mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
argued
january
decided
march
petitioners
filed
action
federal
district
alleging
securities
trading
account
mishandled
respondent
brokers
arbitration
panel
convened
arbitration
provision
parties
contract
federal
arbitration
act
faa
awarded
petitioners
punitive
damages
relief
district
appeals
disallowed
punitive
damages
award
contract
provision
specifies
laws
state
new
york
govern
new
york
law
allows
courts
arbitrators
award
punitive
damages
held
arbitral
award
enforced
within
scope
contract
parties
pp
case
governed
contract
say
arbitrability
petitioners
punitive
damages
claim
faa
central
purpose
ensure
private
agreements
arbitrate
enforced
according
terms
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
decisions
make
clear
contracting
parties
agree
include
punitive
damages
claims
within
issues
arbitrated
faa
ensures
agreement
enforced
according
terms
even
rule
state
law
otherwise
exclude
claims
arbitration
see
terminix
dobson
pp
appeals
misinterpreted
parties
contract
reading
provision
arbitration
provision
conflicting
although
agreement
contains
express
reference
punitive
damages
claims
fact
intended
include
page
ii
claims
demonstrated
considering
separately
impact
two
provisions
inquiring
meaning
taken
together
process
reveals
provision
unequivocal
exclusion
punitive
damages
claims
arbitration
provision
strongly
implies
arbitral
award
punitive
damages
appropriate
best
way
harmonize
two
read
laws
state
new
york
encompass
substantive
principles
new
york
courts
apply
include
special
rules
limiting
authority
arbitrators
thus
provision
covers
rights
duties
parties
arbitration
clause
covers
arbitration
neither
provision
intrudes
upon
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
new
york
law
allows
courts
arbitrators
award
punitive
damages
dispute
arising
contract
expressly
provides
shall
governed
laws
state
new
york
panel
arbitrators
awarded
punitive
damages
district
appeals
disallowed
award
question
presented
whether
arbitrators
award
consistent
central
purpose
federal
arbitration
act
ensure
private
agreements
arbitrate
enforced
according
terms
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
petitioners
antonio
mastrobuono
assistant
professor
medieval
literature
wife
diana
mastrobuono
artist
opened
securities
trading
account
respondent
shearson
lehman
hutton
shearson
executing
shearson
client
agreement
respondent
nick
diminico
vice
president
shearson
managed
mastrobuonos
account
closed
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
petitioners
filed
action
district
northern
district
illinois
alleging
respondents
mishandled
account
claiming
damages
variety
state
federal
law
theories
paragraph
parties
agreement
contains
arbitration
provision
provision
relying
arbitration
provision
federal
arbitration
act
faa
respondents
filed
motion
stay
proceedings
compel
arbitration
pursuant
rules
national
association
securities
dealers
district
granted
motion
panel
three
arbitrators
convened
conducting
hearings
illinois
panel
ruled
favor
petitioners
arbitration
proceedings
respondents
argued
arbitrators
authority
award
punitive
damages
nevertheless
panel
award
included
punitive
damages
addition
compensatory
damages
respondents
paid
compensatory
portion
award
filed
motion
district
vacate
award
punitive
damages
district
granted
motion
supp
nd
appeals
seventh
circuit
affirmed
courts
relied
provision
paragraph
parties
agreement
specifies
contract
shall
governed
new
york
law
new
york
appeals
decided
new
york
power
award
punitive
damages
limited
judicial
tribunals
may
exercised
arbitrators
garrity
lyle
stuart
district
seventh
circuit
held
panel
arbitrators
power
award
punitive
damages
case
granted
certiorari
courts
appeals
expressed
differing
views
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
whether
contractual
provision
may
preclude
arbitral
award
punitive
damages
otherwise
proper
compare
barbier
shearson
lehman
hutton
pierson
dean
witter
reynolds
bonar
dean
witter
reynolds
raytheon
automated
business
systems
lee
chica
reverse
ii
earlier
term
upheld
enforceability
predispute
arbitration
agreement
governed
alabama
law
even
though
alabama
statute
provides
arbitration
agreements
unenforceable
terminix
dobson
writing
justice
breyer
observed
congress
passed
faa
overcome
courts
refusals
enforce
agreements
arbitrate
slip
see
also
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
dean
witter
reynolds
byrd
determining
faa
applied
parties
arbitration
agreement
readily
concluded
federal
statute
alabama
statutory
prohibition
slip
petitioners
seek
similar
disposition
case
us
today
seventh
circuit
interpreted
