king
vincent
argued
october
decided
december
petitioner
king
national
guard
member
advised
civilian
employer
respondent
vincent
hospital
accepted
appointment
guard
requested
leave
absence
hospital
job
ostensibly
guaranteed
statute
provides
reemployment
rights
service
personnel
king
position
vincent
denied
king
request
brought
suit
district
seeking
declaratory
judgment
act
provide
reemployment
rights
tours
duty
long
king
granted
requested
relief
ruling
service
type
question
protected
holding
circuit
precedent
leave
requests
subsection
must
reasonable
king
request
leave
per
se
unreasonable
panel
appeals
affirmed
held
section
limit
length
military
service
member
armed
forces
retains
right
civilian
reemployment
subsection
text
specifies
covered
employee
shall
granted
leave
period
required
perform
active
duty
pon
release
duty
shall
permitted
return
position
utterly
silent
durational
limit
protection
provides
reading
statute
whole
must
inferred
unqualified
nature
subsection
protection
deliberate
since
subsections
protecting
classes
service
personnel
expressly
limit
periods
protection
vincent
argument
limits
reflect
hierarchy
reemployment
rights
reservists
subject
duty
subsection
entitled
least
protection
therefore
subject
imprecise
durational
limit
reasonableness
unconvincing
conclusion
rests
circular
reasoning
requiring
assumption
point
issue
reservists
really
get
less
protection
inductees
enlistees
veterans
covered
subsections
pp
ca
reversed
remanded
souter
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
thomas
took
part
consideration
decision
case
amy
wax
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
solicitor
general
starr
assistant
attorney
general
gerson
deputy
solicitor
general
shapiro
michael
jay
singer
harry
hopkins
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
issue
case
whether
provision
popularly
known
veterans
reemployment
rights
act
implicitly
limits
length
military
service
member
armed
forces
retains
right
civilian
reemployment
hold
june
petitioner
william
sky
king
member
alabama
national
guard
applied
become
command
sergeant
major
active
agr
program
thereby
undertook
serve
tour
duty
required
army
regulations
person
holding
position
next
month
king
learned
selection
advised
employer
respondent
vincent
hospital
accepted
guard
appointment
requested
leave
absence
hospital
job
ostensibly
guaranteed
act
reported
military
duty
ordered
august
several
weeks
later
vincent
advised
request
unreasonable
thus
beyond
act
guarantee
informing
king
vincent
took
step
bringing
declaratory
judgment
action
district
district
northern
alabama
settle
issue
whether
applicable
terms
act
provided
reemployment
rights
tours
duty
long
king
although
held
service
agr
program
carried
protection
nonetheless
rendered
declaratory
judgment
vincent
ground
request
leave
absence
per
se
unreasonable
imposing
test
reasonableness
king
request
district
following
opinion
eleventh
circuit
gulf
paper
ingram
turn
interpreted
fifth
circuit
case
requiring
leave
requests
protection
must
reasonable
see
lee
pensacola
panel
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
two
judges
agreeing
district
guaranteeing
reemployment
tour
duty
per
se
unreasonable
thereby
putting
king
outside
protection
judge
roney
concurred
separately
king
request
unreasonable
dissented
creation
per
se
rule
like
fifth
eleventh
circuits
third
engrafted
reasonableness
requirement
onto
eidukonis
southeastern
pennsylvania
transportation
authority
fourth
circuit
hand
declined
kolkhorst
tilghman
cert
pending
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
reverse
judgment
eleventh
circuit
ii
start
text
see
schreiber
burlington
northern
free
express
conditions
upon
provisions
contention
covered
person
shall
upon
request
granted
leave
absence
person
employer
period
required
perform
active
duty
training
inactive
duty
training
armed
forces
upon
employee
release
period
duty
employee
shall
permitted
return
employee
position
seniority
status
