trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
argued
april
decided
june
trinity
lutheran
church
child
learning
center
missouri
preschool
daycare
center
originally
established
nonprofit
organization
center
later
merged
trinity
lutheran
church
operates
auspices
church
property
among
facilities
center
playground
coarse
pea
gravel
surface
beneath
much
play
equipment
center
sought
replace
large
portion
pea
gravel
rubber
surface
participating
missouri
scrap
tire
program
program
run
state
department
natural
resources
offers
reimbursement
grants
qualifying
nonprofit
organizations
install
playground
surfaces
made
recycled
tires
department
strict
express
policy
denying
grants
applicant
owned
controlled
church
sect
religious
entity
pursuant
policy
department
denied
center
application
letter
rejecting
application
department
explained
article
section
missouri
constitution
department
provide
financial
assistance
directly
church
department
ultimately
awarded
grants
part
program
although
center
ranked
fifth
applicants
receive
grant
church
trinity
lutheran
sued
federal
district
alleging
department
failure
approve
application
violated
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
district
dismissed
suit
free
exercise
clause
stated
prohibits
government
outlawing
restricting
exercise
religious
practice
generally
prohibit
withholding
affirmative
benefit
account
religion
district
likened
case
locke
davey
upheld
free
exercise
challenge
state
decision
fund
degrees
devotional
theology
part
scholarship
program
district
held
free
exercise
clause
require
state
make
funds
available
scrap
tire
program
trinity
lutheran
divided
panel
eighth
circuit
affirmed
fact
state
award
scrap
tire
grant
trinity
lutheran
without
running
afoul
establishment
clause
federal
constitution
ruled
mean
free
exercise
clause
compelled
state
disregard
broader
antiestablishment
principle
reflected
constitution
held
department
policy
violated
rights
trinity
lutheran
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
denying
church
otherwise
available
public
benefit
account
religious
status
pp
repeatedly
confirmed
denying
generally
available
benefit
solely
account
religious
identity
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
thus
mcdaniel
paty
struck
tennessee
statute
disqualifying
ministers
serving
delegates
state
constitutional
convention
plurality
recognized
law
discriminated
mcdaniel
denying
benefit
solely
status
recent
years
rejecting
free
exercise
challenges
neutral
laws
general
applicability
careful
distinguish
laws
single
religious
disfavored
treatment
see
lyng
northwest
indian
cemetery
protective
employment
dept
human
resources
smith
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
hialeah
remained
fundamental
principle
free
exercise
jurisprudence
laws
imposing
special
disabilities
basis
religious
status
trigger
strictest
scrutiny
pp
department
policy
expressly
discriminates
otherwise
eligible
recipients
disqualifying
public
benefit
solely
religious
character
like
disqualification
statute
mcdaniel
department
policy
puts
trinity
lutheran
choice
may
participate
otherwise
available
benefit
program
remain
religious
institution
state
conditions
benefit
way
mcdaniel
says
plainly
state
imposed
penalty
free
exercise
religion
must
withstand
exacting
scrutiny
department
contends
simply
declining
allocate
trinity
lutheran
subsidy
state
obligation
provide
meaningfully
burden
church
free
exercise
rights
absent
burden
argument
continues
department
free
follow
state
antiestablishment
objection
providing
funds
directly
church
even
department
acknowledges
free
exercise
clause
protects
indirect
coercion
penalties
free
exercise
religion
outright
prohibitions
lyng
trinity
lutheran
claiming
entitlement
subsidy
asserting
right
participate
government
benefit
program
without
disavow
religious
character
express
discrimination
religious
exercise
denial
grant
rather
refusal
allow
church
solely
church
compete
secular
organizations
grant
pp
department
tries
sidestep
precedents
arguing
case
instead
controlled
locke
davey
locke
state
washington
created
scholarship
program
assist
students
costs
postsecondary
education
scholarship
recipients
free
use
state
funds
accredited
religious
schools
alike
use
funds
pursue
devotional
theology
degree
outset
made
clear
locke
like
cases
struck
laws
requiring
individuals
choose
religious
beliefs
receiving
government
benefit
davey
denied
scholarship
denied
scholarship
proposed
question
trinity
lutheran
denied
grant
simply
church
locke
also
stated
washington
restriction
use
funds
keeping
state
antiestablishment
interest
using
taxpayer
funds
pay
training
clergy
essentially
religious
endeavor
nothing
sort
said
program
use
recycled
tires
resurface
playgrounds
rate
took
account
washington
antiestablishment
interest
determining
scholarship
program
require
students
choose
religious
beliefs
receiving
government
benefit
dispute
trinity
lutheran
put
choice
church
receiving
government
benefit
pp
department
discriminatory
policy
survive
rigorous
scrutiny
applies
laws
imposing
special
disabilities
account
religious
status
lukumi
standard
demands
state
interest
highest
order
justify
policy
issue
mcdaniel
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
yet
department
offers
nothing
missouri
preference
skating
far
possible
religious
establishment
concerns
face
clear
infringement
free
exercise
interest
qualify
compelling
pp
reversed
remanded
roberts
delivered
opinion
except
kennedy
alito
kagan
joined
opinion
full
thomas
gorsuch
joined
except
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
gorsuch
joined
gorsuch
filed
opinion
concurring
part
thomas
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
petitioner
carol
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
except
missouri
department
natural
resources
offers
state
grants
help
public
private
schools
nonprofit
daycare
centers
nonprofit
entities
purchase
rubber
playground
surfaces
made
recycled
tires
trinity
lutheran
church
applied
grant
preschool
daycare
center
received
one
fact
trinity
lutheran
church
department
policy
categorically
disqualifying
churches
religious
organizations
receiving
grants
playground
resurfacing
program
question
presented
whether
department
policy
violated
rights
trinity
lutheran
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
trinity
lutheran
church
child
learning
center
preschool
daycare
center
open
throughout
year
serve
working
families
boone
county
missouri
surrounding
area
established
nonprofit
organization
center
merged
trinity
lutheran
church
operates
auspices
church
property
center
admits
students
religion
enrollment
stands
children
ranging
age
two
five
center
includes
playground
equipped
basic
playground
essentials
slides
swings
jungle
gyms
monkey
bars
sandboxes
almost
entire
surface
beneath
surrounding
play
equipment
coarse
pea
gravel
youngsters
course
often
fall
playground
tumble
equipment
gravel
unforgiving
center
sought
replace
large
portion
pea
gravel
rubber
surface
participating
missouri
scrap
tire
program
run
state
department
natural
resources
reduce
number
used
tires
destined
landfills
dump
sites
program
offers
reimbursement
grants
qualifying
nonprofit
organizations
purchase
playground
surfaces
made
recycled
tires
funded
fee
imposed
sale
new
tires
state
due
limited
resources
department
offer
grants
applicants
awards
competitive
basis
scoring
highest
based
several
criteria
poverty
level
population
surrounding
area
applicant
plan
promote
recycling
center
applied
department
strict
express
policy
denying
grants
applicant
owned
controlled
church
sect
religious
entity
policy
department
view
compelled
article
section
missouri
constitution
provides
money
shall
ever
taken
public
treasury
directly
indirectly
aid
church
sect
denomination
religion
aid
priest
preacher
minister
teacher
thereof
preference
shall
given
discrimination
made
church
sect
creed
religion
form
religious
