
combined
application
time
limit
rule
tolling
principle
rule
predecessor
fed
rule
civ
proc
resulted
dismissal
appeals
dispositions
habeas
corpus
petitions
flint
howard
see
also
fitzsimmons
yeager
en
banc
cert
denied
munich
see
reason
hold
contrary
statute
addressed
timeliness
motion
reconsider
grant
denial
habeas
corpus
relief
practice
habeas
corpus
proceedings
advent
federal
rules
civil
procedure
conformed
practice
civil
proceedings
respect
correction
reopening
judgment
common
law
power
alter
amend
judgments
term
original
judgment
rendered
mayer
bronson
schulten
ex
parte
lange
wall
basset
wall
rule
applied
habeas
corpus
cases
see
aderhold
murphy
tiberg
warren
amendments
rules
civil
procedure
abolished
terms
instead
confined
power
district
alter
amend
final
order
time
period
stated
rules
see
advisory
committee
report
rules
abolishing
term
rule
substitute
indefiniteness
contrary
precise
times
independent
term
prescribed
smith
referring
time
limit
prescribed
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
new
trial
motions
addition
settled
conformity
habeas
corpus
civil
proceedings
respect
time
limits
relief
emphasis
federal
rules
civil
procedure
speedy
adjudication
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
parallels
ideal
swift
flexible
summary
determination
habeas
corpus
petitioner
claim
preiser
rodriguez
see
also
fay
noia
ex
rel
mattox
scott
wallace
heinze
cert
denied
rule
particular
based
interest
speedy
disposition
finality
silk
sandoval
cert
denied
although
aspects
federal
rules
civil
procedure
may
inappropriate
habeas
proceedings
see
harris
nelson
supra
preiser
supra
requirement
prompt
motion
reconsideration
well
suited
special
problems
character
proceedings
harris
nelson
supra
application
strict
time
limits
rules
motions
reconsideration
rulings
habeas
corpus
petitions
thoroughly
consistent
spirit
habeas
corpus
statutes
respondent
failed
comply
mandatory
jurisdictional
time
limits
judgment
appeals
must
reversed
david
goldberger
joel
gora
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
footnotes
respondent
moved
dismiss
habeas
corpus
petition
failure
state
claim
upon
relief
may
granted
pursuant
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
respondent
base
motion
dismiss
solely
petitioner
waiver
claim
unlawful
arrest
respondent
also
addressed
merits
fourth
amendment
claim
district
held
petitioner
failure
raise
issue
trial
bar
habeas
corpus
relief
found
citing
fay
noia
failure
result
deliberate
tactical
decision
forgo
claim
untimeliness
district
apparently
meant
respondent
failure
request
evidentiary
hearing
prior
ruling
october
made
mention
federal
rules
civil
procedure
untimeliness
respondent
motion
rules
first
mentioned
petitioner
motion
vacate
orders
granting
stay
setting
date
evidentiary
hearing
motion
new
trial
may
made
rule
rule
provides
motion
shall
served
later
days
entry
judgment
similarly
pon
motion
party
made
later
days
entry
judgment
may
amend
findings
make
additional
findings
may
amend
judgment
accordingly
rule
rule
motion
alter
amend
judgment
shall
served
later
days
entry
judgment
since
respondent
neglected
label
motion
impossible
tell
whether
motion
based
rule
rule
rule
rule
prohibits
enlargement
time
period
prescribed
rules
three
rules
contain
time
limit
unnecessary
purposes
decision
determine
whether
respondent
motion
considered
motion
new
trial
motion
amend
make
additional
findings
motion
alter
amend
judgment
shall
refer
motion
one
rehearing
reconsideration
essence
relief
requested
see
generally
dieter
petitioner
acknowledged
rule
provides
relief
judgment
certain
enumerated
circumstances
may
modify
final
order
granting
habeas
relief
ten
day
limit
rules
petitioner
argued
respondent
motion
insufficient
rule
asserted
insufficiency
motion
made
within
reasonable
time
required
rule
significantly
contain
allegations
qualify
relief
rule
six
categories
respondent
merely
sought
convince
erred
granting
relief
without
holding
evidentiary
hearing
respondent
purpose
introduce
additional
newly
discovered
evidence
rule
unlike
rules
contain
time
limit
motion
relief
judgment
rule
however
toll
time
appeal
affect
finality
original
judgment
see
moore
federal
practice
pp
thus
district
lost
jurisdiction
days
entry
october
judgment
grant
relief
rule
power
grant
relief
judgment
rule
still
existed
january
timely
appeal
may
taken
fed
rule
app
proc
ruling
rule
motion
appeals
may
review
ruling
abuse
discretion
however
appeal
denial
rule
relief
bring
underlying
judgment
review
see
daily
mirror
new
york
news
cert
denied
brennan
midwestern
life
ins
cert
denied
moore
federal
practice
pp
respondent
insisted
throughout
litigation
motion
evidentiary
hearing
based
rule
position
derives
part
respondent
consistently
held
view
january
final
judgment
relief
sought
obtained
part
view
federal
rules
civil
procedure
applicable
