first
options
chicago
kaplan
argued
march
decided
may
case
arose
disputes
centered
workout
agreement
embodied
four
documents
governs
working
debts
owed
respondents
manuel
kaplan
wife
wholly
owned
investment
company
mk
investments
mki
petitioner
first
options
chicago
firm
clears
stock
trades
philadelphia
stock
exchange
first
options
demands
payment
went
unsatisfied
sought
arbitration
stock
exchange
panel
mki
signed
workout
document
containing
arbitration
agreement
submitted
arbitration
kaplans
signed
document
filed
objections
panel
denying
disagreement
first
options
arbitrable
arbitrators
decided
power
rule
dispute
merits
ruled
first
options
favor
district
confirmed
award
appeals
reversed
finding
dispute
arbitrable
appeals
said
courts
independently
decide
whether
arbitration
panel
jurisdiction
dispute
apply
ordinary
standards
review
considering
district
denial
respondents
motion
vacate
arbitration
award
held
arbitrability
options
dispute
subject
independent
review
courts
pp
answer
narrow
question
whether
arbitrators
courts
primary
power
decide
whether
parties
agreed
arbitrate
dispute
merits
fairly
simple
arbitrability
merits
dispute
depends
upon
whether
page
ii
parties
agreed
arbitrate
dispute
see
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
question
primary
power
decide
arbitrability
turns
upon
whether
parties
agreed
submit
question
arbitration
defer
arbitrator
arbitrability
decision
decide
question
independently
two
answers
flow
inexorably
fact
arbitration
simply
matter
contract
parties
pp
kaplans
agree
arbitrate
arbitrability
courts
generally
apply
ordinary
principles
governing
contract
formation
deciding
whether
agreement
exists
however
courts
assume
parties
agreed
arbitrate
arbitrability
unless
clea
unmistakabl
evidence
see
technologies
communications
workers
first
options
show
clear
agreement
part
kaplans
kaplans
objections
arbitrators
jurisdiction
indicate
want
arbitrators
binding
authority
conclusion
supported
obvious
explanation
presence
arbitrators
kaplan
wholly
owned
firm
arbitrating
workout
agreement
matters
third
circuit
law
suggested
might
argue
arbitrability
arbitrators
without
losing
right
independent
review
first
options
counterarguments
unpersuasive
pp
courts
appeals
apply
ordinary
standards
reviewing
district
decisions
upholding
arbitration
awards
accepting
findings
fact
clearly
erroneous
deciding
questions
law
de
novo
circumstances
apply
special
abuse
discretion
standard
undesirable
make
law
complicated
proliferating
special
review
standards
without
good
reason
importantly
appeals
reviewing
attitude
toward
district
decision
depend
upon
respective
institutional
advantages
trial
appellate
courts
upon
standard
review
likely
produce
particular
substantive
result
nothing
arbitration
act
supports
first
options
claim
appeals
use
different
standard
conducting
review
certain
district
decisions
pp
factbound
question
whether
appeals
erred
ultimate
conclusion
dispute
arbitrable
beyond
scope
questions
agreed
review
affirmed
breyer
delivered
opinion
unanimous
first
options
chicago
kaplan
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
case
consider
two
questions
courts
review
certain
matters
federal
arbitration
act
et
seq
ed
supp
district
review
arbitrator
decision
parties
agreed
arbitrate
dispute
appeals
review
district
decision
confirming
refusing
vacate
arbitration
award
case
concerns
several
related
disputes
one
side
first
options
chicago
firm
clears
stock
trades
philadelphia
stock
exchange
side
three
parties
manuel
kaplan
wife
carol
kaplan
wholly
owned
investment
company
mk
investments
mki
whose
trading
account
first
options
cleared
disputes
center
around
workout
agreement
embodied
four
separate
documents
governs
working
debts
first
options
mki
kaplans
incurred
result
october
stock
market
crash
entering
agreement
mki
lost
additional
million
first
