morton
argued
april
decided
june
respondent
air
force
colonel
stationed
alaska
finance
office
base
received
certified
mail
writ
garnishment
accompanied
copy
judgment
respondent
issued
alabama
state
divorce
proceeding
writ
directed
air
force
withhold
respondent
pay
satisfy
sums
due
judgment
alimony
child
support
upon
notified
writ
respondent
told
finance
office
alabama
order
void
jurisdiction
nevertheless
finance
office
honored
writ
paid
alabama
deducting
amount
respondent
pay
subsequently
respondent
brought
action
claims
recover
amount
withheld
pay
government
submitted
complete
defense
provides
connection
making
federal
employees
including
members
armed
services
subject
legal
process
enforce
child
support
alimony
payment
obligations
either
disbursing
officer
governmental
entity
shall
liable
respect
payment
made
moneys
due
payable
individual
pursuant
legal
process
regular
face
payment
made
accordance
statute
implementing
regulations
claims
held
writ
garnishment
legal
process
within
meaning
definition
term
requires
issued
competent
jurisdiction
alabama
personal
jurisdiction
respondent
therefore
respondent
entitled
recover
amount
claimed
appeals
affirmed
holding
obligor
notifies
government
issuing
garnishment
order
personal
jurisdiction
order
constitute
legal
process
regular
face
within
meaning
held
government
held
liable
honoring
writ
garnishment
one
question
regular
face
issued
jurisdiction
issue
orders
pp
words
legal
process
must
read
light
immediately
following
phrase
regular
face
phrase
makes
clear
term
legal
process
require
issuing
personal
jurisdiction
plain
language
escaped
simply
obligor
may
provided
information
casting
doubt
issuing
jurisdiction
inquiry
jurisdiction
obligor
squared
plain
language
requires
recipient
writ
act
basis
face
process
pp
legislative
history
shows
congress
contemplate
kind
inquiry
personal
jurisdiction
appeals
holding
require
history
well
plain
language
also
indicates
congress
intended
government
receive
treatment
private
employer
respect
garnishment
orders
whereby
great
majority
jurisdictions
employer
upon
complying
garnishment
order
discharged
liability
judgment
debtor
extent
payment
made
moreover
burdening
garnishment
process
inquiry
issuing
jurisdiction
debtor
frustrate
fundamental
purpose
remedying
plight
persons
left
destitute
speedy
efficacious
means
ensuring
child
support
alimony
paid
pp
controlling
weight
must
given
implementing
regulations
expressly
provide
government
receives
legal
process
face
appears
conform
laws
jurisdiction
issued
government
required
ascertain
whether
issuing
authority
obtained
personal
jurisdiction
obligor
regulations
possibly
considered
clearly
inconsistent
statute
arbitrary
congressional
intent
facilitate
speedy
enforcement
garnishment
orders
minimize
burden
government
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
unanimous
michael
mcconnell
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
briefs
solicitor
general
lee
acting
assistant
attorney
general
willard
deputy
solicitor
general
geller
leonard
schaitman
wendy
keats
mary
mitchelson
kaletah
carroll
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
dan
kinter
filed
brief
sacramento
county
california
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
liable
sums
withheld
pay
one
employees
compiled
direction
withhold
sums
contained
writ
garnishment
issued
without
personal
jurisdiction
employee
december
respondent
colonel
air
force
stationed
elmendorf
air
force
base
alaska
date
elmendorf
finance
office
received
certified
mail
writ
garnishment
accompanied
copy
judgment
respondent
issued
circuit
tenth
judicial
circuit
alabama
divorce
proceeding
writ
regular
form
used
alabama
directed
air
force
withhold
respondent
pay
satisfy
sums
due
judgment
alimony
child
support
finance
office
promptly
notified
respondent
received
writ
advice
air
force
attorney
respondent
told
finance
office
state
order
void
alabama
jurisdiction
nevertheless
finance
officer
honored
writ
paid
clerk
alabama
deducting
amount
respondent
pay
subsequently
additional
writs
garnishment
served
air
force
similar
results
respondent
apparently
never
made
attempt
contest
garnishment
beyond
initial
protest
elmendorf
finance
office
eventually
however
effect
collaterally
attacked
garnishment
bringing
action
recover
amounts
