mckaskle
wiggins
argued
november
decided
january
state
robbery
trial
respondent
permitted
proceed
pro
se
trial
appointed
standby
counsel
assist
trial
respondent
frequently
changed
mind
regarding
standby
counsel
role
objecting
counsel
participation
occasions
agreeing
occasions
following
conviction
respondent
unsuccessfully
moved
new
trial
ground
standby
counsel
unfairly
interfered
presentation
defense
exhausting
direct
appellate
state
habeas
corpus
review
respondent
filed
habeas
petition
federal
district
claiming
standby
counsel
conduct
deprived
right
present
defense
guaranteed
faretta
california
district
denied
petition
appeals
reversed
holding
respondent
sixth
amendment
right
violated
unsolicited
participation
overzealous
standby
counsel
held
respondent
sixth
amendment
right
conduct
defense
violated
since
appears
allowed
make
appearances
saw
fit
standby
counsel
unsolicited
involvement
held
within
reasonable
limits
pp
counsel
clause
sixth
amendment
implies
right
defendant
conduct
defense
assistance
counsel
trial
record
reveals
respondent
accorded
rights
pro
se
defendant
control
organization
conduct
defense
make
motions
argue
points
law
participate
voir
dire
question
witnesses
address
jury
appropriate
points
trial
pp
objectives
affirming
pro
se
defendant
dignity
autonomy
allowing
presentation
may
best
possible
defense
achieved
without
categorically
silencing
standby
counsel
determining
whether
defendant
faretta
rights
respected
primary
focus
must
whether
fair
chance
present
case
way
rights
however
impose
limits
extent
standby
counsel
unsolicited
participation
first
pro
se
defendant
entitled
preserve
actual
control
case
chooses
present
jury
second
standby
counsel
participation
without
defendant
consent
allowed
destroy
jury
perception
defendant
representing
pp
appearance
pro
se
defendant
undermined
standby
counsel
participation
outside
jury
presence
case
incidents
respondent
complains
occurred
jury
courtroom
incidents
regrettable
counsel
participation
fully
satisfied
first
limitation
noted
respondent
given
ample
opportunity
present
position
every
matter
discussed
conflicts
respondent
counsel
resolved
respondent
favor
pp
standby
counsel
participate
jury
presence
defendant
may
legitimately
claim
excessive
involvement
counsel
destroy
appearance
defendant
acting
pro
se
nevertheless
categorical
bar
counsel
participation
unnecessary
respondent
pro
se
efforts
undermined
primarily
changes
mind
regarding
counsel
role
difficult
determine
much
counsel
participation
fact
contrary
respondent
desires
defendant
given
opportunity
elects
counsel
appear
jury
complaints
concerning
counsel
subsequent
unsolicited
participation
lose
much
force
pro
se
defendant
invites
agrees
substantial
participation
counsel
subsequent
appearances
counsel
must
presumed
defendant
acquiescence
least
defendant
expressly
unambiguously
renews
request
standby
counsel
silenced
pp
defendant
sixth
amendment
rights
violated
trial
judge
appoints
standby
counsel
even
defendant
objection
relieve
judge
need
explain
enforce
basic
rules
courtroom
protocol
assist
defendant
overcoming
routine
obstacles
stand
way
achievement
clearly
indicated
goals
respondent
trial
significant
part
standby
counsel
participation
involved
basic
procedures
none
interfered
respondent
control
defense
undermined
appearance
jury
status
pro
se
defendant
pp
aside
standby
counsel
participation
either
approved
respondent
attendant
routine
clerical
procedural
matters
counsel
unsolicited
comments
front
jury
substantial
frequent
enough
seriously
undermined
respondent
appearance
jury
status
representing
pp
delivered
opinion
burger
powell
rehnquist
stevens
joined
blackmun
concurred
result
white
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
joined
post
leslie
benitez
assistant
attorney
general
texas
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
jim
mattox
attorney
general
david
richards
executive
assistant
attorney
general
nancy
simonson
assistant
attorney
general
craig
smyser
appointment
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
filed
brief
respondent
respondent
filed
brief
pro
se
justice
delivered
opinion
faretta
california
recognized
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
conduct
defense
also
held
trial
may
appoint
standby
counsel
assist
pro
se
defendant
defense
today
must
decide
role
standby
counsel
present
trial
defendant
objection
may
play
consistent
protection
defendant
faretta
rights
carl
edwin
wiggins
convicted
robbery
sentenced
life
imprisonment
recidivist
conviction
set
aside
defective
indictment
wiggins
retired
convicted
sentenced
life
imprisonment
standby
counsel
appointed
assist
wiggins
trials
wiggins
challenges
counsel
participation
second
trial
prior
first
trial
hearing
held
wiggins
motion
proceed
pro
se
granted
motion
record
simultaneously
appointed
two
attorneys
act
standby
counsel
wiggins
initially
objected
presence
shortly
thereafter
however
counsel
asked
wiggins
conduct
trial
wiggins
expressly
requested
bring
appropriate
objections
directly
attention
without
first
consulting
trial
newly
appointed
counsel
discovered
original
indictment
defective
new
trial
granted
april
