mitchell
et
al
helms
et
argued
december
decided
june
chapter
education
consolidation
improvement
act
channels
federal
funds
via
state
educational
agencies
sea
local
educational
agencies
lea
turn
lend
educational
materials
equipment
library
media
materials
computer
software
hardware
public
private
elementary
secondary
schools
implement
secular
neutral
nonideological
programs
enrollment
participating
school
determines
amount
chapter
aid
receives
average
year
chapter
funds
spent
jefferson
parish
louisiana
allocated
private
schools
catholic
otherwise
religiously
affiliated
respondents
filed
suit
alleging
among
things
chapter
applied
parish
violated
first
amendment
establishment
clause
agreeing
chief
judge
district
held
lemon
kurtzman
chapter
primary
effect
advancing
religion
materials
equipment
loaned
catholic
schools
direct
aid
schools
pervasively
sectarian
relied
primarily
meek
pittenger
wolman
walter
programs
providing
many
sorts
materials
equipment
chapter
struck
even
though
programs
providing
loan
public
school
textbooks
religious
schools
upheld
judge
issued
order
permanently
excluding
pervasively
sectarian
schools
parish
receiving
chapter
materials
equipment
retired
another
judge
reversed
order
upholding
chapter
inter
alia
zobrest
catalina
foothills
school
public
school
district
allowed
provide
interpreter
deaf
student
catholic
high
school
part
federal
program
disabled
respondents
appeal
pending
decided
agostini
felton
approving
program
title
elementary
secondary
education
act
provided
public
employees
teach
remedial
classes
religious
private
schools
concluding
agostini
neither
directly
overruled
meek
wolman
rejected
distinction
textbooks
aid
fifth
circuit
relied
two
cases
invalidate
chapter
held
judgment
reversed
reversed
justice
thomas
joined
chief
justice
justice
scalia
justice
kennedy
concluded
chapter
applied
jefferson
parish
law
respecting
establishment
religion
simply
many
private
schools
receiving
chapter
aid
parish
religiously
affiliated
pp
modifying
lemon
test
asked
whether
statute
secular
purpose
primary
effect
advancing
inhibiting
religion
creates
excessive
entanglement
government
religion
see
agostini
examined
first
second
factors
see
recasting
entanglement
inquiry
simply
one
criterion
relevant
determining
statute
effect
also
acknowledged
cases
pared
somewhat
factors
justify
finding
excessive
entanglement
set
three
primary
criteria
determining
statute
effect
government
aid
effect
advancing
religion
results
governmental
indoctrination
defines
recipients
reference
religion
creates
excessive
entanglement
case
inquiry
agostini
purpose
effect
test
narrow
one
district
holding
chapter
secular
purpose
challenged
chapter
effect
need
considered
determining
effect
first
two
agostini
criteria
need
considered
district
holding
chapter
create
excessive
entanglement
challenged
pp
whether
governmental
aid
religious
schools
results
religious
indoctrination
ultimately
depends
whether
indoctrination
occurs
reasonably
attributed
governmental
action
see
agostini
moreover
answer
indoctrination
question
resolve
question
whether
educational
aid
program
subsidizes
religion
see
distinguishing
indoctrination
attributable
state
indoctrination
consistently
turned
neutrality
principle
upholding
aid
offered
broad
range
groups
persons
without
regard
religion
way
assuring
neutrality
repeatedly
considered
whether
governmental
aid
religious
institution
results
genuinely
independent
private
choices
individual
parents
agostini
second
primary
criterion
whether
aid
program
defines
recipients
reference
religion
closely
related
first
looks
facts
neutrality
inquiry
see
uses
facts
answer
somewhat
different
question
whether
criteria
allocating
aid
create
financial
incentive
undertake
religious
indoctrination
incentive
present
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
ibid
pp
two
rules
offered
respondents
govern
determination
whether
chapter
effect
advancing
religion
rejected
pp
respondents
chief
argument
direct
nonincidental
aid
religious
schools
always
impermissible
inconsistent
recent
cases
purpose
distinction
present
subsidization
religion
recent
cases
address
concern
principle
private
choice
incorporated
first
agostini
criterion
whether
indoctrination
attributed
government
aid
schools
even
direct
aid
neutrally
available
reaching
benefiting
religious
school
first
passes
hands
literally
figuratively
numerous
private
citizens
free
direct
aid
elsewhere
government
provided
support
religion
witters
washington
dept
servs
blind
although
presence
private
choice
easier
see
aid
literally
passes
individuals
hands
reason
establishment
clause
requires
form
indeed
agostini
expressly
rejected
respondents
absolute
line
direct
payments
issue
pp
ii
respondents
second
argument
provision
religious
schools
aid
divertible
religious
use
always
impermissible
also
inconsistent
recent
cases
particularly
zobrest
supra
witters
also
unworkable
meek
wolman
respondents
appear
rely
divertibility
rule
offer
little
support
rule
issue
divertibility
whether
aid
impermissible
content
aid
suitable
use
public
school
also
suitable
use
private
school
similarly
prohibition
government
providing
impermissible
content
resolves
establishment
clause
concerns
exist
aid
actually
diverted
religious
uses
see
agostini
supra
concern
divertibility
opposed
improper
content
also
misplaced
boundless
enveloping
aid
matter
trivial
thus
attenuated
link
realistic
concern
preventing
establishment
religion
finally
aid
without
content
divertible
sense
allows
schools
divert
resources
yet
accepted
recurrent
argument
aid
forbidden
aid
one
aspect
institution
frees
spend
resources
religious
ends
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
regan
pp
additional
factors
cited
dissent
including
concern
political
divisiveness
cases
disregarded
see
agostini
supra
rejected
particular
whether
recipient
school
pervasively
sectarian
factor
disregarded
recent
cases
witters
supra
relevant
constitutionality
program
pp
applying
two
relevant
agostini
criteria
reveals
basis
concluding
jefferson
parish
chapter
program
effect
advancing
religion
first
chapter
define
recipients
reference
religion
since
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
improper
incentive
statute
aid
allocated
based
school
enrollment
second
chapter
result
governmental
indoctrination
religion
determines
eligibility
aid
neutrally
making
broad
array
schools
eligible
without
regard
religious
affiliations
lack
thereof
see
also
allocates
aid
based
private
choices
students
parents
schools
attend
see
thus
problematic
chapter
fairly
described
providing
direct
aid
finally
chapter
aid
provided
religious
schools
impermissible
content
statute
explicitly
requires
aid
secular
neutral
nonideological
record
indicates
louisiana
sea
jefferson
parish
lea
faithfully
enforced
requirement
insofar
relevant
case
although
evidence
equipment
least
easily
diverted
use
relgious
classes
evidence
relevant
constitutional
analysis
scattered
de
minimis
statutory
violations
restrictions
content
discovered
remedied
relevant
authorities
litigation
began
almost
years
ago
elevated
level
convert
otherwise
unobjectionable
parishwide
program
law
effect
advancing
religion
pp
extent
meek
wolman
conflict
foregoing
analysis
overruled
pp
justice
joined
justice
breyer
concluded
agostini
felton
controls
constitutional
inquiry
presented
requires
reversal
fifth
circuit
judgment
chapter
program
unconstitutional
applied
jefferson
parish
extent
meek
pittenger
wolman
walter
inconsistent
judgment
today
overruled
pp
plurality
announces
rule
unprecedented
breadth
evaluation
establishment
clause
challenges
government
programs
rule
particularly
troubling
first
treatment
neutrality
comes
close
assigning
factor
singular
importance
future
adjudication
establishment
clause
challenges
programs
although
neutrality
important
see
agostini
treat
program
like
chapter
true
private
choice
programs
approved
witters
washington
dept
servs
blind
zobrest
catalina
foothills
school
agostini
represents
recent
attempt
devise
general
framework
approaching
questions
concerning
neutral
programs
involved
establishment
clause
challenge
program
closely
related
instant
program
agostini
criteria
control
pp
agostini
asks
whether
government
acted
purpose
advancing
inhibiting
religion
whether
aid
effect
specific
criteria
used
determine
impermissible
effect
changed
recent
cases
see
disclose
three
primary
criteria
guide
determination
whether
aid
results
governmental
indoctrination
whether
program
defines
recipients
reference
religion
whether
aid
creates
excessive
entanglement
government
religion
finally
criteria
reviewed
determine
whether
program
constitutes
endorsement
religion
respondents
neither
question
chapter
program
secular
purpose
contend
creates
excessive
entanglement
accordingly
need
ask
whether
chapter
applied
jefferson
parish
results
governmental
indoctrination
defines
recipients
reference
religion
clear
chapter
define
aid
recipients
rather
uses
wholly
neutral
secular
criteria
allocate
aid
students
enrolled
religious
secular
schools
alike
indoctrination
inquiry
chapter
program
bears
hallmarks
program
upheld
agostini
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
supplementary
supplant
funds
chapter
funds
reach
coffers
religious
schools
aid
secular
evidence
actual
diversion
de
minimis
program
includes
adequate
safeguards
regardless
whether
factors
constitutional
requirements
sufficient
find
program
issue
impermissible
effect
advancing
religion
reasons
chapter
program
reasonably
viewed
endorsement
religion
pp
respondents
contentions
agostini
distinguishable
meek
wolman
controlling
must
rejected
meek
wolman
created
inexplicable
rift
within
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
decisions
adhered
prior
holding
board
ed
central
school
dist
allen
statutes
authorizing
lending
textbooks
religious
school
students
violate
establishment
clause
see
meek
respondents
assertion
materials
equipment
unlike
textbooks
reasonably
divertible
religious
uses
rejected
provide
logical
distinction
educator
use
virtually
instructional
tool
even
textbook
teach
religious
message
pp
follow
rule
applied
context
textbook
lending
programs
establish
first
amendment
violation
plaintiffs
must
prove
aid
actually
used
religious
purposes
see
allen
supra
agostini
cases
relied
undermined
assumptions
underlying
meek
wolman
agostini
definitive
rejection
presumption
employees
teaching
religious
schools
inevitably
inculcate
religion
also
stood
least
strongly
pointed
broader
proposition
presumptions
religious
indoctrination
normally
inappropriate
evaluating
neutral
programs
establishment
clause
respondents
contentions
agostini
limited
facts
presumption
religious
inculcation
instructional
materials
equipment
retained
must
rejected
assumption
instructors
abide
restrictions
use
textbooks
see
meek
supra
extend
instructional
materials
equipment
school
dist
grand
rapids
ball
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
distinguished
pp
respondents
contention
actual
administration
chapter
jefferson
parish
violated
establishment
clause
rejected
limited
evidence
amassed
respondents
years
discovery
began
approximately
years
ago
best
de
minimis
therefore
insufficient
affect
constitutional
inquiry
assertion
government
must
failsafe
mechanism
capable
detecting
instance
diversion
rejected
agostini
supra
presumption
adopted
meek
wolman
respecting
use
instructional
materials
equipment
teachers
abandoned
constitutional
need
pervasive
monitoring
chapter
program
moreover
review
specific
safeguards
employed
chapter
federal
state
local
levels
demonstrates
constitutionally
sufficient
respondents
evidence
demonstrate
actual
diversion
proves
possibility
diversion
two
isolated
instances
evidence
violations
chapter
supplantation
restrictions
equally
insignificant
therefore
treated
never
declared
entire
aid
program
unconstitutional
establishment
clause
grounds
solely
violations
miniscule
scale
issue
presence
examples
tends
show
rules
failed
worked
pp
thomas
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
joined
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
breyer
joined
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
ginsburg
joined
guy
mitchell
et
petitioners
mary
helms
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
thomas
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
chief
justice
justice
scalia
justice
kennedy
join
part
longstanding
school
aid
program
known
chapter
federal
government
distributes
funds
state
local
governmental
agencies
turn
lend
educational
materials
equipment
public
private
schools
enrollment
participating
school
determining
amount
aid
receives
question
whether
chapter
applied
jefferson
parish
louisiana
law
respecting
establishment
religion
many
private
schools
receiving
chapter
aid
parish
religiously
affiliated
hold
chapter
law
chapter
education
consolidation
improvement
act
pub
stat
amended
origins
elementary
secondary
education
act
esea
pub
stat
close
cousin
provision
esea
recently
considered
agostini
felton
like
provision
issue
agostini
chapter
channels
federal
funds
local
educational
agencies
lea
usually
public
school
districts
via
state
educational
agencies
sea
implement
programs
assist
children
elementary
secondary
schools
among
things
chapter
provides
aid
acquisition
use
instructional
educational
materials
including
library
services
materials
including
media
materials
assessments
reference
materials
computer
software
hardware
instructional
use
curricular
materials
lea
sea
must
offer
assistance
public
private
schools
although
private
school
must
nonprofit
participating
private
schools
receive
chapter
aid
based
number
children
enrolled
school
see
allocations
chapter
funds
schools
must
generally
equal
consistent
number
children
served
expenditures
programs
children
enrolled
public
schools
lea
lea
must
cases
assure
equitable
participation
children
private
schools
purposes
benefits
chapter
see
chapter
funds
may
supplement
extent
practical
increase
level
funds
made
available
sources
lea
sea
may
operate
programs
supplant
funds
sources
ibid
several
restrictions
apply
aid
private
schools
significantly
services
materials
equipment
provided
private
schools
must
secular
neutral
nonideological
addition
private
schools
may
acquire
control
chapter
funds
title
chapter
materials
equipment
property
private
school
receives
materials
equipment
listed
submitting
lea
application
detailing
items
school
seeks
use
lea
approves
application
purchases
items
school
allocation
funds
lends
school
jefferson
parish
louisiana
governmental
unit
issue
case
louisiana
whole
private
schools
primarily
used
allocations
nonrecurring
expenses
usually
materials
equipment
fiscal
year
example
money
budgeted
private
schools
jefferson
parish
spent
lea
acquiring
library
media
materials
instructional
equipment
among
materials
equipment
provided
library
books
computers
computer
software
also
slide
movie
projectors
overhead
projectors
television
sets
tape
recorders
vcr
projection
screens
laboratory
equipment
maps
globes
filmstrips
slides
cassette
appears
average
year
chapter
funds
spent
jefferson
parish
allocated
private
schools
fiscal
year
private
schools
participated
chapter
following
year
participated
participation
level
remained
relatively
constant
since
see
app
roman
catholic
otherwise
religiously
affiliated
religiously
affiliated
respondents
filed
suit
december
alleging
among
things
chapter
applied
jefferson
parish
violated
establishment
clause
first
amendment
federal
constitution
case
tortuous
history
next
years
indicates
well
degree
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
shifted
recent
times
nevertheless
retaining
anomalies
lower
courts
struggle
extended
discovery
chief
judge
heebe
district
eastern
district
louisiana
granted
summary
judgment
favor
respondents
helms
cody
civ
wl
mar
app
pet
cert
held
chapter
violated
establishment
clause
second
part
test
lemon
kurtzman
program
primary
effect
advancing
religion
chapter
effect
view
materials
equipment
loaned
catholic
schools
direct
aid
schools
catholic
schools
concluded
detailed
inquiry
doctrine
curriculum
pervasively
sectarian
app
pet
cert
chief
judge
heebe
relied
primarily
meek
pittenger
wolman
walter
held
unconstitutional
programs
provided
many
sorts
materials
equipment
chapter
resolved
numerous
issues
case
issued
order
permanently
excluding
pervasively
sectarian
schools
jefferson
parish
receiving
chapter
materials
equipment
two
years
later
chief
judge
heebe
retired
judge
livaudais
received
case
ruling
early
postjudgment
motions
reversed
decision
former
chief
judge
heebe
upheld
chapter
pointing
several
significant
changes
legal
landscape
previous
seven
years
helms
cody
wl
app
pet
cert
particular
judge
livaudais
cited
decision
zobrest
catalina
foothills
school
held
state
part
federal
program
disabled
provide
interpreter
deaf
student
catholic
high
school
judge
livaudais
also
relied
heavily
decision
appeals
ninth
circuit
walker
san
francisco
unified
school
upholding
chapter
facts
found
virtually
indistinguishable
ninth
circuit
acknowledged
walker
judge
heebe
summary
judgment
ruling
meek
wolman
appeared
erect
constitutional
distinction
providing
textbooks
permissible
providing
aid
impermissible
see
board
ed
central
school
dist
allen
upholding
textbook
program
appeals
viewed
distinction
however
thin
unmoored
establishment
clause
principles
importantly
rendered
untenable
subsequent
cases
particularly
zobrest
cases
ninth
circuit
view
revived
principle
allen
everson
board
ed
state
benefits
provided
citizens
without
regard
religion
constitutional
ninth
circuit
also
relied
observation
board
ed
kiryas
joel
village
school
dist
grumet
frequently
relied
explicitly
general
availability
benefit
provided
religious
groups
individuals
turning
aside
establishment
clause
challenges
ninth
circuit
purported
distinguish
meek
wolman
based
percentage
schools
receiving
aid
parochial
large
percentage
cases
moderate
percentage
walker
undermined
distinction
observed
meek
also
upheld
massive
provision
textbooks
parochial
schools
thus
although
ninth
circuit
explicitly
hold
meek
wolman
longer
good
law
reasoning
seemed
require
conclusion
finally
addition
relying
decision
zobrest
ninth
circuit
decision
walker
judge
livaudais
invoked
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
months
walker
held
establishment
clause
require
public
university
exclude
religious
publication
assistance
available
numerous
publications
following
judge
livaudais
ruling
respondents
appealed
appeals
fifth
circuit
appeal
pending
decided
agostini
approved
program
title
esea
provided
public
employees
teach
remedial
classes
private
schools
including
religious
schools
holding
overruled
aguilar
felton
partially
overruled
school
dist
grand
rapids
ball
involved
program
fifth
circuit
thus
faced
dilemma
one
hand
ninth
circuit
holding
analysis
walker
subsequent
decisions
rosenberger
agostini
hand
holdings
meek
wolman
resolve
dilemma
fifth
circuit
abandoned
effort
find
coherence
case
law
divine
future
course
decisions
instead
focused
particular
holdings
helms
picard
thought
approach
required
lack
coherence
also
agostini
admonition
lower
courts
abide
applicable
holding
even
though
holding
might
seem
inconsistent
subsequent
decisions
see
agostini
ii
establishment
clause
first
amendment
dictates
congress
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
years
since
everson
consistently
struggled
apply
simple
words
context
governmental
aid
religious
admitted
tilton
richardson
candor
compels
acknowledgment
dimly
perceive
boundaries
permissible
government
activity
sensitive
area
ality
opinion
see
white
concurring
judgment
agostini
however
brought
clarity
case
law
overruling
two
anomalous
precedents
one
whole
part
consolidating
previously
disparate
considerations
revised
test
whereas
lemon
considered
whether
statute
secular
purpose
primary
effect
advancing
inhibiting
religion
creates
excessive
entanglement
government
religion
see
agostini
modified
lemon
purposes
evaluating
aid
schools
examined
first
second
factors
see
acknowledged
cases
discussing
excessive
entanglement
applied
many
considerations
cases
discussing
primary
effect
therefore
recast
lemon
entanglement
inquiry
simply
one
criterion
