vance
terrazas
argued
october
decided
january
section
immigration
nationality
act
provides
person
national
whether
birth
naturalization
shall
lose
nationality
taking
oath
making
affirmation
formal
declaration
allegiance
foreign
state
political
subdivision
thereof
section
provides
party
claiming
loss
citizenship
occurred
must
establish
claim
preponderance
evidence
person
commits
act
expatriation
shall
presumed
done
voluntarily
presumption
may
rebutted
upon
showing
preponderance
evidence
act
acts
committed
performed
done
voluntarily
appellee
citizen
mexico
birth
subsequently
obtained
certificate
mexican
citizenship
executing
application
swore
allegiance
mexico
expressly
renounced
citizenship
thereafter
department
state
issued
certificate
loss
nationality
board
appellate
review
department
state
affirmed
appellee
brought
suit
declaration
nationality
district
concluded
proved
preponderance
evidence
appellee
knowingly
voluntarily
taken
oath
allegiance
mexico
renounced
allegiance
thus
voluntarily
relinquishing
citizenship
pursuant
appeals
reversed
remanded
holding
congress
power
legislate
evidentiary
standard
contained
constitution
required
proof
merely
preponderance
evidence
clear
convincing
unequivocal
evidence
held
establishing
loss
citizenship
government
must
prove
intent
surrender
citizenship
voluntary
commission
expatriating
act
swearing
allegiance
foreign
nation
congress
general
power
take
away
american
citizen
citizenship
without
assent
means
intent
relinquish
citizenship
whether
intent
expressed
words
found
fair
inference
conduct
expatriating
acts
specified
treated
conclusive
evidence
indispensable
voluntary
assent
citizen
trier
fact
must
end
conclude
citizen
voluntarily
committed
expatriating
act
prescribed
statute
also
intended
relinquish
citizenship
cf
afroyim
rusk
pp
however
constitution
permits
congress
prescribe
standard
proof
expatriation
proceedings
specific
evidentiary
standard
provided
invalid
either
citizenship
clause
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
although
due
process
clause
imposes
requirements
proof
beyond
preponderance
evidence
criminal
involuntary
commitment
contexts
nevertheless
expatriation
proceedings
civil
nature
threaten
loss
liberty
thus
congress
exceed
powers
requiring
proof
intentional
expatriating
act
preponderance
evidence
pp
presumption
voluntariness
provided
constitutionally
infirm
statute
provides
statutory
expatriating
acts
proved
presumed
committed
voluntarily
also
direct
presumption
act
performed
intent
relinquish
citizenship
matter
remains
burden
party
claiming
expatriation
prove
preponderance
evidence
section
legislative
history
make
clear
congress
preferred
ordinary
rule
voluntariness
act
presumed
duress
affirmative
defense
proved
party
asserting
invalidate
rule
give
citizenship
clause
far
scope
context
relevant
circumstances
brought
fourteenth
amendment
suggest
appropriate
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
marshall
post
stevens
post
filed
opinions
concurring
part
dissenting
part
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
part
ii
stewart
joined
post
stewart
filed
dissenting
statement
post
allan
ryan
argued
cause
appellant
briefs
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
heymann
deputy
solicitor
general
geller
william
otis
william
brown
kenneth
ditkowsky
argued
cause
filed
brief
appellee
justice
white
delivered
opinion
section
immigration
nationality
act
act
stat
provides
person
national
whether
birth
naturalization
shall
lose
nationality
taking
oath
making
affirmation
formal
declaration
allegiance
foreign
state
political
subdivision
thereof
act
also
provides
party
claiming
loss
citizenship
occurred
must
establish
claim
preponderance
evidence
voluntariness
expatriating
conduct
rebuttably
presumed
added
stat
issues
case
whether
establishing
loss
citizenship
party
must
prove
intent
surrender
citizenship
whether
constitution
permits
congress
legislate
respect
expatriation
proceedings
providing