two
months
second
trial
began
wiggins
filed
request
appointed
counsel
stating
wished
rescind
earlier
waiver
counsel
app
next
day
wiggins
filled
signed
form
captioned
petition
appointment
counsel
order
thereon
trial
appointed
benjamin
samples
month
later
wiggins
filed
additional
request
counsel
five
days
later
wiggins
filled
another
appointment
counsel
form
trial
appointed
norvell
graham
wiggins
wishes
respecting
appointed
counsel
remained
volatile
second
trial
approached
pretrial
proceedings
began
june
wiggins
announced
defending
pro
se
firmly
requested
counsel
allowed
interfere
wiggins
presentations
record
wiggins
reaffirmed
desire
proceed
pro
se
following
morning
june
objected
even
insistence
counsel
remain
available
consultation
trial
began
later
day
shortly
thereafter
wiggins
interrupted
witness
consult
graham
record
still
later
wiggins
expressly
agreed
allow
graham
conduct
voir
dire
another
witness
wiggins
started
next
day
trial
june
request
trial
proceed
samples
absence
courtroom
later
morning
wiggins
requested
counsel
allowed
assist
interrupt
short
wiggins
interrupted
witness
confer
samples
record
trial
reconvened
afternoon
wiggins
agreed
proceed
samples
absence
samples
returned
however
wiggins
interrupted
witness
confer
later
wiggins
insisted
counsel
initiate
private
consultations
end
day
wiggins
found
occasion
interrupt
examination
witness
confer
samples
following
day
june
wiggins
agreed
graham
make
wiggins
opening
statement
jury
june
wiggins
willing
trial
proceed
absence
one
standby
counsel
following
conviction
wiggins
moved
new
trial
july
hearing
wiggins
motion
denounced
services
standby
counsel
provided
insisted
unfairly
interfered
presentation
defense
exhausting
direct
appellate
state
habeas
review
wiggins
filed
petition
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
argued
standby
counsel
conduct
deprived
right
present
defense
guaranteed
faretta
district
denied
habeas
petition
appeals
fifth
circuit
reversed
wiggins
estelle
rehearing
denied
appeals
held
wiggins
sixth
amendment
right
violated
unsolicited
participation
overzealous
standby
counsel
rule
establish
today
standby
counsel
seen
heard
mean
compete
defendant
supersede
defense
rather
presence
advisory
purposes
used
used
defendant
sees
fit
omitted
ii
faretta
considered
case
criminal
defendant
required
present
defense
exclusively
counsel
held
accused
sixth
amendment
right
conduct
defense
provided
knowingly
intelligently
forgoes
right
counsel
able
willing
abide
rules
procedure
courtroom
protocol
faretta
concluded
nless
accused
acquiesced
representation
counsel
defense
presented
defense
guaranteed
constitution
real
sense
defense
faretta
holding
based
longstanding
recognition
right
federal
state
courts
language
structure
spirit
sixth
amendment
amendment
accused
counsel
must
informed
nature
cause
accusation
right
confront
witnesses
must
accorded
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
counsel
clause
permits
accused
assistance
counsel
defence
implies
right
defendant
conduct
defense
assistance
counsel
trial
defendant
right
plainly
encompasses
certain
specific
rights
voice
heard
pro
se
defendant
must
allowed
control
organization
content
defense
make
motions
argue
points
law
participate
voir
dire
question
witnesses
address
jury
appropriate
points
trial
record
reveals
wiggins
fact
accorded
rights
trial
wiggins
moved
trial
order
preparation
transcript
first
trial
standby
counsel
waived
receipt
transcript
announced
ready
trial
record
filed
argued
least
pro
se
motions
pretrial
proceedings
wiggins
alone
conducted
defense
voir
dire
prospective
jurors
made
opening
statement
defense
jury
wiggins
filed
numerous
pro
se
motions
course
trial
prosecution
witnesses
freely
registered
objections
throughout
trial
wiggins
selected
witnesses
defense
examined
decided
certain
questions
asked
defense
decided
witnesses
called
counsel
advice
wiggins
announced
defense
rested
wiggins
filed
requested
charges
jury
made
objections
suggested
charge
obtained
removal
one
proposed
charges
counsel
express
objection
approved
verdict
form
supplied
jury
gave
closing
argument
jury
wiggins
elected
go
jury
punishment
phase
trial
argued
case
jury
stage
well
wiggins
complaint
directed
limits
placed
participation
trial
clearly
none
directed
instead
allegedly
inadequate
limits
placed
standby
counsel
participation
trial
wiggins
objected
fact
counsel
remain
available
assist
wiggins
abandoned
objection
contends
faretta
right
present
defense
pro
se
impaired
distracting
intrusive
unsolicited
participation
counsel
throughout
trial
iii
wiggins
claims
appeals
agreed
pro
se
defendant
may
insist
presenting
case
wholly
free
interruption
uninvited
involvement
standby
counsel
wiggins
relies
primarily
faretta
sole
reference
standby
counsel
course
state
may
even
objection
accused
appoint
standby
counsel
aid
accused
accused
requests
help
available
represent
accused
event
termination
defendant
necessary
see
dougherty
app
view
faretta
logic
citation
dougherty
case
indicate
absolute
bar
standby
counsel
unsolicited
participation
appropriate
intended
right
appear
pro
se
exists
affirm
dignity
autonomy
accused
allow
presentation
