maryland
garrison
argued
november
decided
february
baltimore
police
officers
obtained
executed
warrant
search
person
one
mcwebb
premises
known
park
avenue
third
floor
apartment
controlled
substances
related
paraphernalia
police
reasonably
believed
one
apartment
described
premises
fact
third
floor
divided
two
apartments
one
occupied
mcwebb
one
respondent
officers
became
aware
respondent
apartment
discovered
contraband
provided
basis
respondent
conviction
violating
maryland
controlled
substances
act
trial
denied
respondent
motion
suppress
evidence
maryland
special
appeals
affirmed
maryland
appeals
reversed
remanded
new
trial
held
basis
information
officers
disclosed
duty
discover
disclose
issuing
magistrate
warrant
insofar
authorized
search
turned
ambiguous
scope
valid
issued
validity
warrant
must
judged
light
information
available
officers
time
obtained
warrant
discovery
facts
demonstrating
valid
warrant
unnecessarily
broad
retroactively
invalidate
warrant
pp
execution
warrant
violate
respondent
rights
fourth
amendment
validity
search
apartment
pursuant
warrant
depends
whether
officers
failure
realize
overbreadth
warrant
objectively
understandable
reasonable
unquestionably
objective
facts
available
officers
time
suggested
distinction
mcwebb
apartment
premises
whether
premises
described
warrant
interpreted
entire
third
floor
mcwebb
apartment
officers
conduct
consistent
reasonable
effort
ascertain
identify
place
intended
searched
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
powell
scalia
joined
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
joined
post
stephen
sachs
attorney
general
maryland
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
deborah
chasanow
anne
singleton
assistant
attorney
general
gerald
kroop
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
california
john
van
de
kamp
attorney
general
steve
white
chief
assistant
attorney
general
ronald
niver
clifford
thompson
deputy
attorneys
general
americans
effective
law
enforcement
et
al
fred
inbau
wayne
schmidt
james
manak
david
crump
daniel
hales
jack
yelverton
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
baltimore
police
officers
obtained
executed
warrant
search
person
lawrence
mcwebb
premises
known
park
avenue
third
floor
apartment
police
applied
warrant
conducted
search
pursuant
warrant
reasonably
believed
one
apartment
premises
described
warrant
fact
third
floor
divided
two
apartments
one
occupied
mcwebb
one
respondent
garrison
officers
executing
warrant
became
aware
separate
apartment
occupied
respondent
discovered
contraband
provided
basis
respondent
conviction
violating
maryland
controlled
substances
act
question
presented
whether
seizure
contraband
prohibited
fourth
amendment
trial
denied
respondent
motion
suppress
evidence
seized
apartment
app
maryland
special
appeals
affirmed
md
app
appeals
maryland
reversed
remanded
instructions
remand
case
new
trial
md
question
warrant
valid
supported
probable
cause
trial
found
two
appellate
courts
dispute
making
reasonable
investigation
including
verification
information
obtained
reliable
informant
exterior
examination
building
park
avenue
inquiry
utility
company
officer
obtained
warrant
reasonably
concluded
one
apartment
third
floor
occupied
mcwebb
app
md
six
baltimore
police
officers
executed
warrant
fortuitously
encountered
mcwebb
front
building
used
key
gain
admittance
hallway
locked
door
top
stairs
third
floor
entered
vestibule
third
floor
encountered
respondent
standing
hallway
area
police
see
interior
mcwebb
apartment
left
respondent
right
doors
open
respondent
apartment
entered
heroin
cash
drug
paraphernalia
found
officers
realize
third
floor
contained
two
apartments
app
soon
became
aware
fact
search
discontinued
officers
reasonably
believed
searching
mcwebb
apartment
search
respondent
apartment
made
matter
difference
opinion
concerns
proper
