comptroller
treasury
maryland
wynne
et
argued
november
decided
may
maryland
personal
income
tax
state
residents
consists
state
income
tax
md
code
ann
county
income
tax
residents
pay
income
tax
another
jurisdiction
income
earned
jurisdiction
allowed
credit
state
tax
county
tax
nonresidents
earn
income
sources
within
maryland
must
pay
state
income
tax
nonresidents
subject
county
tax
must
pay
special
nonresident
tax
lieu
county
tax
respondents
maryland
residents
earned
income
subchapter
corporation
earned
income
several
respondents
claimed
income
tax
credit
maryland
income
tax
return
taxes
paid
state
comptroller
treasury
petitioner
allowed
respondents
credit
state
income
tax
county
income
tax
assessed
tax
deficiency
decision
affirmed
hearings
appeals
section
comptroller
office
maryland
tax
circuit
howard
county
reversed
ground
maryland
tax
system
violated
commerce
clause
federal
constitution
appeals
maryland
affirmed
held
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminated
interstate
commerce
held
maryland
personal
income
tax
scheme
violates
dormant
commerce
clause
pp
commerce
clause
grants
congress
power
regulate
commerce
among
several
art
cl
also
negative
command
known
dormant
commerce
clause
oklahoma
tax
jefferson
lines
precludes
discriminat
ing
transactions
basis
interstate
element
boston
stock
exchange
state
tax
thus
inter
alia
state
may
tax
transaction
incident
heavily
crosses
state
lines
occurs
entirely
within
state
armco
hardesty
impose
tax
discriminates
interstate
commerce
either
providing
direct
commercial
advantage
local
business
subjecting
interstate
commerce
burden
taxation
northwestern
portland
cement
minnesota
pp
result
case
dictated
dormant
commerce
clause
cases
particularly
adams
mfg
storen
gwin
white
prince
henneford
central
greyhound
lines
mealey
invalidated
state
tax
schemes
might
lead
double
taxation
income
discriminated
favor
intrastate
interstate
economic
activity
pp
conclusion
affected
fact
three
cases
involved
tax
gross
receipts
rather
net
income
tax
corporations
rather
individuals
decisions
previously
rejected
formal
distinction
gross
receipts
net
income
taxes
reason
dormant
commerce
clause
treat
individuals
less
favorably
corporations
addition
taxes
invalidated
adams
gwin
white
applied
income
individuals
corporations
right
individual
vote
political
elections
justify
disparate
treatment
corporate
personal
income
thus
previously
entertained
even
sustained
dormant
commerce
clause
challenges
individual
residents
state
imposed
alleged
burden
interstate
commerce
see
department
revenue
davis
granholm
heald
pp
maryland
tax
scheme
immune
dormant
commerce
clause
scrutiny
simply
maryland
jurisdictional
power
due
process
clause
impose
tax
hile
state
may
consistent
due
process
clause
authority
tax
particular
taxpayer
imposition
tax
may
nonetheless
violate
commerce
clause
quill
north
dakota
pp
maryland
income
tax
scheme
discriminates
interstate
commerce
internal
consistency
test
helps
courts
identify
tax
schemes
discriminate
interstate
commerce
every
state
tax
structure
maryland
income
tax
scheme
fails
internal
consistency
test
every
state
adopted
maryland
tax
structure
interstate
commerce
taxed
higher
rate
intrastate
commerce
maryland
tax
scheme
inherently
discriminatory
operates
tariff
fatal
tariffs
paradigmatic
example
law
discriminating
interstate
commerce
west
lynn
creamery
healy
petitioner
emphasizes
offering
residents
earn
income
interstate
commerce
credit
state
portion
income
tax
maryland
actually
receives
less
tax
revenue
residents
earn
income
interstate
commerce
rather
intrastate
commerce
argument
red
herring
critical
point
total
tax
burden
interstate
commerce
higher
pp
md
affirmed
alito
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
sotomayor
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
parts
ii
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
joined
except
first
paragraph
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
kagan
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
comptroller
treasury
maryland
petitioner
brian
wynne
et
ux
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
may
justice
alito
delivered
opinion
case
involves
constitutionality
unusual
feature
maryland
personal
income
tax
scheme
like
many
maryland
taxes
income
residents
earn
within
outside
state
well
income
nonresidents
earn
sources
within
maryland
unlike
maryland
offer
residents
full
credit
income
taxes
pay
effect
scheme
income
earned
maryland
residents
outside
state
taxed
twice
maryland
scheme
creates
incentive
taxpayers
opt
intrastate
rather
interstate
economic
activity
long
held
subject
corporate
income
tax
schemes
similar
maryland
see
reason
income
earned
individuals
treated
less
favorably
maryland
admits
law
economic
effect
state
tariff
quintessential
evil
targeted
dormant
commerce
clause
therefore
affirm
decision
maryland
highest
hold
feature
state
tax
scheme
federal
constitution
maryland
like
raises
revenue
part
levying
personal
income
tax
income
tax
maryland
imposes
upon
residents
two
parts
state
income
tax
set
graduated
rate
md
code
ann
supp
county
income
tax
set
rate
varies
county
capped
despite
names
maryland
assigned
taxes
state
taxes
collected
state
comptroller
treasury
frey
comptroller
treasury
md
course
maryland
residents
earn
income
also
tax
income
maryland
residents
pay
income
tax
another
jurisdiction
income
earned
maryland
allows
credit
state
tax
county
tax
md
case
result
part
income
maryland
resident
earns
outside
state
may
taxed
twice
maryland
also
taxes
income
nonresidents
tax
two
parts
first
nonresidents
must
pay
state
income
tax
income
earn
sources
within
maryland
supp
second
nonresidents
subject
county
tax
must
pay
special
nonresident
tax
lieu
county
tax
frey
supra
special
nonresident
tax
levied
income
earned
sources
within
maryland
rate
equal
lowest
county
income
tax
rate
set
maryland
county
maryland
tax
income
nonresidents
earn
sources
outside
maryland
see
respondents
brian
karen
wynne
maryland
residents
relevant
tax
year
brian
wynne
owned
stock
maxim
healthcare
services
subchapter
year
maxim
earned
income
maryland
filed
state
income
tax
returns
wynnes
earned
income
passed
maxim
tax
return
wynnes
claimed
income
tax
credit
income
taxes
paid
petitioner
maryland
state
comptroller
treasury
denied
claim
assessed
tax
deficiency
accordance
maryland
law
comptroller
allowed
wynnes
credit
maryland
state
income
tax
county
income
tax
hearings
appeals
section
comptroller
office
slightly
modified
assessment
otherwise
affirmed
maryland
tax
also
affirmed
circuit
howard
county
reversed
ground
maryland
tax
system
violated
commerce
clause
appeals
maryland
affirmed
md
evaluated
tax
test
complete
auto
transit
brady
asks
whether
tax
applied
activity
substantial
nexus
taxing
state
fairly
apportioned
discriminate
interstate
commerce
fairly
related
services
provided
state
appeals
held
tax
failed
fair
apportionment
nondiscrimination
parts
complete
auto
test
respect
fair
apportionment
first
held
tax
failed
internal
consistency
test
every
state
adopted
maryland
tax
scheme
interstate
commerce
taxed
higher
rate
intrastate
commerce
held
tax
failed
external
consistency
test
created
risk
multiple
taxation
respect
nondiscrimination
held
tax
discriminated
interstate
commerce
denied
residents
credit
income
taxes
paid
taxed
income
earned
interstate
rate
higher
income
earned
intrastate
thus
concluded
maryland
tax
scheme
unconstitutional
insofar
denied
wynnes
credit
county
tax
income
taxes
paid
two
judges
dissented
argued
tax
violate
commerce
clause
appeals
later
issued
brief
clarification
state
may
avoid
discrimination
interstate
commerce
providing
tax
credit
method
apportionment
avoid
discriminating
interstate
commerce
violation
dormant
commerce
clause
granted
certiorari
ii
commerce
clause
grants
congress
power
regulate
commerce
among
several
art
cl
simple
words
reflected
central
concern
framers
immediate
reason
calling
constitutional
convention
conviction
order
succeed
new
union
avoid
tendencies
toward
economic
balkanization
plagued
relations
among
colonies
later
among
articles
confederation
hughes
oklahoma
although
clause
framed
positive
grant
power
congress
consistently
held
language
contain
negative
command
known
dormant
commerce
clause
prohibiting
certain
state
taxation
even
congress
failed
legislate
subject
oklahoma
tax
jefferson
lines
interpretation
commerce
clause
disputed
see
camps
town
harrison
thomas
dissenting
tyler
pipe
industries
washington
state
dept
revenue
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
license
cases
taney
also
deep
roots
see
case
state
freight
tax
wall
cooley
board
wardens
port
philadelphia
ex
rel
soc
relief
distressed
pilots
gibbons
ogden
wheat
marshall
prohibiting
discriminating
imposing
excessive
burdens
interstate
commerce
without
congressional
approval
strikes
one
chief
evils
led
adoption
constitution
namely
state
tariffs
laws
burdened
interstate
commerce
fulton
faulkner
hughes
supra
welton
missouri
see
also
federalist
nos
hamilton
madison
precedents
dormant
commerce
clause
precludes
discriminat
ing
transactions
basis
interstate
element
boston
stock
exchange
state
tax
means
among
things
state
may
tax
transaction
incident
heavily
crosses
state
lines
occurs
entirely
within
state
armco
hardesty
may
state
impose
tax
discriminates
interstate
commerce
either
providing
direct
commercial
advantage
local
business
subjecting
