illinois
city
milwaukee
argued
february
decided
april
state
illinois
filed
motion
leave
file
bill
complaint
four
wisconsin
cities
two
local
sewerage
commissions
allegedly
polluting
lake
michigan
illinois
seeks
invoke
original
jurisdiction
ground
defendants
instrumentalities
wisconsin
suit
therefore
one
state
must
brought
art
iii
cl
constitution
confers
original
jurisdiction
cases
state
shall
party
provides
shall
original
exclusive
jurisdiction
controversies
two
original
exclusive
jurisdiction
actions
state
citizens
another
state
district
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
wherein
matter
controversy
exceeds
arises
constitution
laws
held
though
wisconsin
joined
defendant
appropriate
pleadings
mandatory
made
one
political
subdivisions
within
meaning
subdivisions
may
sued
illinois
federal
district
original
jurisdiction
merely
permissible
mandatory
pp
case
appropriate
federal
district
jurisdiction
give
relief
nuisance
interstate
water
pollution
proper
forum
litigation
issues
involved
pp
requirement
satisfied
action
involving
purity
interstate
waters
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
creates
actions
laws
within
meaning
since
term
laws
embraces
claims
like
one
involved
founded
federal
common
law
well
statutory
origin
pp
state
may
sue
defendant
another
state
district
pp
federal
common
law
applies
air
water
ambient
interstate
aspects
pp
application
federal
common
law
abate
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
inconsistent
federal
enforcement
powers
water
pollution
control
act
pp
federal
environmental
protection
statutes
may
sources
federal
common
law
necessarily
form
outer
limits
law
pp
state
environmental
quality
standards
relevant
conclusive
sources
federal
common
law
federal
equity
courts
wide
range
powers
grant
relief
pollution
sort
pp
douglas
delivered
opinion
unanimous
fred
herzog
argued
cause
plaintiff
briefs
william
scott
attorney
general
illinois
harry
slater
argued
cause
defendants
brief
defendant
city
milwaukee
john
fleming
richard
maruszewski
michael
fisher
burton
scott
filed
brief
defendant
city
kenosha
jack
harvey
edward
krenzke
louis
roshar
filed
brief
defendant
city
racine
fleming
harvey
odenbrett
filed
brief
defendant
sewerage
commission
city
milwaukee
ewald
moerke
filed
brief
defendant
metropolitan
sewerage
commission
county
milwaukee
justice
douglas
delivered
opinion
motion
illinois
file
bill
complaint
original
jurisdiction
four
cities
wisconsin
sewerage
commission
city
milwaukee
metropolitan
sewerage
commission
county
milwaukee
cause
action
alleged
pollution
defendants
lake
michigan
body
interstate
water
according
plaintiff
million
gallons
raw
inadequately
treated
sewage
waste
materials
discharged
daily
lake
milwaukee
area
alone
plaintiff
alleges
subdivisions
prohibit
prevent
discharges
defendants
take
actions
plaintiff
asks
abate
public
nuisance
article
iii
cl
constitution
provides
cases
state
shall
party
shall
original
jurisdiction
congress
provided
shall
original
exclusive
jurisdiction
controversies
two
long
philosophy
original
jurisdiction
invoked
sparingly
utah
construe
art
iii
cl
honor
original
jurisdiction
make
obligatory
appropriate
cases
question
appropriate
concerns
course
seriousness
dignity
claim
yet
beyond
necessarily
involves
availability
another
forum
jurisdiction
named
parties
issues
tendered
may
litigated
appropriate
relief
may
incline
sparing
use
original
jurisdiction
increasing
duties
appellate
docket
suffer
washington
general
motors
post
illinois
presses
request
leave
file
saying
agencies
named
defendants
instrumentalities
wisconsin
therefore
suit
wisconsin
brought
forum
decisions
doubt
actions
public
entities
might
appropriate
pleadings
attributed
state
warrant
joinder
state
party
defendant
missouri
illinois
missouri
invoked
original
jurisdiction
action
state
illinois
sanitary
district
city
chicago
seeking
injunction
restrain
discharge
raw
sewage