interpretation
warrant
literal
reading
plain
language
well
language
used
application
warrant
indicates
intended
authorize
search
entire
third
floor
construction
adopted
intermediate
appellate
see
md
also
appears
construction
adopted
trial
judge
see
app
one
sentence
trial
judge
oral
opinion
however
lends
support
construction
adopted
appeals
namely
warrant
authorized
search
mcwebb
apartment
interpretation
appeals
concluded
warrant
authorize
search
respondent
apartment
police
justification
making
warrantless
entry
premises
opinion
maryland
appeals
relies
article
maryland
declaration
rights
maryland
cases
well
fourth
amendment
federal
constitution
federal
cases
rather
containing
plain
statement
decision
rests
upon
adequate
independent
state
grounds
see
michigan
long
opinion
indicates
maryland
constitutional
provision
construed
pari
materia
fourth
amendment
therefore
jurisdiction
result
appeals
reached
appear
required
fourth
amendment
granted
certiorari
reverse
view
case
presents
two
separate
constitutional
issues
one
concerning
validity
warrant
concerning
reasonableness
manner
executed
see
dalia
shall
discuss
questions
separately
warrant
clause
fourth
amendment
categorically
prohibits
issuance
warrant
except
one
particularly
describing
place
searched
persons
things
seized
manifest
purpose
particularity
requirement
prevent
general
searches
limiting
authorization
search
specific
areas
things
probable
cause
search
requirement
ensures
search
carefully
tailored
justifications
take
character
exploratory
searches
framers
intended
prohibit
thus
scope
lawful
search
defined
object
search
places
probable
cause
believe
may
found
probable
cause
believe
stolen
lawnmower
may
found
garage
support
warrant
search
upstairs
bedroom
probable
cause
believe
undocumented
aliens
transported
van
justify
warrantless
search
suitcase
ross
case
claim
persons
things
seized
inadequately
described
probable
cause
believe
things
might
found
place
searched
described
warrant
benefit
hindsight
however
know
description
place
broader
appropriate
based
mistaken
belief
one
apartment
third
floor
building
park
avenue
question
whether
factual
mistake
invalidated
warrant
undoubtedly
valid
reflected
completely
accurate
understanding
building
floor
plan
plainly
officers
known
even
known
two
separate
dwelling
units
third
floor
park
avenue
obligated
exclude
respondent
apartment
scope
requested
warrant
must
judge
constitutionality
conduct
light
information
available
time
acted
items
evidence
emerge
warrant
issued
bearing
whether
warrant
validly
issued
discovery
contraband
validate
warrant
invalid
issued
equally
clear
discovery
facts
demonstrating
valid
warrant
unnecessarily
broad
retroactively
invalidate
warrant
validity
warrant
must
assessed
basis
information
officers
disclosed
duty
discover
disclose
issuing
magistrate
basis
information
agree
conclusion
three
maryland
courts
warrant
insofar
authorized
search
turned
ambiguous
scope
valid
issued
ii
question
whether
execution
warrant
violated
respondent
constitutional
right
secure
home
somewhat
less
clear
difficulty
concluding
officers
entry
common
area
legal
carried
warrant
premises
accompanied
mcwebb
provided
key
used
open
door
giving
access
common
area
officers
known
known
third
floor
contained
two
apartments
entered
living
quarters
third
floor
thus
aware
error
warrant
obligated
limit
search
mcwebb
apartment
moreover
officers
recognized
required
discontinue
search
respondent
apartment
soon
discovered
two
separate
units
third
floor
therefore
put
notice
risk
might
unit
erroneously
included
within
terms
warrant
officers
conduct
limits
search
based
information
available
search
proceeded
purposes
justifying
police
search
strictly
limit
permissible
extent
search
also
recognized
need
allow
latitude
honest
mistakes
made
officers
dangerous
difficult
process
making
arrests
executing
search
warrants