interstate
commerce
burden
taxation
northwestern
portland
cement
minnesota
citations
omitted
existing
dormant
commerce
clause
cases
dictate
result
reached
case
maryland
highest
three
cases
involving
taxation
income
domestic
corporations
particularly
instructive
adams
mfg
storen
indiana
taxed
income
every
indiana
resident
including
individuals
income
every
nonresident
derived
sources
within
indiana
state
levied
tax
income
earned
plaintiff
indiana
corporation
sales
made
state
holding
scheme
violated
dormant
commerce
clause
explained
vice
statute
taxed
without
apportionment
receipts
derived
activities
interstate
commerce
receipts
also
taxed
sales
occurred
warned
interstate
commerce
subjected
risk
double
tax
burden
intrastate
commerce
exposed
commerce
clause
forbids
ibid
next
year
gwin
white
prince
henneford
reached
similar
result
case
state
washington
taxed
income
persons
business
state
washington
levied
tax
income
plaintiff
washington
corporation
earned
shipping
fruit
washington
foreign
countries
tax
wrote
discriminates
interstate
commerce
since
imposes
upon
merely
interstate
commerce
done
risk
multiple
burden
local
commerce
exposed
third
cases
involving
taxation
domestic
corporation
central
greyhound
lines
mealey
new
york
sought
tax
portion
domiciliary
bus
company
gross
receipts
derived
services
provided
neighboring
see
also
murphy
dissenting
stating
plaintiff
new
york
corporation
noting
might
also
attempt
tax
portion
company
gross
receipts
held
new
york
scheme
violated
dormant
commerce
clause
imposed
unfair
burden
interstate
commerce
majority
opinion
three
cases
struck
state
tax
scheme
might
resulted
double
taxation
income
earned
state
discriminated
favor
intrastate
interstate
economic
activity
explain
see
part
infra
maryland
tax
scheme
unconstitutional
similar
reasons
principal
dissent
distinguishes
cases
sole
ground
involved
tax
gross
receipts
rather
net
income
see
reason
distinction
gross
receipts
net
income
matter
particularly
light
admonition
must
consider
formal
language
tax
statute
rather
practical
effect
complete
auto
principal
dissent
claims
post
opinion
ginsburg
historically
taken
position
difference
taxes
net
income
taxes
gross
receipts
interstate
commerce
warrants
different
results
trost
hartman
federal
limitations
state
local
taxation
emphasis
added
hereinafter
trost
historical
point
irrelevant
principal
dissent
seems
acknowledge
cases
rejected
formal
distinction
time
ago
distinction
gross
receipts
net
income
taxes
basis
decisions
adams
gwin
white
central
greyhound
turned
instead
threat
multiple
taxation
discarded
distinction
taxes
gross
receipts
net
income
based
notion
endorsed
early
cases
tax
gross
receipts
impermissible
direct
immediate
burden
interstate
commerce
whereas
tax
net
income
merely
indirect
incidental
burden
glue
town
oak
creek
see
also
shaffer
carter
arid
distinction
direct
indirect
burdens
allowed
little
coherent
trustworthy
guidance
tax
validity
trost
beginning
justice
stone
seminal
opinion
western
live
stock
bureau
revenue
continuing
cases
like
adams
gwin
white
burdens
test
replaced
practical
approach
looked
economic
impact
tax
cases
worked
substantial
judicial
reinterpretation
power
levy
taxes
gross
income
interstate
commerce
trost
temporary
reversion
earlier
formalism
see
spector
motor
service
gross
receipts
judicial
pendulum
swung
wide
arc
recently
reaching
place
taxation
gross
receipts
interstate
commerce
placed
equal
footing
receipts
local
business
complete
auto
transit
brady
trost
squarely
rejected
argument
commerce
clause
distinguishes
taxes
net
gross
income
see
jefferson
lines
explaining
central
greyhound
understood
gross
receipts
tax
simply
variety
tax
income
moorman
mfg
bair
rejecting
suggestion
commerce
clause
distinguishes
gross
receipts
taxes
net
income
taxes
brennan
dissenting
agree
purposes
constitutional
review
distinction
corporate
income
tax
tax
complete
auto
supra
upholding
gross
receipts
tax
rejecting
notion
commerce
clause
places
blanket
prohibition
state
taxation
imposed
directly
interstate
transaction
part
petitioner
distinguishes
adams
gwin
white
central
greyhound
ground
concerned
taxation
corporations
individuals
hard
see
dormant
commerce
clause
treat
individuals
less
favorably
corporations
see
camps
newfound
tax
real
estate
like
tax
may
impermissibly
burden
interstate
commerce
emphasis
added
addition
distinction
individuals
corporations
stand
taxes
invalidated
adams
gwin
white
applied
income
individuals
corporations
see
ind
stat
ch
burns
tax
adams
sess
laws
ch
tit
ii
pp
tax
gwin
white
attempting
explain
dormant
commerce
clause
provide
less
protection
natural
persons
corporations
petitioner
solicitor
general
argue
free
hand
tax
residents
income
provide
residents
many
services
solicitor
general
puts
individuals
reap
benefits
local
roads
local
police
fire
protection
local
public
schools
local
health
welfare
benefits
brief
amicus
curiae
argument
fails
corporations
also
benefit
heavily
state
local
services
trucks
hauling
corporation
supplies
goods
vehicles
transporting
employees
use
local
roads
corporations
call
upon
local
police
fire
departments
protect
facilities
corporations
rely
local
schools
educate
prospective
employees
availability
good
schools
government
services
features
may
aid
corporation
attracting
retaining
employees
thus
disparate
treatment
corporate
personal
income
justified
based
state
services
enjoyed
two
groups
taxpayers
sole
remaining
attribute
view
petitioner
distinguishes
corporation
individual
present
purposes
right
individual
vote
principal
dissent
also
emphasizes
residents
vote
change
maryland
discriminatory
tax
law
post
argument
need
concerned
state
laws
burden
interstate
activities
individuals
individuals
lobby
vote
legislators
support
measures
state
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminates
interstate
commerce
invalid
regardless
whether
plaintiff
resident
voter
nonresident
state
thus
entertained
even
sustained
dormant
commerce
clause
challenges
individual
residents
state
imposed
alleged
burden
interstate
commerce
department
revenue
davis
granholm
heald
also
sustained
challenge
tax
whose
burden
borne
consumers
bacchus
imports
dias
principal
dissent
justice
scalia
respond
holdings
relying
dictum
goldberg
sweet
purpose
dormant
commerce
clause
protect
state
residents
state
taxes
post
ginsburg
dissenting
post
scalia
dissenting
repudiated
dictum
west
lynn
creamery
healy
stated
tate
taxes
ordinarily
paid
businesses
consumers
yet
discriminate
products
unconstitutional
course
dictum
must
bow
holdings
many
cases
entertaining
commerce
clause
challenges
brought
residents
find
dissents
reliance
goldberg
dictum
particularly
inappropriate
since
find
similarly
bound
rule
case
applied
internal
consistency
test
determine
whether
tax
issue
violated
dormant
commerce
clause
addition
notion
victims
discrimination
complete
remedy
polls
fanciful
likely
distinct
minority
state
residents
earns
income
state
schemes
discriminate
income
earned
may
attractive
legislators
majority
constituents
precisely
reason
even
farfetched
suggest
natural
persons
income
better
able
influence
state
lawmakers
large
corporations
headquartered
state
short
petitioner
argument
leave
security
majority
voters
prefer
protectionism
expense
earn
income
interstate
particularly
incongruous
present
case
disregard
prior
decisions
regarding
taxation
corporate
income
income
issue
type
corporate
income
namely
income
subchapter
corporation
small
businesses
may
incorporate
subchapter
thus
acceptance
petitioner
submission
provide
greater
protection
income
earned
large
subchapter
corporations
small
businesses
incorporated
subchapter
attempting
justify
maryland
unusual
tax
scheme
principal
dissent
argues
commerce
clause
imposes
limit
maryland
ability
tax
income
residents
matter
income
earned
argues
maryland
sovereign
power
tax
income
residents
wherever
earned
reasons
dormant
commerce
clause
constrain
maryland
ability
expose
residents
nonresidents
threat
double
taxation
argument
confuses
state
may
without
violating
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
may
without
violating
commerce
clause
due
process
clause
allows
state
tax
income
residents
even
income
earned
outside
taxing
jurisdiction
oklahoma
tax
chickasaw
nation
state
may
consistent
due
process
clause
authority
tax
particular
taxpayer
imposition
tax
may
nonetheless
violate
commerce
clause
quill
north
dakota
rejecting
due
process
challenge
tax
sustaining
commerce
clause
challenge
tax
decision
camps
newfound
illustrates
point
held
commerce
clause
prohibited
maine
granting
favorable
tax
treatment
charities
operated
principally
benefit
maine
residents
plaintiff
charity
case
maine
nonprofit
corporation
question
maine
raw
jurisdictional
power
tax
charity
see
chickasaw
nation
supra
nonetheless
tax
failed
scrutiny
commerce
clause
camps
newfound
supra
similarly
maryland
raw
power
tax
residents
income
insulate
tax
scheme
scrutiny
dormant
commerce
clause
although
principal
dissent
claims
mantle
precedent
unable
identify
single
case
endorses
essential
premise
namely
commerce
clause
places
constraint
state
power
tax
income
residents
wherever
earned
unsurprising
cases
like
quill
camps
newfound
recognize
fact
state
jurisdictional
power
impose
tax
says
nothing
whether
tax
violates
commerce
clause
see
also
barclays
bank
plc
franchise
tax
bd
separately
addressing
due
process
commerce
clause
challenges
tax
moorman