standard
proof
statutory
presumption
contained
appellee
laurence
terrazas
born
country
son
mexican
citizen
thus
acquired
birth
mexican
citizenship
fall
student
monterrey
mexico
age
appellee
executed
application
certificate
mexican
nationality
swearing
adherence
obedience
submission
laws
authorities
mexican
republic
expressly
renounc
ing
citizenship
well
submission
obedience
loyalty
foreign
government
especially
america
app
brief
appellant
certificate
issued
upon
application
april
recited
terrazas
sworn
adherence
mexican
expressly
renounced
rights
inherent
nationality
well
submission
obedience
loyalty
foreign
government
especially
recognized
national
terrazas
read
understood
certificate
upon
receipt
app
juris
statement
months
later
following
discussion
officer
consulate
monterrey
proceedings
instituted
determine
whether
appellee
lost
citizenship
obtaining
certificate
mexican
nationality
appellee
denied
december
department
state
issued
certificate
loss
nationality
app
brief
appellant
board
appellate
review
department
state
full
hearing
affirmed
appellee
voluntarily
renounced
citizenship
app
juris
statement
permitted
act
stat
appellee
brought
suit
secretary
state
declaration
nationality
trial
de
novo
district
recognized
first
sentence
fourteenth
amendment
construed
afroyim
rusk
protect
every
citizen
nation
congressional
forcible
destruction
citizenship
every
citizen
constitutional
right
remain
citizen
unless
voluntarily
relinquishes
citizenship
app
juris
statement
person
dual
nationality
district
said
held
expatriated
shown
voluntarily
committed
act
whereby
unequivocally
renounced
allegiance
ibid
specifically
district
found
appellee
taken
oath
allegiance
mexico
knowingly
understandingly
renounced
allegiance
connection
application
certificate
mexican
nationality
taking
oath
allegiance
mexico
renunciation
foreign
country
sic
citizenship
condition
precedent
mexican
law
issuance
certificate
mexican
nationality
ibid
district
concluded
proved
preponderance
evidence
laurence
terrazas
knowingly
understandingly
voluntarily
took
oath
allegiance
mexico
concurrently
renounced
allegiance
therefore
voluntarily
relinquished
citizenship
pursuant
act
ibid
opinion
accompanying
findings
conclusions
district
observed
appellee
acted
voluntarily
swearing
allegiance
mexico
renouncing
allegiance
appellee
knew
repudiating
allegiance
actions
ibid
also
said
relying
upon
quoting
matheson
supp
sdny
aff
cert
denied
declaration
allegiance
foreign
state
conjunction
renunciatory
language
citizenship
leave
room
ambiguity
intent
applicant
app
juris
statement
appeals
reversed
appeals
understood
law
appears
dispute
basic
requirements
courts
appeals
prove
taking
oath
foreign
state
also
demonstrate
intent
appellee
part
renounce
citizenship
district
found
basic
elements
proved
preponderance
evidence
appeals
observed
ssuming
proper
evidentiary
standards
applied
convinced
record
fully
supports
findings
appeals
ruled
however
afroyim
rusk
supra
congress
power
legislate
evidentiary
standard
contained
constitution
required
proof
merely
preponderance
evidence
clear
convincing
unequivocal
evidence
case
remanded
district
proceedings
secretary
took
appeal
invalidation
posed
substantial
constitutional
issue
noted
probable
jurisdiction
ii
secretary
first
urges
appeals
erred
holding
specific
intent
renounce
citizenship
must
proved
mere
taking
oath
allegiance
result
individual
expatriation
position
need
prove
voluntary
commission
act
swearing
allegiance
foreign
nation
inherently
inconsistent
continued
retention
american
citizenship
congress
may
accord
natural
consequences
loss
nationality
brief
appellant
disagree
afroyim
rusk
held
nationality
act
stat
provided
american
citizen
shall
lose
nationality
oting
political
election
foreign
state
contravened
citizenship
clause
fourteenth
amendment
afroyim
naturalized
american
citizen
lived
israel
years
nation
afroyim
voted
political
election
consequence
stripped
citizenship
consistently
perez
brownell
