camreta
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
et
argued
march
decided
may
nearly
decade
ago
petitioner
camreta
state
child
protective
services
worker
petitioner
alford
county
deputy
sheriff
interviewed
oregon
elementary
school
allegations
father
sexually
abused
warrant
parental
consent
conduct
interview
eventually
stated
abused
father
stood
trial
abuse
jury
failed
reach
verdict
charges
later
dismissed
mother
respondent
hereinafter
subsequently
sued
camreta
alford
behalf
damages
alleging
interview
breached
fourth
amendment
proscription
unreasonable
seizures
district
granted
summary
judgment
officials
ninth
circuit
affirmed
appeals
first
ruled
seizing
absent
warrant
order
parental
consent
exigent
circumstances
violated
constitution
held
officials
entitled
qualified
immunity
damages
liability
clearly
established
law
warned
illegality
conduct
explained
chosen
rule
merits
constitutional
claim
officials
notice
dispense
traditional
fourth
amendment
protections
context
although
judgment
entered
favor
camreta
alford
petitioned
review
ninth
circuit
ruling
conduct
violated
fourth
amendment
declined
review
decision
officials
immunity
held
generally
may
review
lower
constitutional
ruling
behest
government
officials
final
judgment
qualified
immunity
grounds
pp
relevant
statute
confers
unqualified
power
grant
certiorari
upon
petition
party
language
covers
petitions
brought
litigants
prevailed
well
lost
courts
pp
appeal
brought
prevailing
party
may
satisfy
article
iii
requirement
comply
requirement
litigants
must
demonstrate
personal
stake
suit
summers
earth
island
institute
petitioner
stake
suffered
caused
conduct
complained
favorable
decision
lujan
defenders
wildlife
opposing
party
also
must
ongoing
interest
dispute
case
features
concrete
adverseness
sharpens
presentation
issues
los
angeles
lyons
parties
must
necessary
stake
outset
litigation
throughout
course
arizonans
official
english
arizona
long
litigants
possess
requisite
personal
stake
appeal
presents
case
controversy
matter
appealing
party
prevailing
party
see
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
article
iii
standard
often
met
immunized
officials
seek
challenge
determination
conduct
violated
constitution
ruling
may
prospective
effect
parties
long
remains
good
law
official
regularly
engages
challenged
conduct
part
job
camreta
must
either
change
way
performs
duties
risk
meritorious
damages
action
official
thus
demonstrate
injury
causation
redressability
conversely
person
initially
brought
suit
may
subject
challenged
conduct
stake
preserving
holding
ongoing
protection
practice
pp
prudential
practice
declining
hear
appeals
prevailing
parties
bar
consideration
immunized
officials
petitions
recognized
exceptions
prudential
rule
policy
reaso
sufficient
importance
allow
appeal
winner
deposit
guaranty
reason
exists
qualified
immunity
cases
constitutional
rulings
prevailing
parties
ask
consider
cases
significant
future
effect
conduct
public
officials
policies
government
units
belong
rulings
designed
produce
effect
establishing
controlling
law
preventing
invocations
immunity
later
cases
moreover
designed
permission
promote
clarity
observance
constitutional
rules
taken
together
features
qualified
immunity
cases
support
bending
usual
rule
permit
consideration
immunized
officials
petitions
begin
nature
suits
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
plaintiff
may
seek
money
damages
government
officials
violated
constitutional
statutory
rights
officials
entitled
qualified
immunity
dismiss
damages
claim
without
ever
deciding
merits
qualified
immunity
situation
threatens
leave
standards
official
conduct
permanently
limbo
prevent
problem
permitted
lower
courts
determine
whether
right
exists
examining
whether
clearly
established
see
pearson
callahan
ninth
circuit
followed
exactly
process
settle
question
constitutional
law
thereby
guide
future
conduct
officials
given
purpose
effect
decision
reviewable
immunized
official
behest
usual
prevailing
party
rule
applied
official
either
acquiesce
ruling
opportunity
contest
defy
lower
view
adhere
declared
illegal
practice
invite
law
suits
possible
punitive
damages
applying
usual
bar
review
undermine
purpose
process
clarify
constitutional
rights
without
undue
delay
bunting
mellen
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
purpose
may
justify
appellate
reaching
beyond
immunity
defense
decide
constitutional
issue
may
support
reviewing
correctness
lower
decision
holding
limited
two
respects
first
addresses
authority
review
cases
procedural
posture
need
decide
appellate
also
entertain
appeal
party
prevailed
immunity
grounds
second
holding
concerns
may
review
actually
choose
review
going
forward
consider
prevailing
parties
petitions
one
one
accord
usual
standards
granting
certiorari
pp
separate
jurisdictional
problem
requires
dismiss
case
threshold
case
moot
dispute
kind
plaintiff
defendant
ordinarily
retain
stake
outcome
true
camreta
remains
employed
child
protective
services
worker
interest
challenging
ninth
circuit
ruling
requiring
obtain
warrant
conducting
interview
longer
claim
plaintiff
usual
stake
preserving
holding
longer
needs
protection
challenged
practice
moved
florida
months
away
birthday
presumably
high
school
graduation
subsequent
events
ke
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
live
controversy
review
concentrated
phosphate
export
civil
suit
becomes
moot
pending
appeal
authority
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
established
practice
vacate
judgment
see
munsingwear
ensure
prevented
obtaining
review
entitled
treated
review
ibid
point
vacatur
prevent
unreviewable
decision
spawning
legal
consequences
constitutional
ruling
qualified
immunity
case
legally
consequential
decision
happenstance
prevents
review
ruling
normal
rule
apply
vacatur
rightly
strips
decision
binding
effect
deakins
monaghan
clears
path
future
relitigation
munsingwear
mootness
frustrated
camreta
ability
challenge
ninth
circuit
ruling
must
obtain
warrant
interviewing
suspected
child
abuse
victim
school
part
ninth
circuit
decision
must
vacated
pp
vacated
part
remanded
kagan
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
ginsburg
alito
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
sotomayor
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
breyer