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
contract
incorporate
new
york
law
including
garrity
rule
arbitrators
may
award
punitive
damages
petitioners
ask
us
hold
faa
new
york
prohibition
arbitral
awards
punitive
damages
state
law
vestige
ancient
judicial
hostility
arbitration
see
slip
quoting
bernhardt
polygraphic
america
frankfurter
concurring
petitioners
rely
southland
keating
perry
thomas
held
faa
two
california
statutes
purported
require
judicial
resolution
certain
disputes
southland
explained
faa
declared
national
policy
favoring
arbitration
actually
withdrew
power
require
judicial
forum
resolution
claims
contracting
parties
agreed
resolve
arbitration
respondents
answer
provision
contract
evidences
parties
express
agreement
punitive
damages
awarded
arbitration
dispute
arising
contract
thus
claim
case
distinguishable
southland
perry
parties
presumably
desired
unlimited
arbitration
state
law
stood
way
regardless
whether
faa
garrity
decision
contracts
expressly
incorporating
new
york
law
respondents
argue
parties
may
agree
bound
garrity
may
agree
forgo
arbitration
altogether
words
contract
says
punitive
damages
end
matter
courts
bound
interpret
contracts
accordance
expressed
intentions
parties
even
effect
intentions
limit
arbitration
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
previously
held
faa
policy
operate
without
regard
wishes
contracting
parties
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
california
appeal
construed
contractual
provision
mean
parties
intended
california
rules
arbitration
rather
faa
rules
govern
resolution
dispute
noting
california
rules
manifestly
designed
encourage
resort
arbitral
process
generally
foster
ed
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
concluded
interpretation
entirely
consistent
federal
policy
ensure
enforceability
according
terms
private
agreements
arbitrate
referring
holdings
southland
perry
struck
state
laws
limiting
arbitrability
added
follow
faa
prevents
enforcement
agreements
arbitrate
different
rules
set
forth
act
indeed
result
quite
inimical
faa
primary
purpose
ensuring
private
agreements
arbitrate
enforced
according
terms
arbitration
act
matter
consent
coercion
parties
generally
free
structure
arbitration
agreements
see
fit
may
limit
contract
issues
arbitrate
see
mitsubishi
soler
may
specify
contract
rules
arbitration
conducted
volt
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
ii
shearson
client
agreement
petitioners
executed
contains
paragraphs
two
relevant
provisions
agreement
found
paragraph
first
sentence
paragraph
provides
part
entire
agreement
shall
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
governed
laws
state
new
york
app
pet
cert
second
sentence
provides
controversy
arising
transactions
parties
shall
settled
arbitration
accordance
rules
national
association
securities
dealers
nasd
boards
directors
new
york
stock
exchange
american
stock
exchange
ibid
agreement
contains
express
reference
claims
punitive
damages
ascertain
whether
paragraph
expresses
intent
include
exclude
claims
first
address
impact
two
relevant
provisions
considered
separately
move
important
inquiry
meaning
two
provisions
taken
together
see
restatement
second
contracts
writing
interpreted
whole
provision
viewed
isolation
may
reasonably
read
merely
substitute
analysis
otherwise
determine
law
apply
disputes
arising
contractual
relationship
thus
similar
contract
without
provision
signed
new
york
performed
new
york
presumably
laws
state
new
york
apply
even
though
contract
expressly
state
event
nothing
contract
possibly
constitute
evidence
intent
exclude
punitive
damages
claims
accordingly
punitive
damages
allowed
absence
contractual
intent
contrary
faa
garrity
rule
see
supra
even
reference
laws
state
new
york
substitute
ordinary
analysis
respondents
urge
includes
caveat
detached
federal
law
provision
might
preclude
award
punitive
damages
new
york
allows
courts
though
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
arbitrators
enter
awards
see
garrity
words
provision
might
include
new
york
substantive
rights
obligations
state
allocation
power
alternative
tribunals
respondents
argument
persuasive
new
york
law
means
new
york
decisional
law
including
state
allocation
power
courts
arbitrators
notwithstanding
federal
law
demonstrated
provision
need
read
broadly
unequivocal
exclusion
punitive
damages
claims
arbitration
provision
second
sentence
paragraph
improve
respondents
argument
contrary
read
separately
clause
strongly
implies
arbitral
award
punitive
damages
appropriate
explicitly
authorizes
arbitration
accordance
nasd
rules
panel
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
arbitrators
fact
proceeded
set
rules
nasd
