ristaino
ross
argued
decided
march
absent
circumstances
comparable
significance
existing
ham
south
carolina
examination
veniremen
voir
dire
racial
prejudice
held
constitutionally
required
instant
case
involved
prosecution
respondent
negro
violent
crimes
white
security
guard
respondent
show
circumstances
thus
error
constitutional
dimensions
state
trial
judge
questioned
veniremen
general
bias
prejudice
declined
question
specifically
racial
prejudice
pp
reversed
powell
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
blackmun
rehnquist
joined
white
filed
statement
concurring
result
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
stevens
took
part
consideration
decision
case
barbara
smith
assistant
attorney
general
massachusetts
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
francis
bellotti
attorney
general
john
irwin
david
mills
assistant
attorneys
general
michael
west
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
respondent
negro
convicted
state
violent
crimes
white
security
guard
trial
judge
denied
respondent
motion
question
specifically
directed
racial
prejudice
asked
voir
dire
addition
customary
questions
directed
general
bias
prejudice
narrow
issue
whether
recent
decision
ham
south
carolina
respondent
constitutionally
entitled
require
asking
question
specifically
directed
racial
prejudice
broader
issue
presented
whether
ham
announced
requirement
applicable
whenever
may
confrontation
criminal
trial
persons
different
races
different
ethnic
origins
answer
questions
negative
respondent
james
ross
tried
massachusetts
two
negroes
armed
robbery
assault
battery
means
dangerous
weapon
assault
battery
intent
murder
victim
alleged
crimes
white
man
employed
boston
university
uniformed
security
guard
voir
dire
prospective
jurors
conducted
required
statute
inquire
generally
prejudice
see
infra
defendant
represented
separate
counsel
made
written
motion
prospective
jurors
also
questioned
specifically
racial
prejudice
defendant
also
moved
veniremen
asked
affiliations
law
enforcement
agencies
trial
judge
consulted
counsel
defendants
motions
tentatively
indicating
felt
purpose
accomplished
asking
questions
instance
judge
invited
views
counsel
thought
something
donnelly
counsel
codefendant
said
might
wanted
record
something
peculiar
case
peculiar
circumstances
operating
perhaps
want
say
open
anything
peculiar
donnelly
donnelly
fact
victim
white
defendants
black
unfortunately
problem
us
hope
pray
jurors
take
oaths
seriously
understand
spirit
oath
understand
spirit
says
judge
anyway
sure
judges
take
time
impress
upon
trial
verdict
oath
means
says
decide
case
evidence
extraneous
considerations
believe
best
done
respect
problems
said
regard
extremely
important
app
voir
dire
five
panels
prospective
jurors
commenced
trial
judge
briefly
familiarized
panel
facts
case
omitting
reference
racial
matters
explained
panel
clerk
ask
general
question
impartiality
question
affiliations
law
enforcement
agencies
consistently
announced
intention
impress
upon
jurors
decide
case
evidence
extraneous
considerations
judge
preceded
questioning
panel
extended
discussion
obligations
jurors
remarks
clerk
posed
questions
indicated
panel
panelists
answering
question
affirmatively
questioned
individually
bench
judge
presence
counsel
procedure
led
excusing
veniremen
cause
grounds
prejudice
including
one
panelist
admitted
racial
bias
jury
eventually
impaneled
convicted
defendant
counts
direct
appeal
ross
contended
federal
constitutional
rights
violated
denial
request
prospective
jurors
questioned
specifically
racial
prejudice
contention
rejected
judicial
massachusetts
commonwealth
ross
mass
ross
sought
writ
certiorari
petition
pending
held
ham
trial
failure
request
question
veniremen
specifically
racial
prejudice
denied
ham
due
process
law
granted
ross
petition
certiorari
remanded
reconsideration
light
ham
judicial
affirmed
ross
conviction
commonwealth
ross
mass
reasoned
ham
turned
need
questions
racial
prejudice
presented
facts
announce
