webster
doe
argued
january
decided
june
section
national
security
act
nsa
authorizes
director
central
intelligence
agency
cia
discretion
terminate
employment
cia
employee
whenever
shall
deem
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
respondent
covert
electronics
technician
cia
employ
voluntarily
informed
agency
homosexual
discharged
director
petitioner
predecessor
respondent
filed
suit
petitioner
federal
district
declaratory
injunctive
relief
alleging
violations
administrative
procedure
act
apa
rights
property
liberty
privacy
first
fourth
fifth
ninth
amendments
rights
procedural
due
process
equal
protection
laws
fifth
amendment
granted
respondent
motion
partial
summary
judgment
apa
claim
declining
address
constitutional
claims
appeals
vacated
judgment
remanded
agreed
district
judicial
review
apa
petitioner
termination
decisions
made
nsa
precluded
provision
apa
renders
act
inapplicable
whenever
statutes
preclude
judicial
review
agency
action
committed
agency
discretion
law
however
held
district
erred
ruling
merits
held
title
precludes
judicial
review
apa
cia
director
termination
decisions
nsa
section
applies
statute
drawn
broad
terms
given
case
law
apply
meaningful
standard
judge
agency
exercise
discretion
allowing
termination
whenever
director
shall
deem
necessary
advisable
simply
dismissal
necessary
advisable
fairly
exudes
deference
director
forecloses
application
meaningful
judicial
standard
review
assessing
termination
decision
short
permitting
director
implementation
committed
agency
discretion
law
also
strongly
suggested
overall
structure
nsa
vests
director
broad
authority
protect
intelligence
sources
methods
unauthorized
disclosure
section
integral
part
structure
cia
efficacy
nation
security
depend
large
measure
reliability
trustworthiness
cia
employees
pp
district
review
respondent
constitutional
claims
precluded
nsa
petitioner
view
cia
employment
termination
decisions
even
based
policies
normally
repugnant
constitution
given
director
absolute
discretion
supported
required
heightened
showing
clear
congressional
intent
although
commit
termination
decisions
director
discretion
remove
judicial
review
determinations
specifically
identified
congress
committed
agency
discretion
law
nothing
demonstrates
congress
meant
preclude
consideration
colorable
constitutional
claims
arising
director
actions
pursuant
section
petitioner
contention
judicial
review
constitutional
claims
entail
extensive
rummaging
around
cia
affairs
detriment
national
security
persuasive
since
claims
attacking
cia
employment
policies
title
vii
civil
rights
act
routinely
entertained
federal
district
latitude
control
discovery
process
order
balance
respondent
need
access
proof
cia
extraordinary
need
confidentiality
petitioner
contention
congress
interest
national
security
may
deny
courts
authority
decide
respondent
colorable
constitutional
claims
arising
discharge
order
reinstatement
claims
upheld
also
without
merit
since
congress
mean
impose
restrictions
enacted
even
without
prohibitory
legislation
traditional
equitable
principles
requiring
balancing
public
private
interests
control
grant
declaratory
injunctive
relief
remand
district
thus
address
respondent
constitutional
claims
propriety
equitable
remedies
sought
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
parts
ii
joined
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
post
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
kennedy
took
part
consideration
decision
case
solicitor
general
fried
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
assistant
attorney
general
willard
deputy
solicitor
general
ayer
paul
larkin
barbara
herwig
barbara
biddle
david
doherty
bruce
burke
mark
lynch
argued
cause
respondent
brief
william
allen
elliott
schulder
john
powell
helen
hershkoff
steven
shapiro
randall
glenn
wick
susan
mcgreivy
matthew
coles
mary
dunlap
filed
brief
national
organization
gay
lesbian
scientists
technical
professionals
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
jeffrey
liss
laura
foggan
nan
hunter
filed
brief
employment
law
center
et
al
amici
curiae
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
section
national
security
act
stat
amended
provides
director
central
intelligence
may
discretion
terminate
employment
officer
employee
agency
whenever
shall
deem
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
respondent
john
doe
first
employed
central
intelligence
agency
cia
agency
received
periodic
fitness
reports
consistently
rated
excellent
outstanding
employee
respondent
promoted
position
covert
electronics
technician
january
respondent
voluntarily
informed
cia
security
officer
homosexual
almost
immediately
agency
placed
respondent
paid
administrative
leave
pending
investigation
sexual
orientation
conduct
february
february
