hein
director
white
house
office
community
initiatives
et
al
freedom
religion
foundation
et
argued
february
decided
june
president
executive
orders
created
white
house
office
several
centers
within
federal
agencies
ensure
community
groups
eligible
compete
federal
financial
support
congressional
legislation
specifically
authorized
entities
created
entirely
within
executive
branch
congress
enacted
law
specifically
appropriating
money
activities
funded
general
executive
branch
appropriations
respondents
organization
opposed
government
endorsement
religion
three
members
brought
suit
alleging
petitioners
directors
federal
offices
violated
establishment
clause
organizing
conferences
designed
promote
effect
promoting
religious
community
groups
secular
ones
asserted
basis
standing
individual
respondents
federal
taxpayers
opposed
executive
branch
use
congressional
appropriations
conferences
district
dismissed
claims
lack
standing
concluding
flast
cohen
federal
taxpayer
standing
limited
establishment
clause
challenges
constitutionality
exercises
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
petitioners
acted
president
behalf
charged
administering
congressional
program
held
challenged
activities
authorize
taxpayer
standing
flast
seventh
circuit
reversed
reading
flast
granting
federal
taxpayers
standing
challenge
executive
branch
programs
establishment
clause
grounds
long
activities
financed
congressional
appropriation
even
statutory
program
funds
appropriations
general
administrative
expenses
according
taxpayer
standing
challenge
anything
done
federal
agency
long
marginal
incremental
cost
public
alleged
establishment
clause
violation
greater
zero
held
judgment
reversed
reversed
justice
alito
joined
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
concluded
seventh
circuit
broad
reading
flast
incorrect
respondents
lack
standing
pp
jurisdiction
limited
actual
cases
controversies
art
iii
controlling
factor
definition
case
controversy
standing
asarco
kadish
requisite
elements
well
established
plaintiff
must
allege
personal
injury
fairly
traceable
defendant
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
likely
redressed
requested
relief
allen
wright
pp
generally
federal
taxpayer
interest
seeing
treasury
funds
spent
accordance
constitution
attenuated
give
rise
kind
redressable
personal
injury
required
article
iii
standing
see
frothingham
mellon
decided
massachusetts
mellon
pp
flast
carved
narrow
exception
general
constitutional
prohibition
taxpayer
standing
alleged
distribution
federal
funds
religious
schools
federal
statute
violated
establishment
clause
set
test
determining
standing
first
taxpayer
proper
party
allege
unconstitutionality
exercises
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
secondly
taxpayer
must
show
challenged
enactment
exceeds
specific
constitutional
limitations
imposed
upon
exercise
congressional
taxing
spending
power
simply
enactment
generally
beyond
powers
delegated
congress
art
held
particular
taxpayer
satisfied
prongs
test
pp
respondents
broad
reading
flast
exception
cover
expenditure
government
funds
violation
establishment
clause
fails
observe
rigor
flast
exception
frothingham
principle
applied
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
given
alleged
establishment
clause
violation
flast
funded
specific
congressional
appropriation
undertaken
pursuant
express
congressional
mandate
concluded
established
requisite
logical
link
taxpayer
status
type
legislative
enactment
attacked
constitutional
challenge
made
exercise
congress
power
art
spend
general
welfare
flast
limited
taxpayer
standing
challenges
directed
exercises
congressional
taxing
spending
clause
valley
forge
supra
pp
link
congressional
action
constitutional
violation
supported
taxpayer
standing
flast
missing
respondents
neither
challenge
specific
congressional
action
appropriation
ask
invalidate
congressional
enactment
legislatively
created
program
unconstitutional
expenditures
issue
made
pursuant
act
congress
general
appropriations
executive
branch
fund
activities
appropriations
expressly
authorize
direct
even
mention
expenditures
question
resulted
executive
discretion
congressional
action
never
found
taxpayer
standing
circumstances
bowen
kendrick
distinguished
pp
respondents
argue
avail
distinguishing
money
spent
pursuant
congressional
mandate
expenditures
made
course
executive
discretion
arbitrary
injury
taxpayers
situations
targeted
establishment
clause
flast
expenditure
support
religion
funds
exacted
taxpayers
flast
focused
congressional
action
invitation
extend
holding
encompass
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditures
must
declined
repeatedly
emphasized
flast
exception
narrow
application
daimlerchrysler
cuno
slightly
lowered
bar
taxpayer
standing
richardson
must
applied
rigor
valley
forge
supra
pp
also
rejected
respondents
argument
executive
branch
expenditures
support
religion
different
legislative
extractions
flast
rejected
equivalence
almost
executive
branch
activity
ultimately
funded
congressional
appropriation
extending
flast
exception
purely
executive
expenditures
effectively
subject
every
federal
action
conference
proclamation
speech
establishment
clause
challenge
taxpayer
federal
respondents
proposed
rule
also
raise
serious
concerns
enlisting
federal
courts
superintend
behest
federal
taxpayer
speeches
statements
myriad
daily
activities
president
staff
executive
branch
officials
pp
seventh
circuit
respondents
implicitly
recognize
unqualified
federal
taxpayer
standing
assert
establishment
clause
claims
go
far
neither
identified
workable
limitation
taking
circuit
test
literally
marginal
cost
greater
zero
suffices
taxpayers
might
well
standing
challenge
perhaps
many
speeches
government
officials
minimum
approach
create
difficult
uncomfortable
problems
respondents
proposal
require
expenditure
fairly
traceable
conduct
alleged
violate
establishment
clause
challenges
content
particular
speech
screened
vague
accepted
pp
none
parade
horribles
respondents
claim
occur
flast
extended
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditures
happened
unlikely
event
take
place
congress
quickly
step
respondents
make
effort
show
improbable
abuses
challenged
federal
plaintiffs
possessed
standing
based
grounds
taxpayer
status
pp
case
require
reconsider
flast
seventh
circuit
apply
flast
extended
valley
forge
christian
academy
illustrates
necessary
concomitant
stare
decisis
precedent
always
expanded
limit
logic
approach
taken
flast
neither
extended
overruled
simply
left
pp
justice
scalia
joined
justice
thomas
concurred
judgment
concluding
flast
cohen
overruled
wholly
irreconcilable
article
iii
restrictions
jurisdiction
embodied
standing
doctrine
pp
cases
involving
establishment
clause
challenges
government
expenditures
notoriously
inconsistent
inconsistently
described
relevant
injury
fact
article
iii
requires
cases
focused
financial
effect
taxpayer
wallet
whereas
flast
cases
follow
teaching
emphasized
mental
displeasure
taxpayer
suffers
funds
extracted
spent
aid
religion
two
logical
routes
available
respect
taxpayer
standing
mental
displeasure
created
establishment
clause
violations
concrete
particularized
enough
constitute
article
iii
injury
fact
flast
applied
minimum
challenges
government
expenditures
allegedly
violating
constitutional
provisions
specifically
limit
taxing
spending
power
flast
overturned
pp
today
plurality
avails
neither
principled
option
instead
accepting
government
submission
flast
limited
challenges
expenditures
expressly
authorized
mandated
specific
congressional
enactment
however
plurality
gives
explanation
factual
differences
case
flast
material
whether
challenged
government
expenditure
expressly
allocated
specific
congressional
enactment
relevant
article
iii
criteria
injury
fact
traceability
redressability
yet
plurality
also
unwilling
acknowledge
flast
erred
relying
purely
mental
injury
pp
respondents
legal
position
coherent
plurality
refuse
admit
argument
logically
implies
every
expenditure
tax
revenues
alleged
violate
establishment
clause
subject
suit
flast
course
position
finds
support
precedents
nation
history
pp
taxpayer
purely
psychological
disapproval
funds
spent
allegedly
unlawful
manner
never
sufficiently
concrete
particularized
support
article
iii
standing
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
although
overruling
precedents
serious
undertaking
stare
decisis
prevent
flast
inconsistent
cases
came
undervalued
function
standing
lack
logical
theoretical
underpinning
rendered
doctrine
incomprehensible
appellate
judges
know
make
case
engendered
reliance
interests
cases
less
warrant
stare
decisis
effect
past
time
overturn
flast
pp
alito
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
joined
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
thomas
joined
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
ginsburg
breyer
joined
jay
hein
director
white
house
office
community
initiatives
et
petitioners
freedom
gion
foundation
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
june
justice
alito
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
join
lawsuit
claimed
conferences
held
part
president
community
initiatives
program
violated
establishment
clause
first
amendment
among
things
president
bush
former
secretary
education
paige
gave
speeches
used
religious
imagery
praised
efficacy
programs
delivering
social
services
plaintiffs
contend
meet
standing
requirements
article
iii
constitution
pay
federal
taxes
long
established
