denver
area
educational
telecommunications
consortium
et
al
federal
communications
commission
et
argued
february
decided
june
cases
involve
three
sections
cable
television
consumer
protection
competition
act
act
implemented
federal
communications
commission
fcc
regulations
section
applies
leased
access
channels
reserved
federal
law
commercial
lease
parties
unaffiliated
cable
television
system
section
regulates
public
access
channels
required
local
governments
public
educational
governmental
permit
operator
allow
prohibit
programming
reasonably
believes
depicts
sexual
activities
organs
patently
offensive
manner
section
applies
leased
access
channels
operators
required
segregate
patently
offensive
programming
single
channel
block
channel
viewer
access
unblock
later
reblock
within
days
subscriber
written
request
congress
authorized
municipalities
require
operators
create
public
access
channels
act
passage
federal
law
prohibited
operators
exercising
editorial
control
content
programs
broadcast
either
type
access
channel
petitioners
sought
judicial
review
section
sections
implemented
consistent
first
amendment
held
judgment
affirmed
part
reversed
part
affirmed
part
reversed
part
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
respect
part
iii
concluding
section
violates
first
amendment
section
segregate
block
requirements
obvious
effects
viewers
watch
programs
segregated
patently
offensive
channel
without
considerable
advance
planning
receive
occasional
programs
may
judge
program
value
company
keeps
refrain
subscribing
segregated
channel
fear
operator
disclose
subscriber
list
moreover
section
appropriately
tailored
achieve
basic
legitimate
objective
protecting
children
exposure
patently
offensive
materials
less
restrictive
means
utilized
congress
elsewhere
protect
children
patently
offensive
sexual
material
broadcast
cable
channels
indicate
section
overly
restrictive
benefits
speculative
include
provisions
telecommunications
act
utilizes
blocking
without
written
request
significantly
less
restrictive
means
lockbox
requirement
place
since
cable
act
pp
justice
breyer
joined
justice
stevens
justice
justice
souter
concluded
parts
ii
section
consistent
first
amendment
pp
close
scrutiny
demonstrates
section
properly
addresses
serious
problem
without
imposing
light
relevant
competing
interests
unnecessarily
great
restriction
speech
first
section
comes
accompanied
extremely
important
justification
often
found
compelling
see
sable
communications
fcc
second
section
arises
particular
permission
cable
operators
regulate
programming
previous
act
congress
path
access
cable
channels
free
operator
control
first
amendment
interests
involved
therefore
complex
require
balance
interests
served
access
requirements
increasing
availability
avenues
expression
programmers
otherwise
see
pp
disadvantage
first
amendment
interests
cable
operators
programmers
operator
assigned
channels
devoted
access
see
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
third
problem
section
addresses
analogous
indecent
radio
broadcasts
issue
fcc
pacifica
foundation
balance
congress
struck
commensurate
balance
approved
case
fourth
section
permissive
nature
means
likely
restricts
speech
less
ban
issue
pacifica
importance
interest
stake
children
exposure
patently
offensive
depictions
sex
accommodation
interests
programmers
maintaining
access
channels
cable
operators
editing
contents
channels
similarity
problem
solution
issue
pacifica
flexibility
inherent
approach
permits
private
cable
operators
make
editorial
decisions
persuasively
establishes
section
sufficiently
tailored
response
extraordinarily
important
problem
involving
complex
balance
interests
sable
supra
turner
supra
distinguished
pp
petitioners
reliance
public
forum
cases
unavailing
unnecessary
unwise
decide
whether
apply
public
forum
doctrine
leased
access
channels
first
clear
whether
doctrine
imported
wholesale
common
carriage
regulation
new
changing
area
second
although
limited
public
forums
permissible
yet
determined
whether
decision
limit
forum
necessarily
subject
highest
level
scrutiny
cases
require
finally
important
features
make
section
acceptable
constraint
speech
also
make
acceptable
limitation
access
claimed
public
forum
pp
impermissibly
vague
language
used
similar
adopted
miller
california
guidelin
state
obscenity
laws
appear
narrow
cable
operators
authority
materials
involve
kind
sexually
explicit
materials
obscene
miller
might
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
nonprurient
purposes
ibid
definition
overly
broad
indicated
construction
phrase
patently
offensive
see
pacifica
supra
narrow
category
late
night
audience
basically
adult
fact
section
permits
operators
screen
programs
pursuant
written
published
policy
definition
reasonabl
belie
qualifier
seems
designed
provide
legal
excuse
operator
honest
mistake
constrains
operator
discretion
much
protects
pp
justice
breyer
joined
justice
stevens
justice
souter
concluded
part
iv
section
violates
first
amendment
section
different
section
four
reasons
first
cable
operators
historically
exercised
editorial
control
public
access
channels
section
restriction
programmers
capacity
speak
effect
countervailing
removal
restriction
cable
operators
speech
second
programming
channels
normally
subject
complex
supervisory
systems
composed
public
private
elements
section
therefore
likely
less
necessary
protect
children
third
existence
system
encourages
secures
programming
community
considers
valuable
strongly
suggests
cable
operator
veto
likely
erroneously
exclude
borderline
programs
broadcast
achieve
statute
basic
objective
protecting
children
fourth
government
shown
significant
enough
problem
patently
offensive
broadcasts
children
public
access
channels
justifies
restriction
first
amendment
pp
justice
kennedy
joined
justice
ginsburg
concurred
judgment
public
access
channels
regulated
section
required
local
cable
franchise
authorities
channels
designated
public
forums
property
government
opened
expressive
activity
public
international
soc
krishna
consciousness
lee
section
vests
cable
operator
power
federal
law
defined
reference
content
speech
override
franchise
agreement
undercut
public
forum
agreement
creates
government
thus
excludes
speech
public
forum
basis
content
constitution
requires
regulation
given
exacting
scrutiny
see
ibid
section
survive
strict
scrutiny
although
congress
compelling
interest
protecting
children
indecent
speech
see
sable
communications
section
narrowly
tailored
serve
interest
since
among
things
basis
record
establishing
section
least
restrictive
means
accomplish
purpose
see
sable
communications
supra
government
argument
applying
strict
scrutiny
indecent
cablecasts
subject
lower
standard
review
applied
fcc
pacifica
foundation
persuasive
since
lower
standard
even
apply
infringements
liberties
cable
operators
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
less
cause
lower
standard
rights
cable
programmers
viewers
stake
pp
justice
thomas
joined
chief
justice
justice
scalia
agreed
section
constitutionally
permissible
cable
operators
generally
entitled
much
first
amendment
protection
print
media
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
miami
herald
publishing
tornillo
pacific
gas
elec
public
util
therefore
applicable
see
turner
supra
concurring
part
dissenting
part
cable
operator
editorial
rights
general
primacy
first
amendment
rights
programmers
transmit
viewers
watch
none
petitioners
cable
operators
cable
viewers
access
programmers
representative
organizations
cable
access
provisions
part
scheme
restricts
operators
free
speech
rights
expands
speaking
opportunities
programmers
underlying
constitutional
right
speak
cable
medium
programmers
challenge
scheme
particular
part
abridgment
freedom
speech
sections
operator
absent
government
regulation
pp
breyer
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
part
iii
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
joined
opinion
respect
parts
ii
stevens
souter
joined
opinion
respect
parts
iv
vi
stevens
souter
joined
stevens
souter
filed
concurring
opinions
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
ginsburg
joined
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
rehnquist
scalia
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
nos
denver
area
educational
telecommunications
consortium
et
petitioners
federal
communications
commission
et
al
alliance
community
media
et
petitioners
federal
communications
commission
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
breyer
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
part
iii
opinion
respect
parts
ii
justice
stevens
justice
justice
souter
join
opinion
respect
parts
iv
vi
justice
stevens
justice
souter
join
cases
present
first
amendment
challenges
three
statutory
provisions
seek
regulate
broadcasting
patently
offensive
material
cable
television
cable
television
consumer
protection
competition
act
act
act
stat
section
section
note
following
section
provisions
apply
programs
broadcast
cable
known
leased
access
channels
public
educational
governmental
channels
two
provisions
essentially
permit
cable
system
operator
prohibit
broadcasting
programming
operator
reasonably
believes
describes
depicts
sexual
excretory
activities
organs
patently
offensive
manner
act
section
see
section
consumer
protection
competition
act
indecent
programming
types
materials
cable
access
channels
first
report
order
fcc
rcd
first
report
order
implementation
section
cable
consumer
protection
competition
act
indecent
programming
types
materials
cable
access
channels
second
report
order
fcc
rcd
second
report
order
remaining
provision
requires
cable
system
operators
segregate
certain
patently
offensive
programming
place
single
channel
block
channel
viewer
access
unless
viewer
requests
access
advance
writing
act
section
cfr
section
conclude
first
permits
operator
decide
whether
broadcast
programs
leased
access
consistent
first
amendment
second
provision
requires
leased
channel
operators
segregate
block
programming
third
provision
applicable
public
educational
governmental
channels
violate
first
amendment
appropriately
tailored
achieve
basic
legitimate
objective
protecting
children
exposure
patently
offensive
material
leased
channel
channel
federal
law
requires
cable
system
operator
reserve
commercial
lease
unaffiliated
third
parties
percent
cable
system
channels
typically
fall
category
see
section
ublic
educational
governmental
channels
shall
call
public
access
channels
channels
years
local
governments
required
cable
system
operators
set
aside
public
educational
governmental
purposes
part
consideration
operator
gives
return
permission
install
cables
city
streets
use
public
see
section
see
also
authorizing
local
authorities
require
creation
public
access
channels
federal
law
much
state
law
respect
public
access
channels
prohibited
cable
system
operators
exercising
editorial
control
content
program
broadcast
either
leased
public
access
channels
see
section
public
access
leased
access
effort
control
sexually
explicit
programming
conveyed
access
channels
congress
enacted
three
provisions
us
first
two
provisions
relate
leased
channels
first
says
subsection
shall
permit
cable
operator
enforce
prospectively
written
published
policy
prohibiting
programming
cable
operator
reasonably
believes
describes
depicts
sexual
excretory
activities
organs
patently
offensive
manner
measured
contemporary
community
standards
act
section
stat
third
provision
similar
first
provision
applies
public
access
channels
relevant
statutory
section
instructs
fcc
promulgate
regulations
enable
cable
operator
cable
system
prohibit
use
system
channel
capacity
public
educational
governmental
access
facility
programming
contains
obscene
material
sexually
explicit
conduct
material
soliciting
promoting
unlawful
conduct
act
section
ibid
upshot
said
beginning
federal
law
us
statute
implemented
regulations
permits
cable
operators
either
allow
forbid
transmission
patently
offensive
materials
leased
public
access
channels
requires
operators
minimum
segregate
block
transmission
material
leased
channels
petitioners
claiming
three
statutory
provisions
implemented
commission
regulations
violate
first
amendment
sought
judicial
review
commission
first
report
order
second
report
order
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
panel
circuit
agreed
petitioners
provisions
violated
first
amendment
alliance
community
media
fcc
entire
appeals
however
heard
case
en
banc
reached
opposite
conclusion
held
three
statutory
provisions
implemented
consistent
first
amendment
alliance
community
media
fcc
four
eleven
en
banc
appeals
judges
dissented
two
dissenting
judges
concluded
three
provisions
violated
first
amendment
two
others
thought
either
one
two
three
provisions
violated
first
amendment
granted
certiorari
review
en
banc
first
amendment
determinations
ii
recognize
first
amendment
terms
apply
governmental
action
ordinarily
throw
constitutional
doubt
decisions
private
citizens
permit
restrict
ordinarily
even
decisions
take
place
within
framework
regulatory
regime
broadcasting
courts
might
face
difficult
potentially
restrictive
practical
task
deciding
among
number
private
parties
involved
providing
program
example
networks
station
owners
program
editors
program
producers
speaker
whose
rights
may
abridged
censor
furthermore
held
editorial
function
aspect
speech
see
turner
slip
decision
private
party
say
station
owner
censor
interfere
private
censor
freedom
speak
editor
thus
surprisingly
first
amendment
broadcasting
cases
dealt
governmental
efforts
restrict
governmental
efforts
provide
maintain
broadcaster
freedom
pick
choose
programming
columbia
broadcasting
system
democratic
national
committee
striking
restrictions
broadcaster
ability
refuse
carry
political
advertising
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
upholding
restrictions
editorial
authority
fcc
league
women
voters
striking
restrictions
cf
consolidated
edison
public
serv
striking
ban
political
speech
public
utility
using
billing
envelopes
broadcast
medium
central
hudson
gas
elec
public
serv
striking
restriction
public
utility
advertising
nonetheless
petitioners
conceding
ordinarily
point
circumstances
view
make
analogy
private
broadcasters
inapposite
make
case
special
one
warranting
different
constitutional
result
practical
matter
say
cable
system
operators
considerably
power
censor
program
viewing
broadcasters
individual
communities
typically
one
cable
system
linking
broadcasters
program
providers
community
many
subscribers
see
turner
supra
slip
one
cable
system
communities
nationally
homes
subscribe
cable
becomes
primary
sole
source
video
programming
overwhelming
majority
homes
moreover
concern
system
operators
exercise
considerable
power
originally
led
insist
operators
provide
leased
public
access
channels
free
operator
editorial
control
permit
system
operators
supervise
programming
leased
access
channels
create
risk
anticensorship
effort
sought
avoid
time
petitioners
add
cable
systems
two
relevant
special
characteristics
unusually
involved
government
depend
upon
government
permission
government
facilities
streets
string
cable
necessary
services
respect
leased
channels
speech
interests
relatively
weak
act
less
like
editors
newspapers
television
broadcasters
like
common
carriers
telephone
companies
circumstances
petitioners
conclude
congress
permissive
law
actuality
abridge
free
speech
treat
law
congressionally
imposed
restriction
unredeemed
properly
tailored
effort
serve
compelling
interest
see
simon
schuster
members
state
crime
victims
sable
communications
fcc
analogize
provisions
constitutionally
forbidden
restrictions
upon
speech
taking
place
public
forums
public
streets
parks
buildings
dedicated
open
speech
communication
see
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
ed
fund
perry
ed
assn
perry
local
educators
see
also
supra
identifying
public
access
channels
electronic
equivalent
speaker
soap
box
finally
petitioners
say
legal
standard
law
contains
patently
offensive
standard
unconstitutionally
vague
see
interstate
circuit
dallas
rejecting
censorship
ordinance
vague
even
though
intended
protect
children
like
petitioners
justices
kennedy
thomas
us
decide
case
simply
transferring
applying
literally
categorical
standards
developed
contexts
justice
kennedy
leased
access
channels
like
common
carrier
cablecast
protected
medium
strict
scrutiny
applies
section
fails
test
therefore
section
invalid
post
justice
thomas
case
simple
cable
operator
owns
system
access
channels
broadcast
like
bookstore
owner
respect
displays
shelves
predominant
first
amendment
interest
post
categorical
approaches
suffer
flaws
import
law
developed
different
contexts
new
changing
environment
lack
flexibility
necessary
allow
government
respond
serious
practical
problems
without
sacrificing
free
exchange
ideas
first
amendment
designed
protect
history
first
amendment
jurisprudence
however
one
continual
development
constitution
general
command
congress
shall
make
law
abridging
freedom
speech
press
applied
new
circumstances
requiring
different
adaptations
prior
principles
precedents
essence
protection
congress
may
regulate
speech
except
cases
extraordinary
need
exercise
degree
care
elsewhere
required
see
schenck
abrams
holmes
dissenting
west
viginia
bd
ed
barnette
texas
johnson
time
cases
left
congress
powerless
address
serious
problems
see
chaplinsky
new
hampshire
young
american
mini
theaters
fcc
pacifica
foundation
years
restated
refined
basic
first