relevant
determining
statute
effect
agostini
supra
also
acknowledged
cases
pared
somewhat
factors
justify
finding
excessive
entanglement
set
revised
criteria
determining
effect
statute
summarize
new
york
city
title
program
run
afoul
three
primary
criteria
currently
use
evaluate
whether
government
aid
effect
advancing
religion
result
governmental
indoctrination
define
recipients
reference
religion
create
excessive
entanglement
case
inquiry
agostini
purpose
effect
test
narrow
one
respondents
challenge
district
holding
chapter
secular
purpose
fifth
circuit
also
question
holding
cf
consider
chapter
effect
determining
effect
consider
first
two
agostini
criteria
since
neither
respondents
fifth
circuit
questioned
district
holding
app
pet
cert
chapter
create
excessive
entanglement
considering
chapter
light
recent
case
law
conclude
neither
results
religious
indoctrination
government
defines
recipients
reference
religion
therefore
hold
chapter
law
respecting
establishment
religion
holding
acknowledge
ninth
fifth
circuits
saw
inescapable
meek
wolman
anomalies
case
law
therefore
conclude
longer
good
law
indicated
agostini
indicated
elsewhere
question
whether
governmental
aid
religious
schools
results
governmental
indoctrination
ultimately
question
whether
religious
indoctrination
occurs
schools
reasonably
attributed
governmental
action
see
agostini
supra
quoting
zobrest
mueller
allen
cf
corporation
presiding
bishop
church
jesus
christ
saints
amos
law
forbidden
effects
lemon
must
fair
say
government
advanced
religion
activities
influence
also
indicated
answer
question
indoctrination
resolve
question
whether
program
educational
aid
subsidizes
religion
religion
cases
use
term
see
agostini
see
also
distinguishing
indoctrination
attributable
state
indoctrination
consistently
turned
principle
neutrality
upholding
aid
offered
broad
range
groups
persons
without
regard
religion
religious
irreligious
areligious
alike
eligible
governmental
aid
one
conclude
indoctrination
particular
recipient
conducts
done
behest
government
attribution
indoctrination
relative
question
government
offering
assistance
recipients
provide
speak
broad
range
indoctrination
government
thought
responsible
particular
indoctrination
put
point
differently
government
seeking
legitimate
secular
purpose
offers
aid
terms
without
regard
religion
adequately
purpose
see
allen
discussing
dual
secular
religious
purposes
religious
schools
fair
say
aid
going
religious
recipient
effect
furthering
secular
purpose
government
crafting
aid
program
conclude
given
level
aid
necessary
purpose
among
secular
recipients
provided
level
religious
recipients
way
assuring
neutrality
repeatedly
considered
whether
governmental
aid
goes
religious
institution
result
genuinely
independent
private
choices
individuals
agostini
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
viewed
significant
whether
private
choices
individual
parents
opposed
unmediated
government
ball
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
determine
schools
ultimately
benefit
governmental
aid
much
numerous
private
choices
rather
single
choice
government
determine
distribution
aid
pursuant
neutral
eligibility
criteria
government
least
easily
grant
special
favors
might
lead
religious
establishment
private
choice
also
helps
guarantee
neutrality
mitigating
preference
recipients
arguably
inherent
governmental
aid
program
see
gilder
revitalization
everything
law
microcosm
harv
bus
rev
lead
program
inadvertently
favoring
one
religion
favoring
religious
private
schools
general
nonreligious
ones
principles
neutrality
private
choice
relationship
prominent
agostini
supra
also
zobrest
witters
heart
reasoning
zobrest
upholding
governmental
provision
interpreter
deaf
student
catholic
high
school
follows
service
issue
case
part
general
government
program
distributes
benefits
neutrally
child
qualifying
disabled
statute
without
regard
nature
school
child
attends
according
parents
freedom
select
school
choice
statute
ensures
interpreter
present
sectarian
school
result
private
decision
individual
parents
words
statute
creates
financial
incentive
parents
choose
sectarian
school
interpreter
presence
attributed
state
decisionmaking
passage
indicates
private
choices
helped
ensure
neutrality
neutrality
private
choices
together
eliminated
possible
attribution
government
even
interpreter
translated
classes
catholic
doctrine
witters
mueller
employed
similar
reasoning
witters
held
establishment
clause
bar
state
including
within
neutral
program
providing
tuition
payments
vocational
rehabilitation
blind
person
studying
christian
college
become
pastor
missionary
youth
director
explained
aid
ultimately
flows
religious
institutions
result
genuinely
independent
private
choices
aid
recipients
washington
program
made
available
generally
without
regard
nature
institution
benefited
creates
financial
incentive
students
undertake
sectarian
education
fact
aid
goes
individuals
means
decision
support
religious
education
made
individual
state
seem
appropriate
view
aid
ultimately
flowing
inland
empire
school
bible
resulting
state
action
sponsoring
subsidizing
religion
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
five
members
separate
opinions
emphasized
importance
neutrality
private
choices
relationship
two
see
powell
joined
burger
rehnquist
concurring
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
see
also
white
concurring
tax
deduction
educational
expenses
upheld
mueller
respects
tuition
grant
witters
upheld
chiefly
neutrally
provides
state
assistance
broad
spectrum
citizens
numerous
private
choices
individual
parents
children
determined
schools
benefit
deductions
explained
aid
parochial
schools
available
result
decisions
individual
parents
imprimatur
state
approval
deemed
conferred
particular
religion
religion
generally
ibid
citation
omitted
see
neutrality
indicates
lack
state
imprimatur
agostini
second
primary
criterion
determining
effect
governmental
aid
closely
related
first
second
criterion
requires
consider
whether
aid
program
define
recipients
reference
religion
briefly
explained
agostini
second
criterion
looks
set
facts
focus
first
criterion
neutrality
see
second
criterion
uses
facts
answer
somewhat
different
question
whether
criteria
allocating
aid
creat
financial
incentive
undertake
religious
indoctrination
agostini
set
following
rule
answering
question
incentive
present
however
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
circumstances
aid
less
likely
effect
advancing
religion
ibid
cases
agostini
relied
rule
agostini
make
clear
close
relationship
rule
incentives
private
choice
say
program
create
incentive
choose
religious
schools
say
private
choice
truly
independent
witters
see
agostini
supra
holding
title
create
impermissible
incentive
services
available
children
meet
act
eligibility
requirements
matter
religious
beliefs
go
school
zobrest
discussing
successive
sentences
neutrality
private
choice
financial
incentives
respectively
witters
supra
similar
incentive
exist
greater
risk
one
attribute
government
indoctrination
religious
schools
see
zobrest
supra
hasten
add
obvious
rule
simply
aid
program
offers
private
schools
thus
religious
schools
benefit
previously
receive
mean
program
reducing
cost
securing
religious
education
creates
agostini
second
criterion
incentive
parents
choose
education
children
aid
effect
see
allen
everson
see
also
mueller
respondents
inexplicably
make
effort
address
chapter
agostini
test
instead
dismissing
agostini
factually
distinguishable
offer
two
rules
contend
govern
determination
whether
chapter
effect
advancing
religion
argue
first
chiefly
direct
nonincidental
aid
primary
educational
mission
religious
schools
always
impermissible
second
argue
provision
religious
schools
aid
divertible
religious
use
similarly
respondents
arguments
inconsistent
recent
case
law
particular
agostini
zobrest
therefore
reject
although
earlier
cases
particularly
ball
emphasize
distinction
direct
indirect
aid
purpose
distinction
merely
prevent
subsidization
religion
see
even
dissent
admits
see
post
opinion
souter
recent
cases
address
purpose
distinction
rather
principle
private
choice
incorporated
first
agostini
criterion
whether
indoctrination
attributed
government
aid
schools
even
direct
aid
neutrally
available
reaching
benefiting
religious
school
first
passes
hands
literally
figuratively
numerous
private
citizens
free
direct
aid
elsewhere
government
provided
support
religion
witters
supra
see
supra
although
presence
private
choice
easier
see
aid
literally
passes
hands
individuals
mentioned
directness
breath
private
choice
see
agostini
supra
witters
supra
mueller
supra
reason
establishment
clause
requires
form
indeed
agostini
expressly
rejected
absolute
line
respondents
us
draw
explained
departed
rule
relied
ball
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
agostini
relied
primarily
witters
conclusion
made
clear
private
choice
neutrality
resolve
concerns
formerly
addressed
rule
ball
undeniable
witters
aid
tuition
ultimately
go
inland
empire
school
bible
support
religious
education
viewed
arrangement
however
different
government
issuing
paycheck
one
employees
knowing
employee
direct
funds
religious
institution
arrangements
valid
reason
ny
money
ultimately
went
religious
institutions
result
genuinely
independent
private
choices
individuals
agostini
supra
quoting
witters
addition
program
witters
neutral
quoting
witters
supra
agostini
explained
reasoning
work
zobrest
allowed
interpreter
provide
assistance
catholic
school
even
though
mouthpiece
religious
instruction
interpreter
provided
according
neutral
eligibility
criteria
private
choice
therefore
religious
messages
interpreted
interpreter
attributed
government
see
ibid
saw
difference
zobrest
government
hiring
interpreter
directly
government
providing
funds
parents
hire
interpreter
rejected
dissent
objection
never
allowed
public
employee
participate
directly
religious
indoctrination
see
blackmun
dissenting
finally
agostini
used
reasoning
witters
zobrest
conclude
remedial
classes
provided
title
esea
public
employees
impermissibly
finance
religious
indoctrination
see
found
insignificant
students
directly
apply
title
services
title
instruction
provided
students
groups
rather
individually
instruction
provided
facilities
private
schools
extent
respondents
intend
distinction
require
aid
literally
placed
hands
schoolchildren
rather
given
directly
school
teaching
children
cases
respondents
rely
meek
wolman
demonstrate
irrelevance
formalism
meek
justified
rejection
program
loaned
instructional
materials
equipment
among
things
pointing
aid
loaned
schools
thus
direct
aid
program
wolman
essentially
identical
except
state
effort
comply
meek
see
wolman
loaned
aid
students
revised
program
operated
much
like
one
upheld
allen
compare
wolman
supra
allen
yet
dismissed
technical
difference
two
programs
exalt
form
substance
distinction
found
justify
result
different
meek
wolman
thus
although
purporting
reaffirm
meek
actually
undermined
decision
evident
similarity
reasoning
wolman
meek
dissent
compare
wolman
supra
technical
change
legal
bailee
irrelevant
meek
supra
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
fact
school
bailee
regarded
constitutionally
determinative
meek
wolman
reached
result
programs
indistinguishable
distinction
shows
distinction
played
part
meek
respondents
formalistic
line
breaks
application
programs
allen
example
although
recognize
students
received
owned
textbooks
also
noted
books
provided
private
schools
required
courses
schools
collect
students
requests
books
submit
board
education
schools
store
textbooks
textbooks
essential
schools
teaching
secular
subjects
see
whether
one
chooses
label
program
direct
indirect
rather
arbitrary
choice
one
constitutional
analysis
course
seen
special
establishment
clause
dangers
rosenberger
compare
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
regan
levitt
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
direct
payments
money
issue
case
refuse
allow
special
case
create
rule
cases
respondents
also
contend
establishment
clause
requires
aid
religious
schools
impermissibly
religious
nature
divertible
religious
use
agree
first
part
argument
second
respondents
divertibility
rule
inconsistent
recent
case
law
unworkable
long
governmental
aid
unsuitable
use
public
schools
religious
content
allen
supra
eligibility
aid
determined
constitutionally
permissible
manner
use
aid
indoctrinate
attributed
government
thus
constitutional
concern
course
use
aid
put
affect
criteria
governing
aid
allocation
thus
create
impermissible
incentive
agostini
second
criterion
recent
precedents
particularly
zobrest
require
us
reject
respondents
argument
zobrest
gave
consideration
divertibility
even
actual
diversion
things
mattered
zobrest
found
case
quite
easy
striking
rather
upholding
program
dissent
saw
case
see
blackmun
dissenting
never
authorized
public
employee
participate
directly
religious
indoctrination
overnment
crosses
boundary
furnishes
medium
communication
religious
message
interpreter
serve
conduit
james
religious
education
thereby
assisting
salpointe
high
school
mission
religious
indoctrination
interpreter
likely
place
imprimatur
governmental
approval
upon
favored
religion
see
generally
quite
clearly
respondents
think
use
governmental
aid
religious
indoctrination
synonymous
religious
indoctrination
government
use
aid
created
improper
incentives
similarly
witters
concerned
divertibility
diversion
unhesitatingly
perhaps
summarily
struck
program
certain
witters
sought
participate
acquire
education
religious
career
sectarian
institution
diversion
guaranteed
mueller
took
view
zobrest
witters
mueller
require
state
show
tax
deductions
costs
education
secular
subjects
declined
impose
segregation
requirement
either
deductions
deductions
items
strikingly
similar
issue
meek
wolman
see
mueller
see
also
marshall
dissenting
instructional
materials
subsidized
minnesota
tax
deduction
plainly
may
used
inculcate
religious
values
belief
justice
acknowledges
zobrest
witters
approved
programs
involved
actual
diversion
see
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
dissent
likewise
deny
witters
involved
actual
diversion
see
post
dissent
claim
aid
zobrest
considered
divertible
post
dissent
zobrest
author
today
dissent
joined
understood
case
otherwise
see
supra
dissent
made
clear
diversion
use
government
aid
religious
message
see
zobrest
supra
blackmun
dissenting
see
also
post
concurring
judgment
definition
interpreter
zobrest
divertible
actually
diverted
respondents
appear
rely
meek
wolman
establish
rule
divertible
aid
cases
offer
little
support
respondents
meek
mentioned
divertibility
briefly
concluding
see
mention
peripheral
reasoning
striking
lending
instructional
materials
equipment
aid
program
wolman
explicitly
barred
divertible
aid
concern
divertibility
part
reason
finding
program
invalid
issue
divertibility
aid
rather
whether
aid
impermissible
content
aid
suitable
use
public
school
also
suitable
use
private
school
similarly
prohibition
government
providing
impermissible
content
resolves
establishment
clause
concerns
exist
aid
actually
diverted
religious
agostini
explained
zobrest
making
distinction
content
aid
use
aid
government
aid
zobrest
interpreter
inculcating
religious
messages
government
indoctrination
took
place
second
emphasis
added
agostini
also
acknowledged
dissenters
zobrest
charged
essentially
true
zobrest
effect
shift
establishment
clause
law
interpreter
assuming
fulfilled
assigned
duties
see
inherent
religious
significance
allen
discussing
bus
rides
everson
matter
given
neutrality
private
choice
involved
program
mouthpiece
religious
instruction
agostini
supra
discussing
zobrest
government
interpreter
inculcate
religious
message
even
conveying
one
also
government
computer
overhead
projector
inculcate
religious
message
even
conveying
one
agostini
approved
provision
public
employees
teach
secular
remedial
classes
private
schools
partly
concluded
reason
suspect
indoctrinating
content
part
governmental
aid
see
relying
zobrest
refused
presume
public
teachers
inject
religious
classes
especially
given
certain
safeguards
existed
also
saw
evidence
done
allen
similarly
focused
content
emphasizing
textbooks
preapproved
public
school
authorities
unsuitable
use
public
schools
religious
content
see
lemon
note
dissenters
allen
seemed
chiefly
concerned
pragmatic
difficulties
involved
ensuring
truly
secular
content
textbooks
emphasis
added
although
might
appear
book
content
divertible
thus
lack
divertibility
motivated
holding
allen
hard
imagine
book
even
moderately
skilled
hands
serve
illustrate
religious
post
concurring
judgment
agreeing
point
indeed
plaintiffs
walker
essentially
conceded
much
teacher
example
easily
use
shakespeare
king
lear
even
though
set
pagan
times
illustrate
fourth
commandment
see
exodus
honor
father
mother
thus
dissent
contend
textbooks
allen
readily
divertible
religious
teaching
purposes
known
fixed
secular
content
post
concern
divertibility
opposed
improper
content
misplaced
fails
explain
sort
aid
allowed
permissible
also
boundless
enveloping
aid
matter
trivial
thus
attenuated
link
realistic
concern
preventing
establishment
religion
presumably
example
lecterns
chalk
crayons
pens
paper
paintbrushes
excluded
religious
schools
respondents
proposed
rule
fail
see
indoctrination
means
diversion
aid
attributed
government
fact
risk
improper
attribution
less
aid
lacks
content
risk
books
government
inadvertently
providing
improper
content
see
allen
supra
douglas
dissenting
finally
aid
without
content
divertible
sense
allows
schools
divert
resources
yet
accepted
recurrent
argument
aid
forbidden
aid
one
aspect
institution
frees
spend
resources
religious
ends
regan
perhaps
conceivable
courts
take
upon
task
distinguishing
among
myriad
kinds
possible
aid
based
ease
diverting
kind
escapes
us
might
coherently
draw
line
far
workable
also
actually
related
real
concerns
preventing
advancement
religion
government
simply
require
zobrest
agostini
allen
program
aid
schools
provide
improper
content
determine
eligibility
allocate
aid
permissible
dissent
serves
smorgasbord
factors
depending
facts
case
particularity
post
relevant
constitutionality
program
bare
minimum
reassured
likely
see
post
presumably
revealed
future
cases
needed
least
one
additional
factor
evident
dissent
dissent
resurrects
concern
political
divisiveness
occupied
cases
rightly
disregarded
compare
post
agostini
supra
bowen
amos
justice
explained
dissent
aguilar
curious
indeed
base
interpretation
constitution
speculation
likelihood
phenomenon
parties
may
create
merely
prosecuting
lawsuit
dissent
delights
perverse
chaos
factors
produce
post
see
also
post
constitution
becomes
unnecessarily
clouded
legislators
litigants
lower
courts
groan
history
case
amply
demonstrates
see
part
supra
one
dissent
factors
deserves
special
mention
whether
school
receives
aid
whose
students
receive
aid
pervasively
sectarian
dissent
correct
period
factor
mattered
particularly
pervasively
sectarian
school
primary
secondary
school
post
period
one
regret
thankfully
long
past
numerous
reasons
formally
dispense
factor
first
relevance
precedents
sharp
decline
although
case
law
consistently
mentioned
even
recent
years
struck
aid
program
reliance
factor
since
aguilar
ball
agostini
course
overruled
aguilar
full
ball
part
today
justice
distances
part
ball
previously
agreed
rejecting
distinction
public
private
employees
prominent
agostini
compare
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
agostini
supra
witters
year
aguilar
ball
ask
whether
inland
empire
school
bible
pervasively
sectarian
bowen
decision
refused
find
facially
invalid
aid
program
although
one
involving
schools
whose
recipients
district
found
included
pervasively
sectarian
institutions
see
blackmun
dissenting
although
left
open
remand
district
reaffirm
prior
finding
took
pains
emphasize
narrowness
pervasively
sectarian
category
see
opinion
two
members
majority
questioned
whether
category
kennedy
joined
scalia
concurring
zobrest
agostini
upheld
aid
programs
children
attended
schools
pervasively
sectarian
also
primary
secondary
zobrest
turning
away
challenge
based
pervasively
sectarian
nature