however
payment
taxes
generally
enough
establish
standing
challenge
action
taken
federal
government
light
size
federal
budget
complete
fiction
argue
unconstitutional
federal
expenditure
causes
individual
federal
taxpayer
measurable
economic
harm
every
federal
taxpayer
sue
challenge
government
expenditure
federal
courts
cease
function
courts
law
cast
role
general
complaint
bureaus
flast
cohen
recognized
narrow
exception
general
rule
federal
taxpayer
standing
flast
plaintiff
asserting
establishment
clause
claim
standing
challenge
law
authorizing
use
federal
funds
way
allegedly
violates
establishment
clause
present
case
congress
specifically
authorize
use
federal
funds
pay
conferences
speeches
plaintiffs
challenged
instead
conferences
speeches
paid
general
executive
branch
appropriations
appeals
however
held
plaintiffs
standing
taxpayers
conferences
paid
money
appropriated
congress
question
presented
whether
broad
reading
flast
correct
hold
therefore
reverse
decision
appeals
president
issued
executive
order
creating
white
house
office
community
initiatives
within
executive
office
president
exec
order
cfr
purpose
new
office
ensure
private
charitable
community
groups
including
religious
ones
fullest
opportunity
permitted
law
compete
level
playing
field
long
achieve
valid
public
purposes
adhere
bedrock
principles
pluralism
nondiscrimination
evenhandedness
neutrality
ibid
office
specifically
charged
task
eliminating
unnecessary
bureaucratic
legislative
regulatory
barriers
impede
organizations
effectiveness
ability
compete
equally
federal
assistance
separate
executive
orders
president
also
created
executive
department
centers
community
initiatives
within
several
federal
agencies
centers
given
job
ensuring
community
groups
eligible
compete
federal
financial
support
without
impairing
independence
autonomy
long
use
direct
federal
financial
assistance
support
inherently
religious
activities
worship
religious
instruction
proselytization
exec
order
cfr
end
president
directed
organization
discriminated
basis
religion
religious
belief
administration
distribution
federal
financial
assistance
social
service
programs
organizations
receive
federal
financial
assistance
social
services
programs
prohibited
discriminating
beneficiaries
potential
beneficiaries
social
services
programs
basis
religion
religious
belief
petitioners
sued
official
capacities
directors
white
house
office
various
executive
department
centers
congressional
legislation
specifically
authorized
creation
white
house
office
executive
department
centers
rather
created
entirely
within
executive
branch
presidential
executive
order
freedom
religion
foundation
chao
congress
enacted
law
specifically
appropriating
money
entities
activities
instead
activities
funded
general
executive
branch
appropriations
example
department
education
center
funded
money
appropriated
office
secretary
education
department
housing
urban
development
center
funded
department
salaries
expenses
account
see
government
accountability
office
community
initiative
improvements
monitoring
grantees
measuring
performance
enhance
accountability
june
online
http
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
see
also
amended
complaint
wd
app
pet
cert
respondents
freedom
religion
foundation
nonstock
corporation
opposed
government
endorsement
religion
app
pet
cert
three
members
respondents
brought
suit
district
western
district
wisconsin
alleging
petitioners
violated
establishment
clause
organizing
conferences
organizations
allegedly
singled
particularly
worthy
federal
funding
belief
god
extolled
distinguishing
claimed
effectiveness
social
services
app
pet
cert
respondents
alleged
content
conferences
sent
message
religious
believers
insiders
favored
members
political
community
conferences
sent
message
nonbelievers
outsiders
full
members
political
community
app
pet
cert
short
respondents
alleged
conferences
designed
promote
effect
promoting
religious
community
groups
secular
ones
asserted
basis
standing
individual
respondents
federal
taxpayers
opposed
use
congressional
taxpayer
appropriations
advance
promote
religion
app
pet
cert
see
also
app
pet
cert
capacity
federal
taxpayers
respondents
sought
challenge
executive
branch
expenditures
conferences
contended
violated
establishment
clause
district
dismissed
claims
petitioners
lack
standing
see
freedom
religion
foundation
towey
wd
app
pet
cert
concluded
flast
federal
taxpayer
standing
limited
establishment
clause
challenges
constitutionality
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
app
pet
cert
quoting
flast
supra
petitioners
case
acted
president
request
president
behalf
charged
administration
congressional
program
district
concluded
challenged
activities
congressional
sufficient
provide
basis
taxpayer
standing
flast
app
pet
cert
divided
panel
appeals
seventh
circuit
reversed
majority
read
flast
granting
federal
taxpayers
standing
challenge
executive
branch
programs
establishment
clause
grounds
long
activities
financed
congressional
appropriation
case
majority
concluded
even
statutory
program
enacted
congress
funds
appropriations
general
administrative
expenses
president
executive
branch
officials
degree
discretionary
power
according
majority
taxpayer
standing
challenge
anything
done
federal
agency
officer
long
marginal
incremental
cost
taxpaying
public
alleged
violation
establishment
clause
greater
zero
dissent
judge
ripple
opined
majority
decision
reflected
dramatic
expansion
current
standing
doctrine
cuts
concept
taxpayer
standing
loose
moorings
noting
executive
nothing
without
general
budget
appropriations
congress
criticized
majority
overstepping
flast
requirement
plaintiff
must
bring
attack
disbursement
public
funds
made
exercise
congress
taxing
spending
power
emphasis
original
appeals
denied
en
banc
review
vote
seven
four
concurring
denial
rehearing
chief
judge
flaum
expressed
doubt
panel
decision
noted
obvious
tension
evolved
area
jurisprudence
resolved
ibid
granted
certiorari
resolve
question
reverse
ii
article
iii
constitution
limits
judicial
power
resolution
cases
controversies
iii
standing
enforces
constitution
requirement
daimlerchrysler
cuno
slip
quoting
elk
grove
unified
school
dist
newdow
principle
fundamental
judiciary
proper
role
system
government
constitutional
limitation
jurisdiction
actual
cases
controversies
raines
byrd
quoting
simon
eastern
ky
welfare
rights
organization
ne
controlling
elements
definition
case
controversy
article
iii
standing
asarco
kadish
opinion
kennedy
requisite
elements
article
iii
standing
well
established
plaintiff
must
allege
personal
injury
fairly
traceable
defendant
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
likely
redressed
requested
relief
allen
wright
constitutionally
mandated
standing
inquiry
especially
important
case
like
one
taxpayers
seek
challenge
laws
general
application
injury
distinct
suffered
general
taxpayers
citizens
asarco
supra
opinion
kennedy
judicial
power
defined
art
iii
unconditioned
authority
determine
constitutionality
legislative
executive
acts
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
federal
courts
empowered
seek
strike
governmental
act
deem
repugnant
constitution
rather
federal
courts
sit
solely
decide
rights
individuals
marbury
madison
cranch
must
passing
upon
constitutionality
act
unless
obliged
proper
performance
judicial
function
question
raised
party
whose
interests
entitle
raise
valley
forge
supra
quoting
blair
held
years
ago
another
case
involving
question
taxpayer
standing
power
per
se
review
annul
acts
congress
ground
unconstitutional
question
may
considered
justification
direct
injury
suffered
threatened
presenting
justiciable
issue
made
rest
upon
act
party
invokes
power
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
frothingham
mellon
decided
massachusetts
mellon
general
matter
interest
federal
taxpayer
seeing
treasury
funds
spent
accordance
constitution
give
rise
kind
redressable
personal
injury
required
article
iii
standing
course
taxpayer
standing
challenge
collection
specific
tax
assessment
unconstitutional
forced
pay
tax
causes
real
immediate
economic
injury
individual
taxpayer
see
follett
town
mccormick
invalidating
tax
preaching
first
amendment
grounds
interest
respondents
assert
standing
rather
claim
paid
lawfully
collected
taxes
federal
treasury
point
continuing
legally
cognizable
interest
ensuring
funds
used
government
way
violates
constitution
consistently
held
type
interest
generalized
attenuated
support
article
iii
standing
frothingham
federal
taxpayer
sought
challenge
federal
appropriations
mothers
children
health
arguing
federal
involvement
area
intruded
rights
reserved
tenth
amendment
increase
burden
future
taxation
thereby
take
plaintiff
property
without
due
process
law
concluded
plaintiff
lacked
kind
particularized
injury
required
article
iii
standing
nterest
moneys
treasury
shared
millions
others
comparatively
minute
indeterminable
effect
upon
future
taxation
payment
funds
remote
fluctuating
uncertain
basis
afforded
appeal
preventive
powers
equity
administration
statute
likely
produce
additional
taxation
imposed
upon
vast
number
taxpayers
extent
whose
several
liability
indefinite
constantly
changing
essentially
matter
public
individual
concern
interests
taxpayer
essence
interests
deciding
constitutional
claim
based
solely
taxpayer
standing
decide
judicial
controversy
assume
position
authority
governmental
acts
another
department
authority
plainly
possess
see
also
alabama
power
ickes
doremus
