quackenbush
california
insurance
commissioner
et
al
allstate
insurance
argued
february
decided
june
petitioner
california
insurance
commissioner
trustee
assets
mission
insurance
company
affiliates
filed
state
action
respondent
allstate
insurance
company
seeking
among
things
contract
tort
damages
allstate
alleged
breach
reinsurance
agreements
allstate
removed
action
federal
diversity
grounds
filed
motion
compel
arbitration
federal
arbitration
act
commissioner
sought
remand
state
arguing
district
abstain
hearing
case
burford
sun
oil
resolution
might
interfere
california
regulation
mission
insolvency
specifically
commissioner
indicated
issue
whether
allstate
set
contract
claims
commissioner
recovery
question
state
law
currently
pending
state
courts
another
mission
insolvency
case
observing
state
overriding
interest
uniform
orderly
regulation
insurance
insolvencies
liquidations
undermined
inconsistent
rulings
federal
state
courts
determining
setoff
question
resolved
state
district
concluded
burford
abstention
appropriate
remanded
case
state
without
ruling
allstate
arbitration
motion
determining
appellate
review
district
remand
order
barred
section
remand
order
appealable
section
final
collateral
order
ninth
circuit
vacated
decision
ordered
case
sent
arbitration
concluding
burford
abstention
limited
equitable
actions
held
abstention
inappropriate
damages
action
held
remand
order
appealable
section
section
provides
order
remanding
case
state
removed
reviewable
appeal
otherwise
bar
appellate
review
order
issue
remands
based
grounds
specified
district
order
case
fall
either
category
remand
order
described
section
based
lack
subject
matter
jurisdiction
defects
removal
procedure
remand
order
falls
within
narrow
class
collateral
orders
immediately
appealable
section
puts
litigants
case
effectively
effect
precisely
surrender
jurisdiction
federal
suit
state
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
order
also
conclusively
determines
issue
separate
merits
namely
question
whether
federal
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
interest
comity
federalism
rights
asserted
appeal
abstention
decision
sufficiently
important
warrant
immediate
appeal
remand
order
subsumed
appealable
order
entered
district
see
moses
cone
supra
decision
thermtron
products
hermansdorfer
order
remanding
removed
action
represent
final
judgment
reviewable
appeal
disavowed
extent
require
ignore
implications
later
holding
moses
cone
pp
federal
courts
power
dismiss
remand
cases
based
abstention
principles
relief
sought
equitable
otherwise
discretionary
damages
action
district
remand
order
unwarranted
application
burford
doctrine
pp
cases
relief
sought
equitable
nature
otherwise
discretionary
federal
courts
power
stay
action
based
abstention
principles
also
otherwise
appropriate
circumstances
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
altogether
either
dismissing
suit
remanding
state
see
great
lakes
dredge
dock
huffman
contrast
federal
courts
may
stay
actions
damages
based
abstention
principles
principles
support
outright
dismissal
remand
damages
actions
see
louisiana
power
light
thibodaux
pp
burford
allows
federal
dismiss
case
presents
difficult
questions
state
law
bearing
policy
problems
substantial
public
import
whose
importance
transcends
result
case
bar
adjudication
federal
forum
disruptive
state
efforts
establish
coherent
policy
respect
matter
substantial
public
concern
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
power
dismiss
represents
extraordinary
narrow
exception
district
duty
adjudicate
controversy
properly
pp
allstate
motion
compel
arbitration
federal
arbitration
act
implicates
substantial
federal
concern
enforcement
arbitration
agreements
regard
state
interests
case
appears
first
blush
present
nothing
contract
dispute
commissioner
seeks
damages
allstate
failure
perform
obligations
reinsurance
agreement
pp
extent
ninth
circuit
held
federal
burford
dismiss
remand
action
relief
sought
discretionary
judgment
consistent
abstention
cases
commissioner
appears
conceded
relief
sought
neither
equitable
otherwise
committed
discretion
however
limiting
burford
abstention
equitable
cases
applied
per
se
rule
rigid
precedents
require
since
abstention
principles
completely
inapplicable
damages
actions
burford
might
supported
order
stay
