puerto
rico
aqueduct
sewer
auth
metcalf
eddy
argued
november
decided
january
petitioner
autonomous
puerto
rico
government
instrumentality
moved
dismiss
diversity
action
brought
respondent
private
firm
grounds
arm
state
eleventh
amendment
therefore
prohibited
suit
district
denied
motion
appeals
dismissed
petitioner
appeal
want
jurisdiction
concluding
circuit
precedent
barred
agencies
taking
immediate
appeal
claim
eleventh
amendment
immunity
held
state
entities
claim
arms
state
may
take
advantage
collateral
order
doctrine
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
appeal
district
order
denying
claim
eleventh
amendment
immunity
suit
federal
although
requires
appeals
taken
final
decisions
district
courts
cohen
supra
provides
small
class
judgments
complete
final
immediately
appealable
acknowledged
state
arms
effect
immune
federal
suit
amendment
see
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
follows
elements
collateral
order
doctrine
necessary
bring
order
within
cohen
small
class
see
coopers
lybrand
livesay
satisfied
first
denials
eleventh
amendment
immunity
claims
purport
conclusive
determinations
entities
right
sued
federal
second
motion
dismiss
eleventh
amendment
grounds
involves
claim
fundamental
constitutional
protection
whose
resolution
generally
bearing
merits
underlying
action
third
value
constitutional
immunity
like
benefits
conferred
qualified
immunity
individual
officials
see
mitchell
forsyth
part
lost
litigation
proceeds
past
motion
practice
denial
order
effectively
unreviewable
appeal
final
judgment
respondent
claim
amendment
confer
immunity
suit
merely
defense
liability
misunderstands
role
amendment
system
federalism
rejected
moreover
little
basis
respondent
alternative
argument
distinction
drawn
cases
determination
eleventh
amendment
claim
bound
factual
complexities
whose
resolution
requires
trial
cases
event
determination
petitioner
eleventh
amendment
status
appear
implicate
extraordinary
factual
difficulty
fully
explored
remand
pp
reversed
remanded
white
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
blackmun
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
joined
blackmun
filed
concurring
opinion
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
richard
taranto
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
perry
rosen
paige
reffe
michael
brady
peter
sipkins
argued
cause
respondent
brief
michael
wahoske
paul
dieseth
carol
peterson
jay
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
ohio
et
al
lee
fisher
attorney
general
ohio
patrick
devine
andrew
sutter
assistant
attorneys
general
attorneys
general
respective
jurisdictions
follows
james
evans
alabama
grant
woods
arizona
winston
bryant
arkansas
daniel
lungren
california
richard
blumenthal
connecticut
robert
butterworth
florida
michael
bowers
georgia
elizabeth
guam
warren
price
iii
hawaii
larry
echohawk
idaho
roland
burris
illinois
linley
pearson
indiana
bonnie
campbell
iowa
robert
stephan
kansas
chris
gorman
kentucky
michael
carpenter
maine
scott
harshbarger
massachusetts
frank
kelley
michigan
mike
moore
mississippi
william
webster
missouri
marc
racicot
montana
frankie
sue
del
papa
nevada
robert
del
tufo
new
jersey
tom
udall
new
mexico
robert
abrams
new
york
lacy
thornburg
north
carolina
nicholas
spaeth
north
dakota
robert
naraja
northern
mariana
islands
susan
loving
oklahoma
charles
crookham
oregon
ernest
preate
pennsylvania
jorge
perez
diaz
puerto
rico
james
rhode
island
travis
medlock
south
carolina
mark
barnett
south
dakota
charles
burson
tennessee
dan
morales
texas
paul
van
dam
utah
jeffrey
amestoy
vermont
mary
sue
terry
virginia
kenneth
eikenberry
washington
mario
palumbo
west
virginia
james
doyle
wisconsin
joseph
meyer
wyoming
council
state
governments
et
al
richard
ruda
michael
dzialo
clifton
elgarten
justice
white
delivered
opinion
question
whether
district
order
denying
claim
state
state
entity
eleventh
amendment
immunity
suit
federal
may
appealed
collateral
order
doctrine
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
conclude
may
petitioner
puerto
rico
aqueduct
sewer
authority
prasa
autonomous
government
instrumentality
functions
provide
inhabitants
puerto
rico
adequate
drinking
water
sanitary
sewage
service
service
facility
proper
incidental
thereto
tit
prasa
entered
consent
decree
federal
environmental
protection
agency
agreed
upgrade
many
wastewater
treatment
plants
ensure
compliance
