assoc
gen
contractors
city
jacksonville
argued
february
decided
june
respondent
city
enacted
ordinance
requiring
amount
spent
city
contracts
set
aside
fiscal
year
minority
business
enterprises
mbe
petitioner
construction
contractors
association
whose
members
qualify
mbe
filed
suit
district
city
respondent
mayor
alleging
many
members
regularly
bid
performed
construction
work
city
bid
designated
set
aside
contracts
restrictions
imposed
ordinance
violation
fourteenth
amendment
equal
protection
clause
ultimately
entered
summary
judgment
petitioner
appeals
vacated
judgment
ruling
petitioner
lacked
standing
challenge
ordinance
demonstrated
program
member
bid
successfully
contracts
certiorari
granted
city
repealed
mbe
ordinance
replacing
another
ordinance
although
different
repealed
ordinance
still
set
aside
certain
contracts
certified
businesses
subsequently
denied
respondents
motion
dismiss
case
moot
held
case
moot
well
settled
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
deprive
federal
power
determine
practice
legality
defendant
precluded
reinstating
practice
mere
risk
city
repeat
allegedly
wrongful
conduct
already
done
insofar
city
new
ordinance
accords
preferential
treatment
award
city
contracts
disadvantages
petitioner
members
way
repealed
ordinance
pp
petitioner
standing
sue
city
pp
government
erects
barrier
makes
difficult
members
one
group
obtain
benefit
members
another
group
member
former
group
seeking
challenge
barrier
need
allege
obtained
benefit
barrier
order
establish
standing
see
regents
univ
cal
bakke
injury
fact
element
standing
equal
protection
case
denial
equal
treatment
resulting
imposition
barrier
inability
compete
equal
footing
bidding
process
ultimate
inability
obtain
benefit
establish
standing
therefore
petitioner
need
demonstrate
members
able
ready
bid
contracts
discriminatory
policy
prevents
equal
basis
pp
respondents
reliance
warth
seldin
construction
association
denied
standing
challenge
town
zoning
ordinance
misplaced
unlike
petitioner
association
warth
claimed
members
obtain
variances
permits
apply
variances
permits
equal
basis
allege
members
applied
permit
variance
current
project
pp
petitioner
allegations
members
regularly
bid
city
contracts
bid
contracts
set
aside
ordinance
unchallenged
assumed
true
pp
thomas
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
stevens
scalia
kennedy
souter
joined
filed
dissenting
opinion
blackmun
joined
post
deborah
ausburn
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
stephen
parker
leonard
magid
argued
cause
respondents
brief
charles
arnold
steven
rohan
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
associated
general
contractors
america
walter
ryland
michael
kennedy
equal
rights
advocates
et
al
curtis
karnow
judith
kurtz
eva
jefferson
paterson
antonia
hernandez
william
mcneill
iii
pacific
legal
foundation
et
al
john
findley
ronald
zumbrun
james
polk
public
citizen
et
al
paul
wolfson
alan
morrison
john
powell
steven
shapiro
richard
ruda
filed
brief
national
league
cities
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
lee
fisher
attorney
general
ohio
andrew
sutter
assistant
attorney
general
frank
kelley
attorney
general
michigan
filed
brief
state
ohio
et
al
amici
curiae
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
jacksonville
florida
ordinance
accords
preferential
treatment
certain
businesses
award
city
contracts
case
decide
whether
order
standing
challenge
ordinance
association
contractors
required
show
one
members
received
contract
absent
ordinance
hold
respondent
jacksonville
enacted
ordinance
entitled
minority
business
enterprise
participation
required
amount
spent
city
contracts
set
aside
fiscal
year
minority
business
enterprises
mbe
city
jacksonville
purchasing
code
mbe
defined
business
whose
ownership
least
minority
female
minority
turn
defined
person
considers
black
oriental
indian
eskimo
aleut
handicapped
projects
earmarked
mbe