may
least
occasionally
accused
best
possible
defense
objectives
achieved
without
categorically
silencing
standby
counsel
determining
whether
defendant
faretta
rights
respected
primary
focus
must
whether
defendant
fair
chance
present
case
way
faretta
dealt
defendant
affirmative
right
participate
limits
standby
counsel
additional
involvement
specific
rights
make
voice
heard
wiggins
plainly
accorded
see
supra
form
core
defendant
right
recognize
nonetheless
right
speak
oneself
entails
opportunity
add
one
voice
cacophony
others
wiggins
contends
objectives
underlying
right
proceed
pro
se
may
undermined
unsolicited
excessively
intrusive
participation
standby
counsel
proceedings
jury
defendant
may
legitimately
concerned
multiple
voices
defense
confuse
message
defendant
wishes
convey
thus
defeating
faretta
objectives
accordingly
faretta
right
must
impose
limits
extent
standby
counsel
unsolicited
participation
first
pro
se
defendant
entitled
preserve
actual
control
case
chooses
present
jury
core
faretta
right
standby
counsel
participation
defendant
objection
effectively
allows
counsel
make
substantially
interfere
significant
tactical
decisions
control
questioning
witnesses
speak
instead
defendant
matter
importance
faretta
right
eroded
second
participation
standby
counsel
without
defendant
consent
allowed
destroy
jury
perception
defendant
representing
defendant
appearance
status
one
conducting
defense
important
criminal
trial
since
right
appear
pro
se
exists
affirm
accused
individual
dignity
autonomy
related
contexts
courts
recognized
defendant
right
present
important
stages
trial
snyder
massachusetts
may
normally
forced
appear
shackles
prison
garb
estelle
williams
right
present
testimony
behalf
see
harris
new
york
brooks
tennessee
appearing
jury
status
one
defending
may
equally
important
pro
se
defendant
jury
perspective
message
conveyed
defense
may
depend
much
messenger
message
defendant
point
view
right
appear
pro
se
lose
much
importance
lawyers
courtroom
know
right
exercised
iv
participation
standby
counsel
outside
presence
jury
engages
first
two
limitations
trial
judge
event
receives
defendant
original
faretta
request
supervises
protection
right
throughout
trial
must
considered
capable
differentiating
claims
presented
pro
se
defendant
presented
standby
counsel
cf
martinez
cert
denied
penick
cert
denied
reeves
cert
denied
accordingly
appearance
pro
se
defendant
unacceptably
undermined
counsel
participation
outside
presence
jury
thus
faretta
rights
adequately
vindicated
proceedings
outside
presence
jury
pro
se
defendant
allowed
address
freely
behalf
disagreements
counsel
pro
se
defendant
resolved
defendant
favor
whenever
matter
one
normally
left
discretion
counsel
incidents
wiggins
complains
occurred
jury
courtroom
jury
absence
wiggins
two
standby
counsel
frequently
explained
trial
judge
views
points
disagreement
wiggins
counsel
made
motions
dictated
proposed
strategies
record
registered
objections
prosecution
testimony
urged
summoning
additional
witnesses
suggested
questions
defendant
asked
witnesses
several
occasions
wiggins
expressly
adopted
standby
counsel
initiatives
counsel
moved
quash
jury
panel
example
wiggins
joined
motion
record
wiggins
seconded
counsel
requests
police
report
photographs
least
twice
counsel
made
motion
motion
denied
wiggins
registered
exception
denial
several
occasions
wiggins
strongly
opposed
initiatives
counsel
resisted
counsel
suggestion
trial
postponed
transcript
prior
trial
prepared
waived
counsel
right
preparation
period
counsel
wished
invoke
course
pretrial
discussion
concerning
discovery
request
wiggins
indignantly
demanded
counsel
participate
without
invitation
later
wiggins
successfully
opposed
inclusion
jury
instructions
charge
counsel
felt
included
acrimonious
exchange
graham
wiggins
occurred
course
questioning
witness
voir
dire
wiggins
suggests
exchange
typical
counsel
overbearing
conduct
fails
place
incident
context
wiggins
expressly
agreed
graham
conduct
voir
dire
wiggins
attempted
take
questioning
midstream
plainly
exasperated
graham
used
profanity
curtly
directed
wiggins
though
several
incidents
regrettable
satisfied
counsel
participation
outside
presence
jury
fully
satisfied
first
standard
outlined
wiggins
given
ample
opportunity
present
position
every
matter
discussed
given
time
think
matters
explain
problems
concerns
informally
speak
judge
record
standby
counsel
participated
actively
part
orderly
manner
one
instance
overbearing
conduct
counsel
direct
result
wiggins
indecision
question
witness
voir
dire
wiggins
given
abundant
opportunity
argue
contentions
equally
important
conflicts
wiggins
counsel
resolved
wiggins
favor
trial
judge
repeatedly
explained
concerned
wiggins
strategic
choices
counsel
prevail
every
motion
made
wiggins
granted
instance
counsel
position
adopted
wiggins
matter
normally
left
defense
discretion
participation
standby
counsel
presence
jury
problematic
defendant
may
legitimately
claim
excessive
involvement
counsel
destroy
appearance
defendant
acting
pro
se
turn
may
erode
dignitary
values
right
intended
promote
may
undercut
defendant
presentation
jury
effective
defense
nonetheless
