bumper
north
carolina
argued
decided
june
petitioner
tried
rape
north
carolina
offense
punishable
death
unless
jury
recommends
life
imprisonment
prosecution
permitted
challenge
cause
prospective
jurors
stated
opposed
capital
punishment
conscientious
scruples
imposing
death
penalty
rifle
introduced
trial
obtained
search
petitioner
grandmother
house
resided
four
officers
appeared
home
announced
warrant
search
told
owner
ahead
hearing
motion
suppress
denied
prosecutor
stated
rely
warrant
justify
search
consent
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
recommended
life
imprisonment
state
affirmed
held
petitioner
adduced
evidence
support
claim
jury
opposed
capital
punishment
conscientious
scruples
imposing
death
penalty
excluded
cause
necessarily
prosecution
prone
warranting
reversal
conviction
denial
sixth
fourteenth
amendment
rights
impartial
jury
witherspoon
illinois
ante
search
justified
lawful
basis
consent
consent
given
official
conducting
search
asserted
possesses
warrant
consent
circumstances
pp
rifle
erroneously
admitted
evidence
plainly
damaging
petitioner
admission
harmless
error
chapman
california
norman
smith
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
pro
hac
vice
harry
mcgalliard
deputy
attorney
general
north
carolina
argued
cause
respondent
brief
bruton
attorney
general
briefs
amici
curiae
filed
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
michael
meltsner
leroy
clark
norman
amaker
charles
ralston
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
et
lee
bailey
pro
se
justice
stewart
delivered
opinion
petitioner
brought
trial
north
carolina
upon
charge
rape
offense
punishable
state
death
unless
jury
recommends
life
imprisonment
among
items
evidence
introduced
prosecution
trial
rifle
allegedly
used
commission
crime
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
recommended
sentence
life
imprisonment
trial
imposed
sentence
north
carolina
affirmed
judgment
granted
certiorari
consider
two
separate
constitutional
claims
pressed
unsuccessfully
petitioner
throughout
litigation
north
carolina
courts
first
petitioner
argues
constitutional
right
impartial
jury
violated
capital
case
prosecution
permitted
challenge
cause
prospective
jurors
stated
opposed
capital
punishment
conscientious
scruples
imposing
death
penalty
secondly
petitioner
contends
rifle
introduced
evidence
obtained
state
search
seizure
violative
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
ii
hearing
motion
prosecutor
informed
rely
upon
warrant
justify
search
upon
consent
leath
testified
hearing
stating
among
things
four
came
busy
work
walked
house
one
walked
said
search
warrant
search
house
walked
told
come
come
said
warrant
search
house
read
nothing
told
come
go
ahead
search
went
work
concerned
satisfied
told
search
warrant
read
tell
search
warrant
said
law
search
warrant
search
house
thought
go
ahead
believed
search
warrant
took
word
seen
yard
got
door
opened
time
know
grandson
charged
crime
nobody
told
anything
tell
anything
picked
like
tell
nothing
grandson
issue
thus
presented
whether
search
justified
lawful
basis
consent
consent
given
official
conducting
search
asserted
possesses
warrant
hold
consent
circumstances
prosecutor
seeks
rely
upon
consent
justify
lawfulness
search
burden
proving
consent
fact
freely
voluntarily
given
burden
discharged
showing
acquiescence
claim
lawful
authority
search
conducted
reliance
upon
warrant
later
justified
basis
consent
turns
warrant
invalid
result
different
turns
state
even
attempt
rely
upon
validity
warrant
fails
show
fact
warrant
law
enforcement
officer
claims
authority
search
home
warrant
announces
effect
occupant
right
resist
search
situation
instinct
coercion
albeit
colorably
lawful
coercion
coercion
consent
hold
leath
consent
search
constitutional
error
admit
rifle
evidence
petitioner
mapp
ohio
rifle
plainly
damaging
evidence
petitioner
respect
three
charges
admission
trial
harmless
error
chapman
california
judgment
north
