argued
april
decided
june
held
person
trades
securities
personal
profit
using
confidential
information
misappropriated
breach
fiduciary
duty
source
information
may
held
liable
violating
rule
pp
section
proscribes
using
deceptive
device
connection
purchase
sale
security
contravention
sec
rules
commission
adopted
rule
pursuant
rulemaking
authority
liability
rule
extend
beyond
conduct
encompassed
prohibition
see
ernst
ernst
hochfelder
traditional
classical
theory
insider
trading
liability
violation
rule
occurs
corporate
insider
trades
corporation
securities
basis
material
confidential
information
obtained
reason
position
trading
qualifies
deceptive
device
relationship
trust
confidence
corporation
shareholders
insider
gives
rise
duty
disclose
abstain
trading
chiarella
complementary
misappropriation
theory
urged
government
corporate
outsider
violates
rule
misappropriates
confidential
information
securities
trading
purposes
breach
fiduciary
duty
owed
source
information
rather
persons
trades
pp
misappropriation
defined
proper
subject
charge
meets
statutory
requirement
deceptive
conduct
connection
securities
transaction
first
misappropriators
deal
deception
fiduciary
pretends
loyalty
principal
secretly
converting
principal
information
personal
gain
dupes
defrauds
principal
company
confidential
information
qualifies
property
company
right
exclusive
use
undisclosed
misappropriation
information
constitutes
fraud
akin
embezzlement
cf
carpenter
deception
nondisclosure
central
liability
misappropriation
theory
theory
thus
consistent
santa
fe
industries
green
decision
underscoring
purpose
breach
fiduciary
duty
ban
trains
conduct
manipulative
deceptive
conversely
full
disclosure
forecloses
liability
deception
essential
theory
involves
feigning
fidelity
information
source
fiduciary
discloses
source
plans
trade
information
deceptive
device
thus
violation
second
requirement
misappropriator
deceptive
use
information
connection
purchase
sale
security
satisfied
themisappropriation
theory
fiduciary
fraud
consummated
obtains
confidential
information
without
disclosure
principal
uses
information
purchasing
selling
securities
transaction
breach
duty
coincide
even
though
person
entity
defrauded
party
trade
instead
source
nonpublic
information
undisclosed
trading
basis
misappropriated
nonpublic
information
deceives
source
information
harms
members
investing
public
misappropriation
theory
tuned
animating
purpose
exchange
act
ensure
honest
markets
thereby
promoting
investor
confidence
make
scant
sense
hold
lawyer
turned
trader
like
violator
works
law
firm
representing
target
tender
offer
works
firm
representing
bidder
statute
text
requires
result
pp
eighth
circuit
erred
holding
misappropriation
theory
inconsistent
first
understood
theory
require
neither
misrepresentation
nondisclosure
explains
however
deceptive
nondisclosure
essential
liability
theory
concretely
failure
disclose
personal
trading
grand
met
dorsey
breach
duty
made
conduct
deceptive
second
eighth
circuit
misread
precedents
ruled
chiarella
dirks
sec
central
bank
denver
first
interstate
bank
denver
breach
duty
parties
securities
transaction
market
participants
investors
sufficient
give
rise
liability
chiarella
supra
expressly
left
open
question
misappropriation
theory
validity
dirks
supra
also
left
room
application
misappropriation
theory
cases
one
central
bank
discussion
concerned
private
civil
litigation
rule
criminal
liability
pp
vital
decision
criminal
liability
may
sustained
misappropriation
theory
exchange
act
requirement
government
prove
person
willfully
violated
rule
order
establish
criminal
violation
act
provision
defendant
may
imprisoned
violation
proves
knowledge
rule
requirement
culpable
intent
weakens
charge
misappropriation
theory
indefinite
permit
imposition
criminal
liability
see
boyce
motor
lines
eighth
circuit
may
address
remand
challenges
rule
convictions
pp
relevant
case
sec
exceed
rulemaking
authority
adopting
rule
without
requiring
showing
trading
issue
entailed
breach
fiduciary
duty
section
prohibits
fraudulent
acts
connection
tender
offer
authorizes
sec
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
adopted
statutory
authorization
rule
forbids
person
trade
basis
material
nonpublic
information
concerns
tender
offer
person
knows
know
acquired
insider
offeror
issuer
someone
working
behalf
unless
within
reasonable
time
purchase
sale
information
source
publicly
disclosed
rule
imposes
duty
disclose
abstain
trading
whether
trader
owes
fiduciary
duty
respect
confidentiality
information
invalidating
rule
eighth
circuit
reasoned
inter
alia
empowers
sec
identify
regulate
fraudulent
acts
create
definition
fraud
schreiber
burlington
northern
interpretations
guide
construction
chiarella
supra
failure
disclose
information
fraudulent
purposes
duty
speak
arising
fiduciary
similar
relationship
trust
confidence
need
resolve
whether
sec
fraud
defining
authority
broader
like
authority
rule
applied
cases
genre
qualifies
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
trading
material
nonpublic
information
tender
offer
context
prophylactic
measure
properly
encompasses
core
activity
prohibited
sec
may
prohibit
acts
fraudulent
common
law
prohibition
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
see
schreiber
supra
must
accord
sec
assessment
regard
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
case
sec
assessment
none
fair
assumption
trading
basis
material
nonpublic
information
often
involve
breach
duty
confidentiality
bidder
target
company
representatives
sec
cognizant
proof
problems
enable
sophisticated
traders
escape
responsibility
trading
placed
rule
disclose
abstain
trading
command
require
specific
proof
breach
fiduciary
duty
insofar
serves
toprevent
type
misappropriation
charged
rule
therefore
proper
exercise
sec
prophylactic
power
declines
consider
first
instance
alternate
arguments
rule
prohibition
trading
conflicts
violates
due
process
eighth
circuit
may
address
remand
argument
preserved
pp
rulings
securities
fraud
issues
require
reversal
eighth
circuit
judgment
mail
fraud
counts
arguments
attacking
mail
fraud
convictions
alternate
grounds
addressed
eighth
circuit
remain
open
consideration
remand
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
stevens
kennedy
souter
breyer
joined
parts
iii
iv
scalia
joined
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
rehnquist
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
wash
ington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
petitioner
james
herman
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
interpretation
enforcement
securities
exchange
act
rules
made
securities
exchange
commission
pursuant
provisions
rule
rule
two
prime
questions
presented
first
relates
misappropriation
material
nonpublic
information
securities
trading
second
concerns
fraudulent
practices
tender
offer
setting
particular
address
resolve
issues
person
trades
securities
personal
profit
using
confidential
information
misappropriated
breach
fiduciary
duty
source
information
guilty
violating
rule
commission
exceed
rulemaking
authority
adopting
rule
proscribes
trading
undisclosed
information
tender
offer
setting
even
absence
duty
disclose
answer
first
question
yes
second
question
viewed
context
case
respondent
james
herman
partner
law
firm
dorsey
whitney
minneapolis
minnesota
july
grand
metropolitan
plc
grand
met
company
based
london
england
retained
dorsey
whitney
local
counsel
represent
grand
met
regarding
potential
tender
offer
common
stock
pillsbury
company
headquartered
minneapolis
grand
met
dorsey
whitney
took
precautions
protect
confidentiality
grand
met
tender
offer
plans
work
grand
met
representation
dorsey
whitney
withdrew
representing
grand
met
september
less
month
later
october
grand
met
publicly
announced
tender
offer
pillsbury
stock
august
dorsey
whitney
still
representing
grand
met
began
purchasing
call
options
pillsbury
stock
option
gave
right
purchase
shares
pillsbury
stock
specified
date
september
later
august
september
made
additional
purchases
pillsbury
call
options
end
september
owned
unexpired
pillsbury
options
apparently
individual
investor
see
app
also
purchased
september
shares
pillsbury
common
stock
price
per
share
grand
met
announced
tender
offer
october
price
pillsbury
stock
rose
nearly
per
share
sold
pillsbury
call
options
common
stock
making
profit
million
securities
exchange
commission
sec
commission
initiated
investigation
transactions
culminating
count
indictment
indictment
alleged
defrauded
law
firm
client
grand
met
using
trad
ing
purposes
material
nonpublic
information
regarding
grand
met
planned
tender
offer
accordingto
indictment
used
profits
gained
trading
conceal
previous
embezzlement
conversion
unrelated
client
trust
funds
charged
counts
mail
fraud
violation
counts
securities
fraud
violation
securities
exchange
act
exchange
act
stat
sec
rule
cfr
counts
fraudulent
trading
connection
tender
offer
violation
exchange
act
sec
rule
cfr
counts
violating
federal
money
laundering
statutes
see
app
jury
convicted
counts
sentenced
month
term
imprisonment
divided
panel
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
convictions
liability
rule
eighth
circuit
held
may
grounded
theory
securities
fraud
prosecution
relied
appeals
also
held
rule
prohibits
trading
possession
material
nonpublic
information
relating
tender
offer
exceeds
sec
rulemaking
authority
rule
contains
breach
