federated
department
stores
moitie
argued
march
decided
june
seven
private
antitrust
actions
including
separate
actions
respondents
brought
plaintiffs
seeking
represent
classes
retail
purchasers
petitioners
owners
various
department
stores
alleged
price
fixing
actions
consolidated
federal
district
dismissed
failure
allege
injury
plaintiffs
business
property
within
meaning
clayton
act
plaintiffs
five
actions
appealed
respondents
chose
instead
refile
two
actions
state
making
allegations
similar
made
prior
complaints
petitioners
removed
new
actions
district
dismissed
doctrine
res
judicata
respondents
appealed
intervening
decision
reiter
sonotone
appeals
thereafter
reversed
remanded
five
cases
initially
decided
respondents
first
actions
later
reversed
district
dismissal
respondents
subsequent
actions
appeals
held
respondents
position
closely
interwoven
successfully
appealing
parties
doctrine
res
judicata
must
give
way
public
policy
simple
justice
held
res
judicata
bars
relitigation
unappealed
adverse
judgments
respondents
claims
res
judicata
consequences
final
unappealed
judgment
merits
altered
fact
judgment
may
wrong
rested
legal
principle
subsequently
overruled
another
case
general
equitable
doctrine
countenances
exception
finality
party
failure
appeal
merely
rights
closely
interwoven
another
party
successfully
appeals
cf
reed
allen
principle
law
equity
sanctions
rejection
salutary
principle
res
judicata
basis
simple
justice
public
policy
doctrine
res
judicata
mere
matter
practice
procedure
rule
fundamental
substantial
justice
public
policy
private
peace
cordially
regarded
enforced
courts
hart
steel
railroad
supply
pp
reversed
remanded
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
powell
stevens
joined
blackmun
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
marshall
joined
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
jerome
chapman
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
abe
krash
paul
fitting
charles
miller
eugene
gordon
john
grosz
bernard
persky
john
curran
ladd
jerrold
offstein
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondents
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
question
presented
case
whether
appeals
ninth
circuit
validly
created
exception
doctrine
res
judicata
held
res
judicata
bar
relitigation
unappealed
adverse
judgment
plaintiffs
similar
actions
common
defendants
successfully
appeal
judgments
disagree
view
taken
appeals
ninth
circuit
reverse
brought
antitrust
action
petitioners
owners
various
department
stores
alleging
violated
sherman
act
agreeing
fix
retail
price
women
clothing
sold
northern
california
seven
parallel
civil
actions
subsequently
filed
private
plaintiffs
seeking
treble
damages
behalf
proposed
classes
retail
purchasers
including
respondent
moitie
state
moitie
respondent
brown
brown
district
northern
district
california
complaints
tracked
almost
verbatim
allegations
government
complaint
though
moitie
complaint
referred
solely
state
law
actions
originally
filed
district
assigned
single
federal
judge
moitie
case
removed
basis
diversity
citizenship
jurisdiction
district
dismissed
actions
entirety
ground
plaintiffs
alleged
injury
business
property
within
meaning
clayton
act
weinberg
federated
department
stores
supp
plaintiffs
five
suits
appealed
judgment
appeals
ninth
circuit
single
counsel
representing
moitie
brown
however
chose
appeal
instead
refiled
two
actions
state
moitie
ii
brown
ii
although
complaints
purported
raise
claims
made
allegations
similar
made
prior
complaints
including
government
petitioners
removed
new
actions
district
northern
district
california
moved
dismissed
ground
res
judicata
decision
rendered
july
district
first
denied
respondents
motion
remand
held
complaints
though
artfully
couched
terms
state
law
many
respects
identical
prior
complaints
thus
properly
removed
federal
raised
essentially
federal
law
claims
concluded
moitie
ii
brown
ii
involved
parties
alleged
offenses
time
periods
moitie
brown
doctrine
res
judicata
required
dismissed
time
moitie
brown
appealed
pending
appeal
june
decided
reiter
sonotone
holding
retail
purchasers
suffer
injury
business