amendment
principles
adopting
particularly
balance
competing
interests
special
circumstances
field
application
see
new
york
times
sullivan
allowing
criticism
public
officials
regulated
civil
libel
plaintiff
shows
actual
malice
gertz
robert
welch
allowing
greater
regulation
speech
harming
individuals
public
officials
still
requiring
negligence
standard
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
employing
highly
flexible
standard
response
scarcity
problem
unique
broadcast
arkansas
writers
project
ragland
requiring
compelling
state
interest
narrowly
drawn
means
context
differential
taxation
media
sable
supra
applying
compelling
interest
least
restrictive
means
narrowly
tailored
requirements
indecent
telephone
communications
turner
slip
using
heightened
scrutiny
address
regulations
cable
system
broadcasts
central
hudson
gas
elec
restriction
commercial
speech
extensive
necessary
serve
substantial
government
interest
tradition
teaches
first
amendment
embodies
overarching
commitment
protect
speech
government
regulation
close
judicial
scrutiny
thereby
enforcing
constitution
constraints
without
imposing
judicial
formulae
rigid
become
straightjacket
disables
government
responding
serious
problems
different
contexts
consistently
held
government
may
directly
regulate
speech
address
extraordinary
problems
regulations
appropriately
tailored
resolve
problems
without
imposing
unnecessarily
great
restriction
speech
justices
kennedy
thomas
us
declare
among
many
applications
general
approach
developed
years
applying
definitive
choice
among
competing
analogies
broadcast
common
carrier
bookstore
allows
us
declare
rigid
single
standard
good
future
media
purposes
say
reject
specific
formulations
appropriately
cover
vast
majority
cases
involving
government
regulation
speech
rather
aware
changes
taking
place
law
technology
industrial
structure
related
telecommunications
see
telecommunications
act
stat
believe
unwise
unnecessary
definitively
pick
one
analogy
one
specific
set
words
see
columbia
broadcasting
problems
regulation
rendered
difficult
broadcast
industry
dynamic
terms
technological
change
solutions
adequate
decade
ago
necessarily
acceptable
today
may
well
outmoded
years
hence
pacifica
supra
long
recognized
medium
expression
presents
special
first
amendment
problems
therefore
think
premature
answer
broad
questions
justices
kennedy
thomas
raise
efforts
find
definitive
analogy
deciding
example
extent
private
property
designated
public
forum
compare
post
kennedy
concurring
part
dissenting
part
post
thomas
dissenting
part
concurring
judgment
whether
public
access
channels
public
forum
post
kennedy
whether
government
viewpoint
neutral
decision
limit
public
forum
subject
scrutiny
selective
exclusion
public
forum
post
kennedy
whether
exclusion
common
carriage
must
purposes
treated
like
exclusion
public
forum
post
kennedy
whether
interests
owners
communications
media
always
subordinate
interests
users
medium
post
thomas
rather
decide
issues
decide
case
narrowly
closely
scrutinizing
section
assure
properly
addresses
extremely
important
problem
without
imposing
light
relevant
interests
unnecessarily
great
restriction
speech
importance
interest
stake
children
exposure
patently
offensive
depictions
sex
accommodation
interests
programmers
maintaining
access
channels
cable
operators
editing
contents
channels
similarity
problem
solution
issue
pacifica
supra
flexibility
inherent
approach
permits
private
cable
operators
make
editorial
decisions
lead
us
conclude
section
sufficiently
tailored
response
extraordinarily
important
problem
first
provision
us
comes
accompanied
extremely
important
justification
one
often
found
need
protect
children
exposure
patently
offensive
material
sable
communications
ginsberg
new
york
new
york
ferber
second
provision
arises
particular
permission
cable
operators
regulate
programming
previous
act
congress
path
access
cable
channels
free
operator
control
first
amendment
interests
involved
therefore
complex
involve
balance
interests
served
access
requirements
increasing
availability
avenues
expression
programmers
otherwise
pp
disadvantage
first
amendment
interests
cable
operators
programmers
cable
operator
assigned
channels
devoted
access
see
turner
slip
third
problem
congress
addressed
remarkably
similar
problem
addressed
fcc
pacifica
balance
congress
struck
commensurate
balance
approved
pacifica
considered
governmental
ban
radio
broadcast
indecent
materials
defined
part
like
provisions
us
include
language
describes
terms
patently
offensive
measured
contemporary
community
standards
broadcast
medium
sexual
excretory
activities
organs
times
day
reasonable
risk
children
may
audience
quoting
factors
present
cable
television
broadcasting
including
access
channel
broadcasting
accessible
children
broadcasting
see
heeter
greenberg
baldwin
paugh
srigley
atkin
parental
influences
viewing
style
cableviewing
heeter
greenberg
eds
children
spend
time
watching
television
view
channels
parents
whether
household
subscribes
cable
receives
television
air
cable
television
systems
including
access
channels
established
uniquely
pervasive
presence
lives
americans
pacifica
supra
see
jost
future
television
cq
researcher
american
homes
subscribe
cable
greenberg
heeter
sipes
cable
noncable
viewing
style
comparisons
cableviewing
cable
households
spend
day
average
watching
television
watch
channels
households
without
cable
service
patently
offensive
material
stations
confron
citizen
privacy
home
pacifica
supra
little
prior
warning
cableviewing
cable
subscribers
tend
use
guides
broadcast
viewers
difference
among
groups
amount
viewing
planned
fact
cable
subscribers
tended
sample
channels
settling
program
thereby
making
less
susceptible
random
exposure
unwanted
materials
nothing
stop
adults
feel
need
finding
similar
programming
elsewhere
say
tape
theaters
fact
power
cable
systems
control
home
program
viewing
absolute
broadcasting
direct
broadcast
satellites
already
provide
alternative
ways
programmers
reach
home
likely
greater
extent
near
future
see
generally
telecommunications
act
stat
section
advanced
television
services
direct
broadcast
satellite
video
programming
telephone
companies
availability
navigation
devices
enhance
multichannel
programming
johnson
toward
competition
cable
television
fourth
permissive
nature
section
means
likely
restricts
speech
less
ban
issue
pacifica
provision
removes
restriction
cable
operators
see
supra
moreover
although
provision
create
risk
program
appear
risk
certainty
accompanies
governmental
ban
fact
glance
programming
cable
operators
allow
nonaccess
channels
suggests
distinction
theoretical
real
see
app
regular
channel
broadcast
playboy
real
sex
programming
finally
provision
permissive
nature
brings
flexibility
allows
cable
operators
example
ban
broadcasts
say
rearrange
broadcast
times
better
fit
desires
adult
audiences
lessening
risks
harm
children
see
first
report
order
para
fcc
rcd
interpreting
act
provisions
allow
cable
operators
broad
discretion
offensive
materials
respects
permissive
nature
approach
taken
congress
renders
measure
appropriate
means
achieving
underlying
purpose
protecting
children
course
cable
system
operators
may
always
rearrange
reschedule
patently
offensive
programming
sometimes
petitioners
fear
may
ban
programming
instead
may
said
pacifica
ban
practice
fcc
daytime
broadcast
ban
become
total
ban
depending
upon
private
operators
programmers
station
owners
networks
responded
decide
whether
reschedule
daytime
show
nighttime
broadcast
light
comparative
audience
demand
host
practical
factors
similarly
determine
practical
outcomes
provisions
us
upshot
cases
must
uncertainty
practical
governmental
ban
one
case
permission
common
uncertainty
makes
difficult
say
provision
respect
restrictive
order
pacifica
time
respects
discussed
provision
significantly
less
restrictive
existence
complex
balance
interests
persuades
us
permissive
nature
provision
coupled
application
constitutionally
permissible
way
protect
children
type
sexual
material
concerned
congress
accommodating
first
amendment
interests
served
access
requirements
served
restoring
cable
operators
degree
editorial
control
congress
removed
basic
disagreement
justice
kennedy
narrow
like
believe
must
scrutinize
section
greatest
care
like
justices
kennedy
thomas
believe
interest
protecting
children
section
purports
serve
compelling
part
company
justice
kennedy
two
issues
first
justice
kennedy
focus
categorical
analysis
forces
disregard
cable
system
operators
interests
post
hand
recognize
context
cable
broadcast
involves
access
requirement
partial
removal
unlike
cases
explicitly
required
narrow
tailoring
expressive
interests
cable
operators
play
legitimate
role
cf
turner
slip
agree
justice
thomas
everything
turns
rights
cable
owner
see
post
also
agree
justice
kennedy
must
ignore
expressive
interests
cable
operators
altogether
second
justice
kennedy
application
strict
narrow
tailoring
test
depends
upon
analogy
category
public
forum
cases
distilled
time
similarities
many
cases
rather
seeking
analogy
category
cases
however
looked
cases
said
found
pacifica
provides
closest
analogy
lends
considerable
support
conclusion
petitioners
justice
kennedy
see
post
argue
opposite
result
required
two
cases
sable
communications
fcc
case
found
unconstitutional
statute
banned
indecent
telephone
messages
turner
stated
cable
broadcast
receives
full
first
amendment
protection
see
turner
supra
slip
ban
issue
sable
however
total
governmentally
imposed
ban
category
communications
also
involved
communications
medium
telephone
service
significantly
less
likely
expose
children
banned
material
less
intrusive
allowed
significantly
control
comes
home
either
broadcasting
cable
transmission
system
us
see
distinction
turner
furthermore
cable
broadcast
television
relied
inapplicability
spectrum
scarcity
problem
cable
see
slip
distinction
relevant
turner
justification
structural
regulations
issue
must
carry
rules
little
case
involves
effects
television
viewing
children
effects
result
parents
children
view
television
programming
pervasive
intrusive
programming
respect
cable
broadcast
television
differ
little
see
supra
justice
kennedy
us
decide
common
carriage
exclusions
subject
highest
scrutiny
see
post
decide
case
basis
categories
provide
imprecise
analogies
rather
basis
contextual
assessment
consistent
first
amendment
tradition
assessing
whether
congress
carefully
appropriately
addressed
serious
problem
petitioners
also
rely
public
forum
cases
point
perry
ed
assn
perry
local
educators
case
said
public
forums
places
government
opened
use
public
place
expressive
activity
long
tradition
devoted
assembly
debate
see
also
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
ed
fund
assuming
public
forums
may
include
private
property
dedicated
public
use
add
government
enforce
exclusion
public
forum
unless
necessary
serve
compelling
state
interest
narrowly
drawn
perry
supra
argue
statute
permissive
provisions
unjustifiably
exclude
material
basis
content
public
forum
government
created
form
access
channels
justice
kennedy
adds
analogy
decision
exclude
certain
content
common
carriage
similarly
subject
strict
scrutiny
satisfy
standard
review
see
post
three
reasons
however
unnecessary
indeed
unwise
us
definitively
decide
whether
apply
public
forum
doctrine
leased
access
channels
first
may
exclusions
right
use
common
carriers
violate
first
amendment
see
post
kennedy
clear
public
forum
doctrine
imported
wholesale
area
common
carriage
regulation
discussed
wary
notion
partial
analogy
one
context
developed
doctrines
compel
full
range
decisions
new
changing
area
see
supra
second
plain
cases
public
forum
may
created
limited
purpose
perry
supra
see
also
cornelius
supra
government
required
indefinitely
retain
open
character
facility
quoting
perry
supra
cases
yet
determined
however
government
decision
dedicate
public
forum
one
type
content
another
necessarily
subject
highest
level
scrutiny
must
local
government
example
show
compelling
state
interest
builds
band
shell
park
dedicates
solely
classical
music
jazz
answer
obvious
cf
perry
supra
minimum
case
require
us
answer
finally
important
effects
congress
decision
interests
programmers
viewers
cable
operators
children
whether
characterize
congress
decision
one
limits
access
public
forum
discriminates
common
carriage
constrains
speech
content
consider
particular
limitation
indecent
television
programming
acceptable
constraint
speech
must
less
accept
limitation
places
access
claimed
public
forum
use
common
carrier
consequently
one
wishes
view
permissive
provisions
us
public
forum
lens
one
view
provisions
limiting
otherwise
totally
open
nature
forum
leased
access
channels
provide
communication
patently
offensive
sexual
account
fact
limitation
imposed
light
experience
gained
maintaining
totally
open
forum
one
must
still
ask
whether
first
amendment
forbids
limitation
unless
label
alone
make
critical
first
amendment
difference
think
features
case
already
government
interest
protecting
children
permissive
aspect
statute
nature
justify
limitation
availability
forum
finally
petitioners
argue
definition
materials
subject
challenged
provisions
vague
thereby
granting
cable
system
operators
broad
authority
cf
hoffman
estates
flipside
hoffman
estates
citing
grayned
rockford
vague
laws
may
lead
arbitrary
enforcement
dombrowski
pfister
uncertainty
may
perniciously
chill
speech
definition
however
uses
language
similar
language
previously
used
roughly
similar
purposes
provisions
augmented
fcc
regulations
permit
cable
system
operators
prohibit
programming
cable
operator
reasonably
believes
describes
depicts
sexual
excretory
activities
organs
patently
offensive
manner
measured
contemporary
community
standards
act
section
stat
whether
average
person
applying
contemporary
community
standards
find
work
taken
whole
appeals
prurient
interest
whether
work
depicts
describes
patently
offensive
way
sexual
conduct
specifically
defined
applicable
state
law
whether
work
taken
whole
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
ibid
emphasis
added
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
history
suggests
statute
language
aims
kind
programming
sponsors
oral
sex
bestiality
rape
see
cong
rec
statement
helms
scientific
educational
programs
least
unless
done
highly
unusual
lack
concern
viewer
reaction
moreover
pointed
pacifica
patently
offensive
depends
context
kind
program
appears
degree
occasional
expletive
time
broadcast
pig
offensive
parlor
barnyard
programming
two
morning
seen
basically
adult
audience
patently
offensive
must
defined
fact
mind
statute
protects
overly
broad
application
standards
insofar
permits
cable
system
operators
screen
programs
pursuant
written
published
policy
act
section
stat
cable
system
operator
find
difficult
show
leased
access
program
prohibition
reflects
rational
policy
operator
permits
similarly
offensive
programming
run
elsewhere
system
comparable
times
comparable
ways
concede
statute
protection
overly
broad
application
somewhat
diminished
fact
permits
cable
operator
ban
programming
operator
reasonably
believes
patently
offensive
ibid
emphasis
added
reasonabl
belie
qualifier
elsewhere
law
seems
designed
expand
category
law
aims
rather
provide
legal
excuse
least
one
honest
mistake
liability
might
otherwise
attach
cf
waters
churchill
slip
souter
concurring
public
employer
reasonable
belief
employee
engaged
unprotected
speech
excuses
liability
gypsum
meeting
competition
defense
antitrust
based
reasonable
belief
necessity
meet
competition
pierson
ray
police
officer
defense
constitutional
claim
officers
peace
common
law
actions
false
arrest
officer
reasonably
believed
statute
whose
violation
precipitated
arrest
valid
contours
discretion
cable
operator
much
protect
example
already
found
substantially
similar
programming
beyond
pale
patently
offensive
material
local
authority
overseeing
local
public
governmental
educational
channels
indicated
materials
type
cable
operator
decides
ban
patently
offensive
community
cable
operator
hard
pressed
claim
exclusion
material
reasonable
conclude
statute
impermissibly
vague
reasons
discussed
conclude
section
consistent
first
amendment
iii
requirements
obvious
restrictive
effects
several
delays
along
single
channel
segregation
mean
subscriber
decide
watch
single
program
without
considerable
advance
planning
without
letting
patently
offensive
channel
entirety
invade
household
days
perhaps
weeks
time
restrictions
prevent
programmers
broadcasting
viewers
select
programs
day
day
surfing
minute
minute
viewers
like
occasionally
watch
many
programs
patently
offensive
channel
viewers
simply
tend
judge
program
value
channel
reputation
company
keeps
moreover
written
notice
requirement
restrict
viewing
subscribers
fear
reputations
operator
advertently
inadvertently
disclose
list
wish
watch
patently
offensive
channel
cf
lamont
postmaster
general
finding
unconstitutional
requirement
recipients
communist
literature
notify
post
office
wish
receive
added
costs
burdens
requirements
impose
upon
cable
system
operator
may
encourage
operator
ban
programming
operator
otherwise
permit
run
even
late
night
government
argues
despite
adverse
consequences
segregate
block
requirements
lawful
least
restrictive
means
realizing
compelling
interest
namely
protecting
physical
psychological
minors
see
brief
federal
respondents
quoting
sable
adds
event
first
amendment
applied
pacifica
require
regulations
indecency
television
subject
strictest
first
amendment
standard
review
ibid
agree
