williams
people
state
new
york
argued
april
decided
june
rehearing
denied
june
see
appeal
appeals
state
new
york
williams
people
state
new
york
john
finerty
new
york
city
appellant
solomon
klein
brooklyn
appellee
justice
black
delivered
opinion
jury
new
york
state
found
appellant
guilty
murder
first
degree
jury
recommended
life
imprisonment
trial
judge
imposed
sentence
death
giving
reasons
imposing
death
sentence
judge
discussed
open
evidence
upon
jury
convicted
stating
evidence
considered
light
additional
information
obtained
department
sources
consideration
additional
information
pursuant
new
york
criminal
code
provides
rendering
judgment
pronouncing
sentence
shall
cause
defendant
previous
criminal
record
submitted
including
reports
may
made
result
mental
phychiatric
sic
physical
examination
person
may
seek
information
aid
determining
proper
treatment
defendant
appeals
new
york
affirmed
conviction
sentence
contention
construed
applied
controlling
penal
statutes
violation
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
constitution
sentence
death
based
upon
information
supplied
witnesses
accused
confronted
opportunity
rebuttal
statutes
sustained
constitutional
challenge
case
appeal
narrow
contention
makes
unnecessary
set
facts
length
record
shows
carefully
conducted
trial
lasting
two
weeks
appellant
represented
three
appointed
lawyers
conducted
defense
fidelity
zeal
evidence
proved
wholly
indefensible
murder
committed
person
engaged
burglary
judge
instructed
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
charged
without
recommendation
life
sentence
must
impose
death
penalty
recommendation
made
may
impose
life
sentence
judge
went
emphasize
bound
accept
recommendation
five
weeks
verdict
guilty
recommendation
life
imprisonment
statutory
investigation
report
judge
defendant
brought
sentenced
asked
say
appellant
protested
innocence
three
lawyers
appealed
accept
jury
recommendation
life
sentence
judge
gave
reasons
felt
death
sentence
imposed
narrated
shocking
details
crime
shown
trial
evidence
expressing
complete
belief
appellant
guilt
stated
investigation
revealed
many
material
facts
concerning
appellant
background
though
relevant
question
punishment
properly
brought
attention
jury
consideration
question
guilt
referred
experience
appellant
thirty
burglaries
vicinity
murder
committed
appellant
convicted
burglaries
although
judge
information
confessed
identified
perpetrator
others
judge
also
referred
certain
activities
appellant
shown
probation
report
indicated
appellant
possessed
morbid
sexuality
classified
society
accuracy
statements
made
judge
appellant
background
past
practices
challenged
appellant
counsel
judge
asked
disregard
afford
appellant
chance
refute
discredit
otherwise
case
presents
serious
difficult
question
question
relates
rules
evidence
applicable
manner
judge
may
obtain
information
guide
imposition
sentence
upon
already
convicted
defendant
within
limits
fixed
statutes
new
york
judges
given
broad
discretion
decide
type
extent
punishment
convicted
defendants
example
judge
discretion
sentence
life
imprisonment
death
aid
judge
exercising
discretion
intelligently
new
york
procedural
policy
encourages
consider
information
convicted
person
past
life
health
habits
conduct
mental
moral
propensities
sentencing
judge
may
consider
information
even
though
obtained
outside
courtroom
persons
defendant
permitted
confront
consideration
information
obtained
sentencing
judge
manner
basis
appellant
broad
constitutional
challenge
new
york
statutory
policy
appellant
urges
new
york
statutory
policy
irreconcilable
conflict
underlying
philosophy
second
procedural
policy
grounded
due
process
law
clause
fourteenth
amendment
policy
stated
oliver
part
person
shall
tried
convicted
offense
unless
given
reasonable
notice
charges
afforded
opportunity
examine
adverse
witnesses
due
process
clause
provide
salutary