respondent
extensively
questioned
polygraph
officer
concerning
homosexuality
possible
security
violations
respondent
denied
sexual
relations
foreign
nationals
maintained
disclosed
classified
information
sexual
partners
interviews
officer
told
respondent
polygraph
tests
indicated
truthfully
answered
questions
polygraph
officer
prepared
summary
interviews
respondent
respondent
allowed
attach
addendum
april
cia
security
agent
informed
respondent
agency
office
security
determined
respondent
homosexuality
posed
threat
security
declined
explain
nature
danger
respondent
asked
resign
refused
office
security
recommended
cia
director
petitioner
predecessor
respondent
dismissed
reviewing
respondent
records
evaluations
subordinates
director
deemed
necessary
advisable
interests
terminate
respondent
employment
agency
pursuant
section
national
security
act
respondent
also
advised
cia
give
positive
recommendation
future
job
search
applied
job
requiring
security
clearance
agency
inform
prospective
employer
concluded
respondent
homosexuality
presented
security
threat
respondent
filed
action
petitioner
district
district
columbia
respondent
amended
complaint
asserted
variety
statutory
constitutional
claims
director
respondent
alleged
director
decision
terminate
employment
violated
administrative
procedure
act
apa
arbitrary
capricious
represented
abuse
discretion
reached
without
observing
procedures
required
law
cia
regulations
also
complained
director
termination
employment
deprived
constitutionally
protected
rights
property
liberty
privacy
violation
first
fourth
fifth
ninth
amendments
finally
asserted
dismissal
transgressed
procedural
due
process
equal
protection
laws
guaranteed
fifth
amendment
respondent
requested
declaratory
judgment
director
violated
apa
constitution
asked
district
injunction
ordering
petitioner
reinstate
position
held
cia
prior
dismissal
alternative
remedy
suggested
returned
paid
administrative
leave
petitioner
ordered
reevaluate
respondent
employment
termination
provide
statement
reasons
adverse
final
determination
respondent
sought
monetary
damages
amended
complaint
petitioner
moved
dismiss
respondent
amended
complaint
ground
national
security
act
nsa
precludes
judicial
review
director
termination
decisions
provisions
apa
set
forth
supp
iv
section
provides
judicial
review
person
suffering
legal
wrong
agency
action
adversely
affected
aggrieved
agency
action
within
meaning
relevant
statute
section
instructs
action
seeking
relief
money
damages
stating
claim
agency
officer
employee
thereof
acted
failed
act
official
capacity
color
legal
authority
shall
dismissed
relief
therein
denied
ground
indispensable
party
scope
judicial
review
however
circumscribed
see
supra
availability
predicated
satisfying
requirements
provides
chapter
applies
according
provisions
thereof
except
extent
statutes
preclude
judicial
review
agency
action
committed
agency
discretion
law
divided
panel
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
vacated
district
judgment
remanded
case
proceedings
appeals
first
decided
judicial
review
apa
agency
decision
terminate
respondent
precluded
turning
merits
appeals
found
agency
must
normally
follow
regulations
cia
regulations
cited
respondent
limit
director
discretion
making
termination
decisions
moreover
regulations
state
respect
terminations
pursuant
director
need
follow
standard
discharge
procedures
may
direct
employee
separated
immediately
without
regard
suggested
procedural
steps
majority
thus
concluded
cia
regulations
provide
independent
source
procedural
substantive
protection
appeals
went
hold
respondent
must
demonstrate
director
action
arbitrary
capricious
exercise
power
discharge
employees
record
unclear
certain
points
critical
respondent
claim
relief
appeals
remanded
case
district
determination
reason
director
termination
respondent
granted
certiorari
decide
question
whether
director
decision
discharge
cia
employee
nsa
judicially
reviewable
apa
ii
apa
comprehensive
provisions
set
forth
ed
supp
iv
allow
person
adversely
affected
aggrieved
agency
action
obtain
judicial
review
thereof
long
decision
challenged
represents
final
agency
action
adequate
remedy
typically
litigant
contest
action
failure
act
agency
ground
agency
neglected
follow
statutory
directives
congress
section
however
limits
application
entire
apa
situations
judicial
review
precluded
statute
see
agency
action
committed
agency
discretion
law
see
citizens
preserve
overton
park
volpe
explained
distinction
subsection
concerned
whether
congress
expressed
intent
prohibit
judicial
review
subsection
applies
rare
instances
statutes
drawn
broad
terms
given
case
law
apply
citing
explained
means
action
committed
agency
discretion
law
heckler
chaney
heckler
required
determine
whether
food
drug
administration
decision
undertake