withheld
pay
remitted
alabama
government
took
position
complete
defense
since
congress
statute
provided
neither
disbursing
officer
governmental
entity
shall
liable
respect
payment
made
moneys
due
payable
individual
pursuant
legal
process
regular
face
payment
made
accordance
section
regulations
issued
carry
section
appeals
federal
circuit
affirmed
concluded
obligor
notifies
government
issuing
garnishment
order
personal
jurisdiction
order
constitute
legal
process
regular
face
within
meaning
statute
judge
nies
dissented
reasoning
statute
required
state
jurisdiction
enter
writ
garnishment
notice
respondent
provided
disbursing
officer
affect
question
whether
alabama
competent
jurisdiction
holding
federal
circuit
creates
substantial
risk
imposing
significant
liabilities
upon
result
garnishment
proceedings
decision
created
conflict
circuits
granted
government
petition
certiorari
ten
years
ago
congress
decided
compensation
payable
federal
employees
including
members
armed
services
subject
legal
process
enforce
employees
obligations
provide
child
support
make
alimony
payments
section
social
services
amendments
stat
enacted
result
amended
currently
provides
notwithstanding
provision
law
effective
january
moneys
entitlement
based
upon
remuneration
employment
due
payable
district
columbia
including
agency
subdivision
instrumentality
thereof
individual
including
members
armed
services
shall
subject
like
manner
extent
district
columbia
private
person
legal
process
brought
enforcement
individual
legal
obligations
provide
child
support
make
alimony
payments
ii
assume
government
alabama
lacked
jurisdiction
respondent
issued
writs
garnishment
based
assumption
respondent
defends
judgment
arguing
alabama
competent
jurisdiction
hence
orders
satisfy
statutory
definition
legal
process
look
words
competent
jurisdiction
isolation
concede
statute
ambiguous
concept
competent
jurisdiction
though
usually
used
refer
jurisdiction
also
used
occasion
refer
jurisdiction
defendant
person
however
construe
statutory
phrases
isolation
read
statutes
whole
thus
words
legal
process
must
read
light
immediately
following
phrase
regular
face
phrase
makes
clear
term
legal
process
require
issuing
personal
jurisdiction
jurisdiction
defines
authority
hear
given
type
case
whereas
personal
jurisdiction
protects
individual
interest
implicated
nonresident
defendant
haled
distant
possibly
inconvenient
forum
see
insurance
ireland
compagnie
des
bauxites
de
guinee
strength
interest
particular
case
ascertained
face
process
determined
evaluating
specific
aggregation
facts
well
possible
vagaries
law
forum
determining
relationship
defendant
case
obligor
forum
possibly
particular
controversy
makes
reasonable
expect
defendant
defend
action
filed
forum
state
statutory
requirement
garnishee
refer
face
process
patently
inconsistent
kind
inquiry
may
required
ascertain
whether
issuing
jurisdiction
obligor
person
plain
language
escaped
simply
obligor
may
provided
information
raises
doubt
concerning
issuing
jurisdiction
must
appeals
holding
case
determination
based
information
provided
obligor
rather
required
statute
face
writ
garnishment
writ
simply
direction
garnishee
contains
information
shedding
light
upon
issuing
jurisdiction
obligor
inquiry
issuing
jurisdiction
debtor
squared
plain
language
statute
requires
recipient
writ
act
basis
face
process
iii
legislative
history
contain
specific
discussion
precise
question
presented
case
however
show
congress
contemplate
kind
inquiry
personal
jurisdiction
appeals
holding
require
plainly
identifies
legislative
objectives
compromised
requiring
inquiry
colloquy
floor
house
consideration
legislation
two
principal
sponsors
made
clear
face
writ
garnishment
basis
garnishment
federal
employee
salary
st
germain
essentially
mother
wife
goes
state
gets
judgment
proceeds
judgment
execution
proceeds
garnishment
correct
ullman
gentleman
correct
st
germain
conditions
precedent
ullman
garnishment
basis
order
decision
basis
order
trial
case
father
mother
failing
live
obligations
st
germain
correct
alimony
ullman
right
alimony
cong
rec
liability
private
employers
similar
circumstances
also
illuminating
legislative
history
well
plain
language
indicates
congress
intended
government
receive
treatment
private
employer
respect
garnishment
orders