government
protection
children
compelling
interest
see
supra
agree
segregate
block
requirements
properly
accommodate
speech
restrictions
impose
legitimate
objective
seek
attain
need
determine
whether
extent
pacifica
impose
lesser
standard
review
indecent
speech
issue
compare
opinion
stevens
indecent
materials
enjoy
lesser
first
amendment
protection
powell
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
refusing
accept
lesser
standard
nonobscene
indecent
material
one
examines
governmental
restriction
becomes
apparent
least
restrictive
alternative
narrowly
tailored
meet
legitimate
objective
also
seems
considerably
extensive
necessary
say
fails
satisfy
formulations
first
amendment
strictest
well
somewhat
less
strict
requirements
see
sable
compelling
interest
least
restrictive
means
requirements
applied
indecent
telephone
communications
requiring
narrowly
tailored
law
turner
slip
using
heightened
scrutiny
address
structural
regulations
cable
systems
slip
quoting
greater
essential
language
example
heightened
first
amendment
scrutiny
central
hudson
restriction
commercial
speech
extensive
necessary
florida
bar
went
slip
restriction
must
narrowly
drawn
must
reasonable
fit
objective
legitimates
speech
restriction
provision
us
reveal
caution
care
standards
underlying
various
verbal
formulas
impose
upon
laws
seek
reconcile
critically
important
interest
protecting
free
speech
important
even
compelling
interests
sometimes
warrant
restrictions
several
circumstances
lead
us
conclusion
one
thing
law
recently
amended
uses
means
protect
children
similar
patently
offensive
material
broadcast
unleased
cable
channels
broadcast
system
numerous
ordinary
public
access
channels
law
recently
amended
requires
cable
operators
scramble
block
programming
unleased
channel
primarily
dedicated
programming
telecommunications
act
section
stat
emphasis
added
addition
cable
operators
must
honor
subscriber
request
block
programs
channel
wish
subscribe
section
ibid
manufacturers
future
make
television
sets
device
able
automatically
identify
block
sexually
explicit
violent
programs
section
although
decide
whether
new
provisions
lawful
matter
us
note
significantly
less
restrictive
provision
issue
force
viewer
receive
days
weeks
time
patently
offensive
programming
none
lead
viewer
automatically
judge
reputation
many
automatically
place
occasional
viewer
name
special
list
therefore
inevitably
lead
us
ask
adequately
protect
children
patently
offensive
material
broadcast
ordinary
channels
offer
adequate
protection
similar
leased
channel
broadcasts
well
alternatively
provisions
adequately
protect
children
patently
offensive
material
broadcast
ordinary
channels
one
justify
severe
leased
channel
restrictions
given
ordinary
channel
programming
yield
little
additional
protection
children
record
answer
questions
explain
new
act
blocking
written
protects
children
exposure
regular
channels
adequately
protect
children
programming
similarly
channels
leased
explain
simple
subscriber
blocking
request
system
perhaps
based
system
adequately
protect
children
patently
offensive
material
broadcast
ordinary
channels
almost
channels
far
restrictive
system
needed
protect
children
similar
broadcasts
absence
segregation
requirement
channels
leased
indication
congress
thought
new
ordinary
channel
protections
less
adequate
answers
questions
obvious
empirical
reason
believe
example
channels
mostly
leased
channels
patently
offensive
programming
channels
found
mostly
leased
channels
contrary
parties
briefs
major
city
television
guides
provide
examples
seems
likely
programming
broadcast
kinds
channels
recognize
solicitor
general
properly
points
congress
need
deal
every
problem
cf
semler
oregon
bd
dental
examiners
legislature
need
strike
evils
time
congress
also
must
degree
leeway
tailoring
means
ends
columbia
broadcasting
light
statute
seems
fair
say
congress
tried
deal
problem
point
take
congress
different
significantly
less
restrictive
treatment
highly
similar
problem
least
indication
restrictive
means
essential
prove
helpful
cf
boos
barry
existence
less
restrictive
statute
suggested
challenged
ordinance
aimed
problem
overly
restrictive
record
description
discussion
different
lockbox
different
route
similar
conclusion
cable
communications
policy
act
required
cable
operators
provide
upon
request
subscriber
device
subscriber
prohibit
viewing
particular
cable
service
periods
selected
subscriber
section
government
sets
forth
reasons
follows
case
lockboxes
parents
discover
devices
exist
find
cable
operators
offer
sale
spend
time
money
buy
one
learn
program
lockbox
block
undesired
programs
finally
exercise
sufficient
vigilance
ensure
indeed
locked
whatever
indecent
programming
wish
children
view
brief
federal
respondents
provision
concede
short
absolute
ban
offer
certain
protection
assault
determined
child
however
generally
allowed
fact
alone
justify
reduc
ing
adult
population
fit
children
sable
quoting
bolger
youngs
drug
products
turn
quoting
butler
michigan
see
sable
supra
leaving
problem
aside
solicitor
general
list
practical
difficulties
seem
call
segregate
block
requirements
rather
informational
requirements
simple
coding
system
readily
available
blocking
equipment
perhaps
accessible
telephone
imposing
cost
burdens
upon
system
operators
may
spread
subscription
fees
perhaps
even
system
requires
lockbox
defaults
set
block
certain
channels
say
kinds
requirements
resemble
congress
recently
imposed
upon
leased
channels
reason
lockbox
description
discussion
frailties
reinforces
conclusion
leased
channel
provision
overly
restrictive
measured
benefits
likely
achieve
add
record
discussion
lockbox
explain
law
treats
leased
channels
restrictively
ordinary
channels
may
course
explanations
congress
may
simply
bothered
change
leased
channel
provisions
introduced
new
system
channels
responses
sort
like
guesses
comparative
seriousness
problem
legally
adequate
cases
record
congress
agency
provides
convincing
explanation
willing
stretch
limits
plausible
create
hypothetical
nonobvious
explanations
order
justify
laws
impose
significant
restrictions
upon
speech
see
sable
supra
congressional
record
presented
us
contains
evidence
effective
ineffective
fcc
recent
regulations
might
prove
simon
schuster
minneapolis
star
tribune
minnesota
revenue
arkansas
writers
project
ragland
consequently
find
segregate
block
restrictions
speech
narrowly
reasonably
tailored
effort
protect
children
rather
overly
restrictive
sacrific
ing
important
first
amendment
interests
speculative
gain
columbia
broadcasting
see
league
women
voters
reason
consistent
first
amendment
iv
first
historical
background
justice
kennedy
points
see
post
cable
operators
traditionally
agreed
reserve
channel
capacity
public
governmental
educational
channels
part
consideration
give
municipalities
award
cable
franchises
see
terms
preferred
justice
thomas
see
post
requirement
reserve
capacity
public
access
channels
similar
reservation
public
easement
dedication
land
streets
parks
part
municipality
approval
subdivision
land
cf
post
kennedy
significantly
channels
cable
operators
historically
exercised
editorial
control
supra
unlike
section
therefore
section
restore
cable
operators
editorial
rights
countervailing
first
amendment
interest
nonexistent
least
much
diminished
see
also
post
kennedy
second
difference
institutional
background
developed
result
historical
difference
leased
channel
made
available
operator
private
lessee
lessee
total
control
programming
leased
time
slot
see
section
public
access
channels
hand
normally
subject
complex
supervisory
systems
various
sorts
often
public
private
elements
see
section
franchising
authorities
may
require
rules
procedures
use
public
access
channel
capacity
municipalities
generally
provide
cable
franchising
agreements
access
channel
manager
commonly
nonprofit
organization
may
also
municipality
instances
cable
system
owner
see
brenner
price
myerson
cable
television
nonbroadcast
video
para
aufderheide
public
access
cable
programming
controversial
speech
free
expression
hereinafter
aufderheide
reprinted
app
surveying
communities
access
manager
nonprofit
organization
local
government
official
cable
operator
unidentified
entity
agosta
rogoff
norman
participate
report
case
study
public
access
cable
television
new
york
state
attached
exh
joint
comments
alliance
community
media
et
filed
fcc
mm
docket
materials
filed
hereinafter
fcc
record
new
york
public
access
systems
access
channels
programmed
jointly
cable
operator
another
institution
university
library
access
organization
agosta
fcc
record
comments
national
cable
television
association
fcc
record
operators
often
involvement
peg
channels
run
local
access
organizations
access
channel
activity
management
partly
financed
public
franchise
fees
payments
pursuant
franchise
agreement
general
municipal
funds
see
brenner
para
aufderheide
app
commonly
subject
supervision
local
supervisory
board
see
code
ann
section
supp
lynchburg
city
code
section
system
public
private
mixed
nonprofit
elements
supervising
boards
nonprofit
governmental
access
managers
set
programming
policy
approve
disapprove
particular
programming
services
system
police
policy
example
requiring
indemnification
programmers
certification
compliance
local
standards
time
segregation
adult
content
advisories
even
prescreening
individual
programs
see
second
report
order
fcc
rcd
para
rom
comments
received
appears
number
access
organizations
already
place
procedures
require
certification
statements
compliance
local
standards
equivalent
access
programmers
comments
boston
community
access
programming
foundation
app
aufderheide
app
comments
metropolitan
area
communications
commission
fcc
record
reply
comments
waycross
community
television
fcc
record
reply
comments
columbus
community
cable
access
app
reply
comments
city
paul
app
reply
comments
erik
mollberg
public
access
coordinator
wayne
fcc
record
comments
defiance
community
television
fcc
record
comments
nutmeg
public
access
television
fcc
record
whether
locally
accountable
bodies
prescreen
programming
promulgate
rules
use
public
access
channels
merely
available
respond
problems
arise
upshot
locally
accountable
body
capable
addressing
problem
arise
patently
offensive
programming
broadcast
children
making
unlikely
many
children
fact
exposed
programming
considered
patently
offensive
community
see
second
report
order
supra
para
third
existence
system
aimed
encouraging
securing
programming
community
considers
valuable
strongly
suggests
cable
operator
veto
less
likely
necessary
achieve
statute
basic
objective
protecting
children
similar
veto
context
leased
channels
course
system
access
managers
supervising
boards
make
mistakes
operator
might
cases
correct
veto
power
balanced
potential
benefit
however
risk
veto
may
mistaken
use
threatened
use
prevent
presentation
programming
though
borderline
patently
offensive
targeted
audience
see
aufderheide
app
describing
programs
considered
borderline
access
managers
including
sex
education
health
education
broadcasts
politically
marginal
groups
various
artistic
experiments
latter
threat
must
bulk
large
within
system
already
publicly
accountable
systems
maintaining
responsible
programs
finally
examination
legislative
history
record
us
consistent
common
sense
suggests
namely
programming
control
systems
place
normally
avoid
minimize
eliminate
problems
concerning
patently
offensive
programming
found
anecdotal
references
seem
isolated
instances
potentially
indecent
programming
may
well
occurred
leased
public
access
channels
see
cong
rec
statement
wirth
mentioning
abuses
time
warner
new
york
city
channel
see
comments
manhattan
neighborhood
network
app
new
york
access
manager
noting
leased
public
access
channels
regularly
carry
sexually
explicit
programming
new
york
commercial
programs
advertising
allowed
public
access
channels
brief
time
warner
cable
amicus
curiae
indicating
relevant
abuses
likely
occurred
leased
channels
see
also
cong
statement
fowler
describing
solicitation
prostitution
statement
helms
identifying
newspaper
headline
referring
mayor
protest
strip
act
recounting
comments
submitted
fcc
describing
three
complaints
offensive
programming
letter
mayor
rancho
palos
verdes
fcc
record
resolution
san
antonio
city
council
fcc
record
examples
necessarily
indicate
significant
nationwide
pattern
see
public
access
channels
pose
dangers
order
magnitude
identified
leased
access
channels
local
franchising
authorities
respond
problems
issuing
rules
procedures
requirements
commission
report
examples
indecent
programs
public
access
channels
see
second
report
order
fcc
rcd
see
also
comments
boston
community
access
programming
foundation
app
noting
fcc
notice
proposed
rulemaking
fcc
rcd
identify
inappropriate
programming
actually
exists
public
access
channels
moreover
comments
submitted
fcc
undermine
suggestion
prior
significant
problems
indecent
programming
public
access
channels
see
agosta
fcc
record
surveying
public
access
systems
new
york
two
years
finding
two
examples
controversial
programming
settled
producers
access
channel
reply
comments
staten
island
community
television
fcc
record
access
channels
air
since
without
single
incident
covered
section
new
law
reply
comments
waycross
community
television
fcc
record
ndecent
obscene
programs
never
cablecast
waycross
community
television
entire
ten
year
programming
history
reply
comments
cambridge
community
television
app
cambridge
less
one
hour
hours
programming
cctv
run
past
five
year
may
affected
act
ibid
cctv
feels
simply
problem
needs
fixed
reply
comments
columbus
community
cable
access
app
actv
unaware
actions
taken
cable
operators
local
law
authorizing
prohibit
legally
obscene
matter
within
last
years
reply
comments
cincinnati
community
video
years
access
operations
access
programs
cablecast
single
obscenity
violation
ever
occurred
comments
defiance
community
television
fcc
record
eight
years
operation
never
serious
problem
content
programming
channel
found
borderline
examples
people
judgment
may
differ
perhaps
acceptable
communities
others
type
petitioners
fear
law
might
prohibit
see
aufderheide
app
brief
petitioners
describing
depiction
gynecological
examination
comments
time
warner
entertainment
app
describing
austin
program
included
nude
scenes
movie
indianapolis
safe
sex
program
difficult
see
borderline
examples
show
compelling
need
nationally
protect
children
significantly
harmful
materials
compare
cong
statement
helms
justifying
regulation
leased
access
channels
terms
programming
depicts
bestiality
rape
absence
factual
basis
substantiating
harm
efficacy
proposed
cure
assume
harm
exists
regulation
redresses
see
turner
slip
op
upshot
respect
public
access
channels
law
radically
change
present
relationships
among
local
community
nonprofit
supervising
boards
access
managers
relationships
established
municipal
law
regulation
contract
significantly
restore
editorial
rights
cable
operators
greatly
increase
risk
certain
categories
programming
say
borderline
offensive
programs
appear
time
given
present
supervisory
mechanisms
need
particular
provision
aimed
directly
public
access
channels
obvious
carefully
reviewed
legislative
history
act
proceedings
fcc
record
submissions
parties
amici
conclude
government
sustain
burden
showing
section
necessary
protect
children
appropriately
tailored
secure
end
see
columbia
broadcasting
league
women
voters
sable
consequently
find
third
provision
violates
first
amendment
although
act
contains
express
severability
clause
find
act
severability
intention
structure
purpose
seems
fairly
obvious
congress
intended
permissive
leased
access
channels
provision
section
stand
irrespective
section
legal
fate
latter
provision
concerns
public
educational
governmental
channels
presence
little
effect
upon
leased
access
channels
hence
absence
respect
channels
make
significant
difference
segregate
block
requirement
invalidity
make
difference
however
effectiveness
permissive
leased
access
provision
section
together
told
cable
system
operator
either
ban
patently
offensive
program
segregate
block
without
segregate
block
provision
cable
operators
afforded
broad
discretion
patently
offensive
program
longer
bear
costs
segregation
blocking
refuse
ban
programs
cable
operators
may
choose
ban
fewer
programs
nonetheless
difference
make
two
provisions
unseverable
without
segregate
block
provision
law
simply
treats
leased
channels
respect
patently
offensive
programming
treats
channels
judging
absence
similar
provisions
context
channels
congress
probably
thought
section
standing
alone
effective
though
perhaps
effective
means
pursuing
objective
moreover
find
reason
light
congress
basic
objective
protection
children
congress
preferred
provisions
permissive
provision
standing
provision
capable
functioning
still
helps
achieve
basic
objective
consequently
believe
valid
provision
severable
others
vi
ordered
justice
stevens
concurring
difference
section
section
difference
permit
prohibition
former
restores
freedom
cable
operators
reject
indecent
programs
latter
requires
local
franchising
authorities
reject
programs
join
opinion
add
comments
emphasize
difference
two
provisions
endorse
analysis
part
justice
kennedy
opinion
even
though
think
necessary
characterize
public
access
channels
public
fora
like
justice
souter
convinced
unwise
take
categorical
approach
resolution
novel
first
amendment
questions
arising
industry
dynamic
cf
paul
stevens
concurring
judgment
federal
government
established
leased
access
requirements
ensure
certain
programmers
channels
