mertens
hewitt
argued
february
decided
june
petitioners
allege
represent
class
former
employees
participated
kaiser
steel
retirement
plan
qualified
pension
plan
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
respondent
plan
actuary
kaiser
began
phase
steelmaking
operations
prompting
early
retirement
many
plan
participants
respondent
failed
change
plan
actuarial
assumptions
reflect
additional
retirement
costs
causing
plan
funded
inadequately
eventually
terminated
petitioners
receive
benefits
guaranteed
erisa
rather
substantially
greater
pensions
due
plan
respondent
liable
plan
losses
nonfiduciary
knowingly
participated
plan
fiduciaries
breach
fiduciary
duties
district
dismissed
complaint
appeals
affirmed
held
erisa
authorize
suits
money
damages
nonfiduciaries
knowingly
participate
fiduciary
breach
fiduciary
duty
erisa
permits
plan
participants
bring
civil
actions
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
redress
violations
statute
plan
assuming
arguendo
creates
cause
action
nonfiduciaries
knowingly
assist
fiduciary
breach
duty
requiring
respondent
make
plan
whole
losses
sustained
constitute
appropriate
equitable
relief
petitioners
fact
seek
classic
form
legal
relief
compensatory
damages
held
similar
language
used
another
statute
precludes
awarding
damages
see
burke
text
erisa
leaves
doubt
congress
intended
equitable
relief
include
types
relief
typically
available
equity
injunction
mandamus
restitution
given
erisa
roots
law
trusts
equitable
relief
theory
mean
relief
available
breach
trust
common
law
courts
equity
include
relief
sought
since
relief
available
breach
trust
obtained
equity
however
interpretation
render
modifier
equitable
superfluous
reading
also
deprive
meaning
distinction
congress
drew
equitable
relief
remedial
legal
relief
throughout
erisa
erisa
authorizes
secretary
labor
assess
civil
penalty
based
monetary
recovery
actions
person
knowingly
participate
breach
fiduciary
duty
given
meaningful
content
without
adopting
petitioners
theory
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
blackmun
kennedy
souter
thomas
joined
white
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
joined
post
alfred
sigman
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
dan
feinberg
jeffrey
kobrick
joseph
kociubes
ronald
mann
argued
cause
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
solicitor
general
starr
deputy
solicitor
general
mahoney
allen
feldman
nathaniel
spiller
mark
flynn
steven
frankel
argued
cause
respondent
brief
duane
quaini
elpidio
villarreal
lawrence
connolly
iii
john
ryan
steven
zaleznick
cathy
filed
brief
american
association
retired
persons
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
american
academy
actuaries
lauren
bloom
american
council
life
insurance
james
jorden
waldemar
pflepsen
stephen
goldberg
richard
barnsback
stephen
kraus
phillip
stano
american
society
pension
actuaries
chester
salkind
booke
company
et
al
paul
ondrasik
suzanne
meeker
ellen
hennessy
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
nonfiduciary
knowingly
participates
breach
fiduciary
duty
imposed
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
stat
amended
et
liable
losses
employee
benefit
plan
suffers
result
breach
according
complaint
allegations
take
true
petitioners
represent
class
former
employees
kaiser
steel
corporation
kaiser
participated
kaiser
steel
retirement
plan
qualified
pension
plan
erisa
respondent
plan
actuary
kaiser
began
phase
steelmaking
operations
prompting
early
retirement
large
number
plan
participants
respondent
however
change
plan
actuarial
assumptions
reflect
additional
costs
imposed
retirements
result
kaiser
adequately
fund
plan
eventually
plan
assets
became
insufficient
satisfy
benefit
obligations
causing
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
pbgc
terminate
plan
pursuant
petitioners
receive
benefits
guaranteed
erisa
see
general
substantially
lower
fully
vested
pensions
due
plan
petitioners
sued
fiduciaries
failed
plan
alleging
breach
fiduciary
duties
see
mertens
black
per
curiam
affirming
denial
summary
judgment
also
commenced
action
respondent
alleging
caused
losses
allowing
kaiser
select
plan
actuarial
assumptions
failing
disclose
kaiser
one
clients
failing
disclose
plan
funding
shortfall
petitioners
claimed
acts
omissions
violated
erisa
effecting
breach
respondent
professional
duties
plan
sought
inter
alia
monetary
relief
opposing
respondent
motion
dismiss
petitioners
fleshed
claim
asserting