federal
proceedings
pending
outcome
state
litigation
setoff
issue
remand
order
ninth
circuit
entered
reviewed
thus
necessary
determine
whether
limited
stay
order
warranted
facts
case
pp
affirmed
delivered
opinion
unanimous
scalia
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinions
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
charles
quackenbush
california
insurance
commissioner
et
petitioners
allstate
insurance
company
allstate
removed
action
federal
diversity
grounds
filed
motion
compel
arbitration
federal
arbitration
act
section
et
seq
ed
supp
commissioner
sought
remand
state
arguing
district
abstain
hearing
case
burford
supra
resolution
might
interfere
california
regulation
mission
insolvency
specifically
commissioner
indicated
allstate
asserting
right
set
contract
claims
commissioner
recovery
contract
viability
setoff
claims
hotly
disputed
question
state
law
question
currently
pending
state
courts
another
case
arising
mission
insolvency
district
observed
california
overriding
interest
regulating
insurance
insolvencies
liquidations
uniform
orderly
manner
case
important
state
interest
undermined
inconsistent
rulings
federal
state
courts
app
pet
cert
based
observations
determination
setoff
question
resolved
state
district
concluded
case
appropriate
one
exercise
burford
abstention
district
stay
hand
pending
california
courts
resolution
setoff
issue
instead
remanded
entire
case
state
district
entered
remand
order
without
ruling
allstate
motion
compel
arbitration
determining
appellate
review
district
remand
order
barred
section
see
garamendi
allstate
ins
citing
thermtron
products
hermansdorfer
remand
order
appealable
section
final
collateral
order
see
citing
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
appeals
ninth
circuit
vacated
district
decision
ordered
case
sent
arbitration
ninth
circuit
concluded
federal
courts
abstain
hearing
case
burford
relief
sought
equitable
nature
therefore
held
abstention
inappropriate
case
commissioner
purported
seeking
legal
relief
app
pet
cert
order
denying
petition
rehearing
commissioner
waived
argument
case
involved
request
equitable
relief
ninth
circuit
holding
remand
orders
appealable
conflicts
decisions
courts
appeals
see
doughty
underwriters
lloyd
london
order
appealable
corcoran
ardra
insurance
burns
wilcox
see
minot
order
appealable
collateral
order
doctrine
determination
burford
abstention
exercised
cases
equitable
relief
sought
see
lac
du
quebec
ltee
american
home
assurance
burford
abstention
appropriate
case
seeking
declaratory
relief
brandenburg
seidel
burford
abstention
appropriate
action
damages
wolfson
mutual
benefit
life
ins
see
fragoso
lopez
federal
abstain
burford
sitting
equity
university
maryland
peat
marwick
main
baltimore
bank
cooperatives
farmer
cheese
cooperative
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflicts
affirm
grounds
different
provided
ninth
circuit
ii
finding
affirmative
bar
appellate
review
district
remand
order
must
determine
whether
review
may
obtained
appeal
section
general
rule
party
entitled
single
appeal
deferred
final
judgment
entered
claims
district
error
stage
litigation
may
ventilated
digital
equipment
desktop
direct
slip
citations
omitted
accordingly
held
decision
ordinarily
considered
final
appealable
section
ends
litigation
merits
leaves
nothing
execute
judgment
catlin
see
also
digital
supra
slip
quoting
standard
also
recognized
however
narrow
class
collateral
orders
meet
definition
finality
nevertheless
immediately
appealable
section
conclusively
determine
disputed
question
completely
separate
merits
action
effectively
unreviewable
appeal
final
judgment
koller
quoting
coopers
lybrand
livesay
important
denied
review
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
application
principles
appealability
remand
order
us
controlled
decision
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
district
case
entered
order
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
staying
federal
diversity
suit
pending
completion
declaratory
judgment
action
filed
state
appeals
held
stay
order
appealable
section
affirmed
determination
two
independent
grounds
first
concluded
stay
order
appealable
final
decision
section
put
litigants
effectively
quoting
idlewild
bon
voyage
liquor
epstein
per
curiam
effect
precisely
surrender
