state
missouri
state
illinois
argued
decided
april
ordered
oral
argument
may
argued
november
january
state
missouri
filed
bill
complaint
state
illinois
sanitary
district
chicago
corporation
latter
state
following
terms
complainant
state
missouri
one
brings
bill
complaint
state
illinois
one
sanitary
district
chicago
public
corporation
organized
laws
state
illinois
located
part
city
chicago
county
cook
said
state
illinois
citizen
state
illinois
orator
complains
says
state
containing
population
upwards
three
millions
people
lying
west
bank
mississippi
river
public
navigable
running
stream
frontage
said
stream
miles
orator
shows
act
congress
providing
organization
admission
illinois
missouri
union
declared
western
boundary
illinois
eastern
boundary
missouri
middle
main
channel
mississippi
river
shores
mississippi
river
waters
form
missouri
illinois
boundary
soil
waters
thereof
granted
constitution
reserved
illinois
missouri
respectively
orator
shows
missouri
illinois
concurrent
general
jurisdiction
waters
mississippi
river
forming
boundary
said
exclusive
territorial
jurisdiction
portion
adjacent
shore
orator
shows
illinois
river
empties
mississippi
river
point
city
louis
illinois
side
said
mississippi
river
orator
shows
within
territory
orator
banks
shores
said
mississippi
river
mouth
illinois
river
many
cities
towns
state
missouri
many
thousands
persons
compelled
rely
upon
waters
said
river
regular
natural
accustomed
flow
daily
necessary
supply
water
drinking
domestic
agricultural
manufacturing
purposes
watering
stock
animals
kinds
said
mississippi
river
flowing
regular
course
used
purposes
aforesaid
inhabitants
said
state
missouri
time
whereof
memory
man
runneth
contrary
said
river
waters
use
thereof
drinking
agricultural
manufacturing
purposes
accustomed
natural
flow
indispensable
life
health
business
many
thousands
inhabitants
state
missouri
great
value
orator
state
orator
shows
cities
towns
mouth
said
illinois
river
within
territory
orator
compelled
means
waterworks
water
towers
intakes
built
constructed
purpose
supply
inhabitants
said
cities
towns
adequate
supply
pure
wholesome
water
fit
healthful
drinking
domestic
purposes
uses
said
mississippi
river
flowing
ancient
accustomed
natural
course
orator
shows
said
waterworks
systems
constructed
reference
said
mississippi
river
purpose
taking
water
therefrom
source
orator
shows
heretofore
wit
state
illinois
enacted
law
known
sanitary
district
act
together
act
improvement
illinois
des
plaines
rivers
said
act
said
state
said
corporation
known
said
sanitary
district
chicago
organized
existing
operating
express
terms
said
act
canal
drain
corporation
organized
accordance
provisions
may
conditions
restrictions
additional
requirements
placed
said
corporation
act
authorizing
creation
said
corporation
may
amended
repealed
express
provisions
said
act
water
sewage
shall
admitted
channel
constructed
said
act
trustees
said
channel
shall
notify
governor
illinois
completion
said
channel
governor
illinois
shall
appoint
three
commissioners
examine
said
canal
channel
report
governor
complies
act
state
illinois
governor
shall
authorize
water
sewage
turned
said
channel
without
said
permit
turned
general
provisions
said
act
said
channel
times
subject
control
supervision
state
illinois
authorities
orator
shows
chicago
river
situated
basin
lake
michigan
two
forks
branches
flowing
city
chicago
lake
michigan
natural
drainage
chicago
illinois
lake
michigan
sewage
drainage
territory
embraced
defendant
district
sanitary
district
chicago
led
flows
chicago
river
lake
michigan
orator
shows
defendant
herein
sanitary
district
chicago
authority
state
illinois
acting
governmental
agency
said
state
supervision
control
subject
approval
state
illinois
constructed
channel
open
drain
west
fork
south
branch
chicago
river
city
chicago
county
cook
state
illinois
point
near
lockport
county
said
state
said
channel
drain
connects
empties
des
plaines
river
empties
illinois
river
latter
river
flows
empties
mississippi
river
point
distant
miles
city
louis
missouri
orator
channel
built
sanitary
district
chicago
built
said
sanitary
district
one
governmental
agencies
state
illinois
pretended
lawful
authority
said
state
direction
supervision
control
governmental
power
state
illinois
said
state
heretofore
times
sanctioned
governor
officers
sanctions
building
said
channel
opening
thereof
orator
shows
construction
said
channel
drain
defendant
sanitary
district
chicago
illinois
sanction
approval
state
illinois
cut
natural
bridge
watershed
divides
basin
lake
michigan
basins
des
plaines
illinois
rivers
basin
mississippi
river
constructed
said
channel
completed
supervision
sanction
state
illinois
extended
said
artificial
channel
said
natural
divide
watershed
defendants
propose
threaten
receive
said
channel
drain
sewage
matter
filth
sanitary
district
chicago
embraces
nearly
whole
city
chicago
portion
county
cook
without
legal
authority
already
part
effectuated
said
threat
purpose
threatens
permit
cause
said
sewage
filth
artificial
means
pumping
otherwise
flow
channel
drain
towards
said
des
plaines
river
eventually
mississippi
river
thereby
approval
subject
inspection
control
supervision
state
illinois
pretended
authority
thereof
reversing
natural
flow
said
chicago
river
orator
shows
sewage
matter
poisonous
filth
thus
threatened
receive
permit
cause
flow
said
artificial
channel
said
des
plaines
river
created
population
upwards
one
one
half
millions
people
besides
created
great
number
stock
yards
slaughtering
establishments
rendering
establishments
distilleries
business
enterprises
industries
lining
sides
chicago
river
producing
filth
noxious
matters
discharged
said
chicago
river
drained
therein
surface
orator
shows
many
years
past
said
city
chicago
greater
portion
embraced
limits
defendant
corporation
sanitary
district
chicago
aforesaid
discharging
sewage
matter
filth
chicago
river
lake
michigan
large
quantities
much
accumulated
bed
along
sides
river
upon
bed
said
lake
michigan
near
shores
thereof
plan
threatened
attempted
adopted
defendant
sanitary
district
chicago
acting
conjunction
subject
control
defendant
state
illinois
pretended
authority
said
state
illinois
loosen
said
accumulated
matter
filth
also
direct
cause
flow
towards
said
artificial
channel
drain
thence
said
des
plaines
river
finally
mississippi
river
waters
thereof
within
jurisdiction
control
orator
past
homes
inhabitants
orator
towns
cities
within
borders
orator
past
waterworks
said
cities
towns
within
state
missouri
orator
shows
amount
said
undefecated
filth
sewage
poisonous
unhealthful
noxious
matters
proposed
permitted
turned
said
artificial
channel
said
des
plaines
illinois
rivers
mississippi
river
said
sanitary
district
chicago
defendants
acting
jointly
amount
daily
tons
defendants
permitted
carry
said
threats
execution
cause
said
amount
undefecated
sewage
poisonous
noxious
matters
otherwise
flow
lake
michigan
flow
mississippi
river
waters
mississippi
river
