florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
college
savings
bank
et
argued
april
decided
june
patent
plant
variety
protection
remedy
clarification
act
act
amended
patent
laws
expressly
abrogate
sovereign
immunity
respondent
college
savings
bank
filed
patent
infringement
suit
petitioner
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expenses
board
florida
prepaid
florida
state
entity
decided
seminole
tribe
florida
florida
prepaid
moved
dismiss
action
claiming
act
unconstitutional
attempt
congress
use
article
powers
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
college
savings
countered
congress
properly
exercised
power
pursuant
fourteenth
amendment
order
enforce
due
process
guarantees
amendment
intervened
defend
statute
constitutionality
agreeing
college
savings
district
denied
motion
federal
circuit
affirmed
held
act
abrogation
sovereign
immunity
invalid
sustained
legislation
enacted
enforce
guarantees
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
pp
florida
expressly
consented
suit
impliedly
waived
immunity
see
college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
post
determine
whether
act
nonetheless
validly
abrogated
immunity
must
ask
first
whether
congress
unequivocally
expresse
intent
abrogate
second
whether
congress
acted
pursuant
valid
exercise
power
seminole
tribe
supra
congress
clearly
made
known
intent
abrogate
act
whether
power
another
matter
seminole
tribe
held
congress
power
article
reaffirmed
holding
fitzpatrick
bizer
congress
power
fourteenth
amendment
thus
legislation
appropriate
term
construed
city
boerne
flores
abrogate
state
sovereignty
since
congress
enforcement
power
remedial
invoke
congress
must
identify
conduct
transgressing
fourteenth
amendment
substantive
provisions
must
tailor
legislative
scheme
remedying
preventing
conduct
pp
underlying
conduct
unremedied
patent
infringement
however
enacting
act
congress
identified
pattern
infringement
let
alone
pattern
constitutional
violations
house
report
provided
two
examples
patent
infringement
suits
federal
circuit
identified
eight
suits
years
testimony
house
subcommittee
acknowledged
willing
able
respect
patent
rights
senate
report
contains
evidence
unremedied
patent
infringement
become
problem
national
import
pp
although
patents
may
considered
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
legislative
record
still
provides
little
support
proposition
congress
sought
remedy
fourteenth
amendment
violation
enacting
act
plain
terms
due
process
clause
clear
import
precedent
state
infringement
patent
violates
constitution
state
provides
remedy
inadequate
remedies
injured
patent
owners
infringement
patent
congress
however
barely
considered
availability
state
remedies
patent
infringement
primary
point
made
limited
testimony
state
remedies
whether
remedies
constitutionally
inadequate
rather
less
convenient
federal
remedies
might
undermine
uniformity
patent
law
congress
said
nothing
existence
adequacy
state
remedies
statute
senate
report
need
uniformity
patent
law
construction
though
undoubtedly
important
factor
belonging
article
calculus
moreover
state
actor
negligent
act
causing
unintended
injury
person
property
deprive
person
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
record
suggests
state
infringement
patents
worst
innocent
legislative
record
thus
suggests
act
respond
history
widespread
persisting
deprivation
constitutional
rights
sort
congress
faced
enacting
proper
prophylactic
legislation
lack
legislative
support
congress
conclusion
act
provisions
proportion
supposed
remedy
preventive
object
understood
responsive
designed
prevent
unconstitutional
behavior
congress
limit
act
coverage
cases
involving
arguable
constitutional
violations
confine
reach
limiting
remedy
certain
types
infringement
instead
congress
made
immediately
amenable
suits
kinds
possible
patent
infringement
indefinite
duration
statute
appearance
basic
aims
present
uniform
remedy
patent
infringement
place
footing
private
parties
regime
proper
article
concerns
article
give
congress
power
enact
legislation
seminole
tribe
pp
reversed
remanded
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
petitioner
college
savings
bank
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
congress
amended
patent
laws
expressly
abrogated
sovereign
immunity
claims
patent
infringement
respondent
college
savings
sued
state
florida
patent
infringement
appeals
held
congress
validly
abrogated
state
sovereign
immunity
infringement
suits
pursuant
authority
fourteenth
amendment
hold
city
boerne
flores
statute
sustained
legislation
enacted
enforce
guarantees
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
accordingly
reverse
decision
appeals
since
respondent
college
savings
bank
new
jersey
chartered
savings
bank
located
princeton
new
jersey
marketed
sold
certificates
deposit
known
collegesure
cd
essentially
annuity
contracts
financing
future
college
expenses
college
savings
obtained
patent
financing
methodology
designed
guarantee
investors
sufficient
funds
cover
costs
tuition
colleges
petitioner
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expenses
board
florida
prepaid
entity
created
state
florida
administers
similar
tuition
prepayment
contracts
available
florida
residents
children
see
stat
supp
college
savings
claims
course
administering
tuition
prepayment
program
florida
prepaid
directly
indirectly
infringed
college
savings
patent
college
savings
brought
infringement
action
florida
prepaid
district
district
new
jersey
november
time
college
savings
filed
suit
congress
already
passed
patent
plant
variety
protection
remedy
clarification
act
patent
remedy
act
legislation
patent
laws
stated
whoever
without
authority
made
used
sold
patented
invention
infringed
patent
applying
decision
atascadero
state
hosp
scanlon
federal
circuit
held
patent
laws
failed
contain
requisite
statement
intent
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
infringement
suits
see
chew
california
response
chew
similar
decisions
congress
enacted
patent
remedy
act
clarify
instrumentalities
officers
employees
acting
official
capacity
subject
suit
federal
person
infringement
patents
plant
variety
protections
pub
preamble
stat
see
also
pt
pp
hereinafter
pp
hereinafter
section
used
section
term
whoever
includes
state
instrumentality
state
officer
employee
state
instrumentality
state
acting
official
capacity
section
addresses
sovereign
immunity
issue
even
specifically
state
instrumentality
state
officer
employee
state
instrumentality
state
acting
official
capacity
shall
immune
eleventh
amendment
constitution
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
