valley
forge
college
americans
argued
november
decided
january
pursuant
authority
property
clause
congress
enacted
federal
property
administrative
services
act
provide
economical
efficient
system
disposal
surplus
federal
government
property
statute
property
outlived
usefulness
government
declared
surplus
may
transferred
private
public
entities
act
authorizes
secretary
health
education
welfare
hew
secretary
education
assume
responsibility
disposing
surplus
real
property
educational
use
may
sell
property
nonprofit
educational
institutions
consideration
takes
account
benefit
accrued
may
accrue
transferee
use
property
property
formerly
used
military
hospital
declared
surplus
property
act
conveyed
department
hew
petitioner
college
appraised
value
property
discounted
secretary
hew
computation
public
benefit
allowance
thus
permitting
petitioner
acquire
property
without
making
financial
payment
respondents
organization
dedicated
separation
church
state
several
employees
brought
suit
federal
district
challenging
conveyance
ground
violated
establishment
clause
first
amendment
alleging
member
respondent
organization
deprived
fair
constitutional
use
tax
dollars
district
dismissed
complaint
ground
respondents
lacked
standing
sue
taxpayers
flast
cohen
failed
allege
actual
injury
beyond
generalized
grievance
common
taxpayers
appeals
reversed
holding
although
respondents
lacked
standing
taxpayers
challenge
conveyance
standing
merely
citizens
claiming
injury
fact
shared
individuated
right
government
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
standing
sufficient
satisfy
case
controversy
requirement
art
iii
held
respondents
standing
either
capacity
taxpayers
citizens
challenge
conveyance
question
pp
exercise
judicial
power
art
iii
restricted
litigants
show
injury
fact
resulting
action
seek
adjudicate
pp
respondents
without
standing
sue
taxpayers
source
complaint
congressional
action
decision
hew
transfer
parcel
federal
property
conveyance
question
exercise
congress
authority
conferred
taxing
spending
clause
property
clause
cf
flast
cohen
supra
pp
respondents
sufficiently
alleged
basis
standing
bring
suit
although
claim
constitution
violated
claim
nothing
else
fail
identify
personal
injury
suffered
consequence
alleged
constitutional
error
psychological
consequence
presumably
produced
observation
conduct
one
disagrees
injury
sufficient
confer
standing
art
iii
respondents
firmly
committed
constitutional
principle
separation
church
state
standing
measured
intensity
litigant
interest
fervor
advocacy
pp
enforcement
establishment
clause
justify
special
exceptions
standing
requirements
art
iii
place
constitutional
scheme
philosophy
business
federal
courts
correcting
constitutional
errors
cases
controversies
best
merely
convenient
vehicles
worst
nuisances
may
dispensed
become
obstacles
transcendent
endeavor
philosophy
become
palatable
underlying
merits
concern
establishment
clause
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
white
powell
joined
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
marshall
blackmun
joined
post
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
clark
hodgson
argued
cause
filed
brief
petitioner
solicitor
general
lee
argued
cause
federal
parties
respondents
rule
support
petitioner
briefs
former
solicitor
general
mccree
deputy
solicitor
general
geller
deputy
solicitor
general
shapiro
leonard
schaitman
bruce
bagni
lee
boothby
argued
cause
respondents
brief
robert
nixon
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
nathan
dershowitz
marc
stern
american
jewish
congress
et
al
leo
pfeffer
national
coalition
public
education
religious
liberty
et
al
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
article
iv
cl
constitution
vests
congress
power
dispose
make
needful
rules
regulations
respecting
property
belonging
shortly
termination
hostilities
second
world
war
congress
enacted
federal
property
administrative
services
act
stat
amended
et
seq
ed
supp
iii
act
designed
part
provide
economical
efficient
system
disposal
surplus
property
stat
furtherance