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
bob
camreta
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
james
alford
deputy
sheriff
deschutes
county
oregon
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
may
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
almost
decade
ago
state
child
protective
services
worker
county
deputy
sheriff
interviewed
girl
elementary
school
oregon
allegations
father
sexually
abused
girl
mother
subsequently
sued
government
officials
child
behalf
damages
rev
stat
claiming
interview
infringed
fourth
amendment
appeals
ninth
circuit
agreed
ruling
officials
violated
constitution
failing
obtain
warrant
conduct
interview
appeals
held
qualified
immunity
shielded
officials
monetary
liability
constitutional
right
issue
clearly
established
existing
law
two
officials
sought
review
ninth
circuit
ruling
fourth
amendment
granted
petitions
examine
two
questions
first
may
officials
prevail
grounds
qualified
obtain
review
appeals
decision
conduct
violated
constitution
second
may
consider
cases
procedural
posture
ninth
circuit
correctly
determine
interview
breached
fourth
amendment
conclude
generally
may
review
lower
constitutional
ruling
behest
government
official
granted
immunity
may
case
reasons
peculiar
case
become
moot
child
grown
moved
across
country
never
subject
oregon
interviewing
practices
whose
constitutionality
issue
therefore
reach
fourth
amendment
question
case
line
normal
practice
mootness
frustrates
party
right
appeal
see
munsingwear
vacate
part
ninth
circuit
opinion
decided
fourth
amendment
issue
february
police
arrested
nimrod
greene
suspected
sexual
abuse
young
boy
unrelated
investigation
offense
boy
parents
told
police
suspected
greene
molesting
daughter
police
reported
information
oregon
department
human
services
assigned
petitioner
bob
camreta
child
protective
services
caseworker
assess
safety
several
days
later
camreta
accompanied
petitioner
james
alford
deschutes
county
deputy
sheriff
went
elementary
school
interviewed
allegations
alford
warrant
obtained
parental
consent
conduct
interview
although
first
denied
father
molested
eventually
stated
abused
greene
indicted
stood
trial
sexually
abusing
jury
failed
reach
verdict
charges
later
dismissed
respondent
sarah
greene
mother
subsequently
sued
camreta
alford
behalf
damages
authorizes
suits
state
officials
violations
constitutional
rights
alleged
officials
interview
breached
fourth
amendment
proscription
unreasonable
district
granted
summary
judgment
camreta
alford
ninth
circuit
affirmed
appeals
first
ruled
interview
violated
rights
camreta
alford
seize
interrogate
absence
warrant
order
exigent
circumstances
parental
consent
omitted
held
officials
entitled
qualified
immunity
damages
liability
clearly
established
law
warned
illegality
conduct
ninth
circuit
explained
chosen
rule
merits
constitutional
claim
rather
merely
hold
officials
immune
suit
addressing
legality
interview
said
provide
guidance
charged
difficult
task
protecting
child
welfare
within
confines
fourth
amendment
guidance
came
uncertain
terms
overnment
officials
investigating
allegations
child
abuse
warned
cease
operating
assumption
need
automatically
justifies
dispensing
traditional
fourth
amendment
protections
context
although
judgment
entered
favor
camreta
alford
petitioned
review
ninth
circuit
ruling
conduct
violated
fourth
amendment
declined
review
decision
officials
immunity
granted
certiorari
ii
first
consider
ability
act
petition
brought
government
officials
final
judgment
grounds
qualified
immunity
object
appellate
ruling
violated
plaintiff
constitutional
rights
camreta
alford
without
doubt
prevailing
parties
ninth
circuit
decision
shielded
monetary
liability
chose
contest
ruling
whatever
else
follows
pay
damages
sought
question
confront
whether
may
nonetheless
review
appeals
holding
officials
violated
constitution
statute
governing
jurisdiction
authorizes
us
adjudicate
case
posture
contend
otherwise
relevant
provision
confers
unqualified
power
grant
certiorari
upon
petition
party
emphasis
added
language
covers
petitions
brought
litigants
prevailed
well
lost
see
gressman
geller
shapiro
bishop
hartnett
practice
ed
hereinafter
stern
gressman
however
alleges
two
impediments
exercise
statutory
authority
one
constitutional
prudential
first
claims
article
iii
bars
review
petitions
submitted
immunized
officials
present
case
controversy
see
brief
respondent
second
argues
settled
practice
declining
hear
appeals
prevailing
parties
apply
full
force
officials
obtained
immunity
see
disagree
counts
article
iii
constitution
grants
authority
adjudicate
legal
disputes
context
cases
controversies
enforce
limitation
demand
litigants
demonstrate
personal
stake
suit
summers
earth
island
institute
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
parole
geraghty
party
invoking
authority
stake
three
conditions
satisfied
petitioner
must
show
suffered
injury
fact
caused
conduct
complained
redressed
favorable
decision
lujan
defenders
wildlife
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
opposing
party
also
must
ongoing
interest
dispute
case
features
concrete
sharpens
presentation
issues
los
angeles
lyons
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
ensure
case
remains
fit
adjudication
parties
must
necessary
stake
outset
litigation
throughout
course
arizonans
official
english
arizona
previously
recognized
appeal
brought
prevailing
party
may
satisfy
article
iii
requirement
see
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
indeed
twice
allowed
party
judgment
entered
challenge
unfavorable
lower
ruling
see
ibid
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
context
others
stated
critical
question
article
iii
whether
litigant
retains
necessary
personal
stake
appeal
deposit
guaranty
explain
usually
invoke
rules
federal
appellate
practice
decline
review
prevailing
party
challenge
even
requisite
stake
see
infra
case
article
iii
poses
bar
rules
practice
source
jurisdictional
limitations
constitution
deposit
guaranty
long
litigants
possess
personal
stake
discussed
appeal
presents
case
controversy
matter
appealing
party
prevailing
party
article
iii
standard
often
met
immunized
officials
seek
challenge
ruling
conduct
violated
constitution
made
retrospective
judgment
lawfulness
officials
behavior
judgment
unaccompanied
personal
liability
rather
judgment
may