salpointe
catholic
high
school
emphasized
presence
private
choice
absence
sectarian
content
agostini
explaining
aid
program
constitutional
bother
mention
pervasively
sectarian
schools
see
fact
lost
dissent
see
opinion
souter
disregarding
nature
school
zobrest
agostini
merely
returning
approach
everson
allen
upheld
aid
programs
students
pervasively
sectarian
schools
see
post
souter
dissenting
noting
fact
regarding
everson
allen
black
dissenting
douglas
dissenting
second
religious
nature
recipient
matter
constitutional
analysis
long
recipient
adequately
furthers
government
secular
purpose
see
supra
program
offers
permissible
aid
religious
including
pervasively
sectarian
areligious
irreligious
mystery
view
religion
government
established
thus
mystery
constitutional
violation
pervasively
sectarian
recipient
received
special
favor
bizarre
dissent
seemingly
reserve
special
hostility
take
religion
seriously
think
religion
affect
whole
lives
make
mistake
effective
transmitting
views
children
third
inquiry
recipient
religious
views
required
focus
whether
school
pervasively
sectarian
unnecessary
also
offensive
well
established
numerous
contexts
courts
refrain
trolling
person
institution
religious
beliefs
see
employment
dept
human
resources
smith
collecting
cases
yet
factor
requires
evident
district
although
dissent
welcomes
probing
see
post
find
profoundly
troubling
addition
related
application
pervasively
sectarian
factor
collides
decisions
prohibited
governments
discriminating
distribution
public
benefits
based
upon
religious
status
sincerity
see
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
lamb
chapel
center
moriches
union
free
school
widmar
vincent
finally
hostility
aid
pervasively
sectarian
schools
shameful
pedigree
hesitate
disavow
cf
chicago
morales
plurality
opinion
although
dissent
professes
concern
implied
exclusion
less
favored
post
exclusion
pervasively
sectarian
schools
programs
particularly
given
history
exclusion
opposition
aid
sectarian
schools
acquired
prominence
congress
consideration
near
passage
blaine
amendment
amended
constitution
bar
aid
sectarian
institutions
consideration
amendment
arose
time
pervasive
hostility
catholic
church
catholics
general
open
secret
sectarian
code
catholic
see
generally
green
blaine
amendment
reconsidered
legal
hist
notwithstanding
history
course
sectarian
face
describe
school
religious
sect
eliminated
possibility
confusion
hunt
mcnair
coined
term
pervasively
sectarian
term
time
applied
almost
exclusively
catholic
parochial
schools
even
today
dissent
exemplifies
chiefly
reference
schools
see
post
souter
dissenting
short
nothing
establishment
clause
requires
exclusion
pervasively
sectarian
schools
otherwise
permissible
aid
programs
doctrines
bar
doctrine
born
bigotry
buried
iii
applying
two
relevant
agostini
criteria
see
basis
concluding
jefferson
parish
chapter
program
effect
advancing
religion
agostini
supra
chapter
result
governmental
indoctrination
determines
eligibility
aid
neutrally
allocates
aid
based
private
choices
parents
schoolchildren
provide
aid
impermissible
content
chapter
define
recipients
reference
religion
taking
second
criterion
first
clear
chapter
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
agostini
supra
aid
allocated
based
enrollment
private
schools
receive
chapter
materials
equipment
based
per
capita
number
students
school
walker
allocations
private
schools
must
equal
consistent
number
children
served
expenditures
programs
subchapter
children
enrolled
public
schools
lea
lea
must
provide
chapter
materials
equipment
benefit
children
private
schools
extent
consistent
number
children
school
district
lea
enrolled
private
nonprofit
elementary
secondary
schools
see
app
pet
cert
district
recounting
testimony
head
louisiana
chapter
program
lea
told
every
dollar
spend
public
school
student
spend
dollar
school
children
private
schools
must
receive
equitable
participation
allocation
criteria
therefore
create
improper
incentive
chapter
statute
deviate
pure
per
capita
basis
allocating
aid
lea
increasing
allocation
based
number
children
within
lea
poor
families
reside
poor
areas
reside
rural
areas
respondents
contended
reason
think
deviation
allocation
lea
leads
deviation
allocation
among
schools
within
lea
see
even
presume
deviation
created
incentive
one
way
regard
religion
chapter
also
satisfies
first
agostini
criterion
program
makes
broad
array
schools
eligible
aid
without
regard
religious
affiliations
lack
thereof
see
therefore
difficulty
concluding
chapter
neutral
regard
religion
see
agostini
supra
chapter
aid
also
like
aid
agostini
zobrest
witters
reaches
participating
schools
consequence
private
decisionmaking
agostini
supra
private
decisionmaking
controls
per
capita
allocation
scheme
decisions
independent
program
neutrality
see
students
parents
government
choice
school
determine
receives
chapter
funds
aid
follows
child
chapter
aid
provided
pursuant
private
choices
problematic
one
fairly
describe
chapter
providing
direct
aid
materials
equipment
provided
chapter
presumably
used
time
time
entire
classes
rather
individual
students
although
individual
students
likely
chief
consumers
library
books
perhaps
computers
computer
software
students
need
apply
chapter
aid
order
schools
receive
explained
agostini
traits
constitutionally
significant
meaningful
see
reasons
already
explained
constitutional
significance
schools
rather
students
bailees
chapter
aid
ultimate
beneficiaries
chapter
aid
students
attend
schools
receive
aid
regardless
whether
individual
students
lug
computers
school
day
jefferson
parish
sensibly
provided
schools
receive
computers
like
ninth
circuit
unlike
dissent
post
see
little
difference
loaning
science
kits
students
bring
kits
school
opposed
loaning
science
kits
school
directly
walker
supra
see
allen
finally
chapter
satisfies
first
agostini
criterion
provide
religious
schools
aid
impermissible
content
statute
explicitly
bars
anything
sort
providing
chapter
aid
benefit
children
private
schools
shall
secular
neutral
nonideological
record
indicates
louisiana
sea
jefferson
parish
lea
faithfully
enforced
requirement
insofar
relevant
case
chief
aid
issue
computers
computer
software
library
books
computers
presumably
content
least
none
impermissible
use
public
schools
respondents
contend
otherwise
respondents
also
offer
evidence
religious
schools
received
software
government
impermissible
content
evidence
equipment
least
easily
diverted
use
religious
classes
see
app
justice
however
finds
safeguards
diversion
adequate
prevent
detect
actual
diversion
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
safeguards
relies
reduce
three
signed
assurances
chapter
aid
used
secular
neutral
nonideological
purposes
monitoring
visits
requirement
equipment
labeled
belonging
chapter
first
justice
rightly
places
little
reliance
post
second
monitoring
sea
lea
officials
highly
unlikely
prevent
catch
third
compliance
labeling
requirement
haphazard
see
app
even
requirement
followed
fail
see
label
prevents
addition
agree
dissent
evidence
actual
diversion
safeguards
anything
anemic
almost
certainly
evidence
see
post
event
reasons
discussed
part
supra
evidence
actual
diversion
weakness
safeguards
actual
diversion
relevant
constitutional
inquiry
whatever
relevance
may
statute
regulations
respondents
however
point
religious
books
lea
improperly
allowed
loaned
several
religious
schools
contend
monitoring
programs
sea
jefferson
parish
lea
insufficient
prevent
errors
evidence
however
establishes
opposite
improper
lending
library
books
occurred
discovered
remedied
litigation
began
almost
years
words
monitoring
system
worked
see
post
concurring
judgment
violation
lea
private
schools
minor
view
sea
coordinator
inadvertent
see
app
approximately
improper
book
requests
three
years
school
years
requests
came
fewer
half
private
schools
participating
cost
books
amounted
less
one
percent
total
allocation
years
district
found
prescreening
lea
coordinator
requested
library
books
sufficient
prevent
statutory
violations
see
app
pet
cert
fifth
circuit
disagree
noted
monitoring
system
appears
adequate
catch
errors
occur
unwilling
elevate
scattered
de
minimis
statutory
violations
discovered
remedied
relevant
authorities
prior
litigation
level
convert
otherwise
unobjectionable
parishwide
program
law
effect
advancing
religion
iv
short
chapter
satisfies
first
second
primary
criteria
agostini
therefore
effect
advancing
religion
reason
chapter
also
reasonably
viewed
endorsement
religion
agostini
supra
accordingly
hold
chapter
law
respecting
establishment
religion
jefferson
parish
need
exclude
religious
schools
chapter
extent
meek
wolman
conflict
holding
overrule
conclusion
regarding
meek
wolman
come
surprise
early
wolman
left
doubt
meek
allen
irreconcilable
see
repeatedly
reaffirmed
allen
since
see
agostini
supra
fact
meek
discussing
program
even
cite
allen
see
meek
less
three
years
wolman
explained
meek
despite
appearances
hold
loans
secular
instructional
material
equipment
inescapably
effect
direct
advancement
religion
regan
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
mueller
conceded
aid
issue
meek
wolman
resembl
many
respects
aid
upheld
everson
allen
see
see
also
marshall
dissenting
viewing
allen
incompatible
meek
wolman
distinction
textbooks
instructional
materials
simply
untenable
recently
agostini
rejecting
ball
assumption
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
agostini
supra
necessarily
rejected
large
portion
perhaps
see
ball
reasoning
meek
wolman
invalidating
lending
materials
equipment
ball
borrowed
assumption
cases
see
shared
time
program
issue
ball
surely
invalid
iven
holdings
meek
wolman
regarding
instructional
materials
equipment
today
simply
acknowledge
long
evident
evident
ninth
fifth
circuits
district
judgment
fifth
circuit
reversed
ordered
guy
mitchell
et
petitioners
mary
helms
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
justice
breyer
joins
concurring
judgment
congress
passed
elementary
secondary
education
act
stat
act
title
congress
provided
monetary
grants
address
needs
educationally
deprived
children
families
title
ii
congress
provided
monetary
grants
acquisition
library
resources
textbooks
instructional
materials
use
children
teachers
public
private
elementary
secondary
schools
since
congress
reauthorized
title
title
ii
programs
several
times
three
terms
ago
held
agostini
felton
title
applied
new
york
city
violate
establishment
clause
believe
agostini
likewise
controls
constitutional
inquiry
respecting
title
ii
presented
requires
reversal
appeals
judgment
program
unconstitutional
applied
jefferson
parish
louisiana
extent
decisions
meek
pittenger
wolman
walter
inconsistent
judgment
today
agree
decisions
overruled
therefore
concur
judgment
write
separately
view
plurality
announces
rule
unprecedented
breadth
evaluation
establishment
clause
challenges
government
programs
reduced
essentials
plurality
rule
government
aid
religious
schools
effect
advancing
religion
long
aid
offered
neutral
basis
aid
secular
content
plurality
also
rejects
distinction
direct
indirect
aid
holds
actual
diversion
secular
aid
religious
school
advancement
religious
mission
permissible
although
expansive
scope
plurality
rule
troubling
two
specific
aspects
opinion
compel
write
separately
first
plurality
treatment
neutrality
comes
close
assigning
factor
singular
importance
future
adjudication
establishment
clause
challenges
government
programs
second
plurality
approval
actual
diversion
government
aid
religious
indoctrination
tension
precedents
event
unnecessary
decide
instant
case
clearest
example
plurality
position
respect
neutrality
found
following
statement
religious
irreligious
areligious
alike
eligible
governmental
aid
one
conclude
indoctrination
particular
recipient
conducts
done
behest
government
attribution
indoctrination
relative
question
government
offering
assistance
recipients
provide
speak
broad
range
indoctrination
government
thought
responsible
particular
indoctrination
put
point
differently
government
seeking
legitimate
secular
purpose
offers
aid
terms
without
regard
religion
adequately
purpose
fair
say
aid
going
religious
recipient
effect
furthering
secular
purpose
ante
citation
omitted
agree
justice
souter
plurality
taking
stance
appears
take
evenhandedness
neutrality
practical
terms
promote
single
sufficient
test
establishment
constitutionality
school
aid
post
quarrel
plurality
recognition
neutrality
important
reason
upholding
programs
establishment
clause
challenges
cases
described
neutrality
precisely
manner
emphasized
program
neutrality
repeatedly
decisions
approving
various
forms
school
aid
see
agostini
supra
zobrest
catalina
foothills
school
witters
washington
dept
servs
blind
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
mueller
allen
nevertheless
never
held
program
passes
constitutional
muster
solely
neutral
criteria
employs
basis
distributing
aid
example
agostini
neutrality
one
several
factors
considered
determining
new
york
city
title
program
impermissible
effect
advancing
religion
see
noting
lack
evidence
inculcation
religion
title
instructors
legal
requirement
title
services
supplemental
regular
curricula
title
funds
reached
religious
schools
coffers
indeed
given
aid
agostini
secular
content
distributed
basis
wholly
neutral
criteria
consideration
additional
factors
demonstrates
plurality
rule
accurately
describe
recent
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
see
also
zobrest
supra
noting
government
funds
reached
religious
school
coffers
aid
relieve
school
expense
otherwise
assumed
aid
distributed
school
child
justice
souter
provides
comprehensive
review
establishment
clause
cases
government
aid
religious
institutions
useful
explanation
various
ways
used
term
neutrality
decisions
see
post
even
one
time
used
term
neutrality
descriptive
sense
refer
aid
programs
characterized
requisite
equipoise
support
religion
antagonism
religion
justice
souter
discussion
convincingly
demonstrates
evolution
meaning
term
jurisprudence
cause
hesitate
equating
neutrality
recent
decisions
neutrality
old
previously
explained
neutrality
important
means
axiom
history
precedent
establishment
clause
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
concurring
opinion
thus
agree
justice
souter
conclusion
recent
use
neutrality
refer
generality
evenhandedness
distribution
relevant
judging
whether
benefit
scheme
characterized
seen
aiding
sectarian
school
religious
mission
neutrality
alone
sufficient
qualify
aid
constitutional
post
also
disagree
plurality
conclusion
actual
diversion
government
aid
religious
indoctrination
consistent
establishment
clause
see
ante
although
ur
cases
permitted
government
funding
secular
functions
performed
sectarian
organizations
decisions
provide
precedent
use
public
funds
finance
religious
activities
rosenberger
supra
concurring
least
two
decisions
heart
today
case
demonstrate
long
concerned
secular
government
aid
diverted
advancement
religion
agostini
recent
case
board
ed
central
school
dist
allen
rested
approval
relevant
programs
part
fact
aid
used
advance
religious
missions
recipient
schools
see
agostini
supra
evidence
ever
shown
new
york
city
title
instructor
teaching
parochial
school
premises
attempted
inculcate
religion
students
allen
supra
nothing
record
supports
proposition
textbooks
whether
deal
mathematics
physics
foreign
languages
history
literature
used
parochial
schools
teach
religion
course
focus
lack
evidence
entirely
unnecessary
believed
establishment
clause
permits
actual
diversion
secular
government
aid
religious
indoctrination
decision
bowen
kendrick
also
demonstrates
actual
diversion
constitutionally
impermissible
concluding
program
question
constitutional
face
remanded
case
district
determine
factual
development
whether
aid
recipients
used
government
aid
support
religious
objectives
see
kennedy
concurring
purpose
inquiring
whether
particular
grantee
institution
pervasively
sectarian
preliminary
step
demonstrating
funds
fact
used
religion
remand
unnecessary
plurality
contends
actual
diversion
irrelevant
establishment
clause
plurality
bases
holding
actual
diversion
permissible
witters
zobrest
ante
decisions
however
rested
significant
factual
premise
missing
case
well
majority
cases
thus
far
considered
involving
establishment
clause
challenges
programs
specifically
decided
witters
zobrest
understanding
aid
provided
directly
individual
student
turn
made
choice
put
aid
use
see
witters
zobrest
accordingly
approval
aid
cases
relied
significant
extent
fact
ny
aid
ultimately
flows
religious
institutions
result
genuinely
independent
private
choices
aid
recipients
witters
supra
see
zobrest
supra
interpreter
present
sectarian
school
result
private
decision
individual
parents
characteristic
programs
made
less
like
direct
subsidy
impermissible
establishment
clause
akin
government
issuing
paycheck
employee
turn
donates
portion
check
religious
institution
see
witters
supra
see
also
rosenberger
supra
concurring
discussing
witters
recognizing
distinction
plurality
nevertheless
finds
witters
zobrest
extent
decisions
might
permit
use
government
aid
religious
purposes
relevant
case
involving
neutral
program
see
ante
like
justice
souter
believe
treat
program
true
programs
considered
witters
zobrest
see
post
first
government
provides
aid
directly
student
beneficiary
student
attend
religious
school
yet
retain
control
whether
secular
government
aid
applied
toward
religious
education
fact
aid
flows
religious
school
used
advancement
religion
therefore
wholly
dependent
student
private
decision
see
rosenberger
concurring
discussing
importance
private
choice
witters
witters
fact
aid
goes
individuals
means
decision
support
religious
education
made
individual
state
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
aid
religion
issue
result
petitioner
private
choice
reason
agostini
relied
witters
zobrest
reject
rule
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
yet
also
rested
approval
new
york
city
title
program
part
lack
evidence
actual
diversion
second
believe
distinction
program
true
program
significant
purposes
endorsement
see
lynch
donnelly
concurring
terms
public
perception
government
program
direct
aid
religious
schools
based
number
students
attending
school
differs
meaningfully
government
distributing
aid
directly
individual
students
turn
decide
use
aid
religious
schools
former
example
religious
school
uses
aid
inculcate
religion
students
reasonable
say
government
communicated
message
endorsement
religious
indoctrination
supported
government
assistance
reasonable
observer
naturally
perceive
aid
program
government
support
advancement
religion
amount
aid
received
school
based
school
enrollment
separate
government
endorsement
religious
message
aid
formula
indicate
reasonable
observer
inculcation
religion
endorsed
individuals
attending
religious
school
affirmatively
choose
direct
secular
government
aid
school
religious
mission
choices
made
contrast
government
aid
supports
school
religious
mission
independent
decisions
made
numerous
individuals
guide
secular
aid
school
reasonable
observer
likely
draw
facts
inference
state
endorsing
religious
practice
belief
witters
supra
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
rather
endorsement
religious
message
reasonably
attributed
individuals
select
path
aid
finally
distinction
program
true
program
important
considering
aid
consists
direct
monetary
subsidies
recognized
special
establishment
clause
dangers
government
makes
direct
money
payments
sectarian
institutions
rosenberger
see
also
ibid
collecting
cases
plurality
contends
program
identical
relevant
constitutional
respects
true
program
reason
plurality
reasoning
government
precluded
providing
direct
money
payments
religious
organizations
including
churches
based
number
persons
belonging
organization
actual
diversion
permissible
plurality
holding
participating
religious
organizations
including
churches
use
aid
support
religious
indoctrination
sure
plurality
actually
hold
theory
extends
direct
money
payments
see
ante
omission
however
little
comfort
logic
well
specific
advisory
language
see
ante
plurality
opinion
foreshadows
approval
direct
monetary
subsidies
religious