policy
federal
agencies
directed
maintain
adequate
inventories
property
control
identify
excess
property
transfer
agencies
able
use
see
stat
property
outlived
usefulness
federal
government
declared
surplus
may
transferred
private
public
entities
see
generally
stat
amended
act
authorizes
secretary
health
education
welfare
secretary
education
assume
responsibility
disposing
surplus
real
property
school
classroom
educational
use
stat
amended
subject
disapproval
administrator
general
services
secretary
may
sell
lease
property
nonprofit
educational
institutions
consideration
takes
account
benefit
accrued
may
accrue
transferee
use
property
stat
regulation
secretary
provided
computation
public
benefit
allowance
discounts
transfer
price
property
basis
benefits
use
property
educational
purposes
cfr
property
spawned
litigation
acquired
department
army
part
larger
tract
approximately
acres
land
northwest
philadelphia
army
built
land
valley
forge
general
hospital
years
thereafter
hospital
provided
medical
care
members
armed
forces
april
part
plan
reduce
number
military
installations
secretary
defense
proposed
close
hospital
general
services
administration
declared
surplus
property
department
health
education
welfare
hew
eventually
assumed
responsibility
disposing
portions
property
august
conveyed
tract
petitioner
valley
forge
christian
college
appraised
value
property
time
conveyance
appraised
value
discounted
however
secretary
computation
public
benefit
allowance
permitted
petitioner
acquire
property
without
making
financial
payment
deed
hew
conveyed
land
fee
simple
certain
conditions
subsequent
required
petitioner
use
property
years
solely
educational
purposes
described
petitioner
application
description
petitioner
stated
intention
conduct
program
education
meeting
accrediting
standards
state
pennsylvania
american
association
bible
colleges
division
education
general
council
assemblies
god
veterans
administration
petitioner
nonprofit
educational
institution
operating
supervision
religious
order
known
assemblies
god
description
petitioner
purpose
offer
systematic
training
collegiate
level
men
women
christian
service
either
ministers
laymen
app
degree
programs
reflect
orientation
providing
courses
study
train
leaders
church
related
ministries
faculty
members
must
baptized
holy
spirit
living
consistent
christian
lives
members
college
administration
must
affiliated
assemblies
god
application
tract
petitioner
represented
obtained
property
make
additions
offerings
arts
humanities
strengthen
psychology
counselling
courses
provide
services
areas
september
respondents
americans
separation
church
state
americans
four
employees
learned
conveyance
news
release
two
months
later
brought
suit
district
district
columbia
later
transferred
eastern
district
pennsylvania
challenge
conveyance
ground
violated
establishment
clause
first
amendment
see
amended
complaint
americans
described
nonprofit
organization
composed
members
complaint
asserted
member
deprived
fair
constitutional
use
tax
dollar
constitutional
purposes
violation
rights
first
amendment
constitution
ibid
respondents
sought
declaration
conveyance
null
void
order
compelling
petitioner
transfer
property
back
petitioner
motion
district
granted
summary
judgment
dismissed
complaint
app
pet
cert
found
respondents
lacked
standing
sue
taxpayers
flast
cohen
failed
allege
suffered
actual
concrete
injury
beyond
generalized
grievance
common
taxpayers
app
pet
cert
respondents
appealed
appeals
third
circuit
reversed
judgment
district
divided
vote
americans
dept
hew
members
agreed
respondents
lacked
standing
taxpayers
challenge
conveyance
flast
cohen
supra
since
case
extended
standing
taxpayers
qua
taxpayers
challenge
congressional
exercises
power
tax
spend
conferred
art
constitution
conveyance
authorized
legislation
enacted
authority
property
clause
art
iv
cl
notwithstanding
significant
factual
difference
flast
majority
appeals
found
respondents
standing
merely
citizens
claiming
injury
fact
shared
individuated
right
government
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