jurisdiction
federal
suit
state
standards
reflect
definition
finality
see
supra
citing
catlin
supra
see
digital
supra
slip
citing
catlin
definition
lauro
lines
chasser
van
cauwenberghe
biard
moses
cone
found
application
compelled
precedent
see
idlewild
reasoning
limited
cases
colorado
river
abstention
closely
similar
doctrine
object
stay
require
essential
part
federal
suit
litigated
state
forum
alternative
reliance
idlewild
also
held
stay
order
issue
moses
cone
appealable
collateral
order
doctrine
determined
stay
order
based
colorado
river
doctrine
presents
important
issue
separate
merits
amounts
refusal
adjudicate
case
federal
orders
reviewed
appeal
final
judgment
federal
action
district
bound
matter
res
judicata
honor
state
judgment
unlike
stay
orders
might
readily
reconsidered
district
stay
orders
ilk
conclusive
practical
equivalent
order
dismissing
case
district
order
remanding
grounds
burford
abstention
relevant
respects
indistinguishable
stay
order
found
appealable
moses
cone
less
order
staying
action
pending
adjudication
dispute
state
puts
litigants
case
effectively
moses
cone
supra
quoting
idlewild
bon
voyage
liquor
epstein
supra
effect
precisely
surrender
jurisdiction
federal
suit
state
indeed
remand
order
clearly
final
stay
order
sense
district
remands
case
state
district
disassociates
case
entirely
retaining
nothing
matter
federal
docket
district
order
also
indistinguishable
stay
order
considered
moses
cone
conclusively
determines
issue
separate
merits
namely
question
whether
federal
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
interest
comity
federalism
see
infra
addition
rights
asserted
appeal
district
abstention
decision
view
sufficiently
important
warrant
immediate
appeal
see
infra
describing
interests
weighed
decision
abstain
burford
cf
digital
supra
slip
review
collateral
order
doctrine
limited
issues
important
denied
review
quoting
cohen
supra
like
stay
order
found
appealable
moses
cone
district
remand
order
case
subsumed
appealable
order
entered
district
previously
stated
order
remanding
removed
action
represent
final
judgment
reviewable
appeal
thermtron
products
hermansdorfer
petitioner
asks
adhere
statement
hold
appellate
review
district
remand
order
obtained
petition
writ
mandamus
extent
thermtron
require
us
ignore
implications
later
holding
moses
cone
however
disavow
thermtron
determination
remand
orders
reviewable
final
judgments
doubtless
necessary
resolution
case
see
posing
question
whether
mandamus
appropriate
vehicle
principal
concern
thermtron
interpretation
bar
appellate
review
embodied
section
see
supra
statement
concerning
appropriate
procedural
vehicle
reviewing
district
remand
order
peripheral
concern
moreover
parties
thermtron
brief
question
opinion
refer
catlin
definition
final
decisions
opinion
nowhere
addresses
whether
class
remand
order
might
appealable
collateral
order
doctrine
indeed
support
thermtron
cites
proposition
remand
orders
reviewable
mandamus
appeal
railroad
wiswall
wall
superannuated
reasoning
little
vitality
today
compare
deeming
writ
error
review
done
inappropriate
vehicle
reviewing
appeals
refusal
hear
decide
moses
cone
holding
stay
order
appealable
amounts
refusal
hear
decide
case
admittedly
remand
orders
like
one
entered
case
meet
traditional
definition
finalitythey
en
litigation
merits
leav
nothing
execute
judgment
catlin
district
remand
order
functionally
indistinguishable
stay
order
found
appealable
moses
cone
see
supra
conclude
appealable
turn
merits
ninth
circuit
decision
respecting
burford
abstention
iii
thus
held
federal
courts
power
refrain
hearing
cases
interfere
pending
state
criminal
proceeding
see
younger
harris
certain
types
state
civil
proceedings
see
huffman
pursue
juidice
vail
cases
resolution
federal
constitutional
question
might
obviated
state
courts
given
opportunity
interpret
ambiguous
state
law
see
railroad
tex
pullman
cases
raising
issues
intimately
involved
sovereign
prerogative
proper
adjudication
might
impaired
unsettled
questions
state
law
see
louisiana
power
light
thibodaux
stewart
concurring
cases
whose
resolution
federal
might
unnecessarily
interfere
state
system
collection
taxes
see
great
lakes
dredge
dock
huffman
cases
duplicative
pending
state
proceeding
see
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
pennsylvania
williams