organizations
even
use
money
advance
religious
objectives
cases
often
pose
difficult
questions
intersection
neutrality
principles
therefore
defy
simple
categorization
either
rule
explained
rosenberger
esolution
instead
depends
hard
task
judging
sifting
details
determining
whether
challenged
program
offends
establishment
clause
judgment
requires
courts
draw
lines
sometimes
quite
fine
based
particular
facts
case
concurring
opinion
agostini
represents
recent
attempt
devise
general
framework
approaching
questions
concerning
neutral
programs
agostini
also
concerned
establishment
clause
challenge
program
closely
related
one
issue
reasons
well
disagreement
plurality
approach
decide
today
case
applying
criteria
set
forth
agostini
ii
agostini
reexamining
jurisprudence
since
school
dist
grand
rapids
ball
explained
general
principles
used
determine
whether
government
aid
violates
establishment
clause
remained
largely
unchanged
thus
still
ask
whether
government
acted
purpose
advancing
inhibiting
religion
whether
aid
effect
advancing
inhibiting
religion
also
concluded
agostini
however
specific
criteria
used
determine
whether
government
aid
impermissible
effect
changed
looking
recently
decided
cases
articulated
three
primary
criteria
guide
determination
whether
program
impermissibly
advances
religion
whether
aid
results
governmental
indoctrination
whether
aid
program
defines
recipients
reference
religion
whether
aid
creates
excessive
entanglement
government
religion
finally
noted
criteria
reviewed
determine
whether
program
constitutes
endorsement
religion
respondents
neither
question
secular
purpose
chapter
title
ii
program
contend
creates
excessive
entanglement
due
denomination
chapter
education
consolidation
improvement
act
stat
parties
refer
act
title
ii
program
modified
subsequent
legislation
chapter
ease
reference
accordingly
purposes
deciding
whether
chapter
applied
jefferson
parish
louisiana
violates
establishment
clause
need
ask
whether
program
results
governmental
indoctrination
defines
recipients
reference
religion
taking
second
inquiry
first
clear
chapter
define
aid
recipients
reference
religion
agostini
explained
scrutiny
manner
program
identifies
recipients
important
criteria
might
effect
advancing
religion
creating
financial
incentive
undertake
religious
indoctrination
clarified
financial
incentive
present
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
ibid
chapter
secretary
education
allocates
funds
based
state
share
nation
population
state
educational
agency
sea
recipient
state
turn
must
distribute
state
chapter
funds
local
educational
agencies
lea
according
relative
enrollments
public
private
nonprofit
schools
within
school
districts
agencies
adjusted
take
account
lea
greatest
numbers
percentages
children
whose
education
imposes
higher
average
cost
per
child
lea
must
expend
funds
innovative
assistance
programs
designed
improve
student
achievement
statute
generally
requires
lea
ensure
equitable
participation
children
enrolled
private
nonprofit
elementary
secondary
schools
specifically
mandates
lea
expenditures
behalf
children
enrolled
private
schools
equal
consistent
number
children
served
expenditures
programs
children
enrolled
public
schools
lea
statutory
provisions
make
clear
chapter
uses
wholly
neutral
secular
criteria
allocate
aid
students
enrolled
religious
secular
schools
alike
result
creates
financial
incentive
undertake
religious
indoctrination
agostini
next
requires
us
ask
whether
chapter
result
governmental
indoctrination
held
new
york
city
program
unconstitutional
ball
companion
case
aguilar
also
held
similar
program
grand
rapids
michigan
violated
constitution
decisions
aguilar
ball
based
presumption
drawn
large
part
meek
see
instructors
teach
secular
classes
campuses
religious
schools
inevitably
inculcate
religion
students
agostini
recognized
ur
recent
cases
undermined
assumptions
upon
ball
aguilar
relied
first
explained
since
abandoned
presumption
erected
meek
ball
placement
public
employees
parochial
school
grounds
inevitably
results
impermissible
effect
indoctrination
constitutes
symbolic
union
government
religion
rather
relying
zobrest
explained
absence
evidence
showing
teachers
actually
using
title
aid
inculcate
religion
presume
instructors
comply
program
secular
restrictions
see
agostini
title
services
required
statute
secular
neutral
nonideological
quoting
second
noted
departed
rule
relied
ball
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
agostini
supra
relying
witters
zobrest
noted
cases
taken
forgiving
view
neutral
government
programs
make
aid
available
generally
without
regard
religious
nonreligious
character
recipient
school
see
agostini
respect
specific
title
program
issue
noted
several
factors
precluded
us
finding
impermissible
financing
religious
indoctrination
aid
provided
students
whatever
school
choose
attend
services
law
supplemental
regular
curricula
benefited
schools
title
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
schools
evidence
title
instructors
attempted
inculcate
religion
students
relying
factors
also
concluded
new
york
city
program
reasonably
viewed
endorsement
religion
although
found
relevant
title
services
provided
basis
also
explained
fact
likely
sufficient
rather
necessary
condition
program
constitutionality
willing
conclude
constitutionality
aid
program
depends
number
sectarian
school
students
happen
receive
otherwise
neutral
aid
chapter
program
issue
bears
hallmarks
new
york
city
title
program
found
important
agostini
first
explained
chapter
aid
distributed
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
aid
available
assist
students
regardless
whether
attend
public
private
nonprofit
religious
schools
second
statute
requires
participating
sea
lea
use
allocate
chapter
funds
supplement
funds
otherwise
available
religious
school
chapter
funds
must
case
used
supplant
funds
sources
ibid
third
chapter
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
school
like
title
program
considered
agostini
chapter
funds
controlled
public
agencies
sea
lea
lea
purchase
instructional
educational
materials
lend
materials
public
private
schools
see
respect
lending
private
schools
chapter
statute
specifically
provides
relevant
public
agency
must
retain
title
materials
equipment
together
supplantation
restriction
provision
ensures
religious
schools
reap
financial
benefit
virtue
receiving
loans
materials
equipment
finally
statute
provides
chapter
materials
equipment
must
secular
neutral
nonideological
restriction
reinforced
statutory
prohibition
making
payment
religious
worship
instruction
although
respondents
claim
chapter
aid
diverted
religious
instruction
evidence
de
minimis
explain
greater
length
see
infra
iii
respondents
contend
agostini
distinguishable
pointing
distinct
character
aid
program
considered
see
brief
respondents
agostini
federal
funds
paid
teachers
provide
secular
instruction
eligible
children
premises
religious
schools
contrast
federal
funds
pay
instructional
materials
equipment
lea
lend
religious
schools
use
schools
teachers
classes
held
similar
programs
unconstitutional
meek
wolman
respondents
contend
decisions
agostini
controlling
see
brief
respondents
like
respondents
justice
souter
also
relies
meek
wolman
finding
character
chapter
aid
constitutionally
problematic
see
post
time
decided
meek
wolman
created
inexplicable
rift
within
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
concerning
government
aid
schools
seven
years
decision
meek
held
allen
new
york
statute
authorized
lending
textbooks
students
attending
religious
schools
violate
establishment
clause
explained
statute
merely
made
available
children
benefits
general
program
lend
school
books
free
charge
state
retained
ownership
textbooks
religious
schools
received
financial
benefit
program
specifically
rejected
contrary
argument
statute
violated
establishment
clause
textbooks
critical
teaching
process
religious
school
employed
inculcate
religion
meek
wolman
adhered
allen
holding
textbook
lending
programs
issue
case
violate
establishment
clause
see
meek
plurality
opinion
wolman
plurality
opinion
time
however
held
cases
lending
instructional
materials
equipment
religious
schools
unconstitutional
see
meek
supra
wolman
supra
reasoned
religious
schools
receiving
materials
equipment
pervasively
sectarian
assistance
support
schools
educational
missions
inevitably
impermissible
effect
advancing
religion
example
meek
explained
simply
ignore
reality
attempt
separate
secular
educational
functions
predominantly
religious
role
performed
many
pennsylvania
elementary
secondary
schools
characterize
statute
channeling
aid
secular
without
providing
direct
aid
sectarian
even
though
earmarked
secular
purposes
flows
institution
religion
pervasive
substantial
portion
functions
subsumed
religious
mission
state
aid
impermissible
primary
effect
advancing
religion
thus
held
aid
program
necessarily
results
aid
sectarian
school
enterprise
whole
inescapably
results
direct
substantial
advancement
religious
activity
meek
supra
emphases
added
similarly
wolman
concluded
view
impossibility
separating
secular
education
function
sectarian
state
aid
inevitably
flows
part
support
religious
role
schools
emphasis
added
whatever
reason
willing
extend
presumption
inevitable
religious
indoctrination
school
aid
instead
consisted
textbooks
lent
free
charge
example
meek
despite
identifying
religious
schools
secular
educational
functions
religious
missions
inextricably
intertwined
upheld
textbook
lending
program
record
case
like
record
allen
contains
suggestion
religious
textbooks
lent
books
provided
used
anything
purely
secular
purposes
citation
omitted
accordingly
willing
apply
irrebuttable
presumption
secular
instructional
materials
equipment
diverted
use
religious
indoctrination
required
evidence
religious
schools
diverting
secular
textbooks
religious
instruction
inconsistency
two
strands
jurisprudence
go
unnoticed
justices
sides
meek
wolman
decisions
relied
contradiction
support
respective
arguments
see
meek
rehnquist
dissenting
footnotes
omitted
indeed
technology
advance
since
allen
meek
wolman
decisions
made
distinction
textbooks
instructional
materials
equipment
suspect
case
example
asked
draw
constitutional
line
lending
textbooks
lending
computers
computers
constitute
instructional
equipment
adherence
meek
wolman
require
exclusion
computers
government
school
aid
program
includes
religious
schools
yet
computers
necessary
schoolbooks
years
ago
play
somewhat
similar
role
educational
process
allen
meek
wolman
permit
constitutionality
program
turn
whether
aid
took
form
computer
rather
book
reveals
inconsistency
inherent
logic
respondents
insist
reasoned
basis
establishment
clause
distinction
textbooks
instructional
materials
equipment
claim
presumption
religious
schools
use
instructional
materials
equipment
inculcate
religion
sound
materials
equipment
unlike
textbooks
reasonably
divertible
religious
uses
example
matter
secular
criteria
government
employs
selecting
film
projector
lend
religious
school
school
officials
always
divert
projector
religious
instruction
respondents
therefore
claim
establishment
clause
prohibits
government
giving
lending
aid
religious
schools
aid
reasonably
divertible
religious
uses
see
brief
respondents
justice
souter
also
divertibility
secular
government
aid
important
consideration
establishment
clause
although
apparently
ascribe
constitutionally
determinative
status
respondents
see
post
reject
respondents
proposed
divertibility
rule
first
respondents
cite
precedent
require
possible
direct
precedential
support
rule
single
sentence
contained
wolman
decision
described
allen
premised
view
educational
content
textbooks
something
ascertained
advance
diverted
sectarian
uses
wolman
supra
extent
simple
description
allen
even
correct
certainly
constitute
actual
holding
establishment
clause
prohibits
government
lending
divertible
aid
religious
schools
rather
explained
wolman
based
holding
invalidating
lending
instructional
materials
equipment
religious
schools
rationale
adopted
meek
secular
educational
function
religious
school
inseparable
religious
mission
see
wolman
supra
indeed
anything
wolman
confirms
irrationality
distinction
textbooks
instructional
materials
equipment
wolman
acknowledged
holding
respect
instructional
materials
equipment
tension
allen
explained
continuing
validity
allen
solely
basis
stare
decisis
board
education
allen
remained
law
follow
matter
stare
decisis
principle
restriction
textbooks
provided
public
schools
sufficient
ensure
books
used
religious
purposes
wolman
thus
wolman
never
justified
inconsistent
treatment
accorded
lending
textbooks
lending
instructional
materials
equipment
based
items
reasonable
divertibility
justice
souter
attempt
defend
divertibility
rationale
viable
distinction
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
fares
better
justice
souter
secular
school
aid
presents
constitutional
problems
actually
diverted
religious
ends
also
simply
capacity
presents
possibility
diversion
see
post
discussing
susceptibility
secular
supplies
service
religious
ends
thus
explains
allen
meek
wolman
decisions
follows
textbooks
known
fixed
secular
content
readily
divertible
religious
teaching
purposes
adaptable
materials
post
view
come
surprise
meek
expressly
conceded
material
equipment
subjects
loan
ing
starting
secular
nonideological
neutral
change
use
quoting
meek
pittenger
supp
ed
indeed
given
nature
instructional
materials
considered
meek
wolman
difficult
comprehend
divertibility
rationale
explained
decisions
statutes
issue
cases
authorized
lending
periodicals
photographs
maps
charts
sound
recordings
films
meek
supra
maps
globes
wolman
supra
plausible
basis
saying
items
somehow
divertible
textbook
given
items
like
textbook
fixed
ascertainable
content
event
even
meek
wolman
articulated
divertibility
rationale
urged
respondents
justice
souter
still
reject
fundamental
reason
stated
simply
theory
provide
logical
distinction
lending
textbooks
lending
instructional
materials
equipment
educator
use
virtually
instructional
tool
whether
ascertainable
content
teach
religious
message
respect
agree
plurality
hard
imagine
book
even
moderately
skilled
hands
serve
illustrate
religious
message
ante
today
case
example
asked
draw
constitutional
distinction
lending
textbook
lending
library
book
justice
souter
try
justifying
distinction
demonstrates
absurdity
difference
must
rest
lthough
library
books
like
textbooks
fixed
content
religious
teachers
assign
secular
library
books
religious
critique
post
regardless
whether
explanation
even
correct
student
surely
given
religious
assignment
connection
textbook
hardly
distinction
constitutional
law
turn
moreover
mere
ability
teacher
devise
religious
lesson
involving
secular
aid
question
suffices
hold
provision
aid
unconstitutional
difficult
discern
limiting
principle
divertibility
rule
example
even
publicly
financed
lunch
apparently
unconstitutional
divertibility
rationale
officials
conceivably
use
lunch
lead
students
blessing
bread
see
brief
avi
chai
foundation
amicus
curiae
extent
justice
souter
believes
several
related
establishment
clause
decisions
require
application
divertibility
rule
context
case
respectfully
disagree
justice
souter
correct
note
continued
recognition
special
dangers
associated
direct
money
grants
religious
institutions
see
post
follow
however
treat
constitutionally
suspect
form
secular
aid
might
conceivably
diverted
religious
use
cases
justice
souter
cites
demonstrate
concern
direct
monetary
aid
based
diversion
fact
important
reason
according
special
treatment
direct
money
grants
form
aid
falls
precariously
close
original
object
establishment
clause
prohibition
see
walz
tax
city
new
york
men
wrote
religion
clauses
first
amendment
establishment
religion
connoted
sponsorship
financial
support
active
involvement
sovereign
religious
activity
statements
concerning
constitutionally
suspect
status
direct
cash
aid
accordingly
provide
justification
applying
absolute
rule
divertibility
aid
consists
instead
instructional
materials
equipment
justice
souter
also
relies
decisions
wolman
extent
concerned
transportation
nonpublic
schools
levitt
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
tilton
richardson
bowen
see
post
none
requires
application
divertibility
rule
context
case
wolman
levitt
based
presumption
government
aid
used
inculcation
religion
chosen
apply
textbook
lending
programs
generally
rejected
recent
decisions
compare
wolman
supra
levitt
supra
supra
infra
tilton
considered
federal
statute
authorized
grants
universities
construction
buildings
facilities
used
exclusively
secular
educational
purposes
see
held
statute
unconstitutional
extent
university
obligation
use
facility
sectarian
instruction
religious
worship
appear
ed
expire
end
years
hold
statute
unconstitutional
lacks
secular
content
restriction
quite
different
resting
divertibility
rationale
indeed
fact
held
statute
constitutional
respects
probative
divertibility
question
demonstrates
willingness
presume
university
abide
secular
content
restriction
years
requirement
effect
event
chapter
contains
secular
content
restriction
prohibition
use
aid
religious
worship
instruction
tilton
provides
basis
upholding
respondents
challenge
finally
decision
bowen
proves
actual
diversion
opposed
mere
divertibility
constitutionally
impermissible
see
believed
divertibility
secular
aid
sufficient
call
aid
program
question
need
remand
ordered
basis
reversal
iv
divertibility
fails
explain
distinction
cases
drawn
textbooks
instructional
materials
equipment
remains
question
two
irreconcilable
strands
establishment
clause
jurisprudence
follow
two
adhere
rule
applied
context
textbook
lending
programs
establish
first
amendment
violation
plaintiffs
must
prove
aid
question
actually
used
religious
purposes
see
meek
allen
held
agostini
recent
cases
undermined
assumptions
underlying
ball
aguilar
hold
agostini
cases
relied
undermined
assumptions
underlying
meek
wolman
sure
agostini
addressed
specific
presumption
employees
teaching
premises
religious
schools
inevitably
inculcate
religion
nevertheless
believe
definitive
rejection
presumption
also
stood
least
strongly
pointed
broader
proposition
presumptions
religious
indoctrination
normally
inappropriate
evaluating
neutral
programs
establishment
clause
agostini
repeatedly
emphasized
inappropriate
presume
inculcation
religion
rather
plaintiffs
raising
establishment
clause
challenge
must
present
evidence
government
aid
question
resulted
religious
indoctrination
see
specifically
relied
statement
zobrest
presumption
indoctrination
constitutes
absolute
bar
aid
question
regardless
religious
school
ability
separate
aid
religious
mission
constitutes
flat
rule
smacking
antiquated
notions
taint
indeed
exalt
form
substance
reasoning
applies
equal
force
presumption
meek
ball
concerning
instructional
materials
equipment
explained
agostini
departed
rule
relied
ball
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
respondents
contend
agostini
limited
facts
point
specifically
following
statement
separate
opinion
ball
basis
retaining
presumption
religious
inculcation
instructional
materials
equipment
parochial
school
teachers
receive
public
funds
teach
secular
courses
parochial
school
students
parochial
school
supervision
agree
program
perceived
actual
effect
advancing
religious
aims
schools
particularly
case
religion
pervades
curriculum
teachers
accustomed
bring
religion
play
everything
teach
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
respondents
note
agostini
overrule
portion
ball
holding
community
education
program
unconstitutional
program
government
paid
teachers
operate
public
teachers
religious
schools
teaching
secular
classes
conclusion
regular
school
day
ball
relying
majority
opinion
separate
opinion
ball
respondents
therefore
contend
must
presume
teachers
inculcate
religion
students
argue
must
also
presume
teachers
unable
follow
secular
restrictions
use
instructional
materials
equipment
lent
schools
government
see
brief
respondents
disagree
however
latter
proposition
follows
former
first
holding
allen
reaffirmance
meek
wolman
demonstrate
willingness
assume
instructors
inculcate
religion
caused
