virginia
bankshares
sandberg
argued
october
decided
june
part
proposed
merger
first
american
bank
virginia
bank
merged
petitioner
virginia
bankshares
vbi
wholly
owned
subsidiary
petitioner
first
american
bankshares
fabi
bank
executive
committee
board
approved
price
share
minority
stockholders
lose
interests
bank
merger
although
virginia
law
required
merger
proposal
submitted
vote
shareholders
meeting
preceded
circulation
informational
statement
shareholders
petitioner
bank
directors
nevertheless
solicited
proxies
voting
proposal
solicitation
urged
proposal
adoption
stated
plan
approved
opportunity
minority
shareholders
receive
high
value
stock
respondent
sandberg
give
proxy
filed
suit
district
merger
approved
seeking
damages
petitioners
inter
alia
soliciting
proxies
means
materially
false
misleading
statements
violation
securities
exchange
act
security
exchange
commission
rule
among
things
alleged
directors
believed
alternative
recommend
merger
wished
remain
board
trial
obtained
jury
instruction
based
language
mills
electric
prevail
without
showing
reliance
alleged
misstatements
long
material
proxy
solicitation
essential
link
merger
process
awarded
amount
equal
difference
offered
price
stock
true
value
remaining
respondents
prevailed
separate
action
raising
similar
claims
appeals
affirmed
holding
certain
statements
proxy
solicitation
including
one
regarding
stock
value
materially
misleading
respondents
maintain
action
even
though
votes
needed
effectuate
merger
held
knowingly
false
statements
reasons
opinion
belief
even
though
conclusory
form
may
actionable
misstatements
material
fact
within
meaning
rule
pp
statements
per
se
inactionable
statement
belief
corporate
directors
recommended
course
action
explanation
reasons
recommending
may
materially
significant
since
substantial
likelihood
reasonable
shareholder
consider
important
deciding
vote
see
tsc
industries
northway
pp
statements
reasons
opinions
beliefs
statements
respect
material
fact
within
meaning
rule
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
support
petitioners
position
statements
placed
outside
rule
scope
policy
grounds
right
bring
suit
act
limited
actual
stock
buyers
sellers
risk
nuisance
litigation
sellers
buyers
manufacture
claims
hypothetical
action
unconstrained
independent
evidence
contrast
reasons
directors
recommendations
statements
belief
factual
statements
directors
act
reasons
given
hold
belief
stated
statements
subject
matter
reason
belief
expressed
thus
matters
corporate
record
subject
documentation
supported
attacked
objective
evidence
outside
plaintiff
control
conclusory
terms
commercial
context
also
reasonably
understood
rest
factual
basis
provable
facts
either
furnish
good
reasons
make
conclusory
judgment
count
expressions
judgments
stated
knowledge
truth
falsity
like
definite
statements
defended
attacked
orthodox
evidentiary
process
respondents
presented
facts
bank
assets
actual
potential
level
operation
prove
directors
statement
misleading
stock
value
false
explanation
directors
beliefs
however
director
disbelief
undisclosed
motivation
standing
alone
insufficient
basis
sustain
action
pp
fact
proxy
material
discloses
offending
statement
factual
basis
limits
liability
misstatements
inconsistency
obvious
neutralizes
misleading
conclusion
capacity
influence
reasonable
shareholder
evidence
fell
short
compelling
jury
find
misleading
statement
facial
materiality
neutralized
pp
respondents
show
causation
damages
compensable
pp
allowing
shareholders
whose
votes
required
law
corporate
bylaw
authorize
corporate
action
subject
proxy
solicitation
bring
implied
private
action
pursuant
case
borak
extend
scope
borak
actions
beyond
ambit
mills
electric
supra
held
proxy
solicitation
essential
link
transaction
links
directors
proposal
votes
legally
required
authorize
action
proposed
serious
obstacle
expansion
borak
right
manifestation
either
act
legislative
history
congressional
intent
recognize
cause
action
broad
proposed
respondents
private
right
action
violating
federal
statute
must
ultimately
rest
congressional
intent
provide
private
remedy
touche
ross
redington
breadth
right
recognized
general
matter
grow
beyond
scope
congressionally
intended
nonetheless
faced
claim
equality
rounding
scope
implied
private
action
look
policy
reasons
deciding
outer
limits
right
lie
see
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
supra
pp
respondents
theory
rejected
link
existed
essential
vbi
fabi
order
avoid
minority
stockholders
ill
unwilling
proceed
merger
without
approval
manifested
proxies
case
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
supra
threats
speculative
claims
procedural
intractability
inherent
theory
linked
directors
desire
cosmetic
vote
causation
turn
inferences
directors
thought
done
without
minority
shareholder
approval
issues
hazy
litigation
protracted
resolution
unreliable
pp
respondents
rely
theory
proxy
statement
essential
link
case
part
means
avoid
suit
virginia
state
law
bars
shareholder
seeking
avoid
transaction
tainted
director
conflict
interest
inter
alia
minority
shareholders
ratified
transaction
disclosure
material
facts
transaction
conflict
indication
law
facts
case
proxy
solicitation
resulted
loss
need
resolve
question
whether
provides
federal
remedy
false
misleading
proxy
statement
results
shareholder
loss
state
remedy
pp
souter
delivered
opinion
part
rehnquist
white
marshall
blackmun
scalia
kennedy
joined
part
ii
rehnquist
white
marshall
blackmun
kennedy
joined
parts
iii
iv
rehnquist
white
scalia
joined
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
post
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
marshall
joined
post
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
post
stephen
shapiro
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
andrew
frey
kenneth
geller
john
stump
lewis
booker
joseph
hassett
argued
cause
respondents
brief
john
keeney
george
mernick
iii
michael
dreeben
argued
cause
securities
exchange
commission
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
brief
acting
solicitor
general
bryson
deputy
solicitor
general
shapiro
james
doty
paul
gonson
jacob
stillman
joseph
franco
alfred
byrne
colleen
bombardier
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
american
bankers
association
et
al
john
gill
iii
michael
crotty
charles
marinaccio
richard
whiting
american
corporate
counsel
association
et
al
nancy
nord
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
section