mississippi
river
demurrer
motion
leave
file
bill
complaint
illinois
argued
sanitary
district
proper
defendant
illinois
made
party
argument
rejected
contention
seems
matters
complained
bill
proceed
continue
proceed
acts
sanitary
district
chicago
corporation
state
illinois
therefore
follows
state
interested
question
improperly
made
party
unable
see
force
suggestion
bill
allege
sanitary
district
acting
without
excess
lawful
authority
averment
conceded
facts
corporation
agency
state
things
according
theory
complainant
case
result
mischief
apprehended
state
action
results
complained
thus
distinguishing
case
louisiana
texas
acts
sought
restrained
alleged
officers
functionaries
proceeding
wrongful
malevolent
misapplication
quarantine
laws
texas
sanitary
district
chicago
private
corporation
formed
purposes
private
gain
public
corporation
whose
existence
operations
wholly
within
control
state
object
bill
subject
public
work
judicial
supervision
upon
allegation
method
construction
maintenance
create
continuing
nuisance
dangerous
health
neighboring
state
inhabitants
surely
case
state
illinois
right
appear
traverse
allegations
bill
right
might
properly
made
party
defendant
also
purpose
showing
responsibility
state
new
jersey
proposed
action
defendant
passaic
valley
sewerage
commissioners
bill
sets
much
detail
acts
legislature
state
authorizing
directing
action
part
sufficient
say
averments
bill
quite
undenied
show
defendant
sewerage
commissioners
constitute
statutory
corporate
agency
state
action
actual
intended
must
treated
state
shall
regard
present
parties
litigation
formally
opposed
motion
intervene
grounds
intervention
permit
suit
state
citizen
another
state
contravention
eleventh
amendment
commonwealth
pennsylvania
exclusive
right
represent
interest
philadelphia
parens
patriae
intervention
denied
event
matter
sound
discretion
city
philadelphia
represents
part
citizens
pennsylvania
reside
watershed
area
delaware
river
tributaries
depend
upon
waters
undertook
evaluate
separate
interests
within
pennsylvania
effect
drawn
intramural
dispute
distribution
water
within
commonwealth
original
jurisdiction
thus
expanded
dimensions
ordinary
class
actions
intervenor
whose
state
already
party
burden
showing
compelling
interest
right
apart
interest
class
citizens
creatures
state
interest
properly
represented
state
presence
new
york
city
litigation
urged
reason
permitting
philadelphia
intervene
argument
misconstrues
new
york
city
position
case
new
york
city
admitted
litigation
matter
discretion
request
forcibly
joined
defendant
original
action
since
authorized
agent
execution
sovereign
policy
threatened
injury
citizens
new
jersey
position
defendant
subordinate
parent
state
primary
defendant
new
york
city
position
case
raises
problems
eleventh
amendment
well
settled
purposes
diversity
citizenship
political
subdivisions
citizens
respective
bullard
city
cisco
cowles
mercer
county
wall
political
subdivision
citizen
diversity
purposes
make
jurisdictional
difference
whether
plaintiff
defendant
action
case
political
subdivision
one
state
able
bring
action
founded
upon
diversity
jurisdiction
political
subdivision
another
state
therefore
conclude
term
used
read
include
political
subdivisions
course
mean
political
subdivisions
state
may
sued
head
original
jurisdiction
provides
shall
original
exclusive
jurisdiction
actions
proceedings
state
citizens
another
state
named
public
entities
wisconsin
may
however
sued
illinois
federal
district
original
jurisdiction
mandatory
aspect
case
turn
ii
title
provides
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
wherein
matter
controversy
exceeds
sum
value
exclusive
interest
costs
arises
constitution
laws
treaties
considerable
interests
involved
purity
interstate
waters
seem
put
beyond
question
jurisdictional
amount
provided
see
glenwood
light
water
mutual
light
heat
power
mississippi
missouri
ward
black
ronzio
denver
