beacon
theatres
westover
argued
december
decided
may
anticipation
suit
petitioner
treble
damages
sherman
clayton
acts
prospective
defendant
brought
suit
petitioner
federal
district
declaratory
judgment
settled
key
issues
antitrust
suit
prayed
bringing
suit
enjoined
pending
outcome
declaratory
judgment
litigation
petitioner
filed
counterclaim
raising
issues
raised
antitrust
suit
treble
damages
demanded
jury
trial
purporting
act
exercise
discretion
rules
federal
rules
civil
procedure
district
ruled
try
equity
without
jury
issues
common
proceedings
trying
petitioner
counterclaim
appeals
held
district
acted
within
proper
scope
discretion
denied
petitioner
application
writ
mandamus
requiring
district
set
aside
ruling
held
judgment
appeals
reversed
pp
district
finding
complaint
declaratory
relief
presented
basically
equitable
issues
draws
support
declaratory
judgment
act
specifically
preserves
right
jury
trial
parties
petitioner
entitled
jury
trial
treble
damage
suit
deprived
right
merely
prospective
defendant
took
advantage
availability
declaratory
relief
sue
petitioner
first
since
right
trial
jury
applies
treble
damage
suits
antitrust
laws
essential
part
congressional
plan
making
competition
rather
monopoly
rule
trade
antitrust
issues
raised
declaratory
judgment
suit
essentially
jury
questions
assuming
pleadings
construed
support
request
injunction
threats
lawsuits
alleging
kind
harassment
multiplicity
lawsuits
traditionally
justified
equity
taking
jurisdiction
settling
case
one
suit
nevertheless
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
civil
procedure
neither
claim
justify
denying
petitioner
trial
jury
issues
antitrust
controversy
pp
today
existence
irreparable
harm
inadequacy
legal
remedies
basis
injunctive
relief
must
determined
precedents
discarded
procedures
light
remedies
made
available
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
civil
procedure
pp
viewed
manner
use
discretion
district
rule
deprive
petitioner
full
jury
trial
issues
antitrust
controversy
justified
mandamus
available
writs
act
require
jury
trial
improperly
denied
jack
corinblit
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
elwood
kendrick
frank
johnston
argued
cause
respondents
brief
hudson
cox
justice
black
delivered
opinion
petitioner
beacon
theatres
sought
mandamus
require
district
judge
southern
district
california
vacate
certain
orders
alleged
deprive
jury
trial
issues
arising
suit
brought
fox
west
coast
theatres
inc
appeals
ninth
circuit
refused
writ
holding
trial
judge
acted
within
proper
discretion
denying
petitioner
request
jury
granted
certiorari
maintenance
jury
body
importance
occupies
firm
place
history
jurisprudence
seeming
curtailment
right
jury
trial
scrutinized
utmost
care
dimick
schiedt
fox
asked
declaratory
relief
beacon
alleging
controversy
arising
sherman
antitrust
act
stat
amended
clayton
act
stat
authorizes
suits
treble
damages
sherman
act
violators
according
complaint
fox
operates
movie
theatre
san
bernardino
california
long
exhibiting
films
contracts
movie
distributors
contracts
grant
exclusive
right
show
first
run
pictures
san
bernardino
competitive
area
provide
clearance
period
time
theatre
exhibit
pictures
building
theatre
miles
san
bernardino
beacon
notified
fox
considered
contracts
barring
simultaneous
exhibitions
films
two
theatres
overt
acts
violation
antitrust
laws
fox
complaint
alleged
notification
together
threats
treble
damage
suits
fox
distributors
gave
rise
duress
coercion
deprived
fox
valuable
property
right
right
negotiate
exclusive
contracts
unless
beacon
restrained
complaint
continued
irreparable
harm
result
accordingly
pleading
styled
complaint
declaratory
relief
fox
prayed
declaration
grant
clearance
fox
beacon
theatres
reasonable
violation
antitrust
laws
injunction
pending
final
resolution
litigation
prevent
beacon
instituting
action
antitrust
laws
fox
distributors
arising
controversy
alleged
complaint
beacon
filed
answer
counterclaim
fox
exhibitor
intervened
denied
threats
asserted
substantial
competition
two
theatres
clearances
granted
therefore
unreasonable
conspiracy
existed
fox
distributors
manipulate
contracts
clearances
restrain
trade
monopolize
pictures
violation
antitrust
laws
treble