respondent
liable
erisa
fiduciary
committed
breach
fiduciary
duties
nonfiduciary
knowingly
participated
plan
fiduciaries
breach
fiduciary
duties
nonfiduciary
committed
breach
nonfiduciary
duties
imposed
actuaries
erisa
district
northern
district
california
dismissed
complaint
app
pet
cert
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirmed
relevant
part
petitioners
sought
certiorari
question
whether
erisa
authorizes
suits
money
damages
nonfiduciaries
knowingly
participate
fiduciary
breach
fiduciary
duty
agreed
hear
case
ii
erisa
observed
comprehensive
reticulated
statute
product
decade
congressional
study
nation
private
employee
benefit
system
nachman
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
statute
provides
persons
named
fiduciaries
benefit
plan
see
also
anyone
else
exercises
discretionary
control
authority
plan
management
administration
assets
see
erisa
fiduciary
fiduciaries
assigned
number
detailed
duties
responsibilities
include
proper
management
administration
investment
plan
assets
maintenance
proper
records
disclosure
specified
information
avoidance
conflicts
interest
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
see
section
makes
fiduciaries
liable
breach
duties
specifies
remedies
available
fiduciary
personally
liable
damages
make
good
plan
losses
plan
resulting
breach
restitution
restore
plan
profits
fiduciary
made
use
assets
plan
fiduciary
equitable
remedial
relief
may
deem
appropriate
including
removal
fiduciary
section
second
erisa
six
carefully
integrated
civil
enforcement
provisions
russell
supra
allows
secretary
labor
plan
beneficiary
participant
fiduciary
bring
civil
action
appropriate
relief
section
described
provisions
however
limited
terms
fiduciaries
appeals
decided
respondent
fiduciary
see
petitioners
contest
holding
lacking
equivalent
provisions
specifying
nonfiduciaries
potential
defendants
damages
remedy
available
petitioners
turned
authorizes
plan
beneficiary
participant
fiduciary
bring
civil
action
enjoin
act
practice
violates
provision
erisa
terms
plan
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
redress
violations
ii
enforce
provisions
erisa
terms
plan
note
outset
far
clear
even
provision
make
money
damages
available
makes
available
actions
issue
authorize
appropriate
equitable
relief
large
appropriate
equitable
relief
purpose
redress
ing
violations
enforc
ing
provisions
erisa
erisa
plan
one
suggests
term
kaiser
plan
violated
enforced
requested
judgment
erisa
contains
various
provisions
read
imposing
obligations
upon
nonfiduciaries
including
actuaries
provision
explicitly
requires
avoid
participation
knowing
unknowing
fiduciary
breach
fiduciary
duty
unlikely
moreover
oversight
since
erisa
explicitly
impose
knowing
participation
liability
cofiduciaries
see
limitation
appears
deliberate
light
fact
knowing
participation
liability
part
cotrustees
third
persons
well
established
common
law
trusts
see
scott
fratcher
law
trusts
ed
hereinafter
scott
fratcher
cotrustees
scott
fratcher
third
persons
russell
emphasized
unwillingness
infer
causes
action
erisa
context
since
statute
carefully
crafted
detailed
enforcement
scheme
provides
strong
evidence
congress
intend
authorize
remedies
simply
forgot
incorporate
expressly
notwithstanding
petitioners
amicus
seem
assume
respondent
alleged
action
inaction
violated
erisa
address
arguments
almost
exclusively
forms
relief
available
respondent
despite
considerable
prompting
amici
expressly
disclaims
reliance
preliminary
point
see
brief
respondent
tr
oral
arg
thus
although
acknowledge
oddity
resolving
dispute
remedies
unclear
remediable
wrong
alleged
decide
case
narrow
battlefield
parties
chosen
reserve
decision
antecedent
question
petitioners
maintain
object
suit
appropriate
equitable
relief
emphasis
added
however
seek
remedy
traditionally
viewed
equitable
injunction
restitution
appeals
held
restitution
unavailable
see
petitioners
challenged
although
often
dance
around
word
petitioners
fact
seek
nothing
compensatory
damages
monetary
relief
losses
plan
sustained
result
alleged
breach
fiduciary
duties
money
damages
course
classic
form
legal
relief
curtis
loether
teamsters
terry
dobbs
remedies
though
never
interpreted
precise
phrase
appropriate
equitable
relief
construed
similar
language
title
vii
civil
rights
act
amendments
equitable
relief
deems
appropriate
preclude
awards
compensatory
punitive
damages
burke
petitioners
assert
however
reading
equitable
relief
fails
acknowledge
erisa
roots
common
law
