scott
illinois
argued
december
decided
march
petitioner
indigent
convicted
shoplifting
fined
bench
trial
illinois
state
applicable
illinois
statute
set
maximum
penalty
offense
fine
one
year
jail
petitioner
conviction
ultimately
affirmed
illinois
petitioner
contention
line
cases
culminating
argersinger
hamlin
requires
state
provision
counsel
whenever
imprisonment
authorized
penalty
held
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
require
indigent
criminal
defendant
sentenced
term
imprisonment
unless
state
afforded
right
assistance
appointed
counsel
defense
require
state
trial
appoint
counsel
criminal
defendant
petitioner
charged
statutory
offense
imprisonment
upon
conviction
authorized
imposed
pp
argersinger
hamlin
supra
limits
constitutional
right
appointed
counsel
state
criminal
proceedings
case
actually
leads
imprisonment
even
matter
res
nova
argersinger
central
premise
actual
imprisonment
penalty
different
kind
fines
mere
threat
imprisonment
eminently
sound
warrants
adoption
actual
imprisonment
line
defining
constitutional
right
appointment
counsel
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
powell
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
marshall
stevens
joined
post
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
john
elson
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
gerri
papushkewych
assistant
attorney
general
illinois
argued
cause
respondent
brief
william
scott
attorney
general
donald
mackay
melbourne
noel
assistant
attorneys
general
howard
eisenberg
filed
brief
national
legal
aid
defender
assn
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
case
resolve
conflict
among
state
lower
federal
courts
regarding
proper
application
decision
argersinger
hamlin
petitioner
scott
convicted
theft
fined
bench
trial
circuit
cook
county
conviction
affirmed
state
intermediate
appellate
illinois
scott
contention
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
required
illinois
provide
trial
counsel
expense
petitioner
scott
convicted
shoplifting
merchandise
valued
less
applicable
illinois
statute
set
maximum
penalty
offense
fine
one
year
jail
petitioner
argues
line
cases
culminating
argersinger
hamlin
supra
requires
state
provision
counsel
whenever
imprisonment
authorized
penalty
illinois
rejected
contention
quoting
following
language
argersinger
hold
therefore
absent
knowing
intelligent
waiver
person
may
imprisoned
offense
whether
classified
petty
misdemeanor
felony
unless
represented
counsel
trial
rule
announce
today
every
judge
know
trial
misdemeanor
starts
imprisonment
may
imposed
even
though
local
law
permits
unless
accused
represented
counsel
measure
seriousness
gravity
offense
therefore
know
name
lawyer
represent
accused
trial
starts
petition
certiorari
petitioner
referred
issue
case
question
left
open
argersinger
hamlin
pet
cert
whether
question
indeed
left
open
argersinger
depends
upon
whether
one
considers
opinion
point
moving
line
holding
state
required
go
far
furnishing
counsel
indigent
defendants
illinois
quoting
language
argersinger
clearly
viewed
latter
argersinger
holding
additional
support
proposition
may
derived
concluding
paragraph
opinion
case
run
misdemeanors
affected
today
ruling
end
actual
deprivation
person
liberty
accused
receive
benefit
guiding
hand
counsel
necessary
one
liberty
jeopardy
considerable
doubt
sixth
amendment
originally
drafted
framers
bill
rights
contemplated
guarantee
right
accused
criminal
prosecution
federal
employ
lawyer
assist
defense
beaney
right
counsel
american
courts
powell
alabama
held
alabama
obligated
appoint
counsel
scottsboro
defendants
phrasing
inquiry
whether
defendants
substance
denied
right
counsel
whether
denial
infringes
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
concluded
opinion
following
language
statute
every
state