within
jurisdiction
orator
certainty
poisoned
polluted
rendered
wholly
unfit
unhealthful
drinking
domestic
uses
render
wholly
valueless
entirely
worthless
various
waterworks
system
towns
cities
borders
state
missouri
established
acquired
great
cost
expense
deprive
orator
state
missouri
inhabitants
right
use
waters
said
river
drinking
domestic
manufacturing
agricultural
purposes
said
water
used
accustomed
natural
flow
heretofore
length
time
memory
man
runneth
contrary
thereof
said
threatened
action
defendants
amount
direct
continuing
nuisance
interference
use
orator
inhabitants
waters
mississippi
river
flowing
natural
state
polluting
poisoning
means
aforesaid
whereby
health
lives
inhabitants
orator
endangered
business
interests
said
state
greatly
irreparably
injured
said
damage
lives
health
business
interests
said
state
resulting
said
poisoning
polluting
said
waters
aforesaid
orator
estimated
money
value
orator
information
belief
charges
fact
said
tons
poisonous
undefecated
filth
sewage
said
sanitary
district
chicago
daily
carried
said
artificial
channel
sent
des
plaines
illinois
rivers
mississippi
great
quantities
thereof
deposited
bed
soil
said
river
belonging
orator
wholly
within
jurisdiction
thereof
orator
great
irreparable
damage
tons
undefecated
sewage
filth
daily
injected
waters
mississippi
river
portion
thereof
state
missouri
jurisdiction
thousands
inhabitants
obtain
drinking
water
pollute
poison
said
water
mississippi
river
extent
render
unwholesome
unfit
unhealthful
use
drinking
said
inhabitants
territory
orator
unfit
use
watering
stock
manufacturing
purposes
orator
shows
great
quantities
undefecated
sewage
turned
mississippi
river
manner
means
aforesaid
poison
pollute
said
water
germs
disease
various
many
kinds
orator
shows
acts
herein
complained
part
state
illinois
acting
conjunction
one
governmental
agencies
said
sanitary
district
chicago
cause
continuing
nuisance
mississippi
river
said
state
illinois
power
authority
cause
permit
assist
causing
commission
continuance
nuisance
flowing
waters
mississippi
river
navigable
stream
detriment
irreparable
continuing
damage
injury
state
missouri
continuing
irreparable
injury
lives
health
citizens
inhabitants
state
missouri
unless
restrained
order
decree
defendants
state
illinois
sanitary
district
chicago
acting
together
accordance
terms
act
said
sanitary
district
organized
upon
permit
authority
governor
illinois
state
illinois
turn
said
water
sewage
aforesaid
manner
means
aforesaid
des
plaines
illinois
rivers
thence
mississippi
orator
says
avers
contrary
equity
good
conscience
result
manifest
irreparable
injury
orator
health
citizens
premises
orator
wholly
without
remedy
law
without
adequate
remedy
prevent
flowing
said
sewage
aforesaid
save
interposition
orator
adequate
relief
except
end
therefore
defendants
may
show
orator
relief
prayed
end
defendants
may
make
full
true
direct
perfect
answer
matters
hereinbefore
stated
charged
oath
answer
oath
hereby
expressly
waived
end
defendants
officers
agents
servants
employees
may
restrained
injunction
issuing
receiving
permitting
sewage
received
discharged
said
artificial
channel
drain
permitting
flow
causing
made
flow
said
channel
drain
towards
des
plaines
river
orator
prays
honors
may
grant
writ
injunction
seal
honorable
properly
restraining
enjoining
defendants
officers
agents
employees
servants
sanitary
district
chicago
state
illinois
permitting
causing
said
sewage
discharged
said
channel
drain
permitting
causing
said
sewage
poisonous
filth
thence
flow
said
des
plaines
river
defendant
state
illinois
enjoined
restrained
issuing
codefendant
permission
authority
perform
acts
aforesaid
allow
done
orator
also
prays
provisional
temporary
injunction
pending
cause
restraining
enjoining
several
acts
aforesaid
relief
equity
case
may
require
honors
may
seem
meet
please
honors
grant
unto
orator
writ
injunction
conformable
prayer
bill
also
writ
subpoena
america
directed
state
illinois
governor
attorney
general
thereof
said
sanitary
district
chicago
officers
trustees
agents
commanding
day
certain
appear
answer
unto
bill
complaint
abide
order
decree
premises
shall
seem
proper
required
principles
equity
good
conscience
march
came
defendants
filed
demurrer
bill
complaint
following
terms
come
state
illinois
attorney
general
edwin
akin
sanitary
district
chicago
attorneys
demur
bill
complaint
filed
herein
say
said
bill
complaint
matters
therein
contained
manner
form
stated
set
forth
sufficient
law
said
state
missouri
maintain
aforesaid
action
said
state
illinois
sanitary
district
chicago
said
defendants
bound
law
land
answer
said
defendants
according
form
statute
case
made
provided
state
show
following
causes
demurrer
said
bill
complaint
jurisdiction
either
parties
suit
appears
upon
face
said
bill
complaint
matters
complained
set
forth
therein
constitute
within
meaning
constitution
controversy
state
missouri
state
illinois
citizens
matters
alleged
set
forth
said
bill
complaint
show
issues
presented
therein
arise
state
illinois
public
corporation
created
laws
said
state
certain
cities
towns
corporate
capacity
state
missouri
certain
persons
said
state
missouri
residing
near
banks
mississippi
river
matters
stated
said
bill
complaint
true
concern
state
missouri
corporate
body
state
said
bill
complaint
shows
upon
face
suit
fact
behalf
certain
cities
towns
said
state
missouri
situate
banks
mississippi
river
certain
persons
reside
said
state
near
banks
said
river
although
said
suit
attempted
prosecuted
name
state
missouri
said
state
effect
loaning
name
said
cities
towns
said
individuals
nominal
party
said
suit
real
parties
interest
said
cities
towns
corporate
capacity
said
private
persons
citizens
said
state
appears
upon
face
said
bill
complaint
said
state
missouri
right
sovereignty
seeking
maintain
suit
redress
supposed
wrongs
certain
cities
towns
said
state
corporate
capacity
certain
private
citizens
said
state
constitution
laws
enacted
thereunder
said
state
possesses
sovereignty
empowers
bring
original
suit
purpose
appears
upon
face
said
bill
complaint
property
rights
state
missouri
manner
affected
matters
alleged
said
bill
complaint
property
right
involved
suit
give
original
jurisdiction
cause
order
authorize
maintain
original
jurisdiction
suit
state
illinois
citizens
said
state
must
appear
controversy
set
forth
bill
complaint
determined
controversy
arising
directly
state
missouri
state
illinois
citizens
controversy
vindication
alleged
grievances
certain
cities
towns
said
state
particular
individuals
residing
therein
said
bill
complaint
respects
uncertain
informal
insufficient
state
facts
sufficient
entitle
said
state
missouri
equitable
relief
prayed
said
bill
complaint
want
sufficient
bill
complaint
behalf
said
defendants
pray
judgment
said
state
missouri
may
barred
maintaining
aforesaid
action
said
defendants
take
cognizance
cause
said
defendants
hence
dismissed
costs
november
case
came
schnurmacher
crow
complainant
charles
gilbert
wm