faith
worship
application
center
disclosed
status
ministry
trinity
lutheran
church
specified
center
mission
provide
safe
clean
attractive
school
facility
conjunction
educational
program
structured
allow
child
grow
spiritually
physically
socially
cognitively
app
pet
cert
describing
playground
safety
hazards
posed
current
surface
center
detailed
anticipated
benefits
proposed
project
increasing
access
playground
children
including
disabilities
providing
surface
compliant
americans
disabilities
act
providing
safe
resilient
surface
play
areas
improving
missouri
environment
putting
recycled
tires
positive
use
center
also
noted
benefits
new
surface
extend
beyond
students
local
community
whose
children
often
use
playground
hours
center
ranked
fifth
among
applicants
scrap
tire
program
despite
high
score
center
deemed
categorically
ineligible
receive
grant
letter
rejecting
center
application
program
director
explained
article
section
missouri
constitution
department
provide
financial
assistance
directly
church
department
ultimately
awarded
grants
part
program
center
operated
trinity
lutheran
church
receive
grant
trinity
lutheran
sued
director
department
federal
district
church
alleged
department
failure
approve
center
application
pursuant
policy
denying
grants
religiously
affiliated
applicants
violates
free
exercise
clause
first
amendment
trinity
lutheran
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
prohibiting
department
discriminating
church
basis
future
grant
applications
district
granted
department
motion
dismiss
free
exercise
clause
district
stated
prohibits
government
outlawing
restricting
exercise
religious
practice
generally
prohibit
withholding
affirmative
benefit
account
religion
district
likened
department
denial
scrap
tire
grant
situation
encountered
locke
davey
case
upheld
free
exercise
challenge
state
washington
decision
fund
degrees
devotional
theology
part
state
scholarship
program
finding
present
case
nearly
indistinguishable
locke
district
held
free
exercise
clause
require
state
make
funds
available
scrap
tire
program
religious
institutions
like
trinity
lutheran
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
pauley
supp
wd
mo
appeals
eighth
circuit
affirmed
recognized
rather
clear
missouri
award
scrap
tire
grant
trinity
lutheran
without
running
afoul
establishment
clause
constitution
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
pauley
appeals
explained
mean
free
exercise
clause
compelled
state
disregard
antiestablishment
principle
reflected
constitution
viewing
monetary
grant
religious
institution
established
religion
concluded
state
rely
applicant
religious
status
deny
application
quoting
locke
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
judge
gruender
dissented
distinguished
locke
ground
concerned
narrow
issue
funding
religious
training
clergy
leave
unfettered
discretion
exclude
religious
generally
available
public
benefits
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
rehearing
en
banc
denied
equally
divided
granted
certiorari
sub
nom
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
pauley
ii
first
amendment
provides
part
congress
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
prohibiting
free
exercise
thereof
parties
agree
establishment
clause
amendment
prevent
missouri
including
trinity
lutheran
scrap
tire
program
however
answer
question
free
exercise
clause
recognized
play
joints
establishment
clause
permits
free
exercise
clause
compels
locke
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
free
exercise
clause
protect
religious
observers
unequal
treatment
subjects
strictest
scrutiny
laws
target
religious
special
disabilities
based
religious
status
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
hialeah
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
applying
basic
principle
repeatedly
confirmed
denying
generally
available
benefit
solely
account
religious
identity
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
justified
state
interest
highest
order
mcdaniel
paty
plurality
opinion
quoting
wisconsin
yoder
everson
board
education
ewing
example
upheld
establishment
clause
challenge
new
jersey
law
enabling
local
school
district
reimburse
parents
public
transportation
costs
sending
children
public
private
schools
including
parochial
schools
course
ruling
establishment
clause
allowed
new
jersey
extend
public
benefit
citizens
regardless
religious
belief
explained
state
hamper
citizens
free
exercise
religion
consequently
exclude
individual
catholics
lutherans
mohammedans
baptists
jews
methodists
presbyterians
members
faith
faith
lack
receiving
benefits
public
welfare
legislation
three
decades
later
mcdaniel
paty
struck
free
exercise
clause
tennessee
statute
disqualifying
ministers
serving
delegates
state
constitutional
convention
writing
plurality
chief
justice
burger
acknowledged
tennessee
disqualified
ministers
serving
legislators
since
adoption
first
constitution
number
early
also
disqualified
ministers
legislative
office
historical
tradition
however
change
fact
statute
discriminated
mcdaniel
denying
benefit
solely
status
mcdaniel
seek
participate
convention
also
maintaining
role
minister
pursue
one
give
way
said
chief
justice
burger
tennessee
law
effectively
penalizes
free
exercise
mcdaniel
constitutional
liberties
quoting
sherbert
verner
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
joined
justice
marshall
concurrence
justice
brennan
added
challenged
provision
requires
mcdaniel
purchase
right
engage
ministry
sacrificing
candidacy
impairs
free
exercise
religion
mcdaniel
recent
years
rejected
free
exercise
challenges
laws
question
neutral
generally
applicable
without
regard
religion
careful
distinguish
laws
single
religious
disfavored
treatment
example
lyng
northwest
indian
cemetery
protective
association
held
free
exercise
clause
prohibit
government
timber
harvesting
road
construction
particular
tract
federal
land
even
though
government
action
obstruct
religious
practice
several
native
american
tribes
held
certain
sites
tract
sacred
accepting
building
road
harvesting
timber
interfere
significantly
private
persons
ability
pursue
spiritual
fulfillment
according
religious
beliefs
nonetheless
found
free
exercise
violation
affected
individuals
coerced
government
action
violating
religious
beliefs
specifically
noted
however
government
action
penalize
religious
activity
denying
person
equal
share
rights
benefits
privileges
enjoyed
citizens
ibid
employment
division
department
human
resources
oregon
smith
rejected
free
exercise
claim
brought
two
members
native
american
church
denied
unemployment
benefits
violated
oregon
drug
laws
ingesting
peyote
sacramental
purposes
along
lines
decision
lyng
held
free
exercise
clause
entitle
church
members
special
dispensation
general
criminal
laws
account
religion
time
made
clear
free
exercise
clause
guard
government
imposition
special
disabilities
basis
religious
views
religious
status
citing
mcdaniel
finally
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
leah
struck
three
facially
neutral
city
ordinances
outlawed
certain
forms
animal
slaughter
members
santeria
religion
challenged
ordinances
free
exercise
clause
alleging
despite
facial
neutrality
ordinances
discriminatory
purpose
easy
ferret
prohibiting
sacrificial
rituals
integral
santeria
distasteful
local
residents
agreed
explaining
challenged
ordinances
fact
neutral
generally
applicable
recounted
fundamentals
free
exercise
jurisprudence
law
said
may
discriminate
religious
beliefs
may
law
regulate
outlaw
conduct
religiously
motivated
citing
mcdaniel
smith
restated
refrain
free
exercise
clause
protects
laws
special
disabilities
basis
religious
status
quoting
smith
see
also
mitchell
helms
plurality
opinion
noting
decisions
prohibited
governments
discriminating
distribution
public
benefits
based
upon
religious
status
sincerity
citing
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