trusts
see
firestone
tire
rubber
bruch
lthough
beneficiary
action
recover
losses
resulting
breach
duty
superficially
resembles
action
law
damages
solicitor
general
suggests
relief
traditionally
obtained
courts
equity
therefore
definition
equitable
relief
brief
amicus
curiae
true
common
law
courts
equity
exclusive
jurisdiction
virtually
actions
beneficiaries
breach
trust
see
lessee
smith
mccann
scott
fratcher
also
true
money
damages
available
courts
trustee
see
mitchell
bogert
bogert
law
trusts
trustees
ed
hereinafter
bogert
bogert
third
persons
knowingly
participated
trustee
breach
see
seminole
nation
scott
participation
breach
trust
common
law
however
many
situations
limited
involving
enforcement
trust
equity
establish
purely
legal
rights
grant
legal
remedies
otherwise
beyond
scope
authority
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
ed
term
equitable
relief
assuredly
mean
petitioners
solicitor
general
whatever
relief
equity
empowered
provide
particular
case
issue
indicated
foregoing
quotation
speaks
legal
remedies
granted
equity
equitable
relief
also
refer
categories
relief
typically
available
equity
injunction
mandamus
restitution
compensatory
damages
memories
divided
bench
familiarity
technical
refinements
recede
past
former
meaning
becomes
perhaps
increasingly
unlikely
remains
question
interpretation
case
meaning
intended
context
present
statute
think
doubt
since
relief
available
breach
trust
obtained
equity
limiting
sort
relief
obtainable
equitable
relief
sense
whatever
relief
equity
provide
case
limit
relief
read
statute
render
modifier
superfluous
see
state
nordic
village
moskal
regarding
equitable
relief
mean
relief
available
breach
trust
common
law
also
require
us
either
give
term
different
meaning
bears
elsewhere
erisa
deprive
meaning
distinction
congress
drew
equitable
remedial
relief
equitable
legal
relief
section
erisa
see
subchapter
erisa
see
erisa
subchapter
dealing
pbgc
see
neither
option
acceptable
see
estate
cowart
nicklos
drilling
cf
lorillard
pons
authority
courts
develop
federal
common
law
erisa
see
firestone
authority
revise
text
statute
petitioners
point
erisa
added
statute
see
omnibus
budget
reconciliation
act
obra
stat
provides
follows
case
breach
fiduciary
responsibility
violation
part
fiduciary
knowing
participation
breach
violation
person
secretary
shall
assess
civil
penalty
fiduciary
person
amount
equal
percent
applicable
recovery
amount
supp
iii
certainly
agree
petitioners
language
used
one
portion
statute
deemed
meaning
language
used
elsewhere
statute
indeed
even
zealous
advocates
principle
petitioners
stop
short
applying
directly
term
equitable
relief
agree
however
establishes
existence
damages
remedy
otherwise
inexplicable
must
give
term
equitable
relief
expansive
meaning
relief
available
breach
trust
even
limited
sense
equitable
relief
awardable
includes
restitution
plan
assets
profits
providing
applicable
recovery
amount
use
calculate
penalty
secretary
may
waive
reduce
paying
prevent
restoration
gains
plan
even
assuming
nonfiduciaries
liable
knowing
participation
fiduciary
breach
duty
see
supra
cofiduciaries
expressly
see
person
liable
applications
give
meaning
scope
without
resort
strange
interpretation
equitable
relief
petitioners
propose
secretary
initial
interpretation
accords
view
prologue
proposed
regulation
implementing
codified
cfr
awards
equitable
relief
opposed
monetary
damages
penalty
assessed
award
involves
transfer
plan
money
property
last
analysis
petitioners
ask
us
give
strained
interpretation
order
achieve
purpose
erisa
protect
plan
participants
beneficiaries
brief
petitioners
note
erisa
nonfiduciaries
generally
liable
state
trust
law
damages
resulting
knowing
participation
trustee
breach
duty
assert
actions
preempted
erisa
broad
preemption
clause
see
mcclendon
thus
contend
construction
leaves
beneficiaries
like
petitioners
less
protection
existed
erisa
contradicting
erisa
basic
goal
promot
ing
interests
employees
beneficiaries
employee
benefit
plans
shaw
delta
air
lines
see
firestone
tire
rubber
bruch
supra
even
assuming
without
deciding
petitioners
correct
preemption
previously
available
state
actions
vague
notions
statute
basic
purpose
nonetheless
inadequate
overcome
words
text
regarding
specific
issue
consideration
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
ltv
especially
true
legislation
erisa
enormously
complex
detailed
statute
resolved
innumerable
disputes
powerful
competing
interests
favor
potential