options
took
first
options
chicago
kaplan
control
liquidated
certain
mki
assets
demanded
immediate
payment
entire
mki
debt
insisted
kaplans
personally
pay
deficiency
demands
went
unsatisfied
first
options
sought
arbitration
panel
philadelphia
stock
exchange
mki
signed
workout
document
four
contained
arbitration
clause
accepted
arbitration
kaplans
however
personally
signed
document
denied
disagreement
first
options
arbitrable
filed
written
objections
effect
arbitration
panel
arbitrators
decided
power
rule
merits
parties
dispute
favor
first
options
kaplans
asked
federal
district
vacate
arbitration
award
see
supp
first
options
requested
confirmation
see
confirmed
award
nonetheless
appeal
appeals
third
circuit
agreed
kaplans
dispute
arbitrable
reversed
district
confirmation
award
granted
certiorari
consider
two
questions
regarding
standards
appeals
used
review
determination
kaplans
dispute
first
options
arbitrable
first
appeals
said
courts
independently
decide
whether
arbitration
panel
jurisdiction
merits
particular
dispute
emphasis
added
first
options
asked
us
decide
whether
whether
courts
reviewing
arbitrators
decision
arbitrability
apply
de
novo
standard
review
deferential
standard
applied
arbitrators
decisions
merits
objecting
party
submitted
issue
arbitrators
decision
first
options
chicago
kaplan
pet
cert
second
appeals
stated
review
district
denial
motion
vacate
commercial
arbitration
award
correlative
grant
motion
confirm
de
novo
first
options
argues
appeals
instead
applied
abuse
discretion
standard
see
robbins
day
ii
first
question
standard
review
applied
arbitrator
decision
arbitrability
narrow
one
understand
narrow
consider
three
types
disagreement
present
case
first
kaplans
first
options
disagree
whether
kaplans
personally
liable
mki
debt
first
options
disagreement
makes
merits
dispute
second
disagree
whether
agreed
arbitrate
merits
disagreement
arbitrability
dispute
third
disagree
primary
power
decide
second
matter
power
belong
primarily
arbitrators
reviews
arbitrability
decision
deferentially
makes
mind
arbitrability
independently
consider
third
question
although
question
narrow
one
certain
practical
importance
party
agreed
arbitrate
normally
right
decision
merits
dispute
say
obligation
contract
party
agreed
arbitrate
effect
relinquished
much
right
practical
value
party
still
ask
review
arbitrator
decision
set
decision
aside
unusual
circumstances
see
first
options
chicago
kaplan
award
procured
corruption
fraud
undue
means
arbitrator
exceeded
powers
wilko
swan
parties
bound
arbitrator
decision
manifest
disregard
law
overruled
grounds
rodriguez
de
quijas
express
hence
arbitrator
primary
authority
decide
whether
party
agreed
arbitrate
make
critical
difference
party
resisting
arbitration
believe
answer
question
question
fairly
simple
arbitrability
merits
dispute
depends
upon
whether
parties
agreed
arbitrate
dispute
see
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
slip
mitsubishi
motors
soler
question
primary
power
decide
arbitrability
turns
upon
parties
agreed
matter
parties
agree
submit
arbitrability
question
arbitration
standard
reviewing
arbitrator
decision
matter
differ
standard
courts
apply
review
matter
parties
agreed
arbitrate
see
technologies
communications
workers
parties
may
agree
arbitrate
arbitrability
steelworkers
warrior
gulf
navigation
say
give
considerable
leeway
arbitrator
setting
aside
decision
certain
narrow
circumstances
see
hand
parties
agree
submit
arbitrability
question
arbitration
decide
question
decide
question
parties
submit
arbitration
namely
independently
two
first
options
chicago
kaplan
answers
flow
inexorably
fact
arbitration
simply
matter
contract
parties
way
resolve
disputes
disputes
parties
agreed
submit
arbitration
see
technologies
supra
mastrobuono
supra
slip
terminix
dobson
slip
mitsubishi
motors
supra
agree
first
options