lamb
chapel
center
moriches
union
free
school
widmar
vincent
iii
department
policy
expressly
discriminates
otherwise
eligible
recipients
disqualifying
public
benefit
solely
religious
character
cases
described
make
one
thing
clear
policy
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
triggers
exacting
scrutiny
lukumi
conclusion
unremarkable
light
prior
decisions
like
disqualification
statute
mcdaniel
department
policy
puts
trinity
lutheran
choice
may
participate
otherwise
available
benefit
program
remain
religious
institution
course
trinity
lutheran
free
continue
operating
church
mcdaniel
free
continue
minister
freedom
comes
cost
automatic
absolute
exclusion
benefits
public
program
center
otherwise
fully
qualified
state
conditions
benefit
way
mcdaniel
says
plainly
state
punished
free
exercise
religion
condition
availability
benefits
upon
recipient
willingness
surrender
religiously
impelled
status
effectively
penalizes
free
exercise
constitutional
liberties
plurality
opinion
alterations
omitted
department
contends
merely
declining
extend
funds
trinity
lutheran
prohibit
church
engaging
religious
conduct
otherwise
exercising
religious
rights
sense
says
department
policy
unlike
ordinances
struck
lukumi
outlawed
rituals
central
santeria
department
simply
declined
allocate
trinity
lutheran
subsidy
state
obligation
provide
first
place
decision
meaningfully
burden
church
free
exercise
rights
absent
burden
argument
continues
department
free
heed
state
antiestablishment
objection
providing
funds
directly
church
brief
respondent
true
department
criminalized
way
trinity
lutheran
worships
told
church
subscribe
certain
view
gospel
department
acknowledges
free
exercise
clause
protects
indirect
coercion
penalties
free
exercise
religion
outright
prohibitions
lyng
put
years
ago
late
day
doubt
liberties
religion
expression
may
infringed
denial
placing
conditions
upon
benefit
privilege
sherbert
see
also
mcdaniel
brennan
concurring
judgment
proposition
law
interfere
free
exercise
directly
prohibit
religious
activity
merely
conditions
eligibility
office
abandonment
squarely
rejected
precedent
trinity
lutheran
claiming
entitlement
subsidy
instead
asserts
right
participate
government
benefit
program
without
disavow
religious
character
imposition
condition
upon
even
gratuitous
benefit
inevitably
deter
discourage
exercise
first
amendment
rights
sherbert
express
discrimination
religious
exercise
denial
grant
rather
refusal
allow
church
solely
church
compete
secular
organizations
grant
cf
northeastern
chapter
associated
gen
contractors
america
jacksonville
fact
inability
compete
equal
footing
bidding
process
loss
contract
trinity
lutheran
member
community
state
decision
exclude
purposes
public
program
must
withstand
strictest
scrutiny
department
attempts
get
weight
precedents
arguing
free
exercise
question
case
instead
controlled
decision
locke
davey
locke
state
washington
created
scholarship
program
assist
students
costs
postsecondary
education
scholarships
paid
state
general
fund
eligibility
based
criteria
applicant
score
college
admission
tests
family
income
scholarship
recipients
free
use
money
accredited
religious
schools
alike
permitted
use
funds
pursue
devotional
theology
degree
one
devotional
nature
designed
induce
religious
faith
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
davey
selected
scholarship
denied
funds
refused
certify
use
toward
devotional
degree
sued
arguing
state
refusal
allow
scholarship
money
go
toward
degrees
violated
free
exercise
rights
disagreed
began
explaining
issue
washington
selective
funding
program
comparable
free
exercise
violations
found
lukumi
line
cases
including
striking
laws
requiring
individuals
choose
religious
beliefs
receiving
government
benefit
outset
made
clear
locke
like
case
us
washington
restriction
use
scholarship
funds
different
according
state
merely
chosen
fund
distinct
category
instruction
davey
denied
scholarship
denied
scholarship
proposed
use
funds
prepare
ministry
question
trinity
lutheran
denied
grant
simply
church
locke
also
stated
washington
choice
keeping
state
antiestablishment
interest
using
taxpayer
funds
pay
training
clergy
fact
think
areas
state
antiestablishment
interests
come
play
claimant
locke
sought
funding
essentially
religious
endeavor
akin
religious
calling
well
academic
pursuit
opposition
funding
support
church
leaders
lay
historic
core
religion
clauses
nothing
sort
said
program
use
recycled
tires
resurface
playgrounds
relying
locke
department
nonetheless
emphasizes
missouri
similar
constitutional
tradition
furnishing
taxpayer
money
directly
churches
brief
respondent
locke
took
account
washington
antiestablishment
interest
determining
noted
scholarship
program
require
students
choose
religious
beliefs
receiving
government
benefit
citing
mcdaniel
put
washington
scholarship
program
went
long
way
toward
including
religion
benefits
locke
students
program
free
use
scholarships
pervasively
religious
schools
ibid
davey
use
scholarship
pursue
secular
degree
one
institution
studying
devotional
theology
another
also
use
scholarship
money
attend
religious
college
take
devotional
theology
courses
thing
use
scholarship
pursue
degree
subject
case
dispute
trinity
lutheran
put
choice
church
receiving
government
benefit
rule
simple
churches
need
state
case
expressly
requires
trinity
lutheran
renounce
religious
character
order
participate
otherwise
generally
available
public
benefit
program
fully
qualified
cases
make
clear
condition
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
must
subjected
rigorous
scrutiny
lukumi
stringent
standard
state
interest
highest
order
justify
department
discriminatory
policy
mcdaniel
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
yet
department
offers
nothing
missouri
policy
preference
skating
far
possible
religious
establishment
concerns
brief
respondent
face
clear
infringement
free
exercise
us
interest
qualify
compelling
said
considering
missouri
policy
preference
prior
occasion
state
interest
asserted
achieving
greater
separation
church
state
already
ensured
establishment
clause
federal
constitution
limited
free
exercise
clause
widmar
state
pursued
preferred
policy
point
expressly
denying
qualified
religious
entity
public
benefit
solely
religious
character
precedents
goes
far
department
policy
violates
free
exercise
nearly
years
ago
legislator
urged
maryland
assembly
adopt
bill
end
state
disqualification
jews
public
office
account
religious
faith
subjected
disqualifications
others
free
consider
persecuted
man
odious
exclusion
benefits
common
rest
persecution
differing
degree
nature
equally
unjustifiable
whose
instruments
chains
torture
speech
brackenridge
sess
brackenridge
worthington
tyson
speeches
house
delegates
maryland
missouri
department
natural
resources
subjected
anyone
chains
torture
account
religion
result
state
policy
nothing
dramatic
denial
political
office
consequence
likelihood
extra
scraped
knees
exclusion
trinity
lutheran
public
benefit
otherwise
qualified
solely
church
odious
constitution
stand
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
thomas
concurring
part
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
petitioner
carol
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
thomas
justice
gorsuch
joins
concurring
part
today
reaffirms
denying
generally
available
benefit
solely
account
religious
identity
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
justified
state
interest
highest
order
ante
free
exercise
clause
generally
prohibits
laws
facially
discriminate
religion
compels
conclusion
see
locke
davey
scalia
dissenting
despite
prohibition
locke
permitted
state
disfavor
religion
imposing
deemed
relatively
minor
burden
religious
exercise
advance
state
antiestablishment
interest
funding
religious
training
clergy
justified
law
based
view
free
exercise
clause
establishment
clause
state
actions
permitted