securities
exchange
act
stat
authorizes
securities
exchange
commission
sec
adopt
rules
solicitation
proxies
prohibits
violation
case
borak
first
recognized
implied
private
right
action
breach
implemented
sec
rule
prohibits
solicitation
proxies
means
materially
false
misleading
statements
questions
us
whether
statement
couched
conclusory
qualitative
terms
purporting
explain
directors
reasons
recommending
certain
corporate
action
materially
misleading
within
meaning
rule
whether
causation
damages
compensable
shown
member
class
minority
shareholders
whose
votes
required
law
corporate
bylaw
authorize
corporate
action
subject
proxy
solicitation
hold
knowingly
false
statements
reasons
may
actionable
even
though
conclusory
form
respondents
failed
demonstrate
equitable
basis
required
extend
private
action
shareholders
indication
congressional
intent
lacking
december
first
american
bankshares
fabi
bank
holding
company
began
merger
first
american
bank
virginia
bank
eventually
merged
virginia
bankshares
vbi
wholly
owned
subsidiary
fabi
vbi
owned
bank
shares
remaining
hands
minority
shareholders
fabi
hired
investment
banking
firm
keefe
bruyette
woods
kbw
give
opinion
appropriate
price
shares
minority
holders
lose
interests
bank
result
merger
based
market
quotations
unverified
information
fabi
kbw
gave
bank
executive
committee
opinion
share
fair
price
minority
stock
executive
committee
approved
merger
proposal
price
full
board
followed
suit
although
virginia
law
required
merger
proposal
submitted
vote
shareholders
meeting
meeting
preceded
circulation
statement
information
shareholders
directors
nevertheless
solicited
proxies
voting
proposal
annual
meeting
set
april
solicitation
directors
urged
proposal
adoption
stated
approved
plan
opportunity
minority
shareholders
achieve
high
value
elsewhere
described
fair
price
stock
although
minority
shareholders
gave
proxies
requested
respondent
sandberg
approval
merger
sought
damages
district
eastern
district
virginia
vbi
fabi
directors
bank
pleaded
two
counts
one
soliciting
proxies
violation
rule
breaching
fiduciary
duties
owed
minority
shareholders
state
law
first
count
sandberg
alleged
among
things
directors
believed
price
offered
high
terms
merger
fair
recommended
merger
believed
alternative
wished
remain
board
trial
sandberg
invoked
language
opinion
mills
electric
obtain
instruction
jury
find
without
showing
reliance
alleged
misstatements
long
material
proxy
solicitation
essential
link
merger
process
jury
verdicts
sandberg
counts
finding
violations
rule
defendants
breach
fiduciary
duties
bank
directors
jury
awarded
sandberg
share
found
received
stock
valued
adequately
sandberg
case
pending
separate
action
similar
allegations
brought
petitioners
district
district
columbia
several
minority
shareholders
including
respondent
weinstein
like
sandberg
withheld
proxy
case
transferred
eastern
district
virginia
sandberg
action
tried
weinstein
respondents
successfully
pleaded
collateral
estoppel
get
summary
judgment
liability
appeal
appeals
fourth
circuit
affirmed
judgments
holding
certain
statements
proxy
solicitation
materially
misleading
purposes
rule
respondents
maintain
action
even
though
votes
needed
effectuate
merger
granted
certiorari
importance
issues
presented
ii
appeals
affirmed
petitioners
liability
two
statements
found
materially
misleading
violation
act
one
plan
merger
approved
board
directors
provides
opportunity
bank
public
shareholders
achieve
high
value
shares
app
pet
cert
petitioners
argue
statements
opinion
belief
incorporating
indefinite
unverifiable
expressions
actionable
misstatements
material
fact
within
meaning
rule
declaration
opinion
belief
never
actionable
placed
proxy
solicitation
incorporating
statements
fact
sufficient
enable
readers
draw
independent
conclusions
consider
first
actionability
per
se
statements
reasons
opinion
belief
statement
definition
purports
express
consciously
speaker
mind
interpret
jury
verdict
finding
directors
statements
belief
opinion
made
knowledge
directors
hold
beliefs
opinions
expressed
confine
discussion
statements
made
statements
may
materially
significant
raises
serious
question
meaning
materiality
requirement
liability
discussed
length
tsc
industries
northway
held
fact
material
substantial
likelihood
reasonable
shareholder
consider
important
deciding
vote
think
room
deny
statement
belief
corporate
directors
recommended
course
action
explanation
reasons
recommending
take
importance
shareholders
know
directors
usually
knowledge
expertness
far
exceeding
normal
investor
resources
directors
perceived
superiority
magnified
even
common
knowledge
state
law
customarily
obliges
exercise
judgment
shareholders
interest
cf
day
avery
app
action
misrepresentation
naturally
shareowner
faced
proxy
request
think
important
know
directors
beliefs
course
recommend
specific
reasons
urging
stockholders
embrace
assuming
materiality
question
remains
whether
statements
reasons
opinions
beliefs
statements
respect
material
fact
fall
within
strictures
rule
petitioners
argue
invite
wasteful
litigation
amorphous
issues
outside
readily
provable
realm
fact
recognize
liability
proof
directors
recommend
merger
stated
reason
cite
authority
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
urging
us
recognize
sound
policy
grounds
placing
statements
outside
scope
rule
agree
blue
chip
stamps
instructive
illustrating
line
manageable
litigation
facts
read
supporting
petitioners
position
issue
blue
chip
stamps
scope
class
plaintiffs
entitled
seek
relief
implied
private
cause
action
violating
act
prohibiting
manipulation
deception
purchase
sale
certain
securities
contrary
commission
rules
held
expanding
class
actual
buyers
sellers
include
rely
deceptive
sales
practices
taking
action
either
sell
buy
observed
actual
sellers
buyers
sue
compensation
must
identify
specific
number
shares
bought
sold
order
calculate
limit
ensuing
recovery
recognizing
liability
merely
investors
however
exposed
courts
litigation
unconstrained
anchor
demonstrable
fact
resting
instead
plaintiff
subjective
hypothesis
number
shares
sold
purchased
hindsight
natural
temptation
hypothesize
boldness
magnified
risk
nuisance
litigation
compounded
opportunity
prolong
discovery
capacity
claims
resting
undocumented
personal
assertion
resist
resolution
short
settlement
trial
premises
policy
added
textual
analysis
precedent
blue
chip
stamps
deflected
threat
vexatious
litigation
many
rather
hazy
issues
historical