believe
categorical
bar
participation
standby
counsel
presence
jury
unnecessary
measuring
standby
counsel
involvement
standards
described
important
lose
sight
defendant
conduct
defendant
waive
faretta
rights
participation
counsel
pro
se
defendant
express
approval
course
constitutionally
unobjectionable
defendant
invitation
counsel
participate
trial
obliterates
claim
participation
question
deprived
defendant
control
defense
participation
also
diminishes
general
claim
counsel
unreasonably
interfered
defendant
right
appear
status
one
defending
although
also
easily
overlooked
defendant
like
wiggins
vehemently
objects
beginning
trial
standby
counsel
presence
courtroom
may
express
quite
different
views
trial
progresses
even
insists
waiving
faretta
rights
pro
se
defendant
solicitation
acquiescence
certain
types
participation
counsel
substantially
undermines
later
protestations
counsel
interfered
unacceptably
record
case
reveals
wiggins
pro
se
efforts
undermined
primarily
frequent
changes
mind
regarding
counsel
role
early
trial
wiggins
insisted
wished
proceed
entirely
without
assistance
shortly
thereafter
expressly
agreed
counsel
question
witness
voir
dire
wiggins
objected
vehemently
counsel
motions
warmly
embraced
others
initially
wiggins
objected
standby
counsel
presence
later
refused
allow
trial
proceed
absence
end
agreed
counsel
make
closing
statement
defense
two
long
appearances
counsel
wiggins
trial
one
jury
one
outside
presence
initiated
wiggins
express
approval
record
circumstances
difficult
determine
much
counsel
participation
fact
contrary
wiggins
desires
moment
faretta
require
trial
judge
permit
hybrid
representation
type
wiggins
actually
allowed
defendant
given
opportunity
elects
counsel
appear
jury
complaints
concerning
counsel
subsequent
unsolicited
participation
lose
much
force
defendant
constitutional
right
choreograph
special
appearances
counsel
pro
se
defendant
invites
agrees
substantial
participation
counsel
subsequent
appearances
counsel
must
presumed
defendant
acquiescence
least
defendant
expressly
unambiguously
renews
request
standby
counsel
silenced
faretta
rights
also
infringed
standby
counsel
assists
pro
se
defendant
overcoming
routine
procedural
evidentiary
obstacles
completion
specific
task
introducing
evidence
objecting
testimony
defendant
clearly
shown
wishes
complete
infringed
counsel
merely
helps
ensure
defendant
compliance
basic
rules
courtroom
protocol
procedure
neither
case
significant
interference
defendant
actual
control
presentation
defense
likelihood
defendant
appearance
status
one
defending
eroded
also
slight
event
tolerable
defendant
constitutional
right
receive
personal
instruction
trial
judge
courtroom
procedure
constitution
require
judges
take
chores
pro
se
defendant
normally
attended
trained
counsel
matter
course
faretta
recognized
much
right
license
abuse
dignity
courtroom
neither
license
comply
relevant
rules
procedural
substantive
law
accordingly
make
explicit
today
already
implicit
faretta
defendant
sixth
amendment
rights
violated
trial
judge
appoints
standby
counsel
even
defendant
objection
relieve
judge
need
explain
enforce
basic
rules
courtroom
protocol
assist
defendant
overcoming
routine
obstacles
stand
way
defendant
achievement
clearly
indicated
goals
participation
counsel
steer
defendant
basic
procedures
trial
permissible
even
unlikely
event
somewhat
undermines
pro
se
defendant
appearance
control
defense
wiggins
trial
significant
part
standby
counsel
participation
jury
presence
involved
basic
mechanics
type
described
informing
whereabouts
witnesses
supplying
wiggins
form
needed
elect
go
jury
punishment
phase
trial
explaining
wiggins
argue
case
questioning
witness
see
record
wiggins
attempted
introduce
document
evidence
failed
mark
identification
lay
predicate
introduction
counsel
trial
suggestion
questioned
witness
lay
appropriate
predicate
wiggins
resumed
examination
similarly
trial
judge
repeatedly
instructed
wiggins
consult
counsel
regarding
appropriate
procedure
summoning
witnesses
notwithstanding
wiggins
several
general
objections
presence
participation
counsel
find
aspects
counsel
involvement
irreproachable
none
interfered
wiggins
actual
control
defense
none
reasonably
thought
undermined
wiggins
appearance
jury
status
pro
se
defendant
putting
aside
participation
either
approved
wiggins
attendant
routine
clerical
procedural
matters
counsel
unsolicited
comments
front
jury
infrequent
part
innocuous
two
occasions
graham
interrupted
witness
answer
question
put
wiggins
first
interruption
trivial
second
made
jury
briefly
excused
subsequently
given
cautionary
instruction
requested
graham
wiggins
made
objection
standby
counsel
also
moved
mistrial
three
times
presence
jury
motion
response
allegedly
prejudicial
questions
comments
prosecutor
wiggins
comment
first
motion
opposed
following
two
three
motions
immediately
denied
trial
regrettably
counsel
used
profanity
express
exasperation
second
occasion
finally
counsel
played
active
role
punishment
phase
trial
record
supplies
explanation
sudden
change
regard
wiggins
made
objection
counsel
participation
phase
trial
surmise
wiggins
concluded
appearing