majority
view
citizen
standing
sufficient
satisfy
case
controversy
requirement
art
iii
one
judge
perhaps
sensing
doctrinal
difficulties
majority
extension
standing
wrote
separately
expressing
view
standing
necessary
satisfy
need
available
plaintiff
without
establishment
clause
rendered
virtually
unenforceable
judiciary
dissenting
judge
expressed
view
respondents
allegations
constituted
generalized
grievance
abstract
satisfy
injury
fact
component
standing
therefore
concluded
standing
contest
transfer
barred
decisions
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
richardson
unusually
broad
novel
view
standing
litigate
substantive
question
federal
courts
adopted
appeals
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
article
iii
constitution
limits
judicial
power
resolution
cases
controversies
constitutional
power
federal
courts
defined
indeed
substances
without
reference
necessity
adjudge
legal
rights
litigants
actual
controversies
liverpool
commissioners
emigration
requirements
art
iii
satisfied
merely
party
requests
declare
legal
rights
couched
request
forms
relief
historically
associated
courts
law
terms
familiar
ring
trained
legal
process
judicial
power
defined
art
iii
unconditioned
authority
determine
constitutionality
legislative
executive
acts
power
declare
rights
individuals
measure
authority
governments
said
years
ago
legitimate
last
resort
necessity
determination
real
earnest
vital
controversy
chicago
grand
trunk
wellman
otherwise
power
judicial
sense
judicial
power
granted
constitution
courts
ferreira
incident
elaboration
bedrock
requirement
always
required
litigant
standing
challenge
action
sought
adjudicated
lawsuit
term
standing
subsumes
blend
constitutional
requirements
prudential
considerations
see
warth
seldin
always
clear
opinions
whether
particular
features
standing
requirement
required
art
iii
ex
proprio
vigore
whether
requirements
erected
compelled
language
constitution
see
flast
cohen
supra
recent
line
decisions
however
resolved
ambiguity
least
following
extent
irreducible
minimum
art
iii
requires
party
invokes
authority
show
personally
suffered
actual
threatened
injury
result
putatively
illegal
conduct
defendant
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
injury
fairly
traced
challenged
action
likely
redressed
favorable
decision
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
manner
art
iii
limit
federal
judicial
power
disputes
confine
federal
courts
role
consistent
system
separated
powers
traditionally
thought
capable
resolution
judicial
process
flast
cohen
requirement
actual
injury
redressable
simon
supra
serves
several
implicit
policies
embodied
article
iii
flast
supra
tends
assure
legal
questions
presented
resolved
rarified
atmosphere
debating
society
concrete
factual
context
conducive
realistic
appreciation
consequences
judicial
action
standing
requirement
serves
purposes
assures
actual
factual
setting
litigant
asserts
claim
injury
fact
may
decide
case
confidence
decision
pave
way
lawsuits
facts
case
actually
decided
art
iii
aspect
standing
also
reflects
due
regard
autonomy
persons
likely
directly
affected
judicial
order
federal
courts
abjured
appeals
authority
convert
judicial
process
vehicle
vindication
value
interests
concerned
bystanders
scrap
federal
courts
merely
publicly
funded
forums
ventilation
public
grievances
refinement
jurisprudential
understanding
concept
standing
quite
unnecessary
cases
controversies
language
art
iii
forecloses
conversion
courts
judicial
version
college
debating
forums
said
sierra
club
morton
requirement
party
seeking
review
must
allege
facts
showing
adversely
affected
serve
least
rough
attempt
put
decision
whether
review
sought
hands
direct
stake
outcome
exercise
judicial
power
also
affects
relationships
coequal
arms
national
government
effect
course
vivid
federal
declares
unconstitutional
act
legislative
executive
branch
exercise
ultimate
function
chicago
grand
trunk
wellman
supra
formidable
means
vindicating
individual
rights
employed
unwisely
unnecessarily
also
ultimate