springer
akin
samuel
burdett
defendants
justice
shiras
delivered
opinion
cause
us
bill
complaint
demurrer
thereto
questions
thus
presented
two
first
whether
allegations
bill
disclose
case
controversy
state
missouri
state
illinois
citizen
thereof
within
meaning
constitution
statutes
create
define
original
jurisdiction
second
whether
held
allegations
bill
present
controversy
sufficient
entitle
state
missouri
equitable
relief
prayed
question
whether
acts
one
state
seeking
promote
health
prosperity
inhabitants
system
public
works
endangers
health
prosperity
inhabitants
another
adjacent
state
create
sufficient
basis
controversy
sense
constitution
readily
answered
affirmative
regard
language
instrument
judicial
power
shall
vested
one
inferior
courts
congress
may
time
time
ordain
establish
judicial
power
shall
extend
cases
law
equity
arising
constitution
laws
treaties
made
shall
made
authority
controversies
two
state
citizens
another
state
cases
state
shall
party
shall
original
jurisdiction
const
art
definition
description
contained
constitution
kind
nature
controversies
might
arise
provisions
might
supposed
cases
wherein
one
state
institute
legal
proceedings
another
original
jurisdiction
attach
instances
called
upon
construe
apply
provision
constitution
must
look
merely
language
historical
origin
decisions
meaning
scope
operation
received
deliberate
consideration
declaration
independence
colonies
delegates
appointed
colonies
considered
articles
confederation
debated
day
day
time
time
two
years
july
ratified
ten
new
jersey
november
year
delaware
february
maryland
march
article
follows
style
confederacy
shall
america
article
contained
among
provisions
following
congress
assembled
shall
also
last
resort
appeal
disputes
differences
subsisting
hereafter
may
arise
two
concerning
boundary
jurisdiction
cause
whatever
authority
shall
always
exercised
manner
following
whenever
legislative
executive
authority
lawful
agent
state
controversy
another
shall
present
petition
congress
stating
matter
question
praying
hearing
notice
thereof
shall
given
order
congress
legislative
executive
authority
state
controversy
day
assigned
appearance
parties
lawful
agents
shall
directed
appoint
joint
consent
commissioners
judges
constitute
hearing
determining
matter
question
agree
congress
shall
name
three
persons
list
persons
party
shall
alternately
strike
one
petitioners
beginning
number
shall
reduced
thirteen
number
less
seven
nine
names
congress
shall
direct
shall
presence
congress
drawn
lot
persons
whose
names
shall
drawn
five
shall
commissioners
judges
hear
finally
determine
controversy
always
major
part
judges
shall
hear
cause
shall
agree
determination
either
party
shall
neglect
attend
day
appointed
without
showing
reasons
congress
shall
judge
sufficient
present
shall
refuse
strike
congress
shall
proceed
nominate
three
persons
state
secretary
congress
shall
strike
behalf
party
absent
refusing
judgment
sentence
appointed
manner
prescribed
shall
final
conclusive
parties
shall
refuse
submit
authority
appear
defend
claim
cause
shall
nevertheless
proceed
pronounce
sentence
judgment
shall
like
manner
final
decisive
judgment
sentence
proceedings
either
case
transmitted
congress
lodged
among
acts
congress
security
parties
concerned
provided
every
commissioner
sits
judgment
shall
take
oath
administered
one
judges
superior
state
cause
shall
tried
truly
hear
determine
matter
question
according
best
judgment
without
favor
affection
hope
reward
provided
also
state
shall
deprived
territory
benefit
therefore
perceived
confederation
necessity
tribunal
hear
determine
matters
question
two
recognized
provided
purpose
scope
field
within
expected
matters
question
controversies
might
arise
determination
extended
disputes
differences
subsisting
hereafter
may
arise
two
concerning
boundary
jurisdiction
cause
whatever
federal
convention
met
form
present
constitution
several
drafts
instrument
presented
consideration
convention
one
offered
may
edmund
randolph
virginia
shape
resolutions
covering
entire
subject
national
government
resolution
prescribed
formation
national
judiciary
consist
inferior
tribunals
jurisdiction
hear
determine
among
things
involve
internal
peace
harmony
elliot
debates
day
charles
pinckney
south
carolina
submitted
draft
federal
government
article
whereof
follows
senate
shall
sole
exclusive
power
declare
war
make
treaties
appoint
ambassadors
ministers
foreign
nations
judges
shall
exclusive
power
regulate
manner
deciding
disputes
controversies
subsisting
may
arise
respecting
jurisdiction
territory
elliot
debates
june
committee
whole
referred
several
propositions
drafts
reported
convention
consideration
draft
altered
amended
agreed
committee
resolution
follows
jurisdiction
national
judiciary
shall
extend
cases
respect
collection
national
revenue
impeachment
national
officers
questions
involve
national
peace
harmony
elliot
debates
august
committee
five
members
various
propositions
originally
made
amended
committee
whole
reported
convention
draft
constitution
article
follows
senate
shall
power
make
treaties
appoint
ambassadors
judges
disputes
controversies
subsisting
may
hereafter
subsist
two
respecting
jurisdiction
territory
senate
shall
possess
following
powers
etc
follows
scheme
special
terms
similar
provided
articles
confederation
controversies
concerning
lands
claimed
different
grants
two
whose
jurisdiction
respect
lands
shall
decided
adjusted
subsequent
grants
shall
application
senate
finally
determined
near
may
manner
prescribed
deciding
controversies
different
article
contained
among
sections
following
judicial
power
shall
vested
one
inferior
courts
shall
necessary
time
time
constituted
legislature
jurisdiction
shall
extend
cases
arising
laws
passed
legislature
cases
affecting
ambassadors
public
ministers
consuls
trial
impeachment
officers
cases
admiralty
maritime
jurisdiction
controversies
two
except
shall
regard
territory
jurisdiction
state
citizens
another
state
citizens
different
state
citizens
thereof
foreign
citizens
subjects
elliot
debates
may
observed
passing
draft
disputes
controversies
two
respecting
jurisdiction
territory
determined
special
constituted
senate
controversies
two
except
shall
regard
territory
jurisdiction
determinable
therefore
apparent
disputes
controversies
regarded
provided
besides
respecting
territory
jurisdiction
draft
together
numerous
suggestions
amendments
august
submitted
committee
whole
september
committee
revision
reported
draft
constitution
revised
arranged
draft
respects
present
subject
terms
constitution
finally
adopted
took
senate
power
constitute
try
disputes
respecting
territory
jurisdiction
struck
provision
excluding
jurisdiction
disputes
matters
respecting
jurisdiction
territory
entire
jurisdiction
controversies
bestowed
upon
section
article
following
terms
judicial
power
shall
extend
cases
law
equity
arising
constitution
laws
treaties
made
shall
made
authority
cases
affecting
ambassadors
public
ministers