pro
se
best
interests
statements
made
counsel
guilt
phase
trial
presence
jury
without
wiggins
express
consent
occupy
small
portion
transcript
unobjectionable
mechanical
sort
standby
counsel
participation
wiggins
trial
serve
model
future
trials
believe
counsel
involvement
fell
short
infringing
wiggins
faretta
rights
wiggins
unquestionably
maintained
actual
control
presentation
defense
times
also
persuaded
wiggins
allowed
appear
jury
status
one
defending
outset
trial
judge
carefully
explained
jury
wiggins
appearing
pro
se
record
wiggins
counsel
examined
prospective
jurors
voir
dire
prosecution
witnesses
examined
witnesses
made
opening
statement
defense
wiggins
objected
prosecutor
case
least
often
counsel
wiggins
closing
statement
jury
compete
one
made
counsel
wiggins
agreed
advance
arrangement
contrast
counsel
interruptions
wiggins
witnesses
questioned
wiggins
presence
jury
perfunctory
counsel
uninvited
comments
directed
prosecutor
interruptions
present
little
threat
defendant
faretta
rights
least
defendant
view
regarding
objections
clearly
articulated
rare
occasions
disagreements
counsel
wiggins
aired
presence
jury
trial
judge
consistently
ruled
wiggins
favor
pattern
likely
reinforce
detract
appearance
wiggins
controlling
defense
intrusions
counsel
wiggins
trial
simply
substantial
frequent
enough
seriously
undermined
wiggins
appearance
jury
status
one
representing
vi
faretta
affirmed
defendant
constitutional
right
appear
stage
trial
recognize
pro
se
defendant
may
wish
dance
solo
pas
de
deux
standby
counsel
must
generally
respect
preference
counsel
need
excluded
altogether
especially
participation
outside
presence
jury
defendant
express
tacit
consent
defendant
case
allowed
make
appearances
saw
fit
judgment
counsel
unsolicited
involvement
held
within
reasonable
limits
judgment
appeals
therefore
reversed
footnotes
petition
read
comes
carl
edwin
wiggins
defendant
styled
numbered
cause
respectfully
petitions
appoint
counsel
represent
said
felony
cause
show
poor
employ
counsel
request
read
pertinent
part
indicted
four
times
offense
according
higgins
state
snow
state
prosecutions
dismissed
according
vaccp
art
sic
tried
please
appoint
counsel
cite
authorities
issue
also
favor
state
find
authorities
indicating
prosecution
barred
none
indicating
sic
original
emphasis
included
motion
discovery
motion
set
aside
indictment
double
jeopardy
claim
motion
limine
motion
special
relief
motion
correct
offense
report
motion
discovery
exculpatory
material
prosecutor
file
motion
keep
marked
document
sight
jury
motion
sequester
jury
another
motion
limine
motion
change
venue
withdrawn
defendant
motion
speedy
trial
motion
jury
shuffle
motion
witness
fees
wiggins
made
opening
statement
venire
examined
individual
venirepersons
included
motion
acquittal
motion
question
witness
presence
jury
motion
appointment
investigator
pro
se
defendant
must
generally
accept
unsolicited
help
hindrance
may
come
judge
chooses
call
question
witnesses
prosecutor
faithfully
exercises
duty
present
evidence
favorable
defense
plural
voices
speaking
defense
trial
one
defendant
amicus
counsel
appointed
assist
see
brown
app
burger
concurring
part
since
right
right
exercised
usually
increases
likelihood
trial
outcome
unfavorable
defendant
denial
amenable
harmless
error
analysis
right
either
respected
denied
deprivation
harmless
corollary
however
defendant
exercises
right
appear
pro
se
thereafter
complain
quality
defense
amounted
denial
effective
assistance
counsel
faretta
moreover
defendant
right
proceed
pro
se
exists
larger
context
criminal
trial
designed
determine
whether
defendant
guilty
offense
charged
trial
judge
may
required
make
numerous
rulings
reconciling
participation
standby
counsel
pro
se
defendant
objection
participation
nothing
nature
faretta
right
suggests
usual
deference
judgment
calls
issues
trial
judge
obtain
elsewhere
faretta
anticipated
second
requirement
standby
counsel
faretta
cited
three
pages
dougherty
app
find
statement
utility
amicus
appointment
dependent
explanation
cooperation
defendant
understanding
may
claim
merit
pro
se
rights
include
right
appear
jury
status
one
defending
defeated
conspicuous
role
played
attorney
unless
clearly
appears
jury
status
defense
counsel
omitted
cf
aba
standards
criminal
justice
ed
standby
counsel
may
call
judge
attention
matters
favorable
accused
upon
judge
rule
motion
uniform
rule
criminal
procedure
mayberry
pennsylvania
burger
concurring
record
see
occasions
wiggins
simply
react
standby
counsel
participation
see
wiggins
later
came
regret
unavailability
transcript
claimed
never
waived
right
receive
wiggins
given
full
opportunity
question
witness
graham
finished
graham
objection
honor
district
attorney
testifying
lead
graham
ask
instruct
jury
disregard
remarks
counsel
testimony
case
instruct
jury
disregard
last
statement
made
rodriguez
graham
notwithstanding
instruction
sure
prejudicial
require
mistrial
defendant
honor
object
mistrial
object
counsel
denied
motion
mistrial
overruled
graham
jesus
christ
graham
registered
objections
course
prosecutor
questioning
witnesses
closing
argument
involved
pedestrian
matters
hearsay
leading