wright
law
federal
courts
ed
note
harv
rev
question
whether
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
creates
actions
arising
laws
within
meaning
hold
also
hold
includes
suits
brought
state
justice
brennan
speaking
four
members
romero
international
terminal
operating
dissenting
concurring
reached
issue
concluded
laws
within
meaning
embraced
claims
founded
federal
common
law
contention
accepted
since
petitioner
rights
judicially
defined
created
laws
within
meaning
another
context
state
law
recognized
statutory
word
laws
includes
decisions
converse
situation
presented
federal
courts
extensive
responsibility
fashioning
rules
substantive
law
rules
fully
laws
enacted
congress
citations
omitted
judge
harvey
johnsen
texas
pankey
stated
controlling
principle
field
federal
common
law
given
necessary
expansion
matters
federal
concern
relationship
applicable
federal
statute
exists
ecological
rights
state
improper
impairment
sources
outside
state
territory
think
held
matter
basis
standard
federal
common
law
directly
constituting
question
arising
laws
believe
cause
action
similarly
arises
federal
law
dispositive
issues
stated
complaint
require
application
federal
common
law
word
laws
construed
include
laws
created
federal
judicial
decisions
well
congressional
legislation
rationale
grant
federal
question
jurisdiction
insure
availability
forum
designed
minimize
danger
hostility
toward
specially
suited
vindication
federally
created
rights
applicable
judicially
created
rights
rights
created
statute
citations
omitted
respects
power
state
bring
action
ames
kansas
controlling
kansas
sued
number
corporations
courts
since
federal
rights
involved
defendants
cases
removed
federal
kansas
resisted
saying
federal
lacked
jurisdiction
art
iii
cl
constitution
gives
original
jurisdiction
cases
state
shall
party
held
state
suing
parties
original
jurisdiction
exclusive
suits
may
brought
removed
circuit
courts
district
courts
without
regard
character
parties
ibid
adhere
ruling
iii
congress
enacted
numerous
laws
touching
interstate
waters
established
surveillance
army
corps
engineers
industrial
pollution
including
sewage
rivers
harbors
act
march
stat
grant
power
construed
republic
steel
standard
oil
act
reinforced
broadened
complex
laws
recently
enacted
federal
water
pollution
control
act
stat
amended
tightens
control
discharges
navigable
waters
lower
applicable
water
quality
standards
national
environmental
policy
act
stat
et
congress
authorizes
directs
policies
regulations
public
laws
shall
interpreted
administered
accordance
policies
set
forth
act
agencies
federal
government
shall
identify
develop
methods
procedures
insure
presently
unquantified
environmental
amenities
values
may
given
appropriate
consideration
decisionmaking
along
economic
technical
considerations
sec
congress
evinced
increasing
concern
quality
aquatic
environment
affects
conservation
safeguarding
fish
wildlife
resources
see
fish
wildlife
act
stat
act
stat
authorizing
research
migratory
marine
game
fish
fish
wildlife
coordination
act
stat
amended
buttressed
new
expanding
policies
corps
engineers
issued
new
rules
regulations
governing
permits
discharges
deposits
navigable
waters
fed
reg
et
seq
federal
water
pollution
control
act
declares
federal
policy
recognize
preserve
protect
primary
responsibilities
rights
preventing
controlling
water
pollution
act
makes
clear
federal
state
law
end
controls
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
given
time
establish
water
quality
standards
state
fails
federal
administrator
promulgates
one
section
makes
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
subject
abatement
endangers
health
welfare
persons
abatement
authorized
follows
procedure
unnecessary
relate
uses
conference
procedure
hoping
amicable
settlements
none
reached
federal
administrator
may
request
attorney
general
bring
suit
behalf
abatement
pollution
remedy
sought
illinois