enforcement
proceeding
use
certain
drugs
administering
death
penalty
subject
judicial
review
noted
even
congress
affirmatively
precluded
judicial
oversight
review
statute
drawn
meaningful
standard
judge
agency
exercise
discretion
since
statute
conferring
power
food
drug
administration
prohibit
unlawful
misbranding
misuse
drugs
provided
substantive
standards
base
review
found
enforcement
actions
committed
complete
discretion
fda
decide
pursued
overton
park
heckler
emphasized
requires
careful
examination
statute
claim
agency
illegality
based
highway
act
overton
park
federal
food
drug
cosmetic
act
heckler
present
case
respondent
claims
cia
arise
director
asserted
violation
nsa
initial
matter
noted
allows
termination
agency
employee
whenever
director
shall
deem
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
emphasis
added
simply
dismissal
necessary
advisable
interests
standard
fairly
exudes
deference
director
appears
us
foreclose
application
meaningful
judicial
standard
review
short
permitting
director
concerning
views
nation
security
whether
discharged
employee
inimical
interests
see
basis
reviewing
properly
assess
agency
termination
decision
language
thus
strongly
suggests
implementation
committed
agency
discretion
law
overall
structure
nsa
passed
shortly
close
second
world
war
nsa
created
cia
gave
director
responsibility
protecting
intelligence
sources
methods
unauthorized
disclosure
see
section
integral
part
statute
agency
efficacy
nation
security
depend
large
measure
reliability
trustworthiness
agency
employees
recognized
snepp
employment
cia
entails
high
degree
trust
perhaps
unmatched
government
service
overriding
need
ensuring
integrity
agency
led
us
uphold
director
use
nsa
withhold
identities
protected
intelligence
sources
cia
sims
denying
respondent
freedom
information
act
requests
sims
produce
certain
cia
records
stated
plain
meaning
statutory
language
well
legislative
history
national
security
act
indicates
congress
vested
director
central
intelligence
broad
authority
protect
sources
intelligence
information
disclosure
section
portion
nsa
consideration
present
case
part
parcel
entire
act
likewise
exhibits
act
extraordinary
deference
director
decision
terminate
individual
employees
thus
find
language
structure
indicate
congress
meant
commit
individual
employee
discharges
director
discretion
accordingly
precludes
judicial
review
decisions
apa
reverse
appeals
extent
found
terminations
reviewable
courts
iii
addition
claim
director
failed
abide
statutory
dictates
respondent
also
alleged
number
constitutional
violations
amended
complaint
respondent
charged
petitioner
termination
employment
deprived
property
liberty
interests
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
denied
equal
protection
laws
unjustifiably
burdened
right
privacy
respondent
asserts
entitled
apa
judicial
consideration
claimed
violations
share
confusion
appeals
precise
nature
respondent
constitutional
claims
difficult
impossible
ascertain
amended
complaint
whether
respondent
contends
termination
based
homosexuality
constitutionally
impermissible
whether
asserts
pervasive
discrimination
policy
exists
cia
employment
practices
regarding
homosexuals
ambiguity
amended
complaint
doubt
attributable
part
inconsistent
explanations
respondent
received
agency
regarding
termination
prior
discharge
respondent
told
two
cia
security
officers
homosexual
activities
violated
cia
regulations
contrast
deputy
general
counsel
cia
later
informed
respondent
homosexuality
merely
security
concern
inevitably
result
termination
instead
evaluated
basis
petitioner
maintains
matter
nature
respondent
constitutional
claims
judicial
review
precluded
language
intent
petitioner
view
agency
employment
termination
decisions
even
based
policies
normally
repugnant
constitution
given
absolute
discretion
director
hence
unreviewable
apa
think
may
read
exclude
review
constitutional
claims
emphasized
johnson
robison
congress
intends
preclude
judicial
review
constitutional
claims
intent
must
clear
weinberger
salfi
reaffirmed
view
require
heightened
showing
part
avoid
serious
constitutional
question
arise
federal
statute
construed
deny
judicial
forum
colorable
constitutional
claim
see
bowen
michigan
academy
family
physicians
review
convinces
us
bear
preclusive
weight
petitioner
support
detailed
section
commit
employment
termination
decisions
director
discretion
precludes
challenges
decisions
based
upon
statutory
language
discharged
employee
thus
complain
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
since
assessment
director
alone
subsections
however
remove
judicial
review
determinations
specifically
identified
congress
committed
agency
discretion
law
nothing
persuades
us
congress
meant
preclude
consideration
colorable
constitutional
claims
arising
