boumediene
bush
argued
decided
june
petitions
writs
certiorari
denied
statement
justice
stevens
justice
kennedy
respecting
denial
certiorari
despite
obvious
importance
issues
raised
cases
persuaded
traditional
rules
governing
decision
constitutional
questions
see
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
practice
requiring
exhaustion
available
remedies
precondition
accepting
jurisdiction
applications
writ
habeas
corpus
cf
ex
parte
hawk
per
curiam
make
appropriate
deny
petitions
time
however
frequently
recognized
policy
underlying
doctrine
require
exhaustion
inadequate
remedies
marino
ragen
rutledge
concurring
petitioners
later
seek
establish
government
unreasonably
delayed
proceedings
detainee
treatment
act
tit
stat
ongoing
injury
alternative
means
exist
us
consider
jurisdiction
allegations
made
petitioners
appeals
see
government
take
additional
steps
prejudice
position
petitioners
seeking
review
courts
competent
jurisdiction
including
act
promptly
ensure
office
purposes
writ
habeas
corpus
compromised
padilla
hanft
kennedy
concurring
denial
certiorari
always
denial
certiorari
constitute
expression
opinion
merits
see
rasul
bush
majority
opinion
stevens
kennedy
concurring
judgment
lakhdar
boumediene
et
al
george
bush
president
et
al
khaled
al
odah
next
friend
fawzi
khalid
abdullah
fahad
al
odah
et
al
et
al
petitions
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
nos
decided
april
justice
breyer
justice
souter
joins
justice
ginsburg
joins
part
dissenting
denial
certiorari
grant
petitions
certiorari
expedite
argument
cases
petitioners
foreign
citizens
imprisoned
guantanamo
bay
cuba
raise
important
question
whether
military
commissions
act
pub
stat
deprives
courts
jurisdiction
consider
habeas
claims
whether
deprivation
constitutional
believe
questions
deserve
immediate
attention
first
province
great
writ
shaped
guarantee
fundamental
rights
provide
effective
speedy
instrument
judicial
inquiry
may
legality
detention
person
carafas
lavallee
emphasis
added
omitted
yet
petitioners
held
five
years
obtained
judicial
review
habeas
claims
petitioners
right
law
immediate
review
may
avoid
additional
year
imprisonment
wrong
review
nevertheless
appropriate
help
establish
boundaries
constitutional
provision
writ
habeas
corpus
cf
carafas
supra
finally
whether
petitioners
right
wrong
prompt
review
diminish
legal
uncertainty
surrounds
application
guantanamo
detainees
fundamental
constitutional
principle
brief
senator
arlen
specter
amicus
curiae
see
generally
ibid
favoring
expedited
consideration
cases
bring
increased
clarity
turn
speed
review
cases
second
petitioners
plausibly
argue
lower
reasoning
contrary
precedent
previously
held
federal
jurisdiction
lay
consider
petitioners
habeas
claims
rasul
bush
providing
several
petitioners
right
habeas
review
law
stood
analysis
proceeded
statute
petitioners
urge
reasoning
applies
scope
constitutional
habeas
right
well
holding
writ
extended
petitioners
rasul
said
guantanamo
complete
control
jurisdiction
kennedy
concurring
judgment
guantanamo
bay
every
practical
respect
territory
observed
writ
common
law
extended
petitioners
application
habeas
statute
persons
detained
base
consistent
historical
reach
writ
habeas
corpus
common
law
courts
exercised
habeas
jurisdiction
claims
aliens
detained
within
sovereign
territory
realm
well
claims
persons
detained
exempt
jurisdictions
ordinary
writs
run
dominions
sovereign
control
ven
territory
part
realm
doubt
power
issue
writs
habeas
corpus
territory
subjection
crown
internal
quotation
marks
footnotes
omitted
reasoning
may
applicable
lower
holding
petitioners
urge
disregards
statements
reasoning
petitioners
boumediene
natives
algeria
citizens
bosnia
seized
bosnia
pet
cert
detainees
including
several
petitioners
al
odah
also
citizens
friendly
nations
including
australia
canada
kuwait
turkey
kingdom
many
seized
outside
theater
hostility
places
like
pakistan
thailand
zambia
pet
cert
pp
cadc
rogers
dissenting
possible
circumstances
make
difference
respect
resolution
constitutional
questions
presented
cf
hamdi
rumsfeld
plurality
opinion
joined
rehnquist
kennedy
breyer
jj
holding
military
authority
detain
citizen
enemy
combatant
captured
zone
active
combat
foreign
theater
conflict
specifically
afghanistan
stressing
narrow
holding
ctive
combat
operations
taliban
fighters
ongoing
afghanistan
emphasis
added
government
course
contests
petitioners
arguments
merits
say
petitioners
correct
say
questions
presented
significant
ones
warranting
review
petitioners
right
access
habeas
corpus
federal
courts
consider
whether
congress
provision
detainee
treatment
act
dta
tit
stat
providing
review
appeals
circuit
proceedings
constitutionally
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
see
swain
pressley
government
argues
therefore
wait
case
unlike
petitioners
detainee
seeking
certiorari
actually
sought
received
review
alternative
means
brief
opposition
petitioners
respond
however
proceedings
appeals
dta
possibly
remedy
constitutional
violation
lower
expressly
indicated
constitutional
rights
merely
right
habeas
extend
guantanamo
detainees
rejecting
petitioners
arguments
precedent
fundamental
rights
afforded
constitution
extend
guantanamo
noting
recedent
circuit
also
forecloses
detainees
claims
constitutional
rights
therefore
irrelevant
petitioners
dta
provides
review
circuit
constitutional
infirmities
proceedings
act
ii
stat
lower
already
rendered
provision
nullity
percolation
question
presented
offer
elucidation
either
threshold
question
whether
petitioners
right
habeas
question
whether
dta
provides
constitutionally
adequate
substitute
unreasonable
suggest
circuit
future
proceedings
dta
provide
review
affords
petitioners
rights
circuit
already
concluded
ordinarily
habeas
petitioners
need
exhaust
remedy
inadequate
vindicate
asserted
right
see
wilwording
swenson
per
curiam
government
hamdan
rumsfeld
similarly
argued
delay
slip
government
objects
consideration
procedural
challenge
stage
grounds
petitioner
able
raise
challenge
following
decision
dta
case
presented
questions
scope
guantanamo
detainees
right
review
procedures
rejected
government
argument
delay
unsound
slip
ontrary
government
assertion
presume
procedures
violate
law
circumstances
review
advance
decision
appropriate
hamdan
petitioners
argue
tribunals
already
subjected
infirm
inter
alia
denying
petitioners
counsel
access
evidence
pet
cert
hamdan
supra
slip
hamdan
petitioners
assert
procedural
infirmities
corrected
review
dta
provides
augmentation
record
appeal
noted
provide
remedy
constitutional
violation
see
dta
stat
rogers
dissenting
hamdan
supra
slip
petitioners
compelling
interest
assuring
advance
procedures
subject
lawful
unlike
hamdan
military
tribunals
guantanamo
completed
work
remains
appeals
reasons
grant
petitions
ii
moreover
expedite
consideration
past
expedited
cases
important
issues
need
speedy
consideration
stake
ex
parte
quirin
decided
grant
expedited
consideration
view
public
importance
questions
raised
petitions
duty
rests
courts
time
war
well
time
peace
preserve
unimpaired
constitutional
safeguards
civil
liberty
opinion
public
interest
required
consider
decide
questions
without
avoidable
delay
see
also
felker
turpin
new
york
times
per
curiam
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
reasons
grant
petitions
certiorari
motions
expedite
cases
accordance
schedule
deemed
acceptable
alternative
government
boumediene
et
al
bush
president
et
al
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
argued
december
decided
june
authorization
use
military
force
aumf
congress
empowered
president
use
necessary
appropriate
force
determines
planned
authorized
committed
aided
terrorist
attacks
september
hamdi
rumsfeld
five
justices
recognized
detaining
individuals
captured
fighting
afghanistan
duration
conflict
fundamental
accepted
incident
war
thereafter
defense
department
established
combatant
status
review
tribunals
csrts
determine
whether
individuals
detained
naval
station
guantanamo
bay
cuba
enemy
combatants
petitioners
aliens
detained
guantanamo
captured
afghanistan
elsewhere
abroad
designated
enemy
combatants
csrts
denying
membership
al
qaeda
terrorist
network
carried
september
attacks
taliban
regime
supported
al
qaeda
petitioner
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
district
ordered
cases
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
guantanamo
outside
sovereign
territory
circuit
affirmed
reversed
holding
extended
statutory
habeas
jurisdiction
guantanamo
see
rasul
bush
petitioners
cases
consolidated
two
proceedings
first
district
judge
granted
government
motion
dismiss
holding
detainees
rights
vindicated
habeas
action
second
judge
held
detainees
due
process
rights
appeals
pending
congress
passed
detainee
treatment
act
dta
amended
provide
justice
judge
shall
jurisdiction
consider
application
habeas
corpus
filed
behalf
alien
detained
guantanamo
gave
appeals
exclusive
jurisdiction
review
csrt
decisions
hamdan
rumsfeld
held
provision
inapplicable
cases
like
petitioners
pending
dta
enacted
congress
responded
military
commissions
act
mca
amended
deny
jurisdiction
respect
habeas
actions
detained
aliens
determined
enemy
combatants
denies
jurisdiction
action
relating
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
confinement
detained
alien
determined
enemy
combatant
mca
provides
amendments
shall
take
effect
date
enactment
act
shall
apply
cases
without
exception
pending
date
relate
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
detention
alien
detained
since
september
appeals
concluded
mca
must
read
strip
federal
courts
jurisdiction
consider
petitioners
habeas
applications
petitioners
entitled
habeas
protections
suspension
clause
art
cl
provides
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
suspended
unless
cases
rebellion
invasion
public
safety
may
require
therefore
unnecessary
consider
whether
dta
provided
adequate
effective
substitute
habeas
held
mca
denies
federal
courts
jurisdiction
hear
habeas
actions
like
instant
cases
pending
time
enactment
section
effective
date
provision
undoubtedly
applies
habeas
actions
definition
relate
detention
within
section
meaning
petitioners
argue
avail
apply
habeas
action
action
largely
repeats
section
language
phrase
action
understood
without
referring
back
explicitly
mentions
writ
habeas
corpus
two
paragraphs
structure
implies
habeas
type
action
relating
aspect
detention
pending
habeas
actions
category
cases
subject
statute
jurisdictional
bar
confirmed
mca
legislative
history
thus
mca
valid
petitioners
cases
must
dismissed
pp
petitioners
constitutional
privilege
habeas
corpus
barred
seeking
writ
invoking
suspension
clause
protections
designated
enemy
combatants
presence
guantanamo
pp
brief
account
writ
history
origins
shows
protection
habeas
privilege
one
safeguards
liberty
specified
constitution
outset
bill
rights
system
framers
conceived
writ
centrality
must
inform
proper
interpretation
suspension
clause
framers
considered
writ
vital
instrument
protection
individual
liberty
evident
care
taken
suspension
clause
specify
limited
grounds
suspension
writ
may
suspended
public
safety
requires
times
rebellion
invasion
clause
designed
protect
cyclical
abuses
writ
executive
legislative
branches
protects
detainee
rights
means
consistent
constitution
essential
design
ensuring
except
periods
formal
suspension
judiciary
device
writ
maintain
delicate
balance
governance
hamdi
supra
principles
history
influenced
design
inform
clause
reach
purpose
pp
diligent
search
precedents
legal
commentaries
reveals
certain
conclusions
none
cases
parties
cite
reveal
whether
granted
refused
hear
lack
jurisdiction
habeas
petition
prisoner
deemed
enemy
combatant
standard
like
defense
department
cases
held
territory
like
guantanamo
government
total
military
civil
control
evidence
writ
geographic
scope
common
law
informative
dispositive
petitioners
argue
site
detention
analogous
two
territories
outside
england
writ
ran
exempt
jurisdictions
india
critical
differences
places
guantanamo
render
claims
unpersuasive
government
argues
guantanamo
closely
analogous
scotland
hanover
writ
run
unclear
whether
courts
lacked
power
issue
writ
whether
refrained
prudential
reasons
parties
arguments
lack
precedent
point
supports
respective
positions
premised
upon
doubtful
assumptions
historical
record
complete
common
law
properly
understood
yields
definite
answer
questions
pp
suspension
clause
full
effect
guantanamo
government
argument
clause
affords
petitioners
rights
claim
sovereignty
naval
station
rejected
pp
question
government
position
cuba
maintains
sovereignty
legal
technical
sense
guantanamo
accept
government
premise
de
jure
sovereignty
touchstone
habeas
jurisdiction
habeas
history
provides
scant
support
proposition
inconsistent
precedents
contrary
fundamental
principles
pp
ii
discussions
constitution
extraterritorial
application
cases
involving
provisions
suspension
clause
undermine
government
argument
fundamental
questions
regarding
constitution
geographic
scope
first
arose
nation
acquired
hawaii
noncontiguous
territories
ceded
spain
war
congress
discontinued
prior
practice
extending
constitutional
rights
territories
statute
insular
cases
held
constitution
independent
force
territories
contingent
upon
acts
legislative
grace
see
dorr
yet
difficulties
disruption
inherent
transforming
former
spanish
colonies
system
system
adopted
doctrine
territorial
incorporation
constitution
applies
full
incorporated
territories
surely
destined
statehood
part
unincorporated
territories
see
practical
considerations
likewise
influenced
analysis
reid
covert
applying
jury
provisions
fifth
sixth
amendments
american
civilians
tried
military
abroad
plurality
concurrences
noted
relevance
practical
considerations
related
petitioners
citizenship
place
confinement
trial
finally
holding
habeas
jurisdiction
extend
enemy
aliens
convicted
violating
laws
war
detained
german
prison
allied
powers
war
ii
occupation
johnson
eisentrager
stressed
practical
difficulties
ordering
production
prisoners
government
reading
eisentrager
adopting
formalistic
test
determining
suspension
clause
reach
rejected
discussion
practical
considerations
case
integral
part
opinion
came
announced
holding
see
mentioned
concept
territorial
sovereignty
twice
opinion
contrast
significant
discussion
practical
barriers
running
writ
government
reading
correct
opinion
marked
change
complete
repudiation
insular
cases
later
reid
functional
approach
constricted
reading
eisentrager
overlooks
sees
common
thread
uniting
cases
idea
extraterritoriality
questions
turn
objective
factors
practical
concerns
formalism
pp
iii
government
test
raises
troubling
concerns
illustrated
guantanamo
political
history
although
maintained
complete
uninterrupted
control
guantanamo
years
government
view
constitution
effect
least
noncitizens
disclaimed
formal
sovereignty
lease
cuba
nation
basic
charter
contracted
away
like
constitution
grants
congress
president
power
acquire
dispose
govern
territory
power
decide
terms
apply
hold
political
branches
may
switch
constitution
lead
regime
say
law
marbury
madison
cranch
concerns
particular
bearing
upon
suspension
clause
question
habeas
writ
indispensable
mechanism
monitoring
separation
powers
pp
iv
based
eisentrager
supra
reasoning
extraterritoriality
opinions
least
three
factors
relevant
determining
suspension
clause
reach
detainees
citizenship
status
adequacy
process
status
determined
nature
sites
apprehension
detention
took
place
practical
obstacles
inherent
resolving
prisoner
entitlement
writ
application
framework
reveals
first
petitioners
status
dispute
american
citizens
deny
enemy
combatants
although
afforded
process
csrt
proceedings
trial
military
commission
violations
laws
war
second
sites
petitioners
apprehension
detention
weigh
finding
suspension
clause
rights
critical
differences
eisentrager
german
prison
circa
guantanamo
naval
station
given
government
absolute
indefinite
control
naval
station
third
although
sensitive
financial
administrative
costs
holding
suspension
clause
applicable
case
military
detention
abroad
factors
dispositive
government
presents
credible
arguments
military
mission
guantanamo
compromised
habeas
courts
jurisdiction
situation
eisentrager
far
different
given
historical
context
nature
military
mission
germany
pp
petitioners
therefore
entitled
habeas
privilege
privilege
denied
congress
must
act
accordance
suspension
clause
requirements
cf
rasul
pp
dta
procedures
reviewing
detainees
status
adequate
effective
substitute
habeas
writ
mca
operates
unconstitutional
suspension
writ
pp
given
holding
writ
run
petitioners
circuit
found
unnecessary
consider
whether
adequate
substitute
habeas
usually
remands
consideration
questions
decided
departure
rule
appropriate
exceptional
circumstances
see
cooper
industries
aviall
services
grave
issues
raised
cases
fact
petitioners
denied
meaningful
access
judicial
forum
years
pp
historically
congress
taken
care
avoid
suspensions
writ
example
statutes
issue
two
leading
cases
addressing
habeas
substitutes
swain
pressley
hayman
attempts
streamline
habeas
relief
cut
back
cases
provide
little
guidance
inter
alia
statutes
question
gave
courts
broad
remedial
powers
secure
historic
office
writ
included
saving
clauses
preserve
habeas
review
avenue
last
resort
contrast
congress
intended
dta
mca
circumscribe
habeas
review
evident
unequivocal
nature
mca
language
dta
text
limiting
appeals
jurisdiction
assessing
whether
csrt
complied
standards
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
dta
absence
saving
clause
either
act
congress
intended
create
limited
procedure
also
confirmed
legislative
history
comparison
dta
habeas
statute
govern
mca
absence
congress
authorized
justice
circuit
judge
issue
writ
thereby
accommodating
necessity
factfinding
arise
cases
allowing
appellate
judge
justice
transfer
case
district
see
however
granting
circuit
exclusive
jurisdiction
petitioners
cases
see
dta
congress
foreclosed
option
cases
pp
endeavor
offer
comprehensive
summary
requisites
adequate
habeas
substitute
uncontroversial
however
habeas
privilege
entitles
prisoner
meaningful
opportunity
demonstrate
held
pursuant
erroneous
application
interpretation
relevant
law
ins
cyr
habeas
must
power
order
conditional
release
individual
unlawfully
detained
may
required
depending
circumstances
petitioners
identify
see
myriad
deficiencies
csrts
relevant
constraints
upon
detainee
ability
rebut
factual
basis
government
assertion
enemy
combatant
csrt
stage
detainee
limited
means
find
present
evidence
challenge
government
case
assistance
counsel
may
aware
critical
allegations
government
relied
upon
order
detention
opportunity
confront
witnesses
likely
theoretical
real
given
limits
admission
hearsay
therefore
agrees
petitioners
considerable
risk
error
tribunal
findings
fact
given
consequence
error
may
detention
duration
hostilities
may
last
generation
risk
significant
ignore
accordingly
habeas
writ
substitute
function
effective
meaningful
remedy
context
conducting
collateral
proceeding
must
ability
correct
errors
assess
sufficiency
government
evidence
admit
consider
relevant
exculpatory
evidence
introduced
earlier
proceeding
yamashita
ex
parte
quirin
distinguished
pp
petitioners
met
burden
establishing
dta
review
process
face
inadequate
substitute
habeas
among
constitutional
infirmities
dta
potentially
suffers
absence
provisions
allowing
petitioners
challenge
president
authority
aumf
detain
indefinitely
contest
csrt
findings
fact
supplement
record
review
exculpatory
evidence
discovered
csrt
proceedings
request
release
statute
read
contain
constitutionally
required
procedures
mca
thus
effects
unconstitutional
suspension
writ
jurisdictional
bar
district
entertaining
petitioners
claims
pp
prudential
barriers
habeas
review
pp
petitioners
need
seek
review
csrt
determinations
circuit
proceeding
habeas
actions
district
cases
involved
detainees
held
short
time
awaiting
csrt
determinations
probable
appeals
complete
prompt
review
applications
case
requiring
temporary
abstention
exhaustion
alternative
remedies
much
stronger
qualifications
longer
pertain
instances
six
years
elapsed
without
judicial
oversight
habeas
corpus
adequate
substitute
demands
require
detainees
pursue
limited
structure
dta
review
proceeding
habeas
actions
require
additional
months
years
delay
holding
read
imply
habeas
intervene
moment
enemy
combatant
steps
foot
territory
writ
runs
except
cases
undue
delay
present
federal
courts
refrain
entertaining
enemy
combatant
habeas
petition
least
csrt
chance
review
status
pp
effectuating
today
holding
certain
accommodations
including
channeling
future
cases
single
district
requiring
use
discretion
accommodate
greatest
extent
possible
government
legitimate
interest
protecting
sources
intelligence
gathering
methods
made
reduce
burden
habeas
proceedings
place
military
without
impermissibly
diluting
writ
protections
pp
considering
procedural
substantive
standards
used
impose
detention
prevent
acts
terrorism
courts
must
accord
proper
deference
political
branches
however
security
subsists
fidelity
freedom
first
principles
chief
among
freedom
arbitrary
unlawful
restraint
personal
liberty
secured
adherence
separation
powers
pp
reversed
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
stevens
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
souter
filed
concurring
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
joined
roberts
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
alito
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
thomas
alito
joined
lakhdar
boumediene
et
petitioners
george
bush
president
et
al
khaled
al
odah
next
friend