suit
federal
person
infringement
patent
section
violation
title
relying
provisions
college
savings
alleged
florida
prepaid
willfully
infringed
patent
well
contributed
induced
infringement
college
savings
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
well
damages
attorney
fees
costs
decided
seminole
tribe
fla
florida
florida
prepaid
moved
dismiss
action
grounds
sovereign
immunity
florida
prepaid
argued
patent
remedy
act
unconstitutional
attempt
congress
use
article
powers
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
college
savings
responded
congress
properly
exercised
power
pursuant
fourteenth
amendment
enforce
guarantees
due
process
clause
amendment
intervened
defend
constitutionality
statute
agreeing
college
savings
district
denied
florida
prepaid
motion
dismiss
supp
federal
circuit
affirmed
federal
circuit
held
congress
clearly
expressed
intent
abrogate
immunity
suit
federal
patent
infringement
congress
power
fourteenth
amendment
reasoned
patents
property
subject
protections
due
process
clause
congress
objective
enacting
patent
remedy
act
permissible
sought
prevent
depriving
patent
owners
property
without
due
process
see
id
rejected
florida
prepaid
argument
deprived
patent
owners
property
without
due
process
refused
deny
congress
authority
subject
suit
patent
infringement
federal
courts
regardless
extent
procedural
due
process
may
exist
particular
time
id
finally
held
patent
remedy
act
proportionate
response
state
infringement
appropriate
measure
protect
patent
owners
property
decision
city
boerne
concluded
significant
harm
results
state
infringement
patents
sound
reason
hold
congress
subject
state
civil
consequences
face
private
party
infringer
id
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
eleventh
amendment
provides
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
citizens
subjects
foreign
state
recently
explained
seminole
tribe
supra
although
text
amendment
appear
restrict
article
iii
diversity
jurisdiction
federal
courts
understood
eleventh
amendment
stand
much
says
presupposition
confirms
presupposition
first
observed
century
ago
hans
louisiana
two
parts
first
state
sovereign
entity
federal
system
second
inherent
nature
sovereignty
amenable
suit
individual
without
consent
emphasis
deleted
quoting
federalist
century
reaffirmed
federal
jurisdiction
suits
unconsenting
contemplated
constitution
establishing
judicial
power
hans
supra
college
savings
sued
state
florida
federal
undisputed
florida
expressly
consented
suit
college
savings
argue
florida
impliedly
waived
immunity
parden
terminal
docks
dept
argument
however
foreclosed
decision
companion
case
overruling
constructive
waiver
theory
announced
parden
see
college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
college
savings
nonetheless
contend
congress
enactment
patent
remedy
act
validly
abrogated
sovereign
immunity
determine
merits
proposition
must
answer
two
questions
first
whether
congress
unequivocally
expresse
intent
abrogate
immunity
second
whether
congress
acted
pursuant
valid
exercise
power
seminole
tribe
supra
agree
parties
federal
circuit
enacting
patent
remedy
act
congress
made
intention
abrogate
immunity
unmistakably
clear
language
statute
dellmuth
muth
indeed
congress
intent
abrogate
clearer
see
state
shall
immune
eleventh
amendment
constitution
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
suit
federal
infringement
whether
congress
power
compel
surrender
sovereign
immunity
purposes
however
another
matter
congress
justified
patent
remedy
act
three
sources
constitutional
authority
patent
clause
art
cl
interstate
commerce
clause
art
cl
fourteenth
amendment
see
seminole
tribe
course
overruled
plurality
opinion
pennsylvania
union
gas
prior
case
finding
congressional
authority
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
pursuant
article
power
commerce
clause
seminole
tribe
makes
clear
congress
may
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
pursuant
article
powers
hence
patent
remedy
act
sustained
either
commerce
clause
patent
clause
ibid
federal
circuit
recognized
college
savings
contend
otherwise
instead
college
savings
argue
federal
circuit
properly
concluded
congress
enacted
patent
remedy
act
secure
fourteenth
amendment
protections
deprivations
property
without
due
process
law
fourteenth
amendment
provides
relevant
part
section
state
shall
deprive
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
section
congress
shall
power
enforce
appropriate
legislation
provisions
article
reaffirming
view
state
sovereign
immunity
yield
congress
article
powers
seminole
tribe
also
reaffirmed
holding
fitzpatrick
bitzer
congress
retains
authority
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
pursuant
fourteenth
amendment
opinion
explained
fitzpatrick
recognized
fourteenth
amendment
expanding
federal
power
expense
state
autonomy
fundamentally
altered
balance
state
federal
power
struck
constitution
seminole
tribe
supra
described
fitzpatrick
holding
fourteenth
amendment
federal
power
extended
intrude
upon
province
eleventh
amendment
therefore
fourteenth
amendment
allowed
congress
abrogate
immunity
suit
guaranteed
amendment
seminole
tribe
supra
college
savings
correct
suggesting
appropriate
legislation
pursuant
enforcement
clause
fourteenth
amendment
abrogate
state
sovereignty
congress
apparently
thought
patent
remedy
act
justified
bill
justified
acceptable
method
enforcing
provisions
fourteenth
amendment
lemelson
ampex
supp
nd
recognized
patent
form
property
holding
right
compensation
exists
patent
infringement
additionally
courts
continually
recognized
patent
rights
property
fourteenth
amendment
prohibits
state
depriving
person
property
without
due
process
law
footnotes
omitted
held
provisions
article
refers
include
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
city
boerne
flores
legislation
must
nonetheless
appropriate
term
construed
city
boerne
held
religious
freedom
restoration
act
rfra
stat
et
seq
exceeded
congress
authority
fourteenth
amendment
insofar
rfra
made
applicable
rfra
enacted
direct
response
decision
employment
dept
human
resources
smith
construed
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
hold
neutral
generally
applicable
laws
may
applied
religious
practices
even
supported
compelling
governmental
interest
city
boerne
supra
rfra
congress
reinstated
compelling
governmental
interest
test
eschewed
smith
requiring
generally
applicable
law
placing
substantial
burden
free
exercise
religion
must
justified
compelling
governmental
interest
must
employ
least
restrictive
means
furthering
interest
holding
rfra
justified
appropriate