actions
director
pursuant
section
believe
constitutional
claim
based
individual
discharge
may
reviewed
district
agree
appeals
must
proceedings
district
issue
petitioner
complains
judicial
review
even
constitutional
claims
entail
extensive
rummaging
around
agency
affairs
detriment
national
security
see
tr
oral
arg
petitioner
acknowledges
title
vii
claims
attacking
hiring
promotion
policies
agency
routinely
entertained
federal
see
reply
brief
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
inquiry
discovery
associated
proceedings
seem
involve
sort
rummaging
furthermore
district
latitude
control
discovery
process
may
instituted
balance
respondent
need
access
proof
support
colorable
constitutional
claim
extraordinary
needs
cia
confidentiality
protection
methods
sources
mission
see
kerr
district
reynolds
petitioner
also
contends
even
respondent
raised
colorable
constitutional
claim
arising
discharge
congress
interest
national
security
may
deny
courts
authority
decide
claim
order
respondent
reinstatement
claim
upheld
reasons
previously
stated
think
congress
meant
impose
restrictions
enacted
nsa
even
without
prohibitory
legislation
congress
course
traditional
equitable
principles
requiring
balancing
public
private
interests
control
grant
declaratory
injunctive
relief
federal
courts
weinberger
hecht
bowles
remand
district
thus
address
respondent
constitutional
claims
propriety
equitable
remedies
sought
judgment
appeals
affirmed
part
reversed
part
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
see
amended
complaint
title
provides
pertinent
part
scope
review
extent
necessary
decision
presented
reviewing
shall
decide
relevant
questions
law
interpret
constitutional
statutory
provisions
determine
meaning
applicability
terms
agency
action
reviewing
shall
compel
agency
action
unlawfully
withheld
unreasonably
delayed
hold
unlawful
set
aside
agency
action
findings
conclusions
found
arbitrary
capricious
abuse
discretion
otherwise
accordance
law
contrary
constitutional
right
power
privilege
immunity
excess
statutory
jurisdiction
authority
limitations
short
statutory
right
without
observance
procedure
required
law
doe
casey
app
citing
cia
regulation
hr
arbitrary
capricious
standard
derived
see
supra
dissenting
judge
argued
congress
intended
preclude
review
creating
decision
discharge
employee
committed
section
agency
discretion
concluded
neither
statutory
constitutional
claims
arising
discharge
judicially
reviewable
apa
understand
petitioner
concedes
agency
failure
follow
regulations
challenged
apa
violation
see
reply
brief
appellant
cadc
doe
casey
app
see
also
service
dulles
recognizing
right
federal
courts
review
agency
actions
ensure
regulations
followed
sampson
murray
stating
federal
courts
authority
review
claim
discharged
governmental
employee
agency
effectuating
discharge
followed
administrative
regulations
appeals
however
found
cia
regulations
plainly
protect
discretion
granted
director
regulations
provid
independent
source
procedural
substantive
protections
doe
casey
supra
thus
since
petitioner
prevailed
ground
seek
review
question
reach
issue
petitioner
asserts
see
brief
petitioner
respondent
fails
present
colorable
constitutional
claim
asserts
general
cia
policy
employing
homosexuals
petitioner
relies
decision
bowers
hardwick
support
view
question
presented
petition
certiorari
decline
consider
stage
litigation
justice
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
administrative
procedure
act
apa
authorize
judicial
review
employment
decisions
referred
national
security
act
provide
meaningful
standard
judicial
review
decisions
clearly
committed
agency
discretion
law
within
meaning
provision
apa
set
forth
understand
say
exception
necessarily
fully
defined
reference
statutes
drawn
broad
terms
given
case
law
apply
see
citizens
preserve
overton
park
volpe
quoted
ante
accordingly
join
parts
ii
opinion
disagree
however
conclusion
constitutional
claim
challenging
validity
employment
decision
covered
may
nonetheless
brought
federal
district
whatever
may
exact
scope
congress
power
close
lower
federal
courts
constitutional
claims
contexts
doubt
authority
functions
performed
central
intelligence
agency
director
central
intelligence
lie
core
delicate
plenary
exclusive
power
president
sole
organ
federal
government
field
international
relations
export
authority
director
central
intelligence
control
access
sensitive
national
security
information
discharging
employees
deemed
untrustworthy
flows
primarily
constitutional
power
president
congress
may
surely
provide
inferior
federal
courts
used
infringe
president
constitutional
authority
see
department
navy
egan
totten
section
plainly
indicates
congress
done
exactly
points
nothing
structure
purpose
legislative
history
national
security
act
suggest
different