fiduciary
duty
requirement
eighth
circuit
concluded
mail
fraud
money
laundering
convictions
rested
violations
securities
laws
therefore
stand
securities
fraud
convictions
reversed
judge
fagg
dissenting
stated
recognize
enforce
misappropriation
theory
hold
sec
exceed
rulemaking
authority
adopted
rule
without
requiring
proof
breach
fiduciary
duty
decisions
courts
appeals
conflict
propriety
misappropriation
theory
rule
see
infra
page
legitimacy
rule
see
infra
granted
certiorari
reverse
eighth
circuit
judgment
address
first
appeals
reversal
convictions
rule
following
fourth
circuit
lead
see
bryan
eighth
circuit
rejected
misappropriation
theory
basis
liability
hold
accord
several
courts
appeals
criminal
liability
may
predicated
misappropriation
theory
pertinent
part
exchange
act
provides
shall
unlawful
person
directly
indirectly
use
means
instrumentality
interstate
commerce
mails
facility
national
securities
use
employ
connection
purchase
sale
security
registered
national
securities
exchange
security
registered
manipulative
deceptive
device
contrivance
contravention
rules
regulations
securities
exchange
commission
may
prescribe
necessary
appropriate
public
interest
protection
investors
pursuant
rulemaking
authority
commission
adopted
rule
relevant
provides
shall
unlawful
person
directly
indirectly
use
means
instrumentality
interstate
commerce
mails
facility
national
securities
exchange
employ
device
scheme
artifice
defraud
engage
act
practice
course
business
operates
operate
fraud
deceit
upon
person
liability
rule
precedent
indicates
extend
beyond
conduct
encompassed
prohibition
see
ernst
ernst
hochfelder
scope
rule
exceed
power
congress
granted
commission
see
also
central
bank
denver
first
interstate
bank
denver
refused
allow
private
challenges
conduct
prohibited
text
traditional
classical
theory
insider
trading
liability
rule
violated
corporate
insider
trades
securities
corporation
basis
material
nonpublic
information
trading
information
qualifies
deceptive
device
affirmed
relationship
trust
confidence
exists
theshareholders
corporation
insiders
obtained
confidential
information
reason
position
corporation
chiarella
relationship
recognized
gives
rise
duty
disclose
abstain
trading
necessity
preventing
corporate
insider
tak
ing
unfair
advantage
uninformed
stockholders
citation
omitted
classical
theory
applies
officers
directors
permanent
insiders
corporation
also
attorneys
accountants
consultants
others
temporarily
become
fiduciaries
corporation
see
dirks
sec
misappropriation
theory
holds
person
commits
fraud
connection
securities
transaction
thereby
violates
rule
misappropriates
confidential
information
securities
trading
purposes
breach
duty
owed
source
information
see
brief
theory
fiduciary
undisclosed
self
serving
use
principal
information
purchase
sell
securities
breach
duty
loyalty
confidentiality
defrauds
principal
exclusive
use
information
lieu
premising
liability
fiduciary
relationship
company
insider
purchaser
seller
company
stock
misappropriation
theory
premises
liability
fiduciary
turned
trader
deception
entrusted
access
confidential
information
two
theories
complementary
addressing
efforts
capitalize
nonpublic
information
purchase
sale
securities
classical
theory
targets
corporate
insider
breach
duty
shareholders
insider
transacts
misappropriation
theory
outlaws
trading
basis
nonpublic
information
corporate
outsider
breach
dutyowed
trading
party
source
information
misappropriation
theory
thus
designed
protec
integrity
securities
markets
abuses
outsiders
corporation
access
confidential
information
affect
th
corporation
security
price
revealed
owe
fiduciary
duty
corporation
shareholders
ibid
case
indictment
alleged
breach
duty
trust
confidence
owed
law
firm
dorsey
whitney
client
grand
met
traded
basis
nonpublic
information
regarding
grand
met
planned
tender
offer
pillsbury
common
stock
app
conduct
government
charged
constituted
fraudulent
device
connection
purchase
sale
securities
agree
government
misappropriation
defined
satisfies
requirement
chargeable
conduct
involve
deceptive
device
contrivance
used
connection
purchase
sale
securities
observe
first
misappropriators
government
describes
deal
deception
fiduciary
pretends
loyalty
principal
secretly
converting
principal
information
personal
gain
brief
dupes
defrauds
principal
see
aldave
misappropriation
general
theory
liability
trading
nonpublic
information
hofstra
rev
addressed
fraud
species
carpenter
involved
mail
fraud
statute
proscription
scheme
artifice
defraud
affirming
convictions
statute
said
carpenter
employee
undertaking
reveal
employer
confidential
information
became
sham
employee
provided
information
co
conspirators
scheme
obtain
trading
profits
company
confidential
information
recognized
carpenter
qualifies
property
company
right
exclusive
use
undisclosed
misappropriation
information
violation
fiduciary
duty
said
carpenter
constitutes
fraud
akin
embezzlement
fraudulent
appropriation
one
use
money
goods
entrusted
one
care
another
quoting
grin
shine
see
aldave
hofstra
carpenter
discussion
fraudulent
misuse
confidential
information
government
notes
particularly
apt
source
guidance
mail
fraud
statute
like
section
long
held
require
deception
merely
breach
fiduciary
duty
brief
citation
omitted
deception
nondisclosure
central
theory
liability
government
seeks
recognition
counsel
government
stated
explanation
theory
oral
argument
satisfy
common
law
rule
trustee
may
use
property
entrusted
consent
satisfy
requirement
securities
act
deception
wouldonly
disclosure
tr
oral
arg
see
generally
restatement
second
agency
agent
disclosure
obligation
regarding
use
confidential
information
misappropriation
theory
advanced
government
consistent
santa
fe
industries
green
decision
underscoring
purpose
breach
fiduciary
duty
ban
rather
trains
conduct
involving
manipulation
deception
see
contrast
government
allegations
case
santa
fe
industries
pertinent
facts
disclosed
persons
charged
violating
rule
see
therefore
deception
nondisclosure
liability
provisions
attach
see
similarly
full
disclosure
forecloses
liability
misappropriation
theory
deception
essential
misappropriation
theory
involves
feigning
fidelity
source
information
fiduciary
discloses
source
plans
trade
nonpublic
information
deceptive
device
thus
violation
although
fiduciary
turned
trader
may
remain
liable
state
law
breach
duty
loyalty
turn
next
requirement
misappropriator
deceptive
use
information
connection
purchase
sale
security
element
satisfied
fiduciary
fraud
consummated
fiduciary
gains
confidential
information
without
disclosure
principal
uses
information
purchase
sell
securities
securities
transaction
breach
duty
thus
coincide
even
though
person
entity
defrauded
party
trade
instead
source
nonpublic
information
see
aldave
hofstra
fraud
deceit
practiced
one
person
resultant
harm
another
person
group
persons
misappropriator
trades
basis
material
nonpublic
information
short
gains
advantageous
market
position
deception
deceives
source
information
simultaneously
harms
members
investing
public
see
misappropriation
theory
targets
information
sort
misappropriators
ordinarily
capitalize
upon
gain
risk
profits
purchase
sale
securities
misappropriator
put
information
use
statute
prohibition
implicated
theory
catch
conceivable
forms
fraud
involving
confidential
information
rather
catches
fraudulent
means
capitalizing
information
securities
transactions
government
notes
another
limitation
forms
fraud
reaches
misappropriation
theory
apply
case
person
defrauded
bank
giving
loan
embezzledcash
another
used
proceeds
misdeed
purchase
securities
brief
case
government
proceeds
value
malefactor
apart
use
securities
transaction
fraud
complete
soon
money
obtained
ibid
words
money
buy
anything
least
many
things
misappropriation
may
thus
viewed
sufficiently
detached
subsequent
securities
transaction
connection
requirement
met
ibid
dissent
charge
misappropriation
theory
incoherent
information
like
funds
put
multiple
uses
see
post
misses
point
exchange
act
enacted
part
insure
maintenance
fair
honest
markets
question
fraudulent
uses
confidential
information
fall
within
prohibition
fraud
connection
securities
transaction
hardly
remarkable
rule
suitably
applied
fraudulent
uses
certain
kinds
information
stretched
beyond
reason
applied
fraudulent
use
money
dissent
catch
government
overstatement
observing
money
used
manner
purposes
purchases
government
urges
confidential
information
kind
issue
derives
value
utility
securities
trading
see
brief
post
several
times
emphasizing
word
substitute
ordinarily
government
mark
recognition
government
overstatement
provoked
dissent
cry
new
theory
see
post
case
dissent
relies
motor
vehicle
mfrs
assn
state
farm
mut
automobile
ins
shows
extremity
charge
state
farm
reviewed
agency
rescission
rule
arbitrary
capricious
standard
promulgation
rule
relevant
statute
judged
see
decision
concluding
agency
adequately
explained
regulatory
action
see
cautioned
reviewing
attempt
make
deficiencies
contrast
rule
promulgation
challenged
consider
government
charge
alleged
fraudulent
conduct
falls
within
prohibitions
rule
context
acknowledge
simply
defending
government
interpretation
rule
statute
government
lawyers
pressed
solid
point
far
something
lawyers
occasionally
even
judges
wont
misappropriation
theory
comports
language
requires
deception
connection
purchase
sale
security
deception
identifiable
purchaser