bidding
city
chief
purchasing
officer
deemed
reserved
minority
business
enterprises
ordinance
athematical
certainty
required
determining
amount
set
aside
chief
purchasing
officer
required
make
every
attempt
come
close
possible
ten
percent
figure
ordinance
also
provided
waiver
reduction
certain
circumstances
petitioner
northeastern
florida
chapter
associated
general
contractors
america
agc
association
individuals
firms
construction
industry
petitioner
members
business
jacksonville
qualify
mbe
city
ordinance
april
petitioner
filed
action
pursuant
city
mayor
also
respondent
district
middle
district
florida
claiming
jacksonville
ordinance
violated
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
face
applied
petitioner
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
complaint
petitioner
alleged
many
members
regularly
bid
perform
construction
work
city
jacksonville
complaint
bid
designated
set
aside
contracts
restrictions
imposed
ordinance
id
april
district
entered
temporary
restraining
order
prohibiting
city
implementing
mbe
ordinance
april
issued
preliminary
injunction
respondents
appealed
concluding
petitioner
demonstrated
irreparable
injury
appeals
reversed
issuance
preliminary
injunction
remanded
case
expedited
disposition
merits
chief
judge
tjoflat
concurred
judgment
view
suit
dismissed
lack
standing
petitioner
complaint
refer
specific
contract
subcontract
awarded
nonminority
bidder
ordinance
meantime
petitioner
respondents
moved
summary
judgment
may
district
entered
summary
judgment
petitioner
concluding
mbe
ordinance
inconsistent
equal
protection
criteria
established
richmond
croson
respondents
appealed
obtained
favorable
ruling
rather
addressing
merits
petitioner
equal
protection
claim
appeals
held
petitioner
lacks
standing
challenge
ordinance
establishing
program
demonstrated
program
agc
member
bid
successfully
contracts
appeals
accordingly
vacated
district
judgment
remanded
case
instructions
dismiss
petitioner
complaint
without
prejudice
eleventh
circuit
decision
conflicts
decisions
district
columbia
circuit
ninth
circuit
see
constr
district
columbia
app
coral
constr
king
county
cert
denied
granted
certiorari
october
days
grant
certiorari
city
repealed
mbe
ordinance
replaced
ordinance
entitled
women
business
enterprise
participation
became
effective
next
day
ordinance
differs
repealed
ordinance
three
principal
respects
first
unlike
prior
ordinance
applied
women
members
seven
different
minority
groups
new
ordinance
applies
women
blacks
jacksonville
purchasing
code
second
rather
set
aside
new
ordinance
established
participation
goals
ranging
depending
upon
type
contract
ownership
contractor
fiscal
year
contract
awarded
third
new
ordinance
provides
one
five
alternative
methods
achieving
participation
goals
methods
city
use
decided
project
project
basis
one
sheltered
market
plan
apart
percentages
virtually
identical
prior
ordinance
set
aside
plan
certain
contracts
reserved
exclusive
competition
certified
businesses
claiming
longer
live
controversy
respect
constitutionality
repealed
ordinance
respondents
filed
motion
dismiss
case
moot
november
denied
motion
december
ii
brief
merits
respondents
reassert
claim
repeal
challenged
ordinance
renders
case
moot
decline
disturb
earlier
ruling
however
mootness
question
controlled
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
applied
well
settled
rule
defendant
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
deprive
federal
power
determine
legality
practice
although
challenged
statutory
language
issue
city
mesquite
eliminated
case
pending
appeals
held
case
moot
defendant
repeal
objectionable
language
preclude
reenacting
precisely
provision
district
judgment
vacated
ibid
fortiori
case
mere
risk
jacksonville
repeat
allegedly
wrongful
conduct
already
done
matter
new
ordinance
differs
certain
respects
old
one
city
mesquite
stand
proposition
possibility
selfsame
statute
enacted
prevents