hill
california
considered
validity
arrest
man
named
miller
based
mistaken
belief
hill
police
probable
cause
arrest
hill
good
faith
believed
miller
hill
found
hill
apartment
explained
upshot
officers
good
faith
believed
miller
hill
arrested
quite
wrong
turned
subjective
belief
justify
either
arrest
subsequent
search
sufficient
probability
certainty
touchstone
reasonableness
fourth
amendment
record
us
officers
mistake
understandable
arrest
reasonable
response
situation
facing
time
reason
officers
properly
responded
command
contained
valid
warrant
even
warrant
interpreted
authorizing
search
limited
mcwebb
apartment
rather
entire
third
floor
prior
officers
discovery
factual
mistake
perceived
mcwebb
apartment
premises
one
therefore
execution
warrant
reasonably
included
entire
third
floor
either
interpretation
warrant
officers
conduct
consistent
reasonable
effort
ascertain
identify
place
intended
searched
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
cf
steele
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
search
progress
officer
respondent
apartment
answered
telephone
caller
asked
red
cross
name
mcwebb
known
confidential
informant
neither
respondent
mcwebb
indicated
police
search
two
apartments
warrant
affidavit
made
detective
albert
marcus
baltimore
police
department
narcotic
unit
reason
believe
person
lawrence
meril
mcwebb
premises
known
park
avenue
third
floor
apartment
described
three
story
brick
dwelling
numerals
affixed
front
city
baltimore
concealed
certain
property
therefor
commanded
necessary
proper
assistants
search
forthwith
hereinabove
described
property
specified
executing
warrant
making
search
immediately
ruling
suppression
motions
made
mcwebb
garrison
observed
search
two
apartments
building
must
supported
probable
cause
searching
apartment
added
exception
general
rule
multiple
unit
character
premises
externally
apparent
known
officer
applying
executing
warrant
trial
ruled
clear
warrant
specified
premises
searched
third
floor
apartment
defendant
mcwebb
statement
makes
sense
rejection
garrison
claim
warrant
general
warrant
specify
apartment
searched
third
floor
recognition
search
invalid
lack
specificity
warrant
premises
searched
interpret
trial
statement
ruling
search
subunit
building
referred
third
floor
apartment
defendant
mcwebb
authorized
warrant
found
precise
facts
case
search
garrison
apartment
valid
officers
know
one
apartment
third
floor
nothing
alerted
fact
search
made
items
seized
contrary
construction
adopted
appeals
fails
take
account
plain
language
warrant
authorized
search
person
mcwebb
premises
park
avenue
third
floor
appeals
explained
undisputed
police
authorized
search
one
apartment
mcwebb
warrant
authorize
search
garrison
apartment
question
validity
search
warrant
argument
made
exceptions
warrant
requirement
applied
clear
therefore
police
authority
cross
threshold
garrison
apartment
seize
evidence
police
warrant
search
mcwebb
apartment
warrant
search
garrison
justification
entering
premises
regardless
appearances
md
article
maryland
declaration
rights
provides
warrants
without
oath
affirmation
search
suspected
places
seize
person
property
grevious
grievous
oppressive
general
warrants
search
suspected
places
apprehend
suspected
persons
without
naming
describing
place
person
special
illegal
granted
statement
indicates
state
decision
fairly
appears
rest
primarily
federal
law
interwoven
federal
law
michigan
long
see
andresen
maryland
stanley
georgia
stewart
concurring
result
stanford
texas
importing
marron
cf
jacobsen
warrantless
test
white
powder
reasonableness
official
invasion
citizen
privacy
must
appraised
basis
facts
existed
time
invasion
occurred
arguments
certainly
made
police
case
able
ascertain
one
apartment
third
floor
building
contained
seven
separate
dwelling
units
surely
possible
two
might
third
floor
record
also
establishes
officer