establishment
clause
required
free
exercise
clause
accordingly
locke
subject
law
issue
form
heightened
scrutiny
also
suggest
discrimination
religion
outside
limited
context
support
ministerial
training
similarly
exempt
exacting
review
endorsement
locke
even
mil
kind
discrimination
religion
remains
troubling
see
generally
scalia
dissenting
today
appropriately
construes
locke
narrowly
see
part
ante
party
asked
us
reconsider
join
nearly
opinion
however
join
reasons
expressed
justice
gorsuch
post
opinion
concurring
part
gorsuch
concurring
part
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
petitioner
carol
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
gorsuch
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
part
missouri
law
bars
trinity
lutheran
participating
public
benefits
program
church
agree
violates
first
amendment
pleased
join
nearly
opinion
offer
two
modest
qualifications
first
leaves
open
possibility
useful
distinction
might
drawn
laws
discriminate
basis
religious
status
religious
use
see
ante
respectfully
harbor
doubts
stability
line
religious
man
say
grace
dinner
man
begin
meal
religious
manner
religious
group
built
playground
group
build
playground
might
used
advance
religious
mission
distinction
blurs
much
way
line
acts
omissions
blur
stared
long
leaving
us
ask
example
whether
man
drowns
awaiting
incoming
tide
act
coming
upon
sea
omission
allowing
sea
come
upon
see
cruzan
director
mo
dept
health
scalia
dissenting
often
enough
facts
described
ways
neither
see
first
amendment
free
exercise
clause
care
clause
guarantees
free
exercise
religion
right
inward
belief
status
employment
dept
human
resources
smith
long
explained
government
may
devise
mechanisms
overt
disguised
designed
persecute
oppress
religion
practices
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
hialeah
generally
government
may
force
people
choose
participation
public
program
right
free
exercise
religion
see
thomas
review
bd
indiana
employment
security
everson
board
ed
ewing
see
matter
whether
describe
benefit
say
closed
lutherans
status
closed
people
lutheran
things
use
free
exercise
either
way
reasons
reliance
distinction
suffice
distinguish
locke
davey
see
ante
case
upheld
funding
restriction
barring
student
using
scholarship
pursue
degree
devotional
theology
really
matter
whether
restriction
locke
phrased
terms
use
instead
status
student
wanted
vocational
degree
religion
religious
student
wanted
necessary
education
chosen
vocation
case
correct
distinguished
seems
might
opinion
claim
long
tradition
use
public
funds
training
clergy
tradition
correctly
explains
analogue
ante
second
similar
reasons
unable
join
footnoted
observation
ante
case
involves
express
discrimination
based
religious
identity
respect
playground
resurfacing
course
entirely
correct
worry
might
mistakenly
read
suggest
playground
resurfacing
cases
association
children
safety
health
perhaps
social
good
find
sufficiently
worthy
governed
legal
rules
recounted
faithfully
applied
opinion
reading
unreasonable
cases
governed
general
principles
rather
ad
hoc
improvisations
elk
grove
unified
school
dist
newdow
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
general
principles
permit
discrimination
religious
exercise
whether
playground
anywhere
else
breyer
concurring
judgment
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
petitioner
carol
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
concurring
judgment
agree
much
says
result
find
relevant
emphasize
particular
nature
public
benefit
issue
cf
ante
trinity
lutheran
asserts
right
participate
government
benefit
program
ante
referring
precedent
striking
laws
requiring
individuals
choose
religious
beliefs
receiving
government
benefit
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
ante
referring
trinity
lutheran
automatic
absolute
exclusion
benefits
public
program
ante
state
policy
disqualifies
otherwise
eligible
recipients
public
benefit
solely
religious
character
ante
quoting
statement
everson
board
ed
ewing
state
exclude
individuals
faith
receiving
benefits
public
welfare
legislation
stated
everson
cutting
church
schools
general
government
services
ordinary
police
fire
protection
obviously
purpose
first
amendment
state
cut
trinity
lutheran
participation
general
program
designed
secure
improve
health
safety
children
see
significant
difference
fact
program
issue
ultimately
funds
limited
number
projects
justify
religious
distinction
administrative
reason
treat
church
schools
differently
sole
reason
advanced
explains
difference
faith
fact
calls
free
exercise
clause
play
need
go
public
benefits
come
many
shapes
sizes
leave
application
free
exercise
clause
kinds
public
benefits
another
day
sotomayor
dissenting
trinity
lutheran
church
columbia
petitioner
carol
comer
director
missouri
department
natural
resources
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
sotomayor
justice
ginsburg
joins
dissenting
hear
tell
simple
case
recycling
tires
resurface
playground
stakes
higher
case
nothing
less
relationship
religious
institutions
civil
government
church
state
today
profoundly
changes
relationship
holding
first
time
constitution
requires
government
provide
public
funds
directly
church
decision
slights
precedents
history
reasoning
weakens
country
longstanding
commitment
separation
church
state
beneficial
founded
trinity
lutheran
church
church
operates
express
purpose
carrying
commission
jesus
christ
directed
church
earth
story
http
internet
materials
last
visited
june
church
uses
preaching
teaching
worship
witness
service
fellowship
according
word
god
carry
mission
disciples
mission
http
quoting
matthew
church
religious
beliefs
include
desire
associat
trinity
church
child
learning
center
app
pet
cert
located
church
property
learning
center
provides
daycare
preschool
children
ages
two
kindergarten
learning
center
serves
ministry
church
incorporates
daily
religion
developmentally
appropriate
activities
program
way
hrough
learning
center
church
teaches
christian
world
view
children
members
church
well
children
residents
area
ibid
activities
represent
church
sincere
religious
belief
use
learning
center
teach
gospel
children
members
well
bring
gospel
message
ibid
learning
center
facilities
include
playground
unlikely
source
dispute
church
provides
playground
safe
clean
attractive
facilities
conjunction
education
program
structured
allow
child
grow
spiritually
physically
socially
cognitively
ibid
case
began
church
applied
funding
upgrade
playground
pea
gravel
grass
surface
missouri
scrap
tire
program
provides
grants
purchase
installation
recycled
tire
material
resurface
playgrounds
church
sought
project
modernize
playground
part
effort
gain
state
accreditation
learning
center
early
childhood
education
program
missouri
denied
church
funding
based
article
state
constitution
prohibits
use
public
funds
aid
church
sect
denomination
religion
ii
properly
understood
case
whether
missouri
decline
fund
improvements
facilities
church
uses
practice
spread
religious
views
repeatedly
warned
funding
exactly
kind
payments
government
house
worship
cross
line
drawn
establishment
clause
see
walz
tax
city
new
york
rosenberger
rector
visitors
univ
mitchell
helms
concurring
judgment
surprising
mentions
establishment
clause
note
parties
agreement
prevent
missouri
including
trinity
lutheran
scrap
tire
program
ante
constitutional
questions
decided
parties
concessions
establishment
clause
allow
missouri
grant
church
funding
request
church
uses
learning
center
including
playground
conjunction
religious
mission
silence
front
signals
either
misunderstanding
facts
case
startling
departure
precedents
government
may
directly
fund
religious
exercise
see
everson
board
ed
ewing
mitchell
concurring
judgment
ur
decisions
provide
precedent
use
public
funds
finance
religious
activities
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
put
doctrinal
terms
funding
violates