pay
vacation
employee
employee
absent
purposes
thus
fourth
circuit
call
subsection
guarantee
leave
reemployment
unequivocal
unqualified
kolkhorst
supra
eleventh
circuit
observed
subsection
address
reasonableness
reservist
leave
request
gulf
supra
although
vincent
recognizes
importance
statute
freedom
provisos
see
brief
respondent
still
argues
text
subsection
favors
position
hospital
stresses
leave
used
subsection
enjoyed
employee
whose
status
implies
employment
relationship
continues
absence
accordingly
employees
protected
subsection
returned
positions
military
service
reservists
protected
subsections
restored
difference
language
attesting
former
remain
employees
latter
cease
time
away
hospital
argues
notion
continuing
relationship
incompatible
absences
lengthy
king
finds
conclusion
supported
provisions
speaking
actual
mechanics
resuming
employment
reservists
subject
subsections
must
reapply
employment
protected
subsection
allowed
indeed
required
report
work
beginning
next
regularly
scheduled
working
period
tour
military
duty
expires
hospital
posits
impracticality
expecting
employee
report
work
immediately
absence
take
apron
peg
hospital
counsel
put
go
back
work
nothing
happened
also
makes
much
difficulties
filling
responsible
positions
follow
incumbents
turned
abruptly
serving
long
upon
prior
incumbent
equally
abrupt
return
arguments
others
like
set
length
two
replies
order
may
grant
congressionally
mandated
leave
absence
ungainly
perquisite
military
service
tour
duty
lasts
long
king
promises
free
tinker
statutory
scheme
reasonably
accord
significance
burdens
imposed
employers
workers
long
leaves
absence
chosen
means
guaranteeing
eventual
reemployment
military
personnel
grant
find
equivocation
statute
silence
render
susceptible
interpretive
choice
contrary
verbal
distinctions
underlying
hospital
arguments
become
pallid
light
textual
difference
far
glaring
noted
subsection
utterly
silent
durational
limit
protection
provides
subsections
protecting
classes
service
personnel
expressly
limit
periods
protection
thus
currently
gives
enlistees
least
four
years
reemployment
protection
possibility
extension
five
years
even
longer
example
extends
protection
entering
active
duty
except
purpose
determining
physical
fitness
training
least
four
years
possibility
extension
beyond
given
examples
affirmative
limitations
reemployment
benefits
conferred
neighboring
provisions
infer
simplicity
subsection
deliberate
consistent
plain
meaning
provide
benefit
without
conditions
length
service
concluding
nothing
course
follow
cardinal
rule
statute
read
whole
see
massachusetts
morash
since
meaning
statutory
language
plain
depends
context
see
shell
oil
iowa
dept
revenue
words
pebbles
alien
juxtaposition
communal
existence
meaning
interpenetrate
aggregate
take
purport
setting
used
nlrb
federbush
hand
quoted
shell
oil
supra
vincent
embraces
principle
though
think
way
misapplication
countering
preceding
textual
analysis
structural
analysis
purports
discern
significant
hierarchy
reemployment
rights
statutory
scheme
hospital
reads
together
companion
provisions
generous
protection
goes
inductees
whose
reemployment
rights
unqualified
reference
duration
service
enlistees
entering
active
duty
response
order
call
come
next
protection
long
tours
duty
exceed
five
years
hospital
claims
bottom
employment
rights
scheme
brief
respondent
fall
reemployment
rights
protected
ibid
unnatural
view
least
protected
veterans
subject
imprecise
limit
reasonableness
length
voluntary
duty
giving
rise
job
protection
hospital
argument
convince
invokes
significance
context
conclusion
rests
quite
circular
reasoning
pointed
differences
treatment
among
various
classes
service
people
protected
various
provisions
statute
differences
necessarily
make
hierarchies
differences
revealed
hospital
examples
point
inexorably
downward
without
assuming
point
issue
reservists
subject
training
duty
within
meaning
subsection
really
get
less
protection
inductees
enlistees