marcus
made
specific
inquiries
determine
identity
occupants
premises
officer
went
park
avenue
found
matched
description
given
informant
brick
dwelling
numerals
affixed
front
premises
app
officer
made
check
baltimore
gas
electric
company
discovered
premises
park
third
floor
name
lawrence
mcwebb
ibid
officer
marcus
testified
suppression
hearing
inquired
baltimore
gas
electric
company
whose
name
third
floor
apartment
listed
asked
front
rear
middle
room
told
one
third
floor
listed
lawrence
mcwebb
officer
also
discovered
check
baltimore
police
department
police
records
lawrence
mcwebb
matched
address
physical
description
given
informant
maryland
courts
presumptively
familiar
local
conditions
unanimous
concluding
officer
reasonably
believed
mcwebb
tenant
floor
evidence
supports
conclusion
accept
conclusion
purpose
decision
many
situations
confront
officers
course
executing
duties
less
ambiguous
room
must
allowed
mistakes
part
mistakes
must
reasonable
men
acting
facts
leading
sensibly
conclusions
probability
brinegar
nothing
mcwebb
said
detained
outside
park
avenue
suggested
police
two
apartments
third
floor
mcwebb
provided
key
opened
doors
first
floor
third
floor
police
reasonably
believed
mcwebb
admitting
undivided
apartment
third
floor
officers
entered
foyer
third
floor
neither
mcwebb
garrison
informed
lived
separate
apartments
app
expressly
distinguish
facts
case
situation
police
know
two
apartments
certain
floor
building
probable
cause
believe
drugs
sold
floor
know
two
apartments
illegal
transactions
taking
place
search
pursuant
warrant
authorizing
search
entire
floor
circumstances
present
quite
different
issues
ones
us
case
respondent
argued
execution
warrant
violated
fourth
amendment
moment
officers
walked
threshold
house
tr
oral
arg
another
point
respondent
argued
search
illegal
point
police
went
garrison
apartment
without
probable
cause
apartment
purpose
addressing
respondent
argument
exact
point
asserts
search
became
illegal
essential
whether
illegal
threshold
viewed
beginning
entire
premises
beginning
premises
upon
closer
examination
turn
excluded
intended
scope
warrant
accept
respondent
argument
brand
illegal
execution
warrant
due
mistake
fact
premises
intended
searched
vary
description
warrant
yet
case
mistake
fact
invalidate
warrant
precisely
police
know
mistake
fact
apply
receive
prepare
execute
warrant
police
reasonably
know
prior
search
warrant
rests
mistake
fact
police
begin
execute
warrant
set
foot
upon
described
premises
discover
factual
mistake
must
reasonably
limit
search
accordingly
respondent
proposes
police
conduct
preliminary
survey
premises
whenever
search
building
multiple
dwelling
units
order
determine
extent
premises
searched
find
persuasive
reason
impose
burden
bedrock
requirement
exceptions
traced
cases
police
may
conduct
searches
pursuant
reasonably
detailed
warrant
justice
blackmun
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
join
dissenting
precedents
search
respondent
garrison
apartment
violated
fourth
amendment
executing
warrant
specifically
limited
mcwebb
residence
officers
expanded
search
include
respondent
adjacent
apartment
expansion
made
without
warrant
absence
exigent
circumstances
view
maryland
highest
correctly
concluded
trial
judge
granted
respondent
motion
suppress
evidence
seized
result
warrantless
search
apartment
moreover
even
accept
majority
analysis
case
one
involving
mistake
part
police
officers
find
officers
error
either
obtaining
executing
warrant
reasonable
circumstances
home
always
received
special
protection
analysis
fourth
amendment
protects
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
unreasonable
searches
seizures
emphasis
added
see
silverman
core
fourth
amendment
stands
right
man
retreat
home
free
unreasonable
governmental
intrusion
fourth
amendment
fact
direct
response
colonists
objection
searches
homes
general