threat
continued
effectiveness
federal
courts
performing
role
propriety
action
federal
recognized
since
marbury
madison
cranch
recognized
tool
last
resort
part
federal
judiciary
throughout
nearly
years
existence
epeated
essentially
confrontations
branch
representative
branches
government
long
run
beneficial
either
public
confidence
essential
former
vitality
critical
latter
may
well
erode
exercise
utilization
power
negative
actions
branches
richardson
powell
concurring
beyond
constitutional
requirements
federal
judiciary
also
adhered
set
prudential
principles
bear
question
standing
thus
held
plaintiff
generally
must
assert
legal
rights
interests
rest
claim
relief
legal
rights
interests
third
parties
warth
seldin
addition
even
plaintiff
alleged
redressable
injury
sufficient
meet
requirements
art
iii
refrained
adjudicating
abstract
questions
wide
public
significance
amount
generalized
grievances
pervasively
shared
appropriately
addressed
representative
branches
finally
required
plaintiff
complaint
fall
within
zone
interests
protected
regulated
statute
constitutional
guarantee
question
association
data
processing
service
orgs
camp
merely
articulate
principles
demonstrate
close
relationship
policies
reflected
art
iii
requirement
actual
threatened
injury
amenable
judicial
remedy
neither
counsels
prudence
policies
implicit
case
controversy
requirement
mistaken
rigorous
art
iii
requirements
satisfaction
former
substitute
demonstration
distinct
palpable
injury
likely
redressed
requested
relief
granted
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
quoting
warth
seldin
supra
requirement
limitation
judicial
power
merely
factor
balanced
weighing
prudential
considerations
need
mince
words
say
concept
art
iii
standing
defined
complete
consistency
various
cases
decided
discussed
say
fact
probably
proof
concept
reduced
definition
one
thing
may
sure
possess
art
iii
standing
may
litigate
suitors
courts
article
iii
every
bit
important
circumscription
judicial
power
granting
power
merely
troublesome
hurdle
overcome
possible
reach
merits
lawsuit
party
desires
adjudicated
part
basic
charter
promulgated
framers
constitution
philadelphia
charter
created
general
government
provided
interaction
government
governments
several
later
amended
either
enhance
limit
authority
respect
individuals
iii
injury
alleged
respondents
amended
complaint
depriv
ation
fair
constitutional
use
tax
dollar
app
result
discussion
must
begin
frothingham
mellon
decided
massachusetts
mellon
action
taxpayer
brought
suit
challenging
constitutionality
maternity
act
provided
federal
funding
purpose
improving
maternal
infant
health
injury
alleged
consisted
burden
taxation
support
unconstitutional
regime
characterized
deprivation
property
without
due
process
looking
forms
words
substance
complaint
concluded
injury
fact
officials
executive
department
government
executing
execute
act
congress
asserted
unconstitutional
tangible
effect
challenged
statute
plaintiff
tax
burden
remote
fluctuating
uncertain
rejecting
cognizable
injury
sufficient
establish
standing
admonished
party
invokes
power
judicial
review
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
parties
plaintiff
case
held
interests
taxpayer
moneys
federal
treasury
indeterminable
remote
uncertain
indirect
furnish
basis
appeal
preventive
powers
manner
expenditure
without
disparaging
availability
remedy
taxpayer
action
restrain
unconstitutional
acts
result
direct
pecuniary
injury
reiterate
said
federal
statute
equally
true
state
act
assailed
party
invokes
power
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
quoting
frothingham
mellon
supra
citations
omitted
visited
problem
taxpayer
standing
flast
cohen
taxpayer
plaintiffs
flast
sought
enjoin
expenditure
federal
funds
elementary
secondary
education
act
alleged
used
support
religious
schools
violation
establishment
clause
developed
test
determine
whether
plaintiffs
standing
sue
first
taxpayer
alleges
injury
virtue
liability
taxes
held
taxpayer
proper
party
allege
unconstitutionality
exercises
congressional
power
taxing