establishment
clause
impermissibly
advanc
es
religion
agostini
felton
nowhere
rule
clearly
implicated
funds
flow
directly
public
treasury
house
house
worship
exists
foster
religious
exercise
group
people
bound
common
religious
beliefs
comes
together
shape
faith
mission
evangelical
lutheran
church
school
eeoc
within
walls
worshippers
gather
practice
reaffirm
faith
base
faithful
reach
yet
convinced
group
beliefs
government
funds
house
worship
underwrites
religious
exercise
tilton
richardson
held
much
federal
program
issue
provided
construction
grants
colleges
universities
prohibited
grantees
using
funds
construct
facilities
sectarian
instruction
place
religious
primarily
connection
part
program
school
department
divinity
plurality
opinion
quoting
supp
allowed
federal
government
recover
grant
value
grantee
violated
prohibition
within
twenty
years
grant
see
unanimously
agreed
time
limit
recovery
violated
establishment
clause
original
federal
grant
ould
part
effect
advancing
religion
plurality
explained
grantee
converted
facility
chapel
otherwise
used
promote
religious
interests
twenty
years
see
also
douglas
concurring
part
dissenting
part
lemon
kurtzman
brennan
concurring
opinion
white
accordingly
severed
limit
ensuring
program
funds
put
secular
use
thereby
bringing
program
line
establishment
clause
see
tilton
plurality
opinion
case
different
church
seeks
state
funds
improve
learning
center
facilities
church
avowed
description
used
assist
spiritual
growth
children
members
spread
church
faith
children
nonmembers
church
playground
surface
like
sunday
school
room
walls
sanctuary
pews
integrated
integral
religious
mission
conclusion
funding
church
seeks
impermissibly
advance
religion
inescapable
true
found
direct
government
funding
religious
institutions
consistent
establishment
clause
funding
cases
came
assurances
public
funds
used
religious
activity
despite
religious
nature
institution
see
rosenberger
souter
dissenting
chronicling
cases
church
provide
assurances
see
committee
public
ed
religious
liberty
nyquist
attempt
made
restrict
payments
expenditures
related
upkeep
facilities
used
exclusively
secular
purposes
think
possible
within
context
institutions
impose
restrictions
church
religious
mission
one
pursues
learning
center
playground
surface
confined
secular
use
lumber
used
frame
church
walls
glass
stained
used
form
windows
nails
used
build
altar
may
simply
disagree
account
facts
think
church
put
playground
religious
use
mistake
limited
case
agrees
state
funding
religious
activity
sees
establishment
clause
problem
must
implicitly
applying
rule
one
agreed
precedents
last
addressed
direct
funding
religious
institutions
mitchell
adhered
rule
establishment
clause
prohibits
direct
funding
religious
activities
issue
federal
program
helped
state
local
agencies
lend
educational
materials
public
private
schools
including
religious
schools
see
plurality
opinion
controlling
concurrence
assured
program
lead
public
funding
religious
activity
pointed
program
allocated
secular
aid
basis
neutral
secular
criteria
aid
supplant
program
funds
funds
ever
reach
coffers
religious
schools
evidence
actual
diversion
de
minimis
program
adequate
safeguards
police
violations
concurring
judgment
factors
concluded
sufficient
find
program
impermissible
effect
advancing
religion
ibid
plurality
instead
upheld
program
based
secular
nature
aid
program
neutrality
religious
secular
nature
recipient
see
controlling
concurrence
rejected
approach
viewed
plurality
test
secular
content
aid
distributed
basis
wholly
neutral
criteria
constitutionally
insufficient
test
explained
concurrence
ignored
whether
public
funds
subsidize
religion
touchstone
establishment
jurisprudence
see
noting
plurality
logic
allow
funding
religious
organizations
including
churches
participating
religious
organizations
including
churches
use
aid
support
religious
indoctrination
today
opinion
suggests
made
leap
mitchell
plurality
agrees
funding
finance
religious
activities
rule
considers
fact
irrelevant
support
conclusion
constitutionality
problems
secular
neutral
approach
aired
see
souter
dissenting
basis
history
repeatedly
turned
inform
understanding
establishment
clause
permits
direct
subsidies
religious
indoctrination
attendant
concerns
led
establishment
clause
favors
certain
religious
groups
belief
system
allows
compete
public
dollars
enough
break
precedent
mark
radical
mistake
establishment
clause
protects
religion
government
dangers
result
two
become
entwined
providing
every
religion
equal
opportunity
say
secure
state
funding
pray
public
schools
drawing
fairly
clear
lines
separation
church
state
least
heartland
religious
belief
primary
religious
worship
issue
zelman
breyer
dissenting
iii
even
assuming
absence
establishment
clause
violation
proceeding
preferred
front
free
exercise
clause
errs
claims
government
may
draw
lines
based
entity
religious
status
repeatedly
said
confronted
government
action
draws
line
carefully
considered
whether
interests
embodied
religion
clauses
justify
line
question
thus
whether
interests
support
line
drawn
missouri
article
separating
state
treasury
houses
worship
unquestionably
establishment
clause
prohibits
laws
respecting
establishment
religion
free
exercise
clause
prohibits
laws
prohibiting
free
exercise
thereof
amdt
expanded
logical
extreme
prohibitions
tend
clash
walz
even
absence
violation
one
religion
clauses
interaction
government
religion
raise
concerns
sound
clauses
reason
government
may
sometimes
act
accommodate
concerns
even
required
free
exercise
clause
without
violating
establishment
clause
government
may
sometimes
act
accommodate
concerns
even
required
establishment
clause
without
violating
free
exercise
clause
room
play
joints
productive
benevolent
neutrality
permit
religious
exercise
exist
without
sponsorship
without
interference
space
two
clauses
gives
government
room
recognize
unique
status
religious
entities
single
basis
exclusion
otherwise
generally
applicable
laws
invoking
principle
held
government
may
sometimes
relieve
religious
entities
requirements
government
programs
state
need
example
require
nonprofit
houses
worship
pay
property
taxes
may
instead
spar
exercise
religion
burden
property
taxation
levied
private
profit
institutions
spare
government
direct
confrontations
conflicts
follow
train
legal
processes
associated
taxation
see
must
state
require
nonprofit
religious
entities
abstain
making
employment
decisions
basis
religion
may
instead
avoid
imposing
institutions
ear
potential
liability
might
affect
way
carried
understood
religious
mission
government
sensitive
task
policing
compliance
corporation
presiding
bishop
church
jesus
christ
saints
amos
see
also
brennan
concurring
judgment
government
may
invoke
space
religion
clauses
manner
devolve
unlawful
fostering
religion
cutter
wilkinson
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
invoking
principle
held
government
may
sometimes
close
certain
government
aid
programs
religious
entities
state
need
example
fund
training
religious
group
leaders
preach
beliefs
teach
faith
carry
mission
may
instead
avoid
historic
antiestablishment
interests
raised
use
taxpayer
funds
support
church
leaders
locke
davey
reviewing
law
like
one
singles
religious
entities
exclusion
reach
thus
myopically
focused
fact
law
singles
religious
entities
reasons
missouri
decided
unique
status
houses
worship
requires
special
rule
comes
public
funds
constitution
reflects
choice
provides
money
shall
ever
taken
public
treasury
directly
indirectly
aid
church
sect
denomination
religion
aid
priest
preacher
minister
teacher
thereof
preference
shall
given
discrimination
made
church
sect
creed
religion
form
religious
faith
worship
art
missouri
decision
deep
roots
nation
history
reflects
reasonable
constitutional
judgment
consistently
looked
history
guidance
applying
constitution
religion
clauses
clauses
guard
return
past
past
properly
informs
meaning
see