available
section
therefore
best
understood
limitation
amount
speech
federal
government
spared
censorial
control
cable
operator
rather
direct
prohibition
communication
speech
absence
federal
intervention
flow
freely
agree
however
section
established
public
forum
unlike
sidewalks
parks
federal
government
created
leased
access
channels
course
legitimate
regulation
communications
industry
establish
entirely
open
forum
rather
restricted
access
certain
speakers
namely
unaffiliated
programmers
able
lease
air
time
facilitating
certain
speech
cable
operators
otherwise
carry
leased
access
channels
operate
like
rules
considered
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
slip
without
reference
public
forum
precedents
federal
government
opens
cable
channels
otherwise
left
entirely
private
hands
deserves
deference
rigid
application
public
forum
doctrine
allow
early
stage
regulation
developing
industry
congress
put
choice
deciding
whether
open
certain
cable
channels
programmers
otherwise
lack
resources
participate
marketplace
ideas
congress
may
legitimately
limit
access
channels
unaffiliated
programmers
believe
may
also
limit
within
certain
reasonable
bounds
extent
access
confers
upon
programmers
government
reasonable
basis
concluding
already
enough
classical
musical
programs
cartoons
perhaps
even
enough
political
find
first
amendment
objection
open
access
requirement
extended
impartial
basis
particular
subjects
contrary
conclusion
first
amendment
values
dissuading
government
creating
access
rights
altogether
course
fact
federal
government
may
entitled
deference
regulating
access
cable
programmers
mean
may
evade
first
amendment
constraints
selectively
choosing
speech
excepted
private
control
government
spared
speech
communicated
republicans
control
cable
operator
example
first
amendment
violation
plain
see
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
subtle
limitations
access
also
may
prohibited
first
amendment
see
southeastern
promotions
conrad
douglas
dissenting
part
concurring
result
part
even
though
often
difficult
determine
whether
given
access
restriction
impermissibly
singles
certain
ideas
repression
case
find
basis
concluding
section
species
viewpoint
discrimination
returning
control
indecent
programming
cable
operator
section
treats
indecent
programming
access
channels
differently
indecent
programming
regular
channels
decision
permit
operator
determine
whether
show
indecent
programming
access
channels
therefore
said
reflect
governmental
bias
indecent
programming
appears
access
channels
particular
argued
indecent
programming
outlet
leased
access
channels
thus
exclusion
speech
special
protection
designed
prohibit
communication
altogether
petitioners
impliedly
concede
point
contend
indecency
restrictions
arbitrarily
underinclusive
affect
similarly
indecent
programming
appears
regular
criteria
section
identifies
limiting
access
fully
consistent
government
contention
speech
restrictions
designed
suppress
certain
form
expression
government
dislikes
ante
kennedy
concurring
part
dissenting
part
rather
protect
children
sexually
explicit
programming
pervasive
medium
cases
concluded
justification
legitimate
sable
communications
fcc
fcc
pacifica
foundation
reason
conclude
otherwise
finally
section
assailed
somewhat
broader
ground
nevertheless
reduces
programming
available
adult
population
suitable
children
butler
michigan
ante
kennedy
concurring
part
dissenting
part
section
serves
ensure
newly
created
access
right
require
operators
expose
children
unsuitable
communications
otherwise
case
thus
far
different
purpose
effect
provision
issue
butler
criminalized
sale
certain
books
butler
michigan
sum
section
constitutes
reasonable
viewpoint
neutral
limitation
access
right
certain
cable
programmers
accordingly
affirm
judgment
appeals
provision
ii
name
reflects
peg
channels
subject
variety
local
governmental
controls
regulations
federal
result
either
prohibition
requirement
certain
types
programs
carried
ante
opinion
breyer
presumably
justice
breyer
explains
local
authorities
seldom
permit
programming
type
described
critical
importance
however
left
devices
authorities
may
choose
carry
programming
federal
government
decided
restrict
governments
making
choice
inject
federally
authorized
private
censors
forums
might
otherwise
excluded
therefore
limit
local
forums
might
otherwise
open
constitutionally
protected
speech
absence
federal
intervention
might
flow
freely
federal
government
therefore
entitled
leeway
believe
deserves
enacts
provisions
section
define
limits
federally
created
access
rights
see
supra
federal
government
entitlement
restrict
power
local
authority
disseminate
materials
channels
creation
restrict
power
cable
operators
channels
respect
agree
entirely
justice
kennedy
save
designation
channels
public
fora
say
federal
government
may
impose
restrictions
dissemination
indecent
materials
cable
television
although
indecent
speech
protected
first
amendment
government
may
compelling
interest
protecting
children
indecent
speech
pervasive
medium
sable
communications
fcc
fcc
pacifica
foundation
government
acts
suppress
directly
dissemination
speech
however
may
rely
solely
speculation
conjecture
see
sable
communications
fcc
justice
breyer
persuasively
demonstrates
government
made
effort
identify
harm
caused
permitting
local
franchising
authorities
determine
quantum
indecent
speech
may
aired
communities
ante
government
attempted
determine
whether
intervention
discretionary
censorial
authority
private
cable
operator
constitutes
appropriately
limited
means
addressing
harm
ibid
given
direct
nature
restriction
speech
justification
accordingly
agree
judgment
appeals
respect
section
reversed
justice
souter
concurring
justice
kennedy
separate
opinion
stresses
worthy
point
first
amendment
values
generally
categorizing
speech
protection
according
respective
characters
expression
context
restriction
issue
reviewing
speech
regulations
fairly
strict
categorical
rules
keeps
starch
standards
moments
daily
politics
cries
loudest
limiting
may
said
justice
kennedy
sees
warrant
case
anything
categorical
approach
applying
fixed
level
scrutiny
strictest
judge
provisions
section
accordingly
faults
plurality
opinion
declining
decide
precise
doctrinal
categories
govern
issue
hand
value
categorical
approach
generally
first
amendment
security
prompts
word
explain
join
unwillingness
announce
definitive
categorical
analysis
case
neither
speech
limitation
issue
may
categorized
simply
content
prior
case
nearly
point
dealt
flat
restriction
covering
separate
category
indecency
first
amendment
periphery
less
total
ban
directed
instances
indecent
speech
easily
available
children
broadcasts
readily
received
household
difficult
impossible
control
without
immediate
supervision
see
fcc
pacifica
foundation
plurality
opinion
characteristic
speech
capacity
offend
social
value
vary
circumstances
surprising
contextually
complex
category
expressly
assigned
standard
level
scrutiny
reviewing
government
limitation
issue
fact
deal
case
cable
transmission
necessarily
suggest
simple
category
subject
standard
level
scrutiny
recognized
point
found
cable
television
different
broadcast
respect
factors
justifying
intrusive
access
requirements
rule
red
lion
see
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
slip
finding
red
lion
spectrum
scarcity
rationale
application
cable
today
plurality
opinion
rightly
observes
characteristics
broadcast
radio
rendered
indecency
particularly
threatening
pacifica
intrusion
house
accessibility
children
also
present
case
cable
television
ante
seem
appropriate
category
cable
indecency
contextually
detailed
pacifica
example
settling
upon
definitive
rule
review
complex
category
require
subtle
judgment
even
considered
enough
demand
subtlety
tantamount
prescience
relevant
characteristics
cable
presently
state
technological
regulatory
flux
recent
legislation
affects
technical
feasibility
parental
control
children
access
undesirable
material
see
telecommunications
act
section
pub
stat
provision
block
sexually
explicit
violent
programs
portends
fundamental
changes
competitive
structure
industry
therefore
ability
individual
entities
act
bottlenecks
free
flow
information
see
title
iii
stat
promoting
competition
cable
services
cable
telephone
companies
begin
competition
control
single
wire
carry
services
hardly
settle
rules
review
regulation
assumption
cable
remain
separable
useful
category
first
amendment
scrutiny
broadcast
cable
internet
world
wide
web
approach
day
using
common
receiver
hardly
assume
standards
judging
regulation
one
immense
unknown
unknowable
effects
others
accordingly
charting
course
permit
reasonable
regulation
light
values
competition
accept
likelihood
media
communication
become
less
categorical
protean
confident
purposes
judging
speech
restrictions
continue
make
sense
distinguish
cable
technologies
know
changes
regulated
technologies
enormously
alter
structure
regulation
shy
saying
final
word
today
accepted
reasonable
tomorrow
ignorance
accept
real
possibility
decide
today
first
amendment
mean
cyberspace
get
fundamentally
wrong
lessig
path
cyberlaw
yale
upshot
appreciating
fluidity
subject
congress
must
regulate
simply
accept
fact
every
nuance
old
standards
necessarily
new
technology
proper
choice
among
existing
doctrinal
categories
obvious
rather
definitively
settling
issue
justice
breyer
wisely
reasons
direct
analogy
rather
rule
concluding
speech
restriction
issue
case
may
usefully
measured
ones
issue
pacifica
means
take
time
reaching
final
method
review
cases
like
one
may
consolation
recalling
years
passed
roth
miller
california
modern
obscenity
rule
jelled
took
years
hague
cio
perry
ed
assn
perry
local
educators
public
forum
category
settle
round
passed
clear
present
danger
schenck
evolved
modern
incitement
rule
brandenburg
ohio
guess
much
time
go
technologies
communication
us
today
matured
relationships
become
known
category
indecency
defined
reference
new
technology
prospect
durability
job
courts
justice
breyer
today
recognizing
established
first
amendment
interests
close
analysis
constrains
congress
without
wholly
incapacitating
matters
significance
apparent
maintaining
high
value
open
communication
measuring
costs
regulation
exact
attention
fact
compiling
pedigree
experience
changing
subject
familiar
judicial
responsibilities
times
know
little
risk
finality
precision
attention
probably
take
us
communications
revolution
maybe
judicial
obligation
shoulder
responsibilities
captured
much
older
rule
familiar
every
doctor
medicine
first
harm
justice
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
section
constitutional
section
unconstitutional
join
parts
ii
iii
judgment
part
persuaded
however
asserted
important
differences
section
ante
sufficient
justify
striking
section
find
features
shared
section
covers
leased
access
channels
section
covers
public
access
channels
significant
differences
reason
find
section
withstands
constitutional
scrutiny
section
serve
important
governmental
interest
compelling
interest
protecting
children
exposure
indecent
material
see
sable
communications
cal
fcc
ginsberg
new
york
cable
television
like
broadcast
television
medium
uniquely
accessible
children
see
ante
course
children
equally
easy
access
public
access
channels
leased
access
channels
permitting
cable
operator
prevent
transmission
patently
offensive
programming
section
interest
protecting
children
furthermore
provisions
permissive
neither
presents
outright
ban
category
speech
struck
sable
communications
cal
fcc
supra
sections
leave
cable
operator
decision
whether
broadcast
indecent
programming
therefore
less
restrictive
absolute
governmental
ban
certainly
section
restrictive
section
regard
also
significant
neither
section
restriction
upheld
fcc
pacifica
foundation
agree
justice
breyer
yet
undertake
fully
adapt
first
amendment
doctrine
new
context
confront
refrain
precedent
established
pacifica
offers
important
guide
section
less
section
within
range
acceptability
set
pacifica
see
ante
distinctions
upon
relies
deciding
view
constitutionally
significant
much
emphasis
placed
differences
origins
leased
access
public
access
channels
sure
leased
access
channels
covered
section
product
federal
government
public
access
channels
municipalities
see
ante
persuaded
difference
origin
access
channels
sufficient
justify
upholding
section
striking
section
interest
protecting
children
remains
whether
leased
access
channel
public
access
channel
allowing
cable
operator
option
prohibiting
transmission
indecent
speech
seems
constitutionally
permissible
means
addressing
interest
fact
public
access
programming
may
subject
supervisory
systems
addition
cable
operator
see
ante
sufficient
mind
render
section
goal
compelling
interest
precedent
hold
section
like
section
constitutional
justice
kennedy
justice
ginsburg
joins
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
plurality
opinion
insofar
upholds
section
cable
act
adrift
opinion
treats
concepts
public
forum
broadcaster
common
carrier
mere
labels
rather
categories
settled
legal
significance
applies
standard
omission
loses
sight
existing
first
amendment
doctrine
confronted
threat
free
speech
context
emerging
technology
discipline
analyze
case
reference
existing
elaborations
constant
first
amendment
principles
essence
approach
ensuring
protection
speech
first
amendment
even
novel
settings
rather
undertake
task
however
plurality
declares
things
considered
section
seems
fine
think
implications
past
cases
one
clearer
plurality
suggests
require
us
hold
section
invalid
though
join
part
iii
opinion
striking
section
act
concur
judgment
remainder
though
two
provisions
differ
significant
respects
common
flaws
instances
congress
singles
one
sort
speech
vulnerability
private
censorship
context
discrimination
otherwise
permitted
plurality
least
recognizes
state
action
ante
avoiding
mistake
made
appeals
alliance
community
media
fcc
state
action
lies
enactment
statute
altering
legal
relations
persons
including
selective
withdrawal
one
group
legal
protections
private
acts
regardless
whether
private
acts
attributable
state
cf
hunter
erickson
state
action
fourteenth
amendment
plurality
balks
taking
next
step
however
advise
us
standard
applies
determine
whether
state
action
conforms
first
amendment
sections
disadvantage
nonobscene
indecent
programming
protected
category
expression
sable
communications
fcc
basis
content
constitution
general
tolerate
restriction
discrimination
speech
paul
regulations
presumptively
invalid
carey
brown
police
dept
chicago
mosley
realm
speech
expression
first
amendment
envisions
citizen
shaping
government
reverse
removes
governmental
restraints
arena
public
discussion
putting
decision
views
shall
voiced
largely
hands
us
hope
use
freedom
ultimately
produce
capable
citizenry
perfect
polity
cohen
california
ach
person
decide
ideas
beliefs
deserving
expression
consideration
adherence
political
system
cultural
life
rest
upon
ideal
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
slip
therefore
given
exacting
scrutiny
regulations
suppress
disadvantage
impose
differential
burdens
upon
speech
content
slip
sections
unusual
require
direct
action
speech
authorize
cable
operator
deny
use
property
certain
forms
speech
general
matter
private
person
may
exclude
certain
speakers
property
without
violating
first
amendment
hudgens
nlrb
section
affirmations
principle
might
unremarkable
access
channels
however
property
cable
operator
dedicated
otherwise
reserved
programming
speakers
government
public
access
channel
public
forum
laws
requiring
leased
access
channels
create
common
carrier
obligations
government
identifies
certain
speech
basis
content
vulnerable
exclusion
common
carrier
public
forum
strict
scrutiny
applies
laws
survive
exacting
review
however
compelling
congress
interest
shielding
children
indecent
programming
provisions
case
drawn
enough
care
withstand
scrutiny
precedents
ii
plurality
begins
flight
standards
number
assertions
nobody
disputes
agree
course
unwise
declare
rigid
single
standard
good
future
media
purposes
ante
think
necessary
however
decide
standard
applies
discrimination
indecent
programming
cable
access
channels
present
state
industry
owe
least
much
public
leased
access
programmers
whose
speech
put
risk
nationwide
laws
similar
vein
admonished
case
complicated
simple
importance
contextual
review
told
evaded
recourse
simple
analogies
ante
true
use
standard
foreclose
consideration
context
indeed
strict
scrutiny
instance
judicial
formulae
rigid
become
straitjacket
disables
government
responding
serious
problems
ante
grave
indictment
first
amendment
jurisprudence
relies
strict
scrutiny
number
settings
context
important
expressed
misgivings
judicial
balancing
first
amendment
see
burson
freeman
concurring
opinion
simon
schuster
members
state
crime
victims
opinion
concurring
judgment
strict
scrutiny
least
confines
balancing
process
manner
protective
speech
disable
government
addressing
serious
problems
ensure
solutions
sacrifice
speech
greater
extent
necessary
plurality
claims
resistance
standards
keeping
case
law
shown
willingness
flexible
confronting
novel
first
amendment
problems
cases
cites
ante
however
demonstrate
opposite
plurality
supposes
developed
specialized
less
stringent
standards
certain
contexts
demanded
avoid
use
standards
altogether
indeed
creation
standards
adherence
even
means
affording
protection
speech
unpopular
distasteful
central
achievement
first
amendment
jurisprudence
standards
means
state
advance
test