warrants
without
warrants
see
chimel
california
harris
frankfurter
dissenting
today
society
protection
amendment
course
extended
equivalent
traditional
house
apartment
see
ker
california
observed
determining
whether
one
interest
protected
fourth
amendment
appropriate
limit
analysis
place
question
fourth
amendment
protects
people
simply
areas
katz
articulated
justice
harlan
katz
concurrence
proper
test
amendment
whether
person
exhibited
actual
subjective
expectation
privacy
society
prepared
recognize
reasonable
justice
harlan
noted
however
answer
question
concerning
protection
fourth
amendment
gave
particular
person
always
requires
reference
place
ibid
view
home
meet
test
virtually
situations
man
home
stated
purposes
place
expects
privacy
ibid
home
thus
continued
occupy
special
role
fourth
amendment
analysis
era
see
payton
new
york
physical
entry
home
chief
evil
wording
fourth
amendment
directed
quoting
district
karo
searches
seizures
inside
home
without
warrant
presumptively
unreasonable
absent
exigent
circumstances
california
carney
stevens
dissenting
places
mobile
homes
may
spartan
humble
cottage
compared
majestic
mansion
highest
legitimate
expectations
privacy
associated
temporary
abodes
command
respect
see
also
steagald
coolidge
new
hampshire
fourth
amendment
also
warrants
shall
issue
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
particularly
describing
place
searched
persons
things
seized
emphasis
added
requirement
satisfied
description
officer
search
warrant
reasonable
effort
ascertain
identify
place
intended
steele
applying
requirement
searches
aimed
residences
within
multiunit
buildings
search
present
case
courts
declared
invalid
warrants
fail
describe
targeted
unit
enough
specificity
prevent
search
units
see
higgins
votteller
courts
used
different
criteria
determine
whether
warrant
identified
unit
sufficient
particularity
see
bedford
name
occupant
apartment
cert
denied
haynes
state
tex
crim
app
directions
reach
particular
room
see
generally
lafave
search
seizure
crais
sufficiency
description
apartment
room
searched
structure
supp
applying
principles
case
conclude
search
respondent
apartment
improper
words
warrant
plain
distinctive
warrant
directed
officers
seize
marijuana
drug
paraphernalia
person
mcwebb
mcwebb
apartment
premises
known
park
avenue
third
floor
apartment
app
appeals
observed
warrant
specifically
authorized
search
mcwebb
respondent
residence
md
interpretation
warrant
majority
suggests
language
document
well
supporting
affidavit
permitted
search
entire
third
floor
ante
escapes
language
question
third
floor
apartment
used
reference
single
unit
building
context
one
person
residence
plainly
meaning
majority
discerns
rather
apparent
indeed
obvious
signification
one
apartment
located
third
floor
accordingly
appears
case
warrant
limited
description
apartment
mcwebb
search
additional
apartment
respondent
warrantless
presumed
unreasonable
absence
one
number
well
defined
exigent
circumstances
coolidge
new
hampshire
state
advanced
exception
warrant
requirement
evidence
obtained
result
search
excluded
ii
justify
officers
search
exceptional
circumstances
rubric
analyzes
police
conduct
terms
mistake
according
hindsight
makes
clear
officers
mistaken
first
describing
mcwebb
apartment
greater
specificity
warrant
ante
second
including
respondent
apartment
within
scope
execution
warrant
ante
inquiry
focuses
officers
knew
known
particular
junctures
reasons
light
officers
actual
imputed
knowledge
behavior
reasonable
mistakes
constitute
infringement
respondent
fourth
amendment
rights
case
finds
fourth
amendment
violation
officers
reasonably
drawn
warrant
greater
particularity
moment
officers
realized
fact
searching
two
different
apartments
reason
believe
mcwebb
residence
cover
entire
third
floor
majority
relies
upon
hill
california
conclusion
honest
mistakes
arrests
searches