everson
torcaso
watkins
case
different
nation
early
experience
eventual
rejection
established
religion
shorthand
sponsorship
financial
support
active
involvement
sovereign
religious
activity
walz
defies
easy
summary
two
experiences
religious
establishment
never
took
hold
see
curry
first
freedoms
curry
others
establishment
varied
terms
sect
sects
supported
nature
extent
support
uniformity
support
across
state
establishment
take
hold
lost
grip
different
times
different
speeds
see
cobb
rise
religious
liberty
america
ed
cobb
despite
rich
diversity
experience
story
relevant
one
consistency
use
public
funds
support
core
religious
institutions
safely
described
hallmark
early
experiences
religious
establishment
every
state
establishment
saw
laws
passed
raise
public
funds
direct
toward
houses
worship
ministers
disestablished
one
one
undid
fought
end
public
funding
religion
based
opposition
powerful
set
arguments
stemming
basic
premise
practice
harmed
civil
government
religion
civil
government
maintained
claim
authority
religious
belief
support
religion
compelled
state
marked
overstep
authority
lead
equally
troubling
risked
divisiveness
giving
religions
reason
compete
state
beneficence
faith
believed
personal
matter
entirely
individual
god
religion
best
served
sects
reached
basis
tenets
alone
unsullied
outside
forces
allowing
adherents
come
faith
voluntarily
arguments
gained
acceptance
led
end
state
laws
exacting
payment
support
religion
take
virginia
revolution
virginia
debated
rejected
general
religious
assessment
proposed
bill
allowed
taxpayers
direct
payments
christian
church
choice
support
minister
exempted
quakers
menonists
sent
undirected
assessments
public
treasury
seminaries
learning
bill
establishing
provision
teachers
christian
religion
reprinted
everson
supplemental
appendix
dissent
rutledge
opposing
proposal
james
madison
authored
famous
memorial
remonstrance
condemned
bill
hostile
religious
freedom
memorial
remonstrance
religious
assessments
founders
constitution
kurland
lerner
eds
believing
proper
take
alarm
despite
bill
limits
protested
authority
force
citizen
contribute
three
pence
property
support
one
establishment
may
force
conform
establishment
religion
flourished
without
support
human
laws
spite
every
opposition
compelled
support
religion
argued
weaken
believers
confidence
innate
excellence
strengthen
others
suspicion
friends
conscious
fallacies
trust
merits
harm
purity
efficacy
supported
religion
ibid
ended
deeming
bill
incompatible
virginia
guarantee
exercise
religion
according
dictates
conscience
madison
contributed
one
influential
voice
larger
chorus
petitions
opposed
bill
others
included
religious
bodies
baptists
presbyterians
quakers
buckley
church
state
revolutionary
virginia
petitions
raised
similar
points
see
like
madison
many
viewed
bill
step
toward
dangerous
relationship
see
voices
bill
virginia
soon
prohibited
religious
assessments
see
virginia
act
establishing
religious
freedom
founders
constitution
debate
played
nearby
maryland
result
assessment
bill
proposed
allowed
taxpayers
direct
payments
ministers
sufficiently
large
churches
poor
exempt
see
curry
controversy
bill
eclipse
volume
writing
bitterness
invective
every
political
dispute
since
debate
question
independence
rainbolt
struggle
define
religious
liberty
maryland
church
state
critics
bill
raised
themes
virginia
religion
needs
power
rules
establish
protect
financial
support
religion
leads
toward
establishment
laws
support
oppressive
curry
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
copy
petition
general
assembly
maryland
gazette
mar
pp
hy
desire
make
conscience
forced
law
legislature
next
met
representatives
elected
voters
bill
failed
curry
maryland
revoked
authority
levy
religious
assessments
see
md
amdt
xiii
federal
state
constitutions
thorpe
ed
thorpe
new
england
took
longer
reach
conclusion
vermont
went
first
religious
assessment
laws
accommodating
person
member
town
church
upon
securing
certificate
effect
exempt
see
levy
establishment
clause
levy
even
laws
viewed
many
violating
vermont
constitutional
prohibition
involuntary
support
religion
guarantee
freedom
conscience
see
address
council
censors
people
vermont
eligion
concern
personally
exclusively
operative
individual
god
address
council
censors
vermont
laws
evils
included
violence
done
feelings
men
property
animosities
dangerous
lengths
foundation
us
go
civil
religious
usurpation
vermont
repealed
laws
concerning
taxation
religion
levy
rest
new
england
heard
arguments
reached
conclusion
john
leland
sustained
criticism
religious
assessments
years
helped
end
practice
connecticut
see
esbeck
dissent
disestablishment
settlement
early
american
republic
rev
reasons
offered
urging
opposition
state
laws
familiar
religion
matter
god
individuals
need
harmed
government
support
leland
rights
conscience
inalienable
sacred
rights
conscience
dreisbach
hall
eds
ruth
gains
honor
men
firmly
believe
religion
subjected
cool
investigation
fair
argument
freedom
conscience
produces
religious
assessments
violated
freedom
argued
see
people
bind
nobody
injured
religious
opinions
bind
individual
besides
bond
fraudulent
declared
illegal
connecticut
ended
religious
assessments
first
statute
state
constitution
see
cobb
new
hampshire
steady
campaign
religious
assessments
led
bill
subjected
scrutiny
people
kinney
church
state
struggle
separation
new
hampshire
kinney
nicknamed
whipple
act
strongest
advocate
state
house
orford
union
congregational
soc
west
congregational
soc
orford
defended
bill
means
take
religion
politics
eliminate
state
support
insure
opportunity
worship
true
freedom
conscience
put
sects
denominations
christians
upon
level
kinney
bill
became
law
provided
person
shall
compelled
join
support
classed
associated
congregation
church
religious
society
without
express
consent
first
obtained
act
july
regulating
towns
choice
town
officers
laws
state
new
hampshire
enacted
since
june
massachusetts
held
longest
finally
ending
religious
assessments
see
cobb
course
history
shows
lived
laws
practices
formed
religious
establishments
made
considered
decision
civil
government
fund
ministers
houses
worship
us
debates
may
seem
abstract
history
remote
live
society
long
benefited
decisions
made
response
arguments
society
fortunate
fought
hard
build
locke
expressed
understanding
respect
history
locke
involved
provision
state
washington
constitution
like
missouri
nearly
identical
article
barred
use
public
funds
houses
worship
ministers
consistent
denial
funds
ministers
state
college
scholarship
program
allow
funds
used
devotional
theology
degrees
asked
whether
violated
minister
free
exercise
rights
invoked
play
joints
principle
answered
establishment
clause
require
prohibition
link
government
funds
religious
training
broken
independent
private
choice
scholarship
recipients
see
also
supra
nonetheless
denial
violate
free
exercise
clause
historic
substantial
state
interest
supported
constitutional
provision
think
areas
state
antiestablishment
interests
come
play
procuring
taxpayer
funds
support
church
leaders
true
case
directing
taxpayer
funds
houses
worship
see
supra
like
use
public
dollars
ministers
issue
locke
turning
public
funds
houses
worship
implicates
serious
antiestablishment
free
exercise
interests
history
discussed
fully
supports
conclusion
disestablished
repealed
laws
allowing
taxation
support
religion
practice
threatened
forms
government
support
involved
government
control
weakened
supporters
control
religion
common
sense
also
supports
conclusion
recall
state
may
fund
religious
activities
without
violating
establishment
clause
see
part
supra
state
reasonably
use
status
house
worship
religious
activities
inside
house
worship
dividing
religious
secular
require
intrusive
government
monitoring
lines
entangle
government
house
worship
activities
every
activity
house
worship
undertakes
inseparably
linked
religious
activity
likelihood
many