sustained
district
affirmed
power
congress
expatriate
conduct
regardless
citizen
intent
renounce
citizenship
however
overruling
perez
reject
ed
idea
aside
fourteenth
amendment
congress
general
power
express
implied
take
away
american
citizen
citizenship
without
assent
afroyim
rusk
supra
afroyim
opinion
continued
fourteenth
amendment
reasonably
read
defining
citizenship
citizen
keeps
unless
voluntarily
relinquishes
secretary
argues
afroyim
stand
proposition
specific
intent
renounce
must
shown
citizenship
relinquished
enough
urges
establish
one
expatriating
acts
specified
congress
declared
acts
inherently
inconsistent
retention
citizenship
afroyim
emphasized
loss
citizenship
requires
individual
assent
addition
voluntary
commission
expatriating
act
difficult
understand
assent
loss
citizenship
mean
anything
less
intent
relinquish
citizenship
whether
intent
expressed
words
found
fair
inference
proved
conduct
perez
sustained
congressional
power
expatriate
without
regard
intent
citizen
surrender
citizenship
afroyim
overturned
proposition
may
secretary
maintains
requirement
intent
relinquish
citizenship
poses
substantial
difficulties
government
performance
essential
task
determining
citizen
nevertheless
intent
fourteenth
amendment
among
things
define
citizenship
interpreted
afroyim
definition
coexist
congressional
power
specify
acts
work
renunciation
citizenship
even
absent
intent
renounce
last
analysis
expatriation
depends
citizen
rather
congress
assessment
conduct
secretary
argues
dissent
perez
said
opinion
afroyim
adopted
spoke
conduct
contrary
undivided
allegiance
country
result
loss
citizenship
without
regard
intent
actor
assent
therefore
read
code
word
intent
renounce
afroyim
majority
opinion
reach
neither
expressly
implicitly
limited
dissent
perez
furthermore
perez
dissent
chief
justice
warren
speaking
acts
expatriating
fundamentally
inconsistent
citizenship
concluded
saying
instances
government
simply
giving
formal
recognition
inevitable
consequence
citizen
voluntary
surrender
citizenship
perez
brownell
supra
suggests
chief
justice
conception
actions
derogation
undivided
allegiance
country
fact
entail
element
assent
event
confident
inconsistent
afroyim
treat
expatriating
acts
specified
equivalent
conclusive
evidence
indispensable
voluntary
assent
citizen
course
specified
acts
may
highly
persuasive
evidence
particular
case
purpose
abandon
citizenship
nishikawa
dulles
black
concurring
trier
fact
must
end
conclude
citizen
voluntarily
committed
expatriating
act
prescribed
statute
also
intended
relinquish
citizenship
understanding
afroyim
little
different
expressed
attorney
general
opinion
explaining
impact
case
op
atty
act
reasonably
manifest
individual
transfer
abandonment
allegiance
attorney
general
said
made
basis
expatriation
voluntary
relinquishment
confined
written
renunciation
also
manifested
actions
declared
expatriative
ct
actions
derogation
allegiance
country
ibid
even
cases
however
issue
intent
deemed
attorney
general
open
raised
burden
proof
issue
party
asserting
expatriation
occurred
ibid
case
attorney
general
stated
administrative
authorities
must
make
judgment
based
evidence
whether
individual
comes
within
terms
expatriation
provision
fact
voluntarily
relinquished
citizenship
advice
secretary
concedes
relevant
departments
government
applied
statute
constitution
require
ultimate
finding
intent
expatriate
brief
appellant
accordingly
case
us
board
appellate
review
state
department
found
appellee
swore
allegiance
mexico
also
intended
abandon
citizenship
consideration
complete
record
view
appellant
declaration
allegiance
mexico
concurrent
repudiation
submission
obedience
loyalty
compelling
evidence
specific
intent
relinquish
citizenship
app
juris
statement
view
expatriation
depends
citizen
ascertained
words
conduct
also
reflected
response
petition
certiorari
matheson
cert
denied
insofar
advised
view
remained
official
position
appeal
case
said
afroyim
requires
record
support
finding