board
ed
hawthorne
reaffirmed
principle
explaining
interests
taxpayer
moneys
federal
treasury
indeterminable
remote
uncertain
indirect
furnish
basis
appeal
preventive
powers
manner
expenditure
therefore
rejected
state
taxpayer
claim
standing
challenge
state
law
authorizing
public
school
teachers
read
bible
grievance
plaintiff
sought
litigate
direct
injury
religious
difference
gave
effect
basic
constitutional
principle
plaintiff
raising
generally
available
grievance
government
claiming
harm
every
citizen
interest
proper
application
constitution
laws
seeking
relief
directly
tangibly
benefits
public
large
state
article
iii
case
controversy
lujan
defenders
wildlife
flast
carved
narrow
exception
general
constitutional
prohibition
taxpayer
standing
case
challenged
distribution
federal
funds
religious
schools
elementary
secondary
education
act
alleging
aid
violated
establishment
clause
set
test
determining
whether
federal
taxpayer
standing
challenge
allegedly
unconstitutional
expenditure
first
taxpayer
must
establish
logical
link
status
type
legislative
enactment
attacked
thus
taxpayer
proper
party
allege
unconstitutionality
exercises
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
constitution
sufficient
allege
incidental
expenditure
tax
funds
administration
essentially
regulatory
statute
secondly
taxpayer
must
establish
nexus
status
precise
nature
constitutional
infringement
alleged
requirement
taxpayer
must
show
challenged
enactment
exceeds
specific
constitutional
limitations
imposed
upon
exercise
congressional
taxing
spending
power
simply
enactment
generally
beyond
powers
delegated
congress
art
flast
held
flast
satisfied
prongs
test
plaintiff
constitutional
challenge
made
exercise
congress
power
art
spend
general
welfare
alleged
violation
establishment
clause
operates
specific
constitutional
limitation
upon
exercise
congress
taxing
spending
power
conferred
art
iii
respondents
argue
case
falls
within
flast
exception
read
cover
expenditure
government
funds
violation
establishment
clause
brief
respondents
broad
reading
fails
observe
rigor
flast
exception
frothingham
principle
applied
valley
forge
expenditures
issue
flast
made
pursuant
express
congressional
mandate
specific
congressional
appropriation
plaintiff
case
challenged
disbursements
made
elementary
secondary
education
act
stat
act
expressly
appropriated
sum
million
fiscal
year
authorized
disbursement
funds
local
educational
agencies
education
students
see
flast
supra
act
mandated
local
educational
agencies
receiving
funds
provision
including
special
educational
services
arrangements
dual
enrollment
educational
radio
television
mobile
educational
services
equipment
students
enrolled
private
elementary
secondary
schools
participate
stat
addition
recipient
agencies
required
ensure
library
resources
textbooks
instructional
materials
funded
grants
provided
equitable
basis
use
children
teachers
private
elementary
secondary
schools
expenditures
challenged
flast
funded
specific
congressional
appropriation
disbursed
private
schools
including
religiously
affiliated
schools
pursuant
direct
unambiguous
congressional
indeed
flast
constitutional
claim
premised
contention
government
actions
authority
intent
act
act
extent
unconstitutional
void
flast
judgment
reviewed
flast
solely
concerned
question
whether
challenged
expenditures
authorized
act
statute
constitutes
respecting
establishment
religion
law
free
exercise
first
amendment
flast
gardner
supp
sdny
given
alleged
establishment
clause
violation
flast
funded
specific
congressional
appropriation
undertaken
pursuant
express
congressional
mandate
concluded
established
requisite
logical
link
taxpayer
status
type
legislative
enactment
attacked
words
heir
constitutional
challenge
made
exercise
congress
power
art
spend
general
welfare
later
noted
flast
limited
taxpayer
standing
challenges
directed
exercises
congressional
taxing
spending
clause
valley
forge
link
congressional
action
constitutional
violation
supported
taxpayer
standing
flast
missing
respondents
challenge
specific
congressional
action
appropriation
ask
invalidate
congressional
enactment
legislatively
created
program
unconstitutional
expenditures
issue
made
pursuant
act
congress
rather
congress
provided
general
appropriations
executive
branch
fund
appropriations
expressly
authorize
direct
even
mention
expenditures
respondents
complain
expenditures
resulted
executive
discretion
congressional
action
never
found
taxpayer
standing
circumstances
valley
forge
held
taxpayer
lacked
standing
challenge
decision
federal
department
health
education
welfare
transfer
parcel
federal
property
religious
college
transfer
congressional
action
fact
connection
congressional
action
closer
valley
forge
case
particular
executive
branch
action
challenged
least
arguably
authorized
federal
property
administrative
services
act
permitted
federal
agencies
transfer
surplus
property
private
entities
nevertheless
found
plaintiffs
lacked
standing
flast
limited
taxpayer
standing
challenges
directed
exercises
congressional
taxing
spending
clause
quoting
flast
supra
similarly
schlesinger
reservists
comm
stop
war
contended
incompatibility
clause
article
prohibited
members
congress
holding
commissions
armed
forces
reserve
held
plaintiffs
lacked
standing
flast
challenge
enactment
art
rather
action
executive
branch
permitting
members
congress
maintain
reserve
status
case
even
though
plaintiffs
sought
reclaim
reservist
pay
received
members
pay
presumably
funded
congress
general
appropriations
support
armed
forces
relief
follow
invalidity
executive
action
paying
persons
lawfully
reservists
invalidity
statutes
authorizing
pay
lawfully
reservists
see
also
richardson
denying
taxpayers
standing
compel
publication
accounting
central
intelligence
agency
nexus
asserted
status
taxpayer
claimed
failure
congress
require
executive
supply
detailed
report
expenditures
agency
bowen
kendrick
respondents
rely
heavily
contrary
case
held
standing
mount
challenge
adolescent
family
life
act
afla
authorized
federal
grants
private
community
service
groups
including
religious
organizations
found
sufficient
nexus
taxpayer
standing
taxpayer
congressional
exercise
taxing
spending
power
notwithstanding
fact
funding
authorized
congress
ha
flowed
administered
executive
branch
official
key
conclusion
recognition
afla
heart
program
disbursement
funds
pursuant
congress
taxing
spending
powers
plaintiffs
claims
call
ed
question
funds
authorized
congress
disbursed
pursuant
afla
statutory
mandate
emphasis
added
afla
expressly
authorized
appropriated
specific
funds
also
expressly
contemplated
moneys
might
go
projects
involving
religious
groups
see
see
also
concurring
noting
partnership
governmental
religious
institutions
contemplated
afla
unlike
case
kendrick
involved
program
disbursement
funds
pursuant
congress
taxing
spending
powers
congress
created
authorized
mandate
respondents
attempt
paint
lawsuit
challenge
effort
unavailing
simple
reason
cite
statute
whose
application
challenge
best
point
unspecified
congressional
budget
appropriations
general
use
executive
branch
allocation
administrative
decision
traditionally
regarded
committed
agency
discretion
lincoln
vigil
characterizing
case
challenge
general
appropriations
statutes
stretch
meaning
term
past
breaking
point
every
legal
challenge
discretionary
executive
branch
action
implicates
constitutionality
underlying
congressional
appropriation
criminal
defendant
charges
federal
agent
carried
unreasonable
search
seizure
view
claim
challenge
constitutionality
statute
appropriating
funds
federal
bureau
investigation
respondents
established
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditures
similarly
funded
appropriations
viewed
short
case
falls
outside
narrow
exception
flast
created
general
rule
taxpayer
standing
established
frothingham
kendrick
supra
expenditures
respondents
challenge
expressly
authorized
mandated
specific
congressional
enactment
respondents
lawsuit
directed
exercise
congressional
power
see
valley
forge
thus
lacks
requisite
logical
nexus
taxpayer
status
type
legislative
enactment
attacked
flast
iv
respondents
argue
arbitrary
distinguish
money
spent
pursuant
congressional
mandate
expenditures
made
course
executive
discretion
injury
taxpayers
situations
injury
targeted
establishment
clause
flast
expenditure
support
religion
funds
exacted
taxpayers
brief
respondents
panel
majority
agreed
based
observation
much
executive
officials
promote
religion
ways
forbidden
establishment
clause
flast
focused
congressional
action
must
decline
invitation
extend
holding
encompass
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditures
flast
distinguished
incidental
expenditure
tax
funds
administration
essentially
regulatory
statute
flast
supra
subsequently
rejected
view
taxpayer
standing
extends
government
whole
regardless
branch
work
particular
instance
valley
forge
supra
moreover
repeatedly
emphasized
flast
exception
narrow
application
precedent
cuno
slip
slightly
lowered
bar
taxpayer
standing
richardson
must
applied
rigor
valley
forge
supra
significant
four
decades
since
creation
flast
exception
largely
confined
facts
declined
lower
taxpayer
standing
bar
suits
alleging
violations
constitutional
provision
apart
establishment
clause
see
tilton
richardson
taxpayer
standing
sue
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
richardson
taxpayer
standing
sue
statement
account
clause
art
schlesinger
taxpayer
standing
sue
incompatibility
clause
art
cuno
supra