standard
pressed
steel
department
revenue
lawrence
state
tax
separately
addressing
due
process
equal
protection
challenges
tax
travis
yale
towne
mfg
separately
addressing
due
process
challenges
tax
one
good
reason
never
accepted
principal
dissent
logic
lead
plainly
untenable
results
imagine
maryland
taxed
income
residents
earned
exempted
income
earned
state
business
primarily
served
maryland
residents
tax
violate
dormant
commerce
clause
see
camps
newfound
supra
saved
principal
dissent
admonition
maryland
power
tax
income
residents
principled
difference
hypothetical
commerce
clause
challenge
one
principal
dissent
accepted
work
sea
change
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
legion
cases
considered
even
upheld
dormant
commerce
clause
challenges
brought
residents
taxes
state
jurisdictional
power
impose
see
davis
camps
newfound
fulton
bacchus
imports
central
greyhound
gwin
white
adams
principal
dissent
prevail
cases
thrown
doubt
cases
state
decision
tax
way
allegedly
discriminates
interstate
commerce
justified
argument
state
may
tax
residents
without
commerce
clause
constraints
principal
dissent
claims
departing
principles
accepted
century
repeatedly
acknowledged
see
post
comes
providing
supporting
authority
assertion
cites
exactly
two
commerce
clause
decisions
supposedly
inconsistent
decision
today
one
summary
affirmance
west
publishing
mccolgan
neither
actually
supports
principal
dissent
argument
first
cases
shaffer
carter
resident
illinois
earned
income
oil
oklahoma
unsuccessfully
argued
oklahoma
income
tax
assessment
violated
several
provisions
federal
constitution
main
argument
based
due
process
also
raised
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
although
principal
dissent
relies
shaffer
proposition
state
may
tax
income
residents
wherever
earned
shaffer
reject
commerce
clause
challenge
basis
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
shaffer
nothing
like
wynnes
challenge
taxpayer
shaffer
argued
tax
considered
excise
tax
business
rather
income
tax
proper
unconstitutionally
burdened
interstate
commerce
brief
appellant
taxpayer
argue
burden
occurred
subject
double
taxation
instead
argued
tax
impermissible
direct
tax
interstate
business
ibid
argument
based
notion
may
impose
tax
directly
interstate
commerce
see
supra
assuming
taxpayer
business
engaged
interstate
commerce
held
sufficient
say
tax
imposed
upon
gross
receipts
upon
net
proceeds
plainly
sustainable
even
includes
net
gains
interstate
commerce
glue
town
oak
creek
shaffer
supra
citation
omitted
shaffer
thus
adjudicate
anything
like
double
taxation
argument
accepted
later
cases
us
today
principal
dissent
suggestion
shaffer
allows
levy
discriminatory
net
income
taxes
refuted
case
decided
day
travis
connecticut
corporation
challenged
new
york
net
income
tax
allowed
residents
nonresidents
certain
tax
exemptions
first
rejected
taxpayer
due
process
argument
settled
decision
shaffer
due
process
inquiry
end
matter
separately
considered
sustained
argument
net
income
tax
disparate
treatment
residents
nonresidents
violated
privileges
immunities
clause
second
case
principal
dissent
relies
west
publishing
summary
affirmance
thus
considerably
less
precedential
value
opinion
merits
illinois
bd
elections
socialist
workers
party
summary
affirmance
read
renunciation
doctrines
previously
announced
opinions
full
argument
mandel
bradley
per
curiam
quoting
fusari
steinberg
burger
concurring
principal
dissent
reliance
decision
case
particularly
inappropriate
summary
affirmance
affirmance
judgment
rationale
affirmance
may
gleaned
solely
opinion
moreover
disagree
result
west
publishing
tax
case
levied
net
income
every
corporation
derived
sources
within
state
thus
internally
consistent
nondiscriminatory
tax
scheme
see
west
publishing
mccolgan
cal
emphasis
added
moreover
even
disagree
result
citation
summary
affirmance
glue
suggests
decision
based
distinction
net
income
gross
receipts
taxes
west
publishing
indeed
repudiate
double
taxation
cases
upon
rely
principal
dissent
also
finds
significant
first
enacted
modern
income
taxes
early
tax
schemes
similar
maryland
practice
however
means
universal
great
many
alabama
colorado
georgia
kentucky
maryland
early
income
tax
schemes
allowed
residents
credit
taxes
paid
see
code
tit
ch
stat
ch
cum
supp
code
ann
carroll
stat
ch
art
xx
baldwin
rev
md
ann
code
art
ch
also
adopted
internally
consistent
tax
schemes
example
massachusetts
utah
taxed
income
residents
nonresidents
see
mass
laws
ch
utah
rev
stat
et
seq
event
hardly
surprising
early
state
ventures
taxation
income
included
protectionist
regimes
favored
local
economy
interstate
commerce
much
significant
next
century
commerce
clause
developed
almost
entirely
abandoned
approach
perhaps
recognition
doubtful
constitutionality
today
state
practice
provide
credits
personal
income
taxes
taxes
paid
see
hellerstein
hellerstein
state
taxation
pp
ed
previously
noted
tax
schemes
held
unconstitutional
adams
gwin
white
central
greyhound
potential
result
discriminatory
double
taxation
income
earned
state
created
powerful
incentive
engage
intrastate
rather
interstate
economic
activity
although
use
term
cases
held
schemes
cured
taxes
satisfy
subsequently
labeled
internal
consistency
test
see
jefferson
lines
citing
gwin
white
case
requiring
internal
consistency
see
also
trost
explaining
internal
consistency
test
origins
western
live
stock
adams
gwin
white
test
helps
courts
identify
tax
schemes
discriminate
interstate
commerce
looks
structure
tax
issue
see
whether
identical
application
every
state
union
place
interstate
commerce
disadvantage
compared
commerce
intrastate
see
also
tyler
pipe
armco
container
america
franchise
tax
hypothetically
assuming
every
state
tax
structure
internal
consistency
test
allows
courts
isolate
effect
defendant
state
tax
scheme
virtue
test
allows
courts
distinguish
tax
schemes
inherently
discriminate
interstate
commerce
without
regard
tax
policies
tax
schemes
create
disparate
incentives
engage
interstate
commerce
sometimes
result
double
taxation
result
interaction
two
different
nondiscriminatory
internally
consistent
schemes
see
armco
supra
moorman
brief
tax
economists
amici
curiae
hereinafter
brief
tax
economists
brief
michael
knoll
ruth
mason
amici
curiae
hereinafter
brief
knoll
mason
first
category
taxes
typically
unconstitutional
second
see
armco
supra
moorman
supra
tax
schemes
fail
internal
consistency
test
fall
first
category
second
ny
tax
disadvantage
remains
application
test
due
tax
disparities
instead
attributable
taxing
state
discriminatory
policies
alone
neither
petitioner
principal
dissent
questions
economic
bona
fides
internal
consistency
test
despite
professed
adherence
precedent
principal
dissent
ignores
numerous
cases
applied
internal
consistency
test
past
internal
consistency
test
formally
introduced
three
decades
ago
see
container
supra
invoked
fewer
seven
cases
invalidating
tax
three
cases
see
american
trucking
michigan
pub
serv
jefferson
lines
goldberg
american
trucking
scheiner
tyler
pipe
armco
container
supra
maryland
income
tax
scheme
fails
internal
consistency
simple
example
illustrates
point
assume
every
state
imposed
following
taxes
similar
maryland
county
special
nonresident
taxes
tax
income
residents
earn
state
tax
income
residents
earn
jurisdictions
tax
income
nonresidents
earn
state
assume
two
taxpayers
april
bob
live
state
april
earns
income
state
whereas
bob
earns
income
state
circumstance
bob
pay
income
tax
april
solely
earns
income
interstate
specifically
april
pay
tax
state
bob
pay
tax
twice
state
resides
state
earns
income
critically
dispels
central
argument
made
petitioner
principal
dissent
maryland
scheme
discriminatory
treatment
interstate
commerce
simply
result
interaction
taxing
schemes
instead
internal
consistency
test
reveals
undisputed
economic
analysis
shows
maryland
tax
scheme
inherently
discriminatory
operates
tariff
see
brief
tax
economists
brief
knoll
mason
identity
maryland
tax
tariff
fatal
tariffs
paradigmatic
example
law
discriminating
interstate
commerce
west
lynn
indeed
asked
foregoing
analysis
made
amici
tax
economists
knoll
mason
counsel
maryland
responded
dispute
mathematics
lose
switch
tariffs
income
taxes
tr
oral
arg
maryland
offered
reason
analysis
change
deal
income
tax
rather
formal
tariff
see
none
tariffs
products
patently
unconstitutional
cases
reveal
single
attempt
state
enact
one
instead
cases
filled
state
laws
aspire
reap
benefits
tariffs
means
west
lynn
supra
none
dissenting
colleagues
dispute
economic
analysis
principal
dissent
focuses
instead
supposed
oddity
analysis
principal
dissent
envision
tax
schemes
result
double
taxation
violate
internal
consistency
test
happen
principal
dissent
points
state
taxed
based
residence
state
taxed
based
source
post
ginsburg
dissenting
see
also
post
scalia
dissenting
prior
decisions
already
considered
rejected
precise
argument
good
reason
example
armco
struck
internally
inconsistent
tax
posed
risk
double
taxation
even
though
recognized
might
permissible
arrangements
result
double
taxation
schemes
constitutional
explained
result
arise
impermissible
discrimination
interstate
commerce
principal
dissent
protest
distinction
entirely
circular
post
misunderstands
critical
distinction
recognized
cases
like
armco
discriminatory
tax
schemes
double
taxation
results
interaction
two
different
nondiscriminatory
tax
schemes
see