prospective
effect
parties
case
says
although
official
immune
damages
today
violates
constitution
anyone
else
thing
personally
liable
official
regularly
engages
conduct
part
job
camreta
suffers
injury
caused
adverse
constitutional
ruling
long
continues
effect
must
either
change
way
performs
duties
risk
meritorious
damages
action
cf
discussing
prevailing
party
stake
ruling
prospective
effects
overturning
ruling
appeal
official
gain
clearance
engage
conduct
future
thus
demonstrate
demand
injury
causation
conversely
person
initially
brought
suit
may
subject
challenged
conduct
stake
preserving
holding
see
erie
pap
honig
doe
cf
lyons
examining
whether
plaintiff
shown
sufficient
likelihood
wronged
similar
way
ruling
remains
good
law
ongoing
protection
practice
therefore
reject
view
article
iii
bars
us
adjudicating
challenges
brought
government
officials
received
immunity
victor
filed
appeal
deprive
us
jurisdiction
parties
cases
may
yet
sufficient
interest
outcome
litigated
issue
present
case
controversy
deposit
guaranty
article
iii
aside
important
question
judicial
policy
remains
matter
practice
prudence
generally
declined
consider
cases
request
prevailing
party
even
constitution
allowed
us
see
gunn
university
comm
end
war
viet
nam
new
york
telephone
maltbie
per
curiam
see
also
bunting
mellen
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
ur
practice
reflects
refusal
entertain
appeal
party
issue
prevailed
quoting
stern
gressman
ed
resources
well
spent
superintending
word
lower
utters
en
route
final
judgment
petitioning
party
favor
see
california
rooney
per
curiam
hat
appeal
reached
decision
analysis
different
might
used
make
appropriate
prevailing
party
request
us
review
therefore
adhered
rigor
principle
reviews
judgments
statements
opinions
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
occasions
departed
principle
pointed
policy
reaso
sufficient
importance
allow
appeal
winner
deposit
guaranty
think
reason
places
qualified
immunity
cases
special
category
comes
review
appeals
brought
winners
constitutional
determinations
prevailing
parties
ask
us
consider
cases
mere
dicta
statements
opinions
rooney
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
bunting
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
stating
determination
mere
dictum
ordinary
sense
rulings
significant
future
effect
conduct
public
officials
prevailing
parties
policies
government
units
belong
see
supra
rulings
designed
produce
effect
establishing
controlling
law
preventing
invocations
immunity
later
cases
still
rulings
designed
way
permission
promote
clarity
observance
constitutional
rules
describe
detail
qualified
immunity
world
came
hold
taken
together
support
bending
usual
rule
permit
consideration
immunized
officials
petitions
begin
nature
suits
invoked
case
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
plaintiff
may
seek
money
damages
government
officials
violated
constitutional
statutory
rights
ensure
fear
liability
unduly
inhibit
officials
discharge
duties
anderson
creighton
officials
may
claim
qualified
immunity
long
violated
clearly
established
right
shielded
personal
liability
harlow
fitzgerald
means
often
avoid
ruling
plaintiff
claim
particular
right
exists
prior
case
law
clearly
settled
right
given
officials
fair
notice
simply
dismiss
claim
money
damages
need
never
decide
whether
plaintiff
claim
even
though
novel
otherwise
unsettled
fact
merit
indeed
usual
adjudicatory
rules
suggest
forbear
resolving
issue
longstanding
principle
judicial
restraint
requires
courts
avoid
reaching
constitutional
questions
advance
necessity
deciding
lyng
northwest
indian
cemetery
protective
see
also
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
category
qualified
immunity
cases
enter
judgment
without
ever
ruling
perhaps
difficult
constitutional
claim
plaintiff
raised
small
wonder
might
leave
issue
another
day
long
recognized
day
may
never
come
regular
policy
avoidance
sometimes
fit
qualified
immunity
situation
threatens
leave
standards
official
conduct
permanently
limbo
county
sacramento
lewis
consider
plausible
unsettled
constitutional
claim
asserted
government
official
suit
money
damages
resolve
claim
official
immunity
thus
persists
challenged
practice
knows
avoid
liability
future
damages
action
law
still
clearly
established
another
plaintiff
brings
suit
another
awards
immunity
bypasses
claim
moment
decision
courts
fail
clarify
uncertain
questions
fail
address
novel
claims
fail
give
guidance
officials
comply
legal
requirements
see
ibid
wilson
layne
qualified
immunity
thus
may
frustrate
development
constitutional
precedent
promotion
behavior
pearson
callahan
reason
permitted
lower
courts
avoid
avoidance
determine
whether
right
exists
examining
whether
clearly
established
see
ibid
lewis
indeed
time
required
courts
considering
qualified
immunity
claims
first
address
constitutional
question
promote
law
elaboration
case
case
saucier
katz
recently
left
matter
discretion
lower
courts
indeed
detailed
range
circumstances
courts
address
immunity
question
see
pearson
general
courts
think
hard
think
hard
turning
small
cases
large
ones
remains
true
following
sequence
defining
constitutional
rights
conferring
immunity
sometimes
beneficial
clarify
legal
standards
governing
public
officials
see
discussing
factors
courts
consider
making
determination
appeals
followed
exactly
process
exactly
reasons
said
may
select
circumstances
make
advantageous
noted
earlier
explained
address
ing
prongs
qualified
immunity
inquiry
provide
guidance
charged
difficult
task
protecting
child
welfare
within
confines
fourth
amendment
end
adopted
constitutional
standards
govern
interviews
suspected
child
abuse
victims
see
specifically
instructed
government
officials
follow
standards
going
forward
cease
operating
assumption
warrantless
interviews
permitted
see
law
thus
clearly
established
officials
conduct
kind
interview
receive
immunity
ninth
circuit
state
oregon
done
expect
wake
decision
provided
revised
legal
advice
consonant
ninth
circuit
ruling
child
protective
services
workers
wishing
interview
children
schools
see
tr
oral
arg
thus
accomplished
set
settle
question
constitutional
law
thereby
guide
conduct
officials
given
purpose
effect
decision
reviewable
behest
immunized
official
mere
dictum
constitutional
ruling
preparatory
grant
immunity
creates
law