spending
clause
art
constitution
second
required
taxpayer
show
challenged
enactment
exceeds
specific
constitutional
limitations
upon
exercise
taxing
spending
power
simply
enactment
generally
beyond
powers
delegated
congress
art
plaintiffs
flast
satisfied
test
heir
constitutional
challenge
made
exercise
congress
power
art
spend
general
welfare
establishment
clause
plaintiffs
complaint
rested
operates
specific
constitutional
limitation
upon
exercise
congress
taxing
spending
power
conferred
art
distinguished
frothingham
mellon
supra
ground
frothingham
relied
specific
limitation
power
tax
spend
general
claim
based
due
process
clause
thus
reaffirmed
case
controversy
aspect
standing
unsatisfied
taxpayer
seeks
employ
federal
forum
air
generalized
grievances
conduct
government
allocation
power
federal
system
unlike
plaintiffs
flast
respondents
fail
first
prong
test
taxpayer
standing
claim
deficient
two
respects
first
source
complaint
congressional
action
decision
hew
transfer
parcel
federal
property
flast
limited
taxpayer
standing
challenges
directed
exercises
congressional
power
see
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
denying
standing
taxpayer
plaintiffs
challenge
enactment
art
rather
action
executive
branch
second
perhaps
redundantly
property
transfer
respondents
complain
exercise
authority
conferred
taxing
spending
clause
art
authorizing
legislation
federal
property
administrative
services
act
evident
exercise
congress
power
property
clause
art
iv
cl
respondents
dispute
conclusion
see
brief
respondents
americans
et
al
decisive
claim
taxpayer
standing
flast
precedent
doubt
might
existed
concerning
rigor
flast
exception
frothingham
principle
applied
erased
recent
decisions
richardson
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
supra
richardson
question
whether
plaintiff
standing
federal
taxpayer
argue
legislation
permitted
central
intelligence
agency
withhold
public
detailed
information
expenditures
violated
accounts
clause
constitution
rejected
plaintiff
claim
standing
challenge
addressed
taxing
spending
power
statutes
regulating
cia
mere
recital
claims
demonstrate
far
fell
short
standing
criteria
flast
neatly
fell
within
frothingham
holding
left
undisturbed
claim
schlesinger
marred
deficiency
plaintiffs
case
argued
incompatibility
clause
art
prevented
certain
members
congress
holding
commissions
armed
forces
reserve
summarily
rejected
assertion
standing
taxpayers
challenge
enactment
art
rather
action
executive
branch
permitting
members
congress
maintain
reserve
status
omitted
respondents
therefore
plainly
without
standing
sue
taxpayers
appeals
apparently
reached
conclusion
remains
seen
whether
respondents
alleged
basis
standing
bring
suit
iv
although
appeals
properly
doubted
respondents
ability
establish
standing
solely
basis
taxpayer
status
considered
allegations
taxpayer
injury
essentially
assumed
role
plaintiffs
reason
expect
perhaps
care
personal
tax
saving
might
result
prevail
crux
interest
stake
plaintiffs
argue
found
establishment
clause
supposed
loss
money
matter
primary
identity
therefore
plaintiffs
much
taxpayers
separationists
ibid
appeals
surely
correct
recognizing
art
iii
requirements
standing
satisfied
abstract
injury
nonobservance
constitution
asserted
citizens
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
repeatedly
rejected
claims
standing
predicated
right
possessed
every
citizen
require
government
administered
according
law
fairchild
hughes
baker
carr
see
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
supra
laird
tatum
ex
parte
levitt
claims
amount
little
attempts
employ
federal
forum
air
generalized
grievances
conduct
government
flast
cohen
finding
respondents
alleged
something
generalized
interest
citizens
constitutional
governance
schlesinger
supra
appeals
relied
factual
differences
think
amount
legal
distinctions
decided
respondents
claim
differed
schlesinger
richardson
predicated
respectively
incompatibility
accounts
clauses
least
arguable
establishment
clause
creates
citizen
personal
constitutional
right
government