therefore
must
defer
arbitrator
arbitrability
decision
parties
submitted
matter
arbitration
nevertheless
conclusion
help
first
options
win
case
fair
complete
answer
question
requires
word
decide
whether
parties
agreed
submit
arbitrability
issue
arbitration
word
makes
clear
kaplans
agree
arbitrate
arbitrability
deciding
whether
parties
agreed
arbitrate
certain
matter
including
arbitrability
courts
generally
though
qualification
discuss
apply
ordinary
principles
govern
formation
contracts
see
mastrobuono
supra
slip
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
perry
thomas
wilner
domke
commercial
arbitration
rev
ed
supp
hereinafter
domke
relevant
state
law
example
require
see
whether
parties
objectively
revealed
intent
submit
arbitrability
issue
arbitration
see
estate
jesmer
rohlev
app
law
state
whose
law
governs
workout
agreement
burkett
allstate
ins
first
options
chicago
kaplan
law
state
kaplans
objected
arbitrability
see
generally
mitsubishi
motors
supra
however
said
added
important
qualification
applicable
courts
decide
whether
party
agreed
arbitrators
decide
arbitrability
courts
assume
parties
agreed
arbitrate
arbitrability
unless
clea
unmistakabl
evidence
technologies
supra
see
warrior
gulf
supra
manner
law
treats
silence
ambiguity
question
primarily
decide
arbitrability
differently
way
treats
silence
ambiguity
question
whether
particular
dispute
arbitrable
within
scope
valid
arbitration
agreement
respect
latter
question
law
reverses
presumption
see
mitsubishi
motors
supra
ny
doubts
concerning
scope
arbitrable
issues
resolved
favor
arbitration
quoting
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
warrior
gulf
supra
difference
treatment
understandable
latter
question
arises
parties
contract
provides
arbitration
issues
circumstances
parties
likely
gave
least
thought
scope
arbitration
given
law
permissive
policies
respect
arbitration
see
mitsubishi
motors
supra
one
understand
law
insist
upon
clarity
concluding
parties
want
arbitrate
related
matter
see
domke
issues
deemed
arbitrable
unless
clear
arbitration
clause
included
hand
former
question
primarily
decide
arbitrability
question
rather
arcane
party
often
might
focus
first
options
chicago
kaplan
upon
question
upon
significance
arbitrators
decide
scope
powers
cf
cox
reflections
upon
labor
arbitration
harv
rev
cited
warrior
gulf
given
principle
party
forced
arbitrate
issues
specifically
agreed
submit
arbitration
one
understand
courts
might
hesitate
interpret
silence
ambiguity
decide
arbitrability
point
giving
arbitrators
power
might
often
force
unwilling
parties
arbitrate
matter
reasonably
thought
judge
arbitrator
decide
ibid
see
generally
dean
witter
reynolds
byrd
arbitration
act
basic
purpose
ensure
judicial
enforcement
privately
made
agreements
arbitrate
record
us
first
options
show
kaplans
clearly
agreed
arbitrators
decide
arbitrate
question
arbitrability
first
options
relies
kaplans
filing
arbitrators
written
memorandum
objecting
arbitrators
jurisdiction
merely
arguing
arbitrability
issue
arbitrator
indicate
clear
willingness
arbitrate
issue
willingness
effectively
bound
arbitrator
decision
point
contrary
insofar
kaplans
forcefully
objecting
arbitrators
deciding
dispute
first
options
one
naturally
think
want
arbitrators
binding
authority
conclusion
draws
added
support
obvious
explanation
kaplans
presence
arbitrators
mki
kaplan
wholly
owned
firm
arbitrating
workout
agreement
matters
third
circuit
law
suggested
kaplans
might
argue
arbitrability
arbitrators
without
losing
right
independent
first
options
chicago
kaplan
review
teamsters
western
pennsylvania
motor
carriers
see
first
options
makes
several
counterarguments
kaplans
ways
get
independent
decision
question
arbitrability
without
arguing
issue
arbitrators
trying
enjoin
arbitration
refusing
participate
arbitration
defending
petition
first
options
