martin
ohio
argued
december
decided
february
ohio
revised
code
code
burden
proving
elements
criminal
offense
upon
prosecution
affirmative
defense
burden
proof
preponderance
evidence
placed
accused
affirmative
defense
ohio
law
therefore
must
proved
defendant
petitioner
charged
ohio
aggravated
murder
defined
purposely
prior
calculation
design
causing
death
another
pleaded
testified
shot
killed
husband
came
following
argument
struck
crime
jury
instructed
convict
must
find
light
evidence
elements
aggravated
murder
proved
state
beyond
reasonable
doubt
burden
proof
respect
elements
shift
find
guilt
must
convinced
none
evidence
whether
offered
state
petitioner
connection
plea
raised
reasonable
doubt
killed
husband
specific
purpose
intent
cause
death
done
prior
calculation
design
however
jury
instructed
acquit
found
preponderance
evidence
petitioner
proved
precipitated
confrontation
husband
honestly
believed
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
means
escape
use
force
satisfied
duty
retreat
avoid
danger
jury
found
guilty
ohio
appeals
affirmed
conviction
rejecting
petitioner
due
process
clause
challenge
based
charge
placing
burden
proof
reaching
decision
state
relied
patterson
new
york
held
neither
ohio
law
instructions
violate
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
shifting
petitioner
state
burden
proving
elements
crime
instructions
read
whole
improperly
suggest
evidence
considered
determining
whether
reasonable
doubt
sufficiency
state
proof
crime
elements
furthermore
simply
evidence
offered
support
might
negate
purposeful
killing
prior
calculation
design
mean
elements
crime
impermissibly
overlap
since
evidence
creating
reasonable
doubt
fact
necessary
finding
guilt
easily
fall
far
short
proving
preponderance
evidence
hand
killing
excused
satisfactorily
established
even
reasonable
doubt
jury
mind
defendant
guilty
pp
violation
due
process
clause
ohio
place
burden
proving
defendant
charged
committing
aggravated
murder
merit
petitioner
argument
necessary
ohio
law
state
disprove
since
unlawfulness
criminal
intent
elements
serious
offenses
renders
lawful
otherwise
crime
negates
showing
criminal
intent
follow
ohio
courts
rejected
argument
holding
unlawfulness
cases
conduct
satisfying
elements
aggravated
murder
necessary
mental
state
crime
specific
purpose
take
life
pursuant
prior
calculation
design
furthermore
mere
fact
two
abandoned
rule
affirmative
defenses
including
must
proved
defendant
render
rule
unconstitutional
follow
patterson
decisions
allowed
fashion
rules
pp
white
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
scalia
joined
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
joined
parts
iii
blackmun
joined
post
james
willis
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
margery
koosed
george
sadd
argued
cause
respondent
brief
john
corrigan
randall
dana
gregory
ayers
richard
aynes
margery
koosed
dean
carro
filed
brief
ohio
public
defender
commission
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
white
delivered
opinion
ohio
code
provides
person
accused
offense
presumed
innocent
proven
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
burden
proof
elements
offense
upon
prosecution
burden
going
forward
evidence
affirmative
defense
burden
proof
preponderance
evidence
affirmative
defense
upon
accused
ohio
rev
code
ann
affirmative
defense
one
involving
excuse
justification
peculiarly
within
knowledge
accused
fairly
required
adduce
supporting
evidence
ohio
rev
code
ann
ohio
courts
long
determined
affirmative
defense
ohio
defendant
burden
proving
required
defined
trial
instructions
case
elements
defendant
must
prove
defendant
fault
creating
situation
giving
rise
argument
defendant
honest
belief
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
means
escape
danger
use
force
defendant
violate
duty
retreat
avoid
danger
app
question
us
whether
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
forbids
placing
burden
proving
defendant
charged
state
ohio
committing
crime
aggravated
murder
relevant