case
moot
rule
defendant
moot
case
repealing
challenged
statute
replacing
one
differs
insignificant
respect
gravamen
petitioner
complaint
members
disadvantaged
efforts
obtain
city
contracts
new
ordinance
may
disadvantage
lesser
degree
old
one
insofar
accords
preferential
treatment
contractors
particular
insofar
sheltered
market
plan
set
aside
another
name
disadvantages
fundamental
way
hold
case
moot
turn
question
granted
certiorari
whether
petitioner
standing
challenge
jacksonville
ordinance
iii
doctrine
standing
essential
unchanging
part
requirement
article
iii
lujan
defenders
wildlife
defines
respect
judicial
branch
idea
separation
powers
federal
government
founded
allen
wright
established
long
line
cases
party
seeking
invoke
federal
jurisdiction
must
demonstrate
three
things
injury
fact
mean
invasion
legally
protected
interest
concrete
particularized
actual
imminent
conjectural
hypothetical
lujan
supra
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
causal
relationship
injury
challenged
conduct
mean
injury
fairly
traced
challenged
action
defendant
resulted
independent
action
third
party
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
organization
likelihood
injury
redressed
favorable
decision
mean
prospect
obtaining
relief
injury
result
favorable
ruling
speculative
allen
wright
supra
elements
irreducible
minimum
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
required
constitution
appeals
held
petitioner
establish
standing
failed
allege
one
members
awarded
contract
challenged
ordinance
circumstances
appeals
concluded
injury
holding
reconciled
precedents
turner
georgia
law
limiting
school
board
membership
property
owners
challenged
equal
protection
grounds
held
plaintiff
property
standing
challenge
law
although
say
explicitly
holding
depend
upon
allegation
appointed
board
property
requirement
necessary
plaintiff
wished
considered
position
accord
quinn
millsap
plaintiffs
real
property
standing
challenge
property
requirement
membership
board
freeholders
confronted
similar
issue
clements
fashing
number
officeholders
claimed
equal
protection
rights
violated
automatic
resignation
provision
texas
constitution
requires
immediate
resignation
state
officeholders
upon
announcement
candidacy
another
office
noting
plaintiffs
alleged
announced
candidacy
consequences
rejected
claim
dispute
merely
hypothetical
allegations
insufficient
create
actual
case
controversy
citing
turner
fouche
emphasized
plaintiffs
injury
obstacle
candidacy
emphasis
added
require
allegation
plaintiffs
actually
elected
prohibition
decision
closely
analogous
case
however
regents
univ
cal
bakke
white
male
applicant
claimed
medical
school
admissions
program
reserved
places
entering
class
minority
applicants
inconsistent
equal
protection
clause
addressing
argument
applicant
lacked
standing
challenge
program
justice
powell
concluded
constitutional
requirements
art
iii
satisfied
requisite
injury
medical
school
decision
permit
bakke
compete
places
class
simply
race
emphasis
added
principal
opinion
thus
even
bakke
unable
prove
admitted
absence
special
program
follow
lacked
standing
emphasis
added
portion
justice
powell
opinion
joined
four
justices
see
singly
collectively
cases
stand
following
proposition
government
erects
barrier
makes
difficult
members
one
group
obtain
benefit
members
another
group
member
former
group
seeking
challenge
barrier
need
allege
obtained
benefit
barrier
order
establish
standing
injury
fact
equal
protection
case
variety
denial
equal
treatment
resulting
imposition
barrier
ultimate
inability
obtain
benefit
see
turner
fouche
supra
may
assume
plaintiffs
right
appointed
board
education
federal
constitutional
right
considered
public
service
without
burden
invidiously
discriminatory
disqualifications
omitted
emphasis
added
context
challenge
program
injury
fact
inability
compete
equal
footing
bidding
process
loss
contract
see
croson
principal
opinion