plaintiffs
see
pilot
life
ins
dedeaux
text
described
certainly
nonsensical
allocates
liability
misdeeds
reasonable
proportion
respective
actors
power
control
prevent
misdeeds
traditional
trust
law
although
beneficiary
obtain
damages
third
persons
knowing
participation
trustee
breach
fiduciary
duties
trustee
fiduciary
duties
see
scott
fratcher
erisa
however
defines
fiduciary
terms
formal
trusteeship
functional
terms
control
authority
plan
see
thus
expanding
universe
persons
subject
fiduciary
duties
damages
professional
service
providers
actuaries
become
liable
damages
cross
line
advisor
fiduciary
must
disgorge
assets
profits
obtained
participation
transactions
prohibited
pay
related
civil
penalties
see
excise
taxes
see
assuming
nonfiduciaries
sued
may
enjoined
participating
fiduciary
breaches
compelled
make
restitution
subjected
equitable
decrees
erisa
eliminated
assumptions
common
law
joint
several
liability
direct
consequential
damages
suffered
plan
part
persons
real
power
control
plan
exposure
sort
liability
impose
high
insurance
costs
upon
persons
regularly
deal
offer
advice
erisa
plans
hence
upon
erisa
plans
words
tension
primary
erisa
goal
benefitting
employees
subsidiary
goal
containing
pension
costs
alessi
see
also
russell
attempt
adjust
balance
competing
goals
text
adopted
congress
struck
affirmed
footnotes
petitioners
also
claimed
respondent
activities
constituted
transaction
prohibited
erisa
professional
malpractice
state
law
district
dismissal
former
claim
appealed
appeals
reversed
dismissal
pendent
claim
state
law
grounds
petitioners
also
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
district
deemed
irrelevant
given
plan
terminated
respondent
position
plan
actuary
appeals
address
point
section
reads
entirety
persons
empowered
bring
civil
action
civil
action
may
brought
participant
beneficiary
relief
provided
subsection
section
recover
benefits
due
terms
plan
enforce
rights
terms
plan
clarify
rights
future
benefits
terms
plan
secretary
participant
beneficiary
fiduciary
appropriate
relief
section
title
participant
beneficiary
fiduciary
enjoin
act
practice
violates
provision
subchapter
terms
plan
obtain
either
appropriate
equitable
relief
redress
violations
ii
enforce
provisions
subchapter
terms
plan
secretary
participant
beneficiary
appropriate
relief
case
violation
section
title
except
otherwise
provided
subsection
section
secretary
enjoin
act
practice
violates
provision
subchapter
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
redress
violation
ii
enforce
provision
subchapter
secretary
collect
civil
penalty
subsection
section
ed
supp
iii
example
person
provides
services
plan
party
interest
may
offer
services
engage
certain
transactions
plan
reasonable
compensation
see
also
annual
reports
must
include
certification
enrolled
actuary
minimum
funding
standards
plan
based
reasonable
actuarial
assumptions
dissent
expresses
certitude
statute
clearly
bar
suit
post
course
issue
issue
whether
statute
affirmatively
authorizes
suit
meet
requirement
enough
observe
trust
beneficiaries
clearly
remedy
nonfiduciaries
actively
assist
fiduciary
breach
common
law
ibid
remedy
nonfiduciaries
duty
beneficiaries
assist
fiduciary
breach
similar
duty
set
forth
erisa
noted
common
law
nonfiduciaries
made
subject
namely
fall
within
erisa
artificial
definition
fiduciary
exceptions
actions
law
obtain
payment
money
transfer
chattels
immediately
unconditionally
due
beneficiary
see
scott
fratcher
even
courts
divided
whether
equivalent
actions
also
brought
equity
see
id
dissent
argues
limit
relief
rendering
punitive
damages
unavailable
post
notion
concern
punitive
damages
motivated
congress
classic
example
projecting
current
attitudes
upon
helpless
past
unlike
availability
money
damages
always
central
concern
courts
legislatures
fashioning
causes
action
availability
punitive
damages
major
issue
today
erisa
enacted
see
pacific
mut
life
ins
haslip
dissenting
huber
liability
ellis
fairness
efficiency
law
punitive
damages
cal
rev
particularly
breach
trust
cases
edition
scott
fratcher
cites
case
issue
punitive
damages
see
scott
fratcher
edition
bogert
bogert
cites
two
see
bogert
bogert
supplements
treatises
however
cite
dozen
cases
issue
even
congress
concerned
extracompensatory
forms
relief
post
foolhardy
believe
excluding
legal
relief
way
prohibit
still
permitting
forms
monetary
relief
breach
trust
cases
dissent
confident
assertion
punitive
damages
available
equity
ibid
simply
correspond
state
law
erisa