conclusion
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
decision
allow
lawsuit
go
forward
justice
scalia
dissenting
agree
apparent
holding
part
ii
opinion
ante
director
decision
terminate
cia
employee
committed
agency
discretion
law
within
meaning
see
decision
either
practically
legally
unreviewable
yet
reviewable
constitutional
defect
regard
part
iii
opinion
essentially
undoing
part
ii
therefore
respectfully
dissent
judgment
proceeding
address
part
iii
opinion
think
error
must
discuss
one
significant
element
analysis
part
ii
though
subscribe
analysis
disagree
description
required
come
within
subsection
provides
judicial
review
unavailable
extent
agency
action
committed
agency
discretion
law
discussion
ante
suggests
appeals
correct
holding
provision
triggered
law
apply
see
doe
casey
app
see
buckley
dissenting
precedents
amply
show
commit
ment
agency
discretion
law
includes
limited
situations
law
apply
relies
law
apply
formulation
upon
discussion
heckler
chaney
however
apply
sole
criterion
applicability
contrary
discussed
subject
action
general
unsuitability
review
adverted
tradition
case
law
sound
reasoning
moreover
supporting
authority
law
apply
test
cited
chaney
observation
citizens
preserve
overton
park
volpe
legislative
history
administrative
procedure
act
indicates
applicable
rare
instances
statutes
drawn
broad
terms
given
case
law
apply
perhaps
overton
park
discussed
law
apply
factor
basis
nonreviewability
even
arguably
applicable
surely
believed
factor
exclusive
contradict
legislative
history
cited
quoted
opinion
derived
read
full
basic
exception
matters
committed
agency
discretion
apply
even
stated
outset
judicial
review
chapter
example
statutes
drawn
broad
terms
given
case
law
apply
courts
course
statutory
question
review
emphasis
added
law
apply
test
account
nonreviewability
certain
issues
falls
far
short
explaining
full
scope
areas
courts
excluded
fact
governmental
decision
subject
fair
number
legal
constraints
precise
enough
susceptible
judicial
application
beginning
fundamental
constraint
decision
must
taken
order
public
purpose
rather
purely
private
interest
yet
many
governmental
decisions
subject
judicial
review
attorney
decision
prosecute
example
reviewed
claim
prompted
personal
animosity
thus
law
apply
provides
much
less
full
answer
whether
applies
key
understanding
committed
agency
discretion
law
provision
lies
contrasting
statutes
preclude
judicial
review
provision
statutes
preclusion
much
general
term
law
commission
agency
discretion
answer
implied
chaney
latter
intended
refer
common
law
judicial
review
agency
action
body
jurisprudence
marked
less
precision
certain
issues
certain
areas
beyond
range
judicial
review
jurisprudence
included
principles
ranging
political
question
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
including
doctrines
determining
suit
officer
deemed
suit
sovereign
official
immunity
prudential
limitations
upon
courts
equitable
powers
described
precisely
traditional
respect
functions
branches
reflected
statement
marbury
madison
cranch
head
department
acts
case
executive
discretion
exercised
mere
organ
executive
repeated
application
control
respect
conduct
rejected
without
hesitation
see
chicago
southern
air
lines
waterman
switchmen
national
mediation
board
george
bush
reaves
ainsworth
confiscation
cases
wall
martin
mott
wheat
common
law
embraced
within
true
generally
understood
intended
result
restate
existing
law
area
reviewable
agency
action
attorney
general
manual
administrative
procedure
act
meaning
provision
continued
take
account
purposes
determining
reviewability
text
structure
statute
agency
acts
factors
whether
decision
involves
sensitive
inherently
discretionary
judgment
call
department
navy
egan
whether
sort
decision
traditionally
nonreviewable
icc
locomotive
engineers
chaney
supra
whether
review
disruptive
practical
consequences
see
southern
seaboard
allied
milling
explains
seeming
contradiction
disallowance
review
extent
action
committed
agency
discretion
injunction
shall
set
aside
agency
action
constitutes
abuse
discretion
since
former
provision
committed
agency
discretion
law
means
sort
traditionally
unreviewable
operates
keep
certain
categories
agency
action
courts
agency
action
appropriately
courts
abuse
discretion
course
grounds
reversal
law
shaped
course
centuries
still
developing
application
new
contexts
possibly
contained
within
phrase
law
apply
surprising
although
recites
test
really
apply
like
opinions
relying
upon
one
essentially
announces
test
declares
victory
moves
really
true
meaningful
standard
judge
agency
exercise
discretion
ante
quoting
chaney
standard
set
forth
national
security
act
necessary
advisable
interests
least
excludes
dismissal
personal
vindictiveness
director
wants
give
job
cousin
theory
respondent