slip
taxpayer
standing
sue
commerce
clause
similarly
refused
extend
flast
permit
taxpayer
standing
establishment
clause
challenges
implicate
congress
taxing
spending
power
see
valley
forge
supra
taxpayer
standing
challenge
executive
branch
action
taken
pursuant
property
clause
art
iv
see
also
district
columbia
common
cause
district
columbia
cadc
catholic
conference
effect
adopted
position
set
forth
justice
powell
concurrence
richardson
limit
ed
expansion
federal
taxpayer
citizen
standing
absence
specific
statutory
authorization
outer
boundary
drawn
results
flast
respondents
argue
executive
branch
expenditures
support
religion
different
legislative
extractions
flast
rejected
equivalence
sufficient
allege
incidental
expenditure
tax
funds
administration
essentially
regulatory
statute
almost
executive
branch
activity
ultimately
funded
congressional
appropriation
extending
flast
exception
purely
executive
expenditures
effectively
subject
every
federal
action
conference
proclamation
speech
establishment
clause
challenge
taxpayer
federal
see
wide
swathe
activity
respondents
proposed
rule
cover
one
need
look
amended
complaint
action
focuses
largely
speeches
presentations
made
executive
branch
officials
see
amended
complaint
app
pet
cert
challenging
executive
branch
officials
support
national
regional
conferences
app
pet
cert
challenging
content
speech
secretary
education
app
pet
cert
challenging
content
presidential
speeches
app
pet
cert
challenging
executive
branch
officials
public
appearances
speeches
broad
reading
ignore
first
prong
flast
standing
test
requires
logical
link
taxpayer
status
type
legislative
enactment
attacked
also
raise
serious
concerns
recognized
flast
gave
little
weight
concerns
framing
standing
question
solely
terms
whether
dispute
presented
adversary
context
form
traditionally
viewed
capable
judicial
resolution
flast
failed
recognize
doctrine
component
keeps
courts
within
certain
traditional
bounds
branches
concrete
adverseness
lewis
casey
see
also
valley
forge
respondents
position
adopted
repeat
compound
mistake
constitutional
requirements
jurisdiction
including
standing
requirements
article
iii
essential
ingredient
separation
equilibration
powers
steel
citizens
better
environment
relaxation
standing
requirements
directly
related
expansion
judicial
power
lowering
taxpayer
standing
bar
permit
challenges
purely
executive
actions
significantly
alter
allocation
power
national
level
shift
away
democratic
form
government
richardson
powell
concurring
rule
respondents
propose
enlist
federal
courts
superintend
behest
federal
taxpayer
speeches
statements
myriad
daily
activities
president
staff
executive
branch
officials
quite
odds
flast
promise
transform
federal
courts
forums
taxpayers
conduct
government
cuno
slip
quoting
flast
supra
open
judiciary
arguable
charge
providing
injunction
schlesinger
deputize
federal
courts
continuing
monitors
wisdom
soundness
executive
action
emphatically
role
judiciary
allen
quoting
laird
tatum
appeals
respondents
implicitly
recognize
unqualified
federal
taxpayer
standing
assert
establishment
clause
claims
go
far
neither
appeals
respondents
identified
workable
limitation
appeals
noted
conceded
taxpayer
lack
standing
marginal
incremental
cost
taxpaying
public
alleged
violation
establishment
clause
zero
applying
rule
appeals
opined
taxpayer
standing
challenge
president
favorable
reference
religion
state
union
address
costs
associated
speech
greater
merely
president
mentioned
moses
rather
john
stuart
mill
ibid
reason
question
whether
appeals
intended
test
taken
literally
without
apparent
inquiry
costs
secretary
paige
speech
went
agree
plaintiffs
lacked
standing
challenge
speech
take
appeals
test
literally
marginal
cost
greater
zero
suffices
taxpayers
might
well
standing
challenge
perhaps
many
speeches
judge
easterbrook
observed
total
cost
presidential
proclamations
speeches
cabinet
officers
touch
religion
thanksgiving
several
holidays
surely
exceeds
annually
may
cost
much
use
air
force
one
send
secret
service
detail
single
speaking
engagement
concurring
denial
rehearing
en
banc
minimum
appeals
approach
asking
whether
marginal
cost
exceeded
zero
surely
create
difficult
uncomfortable
problems
suppose
alleged
speech
writer
staff
member
spent
extra
time
research
purpose
including
religious
imagery
speech
suppose
president
cabinet
officer
attends
speaks
prayer
breakfast
time
spent
time
otherwise
spent
secular
work
respondents
take
somewhat
different
approach
contending
proposed
expansion
flast
manageable
require
challenged
expenditure
fairly
traceable
conduct
alleged
violate
establishment
clause
brief
respondents
applying
test
argue
scree
challenge
content
one
particular
speech
example
state
union
address
establishment
clause
violation
find
little
comfort
vague
test
initial
matter
respondents
fail
explain
often
substantial
costs
attend
example
presidential
address
less
traceable
expenses
related
executive
branch
statements
conferences
issue
indeed
respondents
concede
even
lawsuits
involving
de
minimis
amounts
taxpayer
money
pass
proposed
traceability
test
moreover
traceability
inquiry
depending
framed
appear
prove
either
little
much
question
whether
allegedly
unconstitutional
executive
action
somehow
traced
taxpayer
funds
general
answer
always
yes
almost
executive
branch
activities
ultimately
funded
congressional
appropriation
whether
general
specific
turn
financed
tax
receipts
hand
question
whether
challenged
action
traced
contributions
particular
answer
almost
always
recognized
frothingham
interest
individual
taxpayer
particular
federal
expenditure
comparatively
minute
indeterminable
constantly
changing
respondents
set
parade
horribles
claim
occur
flast
extended
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditures
example
say
federal
agency
use
discretionary
funds
build
house
worship
hire
clergy
one
denomination
send
spread
faith
agency
use
funds
make
bulk
purchases
stars
david
crucifixes
depictions
star
crescent
use
offices
distribution
employees
general
public
course
none
things
happened
even
though
flast
previously
expanded
way
respondents
urge
unlikely
event
executive
actions
take
place
congress
quickly
step
respondents
make
effort
show
improbable
abuses
challenged
federal
plaintiffs
possess
standing
based
grounds
taxpayer
standing
years
flast
defended
criticized
others
present
case
require
us
reconsider
precedent
appeals
apply
flast
extended
flast
necessary
concomitant
doctrine
stare
decisis
precedent
always
expanded
limit
logic
approach
rehnquist
took
opinion
valley
forge
approach
take
extend
flast
also
overrule
leave
flast
found
justice
scalia
says
must
either
overrule
flast
extend
limits
logic
position
sane
inconsistent
rule
law
utterly
meaningless
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
wrong
justice
scalia
seriously
dispute
either
flast
spoke
terms
legislative
enactment
exercises
congressional
power
four
decades
since
flast
decided
never
extended
narrow
exception
purely
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditure
need
go
decide
case
relying
provision
constitution
limits
role
resolving
cases
controversies
us
decide
case
hand
reasons
judgment
appeals
seventh
circuit
reversed
ordered
jay
hein
director
white
house
office
community
initiatives
et
petitioners
freedom
religion
foundation
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
concurring
design
constitution
implemented
among
means
article
iii
limitation
resulting
requirement
standing
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
decision
flast
cohen
later
cases
applying
must
interpreted
respecting
principles
acknowledging
well
principles
cases
must
accommodate
first
amendment
establishment
clause
clause
expresses
constitution
special
concern
freedom
conscience
compromised
government
taxing
spending
support
religion
view
result
reached
flast
correct
called
question
reasons
set
forth
justice
alito
however
flast
extended
permit
taxpayer
standing
instant
matter
join
opinion
full
respondents
amended
complaint
challenged
religious
nature
national
regional
conferences
promoted
president
bush
community
initiatives
see
app
pet
cert
support
allegation
respondents
pointed
speeches
given
president
executive
officers
speeches
religious
references
complaint
relies
respondents
taxpayer
status
sole
basis
standing
maintain
suit
points
specific
use
congress
taxing
spending
power
general
appropriations
fund
administration
executive
branch
flast
established
narrow
exception
rule
taxpayer
standing
bowen
kendrick
find
standing
circumstances
case
make
narrow
exception
boundless
public
events
public
speeches
respondents
seek
call
question
part
open
discussion
essential
democratic
executive
branch
free
general
matter
discover
new
ideas
understand
pressing
public
demands
find
creative
responses
address
governmental
concerns
exchange
ideas
among
state
federal
governments
manifold
diverse
constituencies
sustains
free
society
permitting
taxpayers
challenge
content
prototypical
executive
operations
dialogues
lead
judicial
intervention
far
exceeding
traditional
boundaries
judiciary
arise
real
danger
judicial
oversight
executive
duties
burden
discovery
ascertain
relief
justified
potentially
innumerable
cases
risk
altering
free
exchange
ideas
information
constant
supervision
take
place
courts
soon
assume
role
speech
editors
communications
issued
executive
officials
event
planners
meetings
hold
courts
must
reluctant
expand
authority
requiring
intrusive
unremitting
judicial
management
way