us
presume
also
instructors
unable
follow
secular
restrictions
use
textbooks
similarly
reject
presumption
regarding
use
instructional
materials
equipment
religious
school
receives
textbooks
instructional
materials
equipment
lent
secular
restrictions
school
teachers
need
refrain
teaching
religion
altogether
rather
instructors
need
ensure
religious
teaching
done
without
instructional
aids
provided
government
always
willing
assume
instructors
abide
restrictions
aid
consists
textbooks
justice
brennan
described
surely
heart
tools
education
meek
supra
concurring
part
dissenting
part
assumption
extend
instructional
materials
equipment
reason
position
ball
distinguishable
government
paid
instructors
teach
classes
supplemental
offered
normal
school
day
context
willing
presume
teacher
works
throughout
day
advance
school
religious
mission
also
least
extent
supplemental
classes
provided
end
day
government
financed
entirety
classes
religious
indoctrination
taking
place
therein
directly
attributable
government
instant
case
chapter
aid
concerns
teaching
tools
must
remain
supplementary
aid
comprises
portion
teacher
educational
efforts
single
class
context
find
easier
believe
teacher
abide
secular
restrictions
placed
government
assistance
therefore
presume
chapter
aid
advance
perceived
advance
school
religious
mission
respondents
rest
however
divertibility
argument
alone
rather
also
contend
evidence
respecting
actual
administration
chapter
jefferson
parish
demonstrates
program
violated
establishment
clause
first
respondents
claim
program
safeguards
insufficient
uncover
instances
actual
diversion
brief
respondents
second
contend
record
shows
religious
schools
jefferson
parish
may
used
chapter
aid
support
religious
education
diverted
aid
third
respondents
highlight
violations
chapter
secular
content
restrictions
finally
note
isolated
examples
potential
violations
chapter
supplantation
restriction
based
evidence
underlying
first
second
claims
plurality
appears
contend
chapter
program
upheld
actual
diversion
government
aid
advancement
religion
permissible
establishment
clause
see
ante
relying
evidence
underlying
last
claims
justice
souter
concludes
chapter
program
applied
jefferson
parish
violated
establishment
clause
see
post
disagree
plurality
justice
souter
limited
evidence
amassed
respondents
years
discovery
began
approximately
years
ago
best
de
minimis
therefore
insufficient
affect
constitutional
inquiry
plurality
justice
souter
direct
primary
thrust
arguments
alleged
inadequacy
program
safeguards
respondents
plurality
justice
souter
appear
proceed
premise
long
actual
diversion
presents
constitutional
problem
government
must
failsafe
mechanism
capable
detecting
instance
diversion
rejected
assumption
however
agostini
explained
abandoned
assumption
properly
instructed
public
employees
fail
discharge
duties
faithfully
must
also
discard
assumption
pervasive
monitoring
title
teachers
required
emphasis
original
believe
abandon
presumption
adopted
meek
wolman
respecting
use
instructional
materials
equipment
teachers
see
constitutional
need
pervasive
monitoring
chapter
program
safeguards
employed
program
constitutionally
sufficient
federal
level
statute
limits
aid
secular
neutral
nonideological
services
materials
equipment
requires
aid
supplement
supplant
funds
sources
prohibits
payment
religious
worship
instruction
state
level
louisiana
department
education
relevant
sea
louisiana
requires
nonpublic
schools
submit
signed
assurances
use
chapter
aid
supplement
supplant
funds
instructional
materials
equipment
used
secular
neutral
nonideological
purposes
app
see
also
although
dispute
concerning
mandatory
nature
assurances
dan
lewis
director
louisiana
chapter
program
testified
state
nonpublic
schools
thus
far
willing
sign
assurances
state
retained
power
cut
aid
school
breached
assurance
louisiana
sea
also
conducts
monitoring
visits
state
lea
one
two
nonpublic
schools
covered
relevant
lea
every
three
years
addition
tasks
performed
visits
sea
representatives
conduct
random
review
school
library
books
religious
content
local
level
jefferson
parish
public
school
system
jppss
requires
nonpublic
schools
seeking
chapter
aid
submit
applications
complete
specific
project
plans
approval
sample
application
jppss
conducts
annual
monitoring
visits
nonpublic
schools
receiving
chapter
aid
visit
jppss
representative
meets
contact
person
nonpublic
school
reviews
person
school
project
plan
manner
school
used
chapter
materials
equipment
support
plan
jppss
representative
also
reminds
contact
person
prohibition
use
chapter
aid
religious
purposes
conducts
random
sample
school
chapter
materials
equipment
ensure
appropriately
labeled
school
maintained
record
usage
although
plurality
justice
souter
claim
compliance
labeling
requirement
haphazard
cite
statewide
monitoring
report
includes
specific
findings
respect
jefferson
parish
ante
citing
app
post
finally
jppss
representative
randomly
selects
library
books
nonpublic
school
acquired
chapter
reviews
content
ensure
comply
program
secular
content
restriction
app
monitoring
satisfy
jppss
representative
another
visit
scheduled
apart
conducting
monitoring
visits
jppss
reviews
chapter
requests
filed
participating
nonpublic
schools
part
process
jppss
employee
examines
titles
requested
library
books
rejects
book
whose
title
reveals
suggests
religious
subject
matter
description
jppss
monitoring
process
make
clear
justice
souter
citation
statewide
report
finding
lack
monitoring
louisiana
lea
irrelevant
far
jefferson
parish
concerned
see
post
quoting
app
respondents
plurality
justice
souter
fault
safeguards
primarily
depend
good
faith
participating
religious
school
officials
example
plurality
justice
souter
repeatedly
cite
testimony
state
parish
officials
acknowledging
safeguards
depend
certain
extent
religious
schools
therefore
way
state
jefferson
parish
say
definitively
chapter
aid
diverted
religious
purposes
see
ante
post
admissions
however
prove
safeguards
inadequate
find
actual
diversion
flourish
one
must
presume
bad
faith
part
religious
school
officials
report
jppss
monitors
regarding
use
chapter
aid
disagree
plurality
justice
souter
point
believe
entirely
proper
presume
school
officials
act
good
faith
presumption
especially
appropriate
case
since
proof
religious
school
officials
breached
schools
assurances
failed
tell
government
officials
truth
cf
tilton
possibility
always
exists
course
legitimate
objectives
law
legislative
program
may
subverted
conscious
design
lax
enforcement
judicial
concern
possibilities
standing
alone
warrant
striking
statute
unconstitutional
evidence
proffered
respondents
relied
plurality
justice
souter
concerning
actual
diversion
chapter
aid
jefferson
parish
de
minimis
respondents
first
cite
following
statement
jefferson
parish
religious
school
teacher
materials
necessary
enjoyable
tool
used
teaching
young
children
second
grade
teacher
use
subjects
see
positive
result
app
respondents
evidence
consists
chart
concerning
one
jefferson
parish
religious
school
shows
school
theology
department
significant
user
audiovisual
equipment
see
although
accompanying
letter
indicates
much
school
equipment
purchased
federal
funds
chart
provide
breakdown
identifying
specific
chapter
usage
indeed
unless
relieve
respondents
evidentiary
burden
presume
violation
chapter
assume
school
used
equipment
theology
department
chapter
equipment
elsewhere
basic
point
however
neither
piece
evidence
demonstrates
chapter
aid
actually
diverted
religious
education
proves
possibility
nonpublic
schools
jefferson
parish
participating
chapter
aid
may
diverted
one
school
class
another
school
theology
department
plurality
insistence
evidence
somehow
substantial
flatly
contradicts
willingness
disregard
similarly
insignificant
evidence
violations
chapter
supplantation
restrictions
see
ante
finding
material
statutory
violation
supplantation
restriction
ante
characterizing
violations
restriction
scattered
de
minimis
shall
explain
believe
evidence
three
points
equally
insignificant
therefore
treated
justice
souter
also
relies
testimony
one
religious
school
principal
indicating
computer
lent
school
chapter
connected
network
computers
see
post
citing
app
principal
testified
chapter
computer
take
network
another
computer
break
extent
principal
testimony
even
proves
chapter
funds
diverted
school
religious
mission
evidence
hardly
compelling
justice
souter
contends
evidence
actual
diversion
requires
declare
chapter
program
unconstitutional
applied
jefferson
parish
post
support
quotes
concurring
opinion
bowen
statement
therein
use
public
funds
promote
religious
doctrines
violates
establishment
clause
emphasis
original
principle
course
remains
good
law
next
sentence
opinion
relevant
case
hand
xtensive
violations
proved
case
highly
relevant
shaping
appropriate
remedy
ends
abuses
ibid
emphasis
original
know
case
declared
entire
aid
program
unconstitutional
establishment
clause
grounds
solely
violations
miniscule
scale
issue
yet
precisely
remedy
respondents
requested
district
granted
appeals
see
app
helms
picard
amended
extensive
violations
might
require
remedy
along
lines
asked
respondents
evidence
presented
contrary
presence
examples
period
least
years
years
ago
tends
show
rules
failed
worked
accordingly
see
reason
affirm
judgment
thereby
declare
properly
functioning
aid
program
unconstitutional
respondents
next
evidentiary
argument
concerns
admitted
violation
chapter
secular
content
restriction
three
years
jefferson
parish
religious
schools
ordered
approximately
religious
library
books
chapter
app
dan
lewis
director
louisiana
chapter
program
testified
discovered
religious
books
performing
random
check
state
monitoring
visit
jefferson
parish
religious
school
discovery
prompted
state
notify
jppss
reexamined
book
requests
dating
back
discovered
books
question
recalled
series
events
demonstrates
chapter
safeguards
inadequate
rather
program
monitoring
system
succeeded
even
instead
willing
find
incident
evidence
likelihood
future
violations
evidence
insignificant
books
constituted
less
one
percent
total
allocation
chapter
aid
jefferson
parish
relevant
years
justice
souter
understandably
concedes
book
incident
constitutes
limited
evidence
post
agree
plurality
like
evidence
actual
diversion
borrowing
religious
library
books
constitutes
de
minimis
evidence
see
ante
respondents
last
evidentiary
challenge
concerns
effectiveness
chapter
supplantation
restriction
jefferson
parish
although
justice
souter
rest
decision
point
likelihood
unconstitutional
supplantation
occurred
well
post
disagree
evidence
cited
respondents
justice
souter
ambiguous
rest
sound
conclusions
best
shows
scattered
violations
statutory
supplantation
restriction
insignificant
aggregate
affect
constitutional
inquiry
indeed
even
justice
souter
concedes
respect
record
sparse
post
given
important
similarities
chapter
program
title
program
issue
agostini
respondents
establishment
clause
challenge
must
fail
agostini
chapter
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
aid
must
supplementary
supplant
funds
chapter
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
schools
aid
must
secular
evidence
actual
diversion
de
minimis
program
includes
adequate
safeguards
regardless
whether
factors
constitutional
requirements
surely
sufficient
find
program
issue
impermissible
effect
advancing
religion
reasons
carefully
constrained
program
also
reasonably
viewed
endorsement
religion
agostini
accordingly
concur
judgment
guy
mitchell
et
petitioners
mary
helms
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
souter
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
first
amendment
establishment
clause
prohibits
congress
incorporation
making
law
respecting
establishment
religion
held
prohibit
institution
official
church
government
act
favoring
religion
particular
religion
matter
irreligion
thus
bars
use
public
funds
religious
aid
establishment
prohibition
government
religious
funding
serves
one
end
meant
guarantee
right
individual
conscience
compulsion
protect
integrity
religion
corrosion
secular
support
preserve
unity
political
society
implied
exclusion
less
favored
antagonism
controversy
public
support
religious
causes
objectives
always
jeopardy
since
substantive
principle
aid
religion
limitation
government
action
toward
religion
first
amendment
also
bars
prohibition
individual
free
exercise
religion
religious
organizations
isolated
basic
government
functions
create
civil
environment
much
necessary
difficult
draw
lines
forbidden
aid
lawful
benefit
years
attempting
draw
lines
owing
variety
factual
circumstances
lines
must
drawn
points
creating
boundary
enjoyed
far
line
drawn
addressed
government
aid
education
fundamental
generalizations
nonetheless
possible
may
aid
supporting
sectarian
school
religious
exercise
discharge
religious
mission
aid
secular
character
discernible
benefit
sectarian
objective
allowable
religious
secular
spheres
largely
overlap
life
many
schools
tried
identify
facts
likely
reveal
relative
religious
secular
intent
effect
government
benefits
particular
circumstances
asked
whether
government
acting
neutrally
distributing
money
form
aid
path
government
religious
institution
divertibility
religious
nurture
potential
reducing
traditional
expenditures
religious
institutions
relative
importance
recipient
among
things
years
effort
isolated
single
test
constitutional
sufficiency
question
every
case
addresses
substantive
principle
aid
reasons
characterize
benefit
aid
sectarian
school
discharging
religious
mission
particular
factual
circumstances
control
answer
matter
judgment
follows
flesh
summary
case
comes
time
judgment
requires
perspective
establishment
clause
come
understood
applied
majority
today
mistakes
significance
facts
led
conclusions
unconstitutionality
earlier
cases
though
believe
commits
error
failing
recognize
divertibility
funds
service
religious
objectives
important
view
revealed
plurality
opinion
espouses
new
conception
neutrality
practically
sufficient
test
constitutionality
adopted
eliminate
enquiry
law
effects
plurality
position
breaks
fundamentally
establishment
clause
principle
methodology
painstakingly
worked
support
mean
revisit
principle
describe
methodology
length
lest
question
rupture
plurality
view
cause
new
view
law
majority
mistaken
application
old
respectfully
dissent
prohibition
congress
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
amdt
eludes
elegant
conceptualization
simply
prohibition
applies
distinct
phenomena
state
churches
aid
religious
schools
applied
school
aid
prompted
challenges
programs
ranging
construction
subsidies
hearing
aids
textbook
loans
criteria
moreover
must
define
margins
establishment
prohibition
must
respect
succeeding
clause
first
amendment
guaranteeing
religion
free
exercise
amdt
wonder
complementary
constitutional
provisions
inexhaustably
various
circumstances
applicability
defied
simple
test
instead
produced
combination
general
rules
often
tension
edges
coherence
keep
mind
principal
objectives
served
establishment
clause
application
school
aid
recollection
may
help
explain
misunderstandings
underlie
majority
result
case
least
three
concerns
expressed
since
founding
run
throughout
first
amendment
jurisprudence
first
compelling
individual
support
religion
violates
fundamental
principle
freedom
conscience
madison
jefferson
familiar
words
establish
clearly
liberty
personal
conviction
requires
freedom
coercion
support
means
government
compel
aid
fund
madison
put
simply
authority
force
citizen
contribute
three
pence
property
support
one
establishment
may
force
conform
establishment
memorial
remonstrance
reprinted
everson
board
ed
ewing
tax
establish
religion
antithetical
command
minds
men
always
wholly
free
cussing
madison
memorial
remonstrance
noting
jefferson
belief
compel
ling
man
furnish
contributions
money
propagation
opinions
disbelieves
sinful
nical
even
forcing
support
teacher
religious
persuasion
depriving
comfortable
liberty
giving
contributions
particular
pastor
whose
morals
make
pattern
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
souter
dissenting
second
government
aid
corrupts
religion
see
engel
vitale
establishment
clause
first
immediate
purpose
rested
belief
union
government
religion
tends
destroy
government
degrade
religion
everson
supra
rutledge
dissenting
madison
argued
establishment
religion
weakened
beliefs
adherents
favored
strengthened
opponents
generated
pride
indolence
clergy
ignorance
servility
laity
superstition
bigotry
persecution
memorial
remonstrance
quoted
everson
internal
quotation
marks
citations
omitted
see
also
illinois
ex
rel
mccollum
board
ed
school
dist
champaign
overnment
religion
discrete
interests
mutually
best
served
avoids
close
proximity
nonbeliever
fears
injection
sectarian
doctrines
controversies
civil
polity
high
degree
devout
believer
fears
secularization
creed
becomes
deeply
involved
dependent
upon
government
school
dist
abington
township
schempp
brennan
concurring
see
also
rosenberger
supra
souter
dissenting
third
government
establishment
religion
inextricably
linked
conflict
everson
supra
relating
colonists
understanding
recent
history
religious
persecution
countries
established
religion
engel
supra
discussing
struggle
among
religions
government
approval
lemon
kurtzman
history
turmoil
thus
produced
led
rejection
idea
government
subsidize
religious
education
opinion
brennan
discussing
history
rejection
support
religious
schools
mccollum
supra
opinion
frankfurter
position
illustrates
understanding
implicit
endorsement
religion
unconstitutional
see
county
allegheny
american
civil
liberties
union
greater
pittsburgh
chapter
concerns
reflected
classic
summation
delivered
everson
board
education
supra
first
opinion
directly
addressing
standards
governing
aid
religious
establishment
religion
clause
first
amendment
means
least
neither
state
federal
government
set
church
neither
pass
laws
aid
one
religion
aid
religions
prefer
one
religion
another
neither
force
influence
person
go
remain
away
church
force
profess
belief
disbelief
religion
person
punished
entertaining
professing
religious
beliefs
disbeliefs
church
attendance
tax
amount
large
small
levied
support
religious
activities
institutions
whatever
may
called
whatever
form
may
adopt
teach
practice
religion
neither
state
federal
government
openly
secretly
participate
affairs
religious
organizations
groups
vice
versa
words
jefferson
clause
establishment
religion
law
intended
erect
wall
separation
church
state
directly
pertinent
doctrinal
statements
government
pass
laws
aid
one
religion
religions
tax
amount
levied
support
religious
activities
institutions
whatever
form
may
adopt
teach
religion
thus
principle
aid
one
everson
immediately
however
difficulty
might
amount
aid
support
problem
everson
merely
imprecision
words
language
first
amendment
commands
government
hamper
citizens
free
exercise
religion
consequence
government
must
neutral
relations
groups
religious
believers
since
withholding
public
benefits
religious
groups
said
hamper
religious
exercise
indirectly
extending
benefits
said
aid
formulation
principle
impossible
wisely
chose
attempt
thing
instead
gave
definitive
examples
public
benefits
provided
pervasively
throughout
society
value
organized
religion
way
degree
sensibly
described
giving
aid
violating
neutrality
requirement
establishment
clause
concern
general
government
services
ordinary
police
fire
protection
connections
sewage
disposal
public
highways
sidewalks
benefits
public
welfare
legislation
extended
modern
times
virtually
every
member
population
valuable
every
person
association
paradigms
advantages
religious
organizations
enjoy
consistently
prohibition
aid
governments
extend
without
deserting
required
position
neutrality
paradigms
perfect
fits
often
government
spending
resists
easy
classification
universal
general
service
subsidy
favoritism
division
everson
turned
inevitable
question
whether
reimbursing
parents
cost
transporting
children
school
close
enough
police
protection
tolerate
indirect
benefit
degree
religious
schools
majority
everson
thinking
reimbursement
statute
fell
lawful
side
line
although
state
scheme
reimbursed
parents
transporting
children
sectarian