protections
question
consideration
guilt
defendant
seems
entirely
clear
genesis
historical
evolution
clause
see
chambers
state
florida
authorities
cited
note
tribunals
passing
guilt
defendant
always
hedged
strict
evidentiary
procedural
limitations
since
american
colonies
became
nation
courts
country
england
practiced
policy
sentencing
judge
exercise
wide
discretion
sources
types
evidence
used
assist
determining
kind
extent
punishment
imposed
within
limits
fixed
law
affidavits
used
frequently
course
smaller
communities
sentencing
judges
naturally
mind
knowledge
personalities
backgrounds
convicted
offenders
recent
manifestation
historical
latitude
allowed
sentencing
judges
appears
rule
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
rule
provides
consideration
federal
judges
reports
made
probation
officers
containing
information
convicted
defendant
including
information
may
helpful
imposing
sentence
granting
probation
correctional
treatment
defendant
addition
historical
basis
different
evidentiary
rules
governing
trial
sentencing
procedures
sound
practical
reasons
distinction
trial
verdict
issue
whether
defendant
guilty
engaged
certain
criminal
conduct
specifically
accused
rules
dence
fashioned
criminal
trials
narrowly
confine
trial
contest
evidence
strictly
relevant
particular
offense
charged
rules
rest
part
necessity
prevent
time
consuming
confusing
trial
collateral
issues
also
designed
prevent
trubunals
concerned
solely
issue
guilt
particular
offense
influenced
convict
offense
evidence
defendant
habitually
engaged
misconduct
sentencing
judge
however
confined
narrow
issue
guilt
task
within
fixed
statutory
constitutional
limits
determine
type
extent
punishment
issue
guilt
determined
highly
selection
appropriate
sentence
possession
fullest
information
possible
concerning
defendant
life
characteristics
modern
concepts
individualizing
punishment
made
necessary
sentencing
judge
denied
opportunity
obtain
pertinent
information
requirement
rigid
adherence
restrictive
rules
evidence
properly
applicable
trial
undoubtedly
new
york
statutes
emphasize
prevalent
modern
philosophy
penology
punishment
fit
offender
merely
crime
people
johnson
belief
longer
prevails
every
offense
like
legal
category
calls
identical
punishment
without
regard
past
life
habits
particular
offender
whole
country
traveled
far
period
death
sentence
automatic
commonplace
result
offenses
today
deemed
trivial
today
philosophy
individualizing
sentences
makes
sharp
distinctions
example
first
repeated
offenders
indeterminate
sentences
ultimate
termination
sometimes
decided
nonjudicial
agencies
large
extent
taken
place
old
rigidly
fixed
punishments
practice
probation
relies
heavily
implementation
accepted
wise
policy
execution
parole
system
rests
discretion
administrative
parole
board
stat
retribution
longer
dominant
objective
criminal
law
reformation
rehabilitation
offenders
become
important
goals
criminal
jurisprudence
modern
changes
treatment
offenders
make
necessary
century
ago
observance
distinctions
evidential
procedure
trial
sentencing
processes
indeterminate
sentences
probation
resulted
increase
discretionary
powers
exercised
fixing
punishments
general
modern
changes
resulted
making
lot
offenders
harder
contrary
strong
motivating
force
changes
belief
careful
study
lives
personalities
convicted
offenders
many
less
severely
punished
restored
sooner
complete
freedom
useful
citizenship
belief
large
large
extent
justified
practice
individualizing
punishments
investigation
techniques
given
important
role
probation
workers
making
reports
investigations
trained
prosecute
aid
offenders
reports
given
high
value
conscientious
judges
want
sentence
persons
best
available
information
rather
guesswork
inadequate
information
deprive
ing
judges
kind
information
undermine
modern
penological
procedural
policies
cautiously
adopted
throughout
nation
careful