fact
proof
depended
almost
entirely
oral
testimony
attacks
truth
directors
statements
reasons
belief
however
need
carry
threats
statements
factual
two
senses
statements
directors
act
reasons
given
hold
belief
stated
statements
subject
matter
reason
belief
expressed
neither
sense
proof
disproof
statements
implicate
concerns
expressed
blue
chip
stamps
root
concerns
plaintiff
capacity
manufacture
claims
hypothetical
action
unconstrained
independent
evidence
reasons
directors
recommendations
statements
belief
contrast
characteristically
matters
corporate
record
subject
documentation
supported
attacked
evidence
historical
fact
outside
plaintiff
control
evidence
include
corporate
minutes
statements
directors
circumstantial
evidence
bearing
facts
reasonably
underlie
reasons
claimed
honesty
statement
reasons
basis
recommendation
action
point
becomes
especially
clear
reasons
beliefs
go
valuations
dollars
cents
answer
argue
petitioners
quoted
statement
liability
predicated
express
reason
dollars
cents
focused
instead
indefinite
unverifiable
term
high
value
much
like
similar
claim
merger
terms
fair
shareholders
objection
ignores
fact
conclusory
terms
commercial
context
reasonably
understood
rest
factual
basis
justifies
accurate
absence
renders
misleading
provable
facts
either
furnish
good
reasons
make
conclusory
commercial
judgment
count
expressions
judgments
uttered
knowledge
truth
falsity
like
definite
statements
defended
attacked
orthodox
evidentiary
process
either
substantiates
underlying
justifications
tends
disprove
existence
addressing
analogous
issue
action
misrepresentation
day
avery
app
example
held
statement
executive
committee
law
firm
partner
worse
solely
impending
merger
found
material
misrepresentation
cf
vulcan
metals
simmons
mfg
hand
opinion
fact
parties
situated
buyer
may
reasonably
rely
upon
expression
seller
opinion
excuse
give
false
one
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
pp
ed
case
whether
high
proposal
fair
minority
shareholders
depended
whether
provable
facts
bank
assets
actual
potential
levels
operation
substantiated
value
less
figure
assessed
accordance
recognized
methods
valuation
respondents
adduced
evidence
facts
proving
statement
misleading
subject
matter
false
expression
directors
reasons
whereas
proxy
statement
described
price
offering
premium
book
value
market
price
evidence
indicated
calculation
book
figure
based
appreciated
value
bank
real
estate
holdings
eliminated
premium
evidence
significance
market
price
showed
kbw
conceded
market
closed
thin
dominated
fabi
facts
omitted
statement
indeed
evidence
going
concern
value
bank
excess
per
share
common
stock
another
fact
never
disclosed
however
conclusory
directors
statement
may
open
attack
evidence
subject
neither
plaintiff
control
ready
manufacture
undue
risk
liability
uncontrollable
litigation
allowing
respondents
opportunity
recovery
allegation
misleading
call
high
analysis
comports
holding
marked
nearest
prior
approach
issue
faced
tsc
industries
sure
reversed
summary
judgment
borak
plaintiff
sued
description
proposed
compensation
minority
shareholders
offering
substantial
premium
current
market
values
held
case
undisputed
facts
conclusory
adjective
substantial
materially
misleading
necessary
matter
law
remand
trial
assumed
description
materially
misleading
within
meaning
rule
actionable
see
tsc
industries
supra
plaintiff
permitted
prove
specific
statement
reason
knowingly
false
misleadingly
incomplete
even
stated
conclusory
terms
reaching
conclusion
considered
statements
reasons
sort
exemplified
misstate
speaker
reasons
also
mislead
stated
subject
matter
value
shares
statement
belief
may
open
objection
former
respect
however
solely
misstatement
psychological
fact
speaker
belief
says
case
example
appeals
alluded
limited
falsity
observing
jury
certainly
justified
believing
directors
believe
merger
per
share
minority
stockholders
interest
rather
voted
reasons
retaining
seats
board
question
arises
whether
disbelief
undisclosed
belief
motivation
standing
alone
sufficient
basis
sustain
action
absent
proof
sort
objective
evidence
described
statement
also
expressly
impliedly
asserted
something
false
misleading
subject
matter
think
proof
mere
disbelief
belief
undisclosed
suffice
liability
nothing
required
proven
case
reverse
reason
one
hand
rare
find
case
evidence
solely
disbelief
undisclosed
motivation
without
proof
statement
defective
subject
matter
certainly
hold
director
naked
admission
disbelief
incompetent
evidence
proxy
statement
false
misleading
character
unusual
admission
often
stand
alone
substantially
narrow
cause
action
requiring
plaintiff
demonstrate
something
false
misleading
statement
expressly
impliedly
declared
subject
hand
recognize
liability
mere
disbelief
undisclosed
motive
without
demonstration
proxy
statement
false
misleading
subject
authorize
litigation
confined
solely
one
skeptical
spoke
impurities
director
unclean
heart
stedman
storer
supp
sdny
dealing
think
cross
line
blue
chip
stamps
sought
draw
true
liability
recognized
rest
actual
hypothetical
psychological
fact
temptation
rest
otherwise
nonexistent
action
psychological
enquiry
alone
threaten
sort
strike
suits
attrition
discovery
blue
chip
stamps
sought
discourage
therefore
hold
disbelief
undisclosed
motivation
standing
alone
insufficient
satisfy
element
fact
must
established
petitioners
position
assumes
relationship
conclusory
judgment
underlying
facts
described
part
supra
thus
citing
radol
thomas
supp
sd
ohio
petitioners
argue
even
conclusory
statements
reason
belief
actionable
confine
liability
instances
proxy
material
fails
disclose
offending
statement
factual
basis
justification
holding
shareholders
entitled
judicial
relief
given
evidence
stated
reason
proxy
recommendation
misleading
opportunity
draw
conclusion
answer
argument
rests
difference
merely
misleading
statement
one
materially
misleading
statement
always
lose
deceptive
edge
simply
joinder
others
true
true
statements
may
discredit
one
obviously
risk
real
deception
drops
nil
since
liability
must
rest
deceptiveness
materiality
well
significant
enough
important
reasonable
investor
deciding
vote
see
tsc
industries
petitioners
perfectly
firm
ground
insofar
argue
publishing
accurate
facts
proxy
statement
render
misleading
proposition
unimportant
ground
liability
every
mixture
true
neutralize
deceptive
take
financial
analyst
spot
tension
one
whatever
misleading
remain
materially
liability
follow
gerstle