enforcement
legislation
emphasized
congress
enforcement
power
remedial
nature
recognized
egislation
deters
remedies
constitutional
violations
fall
within
sweep
congress
enforcement
power
even
process
prohibits
conduct
unconstitutional
intrudes
legislative
spheres
autonomy
previously
reserved
id
citation
omitted
also
noted
however
broad
congressional
enforcement
power
unlimited
ibid
held
congress
enforce
constitutional
right
changing
right
given
power
enforce
power
determine
constitutes
constitutional
violation
id
canvassing
history
fourteenth
amendment
case
law
examining
propriety
congress
various
voting
rights
measures
explained
line
measures
remedy
prevent
unconstitutional
actions
measures
make
substantive
change
governing
law
easy
discern
congress
must
wide
latitude
determining
lies
distinction
exists
must
observed
must
congruence
proportionality
injury
prevented
remedied
means
adopted
end
lacking
connection
legislation
may
become
substantive
operation
effect
thus
held
congress
invoke
must
identify
conduct
transgressing
fourteenth
amendment
substantive
provisions
must
tailor
legislative
scheme
remedying
preventing
conduct
rfra
failed
meet
test
little
support
record
concerns
supposedly
animated
law
id
unlike
measures
voting
rights
cases
rfra
provisions
proportion
supposed
remedial
preventive
object
understood
responsive
designed
prevent
unconstitutional
behavior
id
see
also
id
simply
put
rfra
designed
identify
counteract
state
laws
likely
unconstitutional
patent
remedy
act
viewed
remedial
preventive
legislation
aimed
securing
protections
fourteenth
amendment
patent
owners
following
city
boerne
must
first
identify
fourteenth
amendment
evil
wrong
congress
intended
remedy
guided
principle
propriety
legislation
must
judged
reference
historical
experience
reflects
id
underlying
conduct
issue
state
infringement
patents
use
sovereign
immunity
deny
patent
owners
compensation
invasion
patent
rights
see
atent
owners
effectively
denied
remedy
damages
resulting
infringement
state
state
entity
laintiffs
patent
infringement
cases
state
foreclosed
damages
regardless
state
conduct
conduct
unremedied
patent
infringement
must
give
rise
fourteenth
amendment
violation
congress
sought
redress
patent
remedy
act
enacting
patent
remedy
act
however
congress
identified
pattern
patent
infringement
let
alone
pattern
constitutional
violations
unlike
undisputed
record
racial
discrimination
confronting
congress
voting
rights
cases
see
city
boerne
supra
congress
came
little
evidence
infringing
conduct
part
house
report
acknowledged
many
comply
patent
law
provide
two
examples
patent
infringement
suits
see
federal
circuit
opinion
identified
eight
suits
prosecuted
years
see
testimony
house
subcommittee
favor
bill
acknowledged
willing
able
respect
patent
rights
fact
reported
cases
involving
patent
infringement
claims
underlies
point
patent
remedy
clarification
act
hearing
subcommittee
courts
intellectual
property
administration
justice
house
committee
judiciary
hereinafter
house
hearings
statement
william
thompson
id
statement
robert
merges
tates
occasionally
find
patent
infringement
suits
even
bill
sponsor
conceded
evidence
massive
widespread
violation
patent
laws
either
without
state
immunity
id
statement
kastenmeier
senate
report
well
contains
evidence
unremedied
patent
infringement
become
problem
national
import
congress
heard
testimony
patent
infringement
might
increase
future
see
house
hearings
statement
jeffrey
samuels
id
statement
robert
merges
id
statement
william
thompson
acted
head
speculative
harm
see
college
savings
argues
infringing
patent
pleading
immunity
infringement
suit
state
infringes
patent
deprives
patentee
property
without
due
process
law
takes
property
patent
without
paying
compensation
required
fifth
amendment
declines
defend
act
based
compensation
clause
joins
college
savings
defense
act
designed
prevent
state
depriving
patentee
property
without
due
process
law
college
savings
contends
congress
may
invoke
protect
property
interests
created
first
place
article
patents
however
long
considered
species
property
see
brown
duchesne
laws
rights
party
patent
private
property
consolidated
wright
patent
invention
much
property
patent
land
surely
included
within
property
person
may
deprived
state
without
due
process
law
due
process
clause
protects
patents
know
reason
congress
might
legislate
deprivation
without
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
though
patents
may
considered
property
purposes
analysis
legislative
record
still
provides
little
support
proposition
congress
sought
remedy
fourteenth
amendment
violation
enacting
patent
remedy
act
due
process
clause
provides
shall
state
deprive
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
amdt
emphasis
added
accordingly
held
procedural
due
process
claims
deprivation
state
action
constitutionally
protected
interest
unconstitutional
unconstitutional
deprivation
interest
without
due
process
law
zinermon
burch
emphasis
deleted
thus
plain
terms
clause
clear
import
precedent
state
infringement
patent
though
interfering
patent
owner
right
exclude
others
violate
constitution
instead
state
provides
remedy
inadequate
remedies
injured
patent
owners
infringement
patent
deprivation
property
without
due
process
result
see
parratt
taylor
hudson
palmer
id
onnor
concurring
challenging
property
deprivation
claimant
must
either
avail
remedies
guaranteed
state
law
prove
available
remedies
inadequate
adequate
remedies
provided
followed
deprivation
property
without
due
process
result
congress
however
barely
considered
availability
state
remedies
patent
infringement
hence
whether
conduct
might
amounted
constitutional
violation
fourteenth
amendment
hear
limited
amount
testimony
effect
remedies
available
uncertain
primary
point
made
witnesses
however
state
remedies
constitutionally
inadequate
rather
less
convenient
federal
remedies
might
undermine
uniformity
patent
law
see
house
hearings
statement
robert
merges
niformity
dictates
sovereign
immunity
mistake
field
variance
among
state
laws
merges
id
statement
william
thompson
congress
said
nothing
existence
adequacy
state
remedies
statute
senate
report
made
fleeting
references
state
remedies
house
report
essentially
repeating
testimony
witnesses
see
availability
state
remedy
tenuous
vary
significantly
state
state
id
patentees
turn
state
courts
alternative
forms
relief
patent
infringement
result
patchwork
state
laws
actually
undermining
goal
national
uniformity
patent
system
need
uniformity
construction
patent
law
undoubtedly
important
factor
belongs
article
calculus
rather
determination
whether
state
plea
sovereign
immunity