seller
theory
alsowell
tuned
animating
purpose
exchange
act
insure
honest
securities
markets
thereby
promote
investor
confidence
see
fed
reg
trading
misappropriated
information
undermines
integrity
investor
confidence
securities
markets
although
informational
disparity
inevitable
securities
markets
investors
likely
hesitate
venture
capital
market
trading
based
misappropriated
nonpublic
information
unchecked
law
investor
informational
disadvantage
vis
vis
misappropriator
material
nonpublic
information
stems
contrivance
luck
disadvantage
overcome
research
skill
see
brudney
insiders
outsiders
informational
advantages
federal
securities
laws
harv
rev
market
thought
systematically
populated
transactors
trading
basis
misappropriated
information
investors
refrain
dealing
altogether
others
incur
costs
avoid
dealing
transactors
corruptly
overcome
unerodable
informational
advantages
aldave
hofstra
sum
considering
inhibiting
impact
market
participation
trading
misappropriated
information
congressional
purposes
underlying
makes
scant
sense
hold
lawyer
like
violator
works
law
firm
representing
target
tender
offer
works
law
firm
representing
bidder
text
statute
requires
result
misappropriation
atissue
properly
made
subject
charge
meets
statutory
requirement
deceptive
conduct
connection
securities
transactions
appeals
rejected
misappropriation
theory
primarily
two
grounds
first
eighth
circuit
comprehended
theory
requires
neither
misrepresentation
nondisclosure
see
explained
however
see
supra
deceptive
nondisclosure
essential
liability
issue
concretely
case
failure
disclose
personal
trading
grand
met
dorsey
breach
duty
de
conduct
deceptive
within
meaning
reply
brief
second
obvious
appeals
said
misappropriation
theory
moored
requirement
fraud
connection
purchase
sale
security
see
quoting
according
eighth
circuit
three
decisions
reveal
liability
predicated
duty
owed
source
nonpublic
information
chiarella
dirks
sec
central
bank
denver
first
interstatebank
denver
nly
breach
duty
parties
securities
transaction
appeals
concluded
market
participants
investors
sufficient
give
rise
liability
read
statute
precedent
differently
note
refers
purchase
sale
security
identifiable
purchasers
sellers
securities
chiarella
involved
securities
trades
printer
employed
shop
printed
documents
announcing
corporate
takeover
bids
see
deducing
names
target
companies
documents
handled
printer
bought
shares
targets
takeover
bids
announced
expecting
correctly
share
prices
rise
upon
announcement
transactions
printer
disclose
sellers
securities
target
companies
shareholders
nonpublic
information
traded
see
ibid
trading
printer
convicted
violating
rule
reversed
appeals
judgment
affirmed
conviction
see
jury
chiarella
instructed
convict
defendant
willfully
failed
inform
sellers
target
company
securities
knew
takeover
bid
increase
value
shares
see
emphasizing
printer
agency
fiduciary
relationship
sellers
held
liability
imposed
broad
theory
see
explained
general
duty
participants
market
transactions
forgo
actions
based
material
nonpublic
information
established
doctrine
said
duty
disclose
abstain
trading
arises
specific
relationship
two
parties
ibid
hold
chiarella
relationship
prompting
liability
trading
undisclosed
information
relationship
corporation
insiders
shareholders
evident
response
government
argument
printer
misappropriation
information
employer
purposes
securities
trading
violation
duty
confidentiality
owed
acquiring
companies
constituted
fraud
connection
purchase
sale
security
thereby
satisfied
terms
declined
reach
potential
basis
printer
liability
theory
submitted
jury
see
four
justices
found
merit
see
brennan
concurring
judgment
burger
dissenting
blackmun
joined
marshall
dissenting
fifth
justice
stated
wisely
le
ft
resolution
issue
another
day
stevens
concurring
chiarella
thus
expressly
left
open
misappropriation
theory
us
today
certain
statements
chiarella
however
led
eighth
circuit
instant
case
conclude
liability
hinges
exclusively
breach
duty
owed
purchaser
seller
securities
see
said
chiarella
liability
premised
upon
duty
disclose
arising
relationship
trust
confidence
parties
transaction
emphasis
added
observed
printshop
employee
defendant
case
person
sellers
placed
trust
confidence
see
statements
rejected
notion
stretches
far
impose
general
duty
participants
market
transactions
forgo
actions
based
material
nonpublic
information
confine
context
statements
highlighted
eighth
circuit
short
appear
opinion
carefully
leaving
future
resolution
validity
misappropriation
theory
therefore
read
foreclose
theory
dirks
left
room
application
misappropriation
theory
cases
like
one
confront
dirks
involved
investment
analyst
received
information
former
insider
corporation
analyst
connection
see
information
indicated
corporation
engaged
massive
fraud
analyst
investigated
fraud
obtaining
corroborating
information
employees
corporation
investigation
analyst
discussed
findings
clients
investors
sold
holdings
company
analyst
suspected
gross
wrongdoing
see
sec
censured
analyst
inter
alia
aiding
abetting
rule
violations
clients
investors
sold
holdings
based
nonpublic
information
analyst
passed
see
sec
view
analyst
tippee
corporation
insiders
duty
rule
refrain
communicating
nonpublic
information
persons
likely
trade
basis
see
found
obligation
see
repeated
key
point
made
chiarella
general
duty
participants
market
transactions
forgo
actions
based
material
nonpublic
information
quoting
chiarella
see
aldave
hofstra
misappropriation
theory
bars
trading
basis
informationthat
wrongdoer
converted
use
violation
fiduciary
contractual
similar
obligation
owner
rightful
possessor
information
showing
made
dirks
tippers
violated
duty
disclosing
analyst
nonpublic
information
former
employer
insiders
acted
personal
profit
expose
massive
fraud
within
corporation
see
dirks
absent
violation
tippers
derivative
liability
tippee
see
important
purposes
instant
case
observed
dirks
expectation
analyst
sources
keep
information
confidence
analyst
misappropriate
illegally
obtain
information
dirks
thus
presents
suggestion
person
gains
nonpublic
information
misappropriation
breach
fiduciary
duty
escapes
liability
without
alerting
source
trades
information
last
three
cases
eighth
circuit
regarded
warranting
disapproval
misappropriation
theory
central
bank
held
private
plaintiff
may
maintain
aiding
abetting
suit
immediately
cautioned
central
bank
secondary
actors
securities
markets
may
sometimes
chargeable
securities
acts
person
entity
including
lawyer
accountant
bank
employs
manipulative
device
makes
material
misstatement
omission
purchaser
seller
securities
relies
may
liable
primary
violator
assuming
requirements
primary
liability
rule
met
ibid
emphasis
added
eighth
circuit
isolated
statement
quoted
drew
conclusion
covers
deceptive
statements
omissions
purchasers
sellers
perhaps
market
participants
rely
see
evident
question
presented
central
bank
however
quoted
passage
sought
clarify
secondary
actors
although
subject
aiding
abetting
liability
remain
subject
primary
liability
rule
certain
conduct
furthermore
central
bank
discussion
concerned
private
civil
litigation
rule
criminal
liability
central
bank
reference
purchasers
sellers
securities
must
read
light
longstanding
limitation
private
suits
blue
chip
stamps
manor
drug
stores
held
actual
purchasers
sellers
securities
may
maintain
private
civil
action
rule
confined
private
right
action
policy
considerations
particular
blue
chip
stamps
recognized
abuse
potential
proof
problems
inherent
suits
investors
neither
bought
sold
asserted
traded
absent
fraudulent
conduct
others
see
see
also
holmes
securities
investor
protection
corporation
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
scalia
concurring
judgment
criminal
prosecutions
present
dangers
addressed
blue
chip
stamps
decision
inapplicable
indictments
violations
rule
naftalin
see
also
holmes
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
standing
requirement
private
civil
actions
rule
import
criminal
prosecutions
willful
violations
sum
misappropriation
theory
haveexamined
explained
opinion
consistent
statute
precedent
vital
decision
criminal
liability
may
sustained
misappropriation
theory
emphasize
two
sturdy
safeguards
congress
provided
regarding
scienter
establish
criminal
violation
rule
government
must
prove
person
willfully
violated
provision
see
furthermore
defendant
may
imprisoned
violating
rule
proves
hehad
knowledge
rule
see
ibid
charge
misappropriation
theory
indefinite
permit
imposition
criminal
liability
see
brief
respondent
thus
fails
theory
limited
breach
recognized
duty
addition
statute
requirement
presence
culpable
intent
necessary
element
offense
much
destroy
force
argument
application
statute
circumstances
unjust
boyce
motor
lines
eighth
circuit
erred
holding
misappropriation
theory
inconsistent
appeals
may
address
remand
challenges
convictions
rule
consider
next
ground
appeals
reversed
convictions
fraudulent
trading
connection
tender
offer
violation
exchange
act
sec
rule
sole
question
us
convictions
commission
appeals
held
exceed
rulemaking
authority
adopted
rule
without
requiring
showing
trading
issue
entailed
breach
fiduciary
duty
hold
commission
regard
extent
relevant
case
exceed
authority
governing
statutory
provision
exchange
act
reads
relevant
part
shall
unlawful
person
engage
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
acts
practices
connection
tender