enacted
year
earlier
major
treatise
remedies
prepared
say
majority
courts
examined
point
probably
still
refuse
grant
punitive
damages
equity
cases
dobbs
remedies
course
speaking
equity
cases
general
even
riskier
presume
punitive
damages
unavailable
subclass
equity
cases
damages
routinely
awarded
namely
breach
trust
cases
trust
cases
allow
punitive
damages
exclusively
actions
law
see
rivero
thomas
two
decisions
upon
dissent
relies
fleishman
krause
lindsay
nahstoll
dixon
northwestern
nat
bank
minneapolis
see
post
held
breach
trust
actions
issue
brought
law
thus
entitling
plaintiffs
jury
trial
decisions
noted
passing
plaintiffs
sought
punitive
well
compensatory
damages
neither
said
damages
obtained
much
less
obtained
law
dissent
claim
courts
appeals
adopted
theory
equitable
relief
used
erisa
exclude
punitive
damages
see
post
also
unfounded
opinion
dissent
cites
permits
punitive
damages
equitable
relief
limitation
exist
permits
equitable
also
remedial
relief
kuntz
reese
opinion
based
ninth
circuit
precedent
subsequently
reversed
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
see
kuntz
supra
formally
withdrawn
vacated
grounds
see
per
curiam
cert
denied
never
relied
upon
even
ninth
circuit
agree
dissent
see
post
distinction
equitable
remedial
relief
artless
agree
therefore
free
consider
meaningless
equitable
relief
must
mean
something
less
relief
congress
may
noted
used
language
equitable
remedial
relief
elsewhere
see
dissent
postulates
congress
used
legal
equitable
relief
language
cause
action
authorizing
lacked
discernible
analogue
common
law
trusts
means
indicating
courts
free
craft
whatever
relief
appropriate
post
demonstrably
administrative
accounting
requirements
like
ones
enforced
uses
legal
equitable
formulation
erisa
see
scott
fratcher
analogue
basic
duty
trustees
keep
render
accounts
upon
demand
beneficiary
see
id
bogert
bogert
pp
moreover
amendment
subchapter
dealing
pbgc
congress
created
cause
action
enforce
provisions
governing
termination
plans
using
appropriate
equitable
relief
language
appears
see
cause
action
reflects
common
law
analogue
created
pbgc
provisions
referred
text
employ
legal
equitable
formulation
justice
white
chief
justice
justice
stevens
justice
join
dissenting
majority
candidly
acknowledges
plausible
interpret
phrase
appropriate
equitable
relief
used
stat
least
standing
alone
meaning
relief
available
courts
equity
breach
trust
ante
majority
also
acknowledges
relief
petitioners
seek
compensatory
monetary
award
available
equity
courts
common
law
trusts
trustees
breach
duty
also
nonfiduciaries
knowingly
participating
breach
trust
ante
finally
dispute
erisa
grounded
common
law
experience
guided
principles
trust
law
construing
terms
statute
firestone
tire
rubber
bruch
nevertheless
majority
today
holds
enacting
erisa
congress
stripped
erisa
trust
beneficiaries
remedy
trustees
third
parties
enjoyed
equity
courts
common
law
although
assumed
cause
action
third
party
respondent
provided
erisa
remedies
available
limited
traditional
equitable
remedies
injunction
restitution
include
compensatory
damages
classic
form
legal
relief
ante
emphasis
original
believe
statutory
language
requires
result
elsewhere
recognized
anomaly
construing
erisa
way
afford
less
protection
employees
beneficiaries
enjoyed
erisa
enacted
firestone
supra
emphasis
added
must
dissent
concerned
many
pension
plans
corruptly
ineptly
mismanaged
american
workers
losing
financial
security
retirement
result
congress
enacted
erisa
declar
ing
policy
statute
protect
interests
participants
employee
benefit
plans
beneficiaries
requiring
disclosure
reporting
participants
beneficiaries
financial
information
respect
plans
establishing
standards
conduct
responsibility
obligation
fiduciaries
employee
benefit
plans
providing
appropriate
remedies
sanctions
ready
access
federal
courts
noted
previously
erisa
legislative
history
confirms
act
fiduciary
responsibility
provisions
codif
mak
applicable
erisa
fiduciaries
certain
principles
developed
evolution
law
trusts
firestone
supra
quoting
code
cong
pp
erisa
explained
abounds
language
terminology
trust
law
must
construed
background
common
law
trusts
firestone
supra
see
also
central
southeast
southwest
areas
pension
fund
central
transport
indeed
absent
express
statutory
departure
erisa
broader
definition
responsible
fiduciary
see
ante
congress
intended
courts
look
settled
experience
common
law
giving
shape
federal
common
law
rights
obligations
plans
firestone
supra
see