law
validity
rather
letting
height
bar
determined
apparent
exigencies
day
also
provide
notice
fair
warning
must
predict
courts
respond
attempts
suppress
speech
yet
formulations
like
strict
scrutiny
used
number
constitutional
settings
ensure
inequities
moment
subordinated
commitments
made
long
run
see
simon
schuster
supra
perry
ed
assn
perry
local
educators
mean
little
watered
whenever
seem
strong
mean
still
less
ignored
altogether
considering
case
fours
seen
plurality
seems
distracted
many
changes
technology
competition
cable
industry
see
ante
ante
souter
concurring
laws
challenged
however
retool
structure
cable
industry
exception
section
involve
intricate
technologies
straightforward
issue
whether
government
deprive
certain
speakers
basis
content
speech
protections
afforded
others
reason
discard
existing
first
amendment
jurisprudence
answering
question
protests
standards
plurality
seem
favor
one
formulation
question
case
namely
whether
act
properly
addresses
extremely
important
problem
without
imposing
light
relevant
interests
unnecessarily
great
restriction
speech
ante
though
plurality
frowns
effort
settle
form
words
likes
formulation
well
enough
repeat
see
ante
description
question
accomplishes
little
save
clutter
first
amendment
case
law
adding
untested
rule
uncertain
relationship
others
use
evaluate
laws
restricting
speech
plurality
bring
apply
strict
scrutiny
yet
realizes
decide
case
without
uttering
sort
standard
settled
synonyms
lose
judicial
scrutiny
ante
substituted
strict
scrutiny
extremely
important
problem
ante
extraordinary
proble
ante
substituted
compelling
interest
admonition
restriction
unnecessarily
great
light
interest
serves
ante
substituted
usual
narrow
tailoring
requirements
know
substitutes
inferior
antecedents
told
act
must
appropriately
tailored
ante
sufficiently
tailored
ante
carefully
appropriately
addressed
ante
problems
evidently
except
narrowly
tailored
restatements
unfortunate
consequences
first
make
principles
intended
protect
speech
easy
manipulate
words
end
legalistic
cover
ad
hoc
balancing
interests
respect
plurality
succeeds
avoiding
use
standard
second
plurality
exercise
pushing
around
synonyms
words
usual
standards
sow
confusion
courts
bound
precedents
courts
lawyers
communications
field
discern
difference
formulation
plurality
applies
today
usual
strict
scrutiny
offer
little
guidance
except
note
unprotective
outcome
plurality
reaches
comparisons
analogies
areas
first
amendment
case
law
become
responsibility
rather
luxury
plurality
considers
comparisons
provide
discipline
guidance
others
give
clear
content
things
find
missing
plurality
opinion
novelty
complexity
case
reason
look
help
areas
first
amendment
jurisprudence
license
wander
uncharted
areas
law
compass
opinions
good
policy
another
troubling
aspect
plurality
approach
suggestion
congress
leeway
usual
enact
restrictions
speech
emerging
technologies
concerned
unsure
standard
used
assess
justice
souter
recommends
precept
first
harm
ante
question
though
whether
harm
sustaining
law
striking
plurality
concerned
technology
direction
begin
allowing
speech
suppressing
us
urgent
claim
relief
discrimination
dry
run
turn
issues
presented
explain
strict
scrutiny
warranted
iii
peg
access
channels
grew
local
initiatives
late
early
federal
government
began
regulating
cable
television
mueller
local
franchising
first
form
cable
regulation
arising
need
localities
control
access
public
easements
minimize
disruption
traffic
public
activity
laying
cable
lines
see
brenner
price
meyerson
cable
television
nonbroadcast
video
section
hereinafter
brenner
turner
broadcasting
supra
slip
cable
medium
may
depend
existence
upon
express
permission
local
governing
authorities
local
government
set
franchise
authority
oversee
cable
system
negotiate
franchise
agreement
specifying
cable
operator
rights
obligations
see
brenner
section
section
discussing
local
franchising
displaced
state
regulation
cf
section
defining
franchise
authority
franchise
mandatory
federal
law
except
systems
operating
without
prior
section
authorization
akin
license
franchise
authority
permitting
construction
operation
cable
system
section
early
onward
franchise
authorities
began
requiring
operators
set
aside
access
channels
condition
franchise
see
mueller
agosta
rogoff
norman
participate
report
case
study
public
access
cable
television
new
york
state
hereinafter
agosta
attached
exhibit
joint
comments
alliance
community
media
et
filed
fcc
mm
docket
fcc
entered
arena
requiring
cable
companies
servicing
country
largest
television
markets
set
aside
four
access
channels
one
public
educational
governmental
leased
programming
date
certain
add
channel
capacity
necessary
meet
requirement
cable
television
report
order
see
also
amendment
part
commission
rules
regulations
concerning
cable
television
channel
capacity
access
channel
requirements
section
modifying
rules
struck
access
rules
beyond
fcc
authority
communications
act
fcc
midwest
video
congress
turned
attention
peg
access
channels
recognized
reasonable
access
cable
systems
mean
wide
diversity
information
sources
fundamental
goal
first
need
regulate
content
programming
provided
cable
declined
however
set
new
federal
mandates
authorize
fcc
since
lmost
recent
franchise
agreements
provide
access
local
governments
schools
nonprofit
community
groups
channels
act
instead
continue
policy
allowing
cities
specify
cable
franchises
channel
capacity
facilities
devoted
use
ibid
section
communications
act
added
cable
communications
policy
act
act
authorized
local
franchise
authorities
require
cable
operators
set
aside
channel
capacity
peg
access
seeking
new
franchises
renewal
old
ones
section
franchise
authorities
may
enforce
franchise
agreements
section
lack
power
impose
requirements
beyond
authorized
federal
law
section
cf
section
grandfathering
valid
franchise
agreements
remainder
term
federal
law
also
allows
franchise
authority
require
adequate
assurance
cable
operator
provide
adequate
public
educational
governmental
access
channel
capacity
facilities
financial
support
section
prior
passage
section
act
cable
operator
save
implementing
provisions
franchise
agreement
limiting
obscene
otherwise
constitutionally
unprotected
cable
programming
section
forbidden
editorial
control
peg
access
channels
section
congress
act
since
defined
public
educational
governmental
access
means
placed
substantive
limits
types
programming
channels
tasks
left
franchise
agreements
long
channels
comport
sense
industry
practice
congress
referred
statute
principal
concern
public
access
channels
peg
channels
open
programming
members
public
petitioners
include
public
access
programmers
viewers
watch
shows
contrast
educational
governmental
access
channels
peg
serve
speakers
many
franchises
educational
channels
controlled
local
school
systems
use
provide
school
information
educational
programs
governmental
access
channels
committed
cable
franchise
local
municipal
government
uses
distribute
information
constituents
public
affairs
mueller
local
governmental
entity
school
system
petitioned
relief
case
none
petitioners
viewers
asserted
interest
viewing
educational
governmental
programming
briefed
relevant
issues
public
access
channels
meet
definition
public
forum
recognized
two
kinds
public
forums
first
familiar
traditional
public
forums
like
streets
sidewalks
parks
custom
long
open
public
assembly
discourse
perry
hague
cio
opinion
roberts
second
category
public
property
designated
public
forum
whether
limited
unlimited
state
opened
expressive
activity
part
public
international
soc
krishna
consciousness
lee
public
access
channels
fall
second
category
required
franchise
authority
condition
franchise
open
comers
designated
public
forum
unlimited
character
house
report
cable
act
consistent
view
characterized
public
access
channels
video
equivalent
speaker
soapbox
electronic
parallel
printed
leaflet
provide
groups
individuals
generally
access
electronic
media
opportunity
become
sources
information
electronic
marketplace
ideas
public
forums
physical
gathering
places
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
slip
limited
property
owned
government
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
ed
fund
indeed
majority
jurisdictions
title
traditional
public
forums
streets
sidewalks
remains
private
hands
mcquillin
law
municipal
corporations
section
ed
hague
cio
supra
wherever
title
streets
parks
may
rest
immemorially
held
trust
use
public
time
mind
used
purposes
assembly
communicating
thoughts
citizens
discussing
public
questions
public
access
channels
analogous
public
forums
even
though
operate
property
cable
operator
holds
title
important
understand
public
access
channels
public
forums
created
local
state
governments
cable
franchise
section
section
appeals
thought
return
rightful
first
amendment
discretion
cable
operator
see
alliance
community
media
cable
operators
first
amendment
rights
course
restrictions
entry
cable
business
may
challenged
first
amendment
los
angeles
preferred
communications
cable
operator
activities
originating
programs
exercising
editorial
discretion
programs
others
provide
system
also
protected
turner
broadcasting
slip
cf
slip
distinguishing
discretion
cable
operators
newspaper
editors
yet
editorial
discretion
cable
operator
function
cable
franchise
receives
local
government
operator
right
exercise
editorial
discretion
cable
service
disappears
franchise
terminated
see
section
cable
service
may
offered
without
franchise
section
prescribing
procedures
standards
renewal
cf
brenner
section
franchise
terms
years
norm
section
typical
franchise
agreements
recognize
absolute
right
franchisor
refuse
renewal
expiration
term
franchise
transferred
another
right
editorial
discretion
cable
operator
may
cables
transmitting
signal
agreement
cable
operator
local
allocates
channels
full
discretion
cable
operator
reserving
others
public
access
providing
public
access
channels
franchise
agreements
cable
operators
therefore
exercising
first
amendment
rights
serve
conduits
speech
others
cf
pruneyard
shopping
center
robins
section
channels
cable
operator
discretion
never
existed
vests
cable
operator
power
federal
law
defined
reference
content
speech
override
franchise
agreement
undercut
public
forum
agreement
creates
enacting
law
excluding
indecent
programming
protection
retaining
prohibition
cable
operators
editorial
control
protected
speech
federal
government
time
ratified
character
public
access
channels
discriminated
certain
speech
based
content
plurality
refuses
analyze
public
access
channels
public
forums
reluctant
decide
extent
private
property
designated
public
forum
ante
need
decide
broad
issue
whether
private
property
declared
public
forum
simple
governmental
decree
happens
creation
public
access
channels
rather
return
granting
cable
operators
easements
use
public
cable
lines
local
governments
bargained
right
use
cable
lines
public
access
channels
justice
thomas
resists
analysis
sees
evidence
formal
easement
post
general
principles
property
law
particular
formalities
necessary
create
easement
easements
may
created
contract
thompson
commentaries
modern
law
real
property
section
tiffany
law
real
property
section
ed
franchise
agreement
contract
agreements
cable
operator
surrenders
power
exclude
certain
programmers
use
property
specific
purposes
state
confronted
issue
likely
hold
franchise
agreement
create
right
access
equivalent
easement
land
one
even
view
case
local
government
dedication
property
interest
speech
members
public
event
seems
clear
local
government
contracts
use
private
property
public
expressive
activity
creates
public
forum
treating
access
channels
public
forums
place
label
plurality
suggests
see
ante
defines
first
amendment
rights
speakers
seeking
use
channels
property
dedicated
public
expressive
activities
tradition
government
designation
access
protected
first
amendment
regulations
speech
content
designated
public
forum
whether
limited
unlimited
character
subject
highest
scrutiny
survive
narrowly
drawn
achieve
compelling
state
interest
lee
unless
reasons
applying
lesser
standard
section
must
satisfy
stringent
review
congress
created
leased
access
channels
cable
act
section
act
amended
requires
cable
system
channels
set
aside
certain
percentage
channels
depending
size
system
commercial
use
persons
unaffiliated
operator
section
commercial
use
means
provision
video
programming
whether
profit
section
unaffiliated
programmer
seeks
access
cable
operator
shall
set
price
terms
conditions
use
least
sufficient
assure
use
adversely
affect
operation
financial
condition
market
development
cable
system
section
cf
cfr
section
rules
governing
terms
conditions
leased
access
price
may
exceed
maximum
charged
unaffiliated
programmer
program
category
use
channels
section
aggrieved
programmers
recourse
federal
district
fcc
repeated
violations
compel
access
appropriate
terms
section
cable
operators
forbidden
editorial
control
video
programming
leased
access
channels
consider
content
programming
except
set
price
section
prohibiting
programs
obscene
otherwise
unprotected
constitution
leased
access
channels
section
act
modifies
rule
allowing
cable
operators
reject
pursuant
written
published
policy
programs
reasonably
believe
indecent
section
section
act
indecent
programming
must
segregated
onto
one
channel
blocked
unless
subscriber
requests
channel
provided
section
cfr
section
two
distinctions
public
leased
access
channels
important
first
whereas
public
access
channels
required
state
local
franchise
authorities
subject
certain
federal
limitations
leased
access
channels
created
federal
law
second
whereas
cable
operators
never
editorial
discretion
public
access
channels
franchise
agreements
leased
access
provisions
act
take
away
channels
operator
controlled
cf
midwest
video
federal
mandates
compelling
cable
operators
indiscriminately
accept
access
programming
interfere
determinations
regarding
total
service
offering
extended
subscribers
sense
section
gives
back
operator
discretion
congress
imposed
leased
access
requirements
first
place
constitutionality
turner
broadcasting
slip
requiring
cable
operator
set
aside
leased
access
channels
us
purposes
case
treat
cable
operator
rights
channels
extinguished
address
issue
petitioners
present
namely
whether
government
discriminate
basis
content
affording
protection
certain
programmers
agree
justice
thomas
post
cable
operator
rights
inform
analysis
laws
requiring
cable
operators
provide
leased
access
practical
equivalent
making
common
carriers
analogous
respect
telephone
companies
obliged
provide
conduit
speech
others
plurality
resists
classification
leased
access
channels
created
act
common
carrier
provision
ante
although
described
terms
access
including
leased
access
rules
promulgated
fcc
access
rules
plainly
impose
obligations
cable
operators
rules
cable
systems
required
hold
dedicated
channels
nondiscriminatory
basis
operators
prohibited
determining
influencing
content
access
programming
rules
delimit
operators
may
charge
access
use
equipment
midwest
video
supra
citations
footnotes
omitted
section
authorizes
cable
operators
ban
indecent
programming
leased
access
channels
held
law
precluding
common
carrier
transmitting
protected
speech
subject
strict
scrutiny
sable
communications
striking
ban
indecent
telephonic
communications
occasion
consider
standard
reviewing
law
section
permitting
carrier
discretion
exclude
specified
speech
laws
removing
protection
single
form
speech
based
content
reviewed
standard
restrictions
speech
public
forum
making
cable
operator
common
carrier
create
public
forum
sense
taking
property
private
control
dedicating
public
use
rather
regulations
common
carrier
dictate
manner
private
control
exercised
mandate
nonetheless
serves
function
public
forum
ensures
open
nondiscriminatory
access
means
communication
purpose
evident
statute
committee
findings
supporting
congress
described
leased
access
requirements
intended
promote
competition
delivery
diverse
sources
video
programming
assure
widest
possible
diversity
information
sources
made
available
public
cable
systems
manner
consistent
growth
development
cable
systems
section
house
committee
reporting
cable
bill
acknowledged
general
market
demand
prompt
cable
operators
provide
diverse
programming
recognized
though
incentives
cable
operators
might
exclude
programming
represents
social
political
viewpoint
cable
operator
wish
disseminate
competes
program
service
already
provided
cable
system
view
leased
access
provisions
narrowly
drawn
structural
regulations
private
industry
cf
associated
press
enhance
free
flow
diversity
information
available
public
without
governmental
intrusion
decisions
program
content
supra
functional
equivalence
designating
public
forum
mandating
common
carriage
suggests
scrutiny
applied
attempts
either
setting
impose
content
discrimination
law
precedents
scrutiny
strict
constitution
forbids
state
enforce
certain
exclusions
forum
generally
open
public
even
required
create
forum
first
place
widmar
vincent
university
meeting
facilities
city
madison
joint
school
district
wisconsin
employment
relations
school
board
meeting
southeastern
promotions
conrad
municipal
theater
although
state
required
indefinitely
retain
open
character
facility
long
bound
standards
apply
traditional
public
forum
reasonable
time
place
manner
regulations
permissible
prohibition
must
narrowly
drawn
effectuate
compelling
state
interest
perry
forum
opened
assembly
speaking
groups
government
may
prohibit
others
assembling
speaking