offer
sec
shall
purposes
subsection
rules
regulations
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
provisions
disclosure
williams
act
congress
sought
ensure
shareholders
confronted
cash
tender
offer
stock
required
respond
without
adequate
information
rondeau
mosinee
paper
see
lewis
mcgraw
per
curiam
purpose
williams
act
informed
decisionmaking
shareholders
recognized
schreiber
burlington
northern
congress
designed
williams
act
make
disclosure
rather
imposed
principles
fairness
artificiality
preferred
method
market
regulation
section
explained
supplements
precise
disclosure
provisions
found
elsewhere
williams
act
requiring
disclosure
explicitly
addressed
tender
offer
context
required
relying
rulemaking
authorization
commission
promulgated
rule
measure
provides
person
taken
substantial
step
steps
commence
commenced
tender
offer
offering
person
shall
constitute
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
act
practice
within
meaning
section
exchange
act
person
possession
material
information
relating
tender
offer
information
knows
reason
know
nonpublic
knows
reason
know
acquired
directly
indirectly
offering
person
issuer
securities
sought
sought
tender
offer
officer
director
partner
employee
person
acting
behalf
offering
person
issuer
purchase
sell
cause
purchased
sold
securities
securities
convertible
exchangeable
securities
option
right
obtain
dispose
foregoing
securities
unless
within
reasonable
time
prior
purchase
sale
information
source
publicly
disclosed
press
release
otherwise
cfr
one
violates
rule
trades
basis
material
nonpublic
information
concerning
pending
tender
offer
knows
reason
know
acquired
directly
indirectly
insider
offeror
issuer
someone
working
behalf
rule
disclosure
provision
creates
duty
traders
fall
within
ambit
abstain
disclose
without
regard
whether
trader
owes
fiduciary
duty
respect
confidentiality
information
chestman
en
banc
emphasis
added
cert
denied
eighth
circuit
view
rule
applies
whether
trading
question
breaches
fiduciary
duty
regulation
exceeds
sec
rulemaking
authority
see
contra
maio
peters
chestman
holding
rule
proper
exercise
sec
statutory
authority
support
holding
eighth
circuit
relied
text
decisions
schreiber
chiarella
see
eighth
circuit
homed
essence
rulemaking
authorization
statute
empowers
sec
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
means
eighth
circuit
found
plain
sec
may
identify
regulate
tender
offer
context
acts
practices
law
already
defines
fraudulent
eighth
circuit
maintained
sec
may
create
definition
fraud
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
eighth
circuit
pointed
held
schreiber
word
manipulative
phrase
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
acts
practices
means
word
means
absent
misrepresentation
nondisclosure
act
indicted
manipulative
see
citing
schreiber
section
interpretations
guide
construction
eighth
circuit
added
see
citing
acknowledgment
schreiber
broad
antifraud
prohibition
modeled
antifraud
provisions
rule
citation
omitted
see
meaning
fraudulent
eighth
circuit
looked
chiarella
see
case
eighth
circuit
recounted
held
failure
disclose
information
fraudulent
duty
speak
arising
fiduciary
similar
relationship
trust
confidence
chiarella
quoting
restatement
second
torts
demands
showing
breach
fiduciary
duty
breach
necessary
make
violation
eighth
circuitconcluded
commission
authority
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
acts
eighth
circuit
stated
properly
read
provision
means
simply
sec
broad
regulatory
powers
field
tender
offers
statutory
terms
fixed
meaning
sec
alter
way
administrative
rule
urges
eighth
circuit
reading
misapprehends
commission
authority
define
fraudulent
acts
commission
power
prevent
defining
power
submits
virtual
nullity
sec
permitted
go
beyond
common
law
fraud
separately
prohibited
first
self
operative
sentence
section
brief
see
maintaining
commission
power
define
fraudulent
acts
broader
rulemaking
power
questions
appeals
reading
schreiber
see
parenthetically
notes
word
schreiber
manipulative
unlike
fraudulent
observes
manipulative
virtually
term
art
used
connection
securities
markets
quoting
schreiber
tellingly
submits
schreiber
involved
acts
alleged
violate
self
operative
provision
first
sentence
sentence
containing
language
similar
second
sentence
containing
rulemaking
authorization
points
track
simply
authorizes
sec
proscribe
manipulative
deceptive
device
contrivance
brief
instead
rulemaking
prescription
tracks
exchange
act
concernsthe
conduct
broker
dealers
counter
markets
see
brief
since
see
stat
given
commission
authority
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
broker
dealer
acts
practices
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
congress
added
rulemaking
language
government
commission
already
used
authority
reach
beyond
common
law
fraud
see
brief
need
resolve
case
whether
commission
authority
define
acts
practices
fraudulent
broader
commission
fraud
defining
authority
agree
rule
applied
cases
genre
qualifies
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
trading
material
nonpublic
information
tender
offer
context
prophylactic
measure
itsmission
prevent
typically
encompasses
core
activity
prohibited
noted
schreiber
rulemaking
authorization
gives
commission
latitude
even
context
term
art
like
manipulative
regulate
nondeceptive
activities
reasonably
designed
means
preventing
manipulative
acts
without
suggesting
change
meaning
term
manipulative
hold
accordingly
commission
may
prohibit
acts
fraudulent
common
law
prohibition
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
congress
authorized
commission
prescribe
legislative
rules
owe
commission
judgment
mere
deference
weight
batterton
francis
therefore
determining
whether
rule
disclose
abstain
trading
requirement
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
acts
must
accord
commission
assessment
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
case
conclude
none
adopting
disclose
abstain
rule
sec
explained
commission
previously
expressed
continues
serious
concerns
trading
persons
possession
material
nonpublic
information
relating
tender
offer
practice
results
unfair
disparities
market
information
market
disruption
security
holders
purchase
sell
persons
effectively
denied
benefits
disclosure
substantive
protections
williams
act
furnished
information
security
holders
able
make
informed
investment
decision
involve
deferring
purchase
sale
securities
material
information
disseminated
tender
offer
commenced
terminated
fed
reg
footnotes
omitted
emphasizes
rule
reaches
trading
breach
duty
likely
difficult
prove
reply
brief
particularly
context
tender
offer
tenth
circuit
recognized
fairly
wide
circle
people
confidential
information
peters
notably
attorneys
investment
bankers
accountants
involved
structuring
transaction
availability
information
may
lead
abuse
even
hint
upcoming
tender
offer
may
send
price
target
company
stock
soaring
sec
materia
individuals
entrusted
nonpublic
information
particularly
long
term
loyalty
issuer
may
find
temptation
trade
information
hard
resist
view
large
short
term
profits
potentially
available
peters
may
possible
prove
circumstantially
person
traded
basis
material
nonpublic
information
almost
impossible
prove
trader
obtained
information
breach
fiduciary
duty
owed
either
trader
ultimate
insider
source
information
ibid
example
tippee
trades
information
received
insider
illustrates
problem
rule
tippee
assumes
fiduciary
duty
shareholders
corporation
trade
material
nonpublic
information
insider
breached
fiduciary
duty
shareholders
disclosing
information
tippee
tippee
knows
know
breach
dirks
show
tippee
traded
nonpublic
information
tender
offer
breached
fiduciary
duty
require
proof
insider
source
breached
fiduciary
duty
tippee
knew
known
breach
yet
cases
parties
information
transfer
insider
alleged
tippee
peters
alternate
ground
affirming
eighth
circuit
judgment
urges
rule
invalid
prohibits
trading
advance
tender
offer
substantial
step
commence
offer
taken
prohibits
fraudulent
acts
connection
tender
offer
see
brief
respondent
contends
covering
conduct
rule
fails
comport
due
process
two
levels
rule
give
fair
notice
advance
tender
offer
violation
occurs
disposes
scienter
requirement
appeals
address
arguments
raise
due
process
points
briefs
decline
consider
contentions
first
instance
appeals
may
address
remand
arguments
preserved
based
dispositions
securities
fraud
convictions
appeals
also
reversed
convictions
mail
fraud
see
reversal
securitiesconvictions
appeals
recognized
id
matter
law
require
mail
fraud
convictions
likewise
reversed
citing
carpenter
unanimously
affirmed
mail
wire
fraud
convictions
based
conduct
evenly
divided
defendants
securities
fraud
convictions
case
appeals
said
indictment
structured
mail
fraud
charges
disassociated
securities
fraud
charges
absent
securities
fraud
fraud
upon
base
mail
fraud
charges
urges
appeals
position
irreconcilable
carpenter
carpenter
mail
fraud
charges
independent
securities
fraud
charges
even
though
rest
set
facts
brief
need
linger
matter
rulings
securities
fraud
issues
require
reverse
appeals
judgment
mail
fraud
counts
well
note
attacked
mail
fraud
convictions
appeals
alternate
grounds
arguments
yet
addressed
eighth
circuit
remain
open
consideration
remand
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
petitioner
james
herman
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
join
parts