construction
statute
impose
liability
government
honoring
writ
issued
jurisdiction
inconsistent
law
applicable
private
garnishees
long
rule
least
obligor
receives
notice
garnishment
garnishee
liable
honoring
writ
garnishment
see
harris
balk
example
imposing
employers
duty
honor
writs
garnishment
district
columbia
code
congress
enacted
see
stat
provides
payments
made
conformity
section
shall
discharge
liability
employer
judgment
debtor
extent
payment
code
finally
underlying
purpose
significant
statute
enacted
remedy
plight
persons
left
destitute
speedy
efficacious
means
ensuring
child
support
alimony
paid
burdening
garnishment
process
inquiry
state
jurisdiction
obligor
frustrate
fundamental
purpose
consequence
resulting
delay
process
collection
ecause
delay
often
results
loss
substantial
rights
effect
frequently
also
make
impossible
ultimate
well
immediate
collection
due
substitute
right
lifelong
litigation
one
certain
means
subsistence
griffin
griffin
rutledge
dissenting
part
result
odds
congressional
intent
iv
part
amendment
congress
authorized
promulgation
regulations
implementation
provisions
section
last
sentence
congress
indicated
held
liable
honoring
writ
garnishment
long
payment
made
accordance
regulations
congress
explicitly
delegated
authority
construe
statute
regulation
case
must
give
regulations
legislative
hence
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
plainly
contrary
statute
moreover
implementing
regulations
simplify
disbursing
officer
task
deciding
whether
honor
writ
garnishment
entitled
special
deference
since
precise
objective
congress
delegated
authority
issue
regulations
relevant
regulations
squarely
address
question
presented
case
regulations
require
within
days
service
process
garnishee
must
give
notice
service
copy
process
employee
cfr
regulations
provide
garnishee
entity
must
honor
process
except
specified
situations
none
involves
issuing
lack
jurisdiction
employee
state
governmental
entity
receives
legal
process
face
appears
conform
laws
jurisdiction
issued
entity
shall
required
ascertain
whether
authority
issued
legal
process
obtained
personal
jurisdiction
obligor
plain
language
statute
legislative
history
underlying
purposes
well
explicit
regulations
authorized
statute
indicate
government
held
liable
honoring
writ
garnishment
regular
face
issued
jurisdiction
issue
orders
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
ordered
footnotes
statute
provides
term
legal
process
means
writ
order
summons
similar
process
nature
garnishment
issued
competent
jurisdiction
within
state
territory
possession
directed
purpose
compel
governmental
entity
holds
moneys
otherwise
payable
individual
make
payment
moneys
another
party
order
satisfy
legal
obligation
individual
provide
child
support
make
alimony
payments
see
calhoun
cert
denied
although
least
initial
garnishment
case
occurred
prior
passage
amendment
parties
agree
statute
amended
applies
case
however
ground
respondent
attacks
enforcement
writs
garnishment
thus
question
raised
concerning
sufficiency
notice
opportunity
contest
garnishment
respondent
received
prior
execution
writs
see
generally
lugar
edmondson
oil
north
georgia
finishing
fuentes
shevin
sniadach
family
finance
particular
question
raised
whether
respondent
afforded
adequate
opportunity
contest
jurisdiction
issuing
writ
jurisdiction
writ
enforced
see
generally
vanderbilt
vanderbilt
may
anderson
estin
estin
griffin
griffin
far
back
pennoyer
neff
drew
clear
distinction
competence
jurisdiction
parties
give
proceedings
validity
must
tribunal
competent
constitution
law
creation
pass
upon
suit
involves
merely
determination
personal
liability
defendant
must
brought
within
jurisdiction
service
process
within
state
voluntary
appearance
see
restatement
second
judgments
comment
see
stafford
briggs
philbrook
glodgett
chemehuevi
tribe
indians
fpc
chemical
workers
pittsburgh
plate
glass
see
keeton
hustler
magazine
volkswagen
woodson
shaffer
heitner
comptroller
general
wrote
similar
case
inquiry
whether
order
valid
face
examination
procedural
aspects
legal
process
involved
substantive
issues
whether
process
conforms
regular
face
means
facial
validity
writ
need
determined
upon
basis
scrutiny
trained
legal
mind
facial
validity
judged
light
facts
outside
writ
provisions
person
executing