property
terms
used
clayton
act
june
appeals
ninth
circuit
reversed
remanded
five
cases
decided
moitie
brown
cases
appealed
proceedings
light
reiter
moitie
ii
brown
ii
finally
came
appeals
ninth
circuit
reversed
decision
district
dismissing
cases
though
recognized
strict
application
doctrine
res
judicata
preclude
review
instant
decision
refused
apply
doctrine
facts
case
observed
five
litigants
weinberg
cases
successfully
appealed
decision
asserted
parties
may
benefit
reversal
position
closely
interwoven
appealing
parties
concluded
ecause
instant
dismissal
rested
case
effectively
overruled
doctrine
res
judicata
must
give
way
public
policy
simple
justice
granted
certiorari
consider
validity
appeals
novel
exception
doctrine
res
judicata
ii
little
added
doctrine
res
judicata
developed
case
law
final
judgment
merits
action
precludes
parties
privies
relitigating
issues
raised
action
commissioner
sunnen
cromwell
county
sac
res
judicata
consequences
final
unappealed
judgment
merits
altered
fact
judgment
may
wrong
rested
legal
principle
subsequently
overruled
another
case
angel
bullington
chicot
county
drainage
district
baxter
state
bank
wilson
executor
deen
explained
baltimore
phillips
erroneous
conclusion
reached
first
suit
deprive
defendants
second
action
right
rely
upon
plea
res
judicata
judgment
merely
voidable
based
upon
erroneous
view
law
open
collateral
attack
corrected
direct
review
bringing
another
action
upon
cause
action
observed
indulgence
contrary
view
result
creating
elements
uncertainty
confusion
undermining
conclusive
character
judgments
consequences
purpose
doctrine
res
judicata
avert
reed
allen
case
appeals
conceded
strict
application
doctrine
res
judicata
required
brown
ii
dismissed
presumably
meant
technical
elements
res
judicata
satisfied
namely
decision
brown
final
judgment
merits
involved
claims
parties
brown
ii
however
declined
dismiss
brown
ii
view
unfair
bar
respondents
relitigating
claim
closely
interwoven
successfully
appealing
parties
believe
unprecedented
departure
accepted
principles
res
judicata
unwarranted
indeed
decision
foreclosed
prior
case
law
reed
allen
supra
addressed
issue
presented
case
involved
dispute
rights
property
left
interpleader
action
rents
derived
property
appeal
pending
brought
ejectment
action
rival
claimant
basis
decree
interpleader
suit
ejectment
action
appeal
judgment
prevailed
earlier
appeal
interpleader
decree
awarded
rents
collected
sought
bring
ejectment
action
latter
pleaded
res
judicata
based
previous
successful
ejectment
action
held
res
judicata
available
defense
property
belonged
judgment
ejectment
action
final
open
assault
collaterally
subject
impeachment
form
direct
attack
appellate
limited
review
interpleader
decree
hardly
necessary
say
jurisdiction
review
one
judgment
gives
appellate
power
reverse
modify
another
independent
judgment
respondent
addition
appealing
interpleader
decree
appealed
ejectment
judgment
appellate
cases
might
afforded
remedy
course
respondent
neglected
follow
appeals
also
rested
opinion
part
viewed
simple
justice
see
grave
injustice
done
application
accepted
principles
res
judicata
simple
justice
achieved
complex
body
law
developed
period
years
evenhandedly
applied
doctrine
res
judicata
serves
vital
public
interests
beyond
individual
judge
ad
hoc
determination
equities
particular
case
simply
principle
law
equity
sanctions
rejection
federal
salutary
principle
res
judicata
heiser
woodruff
appeals
reliance
public
policy
similarly
misplaced
long
recognized
ublic
policy
dictates
end
litigation
contested
issue
shall
bound
result
contest
matters
tried
shall
considered
forever
settled
parties
baldwin
traveling
men
stressed
doctrine
res
judicata
mere
matter
practice
procedure
inherited
technical
time
rule
fundamental
substantial
justice
public
policy
private
peace
cordially
regarded
enforced
courts
hart
steel
railroad
supply
language
used
half
century
ago
even
compelling
view
today
crowded
dockets
predicament
respondent
finds
making
expected
sole
relief
upset
general
doctrine
res
judicata
conceived
light
maxim
interest
state
requires
end
litigation
maxim
comports
common
sense
well
public