also
supra
code
cong
statement
williams
accordingly
common
law
trusts
must
look
construing
scope
appropriate
equitable
relief
breaches
trust
contemplated
majority
notes
common
law
courts
equity
predominant
forum
beneficiaries
claims
arising
breach
trust
courts
however
exclusive
forum
instances
jurisdiction
law
equity
generally
although
universally
acknowledged
beneficiary
elect
legal
equitable
remedies
see
clews
jamieson
bogert
bogert
law
trusts
trustees
pp
rev
ed
scott
fratcher
law
trusts
pp
ed
hill
trustees
remedy
law
available
beneficiary
trust
exclusive
remedy
equity
indeed
restatement
trusts
sets
separate
successive
sections
legal
equitable
remedies
available
beneficiaries
common
law
trusts
see
restatement
second
trusts
traditional
equitable
remedies
available
trust
beneficiary
included
compensatory
damages
equity
endeavor
ed
far
possible
replace
parties
situation
breach
trust
committed
hill
supra
see
also
tiffany
bullard
law
trusts
trustees
defendant
chargeable
losses
caused
trust
profits
trust
might
earned
absent
breach
included
necessary
payment
monetary
award
make
victims
breach
whole
clews
jamieson
supra
hill
supra
bogert
bogert
supra
see
also
mitchell
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
brennan
concurring
judgment
given
history
entirely
reasonable
view
construe
reference
appropriate
equitable
relief
encompass
equity
routine
remedy
breaches
compensatory
monetary
award
calculated
make
victims
whole
remedy
available
fiduciaries
participating
nonfiduciaries
construing
statute
manner
also
avoids
anomaly
interpreting
erisa
leave
congress
set
protect
participants
plans
beneficiaries
less
protection
enjoyed
erisa
enacted
firestone
indeed
precisely
four
justices
read
reference
appropriate
equitable
relief
russell
see
brennan
joined
white
marshall
blackmun
concurring
judgment
ii
majority
however
struggles
find
face
statute
evidence
narrowly
construed
first
observes
erisa
elsewhere
uses
terms
remedial
relief
legal
relief
reasons
congress
must
therefore
intended
differentiate
concepts
equitable
relief
second
noted
crucial
language
describes
available
relief
equitable
relief
asserted
ince
relief
available
breach
trust
obtained
equity
limiting
sort
relief
obtainable
equitable
relief
sense
whatever
relief
common
law
equity
provide
case
limit
relief
rendering
congress
imposition
modifier
equitable
nullity
ante
emphasis
original
searching
way
give
appropriate
equitable
relief
limiting
effect
majority
feels
compelled
read
phrase
encompassing
categories
relief
typically
available
broad
run
equity
cases
without
regard
particular
equitable
remedies
available
trust
cases
see
ante
emphasis
original
include
injunction
restitution
example
money
damages
see
ibid
see
however
words
appropriate
equitable
relief
descriptive
simply
refer
remedies
available
equity
common
law
trusts
whether
exclusive
remedies
breach
trust
disagree
majority
inference
using
term
legal
relief
elsewhere
erisa
congress
demonstrated
considered
judgment
constrict
relief
available
sure
statute
empowers
courts
award
appropriate
legal
equitable
relief
fiduciary
successfully
sues
employer
failing
make
required
contributions
multiemployer
plan
likewise
authorizes
secretary
labor
bring
civil
action
legal
equitable
relief
may
appropriate
force
administrator
employee
benefit
plan
file
certain
plan
documents
secretary
finally
statute
also
cited
majority
empower
courts
dispense
appropriate
relief
legal
equitable
actions
brought
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
pbgc
plan
fiduciaries
participants
beneficiaries
respect
peculiar
statutory
duties
relating
pbgc
see
also
authorizing
action
appropriate
legal
equitable
relief
significantly
however
none
causes
action
described
sections
relating
financing
multiemployer
plans
administrative
filing
requirements
pbgc
discernible
analogue
common
law
trusts
accordingly
common
law
tradition
either
law
equity
congress
might
direct
courts
surprising
congress
refer
legal
equitable
relief
making
clear
courts
free
craft
whatever
relief
appropriate
seems
treacherous
leap
draw
sections
congressional
intention
foreclose
compensatory
monetary
awards
notwithstanding
awards
always
considered
appropriate
equitable
relief
breach
trust
common
law
see
supra
even
accepting
however
equitable
relief
distinguished
legal
relief
statute
majority
wrong
supposing
former
concept
swallows
latter
reference
appropriate
equitable
relief
understood
encompass
remedies
traditionally
available
equity