writ
may
know
mathews
comp
moreover
floor
debates
also
indicate
congress
envisioned
garnishments
based
foreign
judgments
nonresident
debtors
statute
mr
white
read
conference
report
paternity
suit
brought
another
state
judgment
rendered
state
judgment
brought
back
texas
paternity
suit
action
line
brought
federal
file
garnishment
social
security
veterans
benefits
true
pettis
understand
correct
cong
rec
amendment
statute
adding
alter
state
affairs
since
specifies
circumstances
government
liable
fact
legislative
history
amendment
indicates
intended
clarify
law
see
conf
cong
rec
remarks
sens
curtis
nunn
inquiry
personal
jurisdiction
actually
inconsistent
intent
amendment
statute
memorandum
explaining
amendment
sponsors
indicated
intended
federal
agencies
respond
garnishment
orders
promptly
amendment
provides
specific
conditions
procedures
followed
section
specifies
service
legal
process
brought
enforcement
individual
obligation
provide
child
support
alimony
accomplished
certified
registered
mail
personal
service
upon
person
designated
accept
service
government
entity
process
must
accomplished
sufficient
data
permit
prompt
identification
individual
moneys
involved
provisions
permit
inexpensive
expedited
service
enable
agency
respond
efficient
way
example
explanatory
material
accompanying
amendment
stated
emphasized
fact
section
applicable
particular
moneys
necessarily
mean
moneys
subject
legal
process
merely
means
question
whether
moneys
subject
legal
process
determined
accordance
state
law
like
manner
private
person
see
code
alaska
stat
ann
see
rev
stat
ann
ark
stat
ann
cal
civ
proc
code
ann
west
supp
idaho
code
rev
ch
ind
code
iowa
code
md
cts
jud
proc
code
ann
mass
laws
ch
west
comp
laws
stat
miss
code
ann
mo
rev
stat
rev
stat
ann
stat
ann
west
supp
civ
prac
law
mckinney
cent
code
supp
ohio
rev
code
ann
supp
okla
tit
rev
stat
codified
laws
code
ann
stat
tit
rev
code
code
stat
wyo
stat
senator
montoya
said
modification
proposed
committee
provides
money
due
individual
citizen
including
service
men
women
may
garnished
result
legal
process
payment
alimony
child
support
really
means
civil
servants
military
personnel
forced
accept
full
responsibility
care
families
especially
dependent
children
way
americans
tragic
men
women
willingly
desert
children
leaving
wives
families
struggle
alone
go
already
overburdened
welfare
rolls
however
member
judiciary
legal
profession
tell
truth
always
try
avoid
responsibility
must
forced
pay
debts
president
child
support
proposal
contained
committee
substitute
give
us
opportunity
prove
women
children
justice
exists
proposal
new
believe
time
us
make
sure
small
change
made
law
order
correct
patently
disgraceful
situation
must
give
wives
children
federal
employees
retirees
legal
protections
provided
american
women
children
cong
rec
see
schweiker
gray
panthers
batterton
francis
see
cong
rec
regulations
provide
governmental
entity
shall
comply
legal
process
except
process
complied
face
conform
laws
jurisdiction
issued
legal
process
require
withholding
funds
deemed
moneys
due
payable
remuneration
employment
legal
process
brought
enforce
legal
obligation
alimony
child
support
comply
mandatory
provisions
part
order
competent
jurisdiction
enjoining
suspending
operation
legal
process
served
governmental
entity
notice
received
obligor
appealed
either
legal
process
underlying
alimony
child
support
order
payment
moneys
subject
legal
process
shall
suspended
governmental
entity
ordered
authority
resume
payments
however
suspension
action
shall
taken
applicable
law
jurisdiction
wherein
appeal
filed
requires
compliance
legal
process
appeal
pending
legal
process
issued
district
columbia
motion
quash
shall
deemed
equivalent
appeal
cfr
see
also
fed
reg
respondent
argues
entitled
deference
promulgated
office
personnel
management
suit
brought
fact
consequence
congress
authorized
issuance
regulations
problems
arising
administration
statute
addressed
litigation
often
brings
light
latent
ambiguities
unanswered
questions
might
otherwise
apparent
thus
assuming
promulgation
response
suit
demonstrates
suit
brought
light
additional
administrative
problem
type
congress
thought
addressed
regulation
opm
responded
problem
issuing
regulations
task
congress
assigned
see
generally
anderson
clayton
cert
denied
see
supra