iii
iv
opinion
agree
however
part
ii
opinion
containing
analysis
respondent
convictions
rule
entirely
agree
justice
thomas
analysis
convictions
either
principally
seems
irrelevant
whether
government
theory
respondent
acts
covered
coherent
consistent
post
true
respect
matters
agency
accorded
adjudicative
authority
policymaking
discretion
agency
action
must
supported
reasons
agency
sets
forth
sec
chenery
see
also
sec
chenery
think
agency
unadorned
application
law
need
least
chevron
deference
given
agency
interpretation
point
fact
respondent
actions
either
violated
rule
regardless
reasons
government
gave
us
decide
explanation
scope
rule
entirely
reasonable
someother
context
seem
accord
principle
lenity
apply
criminal
statutes
mitigated
rule
less
ambiguous
statute
see
reno
koray
explaining
circumstances
rule
lenity
applies
bass
discussing
policies
underlying
rule
lenity
light
principle
seems
unelaborated
statutory
language
use
employ
connection
purchase
sale
security
manipulative
deceptive
device
contrivance
must
construed
require
manipulation
deception
party
securities
transaction
petitioner
james
herman
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
thomas
chief
justice
joins
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
today
majority
upholds
respondent
convictions
violating
securities
exchange
act
rule
promulgated
thereunder
based
upon
securities
exchange
commission
misappropriation
theory
central
majority
holding
need
interpret
requirement
deceptive
device
use
employ
ed
connection
purchase
sale
security
commission
misappropriation
theory
fails
provide
coherent
consistent
interpretation
essential
requirement
liability
dissent
majority
also
sustains
respondent
convictions
securities
exchange
act
rule
promulgated
thereunder
regardless
whether
respondent
violated
fiduciary
duty
anybody
dissent
holding
allow
regulations
prohibiting
nonfraudulent
acts
prophylactic
certain
fraudulent
acts
neither
majority
commission
identifies
relevant
underlying
fraud
rule
reasonably
provides
prophylaxis
regard
fraud
convictions
however
concur
judgment
take
issue
majority
determination
undisclosed
misappropriation
confidential
information
fiduciary
constitute
deceptive
device
within
meaning
nondisclosure
duty
disclose
satisfies
definitions
fraud
deceit
purposes
securities
laws
see
chiarella
unlike
majority
however
accept
commission
interpretation
deceptive
device
use
connection
securities
transaction
although
commission
majority
points
seem
suggest
relation
securities
transaction
satisfies
connection
requirement
ultimately
reject
overly
expansive
construction
require
integral
connection
fraud
securities
transaction
majority
example
misappropriation
theory
applies
undisclosed
misappropriation
confidential
information
securities
trading
purposes
ante
thus
seeming
require
particular
intent
misappropriator
order
satisfy
connection
language
see
also
ante
misappropriation
theory
targets
information
sort
misappropriators
ordinarily
capitalize
upon
gain
risk
profits
purchase
sale
securities
emphasis
added
ante
distinguishing
embezzlement
money
used
buy
securities
lacking
requisite
connection
commission
goes
argues
misappropriation
theory
satisfies
connection
requirement
depends
inherent
connection
deceptive
conduct
purchase
sale
security
brief
unitedstates
emphasis
added
see
also
ibid
misappropriated
information
personal
value
respondent
utility
securities
trading
emphasis
added
commission
construction
relevant
language
incoherence
construction
become
evident
majority
attempts
describe
fraudulent
theft
information
falls
commission
misappropriation
theory
fraudulent
theft
money
majority
correctly
notes
confidential
information
qualifies
property
company
right
exclusive
use
ante
observes
undisclosed
misappropriation
information
violation
fiduciary
duty
constitutes
fraud
akin
embezzlement
fraudulent
appropriation
one
use
money
goods
entrusted
one
care
another
ibid
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
far
majority
analogy
embezzlement
well
taken
adequately
demonstrates
undisclosed
misappropriation
fraud
source
information
embezzlement
analogy
however
explain
relevant
fraud
use
employ
connection
securities
transaction
majority
seeks
distinguish
embezzlement
funds
embezzlement
information
becomes
clear
neither
commission
majority
hasa
coherent
theory
regarding
connection
requirement
turning
first
embezzlement
information
supposedly
meets
connection
requirement
majority
asserts
requirement
satisfied
fiduciary
fraud
consummated
fiduciary
gains
confidential
information
without
disclosure
principal
uses
information
purchase
sell
securities
securities
transaction
breach
duty
thus
coincide
ante
accepting
government
description
scope
theory
becomes
plain
majority
explanation
misappropriation
theory
supposedly
satisfies
connection
requirement
incomplete
touchstone
required
embezzlement
use
employ
ed
connection
securities
transaction
merely
coincide
consummated
transaction
necessarily
consummated
transaction
property
embezzled
value
apart
use
securities
transaction
even
though
fact
used
securities
transaction
government
contends
violation
misappropriation
theory
understanding
government
proffered
theory
liability
construction
connection
requirement
confirmed
government
explanation
oral
argument
appropriate
client
money
order
buy
stock
violated
securities
laws
counsel
think
connection
purchase
securit
ies
much
one
counsel
much
one
case
use
information
enables
profits
pure
simple
opportunity
engage
profit
money
way
buy
stock
get
money
counsel
difference
money
anything
want
sense
fraud
complete
point
go
use
money
finance
number
activities
connection
far
less
close
case
value
information
personal
profit
respondent
take
profit
securities
markets
trading
saying
case
misappropriation
relevance
substantial
relevance
reference
purchase
securities
counsel
exactly
take
money
accounts
go
racetrack
whatever
counsel
exactly
right
difference
doubt
kind
misappropriation
property
connection
purchase
sale
securities
kinds
misappropriation
property
may
may
unique
form
fraud
unique
securities
markets
fact
way
respondent
profited
information
either
trading
tipping
somebody
else
enable
trades
tr
oral
arg
emphases
added
government
construction
connection
requirement
claim
requirement
precludes
coverage
financial
embezzlement
also
demonstrates
majority
described
distinction
financial
embezzlement
incomplete
although
majority
claims
fraud
financial
embezzlement
case
complete
soon
money
obtained
securities
transaction
consummated
uniformly
true
thus
government
basis
claiming
embezzlement
violate
securities
laws
difficult
imagine
embezzlement
money
takes
place
via
mechanism
securities
transaction
example
broker
directed
purchase
stock
clientand
instead
purchases
stock
using
client
funds
account
unauthorized
presumably
undisclosed
transaction
act
constitutes
embezzlement
securities
transaction
breach
duty
thus
coincide
presumably
distinguishes
monetary
embezzlement
government
thus
necessarily
coincident
securities
transaction
never
lacks
connection
government
construction
misappropriation
theory
accurately
described
accepted
along
implied
construction
connection
language
theory
longer
cover
cases
one
involving
fraud
source
information
source
connection
participant
securities
transaction
seems
obvious
undisclosed
misappropriation
confidential
information
necessarily
consummated
securities
transaction
case
example
upon
learning
grand
met
confidential
takeover
plans
done
number
things
information
sold
newspaper
publication
see
tr
oral
arg
given
sold
information
pillsbury
see
even
kept
information
used
solely
personal
amusement
perhaps
fantasy
stock
trading
game
activities
deprived
grand
met
right
exclusive
use
ante
information
undisclosed
constitute
embezzlement
grand
met
informational
property
theory
liability
however
activities
violate
according
commission
monetary
embezzlement
analogy
possibilities
sufficient
preclude
violation
misappropriation
theory
even
informational
property
wasused
securities
trading
actually
use
information
purchase
securities
thus
significant
case
embezzling
money
used
purchase
securities
cases
embezzler
done
something
else
property
hence
commission
necessary
connection
securities
laws
met
relevant
test
connection
language
whether
fraudulent
act
necessarily
tied
securities
transaction
misappropriation
confidential
information
used
trade
violates
misappropriation
funds
used
trade
commission
concedes
latter
covered
theory
loss
see
theory
coherently
applied
former
majority
makes
attempt
defend
misappropriation
theory
set
forth
commission
indeed
majority
implicitly
concedes
indefensibility
commission
theory
acknowledging
alternative
uses
misappropriated
information
exist
violate
securities
laws
dismissing
government
repeated
explanations
misappropriation
theory
mere
overstatement
ante
rejected
government
description
theory
majority
engages
imaginative
exercise
constructing
misappropriation
theory
whole
cloth
thus
told
merely
ubstitute
ordinarily
describing
degree
connectedness
misappropriation
securities
transaction
government
winner
ibid
presumably
majority
similarly
edit
government
brief
argue
ordinary
rather
inherent
connection
deceptive
conduct
purchase
sale
security
brief
emphasis
added
need
address
coherence
lack
thereof
majority
new
theory
suffers
far
greater
dispositive
flaw
theory
offered
commission
indeed
far
know