consuls
cases
admiralty
maritime
jurisdiction
controversies
shall
party
controversies
two
state
citizens
another
state
citizens
different
citizens
state
claiming
lands
grants
different
state
citizens
thereof
foreign
citizens
subjects
cases
affecting
ambassadors
public
ministers
consuls
state
shall
party
shall
original
jurisdiction
cases
mentioned
shall
appellate
jurisdiction
law
fact
exceptions
regulations
congress
shall
make
section
power
conferred
congress
make
regulations
affecting
exercise
jurisdiction
may
place
quote
provisions
respect
judiciary
act
shall
exclusive
jurisdiction
controversies
civil
nature
state
party
except
state
citizens
state
citizens
aliens
latter
cases
shall
original
exclusive
jurisdiction
rev
stat
case
new
york
connecticut
dall
ed
first
instance
exercise
jurisdiction
controversy
two
case
bill
equity
filed
state
new
york
state
connecticut
certain
private
persons
grantees
latter
state
lands
jurisdiction
claimed
object
bill
obtain
injunction
stay
proceedings
ejectment
pending
circuit
district
connecticut
opinion
state
new
york
party
suits
interested
decisions
suits
injunction
issue
argument
made
jurisdiction
proceeded
assumption
possessed
jurisdiction
although
facts
case
refused
injunction
prayed
new
jersey
new
york
pet
ed
case
bill
filed
state
new
jersey
state
new
york
purpose
ascertaining
settling
boundary
two
opinion
awarding
process
subpoena
chief
justice
marshall
said
constitution
declares
judicial
power
shall
extend
controversies
two
also
declares
cases
affecting
ambassadors
public
ministers
consuls
state
shall
party
shall
original
jurisdiction
settled
predecessors
great
deliberation
may
exercise
original
jurisdiction
suits
state
authority
conferred
constitution
existing
acts
congress
march
state
rhode
island
filed
bill
state
massachusetts
settlement
boundary
two
moved
subpoena
issued
according
practice
similar
cases
appearance
entered
massachusetts
motion
made
dismiss
bill
want
jurisdiction
support
motion
contended
jurisdiction
character
respondent
independent
nature
suit
nature
suit
independent
character
respondent
denied
massachusetts
agreed
adopting
federal
constitution
submit
controversies
judicial
decision
claimed
congress
passed
law
establishing
mode
proceeding
character
judgment
rendered
means
enforcing
respects
nature
suit
argued
character
political
brought
sovereign
avowed
character
judicial
power
extended
constitution
cases
law
equity
questions
jurisdiction
territory
cases
kind
civil
nature
held
jurisdiction
conferred
constitution
judiciary
act
massachusetts
appeared
submitted
process
pleaded
bar
plaintiff
action
certain
matters
judgment
asked
doubts
jurisdiction
parties
rest
respected
power
hear
determine
matters
suit
held
jurisdiction
existed
dispute
controversy
two
within
judicial
power
pet
ed
pet
ed
leaving
case
remarked
principal
contest
whether
question
boundary
involving
question
sovereignty
territory
judicial
question
civil
nature
implication
controversies
two
jurisdiction
granted
constitution
include
questions
political
character
later
cases
contention
opposite
intention
constitution
apply
questions
sovereign
political
powers
respective
controversy
florida
georgia
ed
leave
given
state
florida
file
bill
state
georgia
process
subpoena
directed
issued
state
georgia
object
bill
ascertain
establish
boundary
two
controversy
state
georgia
answered
cause
proceeded
pursuance
prayers
bill
subsequently
application
made
attorney
general
alleging
latter
interested
concerned
matter
controversy
moving
permitted
appear
case
heard
behalf
time
form
order
motion
opposed
matter
argued
length
judges
differed
neither
opinion
majority
granting
motion
attorney
general
dissenting
minority
doubt
expressed
existence
jurisdiction
controversy
two
pennsylvania
wheeling
bridge
ed
idem
idem
ed
idem
idem
idem
idem
ed
case
equity
state
pennsylvania
filed
bill
wheeling
belmont
bridge
company
corporation
virginia
certain
contractors
charging
defendants
color
act
legislature
virginia
engaged
construction
bridge
across
ohio
river
wheeling
alleged
obstruct
navigation
ports
pennsylvania
steamboats
crafts
navigated
many
different
questions
discussed
counsel
considered
respecting
nature
extent
jurisdiction
right
complainant
state
whether
law
equity
character
decree
rendered
several
observations
made
opinion
hereafter
adverted
come
consider
second
ground
demurrer
urged
case
us
sufficient
present
purpose
say
original
jurisdiction
sustained
commissioner
appointed
take
report
proofs
decree
entered
declaring
bridge
obstruction
free
navigation
river
thereby
special
damage
occasioned
plaintiff
adequate
remedy
law
directing
obstruction
removed
either
elevating
bridge
height
designated
abatement
south
carolina
georgia
ed
suit
equity
brought
whereby
state
south
carolina
sought
injunction
restrain
state
georgia
secretary
war
chief
engineer
army
agents
subordinates
obstructing
navigation
savannah
river
violation
alleged
compact
subsisting
south
carolina
georgia
entered
april
denying
assuming
jurisdiction
case
held
adopting
federal
constitution
thereby
delegating
general
government
right
regulate
commerce
foreign
nations
among
several
compact
two
respect
savannah
river
ceased
operate
acts
complained
done
pursuance
congressional
authority
designed
improve
navigation
deemed
illegal
obstruction
accordingly
special
injunction
previously
granted
dissolved
bill
dismissed
wisconsin
duluth
ed
case
bill
chancery
filed
state
wisconsin
virtue
constitutional
provision
confers
original
jurisdiction
suits
state
citizens
city
duluth
corporation
citizen
state
minnesota
defendant
answer
replication
taking
large
amount
evidence
case
came
final
decree
nature
case
reasoning
upon
proceeded
disposing
sufficiently
appear
following
quotations
opinion
delivered
justice
miller
present
suit
brought
state
wisconsin
ground
channel
louis
river
flowed
state
nature
common
boundary
state
state
minnesota
interest
continuance
channel
important
highway
navigation
commerce
natural
usual
course
canal
cut
duluth
across
minnesota
point
deeper
natural
outlet
louis
river
mouth
diverted
continue
divert
current
river
superior
bay
lake
way
canal
result
current
cuts
canal
deeper
gives
outlet
water
lower
level
time
diverting
current
old
outlet
causes
fill
thus
destroys
usefulness
river
bay
aid
commerce
state
right
rely
bill
reciting
facts
already
detailed
insists
city
duluth
right
authority
conferred
state
minnesota
thus
divert
waters
louis
natural
course
prejudice
rights
state
wisconsin
citizens
declares
canal
duluth
violation
law
prays
enjoin
duluth
protecting
maintaining
way
mandatory
injunction
compel
city
fill
canal
restore
things
regard
condition
nature
canal
made
answer
admitting
construction
canal
denies
almost
every
material
allegation
bill
denies
especially
canal
effect
changing
course
current
river
injury
southern
entrance
superior
bay
diminishes
flow
water
point
large
amount
testimony
professional
nonprofessional
presented
subject
answer
also
sets