makes
categorical
rule
suitable
means
avoid
chilling
exercise
religion
amos
brennan
concurring
judgment
finally
course
funding
implicates
free
exercise
rights
taxpayers
denying
chance
decide
whether
fund
religion
play
joints
religion
clauses
locke
quoting
walz
true
locke
prophylactic
rule
use
public
funds
houses
worship
permissible
accommodation
weighty
interests
rule
historical
pedigree
identical
provision
locke
almost
ratified
religion
clauses
operated
rule
see
seven
placed
rule
state
three
enforced
statute
one
yet
embraced
today
counterpart
missouri
article
provisions
general
matter
date
back
original
many
long
drawn
line
prohibits
public
funding
houses
worship
based
principles
rooted
nation
understanding
best
foster
religious
liberty
supports
conclusion
public
funding
houses
worship
different
ilk
locke
locke
missouri
article
closely
tied
state
interests
protects
see
locke
describing
program
issue
go
ing
long
way
toward
including
religion
benefits
straightforward
reading
article
prohibits
funding
church
sect
denomination
religion
aid
priest
preacher
minister
teacher
thereof
missouri
courts
read
state
constitution
reach
broadly
prohibit
funding
religiously
affiliated
institutions
broadly
still
prohibit
funding
religious
believers
see
saint
louis
univ
masonic
temple
assn
louis
mo
university
religious
institution
simply
affiliated
jesuits
roman
catholic
church
scrap
tire
program
issue
proves
point
missouri
fund
religious
organization
owned
controlled
church
mission
activities
secular
separate
religion
spiritual
nature
funds
used
secular
separate
religion
spiritual
purposes
rather
sectarian
denominational
devoted
sect
purposes
app
brief
petitioner
see
also
tr
oral
arg
article
thus
stops
missouri
funding
specific
entities
ones
set
enforce
religious
doctrine
adherents
entities
acutely
raise
establishment
free
exercise
concerns
arise
public
funds
flow
religion
missouri
recognized
simple
truth
even
absent
establishment
clause
violation
transfer
public
funds
houses
worship
raises
concerns
sit
exactly
religion
clauses
avoid
concerns
concerns
prohibited
funding
made
choice
made
earliest
centuries
ago
many
years
since
constitution
permits
choice
view
none
matters
focuses
one
aspect
missouri
article
exclusion
else
denies
funding
house
worship
church
simply
church
ante
describes
constitutionally
impermissible
line
based
religious
status
requires
strict
scrutiny
rule
step
precedents
area
wrong
terms
constitution
creates
specific
rules
control
government
may
interact
religious
entities
course
government
may
act
based
religious
entity
status
status
implicates
interests
protected
religion
clauses
sometimes
religious
entity
unique
status
requires
government
act
see
times
merely
permits
government
act
see
part
supra
cases
dispositive
issue
whether
religious
status
matters
religion
clauses
issue
whether
government
must
may
act
basis
start
stays
silent
opinion
acknowledge
precedents
expressly
approved
government
choice
draw
lines
based
entity
religious
status
see
amos
walz
locke
cases
deploy
strict
scrutiny
create
presumption
unconstitutionality
today
instead
asked
whether
government
offered
strong
enough
reason
justify
drawing
line
based
status
see
amos
see
justification
applying
strict
scrutiny
walz
rejecting
criticisms
approach
giving
little
weight
fact
essential
part
adjudication
draw
distinctions
including
fine
ones
process
interpreting
constitution
locke
balancing
state
interests
aspiring
minister
takes
two
steps
avoid
precedents
first
recasts
locke
case
restriction
prohibited
minister
us
ing
funds
prepare
ministry
ante
faithful
reading
locke
gives
broader
reach
locke
stands
reasonable
proposition
government
may
need
choose
fund
certain
religious
entities
ministers
raises
historic
substantial
establishment
free
exercise
concerns
second
suggests
case
different
involves
discrimination
form
denial
access
possible
benefit
ante
area
law
decision
treat
entities
differently
based
distinctions
religion
clauses
make
relevant
amount
understand
keep
mind
unambiguously
concluded
individual
freedom
conscience
protected
first
amendment
embraces
right
select
religious
faith
none
wallace
jaffree
denial
benefit
others
may
receive
discrimination
violates
free
exercise
clause
accommodations
religious
entities
approved
violate
free
exercise
rights
nonreligious
entities
good
reason
rejected
idea
see
amos
instead
focused
whether
government
provided
good
enough
reason
based
values
religion
clauses
protect
offers
real
reason
rejecting
balancing
approach
precedents
favor
strict
scrutiny
beyond
references
discrimination
desire
avoid
views
discrimination
understandable
context
description
particularly
inappropriate
state
decision
fund
houses
worship
disfavor
religion
rather
represents
valid
choice
remain
secular
face
serious
establishment
free
exercise
concerns
make
state
atheistic
antireligious
county
allegheny
american
civil
liberties
union
greater
pittsburgh
chapter
means
state
establishe
neither
atheism
religion
official
creed
ibid
conclusion
alternative
governmental
support
religion
governmental
hostility
represents
giant
step
backward
religion
clause
jurisprudence
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
bottom
creates
following
rule
today
government
may
draw
lines
basis
religious
status
grant
benefit
religious
persons
entities
may
draw
lines
basis
interests
religion
clauses
protect
ways
nothing
supports
lopsided
outcome
religion
clauses
protect
establishment
free
exercise
interests
constitutional
breath
neither
privileged
precedent
since
repeatedly
explained
clauses
protect
religion
individual
freedom
conscience
jaffree
allows
choose
religion
reject
remain
undecided
reason
case
shows
interests
served
lifting
burdens
certain
religious
entities
may
sometimes
equally
served
denying
benefits
certain
religious
entities
cf
walz
entanglement
amos
influence
religious
activities
justice
breyer
concurrence
offers
narrower
rule
limit
effects
today
decision
rule
resolve
case
justice
breyer
like
thinks
denying
generally
available
benefit
solely
account
religious
identity
imposes
penalty
free
exercise
religion
justified
state
interest
highest
order
ante
majority
opinion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
ante
breyer
concurring
judgment
disagree
literal
interpretation
statement
fence
religious
persons
entities
truly
generally
available
public
benefit
one
provided
questions
asked
police
fire
protections
violate
free
exercise
clause
accord
rosenberger
souter
dissenting
explains
missouri
apply
constitutional
provision
manner
see
tr
oral
arg
done
scrap
tire
program
offers
generally
available
benefit
selective
benefit
recipients
year
context
comparison
truly
generally
available
benefits
inapt
cf
everson
rutledge
dissenting
religion
clauses
forbi
support
protection
interference
destruction
top
application
new
rule
mistaken
concluding
missouri
article
withstand
strict
scrutiny
describes
missouri
interest
mere
policy
preference
skating
far
possible
religious
establishment
concerns
ante
constitutional
provisions
invalidated
today
weighty
interests
protect
history
draw
deserve
judicial
brush
today
decision
discounts
centuries
history
jeopardizes
government
ability
remain
secular
three
years
ago
claimed
understand
area
law
sweep
away
long
settled
create
new
controversy
begin
anew
divisions
along
religious
lines
establishment
clause
seeks
prevent
town
greece
galloway
slip
makes
clear
today
principle
applies
preference
suits
iv
religion
clauses
first
amendment
contain
promise
government
backstop
disables
government
breaking
free
exercise
clause
extends
promise
retain
inalienable
right
free
exercise
religion
choose
whether
believe
worship
establishment
clause
erects
backstop
government
enactment
law
respecting
establishment
religion
start
us
path
past
right
routinely
abridged
today
dismantles
core
protection
religious
freedom
provided
clauses
holds
government
may
support
houses
worship