expatriating
act
accompanied
intent
terminate
citizenship
submission
inconsistent
holding
unprepared
reconsider
iii
respect
principal
issues
appeals
held
congress
without
constitutional
authority
prescribe
standard
proof
expatriation
proceedings
proof
cases
must
clear
convincing
evidence
rather
preponderance
standard
prescribed
fundamental
disagreement
conclusions
nishikawa
dulles
citizen
temporarily
japan
drafted
japanese
army
government
later
claimed
nationality
act
stat
expatriated
serving
armed
forces
foreign
nation
government
agreed
expatriation
occurred
nishikawa
army
service
involuntary
nishikawa
contended
government
prove
service
voluntary
government
urged
duress
affirmative
defense
nishikawa
burden
prove
overcoming
usual
presumption
voluntariness
held
presumption
unavailable
government
required
proof
voluntary
expatriating
act
clear
convincing
evidence
section
soon
followed
evident
aim
supplant
evidentiary
standards
prescribed
nishikawa
provision
sets
rules
evidence
burden
proof
establish
loss
citizenship
preponderance
evidence
rest
upon
government
presumption
voluntariness
proposed
rules
evidence
rebuttable
similarly
preponderance
evidence
see
basis
invalidating
evidentiary
prescriptions
contained
nishikawa
rooted
constitution
noted
moreover
acting
absence
legislative
guidance
nishikawa
dulles
supra
agree
appeals
afroyim
congress
constitutionally
devoid
power
impose
expatriation
citizen
also
without
power
prescribe
evidentiary
standards
govern
expatriation
proceedings
although
law
since
afroyim
address
advert
section
surely
said
intended
construe
constitution
exclude
expatriation
proceedings
traditional
powers
congress
prescribe
rules
evidence
standards
proof
federal
courts
power
rooted
authority
congress
conferred
art
cl
constitution
create
inferior
federal
courts
undoubted
frequently
noted
sustained
see
usery
turner
elkhorn
mining
hawkins
tot
note
also
opinion
afroyim
written
justice
black
concurring
nishikawa
said
question
whether
citizenship
voluntarily
relinquished
determined
facts
case
congress
provide
rules
evidence
proceedings
nishikawa
dulles
supra
respect
agree
justice
black
since
congress
express
power
enforce
fourteenth
amendment
untenable
hold
power
whatsoever
address
manner
means
fourteenth
amendment
citizenship
may
relinquished
unable
conclude
specific
evidentiary
standard
provided
congress
invalid
either
citizenship
clause
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
true
criminal
involuntary
commitment
contexts
held
due
process
clause
imposes
requirements
proof
beyond
preponderance
evidence
mullaney
wilbur
addington
texas
also
stressed
importance
citizenship
evinced
decided
preference
requiring
clear
convincing
evidence
prove
expatriation
nishikawa
supra
expatriation
proceedings
civil
nature
threaten
loss
liberty
moreover
noted
nishikawa
purport
constitutional
ruling
true
similar
rulings
related
areas
woodby
ins
deportation
schneiderman
denaturalization
none
cases
involved
congressional
judgment
present
preponderance
standard
proof
provides
sufficient
protection
interest
individual
retaining
citizenship
contrary
secretary
position
held
expatriation
requires
ultimate
finding
citizen
committed
expatriating
act
intent
renounce
citizenship
heavy
burden
hold
congress
exceeded
powers
requiring
proof
intentional
expatriating
act
preponderance
evidence
iv
appeals
discuss
separately
validity
statutory
presumption
provided
holding
section
beyond
power
congress
however
requiring
expatriating
act
proved
voluntary
clear
convincing
evidence
appeals
effectively
foreclosed
use
presumption
voluntariness
remand
proceedings
district
also
expatriation
proceedings
circuit
indicated
neither
citizenship
clause
afroyim
places
suits
wholly
beyond
accepted
power
congress
prescribe
rules
evidence
federal
courts
also
conclude
presumption
voluntariness
provided
otherwise
constitutionally
infirm
section
provides
relevant
part
person
commits
performs
committed
performed
act
expatriation