schools
among
others
gave
money
schools
support
legislation
provide
general
program
help
parents
get
children
regardless
religion
safely
expeditiously
accredited
schools
dissenters
countered
factual
analyses
showing
limitation
law
benefits
fact
private
school
pupils
roman
catholics
jackson
ing
indicating
inseparability
transporting
pupils
school
support
religious
instruction
school
raison
tre
rutledge
dissenting
everson
usefully
understood
light
successor
case
two
decades
later
board
ed
central
school
dist
allen
challenged
government
practice
lending
textbooks
pupils
schools
public
private
including
religious
ones
evidence
previously
supplied
books
classes
evidence
time
allen
problem
classifying
state
benefit
aid
religion
general
public
service
consistent
government
neutrality
led
formulation
test
required
secular
primary
intent
effect
necessary
conditions
permissible
scheme
split
upholding
state
law
issue
everson
majority
author
justice
black
dissent
remarkable
allen
today
however
much
division
methodology
consistency
way
justices
went
deciding
case
transcended
different
conclusions
neither
side
rested
facile
application
test
simplistic
reliance
generality
evenhandedness
state
law
disagreement
concentrated
true
intent
inferrable
behind
law
feasibility
distinguishing
fact
religious
secular
teaching
church
schools
reality
sham
lending
books
pupils
instead
supplying
books
schools
majority
sure
cited
provision
books
schoolchildren
regardless
religion
everson
majority
spoken
transportation
reimbursement
going
case
sake
analogy
provision
police
fire
stress
practical
significance
actual
benefits
received
schools
everson
rested
understanding
money
support
went
school
allen
emphasized
savings
parents
devoid
measurable
effect
teaching
religion
justice
harlan
concurring
summed
approach
observations
required
government
eutrality
coat
many
colors
quoted
justice
goldberg
conclusion
simple
clear
religious
school
aid
case
may
readily
decided
quoting
schempp
everson
allen
state
law
applying
establishment
clause
public
expenditures
producing
benefit
religious
schools
government
aid
religion
forbidden
tax
revenue
may
used
support
religious
school
religious
teaching
government
provision
paradigms
universally
general
welfare
benefits
police
fire
protection
count
aid
religion
whether
law
benefit
sufficiently
close
universally
general
welfare
paradigms
classified
distinct
religious
aid
function
purpose
effect
challenged
law
particularity
judgment
reducible
application
formula
evenhandedness
distribution
religious
secular
beneficiaries
relevant
factor
sufficiency
test
constitutionality
rule
religious
equal
protection
effect
expenditure
benefit
religious
school
students
necessarily
constitutional
long
public
school
pupils
favored
ostensibly
identical
terms
government
must
maintain
neutrality
religion
neutrality
conclusory
label
required
position
government
neither
aiding
religion
impeding
religious
exercise
believers
neutrality
name
test
identify
permissible
action
particular
synonymous
evenhandedness
conferring
benefit
secular
well
religious
today
substantive
principle
aid
religious
mission
remains
governing
understanding
establishment
clause
applied
public
benefits
inuring
religious
schools
governing
opinions
subject
years
since
allen
never
challenged
principle
cases
however
recognized
actual
establishment
clause
litigation
school
aid
legislation
pure
aid
religion
purely
secular
welfare
benefit
effects
laws
fall
somewhere
judicial
task
make
realistic
allocation
two
possibilities
decisions
demonstrate
repeated
attempts
isolate
considerations
relevant
classifying
particular
benefits
discernibly
support
threaten
support
school
religious
mission
cross
threaten
cross
line
support
religion
ii
deceptively
familiar
considerations
neutrality
presence
absence
sense
addressed
moment
everson
say
sense
used
term
least
three
ways
cases
understanding
term
evolution
help
explain
concept
understood
today
well
limits
significance
establishment
clause
analysis
neutrality
employed
term
describe
requisite
state
government
equipoise
forbidden
encouragement
discouragement
religion
characterize
benefit
aid
secular
indicate
evenhandedness
distributing
already
mentioned
first
referred
neutrality
everson
simply
stating
government
required
neutral
among
religions
religion
nonreligion
describing
cases
see
define
boundaries
neutral
area
religion
clauses
within
legislature
may
legitimately
act
roemer
board
public
works
plurality
opinion
blackmun
neutrality
required
state
must
confine
secular
objectives
neither
advance
impede
religious
activity
course
principle
easily
stated
applied
see
also
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
nyquist
describing
neutral
posture
toward
religion
roemer
supra
opinion
blackmun
enforced
scrupulous
neutrality
state
among
religions
also
religious
activities
cf
wolman
walter
quoting
lemon
noting
difficulty
religious
teachers
remaining
religiously
began
employ
neutrality
sense
different
equipoise
however
explicated
distinction
religious
secular
benefits
religious
schools
latter
circumstances
permissible
see
infra
discussing
considerations
even
though
everson
allen
anticipated
distinction
neither
case
used
term
neutral
way
everson
justice
black
indicated
providing
police
fire
similar
government
services
religious
institutions
permissible
part
separate
indisputably
marked
religious
function
describing
instructional
materials
secular
nonideological
wholly
neutral
describing
auxiliary
services
religiously
neutral
roemer
supra
opinion
blackmun
describing
tilton
approved
buildings
neutral
nonideological
nature
discussing
translator
neutral
service
agostini
felton
discussing
need
assess
whether
nature
aid
neutral
nonideological
cf
levitt
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
noting
district
approved
testing
cost
reimbursement
payment
services
secular
neutral
character
citing
lemon
wolman
supra
quoting
lemon
supra
describing
permitted
services
aid
secular
neutral
nonideological
shift
equipoise
secular
however
last
redefinition
transformed
sense
neutrality
reexamining
reinterpreting
everson
allen
began
use
word
neutral
mean
evenhanded
sense
allocating
aid
common
basis
religious
secular
recipients
neither
everson
allen
explicitly
used
neutral
manner
label
equipoise
lent
referring
secular
characteristic
government
might
provide
readily
adaptable
referring
generality
government
services
everson
paradigms
permissible
benefits
compared
increased
attention
notion
evenhanded
distribution
evident
nyquist
distinguished
program
consideration
government
services
approved
allen
everson
part
class
beneficiaries
everson
allen
included
schoolchildren
public
well
private
schools
nyquist
reserved
question
whether
form
public
assistance
made
available
generally
without
regard
nature
institution
benefitted
permissible
citations
omitted
subsequent
cases
continued
focus
generality
approved
government
services
important
characteristic
meek
example
characterized
everson
allen
approving
general
program
pay
bus
fares
lend
school
books
respectively
approving
two
similar
general
program
new
york
pennsylvania
wolman
upheld
diagnostic
services
described
general
welfare
services
children
quoting
meek
supra
justice
blackmun
writing
roemer
first
called
general
evenhanded
program
neutral
speaking
facial
neutrality
relevant
consideration
determining
whether
establishment
clause
violation
eligious
institutions
need
quarantined
public
benefits
neutrally
available
adopted
redefinition
neutrality
evenhandedness
citing
nyquist
upheld
system
tax
deductions
sectarian
educational
expenses
part
facially
neutral
law
quoting
nyquist
characterizing
program
making
aid
available
generally
zobrest
supra
discussing
government
programs
neutrally
provide
benefits
broad
class
citizens
defined
without
reference
religion
citing
mueller
witters
agostini
supra
discussing
aid
allocated
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
neither
favor
disfavor
religion
made
available
religious
secular
beneficiaries
nondiscriminatory
basis
see
also
rosenberger
guarantee
neutrality
respected
offended
government
following
neutral
criteria
evenhanded
policies
extends
benefits
recipients
whose
ideologies
viewpoints
including
religious
ones
broad
diverse
sum
neutrality
originally
entered
field
jurisprudence
conclusory
term
label
required
relationship
government
religion
state
equipoise
government
ally
government
adversary
reexamining
everson
paradigm
cases
derive
prescriptive
guideline
first
determined
neutral
aid
secular
nonideological
unrelated
religious
education
subsequent
reexamination
everson
allen
beginning
nyquist
culminating
mueller
recently
agostini
recast
neutrality
concept
evenhandedness
course
good
reason
considering
generality
aid
evenhandedness
distribution
making
close
calls
benefits
purpose
effect
support
school
religious
mission
everson
even
disputed
practice
falls
short
everson
paradigms
breadth
evenhanded
distribution
one
pointer
toward
law
purpose
since
face
aid
distributed
generally
without
religious
criterion
less
likely
meant
aid
religion
benefit
going
religious
institutions
people
depending
breadth
distribution
looking
evenhandedness
way
asking
whether
benefit
reasonably
seen
aid
religion
fact
regard
postal
system
aiding
religion
even
though
parochial
schools
get
mail
given
legitimacy
considering
evenhandedness
reason
avoid
term
neutrality
refer
one
crucial
point
must
borne
mind
days
neutral
used
everson
sense
equipoise
neutrality
tantamount
constitutionality
term
conclusory
applied
meant
government
position
constitutional
establishment
clause
however
recent
use
neutrality
refer
generality
evenhandedness
distribution
kind
neutrality
relevant
judging
whether
benefit
scheme
characterized
seen
aiding
sectarian
school
religious
mission
neutrality
alone
sufficient
qualify
aid
constitutional
considered
along
characteristics
aid
administration
recipients
potential
emphasized
years
indicators
religious
intent
effect
given
aid
scheme
really
see
tilton
quoting
meek
overruled
part
agostini
opinion
experience
proves
establishment
clause
like
free
speech
clause
easily
reduced
single
test
rosenberger
concurring
discussing
need
line
drawing
noting
lack
single
grand
unified
theory
establishment
clause
citing
kiryas
joel
cf
agostini
supra
examining
variety
factors
thus
basic
principle
establishment
scrutiny
aid
remains
principle
stated
everson
may
public
aid
religion
support
religious
mission
institution
insufficiency
evenhandedness
neutrality
criterion
constitutional
intent
effect
clear
beginning
interpretative
efforts
obvious
reason
evenhandedness
distributing
benefit
approaches
equivalence
constitutionality
area
term
refers
universality
distribution
makes
sense
think
benefit
going
discrete
group
conversely
evenhandedness
refers
distribution
limited
groups
within
society
like
groups
schools
schoolchildren
make
sense
regard
benefit
aid
recipients
see
everson
discussing
aid
approaches
verge
forbidden
territory
lemon
dimly
perceive
lines
demarcation
extraordinarily
sensitive
area
constitutional
law
nyquist
noting
perplexing
questions
presented
area
acknowledging
entangl
ing
mueller
quoting
lemon
witters
quoting
lemon
hence
looked
evenhandedness
failed
ask
activities
aid
might
support
fact
support
religious
schools
blessed
government
funding
massive
expenditures
made
benefit
public
school
counterparts
religious
missions
thrive
public
money
consideration
less
universal
neutrality
never
recognized
dispositive
always
teamed
attention
facts
bearing
substantive
prohibition
support
school
religious
objective
least
three
main
lines
enquiry
addressed
particularly
school
aid
emerged
complement
evenhandedness
neutrality
first
noted
two
types
aid
recipients
heighten
establishment
clause
concern
pervasively
religious
schools
primary
secondary
religious
schools
second
identified
two
important
characteristics
method
distributing
aid
directness
indirectness
distribution
distribution
genuinely
independent
choice
third
found
relevance
least
five
characteristics
aid
religious
content
cash
form
divertibility
actually
diversion
religious
support
supplantation
traditional
items
religious
school
expense
substantiality
two
types
school
aid
recipients
raised
special
concern
first
recognized
fact
overriding
religious
mission
certain
schools
sometimes
called
pervasively
sectarian
confined
discrete
element
curriculum
everson
lemon
supra
school
operates
commingle
religion
instruction
plainly
completely
secularize
instruction
parochial
schools
large
measure
accept
assumption
secular
subjects
unrelated
religious
teaching
see
also
bowen
kendrick
discussing
pervasively
sectarian
private
schools
based
record
evidence
long
experience
concluded
religious
teaching
schools
core
instructors
individual
personal
obligations
cf
canon
text
commentary
necessary
formation
education
given
catholic
school
based
upon
principles
catholic
doctrine
teachers
outstanding
correct
doctrine
integrity
life
individual
religious
teachers
teach
lemon
douglas
concurring
levitt
meek
wolman
discussing
nonseverability
religious
secular
education
ball
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
overruled
part
agostini
religious
teaching
separated
secular
education
schools
teachers
concluded
direct
government
subsidies
schools
prohibited
inevitably
impermissibly
support
religious
indoctrination
zobrest
discussing
meek
ball
second
expressed
special
concern
aid
primary
secondary
religious
schools
tilton
one
hand
understood
youth
students
schools
makes
highly
susceptible
religious
indoctrination
lemon
supra
process
inculcating
religious
doctrine
course
enhanced
impressionable
age
pupils
primary
schools
particularly
recognized
religious
element
education
offered
sectarian
primary
secondary
schools
far
intertwined
secular
university
teaching
natural
academic
skepticism
older
students
may
separate
two
see
tilton
supra
roemer
thus
government
benefits
accruing
pervasively
religious
primary
secondary
schools
raise
special
dangers
diversion
support
religious
indoctrination
children
involvement
government
religious
training
practice
also
evaluated
portent
support
organization
religious
mission
may
inherent
method
aid
granted
finding
pertinence
least
two
characteristics
distribution
first
asked
whether
aid
direct
indirect
observing
distinctions
government
schemes
individual
beneficiaries
whose
beneficiaries
first
instance
might
religious
schools
everson
supra
bus
fare
supports
parents
schools
allen
textbooks
go
benefit
children
parents
schools
lemon
supra
invalidating
direct
aid
schools
levitt
supra
invalidating
direct
testing
aid
schools
witters
evaluating
whether
aid
direct
subsidy
schools
direct
aid
obviously
raises
greater
risks
although
recent
cases
discounted
risk
factor
looking
features
distribution
mechanism
agostini
supra
second
distinguished
indirect
aid
reaches
religious
schools
incidentally
result
numerous
individual
choices
aid
reality
directed
religious
schools
government
practical
terms
selected
religious
schools
mueller
witters
supra
zobrest
supra
cases
declared
constitutionality
programs
providing
aid
directly
parents
students
tax
deductions
scholarship
money
aid
may
pay
education
sectarian
institutions
mueller
supra
witters
result
genuinely
independent
private
choices
aid
recipients
distinguished
path
aid
route
ball
wolman
opinions
indicated
meaningful
distinction
made
aid
student
aid
school
concept
loan
individuals
transparent
fiction
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
addition
character
school
benefit
accrues
path
government
school
number
features
aid
figured
classifications
made
first
barred
aid
actual
religious
content
obviously
run
afoul
ban
government
participation
religion
everson
walz
cf
lemon
discussing
variable
ideological
religious
character
religious
teachers
compared
fixed
content
books
cases
permitted
aid
regularly
characterized
neutral
sense
noted
supra
without
religious
content
see
tilton
characterizing
buildings
religiously
neutral
zobrest
describing
translator
neutral
service
agostini
discussing
need
assess
whether
nature
aid
neutral
nonideological
see
also
ante
barring
aid
religious
content
second
long
held
government
aid
invalid
circumstances
allow
diversion
religious
education
risk
diversion
obviously
high
aid
form
government
funds
makes
way
coffers
religious
organizations
start
understood
constitution
bar
outright
money
grants
aid
see
everson
noting
approved
aid
expenditure
public
funds
either
grant
loan
wolman
noting
statute
authorize
payment
nonpublic
school
personnel
costs
administering
tests
agostini
emphasizing
approved
services
distributed
directly
religious
schools
title
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
schools
title
services
may
provided
religious
schools
schoolwide
basis
citations
omitted
bowen
rosenberger
noting
recognized
special
establishment
clause
dangers
government
makes
direct
money
payments
sectarian
institutions
cf
lemon
noting
safeguards
accounting
inspections
required
prevent
government
funds
supporting
religious
education
cause
impermissible
entanglement
roemer
approving
segregated
funds
finding
recipients
pervasively
religious
ball
noting
ith
one
exception
subsequent
cases
struck
attempts
make
payments
public
tax
dollars
directly
primary
secondary
religious
educational
institutions
overruled
part
agostini
supra
witters
equally
state
may
grant
aid
religious
school
whether
cash
kind
effect
aid
direct
subsidy
religious
school
internal
quotation
marks
citations
omitted
rosenberger
supra
concurring
noting
student
fee
tax
divertibility
course
characteristic
cash
alone
examining
provisions
ostensibly
secular
supplies
considered
susceptibility
service
religious
upholding
scheme
provide
students
secular
textbooks
emphasized
book
loaned
must
approved
public
school
authorities
secular
books
may
receive
approval
allen
levitt
ignore
substantial
risk
examinations
prepared
teachers
authority
religious
institutions
drafted
eye
unconsciously
otherwise
inculcate
students
religious
precepts
sponsoring
church
point
mind
held
buildings
constructed
government
grants
universities
religious
affiliation
must
barred
religious
use
indefinitely
prevent
diversion
government
funds
religious
objectives
tilton
plurality
opinion
end
years
building
example
converted
chapel
otherwise
used
promote
religious
interests
original
federal
grant
part
effect
advancing
religion
extent
act
therefore
trespasses
religion
clauses
see
also
hunt
accordingly
constrained
strike
aid
repairing
buildings
nonpublic
schools
used
religious
education
nyquist
divertibility
issue
order
remanding
challenge
grant
supporting
counseling
teenage
sexuality
findings
aid
used
support
religious
education
bowen
see
also
concurring
recent
example
attention
significance
divertibility
occurred
explanation
public
school
teachers
assigned
provide
limited
instruction
religious
schools
agostini
majority
rejecting
factual
assumption
public
school
teachers
readily
lured
providing
religious
third
cases
recognized
distinction
adopted
statute
chapter
legislation
aid
merely
supplements
aid
supplants
expenditures
offerings
religious
schools
latter
barred
although
never
adopted
position
benefit
flows
religious
school
impermissible
frees
resources
school
engage
religious
indoctrination
hunt
supra
first
decision
holding
permissible
provide
textbooks
religious
schools
repeatedly
explained
unconstitutionality
aid
supplants
item
school
traditional
expense
see
cochran
louisiana
bd
noting
religious
schools
beneficiaries
appropriations
obtain
nothing
relieved
single
obligation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
everson
specifically
noting
bus
fare
program
support
fund
religious
schools
allen
stating
financial
benefit
providing
textbooks
parents
children
schools
omitted
explicitly
recognizing
record
contains
evidence
private
schools
appellants
districts
previously
provided
textbooks
students
lemon
opinion
brennan
noting
aid
schools
involved
allen
ignored
prohibition
regan
supra
see
also
ante
reimbursement
budgeted
expenses
required
testing
struck
quickly
returned
rule
guideline
permissible
zobrest
specifically
distinguished
meek
ball
explaining
invalid
programs
cases
relieved
sectarian