sufficient
overtones
might
picked
sensitive
antennae
investment
analysts
cf
milkovich
lorain
journal
defamatory
assessment
facts
actionable
even
facts
underlying
assessment
accurately
presented
point
proxy
statement
inform
challenge
reader
critical
wits
inconsistency
exhaust
misleading
conclusion
capacity
influence
reasonable
shareholder
action
fail
element
materiality
suffice
say
evidence
invoked
petitioners
instant
case
fell
short
compelling
jury
find
facial
materiality
misleading
statement
neutralized
directors
claim
example
made
explanatory
disclosure
reasons
recommendation
said
keep
seats
following
merger
failed
mention
least
one
admitted
testimony
expectation
without
supporting
proposal
app
although
proxy
statement
speak
factually
merger
price
describing
higher
share
prices
recent
sales
failed
even
mention
closed
market
dominated
fabi
none
disclosures
directors
point
anything
record
shows
another
fact
statement
invoke
arguably
even
worse
claim
merger
price
exceeded
book
value
controverted
seen
already
evidence
higher
book
value
directors
conceded
reflecting
appreciation
bank
real
estate
portfolio
finally
solicitation
omitted
mention
bank
value
going
concern
share
merger
price
sum
compelling
case
statement
immateriality
accuracy
iii
second
issue
us
left
open
mills
electric
whether
causation
damages
compensable
implied
private
right
action
demonstrated
member
class
minority
shareholders
whose
votes
required
law
corporate
bylaw
authorize
transaction
giving
rise
claim
case
borak
address
requisites
causation
define
class
plaintiffs
eligible
sue
general
holding
private
cause
action
available
shareholder
class
acquired
greater
clarity
definite
concept
causation
mills
addressed
sufficiency
proof
misstatements
proxy
solicitation
responsible
damages
claimed
merger
subject
complaint
although
majority
stockholder
mills
controlled
half
corporation
shares
vote
needed
approve
merger
proposal
proxies
obtained
merger
carried
minority
shareholders
brought
borak
action
mills
question
arose
whether
plaintiffs
burden
demonstrate
causation
damages
traceable
violation
required
proof
defect
proxy
solicitation
decisive
effect
voting
mills
avoided
evidentiary
morass
followed
requiring
individualized
proof
enough
minority
shareholders
relied
upon
misstatements
swing
vote
instead
held
causation
damages
material
proxy
misstatement
established
showing
minority
proxies
necessary
sufficient
authorize
corporate
acts
given
accordance
tenor
solicitation
described
causal
relationship
calling
proxy
solicitation
essential
link
accomplishment
transaction
ibid
case
found
solicitation
essential
contrasted
one
addressed
class
minority
shareholders
without
votes
required
law
bylaw
authorize
action
proposed
left
another
day
decide
whether
minority
shareholder
demonstrate
causation
case
respondents
address
mills
open
question
proffering
two
theories
proxy
solicitation
addressed
essential
link
mills
causation
test
argue
first
link
existed
essential
simply
vbi
fabi
unwilling
proceed
merger
without
approval
manifested
minority
shareholders
proxies
obtained
without
solicitation
express
misstatements
misleading
omissions
reasoning
causal
connection
depend
desire
avoid
bad
shareholder
public
relations
essential
character
causal
link
stem
enforceable
terms
parties
corporate
relationship
one
party
apprehension
ill
alternative
respondents
argue
proxy
statement
essential
link
directors
proposal
merger
means
satisfy
state
statutory
requirement
minority
shareholder
approval
condition
saving
merger
voidability
resulting
conflict
interest
part
one
bank
directors
jack
beddow
voted
favor
merger
also
serving
director
fabi
brief
respondents
terms
code
ann
minority
approval
disclosure
material
facts
transaction
director
interest
one
three
avenues
insulate
merger
later
attack
conflict
two
others
ratification
bank
directors
like
disclosure
proof
merger
fair
corporation
theory
causation
depend
use
proxy
statement
purpose
obtaining
votes
sufficient
bar
minority
shareholder
commencing
proceedings
declare
merger
void
although
respondents
proffered
theories
establishing
chain
causal
connection
proxy
statement
claimed
essential
link
neither
theory
presents
proxy
solicitation
essential
sense
mills
causal
sequence
solicitation
links
directors
proposal
votes
legally
required
authorize
action
proposed
consequence
theory
adopted
extend
scope
borak
actions
beyond
ambit
mills
expand
class
plaintiffs
entitled
bring
borak
actions
include
shareholders
whose
initial
authorization
transaction
prompting
proxy
solicitation
unnecessary
assessing
legitimacy
extension
expansion
calls
application
fundamental
principles
governing
recognition
right
action
implied
federal
statute
first
fact
considered
focus
borak
opinion
rule
emerged
years
since
borak
mills
came
recognition
private
right
action
violating
federal
statute
must
ultimately
rest
congressional
intent
provide
private
remedy
touche
ross
redington
corollary
follows
breadth
right
recognized
general
matter
grow
beyond
scope
congressionally
intended
rule
corollary
present
respondents
serious
obstacle
find
manifestation
intent
recognize
cause
action
class
plaintiffs
broad
respondents
theory
causation
entail
first
blush
might
seem
otherwise
borak
certainly
ignore
matter
intent
opinion
adverted
statutory
object
protection
investors
animating
congress
intent
provide
judicial
relief
necessary
quoted
evidence
intent
house
senate
committee
reports
borak
probe
congressional
mind
however
never
focused
squarely
private
rights
action
distinct
substantive
objects
legislation
one
member
borak
later
characterized
implication
private
right
action
resting
modestly
act
exclusively
procedural
provision
affording
access
federal
forum
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
harlan
concurring
judgment
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
generally
loss
fundamentals
securities
regulation
ed
see
also
touche
ross
supra
fact
importance
enquiring
specifically
intent
authorize
private
cause
action
became
clear
later
see
cort
ash
later
still
touche
ross
intent
accorded
primacy
among
considerations
might
thought
bear
decision
recognize
private
remedy
dealing
claimed
private
right
act
explained
central
inquiry
remains
whether
congress
intended
create
either
expressly
implication
private
cause
action
looking
act
text
legislative
history
mindful
heightened
concern
reveals
little
help
toward
understanding
intended
scope
private
right
according
house
report