may
obviate
fourth
amendment
problems
ante
doubtful
whether
hill
carries
precedential
weight
majority
ascribe
decided
chimel
california
involving
incident
hill
presented
situation
officers
probable
cause
warrant
arrest
hill
went
hill
apartment
found
miller
instead
mistook
miller
hill
despite
former
protestations
contrary
conducted
search
hill
apartment
produced
substantial
evidence
later
used
convict
hill
robbery
deciding
neither
arrest
ensuing
search
constituted
fourth
amendment
violation
entertaining
challenge
made
hill
however
faced
fourth
amendment
claim
brought
respondent
whose
position
comparable
miller
may
make
sense
excuse
reasonable
mistake
police
produces
evidence
intended
target
investigation
warrant
officers
probable
cause
arresting
individual
searching
residence
similar
reasoning
apply
respect
one
probable
cause
singled
victim
officers
error
see
brinegar
standards
probable
cause
seek
safeguard
citizens
rash
unreasonable
interferences
privacy
unfounded
charges
crime
cf
ybarra
illinois
person
mere
propinquity
others
independently
suspected
criminal
activity
without
give
rise
probable
cause
search
person
requirement
probable
cause
undercut
avoided
simply
pointing
fact
coincidentally
exists
probable
cause
search
seize
another
search
premises
person
may
happen
even
one
accepts
majority
view
fourth
amendment
violation
officers
mistake
reasonable
questionable
whether
standard
met
case
repeat
justice
harlan
observation
although
proper
question
fourth
amendment
analysis
protection
affords
people
question
requires
reference
place
katz
concurring
opinion
place
issue
small
building
forms
habitation
common
country
particularly
neighborhoods
changing
populations
declining
affluence
accordingly
analysis
reasonableness
officers
behavior
must
done
context
mind
efforts
detective
marcus
officer
procured
search
warrant
meet
standard
reasonableness
particularly
considering
detective
knew
search
concerned
unit
building
see
app
upon
learning
informant
mcwebb
selling
marijuana
apartment
marcus
inspected
outside
building
approach
however
gather
information
configuration
apartments
ibid
done
discovered
another
officer
day
executing
warrant
seven
separate
mailboxes
bells
porch
outside
main
entrance
house
although
dispute
whether
names
affixed
near
boxes
bells
suppression
hearing
tr
existence
alone
puts
reasonable
observer
notice
structure
possibly
basement
seven
individual
units
detective
therefore
aware
investigation
necessary
eliminate
possibility
one
unit
located
third
floor
moreover
detective
marcus
informant
told
purchased
drugs
mcwebb
apartment
app
appears
detective
never
thought
ask
informant
whether
mcwebb
apartment
one
third
floor
efforts
placed
slight
burden
upon
detective
necessary
order
render
reasonable
officer
behavior
seeking
warrant
moreover
even
one
believed
marcus
efforts
providing
information
issuance
warrant
reasonable
doubt
whether
officers
execution
warrant
meet
standard
view
objective
facts
put
officers
notice
dealing
two
separate
apartments
third
floor
moment
considerably
search
rummaged
dresser
closet
respondent
apartment
discovered
evidence
incriminating
realized
mistake
ante
appears
base
conclusion
officers
error
reasonable
fact
neither
mcwebb
respondent
ever
told
officers
search
lived
separate
apartments
see
ante
view
however
objective
facts
made
officers
aware
two
different
apartments
third
floor
well
discovered
incriminating
evidence
respondent
apartment
mcwebb
happened
drive
search
party
preparing
execute
warrant
one
officers
detective
shea
somewhat
disguised
construction
worker
already
porch
row
house
seeking
gain
access
locked
door
permitted
entrance
building
app
vantage
point
time
observe
seven
mailboxes
bells
indeed
rang
seven
bells
apparently
effort
summon
resident
open
front
door
search
party
reasonable
officer
detective
shea
position
already
aware
multiunit