courts
breach
trust
fact
matter
forms
relief
available
common
law
courts
equity
breach
trust
although
equity
courts
award
monetary
relief
make
victim
breach
trust
whole
extracompensatory
forms
relief
punitive
damages
available
long
recognized
courts
equity
absent
express
statutory
authorization
enforce
penalties
award
punitive
damages
see
tull
stevens
gladding
livingston
woodworth
see
also
sutherland
law
damages
ed
hale
law
damages
ed
sedgwick
measure
damages
ed
justice
kennedy
observed
limitation
equitable
relief
applied
trust
context
well
plaintiffs
recover
compensatory
monetary
relief
breach
trust
punitive
exemplary
damages
see
teamsters
terry
dissenting
opinion
contrast
punitive
damages
among
legal
remedies
available
common
law
trust
cases
trust
cases
historically
brought
actions
law
trustee
immediate
unconditional
duty
pay
funds
beneficiary
see
ante
acknowledged
beneficiary
may
recover
punitive
well
compensatory
damages
see
fleishman
krause
lindsay
nahstoll
reversing
remanding
jury
trial
beneficiary
claim
punitive
compensatory
damages
dixon
northwestern
nat
bank
minneapolis
moreover
majority
courts
adhere
view
equity
courts
even
trust
cases
award
punitive
damages
see
note
participant
beneficiary
remedies
erisa
extracontractual
punitive
damages
massachusetts
mutual
life
insurance
russell
cornell
see
also
dobbs
remedies
pp
number
courts
recent
decades
drawn
upon
legal
powers
award
punitive
damages
even
cases
historically
brought
equity
acknowledging
traditional
bar
relief
equity
courts
concluded
merger
law
equity
authorizes
modern
courts
draw
upon
legal
equitable
powers
crafting
appropriate
remedy
breach
trust
see
central
park
south
app
aff
gould
starr
mo
app
cert
denied
citizens
southern
nat
bank
haskins
see
also
new
jersey
division
horsemen
benevolent
protective
assn
new
jersey
racing
super
chancery
division
afford
full
range
equitable
legal
remedies
breach
trust
including
punitive
damages
cf
charles
epperson
iowa
forms
legal
relief
trust
cases
thus
available
equity
limiting
scope
relief
sort
relief
historically
provided
equity
courts
breach
trust
provides
meaningful
limitation
one
needed
basis
distinguishing
equitable
legal
relief
accordingly
statutory
text
compel
majority
rejection
reading
appropriate
equitable
relief
advanced
petitioners
solicitor
general
reading
majority
acknowledges
otherwise
plausible
see
ante
iii
although
trust
beneficiary
historically
equitable
suit
damages
fiduciary
breach
trust
well
participating
nonfiduciary
majority
today
construes
affording
remedy
fiduciary
participating
third
party
ground
damages
appropriate
equitable
relief
majority
conclusion
see
rests
transparently
insufficient
grounds
text
statute
supports
reading
permit
award
compensatory
monetary
relief
necessary
make
erisa
beneficiary
whole
breach
trust
reading
accord
established
equitable
remedies
available
common
law
trusts
congress
directed
us
construing
erisa
congress
primary
goal
enacting
statute
protection
beneficiaries
financial
security
corrupt
inept
plan
mismanagement
finally
reading
avoid
perverse
case
entirely
needless
result
construing
erisa
deprive
beneficiaries
remedies
enjoyed
prior
statute
enactment
reasons
respectfully
dissent
initial
matter
majority
expresses
uncertainty
whether
affords
cause
action
sort
remedy
nonfiduciaries
participate
fiduciary
breach
duty
statute
see
ante
view
however
statute
clearly
bar
suit
section
gives
cause
action
participant
beneficiary
fiduciary
plan
redress
violations
statute
dispute
erisa
fiduciary
breaches
duty
care
managing
plan
violation
statute
see
question
whether
remedies
provided
redress
violatio
must
stop
breaching
fiduciary
may
extend
nonfiduciaries
actively
assist
fiduciary
breach
section
expressly
provide
limitation
seem
appropriate
import
one
given
trust
beneficiaries
clearly
remedy
common
law
see
ante
erisa
grounded
common
law
intended
protect
interests
beneficiaries
moreover
amendment
statute
adding
seems
clearly
reflect
congress
understanding
erisa
provides
remedy
majority
notes
see
ante
empowers
secretary
labor
assess
civil
penalty
nonfiduciaries
knowing
ly
participat
fiduciary
breach
trust
supp
iii
subsection
provides
penalty
shall
equal
percent
applicable
recovery
amount
obtained
nonfiduciary
proceeding
provides
cause
action
secretary
parallels
provided
beneficiaries
see
also
ante
provision
clearly
contemplates
remedy
may
necessary
implication
nonfiduciaries
knowing
participation
fiduciary
breach
fiduciary
responsibilit
ies
given