covered
provisions
without
assumption
simply
differences
treatment
respected
limiting
protection
text
contains
limit
leaving
textually
unlimited
protection
congress
apparently
chose
leave
text
places
limit
length
tour
king
may
enforce
reemployment
rights
vincent
hold
plain
limit
implied
iii
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
justice
thomas
took
part
consideration
decision
case
footnotes
alabama
national
guard
militia
state
control
except
certain
constitutionally
defined
circumstances
see
art
cl
congress
nonetheless
authorized
generally
provide
organizing
arming
disciplining
guard
cl
federal
law
issue
case
department
army
reg
ch
ii
length
periods
ad
ftd
agr
program
established
congress
see
department
defense
authorization
act
tit
iv
stat
section
covers
agr
participants
see
veterans
rehabilitation
education
amendments
stat
neither
party
contests
applicability
king
leave
request
lee
binding
precedent
eleventh
circuit
decided
january
eleventh
circuit
carved
fifth
see
bonner
prichard
en
banc
fifth
circuit
decisions
handed
adopted
eleventh
circuit
precedent
see
also
lemmon
county
santa
cruz
nd
cal
adopting
reasonableness
requirement
set
forth
lee
bottger
doss
aeronautical
md
following
lee
anthony
basic
foods
nd
cal
parties
accepting
reasonableness
test
subsections
identify
classes
reservists
enlistees
called
active
duty
make
applicable
classes
reemployment
protection
offered
inductees
pursuant
ii
namely
restor
ation
formerly
held
position
position
like
seniority
status
pay
counterexample
vincent
might
cite
providing
reservists
ordered
active
duty
days
guarantee
reemployment
extending
period
duty
standing
alone
subsection
provision
might
suggest
guarantee
extending
duration
reservist
tour
active
duty
must
express
examples
specific
durational
limitations
described
text
show
congress
knew
provide
limits
benefits
intent
even
express
examples
unsettled
significance
subsection
drafting
however
ultimately
read
provision
king
favor
canon
provisions
benefits
members
armed
services
construed
beneficiaries
favor
fishgold
sullivan
drydock
repair
presume
congressional
understanding
interpretive
principles
mcnary
haitian
refugee
center
presumable
congress
legislates
knowledge
basic
rules
statutory
construction
see
also
hartwell
wall
construing
statute
adopt
sense
words
best
harmonizes
context
promotes
policy
objectives
legislature
see
generally
sands
sutherland
statutory
construction
rev
ed
see
see
basic
limit
four
years
additional
year
protection
government
requests
additional
service
hospital
claims
find
additional
support
declension
legislative
history
relying
heavily
excerpts
house
senate
reports
bill
eventuated
current
statute
brief
respondent
find
terms
statute
unambiguous
judicial
inquiry
complete
except
rare
exceptional
circumstances
rubin
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
circumstances
present
indicate
hospital
invocation
legislative
history
make
case
hospital
relies
heavily
senate
house
reports
citing
leaves
covered
see
see
also
brief
respondent
history
may
demonstrate
applied
short
leaves
significance
surely
blunted
congress
undoubted
intention
years
later
apply
subsection
long
leaves
brought
agr
participants
see
veterans
rehabilitation
education
amendments
stat
inference
congress
intended
limits
hospital
espouses
buttressed
joint
conference
committee
disapproval
shift
position
taken
department
labor
issue
department
took
position
adopt
see
department
labor
veterans
reemployment
rights
handbook
lee
pensacola
department
adopted
different
view
protection
applied
leaves
days
less
see
subsequently
joint
conference
committee
report
announced
house
senate
veterans
affairs
committees
id
believe
limit
either
legislative
interpretation
application
pertinent
case
law
coming
aftermath
congress
decision
place
agr
participants
coverage
statement
decidedly
odds
hospital
position
confirms
conclusion
enactment
agr
program
intended
modify
ostensibly
unconditional
application