longstanding
application
doctrines
reflects
commonlaw
background
statutes
conferring
jurisdiction
enacted
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
nopsi
citing
shapiro
jurisdiction
discretion
rev
ninth
circuit
correctly
indicated
long
established
federal
authority
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
asked
employ
historic
powers
equity
fair
assessment
real
estate
mcnary
brennan
concurring
tradition
informs
understanding
jurisdiction
congress
conferred
upon
federal
courts
explains
development
abstention
doctrines
pullman
example
explained
principle
underlying
abstention
doctrines
follows
history
equity
jurisdiction
history
regard
public
consequences
employing
extraordinary
remedy
injunction
public
interests
higher
claim
upon
discretion
federal
chancellor
avoidance
needless
friction
state
policies
whether
policy
relates
enforcement
criminal
law
administration
specialized
scheme
liquidating
embarrassed
business
enterprises
final
authority
state
interpret
doubtful
regulatory
laws
state
cases
reflect
doctrine
abstention
appropriate
federal
system
whereby
federal
courts
exercising
wise
discretion
restrain
authority
scrupulous
regard
rightful
independence
state
governments
smooth
working
federal
judiciary
use
equitable
powers
contribution
courts
furthering
harmonious
relation
state
federal
authority
without
need
rigorous
congressional
restriction
powers
citations
omitted
nevertheless
previously
addressed
whether
principles
underlying
abstention
cases
support
remand
dismissal
action
damages
cf
deakins
monaghan
reserving
question
whether
younger
requires
abstention
action
damages
ankenbrandt
richards
discussing
without
applying
burford
abstention
damages
action
sure
held
fair
assessment
real
estate
mcnary
supra
federal
entertain
section
suit
damages
based
enforcement
state
tax
scheme
see
subsequently
indicated
fair
assessment
case
scope
section
cause
action
see
national
private
truck
council
oklahoma
tax
slip
abstention
doctrines
extent
fair
assessment
apply
abstention
principles
holding
limited
damages
action
case
based
unconstitutional
application
state
tax
law
award
damages
turned
first
declaration
state
tax
fact
unconstitutional
therefore
drew
analogy
huffman
cases
approved
application
abstention
principles
declaratory
judgment
actions
held
federal
decline
hear
action
recovery
damages
civil
rights
act
first
requires
declaration
determination
unconstitutionality
state
tax
scheme
halt
operation
fair
assessment
supra
otherwise
applied
abstention
principles
actions
law
permit
federal
enter
stay
order
postpones
adjudication
dispute
dismiss
federal
suit
altogether
see
thibodaux
approving
stay
order
fornaris
ridge
tool
per
curiam
directing
district
hold
hand
puerto
rican
authoritatively
ruled
local
law
question
light
federal
claims
omitted
emphasis
added
gas
pipe
line
ideal
cement
per
curiam
wise
judicial
administration
case
counsels
decision
federal
question
deferred
potentially
controlling
issue
authoritatively
put
rest
clay
sun
ins
office
approving
postponement
decision
damages
suit
decisions
thibodaux
county
allegheny
frank
mashuda
illustrate
distinction
drawn
remand
orders
dismissals
decisions
merely
stay
adjudication
federal
suit
thibodaux
city
louisiana
brought
eminent
domain
proceeding
state
seeking
condemn
public
use
certain
property
owned
florida
corporation
corporation
removed
action
federal
diversity
grounds
federal
district
decided
motion
stay
case
pending
state
determination
whether
city
exercise
power
eminent
domain
state
law
case
arise
within
equity
jurisdiction
federal
courts
suit
sought
compensation
taking
district
lacked
discretion
deny
relief
corporation
claim
nonetheless
issues
suit
intimately
involved
state
sovereign
prerogative
ibid
concluded
considerations
prevailed
conventional
equity
suits
avoiding
hazards
serious
disruption
federal
courts
state
government
needless
friction
state
federal
authorities
similarly
appropriate
state
eminent
domain
proceeding
brought
removed
federal
ibid
based
conclusion
affirmed
district
order
staying
case
county
allegheny
decided
day
thibodaux
like
thibodaux
involved
review
district
order
abstaining
exercise
diversity
jurisdiction
state
law
eminent
domain
action
unlike
thibodaux
however
district
county
allegheny
merely
stayed
adjudication
federal
action
pending