governs
official
behavior
usual
rule
pertaining
prevailing
parties
applied
official
fac
unenviable
choice
must
either
acquiesce
ruling
opportunity
contest
defy
views
lower
adhere
practices
declared
illegal
thus
invite
new
suits
potential
punitive
damages
pearson
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
usual
bar
review
applied
undermine
purpose
served
process
clarify
constitutional
rights
without
undue
delay
bunting
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
needless
say
also
plays
role
clarifying
rights
purpose
may
justify
appellate
reaching
beyond
immunity
defense
decide
constitutional
issue
purpose
may
support
reviewing
correctness
lower
emphasize
however
two
limits
today
holding
first
addresses
authority
review
cases
procedural
posture
ninth
circuit
consider
whether
hear
appeal
immunized
official
appealed
judgment
officials
favor
therefore
need
decide
appellate
entertain
appeal
party
prevailed
immunity
second
holding
concerns
may
review
actually
choose
review
different
matter
choice
governed
ordinary
principles
informing
decision
whether
grant
certiorari
power
sparingly
exercis
forsyth
hammond
see
also
grants
review
circumstances
case
satisfy
us
importance
question
involved
necessity
avoiding
conflict
lower
courts
matter
affecting
interests
nation
demands
exercise
rule
decision
today
exempt
one
special
category
cases
usual
rule
considering
prevailing
parties
petitions
going
forward
consider
petitions
one
one
accord
usual
standards
iii
although
reject
arguments
dismissing
case
threshold
find
separate
jurisdictional
problem
requires
result
case
conclude
explained
supra
dispute
kind
plaintiff
defendant
ordinarily
retain
stake
outcome
true
one
defendant
camreta
remains
employed
child
protective
services
worker
interest
challenging
ninth
circuit
ruling
requiring
obtain
warrant
conducting
longer
claim
plaintiff
usual
stake
preserving
holding
longer
need
protection
challenged
practice
granted
certiorari
discovered
moved
florida
ha
intention
relocating
back
oregon
brief
respondent
months
away
birthday
presumably
high
school
graduation
see
therefore
affected
appeals
ruling
faces
slightest
possibility
seized
school
ninth
circuit
jurisdiction
part
child
abuse
investigation
subsequent
events
ke
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
live
controversy
review
concentrated
phosphate
export
see
atherton
mills
johnston
suit
contesting
validity
child
labor
statute
mooted
longer
within
ages
affected
act
defunis
odegaard
per
curiam
suit
challenging
law
school
admissions
policy
mooted
plaintiff
neared
graduation
time
distance
combined
stymied
ability
consider
petition
camreta
makes
one
counterargument
avers
continuing
interest
ninth
circuit
constitutional
ruling
may
help
establish
municipal
liability
claim
deschutes
county
see
tr
oral
arg
initial
complaint
charged
county
official
policy
unconstitutionally
subjecting
schoolchildren
police
interrogation
see
supra
finding
evidence
policy
even
assuming
unlawful
seizure
occurred
case
district
granted
summary
judgment
county
app
pet
cert
pp
appeal
ruling
although
recently
sought
reinstate
claim
county
district
denied
motion
docket
entry
whatever
interest
might
municipal
liability
claim
still
pending
issue
need
decide
think
dismissed
claim
different
defendant
involving
separate
legal
theory
save
case
mootness
see
commodity
futures
trading
board
trade
chicago
posner
ne
never
certain
findings
made
decision
concluding
one
lawsuit
day
control
outcome
another
suit
enough
avoid
mootness
case
ever
moot
thus
must
decide
dispose
case
civil
suit
becomes
moot
pending
appeal
authority
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
established
though
exceptionless
practice
situation
vacate
judgment
see
munsingwear
alvarez
smith
slip
party
seeks
review
merits
adverse
ruling
frustrated
vagaries
circumstance
emphasized
fairness
forced
acquiesce
ruling
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
equitable
remedy
vacatur
ensures
prevented
obtaining
review
entitled
treated
review
munsingwear
contends
vacatur
inappropriate
qualified
immunity
context
disposition
undermine
appeals
choice
decide
constitutional
questio
govern
future
cases
brief
respondent
tr
oral
arg
far
counseling
vacatur
argument
reveals
necessity
procedural
course
point
vacatur
prevent
unreviewable
decision
spawning
legal
consequences
party
harmed
called
preliminary
adjudication
munsingwear
explained
ruling
qualified
immunity
case
legally
consequential
decision
reason
think
appropriate
review
even
behest
prevailing
party
see
supra
happenstance
prevents
review
occurring
normal
rule
apply
vacatur
rightly
strips
decision
binding
effect
deakins
monaghan
clears
path
future
relitigation
munsingwear
case
happenstance
moving
across
country
becoming
adult
deprived
camreta
appeal
rights
mootness
frustrated
ability
challenge
appeals
ruling
must
obtain
warrant
interviewing
suspected
child
abuse
victim
school
therefore
vacate
part
ninth
circuit
opinion
addressed
issue
remand
proceedings
consistent
see
arave
hoffman
per
curiam
selig
pediatric
specialty
care
ordered
bob
camreta
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
james
alford
deputy
sheriff
deschutes
county
oregon
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
may
justice
scalia
concurring
join
opinion
reasonably
applies
precedents
strange
though
may
alternative
solution
justice
kennedy
suggests
see
post
dissenting
opinion
end
extraordinary
practice
ruling
upon
constitutional
questions
unnecessarily
defendant
possesses
qualified
immunity
see
saucier
katz
parties
asked
us
adopt
approach
willing
consider
appropriate
case
bob
camreta
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
james
alford
deputy
sheriff
deschutes
county
oregon
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
may
justice
sotomayor
justice
breyer
joins
concurring
judgment
agree
conclusion
case
moot
vacatur
appropriate
disposition
unlike
majority
however
go
exchange
majority
justice
kennedy
demonstrates
question
whether
camreta
prevailing
party
obtain
review
ninth
circuit
constitutional
ruling
difficult
one
warrant
reaching
question
clearly
longer
genuine
case
controversy
parties
us
see
sinochem
malaysia
shipping
noting
readily
dispose
case
one
threshold
ground
reach
another
one
difficult
determine
indeed
improper
us
cf
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