damages
asked
beacon
demanded
jury
trial
factual
issues
case
provided
federal
rule
civil
procedure
district
however
viewed
issues
raised
complaint
declaratory
relief
including
question
competition
two
theatres
essentially
equitable
acting
purported
authority
rules
directed
issues
tried
jury
determination
validity
charges
antitrust
violations
made
counterclaim
common
issue
complaint
declaratory
relief
counterclaim
reasonableness
clearances
granted
fox
depended
part
existence
competition
two
theatres
thus
effect
action
district
appeals
believed
limit
petitioner
opportunity
fully
try
jury
every
issue
bearing
upon
treble
damage
suit
determination
issue
clearances
judge
might
operate
either
way
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
conclude
parties
respect
thereto
subsequent
trial
treble
damage
claim
district
finding
complaint
declaratory
relief
presented
basically
equitable
issues
draws
support
declaratory
judgment
act
fed
rules
civ
see
also
stat
ed
statute
allowing
prospective
defendants
sue
establish
nonliability
specifically
preserves
right
jury
trial
parties
follows
beacon
entitled
jury
trial
treble
damage
suit
fox
deprived
right
merely
fox
took
advantage
availability
declaratory
relief
sue
beacon
first
since
right
trial
jury
applies
treble
damage
suits
antitrust
laws
fact
essential
part
congressional
plan
making
competition
rather
monopoly
rule
trade
see
fleitmann
welsbach
street
lighting
sherman
clayton
act
issues
fox
sought
declaration
essentially
jury
questions
nevertheless
appeals
refused
upset
order
district
judge
held
question
whether
right
jury
trial
existed
judged
fox
complaint
read
whole
addition
seeking
declaratory
judgment
said
fox
complaint
read
making
valid
plea
injunctive
relief
thus
stating
claim
traditionally
cognizable
equity
party
entitled
maintain
suit
equity
injunction
said
may
issues
suit
determined
judge
without
jury
regardless
whether
legal
rights
involved
rejected
argument
equitable
relief
traditionally
available
legal
remedies
inadequate
rendered
unnecessary
case
filing
counterclaim
presented
issues
necessary
determination
right
injunctive
relief
relying
american
life
ins
stewart
decided
enactment
federal
rules
civil
procedure
invoked
principle
sitting
equity
retain
jurisdiction
even
though
later
legal
remedy
became
available
instances
equity
discretion
enjoin
later
lawsuit
order
allow
whole
dispute
determined
one
case
one
reasoning
analogy
appeals
held
abuse
discretion
district
judge
acting
federal
rule
civil
procedure
try
equitable
cause
first
even
though
might
collateral
estoppel
prevent
full
jury
trial
counterclaim
effectively
stopped
equity
injunction
beacon
takes
issue
holding
appeals
complaint
stated
claim
upon
equitable
relief
granted
initially
filed
complaint
alleged
threats
lawsuits
petitioner
fox
distributors
causing
irreparable
harm
fox
business
relationships
prayer
relief
however
made
mention
threats
asked
pending
litigation
claim
declaratory
judgment
beacon
enjoined
beginning
lawsuits
antitrust
laws
fox
distributors
arising
controversy
alleged
complaint
evidently
opinion
prayer
state
good
claim
equitable
relief
appeals
construed
include
request
injunction
threats
lawsuits
liberal
construction
pleading
line
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
see
conley
gibson
fact
solve
problem
assuming
pleadings
construed
support
request
assuming
additionally
complaint
read
alleging
kind
harassment
multiplicity
lawsuits
traditionally
justified
equity
take
jurisdiction
settle
case
one
suit
nevertheless
opinion
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
civil
procedure
neither
claim
justify
denying
beacon
trial
jury
issues
antitrust
controversy
basis
injunctive
relief
federal
courts
always
irreparable
harm
inadequacy
legal
remedies
least
much
required
justify
trial
using
discretion
federal
rules
allow
claims
equitable
origins
tried
ahead
legal
ones
since
effect
equitable
injunction
legal
claims
immaterial
judging
discretion
properly
employed
federal
rules
declaratory
judgment
act
passed
courts
equity
exercising
jurisdiction
separate
courts
law
cases
allowed
enjoin
subsequent
legal
actions
parties
involving
controversy
subsequent
legal
action
though
providing
opportunity
try