fawzi
khalid
abdullah
fahad
al
odah
et
petitioners
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
petitioners
aliens
designated
enemy
combatants
detained
naval
station
guantanamo
bay
cuba
others
detained
also
aliens
parties
suit
petitioners
present
question
resolved
earlier
cases
relating
detention
aliens
guantanamo
whether
constitutional
privilege
habeas
corpus
privilege
withdrawn
except
conformance
suspension
clause
art
cl
hold
petitioners
habeas
corpus
privilege
congress
enacted
statute
detainee
treatment
act
dta
stat
provides
certain
procedures
review
detainees
status
hold
procedures
adequate
effective
substitute
habeas
corpus
therefore
military
commissions
act
mca
supp
operates
unconstitutional
suspension
writ
address
whether
president
authority
detain
petitioners
hold
writ
must
issue
questions
regarding
legality
detention
resolved
first
instance
district
authorization
use
military
force
aumf
stat
note
following
supp
president
authorized
use
necessary
appropriate
force
nations
organizations
persons
determines
planned
authorized
committed
aided
terrorist
attacks
occurred
september
harbored
organizations
persons
order
prevent
future
acts
international
terrorism
nations
organizations
persons
hamdi
rumsfeld
five
members
recognized
detention
individuals
fought
afghanistan
duration
particular
conflict
captured
fundamental
accepted
incident
war
exercise
appropriate
force
congress
authorized
president
use
plurality
opinion
thomas
dissenting
hamdi
deputy
secretary
defense
established
combatant
status
review
tribunals
csrts
determine
whether
individuals
detained
guantanamo
enemy
combatants
department
defines
term
see
app
pet
cert
later
memorandum
established
procedures
implement
csrts
see
app
pet
cert
government
maintains
procedures
designed
comply
due
process
requirements
identified
plurality
hamdi
see
brief
respondents
interpreting
aumf
department
defense
ordered
detention
petitioners
transferred
guantanamo
individuals
apprehended
battlefield
afghanistan
others
places
far
away
bosnia
gambia
foreign
nationals
none
citizen
nation
war
denies
member
al
qaeda
terrorist
network
carried
september
attacks
taliban
regime
provided
sanctuary
al
qaeda
petitioner
appeared
separate
csrt
determined
enemy
combatant
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
district
district
columbia
first
actions
commenced
february
district
ordered
cases
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
naval
station
outside
sovereign
territory
see
rasul
bush
supp
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
affirmed
see
al
odah
granted
certiorari
reversed
holding
extended
statutory
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
guantanamo
see
rasul
bush
constitutional
issue
presented
instant
cases
reached
rasul
rasul
petitioners
cases
consolidated
entertained
two
separate
proceedings
first
set
cases
judge
richard
leon
granted
government
motion
dismiss
holding
detainees
rights
vindicated
habeas
corpus
action
second
set
cases
judge
joyce
hens
green
reached
opposite
conclusion
holding
detainees
rights
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
see
khalid
bush
supp
dc
guantanamo
detainee
cases
supp
dc
appeals
pending
district
decisions
congress
passed
dta
subsection
dta
amended
provide
justice
judge
shall
jurisdiction
hear
consider
application
writ
habeas
corpus
filed
behalf
alien
detained
department
defense
guantanamo
bay
cuba
stat
section
provides
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
shall
exclusive
jurisdiction
review
decisions
csrts
ibid
hamdan
rumsfeld
held
provision
apply
cases
like
petitioners
pending
dta
enacted
congress
responded
passing
mca
et
seq
supp
amended
text
statutory
amendment
discussed
see
part
ii
infra
four
members
hamdan
majority
noted
othing
prevent
ed
president
returning
congress
seek
authority
believes
necessary
breyer
concurring
authority
concurring
opinion
referred
authority
create
military
commissions
kind
issue
case
ibid
nothing
opinion
construed
invitation
congress
suspend
writ
petitioners
cases
consolidated
appeal
parties
filed
supplemental
briefs
light
decision
hamdan
appeals
ruling
cadc
subject
present
review
today
decision
appeals
concluded
mca
must
read
strip
federal
courts
jurisdiction
consider
petitioners
habeas
corpus
applications
petitioners
entitled
privilege
writ
protections
suspension
clause
result
unnecessary
consider
whether
congress
provided
adequate
effective
substitute
habeas
corpus
dta
granted
certiorari
ii
threshold
matter
must
decide
whether
mca
denies
federal
courts
jurisdiction
hear
habeas
corpus
actions
pending
time
enactment
hold
statute
deny
jurisdiction
statute
valid
petitioners
cases
must
dismissed
amended
terms
mca
supp
provides
justice
judge
shall
jurisdiction
hear
consider
application
writ
habeas
corpus
filed
behalf
alien
detained
determined
properly
detained
enemy
combatant
awaiting
determination
except
provided
dta
justice
judge
shall
jurisdiction
hear
consider
action
agents
relating
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
confinement
alien
detained
determined
properly
detained
enemy
combatant
awaiting
determination
section
mca
provides
effective
date
amendment
amendment
made
mca
shall
take
effect
date
enactment
act
shall
apply
cases
without
exception
pending
date
enactment
act
relate
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
detention
alien
detained
since
september
stat
little
doubt
effective
date
provision
applies
habeas
corpus
actions
actions
definition
cases
relate
detention
see
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
habeas
corpus
writ
employed
bring
person
frequently
ensure
party
imprisonment
detention
illegal
petitioners
argue
nevertheless
mca
sufficiently
clear
statement
congressional
intent
strip
federal
courts
jurisdiction
pending
cases
see
ex
parte
yerger
wall
disagree
argument
follows
section
refers
writ
habeas
corpus
next
paragraph
refers
action
relating
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
confinement
alien
properly
detained
enemy
combatant
awaiting
determination
two
separate
paragraphs
argument
continues
must
two
distinct
classes
cases
effective
date
subsection
mca
said
refers
second
class
cases
largely
repeats
language
referring
cases
relate
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
detention
alien
detained
petitioners
textual
argument
force
phrase
action
phrase
understood
without
referring
back
paragraph
precedes
explicitly
mentions
term
writ
habeas
corpus
structure
two
paragraphs
implies
habeas
actions
type
action
relating
aspect
detention
transfer
treatment
trial
conditions
confinement
alien
detained
enemy
combatant
pending
habeas
actions
category
cases
subject
statute
jurisdictional
bar
acknowledge
moreover
litigation
history
prompted
congress
enact
mca
hamdan
found
unnecessary
address
petitioner
suspension
clause
arguments
noted
relevance
clear
statement
rule
deciding
whether
congress
intended
reach
pending
habeas
corpus
cases
see
congress
presumed
effected
denial
habeas
relief
absent
unmistakably
clear
statement
contrary
interpretive
rule
facilitates
dialogue
congress
cf
hilton
south
carolina
public
railways
hart
sacks
legal
process
basic
problems
making
application
law
eskridge
frickey
eds
invokes
clear
statement
rule
advise
certain
statutory
interpretations
favored
order
avoid
constitutional
difficulties
congress
make
informed
legislative
choice
either
amend
statute
retain
existing
text
congress
amends
intent
must
respected
even
difficult
constitutional
question
presented
usual
presumption
members
congress
accord
oath
office
considered
constitutional
issue
determined
amended
statute
lawful
one
judiciary
light
determination
proceeds
independent
judgment
constitutional
question
required
proper
case
ongoing
dialogue
among
branches
government
respected
ignore
mca
direct
response
hamdan
holding
dta
provision
application
pending
cases
appeals
correct
take
note
legislative
history
construing
statute
see
citing
relevant
floor
statements
agree
conclusion
mca
deprives
federal
courts
jurisdiction
entertain
habeas
corpus
actions
us
iii
deciding
constitutional
questions
presented
must
determine
whether
petitioners
barred
seeking
writ
invoking
protections
suspension
clause
either
status
petitioners
designation
executive
branch
enemy
combatants
physical
location
presence
guantanamo
bay
government
contends
noncitizens
designated
enemy
combatants
detained
territory
located
outside
nation
borders
constitutional
rights
privilege
habeas
corpus
petitioners
contend
cognizable
constitutional
rights
congress
seeking
eliminate
recourse
habeas
corpus
means
assert
rights
acted
violation
suspension
clause
begin
brief
account
history
origins
writ
account
proceeds
two
propositions
first
protection
privilege
habeas
corpus
one
safeguards
liberty
specified
constitution
outset
bill
rights
system
conceived
framers
writ
centrality
must
inform
proper
interpretation
suspension
clause
second
extent
settled
precedents
legal
commentaries
regarding
extraterritorial
scope
writ
application
enemy
aliens
authorities
instructive
present
cases
framers
viewed
freedom
unlawful
restraint
fundamental
precept
liberty
understood
writ
habeas
corpus
vital
instrument
secure
freedom
experience
taught
however
writ
often
insufficient
guard
abuse
monarchial
power
history
counseled
necessity
specific
language
constitution
secure
writ
ensure
place
legal
system
magna
carta
decreed
man
imprisoned
contrary
law
land
art
sources
liberties
perry
cooper
eds
free
man
shall
taken
imprisoned
dispossessed
outlawed
banished
way
destroyed
go
upon
send
upon
except
legal
judgment
peers
law
land
important
principle
barons
runnymede
prescribed
specific
legal
process
enforce
holdsworth
tells
us
however
gradually
writ
habeas
corpus
became
means
promise
magna
carta
fulfilled
holdsworth
history
english
law
hereinafter
holdsworth
development
painstaking
even
measures
english
constitutional
history
writ
known
used
form
least
early
reign
edward
yet
outset
used
protect
rights
citizens
king
courts
early
courts
considered
agents
crown
designed
assist
king
exercise
power
see
baker
introduction
english
legal
history
ed
thus
writ
become
part
foundation
liberty
king
subjects
earliest
use
mechanism
securing
compliance
king
laws
see
halliday
white
suspension
clause
english
text
imperial
contexts
american
implications
rev
forthcoming
hereinafter
halliday
white
manuscript
online
http
internet
materials
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
noting
conceptually
writ
arose
theory
power
rather
theory
liberty
time
became
clear
issuing
writ
habeas
corpus
courts
sought
enforce
king
prerogative
inquire
authority
jailer
hold
prisoner
see
hale
prerogatives
king
yale
ed
story
commentaries
constitution
ed
noting
writ
ran
parts
king
dominions
said
king
entitled
times
account
liberty
subjects
restrained
even
early
date
understood
king
subject
law
writers
said
magna
carta
means
king
shall
law
pollock
maitland
history
english
law
ed
see
also
bracton
laws
customs
england
thorne
transl
king
must
man
god
law
law
makes
king
writ
deemed
less
instrument
king
power
restraint
upon
see
collings
habeas
corpus
convicts
constitutional
right
legislative
grace
rev
noting
point
writ
appropriate
process
checking
illegal
imprisonment
public
officials
still
writ
proved
imperfect
check
even
importance
writ
well
understood
england
habeas
relief
often
denied
courts
suspended
parliament
denial
suspension
occurred
times
political
unrest
anguish
imprisoned
outrage
sympathy
notable
example
period
darnel
case
tr
events
giving
rise
case
began
display
stuart
penchant
authoritarian
excess
charles
demanded
darnel
least
four
others
lend
money
upon
refusal
imprisoned
prisoners
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
king
filed
return
form
warrant
signed
attorney
general
ibid
held
sufficient
answer
justified
subjects
continued
imprisonment
immediate
outcry
protest
house
commons
promptly
passed
petition
right
car
ch
statutes
realm
reprint
condemned
executive
imprison
ment
without
cause
shown
declared
freeman
manner
mencioned
shall
imprisoned
deteined
yet
full
legislative
response
long
delayed
king
soon
began
abuse
authority
parliament
dissolved
see
hall
albion
history
england
british
empire
ed
hereinafter
hall
albion
parliament
reconvened
sought
secure
access
writ
statute
act
car
ch
statutes
realm
expressly
authorized
use
writ
test
legality
commitment
command
warrant
king
privy
council
civil
strife
interregnum
soon
followed
parliament
try
secure
writ
time
habeas
corpus
act
car
ch
act
later
described
blackstone
stable
bulwark
liberties
blackstone
commentaries
hereinafter
blackstone
established
procedures
issuing
writ
model
upon
habeas
statutes
american
colonies
based
see
collings
supra
history
known
framers
doubt
confirmed
view
pendular
swings
away
individual
liberty
endemic
undivided
uncontrolled
power
framers
inherent
distrust
governmental
power
driving
force
behind
constitutional
plan
allocated
powers
among
three
independent
branches
design
serves
make
government
accountable
also
secure
individual
liberty
see
loving
noting
ven
birth
country
separation
powers
known
defense
tyranny
cf
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
jackson
concurring
constitution
diffuses
power
better
secure
liberty
clinton
city
new
york
kennedy
concurring
liberty
always
stake
one
branches
seek
transgress
separation
powers
constitution
structure
like
substantive
guarantees
fifth
fourteenth
amendments
see
yick
wo
hopkins
protects
persons
well
citizens
foreign
nationals
privilege
litigating
courts
seek
enforce
principles
see
ins
chadha
framers
considered
writ
vital
instrument
protection
individual
liberty
evident
care
taken
specify
limited
grounds
suspension
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
suspended
unless
cases
rebellion
invasion
public
safety
may
require
art
cl
see
amar
sovereignty
federalism
yale
clause
original
constitution
explicit
reference
remedies
word
privilege
used
perhaps
avoid
mentioning
rights
exclusion
others
indeed
mention
term
right
constitution
ratified
clause
giving
congress
power
protect
rights
authors
inventors
see
art
cl
surviving
accounts
ratification
debates
provide
additional
evidence
framers
deemed
writ
essential
mechanism
scheme
critical
exchange
patrick
henry
virginia
ratifying
convention
edmund
randolph
referred
suspension
clause
exception
power
given
congress
regulate
courts
see
debates
several
state
conventions
adoption
federal
constitution
elliot
ed
hereinafter
elliot
debates
resolution
passed
new
york
ratifying
convention
made
clear
understanding
clause
protects
arbitrary
suspensions
writ
also
guarantees
affirmative
right
judicial
inquiry
causes
detention
see
resolution
new
york
ratifying
convention
july
elliot
debates
noting
convention
understanding
hat
every
person
restrained
liberty
entitled
inquiry
lawfulness
restraint
removal
thereof
unlawful
inquiry
removal
denied
delayed
except
account
public
danger
congress
shall
suspend
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
alexander
hamilton
likewise
explained
providing
detainee
judicial
forum
challenge
detention
writ
preserves
limited
government
explained
federalist
practice
arbitrary
imprisonments
ages
favorite
formidable
instruments
tyranny
observations
judicious
blackstone
well
worthy
recital
bereave
man
life
violence
confiscate
estate
without
accusation
trial
gross
notorious
act
despotism
must
convey
alarm
tyranny
throughout
whole
nation
confinement
person
secretly
hurrying
jail
sufferings
unknown
forgotten
less
public
less
striking
therefore
dangerous
engine
arbitrary
government
remedy
fatal
evil
everywhere
peculiarly
emphatical
encomiums
habeas
corpus
act
one
place
calls
bulwark
british
constitution
rossiter
quoting
blackstone
habeas
developments
england
though
bearing
upon
framers
intent
verify
foresight
later
events
underscore
need
structural
barriers
arbitrary
suspensions
writ
writ
vulnerable
executive
parliamentary
encroachment
sides
atlantic
american
revolution
despite
habeas
corpus
act
writ
suspended
frequency
england
times
political
unrest
parliament
suspended
writ
much
period
resulting
rampant
arbitrary
imprisonment
see
hall
albion
even
late
world
war
least
one
prominent
english
jurist
complained
defence
realm
act
geo
ch
effectively
suspended
privilege
habeas
corpus
person
suspected
communicating
enemy
see
king
halliday
lord
shaw
dissenting
see
generally
simpson
highest
degree
odious
detention
without
trial
wartime
britain
system
suspension
clause
designed
protect
cyclical
abuses
clause
protects
rights
detained
means
consistent
essential
design
constitution
ensures
except
periods
formal
suspension
judiciary
device
writ
maintain
delicate
balance
governance
surest
safeguard
liberty
see
hamdi
plurality
opinion
clause
protects
rights
detained
affirming
duty
authority
judiciary
call
jailer
account
see
preiser
rodriguez
essence
habeas
corpus
attack
person
custody
upon
legality
custody
cf
jackson
cooley
concurring
important
fact
observed
regard
mode
procedure
upon
habeas
writ
directed
served
upon
person
confined
jailer
doctrine
history
influenced
design
therefore
must
inform
reach
purpose
suspension
clause
broad
historical
narrative
writ
function
central
analysis
seek
guidance
well
authorities
addressing
specific
question
us
whether
foreign
nationals
apprehended
detained
distant
countries
time
serious
threats
nation
security
may
assert
privilege
writ
seek
protection
careful
foreclose
possibility
protections
suspension
clause
expanded
along
developments
define
present
scope
writ
see
ins
cyr
analysis
may
begin
precedents
said
absolute
minimum
clause
protects
writ
existed
constitution
drafted
ratified
support
arguments
parties
cases
examined
historical
sources
construct
view
writ
existed
amici
whose
expertise
legal
history
relied
upon
past
see
brief
legal
historians
amici
curiae
see
also
cyr
supra
government
argues
writ
ran
territories
crown
sovereign
see
brief
respondents
petitioners
argue
jurisdiction
followed
king
officers
see
brief
petitioner
boumediene
et
al
diligent
search
parties
reveals
certain
conclusions
none
cases
cited
find
granted
refused
hear
lack
jurisdiction
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
brought
prisoner
deemed
enemy
combatant
standard
like
one
department
defense
used
cases
held
territory
like
guantanamo
government
total
military
civil
control
know
common
law
petitioner
status
alien
categorical
bar
habeas
corpus
relief
see
sommersett
case
tr
ordering
african
slave
freed
upon
finding
custodian
return
insufficient
see
generally
khera
secretary
state
home
habeas
corpus
protection
often
expressed
limited
subjects
really
limited
british
nationals
suffice
say
case
law
given
emphatic
question
know
well
courts
entertained
habeas
petitions
brought
enemy
aliens
detained
england
entertained
least
sense
courts
held
hearings
determine
threshold
question
entitlement
writ
see
case
three
spanish
sailors
black
eng
king
schiever
burr
eng
du
castro
case
fort
eng
schiever
spanish
sailors
case
courts
denied
relief
petitioners
whether
holdings
cases
jurisdictional
based
upon
courts
ruling
petitioners
detained
lawfully
prisoners
war
unclear
see
spanish
sailors
supra
eng
schiever
supra
eng
du
castro
case
granted
relief
case
analogous
petitioners
prisoner
appears
detained
england
see
halliday
white
extent
authorities
suggest
courts
abstained
altogether
matters
involving
prisoners
war
greater
justification
context
declared
wars
nation
judicial
intervention
might
complicated
military
ability
negotiate
exchange
prisoners
enemy
wartime
practice
well
known
framers
see
resolution
mar
journals
continental
congress
ford
ed
directing
general
washington
exchange
prisoners
british
unless
enemy
agreed
exempt
citizens
capture
find
evidence
geographic
scope
writ
common
law
informative
dispositive
petitioners
argue
site
detention
analogous
two
territories
outside
england
writ
run
exempt
jurisdictions
like
channel
islands
former
times
india
critical
differences
places
guantanamo
however
noted
rasul
nn
courts
granted
habeas
corpus
relief
prisoners
detained
exempt
jurisdictions
areas
theory
part
realm
england
nonetheless
crown
control
see
hallam
constitutional
history
england
accession
henry
vii
death
george
ii
pp
reprint
indication
jurisdictions
considered
sovereign
territory
king
cowle
burr
eng
describing
one
exempt
jurisdictions
sovereign
jurisdiction
subjection
crown
england
maintain
formal
sovereignty
guantanamo
bay
see
part
iv
infra
naval
station
exempt
jurisdictions
discussed
english
authorities
similarly
situated
petitioners
amici
rely
cases
british
courts
india
granted
writs
habeas
corpus
noncitizens
detained
territory
moghul
emperor
retained
formal
sovereignty
control
see
supra
brief
legal
historians
amici
curiae
analogy
present
cases
breaks
however
geographic
location
courts
indian
example
judicature
british
sat
calcutta
federal
sits
guantanamo
judicature
moreover
special
set
parliament
monitor
certain
conduct
british
raj
see
regulating
act
geo
power
issue
writ
nonsovereign
territory
prove
courts
sitting
england
power
petitioners
better
argument
point
need
demonstration
consistent
practice
courts
sitting
england
entertaining
petitions
brought
alien
prisoners
detained
abroad
find
little
support
conclusion
government
argues
turn
guantanamo
closely
analogous
scotland
hanover
territories
part
england
nonetheless
controlled
english
monarch
separate
capacities
king
scotland
elector
hanover
see
cowle
eng
lord
mansfield
cited
proposition
time
founding
english
courts
lacked
power
issue
writ
scotland
hanover
territories
lord
mansfield
referred
foreign
ibid
matters
purposes
courts
lacked
power
given
english
crown
delicate
complicated