establish
religion
omitted
found
unnecessary
determine
whether
arguable
proposition
correct
since
judged
mere
allegation
legal
right
sufficient
confer
standing
reasoning
process
merely
disguises
think
rather
thin
veil
inconsistency
results
decisions
schlesinger
richardson
plaintiffs
cases
plainly
asserted
personal
right
government
act
accordance
views
constitution
indeed
see
barrier
assertion
claims
respect
constitutional
provision
assertion
right
particular
kind
government
conduct
government
violated
acting
differently
alone
satisfy
requirements
art
iii
without
draining
requirements
meaning
schlesinger
richardson
distinguished
ground
incompatibility
accounts
clauses
way
less
fundamental
establishment
clause
establishes
norm
conduct
federal
government
bound
honor
greater
lesser
extent
inscribed
constitution
extent
appeals
relied
view
standing
art
iii
burdens
diminish
importance
claim
merits
increases
reject
notion
requirement
standing
focuses
party
seeking
get
complaint
federal
issues
wishes
adjudicated
flast
cohen
supra
moreover
know
principled
basis
create
hierarchy
constitutional
values
complementary
sliding
scale
standing
might
permit
respondents
invoke
judicial
power
proposition
constitutional
provisions
enforceable
citizen
simply
citizens
ultimate
beneficiaries
provisions
boundaries
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
complaint
case
shares
common
deficiency
schlesinger
richardson
although
respondents
claim
constitution
violated
claim
nothing
else
fail
identify
personal
injury
suffered
consequence
alleged
constitutional
error
psychological
consequence
presumably
produced
observation
conduct
one
disagrees
injury
sufficient
confer
standing
art
iii
even
though
disagreement
phrased
constitutional
terms
evident
respondents
firmly
committed
constitutional
principle
separation
church
state
standing
measured
intensity
litigant
interest
fervor
advocacy
hat
concrete
adverseness
sharpens
presentation
issues
baker
carr
anticipated
consequence
proceedings
commenced
one
injured
fact
permissible
substitute
showing
injury
reaching
conclusion
retreat
earlier
holdings
standing
may
predicated
noneconomic
injury
see
scrap
association
data
processing
service
orgs
camp
simply
see
respondents
alleged
injury
kind
economic
otherwise
sufficient
confer
standing
respondents
complain
transfer
property
located
chester
county
pa
named
plaintiffs
reside
maryland
virginia
organizational
headquarters
located
washington
learned
transfer
news
release
claim
government
violated
establishment
clause
provide
special
license
roam
country
search
governmental
wrongdoing
reveal
discoveries
federal
federal
courts
simply
constituted
ombudsmen
general
welfare
appeals
case
ignored
unambiguous
limitations
taxpayer
citizen
standing
appears
done
conviction
enforcement
establishment
clause
demands
special
exceptions
requirement
plaintiff
allege
distinct
palpable
injury
likely
redressed
requested
relief
granted
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
quoting
warth
seldin
derived
precedential
comfort
flast
cohen
underlying
justification
according
standing
flast
seems
implicit
recognition
establishment
clause
create
every
citizen
personal
constitutional
right
citizen
including
taxpayers
may
contest
clause
constitutionality
federal
expenditures
concurring
opinion
even
direct
view
statutes
alleged
violate
establishment
clause
may
individual
impact
sufficient
confer
standing
traditional
sense
satisfy
need
available
plaintiff
thereby
assure
basis
judicial
review
respondents
granted
standing
practical
matter
one
better
suited
bring
lawsuit
thus
vindicate
freedoms
embodied
establishment
clause
implicit
foregoing
philosophy
business
federal
courts
correcting
constitutional
errors
cases
controversies
best
merely
convenient
vehicles
worst
nuisances
may
dispensed
become
obstacles
transcendent
endeavor
philosophy
place
constitutional
scheme
become
palatable
underlying
merits
concern
establishment
clause
respondents
claim
standing
implicitly
rests
presumption
violations
establishment
clause
typically
cause
injury