set
aside
program
denies
certain
citizens
opportunity
compete
fixed
percentage
public
contracts
based
solely
upon
race
emphasis
added
establish
standing
therefore
party
challenging
program
like
jacksonville
need
demonstrate
able
ready
bid
contracts
discriminatory
policy
prevents
equal
basis
urging
affirmance
respondents
rely
primarily
upon
warth
seldin
plaintiffs
claimed
town
zoning
ordinance
terms
enforced
violated
fourteenth
amendment
insofar
effect
preventing
people
low
moderate
income
living
town
seeking
intervene
suit
association
construction
firms
alleged
zoning
restrictions
deprived
members
business
opportunities
profits
held
association
lacked
standing
provided
following
explanation
holding
complaint
refers
specific
project
association
members
currently
precluded
either
ordinance
respondents
action
enforcing
averment
member
applied
respondents
building
permit
variance
respect
current
project
indeed
indication
respondents
delayed
thwarted
project
currently
proposed
association
members
members
taken
advantage
remedial
processes
available
ordinance
short
insofar
complaint
seeks
prospective
relief
association
failed
show
existence
injury
members
sufficient
immediacy
ripeness
warrant
judicial
intervention
event
tension
minimal
even
assuming
alleged
injury
warth
inability
compete
variances
permits
equal
basis
warth
analogous
case
distinguishable
nonetheless
unlike
petitioner
alleged
members
regularly
bid
contracts
jacksonville
bid
city
ordinance
makes
unavailable
construction
association
warth
allege
member
ha
applied
building
permit
variance
respect
current
project
thus
unlike
association
warth
petitioner
alleged
injury
sufficient
immediacy
warrant
judicial
intervention
ibid
furthermore
hold
warth
appeals
mutatis
mutandis
association
required
allege
discriminatory
policy
variances
permits
awarded
members
allegation
specific
project
precluded
existence
administration
zoning
ordinance
certainly
sufficient
establish
standing
suggestion
warth
necessary
iv
complaint
petitioner
alleged
members
regularly
bid
construction
contracts
jacksonville
bid
contracts
set
aside
pursuant
city
ordinance
able
complaint
allegations
challenged
way
motion
summary
judgment
example
must
assume
true
see
lucas
south
carolina
coastal
council
pennell
san
jose
given
assumption
given
legal
standard
reaffirmed
today
inappropriate
appeals
order
petitioner
complaint
dismissed
lack
standing
judgment
appeals
therefore
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
four
methods
participation
percentage
plan
contractors
required
subcontract
businesses
direct
negotiation
plan
pursuant
city
engages
direct
negotiations
businesses
bid
preference
plan
provides
award
contract
business
whose
bid
within
certain
percentage
dollar
amount
lowest
bid
impact
plan
point
values
awarded
businesses
businesses
use
subcontractors
suppliers
specified
employment
program
black
female
employees
bottom
dissent
differs
us
question
whether
new
ordinance
sufficiently
similar
repealed
ordinance
permissible
say
challenged
conduct
continues
dissent
puts
whether
ordinance
sufficiently
altered
present
substantially
different
controversy
one
district
originally
decided
post
believe
ordinance
sufficiently
altered
dissent
disagrees
merits
disagreement
short
answer
dissent
argument
case
controlled
diffenderfer
central
baptist
church
miami
per
curiam
fusari
steinberg
predate
city
mesquite
statutes
issue
cases
changed
substantially
therefore
basis
concluding
challenged
conduct
repeated
see
diffenderfer
supra
crux
complaint
old
statute
violated
constitution
insofar
authorized
tax
exemption
church
property
used
primarily
commercial
purposes
new
statute
authorized
exemption
property
used
predominantly
religious
purposes
fusari
challenged
statute
significantly
revised
legislature
enacted
major
revisions
statute
although
bakke
came
us
state
decision
asarco
kadish
retroactively
render
bakke
discussion
standing