within
precise
scope
remedies
prescribed
congress
yet
remedies
congress
provides
necessarily
federal
remedies
available
uncommon
federal
courts
fashion
federal
law
federal
rights
concerned
textile
workers
lincoln
mills
deal
air
water
ambient
interstate
aspects
federal
common
law
texas
pankey
recently
held
application
federal
common
law
abate
public
nuisance
interstate
navigable
waters
inconsistent
water
pollution
control
act
congress
provided
act
save
may
decree
otherwise
enforcement
action
tate
interstate
action
abate
pollution
interstate
navigable
waters
shall
encouraged
shall
displaced
federal
enforcement
action
leading
air
case
georgia
tennessee
copper
georgia
filed
original
suit
tennessee
company
whose
noxious
gases
causing
wholesale
destruction
forests
orchards
crops
georgia
said
caution
demands
sort
part
state
relief
injuries
analogous
torts
must
examined
dwelt
upon
missouri
illinois
plain
demands
must
recognized
grounds
alleged
proved
union
made
forcible
abatement
outside
nuisances
impossible
thereby
agree
submit
whatever
might
done
renounce
possibility
making
reasonable
demands
ground
still
remaining
interests
alternative
force
suit
missouri
illinois
fair
reasonable
demand
part
sovereign
air
territory
polluted
great
scale
sulphurous
acid
gas
forests
mountains
better
worse
whatever
domestic
destruction
suffered
destroyed
threatened
act
persons
beyond
control
crops
orchards
hills
endangered
source
demand
enforced
must
notwithstanding
hesitation
might
feel
suit
private
parties
doubt
whether
injuries
might
suffering
property
left
action
law
speaking
problem
apportioning
waters
interstate
stream
said
kansas
colorado
successive
disputes
decisions
practically
building
may
improperly
called
interstate
common
law
see
texas
new
jersey
escheat
intangible
personal
property
texas
florida
suit
bill
nature
interpleader
determine
true
domicile
decedent
basis
death
taxes
equitable
apportionment
waters
interstate
stream
often
made
head
original
jurisdiction
nebraska
wyoming
kansas
colorado
supra
cf
arizona
california
applicable
federal
common
law
depends
facts
peculiar
particular
case
priority
appropriation
guiding
principle
physical
climatic
conditions
consumptive
use
water
several
sections
river
character
rate
return
flows
extent
established
uses
availability
storage
water
practical
effect
wasteful
uses
downstream
areas
damage
upstream
areas
compared
benefits
downstream
areas
limitation
imposed
former
relevant
factors
merely
illustrative
exhaustive
catalogue
indicate
nature
problem
apportionment
delicate
adjustment
interests
must
made
may
happen
new
federal
laws
new
federal
regulations
may
time
field
federal
common
law
nuisance
comes
pass
federal
courts
empowered
appraise
equities
suits
alleging
creation
public
nuisance
water
pollution
federal
law
governs
consideration
state
standards
may
relevant
cf
connecticut
massachusetts
kansas
colorado
thus
state
high
standards
may
well
ask
strict
standards
honored
compelled
lower
degrading
standards
neighbor
fixed
rules
govern
equity
suits
informed
judgment
chancellor
largely
govern
deny
without
prejudice
motion
leave
file
original
suit
normally
might
appropriate
vehicle
resolving
controversy
exercise
discretion
remit
parties
appropriate
district
whose
powers
adequate
resolve
issues
ordered
footnotes
see
also
original
jurisdiction
conferred
article
section
constitution
exclusive
virtue
provision
alone
congress
may
provide
deny
exclusiveness
contrary
indication
ohio
wyandotte
chemicals
based
preoccupation
litigation
public
nuisance
ohio
law
federal
common
law
hold
ample
basis
federal
jurisdiction
powers
granted
secretary
interior
federal
water
quality
act
stat
assigned
president
administrator
environmental
protection
agency
pursuant
reorganization
plan
see
fed
reg
various
federal
environmental
protection
statutes
necessarily
mark
outer
bounds
federal
common
law
may
provide
useful
guidelines
fashioning