sufficient
confer
standing
traditional
view
art
iii
assumption
respondents
standing
sue
one
standing
reason
find
standing
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
view
convert
standing
requirement
must
observed
satisfied
moreover
unwilling
assume
injured
parties
nonexistent
simply
joined
respondents
suit
law
averages
substitute
standing
accept
respondents
claim
standing
case
principled
basis
confining
exception
litigants
relying
establishment
clause
ultimately
exception
derives
idea
judicial
power
requires
nothing
invocation
important
issues
able
litigants
existence
injured
parties
might
wish
bring
suit
becomes
irrelevant
unwilling
countenance
departure
limits
judicial
power
contained
art
iii
judgment
appeals
reversed
ordered
footnotes
act
defines
surplus
property
excess
property
required
needs
discharge
responsibilities
federal
agencies
determined
administrator
general
services
stat
see
supp
iii
property
awarded
applicant
program
utilization
provides
opinion
department
education
greatest
public
benefit
cfr
applicants
must
willing
able
assume
immediate
responsibility
property
must
demonstrate
financial
capacity
implement
approved
program
educational
use
calculating
public
benefit
allowance
secretary
considers
factors
applicant
educational
accreditation
sponsorship
public
service
training
plans
introduce
new
instructional
programs
commitment
student
health
welfare
research
service
handicapped
cfr
pt
exh
remaining
property
conveyed
local
school
districts
educational
purposes
set
aside
park
recreational
use
time
conveyance
petitioner
known
northeast
bible
college
appraiser
placed
value
buildings
fixtures
situated
tract
buildings
constructed
use
army
hospital
view
expense
necessary
render
useful
purposes
offset
value
endeavor
congress
shall
make
law
respecting
establishment
religion
see
watt
energy
action
educational
foundation
ante
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
arlington
heights
metropolitan
housing
dev
warth
seldin
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
richardson
littleton
linda
richard
see
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
supra
singleton
wulff
see
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
supra
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
see
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
supra
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
justice
brennan
dissent
takes
us
task
tend
ing
merely
obfuscate
rather
inform
understanding
meaning
rights
law
post
constituted
operate
national
classroom
meaning
rights
benefit
interested
litigants
criticism
carry
weight
teaching
art
iii
however
constitutional
adjudication
available
terms
prescribed
constitution
among
requirement
plaintiff
standing
sue
dissent
asserts
requirement
overrides
provision
constitution
post
surely
art
iii
power
federal
courts
wax
wane
harmony
litigant
desire
hospitable
forum
post
article
iii
obligates
federal
act
assured
power
called
upon
resolve
actual
case
controversy
may
turn
attention
constitutional
provisions
presume
provide
forum
adjudication
rights
see
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
respondent
americans
alleged
injury
organization
distinct
injury
taxpayer
members
result
claim
standing
different
members
seeks
represent
question
whether
members
one
suffering
immediate
threatened
injury
result
challenged
action
sort
make
justiciable
case
members
brought
suit
warth
seldin
see
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
supra
sierra
club
morton
respondents
challenge
constitutionality
federal
property
administrative
services
act
rather
particular
executive
branch
action
arguably
authorized
act
act
designed
simplify
procurement
utilization
disposal
government
property
order
achieve
efficient
businesslike
system
property
management
see
among
central
purposes
act
maximum
utilization
property
already
owned
government
minimum
purchasing
new
property
supra
congress
recognized
however
time
time
certain
property
become
surplus
government
particular
property
acquired
military
meet