policy
mischief
follow
establishment
precedent
disregarding
salutary
doctrine
prolonging
strife
greater
benefit
result
relieving
case
individual
hardship
reed
allen
unnecessary
reach
issue
enough
decision
brown
res
judicata
respondents
claims
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
cause
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
appeals
also
affirmed
district
conclusion
brown
ii
properly
removed
federal
reasoning
claims
presented
federal
nature
agree
least
claims
sufficient
federal
character
support
removal
one
treatise
puts
courts
permit
plaintiff
use
artful
pleading
close
defendant
right
federal
forum
occasionally
removal
seek
determine
whether
real
nature
claim
federal
regardless
plaintiff
characterization
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
pp
citing
cases
omitted
district
applied
settled
principle
facts
case
extensive
review
analysis
origins
substance
two
brown
complaints
found
appeals
expressly
agreed
respondents
attempted
avoid
removal
jurisdiction
artful
ly
casting
essentially
federal
law
claims
claims
question
factual
finding
see
prospect
dairy
dellwood
dairy
supp
ndny
wiring
device
antitrust
litigation
supp
edny
three
farms
alton
box
board
trade
cases
sc
rev
grounds
cert
denied
dismissal
failure
state
claim
federal
rule
civil
procedure
judgment
merits
see
angel
bullington
bell
hood
decision
also
conflicts
courts
appeals
holding
adverse
judgment
appeal
taken
res
judicata
bars
future
action
claim
even
authoritative
contrary
judicial
decision
legal
issues
involved
subsequently
rendered
another
case
national
association
broadcasters
fcc
app
generally
accepted
rule
civil
cases
less
several
appeal
adverse
judgment
reversal
parties
appealing
necessitate
justify
reversal
parties
appealing
clouatre
houston
fire
cas
appleton
toy
furniture
lehman
ripperger
allyn
cert
denied
justice
blackmun
justice
marshall
joins
concurring
judgment
agree
result
reached
case
write
separately
state
views
two
points
first
one
close
door
upon
possibility
cases
doctrine
res
judicata
must
give
way
appeals
referred
overriding
concerns
public
policy
simple
justice
professor
moore
noted
res
judicata
occasionally
qualified
overriding
competing
principle
public
policy
occasionally
needs
equitable
tempering
moore
currier
moore
federal
practice
omitted
see
also
reed
allen
cardozo
joined
brandeis
stone
dissenting
system
procedure
perverted
proper
function
multiplies
impediments
justice
without
warrant
clear
necessity
case
clearly
one
equity
requires
doctrine
give
way
unlike
nonappealing
party
reed
respondents
caught
mesh
procedural
complexities
ibid
instead
made
deliberate
tactical
decision
appeal
public
policy
served
making
exception
doctrine
case
contrary
special
need
strict
application
res
judicata
complex
multiple
party
actions
sort
discourage
litigation
cf
reiter
sonotone
finally
case
rights
appealing
parties
interwoven
dependent
require
reversal
whole
judgment
part
thereof
reversed
see
ford
motor
credit
uresti
tex
civ
app
second
contrast
flatly
hold
brown
res
judicata
respondents
claims
like
district
appeals
found
claims
simply
disguised
federal
claims
since
respondents
judgment
argument
case
remanded
state
barred
res
judicata
important
even
state
federal
claims
distinct
respondents
failure
allege
state
claims
brown
manifestly
bars
allegation
brown
ii
dismissal
brown
res
judicata
claims
respondents
actually
raised
also
claims
raised
see
commissioner
sunnen
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
mar
since
reason
believe
clear
outset
litigation
district
declined
exercise
pendent
jurisdiction
state
claims
respondents
obligated
plead
claims
wished
preserve
see
comment
hold
claims
barred
appeals
reliance
uresti
kvenild
taylor
wyo
estate
mcdill
cal
appears
clearly
misplaced
unlike
cases
one
appealing
nonappealing
parties
made
competing
claims
single
piece
property
see
mcdill
reversal
appealing
party
unjustly
left
nonappealing
party
liable
see
kvenild
without
recourse
see
uresti
justice
brennan
dissenting
eagerness
correct
decision
appeals
ninth
circuit
today
disregards
statutory
restrictions
jurisdiction
process
confuses
rather