consideration
experimentation
must
recognize
information
relied
upon
judges
guide
intelligent
imposition
sentences
unavailable
information
restricted
given
open
witnesse
subject
modern
probation
report
draws
information
concerning
every
aspect
defendant
life
type
extent
information
make
totally
impractical
impossible
open
testimony
procedure
endlessly
delay
criminal
administration
retrial
collateral
issues
considerations
set
admonish
us
treating
clause
uniform
command
courts
throughout
nation
abandon
practice
seeking
information
sources
guide
judgment
toward
enlightened
sentence
new
york
criminal
statutes
set
wide
limits
maximum
minimum
sentences
new
york
statutes
state
judge
escape
grave
responsibility
fixing
sentence
determining
whether
defendant
shall
receive
year
minimum
maximum
sentence
think
federal
constitution
restricts
view
sentencing
judge
information
received
open
clause
treated
device
freezing
evidential
procedure
sentencing
mold
trial
procedure
treat
clause
hinder
preclude
making
progressive
efforts
improve
administration
criminal
justice
urged
however
draw
constitutional
distinction
procedure
obtaining
information
death
sentence
imposed
accept
contention
leaving
sentencing
judge
free
avail
information
making
fateful
choice
sentences
secure
broad
discretionary
power
one
susceptible
abuse
considering
whether
rigid
constitutional
barrier
created
must
remembered
possibility
abuse
wherever
judge
must
choose
life
imprisonment
death
ceded
federal
constitutional
objection
possible
judge
sentenced
appellant
death
appellant
trial
manner
impressed
judge
appellant
bad
risk
society
judge
sentenced
death
giving
reason
say
clause
renders
sentence
void
merely
judge
gets
additional
information
assist
exercise
awesome
power
imposing
death
sentence
appellant
found
guilty
fairly
conducted
trial
sentence
followed
hearing
conducted
judge
upon
judge
inquiry
sentence
imposed
defendant
made
statements
counsel
made
extended
arguments
case
went
highest
state
power
reverse
abuse
discretion
legal
error
imposition
sentence
affirmed
hold
appellant
denied
due
process
law
affirmed
justice
rutledge
dissents
justice
murphy
dissenting
combination
factors
case
impels
dissent
petitioner
convicted
murder
jury
sentenced
death
judge
jury
heard
trial
unanimously
recommended
life
imprisonment
suitable
punishment
defendant
observed
throughout
trial
heard
evidence
adduced
spite
shocking
character
crime
found
guilty
unwilling
decree
life
taken
criminal
courts
jury
sits
representative
community
voice
society
crime
committed
judge
even
though
vested
statutory
authority
hesitate
indeed
increase
severity
community
expression
willing
increase
moreover
scrupulous
regard
rights
defendant
record
us
indicates
judge
exercised
discretion
deprive
man
life
reliance
material
made
available
probation
report
consisting
almost
entirely
evidence
inadmissible
trial
allegations
prior
crimes
irrelevant
much
incompetent
hearsay
damaging
none
subject
scrutiny
defendant
due
process
law
includes
least
idea
person
accused
crime
shall
accorded
fair
hearing
stages
proceedings
agree
value
humaneness
liberal
use
probation
reports
developed
modern
penologists
capital
case
unanimous
recommendation
jury
report
concededly
admissible
trial
subject
examination
defendant
forced
conclude
high
commands
due
process
obeyed
footnotes
killing
human
unless
excusable
justifiable
murder
first
degree
committed
act
imminently
dangerous
others
evincing
depraved
mind
regardless
human
life
although
without
premeditated
design
effect
death
individual
without
design
effect
death
person
engaged
commission
attempt
commit
felony
either
upon
affecting
person
killed
otherwise
new
york
penal
law
first
degree
punishable
death
unless
jury
recommends
life
imprisonment
provided
section
ten
hundred
new
york
penal
law
jury
finding
person
guilty
murder
first
degree
defined
subdivision
two
section
ten