carolina
accordingly
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
petitioner
also
convicted
upon
two
charges
felonious
assault
sentenced
consecutive
prison
terms
submit
affidavits
north
carolina
referring
studies
wilson
goldberg
see
witherspoon
illinois
ante
made
findings
respect
studies
mention
opinion
addition
materials
mentioned
witherspoon
ante
petitioner
brief
cites
unpublished
dissertation
crosson
investigation
certain
personality
variables
among
capital
trial
jurors
western
reserve
university
january
involving
sample
jurors
ohio
motion
says
property
seized
hattie
leath
without
search
warrant
question
going
search
warrant
cooper
state
relying
search
warrant
stating
record
cooper
yes
sir
also
testified
another
point
objection
making
search
house
willing
let
look
room
drawer
house
wanted
nobody
threatened
anything
nobody
told
going
hurt
let
search
house
nobody
told
give
money
let
search
let
search
free
nobody
forced
give
free
look
felt
like
boy
guilty
finds
evidence
hattie
leath
clear
convincing
nature
said
hattie
leath
voluntarily
consented
search
premises
particularly
set
forth
evidence
consent
specifically
given
result
coercion
officers
also
stated
fact
search
reveal
presence
guilty
weapon
justifies
search
petitioner
rights
violated
rather
wrongs
detected
idea
search
justified
turns
long
ago
rejected
constitutional
jurisprudence
search
prosecuted
violation
constitution
made
lawful
brings
light
byars
see
also
di
henry
leath
owned
house
rifle
petitioner
concedes
voluntary
consent
search
binding
upon
conversely
question
petitioner
standing
challenge
lawfulness
search
one
search
directed
jones
house
searched
home
rifle
used
members
household
found
common
part
house
wren
simmons
bomar
judd
app
kovach
see
amos
johnson
higgins
app
marra
mackenzie
robbins
supp
orderly
submission
officers
effect
represented
defendant
authority
enter
search
house
necessary
consent
constituted
understanding
intentional
voluntary
waiver
defendant
fundamental
rights
fourth
amendment
constitution
elliott
supp
one
held
consented
search
premises
accomplished
pursuant
apparently
valid
search
warrant
contrary
legal
effect
consent
basis
warrant
permission
construed
intention
abide
law
resist
search
warrant
rather
invitation
search
bull
armstrong
one
upon
command
officer
authorized
enter
search
seize
search
warrant
opens
door
officer
acquiesces
obedience
request
matter
language
used
acquiescence
showing
regard
supremacy
law
presentation
search
warrant
charge
place
searched
one
authorized
serve
tinged
coercion
submission
thereto
considered
invitation
waive
constitutional
right
unreasonable
searches
seizures
rather
considered
submission
law
meno
state
ind
course
argument
case
advised
searching
officers
fact
warrant
warrant
ever
returned
way
knowing
conditions
issued
determining
whether
based
upon
probable
cause
suggested
dissent
ven
assuming
consent
search
rifle
admitted
evidence
conviction
stand
suggestion
seems
rest
horrible
facts
case
assumption
petitioner
guilty
function
determine
innocence
guilt
much
less
apply
subjective
notions
justice
duty
uphold
constitution
view
discursive
factual
recital
contained
dissenting
opinion
however
additional
word
may
order
doubt
crimes
grave
shocking
doubt
petitioner
perpetrator
crimes
committed
night
first
victims
separately
viewed
lineup
included
petitioner
victims
identified
man
assailant
man
petitioner
later
victims
together
viewed
another
lineup
every
man
lineup
made
speak
name
voice
identification
time
victims
identified
petitioner
assailant
time
lineups
local
newspaper
reported
man
named
wayne
bumper
held
sheriff
prime
suspect
case
least
one
victims
knew
fact
earlier
victims
shown
collection
photographs
one
victim
identified
picture
petitioner
petitioner
name
written
back
photograph
justice
douglas
joins
part
ii
opinion
since
however
record
shows
prospective
jurors
excused
cause
opposition
capital
punishment
also
reverse
ground
petitioner
denied
right
trial
issue