resolution
issue
state
rather
dismissed
federal
action
altogether
based
large
measure
distinction
reversed
district
order
see
thibodaux
stewart
concurring
mashuda
holds
error
district
dismiss
complaint
emphasis
added
careful
note
thibodaux
district
stayed
federal
suit
pending
adjudication
dispute
state
unlike
outright
dismissal
remand
federal
suit
held
order
merely
staying
action
constitute
abnegation
judicial
duty
contrary
wise
productive
discharge
postponement
decision
best
fruition
thus
held
cases
relief
sought
equitable
nature
otherwise
discretionary
federal
courts
power
stay
action
based
abstention
principles
also
otherwise
appropriate
circumstances
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
altogether
either
dismissing
suit
remanding
state
contrast
held
federal
courts
may
stay
actions
damages
based
abstention
principles
held
principles
support
outright
dismissal
remand
damages
actions
one
final
line
cases
bears
mentioning
though
deal
abstention
doctrines
recognized
federal
courts
discretion
dismiss
damages
actions
certain
narrow
circumstances
doctrine
forum
non
conveniens
seminal
case
recognizing
authority
gulf
oil
gilbert
considered
whether
federal
district
sitting
diversity
new
york
dismiss
tort
action
damages
grounds
virginia
provided
appropriate
locale
adjudicating
dispute
conceded
application
doctrine
rare
also
held
exercise
forum
non
conveniens
limited
actions
equity
recognizing
approving
name
never
indicated
rejecting
application
doctrine
law
actions
integral
necessary
part
evolution
doctrine
wherever
applied
courts
jurisdictions
application
depend
whether
action
law
equity
citations
omitted
fact
applied
forum
non
conveniens
doctrine
manner
change
analysis
case
deal
scope
burford
abstention
doctrine
sure
abstention
doctrines
doctrine
forum
non
conveniens
proceed
similar
premise
rare
circumstances
federal
courts
relinquish
jurisdiction
favor
another
forum
abstention
doctrine
distinct
historical
pedigree
traditional
considerations
behind
dismissal
forum
non
conveniens
differ
markedly
informing
decision
abstain
compare
american
dredging
supra
describing
multifarious
factors
including
public
private
interests
might
allow
district
dismiss
case
doctrine
forum
non
conveniens
burford
describing
conflict
requires
federal
yield
jurisdiction
favor
state
forum
federal
courts
abstain
deference
paramount
interests
another
sovereign
concern
principles
comity
federalism
see
ibid
younger
dismissal
forum
non
conveniens
contrast
historically
reflected
far
broader
range
considerations
see
piper
describing
interests
bear
forum
non
conveniens
decision
gulf
oil
notably
convenience
parties
practical
difficulties
attend
adjudication
dispute
certain
locality
see
piper
supra
evidentiary
problems
unavailability
witnesses
difficulty
coordinating
multiple
suits
gulf
oil
supra
availability
witnesses
need
interplead
virginia
corporation
location
evidence
viewing
case
simple
proceeding
equity
enjoin
enforcement
commissioner
order
framed
question
presented
terms
power
federal
equity
abstain
exercising
jurisdiction
although
federal
equity
jurisdiction
particular
proceeding
may
sound
discretion
whether
jurisdiction
invoked
ground
diversity
citizenship
otherwise
refuse
enforce
protect
legal
rights
exercise
may
prejudicial
public
interest
public
interest
federal
courts
equity
exercise
discretionary
power
proper
regard
rightful
independence
state
governments
carrying
domestic
policy
many
questions
argued
find
necessary
decide
one
assuming
federal
district
jurisdiction
matter
sound
equitable
discretion
declined
exercise
jurisdiction
omitted
quoting
ex
rel
greathouse
dern
pennsylvania
williams
ultimately
concluded
burford
dismissal
appropriate
availability
alternative
federal
forum
threatened
frustrate
purpose
complex
administrative
system
texas
established
see
whole
cycle
conflict
permitted
begin
since
provided
generalized
descriptions
burford
doctrine
see
county
allegheny
abstention
grounds
comity
exercise
jurisdiction
federal
disrupt
state
administrative
process
colorado
river
abstention
exercise
federal
review
question
case
similar
cases
disruptive
state
efforts
establish
coherent
policy
respect
matter
substantial
public
concern
exception
cases
rest
loosely
burford
rationale
louisiana
power
light
thibodaux
revisited
decision
infrequently