congress
meant
promote
free
exercise
stockholders
voting
rights
protect
air
corporate
suffrage
abuses
exemplified
proxy
solicitations
concealed
senate
report
called
real
nature
issues
settled
subsequent
votes
true
reports
like
language
act
carry
clear
message
congress
meant
protect
investors
misinformation
rendered
unwitting
agents
damage
true
congress
reticent
indications
far
protection
might
depend
private
action
response
reticence
may
course
claim
enforced
effectively
sake
intended
beneficiaries
without
participation
private
litigants
borak
supra
force
argument
inferred
congressional
intent
depends
degree
need
perceived
congress
trouble
inferring
congressional
urgency
depend
implied
private
actions
deter
violations
congress
expressly
provided
private
rights
action
act
see
congressional
silence
thus
serious
obstacle
expansion
cognizable
borak
causation
however
necessarily
insurmountable
barrier
first
effort
recent
years
expand
scope
action
originally
inferred
act
without
conclusive
guidance
congress
see
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
may
look
earlier
case
proper
response
plea
expansion
accepted
proposition
legal
structure
private
statutory
rights
developed
without
clear
indications
congressional
intent
contours
structure
need
frozen
absolutely
result
demonstrably
inequitable
class
plaintiffs
claims
comparable
previously
recognized
faced
case
claim
equality
rounding
scope
implied
private
statutory
right
action
looked
policy
reasons
deciding
outer
limits
right
lie
may
less
face
respondents
pleas
private
remedy
place
footing
shareholders
votes
necessary
initial
corporate
action
blue
chip
stamps
set
example
worth
recalling
preface
specific
policy
analysis
consequences
recognizing
respondents
first
theory
desire
avoid
minority
shareholders
ill
suffice
justify
recognizing
requisite
causality
proxy
statement
needed
garner
minority
support
recalled
blue
chip
stamps
raised
concerns
practical
consequences
allowing
recovery
act
rule
evidence
merely
hypothetical
buyer
seller
might
done
set
facts
never
occurred
foresaw
expanded
liability
turn
hazy
issues
inviting
testimony
strike
suits
protracted
discovery
little
chance
reasonable
resolution
pretrial
process
good
reasons
deny
recognition
claims
absence
apparent
contrary
congressional
intent
threats
speculative
claims
procedural
intractability
inherent
respondents
theory
causation
linked
directors
desire
cosmetic
vote
causation
turn
inferences
corporate
directors
thought
done
without
minority
shareholder
approval
unneeded
authorize
action
subsequently
dissatisfied
minority
shareholder
virtual
license
allege
managerial
timidity
doomed
corporate
action
ostensible
approval
induced
misleading
statement
opposing
claims
hypothetical
diffidence
hypothetical
boldness
part
directors
probably
provide
enough
depositions
usual
case
preclude
judicial
resolution
short
credibility
judgments
come
trial
reliable
evidence
seldom
exist
directors
understand
prudence
making
statements
plans
proceed
even
without
minority
endorsement
discovery
quest
recollections
oral
conversations
odds
official
pronouncements
hopes
finding
support
ex
post
facto
guesses
much
heat
directors
stood
absence
minority
approval
issues
hazy
litigation
protracted
resolution
unreliable
given
choice
reject
theory
causation
raised
prospects
reject
one
theory
causal
necessity
derived
requirements
virginia
law
dealing
postmerger
ratification
seeks
identify
essential
character
proxy
solicitation
function
obtaining
minority
approval
preclude
minority
suit
attacking
merger
since
link
said
step
process
barring
class
shareholders
resort
state
remedy
otherwise
available
theory
causation
rests
upon
proposition
policy
provide
federal
remedy
whenever
false
misleading
proxy
statement
results
loss
state
law
shareholder
plaintiff
state
remedy
enforcement
state
right
respondents
agree
suggestions
counsel
sec
fdic
causation
recognized
example
minority
shareholder
induced
misleading
proxy
statement
forfeit
right
appraisal
remedy
voting
approve
transaction
cf
swanson
american
consumers
industries
shareholder
deterred
obtaining
order
enjoining
damaging
transaction
proxy
solicitation
misrepresents
facts
injunction
properly
issued
cf
healey
catalyst
recovery
pennsylvania
alabama
farm
bureau
mutual
casualty
american
fidelity
life
ins
cert
denied
respondents
claim
case
predicate
recognizing
causal
link
exists
code
ann
sets
conditions
merger
may
insulated
suit
minority
shareholder
seeking
void
account
beddow
conflict
case
however
require
us
decide
whether
provides
cause
action
lost
state
remedies
since
indication
law
facts
us
proxy
solicitation
resulted
loss
contrary
appears
case
assuming
soundness
respondents
characterization
proxy
statement
materially
misleading
terms
virginia
statute
indicate
favorable
minority
vote
induced
solicitation
suffice
render
merger
invulnerable
later
attack
ground
conflict
statute
bars
shareholder
seeking
avoid
transaction
tainted
director
conflict
inter
alia
minority
shareholders
ratified
transaction
following
disclosure
material
facts
transaction
conflict
code
ann
assuming
material
facts
merger
beddow
interests
accurately
disclosed
minority
votes
inadequate
ratify
merger
state
law
loss
state
remedy
connect
proxy
solicitation
harm
minority
shareholders
irredressable
state
law
claim
statement
misled
respondents
entertaining
false
belief
chance
upset
merger
time
bringing
suit
run
iv
judgment
appeals
reversed
ordered
footnotes
shall
unlawful
person
use
mails
means
instrumentality
interstate
commerce
facility
national
securities
exchange
otherwise
contravention
rules
regulations
commission
may
prescribe
necessary
appropriate
public
interest
protection
investors
solicit
permit
use
name
solicit
proxy
consent
authorization
respect
security
exempted
security
registered
pursuant
section
title
rule
provides
relevant
part
solicitation
subject
regulation
shall
made
means
proxy
statement
containing
statement
time
light
circumstances
made
false
misleading
respect
material
fact
omits
state
material
fact
necessary
order
make
statements
therein
false
misleading
cfr
directors
chosen
issue
statement
instead
proxy
solicitation
subject
sec
antifraud
provision
analogous
rule
see
cfr
see
also
appeals
reversed
district
however
refusal
certify
class
minority
shareholders
sandberg
action
consequently
ruled
petitioners
liable
bank
former
minority
shareholders
per
share
tsc
industries
northway
reserved
question
whether
scienter
necessary