case
defined
revised
code
ohio
purposely
prior
calculation
design
caus
ing
death
another
ohio
rev
code
ann
facts
case
taken
opinions
courts
may
succinctly
stated
july
petitioner
earline
martin
husband
walter
martin
argued
grocery
money
petitioner
claimed
husband
struck
head
argument
petitioner
version
transpired
went
upstairs
put
robe
later
came
back
husband
gun
intended
dispose
husband
saw
something
hand
questioned
came
lost
head
fired
gun
five
six
shots
fired
three
striking
killing
martin
charged
tried
aggravated
murder
pleaded
testified
defense
judge
charged
jury
respect
elements
crime
rejected
petitioner
due
process
clause
challenge
charge
placing
burden
proving
jury
found
guilty
ohio
appeals
ohio
affirmed
conviction
rejected
constitutional
challenge
instruction
requiring
petitioner
prove
latter
relying
upon
opinion
patterson
new
york
concluded
state
required
prove
three
elements
aggravated
murder
patterson
require
disprove
separate
issue
require
martin
disprove
element
offense
charged
said
state
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
appellant
purposely
prior
calculation
design
caused
death
husband
appellant
dispute
existence
elements
rather
sought
justify
actions
grounds
acted
self
defense
ohio
thus
infirmity
conviction
granted
certiorari
affirm
decision
ohio
winship
declared
due
process
clause
protects
accused
conviction
except
upon
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
charged
years
later
held
winship
mandate
fully
satisfied
state
new
york
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
elements
murder
placed
defendant
burden
proving
affirmative
defense
extreme
emotional
disturbance
proved
reduced
crime
murder
manslaughter
patterson
new
york
supra
emphasized
preeminent
role
preventing
dealing
crime
reluctance
disturb
state
decision
respect
definition
criminal
conduct
procedures
criminal
laws
enforced
courts
including
burden
producing
evidence
allocating
burden
persuasion
new
york
authority
define
murder
intentional
killing
another
person
chosen
however
reduce
crime
manslaughter
defendant
proved
preponderance
evidence
acted
influence
extreme
emotional
distress
convict
murder
jury
required
find
beyond
reasonable
doubt
based
evidence
including
related
defendant
mental
state
time
crime
elements
murder
also
conclude
defendant
proved
affirmative
defense
jury
convicted
patterson
held
violation
fourteenth
amendment
construed
winship
referring
leland
oregon
rivera
delaware
added
new
york
leland
rivera
permitted
without
violating
due
process
clause
declined
reconsider
cases
also
observed
fact
majority
assumed
burden
disproving
affirmative
defenses
whatever
reasons
mean
strike
different
balance
violation
constitution
patterson
jury
instructed
convict
must
find
light
evidence
elements
crime
aggravated
murder
proved
state
beyond
reasonable
doubt
burden
proof
respect
elements
shift
find
guilt
jury
convinced
none
evidence
whether
offered
state
martin
connection
plea
raised
reasonable
doubt
martin
killed
husband
specific
purpose
intent
cause
death
done
prior
calculation
design
also
told
however
acquit
found
preponderance
evidence
martin
precipitated
confrontation
honest
belief
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
satisfied
duty
retreat
avoid
danger
jury
convicted
martin
agree
state
conviction
violate
due
process
clause
state
exceed
authority
defining
crime
murder
purposely
causing
death
another
prior
calculation
design
seek
shift
martin
burden
proving
elements
jury
verdict
reflects
none
evidence
raised
reasonable
doubt
state
proof
purposefully
killed
prior
calculation
design
nevertheless
opportunity
state
law
instructions
given
justify
killing
show
blameless
proving
acted
jury
thought
failed
ohio
entitled
punish
martin
one
guilty
murder
new
york
punish
patterson
quite
different
jury
instructed
evidence
considered
determining
whether
reasonable
doubt
state
case
evidence
must
put
aside
purposes
unless
satisfied
preponderance
standard
instruction
relieve
state
burden
plainly
run
afoul
winship
mandate