union
express
provision
law
determination
courts
make
duty
trial
judge
accused
unable
employ
counsel
appoint
counsel
rule
applies
broadly
criminal
prosecutions
others
limited
serious
crimes
limited
number
capital
cases
rule
adopted
unanimous
accord
reflects
establish
inherent
right
counsel
appointed
least
cases
like
present
lends
convincing
support
conclusion
reached
fundamental
nature
right
several
terms
later
held
duncan
louisiana
right
jury
trial
federal
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
applicable
state
virtue
fourteenth
amendment
held
however
doubtless
true
category
petty
crimes
offenses
subject
sixth
amendment
jury
trial
provision
subject
fourteenth
amendment
jury
trial
requirement
applied
crimes
carrying
possible
penalties
six
months
require
jury
trial
otherwise
qualify
petty
offenses
omitted
baldwin
new
york
controlling
opinion
justice
white
concluded
offense
deemed
petty
purposes
right
trial
jury
imprisonment
six
months
authorized
argersinger
state
florida
urged
similar
dichotomy
employed
area
offense
punishable
less
six
months
jail
require
appointment
counsel
indigent
defendant
argersinger
rejected
analogy
however
observing
right
trial
jury
different
genealogy
brigaded
system
trial
judge
alone
number
separate
opinions
gideon
duncan
baldwin
argersinger
suggests
constitutional
line
drawing
becomes
difficult
reach
constitution
extended
efforts
made
transpose
lines
one
area
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
another
process
incorporation
creates
special
difficulties
state
federal
contexts
often
different
application
principle
may
ramifications
distinct
degree
kind
range
human
conduct
regulated
state
criminal
laws
much
broader
federal
criminal
laws
particularly
petty
offense
part
spectrum
matter
constitutional
adjudication
therefore
less
willing
extrapolate
already
extended
line
although
general
nature
principle
sought
applied
clear
precise
limits
ramifications
become
less
decided
cases
departed
literal
meaning
sixth
amendment
fall
back
common
law
existed
prior
enactment
amendment
since
perversely
gave
less
way
right
counsel
accused
felons
accused
misdemeanors
see
powell
alabama
supra
argersinger
rejected
arguments
social
cost
lack
available
lawyers
militated
holding
part
thought
arguments
factually
incorrect
rejected
much
larger
part
conclusion
incarceration
severe
sanction
imposed
result
criminal
trial
unless
indigent
defendant
offered
appointed
counsel
assist
defense
regardless
cost
implicit
rule
opinion
repeatedly
referred
trials
accused
deprived
liberty
case
actually
leads
imprisonment
even
brief
period
chief
justice
opinion
concurring
result
also
observed
deprivation
liberty
serious
matter
although
intentions
argersinger
unmistakably
clear
opinion
conclude
today
argersinger
indeed
delimit
constitutional
right
appointed
counsel
state
criminal
proceedings
even
matter
res
nova
believe
central
premise
argersinger
actual
imprisonment
penalty
different
kind
fines
mere
threat
imprisonment
eminently
sound
warrants
adoption
actual
imprisonment
line
defining
constitutional
right
appointment
counsel
argersinger
proved
reasonably
workable
whereas
extension
create
confusion
impose
unpredictable
necessarily
substantial
costs
quite
diverse
therefore
hold
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
require
indigent
criminal
defendant
sentenced
term
imprisonment
unless
state
afforded
right
assistance
appointed
counsel
defense
judgment
illinois
accordingly
affirmed
footnotes
rev
ch
penalty
provision
statute
time
question
provided
relevant
part
person
first
convicted
theft
property
person
exceeding
value
shall
fined
exceed
imprisoned
penal
institution
penitentiary
exceed
one
year
person
convicted
theft
second
subsequent
time
prior
conviction
type
theft
shall
imprisoned
penitentiary
one
years
brief