understanding
accords
common
law
trust
principles
undergirding
erisa
also
compatible
language
see
basis
doubting
validity
petitioners
cause
action
section
erisa
state
laws
insofar
may
hereafter
relate
employee
benefit
plan
governed
erisa
although
majority
stops
short
deciding
preemption
implications
holding
see
ante
difficult
imagine
common
law
remedy
harm
alleged
participation
breach
fiduciary
duty
concerning
plan
survived
enactment
erisa
deliberately
expansive
preemption
provision
mcclendon
citation
omitted
majority
claims
find
common
law
analogue
action
likening
action
secretary
labor
enforce
erisa
administrative
filing
requirements
common
law
action
trustee
failure
keep
render
accounts
ante
analogy
seems
long
reach
common
law
duty
trustees
account
beneficiaries
transactions
made
behalf
trust
bears
best
slight
resemblance
duty
plan
administrators
file
secretary
labor
specified
annual
reports
plan
descriptions
summary
plan
descriptions
see
fact
statute
required
trustees
render
accounting
state
courts
see
scott
fratcher
law
trusts
ed
cited
ante
fails
establish
common
law
analogue
actions
secretary
moreover
text
statute
reflects
congress
careful
differentiation
legal
equitable
relief
majority
posits
presumably
must
also
reflect
careful
differentiation
equitable
remedial
relief
matter
legal
remedial
relief
see
breaching
fiduciary
shall
subject
equitable
remedial
relief
may
deem
appropriate
limiting
principle
congress
intended
convey
latter
term
readily
imagine
remedial
simply
means
intended
remedy
webster
ninth
new
collegiate
dictionary
relief
commonly
understood
synonym
remedy
least
congress
apparent
imprecision
regard
undermines
confidence
strong
inferences
drawn
majority
congress
varying
phraseology
concerning
relief
erisa
justice
kennedy
observation
legal
history
crafting
remedy
breach
trust
exclusive
aim
common
law
equity
courts
make
victim
whole
endeavor
ing
far
possible
replace
parties
situation
breach
trust
committed
hill
trustees
see
also
restatement
second
trusts
historically
punitive
damages
unavailable
equitable
action
theory
chancery
equity
conscience
permit
right
element
vengeance
beals
washington
international
accord
williamson
chicago
mut
lumber
stolz
franklin
ark
superior
constr
elmo
md
given
fuel
gas
orkin
exterminating
south
florida
truly
nolen
app
dobbs
remedies
pp
thus
even
equitable
actions
becomes
necessary
award
damages
compensatory
damages
allowed
karns
allen
see
also
laboratories
cert
denied
bernard
sedgwick
measure
damages
ed
majority
denigrates
traditional
rule
citing
professor
dobbs
treatise
remedies
treatise
noted
modern
trend
among
courts
eve
erisa
enactment
allow
punitive
damages
equity
cases
also
noted
majority
rule
remained
otherwise
moreover
trend
professor
dobbs
identified
driven
large
part
modern
merger
law
equity
consequent
belief
longer
reason
disallow
legal
remedies
traditionally
equitable
actions
see
ante
accordingly
majority
observation
way
undermines
validity
traditional
rule
well
ensconced
time
erisa
enactment
punitive
damages
appropriate
equitable
remedy
even
trust
cases
surprisingly
light
history
courts
appeals
passed
question
concluded
statutory
language
legislative
history
section
erisa
prohibit
recovery
punitive
damages
varhola
doe
see
also
harsch
eisenberg
cert
denied
sub
nom
bihler
eisenberg
drinkwater
metropolitan
life
ins
cert
denied
amos
blue
shield
alabama
cert
denied
sommers
drug
stores
co
employee
profit
sharing
trust
corrigan
enterprises
cert
denied
powell
chesapeake
potomac
telephone
virginia
cert
denied
respect
however
beneficiary
may
claim
equitable
remedial
relief
see
allowing
appropriate
relief
section
title
courts
split
whether
punitive
damages
may
recovered
compare
kuntz
reese
allowing
recovery
vacated
grounds
cert
denied
sommers
drug
stores
supra
disallowing
recovery
see
also
cox
eichler
ndcal
punitive
damages
available
thishis
russell
expressly
reserved
judgment
whether
punitive
damages
might
recovered
behalf
plan
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
majority
faults
notion
concern
punitive
damages
motivated
congress
drafting
erisa
grounds
availability
punitive
damages
major
issue
ante
neither
course
anything
suggest
availability
compensatory
damages
major
issue
although
majority
hesitate
attribute
concern
congress
event
seems
considerably
less
fanciful
suppose
congress
motivated
desire
limit
availability
punitive
damages
moved
desire
take
statute
intended
beneficiaries
traditional
possibly
means
relief