executive
branch
performs
duties
refused
establish
constitutional
rule
require
allow
permanent
judicial
intervention
conduct
governmental
operations
degree
inconsistent
sound
principles
federalism
separation
powers
garcetti
ceballos
slip
see
also
cheney
dist
noting
considerations
inform
appeals
evaluation
mandamus
petition
involving
president
vice
president
mandamus
standards
broad
enough
prevent
lower
interfering
coequal
branch
ability
discharge
constitutional
responsibilities
article
iii
context
explained
concerns
based
separation
powers
counsel
ed
recognizing
standing
case
brought
seek
restructuring
apparatus
established
executive
branch
fulfill
legal
duties
allen
wright
principle
applies
authorize
constant
intrusion
upon
executive
realm
result
granting
taxpayer
standing
instant
case
justice
alito
explains
detail
precedents
require
concerns
implicated
intrusive
judicial
regulation
executive
operations
reinforce
interpretation
flast
framework
cf
allen
supra
relying
separation
powers
principles
interpret
traceable
component
standing
requirement
must
remembered
even
parties
standing
sue
members
legislative
executive
branches
excused
making
constitutional
determinations
regular
course
duties
government
officials
must
make
conscious
decision
obey
constitution
whether
acts
challenged
law
must
conform
actions
principled
determinations
jay
hein
director
white
house
office
community
initiatives
et
petitioners
freedom
religion
foundation
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
june
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
judgment
today
opinion
one
significant
respect
entirely
consistent
previous
cases
addressing
taxpayer
standing
raise
establishment
clause
challenges
government
expenditures
unfortunately
consistency
lies
creation
utterly
meaningless
distinctions
separate
case
hand
precedents
come
differently
possibly
sane
world
reason
comes
differently
decide
cases
rule
law
rather
show
hands
must
surrender
logic
choose
sides
either
flast
cohen
applied
minimum
challenges
governmental
expenditure
general
tax
revenues
manner
alleged
violate
constitutional
provision
specifically
limiting
taxing
spending
power
flast
repudiated
choice
easy
flast
wholly
irreconcilable
article
iii
restrictions
jurisdiction
repeatedly
confirmed
embodied
doctrine
standing
simple
reason
cases
involving
establishment
clause
challenges
government
expenditures
notoriously
inconsistent
inconsistently
described
first
element
irreducible
constitutional
minimum
standing
minimum
consists
concrete
particularized
fairly
traceable
defendant
alleged
unlawful
conduct
likely
redressed
favorable
decision
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
alternately
relied
two
entirely
distinct
conceptions
injury
fact
convenience
call
wallet
injury
psychic
injury
wallet
injury
type
concrete
particularized
injury
one
expect
asserted
taxpayer
suit
namely
claim
plaintiff
tax
liability
higher
allegedly
unlawful
government
action
stumbling
block
suits
challenging
government
expenditures
based
conventional
type
injury
quite
predictable
plaintiff
satisfy
traceability
redressability
prongs
standing
uncertain
plaintiff
tax
bill
allegedly
forbidden
expenditure
made
even
speculative
whether
government
response
adverse
decision
lower
taxes
rather
spend
funds
manner
psychic
injury
hand
nothing
plaintiff
tax
liability
instead
injury
consists
taxpayer
mental
displeasure
money
extracted
spent
unlawful
manner
shift
focus
eliminates
traceability
redressability
problems
psychic
injury
directly
traceable
improper
use
taxpayer
funds
redressed
improper
use
enjoined
regardless
whether
injunction
affects
taxpayer
purse
flast
cases
following
teaching
invoked
peculiarly
restricted
version
psychic
injury
permitting
taxpayer
displeasure
unconstitutional
spending
support
standing
constitutional
provision
allegedly
violated
specific
limitation
taxing
spending
power
restricted
conceptualizing
injury
fact
purely
mental
terms
conflicts
squarely
familiar
proposition
plaintiff
lacks
concrete
particularized
injury
complaint
generalized
grievance
law
violated
reaffirmed
unanimously
term
consistently
held
plaintiff
raising
generally
available
grievance
government
claiming
harm
every
citizen
interest
proper
application
constitution
laws
seeking
relief
directly
tangibly
benefits
public
large
state
article
iii
case
controversy
lance
coffman
per
curiam
slip
quoting
lujan
supra
following
review
cases
demonstrates
initially
denied
taxpayer
standing
based
wallet
injury
found
standing
later
cases
based
limited
version
psychic
injury
described
basic
logical
flaw
cases
thus
twofold
never
explained
psychic
injury
insufficient
cases
standing
denied
never
explained
psychic
injury
however
limited
cognizable
article
iii
two
cases
critical
importance
frothingham
mellon
decided
massachusetts
mellon
taxpayer
challenged
constitutionality
maternity
act
alleging
part
federal
funding
provided
act
authorized
provision
constitution
see
argument
frothingham
opinion
held
taxpayer
lacked
standing
emphasizing
effect
upon
future
taxation
payment
treasury
funds
remote
fluctuating
uncertain
frothingham
concluded
party
invokes
power
judicial
review
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
thus
describing
traceability
redressability
problems
wallet
injury
rejecting
psychic
injury
generalized
grievance
rather
concrete
particularized
harm
second
significant
case
doremus
board
ed
hawthorne
taxpayers
challenged
establishment
clause
state
law
requiring
teachers
read
bible
beginning
school
day
relying
extensively
frothingham
denied
standing
first
emphasizing
allegation
bible
reading
increased
plaintiffs
taxes
cost
running
schools
reaffirming
taxpayers
must
allege
indefinite
injury
suffered
common
people
generally
concluded
grievance
plaintiffs
sought
litigate
direct
injury
religious
difference
ibid
addition
reiterating
frothingham
description
unavoidable
obstacles
recovery
taxpayer
theory
wallet
injury
doremus
rejected
psychic
injury
unmistakable
terms
opinion
deprecation
mere
religious
difference
contrast
real
injury
understood
flat
denial
standing
supported
taxpayer
disapproval
unconstitutional
use
tax
funds
thought
psychic
injury
permissible
basis
standing
sufficed
dissenting
justices
doremus
suggested
see
opinion
douglas
public
employees
paid
part
violate
establishment
clause
sixteen
years
doremus
took
pivotal
turn
flast
cohen
taxpayers
challenged
elementary
secondary
education
act
alleging
funds
expended
pursuant
act
used
support
parochial
schools
argued
either
act
proscribed
expenditures
act
violated
establishment
clause
held
taxpayers
standing
purportedly
order
determine
whether
taxpayers
personal
stake
interest
necessary
satisfy
article
iii
nexus
test
invented
first
prong
required
taxpayer
establish
logical
link
taxpayer
status
type
legislative
enactment
described
meant
follows
taxpayer
proper
party
allege
unconstitutionality
exercises
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
constitution
sufficient
allege
incidental
expenditure
tax
funds
administration
essentially
regulatory
statute
requirement
consistent
limitation
imposed
upon
standing
federal
courts
doremus
ibid
second
prong
required
taxpayer
establish
nexus
taxpayer
status
precise
nature
constitutional
infringement
alleged
ibid
elaborated
required
taxpayer
show
challenged
enactment
exceeds
specific
constitutional
limitations
imposed
upon
exercise
congressional
taxing
spending
power
simply
enactment
generally
beyond
powers
delegated
congress
art
held
establishment
clause
type
specific
limitation
taxing
spending
power
mind
one
specific
evils
feared
framers
clause
taxing
spending
power
used
favor
one
religion
another
support
religion
generally
relying
exclusively
upon
madison
famous
memorial
remonstrance
religious
assessments
prongs
newly
minted
test
satisfied
flast
held
taxpayers
standing
wallet
injury
possibly
basis
conclusion
since
taxpayers
flast
able
prove
success
merits
reduce
tax
burden
taxpayer
frothingham
thus
flast
relied
psychic
injury
support
standing
describing
injury
taxpayer
allegation
tax
money
extracted
spent
violation
specific
constitutional
protections
abuses
legislative
power
created
problem
taxpayers
flast
standing
based
psychic
injury
without
regard
effect
litigation
ultimate
tax
liability
taxpayers
doremus
frothingham
standing
similar
basis
enter
magical
nexus
test
often
pointed
never
refuted
criteria
flast
test
entirely
unrelated
purported
goal
ensuring
plaintiff
sufficient
stake
outcome
controversy
see
flast
harlan
dissenting
see
also
douglas
concurring
richardson
powell
concurring
truth
test
designed
quite
different
goal
prong
meant
disqualify
standing
one
two
prior
cases
otherwise
contradict
holding
flast
first
prong
distinguished
doremus
involving
challenge
incidental
expenditure
tax
funds
administration
essentially
regulatory
statute
rather
challenge
taxing
spending
statute
see
proffer
reason
taxpayer
psychic
injury
less
concrete
particularized
traceable
redressable
challenged
expenditures
incidental
essentially
regulatory
statute
whatever
means
doremus
evaded
reality
course
simply
material
difference
flast
doremus
far
psychic
injury
concerned
taxpayers
upset
government
giving
money
parochial
schools
standing
sue
taxpayers
disapproved
government
paying
teachers
read
flast
dispatching
frothingham
via
second
prong
nexus
test
marginally
less
disingenuous
relationship
allegedly
violated
provision
taxing
spending
power
bearing
upon
concreteness
particularity
psychic
injury
see
part