relationships
scotland
hanover
disregard
possibility
courts
refusal
issue
writ
places
motivated
formal
legal
constructs
think
prudential
concerns
appears
case
regard
british
territories
writ
run
see
chambers
course
lectures
english
law
curley
ed
quoting
view
lord
mansfield
cowle
otwithstanding
power
judges
yet
judge
cause
give
relief
upon
think
proper
interpose
therefore
case
imprisonments
guernsey
jersey
minorca
plantations
usual
way
complain
king
council
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
act
union
kingdoms
england
scotland
merged
politically
queen
anne
successors
new
capacity
sovereign
great
britain
ruled
entire
island
one
kingdom
accordingly
time
lord
mansfield
penned
opinion
cowle
scotland
longer
foreign
country
england
least
sense
cuba
foreign
country
scotland
remained
foreign
lord
mansfield
day
least
one
important
respect
however
even
act
union
scotland
like
hanover
continued
maintain
laws
system
see
blackstone
circumstances
prudential
considerations
weighed
heavily
courts
sitting
england
received
habeas
petitions
scotland
electorate
decisions
withholding
writ
prisoners
detained
places
easily
explained
efforts
avoid
either
two
embarrassments
conflict
judgments
another
competent
jurisdiction
practical
inability
reason
distance
english
courts
enforce
judgments
outside
territorial
jurisdiction
cf
munaf
geren
ante
opinion
recognizing
concerns
comity
orderly
administration
criminal
justice
affect
appropriate
exercise
habeas
jurisdiction
century
british
courts
issue
writ
canada
notwithstanding
fact
canadian
courts
also
power
see
holdsworth
citing
ex
parte
anderson
el
el
might
seen
evidence
existence
separate
system
barrier
running
writ
canada
however
many
respects
analogous
exempt
jurisdictions
ireland
writ
ran
scotland
hanover
unlike
scotland
hanover
canada
followed
english
law
see
laskin
british
tradition
canadian
law
end
categorical
formal
conception
sovereignty
provide
comprehensive
altogether
satisfactory
explanation
general
understanding
prevailed
lord
mansfield
considered
issuance
writ
outside
england
writ
run
scotland
run
ireland
even
though
point
scotland
england
merged
rule
single
sovereign
whereas
crowns
great
britain
ireland
remained
separate
least
theory
see
cowle
supra
eng
blackstone
least
one
major
difference
scotland
ireland
relationship
england
period
might
explain
writ
ran
ireland
scotland
english
law
generally
apply
scotland
even
act
union
apply
ireland
blackstone
put
follows
scotland
england
one
kingdom
yet
differ
municipal
laws
england
ireland
hand
distinct
kingdoms
yet
general
agree
laws
distinction
formal
notions
sovereignty
may
well
explain
writ
run
scotland
hanover
run
ireland
prudential
barriers
may
prevented
english
courts
issuing
writ
scotland
hanover
relevant
reason
believe
order
federal
disobeyed
guantanamo
cuban
jurisdiction
hear
petitioners
claims
law
laws
applies
naval
station
relations
guantanamo
thus
differ
important
respects
relations
england
kingdoms
scotland
hanover
reason
enough
us
discount
relevance
government
analogy
side
present
matter
argues
lack
precedent
point
supports
position
government
points
evidence
sitting
england
granted
habeas
relief
enemy
alien
detained
abroad
petitioners
respond
evidence
refused
lack
jurisdiction
arguments
premised
however
upon
assumption
historical
record
complete
common
law
properly
understood
yields
definite
answer
questions
us
reasons
doubt
assumptions
recent
scholarship
points
inherent
shortcomings
historical
record
see
halliday
white
noting
reports
habeas
proceedings
printed
given
unique
status
guantanamo
bay
particular
dangers
terrorism
modern
age
courts
simply
may
confronted
cases
close
parallels
one
decline
therefore
infer
much
one
way
lack
historical
evidence
point
cf
brown
board
education
noting
evidence
concerning
circumstances
surrounding
adoption
fourteenth
amendment
discussed
parties
briefs
uncovered
investigation
convince
us
although
sources
cast
light
enough
resolve
problem
faced
best
inconclusive
reid
covert
frankfurter
concurring
result
arguing
constitutional
adjudication
based
upon
evidence
episodic
meager
form
solid
basis
history
preceding
contemporaneous
framing
constitution
iv
drawing
position
common
law
writ
ran
territories
crown
sovereign
government
says
suspension
clause
affords
petitioners
rights
claim
sovereignty
place
detention
guantanamo
bay
formally
part
see
dta
stat
terms
lease
cuba
cuba
retains
ultimate
sovereignty
territory
exercises
complete
jurisdiction
control
see
lease
lands
coaling
naval
stations
art
iii
hereinafter
lease
agreement
rasul
terms
treaty
however
cuba
effectively
rights
sovereign
parties
agree
modification
lease
agreement
abandons
base
see
treaty
defining
relations
cuba
may
art
iii
stat
contends
nevertheless
guantanamo
within
sovereign
control
government
position
well
events
september
see
brief
petitioners
sale
haitian
centers
council
arguing
guantanamo
territory
outside
contexts
held
questions
sovereignty
political
branches
decide
see
connell
etermination
sovereignty
area
legislative
executive
departments
see
also
jones
williams
suffolk
ins
pet
even
treaty
interpretation
case
involve
political
question
president
construction
lease
agreement
entitled
great
respect
see
sumitomo
shoji
america
avagliano
therefore
question
government
position
cuba
maintains
sovereignty
legal
technical
sense
term
guantanamo
bay
end
analysis
cases
hold
improper
us
inquire
objective
degree
control
nation
asserts
foreign
territory
commentators
noted
overeignty
term
used
many
senses
much
see
restatement
third
foreign
relations
law
comment
stated
sovereignty
political
question
referred
sovereignty
general
colloquial
sense
meaning
exercise
dominion
power
see
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
sovereignty
definition
sovereignty
narrow
legal
sense
term
meaning
claim
right
see
restatement
third
foreign
relations
supra
comment
noting
sovereignty
implies
state
lawful
control
territory
generally
exclusion
authority
govern
territory
authority
apply
law
indeed
altogether
uncommon
territory
de
jure
sovereignty
one
nation
plenary
control
practical
sovereignty
another
condition
occur
territory
seized
war
guantanamo
war
see
fleming
page
noting
port
tampico
conquered
war
mexico
undoubtedly
subject
sovereignty
dominion
follow
part
ceased
foreign
country
king
earl
crewe
ex
parte
sekgome
opinion
williams
arguing
bechuanaland
protectorate
south
africa
majesty
dominion
sense
power
jurisdiction
dominion
sense
territorial
dominion
accordingly
purposes
analysis
accept
government
position
cuba
retains
de
jure
sovereignty
guantanamo
bay
rasul
however
take
notice
obvious
uncontested
fact
virtue
complete
jurisdiction
control
base
maintains
de
facto
sovereignty
territory
see
kennedy
concurring
judgment
hold
present
cases
turn
political
question
doctrine
required
first
accept
government
premise
de
jure
sovereignty
touchstone
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
premise
however
unfounded
reasons
indicated
history
habeas
corpus
provides
scant
support
proposition
reasons
indicated
position
inconsistent
precedents
contrary
fundamental
principles
discussed
issue
constitution
extraterritorial
application
many
occasions
decisions
undermine
government
argument
least
applied
noncitizens
constitution
necessarily
stops
de
jure
sovereignty
ends
framers
foresaw
expand
acquire
new
territories
see
american
ins
bales
cotton
pet
article
iv
cl
grants
congress
power
admit
new
clause
section
grants
congress
power
dispose
make
needful
rules
regulations
respecting
territory
property
belonging
save
notable
notorious
exceptions
dred
scott
sandford
throughout
history
little
need
explore
outer
boundaries
constitution
geographic
reach
congress
exercised
power
create
new
territories
guaranteed
constitutional
protections
inhabitants
statute
see
act
establish
territorial
government
utah
stat
constitution
laws
hereby
extended
declared
force
said
territory
utah
rev
stat
constitution
laws
locally
inapplicable
shall
force
effect
within
organized
territories
every
territory
hereafter
organized
elsewhere
within
see
generally
burnett
untied
american
expansion
territorial
deannexation
chi
rev
particular
need
test
limits
suspension
clause
early
congress
extended
writ
territories
see
act
stat
reaffirming
art
ii
northwest
ordinance
provided
inhabitants
said
territory
shall
always
entitled
benefits
writ
habeas
corpus
fundamental
questions
regarding
constitution
geographic
scope
first
arose
dawn
century
nation
acquired
noncontiguous
territories
puerto
rico
guam
philippines
ceded
spain
conclusion
war
hawaii
annexed
point
congress
chose
discontinue
previous
practice
extending
constitutional
rights
territories
statute
see
act
temporarily
provide
administration
affairs
civil
government
philippine
islands
purposes
stat
noting
rev
stat
apply
philippines
series
opinions
later
known
insular
cases
addressed
whether
constitution
force
applies
territory
state
see
de
lima
bidwell
dooley
armstrong
downes
bidwell
hawaii
mankichi
dorr
held
constitution
independent
force
territories
force
contingent
upon
acts
legislative
grace
yet
took
note
difficulties
inherent
position
prior
cession
former
spanish
colonies
operated
system
without
experience
various
aspects
legal
tradition
instance
use
grand
petit
juries
least
regard
philippines
complete
transformation
prevailing
legal
culture
disruptive
also
unnecessary
intended
grant
independence
territory
see
act
declare
purpose
people
future
political
status
people
philippine
islands
provide
autonomous
government
islands
jones
act
stat
noting
never
intention
people
incipiency
war
spain
make
war
conquest
territorial
aggrandizement
always
purpose
people
withdraw
sovereignty
philippine
islands
recognize
independence
soon
stable
government
established
therein
thus
reluctant
risk
uncertainty
instability
result
rule
displaced
altogether
existing
legal
systems
newly
acquired
territories
see
downes
supra
obvious
annexation
outlying
distant
possessions
grave
questions
arise
differences
race
habits
laws
customs
people
differences
soil
climate
production
considerations
resulted
doctrine
territorial
incorporation
constitution
applies
full
incorporated
territories
surely
destined
statehood
part
unincorporated
territories
see
dorr
supra
congress
shall
see
fit
incorporate
territory
ceded
treaty
territory
governed
power
existing
congress
make
laws
territories
subject
constitutional
restrictions
upon
powers
body
applicable
situation
downes
supra
white
concurring
determination
particular
provision
constitution
applicable
generally
speaking
cases
involves
inquiry
situation
territory
relations
later
made
clear
real
issue
insular
cases
whether
constitution
extended
philippines
porto
rico
went
provisions
applicable
way
limitation
upon
exercise
executive
legislative
power
dealing
new
conditions
requirements
balzac
porto
rico
may
well
time
ties
unincorporated
territories
strengthen
ways
constitutional
significance
cf
torres
puerto
rico
brennan
concurring
judgment
whatever
validity
insular
cases
particular
historical
context
decided
cases
clearly
authority
questioning
application
fourth
amendment
provision
bill
rights
commonwealth
puerto
rico
early
balzac
took
granted
even
unincorporated
territories
government
bound
provide
noncitizen
inhabitants
guaranties
certain
fundamental
personal
rights
declared
constitution
see
also
late
church
jesus
christ
saints
doubtless
congress
legislating
territories
subject
fundamental
limitations
favor
personal
rights
formulated
constitution
amendments
yet
noting
inherent
practical
difficulties
enforcing
constitutional
provisions
always
everywhere
balzac
supra
devised
insular
cases
doctrine
allowed
use
power
sparingly
needed
doctrine
informs
analysis
present
matter
practical
considerations
likewise
influenced
analysis
later
reid
petitioners
spouses
american
servicemen
lived
american
military
bases
england
japan
charged
crimes
committed
countries
tried
military
courts
consistent
executive
agreements
entered
british
japanese
governments
nn
plurality
opinion
petitioners
military
personnel
argued
entitled
trial
jury
justice
black
writing
plurality
contrasted
cases
insular
cases
involved
territories
wholly
dissimilar
traditions
institutions
congress
intended
govern
temporarily
justice
frankfurter
argued
specific
circumstances
particular
case
relevant
determining
geographic
scope
constitution
opinion
concurring
result
justice
harlan
joined
opinion
reaching
opposite
result
case
previous
term
reid
covert
explicit
rejecting
rigid
abstract
rule
determining
constitutional
guarantees
extend
reid
opinion
concurring
result
read
insular
cases
teach
whether
constitutional
provision
extraterritorial
effect
depends
upon
particular
circumstances
practical
necessities
possible
alternatives
congress
particular
whether
judicial
enforcement
provision
impracticable
anomalous
see
also
kennedy
concurring
applying
impracticable
anomalous
extraterritoriality
test
fourth
amendment
context
petitioners
reid
american
citizens
key
factor
case
central
plurality
conclusion
fifth
sixth
amendments
apply
american
civilians
tried
outside
practical
considerations
related
petitioners
citizenship
place
confinement
trial
relevant
member
reid
majority
justices
harlan
frankfurter
whose
votes
necessary
disposition
considerations
decisive
factors
case
indeed
majority
splintered
point
key
disagreement
plurality
concurring
justices
reid
continued
precedential
value
previous
opinion
ross
reid
understood
holding
circumstances
americans
abroad
right
indictment
trial
jury
petitioner
ross
sailor
serving
american
merchant
vessel
japanese
waters
tried
american
consular
tribunal
murder
fellow
crewman
ross
held
petitioner
british
subject
rights
fifth
sixth
amendments
petitioner
citizenship
played
role
disposition
case
however
assumed
consistent
maritime
custom
time
ross
rights
similarly
situated
american
citizen
noting
ross
protection
subject
laws
equally
seaman
native
born
justices
reid
therefore
properly
understood
ross
standing
proposition
least
circumstances
jury
provisions
fifth
sixth
amendments
application
american
citizens
tried
american
authorities
abroad
see
plurality
opinion
describing
ross
holding
constitutional
protections
applied
citizens
others
within
residents
temporary
sojourners
quoting
ross
supra
frankfurter
concurring
result
noting
consular
tribunals
upheld
ross
ere
based
custom
justified
best
possible
means
securing
justice
americans
present
foreign
countries
harlan
concurring
result
ross
insular
cases
hold
particular
local
setting
practical
necessities
possible
alternatives
relevant
question
judgment
namely
whether
jury
trial
deemed
necessary
condition
exercise
congress
power
provide
trial
americans
overseas
reid
plurality
doubted
ross
rightly
decided
precisely
believed
opinion
insufficiently
protective
rights
american
citizens
see
see
also
clark
dissenting
noting
four
brothers
specifically
overrule
two
impair
vitality
old
respected
precedent
law
case
ross
justices
harlan
frankfurter
willing
hold
american
citizen
petitioners
cases
entitled
protections
fifth
sixth
amendments
unwilling
overturn
ross
frankfurter
concurring
result
harlan
concurring
result
instead
two
concurring
justices
distinguished
ross
cases
basis
citizenship
petitioners
practical
considerations
made
jury
trial
feasible
option
petitioner
ross
citizenship
relevant
factor
case
necessary
overturn
ross
something
justices
harlan
frankfurter
unwilling
see
supra
kennedy
concurring
noting
ross
overruled
practical
considerations
weighed
heavily
well
johnson
eisentrager
addressed
whether
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
extended
enemy
aliens
convicted
violating
laws
war
prisoners
detained
landsberg
prison
germany
allied
powers
postwar
occupation
stressed
difficulties
ordering
government
produce
prisoners
habeas
corpus
proceeding
require
allocation
shipping
space
guarding
personnel
billeting
rations
damage
prestige
military
commanders
sensitive
time
considering
factors
sought
balance
constraints
military
occupation
constitutional
necessities
see
rasul
discussing
factors
relevant
eisentrager
constitutional
holding
kennedy
concurring
judgment
true
eisentrager
denied
access
writ
noted
prisoners
relevant
time
within
territory
sovereign
scenes
offense
capture
trial
punishment
beyond
territorial
jurisdiction
government
seizes
upon
language
proof
positive
eisentrager
adopted
formalistic
test
determining
reach
suspension
clause
see
brief
respondents
reject
reading
three
reasons
first
accept
idea
passage
eisentrager
authoritative
language
opinion
rest
dicta
determinations
based
practical
considerations
integral
part
ii
opinion
came
decision
announced
holding
see
second
lacked
de
jure
sovereignty
plenary
control
landsberg
prison
see
infra
far
clear
eisentrager
used
term
sovereignty
narrow
technical
sense
connote
degree
control
military
asserted
facility
see
supra
justices
decided
eisentrager
understood
sovereignty
multifaceted
concept
see
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
sovereignty
absolute
uncontrollable
power
independent
state
governed
international
independence
state
combined
right
power
regulating
internal
affairs
without
foreign
dictation
power
everything
state
without
accountability
ballentine
law
dictionary
pronunciations
ed
defining
sovereignty
hat
public
authority
commands
civil
society
orders
directs
citizen
perform
obtain
end
institution
principal
brief
eisentrager
government
advocated
test
determining
scope
writ
similar
one
advocates
cases
see
brief
petitioners
johnson
eisentrager
pp
yet
mentioned
concept
territorial
sovereignty
twice
opinion
see
eisentrager
supra
devoted
significant
portion
part
ii
discussion
practical
barriers
running
writ
suggests
concerned
exclusively
formal
legal
status
landsberg
prison
also
objective
degree
control
asserted
even
assume
eisentrager
considered
lack
formal
legal
sovereignty
landsberg
prison
decisive
factor
case
holding
inconsistent
functional
approach
questions
extraterritoriality
formal
legal
status
given
territory
affects
least
extent
political
branches
control
territory
de
jure
sovereignty
factor
bears
upon
constitutional
guarantees
apply
third
government
reading
eisentrager
correct
opinion
marked
change
complete
repudiation
insular
cases
later
reid
functional
approach
questions
extraterritoriality
accept
government
view
nothing
eisentrager
says
de
jure
sovereignty
ever
relevant
consideration
determining
geographic
reach
constitution
habeas
corpus
case
considerable
tension
eisentrager
one
hand
insular
cases
reid
cases
need
read
conflict
manner
constricted
reading
eisentrager
overlooks
see
common
thread
uniting
insular
cases
eisentrager
reid
idea
questions
extraterritoriality
turn
objective
factors
practical
concerns
formalism
government
formal
test
raises
troubling
concerns
well
political
history
guantanamo
illustrates
deficiencies
approach
maintained
complete
uninterrupted
control
bay
years
close
war
spain
ceded
control
entire
island
cuba
specifically
relinquishe
claim
sovereignty
title
see
treaty
paris
art
stat
date
treaty
spain
signed
cuban
republic
established
may
governed
territory
trust
benefit
cuban
people
neely
henkel
thomas
cuba
pursuit
freedom
although
recognized
entering
lease
agreement
cuba
retained
ultimate
sovereignty
guantanamo
continued
maintain
plenary
control
enjoyed
since
yet
government
view
constitution
effect
least
noncitizens
disclaimed
sovereignty
formal
sense
term
necessary
implication
argument
surrendering
formal
sovereignty
unincorporated
territory
third
party
time
entering
lease
grants
total
control
territory
back
possible
political
branches
govern
without
legal
constraint
basic
charter
contracted
away
like
constitution
grants
congress
president
power
acquire
dispose
govern
territory
power
decide
terms
apply
even
acts
outside
borders
powers
absolute
unlimited
subject
restrictions
expressed
constitution
murphy
ramsey
abstaining
questions
involving
formal
sovereignty
territorial
governance
one
thing
hold
political
branches
power
switch
constitution
quite
another
former
position
reflects
recognition
certain
matters
requiring
political
judgments
best
left
political
branches
latter
permit
striking
anomaly
tripartite
system
government
leading
regime
congress
president
say
law
marbury
madison
cranch
concerns
particular
bearing
upon
suspension
clause
question
cases
us
writ
habeas
corpus
indispensable
mechanism
monitoring
separation
powers
test
determining
scope
provision
must
subject
manipulation
whose
power
designed
restrain
recognized
rasul
kennedy
concurring
judgment
outlines
framework
determining
reach
suspension
clause
suggested
factors
relied
upon
eisentrager
addition
practical
concerns
discussed
eisentrager
found
relevant
petitioner
enemy
alien
never
resided
captured
outside
territory
held
military
custody
prisoner
war
tried
convicted
military
commission
sitting
outside
offenses
laws
war
committed
outside
times
imprisoned
outside
based
language
eisentrager
reasoning
extraterritoriality
opinions
conclude
least
three
factors
relevant
determining
reach
suspension
clause
citizenship
status
detainee
adequacy
process
status
determination
made
nature
sites
apprehension
detention
took
place
practical
obstacles
inherent
resolving
prisoner
entitlement
writ
applying
framework
note
onset
status
detainees
matter
dispute
petitioners
like
eisentrager
american
citizens
petitioners
eisentrager
contest
seems
assertion
enemy
alien
ibid
instant
cases
contrast
detainees
deny
enemy
combatants
afforded
process
csrt
proceedings
determine
status
unlike
eisentrager
supra
trial
military
commission
violations
laws
war
difference
trivial
records
eisentrager
trials
suggest
well
petitioners