respondent
argersinger
hamlin
note
line
drawn
argersinger
full
awareness
various
options
petitioner
case
legal
aid
society
new
york
amicus
curiae
argued
right
appointed
counsel
pertain
case
imprisonment
authorized
penalty
underlying
offense
brief
petitioner
argersinger
hamlin
brief
legal
aid
society
new
york
amicus
curiae
argersinger
hamlin
respondent
florida
amici
urged
line
drawn
baldwin
purposes
jury
trial
guarantee
see
brief
respondent
argersinger
hamlin
solicitor
general
argued
standard
finally
adopted
actual
imprisonment
brief
amicus
curiae
argersinger
hamlin
unfortunately
extensive
empirical
work
done
exists
suggests
requirements
argersinger
proved
unduly
burdensome
see
ingraham
impact
argersinger
one
year
later
law
soc
rev
jurisdictions
difficulty
implementing
argersinger
certainly
argument
extending
krantz
smith
rossman
froyd
hoffman
right
counsel
criminal
cases
justice
powell
concurring
reasons
stated
opinion
argersinger
hamlin
think
rule
adopted
case
required
constitution
moreover
drawing
line
based
whether
imprisonment
even
overnight
practical
effect
precluding
provision
counsel
types
cases
conviction
serious
consequences
argersinger
rule
also
tends
impair
proper
functioning
criminal
justice
system
trial
judges
advance
hearing
evidence
knowing
anything
case
except
charge
often
compelled
forgo
legislatively
granted
option
impose
sentence
imprisonment
upon
conviction
preserving
option
providing
counsel
often
impossible
impracticable
particularly
congested
urban
courts
scores
cases
heard
single
sitting
small
rural
communities
lawyers
may
available
despite
continuing
reservations
argersinger
rule
approved
opinion
four
justices
reaffirmed
today
important
provide
clear
guidance
hundreds
courts
across
country
confront
problem
daily
accordingly
mindful
stare
decisis
join
opinion
however
hope
due
time
majority
recognize
flexible
rule
consistent
due
process
better
serve
cause
justice
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
stevens
join
dissenting
sixth
amendment
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
emphasis
supplied
gideon
wainwright
extended
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
fourteenth
amendment
held
right
includes
right
indigent
counsel
provided
argersinger
hamlin
held
right
recognized
gideon
extends
trial
offense
convicted
defendant
likely
incarcerated
case
presents
question
whether
right
counsel
extends
person
accused
offense
although
punishable
incarceration
actually
punished
fine
petitioner
aubrey
scott
charged
theft
violation
rev
ch
offense
punishable
imprisonment
one
year
fine
four
months
argersinger
decided
scott
bench
trial
without
counsel
without
notice
entitlement
retain
counsel
indigent
counsel
provided
found
guilty
charged
sentenced
pay
fine
opinion
best
ignores
basic
principles
prior
decisions
affirms
scott
conviction
without
counsel
sentenced
pay
fine
view
plain
wording
sixth
amendment
precedents
compel
conclusion
scott
uncounseled
conviction
violated
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
reversed
opinion
intimates
precedents
ordaining
right
appointed
counsel
indigent
accuseds
state
criminal
proceedings
fail
provide
principled
basis
deciding
case
demonstrably
principles
developed
relevant
precedents
clear
sound
simply
chooses
ignore
gideon
wainwright
held
representation
counsel
criminal
proceeding
fundamental
essential
fair
trial
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
eason
reflection
require
us
recognize
adversary
system
criminal
justice
person
haled
poor
hire
lawyer
assured
fair
trial
unless
counsel
provided
seems
us
obvious
truth
governments
state
federal
quite
properly
spend
vast
sums
money
establish
machinery
try
defendants
accused
crime
lawyers
prosecute
everywhere
deemed
essential
protect
public
interest
orderly
society
similarly