federal
clean
water
act
prasa
subsequently
contracted
respondent
private
engineering
firm
incorporated
delaware
assist
task
prasa
withheld
payments
contract
light
alleged
overcharging
respondent
respondent
brought
diversity
action
district
district
puerto
rico
alleging
breach
contract
damage
business
reputation
prasa
moved
dismiss
grounds
arm
state
eleventh
amendment
therefore
prohibited
suit
district
found
petitioner
qualify
immunity
ability
raise
funds
payment
contractual
obligations
affect
commonwealth
funds
denied
motion
app
pet
cert
prasa
filed
timely
notice
appeal
appeals
first
circuit
sought
stay
proceedings
appeal
pending
denied
stay
subsequently
dismissed
appeal
want
jurisdiction
concluding
first
circuit
precedent
barred
agencies
taking
immediate
appeal
claim
eleventh
amendment
immunity
discussing
libby
marshall
light
conflict
decision
courts
appeals
considered
issue
granted
certiorari
ii
title
provides
appeal
final
decisions
district
courts
appeal
thereby
precluded
decision
tentative
informal
incomplete
well
fully
consummated
decisions
steps
towards
final
judgment
merge
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
nevertheless
judgment
complete
final
judgment
case
immediately
appealable
fall
small
class
finally
determine
claims
right
separable
collateral
rights
asserted
action
important
denied
review
independent
cause
require
appellate
consideration
deferred
whole
case
adjudicated
ibid
held
orders
denying
individual
officials
claims
absolute
qualified
immunity
among
fall
within
ambit
cohen
see
nixon
fitzgerald
mitchell
forsyth
mitchell
bears
particularly
present
case
attorney
general
appealed
district
order
denying
motion
dismiss
grounds
qualified
immunity
appeals
held
order
appealable
remanded
case
trial
reversed
holding
order
denying
qualified
immunity
collateral
order
immediately
appealable
cohen
found
absent
immediate
appeal
central
benefits
qualified
immunity
avoiding
costs
general
consequences
subjecting
public
officials
risks
discovery
trial
forfeited
much
benefit
bond
requirement
forfeited
cohen
entitlement
immunity
suit
rather
mere
defense
liability
like
absolute
immunity
effectively
lost
case
erroneously
permitted
go
trial
mitchell
supra
emphasis
original
petitioner
maintains
agree
rationale
apply
claims
eleventh
amendment
immunity
made
state
entities
possessing
claim
share
immunity
terms
amendment
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
amdt
withdrawal
jurisdiction
effectively
confers
immunity
suit
thus
consistently
held
unconsenting
state
immune
suits
brought
federal
courts
citizens
well
citizens
another
state
edelman
jordan
absent
waiver
neither
state
agencies
acting
control
may
subject
suit
federal
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
plurality
opinion
see
also
michigan
dept
state
police
cory
white
alabama
pugh
per
curiam
mt
healthy
city
bd
ed
doyle
established
state
arms
effect
immune
suit
federal
follows
elements
cohen
collateral
order
doctrine
satisfied
come
within
small
class
cohen
order
must
conclusively
determine
disputed
question
resolve
important
issue
completely
separate
merits
action
effectively
unreviewable
appeal
final
judgment
coopers
lybrand
livesay
omitted
denials
state
entities
claims
eleventh
amendment
immunity
purport
conclusive
determinations
right
sued
federal
moreover
motion
state
agents
dismiss
eleventh
amendment
grounds
involves
claim
fundamental
constitutional
protection
cf
lauro
lines
chasser
scalia
concurring
whose
resolution
generally
bearing
merits
underlying
action
finally
value
eleventh
amendment
immunity
like
benefit
conferred
qualified
immunity
individual
officials
part
lost
litigation
proceeds
past
motion
practice
respondent
following
rationale
first
circuit
case
libby
marshall
maintains
eleventh
amendment
confer
immunity
suit
merely
defense
liability
true
petitioner
arguably
entitled
avail
collateral
order
doctrine
see
van
cauwenberghe
biard
support
narrow
view
eleventh
amendment
drawn
mainly
ex
parte
young
suits
seeking
prospective
compensatory
retrospective
relief
may
brought
state
officials
federal
challenging
constitutionality
official
conduct
enforcing
state
law
doctrine
ex
parte
young
ensures
state
officials
employ
eleventh
amendment
means
avoiding
compliance
federal
law
regarded
carving
necessary
exception
eleventh
amendment
immunity
see
green
mansour
moreover
exception
narrow
applies
prospective
relief
permit
judgments