brought
case
rigorous
adversarial
process
test
legality
detention
eisentrager
petitioners
charged
bill
particulars
made
detailed
factual
allegations
see
nations
war
crimes
commission
law
reports
trials
war
criminals
reprint
rebut
accusations
entitled
representation
counsel
allowed
introduce
evidence
behalf
permitted
prosecution
witnesses
see
memorandum
command
wedemeyer
establishing
regulations
governing
trial
war
criminals
china
theater
tr
record
johnson
eisentrager
pp
comparison
procedural
protections
afforded
detainees
csrt
hearings
far
limited
conclude
fall
well
short
procedures
adversarial
mechanisms
eliminate
need
habeas
corpus
review
although
detainee
assigned
personal
representative
assist
csrt
proceedings
secretary
navy
memorandum
makes
clear
person
detainee
lawyer
even
advocate
see
app
pet
cert
government
evidence
accorded
presumption
validity
detainee
allowed
present
reasonably
available
evidence
ability
rebut
government
evidence
limited
circumstances
confinement
lack
counsel
stage
although
detainee
seek
review
status
determination
appeals
review
process
cure
defects
earlier
proceedings
see
part
infra
second
factor
relevant
analysis
detainees
similarly
situated
eisentrager
petitioners
sites
apprehension
detention
technically
outside
sovereign
territory
noted
earlier
factor
weighs
finding
rights
suspension
clause
critical
differences
landsberg
prison
circa
naval
station
guantanamo
bay
unlike
present
control
naval
station
control
prison
germany
neither
absolute
indefinite
like
parts
occupied
germany
prison
jurisdiction
combined
allied
forces
see
declaration
regarding
defeat
germany
assumption
authority
respect
germany
june
stat
therefore
answerable
allies
activities
occurring
cf
hirota
macarthur
per
curiam
military
tribunal
set
douglas
macarthur
acting
agent
allied
powers
tribunal
allies
planned
occupation
germany
intend
displace
german
institutions
even
period
occupation
see
agreements
respecting
basic
principles
merger
three
western
german
zones
occupation
matters
apr
art
stat
establishing
governing
framework
uring
period
necessary
occupation
continue
expressing
desire
german
people
shall
enjoy
maximum
possible
degree
consistent
occupation
holding
eisentrager
thus
consistent
insular
cases
held
need
extend
full
constitutional
protections
territories
intend
govern
indefinitely
guantanamo
bay
hand
transient
possession
every
practical
sense
guantanamo
abroad
within
constant
jurisdiction
see
rasul
kennedy
concurring
judgment
third
factor
recognize
eisentrager
costs
holding
suspension
clause
applicable
case
military
detention
abroad
habeas
corpus
proceedings
may
require
expenditure
funds
government
may
divert
attention
military
personnel
pressing
tasks
sensitive
concerns
find
dispositive
compliance
judicial
process
requires
incremental
expenditure
resources
yet
civilian
courts
armed
forces
functioned
along
side
various
points
history
see
duncan
kahanamoku
ex
parte
milligan
wall
government
presents
credible
arguments
military
mission
guantanamo
compromised
habeas
corpus
courts
jurisdiction
hear
detainees
claims
light
plenary
control
asserts
base
none
apparent
us
situation
eisentrager
far
different
given
historical
context
nature
military
mission
germany
hostilities
european
theater
came
end
became
responsible
occupation
zone
encompassing
square
miles
population
million
see
letter
president
truman
secretary
state
byrnes
documents
american
foreign
relations
dennett
turner
eds
pollock
territorial
pattern
military
occupation
germany
pol
sci
rev
addition
supervising
massive
reconstruction
aid
efforts
american
forces
stationed
germany
faced
potential
security
threats
defeated
enemy
retrospect
occupation
may
seem
uneventful
time
eisentrager
decided
right
concerned
judicial
interference
military
efforts
contain
enemy
elements
guerilla
fighters
similar
threats
apparent
government
argue
naval
station
guantanamo
bay
consists
square
miles
land
water
base
used
various
points
house
migrants
refugees
temporarily
present
however
detainees
residents
american
military
personnel
families
small
number
workers
see
history
guantanamo
bay
online
https
gtmohistgeneral
detainees
deemed
enemies
present
dangerous
may
released
contained
secure
prison
facility
located
isolated
heavily
fortified
military
base
indication
furthermore
adjudicating
habeas
corpus
petition
cause
friction
host
government
cuban
jurisdiction
american
military
personnel
guantanamo
enemy
combatants
detained
obligated
abide
terms
lease
practical
purposes
answerable
sovereign
acts
base
case
detention
facility
located
active
theater
war
arguments
issuing
writ
impracticable
anomalous
weight
see
reid
harlan
concurring
result
facts
presented
however
practical
barriers
running
writ
extent
barriers
arise
habeas
corpus
procedures
likely
modified
address
see
part
infra
true
today
never
held
noncitizens
detained
government
territory
another
country
maintains
de
jure
sovereignty
rights
constitution
cases
us
lack
precise
historical
parallel
involve
individuals
detained
executive
order
duration
conflict
measured
september
present
already
among
longest
wars
american
history
see
oxford
companion
american
military
history
detainees
moreover
held
territory
technically
part
complete
total
control
government
circumstances
lack
precedent
point
barrier
holding
hold
art
cl
constitution
full
effect
guantanamo
bay
privilege
habeas
corpus
denied
detainees
us
congress
must
act
accordance
requirements
suspension
clause
cf
hamdi
scalia
dissenting
ndefinite
imprisonment
reasonable
suspicion
available
option
treatment
accused
aiding
enemy
absent
suspension
writ
may
impose
de
facto
suspension
abstaining
controversies
see
hamdan
bstention
appropriate
cases
legal
challenge
status
persons
military
asserted
quoting
schlesinger
councilman
mca
purport
formal
suspension
writ
government
submissions
us
argued
petitioners
therefore
entitled
privilege
habeas
corpus
challenge
legality
detention
light
holding
question
becomes
whether
statute
stripping
jurisdiction
issue
writ
avoids
suspension
clause
mandate
congress
provided
adequate
substitute
procedures
habeas
corpus
government
submits
compliance
suspension
clause
dta
review
process
appeals
see
dta
provides
adequate
substitute
congress
granted
jurisdiction
consider
whether
status
determination
csrt
consistent
standards
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
ii
extent
constitution
laws
applicable
whether
use
standards
procedures
make
determination
consistent
constitution
laws
stat
appeals
decided
writ
run
detainees
event
found
unnecessary
consider
whether
adequate
substitute
provided
ordinary
course
remand
appeals
consider
question
first
instance
see
youakim
miller
per
curiam
well
settled
however
practice
declining
address
issues
left
unresolved
earlier
proceedings
inflexible
rule
ibid
departure
rule
appropriate
exceptional
circumstances
see
cooper
industries
aviall
services
duignan
gravity
issues
raised
cases
fact
detainees
denied
meaningful
access
judicial
forum
period
years
render
cases
exceptional
parties
us
addressed
adequacy
issue
found
informative
consider
reasoning
appeals
point
must
weigh
harms
petitioners
may
endure
additional
delay
given
precedents
addressing
features
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
must
contain
likelihood
remand
simply
delay
ultimate
resolution
issue
benefit
appeals
construction
key
provisions
dta
granted
certiorari
cases
noted
material
assistance
consult
decision
parallel
dta
review
proceedings
pending
appeals
specifically
rulings
matter
bismullah
gates
although
appeals
yet
complete
dta
review
proceeding
panel
bismullah
issued
interim
order
giving
guidance
evidence
made
part
record
review
access
detainees
counsel
classified
information
see
cadc
bismullah
denied
cadc
bismullah
ii
matter
full
denied
government
motion
rehearing
en
banc
see
bismullah
gates
cadc
bismullah
iii
order
denying
rehearing
accompanied
five
separate
statements
members
offer
differing
views
scope
judicial
review
congress
intended
detainees
ibid
circumstances
believe
costs
delay
substantially
outweigh
benefits
remanding
appeals
consider
issue
address
cases
case
law
contain
extensive
discussion
standards
defining
suspension
writ
circumstances
suspension
occurred
simply
confirms
care
congress
taken
throughout
nation
history
preserve
writ
function
indeed
major
legislative
enactments
pertaining
habeas
corpus
acted
contract
writ
protection
expand
hasten
resolution
prisoners
claims
see
habeas
corpus
act
ch
stat
current
version
codified
ed
supp
extending
federal
writ
state
prisoners
cf
harris
nelson
interpreting
writs
act
allow
discovery
habeas
corpus
proceedings
peyton
rowe
interpreting
version
allow
petitioner
proceed
habeas
corpus
action
even
though
yet
begun
serve
sentence
exceptions
course
title
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
stat
contains
certain
gatekeeping
provisions
restrict
prisoner
ability
bring
new
repetitive
claims
second
successive
habeas
corpus
actions
upheld
provisions
suspension
clause
challenge
felker
turpin
provisions
issue
felker
however
constitute
substantial
departure
habeas
procedures
provisions
part
codified
longstanding
doctrine
see
also
mccleskey
zant
aedpa
applies
moreover
federal
postconviction
review
criminal
proceedings
state
taken
place
point
cases
discussing
implementation
statute
give
little
helpful
instruction
save
perhaps
contrast
instant
cases
trial
held
two
leading
cases
addressing
habeas
substitutes
swain
pressley
hayman
likewise
provide
little
guidance
statutes
issue
attempts
streamline
habeas
corpus
relief
cut
back
statute
discussed
hayman
replaced
traditional
habeas
corpus
federal
prisoners
least
first
instance
process
allowed
prisoner
file
motion
sentencing
ground
sentence
inter
alia
violation
constitution
laws
purpose
effect
statute
restrict
access
writ
make
postconviction
proceedings
efficient
directed
claims
territorial
jurisdiction
place
petitioner
confinement
sentencing
already
familiar
facts
case
hayman
explained
section
passed
instance
judicial
conference
meet
practical
difficulties
arisen
administering
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
federal
courts
nowhere
history
section
find
purpose
impinge
upon
prisoners
rights
collateral
attack
upon
convictions
contrary
sole
purpose
minimize
difficulties
encountered
habeas
corpus
hearings
affording
rights
another
convenient
forum
see
also
hill
noting
provides
remedy
sentencing
exactly
commensurate
federal
habeas
corpus
remedy
statute
swain
code
ann
applied
prisoners
custody
sentence
superior
district
columbia
enactment
district
columbia
reform
criminal
procedure
act
reform
act
stat
prisoners
file
habeas
petitions
district
district
columbia
act
patterned
substituted
new
collateral
process
superior
habeas
corpus
procedure
district
see
swain
purpose
effect
statute
expedite
consideration
prisoner
claims
delay
frustrate
see
noting
purpose
reform
act
alleviate
administrative
burdens
district
statutes
hayman
swain
designed
strengthen
rather
dilute
writ
protections
evident
furthermore
significant
fact
neither
statute
eliminated
traditional
habeas
corpus
relief
cases
statute
issue
saving
clause
providing
writ
habeas
corpus
available
alternative
process
proved
inadequate
ineffective
swain
supra
hayman
supra
placed
explicit
reliance
upon
provisions
upholding
statutes
constitutional
challenges
see
swain
supra
noting
provision
avoid
ed
serious
question
constitutionality
statute
hayman
supra
noting
habeas
remained
available
last
resort
unnecessary
reach
constitutional
questions
unlike
hayman
swain
confront
statutes
dta
mca
intended
circumscribe
habeas
review
congress
purpose
evident
unequivocal
nature
mca
language
supp
justice
judge
shall
jurisdiction
hear
consider
application
writ
habeas
corpus
also
comparison
dta
statutes
issue
hayman
swain
interpreting
statute
examine
related
provisions
parts
code
see
west
virginia
univ
hospitals
casey
babbitt
sweet
home
chapter
communities
great
scalia
dissenting
see
generally
eskridge
frickey
garrett
cases
materials
legislation
statutes
creation
public
policy
ed
congress
intended
replace
traditional
habeas
corpus
substitutes
case
hayman
swain
granted
courts
broad
remedial
powers
secure
historic
office
writ
context
example
congress
granted
reviewing
power
determine
issues
make
findings
fact
conclusions
law
respect
whether
judgment
conviction
rendered
without
jurisdiction
sentence
imposed
authorized
law
otherwise
open
collateral
attack
supp
reform
act
statute
upheld
swain
contained
similar
provision
stat
contrast
dta
jurisdictional
grant
quite
limited
appeals
jurisdiction
inquire
legality
detention
generally
assess
whether
csrt
complied
standards
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
whether
standards
procedures
lawful
dta
stat
congress
envisioned
dta
review
coextensive
traditional
habeas
corpus
drafted
statute
manner
instead
used
language
similar
used
statutes
issue
hayman
swain
cf
russello
congress
includes
particular
language
one
section
statute
omits
another
section
act
generally
presumed
congress
acts
intentionally
purposely
disparate
inclusion
quoting
wong
kim
bo
unlike
hayman
swain
moreover
effort
preserve
habeas
corpus
review
avenue
last
resort
saving
clause
exists
either
mca
dta
mca
eliminates
habeas
review
petitioners
differences
dta
habeas
statute
govern
mca
absence
ed
supp
likewise
telling
ed
congress
confirmed
authority
justice
circuit
judge
issue
writ
cf
felker
interpreting
title
aedpa
strip
power
entertain
original
habeas
corpus
petitions
statute
accommodates
necessity
factfinding
arise
cases
allowing
appellate
judge
justice
transfer
case
district
competent
jurisdiction
whose
institutional
capacity
factfinding
superior
see
granting
appeals
exclusive
jurisdiction
petitioners
cases
see
dta
stat
congress
foreclosed
option
choice
indicates
congress
intended
appeals
limited
role
enemy
combatant
status
determinations
district
habeas
corpus
proceedings
dta
interpreted
accord
latitude
appeals
fashion
procedures
necessary
make
review
function
meaningful
one
congressional
intent
respected
procedures
adopted
extensive
protective
rights
detainees
proceeding
otherwise
little
purpose
enacting
dta
extent
doubt
remains
congress
intent
legislative
history
confirms
plain
text
strongly
suggests
passing
dta
congress
intend
create
process
differs
traditional
habeas
corpus
process
name
intended
create
limited
procedure
see
cong
rec
statement
graham
noting
dta
extinguish
es
habeas
actions
order
effect
transfer
jurisdiction
cases
dc
circuit
agreeing
bill
create
place
limited
judicial
review
certain
military
administrative
decisions
statement
kyl
important
note
limited
judicial
review
authorized
paragraphs
subsection
dta
review
limited
judicial
review
nature
background
must
interpret
dta
assess
adequacy
substitute
habeas
corpus
present
cases
thus
test
limits
suspension
clause
ways
hayman
swain
endeavor
offer
comprehensive
summary
requisites
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
consider
uncontroversial
however
privilege
habeas
corpus
entitles
prisoner
meaningful
opportunity
demonstrate
held
pursuant
erroneous
application
interpretation
relevant
law
cyr
habeas
must
power
order
conditional
release
individual
unlawfully
detained
though
release
need
exclusive
remedy
appropriate
one
every
case
writ
granted
see
ex
parte
bollman
cranch
imprisonment
unlawful
direct
prisoner
discharged
hurd
treatise
right
personal
liberty
writ
habeas
corpus
practice
connected
view
law
extradition
fugitives
ed
denied
probable
ground
shown
party
imprisoned
without
cause
therefore
hath
right
delivered
writ
becomes
right
may
denied
granted
every
man
committed
detained
prison
otherwise
restrained
see
chessman
teets
remanding
habeas
case
retrial
within
reasonable
time
easily
identified
attributes
constitutionally
adequate
habeas
corpus
proceeding
depending
circumstances
may
required
indeed
habeas
corpus
adaptable
remedy
precise
application
scope
changed
depending
upon
circumstances
see
blackstone
describing
habeas
great
efficacious
writ
manner
illegal
confinement
see
also
schlup
delo
habeas
core
equitable
remedy
jones
cunningham
habeas
static
narrow
formalistic
remedy
scope
grown
achieve
grand
purpose
appears
habeas
role
extensive
cases
pretrial
noncriminal
detention
little
previous
judicial
review
cause
detention
notably
rule
prisoners
controvert
facts
jailer
return
followed
least
consistency
cases
hurd
supra
noting
general
rule
subject
exceptions
including
cases
bail
impressment
oakes
legal
history
high
habeas
corpus
rev
hen
prisoner
applied
habeas
corpus
indictment
trial
courts
examined
written
depositions
arrested
committed
others
even
heard
oral
testimony
determine
whether
evidence
sufficient
justifying
holding
trial
footnotes
omitted
fallon
meltzer
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
substantive
rights
war
terror
harv
rev
early
practice
consistent
courts
occasionally
permitted
factual
inquiries
opportunity
judicial
review
existed
evidence
american
sources
indicating
even
accorded
strong
res
judicata
effect
prior
adjudications
habeas
courts
country
routinely
allowed
prisoners
introduce
exculpatory
evidence
either
unknown
previously
unavailable
prisoner
see
ex
parte
pattison
miss
noting
hile
former
adjudication
must
considered
conclusive
testimony
adduced
newly
developed
exculpatory
evidence
may
authorize
admission
bail
ex
parte
foster
tex
app
construing
state
habeas
statute
allow
introduction
new
evidence
important
testimony
obtained
though
newly
discovered
though
known
petitioner
power
produce
former
hearing
evidence
newly
discovered
people
martin
leg
obs
custody
criminal
process
indictment
prisoner
absolute
right
demand
original
depositions
looked
see
whether
crime
fact
imputed
inquiry
means
confined
return
facts
return
may
gone
ascertain
whether
committing
magistrate
may
arrived
illogical
conclusion
upon
evidence
given
see
generally
church
treatise
writ
habeas
corpus
hereinafter
church
noting
habeas
courts
hear
evidence
anew
justice
require
justice
mclean
circuit
expressed
view
habeas
consider
prior
judgment
conclusive
clearly
jurisdiction
full
fair
hearing
might
considered
requisites
wanting
ex
parte
robinson
cas
cc
ohio
illustrate
circumstances
prior
adjudication
bind
habeas
gave
example
case
everal
unimpeached
witnesses
provided
new
evidence
exculpate
prisoner
ibid
idea
necessary
scope
habeas
review
part
depends
upon
rigor
earlier
proceedings
accords
test
procedural
adequacy
due
process
context
see
mathews
eldridge
noting
due
process
clause
requires
assessment
inter
alia
risk
erroneous
deprivation
liberty
interest
probable
value
additional
substitute
procedural
safeguards
principle
established
foundation
habeas
corpus
jurisprudence
well
chief
justice
marshall
opinion
ex
parte
watkins
pet
demonstrates
like
petitioner
swain
watkins
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
imprisoned
pursuant
judgment
district
columbia
holding
judgment
stood
high
ground
chief
justice
emphasized
character
rendered
original
judgment
noting
record
general
jurisdiction
criminal
cases
contrast
inferior
tribunals
limited
jurisdiction
courts
record
broad
remedial
powers
gave
habeas
greater
confidence
judgment
validity
see
generally
neuman
habeas
corpus
executive
detention
removal
aliens
colum
rev
accordingly
relief
sought
sentence
resulted
judgment
record
case
watkins
indeed
federal
habeas
cases
considerable
deference
owed
ordered
confinement
see
brown
allen
opinion
frankfurter
noting
federal
habeas
accept
state
factual
findings
unless
vital
flaw
found
process
ascertaining
facts
state
likewise
cases
prisoner
exhaust
adequate
alternative
remedies
filing
writ
federal
see
ex
parte
royall
requiring
exhaustion
state
collateral
processes
aspects
federal
habeas
corpus
review
justified
assumed
usual
course
record
provides
defendants
fair
adversary
proceeding
cases
involving
state
convictions
framework
also
respects
federalism
federal
cases
added
justification
prisoner
already
chance
seek
review
conviction
federal
forum
direct
appeal
present
cases
fall
outside
categories
however
detention
executive
order
person
detained
executive
order
rather
say
tried
convicted
need
collateral
review
pressing
criminal
conviction
usual
course
occurs
judicial
hearing
tribunal
disinterested
outcome
committed
procedures
designed
ensure
independence
dynamics
inherent
executive
detention
orders
executive
review
procedures
context
need
habeas
corpus
urgent
intended
duration
detention
reasons
bear
upon
precise
scope
inquiry
habeas
corpus
proceedings
need
resemble
criminal
trial
even
detention
executive
order
writ
must
effective
habeas
must
sufficient
authority
conduct
meaningful
review
cause
detention
executive
power
detain
determine
necessary
scope
habeas
corpus
review
therefore
must
assess
csrt
process
mechanism
petitioners
designation
enemy
combatants
became
final
whether
one
characterizes
csrt
process
direct
review
executive
battlefield
determination
detainee
enemy
combatant
parties
first
step
collateral
review
battlefield
determination
makes
difference
proper
analysis
whether
procedures
congress
put
place
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
matters
sum
total
procedural
protections
afforded
detainee
stages
direct
collateral
petitioners
identify
see
myriad
deficiencies
csrts
relevant
purposes
constraints
upon
detainee
ability
rebut
factual
basis
government
assertion
enemy
combatant
already
noted
see
part
supra
csrt
stage
detainee
limited
means
find
present
evidence
challenge
government
case
assistance
counsel
may
aware
critical
allegations
government
relied
upon
order
detention
see
app
pet
cert
noting
detainee
access
unclassified
portion
government
information
detainee