witness
calling
conclusion
evidence
record
one
made
without
comment
wiggins
sustained
trial
judge
without
argument
prosecutor
note
first
trial
wiggins
asked
agreed
standby
counsel
make
objections
without
first
consulting
wiggins
several
occasions
second
trial
wiggins
expressly
joined
counsel
objections
motions
might
suggested
fact
trial
interrupted
several
times
standby
counsel
prevented
wiggins
presenting
defense
effectively
jury
line
argument
withstand
scrutiny
count
jury
left
courtroom
times
time
indictment
read
time
jury
retired
deliberate
question
guilt
best
tell
four
interruptions
caused
standby
counsel
four
wiggins
seven
likewise
count
conferences
presence
jury
wiggins
counsel
eight
appear
initiated
wiggins
two
four
standby
counsel
determine
initiated
remaining
three
certainly
trial
judge
expressed
view
wiggins
responsible
delays
interruptions
circumstances
interruptions
caused
standby
counsel
significantly
detract
wiggins
control
appearance
control
pro
se
defense
justice
white
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
join
dissenting
sixth
amendment
accords
accused
fundamental
right
assistance
counsel
also
recognized
embodies
correlative
right
dispense
lawyer
help
adams
ex
rel
mccann
manage
one
defense
faretta
california
believe
undeniable
criminal
prosecutions
defendants
better
defend
counsel
guidance
unskilled
efforts
nevertheless
faretta
establishes
right
counsel
right
one
case
presented
competently
effectively
jones
barnes
brennan
dissenting
right
defend
personal
faretta
text
structure
sixth
amendment
well
jurisprudence
amendment
emerged
comport
nearly
universal
conviction
part
people
well
courts
forcing
lawyer
upon
unwilling
defendant
contrary
basic
right
defend
truly
wants
thus
accused
knowingly
intelligently
voluntarily
elects
constitutionally
entitled
refuse
services
attorney
develop
present
defense
granting
wiggins
request
allowed
represent
trial
designated
two
appointed
attorneys
standby
counsel
made
clear
served
purely
advisory
capacity
one
attorneys
soon
began
assume
active
role
proceedings
wiggins
protested
counsel
unsolicited
participation
frustrating
conduct
defense
trial
informed
wiggins
receive
counsel
aid
whether
wanted
refused
instruct
standby
counsel
volunteer
assistance
without
request
wiggins
wiggins
made
numerous
pretrial
motions
directly
examined
witnesses
state
witnesses
attempted
argue
case
jury
stages
bifurcated
trial
trial
go
smoothly
standby
counsel
continuously
participated
proceedings
outside
presence
jury
wiggins
estelle
rehearing
denied
addition
making
objections
motions
numerous
cite
counsel
argued
wiggins
moved
mistrial
wishes
several
points
trial
twice
cursed
presence
jury
although
petitioner
characterizes
counsel
participation
limited
intermittent
nothing
truth
standby
counsel
intervened
substantial
manner
without
wiggins
permission
well
times
course
trial
many
interruptions
precipitated
direct
conflicts
wiggins
counsel
often
presence
jury
see
app
although
trial
appears
resolved
conflicts
calling
ruling
wiggins
favor
mere
existence
disrupted
proceedings
turned
trial
ordeal
jury
required
suffer
see
record
several
points
trial
moreover
counsel
blatantly
interfered
wiggins
attempt
present
defense
manner
calling
ruling
bench
see
app
course
way
knowing
extent
wiggins
defense
subtly
undermined
adversely
affected
counsel
extensive
unsolicited
participation
appeals
little
trouble
concluding
counsel
conduct
expressly
tacitly
approved
trial
prevented
wiggins
conducting
defense
although
appeals
recognized
trial
courts
empowered
appoint
standby
counsel
pro
se
defendants
declared
standby
counsel
seen
heard
standby
counsel
fifth
circuit
made
clear
compete
defendant
supersede
defense
rather
presence
advisory
purposes
used
used
defendant
sees
fit
ibid
footnotes
omitted
recognized
cases
counsel
interjections
innocuous
reversal
necessary
every
time
overzealous
counsel
acting
best
interests
client
volunteer
aid
without
prior
permission
continuous
substantial
intervention
standby
counsel
despite
wiggins
repeated
demands
play
passive
role
anything
negative
impact
jury
also
destroyed
wiggins
perception
conducting
defense
emphasis
original
appeals
thus
held
state
failed
demonstrate
wiggins
prejudiced
counsel
participation
entitled
relief
disagreeing
several
respects
affirm
judgment
appeals
ii
holds
standard
used
appeals
determining
whether
standby
counsel
improperly
encroached
wiggins
right
rigid
restrictive
conduct
standby
counsel
indicated
however
appeals
hold
every
instance
volunteered
assistance
even
every
series
instances
violate
defendant
rights
understand
appeals
holding
prevent
trial
judge
directing
defendant
consult
standby
counsel
necessary
proper
conduct
trial
insisting
defendant
agree
ground
rules
respect
standby
counsel
inject
trial
agree
trial
judge
burdened
educating
defendant
trial
procedure
able
insist
defendant
learn
needs
know
standby
counsel
judgment
contrary
view
appeals
announced
proper
standard
one
wholly
consistent
faretta
ruling
state
may
even
objection
accused
appoint
standby
counsel
aid
accused
accused
requests
help
faretta
california
applied
acceptable
way
event
seems
proffers