entitled
assert
presence
excesses
abuse
discretion
standard
come
consider
reviewability
dismissal
present
one
ground
violated
agency
regulations
question
avoids
today
see
ante
difference
law
apply
test
consider
correct
test
crucial
perhaps
dismissal
violation
regulations
reviewed
simply
regulations
provide
standard
makes
review
possible
thus
agree
holding
part
ii
opinion
though
soon
appear
holding
seems
undone
holding
part
iii
different
reasoning
ii
taking
reader
terrain
holding
respondent
may
assert
constitutional
claims
suit
like
try
clear
underbrush
consisting
primarily
ominous
warning
serious
constitutional
question
arise
federal
statute
construed
deny
judicial
forum
colorable
constitutional
claim
ante
quoting
bowen
michigan
academy
family
physicians
first
response
grave
doubt
constitutionality
denying
judicial
review
colorable
constitutional
claim
denial
judicial
review
issue
merely
denial
review
district
courts
law
long
clear
article
iii
constitution
extends
judicial
power
cases
arising
constitution
article
iii
provides
judicial
power
shall
vested
one
inferior
courts
congress
may
time
time
ordain
establish
emphasis
added
long
ago
held
power
create
lower
federal
courts
includes
power
invest
less
judicial
power
constitution
defined
limits
judicial
power
prescribed
much
shall
exercised
circuit
consequently
statute
prescribe
limits
jurisdiction
conflict
constitution
unless
confers
powers
enumerated
therein
sheldon
sill
fairly
argued
however
interpretation
indirectly
implicates
constitutional
question
whether
state
courts
deprived
jurisdiction
interpreting
exclude
relief
impute
congress
peculiar
intent
let
state
courts
review
federal
government
action
unwilling
let
federal
district
courts
review
alternatively
peculiar
intent
let
federal
district
courts
review
upon
removal
state
courts
pursuant
claims
unwilling
let
federal
district
courts
review
original
actions
turn
substance
warning
judicial
review
colorable
constitutional
claims
arising
respondent
dismissal
may
well
constitutionally
required
possibly
basis
fear
surely
general
principle
constitutional
violations
must
remediable
courts
text
constitution
refutes
principle
since
provides
ach
house
shall
judge
elections
returns
qualifications
members
art
speech
debate
either
house
senators
representatives
shall
questioned
place
art
claims
concerning
constitutional
violations
committed
contexts
example
rather
grave
constitutional
claim
election
stolen
addressed
courts
see
morgan
app
even
apart
strict
text
constitution
found
constitutional
claims
beyond
judicial
review
involve
political
questions
see
coleman
miller
ohio
ex
rel
bryant
akron
metropolitan
park
district
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
repealed
constitution
contrary
least
partly
reaffirmed
eleventh
amendment
monument
principle
constitutional
claims
go
unheard
one
suggest
congress
passed
tucker
act
courts
able
order
disbursements
treasury
pay
property
taken
lawful
authority
subsequently
destroyed
without
compensation
see
schillinger
finally
doctrine
equitable
discretion
permits
refuse
relief
even
relief
law
available
unduly
impair
public
interest
stand
aside
simply
basis
relief
constitutional
claim
sum
simply
untenable
must
judicial
remedy
every
constitutional
violation
members
congress
supervising
officers
executive
branch
take
oath
uphold
constitution
sometimes
left
perform
oath
unreviewed
always
perhaps
means
appeal
limited
principle
although
may
areas
judicial
review
constitutional
claim
denied
scope
areas
fixed
constitution
judicial
tradition
affected
congress
enactment
statute
rather
counterintuitive
principle
especially
since
congress
reality
principal
determiner
scope
review
constitutional
claims
well
claims
waiver
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
merits
point
however
seems
clear
courts
entertain
example
action
backpay
dismissed
secretary
state
claiming
reason
lost
government
job
president
like
religious
views
surely
colorable
violation
first
amendment
confident
hold
president
choice
secretary
state
political
question
similar
suit
deputy
secretary
state
one
secretaries
assistant
secretary
head
european
desk
really
constitutional
line
falls
immutable
point
one
another
offices
principle
unreviewability
cuts
altered
congressional
prescription
think
think
congress
prescribe
least
within
broad
limits
certain
jobs
dismissal
decision
unreviewable
committed
agency
discretion
law
acknowledged
think
must
constitutional
claims
require
judicial
remedy
identification
even
within
narrow
limits
determined
congress
clear
serious
constitutional
question
feared
illusion
indeed
seems
one
mood
worry
serious
constitutional
questions
one
worry
whether
congress
enacting
give
president
director
central
intelligence
unreviewable
discretion
firing
agents
employs
gather