case
jury
might
protect
right
equity
plaintiff
fair
orderly
adjudication
controversy
see
new
york
life
ins
seymour
circumstances
legal
remedy
quite
naturally
deemed
inadequate
inadequacy
remedy
irreparable
harm
practical
terms
however
existence
today
must
determined
precedents
decided
discarded
procedures
light
remedies
made
available
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
viewed
manner
use
discretion
trial
rule
deprive
beacon
full
jury
trial
counterclaim
well
fox
plea
declaratory
relief
justified
federal
rules
may
try
legal
equitable
causes
action
fed
rules
civ
thus
defenses
equitable
legal
fox
may
charges
antitrust
violations
raised
either
suit
declaratory
relief
answer
beacon
counterclaim
proper
showing
harassment
threats
suits
suits
actually
brought
involving
issues
tried
case
temporarily
enjoined
pending
outcome
litigation
whatever
permanent
injunctive
relief
fox
might
entitled
basis
decision
case
course
given
jury
renders
verdict
way
issues
parties
settled
one
suit
giving
beacon
full
jury
trial
every
antitrust
issue
cf
ring
spina
contrast
holding
granting
fox
additional
protection
unless
avoidance
jury
trial
considered
compel
beacon
split
antitrust
case
trying
part
judge
part
jury
result
involves
postponement
subordination
fox
legal
claim
declaratory
relief
well
counterclaim
beacon
compelled
federal
rules
bring
permissible
decision
consistent
plan
federal
rules
declaratory
judgment
act
effect
substantial
procedural
reform
retaining
distinction
jury
nonjury
issues
leaving
substantive
rights
unchanged
since
federal
courts
equity
always
acted
legal
remedies
inadequate
expansion
adequate
legal
remedies
provided
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
necessarily
affects
scope
equity
thus
justification
equity
deciding
legal
issues
obtains
jurisdiction
refusing
dismiss
case
merely
subsequently
legal
remedy
becomes
available
must
light
liberal
joinder
provisions
federal
rules
allow
legal
equitable
causes
brought
resolved
one
civil
action
similarly
need
therefore
availability
equitable
remedies
bills
peace
quia
timet
injunction
must
reconsidered
view
existence
declaratory
judgment
act
well
liberal
joinder
provision
rules
accord
spirit
rules
act
required
provision
rules
right
trial
jury
declared
seventh
amendment
constitution
given
statute
shall
preserved
inviolate
cases
availability
declaratory
judgment
joinder
one
suit
legal
equitable
causes
respects
protect
plaintiff
seeking
equitable
relief
irreparable
harm
affording
jury
trial
legal
cause
trial
necessarily
use
discretion
deciding
whether
legal
equitable
cause
tried
first
since
right
jury
trial
constitutional
one
however
similar
requirement
protects
trials
discretion
narrowly
limited
must
wherever
possible
exercised
preserve
jury
trial
said
scott
neely
federal
courts
jury
right
dispensed
except
assent
parties
entitled
impaired
blending
claim
properly
cognizable
law
demand
equitable
relief
aid
legal
action
pendency
longstanding
principle
equity
dictates
imperative
circumstances
circumstances
view
flexible
procedures
federal
rules
anticipate
right
jury
trial
legal
issues
lost
prior
determination
equitable
claims
see
leimer
woods
shown
far
case
respondent
claims
mandamus
available
writs
act
whatever
differences
opinion
may
types
cases
think
right
grant
mandamus
require
jury
trial
improperly
denied
settled
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
prayers
aside
general
equitable
plea
relief
deems
proper
added
nothing
material
set
fed
rules
civ
reads
furtherance
convenience
avoid
prejudice
may
order
separate
trial
claim
counterclaim
claim
separate
issue
number
claims
claims
issues
rule
reads
part
may
order
speedy
hearing
action
declaratory
judgment
may
advance
calendar
see
american
lumbermens
mut
cas
timms
howard
hargrove
american
cent
ins
johnson
fidelity
casualty
see
fed
rules
civ
compare
enelow
new
york
life
ins
american
life
ins
stewart
see
also
city
morgantown
royal
ins
peake
lincoln
nat
life
ins
ettelson
metropolitan
life
ins
recognized
orders
enabling
equitable
causes
tried
legal
ones
effect
injunctions
city
morgantown
royal
ins
denied
least
orders
status
injunctions
purposes
appealability
course
imply
orders
came
reviewed
examined
less
strictly