brought
compel
arbitration
see
permitting
parties
argue
arbitrability
arbitrator
without
bound
result
cause
delay
waste
resolution
disputes
arbitration
act
therefore
requires
presumption
kaplans
agreed
bound
arbitrators
decision
contrary
first
points
however
true
simply
say
anything
whether
kaplans
intended
bound
arbitrators
decision
second
point
inconclusive
factual
circumstances
vary
greatly
permit
confident
conclusion
whether
allowing
arbitrator
make
initial
independently
reviewable
arbitrability
determination
general
slow
dispute
resolution
process
third
point
legally
erroneous
strong
policy
favoring
first
options
respect
particular
argument
basic
objective
area
resolve
disputes
quickest
manner
possible
matter
parties
wishes
dean
witter
reynolds
supra
ensure
commercial
arbitration
agreements
like
contracts
enforced
according
terms
mastrobuono
slip
quoting
volt
information
sciences
according
intentions
parties
mitsubishi
motors
first
options
chicago
kaplan
see
slip
policy
favors
kaplans
first
options
conclude
kaplans
clearly
agree
submit
question
arbitrability
arbitration
appeals
correct
finding
arbitrability
options
dispute
subject
independent
review
courts
iii
turn
next
standard
appeals
apply
reviewing
district
decision
refuses
vacate
see
supp
confirms
see
arbitration
award
although
third
circuit
sometimes
used
words
de
novo
describe
standard
opinion
makes
clear
simply
believes
circuits
one
special
standard
governing
review
district
decision
circumstances
rather
review
example
district
decision
confirming
arbitration
award
ground
parties
agreed
submit
dispute
arbitration
proceed
like
review
district
decision
finding
agreement
parties
accepting
findings
fact
clearly
erroneous
deciding
questions
law
de
novo
see
one
appeals
eleventh
circuit
said
something
different
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
says
applies
specially
lenient
abuse
discretion
standard
even
questions
law
reviewing
district
decisions
confirm
set
aside
arbitration
awards
see
robbins
day
first
options
asks
us
hold
eleventh
circuit
view
correct
believe
however
majority
circuits
right
saying
courts
appeals
apply
first
options
chicago
kaplan
ordinary
special
standards
reviewing
district
decisions
upholding
arbitration
awards
one
thing
undesirable
make
law
complicated
proliferating
review
standards
without
good
reasons
importantly
reviewing
attitude
appeals
takes
toward
district
decision
depend
upon
respective
institutional
advantages
trial
appellate
courts
upon
standard
review
likely
produce
particular
substantive
result
salve
regina
college
russell
law
example
tells
courts
trial
appellate
give
administrative
agencies
degree
legal
leeway
review
certain
interpretations
law
agencies
made
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
one
knowledge
suggested
policy
giving
leeway
agencies
means
appeals
give
extra
leeway
district
decision
upholds
agency
similarly
courts
grant
arbitrators
considerable
leeway
reviewing
arbitration
decisions
fact
mean
appellate
courts
give
extra
leeway
district
courts
uphold
arbitrators
first
options
argues
arbitration
act
special
act
one
section
allows
courts
appeals
conduct
interlocutory
review
certain
antiarbitration
district
rulings
orders
enjoining
arbitrations
upholding
arbitration
orders
refusing
enjoin
arbitrations
supp
portion
act
governs
timing
review
therefore
weak
support
distinct
claim
appeals
use
different
standard
reviewing
certain
district
decisions
act
says
nothing
standards
review
first
options
chicago
kaplan
conclude
appeals
used
proper
standards
reviewing
district
arbitrability
determinations
iv
finally
first
options
argues
even
rule
questions
nonetheless
hold
appeals
erred
ultimate
conclusion
merits
options
dispute
arbitrable
factbound
issue
beyond
scope
questions
agreed
review
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
page