majority
opinion
new
theory
never
proposed
commission
much
less
adopted
rule
otherwise
fundamental
proposition
law
may
supply
reasoned
basis
agency
action
agency
given
motor
vehicle
mfrs
assn
state
farm
mut
automobile
ins
even
credit
post
hoc
rationalizatio
counsel
agency
one
left
wonder
possibly
rely
post
hoc
rationalization
invented
never
even
presented
commission
consideration
whether
majority
new
theory
merit
wecannot
possibly
tell
record
us
findings
regarding
ordinary
use
misappropriated
information
much
less
regarding
ordinary
use
forms
embezzled
property
commission
opined
scope
new
requirement
property
must
ordinarily
used
securities
trading
order
misappropriation
connection
securities
transaction
simply
know
covered
requirement
hence
evaluate
whether
requirement
embodies
consistent
coherent
interpretation
statute
moreover
persons
subject
new
theory
respondent
surely
andcannot
regulate
behavior
comply
new
theory
today
theory
never
existed
short
majority
new
theory
simply
presented
case
form
basis
upholding
respondent
convictions
upholding
respondent
convictions
new
improved
misappropriation
theory
majority
also
points
various
policy
considerations
underlying
securities
laws
maintaining
fair
honest
markets
promoting
investor
confidence
protecting
integrity
securities
markets
ante
repeated
reliance
broad
sweeping
legislative
purposes
reaches
far
misleading
context
misappropriation
theory
reaches
far
regardless
overarching
purpose
securities
laws
illegal
run
afoul
purpose
statute
letter
majority
approach
misleading
case
glosses
fact
supposed
threat
fair
honest
markets
investor
confidence
market
integrity
comes
supposed
fraud
case
mere
fact
information
used
nonpublic
majority
concedes
deception
essential
misappropriation
theory
involves
feigning
fidelity
source
information
fiduciary
discloses
source
plans
trade
nonpublic
information
deceptive
device
thus
violation
ante
emphasis
added
indeed
source
expressly
authorize
agents
trade
confidential
information
perk
bonus
perhaps
likewise
violation
yet
either
case
disclosed
misuse
orauthorized
use
hypothesized
inhibiting
impact
market
participation
ante
identical
behavior
violating
misappropriation
theory
outsiders
still
trading
based
nonpublic
information
average
investor
hope
obtaining
diligence
majority
statement
misappropriator
trades
basis
material
nonpublic
information
short
gains
advantageous
market
position
deception
deceives
source
information
simultaneously
harms
members
investing
public
ante
emphasis
added
thus
focuses
wrong
point
even
true
trading
nonpublic
information
hurts
public
true
whether
deception
source
information
moreover
repeatedly
held
use
nonpublic
information
trade
violation
chiarella
rather
use
fraud
connection
securities
transaction
forbidden
relevant
element
fraud
impact
integrity
subsequent
transactions
distinct
nonfraudulent
element
using
nonpublic
information
one
reasonably
question
whether
fraud
used
connection
securities
transaction
one
likewise
question
whether
removing
aspect
fraud
though
perhaps
laudable
anything
confidence
integrity
market
absence
coherent
consistent
misappropriation
theory
necessary
implication
coherent
consistent
application
statutory
use
employ
connection
language
particularly
problematic
context
case
government
claims
remarkable
breadth
delegation
authority
arguing
aim
section
pick
unforeseen
cunning
deceptive
devices
people
might
cleverly
use
securities
markets
tr
oral
arg
aptly
queried
hat
rather
unusual
criminal
statute
open
ended
ibid
unusual
indeed
putting
aside
dubious
validity
open
ended
delegation
independent
agency
go
forth
create
regulations
criminalizing
fraud
case
wedo
even
formal
regulation
embodying
agency
misappropriation
theory
certainly
rule
said
embody
theory
although
deviates
statutory
language
addition
words
person
merely
repeats
unchanged
connection
language
given
validity
misappropriation
theory
turns
construction
language
regulatory
language
singularly
uninformative
regulation
squarely
setting
forth
version
misappropriation
theory
commission
interpretation
statutory
language
left
little
commission
litigating
position
majority
completely
novel
theory
even
acknowledged
much
less
adopted
commission
noted
positions
entitled
deference
get
weight
persuasiveness
warrants
metropolitan
stevedore
rambo
slip
yet
find
wholly
unpersuasive
litigating
position
commission
best
embodies
inconsistent
incoherent
interpretation
relevant
statutory
language
provide
predictable
guidance
behavior
contravenes
statute
position
better
ad
hoc
interpretation
statutory
language
view
provide
basis
liability
also
view
conviction
violating
rule
stand
section
exchange
act
provides
relevant
part
shall
unlawful
person
engage
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
acts
practices
connection
tender
offer
commission
shall
purposes
subsection
rules
regulations
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
person
taken
substantial
step
steps
commence
commenced
tender
offer
offering
person
shall
constitute
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
act
practice
within
meaning
securities
exchange
act
person
possession
material
information
relating
tender
offer
information
knows
reason
know
nonpublic
knows
reason
know
acquired
directly
indirectly
offering
person
issuer
securities
sought
sought
tender
offer
person
acting
behalf
offering
person
issuer
purchase
sell
securities
various
instruments
related
securities
unless
within
reasonable
time
prior
purchase
sale
information
source
publicly
disclosed
press
release
otherwise
cfr
commission
offers
two
grounds
defense
rule
first
argues
delegates
commission
authority
define
fraud
differently
concept
defined
rule
valid
exercise
defining
power
second
argues
authorizes
commission
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
acts
rule
prophylactic
rule
may
prohibit
nonfraudulent
acts
means
preventing
fraudulent
acts
difficult
detect
prove
majority
declines
reach
commission
first
justification
instead
sustaining
rule
ground
commission
may
prohibit
acts
fraudulent
common
law
prohibition
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
ante
quoting
find
neither
commission
justifications
rule
acceptable
misappropriation
cases
regard
commission
claim
authority
redefine
concept
fraud
agree
eighth
circuit
commission
misreads
relevant
provision
simply
put
enabling
provision
permits
sec
identify
regulate
acts
practices
fall
within
legal
definition
fraudulent
grant
sec
license
redefine
term
insofar
rule
purports
define
acts
practices
fraudulent
must
measured
precedents
interpreting
scope
fraud
majority
concedes
however
rule
prohibit
merely
trading
connection
fraudulent
nondisclosure
rather
prohibits
trading
connection
nondisclosure
regardless
presence
duty
disclose
ante
rule
thus
exceeds
scope
commission
authority
define
acts
practices
fraudulent
turning
commission
second
justification
rule
although
agree
majority
authorizes
commission
prohibit
non
fraudulent
acts
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
ones
agree
rule
satisfies
standard
initial
matter
rule
face
purport
exercise
commission
prophylactic
power
rather
redefinition
constitute
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
act
practice
within
meaning
rule
conceived
defended
alternatively
definitional
preventive
ante
misses
point
evaluate
regulations
based
myriad
explanations
given
relevant
agency
explanations
justifications
fact
given
see
state
farm
rule
may
ensibly
read
exercise
preventive
authority
ante
itcan
differently
read
contrary
terms
already
concluded
commission
lacks
power
redefine
fraud
regulation
sustained
reasoning
seem
complete
answer
whether
rule
valid
might
give
deference
commission
regulatory
constructions
reasoning
used
regulation
instance
contrary
law
need
give
deference
commission
post
hoc
litigating
justifications
reflected
regulation
even
merits
commission
prophylactic
justification
fails
order
valid
prophylactic
regulation
rule
must
reasonably
designed
merely
prevent
fraud
prevent
persons
engaging
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
acts
practices
connection
tender
offer
emphasis
added
insofar
rule
designed
prevent
type
misappropriation
issue
case
acts
legitimate
objects
prevention
commission
misappropriation
theory
represent
coherent
interpretation
statutory
connection
requirement
explained
part
supra
even
assuming
person
misappropriating
information
bidder
commits
fraud
bidder
commission
provided
coherent
consistent
explanation
fraud
connection
tender
offer
thus
commission
may
seek
prevent
indirectly
conduct
current
theory
prohibit
directly
finally
even
assuming
commission
misappropriation
theory
valid
basis
direct
liability
fail
see
rule
elimination
requirement
breach
fiduciary
duty
reasonably
designed
prevent
underlying
fraudulent
acts
majority
primary
argument
score
many
cases
breach
duty
likely
difficult
prove
ante
quoting
reply
brief
although
majority
hypothetical
difficulties
involved
tipper
tippee
situation
might
merit
context
classical
insider
trading
reason
suspect
similar
difficulties
misappropriation
cases
cases
rule
requires
commission
prove
defendant
knows
reason
know
nonpublic
information
upon
trading
occurred
came
bidder
agent
bidder
source
information
identified
simple
task
obtain
proof
breach
duty
bidder
defrauded
misappropriation
cases
reason
suspect
victim
fraud
reluctant
provide
evidence
perpetrator
fraud