federal
may
decide
merits
legal
question
posed
article
iii
case
controversy
majority
suggests
must
decide
whether
camreta
right
appeal
order
vacate
judgment
munsingwear
see
ante
see
also
ante
view
accord
past
practice
see
arizonans
official
english
arizona
ordering
vacatur
district
judgment
without
resolv
ing
grave
doubts
petitioners
appellate
standing
deciding
whether
state
attorney
general
right
intervene
party
concluding
statutory
authority
present
argument
appeal
consistent
principles
underlying
mootness
jurisprudence
see
walling
james
reuter
judgment
become
moot
may
make
disposition
whole
case
justice
may
require
accordance
normal
procedure
disposing
cases
become
moot
fault
party
seeking
review
see
bancorp
munsingwear
simply
vacate
portion
ninth
circuit
opinion
camreta
sought
challenge
remand
instructions
dismiss
see
indiana
state
police
pension
trust
chrysler
llc
per
curiam
bob
camreta
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
james
alford
deputy
sheriff
deschutes
county
oregon
petitioner
sarah
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
minor
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
may
justice
kennedy
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
today
decision
results
emerging
rather
troubling
consequence
reasoning
recent
qualified
immunity
cases
correct
note
problem
presented
one
hand
precedents
permit
invite
courts
rule
merits
constitutional
claim
even
qualified
immunity
disposes
matter
hand
jurisdictional
principles
prevent
us
reviewing
invited
rulings
seem
clarification
required
view
however
correct
solution
override
jurisdictional
rules
basic
functioning
necessity
avoiding
advisory
opinions
dictum
though
precedent
may
utility
treated
judgment
standing
acknowledging
problem
confronts
concern
rule
adopted
case
calls
respectful
dissent
acknowledges
settled
refusal
entertain
appeal
including
petition
certiorari
party
issue
prevailed
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
outset
however
important
state
rule
fully
show
foundational
character
party
already
obtained
judgment
requested
may
seek
review
challenge
reasoning
judicial
decision
said
many
occasions
reviews
judgments
statements
opinions
california
rooney
per
curiam
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
collecting
cases
rule
noted
followed
since
early
years
question
appellate
judgment
correct
ground
judgment
professes
proceed
mcclung
silliman
wheat
rule
hearing
appeals
accepting
petitions
certiorari
prevailing
parties
related
article
iii
prohibition
issuing
advisory
opinions
principle
underlies
example
settled
rule
hearing
cases
involving
disputed
judgment
based
grounds
state
law
justice
jackson
explained
ur
power
correct
wrong
judgments
revise
opinions
permitted
render
advisory
opinion
judgment
rendered
state
corrected
views
federal
laws
review
amount
nothing
advisory
opinion
herb
pitcairn
point
repeated
force
clarity
see
michigan
long
power
one
render
judgments
advisory
opinions
plaut
spendthrift
farm
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
rule
hearing
appeals
prevailing
parties
applies
countless
situations
many
involving
government
parties
deficient
performance
may
yield
prejudice
strickland
washington
defective
warrant
may
entitled
reliance
leon
unreasonable
search
may
cured
inevitable
discovery
doctrine
nix
williams
myriad
situations
error
identified
conclusion
affect
ultimate
judgment
entered
contexts
established
prevailing
party
may
appeal
conclusion
holds
true
even
though
statement
merits
adverse
consequences
prevailing
party
appeal
use
analysis
may
adverse
state
interests
allow
state
claim
status
losing
party
purposes
review
rooney
supra
nonetheless
holds
defendants
prevail
courts
appeals
based
qualified
immunity
may
still
obtain
review
point
put
perspective
fact
today
altogether
unprecedented
disposition
says
vacates
judgment
rather
part
ninth
circuit
opinion
ante
conclusion
unsettling
implications
even
reading
cases
almost
invariable
rule
prevailing
parties
permitted
obtain
writ
certiorari
cf
kalka
hawk
cadc
concluding
apparently
never
granted
certiorari
petition
party
prevailed
appellate
today
however
common
prevailing
parties
seek
certiorari
based
newfound
exception
even
though
admonition
reviewing
mere
statements
opinions
special
force
statements
raise
questions
settled
practice
avoid
unnecessary
decision
issues
fcc
pacifica
foundation
defends
holding
citations
two
cases
ante
neither
provides
support
result
first
case
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
plaintiff
alleged
infringement
two
patent
claims
district
found
plaintiff
first
claim
valid
infringed
second
claim
invalid
rather
issuing
judgment
dismissing
bill
without
district
instead
entered
decree
adjudging
claim
valid
dismissing
bill
failure
prove
infringement
district
thus
issued
formal
judgment
regarding
validity
first
claim
defendant
appealed
dispute
claim
validity
noted
without
qualification
party
may
appeal
judgment
decree
favor
purpose
obtaining
review
findings
deems
erroneous
necessary
support
decree
went
explain
decree
purports
adjudge
validity
claim
though
adjudication
immaterial
disposition
cause
stands
adjudication
one
issues
litigated
ibid
words
district
entered
unnecessary
legal
conclusion
terms
judgment
making
possible
example
decree
estoppel
effect
issue
whose
resolution
unnecessary
proper
judgment
dismissal
electrical
fittings
therefore
concluded
petitioners
entitled
portion
decree
eliminated
ibid
sole
relief
provided
order
reformation
decree
ibid
result
accords
indeed
flows
settled
rule
reviews
judgments
statements
opinions
second
case
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
case
plaintiffs
attempted
bring
class
action
bank
district
denied
class
certification
defendant
tendered
plaintiffs
maximum
value
recover
individuals
course
offer
amount
ha
requested
complaint
namely
relief
class
rehnquist
concurring
therefore
surprise
plaintiffs
responded
counteroffer
judgment
attempted
reserve
right
appeal
adverse
class
certification
ruling
opinion
proposal
denied
based
bank
offer
district
entered
judgment
respondents
favor
objection
district
thus
issued
judgment
one
plaintiffs
sought
class
plaintiffs
appealed
later
granted
certiorari
held
appeal
barred
rule
view
denial
class
certification
example
procedural
ruling
collateral