code
arbitration
procedure
indicates
arbitrators
may
award
damages
relief
nasd
code
arbitration
procedure
clear
authorization
punitive
damages
provision
appears
broad
enough
least
contemplate
remedy
moreover
seventh
circuit
noted
manual
provided
nasd
arbitrators
contains
provision
punitive
damages
issue
punitive
damages
may
arise
great
frequency
arbitrations
parties
arbitration
informed
arbitrators
consider
punitive
damages
remedy
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
although
neither
clause
arbitration
clause
separately
considered
expresses
intent
preclude
award
punitive
damages
respondents
argue
fair
reading
entire
paragraph
leads
conclusion
theory
even
new
york
law
ambiguous
even
arbitration
accordance
nasd
rules
indicates
punitive
damages
permissible
juxtaposition
two
clauses
suggests
contract
incorporates
new
york
law
relating
arbitration
disagree
clause
introduces
ambiguity
arbitration
agreement
otherwise
allow
punitive
damages
awards
pointed
volt
interprets
provisions
agreement
covered
faa
due
regard
must
given
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
ambiguities
scope
arbitration
clause
resolved
favor
arbitration
see
also
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
moreover
respondents
overcome
rule
contract
interpretation
construe
ambiguous
language
interest
party
drafted
see
fire
ins
schnackenberg
graff
billet
restatement
second
contracts
seckinger
respondents
drafted
ambiguous
document
claim
benefit
doubt
reason
rule
protect
party
choose
language
unintended
unfair
result
rationale
facts
case
practical
matter
seems
unlikely
petitioners
actually
aware
new
york
bifurcated
approach
punitive
damages
idea
signing
agreement
arbitrate
disputes
might
giving
important
substantive
right
face
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
doubt
unwilling
impute
intent
petitioners
finally
respondents
reading
two
clauses
violates
another
cardinal
principle
contract
construction
document
read
give
effect
provisions
render
consistent
see
halas
crimmins
contracting
city
new
york
fifth
avenue
constr
app
div
restatement
second
contracts
comment
id
think
best
way
harmonize
provision
arbitration
provision
read
laws
state
new
york
encompass
substantive
principles
new
york
courts
apply
include
special
rules
limiting
authority
arbitrators
thus
provision
covers
rights
duties
parties
arbitration
clause
covers
arbitration
neither
sentence
intrudes
upon
contrast
respondents
reading
sets
two
clauses
conflict
one
another
one
foreclosing
punitive
damages
allowing
interpretation
untenable
hold
appeals
misinterpreted
parties
agreement
arbitral
award
enforced
within
scope
contract
judgment
appeals
therefore
reversed
ordered
footnotes
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
paragraph
client
agreement
provides
agreement
shall
inure
benefit
shearson
successors
assigns
shall
binding
undersigned
petitioners
heirs
executors
administrators
assigns
shall
governed
laws
state
new
york
unless
unenforceable
due
federal
state
law
controversy
arising
relating
accounts
transactions
officers
directors
agents
employees
agreement
breach
thereof
shall
settled
arbitration
accordance
rules
effect
national
association
securities
dealers
boards
directors
new
york
stock
exchange
american
stock
exchange
may
elect
make
election
registered
mail
addressed
main
office
within
days
demand
make
election
may
make
election
judgment
upon
award
rendered
arbitrators
may
entered
jurisdiction
thereof
agreement
arbitrate
apply
future
disputes
arising
certain
federal
securities
laws
extent
determined
matter
law
compelled
arbitrate
claims
app
pet
cert
related
point
respondents
argue
meaningful
distinction
substance
remedy
entitlement
prevail
law
entitlement
specific
form
damages
see
brief
respondents
rely
distinction
pass
upon
persuasiveness
dissent
makes
much
similarity
clause
one
volt
took
incorporate
california
statute
allowing
stay
arbitration
pending
resolution
related
litigation
volt
however
interpret
contract
de
novo
instead
deferred
california
construction
state
law
interpretation
private
contracts
ordinarily
question
state
law
sit
review
present
case
contrast
review
federal
interpretation
contract
interpretation
accords
decisionmaker
arguably
entitled
deference
arbitrator
see
supra
contract
also
authorizes
petitioners
election
arbitration
governed
rules
new
york
stock
exchange
american
stock
exchange
instead
nasd
app
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
pet
cert
neither
set
alternative
rules
purports
limit
arbitrator
discretion
award
punitive
damages
moreover
even
doubt
ability
arbitrator
award
punitive
damages
exchanges
rules
contract
expressly
allows
petitioners