also
moorman
distinguishing
potential
consequences
use
different
formulas
two
prohibited
commerce
clause
discrimination
inhere
either
state
formula
prohibited
petitioner
solicitor
general
argue
maryland
tax
neutral
discriminatory
tax
applies
three
categories
income
specifically
point
tax
levied
residents
earn
income
state
residents
earn
income
state
nonresidents
earn
income
state
fact
tax
might
advantage
appearing
nondiscriminatory
save
invalidation
tyler
pipe
quoting
general
motors
washington
goldberg
dissenting
see
also
american
trucking
scheiner
dormant
commerce
clause
applies
state
taxes
even
allocate
tax
burdens
insiders
outsiders
manner
facially
discriminatory
maine
taylor
state
law
may
discriminate
interstate
commerce
face
practical
quoting
hughes
case
internal
consistency
test
economic
analysis
indeed
petitioner
concession
confirm
tax
scheme
operates
tariff
discriminates
interstate
commerce
scheme
invalid
petitioner
principal
dissent
post
also
note
offering
residents
earn
income
interstate
commerce
credit
state
portion
income
tax
maryland
actually
receives
less
tax
revenue
residents
earn
income
interstate
commerce
rather
intrastate
commerce
argument
red
herring
critical
point
total
tax
burden
interstate
commerce
higher
maryland
may
receive
less
tax
revenue
particular
taxpayer
see
armco
supra
maryland
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminates
interstate
commerce
thus
invalid
regardless
much
particular
taxpayer
must
pay
taxing
state
simple
hypothetical
illustrates
point
assume
state
imposes
tax
income
residents
earn
tax
income
earn
jurisdictions
assume
also
state
happens
grant
credit
income
taxes
paid
scheme
discriminates
interstate
commerce
taxes
income
earned
interstate
higher
rate
income
earned
intrastate
despite
fact
certain
circumstances
resident
state
earns
income
interstate
may
pay
less
tax
state
neighbor
earns
income
intrastate
example
bob
lives
state
earns
income
state
income
tax
rate
bob
pay
total
tax
income
though
go
state
credit
go
state
bob
thus
pay
less
state
neighbor
april
lives
state
earns
income
april
pay
tax
state
bob
tax
burden
state
irrelevant
total
tax
burden
matters
principal
dissent
left
two
arguments
internal
consistency
test
arguments
inconsistent
precedents
first
principal
dissent
claims
analysis
outlined
requires
state
taxing
based
residence
recede
state
taxing
based
source
post
establish
rule
priority
sure
maryland
remedy
infirmity
tax
scheme
offering
credit
income
taxes
paid
see
tyler
pipe
supra
maryland
tax
scheme
survive
internal
consistency
test
inherently
discriminatory
tweak
first
hypothetical
supra
assume
impose
tax
three
categories
income
also
allow
credit
income
taxes
residents
pay
jurisdictions
circumstance
april
lives
works
state
bob
lives
state
works
state
pay
tax
specifically
april
pay
tax
state
bob
pay
tax
state
state
give
credit
tax
paid
state
maryland
cure
problem
current
system
granting
credit
taxes
paid
foreclose
possibility
comply
commerce
clause
way
see
brief
tax
economists
brief
knoll
mason
course
decide
constitutionality
hypothetical
tax
scheme
maryland
might
adopt
scheme
us
maryland
existing
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminates
interstate
commerce
enough
decide
case
second
principal
dissent
finds
deep
flaw
possibility
maryland
eliminate
inconsistency
tax
scheme
terminating
special
nonresident
tax
measure
help
wynnes
post
second
objection
refutes
first
positing
maryland
remedy
unconstitutionality
tax
scheme
eliminating
special
nonresident
tax
principal
dissent
accepts
maryland
desire
tax
based
residence
need
recede
another
state
desire
tax
based
source
moreover
principal
dissent
supposed
flaw
simply
truism
every
case
dormant
commerce
clause
mention
equal
protection
clause
whenever
government
impermissibly
treats
like
cases
differently
cure
violation
either
leveling
leveling
whenever
state
impermissibly
taxes
interstate
commerce
higher
rate
intrastate
commerce
infirmity
cured
lowering
higher
rate
raising
lower
rate
combination
two
reason
concluded
state
found
imposed
impermissibly
discriminatory
tax
retains
flexibility
responding
determination
mckesson
division
alcoholic
beverages
tobacco
dept
business
regulation
see
also
associated
industries
mo
lohman
fulton
every
claim
suffers
flaw
succeed
dormant
commerce
clause
equal
protection
claim
ever
succeed
justice
scalia
uphold
constitutionality
maryland
tax
scheme
dormant
commerce
clause
words
judicial
fraud
post
view
gibbons
ogden
wheat
chief
justice
marshall
wrote
great
force
argument
commerce
clause
limits
power
enact
laws
regulating
interstate
commerce
since
time
supposedly
fraudulent
doctrine
applied
dozens
opinions
joined
dozens
justices
perhaps
reason
petitioner
case
challenging
interpretation
application
doctrine
ask
us
reconsider
doctrine
validity
justice
scalia
dispute
fact
state
tariffs
among
principal
problems
led
adoption
constitution
see
post
dispute
fact
maryland
tax
scheme
tantamount
tariff
work
done
state
argues
however
constitution
addresses
problem
state
tariffs
prohibiting
imposing
duties
imports
exports
ibid
quoting
art
cl
explain
interpretation
constitution
clause
lead
result
reach
dormant
commerce
clause
cases
noted
close
relationship
two
provisions
see
state
tonnage
tax
cases
wall
justice
thomas
also
refuses
accept
dormant
commerce
clause
doctrine
suggests
constitution
ratified
understanding
prevent
state
maryland
done
notes
imposed
income
taxes
time
adoption
constitution
observes
indication
early
state
income
tax
schemes
provided
credits
income
taxes
paid
elsewhere
post
dissenting
opinion
seems
highly
implausible
writes
ratified
commerce
clause
understood
conflict
income
tax
laws
nonetheless
adopted
without
word
concern
ibid
argument
plainly
unsound
first
difficulty
interstate
travel
number
individuals
earned
income
state
surely
small
unaware
records
showing
example
common
workers
commute
manhattan
new
jersey
rowboat
connecticut
stagecoach
second
justice
thomas
shown
small
number
individuals
earned
income
state
taxed
twice
income
number
income
tax
schemes
appear
taxed
income
residents
nonresidents
example
report
congress
direct
taxes
oliver
wolcott
secretary
treasury
describes
delaware
income
tax
imposed
inhabitants
state
makes
mention
taxation
nonresidents
income
report
sess
concerning
direct
taxes
american
state
papers
finance
justice
thomas
likewise
understands
massachusetts
delaware
income
taxes
imposed
residents
post
tax
schemes
course
pass
internal
consistency
test
moreover
difficulty
administering
income
tax
nonresidents
diminished
likelihood
double
taxation
see
blakey
state
income
taxation
third
even
persons
taxed
twice
unlikely
matter
common
knowledge
must
known
delegates
state
ratifying
conventions
voted
adopt
constitution
reasons
judgment
appeals
maryland
affirmed
ordered
scalia
dissenting
comptroller
treasury
maryland
petitioner
brian
wynne
et
ux
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
may
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
parts
ii
dissenting
holds
unconstitutional
maryland
refusal
give
residents
full
credits
income
taxes
paid
invoking
negative
commerce
clause
rule
judges
may
set
aside
state
laws
think
impose
much
burden
upon
interstate
commerce
join
principal
dissent
demonstrates
incompatibility
decision
prior
negative
commerce
clause
cases
post
opinion
ginsburg
incompatibility
however
test
though
incompatible
cases
fortiori
fails
test
well
discussed
briefly
part
iii
principal
purpose
writing
separately
point
wrong
negative
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
first
place
well
today
decision
illustrates
error
fundamental
problem
negative
commerce
clause
cases
constitution
contain
negative
commerce
clause
contains
commerce
clause
unlike
negative
commerce
clause
adopted
judges
real
commerce
clause
adopted
people
merely
empowers
congress
regulate
commerce
foreign
nations
among
several
indian
tribes
art
cl
clause
says
nothing
prohibiting
state
laws
burden
commerce
much
less
say
anything
authorizing
judges
set
aside
state
laws
believe
burden
commerce
clearest
sign
negative
commerce
clause
judicial
fraud
utterly
illogical
holding
congressional
consent
enables
enact
laws
otherwise
constitute
impermissible
burdens
upon
interstate
commerce
see
prudential
ins
benjamin
congressional
consent
lift
constitutional
prohibition
see
license
cases
opinion
taney
efforts
justify
judicial
economic
veto
come
naught
claims
doctrine
deep
roots
ante
like
many
weeds
age
alone
make
brazen
invention
doctrine
event
quite
old
makes
seem
idea
commerce
clause
force
limits
state
power
finds
expression
discussions
surrounding
constitution
ratification
frankfurter
commerce
clause
marshall
taney
waite
years
adoption
constitution
continually
made
regulations
burdened
interstate
commerce
like
pilotage
laws
quarantine
laws
without
provoking
doubts
constitutionality
license
cases
supra
earliest
allusions
negative
commerce
clause
came
dicta
ambiguous
dicta
vigorously
contested
time
see
first
clear
holding
setting
aside
state
law
negative
commerce
clause
came
civil
war
years
constitution
adoption
case
state
freight
tax
wall
since
tended
revamp
doctrine
every
couple
decades
upon
finding
existing
decisions
unworkable
unsatisfactory
see
quill
north
dakota
negative
commerce
clause
applied
today
little
common
negative
commerce
clause
century
except
perhaps
incoherence
adds
tariffs
laws
burdened
interstate