new
broad
constitutional
principle
requiring
questions
put
prospective
jurors
state
criminal
trials
defendant
black
ross
sought
certiorari
writ
denied
present
case
ross
renewed
contention
collateral
attack
federal
habeas
corpus
relying
ham
district
granted
writ
habeas
corpus
appeals
first
circuit
affirmed
appeals
assumed
ham
turned
facts
held
facts
ross
case
involving
violence
white
status
close
police
officer
presented
need
specific
questioning
racial
prejudice
similar
ham
think
appeals
read
ham
broadly
ii
constitution
always
entitle
defendant
questions
posed
voir
dire
specifically
directed
matters
conceivably
might
prejudice
veniremen
ham
supra
voir
dire
conducted
supervision
great
deal
must
necessity
left
sound
discretion
connors
see
ham
supra
aldridge
determination
impartiality
demeanor
plays
important
part
particularly
within
province
trial
judge
rideau
louisiana
clark
dissenting
thus
state
obligation
defendant
impanel
impartial
jury
generally
satisfied
less
inquiry
specific
prejudice
feared
defendant
ham
supra
ham
however
recognized
cases
may
present
circumstances
impermissible
threat
fair
trial
guaranteed
due
process
posed
trial
refusal
question
prospective
jurors
specifically
racial
prejudice
voir
dire
ham
involved
negro
tried
south
carolina
courts
possession
marihuana
well
known
locale
trial
civil
rights
activist
defense
law
enforcement
officials
framed
narcotics
charge
get
activities
despite
circumstances
trial
judge
denied
ham
request
voir
dire
include
questions
specifically
directed
racial
prejudice
reversed
judgment
conviction
essential
fairness
required
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
requires
facts
shown
record
defendant
permitted
jurors
interrogated
voir
dire
issue
racial
bias
terms
ham
announce
requirement
universal
applicability
rather
reflected
assessment
whether
circumstances
presented
constitutionally
significant
likelihood
absent
questioning
racial
prejudice
jurors
indifferent
stand
unsworne
coke
littleton
ed
approach
ham
consistent
determinations
state
denied
defendant
due
process
failing
impanel
impartial
jury
see
irvin
dowd
rideau
louisiana
supra
turner
louisiana
cf
avery
georgia
circumstances
ham
strongly
suggested
need
voir
dire
include
specific
questioning
racial
prejudice
ham
defense
framed
civil
rights
activities
prominence
community
civil
rights
activist
already
known
veniremen
inevitably
revealed
members
jury
course
presentation
defense
racial
issues
therefore
inextricably
bound
conduct
trial
ham
reputation
civil
rights
activist
defense
interposed
likely
intensify
prejudice
individual
members
jury
might
harbor
circumstances
deemed
voir
dire
included
questioning
specifically
directed
racial
prejudice
sought
ham
necessary
meet
constitutional
requirement
impartial
jury
impaneled
agree
appeals
need
question
veniremen
specifically
racial
prejudice
also
rose
constitutional
dimensions
case
mere
fact
victim
crimes
alleged
white
man
defendants
negroes
less
likely
distort
trial
special
factors
involved
ham
victim
status
security
officer
also
relied
upon
appeals
cited
respective
defense
counsel
primarily
separate
source
prejudice
aggravating
racial
factor
see
supra
trial
judge
dealt
question
affiliations
circumstances
thus
suggest
significant
likelihood
racial
prejudice
might
infect
ross
trial
made
clear
trial
judge
ross
unable
support
motion
concerning
voir
dire
pointing
racial
factors
existed
ham
others
comparable
significance
circumstances
trial
judge
acted
within
constitution
determining
demands
due
process
satisfied
generalized
thorough
inquiry
impartiality
veniremen
accordingly
judgment
reversed
footnotes
donnelly
one
thing
reference
make
facts
case
victim
white
security
guard
uniform
acting
policeman
newman
counsel
ross
think
factor
might
suggest
question
series
questions
asking
jurors
whether
relatives
policemen
going
adopt
newman
suggestion
double
problem
problem
skin
color
also
problem
someone
quasi
policeman
going
ask
question
area
relations
police
questions