claimants
case
choose
nasd
rules
panel
arbitrators
case
fact
proceeded
nasd
rules
solicitor
general
reminds
us
one
nasd
rule
us
namely
rule
nasd
rules
fair
practice
reads
agreement
member
customer
shall
include
condition
limits
ability
party
file
claim
arbitration
limits
ability
arbitrators
make
award
brief
et
al
confine
analysis
plain
language
arbitration
clause
little
trouble
concluding
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
contract
clause
bound
parties
settle
disputes
arbitration
conducted
according
rules
allow
form
equitable
remedy
relief
sufficiently
broad
encompass
award
punitive
damages
inasmuch
agreements
arbitrate
generously
construed
mitsubishi
motors
soler
seem
sensible
interpret
disputes
remedy
relief
phrases
indicate
minimum
intention
resolve
arbitration
dispute
otherwise
settled
allow
chosen
dispute
resolvers
award
varieties
forms
damages
relief
empowered
award
since
courts
empowered
award
punitive
damages
respect
certain
types
claims
arbitrators
equally
empowered
raytheon
automated
business
systems
arbitration
act
establishes
matter
federal
law
doubts
concerning
scope
arbitrable
issues
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
resolved
favor
arbitration
whether
problem
hand
construction
contract
language
allegation
waiver
delay
like
defense
arbitrability
moses
cone
cite
precedent
illinois
forum
state
place
contract
executed
new
york
state
designated
contract
clause
parties
suggest
state
law
arguably
relevant
controversy
drafters
second
restatement
justified
rule
follows
one
party
chooses
terms
contract
likely
provide
carefully
protection
interests
party
also
likely
party
reason
know
uncertainties
meaning
indeed
may
leave
meaning
deliberately
obscure
intending
decide
later
date
meaning
assert
cases
doubt
therefore
long
factors
decisive
substantial
reason
preferring
meaning
party
restatement
second
contracts
comment
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
university
held
federal
arbitration
act
faa
simply
requires
courts
enforce
private
contracts
arbitrate
normal
contracts
according
terms
holding
led
us
enforce
provision
incorporated
state
procedural
rule
concerning
arbitration
proceedings
provision
reasonably
distinguished
one
volt
dissent
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
concluded
even
faa
preempted
state
statute
applied
parties
clause
contract
issue
demonstrated
parties
agreed
governed
statute
rejecting
volt
position
faa
imposes
policy
precluded
enforcement
statute
permitting
california
courts
stay
arbitration
proceedings
concluded
act
simply
requires
courts
enforce
privately
negotiated
agreements
arbitrate
like
contracts
accordance
terms
result
interpreted
clause
make
applicable
state
rules
governing
conduct
arbitration
even
specific
rule
hampers
delays
arbitration
rejected
argument
clause
construed
incorporating
substantive
law
dismissed
claim
faa
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
preempted
contract
provisions
might
hinder
arbitration
held
volt
concluded
faa
force
arbitration
parties
enter
contracts
involving
interstate
commerce
instead
faa
requires
arbitration
proceed
manner
provided
parties
agreement
although
construe
ambiguities
concerning
scope
arbitrability
favor
arbitration
see
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
construction
remain
mindful
contract
parties
intentions
control
mitsubishi
motors
soler
thus
parties
intend
state
procedure
shall
govern
federal
courts
must
enforce
understanding
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
certain
set
procedural
rules
federal
policy
simply
ensure
enforceability
according
terms
private
agreements
arbitrate
volt
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
majority
claims
incorporation
new
york
law
need
read
broadly
include
substantive
procedural
law
choice
new
york
law
unequivocal
exclusion
punitive
damages
claims
ante
rejected
arguments
volt
garrity
rule
sort
state
rule
governing
conduct
arbitration
volt
requires
federal
courts
enforce
parties
may
limit
contract
issues
arbitrate
may
specify
contract
rules
arbitration
conducted
citation
omitted
sure
majority
might
correct
garrity
rule
concerning
state
allocation
power
alternative
tribunals
ante
although
garrity
appears
describe
substantive
new
york
law
nonetheless
volt
makes
distinction
rules
serve
distribute
authority
courts
arbitrators
majority
finds
unenforceable
types
rules
majority
finds
enforceable
indeed
california
rule
volt
considered
one
allocates
authority
arbitrators
courts
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
permits
california
courts
stay
arbitration
pending
resolution
related
litigation
see
volt
ii
award
shall
contain
names