particular
difficulties
proving
breach
duty
circumstances
rule
removing
requirement
breach
said
reasonably
designed
prevent
underlying
violations
misappropriation
theory
rule
fact
designed
seen
remainder
majority
discussion
rule
quoting
length
commission
explanation
rule
federal
register
majority
notes
commission
concern
unfair
disparities
market
information
market
disruption
ante
quoting
fed
reg
commission
explanation
rule
purpose
continuing
paragraph
partially
quoted
majority
example
problem
addressed
called
stampede
effect
based
leaks
rumors
may
result
trading
material
nonpublic
information
fed
reg
majority
also
notes
rely
government
contention
able
prohibit
supposedly
problematic
practice
warehousing
bidder
intentionally
tipping
allies
buy
stock
advance
bid
announcement
breach
offiduciary
duty
required
ante
citing
reply
brief
given
policy
concerns
majority
notes
seeming
approval
commission
justification
rule
means
necessary
proper
assure
efficacy
williams
act
protections
ante
although
reasoning
doubt
accurately
reflects
commission
purposes
adopting
rule
little
support
validity
rule
means
designed
prevent
behavior
none
described
acts
involve
breaches
fiduciary
duties
hence
rule
designed
prevent
satisfy
requirement
commission
rules
promulgated
section
reasonably
designed
prevent
acts
practices
fraudulent
deceptive
manipulative
majority
recognizes
general
duty
participants
market
transactions
forgo
actions
based
material
nonpublic
information
duty
arises
specific
relationship
two
parties
ante
quoting
chiarella
unfair
disparities
market
information
potential
stampede
effect
leaks
necessarily
involve
breach
duty
anyone
thus
proper
objects
regulation
name
fraud
likewise
government
concedes
reply
brief
warehousing
fraudulent
given
tippees
using
information
express
knowledge
approval
source
information
simply
deception
violation
duty
disclose
circumstances
cf
ante
noting
government
concession
use
bidder
information
bidder
knowledge
fraudulent
misappropriation
theory
enhancing
overall
efficacy
williams
act
may
reasonable
goal
one
may
bepursued
limits
grant
rulemaking
authority
prevention
fraud
deceit
manipulation
held
context
every
instance
financial
unfairness
constitutes
fraudulent
activity
chiarella
context
misappropriation
cases
rule
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
persons
engaging
fraud
connection
tender
offer
exceeds
commission
authority
respondent
conviction
violation
rule
sustained
regard
respondent
convictions
mail
fraud
counts
view
may
sustained
regardless
whether
respondent
may
convicted
securities
fraud
counts
although
issue
highly
fact
bound
independently
worthy
plenary
consideration
nonetheless
accepted
issue
review
therefore
endeavor
resolve
read
indictment
materially
differ
indictment
carpenter
unanimous
upholding
mail
fraud
conviction
despite
evenly
divided
securities
fraud
counts
think
wording
indictment
current
case
requires
finding
securities
fraud
order
find
mail
fraud
certainly
jury
instructions
make
mail
fraud
count
dependent
securities
fraud
counts
rather
counts
simply
predicated
factual
basis
facts
legally
insufficient
constitute
securities
fraud
make
legally
insufficient
constitute
mail
fraud
therefore
concur
judgment
ofthe
relates
respondent
mail
fraud
convictions
footnotes
evidence
traded
basis
nonpublicinformation
misappropriated
law
firm
government
relied
conversation
dorsey
whitney
partner
heading
firm
grand
met
representation
conversation
allegedly
took
place
shortly
august
see
brief
urges
government
evidence
show
traded
basis
nonpublic
information
points
news
reports
august
grand
met
interested
acquiring
pillsbury
earlier
august
news
report
grand
met
put
hotel
chain
auction
raise
funds
acquisition
see
brief
respondent
citing
app
challenge
sufficiency
evidence
remains
open
consideration
remand
convicted
theft
state
sentenced
months
imprisonment
fined
see
state
app
minnesota
disbarred
practice
law
see
see
chestman
en
banc
cert
denied
sec
cherif
cert
denied
sec
clark
twice
presented
question
whether
criminal
liability
violation
may
based
misappropriation
theory
chiarella
jury
received
misappropriation
theory
instructions
declined
address
question
see
infra
carpenter
divided
evenly
whether
circumstances
case
convictions
resting
misappropriation
theory
affirmed
see
aldave
misappropriation
theory
carpenter
aftermath
ohio
observing
carpenter
reckoning
unusual
case
information
misappropriated
belonged
company
preparing
engage
securities
transactions
bidder
corporate
acquisition
wall
street
journal
government
prosecuted
classical
theory
insider
pillsbury
corporation
whose
stock
traded
although
outsider
respect
pillsbury
intimate
association
found
traded
confidential
information
dorsey
whitney
counsel
tender
offeror
grand
met
misappropriation
theory
securities
trading
escape
exchange
act
sanction
dissent
reasoning
simply
associated
gained
nonpublic
information
bidder
rather
target
misappropriation
theory
urged
case
disclosure
obligation
runs
source
information
dorsey
whitney
grand
met
chief
justice
burger
dissenting
chiarella
advanced
broader
reading
rule
disclosure
obligation
envisioned
ran
misappropriator
trades
person
misappropriated
nonpublic
information
absolute
duty
disclose
information
refrain
trading
see
also
government
propose
adopt
misappropriation
theory
breadth
however
person
trading
basis
material
nonpublic
information
owes
duty
loyalty
confidentiality
two
entities
persons
example
law
firm
client
butmakes
disclosure
one
trader
may
still
liable
misappropriation
theory
dissent
evident
struggle
invent
uses
plausibly
might
put
nonpublic
information
see
post
telling
imaginative
suggest
trade
journal
paid
dollars
millions
publish
information
see
tr
oral
arg
counsel
nontrading
use
misappropriat
ed
information
law
firm
client
deliver
ed
pillsbury
suggest
ed
pillsbury
future
might
find
desirable
use
legal
work
pillsbury
might
well
large
doubts
engaging
legal
work
lawyer
stunningly
displayed
readiness
betray
client
confidence
commission
theory
incoherent
inconsistent
post
failing
inhibit
use
confidential
information
personal
amusement
fantasy
stock
trading
game
post
noted
earlier
however
see
supra
textual
requirement
deception
precludes
liability
person
trading
basis
nonpublic
information
disclosed
trading
plans
obtained
authorization
principal
even
though
conduct
may
affect
securities
markets
samemanner
conduct
reached
misappropriation
theory
contrary
dissent
suggestion
see
post
fact
partial
antidote
problems
designed
alleviate
call
question
prohibition
conduct
falls
within
textual
proscription
moreover
disloyal
agent
discloses
imminent
breach
duty
principal
may
seek
appropriate
equitable
relief
state
law
furthermore
context
tender
offer
principal
authorizes
agent
trading
confidential
information
may
commission
view
incur
liability
exchange
act
violation
rule
eighth
circuit
conclusion
contrary
based
large
part
dirks
reiteration
chiarella
language
quoted
discussed
see
additionally
argues
congress
confirmed
validity
misappropriation
theory
insider
trading
securities
fraud
enforcement
act
itsfea
stat
note
following
see
brief
itsfea
declares
rules
regulations
securities
exchange
commission
securities
exchange
act
governing
trading
possession
material
nonpublic
information
required
act
necessary
appropriate
public
interest
protection
investors
note
following
itsfea
also
includes
new
exchange
act
expressly
providing
private
cause
action
persons
violate
exchange
act
purchasing
selling
security
possession
material
nonpublic
information
action
may
brought
person
contemporaneously
purchase
sale
securities
subject
violation
purchased
sold
securities
class
uphold
misappropriation
theory
basis
address
itsfea
significance
cases
genre
relevant
part
exchange
act
set
forth
provides
person
willfully
violates
provision
chapter
rule
regulation
thereunder
violation
made
unlawful
observance
required
terms
chapter
shall
upon
conviction
fined
imprisoned
years
person
shall
subject
imprisonment
section
violation
rule
regulation
proves
knowledge
rule
regulation
statute
provides
defense
imposition
monetary
fines
see
ibid
addition
williams
act
amendments
added
exchange
act
following
provisions
concerning
disclosure
disclosure
requirements
persons
acquiring
five
percent
certain
classes
securities
authorizing
commission
adopt
disclosure
requirements
certain
repurchases
securities
issuer
disclosure
requirements
tender
offer
results
offeror
owning
five
percent
class
securities
disclosure
requirements
tender
offer
results
new
corporate
directors
constituting
majority
rule
thus
adopts
tender
offer
context
requirement
resembling
one
chief
justice
burger
adopted
chiarella
misappropriators
see
supra
government
draws
attention
following
measures
cfr
prohibiting
broker
dealer
hypothecation
customer
securities
hypothecated
securities
commingled
securities
another
customer
absent
written
consent
prohibiting
transactions
broker
dealers
unvalidated
german
securities
prohibiting
broker
dealers
accepting
part
sale
price
security
distributed
unless
money
received
promptly
transmitted
persons
entitled
requiring
broker
dealers
provide
written
disclosure
credit
terms
commissions
connection
securities
sales
broker
dealers
extend
credit
participate
arranging
loans
purchasers
see
brief
leave
another
day
issue
requires
decision
legitimacy
rule
applied
warehousing
government
describes
practice
bidders
leak
advance
information