defendants
charged
crime
indeed
fail
hire
best
lawyers
get
prepare
present
defenses
government
hires
lawyers
prosecute
defendants
money
hire
lawyers
defend
strongest
indications
widespread
belief
lawyers
criminal
courts
necessities
luxuries
right
one
charged
crime
counsel
may
deemed
fundamental
essential
fair
trials
countries
beginning
state
national
constitutions
laws
laid
great
emphasis
procedural
substantive
safeguards
designed
assure
fair
trials
impartial
tribunals
every
defendant
stands
equal
law
noble
ideal
realized
poor
man
charged
crime
face
accusers
without
lawyer
assist
argersinger
hamlin
took
cautious
approach
toward
implementing
logical
consequences
gideon
rationale
petitioner
argersinger
sentenced
jail
days
conviction
trial
without
counsel
carrying
concealed
weapon
florida
offense
carrying
authorized
penalty
imprisonment
six
months
fine
state
relying
duncan
louisiana
baldwin
new
york
urged
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
like
right
jury
trial
apply
accuseds
charged
petty
offenses
punishable
less
six
months
imprisonment
argersinger
refused
extend
petty
offense
limitation
right
counsel
pointed
limitation
contrary
express
words
sixth
amendment
guarantee
enumerated
rights
criminal
prosecutions
right
jury
trial
sixth
amendment
right
applicable
held
inapplicable
petty
offenses
limitation
based
historical
considerations
peculiar
right
jury
trial
right
counsel
fundamentally
related
fairness
criminal
prosecutions
right
jury
trial
fact
essential
meaningful
exercise
sixth
amendment
protections
although
analysis
like
gideon
earlier
cases
suggested
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
apply
state
criminal
prosecutions
argersinger
held
indigent
defendant
entitled
appointed
counsel
even
petty
offenses
punishable
six
months
incarceration
less
likely
sentenced
incarceration
time
convicted
question
right
counsel
cases
incarceration
authorized
imposed
expressly
reserved
ii
view
petitioner
prevail
case
without
extending
right
counsel
beyond
assumed
exist
argersinger
neither
party
case
questioned
existence
right
counsel
trials
involving
nonpetty
offenses
punishable
six
months
jail
question
addressed
whether
right
applied
petty
offenses
right
jury
trial
extend
reasoning
applying
right
counsel
case
right
counsel
fundamental
fair
proceeding
right
jury
trial
historical
limitations
jury
trial
right
irrelevant
right
counsel
certainly
support
standard
right
counsel
restrictive
standard
granting
right
jury
trial
brother
powell
commented
opinion
concurring
result
argersinger
clear
wherever
line
drawn
must
drawn
indigent
right
appointed
counsel
cases
due
process
right
jury
trial
argersinger
thus
established
two
dimensional
test
right
counsel
right
attaches
nonpetty
offense
punishable
six
months
jail
addition
offense
actual
incarceration
likely
regardless
maximum
authorized
penalty
see
duke
right
appointed
counsel
argersinger
beyond
crim
rev
offense
theft
scott
charged
certainly
petty
one
punishable
sentence
one
year
jail
unlike
many
traffic
regulatory
offenses
carries
moral
stigma
associated
crimes
traditionally
recognized
indicative
moral
depravity
state
indicted
oral
argument
services
professional
prosecutor
considered
essential
prosecution
offense
tr
oral
arg
cf
argersinger
hamlin
powell
concurring
result
likewise
nonindigent
defendants
charged
offense
well
advised
hire
best
lawyers
get
scott
right
assistance
appointed
counsel
thus
plainly
mandated
logic
prior
cases
including
argersinger
iii
rather
decide
consonant
assumption
regard
nonpetty
offenses
implicit
explicit
argersinger
today
retreats
indefensible
position
argersinger
actual
imprisonment
standard
test
determining
boundary
sixth
amendment
right
appointed
counsel
state
misdemeanor
cases
thus
necessarily
deciding
many
cases
one
defendant
right
appointed
counsel