merits
litigation
appealable
entry
final
judgment
explained
plaintiffs
obtained
judgment
individual
capacities
yet
plaintiffs
asserted
personal
stake
appeal
desire
shift
successful
class
litigants
portion
fees
expenses
incurred
litigation
see
also
purported
prevailing
parties
injured
failure
obtain
judgment
sought
held
jurisdiction
entertain
appeal
review
asserted
procedural
error
purpose
passing
merits
ibid
clear
district
denial
class
certification
direct
effect
judgment
electrical
fittings
purported
prevailing
parties
entitled
portion
district
judgment
reviewed
ibid
neither
electrical
fittings
deposit
guaranty
provides
support
rule
adopted
today
decisions
instead
held
unusual
circumstances
presented
particular
parties
first
appeared
prevailed
fact
failed
obtain
judgments
sought
therefore
jurisdiction
including
course
jurisdiction
article
iii
provide
relief
harm
caused
adverse
judgments
entered
parties
seeking
appeal
electrical
fittings
deposit
guaranty
might
compared
plaintiffs
requested
relief
obtained
parties
prevailed
part
receive
ha
sought
deposit
guaranty
supra
contrast
appears
assume
petitioners
present
case
true
prevailing
parties
obtained
appeals
formal
judgment
requested
denial
respondent
claim
damages
points
policy
concerns
basis
willingness
hear
appeals
prevailing
parties
ante
concerns
unwarranted
one
dissenting
opinion
suggested
certiorari
granted
reach
merits
determination
locked
inside
favorable
qualified
immunity
ruling
bunting
mellen
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
dissenting
opinion
issued
response
rule
constitutional
issues
decided
every
case
involving
qualified
immunity
yet
mandated
rule
decision
disapproved
dissent
argument
longer
applicable
see
pearson
callahan
indeed
today
suggests
still
allow
review
merits
even
case
provoked
dissent
unlike
petitioner
camreta
petitioner
bunting
left
government
employ
filing
petition
certiorari
lacked
standing
obtain
review
compare
stevens
respecting
denial
certiorari
ante
instant
case
thus
appears
first
new
exception
prevailing
party
rule
might
applied
even
exception
neither
necessary
sufficient
merits
adjudicated
fourth
amendment
question
decided
bound
arise
future
cases
indeed
reasoning
decision
implicates
number
decisions
courts
appeals
cf
collecting
cases
yet
today
decision
supply
courts
appeals
guidance
merits
issues
instead
vacates
part
reasoning
decision
thereby
leaving
decisions
intact
unreviewed
thus
resolves
difficult
constitutional
issues
provides
unprecedented
answer
important
question
judicial
policy
end
ante
errs
reading
electrical
fittings
deposit
guaranty
permit
review
indeed
provision
relief
disconnected
judgment
result
erroneous
unbounded
exception
essential
principle
judicial
restraint
parties
obtained
requested
relief
may
seek
review
ii
today
decision
illustrates
recent
qualified
cases
tend
produce
decisions
tension
conventional
principles
adjudication
given
courts
appeals
permission
find
constitutional
violations
ordering
dismissal
summary
judgment
based
qualified
immunity
ante
see
pearson
supra
invitation
correct
note
intended
produce
binding
constitutional
holdings
merits
ante
goal
make
dictum
precedent
order
hasten
gradual
process
constitutional
interpretation
alter
behavior
government
defendants
ibid
present
case
brings
difficulties
objective
perspective
express
reliance
permission
granted
pearson
appeals
went
way
announce
may
erroneous
interpretation
constitution
case
law
ninth
circuit
must
give
dictum
legal
effect
precedent
future
cases
way
unnecessary
merits
decisions
qualified
immunity
cases
come
resemble
declaratory
judgments
injunctions
indeed
amicus
curiae
contends
merits
decision
effect
similar
injunction
declaratory
judgment
government
whole
brief
amicus
curiae
today
opinion
adopts
view
providing
relief
vacatur
part
ninth
circuit
opinion
namely
part
opinion
rules
constitutional
merits
ante
first
time
obiter
dictum
treated
precedent
future
cases
judgment
right
appeals
case
fact
issue
declaratory
judgment
injunction
embodying
determination
merits
appear
judgment
kind
issued
plaintiffs
must
establish
standing
form
relief
request
yet
plaintiff
case
separate
interest
obtaining
declaratory
judgment
see
los
angeles
lyons
citing
ashcroft
mattis
per
curiam
golden
zwickler
see
also
medimmune
genentech
likelihood
plaintiff
daughter
subjected
interrogation
school
much
less
interrogated
camreta
seem
greater
stake
obtaining
declaratory
judgment
plaintiff
lyons
obtaining
injunction
see
noting
actual
controversy
must
exist
declaratory
judgment
entered
qualified
immunity
cases
permit
plaintiffs
constitutional
cases
make
around
established
principles
justiciability
treating
dictum
though
declaratory
judgment
injunction
appears
approve
issuance
judgments
outside
bounds
article
iii
jurisdiction
creates
exception
prevailing
party
rule
order
solve
difficulties
created
qualified
immunity
jurisprudence
solution
creates
new
problems
sometimes
defendants
qualified
immunity
cases
particular
interest
disputing
constitutional
merits
acknowledging
much
notes
petitioner
alford
longer
works
government
lost
interest
fourth
amendment
ruling
ante
concluding
alford
lacks
article
iii
standing
suggests
lack
jurisdiction
review
perhaps
even
vacate
merits
decision
appeals
respondent
sued
alford
ibid
cf
arizonans
official
english
arizona
discussing
standing
obtain
review
well
jurisdiction
vacate
judgments
issued
without
jurisdiction
suggestion
disconcerting
today
decision
appears
ability
review
merits
determinations
qualified
immunity
cases
contingent
defendant
sued
defendant
left
government
employ
otherwise
lacks
interest
disputing
merits
unable
obtain
review
see
ante
discussing
article
iii
limits
relief
ante
discussing
limitations
equitable
vacatur
authority
today
avoids
difficulty
concluding
petitioner
camreta
suffered
article
iii
injury
ante
cf
ante
decide
questions
arise
alford
defendant
reach
conclusion
part
job
camreta
regularly
engages
conduct
made
unlawful
reasoning
appeals
ante
discussed
conclusion
doubtful
see
infra
event
standing
analysis
inapplicable
qualified
immunity
cases
cf
ante
asserting
article
iii
standard
often
met
officer
sued
taking
extraordinary
action
using
excessive
force
car
chase
little
possibility
constitutional
decision
merits
influence
officer
conduct
officer
like
petitioner
alford
petitioner
bunting
interest