injunctions
see
smyth
ames
detroit
detroit
citizens
street
cf
matthews
rodgers
pennsylvania
wheeling
belmont
bridge
parker
winnipiseogee
lake
cotton
woollen
black
enelow
new
york
life
ins
see
cook
cases
equity
ed
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
ed
moore
federal
practice
morris
jury
trial
federal
fusion
law
equity
tex
rev
cf
maryland
theater
brennan
md
hasselbring
koepke
cf
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
ed
significantly
appeals
relied
procedural
changes
brought
federal
rules
found
plea
equitable
relief
valid
relying
conley
gibson
emphasized
liberal
construction
policies
rules
since
issue
violation
antitrust
laws
often
turns
reasonableness
restraint
trade
light
facts
see
standard
oil
particularly
undesirable
relevant
considerations
tried
one
fact
finder
another
fed
rules
civ
see
fed
rules
civ
see
also
stainback
mo
hock
ke
lok
po
yellow
cab
see
stat
derived
act
stat
provision
antedates
seventh
amendment
discussed
moore
federal
practice
see
hipp
babin
insurance
bailey
wall
grand
chute
winegar
wall
buzard
houston
see
fed
rules
civ
cf
prudential
ins
saxe
morris
jury
trial
federal
fusion
law
equity
tex
rev
see
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
ed
moore
federal
practice
cf
see
also
note
joinder
rules
equity
jurisdiction
avoidance
multiplicity
suits
md
rev
course
unless
issue
right
jury
trial
rights
depend
whether
cause
legal
equitable
one
question
adequacy
legal
remedies
purely
academic
need
arise
fed
rules
civ
delegating
responsibility
drawing
rules
congress
declared
rules
shall
abridge
enlarge
modify
substantive
right
shall
preserve
right
trial
jury
common
law
declared
seventh
amendment
constitution
seventh
amendment
reads
suits
common
law
value
controversy
shall
exceed
twenty
dollars
right
trial
jury
shall
preserved
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
see
hurwitz
hurwitz
app
cf
genesee
chief
fitzhugh
long
emphasized
importance
jury
trial
see
parsons
bedford
pet
see
also
galloway
dissenting
opinion
example
flexible
procedures
available
federal
rules
see
ring
spina
ex
parte
simons
ex
parte
peterson
bereslavsky
caffey
cir
canister
leahy
cir
black
boyd
cf
bruckman
hollzer
cf
chappell
see
also
la
buy
howes
leather
justice
stewart
justice
harlan
justice
whittaker
concur
dissenting
doubt
litigant
entitled
writ
mandamus
protect
clear
constitutional
statutory
right
jury
trial
denial
right
district
judge
simply
exercised
inherent
discretion
explicitly
confirmed
federal
rules
civil
procedure
schedule
trial
equitable
claim
advance
action
law
even
abuse
discretion
think
attacked
extraordinary
writ
mandamus
event
abuse
discretion
apparent
case
complaint
filed
fox
stated
claim
traditionally
cognizable
equity
claim
brief
beacon
wrongfully
interfered
right
fox
compete
freely
beacon
distributors
licensing
films
exhibition
san
bernardino
area
complaint
alleged
plaintiff
without
adequate
remedy
law
irreparably
harmed
unless
defendant
restrained
continuing
interfere
coercion
threats
litigation
plaintiff
lawful
business
relationships
appeals
found
complaint
although
inartistically
drawn
contained
allegations
entitling
petitioner
equitable
relief
finding
accepted
prevailing
opinion
today
complaint
answered
simply
general
denial
therefore
issues
traditional
principles
triable
proceeding
equity
instead
putting
issue
allegations
complaint
however
beacon
filed
pleadings
affirmatively
alleged
existence
broad
conspiracy
among
plaintiff
theatre
owners
monopolize
exhibition
films
san
bernardino
area
refrain
competing
among
discriminate
beacon
granting
film
licenses
based
upon
allegations
beacon
asked
damages
amount
clearly
conspiracy
allegations
stated
cause
action
triable
right
jury
demanded
beacon
however
jury
trial
cause
action
also
issues
presented
original
complaint
upon
motion
fox
trial
judge
ordered
original
action
declaratory
equitable
relief
tried
separately
advance
trial
defendant
counterclaim
damages
order
carefully
preserved
right
trial
jury
upon
conspiracy
damage
issues
raised
counterclaim
conformity
specific
provisions
federal
rules
civil
procedure
yet
decided
today
appeals
must
compel
district
judge
rescind
assuming
existence
factual
issue
common
plaintiff
original
action