clarifies
principles
res
judicata
therefore
respectfully
dissent
respondent
floyd
brown
filed
class
action
brown
ii
petitioners
california
state
complaint
stated
four
causes
action
fraud
deceit
unfair
business
practices
civil
conspiracy
restitution
plaintiffs
complaint
app
alleged
less
damages
per
class
member
addition
sought
appropriate
multiple
damages
exemplary
punitive
damages
interest
date
injury
attorney
fees
costs
relief
four
causes
action
rested
wholly
california
statutory
common
law
none
rested
fashion
federal
law
nonetheless
petitioners
removed
suit
district
northern
district
california
respondent
brown
filed
motion
remand
ground
action
raised
federal
question
within
meaning
respondent
motion
denied
district
stated
rom
start
finish
plaintiffs
essentially
alleged
violations
defendants
federal
antitrust
laws
app
reasoned
rtful
pleading
plaintiffs
convert
essentially
federal
law
claims
state
law
claims
held
respondent
complaint
properly
removed
concerned
federal
questions
originally
brought
federal
district
without
satisfying
minimum
amount
controversy
ibid
dismissed
action
holding
doctrine
res
judicata
brown
ii
barred
adverse
decision
earlier
suit
federal
brown
involving
parties
alleged
offenses
time
periods
ibid
appeals
affirmed
district
decision
remand
stating
correctly
held
claims
presented
federal
nature
memorandum
denial
reconsideration
however
appeals
reversed
district
order
dismissal
remanded
trial
ii
provision
authorizing
removal
actions
state
federal
courts
basis
federal
question
found
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
founded
claim
right
arising
constitution
treaties
laws
shall
removable
without
regard
citizenship
residence
parties
important
corollary
party
brings
suit
master
decide
law
rely
upon
therefore
determine
whether
bring
suit
arising
law
allegations
complaint
fair
kohler
die
specialty
accord
great
northern
alexander
plaintiff
claim
might
brought
either
federal
state
law
plaintiff
normally
free
ignore
federal
question
rest
claim
solely
state
ground
defendant
general
right
removal
jones
general
tire
rubber
la
chemise
lacoste
alligator
cert
denied
warner
records
ridges
distributing
coditron
afa
protective
systems
supp
sdny
corollary
well
grounded
principles
federalism
long
retain
authority
legislate
subject
areas
congress
legislated
without
field
long
state
courts
remain
preferred
forum
interpretation
enforcement
state
law
plaintiffs
must
permitted
proceed
state
state
law
violence
state
autonomy
defendants
able
remove
state
claims
federal
merely
plaintiff
asserted
federal
claim
based
set
facts
underlying
state
claim
stated
shamrock
oil
gas
sheets
power
reserved
constitution
provide
determination
controversies
courts
may
restricted
action
congress
conformity
judiciary
articles
constitution
due
regard
rightful
independence
state
governments
actuate
federal
courts
requires
scrupulously
confine
jurisdiction
precise
limits
statute
defined
quoting
healy
ratta
plaintiff
right
relief
either
federal
law
state
law
independent
source
right
federal
removal
proceedings
may
generally
look
beyond
face
initial
pleading
state
action
determine
whether
federal
question
presented
certain
areas
however
option
longer
available
congress
deemed
federal
substantive
law
altogether
preempt
supplant
state
law
case
congress
explicitly
said
exclusive
source
plaintiff
right
relief
federal
law
unacceptable
permit
plaintiff
artful
manipulation
terms
complaint
defeat
clearly
enunciated
congressional
objective
hearst
shopping
center
network
supp
sdny
emphasis
original
citation
omitted
lawsuit
concerns
area
antitrust
federal
laws
displaced
state
law
see
generally
mosk
state
antitrust
enforcement
coordination
federal
enforcement
antitrust
section
thus
respondent
brown
option
proceeding
state
federal
law
far
apparent
complaint
carefully
limited
four
california
causes
action
case
arises
wholly
without
reference
federal
law
settled
principles
federal
jurisdiction
therefore
respondent
lawsuit
removed
federal
see
gully
first
national
bank
meridian
today
nonetheless
sustains
removal
action
ground
least
claims
sufficient
federal
character
support
removal
ante