building
armed
knowledge
number
units
structure
conducted
time
investigation
specify
exact
location
mcwebb
apartment
proceeding
example
might
questioned
another
resident
building
surprising
moreover
places
much
emphasis
failure
mcwebb
volunteer
information
exact
location
apartment
mcwebb
drove
one
police
vehicles
blocked
car
officers
surrounded
passenger
got
suppression
hearing
tr
although
officers
arrest
warrant
mcwebb
search
warrant
person
apartment
although
though
testified
arrest
time
clear
neither
mcwebb
passenger
free
leave
see
app
suppression
hearing
tr
circumstances
strongly
suggest
mcwebb
already
custody
proper
officers
administer
warnings
pursuant
miranda
arizona
reasonable
officers
aware
problem
detective
shea
discovery
specificity
warrant
ask
mcwebb
whether
apartment
one
third
floor
officers
made
several
requests
questioned
mcwebb
without
giving
miranda
warnings
yet
failed
ask
question
obvious
circumstances
concerning
exact
location
apartment
suppression
hearing
tr
moreover
reasonable
officer
realized
mistake
warrant
moments
following
officers
entrance
third
floor
officers
gained
access
vestibule
separating
mcwebb
respondent
apartments
locked
door
mcwebb
supplied
key
app
open
doorway
apartment
encountered
respondent
clad
pajamas
wearing
cast
result
recent
spinal
operation
suppression
hearing
tr
although
facts
concerning
next
occurred
somewhat
dispute
see
appears
respondent
together
mcwebb
passenger
mcwebb
car
shepherded
mcwebb
apartment
across
vestibule
officers
curiously
silent
informant
led
officers
believe
anyone
mcwebb
lived
apartment
search
party
mcwebb
person
targeted
search
warrant
custody
gained
access
vestibule
yet
met
respondent
third
floor
simply
asked
never
lived
done
likely
discovered
mistake
warrant
began
search
finally
importantly
even
officers
learned
nothing
respondent
realized
error
warrant
initial
security
sweep
third
floor
officers
first
fanned
rooms
conduct
preliminary
check
occupants
might
pose
danger
map
third
floor
demonstrates
see
two
apartments
almost
mirror
image
bathroom
kitchen
living
room
bedroom
given
somewhat
symmetrical
layout
apartments
difficult
imagine
initial
security
sweep
reasonable
officer
discerned
two
apartments
third
floor
realized
mistake
confined
ensuing
search
mcwebb
residence
accordingly
even
reasonable
error
part
police
officers
prevents
fourth
amendment
violation
mistakes
respect
obtaining
executing
warrant
reasonable
easily
avoided
respectfully
dissent
reaching
conclusion
appeals
relied
upon
statement
trial
judge
pursuant
warrant
third
floor
apartment
defendant
mcwebb
searched
app
majority
contends
reliance
unjustified
making
statement
trial
judge
nothing
rejecting
respondent
contention
warrant
general
ante
fail
see
interpretation
appeals
inconsistent
majority
understanding
statement
trial
judge
rejecting
respondent
argument
general
warrant
observing
warrant
limited
single
apartment
mcwebb
view
trial
judge
remark
contradict
observation
procuring
executing
warrant
officers
know
apartments
third
floor
app
lack
knowledge
officers
necessarily
imply
believed
mcwebb
apartment
occupied
entire
third
floor
also
suggest
beyond
knowing
location
mcwebb
apartment
unaware
configuration
remaining
apartments
building
ibid
language
supporting
affidavit
similarly
suggests
apartment
question
one
located
necessarily
occupying
entirely
third
floor
mentioned
meeting
informant
informant
stated
knew
subject
name
red
cross
selling
marihuana
apartment
located
park
third
floor
officers
confused
residence
respondent
encountered
vestibule
see
sketch
reproduced
might
justified
detaining
temporarily
occupant
mcwebb
apartment
see
michigan
summers
tr
oral
arg
officers
asserted
upon
entering
vestibule
observed
marijuana
lying
upon
dresser
respondent
bedroom
door
respondent
apartment
open
app
although
entirely
clear
drug
seized
immediately
plain
view
exception