defendant
counterclaim
damages
agree
district
must
compelled
try
counterclaim
first
course
matter
great
moment
order
issues
parties
present
litigation
tried
disturbing
process
arrives
decision
process
appears
disregard
historic
relationship
equity
law
suggests
expansion
adequate
legal
remedies
provided
declaratory
judgment
act
necessarily
affects
scope
equity
mean
say
mere
availability
action
declaratory
judgment
operates
furnish
adequate
remedy
law
deprive
equity
power
act
novel
line
reasoning
least
implied
opinion
declaratory
judgment
act
expand
substantive
law
act
merely
provided
new
statutory
remedy
neither
legal
equitable
available
areas
equity
law
declaratory
relief
sought
right
trial
jury
depends
upon
basic
context
issues
presented
see
moore
federal
practice
ed
borchard
declaratory
judgments
ed
basic
issues
action
declaratory
relief
kind
traditionally
cognizable
equity
suit
cancellation
written
instrument
declaratory
judgment
remedy
law
hand
issues
arise
context
traditionally
cognizable
common
law
right
jury
trial
course
remains
unimpaired
even
though
relief
demanded
declaratory
judgment
thus
case
complaint
asked
merely
judgment
declaring
plaintiff
specified
manner
business
dealings
distributors
exhibitors
render
liable
beacon
antitrust
laws
simply
juxtaposition
parties
case
beacon
demanded
jury
trial
complaint
present
case
recognizes
presented
issues
exclusively
equitable
cognizance
going
well
beyond
mere
defense
subsequent
action
law
fox
sought
protection
beacon
allegedly
unlawful
interference
business
relationships
protection
seems
recognize
might
afforded
declaratory
judgment
unsupplemented
equitable
relief
availability
declaratory
judgment
therefore
operate
confer
upon
beacon
right
trial
jury
respect
issues
raised
complaint
ii
opinion
course
hold
even
suggest
equity
may
never
determine
legal
rights
indeed
precisely
rights
chancellor
jurisdiction
properly
invoked
often
called
upon
decide
issues
fact
rarely
either
legal
equitable
depends
upon
context
arise
examples
cited
chief
judge
pope
thorough
opinion
appeals
case
illustrative
suit
one
possession
real
property
quiet
title
remove
cloud
title
equity
may
determine
legal
title
suit
specific
performance
contract
may
determine
making
validity
terms
contract
involved
suit
injunction
trespass
real
property
may
determine
legal
right
plaintiff
possession
property
cf
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
though
apparently
disputing
principles
holds
quite
apart
reliance
upon
declaratory
judgment
act
beacon
filing
counterclaim
acquired
right
trial
jury
issues
otherwise
properly
triable
support
position
found
principle
federal
courts
equity
always
acted
legal
remedies
inadequate
yet
principle
employed
traditional
sense
limitation
upon
exercise
power
equity
apparent
recognition
allegations
complaint
entitled
fox
equitable
relief
relief
fox
entitled
adequate
remedy
law
instead
principle
employed
today
mean
possible
counterclaim
jury
trial
factual
issue
substantial
competition
issue
must
tried
jury
even
though
issue
primarily
presented
original
claim
equitable
relief
marked
departure
principles
established
rule
equitable
jurisdiction
existing
filing
bill
destroyed
adequate
legal
remedy
may
become
available
thereafter
american
life
ins
stewart
see
dawson
kentucky
distilleries
also
long
settled
district
discretion
may
order
trial
suit
equity
advance
action
law
parties
even
factual
issue
common
words
justice
cardozo
writing
unanimous
american
life
ins
stewart
supra
control
docket
exercise
sound
discretion
may
hold
one
lawsuit
abeyance
abide
outcome
another
especially
parties
issues
request
made
respondents
suspend
suits
equity
till
causes
disposed
district
considered
whether
justice
done
pursuing
course
remedy
equity
exceptional
outcome
necessity
many
circumstances
weighed
instance
condition
calendar
whether
insurer
precipitate
adversaries
dilatory
well
factors
end
benefit
hardship
set
one
balance
ascertained
iii
today
sweeps
away
basic
principles
precedents
decided
discarded
procedures
suggests
federal
rules
civil
procedure
somehow
worked
expansion
adequate
legal
remedies
oust
district
courts
equitable
jurisdiction
well
deprive
traditional
power
control
dockets
obviously
federal