commerce
among
chief
evils
led
adoption
constitution
ante
line
reasoning
forgets
interpretation
requires
heeding
constitution
purposes
requires
heeding
means
constitution
uses
achieve
purposes
constitution
addresses
evils
local
impediments
commerce
prohibiting
imposing
certain
especially
burdensome
taxes
imposts
duties
imports
exports
dut
ies
tonnage
without
congressional
consent
art
cls
also
addresses
evils
giving
congress
commerce
power
may
prohibit
burdensome
taxes
laws
constitution
text
shows
however
address
evils
empowering
judiciary
set
aside
state
taxes
laws
deems
burdensome
arrogating
power
anyway
negative
commerce
clause
cases
disrupted
balance
constitution
strikes
goal
protecting
commerce
competing
goals
like
preserving
local
autonomy
promoting
democratic
responsibility
ii
failings
negative
commerce
clause
doctrine
go
beyond
lack
constitutional
foundation
today
decision
well
illustrates
one
glaring
defect
negative
commerce
clause
lack
governing
principle
neither
constitution
legal
traditions
offer
guidance
improper
state
interference
commerce
permissible
state
taxation
regulation
commerce
must
make
rules
go
along
ended
bestiary
ad
hoc
tests
ad
hoc
exceptions
apply
nowadays
including
substantial
nexus
test
fair
apportionment
test
fair
relation
test
complete
auto
transit
brady
exception
department
revenue
davis
exception
quill
supra
internal
consistency
rule
invoked
nicely
showcases
ad
hocery
rule
tax
violates
constitution
hypothetical
adoption
interfere
interstate
commerce
ante
exercise
counterfactuals
find
way
basic
charter
test
true
bears
resemblance
kant
first
formulation
categorical
imperative
act
according
maxim
whereby
time
become
universal
law
without
contradiction
grounding
metaphysics
morals
ellington
transl
ed
bears
resemblance
however
anything
text
structure
constitution
one
discern
obligation
internal
consistency
legal
traditions
show
imposing
internally
inconsistent
taxes
quite
recently
approval
see
general
motors
washington
upholding
internally
inconsistent
business
activities
tax
hinson
lott
wall
upholding
internally
inconsistent
liquor
tax
justification
test
seems
disapproves
tax
disadvantage
created
internally
inconsistent
taxes
willing
tolerate
created
interaction
internally
consistent
schemes
ante
whatever
expounding
area
constitution
american
trucking
smith
scalia
concurring
judgment
another
conspicuous
feature
negative
commerce
clause
instability
principle
anchors
development
doctrine
line
wise
regulation
burdensome
interference
changes
age
economic
age
one
never
tell
make
new
rule
throw
away
old
one
change
almost
doctrine
natural
state
natural
state
legislation
constantly
changing
national
economy
ibid
today
decision
continues
proud
tradition
consider
ways
contradicts
earlier
decisions
earlier
case
conceded
trucking
tax
fail
ed
consistency
test
upheld
tax
anyway
american
trucking
michigan
pub
serv
proclaims
income
tax
fails
internal
consistency
test
reason
strikes
ante
earlier
case
concluded
purpose
commerce
clause
protect
state
residents
state
taxes
residents
complain
change
tax
state
political
process
goldberg
sweet
concludes
negative
commerce
clause
operates
regardless
whether
plaintiff
resident
nonresident
notion
residents
complete
remedy
polls
fanciful
ante
earlier
case
said
difference
effect
tax
measured
gross
receipts
one
measured
net
income
manifest
substantial
glue
town
oak
creek
says
formal
distinction
taxes
net
gross
income
matter
ante
earlier
case
upheld
tax
despite
economic
similarity
tax
struck
central
greyhound
lines
mealey
oklahoma
tax
jefferson
lines
explained
economic
equivalence
alone
touchstone
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
strikes
tax
part
economic
similarity
tax
struck
central
greyhound
ante
explains
must
consider
formal
language
tax
statute
rather
practical
effect
ante
much
internal
consistency
final
defect
synthetic
commerce
clause
cases
incompatibility
judicial
role
doctrine
call
upon
us
perform
conventional
judicial
function
like
interpreting
legal
text
discerning
legal
tradition
even
applying
stable
body
precedents
instead
requires
us
balance
needs
commerce
needs
state
governments
task
legislators
judges
today
enterprise
eliminating
double
taxation
puts
problem
prominently
display
one
sure
way
eliminate
double
taxation
prescribe
uniform
national
tax
rules
example
allow
taxation
income
earned
program
prescribing
national
tax
code
plainly
exceeds
judicial
competence
may
even
exceed
legislative
competence
come
uniform
code
accounts
many
political
economic
differences
among
alternative
consider
whether
state
taxes
practice
overlap
much
taxes
approach
drive
us
perplexing
inquiry
unfit
judicial
department
degree
taxation
legitimate
use
degree
may
amount
abuse
power
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
today
chooses
third
approach
prohibiting
imposing
internally
inconsistent
taxes
ante
rule
avoids
double
taxation
hypothetical
world
adopt
internally
consistent
tax
real
world
different
might
adopt
different
internally
consistent
taxes
example
maryland
imposes
income
tax
people
live
maryland
regardless
work
one
internally
consistent
scheme
virginia
imposes
income
tax
people
work
virginia
regardless
live
another
internally
consistent
scheme
marylanders
work
virginia
still
face
double
taxation
post
fitting
imaginary
commerce
clause
lead
imaginary
benefits
iii
reasons
stare
decisis
vote
set
aside
tax
negative
commerce
clause
discriminates
face
interstate
commerce
distinguished
tax
already
held
unconstitutional
american
trucking
scalia
concurring
judgment
income
tax
us
discriminate
face
interstate
commerce
resident
pays
less
maryland
works
maryland
works
elsewhere
neither
tax
us
indistinguishable
one
previously
held
unconstitutional
contrary
principal
dissent
establishes
prior
cases
validate
tax
maryland
refusal
give
residents
full
tax
credits
income
taxes
paid
disadvantages
threatens
double
taxation
encourages
residents
work
maryland
maryland
law
also
advantages
allows
state
collect
equal
revenue
taxpayers
equal
incomes
avoids
administrative
burdens
verifying
tax
payments
ensures
every
resident
pays
state
least
income
tax
nothing
constitution
precludes
maryland
deciding
benefits
tax
scheme
worth
costs
respectfully
dissent
thomas
dissenting
comptroller
treasury
maryland
petitioner
brian
wynne
et
ux
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
may
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
except
first
paragraph
dissenting
continue
adhere
view
negative
commerce
clause
basis
text
constitution
makes
little
sense
proved
virtually
unworkable
application
consequently
serve
basis
striking
state
statute
mcburney
young
thomas
concurring
slip
internal
quotation
marks
alteration
omitted
accord
camps
town
harrison
thomas
dissenting
reason
uphold
maryland
tax
scheme
reaching
contrary
conclusion
proves
far
negative
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
departed
actual
commerce
clause
according
majority
state
income
tax
fails
provide
residents
full
credit
income
taxes
pay
violates
commerce
clause
ante
news
come
surprise
penned
ratified
constitution
observed
time
ago
income
taxes
imposed
several
shortly
adoption
federal
constitution
shaffer
carter
indication
early
state
income
tax
schemes
provided
credits
income
taxes
paid
elsewhere
thus
majority
reasoning
state
laws
contravened
newly
ratified
commerce
clause
seems
highly
implausible
ratified
commerce
clause
understood
conflict
income
tax
laws
nonetheless
adopted
without
word
concern
silence
particularly
deafening
given
importance
taxes
raising
revenues
time
see
kinsman
income
tax
commonwealths
publications
american
economic
assn
noting
example
connecticut
earliest
history
followed
plan
taxing
incomes
rather
property
total
assessed
value
taxable
incomes
connecticut
year
little
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
areas
constitutional
analysis
considered
laws
powerful
evidence
original
understanding
constitution
relied
practices
first
congress
guide
interpretation
provisions
defining
congressional
power
see
golan
holder
slip
copyright
clause
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
necessary
proper
clause
likewise
treated
actions
taken
first
congress
presumptively
consistent
bill
rights
town
greece
galloway
alito
concurring
slip
see
majority
opinion
slip
carroll
looked
state
laws
guide
understanding
constitution
meaning
see
district
columbia
heller
second
amendment
atwater
lago
vista
fourth
amendment
roth
first
amendment
kilbourn
thompson
speech
debate
clause
see
also
calder
bull
dall
opinion
paterson
ex
post
facto
clause
even
one
assumed
negative
commerce
clause
existed
see
reason
subject
different
mode
constitutional
interpretation
majority
quibbles
fail
sho
small
number
individuals
earned
income
state
taxed
twice
income
ante
given
deference
owe
duly
enacted
laws
state
particularly
concerning
paradigmatically
sovereign
activity
taxation
burden
proof
falls
wield
federal
constitution
foreclose
exercise
sovereign
power
doubtful
majority
application
one
many
negative
commerce
clause
tests
correct
precedents
see
ante
scalia
dissenting
post
ginsburg
dissenting
certain
majority
result
incorrect
constitution
well
said
another
area
constitutional
law
inconsistency
tests
historic
practice
inconsistency
calls
question
validity
test
historic
practice
town
greece
supra
alito
concurring
slip
respectfully
dissent
ginsburg