schools
costs
otherwise
borne
educating
students
agostini
made
point
noting
objects
aid
law
supplemental
regular
curricula
citing
zobrest
explained
remedial
education
services
relieve
religious
schools
costs
otherwise
borne
citing
zobrest
supra
explicitly
stated
services
question
supplant
remedial
instruction
guidance
counseling
already
provided
new
york
city
sectarian
schools
finally
recognized
obvious
however
imprecise
holding
substantial
amounts
aid
unconstitutional
whether
plaintiff
show
supplants
specific
item
expense
religious
school
meek
invalidated
loan
instructional
materials
religious
schools
faced
substantial
amounts
direct
support
authorized
program
simply
ignore
reality
attempt
separate
secular
educational
functions
predominantly
religious
role
performed
many
pennsylvania
elementary
secondary
schools
characterize
program
channeling
aid
secular
without
providing
direct
aid
sectarian
see
substantial
aid
educational
function
schools
necessarily
results
aid
sectarian
school
enterprise
whole
see
also
nyquist
wolman
witters
asked
whether
aid
question
direct
subsidy
religious
schools
addressed
substantiality
aid
obliquely
noting
nothing
record
indicates
significant
portion
aid
expended
washington
program
whole
end
flowing
religious
education
zobrest
supra
spoke
substantiality
test
meek
noting
isabled
children
sectarian
schools
primary
beneficiaries
individuals
disabilities
act
idea
extent
sectarian
schools
benefit
idea
incidental
beneficiaries
stretch
doctrinal
history
leaves
one
point
clear
beyond
peradventure
together
james
madison
consistently
understood
establishment
clause
impose
substantive
prohibition
public
aid
religion
hence
religious
mission
sectarian
schools
evenhandedness
neutrality
one
nondispositive
pointer
toward
intent
lesser
degree
probable
effect
permissible
side
line
forbidden
aid
general
public
welfare
benefit
pointers
facts
religious
mission
education
level
benefited
schools
pupils
pathway
benefit
travels
public
treasury
educational
effect
form
content
aid
adaptability
religious
ends
effects
school
budgets
object
enquiries
matters
whatever
particular
circumstances
benefit
intended
aid
providing
religious
element
education
likely
substance
law
thus
changed
since
everson
emphasis
one
sort
fact
another
varied
depending
perceived
utility
enquiry
added
repeated
explanation
relevant
considerations
confirming
predecessors
right
prophecies
simple
test
emerge
allow
easy
application
establishment
principle
plurality
however
reject
lesson
majority
misapplies
iii
nub
plurality
new
position
government
seeking
legitimate
secular
purpose
offers
aid
terms
without
regard
religion
adequately
purpose
fair
say
aid
going
religious
recipient
effect
furthering
secular
purpose
government
crafting
aid
program
conclude
given
level
aid
necessary
purpose
among
secular
recipients
provided
level
religious
recipients
ante
citation
omitted
break
consistent
doctrine
plurality
new
criterion
unequaled
history
establishment
clause
interpretation
simple
face
appears
take
evenhandedness
neutrality
practical
terms
promote
single
sufficient
test
establishment
constitutionality
school
aid
even
terms
errors
manifold
attention
least
three
mistaken
assumptions
show
degree
plurality
proposal
replace
principle
aid
formula
generous
religious
support
first
plurality
treats
external
observer
attribution
religious
support
government
sole
impermissible
effect
government
aid
scheme
see
ante
one
conclude
indoctrination
particular
recipient
conducts
done
behest
government
perceived
state
endorsement
religion
undoubtedly
relevant
concern
establishment
clause
see
allegheny
county
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
souter
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
certainly
one
everson
made
clear
start
secret
aid
religion
government
also
barred
state
aid
attributed
government
still
violate
taxpayer
liberty
conscience
threaten
corrupt
religion
generate
disputes
aid
event
since
feature
scheme
plurality
view
rule
attribution
perception
endorsement
adopting
plurality
rule
facial
evenhandedness
convert
neutrality
dispositive
criterion
establishment
constitutionality
eliminate
effects
enquiry
directed
allen
lemon
cases
plurality
rule
neutrality
program
met
first
part
lemon
enquiry
declining
define
program
recipients
religion
automatically
satisfy
second
supposedly
impermissible
effect
aiding
second
plurality
apparently
assumes
fact
equal
amounts
aid
religious
nonreligious
schools
exclusively
secular
equal
effects
external
perception
incentives
attend
different
schools
see
ante
reason
believe
case
effects
aid
may
confined
secular
sphere
reason
long
recognized
unrestricted
aid
religious
schools
support
religious
teaching
addition
secular
education
fact
true
matter
supposedly
secular
purpose
law
might
third
plurality
assumes
per
capita
distribution
rules
safeguard
principles
independent
private
choices
clearly
approved
university
scholarships
witters
found
close
giving
government
employee
paycheck
allowing
spend
chose
per
capita
aid
program
far
cry
awarding
scholarships
individuals
one
makes
independent
private
choice
least
significant
differences
per
capita
aid
aid
individually
determined
directed
right
genuine
opportunity
recipient
choose
give
hold
otherwise
license
government
donate
funds
churches
based
number
members
patent
fiction
independent
private
choice
plurality
mistaken
assumptions
explain
underscore
sharp
break
framers
understanding
establishment
consistent
interpretative
course
plurality
regime
little
left
right
conscience
compelled
support
religion
massive
aid
potent
influence
government
teaching
mission
generous
support
divisive
resentments
resisting
religious
support
religions
without
school
systems
ready
claim
fair
share
plurality
conception
evenhandedness
however
control
case
whose
disposition
turns
misapplication
accepted
categories
school
aid
analysis
facts
obviously
relevant
chapter
scheme
jefferson
parish
showing
divertibility
actual
diversion
circumstance
pervasively
sectarian
religious
schools
type
aid
structure
program
lack
effective
safeguards
clearly
demonstrate
divertibility
aid
little
known
use
owing
anemic
enforcement
system
parish
even
thin
record
us
reveals
actual
diversion
occurred
aid
government
provided
highly
susceptible
unconstitutional
use
much
equipment
provided
chapter
type
provided
individual
students
app
pet
cert
app
included
slide
projectors
movie
projectors
overhead
projectors
television
sets
tape
recorders
projection
screens
maps
globes
filmstrips
cassettes
computers
computer
software
peripherals
helms
cody
wl
ed
mar
app
pet
cert
app
well
library
books
materials
videocassette
players
overhead
projectors
instructional
aids
sort
found
easily
used
religious
teachers
religious
purposes
meek
wolman
true
computers
readily
employable
religious
teaching
equipment
presumably
immune
countervailing
safeguard
app
although
library
books
like
textbooks
fixed
content
religious
teachers
assign
secular
library
books
religious
critique
books
libraries
may
religious
divinity
school
library
demonstrate
sheer
number
variety
books
ordered
gave
ample
opportunity
diversion
divertibility
thus
inherent
forms
chapter
aid
enhanced
structure
program
jefferson
parish
requests
specific
items
chapter
came
secular
officials
cf
allen
officials
religious
schools
even
parents
religious
school
pupils
see
ante
noting
private
religious
schools
submitted
orders
government
specific
requested
items
app
sectarian
schools
decided
wanted
often
ordered
supplies
forwarded
directly
easy
select
whatever
instructional
materials
library
books
schools
wanted
easy
employ
computers
support
religious
content
curriculum
infused
religious
instruction
concern
divertibility
thus
predicated
underscored
fact
religious
schools
question
covered
primary
secondary
grades
grades
sectarian
nature
instruction
characteristically
pervasive
see
lemon
cf
tilton
pupils
least
critical
schools
religious
objectives
see
lemon
supra
one
indeed
disputes
trial
judge
findings
based
detailed
record
roman
catholic
made
majority
private
schools
pervasively
common
objective
mission
engage
religious
teachers
taught
making
precisely
kind
primary
secondary
religious
schools
raise
serious
establishment
clause
concerns
see
walz
hunt
lemon
supra
threat
establishment
clause
values
accordingly
highest
circumstances
case
precautionary
features
jefferson
parish
scheme
grossly
inadequate
counter
threat
sure
disbursement
aid
subject
statutory
admonitions
diversion
see
supposedly
subject
variety
safeguards
see
ante
provisions
onsite
monitoring
visits
labeling
government
property
government
oversight
accepted
sufficient
face
record
evidence
safeguard
provisions
proved
empty
phrases
jefferson
parish
cf
agostini
zobrest
accepting
precautionary
provisions
absence
evidence
uselessness
plurality
already
noted
length
ineffectiveness
government
monitoring
program
ante
see
also
app
system
monitor
nonpublic
schools
often
operation
therefore
local
educational
agency
always
know
purchased
utilized
monitors
visited
nonpublic
school
sporadically
discussed
program
single
contact
person
observed
nothing
attempts
recordkeeping
failed
inform
teachers
restrictions
involved
although
chapter
required
labeling
government
property
occurred
haphazardly
best
government
sole
monitoring
system
computer
use
amounted
nothing
questioning
school
officials
examining
location
computers
schools
records
software
computer
use
kept
recordkeeping
even
planned
state
local
officials
jefferson
parish
admitted
nothing
prevented
chapter
computers
used
religious
instruction
although
knew
methods
monitoring
computer
usage
locking
computer
functions
implemented
particular
policies
instituted
systems
employed
technologies
minimize
likelihood
diversion
religious
watchdogs
require
religious
schools
give
much
assurance
use
chapter
computers
solely
secular
purposes
helms
picard
amended
app
government
officials
admitted
way
tell
whether
instructional
materials
diverted
plurality
notes
screening
mechanism
library
book
scheme
review
titles
single
government
official
ante
see
app
government
even
policy
consequences
noncompliance
risk
immediate
diversion
chapter
benefits
complement
risk
future
diversion
jefferson
parish
program
absolutely
protection
statute
purchases
chapter
aid
remain
property
merely
lent
recipient
nonpublic
schools
actuality
however
record
indicates
nothing
jefferson
parish
program
stood
way
giving
chapter
property
outright
religious
schools
became
older
although
old
equipment
remained
property
local
education
agency
local
government
administrative
body
one
agency
employee
testified
set
policy
dealing
old
computers
probably
given
outright
religious
schools
app
witness
said
instructional
materials
probably
left
religious
schools
old
unclear
whether
library
books
ever
returned
government
ibid
providing
governmental
aid
without
effective
safeguards
future
diversion
offends
establishment
clause
tilton
nyquist
even
without
evidence
actual
diversion
cases
repeatedly
held
substantial
risk
suffices
invalidate
government
aid
program
establishment
grounds
see
wolman
invalidating
aid
transportation
field
trips
unacceptable
risk
fostering
religion
inevitable
byproduct
meek
striking
program
potential
impermissible
fostering
religion
levitt
invalidating
aid
tests
designed
religious
teachers
substantial
risk
examinations
prepared
teachers
authority
religious
institutions
drafted
eye
unconsciously
otherwise
inculcate
students
religious
precepts
sponsoring
church
lemon
finding
invalid
aid
potential
impermissible
fostering
religion
cf
bowen
noting
diversion
risk
less
clearly
made
case
may
remanded
findings
actual
diversion
aid
religious
indoctrination
regan
characterizing
minimal
chance
tests
complete
safeguards
adopted
religious
testing
substantial
risk
diversion
case
clear
plurality
conceded
first
amendment
violated
record
goes
beyond
risk
instances
actual
diversion
one
expect
paltry
efforts
monitoring
enforcement
naturally
resulted
record
strongly
suggests
undocumented
diversions
probably
occurred
well
first
record
shows
actual
diversion
library
book
program
app
although
limited
evidence
exists
contrasts
starkly
records
numerous
textbook
programs
repeatedly
upheld
evidence
actual
diversion
see
allen
meek
supra
wolman
supra
discovery
revealed
chapter
nonpublic
schools
requested
government
purchased
least
religious
books
taxpayer
funds
december
app
books
child
book
prayers
illustrated
life
jesus
discovered
among
others
ordered
program
see
also
evidence
persuasively
suggests
aid
actually
diverted
well
principal
one
religious
school
testified
example
computers
lent
chapter
funds
joined
network
computers
schools
religious
officials
teachers
allowed
develop
unregulated
software
use
network
admitted
chapter
computer
took
support
computing
system
whenever
breakdown
master
computer
purchased
religious
school
funds
ibid
moreover
plurality
observes
ante
comparing
records
considerable
federal
funding
audiovisual
equipment
religious
schools
records
schools
use
unidentified
audiovisual
equipment
religion
classes
strongly
suggests
film
projectors
videotape
machines
purchased
public
funds
used
religious
indoctrination
period
least
seven
years
app
see
also
statement
teacher
indicating
used
audiovisual
materials
classes
indeed
plurality
readily
recognizes
aid
question
divertible
substantial
evidence
actual
diversion
exists
ante
nn
although
justice
attributes
limited
significance
evidence
divertibility
actual
diversion
also
recognizes
exists
ante
opinion
concurring
judgment
choice
hold
program
applied
violated
establishment
iv
plurality
break
law
majority
misapplies
misapplication
however
consolation
case
reaches
erroneous
result
stage
doctrinal
coup
mistaking
abandonment
doctrine
occur
plurality
become
majority
beyond
question
plurality
notion
evenhandedness
neutrality
practical
guarantee
validity
aid
sectarian
schools
end
principle
aid
schools
religious
mission
obvious
become
reflecting
plurality
thoughts
diversion
giving
attention
pervasiveness
school
sectarian
teaching
plurality
candid
pointing
extent
actual
diversion
chapter
aid
religious
use
case
us
ante
equally
candid
saying
matter
ante
plurality
nothing
wrong
aiding
school
religious
mission
question
whether
religious
teaching
obtains
tax
support
formally
evenhanded
criterion
distribution
principle
aid
religious
teaching
independent
significance
enough
prove
aid
religious
school
aid
dead
plurality
first
amendment
point
nailed
plurality
attack
legitimacy
considering
school
pervasively
sectarian
character
judging
whether
aid
school
likely
aid
religious
mission
ante
relevance
consideration
simply
matter
common
sense
religious
indoctrination
pervades
school
activities
children
adolescents
takes
great
care
able
aid
school
without
supporting
doctrinal
effort
obvious
plurality
nonetheless
condemns
enquiry
pervasiveness
doctrinal
content
remnant
bigotry
evangelical
protestant
schools
orthodox
jewish
yeshivas
never
pervasively
equates
refusal
aid
religious
schools
hostility
religion
aid
religious
teaching
opposed
case
least
one
religious
numerous
religious
amici
tradition
claiming
descent
roger
williams
concern
arguments
goes
much
fact
plurality
choice
employ
imputations
bigotry
irreligion
terms
debate
makes
one
point
clear
rejecting
principle
aid
school
religious
mission
plurality
attacking
fundamental
assumption
underlying
establishment
clause
government
fact
operate
neutrality
relation
religion
believe
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
chapter
technically
subchapter
vi
chapter
codified
improving
america
schools
act
pub
stat
convenience
use
term
chapter
lower
courts
prior
chapter
codified
congress
amended
section
governing
sorts
materials
equipment
available
chapter
compare
ed
record
case
closed
effect
amendment
issue
everson
board
ed
ewing
upholding
reimbursement
parents
costs
busing
children
public
private
school
cases
prior
everson
discussed
issue
indirectly
see
vidal
philadelphia
quick
bear
leupp
evaluated
aid
schools
provisions
constitution
see
cochran
louisiana
bd
justice
acknowledges
neutrality
important
reason
upholding
programs
one
recent
cases
emphasized
repeatedly
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
majority
opinion
also
noted
small
portion
overall
aid
state
program
go
religious
education
see
witters
assert
validity
program
depend
fact
petitioner
appears
handicapped
student
sought
use
assistance
pursue
religious
training
held
proportion
aid
benefiting
students
religious
schools
pursuant
neutral
program
involving
private
choices
irrelevant
constitutional
inquiry
refusing
conclude
constitutionality
aid
program
depends
number
sectarian
school
students
happen
receive
otherwise
neutral
aid
see
also
post
concurring
judgment
quoting
passage
respondents
also
contend
chapter
aid
supplants
rather
supplements
core
educational
function
parochial
schools
therefore
effect
furthering
religion
case
law
provide
indication
distinction
may
relevant
determining
whether
aid
results
governmental
indoctrination
see
agostini
see
school
dist
grand
rapids
ball
never
delineated
distinction
contours
held
constitutionally
required
extent
line
separable
respondents
divertibility
arguments
need
resolve
distinction
constitutional
status
today
already
noted
chapter
requires
aid
may
supplemental
see
also
post
concurring
judgment
declining
decide
whether
distinction
constitutional
requirement
see
post
explaining
computers
necessary
educational
process
presume
whether
parish
complied
statutory
requirement
least
relevant
whether
violation
constitutional
requirement
occurred
yet
reason
believe
material
statutory
violation
statewide
review
louisiana
sea
indicated
receives
nearly
universal
compliance
app
importantly
neither
district
fifth
circuit
even
hinted
jefferson
parish
violated
respondents
barely
mention
statute
brief
offering
slimmest
evidence
possible
violation
see
respondents
argue
chapter
aid
school
uses
comply
state
requirements
relating
computers
libraries
necessarily
violates
whatever
line
may
exist
constitution
decision
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
regan
upholding
reimbursement
parochial
schools
costs
relating
testing
rejects
blanket
rule
reason
concern
form
per
se
bad
form
creates
special
risks
governmental
aid
effect
advancing
religion
even
purpose
indirect
form
payment
reduces
risks
see
mueller
concurring
explaining
witters
reconciling
principle
neutrality
principle
public
funding
religious
messages
relying
principle
private
choice
similarly
doubt
unconstitutional
modify
witters
hypothetical
see
discussing
combined
federal
campaign
finally
least
prior
cases
striking
direct
payments
involved
serious
concerns
whether
payments
truly
neutral
see
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
nyquist
striking
vote
program
providing
direct
grants
maintenance
repair
school
facilities
payments
allocated
available
private
nonprofit
schools
areas
practically
catholic
dissent
find
establishment
religion
projector
used
religious
school
show
privately
purchased
religious
film
even
though
public
school
possessed
kind
projector
likely
constitutionally
barred
refusing
allow
student
bible
club
use
projector
classroom
show
film
classrooms
projectors
generally
available
student
groups
see
lamb
chapel
center
moriches
union
free
school
although
elsewhere
board
ed
central
school
dist
allen
observe
response
party
argument
evidence
schools
using
secular
textbooks
somehow
religious
instruction
see
occasion
say
consequence
use
occurring
importantly
think
brief
concluding
comment
read
especially
zobrest
mention
witters
mueller
agostini
essential
reasoning
allen
justice
agrees
constitution
bar
divertible
aid
see
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
also
finds
actual
diversion
unproblematic
true
directs
aid
see
post
even
private
choice
thinks
amount
actual
diversion
tolerable
safeguards
preventing
detecting
actual
diversion
may
minimal
explain
infra
thus
surprising
dissent
accuse
us
following
rule
breathtaking
manipulability
post
justice
today
analysis
jefferson
parish
chapter
program
many
safeguards
justice
relies
safeguards
improper
content
diversion
see
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
content