military
foreign
affairs
intelligence
rather
whether
congress
constitutionally
permit
courts
review
decisions
wanted
acknowledged
courts
intervene
textually
demonstratable
constitutional
commitment
issue
coordinate
political
department
baker
carr
recognized
insistence
evident
number
clauses
devoted
subject
constitution
confers
authority
army
navy
militia
upon
political
branches
stanley
also
recognized
delicate
plenary
exclusive
power
president
sole
organ
federal
government
field
international
relations
power
require
basis
exercise
act
congress
export
finally
acknowledged
impossible
government
wisely
make
critical
decisions
foreign
policy
national
defense
without
benefit
dependable
foreign
intelligence
snepp
per
curiam
thus
recognized
authority
classify
control
access
information
bearing
national
security
determine
whether
individual
sufficiently
trustworthy
occupy
position
executive
branch
give
person
access
information
flows
primarily
constitutional
investment
power
president
exists
quite
apart
explicit
congressional
grant
department
navy
egan
emphasis
added
think
entirely
beyond
doubt
congress
intended
apa
exclude
judicial
review
president
decision
director
central
intelligence
dismiss
officer
central
intelligence
agency
disposition
constitutionally
permissible
iii
turn
whether
executive
action
within
meaning
committed
agency
discretion
law
discussion
point
brief
answer
compellingly
obvious
section
national
security
act
stat
notwithstanding
provisions
law
director
central
intelligence
may
discretion
terminate
employment
officer
employee
agency
whenever
shall
deem
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
emphasis
added
baffling
observe
seems
agree
foregoing
assessment
holding
language
structure
indicate
congress
meant
commit
individual
employee
discharges
director
discretion
ibid
nevertheless
without
explanation
reaches
conclusion
constitutional
claim
based
individual
discharge
may
reviewed
district
ante
seems
attempting
impossible
feat
cake
eating
opinion
discharged
employee
complain
termination
necessary
advisable
interests
since
assessment
director
alone
ante
emphasis
added
two
sentences
later
says
othing
persuades
us
congress
meant
preclude
consideration
colorable
constitutional
claims
arising
actions
director
pursuant
section
believe
former
case
end
assessment
really
director
alone
conceivable
basis
review
respondent
dismissal
case
dismissal
really
result
assessment
director
respondent
never
contended
counsel
formally
advised
letter
may
director
deemed
necessary
advisable
interests
terminate
client
employment
agency
pursuant
section
app
petitioner
filed
affidavit
director
dated
september
stating
fter
careful
consideration
matter
determined
termination
doe
employment
necessary
advisable
interests
exercising
discretion
authority
granted
section
terminated
doe
employment
even
basis
director
assessment
respondent
homosexuality
even
connection
interests
irrational
hence
unconstitutional
one
assessment
really
director
alone
nothing
litigate
imagine
expects
proceedings
district
commands
ante
consist
unless
perhaps
academic
seminar
relationship
homosexuality
security
risk
even
district
persuaded
relationship
exists
assessment
director
alone
since
disposition
contradicts
fair
assurances
must
assume
judgment
longer
director
alone
rather
director
alone
except
extent
colorably
claimed
judgment
unconstitutional
turn
question
exception
comes
discussed
length
earlier
constitution
assuredly
require
text
statute
true
gives
director
absolute
discretion
dismiss
otwithstanding
provisions
law
emphasis
added
one
hardly
expected
say
otwithstanding
provisions
law
constitution
provision
directly
addresses
authority
dismiss
authority
courts
review
dismissal
director
authority
dismiss
violation
constitution
congress
give
implication
nonreviewability
text
manifestation
action
meant
committed
agency
discretion
weaker
regard
constitutional
claims
nonconstitutional
claims
unless
one
accepts
unacceptable
proposition
basis
committal
law
apply
perhaps
constitutional
right
nature
much
important
claimant
statutory
right
statute
plainly
excludes
latter
read
exclude
former
unless
says
principle
never
announced
good
reason
premise
true
individual
contention
government
reneged
upon
debt
owing
contract
much
important
financially
suspect
sense
injustice
feels
individual
claim
particular
federal
licensing
provision
requiring
license
denies
equal
protection
laws
particular
state
tax
violates
commerce
clause
citizen
much
rather
statutory
entitlement
correctly
acknowledged
constitutionally
inadequate
hearing
incorrectly
denied
proceeding
fulfills
requirements
due
process
clause
respect
constitutional
claim
necessarily
significant
kind
claim
regardless
trivial
importance
may
case
hand
asserted
action
legislature
whereas