basis
intend
say
selective
exclusions
public
forum
may
based
content
alone
may
justified
reference
content
alone
ibid
plurality
acknowledges
exclusions
right
use
common
carrier
violate
first
amendment
tells
us
however
wary
analogies
doctrines
developed
elsewhere
address
issue
ante
newfound
aversion
analogical
reasoning
strikes
process
basic
legal
analysis
see
levi
introduction
legal
reasoning
suggesting
plurality
look
far
afield
areas
law
settled
first
amendment
doctrines
dealing
state
action
depriving
certain
speakers
protections
afforded
others
events
plurality
unwillingness
consider
precedents
relieve
burden
explaining
strict
scrutiny
apply
except
instances
involving
categories
proscribable
speech
see
strict
scrutiny
baseline
rule
reviewing
discrimination
speech
purpose
forum
analysis
determine
whether
property
medium
speech
takes
place
dispensation
rule
see
consolidated
edison
public
service
context
government
property
recognized
exception
government
acting
proprietor
managing
internal
operations
rather
acting
lawmaker
power
regulate
license
circumstances
said
regulations
speech
need
reasonable
lee
course
government
dedicated
cable
operator
property
leased
access
serve
proprietary
function
done
provide
forum
vital
class
programmers
otherwise
excluded
cable
television
question
remains
whether
dispensation
strict
scrutiny
might
appropriate
section
restores
part
editorial
discretion
exercised
cable
operator
speech
occurring
property
doctrine
gives
guidance
requirements
leased
access
little
different
function
designated
public
forums
different
standard
review
apply
functional
equivalence
leased
access
channels
designated
public
forums
compels
strict
scrutiny
rather
simply
militates
recognizing
exception
normal
rule
perhaps
plurality
suggests
ante
section
treated
limitation
forum
rather
exclusion
change
analysis
however
government
freer
hand
draw
distinctions
limiting
forum
excluding
someone
first
amendment
dead
letter
designated
public
forums
every
exclusion
recast
limitation
see
post
governance
management
history
theory
public
forum
ucla
rev
allowed
limitations
public
forums
necessary
serve
specific
institutional
ends
see
perry
school
mailboxes
considered
designated
public
forums
limited
mailings
organizations
engage
activities
interest
educational
relevance
students
widmar
vincent
recognizing
public
university
limit
use
facilities
reasonable
regulations
compatible
mission
education
madison
joint
school
district
wisconsin
employment
relations
assessing
teacher
right
speak
school
board
meeting
considering
obvious
public
bodies
may
confine
meetings
specified
subject
matter
power
limit
redefine
forums
specific
legitimate
purpose
see
rosenberger
slip
allow
government
exclude
certain
speech
speakers
reason
madison
joint
school
district
supra
illustrates
point
wisconsin
employment
relations
commission
ordered
school
board
prohibit
school
employees
union
representatives
speaking
meetings
matters
subject
collective
bargaining
board
union
recognizing
power
state
limit
school
board
meetings
certain
subject
matter
held
confine
forum
one
category
interested
individuals
exclusion
skew
debate
deprive
decisionmakers
benefit
voices
answer
say
congress
create
access
channels
may
limit
access
pleases
whether
government
obligation
make
railroads
common
carriers
equal
protection
clause
define
common
carriage
ways
discriminate
suspect
classes
see
bailey
patterson
per
curiam
may
require
railroads
segregate
races
reason
even
congress
obligation
impose
common
carriage
rules
cable
operators
retain
forever
liberty
exclude
certain
forms
speech
protection
suspect
basis
content
see
perry
supra
foreclose
possibility
government
create
forum
limited
certain
topics
serving
special
needs
certain
speakers
audiences
without
actions
subject
strict
scrutiny
possibility
seems
trouble
plurality
wonders
local
government
must
show
compelling
state
interest
builds
band
shell
park
dedicates
solely
classical
music
jazz
ante
correct
analogy
case
akin
government
creation
band
shell
types
music
might
performed
except
rap
music
provisions
discriminations
strong
sense
suppressing
certain
form
expression
government
dislikes
otherwise
wishes
exclude
account
effects
justification
anything
strict
scrutiny
giving
government
free
rein
exclude
speech
dislikes
delimiting
public
forums
common
carriage
provisions
pernicious
effects
modern
age
minds
changed
streets
parks
increasing
degree
significant
interchanges
ideas
shaping
public
consciousness
occur
mass
electronic
media
cf
kokinda
kennedy
concurring
judgment
extent
public
entitlement
participate
means
communication
may
changed
technologies
change
expanding
entitlements
government
greater
right
discriminate
suspect
grounds
effects
ban
speech
backdrop
entitlements
accustomed
contravenes
first
amendment
give
government
general
license
single
categories
speech
lesser
protection
long
stops
short
viewpoint
discrimination
pacifica
purport
however
apply
special
standard
indecent
broadcasting
emphasizing
narrowness
holding
pacifica
conducted
analysis
fcc
restriction
indecent
programming
daytime
hours
see
see
also
sable
communications
underscoring
narrowness
pacifica
relied
general
rule
broadcasting
received
limited
first
amendment
protection
already
rejected
application
lower
broadcast
standard
review
infringements
liberties
cable
operators
even
though
control
important
communications
medium
turner
broadcasting
slip
even
less
cause
lower
standard
pacifica
identify
two
important
considerations
relevant
broadcast
objectionable
material
first
indecent
broadcasting
confronts
citizen
public
also
privacy
home
individual
right
left
alone
plainly
outweighs
first
amendment
rights
intruder
second
broadcasting
uniquely
accessible
children
even
young
read
pacifica
teaches
access
channels
even
analogous
ordinary
public
forums
standpoint
programmer
must
also
considered
standpoint
viewer
access
channel
forum
confined
discrete
public
space
bring
indecent
expression
home
every
cable
subscriber
children
spend
astounding
amounts
time
watching
television
cf
ante
citing
studies
though
cohen
explained
people
public
areas
may
avert
eyes
messages
offend
acknowledged
government
may
properly
act
many
situations
prohibit
intrusion
privacy
home
unwelcome
views
ideas
totally
banned
public
dialogue
ibid
see
hess
indiana
per
curiam
rowan
post
office
true
interests
children
stake
see
householder
risk
offensive
material
come
hands
children
stopped
concerns
weighty
relevant
whether
law
passes
strict
scrutiny
justify
however
blanket
rule
lesser
protection
indecent
speech
categories
expression
proscribed
see
reluctant
mark
new
categories
speech
diminished
constitutional
protection
hesitancy
reflects
skepticism
possibility
courts
drawing
principled
distinctions
use
judging
governmental
restrictions
speech
ideas
cohen
supra
concern
heightened
inextricability
indecency
expression
indulge
facile
assumption
one
forbid
particular
words
without
also
running
substantial
risk
suppressing
ideas
process
true
forbidding
programs
indecent
respect
artistic
political
settings
indecency
may
strong
communicative
content
protesting
conventional
norms
giving
edge
work
conveying
otherwise
inexpressible
emotions
ibid
scientific
programs
graphic
depiction
even
point
offensiveness
accurate
comprehensive
portrayal
truth
may
indecency
often
inseparable
ideas
viewpoints
conveyed
separable
loss
truth
expressive
power
traditional
first
amendment
jurisprudence
factors
perhaps
justifying
restriction
indecent
cable
programming
may
taken
account
without
derogating
category
protected
speech
marginal
iv
government
compelling
interest
restoring
cable
operator
first
amendment
right
editorial
discretion
franchises
operators
rights
editorial
discretion
peg
access
channels
first
place
section
governmental
interest
restoring
operator
discretion
indecent
programming
leased
access
channels
minimal
justify
law
first
transmission
indecent
programming
leased
access
channels
forced
speech
operator
turner
broadcasting
supra
slip
pruneyard
second
discretion
conferred
law
slight
operator
authorized
place
programs
liking
leased
access
channels
remove
speech
racist
violent
example
might
offensive
viewers
operator
given
veto
one
kind
lawful
speech
congress
disdains
congress
however
compelling
interest
protecting
children
indecent
speech
sable
communications
ginsberg
new
york
see
also
pacifica
long
society
gives
proper
respect
parental
choices
may
appropriate
standard
intervene
spare
children
exposure
material
suitable
minors
interest
substantial
enough
justify
regulation
indecent
speech
even
assume
indecency
standard
used
sections
nonetheless
narrowly
tailored
protect
children
indecent
programs
access
channels
first
extent
operators
may
allow
indecent
programming
children
localities
operators
serve
left
unprotected
partial
service
compelling
interest
narrow
tailoring
fcc
league
women
voters
asserted
interest
keeping
noncommercial
stations
free
controversial
partisan
opinions
served
ban
station
editorials
opinions
aired
programming
florida
star
selective
ban
publication
rape
victim
name
media
others
narrowly
tailored
cf
bolger
youngs
drug
products
restriction
provides
limited
incremental
support
interest
asserted
pass
muster
standards
put
another
way
interest
protecting
children
indecency
caprice
cable
operator
compelling
perhaps
congress
drafted
law
way
avoid
clear
constitutional
difficulties
banning
indecent
speech
access
channels
first
amendment
permit
sort
ill
fit
law
restricting
speech
interest
said
serve
second
extent
cable
operators
prohibit
indecent
programming
access
channels
children
adults
deprived
government
may
reduce
adult
population
viewing
fit
children
butler
michigan
matters
indecent
programming
might
available
operator
channels
government
legitimate
interest
making
access
channels
pristine
requirement
similar
section
without
constitutional
infirmity
requiring
persons
place
list
receive
programming
see
ante
protects
children
far
less
intrusion
liberties
programmers
adult
viewers
allowing
cable
operators
ban
indecent
programming
access
channels
altogether
applying
strict
scrutiny
assume
plausible
alternatives
fail
protect
compelling
interests
must
basis
record
legislative
findings
otherwise
establishing
law
enacted
least
restrictive
means
sable
communications
supra
cf
turner
broadcasting
slip
none
sections
present
classic
case
discrimination
speech
based
content
legitimate
reasons
government
might
wish
regulate
even
restrict
speech
issue
section
drawn
address
reasons
precision
first
amendment
requires
plurality
declares
section
unconstitutional
interferes
local
supervisory
systems
set
programming
policy
approve
disapprove
particular
programming
services
ante
replacing
local
schemes
cable
operator
veto
plurality
view
greatly
increase
risk
certain
categories
programming
say
borderline
offensive
programs
appear
ante
although
plurality
terms
local
schemes
programming
control
systems
ante
contend
record
suggest
local
board
access
center
authority
exclude
indecent
programming
anything
cast
doubt
status
public
access
channels
public
forums
cf
agosta
new
york
state
law
forbids
editorial
control
public
access
programs
either
cable
operator
municipality
comments
hillsborough
county
board
county
commissioners
fcc
record
explaining
county
inability
exclude
indecent
programming
indeed
ost
access
centers
surveyed
prescreen
except
two
named
localities
high
speed
technical
quality
aufderheide
public
access
cable
programming
controversial
speech
free
expression
reprinted
app
plurality
acknowledges
record
indicates
response
indecent
programming
local
access
centers
whether
prescreen
requiring
indemnification
programmers
certification
compliance
local
standards
time
segregation
adult
content
advisories
ante
measures
challenged
likely
survive
strict
scrutiny
narrowly
tailored
safeguard
children
measures
words
plurality
normally
avoid
minimize
eliminate
problems
concerning
patently
offensive
programming
public
access
channels
ante
one
left
wonder
cable
operator
veto
leased
access
programming
authorized
section
constitutional
even
plurality
first
amendment
analysis
although
concur
judgment
section
invalid
agree
plurality
reasoning
regard
section
plurality
analysis
undermines
claims
faithfulness
first
amendment
jurisprudence
close
attention
context
first
plurality
places
weight
nothing
stop
adults
feel
need
finding
indecent
programming
elsewhere
say
tape
theaters
competitive
services
like
direct
broadcast
television
ante
availability
alternative
channels
communication
may
relevant
assessing
time
place
manner
restrictions
ward
rock
racism
fact
speech
occur
elsewhere
justify
restriction
southeastern
promotions
schneider
state
town
irvington
second
plurality
suggests
permissive
nature
section
least
create
risk
exclusion
total
ban
indecency
ante
obvious
possibility
government
imposed
draconian
limitations
speech
never
justified
lesser
abridgment
indeed
argument
almost
always
available
first
amendment
cases
involve
outright
bans
speech
see
forsyth
county
nationalist
movement
broad
discretion
county
administrator
award
parade
permits
adjust
permit
fee
according
content
speech
violates
first
amendment
bantam
books
sullivan
informal
threats
recommend
criminal
prosecutions
pressure
tactics
state
morality
commission
book
publishers
violate
first
amendment
third
based
factual
speculations
plurality
discounts
risks
created
law
operators
run
indecent
programming
access
channels
plurality
takes
glance
programming
cable
operators
allow
channels
espying
indecent
programming
supposes
cable
operators
may
willing
allow
similar
programs
leased
access
channels
ante
sort
surmise
giving
government
benefit
doubt
restricts
speech
unusual
approach
first
amendment
put
mildly
worse
ignores
evidence
industry
structure
cast
doubt
plurality
sanguine
view
probable
fate
programming
considered
indecent
section
plurality
fails
note
aside
indecency
provisions
section
tacked
senate
floor
amendment
act
strengthened
regulation
leased
access
channels
feared
cable
operators
exercise
substantial
market
power
exclude
disfavored
programmers
congressional
findings
statute
conclusions
senate
committee
commerce
science
transportation
two
years
hearings
cable
market
see
pp
instructive
leased
access
channels
underused
since
inception
senate
committee
determined
though
recognized
adverse
economics
leased
access
programmers
may
one
reason
underutilization
committee
found
obstinacy
cable
operators
control
prices
terms
conditions
also
blame
cable
operator
almost
certain
interests
clash
programmer
seeking
use
leased
access
channels
interests
similar
operator
willing
carry
programmer
regular
cable
channels
operator
thus
already
decided
number
reasons
carry
programmer
example
operator
may
believe
programmer
might
compete
programming
operator
owns
controls
permit
operator
establish
leased
access
rate
thus
makes
little
sense
ibid
even
less
reason
think
cable
operators
choose
show
indecent
programs
public
access
channels
operator
paid
paid
much
transmitting
programs
channels
public
access
programs
may
compete
operator
programs
operator
wish
avoid
unwanted
controversy
leased
access
channels
operator
may
reclaim
unused
peg
capacity
paid
use
section
act
congress
recognized
cable
operators
might
want
exclude
unaffiliated
otherwise
disfavored
programmers
channels
granted
operators
discretion
regard
single
category
speech
obvious
consequence
invited
discretion
exclusion
sure
plurality
suppose
otherwise
contend
practical
consequences
section
worse
programmers
flowing
sort
requirement
approved
pacifica
see
ante
despite
claim
making
contextual
assessment
case
ante
plurality
ignores
key
difference
case
pacifica
broadcaster
wanted
air
speech
question
cable
operator
safe
harbor
programming
permitted
fcc
pacifica
likely
promote
speech
whereas
suppression
follow
section
vi
justice
thomas
joined
chief
justice
justice
scalia
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
agree
plurality
conclusion
section
constitutionally
permissible
disagree
conclusion
failed
articulate
extent
first
amendment
protects
cable
operators
programmers
viewers
state
federal
regulation
think
time
go
along
plurality
assiduous
attempts
avoid
addressing
issue
openly
contrast
permitted
level
government
interference
context
print
media
miami
herald
publishing
tornillo
instance
invalidated
florida
statute
required
newspapers
allow
free
charge
right
reply
political
candidates
whose
personal
professional
character
paper
assailed
rejected
claim
statute
constitutional
fostered
speech
rather
restricted
well
related
claim
newspaper
permissibly
made
serve
public
forum
also
flatly
rejected
argument
newspaper
alleged
media
monopoly
justify
forcing
paper
speak
contravention
editorial
discretion
first
amendment
distinctions
media
dubious
infancy
placed
cable
doctrinal
wasteland
regulators
cable
operators
alike
sure
whether
cable
entitled
substantial
first
amendment
protections
afforded
print
media
subject
onerous
obligations
shouldered
broadcast
media
see
los
angeles
preferred
communications
blackmun
concurring
assessing
first
amendment
claims
concerning
cable
access
must
determine
whether
characteristics
cable
television
make
sufficiently
analogous
another
medium
warrant
application
already
existing
standard
whether
characteristics
require
new
analysis
time
however
drawn
closer
recognizing
cable
operators
enjoy
first
amendment
rights
nonbroadcast
media
first
ventures
world
cable
regulation
involved
claims
arising
first
amendment
addressed
fcc
regulatory
authority
cable