dissenting
comptroller
treasury
maryland
petitioner
brian
wynne
et
ux
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
may
justice
ginsburg
justice
scalia
justice
kagan
join
dissenting
today
decision
veers
principle
interstate
international
taxation
repeatedly
acknowledged
nation
state
may
tax
income
residents
even
income
earned
outside
taxing
jurisdiction
oklahoma
tax
chickasaw
nation
accord
principle
regularly
rejected
claims
taxes
resident
income
violate
due
process
clause
lack
sufficient
connection
taxing
state
quill
north
dakota
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
lawrence
state
tax
dormant
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
decides
state
really
empowered
tax
resident
income
whatever
source
derived
taxing
personal
income
holds
authority
authority
tax
commerce
conducted
within
state
territory
boxes
taxing
authority
taxpayer
domicile
see
nothing
constitution
prior
decisions
dictates
one
two
domiciliary
state
source
state
must
recede
simply
lawful
tax
regimes
reaching
income
see
moorman
mfg
bair
finding
discriminat
ion
interstate
commerce
alleged
taxation
disparities
consequence
combined
effect
two
otherwise
lawful
schemes
true
maryland
elected
deny
credit
income
taxes
paid
computing
resident
county
tax
liability
equally
true
however
taxed
wynnes
income
elected
offer
credit
maryland
county
income
taxes
situation
constitution
prefer
one
lawful
basis
state
taxation
person
income
require
one
state
case
maryland
limit
taxation
state
also
choose
exercise
full
extent
authority
often
offer
residents
credits
income
taxes
paid
maryland
state
income
tax
purposes
however
matter
tax
policy
chickasaw
nation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
constitution
compels
course
least
century
domicile
recognized
secure
ground
taxation
residents
worldwide
income
lawrence
enjoyment
privileges
residence
within
state
attendant
right
invoke
protection
laws
explained
inseparable
responsibility
sharing
costs
government
ibid
tax
measured
net
income
residents
equitable
method
distributing
burdens
government
among
privileged
enjoy
benefits
new
york
ex
rel
cohn
graves
given
residents
state
reside
elsewhere
therefore
may
demanded
approbation
long
favored
residents
nonresidents
provision
local
services
see
reeves
stake
favoritism
violate
commerce
clause
see
also
martinez
bynum
upholding
residency
requirements
free
primary
secondary
schooling
cost
services
residents
enjoy
substantial
according
state
comptroller
example
maryland
local
governments
spent
billion
fund
public
schools
billion
state
health
programs
billion
state
food
supplemental
program
programs
available
residents
brief
petitioner
see
also
brief
amicus
curiae
howard
county
wynnes
lived
budgeted
million
education
fiscal
year
excluding
nonresidents
services
observed
rational
residents
fund
state
treasury
state
created
serve
reeves
taxpayer
home
state
hardly
faulted
making
support
local
government
activities
obligation
every
resident
regardless
obligations
residents
may
residents
moreover
possess
political
means
shared
outsiders
ensure
power
tax
income
abused
observed
purpose
commerce
clause
protect
state
residents
state
taxes
goldberg
sweet
reason
evident
residents
insider
presumably
able
complain
change
tax
state
political
process
ibid
nonresidents
contrast
similarly
positioned
effec
legislative
change
ibid
chief
justice
marshall
developer
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
reasoned
imposing
tax
legislature
acts
upon
constituents
general
sufficient
security
erroneous
oppressive
taxation
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
people
state
thus
res
confidently
interest
legislator
influence
constituents
representative
guard
abuse
right
taxing
property
hardly
maintain
majority
insistently
asserts
commerce
clause
places
constraint
state
power
tax
residents
ante
see
also
ante
shied
away
striking
closely
scrutinizing
state
efforts
tax
residents
higher
rate
activities
activities
exempt
taxation
activities
see
department
revenue
davis
camps
owatonna
town
harrison
fulton
faulkner
bacchus
imports
dias
see
also
ante
mistakenly
charging
analysis
cases
thrown
doubt
olitical
processes
ill
equipped
guard
facially
discriminatory
taxes
effect
tax
sort
mollif
interests
otherwise
lobby
west
lynn
creamery
healy
contrast
generally
upheld
evenhanded
tax
es
spite
adverse
effects
interstate
commerce
part
existence
major
interests
adversely
affected
powerful
safeguard
legislative
abuse
ibid
citing
inter
alia
goldberg
justification
applies
full
force
evenhanded
tax
challenged
taxes
residents
income
rate
whether
earned
rationales
state
taxing
residents
worldwide
income
diminished
another
state
independent
interest
requiring
contributions
nonresidents
realize
current
pecuniary
benefits
protection
state
government
shaffer
carter
taxpayer
living
one
state
working
another
gains
protection
benefits
called
upon
share
costs
governments
deciding
whether
tax
residents
entire
worldwide
income
must
choose
legitimate
competing
tax
policy
objectives
state
might
prioritize
obtaining
equal
contributions
benefit
state
protection
roughly
similar
ways
state
might
prioritize
ensuring
taxpayers
subject
double
taxation
state
however
accomplish
objectives
illustrate
consider
wynnes
tax
scheme
place
howard
county
residents
earned
income
otherwise
tax
profile
wynnes
million
taxable
net
income
owed
amount
taxes
maryland
wynnes
see
app
pet
cert
scheme
thus
ensured
residents
similar
access
state
protection
benefits
similar
ability
pay
made
equal
contributions
state
defray
costs
benefits
maryland
achieve
objective
however
without
exposing
wynnes
risk
double
taxation
conversely
prioritizes
reducing
risk
wynnes
income
taxed
twice
two
different
choice
comes
cost
wynnes
enjoyed
equal
access
state
services
paid
less
cover
costs
services
similarly
situated
neighbors
earned
income
entirely
within
state
see
pet
cert
confront
deciding
whether
tax
nonresidents
entire
income
state
require
residents
nonresidents
work
within
state
protection
contribute
equally
cost
protection
state
seek
avoid
exposing
workers
risk
double
taxation
achieve
objectives
least
century
responsibility
striking
right
balance
two
policy
objectives
belonged
congress
chosen
balance
embraces
today
see
ante
since
almost
dawn
modern
era
state
income
taxation
taken
approach
maryland
taxing
residents
entire
income
wherever
earned
time
taxing
nonresidents
entire
income
recognizing
rotection
benefit
power
taxpayer
income
confined
either
state
residence
state
income
earned
long
afforded
flexibility
curry
mccanless
history
imposing
upholding
income
tax
schemes
materially
identical
one
confronts
beginning
end
case
modern
era
state
income
taxation
dates
wisconsin
tax
enacted
see
laws
ch
blakey
state
income
taxation
close
start
modern
era
taxed
residents
nonresidents
ways
materially
indistinguishable
way
maryland
example
oklahoma
began
taxing
residents
entire
net
income
arising
accruing
sources
time
taxing
nonresidents
entire
net
income
sources
th
state
sess
laws
ch
pp
emphasis
added
like
maryland
today
oklahoma
provided
credit
either
residents
nonresidents
taxes
paid
elsewhere
see
ch
et
neighboring
missouri
adopted
similar
scheme
residents
owed
taxes
entire
net
income
sources
nonresidents
owed
taxes
entire
net
income
sources
within
th
state
mo
laws
pp
emphasis
added
missouri
provided
neither
residents
nonresidents
credit
taxes
paid
see
et
thus
much
like
maryland
today
early
income
tax
adopters
simultaneously
taxed
residents
income
wherever
earned
nonresidents
income
earned
within
almost
immediately
began
issuing
became
long
series
decisions
repeatedly
upholding
authority
tax
residents
worldwide
income
nonresidents
income
maguire
trefry
resident
income
tax
shaffer
nonresident
income
tax
see
also
state
tax
utah
aldrich
curry
guaranty
trust
virginia
graves
lawrence
end
principle
interstate
international
taxation
sovereigns
authority
tax
income
residents
including
income
earned
outside
borders
chickasaw
nation
sovereigns
generally
may
also
tax
nonresidents
income
earned
within
sovereign
jurisdiction
far
suggesting
must
choose
taxing
residents
nonresidents
specifically
affirmed
exact
income
may
taxed
state
earned
state
recipient
domicile
curry
emphasis
added
see
also
aldrich
rejecting
rule
immunity
taxation
one
state
including
respect
income
taxation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
lawrence
example
dealt
mississippi
tax
scheme
structure
maryland
today
mississippi
taxed
residents
income
wherever
earned
nonresidents
income
earned
within
state
without
providing
either
set
taxpayers
credit
taxes
paid
elsewhere
see
miss
code
ann
lawrence
upheld
mississippi
tax
net
income
earned
one
residents
construction
public
highways
tennessee
see
fully
aware
mississippi
tennessee
effectively
imposing
income
tax
upon
occupation
reply
brief
lawrence
state
tax
see
also
curry
discussing
lawrence
likewise
guaranty
trust
new
york
taxed
income
new
york
trust
distributed
virginia
resident
resident
sought
block
virginia
tax
order
avoid
double
taxation
identical
income
rejecting
challenge
reiterated
two
may
simultaneously
tax
income
ibid
majority
deems
cases
irrelevant
involved
challenges
brought
due
process
clause
commerce
clause
see
ante
cases
significant
however
constraints
imposed
two
clauses
identical
obviously
see
quill
sheer
volume
consistency
precedent
confirms
rather
degree