dictum
see
brief
public
citizen
et
al
amici
curiae
suggesting
might
asarco
held
jurisdiction
review
judgment
state
even
though
respondents
plaintiffs
trial
standing
sue
principles
governing
federal
courts
petitioners
defendants
trial
allege
specific
injury
stemming
state
decree
hold
irrelevant
whether
state
plaintiffs
met
federal
standing
requirements
instead
made
clear
determination
plaintiffs
satisfied
requirements
obviated
inquiry
thus
bakke
standing
necessary
condition
exercise
jurisdiction
sufficient
follows
definition
injury
fact
petitioner
sufficiently
alleged
city
ordinance
cause
injury
judicial
decree
directing
city
discontinue
program
redress
injury
suggestion
even
petitioner
members
standing
sue
petitioner
one
prerequisites
associational
standing
satisfied
see
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
given
current
state
record
basis
reaching
conclusion
justice
justice
blackmun
joins
dissenting
challenged
statute
expires
repealed
significantly
amended
pending
review
relief
sought
prospective
practice
dismiss
case
moot
today
abandons
practice
relying
solely
decision
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
see
ante
believe
case
closely
resembles
cases
found
mootness
city
mesquite
accordingly
reach
standing
question
decided
majority
earlier
term
reaffirmed
longstanding
rule
case
must
dismissed
moot
event
occurs
pending
review
makes
impossible
grant
effectual
relief
whatever
prevailing
party
church
scientology
cal
quoting
mills
green
principle
applies
challenges
legislation
expired
repealed
plaintiff
sought
prospective
relief
challenged
statute
longer
exists
ordinarily
real
controversy
continuing
validity
order
enjoining
enforcement
meaningless
circumstances
well
settled
case
dismissed
moot
see
new
orleans
flour
inspectors
glover
repeal
accord
burke
barnes
expiration
cf
richmond
croson
expiration
law
moot
case
parties
continuing
controversy
question
whether
prior
application
ordinance
entitled
plaintiff
damages
analysis
varies
challenged
statute
amended
repealed
replaced
new
legislation
agree
defendant
moot
case
simply
altering
law
insignificant
respect
ante
recognized
however
material
changes
may
render
case
moot
see
princeton
univ
schmid
per
curiam
substantia
amend
ment
challenged
regulation
mooted
controversy
validity
seems
clear
example
challenged
law
revised
plainly
cure
alleged
defect
way
law
longer
applies
plaintiff
live
controversy
decide
cases
functionally
indistinguishable
involving
outright
repeal
neither
declaration
challenged
statute
invalidity
injunction
future
enforcement
benefit
plaintiff
statute
longer
said
affect
plaintiff
see
department
treasury
galioto
equal
protection
challenge
federal
firearms
statute
treating
certain
felons
favorably
former
mental
patients
moot
congress
amended
statute
eliminate
discrimination
kremens
bartley
challenge
law
permitting
parents
commit
juveniles
mental
hospital
mooted
respect
new
legislation
permitting
commitment
juveniles
board
pub
util
compania
general
de
tabacos
de
filipinas
challenge
statute
alleged
constitute
unlawful
delegation
legislative
power
regulatory
board
dismissed
statutory
amendment
detailed
board
responsibilities
berry
davis
suit
enjoin
mandatory
vasectomy
plaintiff
dismissed
statute
requiring
operation
replaced
law
inapplicable
plaintiff
difficult
question
presented
granted
review
case
challenged
statute
replaced
new
legislation
obviously
completely
remedying
alleged
infirmity
original
act
narrowly
drawn
new
law
ultimately
may
suffer
legal
defect
old
statute
may
sufficiently
altered
present
substantially
different
controversy
one
district
originally
decided
cases
typically
exercised
caution
treated
case
moot
diffenderfer
central
baptist
church
miami
per
curiam
example
plaintiffs
challenged
florida
statute
exempted
taxation
certain
church
property
used
part
commercial
parking
lot
violative
religion
clauses
first
amendment
noted
probable