poor
substitute
approach
appeals
iii
observes
ante
faretta
presented
situation
trial
wholly
denied
defendant
request
proceed
pro
se
required
address
state
charges
appointed
attorney
wiggins
unlike
faretta
allowed
proceed
pro
se
took
active
role
trial
concludes
basis
examination
record
wiggins
afforded
fair
chance
present
case
way
ante
counsel
unsolicited
involvement
held
within
reasonable
limits
ante
arrives
conclusion
applying
test
judgment
provides
little
guidance
counsel
trial
judges
imposes
difficult
impossible
burdens
appellate
courts
undoubtedly
lead
swift
erosion
defendants
constitutional
right
proceed
pro
se
new
test
necessary
determine
whether
pro
se
defendant
retained
actual
control
case
chose
present
jury
ante
whether
standby
counsel
participation
destroy
ed
jury
perception
defendant
representing
ibid
although
test
purports
protect
values
underlying
holding
faretta
unclear
whether
achieve
result
long
pro
se
defendant
allowed
say
first
prong
test
accords
standby
counsel
bench
trial
proceeding
outside
presence
jury
virtually
untrammeled
discretion
present
factual
legal
argument
defendant
object
limits
placed
counsel
participation
context
actual
control
test
apparent
real
first
counsel
may
make
substantially
interfere
significant
tactical
decisions
ibid
unless
counsel
directly
overrides
defendant
strategy
presence
judge
however
apparent
courts
almost
wholly
incapable
assessing
subtle
effects
counsel
participation
defense
second
suggests
conflicts
pro
se
defendant
standby
counsel
matter
normally
left
defense
discretion
ante
resolved
defendant
favor
many
disagreements
produce
direct
conflicts
requiring
trial
choose
one
position
another
opinion
burden
apparently
fall
pro
se
defendant
comprehend
counsel
submissions
create
conflicts
trial
resolve
applied
way
test
surely
prove
incapable
safeguarding
interest
individual
autonomy
faretta
right
derives
although
solicitous
pro
se
defendant
interests
standby
counsel
intervenes
jury
test
second
prong
suffers
similar
shortcomings
extent
trial
appellate
courts
discern
point
counsel
unsolicited
participation
substantially
undermines
pro
se
defendant
appearance
jury
matter
harbor
substantial
doubts
decisions
certain
extent
affirm
accused
individual
dignity
autonomy
ante
incompletely
focusing
jury
views
defendant
majority
opinion
ignores
faretta
emphasis
defendant
perception
criminal
justice
system
faretta
california
supra
implies
actually
adheres
standard
purports
reject
ante
guide
standby
counsel
lower
courts
moreover
test
clearly
deficient
instead
encouraging
counsel
accept
limited
role
plainly
invites
participate
despite
clients
contrary
instructions
clients
renew
objections
trial
courts
draw
line
trial
courts
required
rule
pro
se
defendants
objections
counsel
intervention
also
left
sea
clearly
must
prevent
standby
counsel
overtly
muzzling
pro
se
clients
resolve
certain
conflicts
defendants
favor
opinion
places
clear
limits
counsel
uninvited
participation
instead
requires
trial
courts
make
numerous
subjective
judgments
concerning
effect
counsel
actions
defendants
faretta
rights
trial
courts
generally
consider
isolated
actions
standby
counsel
expressly
challenged
pro
se
defendants
appellate
courts
may
position
form
impressions
basis
entire
trial
courts
however
also
suffer
lack
clear
standards
inability
unwillingness
make
factual
inquiries
necessitated
test
short
believe
test
unworkable
insufficiently
protective
fundamental
interests
recognized
faretta
iv
inappropriateness
standard
made
manifest
conclusion
conduct
standby
counsel
case
passes
muster
standard
frequently
grievously
exceeding
proper
role
standby
counsel
active
wiggins
appointed
attorneys
distracted
wiggins
usurped
prerogatives
altered
tenor
defense
disrupted
trial
undermined
wiggins
perception
controlled
fate
faretta
california
induced
belief
assuredly
unfounded
sincerely
held
nevertheless
law
contrive
ibid
see
app
record
undoubtedly
reduced
wiggins
credibility
prejudiced
eyes
jury
allowing
intervention
continue
despite
wiggins
repeated
requests
cease
trial
clearly
denied
wiggins
right
right
present
control
one
defense
means
little
indeed
one
standby
attorneys
remain
free
take
action
choose
whether
consistent
desired
defense
inimical
point
trial
short
whatever
advantage
satisfaction
wiggins
might
hoped
derive
see
aba
standards
criminal
justice
ed
surely
nullified
trial
tolerance
counsel
conduct
reaches
different
conclusion
pinning
blame
interference
right
proceed
pro
se
wiggins
dissecting
counsel
activities
discrete
categories
failing
consider
overall
impact
tactics
course
required
factfinding
function
normally
left
district
courts
neither
approach
withstand
scrutiny
particularly
trial
expressly
refused
order
standby
counsel
serve
purely
advisory
capacity
pro
se
defendant
reasonably
expected
object
counsel
every
action
trial
initial
decision
tend
impress
upon
defendant
futility
continuing
objections
also
repeated
objections
destroy
impression
defendant
seeks
convey
jury
accordingly
defendant
acquiescence
violation
faretta
right
immunize
violation
judicial
review
similarly
fact
pro
se
defendant
trial
approval
authorized
standby
counsel