liability
generally
reserve
still
petitioners
also
wrong
argue
construing
statute
allow
recovery
misleading
statement
merger
fair
minority
shareholders
tantamount
assuming
federal
authority
bar
corporate
transactions
thought
unfair
group
shareholders
course
true
said
santa
fe
industries
green
orporations
creatures
state
law
investors
commit
funds
corporate
directors
understanding
except
federal
law
expressly
requires
certain
responsibilities
directors
respect
stockholders
state
law
govern
internal
affairs
corporation
quoting
cort
ash
impose
responsibility
false
misleading
proxy
statements
although
corporate
transaction
fairness
federal
concern
proxy
statement
claim
fairness
presupposes
factual
integrity
federal
law
expressly
concerned
preserve
cf
craftmatic
securities
litigation
kraftsow
petitioners
fail
dissuade
us
recognizing
significance
omissions
arguing
effectively
require
accuse
breach
fiduciary
duty
subjection
liability
misleading
others
raise
duty
enforces
duty
refrain
misleading
occasion
decide
whether
directors
obligated
state
reasons
support
merger
proposal
question
statement
make
carried
option
deceive
cf
berg
first
american
bankshares
app
proxy
statement
purported
disclose
factors
considered
obligation
portray
accurately
respondents
argue
issue
raised
appeals
however
addressed
availability
right
action
minority
shareholders
respondents
circumstances
concluded
respondents
entitled
sue
suffices
purposes
passed
issue
presented
stevens
department
treasury
cf
cohen
cowles
media
ante
particularly
issue
believe
state
evolving
definition
uncertainty
louis
praprotnik
plurality
opinion
quoting
newport
fact
concerts
one
importance
administration
federal
law
praprotnik
supra
citing
decision
schlick
cement
petitioners
characterize
respondents
proffered
theories
examples
sue
facts
shame
facts
theories
brief
petitioners
reply
brief
petitioners
sue
fact
general
fact
material
sue
decision
sue
decision
decision
shareholder
whether
institute
representative
derivative
suit
alleging
cause
action
gelb
rule
santa
fe
herein
sue
facts
shame
facts
matters
rev
quoting
borden
sue
fact
rule
mandates
disclosure
avoid
litigation
state
courts
sec
pp
see
also
note
causation
liability
private
actions
proxy
violations
yale
discussing
theories
causation
shame
facts
said
facts
disclosed
shamed
management
abandoning
proposed
transaction
see
schlick
supra
see
also
gelb
supra
district
appeals
grounded
causation
theory
virginia
law
required
solicitation
proxies
even
minority
shareholders
condition
consummating
merger
see
app
provisions
code
ann
said
required
bank
solicit
minority
proxies
actually
compelled
submission
merger
vote
shareholders
meeting
preceded
issuance
informational
statement
thus
need
statute
solicit
proxies
although
undisputed
proxy
solicitation
sufficed
satisfy
statutory
obligation
provide
statement
relevant
information
theory
causation
depend
use
proxy
statement
satisfy
statutory
obligation
even
though
proxy
solicitation
required
respondents
disclaimed
reliance
theory
object
enquiry
extend
question
holding
either
case
borak
mills
electric
date
done
past
see
touche
ross
redington
point
simply
recognize
hurdle
facing
litigant
urges
us
enlarge
scope
action
beyond
point
reached
mills
parting
company
us
point
justice
kennedy
emphasizes
respondents
particular
case
substantiated
plausible
claim
petitioners
proceeded
without
minority
approval
fabi
attempted
merger
maryland
subsidiary
failed
year
events
question
subsidiary
directors
rejected
proposal
inadequate
share
price
evidence
fabi
desire
avoid
renewal
adverse
comment
issue
us
however
whether
recognize
theory
causation
generally
decision
rests
apprehension
ensuing
litigation
exemplified
cases
far
less
tractable
respondents
burden
justify
recognition
causation
beyond
scope
mills
must
addressed
emphasizing
instant
case
confronting
risk
inherent
cases
expected
characteristic
causal
theory
adopted
opinion
dissenting
point
justice
kennedy
suggests
materiality
virginia
law
might
defined
differently
materiality
standard
cases
resulting
denial
state
remedy
even
solicitation
materially
misleading
federal
law
respondents
however
present
nothing
suggest
might
respondents
claim
application
theory
lost
state
remedies
avail
clear
example
state
appraisal
remedy
lost
violation
case
respondent
weinstein
others
seek
appraisal
virginia
law
virginia
courts
claims
rejected
explicit
grounds
although
tatutory
appraisal
considered
exclusive
remedy
stockholders
opposing
merger
app
pet
cert
see
adams
distributing
cert
denied
dissenting
stockholders
bank
mergers
even
solitary
remedy
available
code
specifically
excludes
bank
mergers
application
virginia
appraisal
statute
app
pet
cert
weinstein
claim
virginia
wrong
rely
claim
way
thus
violation
effect
availability
appraisal
remedy
never
one
justice
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
understand
opinion
statement
opinion
directors
high
value
shares
produce
liability
fact
high
value
directors
knew
produce
liability
fact
high
value
directors
honestly
believed
otherwise
statement
directors
voted
accept
proposal
believe
offers
high
value
produce
liability
fact
directors
genuine
motive
quite
different
except
produce
liability
proposal
fact
offer
high
value
directors
knew
agree
however
every
sentence
word
opinion
refers
motivation
directors
actions
leads
us
psychic
thicket
sometimes
sentence
actually
represents
facts
facts
rather
opinions
event
need
done
apply
normal
rules
liability
think
situation
view
statement
issue
case
fairly
read
affirming
separately
fact
directors
opinion
accuracy
facts
upon
opinion
assertedly
based
reads
follows
plan
merger
approved
board
directors
provides
opportunity
bank
public
shareholders
achieve
high
value
shares
app
pet
cert
present
case
proceed
therefore
think
normal
principles
governing
misrepresentation
fact
apply
ii
recognize
disallowance
part
action
misrepresentation
belief
entirely
contrary
modern
law
torts
authorities
cited
make
plain
see
vulcan
metals
simmons
mfg
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
cited
ante
problem
departing
modern
tort
law
regard
think
federal
cause
action
issue
never
enacted
congress
see
thompson
thompson
scalia
concurring
judgment
hence
narrow
make
within
bounds
rationality
faithful
task
justice
stevens
justice
marshall
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
substance
parts
ii
opinion
agree
reasoning
part
iii
mills
electric
held
finding
terms
merger
fair