rules
decision
said
another
connection
textile
workers
lincoln
mills
relevant
question
substantive
law
applied
suits
conclude
substantive
law
apply
suits
federal
law
courts
must
fashion
policy
national
labor
laws
labor
management
relations
act
expressly
furnishes
substantive
law
points
parties
may
may
certain
situations
problems
lie
penumbra
express
statutory
mandates
lack
express
statutory
sanction
solved
looking
policy
legislation
fashioning
remedy
effectuate
policy
range
judicial
inventiveness
determined
nature
problem
federal
interpretation
federal
law
govern
state
law
state
law
compatible
purpose
may
resorted
order
find
rule
best
effectuate
federal
policy
state
law
applied
however
absorbed
federal
law
independent
source
private
rights
citations
omitted
see
also
woods
reed
interstate
environmental
quality
notes
wyandotte
case
rev
note
rev
thus
character
parties
requires
us
apply
federal
law
see
georgia
tennessee
copper
cf
wisconsin
pelican
ins
federalist
hamilton
justice
harlan
indicated
banco
nacional
de
cuba
sabbatino
overriding
federal
interest
need
uniform
rule
decision
controversy
touches
basic
interests
federalism
fashioned
federal
common
law
see
also
clearfield
trust
duhme
federal
deposit
ins
wright
law
federal
courts
ed
woods
reed
supra
note
texas
rev
certainly
demands
applying
federal
law
present
pollution
body
water
lake
michigan
bounded
four
maintain
state
law
governs
overlook
fact
hinderlider
case
written
justice
brandeis
also
wrote
erie
tompkins
two
cases
decided
day
north
dakota
minnesota
said
one
state
change
method
draining
water
lands
within
border
increases
flow
interstate
stream
natural
capacity
greatly
exceeded
water
thrown
upon
farms
another
state
latter
state
interest
comfort
health
prosperity
farm
owners
resort
may
relief
creation
public
nuisance
simple
type
state
may
properly
ask
injunction
federal
common
law
varying
common
law
individual
think
entitled
necessary
recognized
basis
dealing
uniform
standard
environmental
rights
state
improper
impairment
sources
outside
domain
seem
imperative
present
era
growing
concern
part
state
ecological
conditions
impairments
outside
sources
impairment
conflicting
disputes
increasing
assertions
proliferating
contentions
seem
inevitable
field
made
subject
comprehensive
legislation
authorized
administrative
standards
federal
common
law
basis
provide
adequate
means
dealing
claims
alleged
federal
rights
logic
practicality
regarding
claims
entitled
asserted
within
jurisdiction
seem
texas
pankey
rule
decision
federal
action
may
brought
judicial
district
defendants
reside
claim
arose
thereby
giving
flexibility
choice
venue
see
also
whatever
may
municipality
sovereign
immunity
actions
damages
see
van
alstyne
governmental
tort
liability
decade
change
note
suffolk
rev
actions
seeking
injunctive
relief
stand
different
footing
cases
virtually
unanimous
holding
municipalities
subject
injunctions
abate
nuisances
see
cases
collected
mcquillin
law
municipal
corporations
et
seq
rev
ed
see
also
stat
ann
respects
suability
metropolitan
sewerage
commissions
kind
equitable
relief
accorded
lies
discretion
chancellor
harrisonville
dickey
clay
mfg
state
causes
public
nuisance
suable
public
entities
suable
federal
district
jurisdiction
generally
held
municipality
like
private
individual
may
enjoined
maintaining
nuisance
thus
proper
case
municipal
corporation
restrained
injunction
creating
nuisance
private
property
discharge
sewage
poisonous
gases
thereon
jurisdictions
obstruction
drainage
waters
discharging
sewage
filth
stream
polluting
water
damage
lower
riparian
owners
dumping
garbage
refuse
acts
likewise
municipality
may
enjoined
creating
operating
nuisance
whether
municipality
acting
governmental
proprietary
capacity
impairing
property
rights
nuisance
established
causing
irreparable
injury
adequate
remedy
law
may
enjoined
irrespective
resulting
damage
injury
municipality
mcquillin
supra