deprives
patentee
property
without
due
process
law
also
said
state
actor
negligent
act
causes
unintended
injury
person
property
deprive
person
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
see
daniels
williams
actions
predicated
direct
patent
infringement
however
require
showing
intent
infringe
instead
knowledge
intent
considered
respect
damages
see
supp
iii
chisum
patents
rev
ed
course
elementary
infringement
may
entirely
inadvertent
unintentional
without
knowledge
congress
focus
instances
intentional
reckless
infringement
part
indeed
evidence
congress
suggested
state
infringement
innocent
worst
negligent
see
always
clear
products
government
buy
anyone
really
aware
patent
status
particular
invention
device
rare
find
willful
infringement
part
state
state
agency
negligent
conduct
however
violate
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
legislative
record
thus
suggests
patent
remedy
act
respond
history
widespread
persisting
deprivation
constitutional
rights
sort
congress
faced
enacting
proper
prophylactic
legislation
city
boerne
instead
congress
appears
enacted
legislation
response
handful
instances
state
patent
infringement
necessarily
violate
constitution
though
lack
support
legislative
record
determinative
see
id
identifying
targeted
constitutional
wrong
evil
still
critical
part
calculus
trong
measures
appropriate
address
one
harm
may
unwarranted
response
another
lesser
one
id
record
best
offers
scant
support
congress
conclusion
depriving
patent
owners
property
without
due
process
law
pleading
sovereign
immunity
patent
actions
lack
provisions
patent
remedy
act
proportion
supposed
remedial
preventive
object
understood
responsive
designed
prevent
unconstitutional
behavior
unlimited
range
state
conduct
expose
state
claims
direct
induced
contributory
patent
infringement
house
report
cited
testimony
acknowledging
difficult
us
identify
patented
product
process
might
used
state
supra
despite
subjecting
expansive
liability
congress
nothing
limit
coverage
act
cases
involving
arguable
constitutional
violations
state
refuses
offer
remedy
patent
owners
whose
patents
infringed
make
attempt
confine
reach
act
limiting
remedy
certain
types
infringement
nonnegligent
infringement
infringement
authorized
pursuant
state
policy
providing
suits
questionable
remedies
high
incidence
infringement
instead
congress
made
immediately
amenable
suit
federal
kinds
possible
patent
infringement
indefinite
duration
opinion
city
boerne
discussed
approval
various
limits
congress
imposed
voting
rights
measures
see
noted
congressional
enactment
pervasively
prohibits
constitutional
state
action
effort
remedy
prevent
unconstitutional
state
action
limitations
kind
tend
ensure
congress
means
proportionate
ends
legitimate
id
patent
remedy
act
indiscriminate
scope
offends
principle
particularly
incongruous
light
scant
support
predicate
unconstitutional
conduct
congress
intended
remedy
sum
simply
said
many
acts
infringement
affected
congressional
enactment
significant
likelihood
unconstitutional
historical
record
scope
coverage
therefore
make
clear
patent
remedy
act
sustained
fourteenth
amendment
examples
avoiding
liability
patent
infringement
pleading
sovereign
immunity
patent
action
scarce
enough
plausible
argument
action
part
state
deprived
patentees
property
left
without
remedy
state
law
scarcer
still
statute
apparent
basic
aims
provide
uniform
remedy
patent
infringement
place
footing
private
parties
regime
proper
article
concerns
article
give
congress
power
enact
legislation
seminole
tribe
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
petitioner
college
savings
bank
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
constitution
vests
congress
plenary
authority
patents
copyrights
art
cl
nearly
years
ago
congress
provided
exclusive
jurisdiction
patent
infringement
litigation
federal
courts
see
campbell
haverhill
congress
clarified
jurisdictional
grant
amendment
patent
law
unambiguously
authorizes
patent
infringement
actions
state
instrumentalities
officer
employee
state
acting
official
capacity
pub
stat
given
absence
effective
state
remedies
patent
infringement
statutory
state
remedies
patent
plant
variety
protection
remedy
clarification
act
patent
remedy
act
appropriate
exercise
congress
power
fourteenth
amendment
prevent
state
deprivations
property
without
due
process
law
recent
decision
city
boerne
flores
amply
supports
congressional
authority
enact
patent
remedy
act
whether
one
assumes
seldom
infringe
patents
see
ante
patent
infringements
potentially
permeate
unlimited
range
state
conduct
see
ante
discussing
city
boerne
however
shall
comment
briefly
principle
undergirds
aspects
patent
system
national
uniformity
commentaries
federal
constitution
justice
story
said
patent
copyright
clauses
beneficial
parties
national
government
possess
power
authors
inventors
otherwise
subjected
varying
laws
systems
different
subject
impair
might
even
destroy
value
rights
public
promote
progress
science
useful
arts
admit
people
large
short
interval
full
possession
enjoyment
writings
inventions
without
restraint
story
commentaries
constitution
rotunda
nowak
eds
james
madison
said
clause
utility
power
scarcely
questioned
separately
make
effectual
provision
either
copyrights
patents
anticipated
decision
point
laws
passed
instance
congress
federalist
lodge
ed
madison
sound
reasons
support
congress
authority
patents
subsequent
decision
vest
exclusive
jurisdiction
patent
infringement
litigation
federal
courts
substantive
rules
law
applied
patent
infringement
cases
entirely
federal
beginning
congress
given
patentee
right
bring
action
patent
infringement
stat
accordingly
strong
federal
interest
interpretation
patent
statutes
uniform
faithful
constitutional
goals
stimulating
invention
rewarding
disclosure
novel
useful
advances
technology
see
graham
john
deere
kansas
city
federal
interests
threatened
inadequate
protection
patentees
also
overprotection
may
adverse
impact
competitive
economy
see
bonito
boats
thunder
craft
boats
therefore
consistency
uniformity
familiarity
extensive
relevant
body
patent
jurisprudence
matters
overriding
significance
area
law
patent
infringement
litigation
often
raises
difficult
technical
issues
unfamiliar
average
trial
judge
consideration
well
divergence
among
federal
circuits
interpretation
patent
issues
provided
support
congressional
decision
consolidate
appellate
jurisdiction
patent
appeals
appeals
federal
circuit
although
jurisdiction
appeals
federal
trial
courts
patent
infringement
cases
power
review
state
decisions
questions
patent
law
see
reasons
motivated
creation
federal
circuit
undermined