affirmative
defense
relief
sought
bill
legislative
executive
departments
government
approved
construction
canal
taken
possession
control
work
appropriated
spent
money
adopted
best
mode
making
safe
accessible
harbor
western
end
great
system
lake
navigation
interesting
questions
argued
ably
argued
counsel
found
necessary
decide
counsel
defense
deny
state
wisconsin
legal
interest
flow
waters
natural
course
authorizes
maintain
suit
diversion
argued
take
cognizance
question
concerns
alone
rights
state
political
sovereign
character
sustain
suit
must
proprietary
interest
affected
defendant
question
raised
discussed
almost
every
case
brought
us
state
virtue
original
jurisdiction
find
necessary
make
decision
point
applicable
case
us
shall
address
consideration
mass
conflicting
evidence
effect
canal
flow
waters
superior
bay
first
consider
affirmative
defense
already
mentioned
found
true
point
fact
preclude
action
plaintiff
prayed
proceeded
inquire
action
general
government
matter
canal
question
found
matter
fact
taken
possession
control
canal
public
work
opinion
concluded
follows
congress
exercise
lawful
authority
adopted
carrying
system
harbor
improvements
duluth
lawful
authority
forbid
work
body
sees
fit
provide
way
great
commerce
lakes
countries
west
even
asia
shall
securely
accommodated
harbor
duluth
short
canal
feet
decree
must
forever
pursue
old
channel
natural
outlet
water
shallow
large
vessels
unsafe
small
ones
longer
much
tedious
route
congress
appropriates
improve
protect
secure
canal
power
require
filled
obstructed
engineering
officers
government
authority
congress
make
canal
useful
commerce
keep
good
condition
owe
duty
state
requires
order
city
duluth
destroy
views
show
conclusively
state
wisconsin
entitled
relief
asked
bill
must
therefore
dismissed
costs
therefore
decline
jurisdiction
exercised
inquiring
facts
put
issue
bill
answer
dismissing
bill
want
equity
virginia
west
virginia
wall
ed
bill
filed
settle
boundaries
two
demurrer
bill
delivering
opinion
justice
miller
said
first
proposition
counsel
insist
support
demurrer
jurisdiction
case
involves
consideration
questions
purely
political
say
main
question
decided
conflicting
claims
two
exercise
political
jurisdiction
sovereignty
territory
inhabitants
two
counties
subject
dispute
proposition
sustained
without
reversing
settled
course
decision
overturning
principles
several
cases
decided
citing
rhode
island
massachusetts
pet
ed
missouri
iowa
ed
florida
georgia
ed
alabama
georgia
ed
conclusion
thus
expressed
consider
therefore
established
doctrine
jurisdiction
questions
boundary
two
union
jurisdiction
defeated
deciding
question
becomes
necessary
examine
construe
compacts
agreements
decree
may
render
affects
territorial
limits
political
jurisdiction
sovereignty
parties
proceeding
new
hampshire
louisiana
new
york
louisiana
ed
sup
found
view
amendment
constitution
declaring
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
citizens
subjects
foreign
state
matter
fact
pleadings
testimony
suits
commenced
prosecuted
solely
owners
bonds
coupons
collect
object
suits
accordingly
held
evident
purpose
amendment
promptly
proposed
finally
adopted
prohibit
suits
state
citizens
aliens
without
consent
state
sued
opinion
one
state
create
controversy
another
state
within
meaning
term
used
judicial
clauses
constitution
assuming
prosecution
debts
owing
state
citizens
case
satisfied
prohibited
letter
spirit
constitution
entertaining
suits
bill
case
dismissed
wisconsin
pelican
ins
ed
sup
nature
case
question
involved
thus
stated
justice
gray
delivering
opinion
action
brought
upon
judgment
recovered
state
wisconsin
one
courts
pelican
insurance
company
louisiana
corporation
penalties
imposed
statute
wisconsin
making
returns
insurance
commissioner
state
required
statute
leading
question
argued
bar
whether
action
within
original
jurisdiction
ground
jurisdiction
invoked
nature
cause
character
parties
plaintiff
one
union
defendant
corporation
another
citing
considering
cases
justice
expressed
following
conclusions
rule
courts
country
execute
penal
laws
another
applies
prosecutions
sentences
crimes
misdemeanors
suits
favor
state
recovery
pecuniary
penalties
violation
statutes
protection
revenue
municipal
laws
judgments
penalties
first
organization
courts
nearly
century
ago
always
assumed
original
jurisdiction
controversies
state
citizens
another
state
foreign
country
extend
suit
state
recover
penalties
breach
municipal
law
statute
wisconsin
state
recovered
one
courts
judgment
sued
strictest
sense
penal
statute
imposing
penalty
upon
insurance
company
another
state
business
state
wisconsin
without
deposited
proper
officer
state
full
statement
property
business
previous
year
cause
action
private
injury
solely
offense
committed
state
violating
law
therefore
entertain
original
action
compel
defendant
pay
state
wisconsin
sum
money
satisfaction
judgment
fine
consequently
judgment
entered
defendant
demurrer
interposed
declaration
hans
louisiana
ed
sup
action
brought
circuit
eastern
district
louisiana
state
louisiana
hans
citizen
state
recover
amount
certain
coupons
annexed
bonds
state
circuit
motion
attorney
general
state
dismissed
case
want
jurisdiction
affirmed
judgment
circuit
held
judicial
power
extend
case
suit
brought
state
one
citizens
course
opinion
delivered
justice
bradley
following
observations
made
truth
cognizance
suits
actions
unknown
law
forbidden
law
contemplated
constitution
establishing
judicial
power
things
undoubtedly
made
justiciable
known
common
law
example
controversies
boundary
lines
questions
admitting
judicial
solution
yet
case
penn
baltimore
ves
shows
unusual
subjects
litigation
unknown
courts
even
colonial
times
several
cases
general
character
arose
articles
confederation
brought
tribunal
provided
purpose
articles
appx
establishment
new
branch
jurisdiction
seemed
necessary
extinguishment
diplomatic
relations
controversies
state
another
state
citizens
settled
principles
public
law
subjects
judicial
cognizance
often
declined
take
jurisdiction
see
wisconsin
pelican
ins
ed
sup
cases
cited
last
case
occasion
examine
louisiana
texas
ed
sup
case
brought
us
bill
equity
filed
state
louisiana
state
texas
governor
health
officer
bill
alleged
state
texas
granted
governor
health
officer
extensive
powers
establishment
maintenance
quarantines
infectious
contagious
diseases
power
exercised
way
purpose
build
benefit
commerce
cities
texas
business
rivals
city
new
orleans
prayed
decree
neither
state
texas
governor
health
officer
right
cover
exercise
police
quarantine
powers
declare
enforce
embargo
interstate
commerce
state
louisiana
part
thereof
state
texas
right
make
discriminative
rules
affecting
state
louisiana
part
thereof
different
burdensome
quarantine
rules
regulations
applied
countries
bill
asked
injunction
restraining
texas
officisls
enforcing
texas
laws
manner
enforced
bill
demurrer
filed
assigning
following
causes
jurisdiction
either
parties
suit
appears
face
said
bill
matters