tender
offer
allies
encourage
purchase
target
company
stock
bid
announced
reply
brief
observed
chiarella
one
commission
purposes
proposing
rule
bar
warehousing
authority
regulate
tender
offers
government
acknowledges
trading
authorized
principal
breaches
fiduciary
duty
see
reply
brief
instant
case
however
involve
trading
authorized
principal
therefore
need
decide
whether
commission
proscription
warehousing
falls
within
authority
define
prevent
fraud
commission
power
limited
see
supra
rule
may
proscribe
conduct
prohibits
dissent
urges
commission
must
precise
authority
exercising
must
say
whether
acting
define
prevent
fraud
instance
purported
define
prevent
see
post
dissent
sees
precision
rule
words
shall
constitute
fraudulent
act
within
meaning
section
find
commission
rule
vulnerable
failure
recite
regulatory
preamble
hereby
exercise
authority
define
prescribe
means
reasonably
designed
prevent
fraudulent
acts
sensibly
read
rule
exercise
commission
full
authority
logically
practically
rule
may
conceived
defended
alternatively
definitional
preventive
dissent
opines
reason
anticipate
difficulties
proving
breach
duty
misappropriation
cases
source
purloined
information
identified
dissent
asserts
simple
task
obtain
proof
breach
duty
post
test
assertion
assume
misappropriating
partner
dorsey
whitney
told
daughter
son
wealthy
friend
tender
pillsbury
offing
tippee
promptly
purchased
pillsbury
stock
child
borrowing
purchase
price
wealthy
friend
dissent
confidence
post
reason
suspect
tipper
gratuitously
protect
tippee
seems
misplaced
dissent
insists
even
misappropriation
information
bidder
tender
offer
fraud
commission
explained
fraud
connection
tender
offer
post
else
one
wonder
might
fraud
connection
repeating
argument
made
concerning
misappropriation
theory
see
supra
urges
congress
confirmed
rule
validity
itsfea
see
brief
uphold
rule
basis
need
address
itsfea
relevance
case
scienter
argument
reiterate
requires
government
prove
willful
violat
ion
securities
laws
lack
knowledge
relevant
rule
affirmative
defense
sentence
imprisonment
see
supra
appeals
reversed
respondent
money
laundering
convictions
similar
reasoning
see
seek
review
ruling
leave
undisturbed
portion
appeals
judgment
dissent
finds
convictions
mail
fraud
counts
securities
fraud
counts
sustainable
post
dissent
view
securities
traders
like
escape
sec
civil
actions
federal
prosecutions
legislation
targeting
securities
fraud
caught
trading
activities
broad
mail
fraud
net
misappropriation
theory
cases
proceed
federal
mail
wire
fraud
statutes
practical
consequences
individual
defendants
might
large
see
aldave
ohio
however
proportionally
persons
accused
insider
trading
might
pursued
attorney
proportionally
fewer
sec
decision
course
rest
suchenforcement
policy
considerations
course
use
one
puts
misappropriated
property
need
one
designed
bring
profit
misappropriator
fraudulent
appropriation
one
use
constitutes
embezzlement
regardless
embezzler
chooses
money
see
logan
state
crim
app
diversion
funds
held
trust
constitutes
embezzlement
whether
direct
personal
benefit
long
owner
deprived
money
indeed
even
someone
else
thereafter
used
information
trade
misappropriation
complete
trade
liability
obvious
real
world
example
scenario
simply
tipped
someone
else
information
mere
act
passing
information
along
violated
fiduciary
duty
undisclosed
embezzlement
confidential
information
regardless
whether
tippee
later
traded
information
majority
apparently
unimpressed
example
misappropriator
using
embezzled
information
personal
amusement
fantasy
stock
trading
game
finding
need
commission
inhibit
recreational
uses
ante
argument
course
misses
point
example
use
violate
securities
laws
yet
covered
commission
theory
rather
example
shows
misappropriation
information
inherently
tied
securities
trading
hence
misappropriation
information
whatever
ultimate
use
fails
commission
test
connection
requirement
rule
similarly
majority
assertion
alternative
uses
misappropriated
information
profitable
use
securities
trading
ante
speculative
best
idea
best
profitable
use
misappropriated
information
either
case
generally
likewise
idea
best
use
forms
misappropriated
property
least
conceivable
best
use
embezzled
money
securities
securities
trading
use
embezzled
money
purchase
securities
sufficiently
detached
ante
securities
transaction
see
reason
non
inherent
use
information
securities
trading
also
sufficiently
detached
government
theory
event
loss
find
statutory
language
hint
best
use
requirement
setting
requisite
connection
deception
purchase
sale
securities
majority
claim
unremarkable
rule
suitably
applied
fraudulent
uses
certain
kinds
information
stretched
beyond
reason
applied
fraudulent
use
money
ante
remarkable
given
existing
rule
rule
nowhere
confines
information
indeed
even
contain
word
given
reason
offered
government
support
misappropriation
theory
applies
fails
apply
equally
money
information
application
government
theory
case
less
beyond
reason
applied
financial
embezzlement
see
tr
oral
arg
government
conceding
carpenter
defendant
gone
wall
street
journal
said
look
know
paying
much
like
make
little
bit
money
buying
stock
stocks
going
appear
heard
street
column
wall
street
journal
said
fine
deception
wall
street
journal
dishonesty
aspect
misappropriation
might
eliminated
via
disclosure
authorization
wholly
besides
point
dishonesty
misappropriation
relationship
fiduciary
principal
relationship
misappropriator
market
market
transaction
made
less
honest
disclosure
third
party
principal
rather
market
whole
far
market
concerned
trade
based
confidential
information
honest
third
party
may
know
long
side
trade
remain
dark
majority
statement
arguing
market
advantage
gained
deception
unfortunately
seems
embrace
error
logic
conflating
causation
correlation
misappropriator
may
deceive
source
simultaneously
hurt
public
shows
causal
connection
two
fact
sun
gives
people
tan
simultaneously
nourishes
plants
demonstrates
melanin
production
humans
causes
plants
grow
case
element
common
deception
harm
theresult
antecedent
cause
namely
using
non
public
information
use
even
securities
trading
illegal
consequential
deception
source
follows
entirely
divergent
branch
causation
harm
public
trader
thus
gains
advantageous
market
position
use
nonpublic
information
whether
deception
involved
deception
effect
existence
extent
advantage
commission
may
purport
interpreting
rule
rather
statute
provide
greater
leeway
rule
merely
repeats
verbatim
statutory
language
entire
question
hinges
furthermore
even
majority
recognizes
rule
may
reach
beyond
scope
ante
thus
commission
obligated
explain
theory
fits
within
interpretation
even
purports
interpreting
derivative
rule
although
majority
leaves
open
possibility
rule
may
justified
means
preventing
warehousing
rely
justification
support
conclusion
case
suffice
say
commission
concedes
warehousing
involve
fraud
defined
cases
see
reply
brief
thus
preventing
warehousing
serve
justify
rule
even
defining
authority
subject
construction
given
commission
strong
constitutional
reasons
construing
law
simply
stated
shall
unlawful
however
shall
defined
independent
agency
seem
offer
intelligible
principle
guide
agency
discretion
thus
raise
serious
delegation
concerns
even
current
jurisprudence
hampton
see
also
field
clark
distinguishing
making
law
determining
shall
executing
law
determining
facts
law
operation
depends
commission
interpretation
convert
precisely
type
law
described
thus
even
plausible
interpretation
usual
practice
avoid
unnecessary
interpretations
statutory
language
call
constitutionality
statute
serious
doubt
note
rule
also
applies
persons
trading
upon
information
obtained
insider
target
company
insofar
rule
seeks
prevent
behavior
fraudulent
classical
theory
insider
trading
aspect
myanalysis
apply
majority
notes
however
government
prosecuted
classical
theory
ante
hence
proviso
application
present
case
even
information
obtained
agent
bidder
tippee
claims
known
tipper
violated
duty
still
justification
rule
first
circumstances
tipper
violated
fiduciary
duty
liable
misappropriation
theory
assuming
theory
valid
facing
liability
reason
suspect
tipper
gratuitously
protect
tippee
tipper
accurately
testifies
tippee
falsely
told
information
passed
withoutviolating
tipper
duties
one
question
whether
tippee
fact
done
anything
illegal
even
commission
misappropriation
theory
given
fraudulent
breach
fiduciary
duty
complete
moment
tip
subsequent
trading
information
tippee
might
well
fail
even
commission
construction
connection
requirement
see
supra
thus
even
tipper
might
circumstances
inclined
protect
tippee
see
ante
doubtful
tippee
violated
misappropriation
theory
event
thus
preventing
nonviolations
justify
rule
second
even
scenario
legitimate
concern
justify
eliminating
requirement
tippee
know
breach
duty
explain
rule
elimination
requirement
breach
majority
may
find
strange
mail
fraud
net
broader
reaching
securities
fraud
net
ante
supposed
strangeness
resulting
allocation
prosecutorial
responsibility
commission
various
attorneys
business
adequately
addressed
congress
perceives
problem
regarding
jurisdictional
boundaries
among
nation
prosecutors
majority
believes
upon
shifting
securities
fraud
mail
fraud
prosecutions
practical
consequences
individual
defendants
might
large
undermines
supposed
policy
justifications
today
decision
makes
baffling
majority
willingness
go
great
lengths
save
commission