exception
allowed
patent
infringement
claims
brought
state
today
first
acknowledges
need
uniformity
construction
patent
law
undoubtedly
important
ante
discounts
significance
merely
factor
belongs
article
calculus
rather
determination
whether
state
plea
sovereign
immunity
deprives
patentee
property
without
due
process
law
ibid
article
calculus
directly
relevant
case
establishes
constitutionality
congressional
decision
vest
exclusive
jurisdiction
patent
infringement
cases
federal
courts
basic
decision
unquestionably
appropriate
equally
appropriate
congress
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
patent
infringement
cases
order
close
potential
loophole
uniform
federal
scheme
undermined
necessarily
decrease
efficacy
process
afforded
patent
holders
ii
recent
decision
city
boerne
flores
sets
general
test
determining
whether
congress
enacted
appropriate
legislation
pursuant
fourteenth
amendment
must
congruence
proportionality
injury
prevented
remedied
means
adopted
end
id
first
step
inquiry
determine
injury
congress
sought
prevent
remedy
relevant
legislation
recognizes
congress
authority
fourteenth
amendment
extends
enforcing
due
process
clause
amendment
ante
congress
decided
agree
patent
remedy
act
proper
exercise
power
acknowledges
must
patents
property
ante
see
also
consolidated
wright
every
valid
patent
gives
patentee
assignee
exclusive
right
make
use
vend
invention
discovery
limited
period
machine
stokes
smith
suggests
however
state
infringement
patent
necessarily
constitute
deprivation
within
meaning
due
process
clause
infringement
may
done
negligently
ante
part
attempt
stem
tide
prisoner
litigation
avoid
making
fourteenth
amendment
font
tort
law
superimposed
upon
whatever
systems
may
already
administered
daniels
williams
drawn
constitutional
distinction
negligent
intentional
misconduct
injuries
caused
mere
negligence
state
prison
officials
leaving
pillow
stairs
jail
example
deprive
anyone
liberty
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
amendment
ibid
hand
willful
misconduct
perhaps
recklessness
gross
negligence
may
give
rise
deprivation
disagree
assumption
standard
necessarily
applies
deprivations
patent
rights
daniels
line
cases
marginal
relevance
case
respondent
college
savings
bank
alleged
petitioner
infringement
willful
question
presented
case
whether
patent
remedy
act
clarified
congress
intent
subject
state
infringers
suit
federal
may
applied
willful
infringement
read
opinion
negative
answer
question
nothing
facts
case
instead
relies
entirely
perceived
deficiencies
evidence
reviewed
congress
enacted
clarifying
amendment
enacting
patent
remedy
act
congress
identified
pattern
patent
infringement
let
alone
pattern
constitutional
violations
ante
quite
unfair
strike
congress
act
based
absence
findings
supporting
requirement
yet
articulated
legislative
history
patent
remedy
act
makes
abundantly
clear
congress
attempting
hurdle
barrier
erected
eleventh
amendment
course
clear
statement
rule
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
nevertheless
congress
hear
testimony
inadequate
state
remedies
patent
infringement
considering
patent
remedy
act
leading
case
referred
congressional
hearing
chew
california
ca
fed
fact
chew
prompted
congress
consider
legislation
became
patent
remedy
act
see
pt
federal
circuit
held
case
congressional
intent
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
patent
laws
unmistakably
clear
required
atascadero
chew
facts
chew
clearly
support
congress
decision
authority
enact
patent
remedy
act
marian
chew
invented
method
testing
automobile
engine
exhaust
emissions
secured
patent
discovery
invention
primarily
used
governmental
entities
chew
ohio
resident
sued
state
california
federal
infringing
patent
california
filed
motion
dismiss
eleventh
amendment
grounds
district
granted
federal
circuit
affirmed
id
expressly
stating
question
whether
chew
remedy
california
law
question
us
nevertheless
implied
decision
even
chew
left
without
remedy
id
hearing
patent
remedy
act
congress
heard
testimony
chew
case
professor
merges
stated
chew
might
able
draft
infringement
suit
tort
claim
might
impossible
least
difficult
california
law
consequently
relief
state
statutes
may
true
alternative
avenue
recovery
house
hearing
congress
heard
general
testimony
state
remedies
likely
insufficient
compensate
inventors
whose
patents
infringed
acting
commissioner
patents
stated
instrumentalities
immune
suit
federal
patent
infringement
patent
holders
forced
pursue
uncertain
perhaps
even
remedies
state
law
id
legislative
record
references
several
cases
patent
infringement
involving
see
paperless
accounting
mass
transit
administration
civil
har
md
cited
house
hearing
hercules
minnesota
state
highway
supp
house
hearing
lemelson
ampex
supp
nd
addition
congress
found
state
infringement
patents
likely
increase
pt
opinion
today
dismisses
rationale
congress
heard
testimony
patent
infringement
might
increase
future
acted
head
speculative
harm
ante
citations
omitted
fact
instrumentalities
especially
state
universities
involved
many
patent
cases
since
see
regents
univ
glaxo
wellcome
supp
declaratory
judgment
action
filed
university
minnesota
university
foundation
american
cyanamid
supp
patent
infringement
action
filed
university
colorado
amoco
supp
sd
cal
suit
filed
various
parties
alleging
inter
alia
regents
university
california
induced
patent
infringement
amoco
genentech
regents
univ
ca
fed
declaratory
judgment
suit
filed
genentech
alza
supp
nj
counterclaim
brought
alza
regents
university
california
furthermore
instrumentalities
heavily
involved
federal
patent
system
patent
trademark
office
issued
patents
universities
public
private
alone
chakansky
patent
profiles
computer
law
strategist
royalty
earnings
licenses
universities
totaled
million
increase
prior
year
eckstrom
licensing
foreign
domestic
operations
epstein
ed
state
florida
obtained
patents
since
beginning
brief
new
york
intellectual
property
law
association
amicus
curiae
obtained
patents
brief
true
considering
patent
remedy
act
congress
review
remedies
available
state
patent
infringements
surmise
kind
recovery
plaintiff
might
obtain
tort
suit
jurisdictions
see
ante
particularly
ironic
view
fact
support
holding
given
congress
long
ago
state
jurisdiction
patent
infringement
cases
surely
reasonable
congress
assume
remedies
simply
exist
furthermore
well
known
waived
sovereign
immunity
suit
among
contours
waiver
vary
widely
even
remedies
might
available
theory
appropriate
congress
conclude
guarantee
patentees
due
process
infringement
actions
state
defendants
state
judges
never
exposure
patent
litigation
federal
judges
experienced