complained
constitute
within
meaning
constitution
controversy
louisiana
texas
second
allegations
said
bill
show
issues
presented
said
bill
arise
state
texas
officers
certain
persons
city
new
orleans
state
louisiana
engaged
interstate
commerce
manner
concern
state
louisiana
corporate
body
state
third
said
bill
shows
upon
face
suit
reality
behalf
certain
individuals
engaged
interstate
commerce
suit
attempted
prosecuted
name
state
louisiana
said
state
effect
loaning
name
said
individuals
nominal
party
real
parties
interest
said
individuals
said
city
new
orleans
engaged
interstate
commerce
fourth
appears
face
said
bill
state
louisiana
right
sovereignty
seeking
maintain
suit
redress
supposed
wrongs
citizens
regard
interstate
commerce
constitution
laws
said
state
possesses
sovereignty
empowers
bring
original
suit
purpose
fifth
appears
face
said
bill
property
right
state
louisiana
manner
affected
quarantine
complained
property
right
involved
suit
give
original
jurisdiction
cause
opinion
delivered
chief
justice
fuller
consideration
cases
hereinbefore
mentioned
others
said
order
maintain
jurisdiction
bill
complaint
state
texas
must
appear
controversy
determined
controversy
arising
directly
state
louisiana
state
texas
controversy
vindication
grievances
particular
individuals
constitution
forbidden
treaty
alliance
confederation
grant
letters
marque
reprisal
without
consent
congress
troops
ships
war
time
peace
enter
agreement
compact
another
state
foreign
power
engage
war
unless
actually
invaded
imminent
danger
admit
delay
arising
public
relations
intercourse
settled
either
war
diplomacy
though
consent
congress
may
composed
agreement
absence
agreement
may
controversy
might
arise
two
determination
original
jurisdiction
invoked
must
direct
issue
must
susceptible
judicial
solution
difficult
conceive
direct
issue
two
respect
matter
effort
accommodation
made
conceded
within
judicial
function
inquire
motives
state
legislature
passing
law
chief
magistrate
state
enforcing
exercise
discretion
judgment
public
policy
forbids
imputation
authorized
official
action
legitimate
motives
debs
ed
sup
involving
case
circuit
sought
relief
injunction
observed
province
government
interfere
mere
matter
private
controversy
individuals
use
great
powers
enforce
rights
one
another
yet
whenever
wrongs
complained
affect
public
large
respect
matters
constitution
entrusted
care
nation
concerning
nation
owes
duty
citizens
securing
common
rights
mere
fact
government
pecuniary
interest
controversy
sufficient
exclude
courts
prevent
taking
measures
therein
fully
discharge
constitutional
duties
aspect
bill
us
framed
gravamen
special
peculiar
injury
sustain
action
private
person
state
louisiana
presents
attitude
parens
patrioe
trustee
guardian
representative
citizens
point
view
state
texas
intentionally
absolutely
interdicting
interstate
commerce
respects
state
louisiana
means
unnecessary
unreasonable
quarantine
regulations
inasmuch
vindication
freedom
interstate
commerce
committed
state
louisiana
state
engaged
commerce
cause
action
must
regarded
involving
infringement
powers
state
louisiana
special
injury
property
asserting
state
entitled
seek
relief
way
matters
complained
affect
citizens
large
nevertheless
case
stated
one
presenting
controversy
exercise
original
jurisdiction
state
texas
maintained
quoting
provisions
statute
state
texas
regulating
subject
quarantine
chief
justice
proceeded
say
charged
statute
invalid
tested
terms
true
power
vested
congress
regulate
commerce
among
power
complete
acknowledging
limitations
prescribed
constitution
action
exercise
reserved
powers
comes
collision
latter
must
give
way
yet
also
true
quarantine
laws
belong
class
state
legislation
valid
displaced
congress
legislation
expressly
recognized
laws
almost
beginning
government
complaint
however
laws
texas
respect
quarantine
invalid
health
officer
rules
regulations
framed
put
force
thereunder
places
embargo
fact
interstate
commerce
state
louisiana
state
texas
governor
permits
rules
regulations
stand
enforced
although
power
modify
change
bill
rested
merely
ground
imposition
embargo
without
regard
motive
charges
rules
regulations
stringent
called
particular
exigency
purposely
framed
view
benefit
state
texas
city
galveston
particular
expense
state
louisiana
especially
city
new
orleans
order
controversy
justiciable
held
exist
something
must
put
forward
citizens
one
state
injured
maladministration
laws
another
make
war
enter
treaties
though
may
consent
congress
make
compacts
agreements
agreement
whose
breach
might
create
controversy
arise
unless
action
complained
state
action
acts
state
officers
abuse
excess
powers
laid
hold
committing
one
state
distinct
collision
sister
state
judgment
bill
set
facts
show
state
texas
authorized
confirmed
alleged
action
health
officer
make
necessarily
follows
two
controversy
within
meaning
constitution
unable
hold
bill
may
maintained
presenting
case
controversy
state
citizens
another
state
jurisdiction
controversies
sort
embrace
determination
political
questions
controversy
exists
restrain
governor
state
discharge
executive
functions
matter
lawfully
confided
discretion
judgment
accept
suggestion
bill
maintained
health
officer
alone
theory
conduct
violation
excess
valid
law
state
remedy
clearly
lie
state
authorities
refusal
fulfil
duty
regard
set
truth
difficult
see
record
controversy
state
louisiana
individual
defendants
without
involving
controversy
controversy
said
presented
accordingly
demurrer
sustained
bill
dismissed
language
constitution
cases
language
considered
principles
may
derived
nature
extent
original
jurisdiction
controversies
two
language
alone
considered
might
concluded
whenever
cases
one
state
may
choose
make
complaint
another
matter
whether
subject
complaint
arises
legislation
defendant
state
acts
officers
agents
matter
whether
nature
injury
complained
affect
property
rights
sovereign
powers
complaining
state
affect
rights
citizens
jurisdiction
attach
chief
justice
marshall
case
cohen
virginia
wheat
ed
said
constitution
gives
original
jurisdiction
certain
enumerated
cases
gives
appellate
jurisdiction
others
among
jurisdiction
must
exercised
appellate
form
cases
arising
constitution
laws
provisions
constitution
equally
obligatory
equally
respected
state
party
jurisdiction
original
case
arise
constitution
law
jurisdiction
appellate
case
state
party
may
arise
constitution
law
rule
applicable
case
becomes
duty
certainly
think
construe
constitution
give
effect
provisions
far
possible
reconcile
permit
seeming
repugnancy
destroy
must
endeavor
construe
preserve
true
intent
meaning
instrument
one
description
cases
jurisdiction
founded
entirely
character
parties
nature
controversy
contemplated
constitution
character
parties
everything
nature
case
nothing
description
cases
jurisdiction
founded
entirely
character
case
parties
contemplated
constitution
nature
case
everything
character
parties
nothing
constitution
declares
jurisdiction
cases
state