iii
infra
existence
relationship
even
genuinely
distinguish
flast
frothingham
impossible
maintain
establishment
clause
direct
limitation
taxing
spending
power
constitutional
limitation
invoked
frothingham
contained
within
provision
creating
power
tax
spend
article
cl
provides
congress
shall
power
lay
collect
taxes
pay
debts
provide
common
defence
general
welfare
emphasis
added
though
unmentioned
flast
precisely
limitation
upon
permissible
purposes
taxing
spending
upon
frothingham
relied
see
brief
appellant
frothingham
words
common
defence
general
welfare
used
limitations
taxing
power
discussing
general
welfare
limitation
length
coherence
candor
fared
better
later
cases
three
containing
lengthy
discussion
establishment
clause
warrant
analysis
flast
dismissively
unpersuasively
distinguished
years
later
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
taxpayers
challenged
decision
department
health
education
welfare
give
tract
government
property
worth
half
million
dollars
religious
organization
adhering
strict
letter
flast
nexus
test
held
taxpayers
lacked
standing
flast
first
prong
satisfied
rather
challenging
congressional
taxing
spending
statute
plaintiffs
attacking
agency
decision
transfer
federal
property
pursuant
congress
power
property
clause
art
iv
cl
distinguishing
spending
clause
property
clause
valley
forge
achieved
seemingly
impossible
surpassed
high
bar
irrationality
set
flast
distinguishing
doremus
frothingham
like
dissenters
valley
forge
see
opinion
brennan
opinion
stevens
fathom
article
iii
standing
turn
whether
government
enables
religious
organization
obtain
real
estate
giving
check
drawn
general
tax
revenues
instead
buying
property
transferring
title
valley
forge
application
first
prong
distinguish
flast
unpersuasive
least
trying
hide
ball
holding
forthrightly
based
resounding
rejection
concept
psychic
injury
plaintiffs
fail
identify
personal
injury
suffered
consequence
alleged
constitutional
error
psychological
consequence
presumably
produced
observation
conduct
one
disagrees
injury
sufficient
confer
standing
art
iii
even
though
disagreement
phrased
constitutional
terms
evident
respondents
firmly
committed
constitutional
principle
separation
church
state
standing
measured
intensity
litigant
interest
fervor
advocacy
emphasis
omitted
course
keeping
become
shameful
tradition
cases
candor
inadequacy
psychic
injury
combined
notable
silence
flast
doomed
mere
six
years
later
flast
resuscitated
bowen
kendrick
taxpayers
brought
facial
establishment
clause
challenges
adolescent
family
life
act
afla
congressional
scheme
provided
grants
public
nonprofit
private
organizations
combat
premarital
adolescent
pregnancy
sex
challenge
focused
whether
particular
grantees
selected
secretary
health
human
services
constitutionally
permissible
recipients
solicitor
general
argued
valley
forge
application
flast
first
prong
taxpayers
lacked
standing
claim
claim
really
challenge
executive
decisionmaking
congress
exercise
taxing
spending
power
rejected
contention
holding
taxpayers
claim
still
challenge
congress
taxing
spending
power
even
though
disbursement
funds
authorized
congress
administered
secretary
kendrick
like
flast
obviously
based
psychic
injury
taxpayers
possibly
make
attempt
make
showing
required
wallet
injury
relying
psychic
injury
kendrick
perfectly
revealed
incompatibility
concept
outcome
doremus
kendrick
care
whether
appropriated
funds
spent
anyway
given
different
permissible
recipient
also
doremus
cared
teachers
likely
receive
salary
classroom
activities
limited
secular
conduct
flast
kendrick
acceptance
psychic
injury
fundamentally
odds
frothingham
doremus
valley
forge
brings
final
case
worthy
mention
last
term
daimlerchrysler
cuno
concisely
confirmed
flast
based
psychic
injury
taxpayers
case
sought
rely
flast
raise
commerce
clause
challenge
state
franchise
tax
credit
slip
rejecting
analogy
denying
standing
described
flast
follows
understood
alleged
establishment
clause
challenges
federal
spending
ion
spen
ding
money
aid
religion
alleged
plaintiff
injunction
spending
course
redress
injury
regardless
whether
lawmakers
dispose
savings
way
benefit
personally
slip
citation
omitted
alterations
original
cuno
conceptualization
flast
reveals
two
logical
routes
available
must
initially
decide
whether
psychic
injury
consistent
article
iii
apply
flast
challenges
government
expenditures
violation
constitutional
provisions
specifically
limit
taxing
spending
power
overturn
flast
ii
plurality
today
avails
neither
principled
option
instead
essentially
accepting
solicitor
general
primary
submission
limits
flast
challenges
expenditures
expressly
authorized
mandated
specific
congressional
enactment
ante
offers
intellectual
justification
limitation
except
necessary
concomitant
doctrine
stare
decisis
precedent
always
expanded
limit
logic
ante
true
enough
since
courts
purport
engaged
reasoned
decisionmaking
true
precedent
logic
seen
require
narrowing
readjustment
light
relevant
distinctions
new
fact
situation
brings
fore
logic
fundamentally
flawed
deserves
limited
facts
begot
today
plurality
claims
neither
justifications
first
plurality
offers
explanation
factual
differences
case
flast
material
virtually
admits
express
congressional
allocation
vel
non
nothing
whether
plaintiffs
alleged
injury
fact
fairly
traceable
likely
redressed
see
ante
dissent
correctly
contends
shall
belabor
see
post
opinion
souter
flast
indistinguishable
case
purposes
article
iii
whether
challenged
government
expenditure
expressly
allocated
specific
congressional
enactment
absolutely
relevance
article
iii
criteria
injury
fact
traceability
redressability
yet
plurality
also
unwilling
acknowledge
logic
flast
psychic
injury
rationale
simply
wrong
reason
extended
cases
despite
lack
acknowledgment
however
plausible
explanation
plurality
indifference
whether
distinguishing
fact
legally
material
determination
limit
flast
ante
pick
distinguishing
fact
may
breathe
life
flast
future
cases
preserving
disreputable
disarray
establishment
clause
standing
jurisprudence
hold
taxpayers
raising
establishment
clause
challenges
expenditures
pursuant
elementary
secondary
education
act
standing
suppose
obvious
repudiation
flast
thus
impediment
plurality
pose
minimalism
line
mooring
tripartite
test
article
iii
standing
invites
demonstrably
absurd
results
example
plurality
deny
standing
taxpayer
challenging
president
disbursement
religious
organization
discrete
appropriation
congress
explicitly
allocated
purpose
even
everyone
knew
congress
president
informally
negotiated
entire
sum
spent
precise
manner
see
ante
holding
nonstatutory
earmarks
insufficient
satisfy
requirement
taxpayers
lack
standing
bring
establishment
clause
challenges
executive
branch
use
appropriated
funds
expenditures
added
vice
violating
congressional
restrictions
example
congress
instructs
president
disburse
grants
hospitals
deems
worthy
president
instead
gives
money
catholic
church
link
congressional
action
constitutional
violation
supported
taxpayer
standing
flast
missing
ante
indeed
taking
plurality
word
congress
insulate
president
suits
codifying
truism
appropriation
spent
executive
branch
manner
violates
establishment
clause
last
pretense
minimalism
adhering
prior
law
merely
declining
extend
swept
away
fact
holding
flatly
contradicts
kendrick
whole
point
challenge
kendrick
secretary
congress
chosen
inappropriate
grant
recipients
kendrick
case
equally
involve
relevant
sense
attacks
executive
discretion
rather
congressional
decision
congress
generally
authorized
spending
tax
funds
certain
purposes
explicitly
mandate
spent
unconstitutional
manner
challenged
taxpayers
thus
share
dissent
bewilderment
see
post
opinion
souter
plurality
fixates
amount
additional
discretion
executive
branch
enjoys
law
beyond
discretion
relevant
establishment
clause
issue
whether
spend
taxpayer
funds
purpose
unconstitutional
see
ante
focusing
whether
case
involves
purely
discretionary
executive
branch
expenditure
emphasis
added
critical
members
plurality
means
wish
give
impression
respondents
legal
position
coherent
respondents
argue
flast
turn
whether
congress
expressly
allocated
funds
allegedly
unconstitutional
use
case
plainly
rests
psychic
injury
repeatedly
emphasize
injury
flast
merely
governmental
extraction
spending
tax
money
aid
religion
see
brief
respondents
respondents
refuse
admit
argument
logically
implies
reasons
already
discussed
every
expenditure
tax
revenues
alleged
violate
establishment
clause
subject
suit
flast
course
concession
run
headlong
denial
standing
doremus
respondents
answer
doremus
cryptic
assertion
injury
fairly
traceable
unconstitutional
conduct
brief
respondents
makes
sense
flast
theory
psychic
injury
injury
doremus
perfectly
traceable
way
attenuated
consisted
psychic
frustration
tax
funds
used
violation
establishment
clause
directly
caused
paying
teachers
read
bible
remedied
prohibition
hollowness
respondents
traceability
argument
perhaps
best
demonstrated
counsel
game
submission
oral
argument
standing
challenge
hiring
single
secret
service
agent
guarded
president
religious
trips
standing
responsibilities
corresponding
compensation
spread
entire
secret
service
protective
detail
tr
oral
arg
logical
consequence
respondents
position
finds
support
precedents
nation
history
taxpayer
able
sue
whenever
tax
funds
used
alleged
violation
establishment
clause
example
taxpayer
challenge
fact
marshal
paid
part
call
courtroom
order
proclaiming
god
save
honorable
much
respondents
wish
deny
flast