operators
later
cases
begin
address
level
first
amendment
protection
applicable
cable
operators
preferred
communications
instance
cable
operator
challenged
city
los
angeles
auction
process
single
cable
franchise
held
cable
operator
stated
first
amendment
claim
upon
relief
granted
noted
cable
operators
communicate
various
topics
original
programming
exercising
editorial
discretion
stations
programs
include
repertoire
cf
fcc
midwest
video
midwest
video
ii
cable
operators
share
broadcasters
significant
amount
editorial
discretion
regarding
programming
include
likened
operators
first
amendment
interests
broadcasters
subject
red
lion
right
access
requirement
five
years
later
leathers
medlock
dropped
reference
relaxed
scrutiny
permitted
red
lion
arkansas
subjected
cable
operators
state
general
sales
tax
continuing
exempt
newspapers
magazines
scrambled
satellite
broadcast
television
cable
operators
among
others
challenged
tax
first
amendment
grounds
arguing
state
discriminatorily
apply
tax
members
press
though
ultimately
upheld
tax
scheme
agreed
operators
enjoyed
protection
first
amendment
found
cable
operators
engage
speech
providing
news
information
entertainment
subscribers
part
press
two
terms
ago
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
stated
expressly
implied
leathers
red
lion
standard
apply
cable
television
slip
rationale
applying
less
rigorous
standard
first
amendment
scrutiny
broadcast
regulation
apply
context
cable
regulation
slip
pplication
relaxed
standard
scrutiny
adopted
red
lion
broadcast
cases
inapt
determining
first
amendment
validity
cable
regulation
members
disagreed
whether
rules
imposed
congress
therefore
subject
strict
scrutiny
agreement
cable
operators
generally
entitled
much
first
amendment
protection
print
media
see
slip
stevens
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
cable
operators
control
essential
facilities
provides
basis
intrusive
regulation
inappropriate
perhaps
impermissible
communicative
media
turner
adopting
much
print
paradigm
rejecting
red
lion
adopted
considerable
body
precedent
governs
respective
first
amendment
rights
competing
speakers
red
lion
legitimized
consideration
public
interest
emphasized
rights
viewers
least
abstract
view
right
viewers
listeners
right
broadcasters
paramount
turner
however
view
longer
given
credence
cable
context
operator
right
preeminent
tornillo
pacific
gas
electric
public
utilities
applicable
think
see
turner
supra
slip
concurring
part
dissenting
part
conflict
programmer
asserted
right
transmit
operator
cable
system
must
give
way
operator
editorial
discretion
drawing
analogy
print
media
example
author
book
protected
writing
book
right
book
sold
particular
book
store
without
store
owner
consent
government
force
editor
collection
essays
print
essays
subject
turner
found
fcc
rules
implicated
first
amendment
rights
cable
operators
cable
programmers
rules
interfered
operators
editorial
discretion
forcing
carry
broadcast
programming
might
otherwise
carry
interfered
programmers
ability
compete
space
operators
channels
slip
slip
concurring
part
dissenting
part
implicitly
recognized
turner
programmer
right
compete
channel
space
derivative
subordinate
operator
editorial
discretion
like
writer
seeking
paper
publish
newspaper
editorials
programmer
protected
searching
outlet
cable
programming
first
amendment
right
programming
transmitted
cf
miami
herald
publishing
tornillo
likewise
rights
viewers
derivative
speech
rights
operators
programmers
cf
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
freedom
speech
presupposes
willing
speaker
speaker
exists
protection
afforded
communication
source
recipients
viewers
general
right
see
willing
operator
transmits
tornillo
pacific
gas
certainly
right
force
unwilling
operator
speak
recognizing
general
primacy
cable
operator
editorial
rights
rights
programmers
viewers
turner
raises
serious
questions
merits
petitioners
claims
none
petitioners
cases
cable
operators
cable
viewers
access
programmers
representative
organizations
see
brief
petitioners
pp
brief
petitioners
new
york
citizens
committee
responsible
media
et
brief
petitioners
alliance
community
media
et
intuitively
obvious
first
amendment
protects
interests
petitioners
assert
neither
petitioners
plurality
adequately
explained
source
justification
asserted
rights
justice
breyer
detailed
explanation
believes
unwise
unnecessary
ante
choose
standard
measure
petitioners
first
amendment
claims
largely
disregards
recent
attempt
turner
define
standard
attempt
distinguish
turner
ground
involve
effects
television
viewing
children
ante
meaningless
factual
distinction
bearing
existence
ordering
free
speech
rights
asserted
cases
process
deciding
decide
governing
standard
justice
breyer
purports
discover
cases
expansive
general
principle
permitting
government
directly
regulate
speech
address
extraordinary
problems
regulations
appropriately
tailored
resolve
problems
without
imposing
unnecessarily
great
restriction
speech
ante
heretofore
unknown
standard
facially
subjective
openly
invites
balancing
asserted
speech
interests
degree
ordinarily
permitted
true
standard
endorse
lacks
flexibility
inherent
plurality
balancing
approach
ante
relative
rigidity
required
precedents
making
event
even
plurality
balancing
test
appropriate
standard
applied
protect
speech
interests
circumstances
protected
first
amendment
shifting
focus
balancing
complex
interests
ante
justice
breyer
never
explains
whether
programmer
ordinarily
unprotected
interest
affirmative
transmission
programming
acquires
constitutional
significance
leased
public
access
channels
see
ante
interests
programmers
maintaining
access
channels
ante
interests
served
access
requirements
question
left
unanswered
plurality
turn
ii
since
federal
law
also
permitted
local
franchise
authorities
require
cable
operators
set
aside
certain
channels
public
educational
governmental
use
peg
channels
section
unlike
leased
access
provisions
directly
required
operators
leased
access
congress
generally
prohibited
cable
operators
exercising
editorial
control
public
access
channels
provided
operators
prohibit
transmission
obscene
programming
section
see
section
section
act
broadened
operators
editorial
control
instructed
fcc
promulgate
regulations
enabling
cable
operator
ban
public
access
channels
programming
contains
obscene
material
sexually
explicit
conduct
material
soliciting
promoting
unlawful
conduct
note
following
section
fcc
subsequently
promulgated
regulations
second
report
order
fcc
rcd
fcc
interpreted
congress
reference
sexually
explicit
conduct
mean
programming
must
indecent
regulations
therefore
permit
cable
operators
ban
indecent
programming
public
access
channels
read
provisions
provide
leased
public
access
programmers
expansive
federally
enforced
statutory
right
transmit
virtually
programming
access
channels
limited
bounds
decency
doubt
true
programmers
given
rightly
wrongly
ability
speak
access
channels
first
amendment
continues
protect
programmers
certain
government
intrusions
certainly
current
jurisprudence
congress
impose
total
ban
transmission
indecent
programming
see
sable
communications
fcc
striking
total
ban
indecent
messages
time
however
recognized
entitled
full
constitutional
protection
statutorily
created
speech
rights
directly
conflict
constitutionally
protected
private
speech
rights
another
person
entity
found
first
amendment
violation
statutory
schemes
substantially
expand
speech
opportunities
person
entity
challenging
scheme
getting
around
fact
leased
public
access
type
forced
speech
though
constitutionality
leased
public
access
channels
directly
issue
cases
position
adopted
turner
ineluctably
leads
conclusion
federal
access
requirements
subject
form
heightened
scrutiny
see
turner
slip
citing
ward
rock
racism
view
governmental
impositions
operator
editorial
discretion
may
sustained
important
governmental
interest
unrelated
suppression
free
speech
greater
essential
asserted
interest
see
course
analysis
joined
turner
required
strict
scrutiny
slip
concurring
part
dissenting
part
petitioners
must
concede
cable
access
constitutionally
required
entitlement
right
claim
leased
public
access
definition
governmentally
created
expense
cable
operators
editorial
discretion
apparently
accepted
proposition
constitution
permits
degree
forced
speech
cable
context
mean
beneficiaries
forced
speech
program
enjoy
additional
first
amendment
protections
beyond
normally
afforded
purely
private
speakers
said
realm
private
speech
expression
government
regulation
may
favor
one
speaker
another
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
slip
principle
hardly
supports
petitioners
claims
anything
leased
public
access
requirements
favor
access
programmers
cable
operators
see
section
independent
restrictions
programmers
intricate
parts
leased
public
access
restrictions
imposed
congress
state
local
governments
cable
operators
question
petitioners
pose
whether
section
turner
strongly
suggests
proper
question
whether
leased
public
access
requirements
section
improper
restrictions
operators
free
speech
rights
view
constitutional
presumption
properly
runs
favor
operators
editorial
discretion
discretion
may
burdened
without
compelling
reason
petitioners
view
constitutional
presumption
favors
asserted
right
speak
access
channels
directly
contrary
turner
established
precedents
one
thing
compel
operator
carry
leased
public
access
speech
apparent
violation
tornillo
another
thing
altogether
say
first
amendment
forbids
congress
give
back
part
operators
editorial
discretion
recognize
fundamentally
protected
favor
broader
access
right
answer
say
leased
public
access
content
neutral
section
change
fundamental
fact
petitioners
never
address
operators
journalistic
freedom
infringed
whether
challenged
restrictions
content
neutral
content
based
access
provisions
part
scheme
restricts
free
speech
rights
cable
operators
expands
speaking
opportunities
access
programmers
underlying
constitutional
right
speak
cable
medium
believe
access
programmers
challenge
scheme
particular
part
abridgment
freedom
speech
outside
public
forum
doctrine
discussed
infra
government
intervention
grants
access
programmers
opportunity
speak
otherwise
directly
limit
programmers
underlying
speech
abridgement
programmers
first
amendment
rights
even
new
speaking
opportunity
permissive
nature
section
important
regard
congress
forbidden
cable
operators
carry
indecent
programming
leased
public
access
channels
law
burdened
programmer
right
recognized
turner
supra
slip
compete
space
operator
system
undoubtedly
strictly
scrutinize
law
see
sable
section
burden
programmer
right
seek
access
indecent
programming
operator
system
rather
merely
restore
part
editorial
discretion
operator
absent
government
regulation
without
burdening
programmer
underlying
speech
rights
first
amendment
challenge
one
made
must
come
party
whose
constitutionally
protected
freedom
speech
burdened
viewing
federal
access
requirements
whole
cable
operator
access
programmer
whose
speech
rights
infringed
consequently
operator
programmer
whose
speech
arguably
infringed
provisions
congress
passed
law
forcing
bookstores
sell
books
published
subject
congressional
politics
undoubtedly
entertain
claim
bookstores
law
violated
first
amendment
principles
established
tornillo
pacific
gas
doubt
similarly
find
merit
claim
publishers
gardening
books
law
violated
first
amendment
rights
petitioners
cases
reasonably
assert
strictly
scrutinize
provisions
issue
way
maximizes
ability
speak
leased
public
access
channels
necessity
minimizes
operators
discretion
nothing
common
carrier
status
per
se
constitutionalizes
asserted
interests
petitioners
cases
justice
kennedy
provides
authority
assertion
common
carrier
regulations
reviewed
standard
restrictions
speech
public
forum
ante
whether
viewed
creation
common
carrier
scheme
simply
regulatory
restriction
cable
operators
editorial
discretion
net
effect
operators
speech
rights
restricted
make
room
access
programmers
consequently
fact
leased
access
provisions
impose
form
common
carrier
obligation
cable
operators
alter
view
congress
leased
access
scheme
burdens
constitutionally
protected
speech
rights
cable
operators
order
expand
speaking
opportunities
access
programmers
independently
burden
first
amendment
rights
programmers
viewers
said
government
may
designate
public
property
use
public
place
expressive
activity
designated
property
becomes
public
forum
petitioners
argue
local
government
exactly
requiring
condition
franchise
approval
cable
operator
set
aside
public
access
channel
free
use
general
public
nondiscriminatory
basis
brief
petitioners
alliance
community
media
et
disagree
cable
systems
public
property
cable
systems
privately
owned
privately
managed
petitioners
point
case
held
government
may
designate
private
property
public
forum
public
forum
doctrine
rule
governing
claims
right
access
public
property
perry
ed
supra
never
thought
extend
beyond
property
generally
understood
belong
government
see
international
soc
krishna
consciousness
lee
evidence
expressive
activity
rail
stations
bus
stations
wharves
ellis
island
irrelevant
public
fora
analysis
sites
bus
rail
terminals
traditionally
private
ownership
emphasis
original
see
also
public
forum
government
public
property
perry
ed
supra
designated
public
forum
consists
public
property
petitioners
point
dictum
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
educ
fund
public
forum
may
consist
private
property
dedicated
public
use
statement
applicability
statement
properly
refers
common
practice
formally
dedicating
land
streets
parks
subdividing
real
estate
developments
see
antieau
antieau
antieau
local
government
law
section
mcquillin
law
municipal
corporations
section
ed
dedications
may
may
transfer
title
least
create
enforceable
public
easements
dedicated
land
antieau
supra
section
mcquillin
supra
section
extent
easements
create
property
interest
underlying
land
property
interest
may
designated
public
forum
may
true
petitioners
argue
title
dispositive
public
forum
analysis
nature
regulatory
restrictions
placed
cable
operators
local
franchising
authorities
consistent
kinds
governmental
property
interests
said
may
formally
dedicated
public
fora
public
forum
cases
involved
property
government
held
least
formal
easement
property
interest
permitting
government
treat
property
designating
property
public
forum
see
hague
cio
streets
parks
police
dept
chicago
mosley
sidewalks
adjoining
public
school
southeastern
promotions
conrad
theater
lease
city
carey
brown
sidewalks
front
private
residence
widmar
vincent
university
facilities
opened
student
activities
simply
true
cases
pursuant
federal
state
law
franchising
authorities
require
cable
operators
create
public
access
channels
nothing
record
suggests
local
franchising
authorities
take
formal
easement
property
interest
channels
permit
government
designate
property
public
forum
similarly
assertion
government
control
private
property
justify
designation
property
public
forum
expressly
stated
neither
government
ownership
government
control
guarantee
public
access
property
see
cornelius
supra
postal
service
council
greenburgh
civic
government
control
property
private
property
taken
cognizable
property
interest
like
theater
southeastern
promotions
consistent
designation
public
forum
never
even
hinted
regulatory
control
particularly
direct
regulatory
control
private
entity
first
amendment
speech
rights
justify
creation
public
forum
properly
construed
cases
limited
government
ability
declare
public
forum
property
government
owns
outright
government
holds
significant
property
interest
consistent
communicative
purpose
forum
designated
convinced
formal
transfer
property
interest
public
access
channels
suffice
permit
local
franchising
authority
designate
channels
public
forum
public
forum
recognized
private
entity
owner
obligation
permit
another
speak
actually
help
produce
transmit
message
person
behalf
cable
operators
regularly
retain
level
managerial
operational
control
public
access
channels
subject
requirements
federal
state
local
law
franchise
agreement
traditional
public
fora
government
shoulders
burden
administering
enforcing
openness
expressive
forum
frequently
private
citizen
operator
shoulders
burden
public
access
channels
instance
often
operator
must
accept
schedule
access
programmer
request
time
channel
many
places
operator
actually
obligated
provide
production
facilities
production
assistance
persons
seeking
produce
access
programming
moreover
unlike
park
picketer
access
programmer
transmit
message
instead
operator
must
transmit
speak
access
programmer
message
speech
may
considered
operator
driven
home
section
authorizes
fine
two
years
imprisonment
person
transmits
cable
system
matter
obscene
see
also
section
making
operators
immune
public
access
programming
except
obscene
thus
even
inclined
view
public
access
channels
public
property
numerous
additional
obligations
imposed
cable
operator
managing
operating
public
access
channels
convince
channels
share
basic
characteristics
public
forum
already
indicated
public
access
requirements
view
regulatory
restriction
exercise
cable
operators
editorial
discretion
transfer
sufficient
property
interest
channels
support
designation
property
public
forum
public
access
channels
public
fora
therefore
petitioners
attempt
redistribute
cable
speech
rights
favor
must
fail
reason
reasons
articulated
earlier
sustain
section
section
iii
unlike
section
section
clearly
implicates
petitioners
free
speech
rights