understand
means
claims
federal
character
claims
federal
character
view
predicated
solely
california
law
certainly
none
purports
state
claim
federal
antitrust
laws
mere
fact
plaintiffs
might
chosen
proceed
clayton
act
surely
suffice
transmute
state
claims
federal
claims
relies
calls
factual
finding
district
appeals
agreed
respondents
attempted
avoid
removal
jurisdiction
artful
ly
casting
essentially
federal
law
claims
claims
ibid
amounts
pejorative
characterization
respondents
decision
proceed
state
rather
federal
law
artful
respondents
complaints
based
claim
federal
right
immunity
therefore
removable
iii
even
assuming
lower
federal
courts
jurisdiction
decide
case
however
dissent
disposition
res
judicata
issue
reached
assume
jurisdiction
inexplicably
recoils
deciding
case
finds
unnecessary
reach
question
res
judicata
effect
brown
respondents
claims
ante
emphasis
original
enough
decision
says
brown
res
judicata
respondents
claims
ibid
respondents
raised
claims
respondents
raise
claims
thus
fails
decide
disposition
respondents
claims
decides
nothing
introduces
possibility
heretofore
foreclosed
decisions
unarticulated
theories
recovery
may
survive
unconditional
dismissal
lawsuit
like
justice
blackmun
hold
dismissal
brown
res
judicata
every
matter
actually
litigated
also
every
ground
theory
recovery
might
also
presented
see
ante
opinion
concurring
judgment
moore
currier
moore
federal
practice
unqualified
dismissal
merits
substantial
federal
antitrust
claim
precludes
relitigation
claim
theory
woods
exploration
producing
aluminum
america
cert
denied
ford
motor
superior
cal
app
cal
rptr
see
restatement
second
judgments
reporter
note
illustration
comment
pp
tent
draft
mar
failure
acknowledge
basic
principle
create
doubts
confusion
none
may
encourage
litigants
split
causes
action
state
federal
hope
might
win
second
day
therefore
respectfully
dissent
vacate
judgment
appeals
instructions
remand
district
instructions
remand
state
since
action
respondent
moitie
voluntarily
dismissed
remaining
issues
concern
claims
respondent
brown
district
acknowledged
brown
ii
removed
basis
diversity
citizenship
amount
controversy
exceed
app
correctly
noted
however
action
removed
without
regard
amount
controversy
brought
original
action
federal
without
meeting
minimum
amount
controversy
ibid
actions
clayton
act
may
brought
federal
without
regard
amount
controversy
see
also
pub
stat
supp
iv
note
following
repeal
minimum
amount
controversy
cases
pending
date
enactment
context
often
said
plaintiff
may
fraudulently
defeat
removal
manipulation
complaint
see
sheeran
general
electric
jones
general
tire
rubber
see
also
great
northern
alexander
however
state
federal
laws
support
claim
makes
little
sense
suggest
plaintiff
acts
fraudulently
chooses
proceed
state
law
state
rather
federal
law
federal
see
romick
bekins
van
storage
indeed
admits
additional
claims
brown
ii
included
brown
unfair
competition
fraud
restitution
claims
ante
district
consider
conclusion
factual
finding
included
section
district
opinion
devoted
legal
analysis
section
entitled
facts
compare
app
event
conclusion
concerning
legal
character
complaint
hardly
considered
factual
finding
decisions
cited
support
approach
district
courts
inapplicable
wiring
device
antitrust
litigation
supp
edny
three
farms
alton
box
board
trade
cases
sc
rev
grounds
cert
denied
cases
state
confined
application
state
antitrust
laws
purely
intrastate
commerce
thus
leaving
federal
law
sole
basis
suit
similarly
prospect
dairy
dellwood
dairy
supp
ndny
concerned
claim
unfair
labor
practice
governed
exclusively
federal
law
see
teamsters
morton
admittedly
courts
strictly
observed
restrictions
removal
jurisdiction
see
carter
cert
denied
sub
nom
sheet
metal
workers
carter
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
pp
reports
occasionally
removal
seek
determine
whether
real
nature
claim
federal
regardless
plaintiff
characterization
omitted
perusal
cited
decisions
however
reveals
correctly
confine
practice
areas
law
federal
substantive
law
see
brown
felsen
munsingwear
commissioner
sunnen
chicot
county
drainage
district
baxter
state
bank
cromwell
county
sac