logically
entails
blinks
reality
conclude
otherwise
respondents
prevail
must
endorse
future
ideologically
motivated
taxpayers
roam
country
search
governmental
wrongdoing
reveal
discoveries
federal
transforming
courts
ombudsmen
general
welfare
respect
establishment
clause
issues
valley
forge
ultimately
arguments
parties
case
opinions
colleagues
serve
confirm
flast
adoption
psychic
injury
addressed
minimalism
admirable
judicial
trait
comes
cost
meaningless
disingenuous
distinctions
hold
sure
promise
engendering
meaningless
disingenuous
distinctions
future
rule
law
ill
served
forcing
lawyers
judges
make
arguments
deaden
soul
law
logic
reason
either
flast
correct
must
accorded
wide
application
logically
dictates
must
abandoned
entirety
turn
finally
question
iii
taxpayer
purely
psychological
displeasure
funds
spent
allegedly
unlawful
manner
ever
sufficiently
concrete
particularized
support
article
iii
standing
answer
plainly
noted
outset
lujan
explained
consisten
view
plaintiff
raising
generally
available
grievance
government
claiming
harm
every
citizen
interest
proper
application
constitution
laws
seeking
relief
directly
tangibly
benefits
public
large
state
article
iii
case
controversy
evidence
consistency
affirmed
understanding
lujan
relied
reasoning
frothingham
several
cases
including
ex
parte
lévitt
dismissing
suit
challenging
justice
black
appointment
alleged
violation
ineligibility
clause
art
cl
richardson
denying
standing
challenge
government
failure
disclose
cia
expenditures
alleged
violation
accounts
clause
art
cl
schlesinger
reservists
comm
stop
war
rejecting
challenge
members
congress
holding
commissions
military
reserves
alleged
violation
incompatibility
clause
art
cl
see
term
relying
precisely
cases
reasoning
held
unanimously
suits
raising
generalized
grievances
satisfy
article
iii
requirement
injury
fact
concrete
particularized
see
lance
slip
flast
limitation
psychic
injury
limitation
suffices
nexus
test
met
cure
article
iii
deficiency
fact
alleged
violation
specific
constitutional
limit
taxing
spending
power
produces
taxpayer
mental
angst
change
fundamental
flaw
remains
case
taxpayer
seeks
relief
directly
tangibly
benefits
public
large
lujan
supra
conceivable
relevance
issue
whether
establishment
clause
originally
conceived
specific
limitation
taxing
spending
power
madison
remonstrance
nothing
whatever
say
question
whether
suits
alleging
violations
limitation
anything
generalized
grievances
federal
courts
always
barred
considering
flast
flast
forced
rely
slim
reed
remonstrance
since
better
support
novel
conclusion
violation
establishment
clause
unique
among
provisions
law
always
inflicted
personalized
psychic
injury
upon
taxpayers
federal
courts
power
remedy
moreover
flast
damaged
goods
fanciful
nexus
test
demonstrated
irrelevant
test
supposed
objective
also
cavalier
treatment
standing
requirement
rested
upon
fundamental
underestimation
requirement
importance
flast
explicitly
erroneously
premised
idea
article
iii
standing
perform
crucial
function
question
whether
particular
person
proper
party
maintain
action
force
raise
separation
powers
problems
related
improper
judicial
interference
areas
committed
branches
federal
government
problems
arise
substantive
issues
individual
seeks
adjudicated
thus
terms
article
iii
limitations
federal
jurisdiction
question
standing
related
whether
dispute
sought
adjudicated
presented
adversary
context
form
historically
viewed
capable
judicial
resolution
perceptive
frenchman
visiting
years
chief
justice
warren
wrote
words
perceived
false
true
judicial
censure
exercised
courts
legislation
extend
without
distinction
laws
never
give
rise
sort
clearly
formulated
dispute
one
calls
case
de
tocqueville
democracy
america
mansfield
winthrop
transls
eds
emphasis
added
flast
crabbed
understanding
role
article
iii
standing
plays
preserving
system
separated
powers
repudiated
permit
complainant
concrete
injury
require
rule
important
constitutional
issues
abstract
create
potential
abuse
judicial
process
distort
role
judiciary
relationship
executive
legislature
open
judiciary
arguable
charge
providing
injunction
schlesinger
supra
see
also
richardson
valley
forge
lujan
twice
noted
explicitly
flast
failed
recognize
vital
aspect
article
iii
standing
see
spencer
kemna
lewis
casey
proper
understanding
relationship
standing
separation
powers
brought
bear
psychic
injury
even
limited
flast
revealed
contradiction
basic
propositions
function
judicial
power
solely
decide
rights
individuals
marbury
madison
cranch
generalized
grievances
affecting
public
large
remedy
political
process
overruling
prior
precedents
even
precedents
disreputable
flast
nevertheless
serious
undertaking
understand
impulse
take
minimalist
approach
laying
claim
honoring
stare
decisis
requires
beating
flast
pulp
sending
lower
courts
weakened
denigrated
incomprehensible
ever
yet
somehow
technically
alive
even
addition
new
meaningless
distinction
devised
today
plurality
taxpayer
standing
establishment
clause
cases
game
chance
proceedings
federal
judges
declined
hear
case
en
banc
thought
issue
unimportant
panel
decision
correct
simply
found
cases
lawless
point
quite
literally
panel
see
freedom
religion
foundation
chao
flaum
concurring
denial
rehearing
en
banc
easterbrook
concurring
denial
rehearing
en
banc
describing
cases
arbitrary
illogical
lacking
comprehensiveness
rationality
opportunity
today
erase
blot
jurisprudence
instead
simply
smudged
call
imposition
logic
order
upon
chaotic
set
precedents
perhaps
met
snappy
epigram
life
law
logic
experience
holmes
common
law
experience
shown
flast
lack
logical
theoretical
underpinning
rendered
doctrine
jurisprudential
disaster
appellate
judges
know
make
course
case
engendered
reliance
interests
one
arrange
affairs
eye
standing
also
relying
random
irrational
think
cases
less
warranting
stare
decisis
respect
time
past
time
call
end
flast
overruled
jay
hein
director
white
house
office
community
initiatives
et
petitioners
freedom
religion
foundation
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
june
justice
souter
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
flast
cohen
held
plaintiffs
establishment
clause
claim
demonstrate
necessary
stake
taxpayers
outcome
litigation
satisfy
article
iii
requirements
controlling
plurality
opinion
declares
flast
apply
search
opinion
suggestion
taxpayers
less
stake
outcome
taxpayers
flast
come
empty
plurality
makes
finding
instead
controlling
opinion
closes
door
taxpayers
executive
branch
legislative
branch
caused
injury
see
basis
distinction
either
logic
precedent
respectfully
dissent
held
flast
repeated
last
term
alleged
establishment
clause
challenges
federal
spending
ion
spen
ding
money
aid
religion
daimlerchrysler
cuno
slip
quoting
flast
supra
alterations
original
said
flast
importance
type
injury
deep
historical
roots
going
back
ideal
religious
liberty
james
madison
memorial
remonstrance
religious
assessments
government
free
society
may
force
citizen
contribute
three
pence
property
support
one
establishment
religion
writings
james
madison
hunt
ed
hereinafter
madison
quoted
flast
supra
madison
thus
translated
practical
terms
right
conscience
described
wrote
religion
every
man
must
left
conviction
conscience
every
man
right
every
man
exercise
may
dictate
madison
see
also
zelman
souter
dissenting
historical
matter
protection
liberty
conscience
may
well
central
objective
served
establishment
clause
locke
davey
since
founding
country
popular
uprisings
procuring
taxpayer
funds
support
church
leaders
one
hallmarks
religion
feldman
divided
god
america
problem
advocates
constitutional
ban
establishment
concerned
paying
taxes
support
religious
purposes
consciences
told
support
right
conscience
expenditure
identifiable
three
pence
raised
taxes
support
religious
cause
therefore
split
one
another
three
pence
implicates
conscience
injury
government
expenditures
religion
accurately
classified
psychic
injury
results
whenever
congressional
appropriation
executive
expenditure
raises
hackles
disagreement
policy
supported
see
ante
scalia
concurring
judgment
justice
stewart
recognized
concurring
opinion
flast
said
every
taxpayer
claim
personal
constitutional
right
taxed
support
religious
institution
thus
distinguished
case
one
taxpayer
sought
air
generalized
grievance
federal
dispute
taxpayer
money
identifiable
amounts
funding
conferences
alleged
purpose
promoting
religion
cf
doremus
board
ed
hawthorne
taxpayers
therefore
seek
extend
flast
ante
plurality
opinion
merely
apply
executive
agencies
spend
identifiable
sums
tax
money
religious
purposes
less
congress
authorizes
thing
taxpayers
suffer
injury
recognize
injury
sufficient
article
iii
serious
question
elements
standing
enquiry
injury
indisputably
traceable
spending
likely
redressed
injunction
prohibiting
allen
wright
see
also
cuno
supra
slip
injunction
spending
course
redress
injury
plurality
points
separation
powers
explain
distinction
legislative
executive
spending
decisions
see
ante
difference
point
view
judicial
branch
review
executive
decision
judicial
evaluation
congressional
one
owe
respect
branches
former
latter
one
suggested
establishment
clause
lacks
applicability
executive
uses
money
surely
violate
establishment
clause
department
health
human
services
draw
general
appropriation
build
chapel
weekly
church
services
less
statute
required
good
reason
executive
accomplish
exercise
discretion
exactly
congress
legislation
establishment
clause
protection
melt
bowen
kendrick
recognized