state
officers
declaring
violated
federal
law
past
application
suits
agencies
barred
regardless
relief
sought
cory
white
supra
rather
defining
nature
eleventh
amendment
immunity
young
progeny
render
amendment
wholly
inapplicable
certain
class
suits
suits
deemed
officials
agencies
retain
immunity
suits
federal
generally
respondent
claim
eleventh
amendment
confers
protection
liability
misunderstands
role
amendment
system
federalism
object
purpose
amendment
prevent
indignity
subjecting
state
coercive
process
judicial
tribunals
instance
private
parties
ayers
amendment
rooted
recognition
although
union
maintain
certain
attributes
sovereignty
including
sovereign
immunity
see
hans
louisiana
thus
accords
respect
owed
members
federation
application
collateral
order
doctrine
type
case
justified
part
concern
unduly
burdened
litigation
ultimate
justification
importance
ensuring
dignitary
interests
fully
vindicated
respondent
argues
alternative
distinction
drawn
cases
determination
state
state
agency
claim
eleventh
amendment
immunity
bound
factual
complexities
whose
resolution
requires
trial
cases
see
tr
oral
arg
cf
dube
state
university
new
york
cert
denied
immediate
appeal
lie
immunity
found
matter
law
view
example
order
denying
motion
dismiss
suit
named
state
immediately
appealable
whereas
order
issued
suit
presents
difficult
factual
questions
whether
agency
arm
state
see
little
basis
drawing
line
see
mitchell
forsyth
event
appear
us
determination
prasa
status
eleventh
amendment
implicates
extraordinary
factual
difficulty
issue
entitlement
immunity
fully
explored
appeals
remand
iii
hold
state
entities
claim
arms
state
may
take
advantage
collateral
order
doctrine
appeal
district
order
denying
claim
eleventh
amendment
immunity
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
see
dube
sate
university
new
york
cert
denied
coakley
welch
cert
denied
chrissy
mississippi
dept
pub
welfare
kroll
board
trustees
university
illinois
cert
denied
barnes
missouri
per
curiam
durning
citibank
schopler
bliss
per
curiam
district
also
denied
absolute
immunity
order
held
appealable
appeals
affirmed
us
mitchell
forsyth
result
reached
today
largely
anticipated
ex
parte
new
york
private
citizens
brought
rem
libel
action
federal
district
ships
chartered
operated
new
york
state
new
york
moved
dismiss
ground
action
nature
personam
proceeding
thus
barred
eleventh
amendment
district
denied
motion
state
applied
writ
prohibition
although
noting
state
interest
pressed
appeal
issued
extraordinary
writ
order
vindicate
fully
fundamental
constitutional
rule
state
may
sued
federal
without
consent
reason
first
circuit
attempt
distinguish
mitchell
forsyth
grounds
compared
individual
officials
better
able
bear
burden
litigation
fails
see
libby
marshall
eleventh
amendment
concerned
ability
withstand
suit
privilege
sued
justice
blackmun
concurring
join
opinion
write
separately
make
plain
position
one
feature
continue
believe
interpretation
eleventh
amendment
embodying
broad
principle
state
immunity
suit
federal
simply
reconciled
federal
system
envisioned
basic
document
amendments
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
blackmun
dissenting
nevertheless
believe
eleventh
amendment
preserve
state
immunity
suit
limited
context
action
citizen
another
state
foreign
country
state
law
cause
action
brought
federal
brennan
dissenting
claim
immunity
eleventh
amendment
appealable
immediately
whether
assertion
eleventh
amendment
claim
well
founded
matter
us
case
see
ante
question
separate
question
whether
eleventh
amendment
interests
important
denied
review
independent
cause
require
appellate
consideration
deferred
whole
case
adjudicated
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
believe
eleventh
amendment
guarantee
immunity
suit
narrow
class
cases
concur
opinion
judgment
regardless
merits
district
denial
claim
immunity
eleventh
amendment
appealable
immediately
see
sullivan
finkelstein
opinion
concurring
judgment
justice
stevens
dissenting
case
arises
commercial
dispute
respondent
private
engineering
firm
puerto
rico
aqueduct
sewer
authority
prasa
authority
parties
entered
multimillion
dollar
contract
providing
construction
extensive
improvements
puerto
rico
wastewater
treatment
facilities
respondent
brought
suit
federal
district
district
puerto
rico
alleging
breach
contract
authority
filed
motion
dismiss
claiming
action
barred
eleventh
amendment
district