guilt
jury
representing
fair
community
witherspoon
illinois
ante
separate
opinion
north
carolina
law
rape
punishable
death
unless
jury
recommends
life
imprisonment
stat
indictment
rape
includes
lesser
offense
assault
intent
commit
rape
duty
submit
jury
lesser
degrees
offense
rape
supported
evidence
state
green
see
stat
include
assault
intent
commit
rape
range
punishment
one
years
imprisonment
stat
assault
stat
instant
case
trial
judge
fact
charge
jury
respect
lesser
offenses
justice
harlan
concurring
join
judgment
part
ii
opinion
prompted
add
brief
note
share
sure
every
member
majority
justice
black
abhorrence
brutal
crime
petitioner
stands
convicted
avoid
misapprehension
wish
make
perfectly
clear
reversal
conviction
penalty
imposed
state
infringement
federal
constitutional
rights
reversal
results
always
decision
petitioner
constitutionally
proved
guilty
hence
legally
valid
basis
imposition
penalty
upon
determining
whether
criminal
defendant
convicted
according
law
test
simply
whether
finds
credible
evidence
crediting
discrediting
evidence
function
trier
fact
case
jury
jury
verdict
lawful
verdict
however
based
upon
evidence
constitutionally
admissible
reversal
rests
oldest
fundamental
principle
criminal
jurisprudence
defendant
entitled
put
prosecution
lawful
proof
evidence
petitioner
consisted
part
gun
alleged
unlawfully
taken
home
leath
petitioner
living
state
contended
leath
consented
search
home
however
consent
obtained
immediately
sheriff
told
leath
search
warrant
lawful
right
enter
home
without
consent
nothing
leath
said
response
announcement
taken
mean
considered
officers
welcome
home
without
warrant
done
sheriff
said
warrant
record
hypothetical
question
imaginary
situation
leath
never
faced
course
officers
valid
search
warrant
consent
required
make
search
lawful
search
warrant
case
remains
possible
warrant
issued
circumstances
meeting
requirements
federal
constitution
consequently
situation
state
simply
chosen
wrong
line
constitutional
analysis
search
vote
remand
case
give
prosecution
opportunity
justify
search
proper
grounds
however
noted
prosecution
explicitly
repeatedly
renounced
reliance
warrant
like
parties
lawsuits
prosecutor
obligation
courts
including
parties
present
claims
earliest
appropriate
time
create
adequate
record
cf
ciucci
illinois
separate
note
justice
frankfurter
justice
harlan
finally
persuaded
admission
gun
harmless
error
vote
affirm
persuaded
arguably
harmless
error
vote
remand
case
state
consideration
point
question
whether
view
defendant
actually
committed
crimes
charged
error
harmless
sense
petitioner
got
deserved
question
whether
error
said
petitioner
guilt
adjudicated
basis
constitutionally
admissible
evidence
means
case
whether
properly
admissible
evidence
improper
admission
gun
affected
result
think
said
critical
question
identity
perpetrator
crimes
state
introduced
eyewitness
identification
petitioner
two
victims
gun
evidence
victims
shot
together
testimony
found
petitioner
place
abode
jury
course
found
testimony
victims
credible
beyond
reasonable
doubt
convicted
petitioner
basis
alone
might
well
addition
tangible
linking
petitioner
crime
hardly
said
judicial
vantage
point
harmless
surplusage
justice
black
dissenting
ii
tell
search
warrant
know
sheriff
stockard
paying
much
attention
told
stockard
come
porch
go
ahead
look
house
objection
making
search
house
willing
let
look
room
drawer
house
wanted
nobody
threatened
anything
nobody
told
going
hurt
let
search
house
nobody
told
give
money
let
search
let
search
free
nobody
forced
emphasis
added
despite
statements
leath
cited
despite
clear
finding
consent
trial
judge
personally
saw
heard
leath
testify
refusing
accept
leath
sworn
testimony
freely
consent
overruling
trial
judge
findings
concludes
consent
believe
substitute
believes
leath
said
actually
said
free
accept
believe
unwarranted
conclusion
iii
clear
beyond
shadow
doubt
defendant
committed
crimes
charged
believe
enforce
per
se
rule
automatically