provisions
chapter
act
shall
presumed
done
voluntarily
presumption
may
rebutted
upon
showing
preponderance
evidence
act
acts
committed
performed
done
voluntarily
enacting
congress
dispute
holding
nishikawa
alleged
expatriating
act
service
foreign
army
must
performed
voluntarily
insist
government
benefit
usual
presumption
voluntariness
one
claiming
act
involuntary
make
claim
duress
preponderance
evidence
important
juncture
note
scope
statutory
presumption
section
provides
statutory
expatriating
acts
proved
presumed
committed
voluntarily
also
direct
presumption
act
performed
intent
relinquish
citizenship
matter
remains
burden
party
claiming
expatriation
prove
preponderance
evidence
understood
invalidate
provision
majority
opinion
nishikawa
referred
ordinary
rule
duress
matter
affirmative
defense
proved
party
claiming
duress
nishikawa
dulles
justices
frankfurter
burton
concurring
result
also
referred
ordinarily
controlling
principles
evidence
suggest
individual
peculiarly
equipped
clarify
ambiguity
meaning
outward
events
burden
proving
state
mind
justice
harlan
dissent
justice
clark
pointed
general
rule
consciously
performed
acts
presumed
voluntary
referred
federal
rule
civil
procedure
treats
duress
matter
affirmative
defense
yet
nishikawa
decided
consequences
denationalization
drastic
found
nothing
indicating
contrary
result
legislative
history
nationality
act
held
government
must
carry
burden
proving
expatriating
act
performed
voluntarily
section
enacted
subsequently
legislative
history
make
clear
congress
preferred
ordinary
rule
voluntariness
presumed
duress
affirmative
defense
proved
party
asserting
see
hartsville
oil
mill
towson
moore
savage
duress
proved
may
defense
action
burden
proof
establish
charge
upon
party
making
mason
wall
rationality
procedural
rule
respect
claims
involuntariness
ordinary
civil
cases
doubted
invalidate
rule
disagree
flatly
congress
balance
struck
interest
citizenship
burden
government
must
assume
demonstrating
expatriating
conduct
also
constitutionalize
disagreement
give
citizenship
clause
fourteenth
amendment
far
scope
context
relevant
circumstances
brought
amendment
suggest
appropriate
thus
conclude
presumption
voluntariness
included
continuing
vitality
sum
hold
proving
expatriation
expatriating
act
intent
relinquish
citizenship
must
proved
preponderance
evidence
also
hold
one
statutory
expatriating
acts
proved
constitutional
presume
voluntary
act
unless
proved
otherwise
actor
succeeds
expatriation
fails
question
remains
whether
evidence
government
satisfied
burden
proof
expatriating
act
performed
necessary
intent
relinquish
citizenship
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
effective
date
chapter
person
national
whether
birth
naturalization
shall
lose
nationality
taking
oath
making
affirmation
formal
declaration
allegiance
foreign
state
political
subdivision
thereof
whenever
loss
nationality
put
issue
action
proceeding
commenced
september
virtue
provisions
chapter
act
burden
shall
upon
person
party
claiming
loss
occurred
establish
claim
preponderance
evidence
except
otherwise
provided
subsection
section
person
commits
performs
committed
performed
act
expatriation
provisions
chapter
act
shall
presumed
done
voluntarily
presumption
may
rebutted
upon
showing
preponderance
evidence
act
acts
committed
performed
done
voluntarily
application
contained
following
statement
therefore
hereby
expressly
renounce
citizenship
well
submission
obedience
loyalty
foreign
government
especially
might
subject
protection
foreign
laws
authorities
mexico
rights
treaties
international
law
grant
foreigners
furthermore
swear
adherence
obedience
submission
laws
authorities
mexican
republic
fourteenth
amendment
reads
persons
born
naturalized
subject
jurisdiction
thereof
citizens
state
wherein
reside
remanding
case
district
appeals
necessarily
requir
conduct
new
trial
appeals
recognized
even
granting
higher
standard
proof
imposed
district
factual
determinations
already
record