endorsed
principle
interstate
international
taxation
state
may
tax
residents
worldwide
income
without
restriction
arising
taxes
imposed
regardless
whether
state
also
chooses
impose
taxes
chickasaw
nation
event
incorrect
support
principle
limited
due
process
clause
cases
shaffer
example
rejected
due
process
clause
challenge
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
income
tax
scheme
oklahoma
statute
described
features
majority
latches
onto
today
oklahoma
taxed
residents
worldwide
income
nonresidents
income
without
providing
credit
taxes
paid
elsewhere
either
residents
nonresidents
due
process
challenge
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
see
also
supra
specific
tax
challenged
shaffer
tax
nonresident
income
exposed
taxpayers
risk
double
taxation
maryland
tax
challenged
case
majority
labors
mightily
distinguish
shaffer
dispute
one
thing
give
pause
today
decision
overrules
shaffer
dormant
commerce
clause
holding
see
ante
discard
precedents
lightly
tax
shaffer
encountered
constitutional
shoals
maryland
scheme
survive
inspection
decision
west
publishing
mccolgan
reinforces
conclusion
west
publishing
summarily
affirmed
decision
california
denied
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
based
principles
today
majority
disrespects
merit
contention
california
tax
discriminates
interstate
commerce
ground
subjects
part
plaintiff
income
double
taxation
given
taxability
plaintiff
entire
net
income
state
domicile
taxation
one
state
immunization
taxation
taxation
corporation
carries
business
activities
justified
advantages
attend
pursuit
activities
income
may
taxed
state
earned
state
recipient
domicile
protection
benefit
power
subject
matter
confined
either
state
cal
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
treating
matter
summarily
rejected
argument
strikingly
similar
one
majority
embraces
california
tax
violated
dormant
commerce
clause
subjected
interstate
commerce
risk
double
tax
burden
brief
appellant
opposing
motion
dismiss
affirm
west
publishing
mccolgan
pp
quoting
adams
mfg
storen
long
history
recounted
counsels
favor
respecting
authority
tax
without
discount
residents
worldwide
income
justice
holmes
stated
century
ago
regard
mode
taxation
long
standing
fact
system
force
long
time
strong
reason
leaving
improvement
may
desired
legislature
paddell
city
new
york
recently
followed
sound
advice
resisting
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
taxing
practice
pedigree
enduring
practice
case
see
department
revenue
davis
quoting
padell
surely
advice
merits
application
challenged
tax
draws
support
historical
practice
numerous
decisions
majority
rejects
justice
holmes
counsel
observing
time
chosen
exercise
plenary
authority
tax
residents
worldwide
income
see
ante
however
learns
wrong
lesson
independent
policy
decision
made
chickasaw
emphasis
added
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
history
demonstrates
doub
constitutiona
authority
tax
residents
income
wherever
earned
majority
speculates
ante
political
processes
disregards
fanciful
ante
fact
worked
produce
policies
ranks
responsible
reason
resist
supervision
also
attempts
deflect
force
precedent
relying
trilogy
decisions
finds
particularly
instructive
ante
citing
central
greyhound
lines
mealey
gwin
white
prince
henneford
adams
majority
acknowledges
however
three
decisions
involved
gross
receipts
taxes
income
taxes
ante
true
recently
pointed
similarities
two
forms
taxation
see
ante
indulgence
wishful
thinking
say
previously
rejected
argument
commerce
clause
distinguishes
taxes
ante
decades
including
years
majority
trilogy
decided
routinely
maintained
difference
taxes
net
income
taxes
gross
receipts
interstate
commerce
warrants
different
results
commerce
clause
trost
hartman
federal
limitations
state
local
taxation
shaffer
example
rejected
taxpayer
dormant
commerce
clause
challenge
tax
imposed
upon
gross
receipts
upon
net
proceeds
three
years
deciding
adams
emphasized
manifest
substantial
differences
two
types
taxes
calling
burden
imposed
gross
receipts
tax
direct
immediate
contrast
indirect
incidental
burden
imposed
income
tax
stewart
dry
goods
lewis
quoting
glue
town
oak
creek
gwin
white
opinion
observed
invalidating
gross
receipts
tax
issue
left
wide
scope
taxation
engaged
interstate
commerce
extending
net
income
derived
emphasis
added
majority
asserts
rejected
distinction
moorman
mfg
see
ante
decision
fact
described
gross
receipts
taxes
burdensome
income
taxes
twice
particular
moorman
upheld
state
income
tax
earlier
decision
upheld
similar
inherently
burdensome
gross
receipts
tax
say
constitutionality
income
tax
follows
fortiori
constitutionality
similar
burdensome
gross
receipts
tax
affirm
reject
distinction
two
justices
participating
trilogy
short
scarcely
expect
see
three
decisions
invoked
invalidate
tax
net
income
ii
abandoning
principles
precedent
sustaining
simultaneous
income
taxation
offers
two
reasons
striking
maryland
county
income
tax
tax
creates
risk
double
taxation
ante
deems
maryland
income
tax
scheme
inherently
discriminatory
means
scheme
fails
internal
consistency
test
ante
first
objection
overwhelmed
history
recounted
imposing
upholding
income
taxes
carried
similar
risk
double
taxation
see
supra
reliance
internal
consistency
test
compelling
rigidly
required
maintain
internally
consistent
tax
regimes
today
two
decades
insisted
tax
review
pass
internal
consistency
test
see
oklahoma
tax
jefferson
lines
struck
state
tax
failing
test
nearly
years
see
american
trucking
scheiner
ata
tyler
pipe
industries
washington
state
dept
revenue
moreover
rejected
challenges
taxes
flunk
test
oklahoma
tax
scheme
upheld
dormant
commerce
clause
shaffer
example
materially
indistinguishable
therefore
internally
inconsistent
maryland
scheme
recently
american
trucking
michigan
pub
serv
upheld
concede
dly
internally
inconsistent
state
tax
ata
ii
satisfied
sufficiently
close
connection
tax
issue
local
conduct
triggered
tax
see
logic
ata
ii
counsel
wynnes
appeared
recognize
see
tr
oral
arg
permit
state
impose
head
tax
flat
charge
imposed
every
resident
state
even
tax
part
internally
inconsistent
tax
scheme
tax
rest
purely
local
conduct
taxpayer
residence
taxing
state
taxes
paid
defray
costs
closely
connected
local
conduct
services
used
taxpayer
living
state
see
reason
constitution
requires
us
disarm
using
progressive
tax
rather
flat
toll
cover
costs
local
services
residents
enjoy
head
tax
income
tax
differ
latter
measured
taxpayer
ability
pay
like
head
tax
however
income
tax
triggered
purely
local
conduct
residing
state
also
like
head
tax
income
tax
covers
costs
closely
connected
residence
finances
services
used
living
state
head
tax
qualifies
ata
ii
reprieve
internal
consistency
must
income
tax
majority
asserts
maryland
tax
scheme
internally
inconsistent
operates
tariff
making
unconstitutional
ante
curious
claim
defining
characteristic
tariff
taxes
interstate
activity
higher
rate
taxes
activity
conducted
within
state
see
west
lynn
creamery
maryland
resident
income
tax
exact
opposite
taxes
income
residents
precisely
rate
whether
income
earned
moreover
deep
flaw
chosen
test
characterizes
internal
consistency
cure
ante
test
scarcely
least
double
taxation
believes
justify
intervention
according
maryland
tax
scheme
internally
inconsistent
maryland
simultaneously
imposes
two
taxes
county
income
tax
special
nonresident
tax
see
ante
one
taxes
county
income
tax
actually
falls
wynnes
interaction
two
taxes
renders
maryland
tax
scheme
internally
inconsistent
maryland
eliminate
inconsistency
terminating
special
nonresident
tax
measure
help
wynnes
maryland
words
bring
compliance
test
heart
analysis
without
removing
double
tax
burden
test
designed
cure
illustrate
oddity
consider
simple
example
april
lives
works
state
bob
lives
state
works
state
ante
fail
internal
consistency
test
impose
tax
income
residents
earn
tax
income
residents
earn
jurisdictions
tax
income
nonresidents
earn
according
tax
schemes
troubling
bob
pay
income
tax
april
solely
earns
income
interstate
ante
state
however
need
pursue
approach
make
tax
schemes
internally
see
ante
state
might
choose
tax
residents
worldwide
income
eliminating
tax
nonresidents
income
state
might
instead
choose
exclusively
tax
income
earned
within
state
deleting
tax
residents
income
state
tax
scheme
internally
consistent
tax
burden
april
bob
remain
unchanged
original
schemes
april
pay
tax
state
bob
pay
tax
twice
state
resides
state
earns
income
cure
words
match
perceived
asserts
flaw
truism
every
discrimination
case
whether
brought
dormant
commerce
clause
equal
protection
clause
ante
simply
incorrect
acknowledges
government
impermissibly
treats
like
cases
differently
discriminates
ordinarily
cure
violation
either
leveling
leveling
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
consider
another
april
bob
example
bob
must
pay
tax
april
must
pay
tax
discrimination
eliminated
either
requiring
pay
tax
leveling
requiring
pay
tax
leveling
true
leveling
leaves
bob
tax
bill
unchanged
leveling
nonetheless
benefits
bob
eliminates
unfairness
treated
differently
often
true
dormant
commerce
clause
cases
april
bob
compete
market
leveling
provides
concrete
benefit
placing
new
burden
bob
competitors
majority
rule
work
way
explained
maryland
cure
majority
deems
discrimination
without
lowering
wynnes
taxes
increasing
tax
burden
wynnes
neighbors
terminating
special