constitute
defense
corporation
shareholder
action
alleging
merger
accomplished
using
misleading
proxy
statement
fairness
transaction
according
mills
matter
considered
remedy
stage
litigation
question
causal
connection
proxy
solicitation
harm
plaintiff
shareholders
say
need
supplement
requirement
appeals
requirement
proof
whether
defect
actually
decisive
effect
voting
finding
materiality
shareholder
made
sufficient
showing
causal
relationship
violation
injury
seeks
redress
proves
proxy
solicitation
rather
particular
defect
solicitation
materials
essential
link
accomplishment
transaction
objective
test
avoid
impracticalities
determining
many
votes
affected
resolving
doubts
favor
statute
designed
protect
effectuate
congressional
policy
ensuring
shareholders
able
make
informed
choice
consulted
corporate
transactions
cf
union
pac
chicago
supp
loss
securities
regulation
ed
supp
need
decide
case
whether
causation
shown
management
controls
sufficient
number
shares
approve
transaction
without
votes
minority
even
situation
management
finds
necessary
legal
practical
reasons
solicit
proxies
minority
shareholders
least
one
held
proxy
solicitation
might
sufficiently
related
merger
satisfy
causation
requirement
see
laurenzano
einbender
supp
justice
kennedy
justice
marshall
justice
blackmun
justice
stevens
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
general
agreement
parts
ii
majority
opinion
agree
views
expressed
part
iii
regarding
proof
causation
required
establish
violation
respect
dissent
part
iii
opinion
review
jury
finding
causation
complicated
distinction
reliance
causation
addressed
explicit
terms
earlier
stages
litigation
petitioners
effect
though
recognized
distinction
accepted
district
essential
link
instruction
reliance
causation
agree
issue
preserved
review
appeals
considered
essential
link
presumption
rejecting
petitioners
argument
sandberg
must
show
reliance
demonstrating
read
proxy
voted
favor
proposal
took
specific
action
reliance
upon
appeals
parties
brief
panel
address
possibility
nonvoting
causation
theories
suffice
allow
recovery
petitioners
argue
sandberg
must
demonstrate
reliance
part
part
shareholders
matter
causation
however
must
addressed
ii
severe
limits
places
upon
possible
proof
nonvoting
causation
private
action
justified
neither
precedents
case
courts
appeals
limits
said
flow
shift
approach
implied
causes
action
occurred
since
recognized
implied
private
action
case
borak
ante
acknowledge
exercise
caution
creating
implied
private
rights
action
must
respect
primacy
congressional
intent
inquiry
see
ante
implied
cause
action
well
accepted
cases
become
established
part
securities
laws
however
enforce
meaningful
remedy
unless
eliminate
altogether
phrases
must
consider
causation
question
light
underlying
policy
reasons
deciding
outer
limits
right
lie
ante
see
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
according
acceptance
nonvoting
causation
theories
extend
scope
borak
actions
beyond
ambit
mills
ante
mills
electric
purport
limit
scope
borak
actions
mills
indicates
courts
applied
nonvoting
causation
theories
borak
actions
least
past
years
see
also
loss
fundamentals
securities
regulation
ed
extent
analysis
considers
purposes
underlying
avowed
aim
limit
cause
action
undue
emphasis
upon
fears
speculative
claims
procedural
intractability
ante
result
sort
guerrilla
warfare
restrict
implied
right
action
analysis
adopted
today
guide
congress
charged
enforcement
securities
laws
stand
forewarned
unresolved
questions
concerning
scope
causes
action
likely
answered
favor
defendants
seems
assume
based
upon
mills
reserving
question
sandberg
bears
special
burden
demonstrate
causation
public
shareholders
held
percent
stock
first
american
bank
virginia
bank
justice
stevens
right
reject
theory
first
american
bankshares
fabi
virginia
bankshares
vbi
retained
option
back
transaction
dissatisfied
reaction
minority
shareholders
concerned
merger
result
liability
violation
duties
minority
shareholders
merger
agreement
conditioned
upon
approval
shareholders
app
vbi
voted
shares
merger
decided
extent
distinction
cases
minority
shareholders
voted
transaction
causation
must
proved
nonvoting
theories
suspect
minority
shareholders
identified
post
hoc
inquiry
real
question
whether
injury
shown
effect
nondisclosure
entire
merger
process
including
period
votes
cast
distinction
presumes
majority
shareholder
vote
favor
management
proposal
even
proxy
disclosure
suggests
transaction
unfair
minority
shareholders
board
directors
majority
shareholder
breach
fiduciary
duties
minority
majority
shareholder
votes
transaction
order
comply
duties
fear
liability
upon
concluding
transaction
injure
reputation
business
characterized
nonvoting
causation
course
majority
shareholder
dominates
voting
process
case
may
prefer
avoid
embarrassment
voting
proposal
may
cancel
meeting
shareholders
vote
taken
practical
purposes
result
full
disclosure
transaction
go
forward
resulting
injury
minority
shareholders
avoided
distinction
voting
nonvoting
causation
create
clear
legal
categories
iii
decision
mills
electric
supra
rested
upon
impracticality
attempting
determine
extent
reliance
thousands
shareholders
alleged
misrepresentations
omissions
misstatement
omission
proxy
statement
violate
unless
substantial
likelihood
reasonable
shareholder
consider
important
deciding
vote
tsc
industries
northway
minority
shareholders
hold
sufficient
votes
defeat
management
proposal
misstatement
omission
likely
considered
important
deciding
vote
exists
likely
causal
link
proxy
violation
enactment
proposal
one
justify
recovery
minority
shareholders
damages
resulting
enactment
management
proposal
sake
argument
accept
distinction
voting
nonvoting
causation
must
determine
whether
mills
essential
link
theory
applies
majority
shareholder
holds
sufficient
votes
force
adoption
proposal
merit
essential
link
formulation
rests
upon
likelihood
causation
eliminates
difficulty
proof
even
minority
lacks
votes
defeat
proposal
factors
weigh
favor
finding
causation
long
solicitation
proxies
essential
link
transaction
argues
nonvoting
causation
theory
turn
hazy
issues
inviting
testimony
strike
suits
protracted
discovery
little
chance
reasonable
resolution
pretrial
process
ante
citing
blue
chip
stamps
description
fit
case
sound
objection
event
causation
inquiry
requires
consider
hypothetical
universe
adequate
disclosure
made
indeed
analysis
inevitable
almost
suit
invited
compare
causation
inquiry