might
adequate
permit
consideration
case
remand
without
holding
another
trial
evidentiary
hearing
ibid
appeals
discussion
specific
intent
submerged
analysis
proper
evidentiary
standards
absence
independent
analysis
undoubtedly
resulted
secretary
failure
contend
either
district
appeals
unnecessary
prove
intent
relinquish
citizenship
indeed
jurisdictional
statement
filed
secretary
presented
single
question
whether
unconstitutional
citizenship
clause
fourteenth
amendment
present
separately
question
whether
proof
specific
intent
relinquish
essential
expatriation
rule
nly
question
set
forth
jurisdictional
statement
fairly
comprised
therein
considered
secretary
argues
resolution
intent
issue
essential
least
advisable
predicate
intelligent
resolution
constitutionality
merit
position
arguably
intent
issue
fairly
comprised
question
set
forth
jurisdictional
statement
event
consideration
issues
present
jurisdictional
statement
petition
certiorari
presented
appeals
beyond
power
appropriate
circumstances
addressed
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
erie
tompkins
parties
agreed
swift
tyson
pet
still
good
law
cf
vachon
new
hampshire
moragne
marine
lines
silber
see
generally
stern
gressman
practice
ed
apparent
secretary
represented
solicitor
general
changed
position
intent
issue
since
decision
appeals
present
position
odds
opinion
attorney
general
op
atty
interpreted
afroyim
rusk
guided
administrative
actions
state
department
immigration
naturalization
service
issue
intent
important
parties
briefed
shall
address
secretary
brief
brief
appellant
state
department
immigration
naturalization
service
adopted
administrative
guidelines
attempt
ascertain
individual
intent
taking
consideration
nature
expatriating
act
individual
statements
actions
made
connection
act
state
department
guideline
evidences
position
intent
quite
similar
adopted
light
afroyim
decision
attorney
general
statement
interpretation
decision
department
holds
taking
meaningful
oath
allegiance
foreign
state
highly
persuasive
evidence
intent
transfer
abandon
allegiance
taking
oath
meaningful
result
expatriation
meaningfulness
oath
must
decided
department
individual
merits
case
department
state
foreign
affairs
manual
emphasis
original
contemporaneous
academic
commentary
agreed
afroyim
imposed
requirement
intent
relinquish
citizenship
party
seeking
establish
expatriation
see
comment
expatriation
enigma
afroyim
rusk
rev
note
acquisition
foreign
citizenship
limits
afroyim
rusk
cornell
rev
term
harv
rev
note
ohio
response
petition
certiorari
matheson
solicitor
general
argued
afroyim
broadly
held
congress
power
prescribe
objective
conduct
automatically
result
expatriation
absent
individual
voluntary
relinquishment
citizenship
brief
opposition
matheson
matheson
maintained
nothing
record
support
finding
decedent
application
certificate
mexican
nationality
prompted
specific
intent
relinquish
american
citizenship
thus
solicitor
general
concluded
expatriation
said
taken
place
house
report
accompanying
took
direct
aim
nishikawa
holding
government
must
case
prove
voluntary
conduct
clear
convincing
unequivocal
evidence
nishikawa
dulles
report
quoted
approval
justice
harlan
dissenting
opinion
nishikawa
although
recognizes
general
rule
consciously
performed
acts
presumed
voluntary
citations
omitted
fact
alters
rule
denationalization
cases
placing
burden
proving
voluntariness
government
thus
relieving
cases
duty
proving
presumably
voluntary
acts
actually
involuntary
one
prime
reasons
imposing
burden
proof
party
claiming
involuntariness
evidence
normally
lies
possession
find
compelled
dissent
opinion
majority
position
squared
neither
congressional
intent
proper
rules
governing
burden
proof
issue
duress
supra
quoting
nishikawa
dulles
supra
order
forestall
erosion
statute
designed
preserve
uphold
dignity
priceless
value
citizenship
attendant
obligations
sets
rules
evidence
burden
proof
establish
loss
citizenship
preponderance
evidence
rest
upon