warrant
requirement
depend
upon
whether
officers
access
object
prior
fourth
amendment
justification
illinois
andreas
officers
probably
probable
cause
obtain
search
warrant
conceivably
impounded
respondent
apartment
seeking
warrant
see
segura
nothing
however
justified
search
respondent
apartment
officers
engaged
lower
cases
deal
exception
requirement
warrant
may
support
standard
reasonable
mistake
courts
recognized
exception
applies
outward
appearances
building
appears
structure
contains
reality
several
units
officers
executing
warrant
discovered
character
despite
reasonable
efforts
see
davis
cert
denied
lafave
search
seizure
pp
appears
ruling
upon
propriety
search
trial
judge
case
exception
mind
see
app
uncertain
however
whether
exception
apply
officers
may
know
many
apartments
particular
floor
realize
building
multiunit
officers
aware
structure
houses
residences
besides
target
apartment
notice
must
make
investigation
adequate
draw
warrant
sufficient
specificity
means
must
clearly
distinguish
target
unit
others
order
avoid
infringing
upon
fourth
amendment
rights
occupants
building
put
another
way
exception
apply
officers
drawing
search
warrant
unit
building
put
demanding
standard
reasonableness
justify
mistake
required
rely
reasonable
failure
recognize
multiunit
nature
structure
entirely
clear
record
sort
building
issue
although
respondent
suggests
home
converted
apartment
house
see
tr
oral
arg
brief
respondent
noted
senator
proxmire
estimated
million
rental
units
buildings
containing
units
may
percent
population
approximately
million
units
central
cities
metropolitan
areas
units
home
large
number
lower
income
families
disproportionate
number
minority
families
hearing
multifamily
housing
rehabilitation
subcommittee
housing
urban
affairs
senate
committee
banking
housing
urban
affairs
majority
makes
much
fact
detective
marcus
checked
baltimore
gas
electric
company
order
verify
mcwebb
residence
appeared
informed
one
apartment
third
floor
ante
appear
course
search
officers
discovered
separate
electric
bills
mcwebb
respondent
apartments
app
information
marcus
received
erroneous
given
structure
issue
detective
inquiry
gas
company
relieved
obligation
pursue
less
burdensome
steps
identify
accurately
apartment
searched
dispense
investigation
inquiries
directed
utility
companies
building
owner
telephone
company
see
davis
efforts
providing
affidavit
justifying
search
warrant
deemed
adequate
officers
checked
utilities
respondent
telephone
apartment
app
another
fact
discovered
course
search
brief
check
telephone
company
informed
detective
apartment
third
floor
entirely
clear
moreover
detective
marcus
applied
warrant
believed
one
apartment
third
floor
affidavit
issuing
magistrate
detective
explained
observations
apartment
conducted
due
fact
impossible
tell
apartment
individuals
enter
statement
appears
reference
possibly
telescopic
observations
mcwebb
apartment
informant
purchased
drugs
mcwebb
detective
believed
mcwebb
occupied
entire
third
floor
structure
remark
makes
sense
state
suggests
efforts
detective
marcus
may
alerted
mcwebb
interest
investigating
officer
thus
might
resulted
destruction
evidence
reply
brief
petitioner
difficult
understand
discretely
conducted
investigation
feared
adverse
effect
unclear
record
whether
time
mcwebb
arrival
detective
already
managed
break
front
door
app
warrant
permitted
officers
arrest
persons
found
mcwebb
apartment
engaged
commission
crime
app
specifically
direct
officers
arrest
mcwebb
officers
confronted
mcwebb
street
however
believed
warrant
arrest
suppression
hearing
tr
mcwebb
course
refused
answer
question
given
officers
custody
pursued
avenues
discovering
exact
location
apartment
without
immediate
fear
destruction
evidence
seen
marijuana
located
upon
respondent
dresser
initial
security
sweep
officers
secured
apartment
seeking
search
warrant
see
supra