parties
name
counsel
summary
issues
including
type
security
product
controversy
damages
relief
requested
damages
relief
awarded
statement
issues
resolved
names
arbitrators
dates
claim
filed
award
rendered
number
dates
hearing
sessions
location
hearings
signatures
arbitrators
concurring
award
nasd
code
arbitration
procedure
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
majority
also
purports
find
clear
expression
parties
agreement
availability
punitive
damages
manual
provided
nasd
arbitrators
ante
paragraph
client
agreement
nowhere
mentions
manual
mentions
rules
effect
nasd
manual
fit
either
part
description
neither
nasd
set
rules
first
manual
apparently
official
nasd
document
manual
promulgated
adopted
nasd
instead
apparently
compiled
members
securities
industry
conference
arbitration
sica
supplement
uniform
code
arbitration
parties
clearly
adopt
paragraph
petitioners
present
evidence
nasd
policy
giving
specific
manual
arbitrators
petitioners
assert
manual
even
used
arbitration
gave
rise
case
importantly
indication
text
client
agreement
parties
intended
manual
used
arbitrators
second
manual
provide
rules
sense
contemplated
paragraph
instead
provides
general
information
advice
arbitrator
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
hints
chair
sica
arbitrator
manual
manual
nothing
sort
guide
arbitrator
one
bit
advice
example
care
exercised
particularly
questioning
witness
arbitrator
indicate
disbelief
grimaces
frowns
hand
signals
avoided
poker
face
goal
even
parties
intended
adopt
manual
read
resolve
issue
punitive
damages
read
context
portion
sica
manual
upon
majority
relies
seems
explain
punitive
damages
establish
whether
arbitrators
authority
award
issue
punitive
damages
may
arise
great
frequency
arbitrations
parties
arbitration
informed
arbitrators
consider
punitive
damages
remedy
generally
proceedings
punitive
damages
consist
compensation
excess
actual
damages
awarded
form
punishment
wrongdoer
punitive
damages
awarded
decision
arbitrators
clearly
specify
portion
award
intended
punitive
damages
arbitrators
consider
referring
authority
relied
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
even
one
made
stretch
reading
passage
punitive
damages
relate
nasd
arbitrator
authority
sica
manual
limits
applicability
situation
presented
case
according
manual
code
ethics
arbitrators
hen
arbitrator
authority
derived
agreement
parties
arbitrator
neither
exceed
authority
less
required
exercise
authority
completely
regarding
procedural
rules
code
agreement
parties
sets
forth
procedures
followed
conducting
arbitration
refers
rules
followed
obligation
arbitrator
comply
procedures
rules
manual
clearly
contemplates
parties
agreement
define
powers
authorities
arbitrator
thus
directed
back
rest
paragraph
intent
parties
whose
expression
issue
decision
incorporate
laws
new
york
examination
client
agreement
provision
nasd
code
procedure
sica
manual
demonstrates
parties
made
intent
clear
way
divined
majority
new
york
law
specifically
precludes
arbitrators
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
awarding
punitive
damages
clear
conflict
majority
puts
new
york
law
nasd
rules
provision
speaks
directly
issue
nasd
code
silent
giving
effect
every
provision
contract
requires
us
honor
parties
intent
indicated
text
agreement
preclude
award
punitive
damages
arbitrators
iii
seventh
circuit
adopted
de
novo
standard
review
arbitrators
decision
although
yet
decided
standard
review
apply
cases
sort
see
first
options
chicago
kaplan
cert
granted
petitioners
waived
argument
deferential
standard
appropriate
petitioners
raise
argument
petition
certiorari
opening
brief
standard
review
may
antecedent
question
see
bank
oregon
independent
insurance
agents
america
sct
given
petitioners
waiver
argument
seems
appropriate
resolve
question
first
options
new
york
appeals
rested
holding
principle
punitive
damages
exemplary
social
remedies
intended
punish
rather
compensate
power
punish
rest
hands
state
found
private
arbitrators
wield
authority
impose
damages
garrity
rules
include
chair
maintain
decorum
times
shouting
profanity
gratuitous
remarks
stopped
securities
industry
conference
arbitration
arbitrator
manual
attorneys
think
often
statement
made
truer
becomes
chair
however
discourage
needless
repetition
ibid
immediately
close
hearing
arbitrators
usually
remain
hearing
room
either
begin
deliberations
set
date
deliberation
unlike
jurors
panel
members
restricted
discussing
case
among
telling
petitioners
even
claim
reply
brief
paragraph
expressed
intent
reserve
arbitrators
authority
award
punitive
damages
instead
petitioners
consistently
argued
agreement
constitute
waiver
right
obtain
punitive
damages
page