government
supra
report
concluded
describing
rebuttable
presumption
voluntariness
secretary
asserts
presumption
survive
constitutional
scrutiny
hold
intent
relinquish
citizenship
necessary
element
proving
expatriation
brief
appellant
predicate
assertion
seems
presumes
intent
relinquish
well
voluntariness
read
even
even
agreed
presuming
necessary
intent
inconsistent
afroyim
unnecessary
invalidate
section
insofar
presumes
expatriating
act
performed
voluntarily
departure
normal
rule
duress
affirmative
defense
proved
party
seeking
rely
noted
nishikawa
handed
see
term
harv
rev
nishikawa
extended
government
burden
expatriation
proceedings
include
absence
duress
issue
raised
also
determined
standard
must
shown
position
majority
runs
counter
usual
rule
duress
affirmative
defense
rule
duress
affirmative
defense
pleaded
proved
party
attempting
rely
well
established
even
plaintiff
complaint
improperly
contains
allegations
seek
avoid
defeat
potential
affirmative
defense
inappropriate
shift
burden
proof
anticipated
defense
plaintiff
sanction
failing
follow
burden
pleading
structure
established
rule
adopting
fiction
plaintiff
anticipation
issue
evidences
intention
assume
burden
proving
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
affirmative
defenses
generally
see
et
seq
justice
marshall
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
holding
citizen
may
lose
citizenship
absence
finding
specifically
intended
renounce
also
concur
adoption
saving
construction
require
statutorily
designated
expatriating
acts
done
specific
intent
relinquish
citizenship
however
accept
majority
conclusion
person
may
found
relinquished
american
citizenship
upon
preponderance
evidence
intended
discussion
congressional
power
prescribe
rules
evidence
standards
proof
federal
courts
ante
beginning
end
inquiry
remains
task
determine
rules
standards
impinge
constitutional
rights
brother
stevens
indicates
casual
dismissal
importance
american
citizenship
withstand
scrutiny
mere
fact
one
expatriated
locked
prison
dispose
constitutional
inquiry
chief
justice
warren
stated
years
ago
expatriate
lost
right
rights
punishment
offensive
cardinal
principles
constitution
stands
subjects
individual
fate
fear
distress
knows
discriminations
may
established
proscriptions
may
directed
cause
existence
native
land
may
terminated
may
subject
banishment
fate
universally
decried
civilized
people
stateless
condition
deplored
international
community
democracies
answer
suggest
disastrous
consequences
fate
may
brought
bear
stateless
person
threat
makes
punishment
obnoxious
trop
dulles
plurality
opinion
footnotes
omitted
justice
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
today
unanimously
reiterates
principle
set
forth
afroyim
rusk
congress
may
deprive
american
citizenship
may
effectuate
citizen
intention
renounce
citizenship
agree
congress
may
establish
certain
standards
determining
whether
renunciation
occurred
may
example
provide
expatriation
proved
evidence
person
performed
act
normally
inconsistent
continued
citizenship
person
thereby
specifically
intended
relinquish
american
citizenship
agree
however
conclusion
congress
established
permissible
standard
since
accept
dual
citizenship
taking
oath
allegiance
foreign
government
necessarily
inconsistent
intent
remain
american
citizen
moreover
written
statute
fairly
read
require
finding
specific
intent
relinquish
citizenship
statute
unambiguously
national
shall
lose
nationality
taking
oath
making
affirmation
formal
declaration
allegiance
foreign
state
political
subdivision
thereof
also
disagree
holding
person
may
deprived
citizenship
upon
showing
mere
preponderance
evidence
intended
relinquish
reasons
proceedings
question
civil
nature
result
loss
physical
liberty
greater
burden
proof
required
ordinary
civil
case
reasoning
construes
constitutional
concept
liberty
narrowly
house
report
accompanying
amendment
immigration
naturalization
act
refers
dignity
priceless
value
citizenship