requiring
new
trial
every
case
concludes
part
evidence
obtained
unreasonable
search
seizure
primary
reason
exclusionary
rule
adopted
deter
unreasonable
searches
seizures
violation
fourth
amendment
mapp
ohio
see
concurring
opinion
believe
deterrence
desired
served
adequately
without
blind
adherence
mechanical
formula
requires
automatic
reversal
every
case
exclusionary
rule
violated
little
known
effect
exclusionary
rule
really
actual
police
practices
think
fair
assumption
refusal
reverse
conviction
defendant
admission
illegally
seized
evidence
evidence
conclusively
demonstrates
guilt
going
lessen
police
sensitivity
exclusionary
rule
thereby
reducing
deterrent
effect
obviously
time
search
carried
police
going
know
whether
evidence
hope
obtain
going
necessary
prosecution
case
course
know
necessary
search
needed
thus
effect
automatically
reversing
cases
violation
exclusionary
rule
allow
state
convictions
obviously
guilty
defendants
stand
stand
iv
see
ante
see
ante
see
stat
imposed
additional
sentences
years
imprisonment
run
consecutively
two
felonious
assault
charges
leath
voluntary
consent
sufficient
validate
search
since
owned
house
searched
rifle
taken
also
noted
rifle
found
petitioner
private
room
part
house
assigned
kitchen
behind
door
leath
owned
house
living
throughout
questioning
repeatedly
referred
house
see
commonwealth
tucker
mass
case
mother
consented
officers
looking
broken
pieces
knife
used
murder
search
home
found
officers
went
door
house
tucker
resided
stated
mother
outside
door
house
search
warrant
search
article
named
therein
invited
officers
make
search
desired
saying
knew
son
innocent
thereupon
officers
made
search
upon
warrant
consequence
invitation
knife
blade
admitted
contention
barred
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
finding
follows
finds
evidence
hattie
leath
clear
convincing
nature
said
hattie
leath
voluntarily
consented
search
premises
particularly
set
forth
evidence
consent
specifically
given
result
coercion
officers
facts
testimony
must
remembered
jury
selected
way
witherspoon
holds
designed
produce
hanging
jury
recommended
life
sentence
petitioner
opinion
attempts
convey
impression
victims
sure
assailant
identification
alleged
mistake
police
lineup
see
majority
opinion
completely
overlooks
fact
however
bumper
arrested
victims
idea
attacker
name
girl
still
hospital
identified
bumper
picture
number
others
young
man
also
identified
bumper
picture
days
lineup
held
girl
went
lineup
first
time
confessed
scared
look
men
made
real
attempt
identification
forgotten
testified
positively
oath
trial
mind
certain
bumper
assailant
nothing
really
dissuade
made
mind
know
provides
appellate
jurisdiction
may
affirm
modify
vacate
set
aside
reverse
judgment
decree
order
lawfully
brought
review
may
remand
cause
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
emphasis
added
justice
white
dissenting
consent
search
given
occupant
told
police
officers
warrant
search
seems
reasonable
fourth
amendment
purposes
view
consent
conditioned
valid
warrant
absent
clear
proof
consent
actually
unconditional
evidence
record
show
unconditional
consent
sufficient
clarity
perhaps
result
cases
mean
every
search
following
conditional
consent
invalid
upon
motion
suppress
upon
objection
evidence
offered
trial
state
produces
valid
warrant
search
good
reason
exclude
evidence
simply
police
time
search
relied
consent
neither
served
returned
warrant
case
us
state
represented
warrant
challenged
search
unlike
justice
harlan
brush
matter
aside
since
existence
validity
warrant
determined
state
courts
case
ripe
reversal
affirmance
therefore
reverse
vacate
conviction
returning
case
state
courts
determination
validity
warrant
absence
probable
cause
reason
warrant
proper
predicate
search
mapp
ohio
require
reversal
conviction
unless
saved
rule
chapman
california
course
determined
grandmother
consent
good
petitioner
standing
raise
validity
search
unnecessary
deal
issues
argued
determined
case