taxpayer
funds
least
case
perhaps
others
see
ante
must
whenever
decides
create
funding
program
history
shows
religion
clauses
separate
public
treasury
religious
coffers
one
measure
secure
kind
freedom
conscience
benefits
religion
government
separation
means
anything
means
government
least
need
tax
citizens
turn
money
houses
worship
today
blinds
outcome
history
requires
leads
us
instead
place
separation
church
state
constitutional
slogan
constitutional
commitment
dissent
footnotes
april
governor
missouri
announced
directed
department
begin
allowing
religious
organizations
compete
receive
department
grants
terms
secular
organizations
announcement
moot
case
said
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
moot
case
unless
subsequent
events
ke
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
department
carried
heavy
burden
making
absolutely
clear
revert
policy
excluding
religious
organizations
ibid
parties
agree
see
letter
james
layton
counsel
respondent
scott
harris
clerk
apr
adopting
position
missouri
attorney
general
office
clearly
effective
barrier
prevent
department
reinstating
policy
future
letter
david
cortman
counsel
petitioner
scott
harris
clerk
apr
policy
change
nothing
remedy
source
department
original
policy
missouri
interpretation
article
missouri
constitution
say
application
valid
neutral
law
general
applicability
necessarily
constitutional
free
exercise
clause
recently
evangelical
lutheran
church
school
eeoc
held
religion
clauses
required
ministerial
exception
neutral
prohibition
employment
retaliation
contained
americans
disabilities
act
distinguishing
smith
explained
case
concerned
government
regulation
physical
acts
present
case
contrast
concerns
government
interference
internal
church
decision
affects
faith
mission
church
case
involves
express
discrimination
based
religious
identity
respect
playground
resurfacing
address
religious
uses
funding
forms
discrimination
held
law
targeting
religious
beliefs
never
permissible
lukumi
see
also
mcdaniel
paty
plurality
opinion
need
decide
whether
condition
missouri
imposes
case
falls
within
scope
rule
survive
strict
scrutiny
event
based
holding
need
reach
church
claim
policy
also
violates
equal
protection
clause
footnotes
government
aid
purpose
effect
advancing
inhibiting
religion
violates
establishment
clause
agostini
felton
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
whether
government
aid
effect
turns
whether
result
governmental
indoctrination
define
recipients
reference
religion
create
excessive
entanglement
government
religion
see
also
considerations
speak
whether
aid
reasonably
viewed
endorsement
religion
missouri
decides
scrap
tire
program
applicants
receive
state
funding
case
implicate
line
decisions
indirect
aid
programs
aid
reaches
religious
institutions
result
genuine
independent
choices
private
individuals
zelman
scrap
tire
program
requires
applicant
certify
among
things
mission
activities
secular
put
program
funds
secular
use
app
pet
cert
record
unclear
whether
church
provided
part
certification
case
church
offered
assurances
case
highlights
weaknesses
rule
scrap
tire
program
ranks
highly
applicants
agree
generate
media
exposure
missouri
program
receive
endorsement
local
solid
waste
management
entities
prefers
applicants
agree
advertise
government
funded
seek
approval
government
agencies
ignore
result
ignore
type
state
entanglement
endorsement
religion
establishment
clause
guards
hold
religion
clauses
applied
fourteenth
amendment
see
cantwell
connecticut
free
exercise
clause
everson
board
ed
ewing
establishment
clause
dismantled
religious
establishments
accord
response
lessons
taught
experiences
religious
establishments
might
point
scrap
tire
program
issue
impose
assessment
specifically
religious
entities
rather
directs
funds
raised
general
taxation
scheme
church
distinction
makes
difference
debates
religious
assessment
laws
focused
means
laws
ends
turning
public
funds
religious
entities
see
locke
davey
see
art
xviii
thorpe
shall
person
within
colony
ever
obliged
pay
tithes
taxes
rates
purpose
building
repairing
church
churches
place
places
worship
maintenance
minister
ministry
contrary
believes
right
deliberately
voluntarily
engaged
perform
art
xxxiv
either
shall
person
pretence
whatsoever
obliged
pay
purchase
glebe
building
house
worship
maintenance
minister
ministry
contrary
believes
right
voluntarily
personally
engaged
perform
pa
art
ix
man
right
compelled
attend
erect
support
place
worship
maintain
ministry
consent
art
xxxviii
person
shall
law
obliged
pay
towards
maintenance
support
religious
worship
freely
join
voluntarily
engaged
support
vt
ch
art
iii
man
right
compelled
attend
religious
worship
erect
support
place
worship
maintain
minister
contrary
dictates
conscience
delaware
new
york
constitutions
directly
address
understood
prohibit
public
funding
religion
see
curry
see
also
del
art
man
shall
compelled
attend
religious
worship
contribute
erection
support
place
worship
maintenance
ministry
free
consent
see
virginia
act
establishing
religious
freedom
founders
constitution
kurland
lerner
eds
curry
rhode
island
never
publicly
funded
houses
worship
esbeck
dissent
disestablishment
settlement
early
american
republic
rev
maryland
never
invoked
constitutional
authorization
religious
assessments
see
pt
arts
vi
thorpe
see
ala
art
ariz
art
ii
art
ix
ark
art
ii
cal
art
xvi
colo
art
ii
art
ix
conn
art
seventh
del
art
fla
art
ga
art
para
vii
idaho
art
ix
ill
art
art
ind
art
iowa
art
const
md
decl
rights
art
mass
const
art
xviii
mich
art
minn
art
mo
art
art
ix
mont
art
neb
art
pt
art
art
art
ii
ohio
art
okla
art
ii
ore
art
pa
art
art
iii
art
art
vi
tenn
art
tex
art
utah
art
vt
ch
art
va
art
art
iv
wash
art
va
art
iii
wis
art
wyo
art
art
iii
see
ala
art
thorpe
ariz
art
ii
art
ix
ark
art
ii
thorpe
cal
art
ix
colo
art
ii
art
conn
art
first
art
seventh
del
art
fla
decl
rights
thorpe
ga
art
para
xiv
idaho
art
art
ix
ill
art
viii
ind
art
art
iowa
art
ky
art
xiii
md
decl
rights
art
mass
const
art
xviii
mass
const
art
xviii
mich
art
art
iv
thorpe
minn
art
enabling
act
mo
art
art
ii
mont
art
xi
neb
art
pt
art
art
xviii
thorpe
art
ii
ohio
art
viii
thorpe
okla
art
ii
snyder
constitution
oklahoma
ore
art
thorpe
pa
art
ix
art
iii
art
art
vi
tenn
art
xi
tex
art
art
utah
art
vt
ch
art
iii
va
art
iii
art
iv
wash
art
va
art
ii
wis
art
wyo
art
art
iii
explains
perhaps
reference
equal
protection
clause
precedent
rather
free
exercise
clause
precedent
point
see
ante
citing
northeastern
chapter
associated
gen
contractors
america
jacksonville
surprise
despite
protests
contrary
case
applied
rigid
rule
mcdaniel
paty
relies
heavily
mentioned
status
distinguish
laws
deprived
person
civil
right
solely
religious
beliefs
plurality
opinion
torcaso
watkins
invalidated
law
barred
persons
refused
state
belief
god
public
office
without
evaluat
ing
interests
assertedly
justifying
mcdaniel
plurality
opinion
approach
control
mcdaniel
involved
state
constitutional
provision
barred
ministers
serving
legislators
ministerial
status
defined
terms
conduct
activity
belief
thus
asked
whether
interests
state
offered
strong
enough
justify
denial
constitutional
right
serve
public
office
concluded
references
status
cases
simply
recount
mcdaniel
see
church
lukumi
babalu
aye
hialeah
employment
dept
human
resources
smith
end
soundness
today
decision
may
matter
less
might
enable
tomorrow
principle
establishes
manipulated
call
similar
fate
lines
drawn
basis
religious
use
see
ante
gorsuch
concurring
part
see
also
ante
thomas
concurring
part
going
suggesting
lines
drawn
basis
religious
status
amount
per
se
unconstitutional
discrimination
basis
religious
belief
enough
today
explain
decision
wrong
error
concurrences
decisions
left
tomorrow
see
school
dist
abington
township
schempp
free
exercise
clause
clearly
prohibits
use
state
action
deny
rights
free
exercise
anyone
never
meant
majority
use
machinery
state
practice
beliefs