decades
unlike
infringement
actions
brought
federal
district
courts
decisions
reviewable
appeals
federal
circuit
surely
undertake
task
reviewing
every
state
decision
arguably
misapplied
patent
law
even
amended
construed
permit
state
courts
entertain
infringement
actions
state
named
defendant
given
opinion
alden
maine
means
clear
state
courts
required
hear
cases
post
slip
even
state
courts
elected
hear
patent
infringement
cases
state
entities
entire
category
cases
raise
questions
impartiality
concern
underlies
constitutional
authorization
diversity
jurisdiction
statutory
provisions
removal
certain
cases
state
federal
courts
et
al
concern
justified
john
marshall
narrow
construction
eleventh
amendment
cohens
virginia
wheat
noted
conflict
state
interest
federal
right
hazarding
much
assert
judicatures
exempt
prejudices
legislatures
people
influenced
constitute
perfectly
impartial
tribunals
finally
never
mandated
congress
must
find
widespread
persisting
deprivation
constitutional
rights
ante
order
employ
authority
surprising
therefore
congress
compile
extensive
legislative
record
analyzing
due
process
lack
thereof
state
might
afford
patent
infringement
suit
retooled
action
tort
congress
reason
believe
needed
thing
indeed
today
iii
view
congress
sufficient
evidence
due
process
violations
whether
actual
potential
meet
requirement
expressed
city
boerne
congress
act
remedy
prevent
unconstitutional
actions
see
opinion
today
threatens
read
congress
power
pass
prophylactic
legislation
altogether
holding
unsupported
city
boerne
fact
conflicts
reasoning
case
city
boerne
affirmed
principle
broad
sweep
congress
enforcement
power
encompasses
legislation
deters
remedies
constitutional
violations
even
prohibits
conduct
unconstitutional
even
intrudes
spheres
autonomy
previously
reserved
nevertheless
held
enactment
religious
freedom
restoration
act
rfra
appropriate
exercise
congress
enforcement
power
fourteenth
amendment
id
enacting
rfra
congress
sought
change
meaning
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
interpreted
rather
remedy
prevent
violations
clause
interpreted
held
rfra
crossed
line
measures
remedy
prevent
unconstitutional
actions
measures
make
substantive
change
governing
law
congress
power
corrective
preventive
definitional
extensive
review
legislative
history
rfra
made
clear
statute
fairly
characterized
remedial
measure
rather
legislative
attempt
interpret
elaborate
meaning
free
exercise
clause
congress
violated
principle
power
interpret
constitution
case
controversy
remains
judiciary
difference
harm
targeted
rfra
harm
motivated
enactment
patent
remedy
act
striking
rfra
congress
sought
overrule
interpretation
first
amendment
patent
remedy
act
however
passed
prevent
future
violations
due
process
based
substantiated
fear
unable
unwilling
provide
adequate
remedies
violations
rights
congress
wide
latitude
determining
remedial
preventive
measures
see
id
suddenly
become
narrow
indeed
city
boerne
also
identified
proportionality
component
appropriate
legislation
opinion
expressly
recognized
preventive
rules
sometimes
appropriate
congruence
means
used
ends
achieved
appropriateness
remedial
measures
must
considered
light
evil
presented
see
south
carolina
katzenbach
strong
measures
appropriate
address
one
harm
may
unwarranted
response
another
lesser
one
id
id
rfra
found
congruence
absence
evidence
widespread
violations
need
redress
sweeping
coverage
statute
ensured
intrusion
every
level
government
displacing
laws
prohibiting
official
actions
almost
every
description
regardless
subject
matter
contrast
rfra
act
issue
case
stark
sole
purpose
amendment
abrogate
sovereign
immunity
defense
charge
patent
infringement
impact
whatsoever
substantive
rule
state
law
merely
effectuates
settled
federal
policy
confine
patent
infringement
litigation
federal
judges
precise
congruence
means
used
abrogation
sovereign
immunity
narrow
category
cases
ends
achieved
elimination
risk
defense
sovereign
immunity
deprive
patentees
property
without
due
process
law
congruence
equally
precise
whether
infringement
patents
state
actors
rare
frequent
indeed
unusual
statute
operate
rare
cases
infringements
common
become
common
state
activities
commercial
arena
increase
impact
statute
likewise
expand
precise
harmony
growth
problem
congress
anticipated
sought
prevent
either
event
statute
impact
enforcement
laws
none
concerns
underlay
decision
city
boerne
even
remotely
implicated
case
patent
remedy
act
merely
puts
position
private
users
patent
system
virtually
posture
congress
grants
exclusive
right
monopoly
effects
pervasive
citizen
state
may
escape
reach
goldstein
california
analyzing
copyright
clause
recognizing
injustice
sovereign
immunity
context
waived
immunity
suit
patent
violations
congress
enacted
statute
entitled
act
provide
additional
protection
owners
patents
ch
stat
act
provided
owners
patents
infringed
may
recover
reasonable
compensation
use
suit
claims
consistently
maintained
policy
last
years
see
judgment
act
paradigm
appropriate
exercise
congress
power
iv
reasons
convinced
act
upheld
even
full
respect
given
recent
cases
cloaking
increasing
protection
congressional
legislation
however
note
continuing
dissent
aggressive
sovereign
immunity
jurisprudence
today
demonstrates
champion
rights
case
seeks
guarantee
rights
express
particular
desire
possessing
congress
hearings
patent
remedy
act
although
invited
chose
testify
opposition
abrogation
immunity
statute
invalidates
today
one
several
clear
statements
congress
enacted
response
decision
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
clarifications
congress
fully
justified
assuming
ample
authority
abrogate
sovereign
immunity
defenses
federal
claims
authority
squarely
upheld
pennsylvania
union
gas
holding
plurality
opinion
see
ante
overruled
seminole
tribe
florida
full
reach
case
dramatic
expansion
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
unpredictable
dimensions
defined
present
majority
perception
constitutional
penumbras
rather
constitutional
text
see
acknowledging
understood
eleventh
amendment
stand
much
says
citation
omitted
expansive
judicially
crafted
protection
rights
runs
course
shall
continue
register
agreement
views
expressed
seminole
dissents
scholarly
commentary
case
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
college
savings
also
filed
separate
action
alleging
florida
prepaid
made
false
claims
product
violation
trademark
act
lanham
act
district
dismissed
lanham
act
suit
eleventh
amendment
grounds
third
circuit
affirmed
granted
college
savings
petition
case
day
granted
petition
case
see
lanham
act
suit
subject
opinion