intervening
years
see
nopsi
nopsi
recent
exposition
burford
doctrine
located
power
dismiss
based
abstention
principles
discretionary
power
federal
sitting
equity
illustrated
narrow
range
circumstances
burford
justify
dismissal
federal
action
issue
nopsi
preemption
new
orleans
utility
saddled
decision
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
part
cost
building
operating
nuclear
reactor
sought
approval
rate
increase
council
city
new
orleans
council
denied
rate
increase
grounds
public
hearing
necessary
explore
legality
prudency
sic
expenses
allocated
utility
ferc
decision
utility
brought
suit
federal
seeking
injunction
enforcement
council
order
declaration
utility
entitled
rate
increase
utility
claimed
federal
law
required
council
allow
recover
increase
retail
rates
share
cost
reactor
ibid
federal
question
issue
raised
case
state
law
claims
reversing
district
decision
dismiss
burford
recognized
federal
courts
discretion
determining
whether
grant
certain
types
relief
indicated
previously
alabama
pub
serv
southern
burford
permits
federal
sitting
equity
dismiss
case
extraordinary
circumstances
thus
indicated
burford
allows
federal
dismiss
case
presents
difficult
questions
state
law
bearing
policy
problems
substantial
public
import
whose
importance
transcends
result
case
bar
adjudication
federal
forum
disruptive
state
efforts
establish
coherent
policy
respect
matter
substantial
public
concern
quoting
colorado
river
ultimately
held
burford
provide
proper
grounds
dismissal
nopsi
case
involve
claim
even
assertion
federal
claims
way
entangled
skein
state
law
must
untangled
federal
case
proceed
quoting
mcneese
board
ed
community
unit
school
dist
serious
threat
conflict
adjudication
federal
claim
presented
case
state
interest
ensuring
uniformity
ratemaking
decisions
burford
concerned
protecting
complex
state
administrative
processes
undue
federal
influence
require
abstention
whenever
exists
process
even
cases
potential
conflict
state
regulatory
law
policy
nopsi
primary
claim
council
prohibited
federal
law
refusing
provide
reimbursement
wholesale
costs
unlike
claim
state
agency
misapplied
lawful
authority
failed
take
consideration
properly
weigh
relevant
factors
federal
adjudication
sort
claim
disrupt
state
attempt
ensure
uniformity
treatment
essentially
local
problem
quoting
alabama
pub
serv
supra
citations
omitted
ninth
circuit
concluded
district
remand
order
inappropriate
burford
abstention
apply
suits
seeking
solely
legal
relief
addressing
abstention
cases
ninth
circuit
held
federal
courts
power
abstain
certain
cases
locat
ed
unique
powers
equitable
courts
derives
equity
courts
discretionary
power
grant
withhold
relief
quoting
alabama
pub
serv
southern
ninth
circuit
reversal
district
remand
order
case
therefore
reflects
application
per
se
rule
power
federal
courts
abstain
exercising
jurisdiction
least
burford
abstention
cases
founded
upon
discretion
possess
equitable
cases
extent
ninth
circuit
held
federal
burford
dismiss
remand
action
relief
sought
discretionary
judgment
consistent
abstention
cases
explained
power
dismiss
remand
case
abstention
doctrines
terms
discretion
federal
courts
traditionally
exercised
deciding
whether
provide
equitable
discretionary
relief
see
supra
commissioner
appears
conceded
relief
sought
case
neither
equitable
otherwise
committed
discretion
see
app
pet
cert
order
denying
petition
rehearing
cases
applied
traditional
abstention
principles
damages
actions
permitted
federal
withhold
action
state
proceedings
concluded
growe
permitted
federal
courts
applying
abstention
principles
damages
actions
enter
stay
permitted
dismiss
action
altogether
see
supra
per
se
rule
described
ninth
circuit
however
rigid
precedents
require
strictly
limited
abstention
equitable
cases
rather
extended
doctrine
cases
federal
asked
provide
form
discretionary
relief
see
huffman
samuels
supra
moreover
demonstrated
decision
thibodaux
see
supra
held
abstention
principles
completely
inapplicable
damages
actions
burford
might
support
federal
decision
postpone
adjudication
damages
action
pending
resolution
state
courts
disputed
question
state
law
example
given
situation
district
faced
case
stay
order
might
appropriate
setoff
issue
decided
state
courts
time
district
ruled
see
prudential
reinsurance
supra
interest
avoiding
inconsistent