confront
witnesses
testify
csrt
proceedings
given
effect
limits
admission
hearsay
evidence
requirement
tribunal
deem
evidence
relevant
helpful
detainee
opportunity
question
witnesses
likely
theoretical
real
government
defends
csrt
process
arguing
designed
conform
procedures
suggested
plurality
hamdi
see
setting
aside
fact
relevant
language
hamdi
garner
majority
control
matter
hand
none
parties
hamdi
argued
suspension
writ
habeas
corpus
process
remained
place
accordingly
plurality
concentrated
whether
executive
authority
detain
rights
detainee
due
process
clause
true
places
hamdi
plurality
opinion
difficult
tell
extrapolation
ends
analysis
petitioner
due
process
rights
begins
occasion
define
necessary
scope
habeas
review
suspension
clause
purposes
context
enemy
combatant
detentions
closest
plurality
came
discussing
whether
light
concerns
construed
forbid
district
inquiring
beyond
affidavit
hamdi
custodian
provided
answer
detainee
habeas
petition
plurality
answered
question
emphatic
labeling
argument
extreme
even
assume
csrts
satisfy
due
process
standards
end
inquiry
habeas
corpus
collateral
process
exists
justice
holmes
words
cu
forms
tissue
structure
comes
outside
subordination
proceedings
although
every
form
may
preserved
opens
inquiry
whether
empty
shell
frank
mangum
dissenting
opinion
even
procedures
authorizing
detention
structurally
sound
suspension
clause
remains
applicable
writ
relevant
see
chambers
course
lectures
english
law
liberty
may
violated
either
arbitrary
imprisonment
without
law
appearance
law
lawful
magistrate
unlawful
reason
hayman
swain
make
clear
even
prisoner
detained
criminal
trial
conducted
full
accordance
protections
bill
rights
case
reason
inquire
adequacy
substitute
habeas
procedures
hayman
swain
prisoners
detained
pursuant
rigorous
proceedings
imaginable
full
criminal
trial
enough
render
habeas
substitute
acceptable
per
se
although
make
judgment
whether
csrts
currently
constituted
satisfy
due
process
standards
agree
petitioners
even
parties
involved
process
act
diligence
good
faith
considerable
risk
error
tribunal
findings
fact
risk
inherent
process
words
former
chief
judge
appeals
closed
accusatorial
see
bismullah
iii
ginsburg
concurring
denial
rehearing
en
banc
given
consequence
error
may
detention
persons
duration
hostilities
may
last
generation
risk
significant
ignore
writ
habeas
corpus
substitute
function
effective
proper
remedy
context
conducts
habeas
proceeding
must
means
correct
errors
occurred
csrt
proceedings
includes
authority
assess
sufficiency
government
evidence
detainee
also
must
authority
admit
consider
relevant
exculpatory
evidence
introduced
earlier
proceeding
federal
habeas
petitioners
long
means
supplement
record
review
even
postconviction
habeas
setting
see
townsend
sain
overruled
part
keeney
opportunity
constitutionally
required
consistent
historic
function
province
writ
habeas
corpus
review
may
circumscribed
underlying
detention
proceedings
thorough
two
habeas
cases
involving
enemy
aliens
tried
war
crimes
yamashita
ex
parte
quirin
example
limited
review
determining
whether
executive
legal
authority
try
petitioners
military
commission
see
yamashita
supra
application
habeas
corpus
concerned
guilt
innocence
petitioners
consider
lawful
power
commission
try
petitioner
offense
charged
quirin
supra
concerned
question
guilt
innocence
petitioners
military
courts
courts
record
see
watkins
church
procedures
used
try
general
yamashita
sharply
criticized
members
see
hamdan
yamashita
supra
rutledge
dissenting
need
revisit
cases
however
terms
proceedings
yamashita
quirin
like
eisentrager
adversarial
structure
lacking
see
yamashita
supra
noting
general
yamashita
represented
six
military
lawyers
hroughout
proceedings
defense
counsel
demonstrated
professional
skill
resourcefulness
proper
zeal
defense
charged
quirin
supra
exec
order
fed
reg
appointing
counsel
represent
german
saboteurs
extent
showing
required
government
cases
matter
determined
need
explore
stage
hold
judicial
power
issue
habeas
corpus
properly
invoked
judicial
officer
must
adequate
authority
make
determination
light
relevant
law
facts
formulate
issue
appropriate
orders
relief
including
necessary
order
directing
prisoner
release
consider
whether
dta
allows
appeals
conduct
proceeding
meeting
standards
obligated
construe
statute
avoid
constitutional
problems
cyr
quoting
crowell
benson
limits
principle
however
canon
constitutional
avoidance
supplant
traditional
modes
statutory
interpretation
see
clark
martinez
canon
constitutional
avoidance
comes
play
application
ordinary
textual
analysis
statute
found
susceptible
one
construction
canon
functions
means
choosing
ignore
text
purpose
statute
order
save
dta
explicitly
empower
appeals
order
applicant
dta
review
proceeding
released
find
standards
procedures
used
csrt
hearing
insufficient
justify
detention
troubling
yet
present
purposes
assume
congressional
silence
permits
constitutionally
required
remedy
case
possible
hold
remedy
release
impliedly
provided
dta
might
read
furthermore
allow
petitioners
assert
legal
claims
seek
advance
including
basic
claim
president
authority
aumf
detain
indefinitely
whether
president
authority
turns
whether
aumf
authorizes
constitution
permits
indefinite
detention
enemy
combatants
department
defense
defines
term
thus
challenge
president
authority
detain
essence
challenge
department
definition
enemy
combatant
standard
used
csrts
petitioners
cases
oral
argument
solicitor
general
urged
us
adopt
constructions
allow
mca
remain
intact
see
tr
oral
arg
absence
release
remedy
specific
language
allowing
aumf
challenges
constitutional
infirmities
statute
potentially
suffers
however
difficult
question
whether
dta
permits
appeals
make
requisite
findings
fact
dta
enables
petitioners
request
review
csrt
determination
appeals
dta
stat
scope
review
provision
confines
appeals
role
reviewing
whether
csrt
followed
standards
procedures
issued
department
defense
assessing
whether
standards
procedures
lawful
ibid
among
standards
requirement
conclusion
tribunal
supported
preponderance
evidence
allowing
rebuttable
presumption
favor
government
evidence
ibid
assuming
dta
construed
allow
appeals
review
correct
csrt
factual
determinations
opposed
merely
certifying
tribunal
applied
correct
standard
proof
see
way
construe
statute
allow
also
constitutionally
required
context
opportunity
detainee
present
relevant
exculpatory
evidence
made
part
record
earlier
proceedings
face
statute
allows
appeals
consider
evidence
outside
csrt
record
parallel
litigation
however
appeals
determined
dta
allows
order
production
available
information
possession
government
bearing
issue
whether
detainee
meets
criteria
designated
enemy
combatant
regardless
whether
evidence
put
csrt
see
bismullah
government
see
pet
cert
pending
gates
bismullah
hereinafter
bismullah
pet
support
five
members
appeals
see
bismullah
iii
henderson
dissenting
denial
rehearing
en
banc
opinion
randolph
opinion
brown
disagrees
interpretation
present
purposes
however
assume
appeals
correct
dta
allows
introduction
consideration
relevant
exculpatory
evidence
reasonably
available
government
time
csrt
made
part
record
even
dta
review
proceeding
falls
short
constitutionally
adequate
substitute
detainee
still
opportunity
present
evidence
discovered
csrt
proceedings
concluded
dta
appeals
power
review
csrt
determinations
assessing
legality
standards
procedures
implies
power
inquire
happened
csrt
hearing
perhaps
remedy
certain
deficiencies
proceeding
appeals
determine
csrt
followed
appropriate
lawful
standards
procedures
reached
limits
jurisdiction
language
dta
construed
allow
appeals
admit
consider
newly
discovered
evidence
made
part
csrt
record
unavailable
either
government
detainee
csrt
made
findings
evidence
however
may
critical
detainee
argument
enemy
combatant
cause
detain
remote
hypothetical
one
petitioners
mohamed
nechla
requested
csrt
hearing
government
contact
employer
petitioner
claimed
employer
corroborate
nechla
contention
affiliation
al
qaeda
although
csrt
determined
testimony
relevant
also
found
witness
reasonably
available
testify
time
hearing
petitioner
counsel
however
represents
witness
available
heard
see
brief
boumediene
petitioners
detainee
present
reasonably
available
evidence
demonstrating
basis
continued
detention
must
opportunity
present
evidence
habeas
corpus
even
appeals
generous
construction
dta
however
evidence
identified
nechla
inadmissible
dta
review
proceeding
role
article
iii
exercise
habeas
corpus
function
circumscribed
manner
foreclosing
consideration
evidence
presented
reasonably
available
detainee
csrt
proceedings
dta
disadvantages
detainee
limiting
scope
collateral
review
record
may
accurate
complete
contexts
habeas
cases
prisoner
already
full
fair
opportunity
develop
factual
predicate
claims
similar
limitations
scope
habeas
review
may
appropriate
see
williams
taylor
noting
equate
prisoners
exercise
diligence
pursuing
claims
context
however
underlying
detention
proceedings
lack
necessary
adversarial
character
detainee
held
responsible
deficiencies
record
government
make
alternative
argument
dta
allows
introduction
previously
unavailable
exculpatory
evidence
appeal
point
however
detainee
obtains
evidence
request
deputy
secretary
defense
convene
new
csrt
see
supp
brief
respondents
whatever
merits
procedure
insufficient
replacement
factual
review
detainees
entitled
receive
habeas
corpus
deputy
secretary
determination
whether
initiate
new
proceedings
wholly
discretionary
one
see
dept
defense
office
administrative
review
detention
enemy
combatants
instruction
procedure
review
new
evidence
relating
enemy
combatant
ec
status
may
instruction
decision
convene
csrt
reconsider
basis
detainee
enemy
combatant
status
light
evidence
matter
vested
unreviewable
discretion
deputy
secretary
defense
see
way
construe
dta
allow
detainee
challenge
deputy
secretary
decision
open
new
csrt
pursuant
instruction
congress
directed
secretary
defense
devise
procedures
considering
new
evidence
see
dta
detainee
mechanism
ensuring
procedures
followed
dta
stat
makes
clear
appeals
jurisdiction
limited
consideration
whether
status
determination
combatant
status
review
tribunal
regard
alien
consistent
standards
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
whether
use
standards
procedures
make
determination
consistent
constitution
laws
dta
narrows
appeals
jurisdiction
reviewing
final
decision
combatant
status
review
tribunal
alien
properly
detained
enemy
combatant
deputy
secretary
determination
whether
convene
new
csrt
status
determination
combatant
status
review
tribunal
much
less
final
decision
body
imply
dta
review
constitutionally
sufficient
replacement
habeas
corpus
limitations
detainee
ability
present
exculpatory
evidence
even
possible
textual
matter
read
statute
necessary
procedures
identified
overlook
cumulative
effect
hold
detainees
guantanamo
may
dta
challenge
president
legal
authority
detain
contest
csrt
findings
fact
supplement
record
review
exculpatory
evidence
request
order
release
come
close
reinstating
habeas
corpus
process
congress
sought
deny
language
statute
read
light
congress
reasons
enacting
bear
interpretation
petitioners
met
burden
establishing
dta
review
process
face
inadequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
although
hold
adequate
substitute
must
duplicate
respects
suffices
government
established
detainees
access
statutory
review
provisions
issue
adequate
substitute
writ
habeas
corpus
mca
thus
effects
unconstitutional
suspension
writ
view
holding
need
discuss
reach
writ
respect
claims
unlawful
conditions
treatment
confinement
vi
light
conclusion
jurisdictional
bar
district
entertaining
petitioners
claims
question
remains
whether
prudential
barriers
habeas
corpus
review
circumstances
government
argues
petitioners
must
seek
review
csrt
determinations
appeals
proceed
habeas
corpus
actions
district
noted
earlier
contexts
prudential
reasons
required
exhaustion
alternative
remedies
prisoner
seek
federal
habeas
relief
cases
brought
prisoners
state
custody
ex
parte
royall
thus
involved
federalism
concerns
relevant
extended
rule
require
defendants
exhaust
military
appeals
proceeding
federal
habeas
corpus
action
see
schlesinger
real
risks
real
threats
terrorist
attacks
constant
likely
soon
abate
ways
disrupt
life
laws
many
unforeseen
attempt
even
general
catalogue
crises
might
occur
certain
principles
apparent
however
practical
considerations
exigent
circumstances
inform
definition
reach
law
writs
including
habeas
corpus
cases
tradition
reflect
precept
cases
involving
foreign
citizens
detained
abroad
executive
likely
impractical
unprecedented
extension
judicial
power
assume
habeas
corpus
available
moment
prisoner
taken
custody
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
applies
cases
proper
deference
accorded
reasonable
procedures
screening
initial
detention
lawful
proper
conditions
confinement
treatment
reasonable
period
time
domestic
exigencies
furthermore
might
also
impose
onerous
burdens
government
judicial
branch
required
devise
sensible
rules
staying
habeas
corpus
proceedings
government
comply
requirements
responsible
way
cf
ex
parte
milligan
foreign
invasion
civil
war
courts
actually
closed
impossible
administer
criminal
justice
according
law
theatre
active
military
operations
war
really
prevails
necessity
furnish
substitute
civil
authority
thus
overthrown
preserve
safety
army
society
power
left
military
allowed
govern
martial
rule
laws
free
course
true
detainees
apprehended
abroad
relevant
consideration
determining
courts
role
whether
suitable
alternative
processes
place
protect
arbitrary
exercise
governmental
power
cases
us
however
involve
detainees
held
short
period
time
awaiting
csrt
determinations
case
probable
appeals
complete
prompt
review
applications
case
requiring
temporary
abstention
exhaustion
alternative
remedies
much
stronger
qualifications
longer
pertain
cases
six
years
elapsed
without
judicial
oversight
habeas
corpus
adequate
substitute
demands
showing
executive
faces
onerous
burdens
respond
habeas
corpus
actions
require
detainees
complete
dta
review
proceeding
habeas
corpus
actions
require
additional
months
years
delay
first
dta
review
applications
filed
year
ago
decisions
merits
issued
delay
fashioning
new
procedures
unavoidable
costs
delay
longer
borne
held
custody
detainees
cases
entitled
prompt
habeas
corpus
hearing
decision
today
holds
petitioners
us
entitled
seek
writ
dta
review
procedures
inadequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
petitioners
cases
need
exhaust
review
procedures
appeals
proceeding
habeas
actions
district
law
identify
unconstitutional
mca
supp
accordingly
dta
csrt
process
remain
intact
holding
regard
exhaustion
read
imply
habeas
intervene
moment
enemy
combatant
steps
foot
territory
writ
runs
executive
entitled
reasonable
period
time
determine
detainee
status
entertains
detainee
habeas
corpus
petition
csrt
process
mechanism
congress
president
set
deal
issues
except
cases
undue
delay
federal
courts
refrain
entertaining
enemy
combatant
habeas
corpus
petition
least
department
acting
via
csrt
chance
review
status
although
hold
dta
adequate
effective
substitute
habeas
corpus
follow
habeas
corpus
may
disregard
dangers
detention
cases
intended
prevent
felker
swain
hayman
stand
proposition
suspension
clause
resist
innovation
field
habeas
corpus
certain
accommodations
made
reduce
burden
habeas
corpus
proceedings
place
military
without
impermissibly
diluting
protections
writ
dta
congress
sought
consolidate
review
petitioners
claims
appeals
channeling
future
cases
one
district
doubt
reduce
administrative
burdens
government
legitimate
objective
might
advanced
even
without
amendment
future
case
detainee
files
habeas
petition
another
judicial
district
proper
respondent
served
see
rumsfeld
padilla
government
move
change
venue
hear
petitioners
cases
district
district
columbia
see
braden
judicial
circuit
another
congress
reasons
vesting
exclusive
jurisdiction
appeals
perhaps
avoid
widespread
dissemination
classified
information
government
raised
similar
concerns
elsewhere
see
brief
respondents
bismullah
pet
make
attempt
anticipate
evidentiary
issues
arise
course
detainees
habeas
corpus
proceedings
recognize
however
government
legitimate
interest
protecting
sources
methods
intelligence
gathering
expect
district
use
discretion
accommodate
interest
greatest
extent
possible
cf
reynolds
recognizing
evidentiary
privilege
civil
damages
case
reasonable
danger
compulsion
evidence
expose
military
matters
interest
national
security
divulged
remaining
questions
within
expertise
competence
district
address
first
instance
considering
procedural
substantive
standards
used
impose
detention
prevent
acts
terrorism
proper
deference
must
accorded
political
branches
see
export
unlike
president
designated
members
congress
neither
members
federal
judges
begin
day
briefings
may
describe
new
serious
threats
nation
people
law
must
accord
executive
substantial
authority
apprehend
detain
pose
real
danger
security
officials
charged
daily
operational
responsibility
security
may
consider
judicial
discourse
history
habeas
corpus
act
like
matters
far
removed
nation
present
urgent
concerns
established
legal
doctrine
however
must
consulted
teaching
remote
time
may
irrelevant
present
security
depends
upon
sophisticated
intelligence
apparatus
ability
armed
forces
act
interdict
considerations
however
security
subsists
fidelity
freedom
first
principles
chief
among
freedom
arbitrary
unlawful
restraint
personal
liberty
secured
adherence
separation
powers
principles
judicial
authority
consider
petitions
habeas
corpus
relief
derives
opinion
undermine
executive
powers
commander
chief
contrary
exercise
powers
vindicated
eroded
confirmed
judicial
branch
within
constitution
structure
exercises
judicial
power
legitimate
necessary
responsibility
hear
challenges
authority
executive
imprison
person
petitioners
custody
six
years
definitive
judicial
determination
legality
detention
access
writ
necessity
determine
lawfulness
status
even
end
obtain
relief
seek
nation
past
military
conflicts
limited
duration
possible
leave
outer
boundaries
war
powers
undefined
fear
terrorism
continues
pose
dangerous
threats
us
years
come
might
luxury
result
inevitable
however
political
branches
consistent
independent
obligations
interpret
uphold
constitution
engage
genuine
debate
best
preserve
constitutional
values
protecting
nation
terrorism
cf
hamdan
breyer
concurring
udicial
insistence
upon
consultation
weaken
nation
ability
deal
danger
contrary
insistence
strengthens
nation
ability
determine
democratic
means
best
bears
repeating
opinion
address
content
law
governs
petitioners
detention
matter
yet
determined
hold
petitioners
may
invoke
fundamental
procedural
protections
habeas
corpus
laws
constitution
designed
survive
remain
force
extraordinary
times
liberty
security
reconciled
system
reconciled
within
framework
law
framers
decided
habeas
corpus
right
first
importance
must
part
framework
part
law
determination
appeals
suspension
clause
protections
inapplicable
petitioners
error
judgment
appeals
reversed
cases
remanded
appeals
instructions
remand
cases
district
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
lakhdar
boumediene
et
petitioners
george
bush
president
et
al
khaled
al
odah
next
friend
fawzi
khalid
abdullah
fahad
al
odah
et
petitioners
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
join
concurring
join
opinion
entirety
add
afterword
emphasize
two
things
one
might
overlook
reading
dissents
four
years
ago
rasul
bush
held
statutory
habeas
jurisdiction
extended
claims
foreign
nationals
imprisoned
guantanamo
bay
determine
legality
executive
potentially
indefinite
detention
subsequent
legislation
eliminated
statutory
habeas
jurisdiction
claims
must
constitutionally
based
jurisdiction
none
justice
scalia
thus
correct
first
time
holds
says
confers
constitutional
habeas
jurisdiction
aliens
imprisoned
military
outside
area
de
jure
national
sovereignty
see
post
dissenting
opinion
one
reads
opinion
rasul
seriously
doubt
jurisdictional
question
must
answered
way
purely
constitutional
cases
given
reliance
historical
background
habeas
generally
answering
statutory
question
see
nn
indeed
rasul
directly
answered
historical
question
justice
scalia
says
dispositive
see
post
wrote
pplication
habeas
statute
persons
detained
guantanamo
consistent
historical
reach
writ
habeas
corpus
justice
scalia
dismisses
statement
dictum
see
post
dictum
dictum
well
considered
stated
view
five
members
historical
scope
writ
course
takes
quotation
rasul
however
much
point
resolve
constitutional
issue
us
majority
opinion
explored
afresh
detail
deserves
whether
one
agrees
disagrees
today
decision
bolt
blue
second
fact
insufficiently
appreciated
dissents
length
disputed
imprisonments
prisoners
represented
today
locked
six
years
ante
opinion
hence
hollow
ring
dissenters
suggest
somehow
precipitating
judiciary
reviewing
claims
military
subject
appeal
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
handle
within
reasonable
period
time
see
post
opinion
roberts
declined
intervene
circuit
assessed
nature
validity
congressionally
mandated
proceedings
given
detainee
case
post
necessary
consider
availability
writ
statutory
remedies
shown
inadequate
post
rushes
decide
fundamental
question
reach
habeas
corpus
functioning
dta
may
make
decision
entirely
unnecessary
suggestions
judicial
haste
place
given
realistic
acknowledgment
periods
exigency
tempo
habeas
review
must
reflect
immediate
peril
facing
country
see
ante
fact
lapse
four
years
time
rasul
put
everyone
notice
habeas
process
available
guantanamo
prisoners
lapse