even
constitutional
right
jury
trial
simply
intolerable
result
actual
imprisonment
standard
unprecedented
exclusive
test
also
problems
inherent
application
demonstrate
superiority
authorized
imprisonment
standard
require
appointment
counsel
indigents
accused
offense
imprisonment
time
authorized
first
authorized
imprisonment
standard
faithfully
implements
principles
sixth
amendment
identified
gideon
procedural
rules
established
state
statutes
geared
nature
potential
penalty
offense
actual
penalty
imposed
particular
cases
authorized
penalty
also
better
predictor
stigma
collateral
consequences
attach
conviction
offense
exception
argersinger
authorized
penalties
used
consistently
true
measures
seriousness
offenses
see
baldwin
new
york
frank
moreland
imprisonment
sanction
particularly
associated
criminal
offenses
trials
offenses
punishable
imprisonment
accordingly
possess
characteristics
found
gideon
require
appointment
counsel
contrast
actual
imprisonment
standard
opinion
case
demonstrates
denies
right
counsel
criminal
prosecutions
accuseds
suffer
severe
consequences
prosecution
imprisonment
second
authorized
imprisonment
test
presents
problems
administration
avoids
necessity
consideration
likely
sentence
individual
case
trial
attendant
problems
inaccurate
predictions
unequal
treatment
apparent
actual
bias
problems
actual
imprisonment
standard
suggested
brother
powell
concurrence
argersinger
echoed
scholarly
criticism
decision
petitioner
emphasizes
defects
arguing
considerable
force
implementation
actual
imprisonment
standard
must
assuredly
lead
violations
due
process
equal
protection
clauses
constitution
brief
petitioner
finally
authorized
imprisonment
test
ensures
courts
abrogate
legislative
judgments
concerning
appropriate
range
penalties
considered
offense
actual
imprisonment
standard
judge
forced
decide
advance
trial
without
hearing
evidence
whether
forgo
entirely
judicial
discretion
impose
sentence
imprisonment
abandon
responsibility
consider
full
range
punishments
established
legislature
alternatives
assuming
availability
counsel
appoint
counsel
retain
discretion
vested
law
abandon
discretion
advance
proceed
without
counsel
argersinger
hamlin
supra
powell
concurring
result
apparent
reason
adoption
actual
imprisonment
standard
misdemeanors
concern
economic
burden
authorized
imprisonment
standard
might
place
respect
concern
irrelevant
speculative
role
enforcing
constitutional
guarantees
criminal
defendants
made
dependent
budgetary
decisions
state
governments
unanimous
made
clear
mayer
chicago
rejecting
proposed
fiscal
justification
providing
free
transcripts
appeals
appellant
subject
imprisonment
argument
misconceives
principle
griffin
illinois
griffin
represent
balance
needs
accused
interest
society
principle
flat
prohibition
pricing
indigent
defendants
effective
appeal
available
others
able
pay
way
invidiousness
discrimination
exists
criminal
procedures
made
available
pay
erased
differences
sentences
may
imposed
state
fiscal
interest
therefore
irrelevant
furthermore
public
defender
systems
proved
economically
feasible
establishment
systems
replace
appointment
private
attorneys
keep
costs
acceptable
levels
even
number
cases
requiring
appointment
counsel
increases
dramatically
public
defender
system
alternative
also
answers
argument
authorized
imprisonment
standard
clog
courts
inexperienced
appointed
counsel
perhaps
strongest
refutation
respondent
alarmist
prophecies
authorized
imprisonment
standard
wreak
havoc
standard
produced
result
substantial
number
already
provide
counsel
cases
imprisonment
authorized
include
large
majority
country
population
great
diversity
urban
rural
environments
moreover
yet
provide
counsel
cases
imprisonment
authorized
many
provide
counsel
periods
imprisonment
longer
days
months
months
authorized
fact
scott