adjudications
point
district
might
justified
entering
stay
await
outcome
state
litigation
like
ninth
circuit
review
remand
order
entered
find
unnecessary
determine
whether
limited
stay
order
warranted
facts
case
occasion
resolve
additional
authority
abstain
might
provided
decision
fair
assessment
see
supra
find
necessary
inquire
fully
whether
case
presents
sort
exceptional
circumstance
burford
abstention
grounds
yielding
federal
jurisdiction
might
appropriate
precedents
federal
courts
power
dismiss
remand
cases
based
abstention
principles
relief
sought
equitable
otherwise
discretionary
damages
action
conclude
district
remand
order
unwarranted
application
burford
doctrine
judgment
affirmed
ordered
justice
scalia
concurring
join
opinion
write
separately
respond
justice
kennedy
concurrence
justice
kennedy
joining
opinion
says
rule
possibility
federal
might
dismiss
suit
damages
case
serious
affront
interests
federalism
averted
way
post
joined
today
opinion
believed
left
discretionary
dismissal
available
action
foreclosed
think
holding
clearly
summarized
concluding
sentences
opinion
precedents
federal
courts
power
dismiss
remand
cases
based
abstention
principles
relief
sought
equitable
otherwise
discretionary
damages
action
conclude
district
remand
order
unwarranted
application
burford
doctrine
ante
justice
kennedy
projected
horrible
serious
affront
interests
federalism
possibly
materialize
holding
serious
affront
interests
federalism
congress
lawfully
decides
state
cases
hold
today
opinion
affirms
congress
whenever
instructs
federal
courts
assert
jurisdiction
matters
relief
discretionary
today
felt
empowered
decide
congressionally
decreed
jurisdiction
constitutes
serious
affront
opinion
read
much
differently
pertinently
found
unnecessary
inquire
fully
whether
case
presents
sort
exceptional
circumstance
burford
abstention
grounds
yielding
federal
jurisdiction
might
appropriate
ante
certainly
grounds
inquiry
thought
relevant
unsettled
since
resolved
question
california
law
justice
kennedy
refers
post
part
basis
district
decision
remand
state
also
pointed
generally
thought
state
overriding
interest
regulating
insurance
insolvencies
liquidations
uniform
orderly
manner
app
pet
cert
opinion
says
necessary
inquire
fully
matter
damages
action
justice
kennedy
concurring
suit
first
filed
raised
unsettled
since
resolved
question
california
law
concerning
ability
companies
allstate
position
set
claims
held
mission
principal
reason
district
decision
dismiss
case
threat
posed
state
proceedings
different
state
federal
rulings
question
concern
reasonable
matter
tradition
express
federal
consent
important
interest
maintaining
precise
detailed
regulatory
schemes
insurance
industry
see
act
stat
amended
section
et
seq
fact
state
rather
agency
chosen
implement
california
scheme
provided
reason
less
federal
stay
hand
time
however
considered
case
dismissal
suit
damages
extension
doctrine
burford
sun
oil
held
authorized
necessary
explains
doubt
preferred
course
circumstances
resolve
serious
potential
federal
intrusion
staying
suit
retaining
jurisdiction
rule
though
possibility
federal
might
dismiss
suit
damages
case
serious
affront
interests
federalism
averted
way
need
reach
question
abstention
doctrines
significant
contribution
theory
federalism
preservation
federal
system
practice
allow
federal
courts
give
appropriate
necessary
recognition
role
authority
duty
take
considerations
account
must
inform
exercise
federal
jurisdiction
principles
equity
thus
sole
foundation
abstention
rules
obligations
comity
respect
appropriate
balance
state
federal
interests
important
part
justification
authority
abstention
well
see
sound
respect
independence
state
action
requires
federal
equity
stay
hand
younger
harris
rooting
abstention
proper
respect
state
functions
sensitivity
legitimate
interests
state
national
governments
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
abstention
doctrines
based
considerations
proper
constitutional
adjudication
regard
relations
see
also
shapiro
jurisdiction
discretion
rev
traditional
role
discretion
exercise
equity
jurisdiction
makes
abstention
easiest
justify
cases
equitable
relief
sought
abstention
including
dismissal
possibility
may
yet
addressed
suit
damages
fundamental
concerns
federalism
require
us
face
issue
observations
join
opinion