hundred
may
part
verdict
recommend
defendant
imprisoned
term
natural
life
upon
recommendation
may
sentence
defendant
imprisonment
term
natural
life
new
york
penal
law
requirements
mentioned
oliver
case
defendant
permitted
offer
evidence
behalf
represented
counsel
appellant
however
represented
counsel
tried
sentenced
sentencing
judge
decline
permit
introduction
evidence
response
judge
inquiry
statements
made
appellant
counsel
courts
treated
rules
evidence
applicable
trial
procedure
sentencing
process
differently
see
snyder
commonwealth
massachusetts
graham
state
west
virginia
dalhover
cf
state
stevenson
see
cases
collected
et
seq
et
seq
et
seq
see
also
note
admissibility
character
evidence
determining
sentence
see
pound
criminal
justice
america
see
stephan
see
also
myerson
views
sentencing
criminals
law
glueck
principles
rational
penal
code
warner
cabot
administration
criminal
jusice
comment
reform
federal
penal
procedure
yale
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
lewis
ed
respect
policy
administration
probation
act
said
necessary
individualize
case
give
careful
humane
comprehensive
consideration
particular
situation
offender
possible
exercise
broad
discretion
burns
commonwealth
pennsylvania
ex
rel
sullivan
ashe
stated
determination
sentences
justice
generally
requires
consideration
particular
acts
crime
committed
taken
account
circumstances
offense
together
character
propensities
offender
see
wood
waite
crime
treatment
wood
waite
crime
treatment
orfield
criminal
procedure
arrest
appeal
see
glueck
probation
criminal
justice
national
probation
directory
probation
parole
officers
cooley
probation
delinquency
judge
ulman
writing
trial
judge
dilemma
discusses
problems
confront
sentencing
judge
quotes
one
opinions
factors
judge
consider
imposing
sentence
protection
society
punishmentäor
much
betteräthe
discipline
reformation
rehabilitation
deterrence
others
commission
like
offenses
obvious
proper
dealing
factors
involves
study
case
upon
individual
basis
crime
crime
property
involve
danger
human
life
crime
sudden
passion
studied
deliberate
criminal
man
constituted
habituated
war
upon
society
little
real
hope
ever
anything
menace
societyäor
obviously
amenable
reformation
glueck
probation
criminal
justice
see
also
encyc
soc
science
penal
institutions
late
federal
judge
lewis
schwellenbach
article
difficulties
confront
sentencing
judge
wrote
knowledge
life
man
background
family
proper
basis
determination
treatment
substitute
information
sentencing
judge
federal
tools
acquire
information
failure
make
full
use
tools
justified
schwellenbach
information
intuition
imposition
sentence
see
mcguire
holtzoff
problem
sentence
criminal
law
publication
circulated
administrative
office
courts
contains
suggested
form
probation
reports
serves
example
type
information
contained
reports
form
consists
thirteen
headings
offense
prior
record
family
history
home
neighborhood
education
religion
interests
activities
health
physical
mental
employment
resources
summary
plan
agencies
interested
headings
broken
form
represents
framework
information
inserted
give
sentencing
judge
composite
picture
defendant
administrative
office
courts
presentence
investigation
report
pub
new
york
criminal
statutes
illustrate
broad
statutory
limits
within
sentencing
judge
must
fix
defendant
penalty
robbery
first
degree
punishable
imprisonment
ten
years
thirty
years
new
york
penal
law
rape
first
degree
imprisonment
twenty
years
new
york
penal
law
burglary
first
degree
punishable
imprisonment
ten
thirty
years
burglary
second
degree
term
exceeding
fifteen
years
new
york
penal
law
people
stein
misc
people
ex
rel
barone
fox
people
johnson
see
commonwealth
johnson
english
procedure
see
also
see
note
right
criminal
offenders
challenge
reports
used
determining
sentence
said
accepted
holding
sentencing
procedure
immune
scrutiny
clause
see
townsend
burke