entitled
appointed
counsel
current
laws
least
may
well
adoption
authorized
imprisonment
standard
lead
state
local
governments
criminal
statutes
state
legislature
local
government
might
determine
longer
desired
authorize
incarceration
certain
minor
offenses
light
expense
meeting
requirements
constitution
view
long
overdue
event
actual
imprisonment
standard
must
inevitably
lead
courts
make
plainly
properly
legislative
responsibility
iv
opinion
turns
reasoning
argersinger
head
restricts
right
counsel
perhaps
fundamental
sixth
amendment
right
narrowly
admittedly
less
fundamental
right
jury
trial
abstract
pretext
constitutional
line
drawing
becomes
difficult
reach
constitution
extended
efforts
made
transpose
lines
one
area
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
another
ante
camouflage
anomalous
result
reaches
today
decision
reminds
one
justice
black
description
betts
brady
anachronism
handed
kes
abrupt
break
precedents
gideon
wainwright
scott
found
indigent
time
initial
appeal
attorney
therefore
appointed
provided
free
transcript
trial
use
appeal
illinois
courts
parties
assumed
indigency
time
trial
purposes
case
see
app
sixth
amendment
embodies
realistic
recognition
obvious
truth
average
defendant
professional
legal
skill
protect
brought
tribunal
power
take
life
liberty
wherein
prosecution
presented
experienced
learned
counsel
simple
orderly
necessary
lawyer
untrained
layman
may
appear
intricate
complex
mysterious
johnson
zerbst
right
heard
many
cases
little
avail
comprehend
right
heard
counsel
even
intelligent
educated
layman
small
sometimes
skill
science
law
charged
crime
incapable
generally
determining
whether
indictment
good
bad
unfamiliar
rules
evidence
left
without
aid
counsel
may
put
trial
without
proper
charge
convicted
upon
incompetent
evidence
evidence
irrelevant
issue
otherwise
inadmissible
lacks
skill
knowledge
adequately
prepare
defense
even
though
perfect
one
requires
guiding
hand
counsel
every
step
proceedings
without
though
guilty
faces
danger
conviction
know
establish
innocence
true
men
intelligence
much
true
ignorant
illiterate
feeble
intellect
powell
alabama
see
argersinger
hamlin
simply
arguable
ever
held
trial
petty
offense
may
held
secret
without
notice
accused
charges
cases
defendant
right
confront
accusers
compel
attendance
witnesses
behalf
quoting
junker
right
counsel
misdemeanor
cases
rev
cf
oliver
right
public
trial
pointer
texas
right
confrontation
klopfer
north
carolina
right
speedy
trial
washington
texas
right
compulsory
process
witnesses
groppi
wisconsin
right
impartial
jury
historical
support
limiting
deep
commitment
trial
jury
serious
criminal
cases
support
similar
limitation
right
assistance
counsel
sixth
amendment
extended
right
counsel
beyond
dimensions
nothing
language
amendment
history
decisions
indicate
intended
embody
retraction
right
petty
offenses
wherein
common
law
previously
require
counsel
provided
argersinger
hamlin
citations
omitted
see
supra
justice
powell
suggests
problems
requiring
presence
counsel
insure
accused
fair
trial
raised
even
situations
prospect
imprisonment
need
consider
requirements
sixth
amendment
regards
right
counsel
loss
liberty
involved
however
petitioner
fact
sentenced
jail
see
powell
concurring
result
theft
conviction
implies
dishonesty
may
basis
impeaching
petitioner
testimony
proceeding
people
stufflebean
app
jurors
must
fair
character
approved
integrity
rev
ch
petitioner
may
excluded
jury
duty
result
theft
conviction
twelve
occupations
licensed
illinois
law
occupations
licensed
city
chicago
ordinances
require
license
applicant
good
moral
character
equivalent
background
qualification
found
unsatisfied
theft
conviction
see
chicago
council
lawyers
study
licensing
restrictions
city
chicago
state
illinois
federal
law
petitioner
theft
conviction
bar
working
capacity