instructions
case
clearer
respect
read
whole
think
adequate
convey
jury
evidence
including
evidence
going
must
considered
deciding
whether
reasonable
doubt
sufficiency
state
proof
elements
crime
thus
moved
assertions
elements
aggravated
murder
overlap
sense
evidence
prove
latter
often
tend
negate
former
may
encounters
claimed
arise
suddenly
involve
prior
plan
specific
purpose
take
life
cases
evidence
offered
support
defense
may
negate
purposeful
killing
prior
calculation
design
ohio
shift
defendant
burden
disproving
element
state
case
prosecution
made
prima
facie
case
survives
motion
acquit
jury
may
nevertheless
convict
evidence
offered
defendant
raises
reasonable
doubt
existence
fact
necessary
finding
guilt
evidence
creating
reasonable
doubt
easily
fall
far
short
proving
preponderance
evidence
course
doubt
raised
jury
mind
juror
convinced
defendant
purposely
prior
calculation
design
took
life
killing
still
excused
elements
defense
satisfactorily
established
note
need
rely
observation
ohio
ppellant
dispute
existence
elements
aggravated
murder
rather
sought
justify
actions
grounds
acted
ohio
petitioner
submits
conviction
ohio
law
unless
defendant
conduct
unlawful
renders
lawful
otherwise
crime
unlawfulness
element
offense
state
must
prove
disproving
argument
founders
state
law
rejected
ohio
appeals
sixth
circuit
white
arn
state
morris
ohio
app
true
unlawfulness
essential
conviction
ohio
courts
hold
unlawfulness
cases
like
conduct
satisfying
elements
aggravated
murder
interpretation
state
law
position
dispute
true
claim
necessary
prove
criminal
intent
convict
serious
crimes
occur
shown
necessary
mental
state
aggravated
murder
ohio
law
specific
purpose
take
life
pursuant
prior
calculation
design
see
white
arn
supra
noted
patterson
rule
affirmative
defenses
including
matters
defendant
prove
rule
fifth
amendment
adopted
american
rule
fourteenth
amendment
ratified
indeed
well
century
number
followed
rule
required
defendant
shoulder
burden
proving
acted
fletcher
two
kinds
legal
rules
comparative
study
practices
criminal
cases
yale
aware
two
ohio
south
carolina
abandoned
rule
require
prosecution
prove
absence
properly
raised
defendant
question
remains
whether
violation
constitution
observed
patterson
question
answered
cataloging
practices
convinced
ohio
practice
requiring
proved
defendant
unconstitutional
constitution
requires
prosecution
prove
sanity
defendant
pleads
guilty
reason
insanity
opportunity
depart
leland
oregon
refused
rivera
delaware
cases
important
patterson
decision
along
patterson
authority
decision
today
judgment
ohio
accordingly
affirmed
dissent
believes
instruction
might
led
jury
believe
defendant
burden
proving
absence
prior
calculation
design
indeed
position
instruction
clear
enough
mislead
jury
evident
text
disagree
harbor
dissent
mistrust
jury
instructions
sufficiently
clear
convey
jury
state
burden
proving
prior
calculation
shift
evidence
considered
determining
whether
state
burden
discharged
depart
patterson
new
york
respect
justice
powell
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
join
justice
blackmun
joins
respect
parts
iii
dissenting
today
holds
defendant
convicted
aggravated
murder
even
though
jury
may
reasonable
doubt
whether
accused
acted
thus
whether
guilty
crime
think
decision
inconsistent
precedent
fundamental
fairness
dissent
petitioner
earline
martin
tried
state
aggravated
murder
husband
ohio
law
elements
crime
defendant
purposely
killed
another
prior
calculation
design
ohio
rev
code
ann
martin
admitted
shot
husband
claimed
acted
classified
affirmative
defense
ohio
jury
instructed
martin
burden
proving
claim
preponderance
evidence
martin
apparently
failed
carry
burden
jury
found
guilty
ohio
upheld
conviction
relying
part
opinion
patterson
new
york
today
also
relies
patterson
reasoning
affirming
ohio
decision
one
accepts
patterson
proper
method
analysis
case
believe
opinion
ignores
ignores
central
meaning
patterson
upheld
state
statute
shifted
burden
proof
affirmative
defense
accused
new
york
law
required
prosecutor