habeas
corpus
proceedings
may
respondent
desired
well
avoid
force
petitioner
arguments
limited
scope
appellate
review
district
disposition
rule
motion
see
supra
event
since
respondent
represented
appeals
motion
based
rule
since
district
construe
find
unnecessary
address
question
whether
decision
appeals
sustained
theory
despite
absence
reference
rule
specified
grounds
action
district
reversible
improper
denial
relief
rule
rule
new
federal
rules
governing
cases
provides
federal
rules
civil
procedure
extent
inconsistent
rules
may
applied
appropriate
petitions
filed
rules
undisputed
fed
rule
app
proc
applicable
habeas
corpus
proceedings
see
developments
law
federal
habeas
corpus
harv
rev
stated
walker
johnston
situations
facts
admitted
may
appear
matter
law
prisoner
entitled
writ
discharge
several
courts
appeals
acknowledged
power
federal
district
discharge
habeas
corpus
petitioner
state
custody
without
conducting
evidentiary
hearing
facts
undisputed
establish
denial
petitioner
constitutional
rights
gladden
gidley
dictum
ex
rel
meers
wilkins
marshall
dorsey
gill
app
cert
denied
express
view
whether
district
erred
conducting
evidentiary
hearing
issuing
order
directing
petitioner
conditional
discharge
see
gladden
supra
hunter
thomas
see
ex
rel
mcnair
new
jersey
ex
rel
mitchell
follette
gladden
supra
better
procedure
course
custodian
indicate
submission
asking
dismissal
matter
law
proceedings
deems
entitled
request
denied
mitchell
supra
see
also
mcnair
supra
gladden
supra
respondent
contention
traditional
virtually
unquestioned
practice
habeas
corpus
proceedings
contemplates
evidentiary
hearing
cases
like
one
misunderstands
import
dieter
healy
resort
traditional
practice
cases
predicated
explicitly
absence
relevant
statute
rule
governing
tolling
time
appeal
nothing
practice
procedure
underlying
criminal
trial
rule
governs
procedure
question
problem
addressed
dieter
healy
absent
respondent
assume
however
rule
applicable
denominated
original
response
habeas
petition
motion
dismiss
explicitly
based
rule
see
supra
respondent
conception
lies
heart
view
lack
evidentiary
hearing
rendered
order
october
nonfinal
seems
rule
motion
appropriate
motion
habeas
corpus
proceeding
upon
denial
motion
case
proceed
answer
discovery
trial
view
erroneous
see
preiser
rodriguez
custodian
response
habeas
corpus
petition
like
motion
dismiss
procedure
responding
application
writ
habeas
corpus
unlike
procedure
seeking
correction
judgment
set
forth
habeas
corpus
statutes
rule
takes
precedence
federal
rules
justice
blackmun
justice
rehnquist
joins
concurring
join
opinion
add
comment
slightly
altered
circumstances
respondent
position
might
sustained
fed
rule
civ
proc
done
treating
district
december
order
order
granting
relief
judgment
order
dated
january
entered
january
order
reinstating
judgment
judgment
thus
newly
entered
respondent
notice
appeal
timely
fed
rule
app
proc
filed
january
see
edwards
louisiana
cert
denied
district
judge
actions
denominating
december
order
one
granting
respondent
motion
stay
execution
writ
january
order
one
denying
respondent
motion
reconsider
obstacle
district
judge
though
noting
respondent
motion
untimely
app
evidently
intended
permit
issue
probable
cause
light
evidence
presented
state
hearing
set
january
obvious
way
district
permit
examination
course
set
aside
original
october
judgment
rule
though
district
made
explicit
finding
standards
rule
satisfied
deny
sub
silentio
petitioner
motion
disputing
applicability
subsections
arguably
district
judge
might
intended
set
aside
october
judgment
unless
january
hearing
turned
evidence
mandating
change
grant
habeas
district
judge
acted
respondent
motion
conduct
evidentiary
hearing
within
days
original
judgment
possibility
granting
retroactive
extension
time
taking
appeal
still
open
appeals
properly
reluctant
interpret
district
judge
ambiguous
succession
orders
intending
preclude
full
appellate
review
habeas
corpus
determination
sitting
review
appeals
might
well
chosen
treat
december
order
one
granting
relief
judgment
difficulty
effecting
rescue
appeals
jurisdiction
appeal
january
order
respondent
strenuously
resisted
aid
respondent
evidently
fearing
january
order
treated
order
declining
set
aside
judgment
rule
rather
order
judgment
already
set
aside
december
rule
fearing
scope
review
thus
limited
determining
whether
abuse
discretion
urged
reply
brief
appeals
point
fact
respondent
motion
filed
rule
filed
pursuant
townsend
sain
clear
fac
motion
deepen
difficulty
respondent
added
indeed
doubtful
whether
rule
even
applies
habeas
cases
even
respondent
disavowed
reliance
rule
evidently
preferring
bank
possibility
federal
rules
civil
procedure
governing
timeliness
found
apply
federal
habeas
proceedings
brief
opposition
tr
oral
arg
circumstances
see
obligation
part
attempt
rescue
respondent
case
rule
basis