jurisdiction
florida
legislature
repealed
statute
replaced
new
legislation
exempting
taxation
church
property
used
predominantly
religious
purposes
observing
church
property
question
might
entitled
exemption
new
law
concluded
controversy
us
moot
reasoned
relief
sought
complaint
declaratory
judgment
repealed
statute
unconstitutional
applied
church
parking
lot
used
commercial
purposes
injunction
application
said
lot
relief
course
inappropriate
statute
repealed
took
similar
approach
fusari
steinberg
plaintiffs
challenged
connecticut
procedures
determining
continuing
eligibility
unemployment
compensation
district
held
scheme
violated
due
process
failed
provide
adequate
hearing
administrative
review
hearing
examiner
decision
took
unreasonably
long
time
noted
probable
jurisdiction
state
legislature
amended
relevant
statutes
establishing
additional
procedural
protections
hearing
stage
altering
structure
administrative
review
make
quicker
fairer
changes
might
alter
significantly
character
system
considered
district
unclear
new
procedures
operate
vacated
lower
judgment
remanded
reconsideration
light
intervening
changes
state
law
see
see
also
allee
medrano
criminal
statutes
declared
unconstitutional
replaced
narrowly
drawn
versions
case
moot
absent
pending
prosecutions
precedents
establish
challenged
statute
replaced
narrowly
drawn
legislation
pending
review
plaintiff
seeks
prospective
relief
generally
decline
decide
case
controversy
respect
old
statute
moot
declaration
invalidity
injunction
law
future
enforcement
benefit
plaintiff
sure
statutory
changes
affect
plaintiff
claims
dismissal
avoids
possibility
decision
prove
advisory
like
diffenderfer
case
concerns
law
repealed
replaced
granted
review
petitioner
complaint
requests
declaratory
injunctive
relief
ordinance
longer
exists
acknowledges
jacksonville
new
ordinance
narrowly
drawn
last
see
ante
new
ordinance
may
disadvantage
petitioner
members
lesser
degree
old
one
majority
believes
diffenderfer
similar
cases
inapposite
majority
view
jacksonville
new
ordinance
differ
substantially
one
challenged
petitioner
complaint
see
ante
agree
gravamen
petitioner
complaint
ante
read
original
law
violated
equal
protection
clause
two
reasons
law
lacked
adequate
factual
basis
city
undertaken
studies
determine
whether
past
discrimination
continuing
effects
made
preference
program
necessary
app
ordinance
narrowly
tailored
remedy
prior
racial
discrimination
program
limited
time
figure
rationally
related
relevant
statistic
preferences
awarded
groups
discrimination
ever
occurred
city
district
invalidated
ordinance
authority
richmond
croson
held
program
deficient
similar
respects
violated
equal
protection
clause
app
pet
cert
district
concluded
jacksonville
made
sufficient
findings
past
discrimination
therefore
reach
narro
tailor
ing
question
city
effort
make
law
narrowly
tailored
also
evident
terms
new
program
expire
years
addition
explains
two
eight
previously
favored
groups
eliminated
list
qualified
participants
participation
goals
vary
according
type
contract
ownership
contractor
five
alternative
methods
achieving
participation
goals
see
ante
one
five
methods
complying
participation
goals
sheltered
market
plan
resembles
earlier
law
ante
unclear
city
decide
ever
use
sheltered
market
plan
rather
alternative
method
particular
project
fusari
speculate
new
system
might
operate
whether
new
ordinance
survives
scrutiny
fourteenth
amendment
question
express
view
say
changes
insignificant
ante
petitioner
equal
protection
claim
majority
avoids
difficulty
characterizing
petitioner
complaint
general
terms
possible
gravamen
petitioner
complaint
members
disadvantaged
efforts
obtain
city
contracts
undertake
generalized
approach
diffenderfer
cases
involving
narrowly
drawn
statutory
changes
challenge
new
law
presents
different
case
allee
proper
course
therefore
decline
render
decision
issue
us
question
decided
appeals
concerns
petitioner