substance
following
related
defendants
victim
interest
case
formed
opinion
sensible
bias
prejudice
make
known
time
presently
past
worked
police
department
district
attorney
office
relative
engaged
work
addressed
one
panel
part
follows
nder
oath
absolute
duty
render
fair
impartial
verdicts
sic
based
upon
evidence
hear
courtroom
extraneous
factors
clerk
asking
first
question
giving
opportunity
inform
believe
render
fair
impartial
verdict
evidence
case
giving
opportunity
inform
serious
doubt
whether
render
fair
impartial
verdict
evidence
case
question
oath
question
asked
believe
render
fair
impartial
verdict
evidence
case
doubt
whether
render
fair
impartial
verdict
evidence
case
duty
inform
question
asked
standing
raising
hand
app
least
venireman
knew
defendants
negroes
see
member
first
panel
questioned
record
shows
immediately
questioning
panel
defendants
directed
stand
set
bar
tried
appears
formality
pursued
questioning
first
panel
cf
nothing
record
lodged
indicates
whether
veniremen
panels
knew
defendants
negroes
although
presumably
defendants
remained
courtroom
throughout
questioning
criminal
defendant
state
guaranteed
impartial
jury
sixth
amendment
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
duncan
louisiana
principles
due
process
also
guarantee
defendant
impartial
jury
see
irvin
dowd
questions
proposed
ham
fairly
try
case
basis
evidence
disregarding
defendant
race
prejudice
negroes
black
people
influenced
use
term
black
defending
judgment
appeals
ross
argues
sweeping
per
se
rule
least
crimes
violence
involved
require
defense
motions
voir
dire
racial
prejudice
granted
case
defendant
different
race
victim
require
similar
result
whenever
defendant
sought
voir
dire
racial
prejudice
race
adverse
witnesses
tr
oral
arg
note
per
se
rule
principle
limited
cases
involving
possible
racial
prejudice
apply
equal
force
whenever
voir
dire
questioning
ethnic
origins
sought
logic
encompass
questions
concerning
factors
religious
affiliation
national
origin
see
aldridge
heterogeneous
society
policy
well
constitutional
considerations
militate
divisive
assumption
per
se
rule
justice
law
may
turn
upon
pigmentation
skin
accident
birth
choice
religion
see
connors
although
hold
voir
dire
questioning
directed
racial
prejudice
constitutionally
required
wiser
course
generally
propound
appropriate
questions
designed
identify
racial
prejudice
requested
defendant
supervisory
power
required
much
federal
faced
circumstances
see
aldridge
supra
cf
walker
cert
denied
booker
also
free
allow
require
questions
demanded
constitution
fact
judicial
massachusetts
suggested
guidelines
massachusetts
trial
courts
questioning
racial
prejudice
voir
dire
commonwealth
lumley
mass
commonwealth
ross
mass
facts
resemble
many
respects
aldridge
supra
overturned
conviction
negro
murder
white
policeman
federal
trial
judge
refused
defendant
request
venire
questioned
racial
prejudice
ham
relied
part
aldridge
finding
inquiry
racial
prejudice
voir
dire
sought
ham
constitutional
stature
aldridge
one
factor
relevant
constitutional
decision
ham
rely
directly
precedential
force
rather
noted
aldridge
expressly
grounded
upon
constitutional
requirement
light
holding
today
actual
result
aldridge
recognized
exercise
supervisory
power
federal
courts
cf
supra
justice
white
concurs
result
ground
ham
south
carolina
announced
new
constitutional
rule
applicable
federal
state
criminal
trials
rule
applied
retroactively
cases
involving
trials
occurred
prior
decision
ham
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
refused
review
affirmance
direct
appeal
ross
conviction
dissenting
refusal
observed
deny
petition
certiorari
see
decision
ham
south
carolina
stillborn
write
epitaph
essential
demands
fairness
recognized
years
ago
aldridge
today
reversing
appeals
affirmance
district
grant
writ
habeas
corpus
emphatically
confirms
promises
inherent
ham
aldridge
fulfilled
reasons
expressed
dissent
earlier
denial
certiorari
join
confirmation
accordingly
respectfully
dissent