shall
party
original
cases
arsing
constitution
law
appellate
conclusion
seems
irresistible
framers
designed
include
first
class
cases
jurisdiction
given
state
party
include
second
jurisdiction
given
case
arises
constitution
law
must
conceded
upon
consideration
cases
arising
different
facts
general
language
used
cohen
virginia
extent
modified
thus
cases
new
hampshire
louisiana
new
york
louisiana
ed
sup
jurisdiction
denied
cause
action
belonged
private
persons
endeavoring
use
name
one
state
enforce
rights
action
another
though
perhaps
may
said
jurisdiction
really
entertained
bills
dismissed
found
pleadings
testimony
complainant
interest
kind
proceedings
wisconsin
pelican
ins
ed
sup
held
notwithstanding
action
brought
state
citizens
another
state
thus
within
letter
constitution
yet
right
inquire
nature
case
found
object
suit
enforce
penal
laws
one
state
citizen
another
refuse
exercise
jurisdiction
case
louisiana
texas
ed
sup
bill
dismissed
controversy
two
actually
presented
complained
action
state
texas
alleged
unauthorized
conduct
health
officer
acting
malevolent
purpose
city
new
orleans
may
observed
decline
jurisdiction
exercised
holding
facts
alleged
bill
justify
granting
relief
prayed
cases
cited
show
jurisdiction
exercised
cases
involving
boundaries
jurisdiction
lands
inhabitants
cases
directly
affecting
property
rights
interests
state
cases
manifestly
cover
entire
field
controversies
may
arise
constitution
provided
remedy
objectionable
indeed
impossible
anticipate
definition
controversies
brought
within
original
jurisdiction
inspection
bill
discloses
nature
injury
complained
adequate
remedy
found
suit
state
missouri
true
question
boundary
involved
direct
property
rights
belonging
complainant
state
must
surely
conceded
health
comfort
inhabitants
state
threatened
state
proper
party
represent
defend
missouri
independent
sovereign
state
must
admit
seek
remedy
negotiation
failing
force
diplomatic
powers
right
make
war
surrendered
general
government
expected
upon
latter
devolved
duty
providing
remedy
remedy
think
found
constitutional
provisions
considering
allegations
bill
plainly
present
case
health
comfort
large
communities
inhabiting
parts
state
situated
mississippi
river
alone
concerned
contagious
typhoidal
diseases
introduced
river
communities
may
spread
throughout
territory
state
moreover
substantial
impairment
health
prosperity
towns
cities
state
situated
mississippi
river
including
commercial
metropolis
injuriously
affect
entire
state
suits
brought
individuals
personal
injuries
threatened
received
wholly
inadequate
disproportionate
remedies
requires
argument
contended
support
demurrer
even
state
missouri
proper
party
file
bill
yet
proper
defendant
sanitary
district
chicago
solely
state
illinois
made
party
demurrer
sustained
scarcely
supposed
view
express
provisions
constitution
cited
cases
claimed
state
illinois
exempt
suit
sovereign
state
consented
sued
contention
rather
seems
matters
complained
bill
proceed
continue
proceed
acts
sanitary
district
chicago
corporation
state
illinois
therefore
follows
state
interested
question
improperly
made
party
unable
see
force
suggestion
bill
allege
sanitary
district
acting
without
excess
lawful
authority
averment
conceded
facts
corporation
agency
state
things
according
theory
complainant
case
result
mischief
apprehended
state
action
results
complained
thus
distinguishing
case
louisiana
texas
acts
sought
restrained
alleged
officers
functionaries
proceeding
wrongful
malevolent
misapplication
quarantine
laws
texas
sanitary
district
chicago
private
corporation
formed
purposes
private
gain
public
corporation
whose
existence
orerations
wholly
within
control
state
object
bill
subject
public
work
judicial
supervision
upon
allegation
method
construction
maintenance
create
continuing
nuisance
dangerous
health
neighboring
state
inhabitants
surely
case
state
illinois
right
appear
traverse
allegations
bill
right
might
properly
made
party
defendant
contended
even
original
jurisdiction
even
respective
properly
made
parties
yet
case
made
bill
entitle
state
missouri
equitable
relief
prayed
proposition
sought
maintained
several
considerations
first
place
urged
drawing
artificial
means
sewage
city
chicago
mississippi
river
may
may
become
nuisance
inhabitants
cities
towns
missouri
injuries
apprehended
merely
eventual
contingent
may
fact
never
inflicted
gravely
contended
preventive
remedies
way
injunction
otherwise
injuries
inflicted
experienced
appear
natural
result
acts
defendant
admits
avows
intention
commit
bill
charges
acts
defendants
restained
result
transportation
artificial
means
unnatural
channel
large
quantities
undefecated
sewage
daily
accumulated
deposits
harbor
chicago
bed
illinois
river
poison
water
supply
inhabitants
missouri
injuriously
affect
portion
bed
soil
mississippi
river
lies
within
territory
state
facts
admitted
demurrer
true
feel
necessary
enter
large
discussion
part
defendants
contention
think
sufficient
cite
one
two
authorities
atty
jamaica
pond
aqueduct
mass
proceeding
equity
judicial
enjoin
defendants
lowering
water
one
public
ponds
massachusetts
claimed
necessary
effect
lowering
impair
rights
people
use
pond
fishing
boating
lawful
purposes
create
expose
upon
shores
pond
large
quantity
slime
mud
offensive
vegetation
detrimental
public
health
defendants
demurred
claiming
case
stated
came
within
equity
jurisdiction
questioning
power
attorney
general
behalf
commonwealth
maintain
proceedings
speaking
chief
justice
said
cases
numerous
held
attorney
general
may
maintain
information
equity
restrain
corporation
exercising
right
eminent
domain
power
delegated
legislature
abuse
perversion
powers
may
create
public
nuisance
injuriously
affect
endanger
public
interests
many
cases
proceeding
information
case
alleges
defendant
acts
ultra
vires
abuse
power
granted
legislature
also
necessary
effect
acts
create
public
nuisance
brings
case
within
established
principle
jurisdiction
equity
restrain
prevent
nuisances
nuisance
public
one
information
attorney
general
appropriate
remedy
information
therefore
sustained
ground
unlawful
acts
defendant
produce
nuisance
partially
draining
pond
exposing
shores
thus
endangering
public
health
replying
claim
resort
equity
unnecessary
said
defendant
contends
law
furnishes
plain
adequate
complete
remedy
nuisance
indictment
proceedings
statutes
abatement
nuisance
board
health
neither
remedies
invoked
part
mischief
done
nature
things
restore
pond
land
underground
currents
condition
words
remedy
whole
mischief
preventive
force
decree
equity
restraining
illegal
acts
mischief
done
gives
clearly
efficacious
complete
remedy
nature
equitable
remedy
case
public
nuisances
well
described
justice
harlan
speaking
case
mugler
kansas
ed
sup
ground
jurisdiction
cases
purpresture
well
public
nuisances
ability
courts
equity
give
speedy
effectual
permanent
remedy
law
prevent
nuisances
threatened
irreparable
mischief
ensues
arrest
abate
progress
perpetual
injunction