equivalence
challenge
congressional
spending
bill
claim
executive
branch
spending
appropriation
violation
establishment
clause
held
claim
funds
used
improperly
individual
grantees
less
challenge
congressional
taxing
spending
power
simply
funding
authorized
congress
flowed
administered
secretary
added
questioned
standing
taxpayer
plaintiffs
raise
establishment
clause
challenges
even
claims
raised
questions
administratively
made
grants
plurality
points
statute
bowen
expressly
authorized
appropriated
specific
funds
grantmaking
expressly
contemplated
moneys
might
go
projects
involving
religious
groups
ante
true
reason
think
matter
every
indication
bowen
bowen
already
found
statute
valid
face
turned
taxpayers
challenge
see
case
read
hold
taxpayers
standing
claim
congressional
action
implementation
violates
establishment
clause
thus
bowen
plurality
distinction
congressional
mandate
one
hand
executive
discretion
ante
arbitrary
hard
manage
statute
constitutional
complaints
must
exercise
executive
discretion
line
drawn
bowen
case
us
ii
flast
standing
assert
right
conscience
class
mistake
think
case
unique
recognizing
standing
plaintiff
without
injury
flesh
purse
cognizable
harm
takes
account
nature
interest
protected
reason
constitutional
component
standing
doctrine
incorporates
concepts
concededly
susceptible
precise
definition
leaving
impossible
make
application
constitutional
standing
requirement
mechanical
exercise
allen
question
ultimately
whether
injury
alleged
abstract
otherwise
appropriate
considered
judicially
cognizable
case
economic
physical
harms
course
injury
fact
question
straightforward
one
strays
obvious
cases
enquiry
turn
subtle
esthetic
harms
sufficient
article
iii
standing
forced
compete
uneven
playing
field
based
race
without
showing
economic
loss
resulted
living
racially
gerrymandered
electoral
district
injuries
concrete
seeing
one
tax
dollars
spent
religion
recognized
one
enough
standing
see
friends
earth
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
esthetic
injury
northeastern
chapter
associated
gen
contractors
america
jacksonville
fact
inability
compete
equal
footing
bidding
process
loss
contract
hays
living
racially
gerrymandered
electoral
district
say
sort
alleged
injury
satisfy
article
iii
intangible
harms
must
evaluated
case
thus
flast
speaks
recognition
shared
majority
today
government
spends
money
religious
purposes
taxpayer
injury
serious
concrete
enough
judicially
cognizable
allen
supra
judgment
sufficient
injury
takes
account
madisonian
relationship
tax
money
conscience
equally
reflects
founders
pragmatic
conviction
individual
religious
liberty
achieved
best
government
stripped
power
tax
support
otherwise
assist
religions
everson
board
ed
ewing
realization
continuing
modern
day
favoritism
religion
message
nonadherents
outsiders
full
members
political
community
mccreary
county
american
civil
liberties
union
quoting
santa
fe
independent
school
dist
doe
turn
quoting
lynch
donnelly
concurring
omissions
original
taxpayers
case
alleged
type
injury
seen
sufficient
standing
affirm
footnotes
see
exec
order
cfr
comp
exec
order
cfr
comp
exec
order
cfr
comp
exec
order
fed
reg
see
also
daimlerchrysler
cuno
slip
standing
rejected
alleged
injury
particularized
instead
grievance
taxpayer
indefinite
way
common
people
quoting
defenders
wildlife
asarco
kadish
opinion
kennedy
eneralized
grievances
brought
concerned
citizens
cognizable
federal
courts
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
ssertion
right
particular
kind
government
conduct
government
violated
acting
differently
alone
satisfy
requirements
art
iii
richardson
taxpayer
may
federal
forum
air
generalized
grievances
conduct
government
allocation
power
federal
quoting
flast
cohen
stewart
concurring
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
schlesinger
reservists
comm
stop
war
respondents
seek
judicial
branch
compel
executive
branch
act
conformity
incompatibility
clause
constitution
interest
shared
citizens
claimed
nonobservance
standing
alone
adversely
affect
generalized
interest
citizens
constitutional
governance
abstract
injury
frothingham
mellon
decided
massachusetts
mellon
party
invokes
power
judicial
review
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
around
time
act
passed
flast
decided
great
majority
nonpublic
elementary
secondary
schools
associated
church
example
percent
nonpublic
elementary
schools
percent
nonpublic
secondary
schools
religiously
affiliated
dept
health
education
welfare
statistics
nonpublic
elementary
secondary
schools
congress
surely
understood
much
aid
mandated
statute
find
way
religious
schools
see
stat
appropriating
available
allocation
within
executive
office
president
valley
forge
also
relied
second
rationale
authorizing
act
exercise
congress
power
property
clause
art
iv
cl
taxing
spending
clause
art
conclusion
merely
provided
additional
perhaps
redundan
basis
denying
claim
standing
already
foreclosed
based
congressional
action
example
statute
noted
problems
adolescent
premarital
sex
pregnancy
best
approached
variety
integrated
essential
services
provided
adolescents
families
religious
charitable
organizations
among
groups
went
mandate
federally
provided
services
area
emphasize
provision
support
family
members
religious
charitable
organizations
voluntary
associations
groups
directed
demonstration
projects
funded
government
shall
make
use
support
systems
religious
organizations
required
grant
applicants
describe
involve
religious
charitable
organizations
projects
relevant
congress
may
informally
earmarked
portions
general
executive
branch
appropriations
fund
offices
centers
whose
expenditures
issue
see
fundamental
principle
appropriations
law
merely
appropriates
amounts
without
statutorily
restricting
done
funds
clear
inference
arises
intend
impose
legally
binding
restrictions
indicia
committee
reports
legislative
history
funds
expected
spent
establish
legal
requirements
agency
lincoln
quoting
ltv
aerospace
comp
see
also
tva
hill
expressions
committees
dealing
requests
appropriations
equated
statutes
enacted
congress
footnotes
text
statute
authorize
teachers
read
bible
mandated
least
five
verses
taken
portion
holy
bible
known
old
testament
shall
read
caused
read
without
comment
public
school
classroom
presence
pupils
therein
assembled
teacher
charge
opening
school
upon
every
school
day
rev
stat
emphasis
added
natural
impulse
respond
portion
teachers
salary
corresponded
time
required
read
bible
de
minimis
even
flast
decency
seize
de
minimis
exception
distinguish
doremus
relied
exclusively
madison
remonstrance
justify
conclusion
establishment
clause
specific
limitation
taxing
spending
power
see
flast
simultaneously
ignore
madison
admonition
authority
force
citizen
contribute
three
pence
property
support
one
establishment
may
force
conform
establishment
cases
whatsoever
quoting
madison
remonstrance
emphasis
added
explanation
suffice
regard
justice
kennedy
unlike
members
plurality
openly
avowedly
contends
flast
correctly
decided
respondents
nevertheless
lose
case
ante
concurring
opinion
thus
distinction
justice
affirms
propositions
begin
comprehend
amorphous
concerns
motivate
ante
bear
upon
whether
requirement
grounded
article
iii
criteria
injury
fact
traceability
redressability
dissent
oblique
suggestion
doremus
involve
identifiable
amoun
taxpayer
funds
post
opinion
souter
persuasive
one
need
consult
cpa
realize
portion
school
day
teachers
educational
responsibilities
read
bible
corresponded
fraction
teachers
salaries
amount
money
might
well
inconsequential
probably
greater
three
pence
see
supra
true
occasionally
dicta
described
prohibition
generalized
grievances
merely
prudential
bar
fountainhead
dicta
warth
seldin
supported
statement
naked
citation
schlesinger
richardson
lévitt
cases
squarely
rested
article
iii
considerations
analysis
lujan
lance
confirms
footnotes
plurality
warns
parade
horribles
result
standing
challenge
executive
action
federal
activities
ultimately
funded
congressional
appropriation
ante
even
article
iii
standing
cases
posited
plurality
appeals
thought
least
sometimes
mean
taxpayers
prevail
suits
claims
frivolous
merits
fail
see
harm
dismissing
failure
state
claim
instead
lack
jurisdiction
degree
claims
meritorious
fear
many
provide
compelling
reason
much
less
reason
grounded
article
iii
keep
heard
bowen
also
indicated
barrier
standing
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
taxpayers
challenged
exercise
executive
authority
pursuant
property
clause
article
iv
bowen
kendrick
valley
forge
first
discussed
executive
rather
legislative
nature
action
issue
perhaps
redundantly
pointed
distinction
property
clause
taxing
spending
clause
although
time
valley
forge
might
taken
support
distinction
plurality
draws
today
bowen
said
valley
forge
rested
distinction
property
clause
one
hand
taxing
spending
clause
see
also
valley
forge
supra
noting
transfer
property
religious
college
involved
expenditure
funds
although
plurality
makes
much
fact
injury
case
generalized
ante
shared
ante
properties
strip
plaintiff
standing
see
federal
election
akins
often
fact
interest
abstract
fact
widely
shared
go
hand
hand
association
invariable
harm
concrete
though
widely
shared
found
outside
establishment
clause
context
plurality
points
found
injury
taxpayer
funds
improperly
expended
suffice
standing
see
ante
citing
examples
always
competitors
funds
make
better
plaintiffs
indeed
appears
competitor
accepting
importance
injury
reason
refuse
standing
prudential
matter