bank
insured
federal
deposit
insurance
corporation
possibly
public
private
employment
requiring
security
clearance
cfr
iii
gideon
wainwright
see
junker
supra
brother
powell
concurrence
argersinger
joined
brother
rehnquist
also
supports
petitioner
right
appointed
counsel
case
concurrence
explicitly
stated
right
counsel
extend
least
far
right
jury
trial
preference
approach
repeatedly
limited
petty
offenses
see
even
petty
offenses
argersinger
concurrence
mandated
following
procedures
determination
whether
counsel
must
appointed
made
accused
formally
pleads
many
petty
cases
resolved
guilty
pleas
assistance
counsel
may
required
trial
conclude
assistance
counsel
required
case
state
reasons
issue
preserved
review
see
supra
scope
collateral
consequences
constitutionally
permissible
actual
imprisonment
standard
remains
unsettled
uncertainty
another
source
confusion
generated
standard
see
tr
oral
arg
white
note
argersinger
hamlin
collateral
use
prior
misdemeanor
convictions
indigents
unrepresented
counsel
trial
ohio
see
krantz
smith
rossman
froyd
hoffman
right
counsel
criminal
cases
mandate
argersinger
hamlin
duke
right
appointed
counsel
argersinger
beyond
crim
rev
approach
advocated
brother
powell
argersinger
also
criticized
unworkable
administrative
burden
impose
see
uniform
rules
criminal
procedure
rule
comment
see
also
bounds
smith
see
uniform
rules
criminal
procedure
rule
comment
estimates
misdemeanor
defendants
opposed
felony
defendants
meet
necessary
indigency
standard
national
legal
aid
defender
face
justice
note
pp
survey
indicates
national
average
indigency
felony
cases
misdemeanor
cases
national
advisory
commission
criminal
justice
standards
goals
adopted
maximum
caseload
standard
felony
cases
misdemeanor
cases
per
attorney
per
year
national
advisory
commission
criminal
justice
standards
goals
courts
standard
pp
see
also
face
justice
supra
table
study
conducted
state
wisconsin
introduced
state
public
defender
system
wisconsin
state
ex
rel
winnie
harris
extended
right
counsel
way
urged
petitioner
case
indicated
average
cost
providing
counsel
misdemeanor
case
reduced
using
public
defender
rather
appointing
private
counsel
brief
national
legal
aid
defender
assn
amicus
curiae
see
alaska
alaska
art
alaska
stat
ann
offense
punishable
incarceration
may
result
loss
valuable
license
heavy
fine
alexander
anchorage
alaska
arizona
rule
crim
proc
criminal
proceedings
may
result
punishment
loss
liberty
concludes
interest
justice
requires
california
cal
penal
code
ann
west
supp
criminal
cases
connecticut
stat
criminal
actions
delaware
del
code
tit
indigents
arrest
charged
crime
defendant
requests
orders
hawaii
haw
rev
stat
offense
punishable
confinement
jail
indiana
ind
art
criminal
prosecutions
bolkovac
state
ind
kentucky
rule
crim
proc
offenses
punishable
fine
imprisonment
louisiana
la
code
crim
art
west
supp
offenses
punishable
imprisonment
massachusetts
mass
sup
jud
rule
crime
sentence
imprisonment
may
imposed
minnesota
stat
felonies
gross
misdemeanors
statute
defines
petty
misdemeanors
punishable
imprisonment
fine
new
hampshire
rev
stat
ann
supp
offenses
punishable
imprisonment
new
mexico
stat
ann
supp
offense
carrying
possible
sentence
imprisonment
new
york
crim
proc
law
mckinney
misdemeanors
except
traffic
violations
people
weinstock
misc
traffic
violations
subject
possible
imprisonment
oklahoma
okla
tit
criminal
cases
stewart
state
crim
app
oregon
brown
multnomah
county
dist
app
criminal
cases
south
dakota
comp
laws
ann
supp
criminal
action
tennessee
code
ann
persons
accused
crime
misdemeanor
whatsoever
texas
tex
code
crim
proc
art
vernon
felony
misdemeanor
punishable
imprisonment
virginia
code
supp
misdemeanors
penalty
may
confinement
jail
washington
justice
crim
rule
criminal
offenses
punishable
loss
liberty
west
virginia
code
persons
indictment