characterization
consistent
repeated
appraisal
quality
interest
stake
proceeding
judgment
person
interest
retaining
american
citizenship
surely
aspect
liberty
deprived
without
due
process
law
interest
stake
comparable
involved
addington
texas
essentially
reasons
stated
chief
justice
opinion
unanimous
case
see
believe
due
process
requires
clear
convincing
standard
proof
met
case
well
deprivation
may
occur
perhaps
argued
specific
intent
requirement
derived
subsection
creates
rebuttable
presumption
expatriating
act
set
forth
subsection
performed
voluntarily
term
voluntary
conceivably
stretched
include
concept
specific
intent
renounce
one
citizenship
person
seeking
retain
citizenship
thus
burden
showing
lack
specific
intent
construction
least
provide
statutory
basis
bringing
issue
intent
proceeding
majority
apparently
willing
accept
construction
order
salvage
statute
however
inasmuch
rejects
appellant
secretary
argument
requirement
specific
intent
also
subject
presumption
applicable
voluntariness
ante
majority
assumption
statute
read
require
specific
intent
relinquish
citizenship
element
proof
also
contradicted
treatment
afroyim
different
subsection
statute
like
subsection
issue
subsection
provided
american
automatically
lost
nationality
performing
specific
act
case
voting
foreign
election
majority
analysis
case
correct
afroyim
invalidated
provision
statute
rather
merely
remanded
finding
whether
afroyim
voted
foreign
election
specific
intent
relinquish
american
citizenship
strong
evidence
belief
statute
reformed
today
see
kennedy
quoted
another
report
describing
american
citizenship
one
valuable
rights
world
today
see
also
afroyim
rusk
trop
dulles
justice
brennan
justice
stewart
joins
part
ii
dissenting
holds
one
may
lose
citizenship
government
prove
preponderance
evidence
certain
acts
specified
statute
done
specific
intent
giving
citizenship
accordingly
reversing
judgment
appeals
holds
district
applied
correct
evidentiary
standards
determining
appellee
properly
stripped
citizenship
hold
one
acquires
citizenship
virtue
born
amdt
lose
citizenship
formally
renouncing
hold
act
appellee
accused
case
expatriating
act
dissent
case
governed
afroyim
rusk
afroyim
emphasizing
crucial
importance
right
citizenship
held
unequivocally
citizen
constitutional
right
remain
citizen
unless
voluntarily
relinquishes
citizenship
way
citizenship
lost
voluntary
renunciation
abandonment
citizen
held
congress
abridge
affect
restrict
effect
take
away
citizenship
congress
without
power
rob
citizen
citizenship
voted
foreign
election
clearly
must
true
government
attempt
strip
appellee
citizenship
swore
oath
allegiance
mexico
congress
provided
procedure
one
may
formally
renounce
citizenship
case
appellant
concedes
appellee
renounced
citizenship
procedure
brief
appellant
one
lose
citizenship
voluntarily
renouncing
appellee
formally
renounced
hold
remains
citizen
accordingly
remand
case
orders
appellee
given
declaration
nationality
ii
reach
result
another
independent
line
reasoning
appellee
born
dual
national
citizen
born
citizen
mexico
father
mexican
expatriating
act
appellee
stands
accused
sworn
oath
allegiance
mexico
dual
citizenship
per
se
consistent
citizenship
perkins
elg
see
oath
allegiance
country
one
already
citizen
create
inconsistency
one
owes
allegiance
country
one
citizen
especially
one
living
country
kawakita
formal
oath
adds
nothing
existing
foreign
citizenship
therefore
affect
citizenship
mexican
citizen
virtue
father
citizenship
title
provides
national
whether
birth
naturalization
shall
lose
nationality
therefore
appellant
argue
appellee
expatriated
see
supra
reach
issues
concerning
rogers
bellei
contrary
bellei
citizenship
based
fourteenth
amendment
issue
whether
bellei
lose
statutory
citizenship
failure
satisfy
condition
subsequent
contained
statute
accorded
citizenship
indeed
opinion
state
department
person
dual
citizenship
lives
abroad
country
claiming
national
owes
allegiance
paramount
allegiance
owes
kawakita