six
years
since
prisoners
captured
incarcerated
stand
odds
repeated
suggestions
dissenters
cases
seen
judicial
victory
contest
power
political
branches
see
post
roberts
dissenting
post
scalia
dissenting
several
answers
charge
triumphalism
might
start
basic
fact
constitutional
history
power
first
crown
executive
branch
necessarily
limited
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
enquire
legality
executive
detention
one
explain
exercise
responsibility
preserve
habeas
corpus
something
much
significant
involved
pulling
hauling
judicial
political
branches
instead
though
enough
repeat
petitioners
spent
six
years
behind
bars
six
years
sustained
executive
detentions
guantanamo
subject
habeas
jurisdiction
without
actual
habeas
scrutiny
today
decision
judicial
victory
act
perseverance
trying
make
habeas
review
obligation
courts
provide
mean
something
value
prisoners
nation
see
ante
lakhdar
boumediene
et
petitioners
george
bush
president
et
al
khaled
al
odah
next
friend
fawzi
khalid
abdullah
fahad
al
odah
et
petitioners
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
chief
justice
roberts
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
today
strikes
inadequate
generous
set
procedural
protections
ever
afforded
aliens
detained
country
enemy
combatants
political
branches
crafted
procedures
amidst
ongoing
military
conflict
much
careful
investigation
thorough
debate
rejects
today
hand
without
bothering
say
due
process
rights
detainees
possess
without
explaining
statute
fails
vindicate
rights
single
petitioner
even
attempted
avail
law
operation
effect
majority
merely
replaces
review
system
designed
people
representatives
set
shapeless
procedures
defined
federal
courts
future
date
one
help
think
surveying
modest
practical
results
majority
ambitious
opinion
decision
really
detainees
control
federal
policy
regarding
enemy
combatants
majority
adamant
guantanamo
detainees
entitled
protections
habeas
corpus
opinion
begins
deciding
question
regard
issue
difficult
one
primarily
unique
unusual
jurisdictional
status
guantanamo
bay
nonetheless
agree
justice
scalia
analysis
precedents
pertinent
history
writ
accordingly
join
dissent
important
point
however
resolved
cases
grounds
habeas
fundamentally
procedural
right
mechanism
contesting
legality
executive
detention
critical
threshold
question
cases
prior
inquiry
writ
scope
whether
system
political
branches
designed
protects
whatever
rights
detainees
may
possess
need
additional
process
whether
called
habeas
something
else
congress
entrusted
threshold
question
first
instance
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
constitution
surely
allows
congress
see
detainee
treatment
act
dta
stat
circuit
addressed
issue
cashiers
statute
without
answering
critical
threshold
question
eventually
get
around
asking
whether
review
dta
frames
adequate
substitute
habeas
ante
even
opinion
fails
determine
rights
detainees
possess
whether
dta
system
satisfies
majority
instead
compares
undefined
dta
process
equally
undefined
habeas
right
one
given
shape
future
district
courts
basis
whole
approach
misguided
also
fruitless
detainees
claims
decided
dta
gone
anybody
guess
habeas
process
mandates
likely
end
looking
lot
like
dta
system
replaces
district
judges
shaping
reconcile
review
prisoners
detention
undoubted
need
protect
american
people
terrorist
threat
precisely
challenge
congress
undertook
drafting
dta
today
opinion
done
shift
responsibility
sensitive
foreign
policy
national
security
decisions
elected
branches
federal
judiciary
believe
system
political
branches
constructed
adequately
protects
constitutional
rights
aliens
captured
abroad
detained
enemy
combatants
may
enjoy
therefore
dismiss
cases
ground
respect
contrary
views
majority
must
dissent
opinion
makes
plain
certiorari
review
cases
never
granted
two
members
today
majority
recognized
traditional
rules
governing
decision
constitutional
questions
practice
requiring
exhaustion
available
remedies
make
appropriate
deny
petitions
boumediene
bush
slip
citation
omitted
statement
stevens
kennedy
respecting
denial
certiorari
given
posture
cases
came
us
declined
intervene
circuit
assessed
nature
validity
congressionally
mandated
proceedings
given
detainee
case
political
branches
created
collateral
review
procedure
testing
legality
prisoners
detention
begins
hearing
combatant
status
review
tribunal
csrt
followed
review
circuit
part
review
congress
authorized
circuit
decide
whether
csrt
proceedings
consistent
constitution
laws
dta
stat
petitioner
however
invoked
circuit
review
statute
specifies
see
cadc
brief
federal
respondents
consequence
occasion
decide
whether
csrt
hearings
followed
review
appeals
vindicate
whatever
constitutional
statutory
rights
petitioners
may
possess
see
remarkably
require
petitioners
exhaust
remedies
statute
wait
see
whether
remedies
prove
sufficient
protect
petitioners
rights
instead
denies
circuit
opportunity
assess
statute
remedies
refuses
majority
expressly
declines
decide
whether
csrt
procedures
coupled
article
iii
review
satisfy
due
process
see
ante
grossly
premature
pronounce
detainees
right
habeas
without
first
assessing
whether
remedies
dta
system
provides
vindicate
whatever
rights
petitioners
may
claim
plurality
hamdi
rumsfeld
explained
constitution
guaranteed
american
citizen
challenging
detention
enemy
combatant
right
notice
factual
basis
classification
fair
opportunity
rebut
government
factual
assertions
neutral
decisionmaker
plurality
specifically
stated
constitutionally
adequate
collateral
process
provided
appropriately
authorized
properly
constituted
military
tribunal
given
uncommon
potential
burden
executive
time
ongoing
military
conflict
point
directly
pertinent
surely
due
process
clause
afford
circumstances
greater
protection
citizens
due
csrt
procedures
meet
minimal
due
process
requirements
outlined
hamdi
article
iii
available
ensure
procedures
followed
future
cases
see
ins
cyr
heikkila
barber
need
reach
suspension
clause
question
detainees
received
process
constitution
possibly
require
whether
process
called
habeas
something
else
question
writ
reach
need
addressed
required
petitioners
exhaust
remedies
statute
explained
gusik
schilder
available
procedure
employed
rectify
alleged
error
petitioners
complain
interference
federal
may
wholly
needless
procedure
established
police
errors
tribunal
whose
judgment
challenged
may
adequate
occasion
majority
refuses
assess
whether
csrts
comport
constitution
ends
razing
system
collateral
review
admits
may
fact
satisfy
due
process
clause
structurally
sound
ante
collateral
review
procedures
congress
provided
csrt
review
coupled
article
iii
scrutiny
sound
interference
federal
habeas
may
entirely
unnecessary
way
know
require
petitioners
use
alternative
procedures
congress
designed
mandating
petitioners
exhaust
statutory
remedies
sense
suspension
writ
habeas
corpus
merely
deferment
resort
writ
corrective
procedures
shown
futile
gusik
supra
necessary
consider
availability
writ
statutory
remedies
shown
inadequate
protect
detainees
rights
cf
application
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
granted
unless
appears
applicant
exhausted
remedies
available
courts
state
respect
judgments
congress
whose
members
take
oath
uphold
constitution
requires
less
absence
assessment
dta
remedies
question
whether
detainees
entitled
habeas
entirely
speculative
one
precedents
long
counseled
us
avoid
deciding
hypothetical
questions
constitutional
law
see
spector
motor
service
mclaughlin
one
doctrine
deeply
rooted
process
constitutional
adjudication
pass
questions
constitutionality
unless
questions
unavoidable
see
also
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
constitutional
questions
decided
unless
necessary
decision
quoting
burton
fundamental
rule
judicial
restraint
three
affiliated
tribes
fort
berthold
reservation
wold
engineering
acknowledges
ordinary
course
decide
constitutionality
dta
stage
abandons
ordinary
course
light
gravity
constitutional
issues
presented
prospect
additional
delay
ante
however
precisely
issues
presented
grave
adherence
ordinary
course
important
principle
applied
unimportant
much
principle
charges
judicial
activism
effectively
rebutted
courts
fairly
argue
following
normal
practices
also
concerned
requiring
petitioners
pursue
dta
review
proceeding
habeas
corpus
actions
involve
additional
delay
ante
nature
habeas
remedy
instructs
lower
courts
craft
remand
however
far
unsettled
process
congress
provided
dta
see
ante
ur
opinion
address
content
law
governs
petitioners
detention
matter
yet
determined
reason
suppose
review
according
procedures
federal
judiciary
design
case
case
proceed
faster
dta
process
petitioners
disdained
contrary
system
launched
directs
lower
courts
elaborate
promises
take
longer
assures
us
bringing
habeas
petitions
detainees
must
usually
complete
csrt
process
see
ante
may
seek
review
federal
district
either
success
failure
surely
result
appeal
circuit
exactly
judicial
review
starts
congress
system
effect
decision
add
additional
layers
quite
possibly
redundant
review
nobody
knows
new
layers
habeas
review
operate
new
procedures
require
contours
undoubtedly
subject
fresh
bouts
litigation
majority
truly
concerned
delay
required
petitioners
use
dta
process
available
years
article
iii
review
circuit
system
might
well
provided
petitioners
relief
entitled
long
newly
installed
habeas
review
hope
refusal
require
petitioners
exhaust
remedies
provided
congress
violates
traditional
rules
governing
decision
constitutional
questions
boumediene
slip
statement
stevens
kennedy
respecting
denial
certiorari
disrespect
rules
makes
decision
awkward
business
rushes
decide
fundamental
question
reach
habeas
corpus
functioning
dta
may
make
decision
entirely
unnecessary
scant
idea
dta
judicial
review
actually
operate
ii
majority
overreaching
particularly
egregious
given
weakness
objections
dta
simply
put
opinion
fails
terms
majority
strikes
statute
adequate
substitute
habeas
review
ante
fails
show
rights
detainees
vindicated
dta
system
central
purpose
habeas
corpus
test
legality
executive
detention
writ
requires
fundamentally
article
iii
able
hear
prisoner
claims
necessary
order
release
see
brown
allen
jackson
concurring
result
beyond
process
given
prisoner
entitled
receive
depends
circumstances
rights
prisoner
see
mathews
eldridge
much
hemming
hawing
majority
appears
concede
dta
provides
article
iii
competent
order
release
see
ante
issue
dispute
process
guantanamo
prisoners
entitled
use
test
legality
detention
hamdi
concluded
american
citizens
detained
enemy
combatants
entitled
limited
process
much
process
supplied
military
tribunal
review
follow
article
iii
precisely
system
adequate
vindicate
whatever
due
process
rights
petitioners
may
reaches
opposite
conclusion
partly
misreads
statute
majority
appears
understand
review
system
invalidates
actually
works
specifically
csrt
review
review
circuit
fit
together
briefly
acknowledging
recitation
facts
government
designed
csrts
comply
due
process
requirements
identified
plurality
hamdi
ante
proceeds
dismiss
tribunal
proceedings
suspect
method
used
executive
determining
status
detainees
first
instance
see
ante
leads
treat
review
dta
provides
circuit
opportunity
detainees
challenge
status
determination
see
ante
attempts
explain
glancing
treatment
csrts
arguing
hether
one
characterizes
csrt
process
direct
review
executive
battlefield
determination
first
step
collateral
review
battlefield
determination
makes
difference
ante
first
majority
quite
wrong
dismiss
executive
determination
detainee
status
battlefield
judgment
somehow
provisional
made
great
haste
fact
detainees
designated
enemy
combatants
multiple
levels
review
military
officers
officials
department
defense
memorandum
secretary
navy
implementation
combatant
status
review
tribunal
procedures
enemy
combatants
detained
guantanamo
bay
naval
base
july
app
pet
cert
hereinafter
implementation
memo
majority
equally
wrong
characterize
csrts
part
initial
determination
process
instead
means
detainees
challenge
government
determination
executive
designed
csrts
mirror
army
regulation
see
brief
federal
respondents
procedural
model
plurality
hamdi
said
provided
type
process
enemy
combatant
expect
habeas
see
plurality
opinion
csrts
operate
much
habeas
courts
hearing
detainee
collateral
challenge
first
time
gather
evidence
call
witnesses
take
testimony
render
decision
legality
government
detention
see
implementation
memo
app
pet
cert
csrt
finds
particular
detainee
improperly
held
order
release
see
majority
insists
even
csrts
satisf
ied
due
process
standards
full
habeas
review
still
necessary
habeas
collateral
remedy
available
even
prisoners
detained
pursuant
rigorous
proceedings
imaginable
ante
comment
makes
sense
csrts
incorrectly
viewed
method
used
executive
determining
prisoners
status
part
collateral
review
test
validity
determination
see
gusik
majority
deprecate
importance
csrts
treating
something
use
military
tribunal
csrts
review
aliens
detention
familiar
light
hamdi
plurality
said
due
process
rights
enjoyed
american
citizens
detained
enemy
combatants
vindicated
appropriately
authorized
properly
constituted
military
tribunal
dta
represents
congress
considered
attempt
provide
accused
alien
combatants
detained
guantanamo
constitutionally
adequate
opportunity
contest
detentions
tribunal
congress
went
dta
csrt
review
first
tier
collateral
review
dta
system
statute
provides
additional
review
article
iii
given
rationale
today
decision
well
worth
recalling
exactly
dta
provides
respect
statute
directs
circuit
consider
whether
particular
alien
status
determination
consistent
standards
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
whether
use
standards
procedures
make
determination
consistent
constitution
laws
dta
stat
determines
whether
csrt
procedures
constitutional
determines
whether
procedures
followed
particular
case
short
hamdi
plurality
concluded
type
review
enough
satisfy
due
process
even
citizens
see
congress
followed
lead
find
victim
constitutional
bait
switch
hamdi
merits
scant
attention
remarkable
omission
hamdi
bears
directly
issues
us
majority
attempts
dismiss
hamdi
relevance
arguing
availability
federal
habeas
never
doubt
case
occasion
define
necessary
scope
habeas
review
context
enemy
combatant
detentions
ante
hardly
hamdi
scope
habeas
review
context
enemy
combatant
detentions
petitioner
american
citizen
held
within
enemy
combatant
invoked
writ
challenge
detention
careful
examination
writ
due
process
clause
enunciated
basic
process
constitution
entitled
hamdi
expect
habeas
process
consisted
right
receive
notice
factual
basis
classification
fair
opportunity
rebut
government
factual
assertions
neutral
decisionmaker
light
government
national
security
responsibilities
plurality
found
process
tailored
alleviate
uncommon
potential
burden
executive
time
ongoing
military
conflict
ibid
example
government
rely
hearsay
claim
presumption
favor
evidence
see
hamdi
suggested
basic
process
collateral
review
provided
military
tribunal
pointed
tribunals
model
satisfy
constitution
requirements
see
absence
process
military
tribunal
held
article
iii
courts
need
conduct
habeas
proceedings
ensure
minimum
requirements
due
process
achieved
ibid
emphasis
added
even
petitioner
entitled
process
received
properly
constituted
military
review
panel
given
limited
due
process
rights
government
weighty
interests
see
contrary
majority
hamdi
pressing
relevance
establishes
procedures
american
citizens
detained
enemy
combatants
expect
habeas
proceeding
dta
system
military
tribunal
hearings
followed
article
iii
review
looks
lot
like
procedure
hamdi
blessed
nothing
else
plain
design
dta
congress
president
nation
military
leaders
made
effort
follow
precedent
however
take
yes
answer
majority
contends
congress
envisioned
dta
review
coextensive
traditional
habeas
corpus
granted
circuit
far
broader
review
authority
ante
maybe
comment
reveals
majority
misunderstanding
raditional
habeas
corpus
takes
account
hamdi
recognized
uncommon
potential
burden
executive
time
ongoing
military
conflict
besides
congress
executive
envision
dta
review
assume
means
circuit
review
see
ante
detainees
opportunity
challenge
detentions
instead
political
branches
crafted
csrt
circuit
review
operate
together
goal
providing
noncitizen
detainees
level
collateral
process
hamdi
said
satisfy
due
process
rights
american
citizens
see
brief
federal
respondents
given
statutory
scheme
political
branches
adopted
given
hamdi
simply
majority
dismiss
csrt
procedures
far
limited
used
military
trials
therefore
beneath
level
process
eliminate
need
habeas
corpus
review
ante
question
much
process
csrts
provide
comparison
modes
adjudication
question
whether
csrt
procedures
coupled
judicial
review
specified
dta
provide
basic
process
hamdi
said
constitution
affords
american
citizens
detained
enemy
combatants
see
virtue
refusal
allow
circuit
assess
petitioners
statutory
remedies
virtue
refusal
consider
outset
fit
remedies
due
process
majority
finds
position
evaluating
whether
dta
system
adequate
substitute
habeas
review
without
knowing
rights
either
habeas
dta
supposed
protect
majority
attempts
elide
problem
holding
petitioners
right
habeas
corpus
comparing
dta
historic
office
writ
ante
habeas
majority
acknowledges
flexible
remedy
rather
substantive
right
precise
application
change
depending
upon
circumstances
ante
shape
habeas
review
ultimately
depends
nature
rights
petitioner
may
assert
see
reid
covert
harlan
concurring
result
question
specific
safeguards
constitution
appropriately
applied
particular
context
reduced
issue
process
defendant
particular
circumstances
particular
case
scope
federal
habeas
review
traditionally
limited
contexts
others
depending
status
detainee
rights
may
assert
see
cyr
immigration
cases
question
whether
evidence
support
deportation
order
courts
generally
review
factual
determinations
made
executive
omitted
burns
wilson
plurality
opinion
military
habeas
corpus
inquiry
scope
matters
open
review
always
narrow
civil
cases
yamashita
courts
may
inquire
whether
detention
complained
within
authority
detaining
petitioner
military
tribunals
lawful
authority
hear
decide
condemn
action
subject
judicial
review
ex
parte
quirin
federal
habeas
review
military
commission
verdict
limited
determining
commission
jurisdiction
declaring
petitioners
right
habeas
way
excuses
explaining
dta
protect
whatever
due
process
statutory
rights
petitioners
may
dta
provides
means
vindicating
petitioners
rights
necessarily
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
see
swain
pressley
hayman
part
assume
due
process
rights
petitioners
may
possess
greater
american
citizens
detained
enemy
combatants
worth
noting
hamdi
controlling
opinion
said
constitution
guarantees
citizen
detainees
basic
procedural
rights
process
securing
rights
tailored
alleviate
uncommon
potential
burden
executive
time
ongoing
military
conflict
majority
however
objects
procedural
protections
afforded
detainees
csrt
hearings
limited
ante
evidentiary
limitations
complains
reflect
nature
issue
contest
namely
status
aliens
captured
armed
forces
abroad
alleged
enemy
combatants
contrary
repeated
suggestions
majority
dta
review
need
parallel
habeas
privileges
enjoyed
noncombatant
american
citizens
set
ed
supp
cf
ante
need
provide
process
adequate
noncitizens
detained
alleged
combatants
basic
process
detainees
due
habeas
petitioners
said
absolute
minimum
suspension
clause
protects
writ
existed
cyr
supra
quoting
felker
turpin
majority
admits
number
historical
authorities
suggest
time
constitution
ratification
courts
abstained
altogether
matters
involving
prisoners
war
ante
accurate
process
provided
prisoners
dta
plainly
sufficient
allows
alleged
combatants
challenge
factual
legal
bases
detentions
assuming
constitutional
baseline
robust
dta
still
provides
adequate
process
majority
standards
today
opines
suspension
clause
guarantees
prisoners
detainees
meaningful
opportunity
demonstrate
held
pursuant
erroneous
application
interpretation
relevant
law
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
holds
adequate
substitute
tribunal
reviewing
detainees
cases
must
power
order
conditional
release
individual
unlawfully
detained
ibid
dta
system
csrt
review
executive
determination
followed
circuit
review
sufficiency
evidence
constitutionality
csrt
process
meets
criteria
csrt
stage
every
petitioner
right
present
evidence
wrongfully
detained
includes
right
call
witnesses
reasonably
available
question
witnesses
called
tribunal
introduce
documentary
evidence
testify
tribunal
see
implementation
memo
app
pet
cert
concedes
detainees
may
confront
witnesses
called
tribunal
suggests
right
theoretical
real
effect
limits
admission
hearsay
evidence
ante
complains
petitioners
lack
assistance
counsel
given
limits
access
classified
information
may
aware
critical
allegations
ante
none
complaints
persuasive
detainees
opportunity
confront
witness
appears
tribunal
may
call
witnesses
implementation
memo
requires
detainees
witnesses
reasonably
available
app
pet
cert
requirement
drawn
army
regulation
ch
entirely
consistent
government
interest
avoiding
futile
search
evidence
might
burden
warmaking
responsibilities
hamdi
supra
dangerous
mission
assigned
forces
abroad
fight
terrorists
serve
subpoenas
correct
forms
hearsay
evidence
admissible
csrt
hamdi
expressly
approved
use
hearsay
habeas
courts
hearsay
example
may
need
accepted
reliable
available
evidence
government
classified
information
detainees
permitted
access
implementation
memo
provides
detainee
personal
representative
may
review
classified
documents
csrt
stage
summarize
detainee
implementation
memo
supra
brief
federal