concluded
claim
merit
denied
motion
dismiss
appeals
dismissed
prasa
appeal
order
final
within
meaning
authority
private
litigant
engaged
commercial
dispute
perfectly
clear
dismissal
appeal
required
precedents
denial
motion
dismiss
jurisdictional
grounds
motion
asserts
defendant
sued
particular
forum
final
order
within
meaning
van
cauwenberghe
biard
catlin
case
prasa
makes
assertion
namely
may
sued
federal
forum
rather
must
sued
another
brief
petitioner
nonetheless
despite
decisions
biard
catlin
holds
state
state
entity
claiming
arm
state
asserts
sued
federal
forum
eleventh
amendment
final
decision
rule
must
give
way
claim
must
subject
immediate
appellate
review
reasons
claim
analogous
government
official
claim
absolute
qualified
immunity
held
subject
interlocutory
appeal
nixon
fitzgerald
mitchell
forsyth
agree
defense
absolute
qualified
immunity
designed
shield
government
officials
liability
official
conduct
absence
defense
held
officials
hesitate
exercise
discretion
way
injuriously
affecting
claims
particular
individuals
even
public
interest
required
bold
unhesitating
action
nixon
fitzgerald
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
specter
long
contentious
legal
proceeding
inhibit
government
officials
exercising
authority
freedom
independence
necessary
serve
public
interest
held
claims
absolute
qualified
immunity
subject
immediate
appeal
mitchell
forsyth
eleventh
amendment
defense
available
state
entities
often
labeled
immunity
label
virtually
common
defense
absolute
qualified
immunity
contrast
latter
defense
based
eleventh
amendment
even
amendment
read
broadest
contend
state
state
entity
shielded
liability
conduct
federal
courts
without
jurisdiction
claims
state
state
entity
see
ante
nothing
eleventh
amendment
bars
respondent
seeking
recovery
different
forum
indeed
noted
petitioner
acknowledges
seeking
immunity
conduct
merely
suit
brought
courts
commonwealth
puerto
rico
brief
petitioner
plainly
interests
underlying
decisions
allowing
immediate
appeal
claims
absolute
qualified
immunity
apply
immunity
one
based
eleventh
amendment
whether
petitioner
must
bear
burden
expense
distraction
litigation
stemming
contractual
dispute
respondent
nothing
whatsoever
eleventh
amendment
eleventh
amendment
determines
precisely
suit
may
brought
amendment
goes
jurisdiction
federal
opposed
underlying
liability
state
state
entity
biard
catlin
nixon
mitchell
relevant
precedent
determining
whether
prasa
claim
subject
interlocutory
appeal
indeed
interests
underlying
decisions
permitting
immediate
appeal
claims
absolute
qualified
immunity
apply
state
state
entity
objection
federal
jurisdiction
eleventh
amendment
grounds
driving
hold
prasa
claim
eleventh
amendment
subject
immediate
appeal
tells
us
ante
ultimate
justification
importance
ensuring
dignitary
interests
fully
vindicated
whereas
private
litigant
must
suffer
litigation
federal
tribunal
despite
claim
lacks
jurisdiction
biard
catlin
state
state
entity
must
protected
indignity
present
case
jurisdiction
underlying
merits
neutral
forum
federal
district
find
rationale
embarrassingly
insufficient
mandate
appellate
jurisdiction
limited
final
decisions
district
courts
predicated
upon
mer
technical
conceptions
finality
catlin
serves
important
interests
concerning
fair
efficient
administration
justice
final
decision
rule
preserves
independence
trial
judge
conserves
judicial
resources
necessarily
expended
piecemeal
appeals
moreover
particular
relevance
case
serves
important
fairness
purpose
preventing
obstruction
claims
come
permitting
harassment
cost
succession
separate
appeals
various
rulings
litigation
may
give
rise
firestone
tire
rubber
risjord
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
sacrificing
interests
name
preserving
freedom
independence
government
officials
need
carry
official
duties
one
thing
concern
dignitary
interest
state
case
state
aqueduct
sewer
authority
quite
another
balance
interests
easy
cost
courts
parties
permitting
piecemeal
litigation
sort
clearly
outweighs
whatever
benefit
dignity
state
entities
might
derive
eleventh
amendment
claims
subject
immediate
appellate
review
therefore
hold
denial
motion
dismiss
eleventh
amendment
grounds
subject
immediate
appellate
review
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
surprisingly
expressly
characterized
eleventh
amendment
defense
albeit
different
context
partak
ing
jurisdictional
bar
edelman
jordan