rules
expand
substantive
law
one
whit
like
declaratory
judgment
act
federal
rules
preserve
inviolate
right
trial
jury
actions
historically
cognizable
common
law
constitution
must
create
right
trial
jury
right
exist
constitution
statutes
rule
since
beacon
counterclaim
compulsory
rules
see
rule
apparent
filing
beacon
held
waived
jury
rights
compare
american
mills
american
surety
neither
counterclaim
held
transformed
fox
original
complaint
action
law
see
bendix
aviation
glass
supp
rules
make
possible
trial
legal
equitable
claims
proceeding
expressly
affirm
power
trial
judge
determine
order
claims
shall
heard
rule
certainly
federal
rules
intended
undermine
basic
structure
equity
jurisprudence
developed
centuries
explicitly
recognized
constitution
reasons
think
petition
writ
mandamus
dismissed
compare
black
boyd
black
boyd
cf
de
groot
peters
cal
california
bd
california
cal
app
compare
kessler
eldred
international
news
serv
associated
press
truax
raich
rule
provides
separate
trials
furtherance
convenience
avoid
prejudice
may
order
separate
trial
claim
counterclaim
claim
separate
issue
number
claims
counterclaims
claims
issues
note
rule
advisory
committee
rules
certain
issues
tried
jury
others
may
determine
sequence
issues
shall
tried
language
one
time
contained
draft
rules
deleted
power
adequately
given
rule
moore
federal
practice
ed
see
also
rule
provides
inter
alia
may
order
speedy
hearing
action
declaratory
judgment
may
advance
calendar
altogether
clear
stage
proceedings
whether
existence
substantial
competition
fox
beacon
actually
material
issue
fact
common
equitable
claim
counterclaim
damages
respondent
ingeniously
argues
determination
equitable
suit
issue
competition
theatres
determinative
little
nothing
counterclaim
damages
fact
issue
action
equitable
declaratory
relief
whether
fox
west
coast
california
theatre
petitioner
substantially
competitive
fact
issue
counterclaim
whether
therein
named
conspired
together
restraint
trade
monopolize
manner
alleged
counterclaim
absent
conspiracy
whether
distributors
licensed
single
first
run
picture
petitioner
substantial
competition
substantial
competition
first
run
theatres
san
bernardino
area
petitioner
made
case
counterclaim
petitioner
counterclaim
fail
prove
conspiracy
issue
competition
theatres
meaningless
petitioner
hand
succeeds
proving
allegations
counterclaim
conspiracy
monopolize
first
run
discriminate
new
existence
competition
theatres
exculpate
none
alleged
wrongdoers
although
absence
competition
first
run
theatres
petitioner
contended
answer
complaint
might
difficulty
proving
injury
business
state
farm
mut
auto
ins
mossey
connecticut
general
life
ins
candimat
supp
dickinson
general
accident
assur
hargrove
american
cent
ins
pacific
indemnity
mcdonald
moore
federal
practice
ed
transposition
parties
perhaps
accurate
description
typical
case
one
plaintiff
uses
declaratory
judgment
procedure
seek
determination
nonliability
legal
claim
asserted
defendant
defendant
case
course
entitled
jury
trial
suggestion
subsequent
legal
action
though
providing
opportunity
try
case
jury
might
protect
right
equity
plaintiff
fair
orderly
adjudication
controversy
plainly
inconsistent
many
cases
rule
applied
see
beedle
bennett
clark
wooster
arguable
case
factually
similar
american
life
ins
stewart
arise
declaratory
judgment
act
defendant
entitled
jury
trial
see
cf
moore
federal
practice
ed
congressional
authorization
rules
expressly
provided
said
rules
shall
neither
abridge
enlarge
modify
substantive
rights
litigant
stat
see
suits
common
law
value
controversy
shall
exceed
twenty
dollars
right
trial
jury
shall
preserved
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
amend
vii
see
rules
fed
rules
civ
proc
course
suggest
filing
permissive
legal
counterclaim
equitable
complaint
amount
waiver
jury
rights
issues
raised
counterclaim
determination
whether
claim
stated
complaint
triable
jury
normally
dependent
upon
legal
equitable
character
counterclaim
see
borchard
declaratory
judgments
ed
situations
however
case
plaintiff
seeks
declaration
invalidity
noninfringement
patent
relief
sought
counterclaim
determine
nature
entire
case
see
moore
federal
practice
ed
judicial
power
shall
extend
cases
law
equity
art
iii