respondents
prisoner
counsel
enjoys
privilege
appeal
circuit
access
classified
material
alleged
alien
enemy
combatants
ever
provided
aware
single
instance
certainly
majority
cites
none
detainees
petitioners
provided
access
classified
material
form
indeed
prisoners
war
challenge
status
determinations
geneva
convention
afforded
access
see
army
regulation
ch
model
one
hamdi
cited
consistent
demands
due
process
citizens
see
alternative
propose
allow
free
access
classified
information
ignore
risk
prisoner
may
eventually
convey
learns
parties
hostile
country
deadly
consequences
helped
apprehend
detainee
design
better
system
communicating
detainees
substance
classified
information
relevant
cases
without
fatally
compromising
national
security
interests
sources
majority
come
forward
instead
majority
fobs
vexing
question
district
courts
answer
road
prisoners
war
permitted
access
classified
information
neither
permitted
access
counsel
another
supposed
failing
csrt
process
yet
guantanamo
detainees
hardly
denied
legal
assistance
provided
personal
representative
previously
noted
may
access
classified
information
help
detainee
arrange
witnesses
assist
detainee
preparation
case
even
aid
detainee
presenting
evidence
tribunal
see
implementation
memo
supra
provision
personal
representative
order
one
several
ways
csrt
procedures
generous
provided
prisoners
war
army
regulation
keep
mind
csrt
stage
detainees
receive
additional
process
circuit
including
full
access
appellate
counsel
right
challenge
factual
legal
bases
detentions
dta
empowers
appeals
determine
whether
csrt
observed
procedures
specified
secretary
defense
also
whether
use
standards
procedures
consistent
constitution
laws
stat
provisions
permit
detainees
dispute
sufficiency
evidence
allow
detainees
challenge
csrt
panel
interpretation
relevant
law
even
constitutionality
csrt
proceedings
includes
solicitor
general
acknowledges
ability
dispute
government
right
detain
alleged
combatants
first
place
dispute
government
definition
enemy
combatant
brief
federal
respondents
article
iii
plainly
neutral
decisionmaker
told
dta
provides
prisoners
held
guantanamo
bay
adequate
opportunity
contest
bases
detentions
habeas
corpus
need
allow
dta
provides
opportunity
process
fact
afforded
prisoners
war
alleged
enemy
combatants
history
despite
guarantees
finds
dta
system
inadequate
habeas
substitute
one
central
reason
detainees
unable
introduce
appeal
stage
exculpatory
evidence
discovered
conclusion
csrt
proceedings
see
ante
hints
darkly
dta
may
suffer
infirmities
see
ante
imply
dta
review
constitutionally
sufficient
replacement
habeas
corpus
limitations
detainee
ability
present
exculpatory
evidence
bother
name
making
response
bit
difficult
stands
assume
regards
supposed
defect
identify
gravest
lot
muster
ice
beneath
feet
thin
indeed
noted
csrt
procedures
provide
ample
opportunity
detainees
introduce
exculpatory
evidence
whether
documentary
nature
live
witnesses
military
tribunals
see
infra
implementation
memo
app
pet
cert
ability
introduce
evidence
denied
contrary
constitution
laws
circuit
authority
say
review
nevertheless
asks
us
imagine
instance
evidence
discovered
csrt
panel
renders
decision
appeals
reviews
detainee
case
scenario
course
yet
come
pass
review
circuit
occurred
provides
basis
rejecting
dta
habeas
substitute
majority
correct
dta
contemplate
introduction
newly
discovered
evidence
appeals
petitioners
solicitor
general
agree
dta
permit
circuit
remand
detainee
case
new
csrt
determination
brief
petitioner
boumediene
et
al
brief
federal
respondents
event
detainee
alleges
obtained
new
persuasive
exculpatory
evidence
considered
tribunal
available
circuit
readily
remand
case
tribunal
allow
body
consider
evidence
first
instance
appeals
later
review
new
reinstated
decision
light
supplemented
record
sort
procedure
sounds
familiar
federal
appellate
courts
reviewing
factual
determinations
follow
procedure
variety
circumstances
see
white
remanding
claim
district
brady
evidentiary
hearing
avila
roe
remanding
habeas
claim
district
evidentiary
hearing
clarify
factual
record
leone
observing
faced
direct
appeal
underdeveloped
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
appellate
may
remand
district
necessary
factfinding
remand
relief
available
detainees
caught
hypothetical
conundrum
dta
expressly
directs
secretary
defense
provide
periodic
review
new
evidence
may
become
available
relating
enemy
combatant
status
detainee
dta
regulations
issued
department
defense
provide
detainee
puts
forward
new
material
evidence
previously
presented
detainee
csrt
deputy
secretary
defense
direct
csrt
convene
reconsider
basis
detainee
status
light
new
information
office
administrative
review
detention
enemy
combatants
instruction
procedure
review
new
evidence
relating
enemy
combatant
ec
status
may
brief
federal
respondents
pursuant
dta
resulting
csrt
determination
reviewable
full
addition
dta
requires
department
defense
conduct
yearly
review
status
prisoner
see
stat
deputy
secretary
defense
promulgated
concomitant
regulations
establishing
administrative
review
board
assess
annually
need
continue
detain
enemy
combatant
deputy
secretary
defense
order
osd
may
app
pet
cert
words
implementing
order
purpose
annual
review
afford
every
detainee
opportunity
explain
longer
threat
released
ibid
board
findings
forwarded
presidentially
appointed
civilian
within
department
defense
secretary
defense
designated
administer
review
process
designated
civilian
official
authority
order
release
upon
board
recommendation
hand
wringing
dta
treatment
exculpatory
evidence
show
roving
search
constitutionally
problematic
scenarios
delicate
power
pronouncing
act
congress
unconstitutional
said
exercised
reference
hypothetical
cases
thus
imagined
raines
today
invents
sort
reverse
facial
challenge
applies
gusto
scenario
statute
might
constitutionally
infirm
law
must
struck
cf
salerno
facial
challenge
must
establish
set
circumstances
exists
act
valid
see
also
washington
glucksberg
stevens
concurring
judgments
facial
challenge
must
fail
statute
legitimate
quoting
broadrick
oklahoma
new
method
constitutional
adjudication
underscores
failure
follow
usual
procedures
require
petitioners
demonstrate
harmed
statute
challenge
absence
concrete
showing
unable
imagine
plausible
hypothetical
dta
unconstitutional
second
criterion
adequate
substitute
power
order
conditional
release
individual
unlawfully
detained
ante
basically
admits
dta
read
permit
circuit
order
release
light
traditional
principles
construing
statutes
avoid
difficult
constitutional
issues
reasonably
possible
see
ante
solicitor
general
concedes
remedial
authority
sort
must
implied
statute
given
dta
like
general
habeas
law
see
provides
express
remedy
kind
brief
federal
respondents
parties
agree
least
dta
empowers
circuit
remand
prisoner
case
csrt
instructions
perform
new
status
assessment
brief
petitioner
boumediene
et
al
brief
federal
respondents
avoid
constitutional
infirmity
reasonable
imply
see
ashwander
brandeis
concurring
validity
act
congress
drawn
question
cardinal
principle
ascertain
whether
construction
statute
fairly
possible
constitutional
question
may
avoided
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
cyr
especially
view
solicitor
general
concession
oral
argument
supplemental
brief
authority
release
might
read
statute
see
tr
oral
arg
supplemental
brief
federal
respondents
grudgingly
suggests
congress
silence
question
remedies
suggests
acquiescence
constitutionally
required
remedy
ante
argument
favor
statutorily
authorized
release
stronger
dta
parallels
score
noteworthy
way
remedy
general
federal
habeas
statute
provides
heard
determined
facts
shall
dispose
matter
law
justice
require
ibid
long
held
party
disputes
includes
power
order
release
see
wilkinson
dotson
writ
history
makes
clear
traditionally
accepted
specific
instrument
obtain
release
unlawful
confinement
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
dta
similarly
read
congress
substituted
dta
review
habeas
corpus
unique
purpose
writ
release
applicant
unlawful
confinement
allen
mccurry
dta
read
confer
appeals
authority
order
release
appropriate
circumstances
section
plainly
contemplates
release
addressing
effect
release
alien
custody
department
defense
jurisdiction
stat
reading
avoids
serious
constitutional
difficulty
consistent
text
statute
circuit
thus
order
release
csrts
order
release
head
administrative
review
boards
recommendation
panels
order
release
multiple
release
provisions
within
dta
system
satisfy
majority
requirement
tribunal
substituting
habeas
authority
release
prisoner
basis
contrary
conclusion
summed
following
sentence
near
end
opinion
hold
detainees
guantanamo
may
dta
challenge
president
legal
authority
detain
contest
csrt
findings
fact
supplement
record
review
newly
discovered
previously
unavailable
evidence
request
order
release
come
close
reinstating
habeas
corpus
process
congress
sought
deny
ante
words
interpretation
statute
make
adequate
substitute
habeas
must
rejected
congress
possibly
intended
enact
adequate
substitute
habeas
saved
lot
trouble
simply
announced
approach
beginning
rather
end
opinion
iii
eloquence
detainees
right
writ
makes
effort
elaborate
exactly
remedy
prescribes
differ
procedural
protections
detainees
enjoy
dta
objects
detainees
limited
access
witnesses
classified
material
proposes
alternatives
indeed
simply
ignores
many
difficult
questions
holding
presents
example
become
csrt
process
majority
says
federal
courts
generally
refrain
entertaining
detainee
challenges
petitioner
csrt
proceeding
finished
see
ante
xcept
cases
undue
delay
deference
csrt
determination
entitled
problems
take
witness
availability
makes
majority
think
witnesses
become
magically
available
review
procedure
labeled
habeas
location
witnesses
change
suddenly
become
easily
susceptible
service
process
subpoenas
issued
american
habeas
courts
run
basra
enforced
speaking
witnesses
detainees
able
call
military
officers
witnesses
majority
answers
difficulties
say
leaves
open
distinct
possibility
habeas
remedy
said
done
end
looking
great
deal
like
dta
review
rejects
see
ante
opinion
recognize
however
government
legitimate
interest
protecting
sources
methods
intelligence
gathering
expect
district
use
discretion
accommodate
interest
greatest
extent
possible
role
judiciary
limited
determining
whether
procedures
meet
essential
standard
fairness
due
process
clause
extend
imposing
procedures
merely
displace
congressional
choices
policy
landon
plasencia
majority
rests
decision
abstract
hypothetical
concerns
step
back
consider
real
world
congress
executive
actually
granted
aliens
captured
armed
forces
overseas
found
enemy
combatants
right
hear
bases
charges
including
summary
classified
evidence
ability
challenge
bases
detention
military
tribunals
modeled
geneva
convention
procedures
detainees
released
result
process
brief
federal
respondents
right
csrt
testify
introduce
evidence
call
witnesses
question
government
calls
secure
release
appropriate
right
aid
personal
representative
arranging
presenting
cases
csrt
circuit
right
employ
counsel
challenge
factual
record
contest
lower
tribunal
legal
determinations
ensure
compliance
constitution
laws
secure
release
errors
establish
entitlement
relief
sum
dta
satisfies
majority
criteria
assessing
adequacy
statutory
scheme
provides
combatants
held
guantanamo
greater
procedural
protections
ever
afforded
alleged
enemy
detainees
whether
citizens
aliens
national
history
detainees
analysis
leaves
prospect
litigation
determine
content
new
habeas
right
followed
litigation
resolve
particular
cases
followed
litigation
circuit
started
invoked
dta
procedure
congress
whose
attempt
determine
democratic
means
best
balance
security
american
people
detainees
liberty
interests
see
hamdan
rumsfeld
breyer
concurring
unceremoniously
brushed
aside
great
writ
whose
majesty
hardly
enhanced
extension
jurisdictionally
quirky
outpost
tangible
benefit
anyone
rule
law
unless
meant
rule
lawyers
arguably
greater
role
military
intelligence
officials
shaping
policy
alien
enemy
combatants
certainly
american
people
today
lose
bit
control
conduct
nation
foreign
policy
unelected
politically
unaccountable
judges
respectfully
dissent
lakhdar
boumediene
et
petitioners
george
bush
president
et
al
khaled
al
odah
next
friend
fawzi
khalid
abdullah
fahad
al
odah
et
petitioners
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
scalia
chief
justice
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
today
first
time
nation
history
confers
constitutional
right
habeas
corpus
alien
enemies
detained
abroad
military
forces
course
ongoing
war
chief
justice
dissent
join
shows
procedures
prescribed
congress
detainee
treatment
act
provide
essential
protections
habeas
corpus
guarantees
thus
suspension
writ
basis
exists
judicial
intervention
beyond
act
allows
problem
today
opinion
fundamental
still
writ
habeas
corpus
never
run
favor
aliens
abroad
suspension
clause
thus
application
intervention
military
matter
entirely
ultra
vires
shall
devote
lengthy
opinion
legal
errors
contained
opinion
contrary
usual
practice
however
think
appropriate
begin
description
disastrous
consequences
done
today
america
war
radical
islamists
enemy
began
killing
americans
american
allies
abroad
marine
barracks
lebanon
khobar
towers
dhahran
embassies
dar
es
salaam
nairobi
uss
cole
yemen
see
national
commission
terrorist
attacks
upon
commission
report
pp
september
enemy
brought
battle
american
soil
killing
twin
towers
new
york
city
pentagon
washington
pennsylvania
see
threatened
attacks
homeland
one
need
walk
buttressed
barricaded
washington
board
plane
anywhere
country
know
threat
serious
one
armed
forces
field
enemy
afghanistan
iraq
last
week
countrymen
arms
killed
game
today
opinion
plays
upon
nation
commander
chief
make
war
harder
us
almost
certainly
cause
americans
killed
consequence
tolerable
necessary
preserve
legal
principle
vital
constitutional
republic
blatant
abandonment
principle
produces
decision
today
president
relied
settled
precedent
johnson
eisentrager
established
prison
guantanamo
bay
enemy
aliens
citing
case
president
office
legal
counsel
advised
great
weight
legal
authority
indicates
federal
district
properly
exercise
habeas
jurisdiction
alien
detained
guantanamo
bay
memorandum
patrick
philbin
john
yoo
deputy
assistant
attorneys
general
office
legal
counsel
william
haynes
ii
general
counsel
dept
defense
law
otherwise
military
surely
transported
prisoners
kept
afghanistan
transferred
another
foreign
military
bases
turned
allies
detention
facilities
might
well
worse
detainees
long
term
decision
today
accomplishes
little
except
perhaps
reduce
enemy
combatants
ostensibly
seeks
protect
short
term
however
decision
devastating
least
prisoners
hitherto
released
guantanamo
bay
returned
battlefield
see
pt
minority
views
sens
kyl
sessions
graham
cornyn
coburn
hereinafter
minority
report
captured
killed
see
ibid
see
also
mintz
released
detainees
rejoining
fight
washington
post
pp
others
succeeded
carrying
atrocities
innocent
civilians
one
case
detainee
released
guantanamo
bay
masterminded
kidnapping
two
chinese
dam
workers
one
later
shot
death
used
human
shield
pakistani
commandoes
see
khan
lancaster
pakistanis
rescue
hostage
dies
washington
post
another
former
detainee
promptly
resumed
post
senior
taliban
commander
murdered
nations
engineer
three
afghan
soldiers
mintz
supra
still
another
murdered
afghan
judge
see
minority
report
reported
last
month
released
detainee
carried
suicide
bombing
iraqi
soldiers
mosul
iraq
see
white
detainee
joined
iraq
suicide
attack
washington
post
may
mind
detainees
military
concluded
enemy
combatants
return
kill
illustrates
incredible
difficulty
assessing
enemy
combatant
foreign
theater
operations
environment
lend
rigorous
evidence
collection
astoundingly
today
raises
bar
requiring
military
officials
appear
civilian
courts
defend
decisions
procedural
evidentiary
rules
go
beyond
congress
specified
chief
justice
dissent
makes
clear
idea
procedural
evidentiary
rules
determined
civil
courts
contemplation
least
applied
since
otherwise
reason
hold
congressionally
prescribed
procedures
unconstitutional
impose
higher
standard
proof
foreign
battlefields
current
procedures
require
number
enemy
returned
combat
obviously
increase
even
military
evidence
bring
forward
often
foolhardy
release
evidence
attorneys
representing
enemies
one
escalation
procedures
clear
affording
detainees
increased
access
witnesses
perhaps
troops
serving
afghanistan
classified
information
see
ante
prosecution
omar
abdel
rahman
federal
prosecutors
gave
names
unindicted
blind
sheik
defense
lawyers
information
hands
osama
bin
laden
within
two
weeks
see
minority
report
another
case
trial
testimony
revealed
enemy
monitoring
cellular
network
whereupon
promptly
stopped
using
enabling
evade
capture
continue
atrocities
see
today
military
elbows
aside
mere
two
terms
ago
hamdan
rumsfeld
held
quite
amazingly
detainee
treatment
act
stripped
habeas
jurisdiction
guantanamo
petitioners
claims
four
members
today
majority
joined
opinion
saying
following
nothing
prevents
president
returning
congress
seek
authority
trial
military
commission
believes
necessary
emergency
prevents
consultation
congress
judicial
insistence
upon
consultation
weaken
nation
ability
deal
danger
contrary
insistence
strengthens
nation
ability
determine
democratic
means
best
constitution
places
faith
democratic
means
breyer
concurring
turns
kidding
response
congress
president
request
quickly
enacted
military
commissions
act
emphatically
reasserting
want
prisoners
filing
habeas
petitions
therefore
clear
congress
executive
political
branches
determined
limiting
role
civilian
courts
adjudicating
whether
prisoners
captured
abroad
properly
detained
important
success
war
men
women
fighting
solicitor
general
argued
military
commissions
act
detainee
treatment
act
represent
effort
political
branches
strike
appropriate
balance
need
preserve
liberty
need
accommodate
weighty
sensitive
governmental
interests
ensuring
fact
fought
enemy
war
return
battle
brief
respondents
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
matter
today
decrees
good
reason
accept
judgment
two
branches
apparent
ante
government
declares
presents
credible
arguments
military
mission
guantanamo
compromised
habeas
corpus
courts
jurisdiction
hear
detainees
claims
competence
judgment
congress
president
point
none
whatever
blunders
nonetheless
henceforth
today
opinion
makes
unnervingly
clear
handle
enemy
prisoners
war
ultimately
lie
branch
knows
least
national
security
concerns
subject
entails
ii
suspension
clause
constitution
provides
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
suspended
unless
cases
rebellion
invasion
public
safety
may
require
art
cl
law
operating
written
constitution
role
determine
whether
conflict
clause
military
commissions
act
conflict
arises
suspension
clause
preserves
privilege
writ
aliens
held
military
enemy
combatants
base
guantanamo
bay
located
within
sovereign
territory
cuba
frequently
stated
owe
great
deference
congress
view
law
passed
constitutional
see
department
labor
triplett
national
dairy
products
see
also
american
communications
assn
douds
jackson
concurring
part
dissenting
part
especially
area
foreign
military
affairs
perhaps
area
accorded
congress
greater
deference
rostker
goldberg
indeed
accord
great
deference
even
president
acts
alone
area
see
department
navy
egan
regan
wald
light
principles
deference
conclusion
common
law
yiel
definite
answer
questions
us
ante
leaves
choice
affirm
appeals
writ
preserved
constitution
possibly
extend
farther
common
law
provided
clause
written
see
part
iii
infra
admits
determine
whether
writ
historically
extended
aliens
held
abroad
concedes
necessarily
guantanamo
bay
lies
outside
sovereign
territory
see
ante
rasul
bush
scalia
dissenting
together
two
concessions
establish
view
perfectly
ambiguous
whether
writ
provided
remedy
petitioners
basis
strike
military
commissions
act
must
leave
undisturbed
considered
judgment
coequal
weave
clear
constitutional
prohibition
pure
interpretive
equipoise
resorts
fundamental
principles
interpret
suspension
clause
ante
according
writ
habeas
corpus
indispensable
mechanism
monitoring
separation
powers
test
extraterritorial
reach
must
subject
manipulation
whose
power
designed
restrain
ante
approach
distorts
nature
separation
powers
role
constitutional
structure
fundamental
principles
constitution
embodies
derived
judicially
imagined
matrix
sum
total
individual
provisions
constitution
sets
forth
considering
full
shape
constitution
principles
emerge
nonsensical
interpret
provisions
light
general
principles
dreamed
rather
must
interpreted
mean
understood
mean
people
ratified
understood
scope
writ
habeas
corpus
designed
restrain
says
actions
executive
understood
limits
upon
scope
seems
grasp
much
designed
restrain
incursions
third
branch
manipulation
territorial
reach
writ
judiciary
poses
much
threat
proper
separation
powers
manipulation
executive
show
manipulation
afoot
understood
limits
upon
writ
deny
jurisdiction
habeas
petitions
brought
enemy
aliens
entrust
president
crucial
wartime
determinations
status
continued
confinement
purports
derive
precedents
functional
test
extraterritorial
reach
writ
ante
shows
military
commissions
act
unconstitutionally
restricts
scope
habeas
remarkable
pertinent
precedents
johnson
eisentrager
conclusively
establishes
opposite
confronted
claims
germans
held
landsberg
prison
american
military
facility
located
american
zone
occupation
postwar
germany
captured
china
american
military
commission
sitting
convicted
war
crimes
collaborating
japanese
germany
surrender
like