litigating
merits
appeals
rule
seem
unable
obtain
review
merits
ruling
petitioning
certiorari
see
ante
ante
ante
see
also
lyons
supra
problem
arise
great
frequency
qualified
immunity
cases
decision
today
allows
plaintiffs
obtain
binding
constitutional
determinations
merits
lie
beyond
jurisdiction
review
thus
fails
solve
problem
identifies
iii
doubtful
article
iii
permits
appeals
officer
reasoning
judicial
decision
might
applied
later
suit
yet
appears
implication
holding
favorable
appeals
cause
petitioner
camreta
suffer
article
iii
injury
entitling
appeal
cf
supra
discussing
electrical
fittings
deposit
guaranty
asarco
kadish
finding
article
iii
controversy
petitioner
challenged
final
judgment
altering
tangible
legal
rights
contrary
camreta
injured
decision
greater
extent
hundreds
government
officers
might
argue
affected
unnecessary
statements
made
appeals
notes
limit
authority
entertain
appeals
prevailing
parties
certain
statutory
directives
directives
interpreted
shaped
allow
expanded
powers
review
ante
even
congress
give
explicit
permission
certiorari
petitions
filed
person
instead
party
constitutional
definition
case
controversy
still
constrain
jurisdiction
analysis
appears
rest
premise
reasoning
decision
causes
camreta
injury
today
however
precedential
reasoning
general
applicability
divorced
particular
adverse
judgment
thought
yield
standing
appeal
parr
opinion
harlan
nly
one
injured
judgment
sought
reviewed
appeal
see
also
supra
chathas
local
ibew
posner
adverse
dicta
appealable
rulings
cause
harm
sort
harm
courts
deem
create
genuine
controversy
within
meaning
article
iii
constitution
judgments
appealable
opinions
citations
omitted
department
cadc
williams
ere
precedential
effect
within
agency
alone
enough
create
article
iii
standing
matter
foreseeable
future
litigation
citing
radiofone
fcc
cadc
opinion
scalia
explaining
standing
must
arise
particular
activity
agency
adjudication
approved
mere
precedential
effect
agency
rationale
later
adjudications
oxford
shipping
new
hampshire
trading
breyer
since
judgment
appealed
party
favor
since
statement
made
sense
necessary
judgment
statement
dictum
known
basis
appeal
dictum
revealing
creates
exception
prevailing
party
rule
making
clear
courts
appeals
follow
suit
context
see
ante
conclusion
precedent
general
applicability
create
standing
sue
appeal
flows
basic
principles
camreta
asserted
injury
caused
appeals
respondent
rather
independent
action
third
party
private
plaintiffs
whose
lawsuits
camreta
hopes
avoid
lujan
defenders
wildlife
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
circumstance
distinguishes
present
case
requests
declaratory
injunctive
relief
filed
officeholders
threaten
legal
enforcement
inert
rule
law
cause
particular
concrete
injury
specific
threat
enforcement
proper
defendant
suit
prospective
relief
party
prepared
enforce
relevant
legal
rule
plaintiff
see
medimmune
explaining
declaratory
relief
requires
controversy
parties
adverse
legal
interests
sufficient
immediacy
reality
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
babbitt
farm
workers
plaintiff
challenges
statute
must
demonstrate
realistic
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
statute
operation
enforcement
without
adverse
judgment
appeal
camreta
effect
filed
new
declaratory
judgment
action
appeals
consistent
article
iii
filing
declaratory
judgment
action
issuance
adverse
precedent
congress
response
enactment
unconstitutional
law
iv
today
decision
proves
isolated
anomaly
might
find
necessary
reconsider
special
permission
courts
appeals
may
issue
unnecessary
merits
determinations
qualified
cases
binding
precedential
effect
dynamics
permit
law
constitution
elaborated
within
conventional
framework
case
controversy
development
constitutional
law
means
entirely
dependent
cases
defendant
may
seek
qualified
immunity
pearson
example
qualified
immunity
bar
fourth
fifth
amendment
suppression
challenges
see
kentucky
king
ante
prevent
invocation
constitution
defense
criminal
prosecution
civil
suit
cruel
unusual
punishment
see
snyder
phelps
graham
florida
lawrence
texas
qualified
immunity
available
constitutional
suits
municipalities
case
illustrates
ante
cases
make
clear
moreover
officials
still
notice
conduct
violates
established
law
even
novel
factual
circumstances
hope
pelzer
rule
permits
clearly
established
violations
found
extreme
though
actions
violate
constitution
see
ibid
furthermore
constitutional
plaintiffs
may
seek
declaratory
injunctive
relief
pursuant
standard
principles
justiciability
plaintiffs
need
pearson
special
rule
see
citizens
federal
election
mcdonald
chicago
event
incremental
advance
law
occurs
even
clearly
established
violations
found
inevitable
aspect
judicial
decisionmaking
resolution
one
legal
question
factual
dispute
casts
light
next
preferable
least
explore
refinements
qualified
immunity
jurisprudence
altering
basic
principles
jurisdiction
instance
objectives
qualified
immunity
might
satisfied
bar
reaching
merits
issuing
judgment
requested
damages
nominal
substantial
attorney
fees
waived
allowed
cf
farrar
hobby
discussing
unavailability
attorney
fees
nominal
damages
relief
hewitt
helms
harlow
fitzgerald
carey
piphus
discussing
propriety
providing
nominal
damages
relief
desire
resolve
constitutional
questions
lead
altering
jurisdictional
rules
precise
object
legal
tradition
tells
us
resist
haste
resolve
constitutional
issues
never
thought
advisable
instead
encouraged
courts
appeals
follow
older
wiser
judicial
counsel
pass
questions
constitutionality
unless
adjudication
unavoidable
scott
harris
breyer
concurring
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
generally
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
experience
teaches
persuasive
reason
reverse
normal
principles
judicial
review
qualified
immunity
cases
compare
pearson
supra
siegert
gilley
kennedy
concurring
judgment
seems
reverse
usual
ordering
issues
tell
trial
appellate
courts
resolve
constitutional
question
first
opinion
saucier
katz
yet
puzzling
misadventure
constitutional
dictum
still
come
end
leval
judging
constitution
dicta
dicta
rev
instances
courts
discuss
merits
qualified
immunity
cases
sometimes
better
analytic
approach
preferred
allocation
judicial
time
resources
dismiss
claim
merits
rather
dismiss
based
qualified
immunity
often
may
difficult
decide
whether