perform
discrete
representational
function
give
rise
presumption
defendant
also
sanctioned
subsequent
interference
conduct
trial
event
glaring
intrusions
counsel
occurred
without
wiggins
blessing
considered
isolation
many
types
interference
standby
counsel
pro
se
defense
likely
appear
inconsequential
desire
compartmentalize
counsel
actions
understandable
view
led
ignore
cumulative
effect
counsel
frequent
participation
wiggins
right
defend
extent
rests
proposition
every
transgression
standby
counsel
constitutes
reversible
error
quarrel
reasoning
trial
tolerance
isolated
innocuous
participation
standby
counsel
perhaps
characterized
line
appeals
holding
harmless
constitutional
error
one
also
conclude
participation
simply
rise
level
constitutional
violation
second
formulation
clearly
preferable
unnecessary
choose
resolve
case
since
wiggins
prevail
either
view
also
seems
standard
different
applied
appeals
govern
case
content
announcing
remanding
appeals
reconsideration
light
standard
rather
undertaking
apply
new
standard
first
instance
course
comport
proper
roles
functions
courts
appeals
due
respect
dissent
affirm
judgment
appeals
defendant
honor
like
defend
appreciate
sir
ask
man
let
defend
graham
certainly
help
defendant
grateful
solicited
assistance
honor
want
going
get
help
assistance
obviously
lawyer
defendant
yes
sir
lawyer
trial
go
going
conducted
according
rules
law
defendant
yes
sir
might
occasion
going
require
consult
proper
procedure
may
defendant
yes
sir
every
right
made
available
law
able
determine
defendant
appreciate
honor
assistant
counsel
initiate
something
defendant
want
like
consult
attorneys
advice
appreciate
counsels
sic
initiate
something
contrary
defendant
defense
well
appreciate
app
waiving
ten
days
far
graham
concerned
defendant
yes
honor
basis
expect
attorney
pro
se
defendant
yes
honor
fact
like
waive
assistance
may
going
relieve
use
use
available
case
defendant
yes
sir
ask
ask
graham
take
initiative
interfere
defendant
may
well
defendant
mean
want
graham
help
ask
appreciate
volunteer
without
asking
well
graham
competent
attorney
much
experience
type
thing
sure
trying
thinks
best
going
order
anything
problem
situation
arises
act
time
going
order
defendant
honor
understand
forcing
services
graham
defendant
availability
yes
defendant
may
except
honor
numerous
disagreements
wiggins
counsel
wiggins
moved
request
assistance
trial
defendant
may
say
peculiar
honor
really
appreciate
conduct
defense
without
assistance
interruptions
counsel
respect
graham
right
graham
sit
third
chair
move
back
one
notch
going
order
graham
know
competent
counsel
let
suggest
unless
consults
thing
anyway
object
ask
questions
unless
requests
consult
know
proper
way
something
see
also
record
notwithstanding
admonition
counsel
continued
act
accord
disrupt
presentation
wiggins
defense
throughout
trial
cogently
observed
related
context
umerous
strategic
tactical
decisions
must
made
course
criminal
trial
many
made
circumstances
allow
extended
consultation
every
experienced
advocate
recall
disconcerting
experience
trying
conduct
examination
witness
follow
opposing
arguments
judge
charge
client
plucks
attorney
sleeve
offering
gratuitous
suggestions
aba
standards
criminal
justice
ed
among
things
standby
counsel
actions
created
need
numerous
conferences
hearing
jury
disruptive
vexatious
possibly
prejudicial
effects
repeated
bench
conferences
long
recognized
indeed
expressly
acknowledged
trial
see
record
attempt
attribute
many
interruptions
solely
wiggins
conduct
unpersuasive
although
attributes
counsel
extensive
participation
penalty
phase
trial
conclusion
wiggins
appearing
pro
se
best
interests
equally
plausible
assumption
wiggins
simply
gave
attempted
result
trial
approval
counsel
repeated
interruptions
guilt
phase
nature
right
defend
pro
se
renders
traditional
harmless
error
doctrine
peculiarly
inapposite
unlike
constitutional
rights
right
represent
oneself
normal
operation
harmless
error
doctrine
cases
challenged
error
concerns
right
accorded
defendant
facilitate
defense
insulate
suspect
evidence
contrast
recognize
defendant
right
defend
pro
se
primarily
belief
thereby
stands
better
chance
winning
case
rather
deference
axiomatic
notion
person
ultimately
responsible
choosing
fate
including
position
law
defendant
moral
right
stand
alone
hour
trial
embrace
consequences
course
action
chapman
omitted
see
moreno
estelle
bittaker
enomoto
cert
denied
dougherty
app
plattner
people
tyner
cal
app
cal
rptr
see
people
sharp
cal
cert
denied
burney
state
cert
denied
state
kirby
neb
see
also
walker
loggins
carter
dissenting
case
trial
completely
denies
defendant
right
application
standard
cases
like
one
defendant
allowed
proceed
pro
se
conduct
appointed
standby
counsel
inhibited
ability
result
denigration
right
counsel
interference
characterized
de
minimis
consistent
nature
right
conclude
violation
occurred
say
violation
harmless
constitutional
error
case
counsel
acted
substantial
autonomy
significantly
interfered
pro
se
defendant
presentation
defense
reversal
follow
automatically
without
inquiry
question
whether
constitutional
violation
likely
affected
outcome
trial