prove
statutorily
defined
elements
murder
beyond
reasonable
doubt
permitted
defendant
reduce
charge
manslaughter
showing
acted
suffering
extreme
emotional
disturbance
see
penal
law
mckinney
supp
found
burden
shifting
violate
due
process
largely
affirmative
defense
serve
negative
facts
crime
state
prove
order
convict
murder
clear
implication
ruling
affirmative
defense
negate
element
crime
state
may
shift
burden
see
white
arn
case
winship
requires
state
prove
nonexistence
defense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
reason
treating
defense
negates
element
crime
differently
affirmative
defenses
plain
jury
told
prosecution
burden
proving
elements
crime
also
instructed
defendant
burden
disproving
one
elements
danger
jurors
resolve
inconsistency
way
lessens
presumption
innocence
example
jury
might
reasonably
believe
raising
defense
accused
assumed
ultimate
burden
proving
particular
element
might
reconcile
instructions
simply
balancing
evidence
supports
prosecutor
case
evidence
supporting
affirmative
defense
conclude
state
satisfied
burden
prosecution
version
persuasive
either
case
jury
given
unmistakable
erroneous
impression
defendant
shares
risk
nonpersuasion
fact
necessary
conviction
given
principles
reliance
patterson
puzzling
ohio
law
element
prior
calculation
design
satisfied
accused
engaged
definite
process
reasoning
advance
killing
given
plan
least
studied
consideration
app
jury
instructions
emphasis
added
contrast
defendant
martin
raises
claim
jury
also
instructed
accused
must
prove
honest
belief
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
emphasis
added
many
cases
defendant
finds
immediate
danger
reacts
deadly
force
formed
prior
intent
kill
recognizes
may
encounters
claimed
arise
suddenly
involve
prior
plan
specific
purpose
take
life
cases
evidence
offered
support
defense
may
negate
purposeful
killing
prior
calculation
design
ante
gives
explanation
apparent
rejection
patterson
justification
advanced
decision
jury
used
evidence
find
state
failed
carry
burden
proof
jurors
free
consider
martin
state
evidence
argument
goes
verdict
guilt
necessarily
means
convinced
defendant
acted
prior
calculation
design
unpersuaded
acted
ante
thus
seems
conclude
long
jury
told
state
burden
proving
elements
crime
overlap
offense
defense
immaterial
reasoning
flawed
two
respects
first
simply
ignores
problem
arises
inconsistent
jury
instructions
criminal
case
holding
implicitly
assumes
jury
fact
understands
ultimate
burden
remains
prosecutor
times
despite
conflicting
instruction
places
burden
accused
disprove
element
pointed
patterson
distinction
defenses
negate
element
crime
based
legitimate
concern
jury
mistakenly
lower
state
burden
short
rationale
fails
explain
overlap
case
create
risk
patterson
suggested
unacceptable
second
significantly
without
explanation
extends
deference
granted
state
legislatures
area
today
decision
read
say
virtually
state
attempts
shift
burden
proof
affirmative
defenses
upheld
regardless
relationship
elements
defense
elements
crime
understand
patterson
allowed
burden
shifting
evidence
extreme
emotional
disturbance
negate
mens
rea
underlying
offense
today
decision
however
even
proof
defense
negate
element
offense
burden
shifting
still
may
permitted
jury
consider
defendant
evidence
reaching
verdict
agree
course
must
substantial
defining
criminal
laws
administering
criminal
justice
systems
none
precedents
suggests
courts
must
give
complete
deference
state
judgment
whether
shift
burden
proof
consistent
presumption
innocence
past
emphasized
circumstances
may
necessary
look
beyond
text
state
laws
satisfy
requirements
winship
satisfied
mullaney
wilbur
explicitly
noted
danger
granting
state
unchecked
discretion
shift
burden
element
proof
criminal
case
today
fails
discuss
even
cite
mullaney
despite
unanimous
agreement
case
danger
justify
judicial
intervention
cases
even
patterson
dissented
recognized
obviously
constitutional
limits
beyond
may
go
labeling
elements
crime
affirmative
defense
today
however
simply
asserts