right
clearly
established
without
deciding
precisely
existing
constitutional
right
happens
pearson
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
superintend
judicial
decisionmaking
process
qualified
immunity
cases
special
rules
lest
make
judicial
process
complex
civil
rights
suits
litigation
follows
however
provide
special
permission
reach
merits
qualified
immunity
cases
treated
like
cases
raising
constitutional
questions
settled
principles
avoidance
apply
conventional
rules
regarding
dictum
holding
judicial
observations
made
course
explaining
case
might
give
important
instruction
relevant
assessing
later
claim
qualified
immunity
cf
wilkinson
russell
calabresi
concurring
dicta
remarks
establish
law
qualify
binding
precedent
see
seminole
tribe
florida
distance
qualified
immunity
jurisprudence
taken
us
foundational
principles
made
apparent
today
decision
must
construe
two
precedents
broad
manner
taken
proper
logical
confines
vacate
reasoning
decision
accepts
obiter
dictum
binding
precedent
judgment
susceptible
plenary
review
dismiss
case
note
jurisdictional
rule
hearing
appeals
prevailing
parties
precludes
petitioners
attempt
obtain
review
judicial
reasoning
disconnected
judgment
footnotes
together
alford
deputy
sheriff
deschutes
county
oregon
greene
personally
next
friend
minor
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
greene
filed
suit
next
friend
minor
daughter
refer
respondent
throughout
opinion
also
sued
deschutes
county
alleging
policy
unconstitutionally
seizing
children
public
schools
see
district
rejected
claim
appeal
ruling
ninth
circuit
ibid
dissent
discusses
deposit
guaranty
electrical
fittings
length
effort
distinguish
suit
see
post
opinion
kennedy
say
cases
foursquare
one
facts
rely
proposition
previously
identified
special
article
iii
bar
review
appeals
brought
parties
obtained
judgment
favor
dissent
dispute
simple
point
contrary
dissent
view
see
post
injury
official
thus
occurs
independent
future
suit
brought
third
party
indeed
suit
likely
arise
prospect
damages
liability
force
official
change
conduct
constitutional
issue
arise
case
qualified
immunity
unavailable
example
suit
enjoin
future
action
municipality
litigating
suppression
motion
criminal
proceeding
lewis
decision
case
break
repetitive
cycle
qualified
immunity
defenses
described
kinds
constitutional
questions
often
come
alternative
settings
pearson
callahan
see
lewis
noting
avenues
ill
necessarily
open
dissent
complains
decision
allows
plaintiffs
obtain
binding
constitutional
determinations
merits
lie
beyond
jurisdiction
review
post
case
decision
prior
precedents
allow
lower
courts
issue
binding
constitutional
determinations
qualified
immunity
cases
even
plaintiff
entitled
money
damages
decision
dissent
insulate
rulings
power
review
note
however
considerations
persuading
us
permit
review
petitions
posture
may
force
applied
district
decision
decision
federal
district
judge
binding
precedent
either
different
judicial
district
judicial
district
even
upon
judge
different
case
moore
et
moore
federal
practice
ed
many
courts
appeals
therefore
decline
consider
district
precedent
determining
constitutional
rights
clearly
established
purposes
qualified
immunity
see
kalka
hawk
cadc
tatel
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
collecting
cases
otherwise
said
district
decisions
unlike
courts
appeals
necessarily
settle
constitutional
standards
prevent
repeated
claims
qualified
immunity
justice
sotomayor
maintains
case
moot
warrant
reaching
th
question
whether
immunized
officials
may
obtain
consideration
adverse
constitutional
ruling
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
never
held
may
consider
one
threshold
issue
per
case
explain
infra
discussion
reviewability
critical
ultimate
disposition
suit
moreover
issue
fully
litigated
granted
certiorari
consider
whether
ninth
circuit
constitutional
ruling
reviewable
notwithstanding
appeals
ruled
officials
favor
qualified
immunity
grounds
pet
cert
parties
well
amicus
curiae
addressed
question
briefs
oral
arguments
compare
brief
petitioner
pp
brief
petitioner
reply
brief
petitioner
pp
reply
brief
petitioner
pp
brief
amicus
curiae
tr
oral
arg
brief
respondent
tr
oral
arg
said
deputy
sheriff
alford
briefs
parties
informed
us
alford
longer
works
deschutes
county
law
enforcement
see
brief
respondent
reply
brief
petitioner
alford
participate
child
abuse
investigation
lost
interest
fourth
amendment
ruling
see
supra
cf
arizonans
official
english
arizona
holding
plaintiff
challenge
state
law
affecting
performance
job
duties
mooted
left
state
employment
light
camreta
continuing
stake
alford
altered
circumstances
immaterial
resolution
dispute
decide
questions
arise
defendant
analysis
proper
disposition
case
follows
conclusion
government
officials
secure
favorable
judgment
immunity
grounds
may
obtain
review
adverse
constitutional
holding
see
supra
noted
munsingwear
justified
vacatur
protect
litigant
right
appeal
lost
opportunity
due
happenstance
therefore
left
lower
decisions
intact
mootness
deprive
appealing
party
review
entitled
see
bancorp
mortgage
holding
appealing
party
surrender
ed
claim
equitable
remedy
vacatur
settling
case
thus
voluntarily
forfeit
ing
legal
remedy
ordinary
processes
appeal
karcher
may
holding
vacatur
light
mootness
warranted
losing
party
declined
file
appeal
immunized
officials
challenge
appellate
decision
choose
exercise
equitable
authority
vacate
decision
even
case
later
became
moot
explained
theory
underlies
prior
cases
applying
munsingwear
satisfied
vacatur
expunges
adverse
decision
reviewable
case
become
moot
see
arizonans
finding
vacatur
proper
mooting
event
occurred
arizona
attorney
general
pursuing
right
present
argument
appeal
disposition
case
differs
slightly
normal
munsingwear
order
vacating
lower
judgment
remanding
case
instructions
dismiss
relevant
claim
leave
untouched
appeals
ruling
qualified
immunity
corresponding
dismissal
claim
chose
challenge
ruling
vacate
ninth
circuit
ruling
addressing
merits
fourth
amendment
issue
explained
supra
part
decision
mootness
prevents
us
reviewing
prospective
effects
camreta
see
walling
james
reuter
observing
suit
becomes
moot
may
make
disposition
whole
case
justice
may
require
emphasize
unique
disposition
follows
unique
posture
case
signals
endorsement
deviations
usual
munsingwear
order
situations