college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
bd
section
still
provides
relevant
part
except
otherwise
provided
title
whoever
without
authority
makes
uses
offers
sell
sells
patented
invention
within
imports
patented
invention
term
patent
therefor
infringes
patent
whoever
actively
induces
infringement
patent
shall
liable
infringer
whoever
offers
sell
sells
within
imports
component
patented
machine
manufacture
combination
composition
material
apparatus
use
practicing
patented
process
constituting
material
part
invention
knowing
especially
made
especially
adapted
use
infringement
patent
staple
article
commodity
commerce
suitable
substantial
noninfringing
use
shall
liable
contributory
infringer
ed
supp
iii
district
concluded
purposes
immunity
suit
florida
prepaid
arm
state
florida
conclusion
parties
dispute
either
federal
circuit
patent
clause
provides
congress
shall
power
promote
progress
science
useful
arts
securing
limited
times
authors
inventors
exclusive
right
respective
writings
discoveries
art
cl
commerce
clause
provides
congress
shall
power
regulate
commerce
foreign
nations
among
several
indian
tribes
art
cl
relevant
portions
fourteenth
amendment
discussed
see
south
carolina
katzenbach
katzenbach
morgan
oregon
mitchell
city
rome
representative
kastenmeier
made
statement
course
questioning
jeffrey
samuels
acting
commissioner
patents
trademarks
department
commerce
discussion
continued
kastenmeier
accordingly
one
argue
legislation
may
premature
really
know
whether
affect
sic
samuels
well
right
chairman
many
cases
raised
issue
guess
feeling
step
taken
possibility
exists
light
atascadero
light
chew
case
get
involved
infringing
patents
guess
general
policy
statement
believe
engaged
engage
patent
infringement
subject
remedies
set
forth
patent
act
rights
patent
owner
dependent
upon
identity
entity
infringing
whether
private
individual
corporation
state
general
philosophical
matter
believe
law
needs
passed
suggestion
language
statute
house
senate
reports
bill
became
statute
congress
mind
compensation
clause
fifth
amendment
since
congress
explicit
invoking
authority
article
authority
prevent
state
depriving
person
property
without
due
process
law
fourteenth
amendment
think
omission
precludes
consideration
compensation
clause
basis
patent
remedy
act
see
house
hearings
statement
robert
merges
thus
patentee
apparently
draft
cause
action
general
tort
claim
perhaps
one
restitution
come
within
statute
might
impossible
least
difficult
california
law
id
true
may
state
remedies
alternative
state
remedies
bring
deceit
suit
try
general
unfair
competition
suit
restitution
one
occurred
possible
basis
recovery
id
another
problem
approach
assumes
state
law
remedies
available
every
state
patentee
product
sold
may
may
true
id
statement
william
thompson
case
balance
since
least
effective
patent
remedies
state
level
id
lane
first
nat
bank
boston
supp
mass
pointed
appellant
may
able
obtain
money
damages
recourse
massachusetts
tort
claims
act
sue
state
deceit
conversion
unfair
competition
massachusetts
law
also
noted
massachusetts
statute
provides
damages
may
recovered
state
private
property
confiscated
public
purpose
many
may
similar
statutes
courts
surmise
intellectual
property
infringement
cases
may
pursued
state
courts
offer
us
little
comfort
id
sounds
like
difficult
area
predict
happen
rich
variety
potential
causes
action
prior
speaker
merges
pointed
worth
mentioning
state
florida
provides
remedies
patent
owners
alleged
infringement
part
state
aggrieved
parties
may
pursue
legislative
remedy
claims
bill
payment
full
stat
judicial
remedy
takings
conversion
claim
see
jacobs
wind
electric
florida
dept
relevant
testimony
stated
full
comments
regarding
copyright
centered
substantial
use
copyrighted
textbooks
state
universities
well
state
use
copyrighted
music
computer
software
state
use
patented
products
diverse
substantial
patented
inventions
involved
manner
commonly
used
machines
tools
instruments
chemicals
compounds
materials
devices
description
purpose
furthermore
patented
processes
commonplace
state
instrumentalities
operate
hospitals
universities
prisons
libraries
build
maintain
roads
provide
facilities
equipment
large
numbers
employees
perform
manner
state
supported
activities
difficult
us
identify
patented
product
process
might
used
state
house
hearings
statement
william
thompson
see
stating
state
entities
shall
subject
provisions
title
manner
extent
nongovernmental
entity
see
also
committee
believes
full
panoply
remedies
provided
patent
law
available
patentees
whose
legitimate
rights
infringed
state
entities
thus
contrary
dissent
intimation
see
post
patent
remedy
act
put
position
patent
remedy
act
subject
remedies
available
plaintiffs
infringement
actions
include
punitive
damages
attorney
fees
see
well
injunctive
relief
see
waiving
immunity
patent
infringement
actions
ed
supp
iii
however
consent
either
treble
damages
injunctive
relief
allowed
reasonable
attorney
fees
narrow
class
specified
instances
footnotes
see
act
apr
ch
stat
act
february
ch
stat
dispute
whether
federal
jurisdiction
patent
cases
become
exclusive
see
chisum
patents
event
provides
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
arising
act
congress
relating
patents
plant
variety
protection
copyrights
jurisdiction
shall
exclusive
courts
patent
plant
variety
protection
copyright
cases
second
sentence
excluding
reference
plant
variety
protection
cases
worded
essentially
way
since
see
rev
stat
used
various
criteria
determining
action
arises
patent
law
see
dale
tile
mfg
hyatt
well
established
patent
infringement
claim
paradigm
action
arising
patent
laws
chisum
advisory
commission
patent
law
reform
recommended
patent
jurisdiction
restricted
single
district
per
circuit
district
courts
designate
use
judges
special
expertise
patent
litigation
increased
expertise
courts
able
effectively
control
litigation
proceedings
ensure
consistency
application
substantive
patent
law
course
restricted
jurisdictional
provision
reduce
flexibility
currently
available
parties
file
actions
pursuant
general
jurisdictional
authority
yet
patent
practice
essentially
national
practice
costs
terms
lost
flexibility
associated
change
appear
relatively
minor
comparison
prospective
benefits
uniformity
practice
advisory
commission
patent
law
reform
comer
et
report
secretary
commerce
report
federal
courts
improvement
act
house
stated
patent
litigation
long
identified
problem
area
characterized
undue
unsettling
inconsistency
adjudications
based
evidence
compiled
course
thorough
hearings
subject
commission
revision
federal
appellate
system
created
act
congress
concluded
patent
law
area