nonconstitutional
claim
matter
significant
important
distinction
one
relevant
constitutional
analysis
conducted
relevance
question
whether
executive
violations
statute
executive
violations
constitution
equally
unlawful
neither
said
priori
harmful
unfair
plaintiff
one
category
favored
presumption
exclusion
judicial
review
even
assume
however
contrary
reason
every
constitutional
claim
ipso
facto
worthy
every
statutory
claim
less
worthy
judicial
review
basis
writing
preference
statute
makes
distinction
two
rejected
judicial
rewriting
legislation
even
appealing
situation
particular
applications
statute
merely
less
desirable
fact
raise
grave
constitutional
doubts
said
permits
us
adopt
one
rather
another
permissible
reading
statute
altering
terms
ignore
legislative
order
avoid
constitutional
adjudication
commodity
futures
trading
schor
textual
basis
reading
statute
barring
nonconstitutional
claims
read
barring
claims
monetary
worth
less
million
neither
two
decisions
cited
sustain
power
read
limitation
constitutional
claims
remotely
supports
proposition
johnson
robison
considered
statute
precluding
judicial
review
decisions
administrator
question
law
fact
law
administered
veterans
administration
quoting
concluded
statute
bar
judicial
review
challenge
constitutionality
statute
since
challenge
decision
administrator
decision
congress
holding
based
upon
text
upon
judicial
power
read
constitutional
claims
exception
weinberger
salfi
held
statute
depriving
district
courts
jurisdiction
claim
arising
title
ii
social
security
act
embrace
even
constitutional
challenges
since
language
quite
different
issue
johnson
extend
ed
action
seeking
recover
social
security
claim
irrespective
whether
resort
judicial
processes
necessitated
allegedly
unconstitutional
statutory
restrictions
salfi
sure
another
statutory
provision
available
enable
judicial
review
constitutional
claim
observed
distinction
justify
drawing
line
basis
statute
commodity
futures
trading
schor
supra
seeks
downplay
harm
produced
today
decision
observing
petitioner
acknowledges
title
vii
claims
attacking
hiring
promotion
policies
agency
routinely
entertained
federal
ante
citing
reply
brief
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
assuming
suits
statutorily
authorized
willing
accept
director
assertion
suits
regarding
hiring
promotion
tolerable
suit
regarding
dismissal
like
basis
knowledge
deny
especially
since
obvious
director
thinks
particular
hiring
promotion
suit
genuinely
contrary
interests
simply
make
hiring
grant
promotion
dismiss
prospective
litigant
harm
done
today
decision
contrary
congress
knows
preferable
brings
significant
process
intelligence
services
forum
belong
neither
constitution
laws
common
sense
gives
individual
right
come
litigate
reasons
dismissal
intelligence
agent
course
valid
constitutional
claims
today
decision
makes
basis
judicial
review
director
action
colorable
constitutional
claims
whether
meritorious
determining
whether
colorable
fact
meritorious
necessarily
review
entire
decision
director
denies
example
respondent
contention
present
case
dismissed
homosexual
possibly
resolve
dispute
without
knowing
good
reasons
might
see
latitude
control
discovery
process
ante
justify
refusal
permit
inquiry
least
camera
presumably
expected
evaluate
whether
agent
really
fail
secret
mission
documents
needed
make
interesting
reading
district
judges
perhaps
others
throughout
country
course
agency
seek
protect
ultimately
authorized
assertion
executive
privilege
nixon
power
invoked
extremis
scheme
judicial
review
central
feature
extreme
event
like
agent
explain
intelligence
services
nations
sometimes
cooperate
need
worry
secret
information
give
us
subjected
notoriously
broad
discovery
powers
courts
although
litigate
dismissal
spies
available
protection
somewhat
uncertain
scope
known
executive
privilege
president
invoke
willing
take
political
damage
often
entails
today
result
however
ramifications
far
beyond
creation
world
secret
intelligence
agency
must
litigate
dismissal
agents
constitutional
claims
raised
highly
sensitive
context
hard
imagine
assumption
executive
decisions
hauled
courts
may
longer
valid
also
obsolete
may
assumption
capable
preserving
sensible
common
law
judicial
review
respectfully
dissent
technically
provision
merely
precludes
judicial
review
judicial
review
provisions
administrative
procedure
act
apa
chapter
title
code
however
least
respect
entities
come
within
chapter
definition
agency
see
review
available
apa
available
chapter
originally
enacted
apa
umbrella
statute
governing
judicial
review
federal
agency
action
right
judicial
review
agency
action
may
created
separate
statutory
constitutional
provision
created
becomes
subject
judicial
review
provisions
apa
unless
specifically
excluded
see
knowledge
specific
exclusion
exists