protect
public
future
whereas
courts
law
reach
existing
nuisances
leaving
future
acts
subjects
new
prosecutions
proceedings
salutary
jurisdiction
especially
nuisance
affects
health
morals
safety
community
coosaw
min
south
carolina
ed
sup
said
justice
harlan
citing
english
american
cases
law
indictment
reach
past
present
wrongs
done
appellant
adequately
protect
public
interests
future
public
entitled
security
time
illegal
interference
control
state
digging
mining
removing
phosphate
rock
phosphatic
deposits
bed
coosaw
river
finally
contended
bill
prematurely
filed
filed
late
standing
long
period
complainant
guilty
laches
equity
grant
relief
inconsistency
contentions
manifest
consideration
opinion
suggestion
complainants
remedy
lost
delay
founded
fact
reason
goldsmid
tunbridge
wells
improv
comrs
eq
answering
similar
contention
said
romilly
plaintiff
comes
complains
early
evidence
pollution
wholly
get
evidence
evidence
defendants
pollution
slight
perhaps
observable
times
occasions
saying
proof
appreciable
pollution
must
wait
becomes
nuisance
waits
five
six
years
obvious
everybody
sense
pollution
considerable
say
come
late
allowed
go
twenty
years
acquired
easement
property
right
pouring
sewage
opinion
person
watercourse
flowing
land
sewage
perceptible
brought
watercourse
right
come
stop
pollution
increasing
gradually
increasing
time
time
additional
quantity
sewage
poured
persons
allow
polluted
matter
flow
stream
liberty
claim
right
prescription
matter
great
importance
suggested
argument
matter
regarded
private
interests
must
give
way
public
interests
regard
advantage
public
little
sacrifice
made
private
individuals
assent
view
law
subject
apprehend
observations
quoted
vice
chancellor
sir
william
page
wood
atty
ex
rel
thames
conservators
week
perfectly
accurate
private
rights
interfered
firm
conviction
great
dispensations
operations
nature
interests
individuals
compatible
identical
interests
public
although
case
consider
injury
private
individual
plaintiff
present
occasion
believe
injury
public
may
extremely
great
polluting
stream
flows
considerable
distance
water
cattle
habit
drinking
exhalations
persons
reside
banks
must
necessarily
inhale
time
attention
public
necessarily
called
fact
scientific
men
examined
subject
unable
say
whether
great
diseases
among
cattle
contagious
diseases
affecting
human
beings
cholera
typhus
like
may
great
measure
communicated
aggravated
absorption
particles
feculent
matter
system
either
inappreciable
scarcely
appreciable
minute
chemical
analysis
impossible
state
things
say
amount
injury
may
done
polluting
even
partially
stream
flows
considerable
distance
opinion
goldsmid
bound
remain
quiet
stream
become
nuisance
obvious
everybody
near
banks
result
entitled
decree
injunction
restrain
defendants
causing
permitting
sewage
offensive
matters
draining
town
tunbridge
wells
discharged
calverly
brook
stream
manner
injuriously
affect
water
brook
flows
plaintiff
land
decree
master
rolls
subsequently
affirmed
appeal
ch
similar
views
prevailed
chapman
rochester
bill
filed
enjoin
defendant
city
polluting
discharge
sewage
artificial
means
natural
stream
flowing
lands
opinion
new
york
appeals
said
danforth
citing
goldsmid
tunbridge
wells
improv
comrs
view
principle
upon
like
decisions
turn
objections
learned
counsel
defendant
judgment
appealed
quite
unimportant
filth
city
flow
naturally
lands
plaintiff
surface
water
finds
level
carried
thither
artificial
arrangements
prepared
city
responsible
plaintiff
estopped
acquiescence
proceedings
city
devising
carrying
system
sewerage
principle
invoked
appellant
application
appear
plaintiff
way
encouraged
adoption
system
act
word
induced
city
authorities
direct
sewers
flow
reach
premises
finding
effect
record
contains
evidence
fine
case
comes
within
general
rule
gives
person
injured
pollution
air
water
use
natural
condition
entitled
action
party
whether
natural
person
corporation
causes
pollution
cases
cited
defendants
counsel
injunctions
refused
aid
suppression
public
nuisances
cases
act
complained
fully
completed
nuisance
one
resulting
conduct
repeated
day
day
cases
purpresture
concerned
permanent
structures
already
existing
courts
equity
appealed
bill
case
assail
drainage
canal
unlawful
structure
aim
prevent
use
waterway
sought
relief
pouring
sewage
filth
artificial
arrangements
mississippi
river
detriment
state
missouri
inhabitants
acts
merely
done
done
cease
operate
acts
contemplated
continually
repeated
day
day
relief
prayed
merely
creation
nuisance
maintenance
conclusion
therefore
demurrers
filed
respective
defendants
sustained
wish
understood
holding
case
like
present
one
injuries
complained
grow
prosecution
public
work
authorized
law
equity
interpose
way
preliminary
interlocutory
injunction
denied
answer
reasonable
foundation
charges
contained
bill
dealing
case
bill
alleging
explicit
terms
damage
irreparable
injury
naturally
necessarily
occasioned
acts
defendants
defendants
chosen
rights
disposed
far
present
hearing
concerned
upon
assertions
bill
fully
agree
contention
defendants
counsel
settled
injunction
restrain
nuisance
issue
cases
fact
nuisance
made
upon
determinate
satisfactory
evidence
evidence
conflicting
injury
doubtful
conflict
doubt
ground
withholding
injunction
interposition
injunction
sought
restrain
apprehended
create
nuisance
complainant
may
complain
proofs
must
show
state
facts
manifest
danger
real
immediate
observations
relevant
case
us
demurrers
overruled
leave
given
defendants
file
answers
bill
chief
justice
fuller
concurred
justice
harlan
justice
white
dissenting
controversies
union
made
justiciable
constitution
modes
determining
surrendered
jurisdiction
intended
supply
place
means
usually
resorted
independent
sovereignties
terminate
differences
invoked
must
appear
direct
antagonism
clearly
bill
makes
state
case
however
case
presented
competent
missouri
implead
state
illinois
ground
rested
found
allegation
governor
authorize
water
turned
drainage
channel
sanitary
district
created
act
general
assembly
illinois
authority
state
control
supervision
channel
corporation
control
supervision
lies
lawmaking
power
state
illinois
suppose
complainant
seeks
coerce
difficult
conceive
decree
entered
case
bind
state
illinois
control
action
governor
true
empowered
act
authorize
water
let
channel
receipt
certificate
commissioners
appointed
inspect
work
channel
capacity
character
required
done
water
let
day
application
made
leave
file
bill
governor
discharged
duty
official
act
illinois
remained
performed
assuming
bill
maintained
sanitary
district
proper
case
agree
state
illinois
necessary
proper
party
bill
maintained
corporation
case
stands
act
complained
nuisance
per
se
injury
alleged
threatened
contingent
channel
operation
year
probable
supposed
basis
complaint
tested
follow
bill
present
shape
retained
opinion
demurrers
sustained
bill
dismissed
without
prejudice
application
sanitary
district
authorized
state
missouri
brothers
harlan
white
concur
dissent