though
section
means
bans
indecent
speech
clearly
places
restrictions
transmission
private
speech
requiring
cable
operators
block
segregate
indecent
programming
operator
agreed
carry
consequently
section
must
subjected
strict
scrutiny
upheld
furthers
compelling
governmental
interest
least
restrictive
means
available
see
sable
parties
agree
congress
compelling
interest
protecting
physical
psychological
minors
interest
extends
shielding
minors
influence
indecent
speech
obscene
adult
standards
ibid
see
ginsberg
new
york
persons
th
primary
responsibility
children
entitled
support
laws
designed
aid
discharge
responsibility
section
narrowly
tailored
achieve
compelling
interest
uphold
therefore
dissent
decision
contrary
precedents
establish
government
may
support
parental
authority
direct
moral
upbringing
children
imposing
blocking
requirement
default
position
example
ginsberg
upheld
state
ability
prohibit
sale
indecent
literature
minors
pointed
state
simply
imposed
default
choice
noting
prohibition
sales
minors
bar
parents
desire
purchasing
magazines
children
likewise
sable
set
aside
complete
ban
indecent
messages
part
fcc
previously
imposed
certain
default
rules
intended
prevent
access
minors
evidence
rules
ineffective
strikes
section
pointing
alternatives
lockboxes
says
less
restrictive
segregation
blocking
though
methods
attempt
place
parents
hands
ability
permit
children
watch
little
much
indecent
programming
parents
think
proper
effectively
support
parents
authority
direct
moral
upbringing
children
see
first
report
order
fcc
rcd
fcc
recognized
programming
comes
wide
variety
independent
sources
single
editor
controlling
selection
presentation
thus
indecent
programming
leased
access
channels
especially
likely
shown
randomly
intermittently
programs
ibid
rather
able
simply
block
certain
channels
certain
times
subscriber
armed
lockbox
must
carefully
monitor
programming
constantly
reprogram
lockbox
keep
undesired
programming
thus
even
assuming
cable
subscribers
generally
technical
proficiency
properly
operate
lockbox
means
given
distinguishing
characteristic
leased
access
channels
makes
lockboxes
largely
ineffective
petitioners
argue
section
segregation
blocking
scheme
sufficiently
narrowly
tailored
requires
viewer
written
consent
cfr
section
permits
cable
operator
days
respond
written
request
access
section
impermissibly
underinclusive
reaches
leased
access
programming
relying
lamont
postmaster
general
petitioners
argue
forcing
customers
submit
written
request
access
chill
dissemination
speech
lamont
struck
statute
barring
mail
delivery
communist
political
propaganda
persons
requested
post
office
writing
deliver
propaganda
law
required
post
office
keep
official
list
persons
desiring
receive
communist
political
propaganda
course
intended
chill
demand
materials
however
petitioners
allegations
official
list
wish
watch
patently
offensive
channel
majority
puts
ante
pure
hyperbole
fcc
regulation
implementing
section
written
request
requirement
cfr
section
says
nothing
creation
list
much
less
official
government
list
requires
cable
operator
receive
written
consent
statutory
provisions
make
clear
cable
operator
may
share
information
person
including
government
section
mandates
personally
identifiable
information
regarding
subscriber
kept
strictly
confidential
requires
cable
operators
destroy
information
longer
necessary
purpose
collected
section
none
circumstances
figured
prominently
lamont
exists
though
petitioners
reasonably
fear
specter
officially
published
list
indecency
viewers
true
fact
subscriber
unblocked
ascertainable
cable
operator
find
legally
significant
stigma
fact
segregation
blocking
scheme
generally
permissible
subscriber
access
request
must
take
form
whether
written
oral
see
nothing
nefarious
congress
choice
written
rather
oral
consent
request
access
blocked
whatever
make
subscriber
identity
knowable
hardly
kind
chilling
effect
implicates
first
amendment
though
making
oral
request
access
perhaps
telephone
slightly
less
bothersome
making
written
request
also
true
written
request
less
subject
fraud
determined
child
ante
consequently
despite
fact
oral
request
slightly
less
restrictive
absolute
terms
also
less
effective
supporting
parents
interest
denying
enterprising
parentally
unauthorized
minors
access
blocked
programming
segregation
blocking
requirement
intended
replacement
lockboxes
measures
rather
congress
enacted
section
default
setting
subscriber
receives
blocked
programming
without
written
request
thus
subscribers
want
blocked
programming
protected
subscribers
want
may
request
access
subscriber
requests
access
blocked
programming
however
subscriber
remains
free
use
methods
lockboxes
regulate
kind
programming
shown
channels
home
thus
petitioners
wrong
portray
section
highly
ineffective
method
screening
individual
programs
see
brief
petitioners
majority
similarly
wrong
suggest
person
watch
single
program
without
letting
patently
offensive
channel
entirety
invade
household
days
perhaps
weeks
time
ante
see
ante
given
limited
scope
section
default
setting
see
nothing
constitutionally
infirm
congress
decision
permit
cable
operator
days
unblock
reblock
segregated
channel
petitioners
also
claim
section
implementing
regulations
impermissibly
underinclusive
apply
leased
access
programming
paul
rejected
view
restriction
subject
separate
independent
underinclusiveness
evaluation
view
first
amendment
imposes
underinclusiveness
limitation
content
discrimination
limitation
upon
state
prohibition
proscribable
speech
see
also
ante
congress
need
deal
every
problem
also
petitioners
claim
tension
constitutional
principle
congress
may
impose
remedy
restrictive
necessary
satisfy
asserted
compelling
interest
arguments
pressing
principle
cf
supra
white
concurring
judgment
though
overbreadth
doctrine
redeeming
virtue
attempting
avoid
chilling
protected
expression
underbreadth
challenge
serves
desirable
function
arguing
congress
impose
blocking
requirement
without
also
imposing
requirement
public
access
nonaccess
channels
petitioners
fail
allege
much
less
argue
congress
compelling
interest
true
indecent
programming
appears
nonaccess
channels
programming
appears
almost
exclusively
per
channel
services
subscribers
must
specifically
request
advance
manner
blocking
approach
mandated
section
first
report
order
fcc
rcd
contrast
premium
services
leased
access
channels
part
basic
cable
package
segregation
blocking
scheme
congress
imposed
nothing
convert
sexually
oriented
leased
access
programming
free
premium
service
similarly
congress
failure
impose
segregation
blocking
requirements
public
access
channels
may
based
judgment
channels
presented
less
severe
problem
unintended
appears
anecdotal
evidence
congress
involved
leased
access
channels
congress
may
also
simply
decided
permit
local
franchising
authorities
address
issue
indecency
public
access
channels
local
level
accordance
local
rule
policies
evinced
section
event
segregation
blocking
scheme
established
congress
narrowly
tailored
achieve
compelling
governmental
interest
become
constitutionally
suspect
merely
congress
extend
restriction
channels
less
perceived
problem
perhaps
compelling
interest
carried
burden
demonstrating
section
implementing
regulations
narrowly
tailored
satisfy
compelling
governmental
interest
accordingly
affirm
judgment
appeals
entirety
therefore
concur
judgment
upholding
section
respectfully
dissent
portion
judgment
striking
footnotes
together
alliance
community
media
et
al
federal
communications
commission
et
also
certiorari
precedents
recognize
reasonable
restraints
may
placed
access
certain
fora
reason
cable
television
treated
differently
see
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
slip
slip
souter
dissenting
see
also
widmar
vincent
stevens
concurring
judgment
think
obvious
example
two
groups
students
requested
use
room
particular
view
mickey
mouse
cartoons
rehearse
amateur
performance
first
amendment
require
room
reserved
group
submitted
application
first
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
approving
access
requirement
limited
matters
great
public
concern
purposes
case
canons
constitutional
avoidance
require
us
assume
government
authority
impose
leased
access
requirements
cable
operators
indeed
party
litigation
contends
contrary
petitioners
constitutional
claim
depends
success
constitutionality
underlying
access
rights
certainly
complain
decide
case
assumption
although
congress
essentially
barred
cable
operators
exercising
editorial
control
peg
channels
see
section
section
merely
restore
status
quo
ante
section
authorizes
private
operators
exercise
editorial
discretion
indecent
programming
even
franchising
authority
objects
practice
local
franchising
authorities
free
exclude
operators
exercising
control
peg
channels
see
blasi
pathological
perspective
first
amendment
colum
rev
arguing
courts
place
premium
confining
range
discretion
left
future
decisionmakers
called
upon
make
judgments
pathological
pressures
intense
indecency
cases
since
pacifica
likewise
turned
much
context
medium
speech
content
see
sable
communications
fcc
distinguishing
pacifica
part
ground
telephonic
medium
issue
less
intrusive
broadcast
television
renton
playtime
theatres
permitting
zoning
regulation
adult
theatres
based
secondary
effects
bethel
school
dist
fraser
upholding
restriction
indecent
speech
public
school
analysis
another
important
strand
present
case
right
owners
means
communication
refuse
serve
conduits
messages
dislike
equally
contextual
compare
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
upholding
requirement
broadcasting
context
miami
herald
publishing
tornillo
rejecting
requirement
print
journalism
see
lynch
speedier
access
cable
phone
companies
compete
http
june
describing
cable
modem
technology
gateway
ships
first
destination
big
screen
http
april
describing
computer
cable
tv
internet
reception
capability
see
sunstein
analogical
reasoning
harv
rev
observing
analogical
reasoning
permits
greater
flexibility
time
sullivan
judging
roles
categorization
balancing
rev
noting
categories
established
categorical
mode
leads
briefs
arguments
concentrate
much
threshold
characterization
comparative
analysis
telecommunications
act
pub
section
stat
permits
cable
operator
refuse
transmit
leased
public
access
program
portion
thereof
contains
obscenity
indecency
nudity
constitutionality
amendments
extent
differ
provisions
us
see
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
slip
see
southwestern
cable
midwest
video
midwest
video
decisions
southwestern
cable
midwest
video
purely
regulatory
gave
indication
whether
extent
cable
operators
protected
first
amendment
curiously
plurality
relies
changes
taking
place
law
technology
industrial
structure
relating
telecommunications
ante
justify
avoidance
traditional
first
amendment
standards
anything
plurality
recognizes
ante
recent
include
growth
satellite
broadcast
programming
coming
influx
video
dialtone
local
cable
operators
little
monopoly
power
create
programming
bottleneck
problems
thus
effectively
negating
primary
justifications
treating
cable
operators
differently
first
amendment
speakers
indecent
programming
peg
channels
appears
primarily
public
access
channels
generally
refer
peg
access
public
access
even
pruneyard
shopping
center
robins
instance
permitted
california
compelled
access
rule
burden
conflict
mall
owner
speech
following
turner
commentators
questioned
constitutionality
leased
public
access
see
goodale
cable
section
pp
wake
decision
turner
broadcasting
case
constitutionality
peg
access
leased
access
requirements
seem
open
searching
reexamination
extent
access
requirement
considered
restriction
speech
cable
system
operator
seems
clear
turner
broadcasting
requirement
found
violate
operator
first
amendment
rights
ugland
cable
television
new
technologies
first
amendment
turner
broadcasting
system
mo
rev
peg
requirements
face
force
cable
system
operators
carry
certain
types
programming
emphasis
original
perritt
access
national
information
infrastructure
wake
forest
rev
leased
access
public
access
requirements
called
question
turner
moreover
justice
noted
turner
congress
imposition
common
obligations
cable
operators
may
raise
takings
clause
questions
slip
concurring
part
dissenting
part
questions
issue
plurality
asserting
section
restore
cable
operators
editorial
rights
ante
mistakes
inability
exercise
right
absence
right
altogether
cable
operators
historically
exercised
editorial
control
public
access
channels
diminish
underlying
right
even
operator
forbearance
viewed
contractual
quid
pro
quo
local
franchise
turner
recognized
rules
burden
programmers
must
compete
space
fewer
channels
slip
leased
access
requirements
may
also
similarly
burden
programmers
compete
space
nonaccess
channels
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
slip
found
university
student
activity
fund
nontangible
channel
communication
limited
public
forum
generally
quite
reluctant
find
even
limited
public
fora
channels
communication
cornelius
naacp
legal
defense
ed
fund
combined
federal
campaign
limited
public
forum
perry
ed
assn
perry
local
educators
school
mail
facilities
limited
public
forum
event
certainly
neverz
held
public
access
channels
fully
designated
public
forum
entitles
programmers
freedom
distinctions
see
shapiro
kurland
mercurio
cablespeech
case
first
amendment
protection
cable
systems
operated
private
rather
governmental
entities
cable
television
characterized
public
forum
therefore
rights
derived
public
forum
doctrine
asserted
wish
express
cable
systems
petitioners
argument
property
right
called
right
exclude
transferred
government
persuasive
though
generally
true
excepting
section
public
access
channels
prohibition
absolute
section
provides
prohibition
exercise
editorial
discretion
subject
section
permits
operators
franchising
authorities
ban
obscene
constitutionally
unprotected
speech
however
permitted
exercise
authority
see
stat
section
prohibiting
censorship
leased
public
access
programming
pub
serv
law
section
mckinney
supp
rate
never
recognized
public
forum
based
property
interest
taken
regulatory
restriction
see
brenner
price
meyerson
cable
television
nonbroadcast
video
section
hereinafter
brenner
local
governments
formed
nonprofit
organizations
perform
functions
see
code
ann
section
supp
establishing
public
access
corporation
purpose
facilitating
governing
nondiscriminatory
use
public
access
channels
see
section
authorizing
franchise
authorities
require
adequate
assurance
cable
operator
provide
adequate
public
educational
governmental
access
channel
capacity
facilities
financial
support
stat
section
requiring
cable
operators
contribute
money
resources
cable
advisory
councils
monitor
compliance
public
access
standards
section
regulations
establishing
minimum
standards
equipment
supplied
community
access
programming
code
ann
section
shall
provide
use
production
facilities
production
assistance
amount
set
forth
request
proposal
stat
section
requiring
cable
operators
make
readily
available
public
use
least
minimal
equipment
necessary
production
programming
playback
prerecorded
programs
activities
partly
financed
public
funds
ante
diminish
fact
activities
also
partly
financed
operator
money
see
brenner
section
frequently
access
centers
receive
money
equipment
cable
operator
section
discussing
cable
operator
financing
public
access
channels
questioning
constitutionality
forced
subsidization
speech
petitioners
argue
section
act
section
lifts
cable
operators
immunity
obscene
speech
forces
encourages
operators
ban
indecent
speech
congress
directly
impose
outright
ban
obscene
programming
see
sable
communications
fcc
petitioners
encouragement
argument
meritless
sable
congress
quickly
amended
statute
fcc
promulgated
safe
harbor
rules
rules
later
upheld
first
amendment
challenge
see
dial
information
servs
thornburgh
cert
denied
information
providers
coalition
defense
first
amendment
fcc
promulgating
regulations
pursuant
section
fcc
well
aware
default
rules
established
upheld
asserted
similar
rules
necessary
leased
access
channels
see
first
report
order
fcc
rcd
blocking
scheme
upheld
cases
relevant
respects
identical
required
section
ibid
ust
section
relating
telephone
determined
mandatory
voluntary
blocking
essential
context
courts
upholding
fcc
mandatory
blocking
scheme
expressly
found
voluntary
blocking
schemes
effective
see
dial
information
supra
information
providers
coalition
supra
circumstances
cases
see
constitutionally
significant
difference
written
oral
request
see
blocked
programming
also
see
relevant
distinction
section
blocking
requirement
enacted
act
majority
places
much
reliance
see
ante
indeed
persons
request
access
blocked
programming
pursuant
cfr
section
identifiable
persons
subscribe
sexually
oriented
premium
channels
persons
must
specially
request
premium
service
lockbox
provision
originally
passed
unaffected
act
remains
fully
available
every
subscriber
section
examining
restrictions
imposed
act
majority
probably
correct
doubt
channels
mostly
leased
channels
ante
surely
majority
doubt
nonleased
channels
premium
channels
must
expressly
requested
thus
disagree
provisions
act
address
highly
similar
problem
unlike
congress
blocking
scheme
market
norm
requiring
viewers
pay
premium
indecent
programming
lockboxes
place
financial
burden
seeking
avoid
indecent
programming
leased
access
channels
see
section
cable
operator
shall
provide
sale
lease
device
subscriber
prohibit
viewing
particular
cable
service
periods
selected
subscriber