application
law
facts
case
often
produces
different
outcomes
different
courtrooms
substantially
similar
cases
result
circuit
courts
regarded
much
time
money
expended
shopping
favorable
venue
commission
survey
practitioners
patent
bar
reported
uncertainty
created
lack
national
law
precedent
significant
problem
commission
found
patent
law
area
widespread
particularly
acute
pp
footnotes
omitted
see
also
paragraph
college
savings
complaint
alleges
efendant
florida
prepaid
actual
knowledge
patent
knowledge
infringement
without
lawful
justification
willfully
infringed
patent
app
pet
cert
practical
matter
infringement
actions
based
mere
negligence
rarely
arise
patent
infringers
put
notice
conduct
may
actionable
infringement
suit
filed
first
step
enforcing
patent
usually
send
letter
pokotilow
siegal
cease
desist
letters
legal
pitfalls
patentees
intellectual
property
strategist
chairman
house
subcommittee
considering
patent
remedy
act
representative
kastenmeier
engaged
following
dialogue
william
thompson
president
american
intellectual
property
law
association
whether
definitively
immune
suit
eleventh
amendment
following
federal
circuit
recent
decision
chew
california
astenmeier
mentioned
see
likelihood
cases
area
since
atascadero
chew
cases
seem
fairly
definitive
question
unless
fact
remedial
legislation
anticipate
remedial
legislation
bill
us
passed
law
subject
litigation
hompson
think
clear
legislation
clearly
drawn
seems
match
tests
set
forth
atascadero
making
clear
patent
statute
one
qualify
abrogation
area
sic
amendment
never
guarantee
exactly
attorneys
going
read
statutes
chairman
sane
ones
bring
action
hearing
subcommittee
courts
intellectual
property
administration
justice
house
committee
judiciary
house
hearing
merges
continued
another
problem
approach
assumes
state
law
remedies
available
every
state
patentee
product
sold
may
may
true
event
requiring
potential
plaintiff
patentee
ascertain
validity
claims
differing
substantive
procedural
laws
fifty
may
well
prove
substantial
disincentive
commencement
suits
moreover
vitiate
major
goal
federal
intellectual
property
system
national
uniformity
short
remedies
simply
substitute
patent
infringement
actions
id
see
generally
dueker
biobusiness
campus
commercialization
biomedical
technologies
food
drug
bertha
intellectual
property
activities
research
universities
idea
tech
eisenberg
public
research
private
development
patents
technology
transfer
research
rev
extent
majority
finds
factor
dispositive
hope
copyright
remedy
clarification
act
may
considered
appropriate
legislation
legislative
history
act
includes
many
examples
copyright
infringements
especially
state
universities
see
hearings
subcommittee
courts
intellectual
property
administration
justice
house
committee
judiciary
hearing
subcommittee
patents
copyrights
trademarks
senate
committee
judiciary
sess
perhaps
importantly
house
requested
register
copyrights
prepare
study
described
transmittal
letter
factual
inquiry
enforcement
copyright
state
governments
unfair
copyright
licensing
practices
respect
state
government
use
copyrighted
works
also
prepared
analysis
current
state
eleventh
amendment
law
decisions
relating
copyright
liability
including
assessment
constitutional
limitations
congressional
action
finally
requested
american
law
division
congressional
research
service
conducted
state
survey
statutes
case
law
concerning
waiver
state
sovereign
immunity
register
copyrights
oman
copyright
liability
eleventh
amendment
june
transmittal
letter
report
contains
comments
industry
groups
statistics
legal
analysis
relating
copyright
violations
actual
potential
see
act
passed
florida
hold
patentee
might
bring
sort
takings
claim
state
might
seek
legislative
remedy
see
jacobs
wind
electric
florida
dept
transp
given
unambiguous
text
reason
congress
anticipated
decision
good
reason
believe
may
misinterpreted
federal
law
see
jacobs
wind
harding
dissenting
see
code
claims
may
brought
administratively
va
art
vi
state
west
virginia
shall
never
made
defendant
law
equity
see
rev
stat
waiving
immunity
tort
claims
injuries
resulting
operation
motor
vehicle
operation
public
hospital
correctional
facility
dangerous
condition
public
building
dangerous
condition
public
highway
road
dangerous
condition
caused
snow
ice
operation
public
utility
facility
stat
ann
supp
waiver
immunity
invalid
loss
arises
state
employee
exercises
due
care
performance
failure
perform
discretionary
duty
md
cts
jud
proc
code
ann
immunity
waived
claim
single
occurrence
exceeds
house
report
advocating
creation
federal
circuit
congress
noted
infrequency
review
patent
cases
leaves
present
judicial
system
without
effective
means
assuring
nationwide
administration
patent
laws
senate
said
report
act
current
state
law
leaves
protection
afforded
patent
trademark
holders
dependant
status
infringing
party
public
school
ucla
sue
private
school
usc
patent
infringement
yet
usc
sue
ucla
act
majority
assertion
patent
remedy
act
put
position
ante
misleading
case
private
infringement
suits
treble
damages
available
infringer
acted
wanton
disregard
patentee
patent
rights
infringement
willful
read
portec
ca
fed
reversing
district
award
enhanced
damages
hand
finding
willful
infringement
mandate
damages
enhanced
much
less
mandate
treble
damages
ibid
attorney
fees
available
exceptional
circumstances
determined
case
exceptional
district
discretion
whether
award
attorney
fees
fees
must
reasonable
gentry
gallery
berkline
ca
fed
addition
attorney
fees
available
limited
circumstances
suits
ante
remaining
differences
waiver
sovereign
immunity
patent
remedy
act
supported
quintessentially
federal
concerns
found
procurement
equipment
area
uniquely
federal
interest
boyle
technologies
indeed
importance
federal
interest
military
procurement
led
fashion
doctrine
government
contractors
immunity
without
waiting
congress
consider
question
id
stevens
dissenting
injunctions
available
federal
government
extensive
investment
patented
military
inventions
right
enjoin
officer
virtually
asserts
existence
judicial
power
close
every
arsenal
crozier
krupp
also
persuaded
state
like
florida
invoked
benefits
federal
patent
system
deemed
waived
defense
sovereign
immunity
patent
litigation
reasoning
justice
breyer
dissent
college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
post
applies
special
force
case
subcommittee
invited
state
attorneys
general
representatives
state
universities
testify
none
made
available
hearing
see
americans
disabilities
act
bankruptcy
reform
act
family
medical
leave
act
trademark
remedy
clarification
act
individuals
disabilities
education
act
copyright
remedy
clarification
act