intractable
balance
convinced
likelihood
causation
exists
supports
elimination
requirement
plaintiff
prove
material
misstatement
omission
caused
transaction
go
forward
otherwise
halted
voted
usual
rule
mills
difficulties
proving
disproving
causation
anything
greater
minority
lacks
sufficient
votes
defeat
proposal
presumption
assist
courts
managing
circumstance
direct
proof
rendered
difficult
see
basic
levinson
discussing
presumptions
securities
law
authority
whatsoever
limiting
protecting
minority
shareholders
whose
numerical
strength
permit
vote
proposal
one
chief
purposes
protection
investors
case
borak
lack
strength
vote
proposal
need
disclosure
voting
process
involves
casting
ballots
also
formulation
withdrawal
proposals
minority
right
block
vote
action
threat
adverse
consequences
negotiation
increase
price
proxy
rules
support
deliberative
process
practicalities
result
causation
sufficient
support
recovery
facts
case
us
prove
point
sandberg
argues
material
facts
disclosed
fabi
bank
likely
withdrawn
revised
merger
proposal
evidence
record
might
available
upon
remand
see
infra
meets
reasonable
requirement
specific
nonspeculative
proof
fabi
wanted
friendly
transaction
price
viewed
high
reasonable
shareholder
accept
app
management
expressed
concern
transaction
result
loss
support
bank
community
important
although
fabi
votes
push
proposal
wanted
favorable
response
minority
shareholders
human
element
involved
transaction
nature
fabi
attempted
show
minority
shareholders
fair
theory
fabi
pursued
transaction
full
disclosure
provided
shareholders
realized
inadequacy
price
supported
trial
testimony
also
notes
meeting
bank
board
approved
merger
inquiry
causation
proceed
opposing
claims
hypothetical
diffidence
hypothetical
boldness
ante
examination
evidence
type
finds
acceptable
determination
directors
statements
reasons
lead
liability
discussion
board
meeting
focused
upon
matters
keep
pr
afloat
prevent
adverse
reac
tion
app
demonstrating
directors
concern
unpopular
merger
proposal
injure
bank
year
virginia
merger
fabi
failed
almost
identical
transaction
attempt
freeze
minority
shareholders
maryland
subsidiary
fabi
retained
keefe
bruyette
woods
kbw
transaction
well
kbw
given
opinion
fabi
price
fair
subsidiary
board
directors
retained
adviser
concluded
price
offered
fabi
inadequate
maryland
transaction
failed
directors
maryland
bank
refused
proceed
despite
minority
inability
outvote
fabi
pressed
deal
virginia
transaction
fabi
decided
retain
kbw
beddow
sat
boards
fabi
bank
discouraged
bank
hiring
financial
adviser
fear
maryland
experience
repeated
bank
received
independent
advice
directors
bank
testified
voted
approve
transaction
price
demonstrated
unfair
minority
approval
bank
board
directors
facilitated
fabi
representation
transaction
also
approved
minority
shareholders
facts
alone
suffice
support
finding
causation
sandberg
might
yet
evidence
link
nondisclosure
completion
merger
fabi
executive
robert
altman
bank
chairman
drewer
met
day
shareholders
meeting
vote
taken
notes
produced
petitioners
suggested
drewer
received
shareholder
objections
price
considered
postponing
meeting
obtaining
independent
advice
valuation
altman
persuaded
go
forward
without
cautionary
measures
information
produced
course
discovery
kept
jury
grounds
privilege
sandberg
attacked
privilege
ruling
five
grounds
appeals
light
ruling
favor
sandberg
however
panel
occasion
consider
admissibility
evidence
though
require
shareholder
present
evidence
causation
case
demonstrates
nonvoting
causation
theories
quite
plausible
misstatement
omission
material
damages
sustained
minority
shareholders
serious
professor
loss
summarized
holdings
substantial
number
cases
even
minority
alone
vote
transaction
minority
stockholders
better
position
protect
interests
full
disclosure
unfavorable
minority
vote
might
influence
majority
modify
reconsider
transaction
question
schlick
cement
stockholders
appraisal
rights
state
law
stock
listed
new
york
stock
exchange
advanced
two
additional
considerations
market
informed
even
rapacious
controlling
management
might
modify
terms
merger
want
hang
dirty
linen
line
thereby
expose
suit
securities
commission
action
terms
reputation
future
takeovers
fundamentals
securities
regulation
omitted
iv
majority
avoids
question
whether
plaintiff
may
prove
causation
demonstrating
misrepresentation
omission
deprived
remedy
think
question
difficult
whole
point
federal
proxy
rules
support
principles
corporate
governance
think
avoid
issue
orders
judgment
petitioners
majority
asserts
respondents
show
loss
remedy
material
facts
merger
beddow
interests
accurately
disclosed
minority
votes
inadequate
ratify
merger
state
law
ante
theory
requires
us
conclude
virginia
statute
governing
director
conflicts
interest
code
ann
incorporates
definition
materiality
federal
proxy
rules
find
support
proposition
definitions
sandberg
may
lost
remedy
know
disclosure
minority
shareholders
price
per
share
may
satisfy
virginia
requirement
case
approval
minority
without
full
disclosure
may
deprived
sandberg
ability
void
merger
events
theory
merger
voidable
absent
minority
shareholder
approval
far
speculative
theory
fabi
bank
called
transaction
even
possibility
support
remand
lower
courts
yet
consider
question
well
positioned
institution
provide
definitive
resolution
questions
kind
difficulty
knowing
happened
hypothetical
universe
full
disclosure
suggests
resolv
doubts
favor
statute
designed
protect
order
effectuate
congressional
policy
ensuring
shareholders
able
make
informed
choice
consulted
corporate
transactions
mills
affirm
judgment
appeals
district
petitioners
asked
jury
instructions
requiring
respondent
sandberg
prove
causation
element
cause
action
app
district
gave
instruction
close
substance
requested
fourth
element
count
sandberg
must
establish
conduct
defendants
proximately
caused
damage
plaintiff
order
act
omission
considered
proximate
cause
damage
must
substantial
factor
causing
damage
damage
must
either
direct
result
reasonably
probable
consequence
act
omission
order
satisfy
element
plaintiff
need
prove
defendants
conduct
cause
plaintiff
damage
sufficient
find
actions
defendants
substantial
significant
contributing
cause
damage
plaintiff
asserts
suffered
find
necessary
bank
solicit
proxies
minority
shareholders
order
proceed
merger
may
find
proxy
solicitation
essential
link
accomplishment
transaction
instructed
defense
votes
minority
stockholders
needed
approve
transaction