standing
compel
different
result
cf
burke
barnes
declining
reach
standing
question
expiration
law
mooted
controversy
determination
petitioner
standing
challenge
repealed
law
avails
nothing
since
law
longer
exists
petitioner
benefit
determination
standing
challenge
new
ordinance
even
assuming
standing
questions
identical
old
new
ordinances
decision
case
view
remains
inappropriate
petitioner
yet
attempted
amend
pleadings
file
another
complaint
challenge
new
ordinance
see
tr
oral
arg
thus
today
ruling
standing
question
prove
advisory
reason
believe
wiser
course
one
consistent
precedents
follow
diffenderfer
authority
case
vacate
appeals
judgment
remand
instructions
remand
case
district
permit
petitioner
challenge
new
ordinance
ii
also
agree
majority
assertion
city
mesquite
control
case
ante
understand
city
mesquite
created
narrow
exception
general
principles
described
exception
clearly
inapplicable
plaintiff
city
mesquite
challenged
licensing
ordinance
governing
amusement
establishments
one
factors
considered
determining
whether
grant
license
ordinance
whether
applicant
connections
criminal
elements
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
district
held
phrase
unconstitutionally
vague
appeals
affirmed
case
pending
appeals
however
contested
language
eliminated
ordinance
case
came
us
concluded
need
dismissed
moot
relied
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
provides
defendant
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
deprive
federal
power
determine
legality
practice
defendants
forever
avoid
judicial
review
simply
ceasing
challenged
practice
resume
case
dismissed
cases
said
defendant
establish
mootness
bears
heavy
burden
demonstrat
ing
reasonable
expectation
wrong
repeated
grant
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
city
mesquite
decided
reach
merits
plaintiff
claim
city
repeal
objectionable
language
preclude
reenacting
precisely
provision
district
judgment
vacated
expressly
noted
city
fact
announced
intention
exactly
already
eliminated
reinstated
another
aspect
ordinance
course
litigation
obviously
response
prior
judicial
action
circumstances
made
virtually
impossible
say
reasonable
expectation
city
reenact
challenged
language
city
mesquite
purport
overrule
long
line
cases
found
repeal
challenged
statute
moot
case
significantly
referred
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
case
involving
statute
repealed
materially
altered
pending
review
reason
seems
obvious
unlike
city
mesquite
ordinary
case
reasonable
suppose
legislature
repealed
amended
challenged
law
simply
avoid
litigation
reinstate
original
legislation
given
opportunity
especially
true
law
replaced
doubt
considerable
effort
expense
narrowly
drawn
version
designed
cure
alleged
legal
infirmities
ordinarily
presume
legislative
bodies
act
bad
faith
city
mesquite
required
government
establish
expected
reenact
repealed
legislation
dismiss
case
moot
believe
city
mesquite
stands
proposition
discretion
decide
case
statute
review
repealed
amended
appropriately
may
render
judgment
circumstances
demonstrate
legislature
likely
reinstate
old
law
make
declaratory
judgment
order
enjoining
law
enforcement
worthwhile
circumstances
undoubtedly
rare
majority
points
nothing
record
case
suggest
dealing
sort
legislative
improprieties
concerned
us
city
mesquite
majority
therefore
quite
unconvincing
assertion
mootness
question
case
controlled
city
mesquite
ante
treating
exceptional
case
announcing
general
rule
favoring
exercise
jurisdiction
moreover
today
decision
casts
doubt
cases
injects
new
uncertainty
mootness
jurisprudence
view
principles
developed
decisions
described
continue
apply
ordinary
case
challenged
statute
replaced
narrowly
drawn
version
pending
review
indication
legislature
intends
reenact
prior
version
follow
diffenderfer
vacate
lower
judgment
direct
plaintiff
permitted
challenge
new
legislation
accordingly
respectfully
dissent