crime
wisconsin
wis
art
state
ex
rel
winnie
harris
offenses
punishable
incarceration
respondent
claims
statutes
case
law
need
read
requiring
appointment
counsel
imprisonable
cases
brief
respondent
although
law
unambiguous
every
case
ambiguities
laws
suggest
list
perhaps
short
least
provide
counsel
trivial
offenses
colorado
rev
stat
misdemeanors
municipal
code
violations
discretion
public
defender
georgia
code
violation
state
law
local
ordinance
may
result
incarceration
missouri
mo
op
atty
counsel
appointed
misdemeanor
cases
minor
significance
prejudice
might
result
montana
mont
rev
codes
ann
may
assign
counsel
misdemeanors
interest
justice
nevada
rev
stat
persons
accused
gross
misdemeanors
felonies
new
jersey
stat
ann
west
crim
rule
offense
indictable
pennsylvania
rules
crim
proc
summary
cases
wyoming
wyo
stat
entitled
appointed
counsel
serious
crimes
serious
crimes
incarceration
practical
possibility
cases
accused
shall
may
punished
imprisonment
penitentiary
addition
alabama
florida
georgia
mississippi
today
covered
fifth
circuit
adoption
authorized
imprisonment
standard
see
potts
estelle
thomas
savage
several
adopted
authorized
imprisonment
standard
give
courts
discretionary
authority
appoint
counsel
cases
perceived
necessary
maryland
missouri
montana
north
dakota
ohio
pennsylvania
iowa
iowa
rules
crim
proc
maryland
md
ann
code
art
mississippi
miss
code
ann
idaho
idaho
code
supp
mahler
birnbaum
idaho
maine
newell
state
ohio
ohio
rules
crim
proc
rhode
island
rule
crim
proc
super
rule
crim
proc
dist
state
holliday
utah
utah
code
ann
salt
lake
city
salt
lake
county
see
nn
supra
actual
figure
may
closer
following
appear
governed
likelihood
imprisonment
standard
arkansas
ark
rule
crim
proc
criminal
offenses
except
misdemeanor
cases
determines
circumstances
conviction
result
imprisonment
florida
rule
crim
proc
misdemeanor
municipal
ordinance
violation
unless
prior
written
statement
judge
conviction
result
imprisonment
north
carolina
stat
supp
case
imprisonment
fine
likely
adjudged
north
dakota
rule
crim
proc
nonfelony
cases
unless
magistrate
determines
sentence
upon
conviction
include
imprisonment
vermont
stat
tit
supp
misdemeanor
punishable
period
imprisonment
fine
unless
prior
determination
imprisonment
fine
imposed
two
require
appointment
counsel
indigents
cases
constitutionally
required
alabama
code
south
carolina
code
supp
require
counsel
misdemeanor
cases
virtue
judicial
decisions
reacting
argersinger
kansas
state
giddings
michigan
people
studaker
people
harris
app
nebraska
kovarik
county
banner
neb
see
krantz
et
supra
adversary
system
criminal
justice
right
essential
right
assistance
counsel
lakeside
oregon
interest
protected
right
guilt
innocence
determined
jury
tempering
possibly
arbitrary
harsh
exercise
prosecutorial
judicial
power
important
fundamental
guarantee
fair
trial
right
counsel
argersinger
hamlin
powell
concurring
result
footnotes
omitted
justice
blackmun
dissenting
substantially
reasons
stated
justice
brennan
parts
ii
dissenting
opinion
hold
right
counsel
secured
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
extends
least
far
right
jury
trial
secured
amendments
accordingly
hold
indigent
defendant
state
criminal
case
must
afforded
appointed
counsel
whenever
defendant
prosecuted
nonpetty
criminal
offense
one
punishable
six
months
imprisonment
see
duncan
louisiana
baldwin
new
york
whenever
defendant
convicted
offense
actually
subjected
term
imprisonment
argersinger
hamlin
resolution
feel
provide
bright
line
defendants
prosecutors
trial
appellate
courts
deserve
time
reconcile
principled
basis
important
considerations
led
decisions
duncan
baldwin
argersinger
approach
course
judgment
illinois
upholding
petitioner
scott
conviction
reversed
since
convicted
offense
constitutionally
entitled
jury
trial
therefore
dissent