ohio
law
properly
allocates
burdens
without
giving
indication
limits
lie
precedent
establishes
burden
proof
may
shifted
elements
defense
elements
offense
conflict
seems
clear
case
reverse
decision
ohio
ii
although
believe
case
wrongly
decided
even
principles
set
forth
patterson
differences
approach
fundamental
continue
believe
better
method
deciding
state
may
shift
burden
proof
outlined
opinion
mullaney
dissenting
opinion
patterson
mullaney
emphasized
state
obligation
prove
certain
facts
beyond
reasonable
doubt
necessarily
restricted
legislative
distinctions
offenses
affirmative
defenses
boundaries
state
authority
respect
elaborated
patterson
dissent
proposed
inquiry
due
process
clause
requires
prosecutor
bear
burden
persuasion
beyond
reasonable
doubt
factor
issue
makes
substantial
difference
punishment
stigma
requirement
course
applies
fortiori
factor
makes
difference
guilt
innocence
also
must
shown
legal
tradition
factor
question
historically
held
level
importance
either
branch
test
met
legislature
retains
traditional
authority
matters
proof
footnotes
omitted
least
two
benefits
approach
first
ensures
critical
facts
necessary
sustain
conviction
proved
state
willing
look
beyond
text
state
statute
legislatures
incentive
redefine
essential
elements
offense
make
part
affirmative
defense
thereby
shifting
burden
proof
manner
inconsistent
winship
mullaney
second
leave
free
respects
recognize
new
factors
may
mitigate
degree
criminality
punishment
without
requiring
also
bear
burden
disproving
defenses
see
patterson
new
york
powell
dissenting
new
ameliorative
affirmative
defenses
generally
remain
undisturbed
holdings
winship
mullaney
omitted
analysis
plainly
impermissible
require
accused
prove
petitioner
carried
burden
result
decisively
different
guilt
punishment
also
dispute
historically
one
primary
justifications
otherwise
unlawful
conduct
see
beard
thus
acknowledge
test
may
difficult
apply
times
hard
imagine
application
one
presented
iii
willingness
defer
state
legislative
definitions
crimes
defenses
apparently
failed
recognize
practical
effect
decision
martin
alleged
innocent
acted
complete
justification
ohio
law
see
state
nolton
ohio
burden
proof
issue
jury
believed
likely
martin
conduct
justified
yet
still
voted
convict
words
even
though
jury
may
substantial
doubt
whether
martin
committed
crime
found
guilty
ohio
law
agree
authority
review
state
legislative
choices
limited
justifies
increasing
risk
convicting
person
may
blameworthy
see
patterson
new
york
supra
state
definition
criminal
law
must
yield
offends
principle
justice
rooted
traditions
conscience
people
ranked
fundamental
quoting
speiser
randall
complexity
inquiry
state
may
shift
burden
proof
lead
fashion
simple
rules
deference
lead
unjust
results
footnotes
course
whether
jury
fact
improperly
shift
burden
away
state
uncertain
settled
law
exists
reasonable
possibility
jury
relied
unconstitutional
understanding
law
reaching
guilty
verdict
verdict
must
set
aside
francis
franklin
accused
also
must
avoided
danger
possible
must
fault
creating
threatening
situation
see
state
robbins
ohio
risk
reduced
although
view
eliminated
instructions
made
clear
evidence
create
reasonable
doubt
guilt
even
evidence
rise
level
necessary
prove
affirmative
defense
instructions
gave
little
guidance
respect
trial
simply
told
jury
prosecution
must
prove
elements
crime
defendant
must
prove
existence
defense
instructions
gave
indication
jury
evaluate
evidence
affected
element
crime
defense
cf
francis
franklin
supra
nothing
specific
sentences
jury
charge
whole
makes
clear
one
contradictory
instructions
carries
weight
noted
example
winship
limited
facts
constitute
crime
defined
state
law
state
undermine
many
interests
decision
sought
protect
without
effecting
substantive
change
law
necessary
redefine
elements
constitute
different
crimes
characterizing
factors
bear
solely
extent
punishment
see
also
mcmillan
pennsylvania
certain
limited
circumstances
winship
requirement
applies
facts
formally
identified
elements
offense
charged