nonresident
tax
see
supra
state
words
satisfy
majority
lowering
bob
taxes
raising
april
taxes
eliminating
taxes
imposed
yet
third
taxpayer
say
cathy
internal
consistency
test
thus
scarcely
resembles
ordinary
law
whatever
virtue
internal
consistency
test
contexts
shortcoming
makes
poor
excuse
jettisoning
taxation
principles
entrenched
case
bottom
policy
choices
prioritize
ensuring
live
work
within
state
shoulder
fair
share
costs
government
must
prioritize
avoidance
double
taxation
demonstrated
supra
achieving
even
latter
goal
beyond
competence
resolving
competing
tax
policy
considerations
case
implicates
something
even
less
well
equipped
century
recognized
state
legislatures
congress
constitutionally
assigned
institutionally
better
equipped
balance
issues
reverse
may
leave
task
belongs
footnotes
federal
law
corporations
permit
shareholders
elect
taxation
system
income
subjected
one
level
taxation
corporation
profits
pass
directly
shareholders
pro
rata
basis
reported
shareholders
individual
tax
returns
gitlitz
commissioner
citation
omitted
maryland
affords
similar
treatment
income
corporation
md
contrast
corporations
organized
subchapter
rather
chapter
internal
revenue
code
must
pay
taxes
considered
separate
tax
entities
shareholders
fletcher
cyclopedia
law
corporations
rev
ed
cum
supp
limitations
number
type
shareholders
may
corporations
tend
smaller
closely
held
corporations
principal
dissent
mischaracterizes
import
statement
moorman
gross
receipts
tax
net
income
tax
post
statement
relative
economic
impact
taxes
gross
receipts
tax
applies
regardless
whether
corporation
makes
profit
justice
brennan
confirmed
dissent
suggestion
net
income
taxes
subject
lesser
constitutional
scrutiny
gross
receipts
taxes
indeed
noted
moorman
actual
burden
interstate
commerce
iowa
imposed
plainly
valid
tax
instead
challenged
net
income
tax
moorman
mfg
bair
similarly
sustained
dormant
commerce
clause
challenges
corporate
residents
state
imposed
burden
interstate
commerce
see
camps
town
harrison
fulton
faulkner
central
greyhound
lines
mealey
gwin
white
prince
henneford
adams
mfg
storen
merit
petitioner
argument
maryland
free
adopt
tax
scheme
actually
intended
discriminate
interstate
commerce
reply
brief
commerce
clause
regulates
effects
motives
require
courts
inquire
voters
legislators
reasons
enacting
law
discriminatory
effect
see
associated
industries
mo
lohman
philadelphia
new
jersey
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
cases
held
tax
schemes
may
invalid
dormant
commerce
clause
even
absent
showing
actual
double
taxation
mobil
oil
commissioner
taxes
gwin
white
note
however
petitioner
dispute
respondents
subject
actual
multiple
taxation
case
mason
made
america
european
tax
internal
consistency
test
boston
college
rev
principal
dissent
justice
scalia
inaccurately
state
american
trucking
conceded
trucking
tax
ed
internal
consistency
test
upheld
tax
anyway
post
scalia
dissenting
see
also
post
ginsburg
dissenting
say
tax
question
failed
consistency
test
wrote
petitioner
argued
see
american
trucking
concede
true
tax
case
flat
tax
truck
made
deliveries
michigan
tax
therefore
fell
trucks
made
solely
intrastate
deliveries
made
interstate
deliveries
namely
also
made
intrastate
deliveries
concede
adopted
similar
tax
interstate
truck
pay
fees
totaling
several
hundred
dollars
even
several
thousand
dollars
business
carrying
local
loads
many
even
emphasis
added
concession
tax
violated
internal
consistency
test
internal
consistency
test
asks
whether
adoption
rule
place
interstate
commerce
disadvantage
compared
commerce
intrastate
oklahoma
tax
jefferson
lines
whether
michigan
trucking
tax
effect
depended
empirical
showing
petitioners
failed
make
namely
challenged
tax
imposed
heavier
burden
interstate
truckers
general
intrastate
truckers
michigan
tax
interstate
truckers
used
michigan
roads
solely
trips
started
ended
outside
state
pay
tax
even
though
benefited
use
state
roads
thus
treated
favorably
truckers
leave
state
truckers
made
interstate
trips
made
intrastate
trips
treated
less
favorably
explained
brief
either
record
evidence
abstract
logic
makes
clear
whether
overall
effect
system
increase
reduce
existing
financial
disincentives
interstate
travel
brief
american
trucking
michigan
pub
serv
order
apply
internal
consistency
test
case
must
evaluate
maryland
income
tax
scheme
whole
scheme
taxes
three
separate
categories
income
county
tax
income
maryland
residents
earn
maryland
county
tax
income
maryland
residents
earn
special
nonresident
tax
income
nonresidents
earn
maryland
commerce
clause
purposes
immaterial
maryland
assigns
different
labels
county
tax
special
nonresident
tax
taxes
applying
dormant
commerce
clause
must
considered
one
cf
oregon
waste
systems
department
environmental
quality
independent
taxes
intrastate
interstate
commerce
compensatory
rough
equivalents
imposed
upon
substantially
similar
events
state
labels
controlled
state
always
free
tax
domestic
inbound
outbound
income
discriminatory
rates
simply
attaching
different
labels
footnotes
see
mass
acts
ch
taxing
amount
inhabitants
income
profession
faculty
handicraft
trade
employment
also
amount
incomes
profits
gained
trading
sea
shore
laws
ch
providing
offices
posts
profit
trades
occupations
professions
ministers
gospel
denominations
schoolmasters
excepted
shall
rated
discretion
township
ward
district
assessors
due
regard
profits
arising
see
also
report
oliver
wolcott
secretary
treasury
concerning
direct
taxes
american
state
papers
finance
describing
connecticut
income
tax
assessing
relevant
estimated
gains
profits
arising
lucrative
professions
trades
occupations
noting
delaware
axes
hitherto
collected
estimated
annual
income
inhabitants
state
without
reference
specific
objects
footnotes
offers
response
reason
permitting
state
tax
residents
worldwide
income
urge
commerce
clause
doctrine
favor
corporations
individuals
see
ante
scarcely
disagree
proposition
opinion
suggest
otherwise
fail
see
answers
even
relevant
observation
affording
residents
greater
benefits
entitles
state
require
bear
greater
tax
burden
majority
dismisses
said
goldberg
sweet
dictum
allegedly
repudiated
west
lynn
creamery
healy
ante
doubly
wrong
goldberg
distinguished
tax
struck
american
trucking
scheiner
ata
noting
particular
tax
ata
fell
rs
whereas
tax
goldberg
fell
insider
presumably
able
complain
change
tax
illinois
political
process
essential
holding
rationale
written
dictum
west
lynn
creamery
far
repudiat
ing
goldberg
cited
goldberg
reaffirmed
political
safeguards
rationale
explained
see
infra
page
given
pedigree
rationale
applying
hardly
work
sea
change
commerce
clause
jurisprudence
ante
see
haulers
solid
waste
management
authority
goldberg
minnesota
clover
leaf
creamery
raymond
motor
rice
south
carolina
highway
dept
barnwell
brothers
applying
rationale
net
income
tax
cast
doubt
gross
receipts
precedents
ante
given
longstanding
practice
evaluating
income
gross
receipt
taxes
differently
see
infra
unlike
maryland
county
income
tax
early
income
taxes
allowed
deduction
taxes
paid
jurisdictions
compare
app
mo
laws
pp
sess
laws
wynnes
argued
majority
suggest
however
maryland
fully
cure
asserted
defects
tax
scheme
simply
providing
deduction
lieu
tax
credit
doubt
deduction
give
wynnes
much
satisfaction
deducting
taxes
paid
wynnes
million
taxable
net
income
reduce
maryland
tax
burden
small
fraction
tax
credit
majority
awards
see
pet
cert
app
pet
cert
upholding
maryland
facially
neutral
tax
hardly
means
majority
contends
ante
dormant
commerce
clause
places
limits
authority
tax
residents
worldwide
income
example
principles
interstate
international
taxation
permitting
kind
facially
discriminatory
tax
majority
magine
state
enacting
ibid
political
processes
noted
adequate
safeguard
tax
see
supra
majority
reads
american
trucking
michigan
pub
serv
ata
ii
way
implausible
must
resort
quoting
amicus
brief
rather
opinion
according
majority
think
challenged
tax
failed
internal
consistency
test
ata
ii
held
challengers
failed
make
necessary
empirical
showing
see
ante
true
made
argument
see
brief
amicus
curiae
ata
ii
one
searches
reports
vain
indication
adopted
hardly
surprising
one
scarcely
think
test
turning
hypothetically
assessing
tax
structure
ante
emphasis
added
require
empirical
data
fact
said
ata
ii
tax
internal
inconsistency
excused
multiple
taxation
resulting
every
state
adopting
challenged
tax
caused
interstate
firms
choosing
engag
local
business
majority
faults
dissents
disput
ing
economic
analysis
beyond
citation
pair
amicus
briefs
opinion
offers
analysis
dispute
ante
maryland
provide
nonresidents
credit
taxes
paid
jurisdictions
maryland
source
income
cf
ante
clai
groundlessly
suggests
analysis
establish
es
rule
priority
taxation
ante
objection
rather
treats
authority
box
ing
state
discrete
authority
tax
basis
residence
supra
inconsisten
cy
analysis
majority
plainly
errs
insisting
ante
attempting
preserve
test
qualification
cure
redefines
illness
double
taxation
double
taxation
caused
inherently
discriminat
ory
tax
scheme
ante
relying
distinction
justify
test
entirely
circular
however
defines
inherent
discrimination
case
internal
inconsistency
event
given
concern
purportedly
drives
analysis
mystifying
sees
virtue
striking
one
two
schemes
bob
taxed
twice
ante
whatever
disincentive
original
scheme
creates
bob
wynnes
work
interstate
commerce
created
much
revised
scheme
finds
satisfactory