petitioners
germans
claimed
detentions
violated
constitution
international
law
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
writing
justice
jackson
held
american
courts
lacked
habeas
jurisdiction
cited
sic
instance
country
writ
known
issued
behalf
alien
enemy
relevant
time
stage
captivity
within
territorial
jurisdiction
nothing
text
constitution
extends
right
anything
statutes
justice
jackson
elaborated
historical
scope
writ
alien
traditionally
hospitable
accorded
generous
ascending
scale
rights
increases
identity
society
extending
constitutional
protections
beyond
citizenry
pains
point
alien
presence
within
territorial
jurisdiction
gave
judiciary
power
act
lest
doubt
primacy
territorial
sovereignty
determining
jurisdiction
habeas
alien
justice
jackson
distinguished
two
cases
aliens
permitted
seek
habeas
relief
ground
prisoners
cases
custody
within
sovereign
territory
discussing
ex
parte
quirin
yamashita
reason
sovereignty
time
philippines
jackson
wrote
yamashita
stood
much
quirin
american
courts
eisentrager
thus
held
held
beyond
doubt
constitution
ensure
habeas
aliens
held
areas
government
us
believe
eisentrager
rested
ractical
considerations
difficulties
ordering
government
produce
prisoners
habeas
corpus
proceeding
ante
formal
sovereignty
says
merely
one
consideration
bears
upon
constitutional
guarantees
apply
given
location
ante
sheer
rewriting
case
eisentrager
mentioned
practical
concerns
sure
purpose
determining
circumstances
american
courts
issue
writs
habeas
corpus
aliens
abroad
cited
support
holding
constitution
empower
courts
issue
writs
habeas
corpus
aliens
abroad
circumstances
justice
black
accurately
said
dissent
opinion
inescapably
denies
courts
power
afford
least
bit
protection
alien
subject
occupation
government
abroad
even
neither
enemy
belligerent
even
peace
officially
declared
also
tries
change
eisentrager
functional
test
quoting
paragraph
lists
characteristics
german
petitioners
support
assumption
constitutional
right
habeas
corpus
must
hold
prisoner
military
authorities
constitutionally
entitled
writ
even
though
enemy
alien
never
resided
captured
outside
territory
held
military
custody
prisoner
war
tried
convicted
military
commission
sitting
outside
offenses
laws
war
committed
outside
times
imprisoned
outside
quoted
part
ante
paragraph
introduced
sentence
stating
foregoing
demonstrates
much
must
go
invest
enemy
aliens
resident
captured
imprisoned
abroad
standing
demand
access
courts
emphasis
added
much
rule
set
forth
prior
section
opinion
said
extending
constitutional
protections
beyond
citizenry
pains
point
alien
presence
within
territorial
jurisdiction
gave
judiciary
power
act
words
characteristics
german
prisoners
set
forth
application
functional
test
show
case
represented
fortiori
application
ordinary
rule
reaffirmed
sentences
immediately
follow
listing
germans
characteristics
pointed
privilege
litigation
extended
aliens
whether
friendly
enemy
permitting
presence
country
implied
protection
basis
invoked
prisoners
relevant
time
within
territory
sovereign
scenes
offense
capture
trial
punishment
beyond
territorial
jurisdiction
eisentrager
nowhere
mentions
functional
test
notion
based
upon
principle
patently
also
reasons
eisentrager
must
read
functional
opinion
prior
decisions
insular
cases
see
ante
cites
statement
balzac
porto
rico
real
issue
insular
cases
whether
constitution
extended
philippines
porto
rico
went
provisions
applicable
way
limitation
upon
exercise
executive
legislative
power
dealing
new
conditions
requirements
ante
conveniently
omits
balzac
predicate
statement
constitution
force
porto
rico
wherever
whenever
sovereign
power
government
exerted
emphasis
added
insular
cases
concerned
territories
acquired
congress
article
iv
authority
indisputably
part
sovereign
territory
see
reid
covert
plurality
opinion
black
none
insular
cases
stands
proposition
aliens
located
outside
sovereign
territory
constitutional
rights
eisentrager
held
opposite
respect
habeas
corpus
said
eisentrager
distinguished
yamashita
ground
sovereignty
philippines
also
relies
ractical
considerations
influenced
decision
reid
covert
supra
see
ante
justices
majority
except
justice
frankfurter
limited
analysis
rights
citizens
abroad
see
reid
supra
plurality
opinion
black
harlan
concurring
result
frankfurter
limited
analysis
even
narrower
class
civilian
dependents
american
military
personnel
abroad
see
opinion
concurring
result
trying
wring
kind
support
reid
today
novel
holding
resorts
chain
logic
hold
members
reid
majority
says
divided
whether
ross
according
held
certain
circumstances
american
citizens
abroad
indictment
rights
overruled
view
reid
plurality
overruled
ross
justices
frankfurter
harlan
preferred
distinguish
upshot
citizenship
relevant
factor
case
necessary
overturn
ross
something
justices
harlan
frankfurter
unwilling
ante
exactly
point
supposed
prove
say
practical
considerations
determine
precise
content
constitutional
protections
american
citizens
enjoy
abroad
quite
different
saying
practical
considerations
determine
whether
aliens
abroad
enjoy
constitutional
protections
whatever
including
habeas
words
merely
citizenship
sufficient
factor
extend
constitutional
rights
abroad
mean
necessary
one
tries
reconcile
eisentrager
holding
today
pointing
postwar
germany
answerable
allies
pla
occupation
ante
factors
mentioned
eisentrager
worse
still
impossible
see
relate
asserted
purpose
creating
functional
test
namely
ensure
judicial
inquiry
detention
prevent
political
branches
acting
impunity
possibly
trusts
political
branches
beholden
foreign
powers
act
alone
transforming
fortiori
elements
discussed
functional
test
still
left
difficulty
elements
exist
well
regard
detainees
make
application
newly
crafted
functional
test
produce
different
result
present
cases
must
rely
upon
factors
germans
tried
military
commission
violations
laws
war
present
petitioners
contrast
tried
combatant
status
review
tribunal
csrt
whose
procedural
protections
according
ipse
dixit
fall
well
short
procedures
adversarial
mechanisms
eliminate
need
habeas
corpus
review
ante
one
looking
functional
equivalents
put
eisentrager
present
cases
category
much
less
place
present
cases
preferred
category
difference
cries
lesser
procedures
present
cases
prisoners
eisentrager
prosecuted
crimes
cessation
hostilities
prisoners
enemy
combatants
detained
ongoing
conflict
see
hamdi
rumsfeld
plurality
opinion
suggesting
adequate
substitute
habeas
corpus
use
tribunal
akin
csrt
authorize
detention
american
citizens
enemy
combatants
course
present
conflict
category
prisoner
comparable
detainees
eisentrager
criminal
defendants
prisoners
war
detained
alone
world
war
ii
single
one
accorded
right
detention
validated
habeas
corpus
action
federal
despite
fact
present
soil
see
bradley
military
commissions
act
habeas
corpus
geneva
conventions
analysis
produces
crazy
result
whereas
convicted
sentenced
death
war
crimes
without
judicial
remedy
enemy
combatants
detained
war
least
insofar
confined
area
away
battlefield
exercises
absolute
indefinite
control
may
seek
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
even
bizarre
implication
reasoning
prisoners
military
plans
try
commission
future
date
may
file
habeas
petitions
secure
release
trials
take
place
simply
support
assertion
constitutional
rights
extend
aliens
held
outside
sovereign
territory
see
eisentrager
clearer
privilege
habeas
corpus
extend
aliens
abroad
blatantly
distorting
eisentrager
avoids
difficulty
explaining
overruled
see
planned
parenthood
southeastern
casey
identifying
stare
decisis
factors
rule
aliens
abroad
constitutionally
entitled
habeas
corpus
proved
unworkable
practice
anything
functional
test
never
provide
clear
guidance
future
eisentrager
forms
coherent
whole
accepted
proposition
aliens
abroad
substantive
rights
constitution
since
announced
relevant
factual
premises
changed
engendered
considerable
reliance
part
military
acknowledges
text
history
clearly
compel
contrary
ruling
sad
day
rule
law
important
constitutional
precedent
discarded
without
apologia
much
less
apology
drives
today
decision
neither
meaning
suspension
clause
principles
precedents
rather
inflated
notion
judicial
supremacy
says
extraterritorial
applicability
suspension
clause
turned
formal
notions
sovereignty
possible
political
branches
govern
without
legal
constraint
areas
beyond
sovereign
territory
ante
says
duty
say
law
difficult
imagine
analysis
foundation
power
federal
courts
declare
acts
congress
unconstitutional
lies
power
duty
courts
decide
cases
controversies
properly
raines
citing
marbury
madison
cranch
emphasis
added
power
say
law
circumscribed
limits
statutorily
constitutionally
conferred
jurisdiction
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
precisely
question
cases
whether
constitution
confers
habeas
jurisdiction
federal
courts
decide
petitioners
claims
irrational
arrogant
say
answer
must
yes
otherwise
long
places
habeas
run
long
new
functional
test
satisfied
every
case
circumstances
possible
political
branches
govern
without
legal
constraint
put
impartially
areas
legal
determinations
branches
shudder
words
judicial
supremacy
really
assured
constitutional
rule
creates
gap
rationale
rule
leads
conclude
ultimate
unexpressed
goal
preserve
power
review
confinement
enemy
prisoners
held
executive
anywhere
world
functional
test
usefully
evades
precedential
landmine
eisentrager
inherently
subjective
clears
wide
path
traverse
years
come
iii
putting
aside
conclusive
precedent
eisentrager
clear
original
understanding
suspension
clause
habeas
corpus
available
aliens
abroad
judge
randolph
thorough
opinion
detailed
see
cadc
suspension
clause
reads
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
suspended
unless
cases
rebellion
invasion
public
safety
may
require
art
cl
proper
course
constitutional
interpretation
give
text
meaning
understood
time
adoption
people
see
crawford
washington
course
especially
demanded
constitution
limits
power
congress
infringe
upon
right
nature
writ
habeas
corpus
suspended
must
defined
writ
available
time
founding
see
mcnally
hill
see
also
ins
cyr
scalia
dissenting
duhme
fdic
jackson
concurring
entirely
clear
english
common
law
writ
habeas
corpus
extend
beyond
sovereign
territory
crown
sure
writ
extraordinary
territorial
ambit
prerogative
writ
unlike
writs
extend
beyond
realm
england
places
crown
sovereign
sharpe
law
habeas
corpus
ed
hereinafter
sharpe
see
also
note
power
english
courts
issue
writ
habeas
places
within
dominions
crown
england
position
scotland
relation
power
jurid
rev
hereinafter
note
habeas
king
cowle
burr
eng
prerogative
writs
issue
foreign
countries
even
british
subjects
confined
king
dominions
areas
crown
sovereign
see
sharpe
chambers
course
lectures
english
law
pp
curley
ed
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
hereinafter
blackstone
thus
writ
never
extended
scotland
although
england
james
succeeded
english
throne
considered
foreign
dominion
different
crown
king
scotland
sharpe
note
habeas
lord
mansfield
wrote
foreign
dominions
belong
prince
succeeds
throne
england
power
send
writ
kind
send
habeas
corpus
scotland
cowle
supra
eng
writ
codified
habeas
corpus
act
stood
alongside
magna
charta
english
bill
rights
towering
common
law
lighthouse
liberty
beacon
framing
lawyers
america
consciously
steered
course
amar
sixth
amendment
first
principles
geo
writ
established
colonies
beginning
least
one
colony
adopted
act
almost
verbatim
see
dept
political
science
state
research
reports
walker
american
reception
writ
liberty
section
xi
act
stated
writ
run
may
directed
run
county
palatine
privileged
places
within
kingdom
england
dominion
wales
town
berwick
upon
tweed
islands
jersey
guernsey
car
ch
county
palatine
exempt
jurisdictions
franchises
granted
crown
local
authorities
manage
municipal
affairs
including
system
crown
maintained
ultimate
sovereignty
see
blackstone
places
listed
wales
jersey
guernsey
territories
crown
even
though
part
england
proper
see
cowle
supra
eng
wales
blackstone
jersey
guernsey
sharpe
act
extend
writ
elsewhere
even
though
existence
places
british
prisoners
sent
recognized
act
possibility
evading
judicial
review
eliminated
expanding
writ
abroad
forbidding
article
xii
act
shipment
prisoners
places
writ
run
execution
difficult
see
car
ch
see
generally
nutting
wholesome
law
habeas
corpus
act
hist
rev
habeas
corpus
act
confirms
consensus
view
scholars
jurists
writ
run
outside
sovereign
territory
crown
says
idea
jurisdiction
followed
king
officers
equally
credible
view
ante
credible
support
cites
page
boumediene
brief
turn
cites
dicta
rasul
mischaracterizing
lord
mansfield
statement
writ
ran
place
subjection
crown
cowle
supra
eng
clear
lord
mansfield
saying
writ
extended
outside
realm
england
proper
outside
sovereign
territory
dismisses
example
scotland
grounds
scotland
judicial
system
writ
practical
matter
enforced
ante
explanations
totally
unpersuasive
existence
separate
system
never
basis
denying
power
issue
writ
see
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
citing
ex
parte
anderson
el
el
logistical
problems
difficulties
present
places
like
channel
islands
writ
run
attempts
draw
analogy
prudential
limitations
issuing
writ
remote
areas
within
sovereign
territory
crown
jurisdictional
prohibition
issuing
writ
scotland
see
ante
authority
cites
lord
mansfield
expressly
distinguished
two
concepts
stating
english
courts
power
send
writ
places
within
crown
sovereignty
question
propriety
power
send
writ
kind
scotland
foreign
dominions
cowle
supra
eng
writ
run
scotland
even
union
scotland
remained
foreign
dominion
prince
succeeded
english
throne
union
extend
prerogative
english
crown
scotland
sharpe
see
also
sir
matthew
hale
prerogatives
king
yale
ed
sum
available
historical
evidence
points
conclusion
writ
available
common
law
aliens
captured
held
outside
sovereign
territory
crown
despite
three
opening
briefs
three
reply
briefs
support
legion
amici
petitioners
failed
identify
single
case
history
law
supports
claim
jurisdiction
finds
significant
recorded
case
denying
jurisdiction
prisoners
either
see
ante
case
standing
remarkable
proposition
writ
issue
foreign
land
surely
reported
whereas
case
denying
writ
lack
jurisdiction
likely
minimum
absence
reported
case
either
way
leaves
unrefuted
voluminous
commentary
stating
habeas
confined
dominions
crown
history
teaches
confirmed
nature
limitations
constitution
places
upon
suspension
writ
suspended
cases
rebellion
invasion
art
cl
latter
case
invasion
plainly
limited
territory
conceivable
rebellion
mounted
american
citizens
abroad
surely
overwhelming
majority
occurrences
domestic
extraterritorial
scope
habeas
turned
flexible
functional
considerations
holds
constitution
limit
suspension
almost
entirely
instances
domestic
crisis
surely
even
greater
justification
suspension
foreign
lands
might
hold
prisoners
war
ongoing
conflict
correspondingly
less
threat
liberty
government
suspends
writ
supposed
application
foreign
lands
even
extreme
view
prisoners
entitled
fewer
constitutional
rights
makes
sense
therefore
constitution
generally
forbid
suspension
writ
abroad
indeed
writ
application
may
objected
foregoing
analysis
proves
much
since
already
suggested
writ
habeas
corpus
run
abroad
benefit
citizens
position
citizens
throughout
world
may
entitled
habeas
corpus
rights
precisely
position
adopted
eisentrager
see
even
holding
aliens
abroad
habeas
corpus
rights
rasul
scalia
dissenting
emphasis
deleted
reason
divergence
difficult
discern
writ
received
law
new
constitutional
republic
took
changes
demanded
system
rule
derived
consent
governed
citizens
subjects
afforded
defined
protections
government
justice
story
wrote
common
law
england
taken
respects
america
ancestors
brought
general
principles
claimed
birthright
brought
adopted
portion
applicable
situation
van
ness
pacard
pet
see
also
hall
common
law
account
reception
vand
rev
accords
principle
say
plurality
opinion
said
reid
government
reaches
punish
citizen
abroad
shield
bill
rights
parts
constitution
provide
protect
life
liberty
stripped
away
happens
another
land
see
also
analysis
distinction
citizens
aliens
follows
undoubted
proposition
constitution
create
general
principles
law
create
juridical
relation
country
undefined
limitless
class
noncitizens
beyond
territory
kennedy
concurring
sum
conclude
text
history
suspension
clause
provide
basis
jurisdiction
affirm
appeals
even
eisentrager
govern
cases
today
warps
constitution
way
goes
beyond
narrow
issue
reach
suspension
clause
invoking
judicially
brainstormed
principles
establish
manipulable
functional
test
extraterritorial
reach
habeas
corpus
doubt
extraterritorial
reach
constitutional
protections
well
blatantly
misdescribes
important
precedents
conspicuously
justice
jackson
opinion
johnson
eisentrager
breaks
chain
precedent
old
common
law
prohibits
judicial
inquiry
detentions
aliens
abroad
absent
statutory
authorization
tragically
sets
military
commanders
impossible
task
proving
civilian
whatever
standards
devises
future
evidence
supports
confinement
every
enemy
prisoner
nation
live
regret
done
today
dissent
footnotes
together
al
odah
next
friend
al
odah
et
al
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
light
foregoing
concurrence
wrong
suggest
insufficiently
appreciat
issue
delay
cases
see
ante
opinion
souter
issued
decisions
rasul
bush
hamdi
rumsfeld
concurrence
makes
sound
political
branches
done
nothing
interim
fact
congress
responded
months
later
enacting
dta
congress
faulted
taking
time
consider
best
accommodate
detainees
interests
need
keep
american
people
safe
since
dta
became
law
petitioners
steadfastly
refused
avail
statute
review
mechanisms
unfair
complain
dta
system
involves
much
delay
petitioners
consistently
refused
use
preferring
litigate
instead
today
decision
obligating
district
courts
craft
new
procedures
replace
dta
prolong
process
delay
relief
wonders
might
happen
detainee
puts
forward
new
material
evidence
deputy
secretary
refuses
convene
new
csrt
see
ante
answer
detainee
petition
circuit
review
dta
directs
procedures
review
new
evidence
included
among
procedures
submitted
paragraph
governing
csrt
review
enemy
combatant
status
stat
undisputed
circuit
statutory
authority
review
enforce
procedures
see
dta
footnotes
even
today
resist
striking
pose
faux
deference
congress
president
citing
quoted
passage
says
political
branches
consistent
independent
obligations
interpret
uphold
constitution
engage
genuine
debate
best
preserve
constitutional
values
protecting
nation
terrorism
ante
indeed
apparently
means
political
branches
debate
third
branch
decide
opinion
seeks
avoid
straightforward
conclusion
saying
careful
foreclose
possibility
protections
suspension
clause
expanded
along
developments
define
present
scope
writ
ante
citing
ins
cyr
foreclosing
possibility
expanded
demonstrating
least
holding
without
demonstration
seems
suffice
today
majority
expanded
must
either
hold
suspension
clause
expanded
application
aliens
abroad
acknowledge
basis
set
aside
actions
congress
president
neither
failed
attempt
distinguish
eisentrager
comes
notion
de
jure
sovereignty
simply
additional
factor
added
presumably
de
facto
sovereignty
practical
control
determine
availability
habeas
aliens
necessary
factor
whereas
de
facto
sovereignty
perhaps
de
facto
sense
speculates
eisentrager
found
sovereignty
lacking
see
ante
one
expected
eisentrager
explain
detail
practical
control
american
zone
occupation
probably
course
novel
de
jure
approach
explain
writ
never
issued
scotland
assuredly
within
de
facto
control
english
crown
see
infra
support
holding
de
facto
sovereignty
relevant
reach
habeas
corpus
cites
decision
fleming
page
case
application
customs
statute
foreign
port
occupied
forces
see
ante
case
used
phrase
subject
sovereignty
dominion
refer
practical
control
foreign
country
fleming
went
explain
port
remained
part
enemy
country
even
though
military
occupation
subjugation
compel
held
regard
part
dominions
give
form
civil
government
extend
laws
fleming
relevant
cases
undermines
holding
justice
souter
concurrence
relies
decision
four
terms
ago
rasul
bush
interpreted
habeas
statute
extend
aliens
held
guantanamo
bay
thinks
one
reads
opinion
rasul
seriously
doubt
jurisdictional
question
must
answered
way
purely
constitutional
cases
ante
rasul
devoted
primarily
explanation
eisentrager
statutory
holding
longer
controlled
given
subsequent
decision
braden
judicial
circuit
see
rasul
supra
opinion
today
justice
souter
joins
expressly
rejects
historical
evidence
cited
rasul
support
conclusion
reach
habeas
corpus
compare
ante
moreover
even
one
accept
true
justice
souter
calls
rasul
dictum
explain
eisentrager
constitutional
holding
must
overruled
distinguished
rasul
distinguished
eisentrager
statutory
holding
ground
inapplicable
constitutional
holding
words
even
conclude
eisentrager
rule
incorrect
original
matter
explain
justification
departing
precedent
therefore
possibly
true
rasul
controls
case
justice
souter
suggests
dissent
rasul
bush
mistakenly
included
scotland
among
places
writ
run
dicta
rasul
also
cited
ex
parte
mwenya
explained
dissent
ach
judge
mwenya
made
clear
detainee
status
subject
material
resolution
case
also
argues
fact
writ
run
ireland
even
though
ruled
separate
crown
shows
formal
sovereignty
touchstone
habeas
jurisdiction
ante
passage
blackstone
cites
however
describes
ireland
dependent
subordinate
kingdom
part
king
dominions
blackstone
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
lord
mansfield
opinion
cowle
plainly
understood
ireland
dominion
crown
england
contrast
foreign
dominio
scotland
thought
distinction
dispositive
question
habeas
jurisdiction
cowle
supra
eng