different
matter
diversion
much
easier
police
mutable
use
materials
equipment
one
reason
find
safeguards
improper
content
adequate
infra
similarly
statutory
provisions
supplanting
nonfederal
funds
paying
federal
funds
religious
worship
instruction
justice
also
relies
post
little
relevance
diversion
former
diversion
need
supplant
latter
religious
schools
receive
funds
sea
director
acknowledged
much
said
sea
enforces
rule
diversion
best
visits
ne
two
private
schools
whenever
reviews
lea
reviews
lea
every
three
years
app
asked
whether
way
sea
officials
know
diversion
chapter
computer
responded
way
monitoring
jefferson
parish
lea
similarly
ineffective
lea
visits
private
school
year
less
hour
half
alerts
school
visit
advance
monitoring
visits
consist
reviewing
records
equipment
use
speaking
single
contact
person
sole
source
records
use
case
overhead
projectors
record
appears
sheet
lea
official
simply
checks
whether
recordation
use
attempted
contact
person
teacher
monitoring
include
speaking
teachers
lea
makes
effort
inform
teachers
restrictions
use
chapter
equipment
contact
person
also
usually
involved
computers
thus
contact
person
uninvolved
actual
use
divertible
equipment
therefore
position
know
whether
diversion
occurred
see
unsurprisingly
contact
person
ever
reported
diversion
agostini
contrast
monitors
visited
classroom
unannounced
month
teachers
received
specific
training
activities
permitted
head
jefferson
parish
lea
admitted
idea
whether
chapter
equipment
diverted
way
ascertain
visit
whether
material
equipment
purchased
used
accordance
chapter
plan
submitted
purposes
also
view
school
teach
creation
concept
origin
man
used
chapter
overhead
projector
violation
yes
way
ever
ask
question
school
whether
use
purpose
app
see
similar
fact
label
associating
government
religious
use
equipment
exacerbates
establishment
clause
problem
might
exist
diversion
occurs
justice
dismisses
de
minimis
evidence
actual
diversion
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
may
good
realize
considers
de
minimis
persuasive
evidence
chapter
audiovisual
equipment
used
catholic
school
theology
department
uch
equipment
issue
purchased
federal
funds
app
federal
funds
school
year
almost
certainly
chapter
funds
see
cf
diversion
occurred
seven
consecutive
school
years
use
equipment
theology
department
massive
years
outstripping
every
year
use
departments
science
math
foreign
language
ibid
addition
dissent
documented
likely
diversion
computers
post
coordinator
jefferson
parish
lea
ordered
books
recalled
sometime
summer
early
fall
appears
schools
complied
recall
order
second
week
december
app
respondents
filed
suit
early
december
key
distinction
instance
providing
improper
content
evidence
actual
diversion
see
supra
indeed
petitioners
observe
require
exclusion
religious
schools
program
raise
serious
questions
free
exercise
clause
see
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
hialeah
minimum
protections
free
exercise
clause
pertain
law
issue
discriminates
religious
beliefs
everson
holding
free
speech
clause
bars
exclusion
religious
viewpoints
limited
public
forum
footnotes
jefferson
virginia
bill
establishing
religious
freedom
provided
hat
man
shall
compelled
frequent
support
religious
worship
place
ministry
whatsoever
jefferson
bill
establishing
religious
freedom
founder
constitution
kurland
lerner
eds
see
also
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
souter
dissenting
previously
recognized
provisions
first
amendment
drafting
adoption
madison
jefferson
played
leading
roles
objective
intended
provide
protection
governmental
intrusion
religious
liberty
virginia
statute
everson
board
ed
ewing
plurality
mistakes
recognition
fundamental
concern
ante
may
well
moved
away
considering
political
divisiveness
threatened
particular
instances
aid
practical
criterion
applying
establishment
clause
case
case
never
questioned
importance
motivating
concern
behind
establishment
clause
change
history
find
sectarian
conflict
influence
framers
wrote
upheld
payments
indian
tribes
apparently
roman
catholic
schools
quick
bear
leupp
suggesting
dicta
establishment
clause
problem
squarely
face
question
address
first
amendment
challenge
state
program
providing
textbooks
children
cochran
louisiana
bd
simply
concluded
program
adequate
public
purpose
first
squarely
faced
issue
everson
everson
dissenters
parted
company
majority
specific
question
school
buses
stood
one
behind
principle
aid
religious
teaching
jackson
dissenting
rutledge
dissenting
indeed
two
dissenters
allen
agreed
majority
method
analysis
asking
whether
books
issue
similar
enough
fire
police
protection
see
black
dissenting
fortas
dissenting
fact
religious
education
roman
catholic
schools
defined
part
required
religious
practice
aiding
thus
akin
aiding
church
service
see
code
canon
law
canon
reprinted
code
canon
law
text
commentary
hereinafter
text
commentary
directing
parents
entrust
children
roman
catholic
schools
otherwise
provide
roman
catholic
education
canon
text
commentary
requiring
faithful
support
establishment
maintenance
roman
catholic
schools
canons
text
commentary
requiring
diocesan
bishop
establish
regulate
schools
imparting
education
imbued
christian
spirit
although
longer
assumes
public
school
teachers
assigned
religious
schools
limited
purposes
teach
religiously
see
agostini
felton
never
abandoned
presumption
religious
teachers
teach
way
lemon
kurtzman
douglas
concurring
levitt
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
meek
pittenger
wolman
walter
school
dist
grand
rapids
ball
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
overruled
part
agostini
supra
cf
nlrb
catholic
bishop
chicago
relationship
school
differs
employment
relationship
public
nonreligious
school
agostini
indicated
departed
rule
relied
ball
government
aid
directly
assists
educational
function
religious
schools
invalid
zobrest
catalina
foothills
school
however
agostini
rely
dictum
instead
clearly
stating
hile
true
individual
students
may
directly
apply
title
services
follow
premise
services
distributed
directly
religious
schools
fact
title
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
schools
title
services
may
provided
religious
schools
basis
citations
omitted
today
never
permitted
aid
go
directly
schools
basis
plurality
misreads
precedent
suggesting
abandoned
directness
distribution
relevant
consideration
see
ante
wolman
stated
nominally
describing
aid
students
bar
finding
actually
provided
subsidy
school
agostini
supra
also
permitted
government
supply
students
translators
zobrest
supra
special
education
teachers
agostini
directly
provided
government
services
whatever
schools
specific
students
attended
public
nonpublic
already
noted
agostini
limitations
see
supra
agree
plurality
establishment
clause
absolutely
prohibits
government
providing
aid
clear
religious
content
religious
matter
nonreligious
schools
ante
plurality
however
misreads
precedent
focusing
affirmatively
religious
content
least
building
example
content
squarely
required
government
ensure
publicly
financed
building
diverted
religious
use
tilton
richardson
see
also
bowen
kendrick
concurring
ny
use
public
funds
promote
religious
doctrines
violates
establishment
clause
similarly
noted
paying
salaries
parochial
school
teachers
creates
much
risk
support
aid
teaching
religion
striking
programs
need
pervasive
monitoring
required
see
lemon
assume
however
parochial
school
teachers
unsuccessful
attempts
segregate
religious
beliefs
secular
educational
responsibilities
potential
impermissible
fostering
religion
present
state
legislature
provide
state
aid
basis
mere
assumption
secular
teachers
religious
discipline
avoid
conflicts
state
must
certain
given
religion
clauses
subsidized
teachers
inculcate
religion
comprehensive
discriminating
continuing
state
surveillance
inevitably
required
ensure
restrictions
obeyed
first
amendment
otherwise
respected
true
called
importance
cash
payment
consideration
question
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
regan
approving
program
providing
religious
school
direct
cash
reimbursement
expenses
standardized
testing
case
found
safeguards
diversion
funds
religious
uses
sufficient
allow
aid
contrary
view
insist
drawing
constitutional
distinction
paying
nonpublic
school
grading
paying
state
employees
independent
service
perform
task
even
though
grading
function
regardless
performs
primary
effect
aiding
religion
whether
performed
nonpublic
school
personnel
aside
isolated
circumstance
found
ironclad
guarantees
nondiversion
never
relaxed
prohibition
direct
cash
aid
pervasively
religious
schools
fact
continued
acknowledge
concern
see
agostini
cf
rosenberger
plurality
concedes
basic
point
see
ante
given
find
suggestion
prohibition
undermined
mueller
witters
without
foundation
see
ante
cases
involved
entirely
different
types
aid
namely
tax
deductions
individual
scholarship
aid
university
education
see
also
infra
followed
rosenberger
agostini
continued
support
absolute
restriction
reject
plurality
argument
divertibility
boundless
principle
ante
long
experience
evaluating
consideration
demonstrates
practical
limits
see
infra
moreover
establishment
clause
charges
us
making
enquiries
regardless
difficulty
see
supra
finally
first
amendment
rule
permitting
aid
fixed
secular
content
seems
difficult
apply
plurality
rule
prohibiting
aid
fixed
religious
content
contrary
plurality
apparent
belief
lamb
chapel
center
moriches
union
free
school
sheds
light
question
divertibility
school
aid
ante
case
clearly
distinguished
question
access
public
facilities
anything
resembling
school
aid
cases
showing
film
series
school
hours
sponsored
school
open
public
church
members
lemon
also
specifically
examined
risk
government
program
paid
religious
teachers
support
religious
education
teachers
posed
risk
unable
separate
secular
religious
education
although
invalidated
program
entanglement
grounds
suggested
monitoring
state
established
case
actually
required
eliminate
risk
diversion
see
see
also
supra
plurality
mistaken
reading
zobrest
see
ante
zobrest
reject
principle
divertibility
government
provided
translator
considered
divertible
add
subtract
religious
message
approved
translator
approve
hearing
aid
health
services
diagnostics
tests
see
zobrest
wolman
zobrest
thus
thought
akin
approval
diagnostic
services
wolman
supra
considered
little
educational
content
closely
associated
educational
mission
nonpublic
school
pose
impermissible
risk
fostering
ideological
views
fact
dissent
saw
things
otherwise
plurality
points
ante
beside
point
similarly
plurality
mistaken
reading
holdings
mueller
witters
see
ante
undermine
divertibility
relevant
principle
first
cases
approved
quite
factually
distinct
types
aid
mueller
involving
tax
deductions
quite
separate
history
approval
see
witters
involving
scholarship
money
distributed
university
primary
secondary
school
see
tilton
significant
enough
whole
support
institution
witters
second
neither
case
program
issue
provide
direct
aid
schoolwide
basis
chapter
found
distinction
based
genuinely
independent
private
choices
allocated
different
types
aid
tax
deductions
university
scholarship
money
amount
substantial
support
university
see
mueller
supra
witters
supra
departure
principle
regan
easily
explained
isolated
holding
surrounded
otherwise
unbroken
adherence
principle
long
regan
continued
find
distinction
like
bar
substantial
aid
important
consideration
see
zobrest
supra
agostini
cf
witters
supra
discussing
rule
direct
subsidy
weight
plurality
places
regan
thus
much
bear
see
ante
moreover
apparent
object
regan
concern
vindicating
principle
aid
fixed
secular
content
permissible
distinguishing
divertible
testing
aid
levitt
regan
citing
wolman
supra
cf
levitt
plurality
provides
explanation
continued
reference
principle
aid
subsequent
cases
zobrest
agostini
finds
trustworthy
guides
elsewhere
discussion
first
amendment
see
ante
plurality
explain
places
much
weight
regan
apparent
departure
rule
ignores
regan
core
reasoning
testing
aid
permissible
direct
contrast
levitt
aid
divertible
read
plurality
question
prohibition
substantial
aid
plurality
challenges
rule
based
proportion
aid
program
provides
religious
recipients
citing
witters
agostini
see
ante
reject
plurality
reasoning
plurality
misreads
witters
justice
marshall
writing
witters
emphasized
small
amount
aid
provided
religious
institutions
controlling
majority
rejected
importance
fact
plurality
also
overreads
agostini
supra
simply
declined
adopt
rule
based
proportionality
moreover
regardless
whether
proportion
aid
actually
provided
religious
schools
relevant
never
questioned
holding
meek
substantial
aid
religious
schools
prohibited
adopting
plurality
rule
permit
practically
government
aid
religion
long
supplied
terms
ostensibly
comparable
terms
aid
provided
nonreligious
recipients
principle
constitutional
sufficiency
manipulability
rule
breathtaking
legislature
merely
need
state
secular
objective
order
legalize
massive
aid
religions
one
religion
even
one
sect
largess
directed
easy
exercise
crafting
facially
neutral
terms
offer
aid
favoring
religious
group
short
formally
replacing
establishment
clause
dependable
key
public
fisc
cleaner
break
prior
law
difficult
imagine
indeed
opportunity
individual
choose
religious
school
receive
government
aid
least
one
respondents
seeks
see
brief
respondents
litigation
discovery
opinions
focused
almost
exclusively
aid
roman
catholic
schools
consequently
confine
discussion
information
course
concerns
raised
government
aid
religious
schools
faiths
found
similar
missions
religious
education
religious
teachers
teaching
religiously
jefferson
parish
chapter
program
included
nonpublic
schools
religiously
affiliated
roman
catholic
seven
others
religiously
affiliated
five
religiously
affiliated
app
pet
cert
trial
judge
found
roman
catholic
schools
question
operate
general
supervision
authority
archbishop
new
orleans
parish
pastors
located
next
parish
churches
sometimes
rectory
convent
schools
include
religious
symbols
classrooms
app
require
attendance
daily
religion
classes
conduct
sacramental
preparation
classes
schoolday
require
attendance
mass
provide
extracurricular
religious
activities
least
exercise
religious
preference
accepting
students
charging
tuition
app
pet
cert
district
found
mission
roman
catholic
schools
religious
education
based
archdiocese
individual
schools
published
statements
philosophy
example
anthony
school
handbook
cited
district
reads
catholic
education
intended
make
men
faith
become
living
conscious
active
light
instruction
catholic
school
unique
setting
within
ideal
realized
lives
catholic
children
young
people
school
experience
learning
living
fully
integrated
light
faith
instruction
religious
truth
values
integral
part
school
program
one
subject
along
side
rest
instead
perceived
functions
underlying
reality
student
experiences
learning
living
achieve
coherence
deepest
meaning
ibid
handbook
policies
regulations
elementary
schools
archdiocese
new
orleans
indicates
operation
roman
catholic
schools
governed
canon
law
also
lists
major
objectives
schools
follows
work
closely
home
educating
children
towards
fullness
christian
life
specifically
teach
catholic
principles
christian
values
mission
statements
objectives
outlined
roman
catholic
schools
also
support
conclusion
institutions
primary
objective
religious
instruction
see
also
app
archdiocese
official
policy
calls
religious
preferences
hiring
contracts
principals
teachers
schools
contain
provision
allowing
termination
lifestyle
contrary
teachings
roman
catholic
church
app
pet
cert
one
objectives
handbook
encourage
teachers
become
committed
christians
develop
professional
competence
record
evidence
supports
conclusion
religious
schoolteachers
teach
religiously
see
app
deposition
president
sectarian
high
school
teachers
whether
religion
teachers
certainly
instructed
issues
come
classroom
religious
moral
value
concept
answers
consistent
teachings
catholic
church
respond
way
students
opportunities
classes
religion
discussion
religio
take
place
yes
sir
government
reliance
department
education
guidance
title
vi
elementary
secondary
education
act
misplaced
see
app
brief
secretary
education
place
discovery
closed
matter
merely
highlights
reasons
lack
evidence
diversion
compliance
plurality
applies
inconsistent
standards
evidence
although
plurality
finds
limited
evidence
actual
diversion
sufficient
support
general
finding
diversion
computer
instructional
materials
context
even
face
justice
objections
fails
find
violation
prohibition
providing
aid
religious
content
based
stark
undisputed
evidence
religious
books
compare
ante
nn
ante
matter
precedent
correct
evidentiary
standard
clearly
former
ny
use
public
funds
promote
religious
doctrines
violates
establishment
clause
bowen
concurring
never
found
actual
diversion
allowed
risk
struck
policies
might
permit
tilton
remanded
specific
factual
findings
whether
diversion
occurred
bowen
supra
see
supra
matter
principle
low
threshold
required
safeguard
values
first
amendment
madison
words
make
clear
even
small
infringement
prohibition
compelled
aid
religion
odious
freedom
conscience
less
open
door
threat
corruption
return
religious
conflict
since
divertibility
diversion
require
finding
unconstitutionality
explore
grounds
beyond
noting
likelihood
unconstitutional
supplantation
occurred
well
record
demonstrates
chapter
aid
impermissibly
relieved
religious
schools
costs
otherwise
borne
unconstitutionally
supplanted
support
budgetary
categories
record
affidavits
evaluation
forms
religious
school
teachers
officials
indicates
chapter
aid
significant
development
teaching
curriculums
introduction
new
programs
support
old
ones
app
evidence
shows
concept
supplementing
instead
supplanting
poorly
understood
sole
government
official
administering
program
apparently
believed
bar
supplanting
nothing
prohibition
paying
replacements
equipment
religious
schools
previously
purchased
government
officials
admitted
way
determine
whether
payments
materials
equipment
books
assistance
provided
program
reduced
amount
money
budgeted
library
educational
equipment
monitoring
report
shows
officials
least
one
religious
school
admitted
government
aid
used
create
library
school
regular
funds
occasionally
available
used
merely
supplement
government
money
fine
deposition
use
records
audiovisual
materials
one
religious
high
school
revealed
chapter
funds
essential
school
educational
process
different
school
already
noted
used
chapter
computer
support
computer
network
computers
failed
record
sparse
incidents
suggest
constitutional
statutory
prohibition
supplanting
expenses
may
largely
aspirational
seems
program
jefferson
parish
violated
statute
ran
afoul
constitution
cf
nyquist
zobrest
indeed
one
group
amici
curiae
consists
religious
educational
leaders
broad
range
eastern
western
religious
traditions
methodist
jewish
adventist
individuals
including
church
administrators
administrators
religious
elementary
secondary
school
systems
elementary
secondary
school
teachers
religious
schools
pastors
laity
serve
church
school
boards
identifies
members
broad
experience
teaching
administering
pervasively
sectarian
schools
brief
interfaith
religious
liberty
foundation
et
al
amici
curiae
one
respondents
describes
committed
member
roman
catholic
church
objects
government
providing
benefits
parish
school
seen
chilling
effect
entangling
government
aid
religious
mission
schools
run
church
brief
respondents
member
church
years
six
children
attended
different
jefferson
parish
catholic
run
schools
brief
baptist
joint
committee
public
affairs
amicus
curiae
brief
interfaith
religious
liberty
foundation
et
al
amici
curiae
brief
national
committee
public
education
et
al
amici
curiae
think
worthwhile
comment
length
example
plurality
clear
misunderstanding
cases
lamb
chapel
widmar
vincent
decisions
prohibited
governments
discriminating
distribution
public
benefits
based
religious
status
sincerity
ante
decided
completely
different
narrowly
limited
grounds
worthwhile
engage
extended
discussion
goal
preventing
courts
trol
person
institution
religious
beliefs
ante
calls
less
aid
commingling
government
religion
tolerance
effects