wartime
contingencies
congress
provided
means
disposing
property
meet
public
priorities
including
education
see
supra
supra
although
necessary
decision
note
connection
challenged
property
transfer
respondents
tax
burden
best
speculative
worst
nonexistent
although
public
funds
expended
establish
valley
forge
general
hospital
land
acquired
facilities
constructed
years
prior
challenged
transfer
respondents
challenge
expenditure
immediately
perceive
challenge
might
raised
respondents
dispute
government
conclusion
property
become
useless
federal
purposes
disposed
productive
manner
fact
respondents
objection
government
receive
adequate
consideration
transfer
petitioner
use
property
confer
public
benefit
see
brief
respondents
americans
et
al
assuming
arguendo
proposition
true
assumption
means
clear
basis
believing
transfer
different
purchaser
added
government
receipts
government
argues
ultimate
purchaser
likelihood
another
institution
local
school
district
rather
purchaser
cash
brief
federal
respondents
moreover
year
delay
disposing
property
depleted
treasury
amounts
necessary
maintain
facility
lost
value
government
even
respondents
brought
claim
within
outer
limits
flast
therefore
still
encountered
serious
difficulty
establishing
personally
benefit
tangible
way
intervention
warth
seldin
art
cl
nd
regular
statement
account
receipts
expenditures
public
money
shall
published
time
time
art
cl
person
holding
office
shall
member
either
house
continuance
office
justice
brennan
dissent
premised
revisionist
reading
precedents
leads
conclusion
art
iii
requirement
standing
satisfied
taxpayer
contends
federal
government
exceeded
bounds
law
allocating
largesse
post
concept
taxpayer
injury
necessarily
recognizes
continuing
stake
taxpayer
disposition
treasury
contributed
taxes
right
funds
put
lawful
uses
post
novel
understanding
dissent
reads
cases
frothingham
flast
decisions
merits
taxpayers
claims
frothingham
explained
holding
taxpayer
ordinarily
legal
right
challenge
congressional
expenditures
post
dissent
divines
flast
holding
taxpayer
enforceable
right
challenge
federal
bestowal
largesse
religious
purposes
post
right
extends
government
whole
regardless
branch
work
particular
instance
post
regardless
whether
challenged
action
exercise
spending
power
post
however
appealing
reconstruction
precedent
may
bears
little
resemblance
cases
purports
rest
frothingham
flast
decisions
plainly
turned
standing
plainly
rejected
notion
art
iii
requirement
direct
injury
satisfied
taxpayer
contends
federal
government
exceeded
bounds
law
allocating
largesse
post
moreover
although
dissent
view
may
lead
result
satisfying
many
case
evident
substitution
legal
interest
post
standing
enhances
understanding
meaning
rights
law
post
logically
dissent
must
shoulder
burden
explaining
taxpayers
standing
legal
interest
congressional
expenditures
except
possible
allege
violation
establishment
clause
yet
attempt
dissent
interpretation
standing
adequately
explain
cases
schlesinger
richardson
according
dissent
taxpayer
plaintiffs
cases
lacked
standing
failed
challenge
exercise
spending
power
complain
distribution
government
largesse
post
yet
standing
taxpayer
established
continuing
stake
disposition
treasury
contributed
taxes
post
seem
follow
assert
right
examine
budget
cia
richardson
see
right
argue
members
congress
claim
reserve
pay
government
schlesinger
see
course
claims
rejected
precisely
art
iii
requires
demonstration
redressable
injury
satisfied
claim
tax
moneys
spent
unlawfully
schlesinger
rejected
argument
standing
recognized
adverse
parties
sharply
conflicted
interests
views
supported
able
briefs
arguments
doubt
sincerity
respondents
stated
objectives
depth
commitment
essence
standing
question
motivation
possession
requisite
interest
threatened
injured
unconstitutional
conduct
doremus
board
education
respondents
rely
statement
association
data
processing
service
orgs
camp
person
family
may
spiritual
stake
first
amendment
values
sufficient
give
standing
raise
issues
concerning
establishment
clause
free
exercise
clause
abington
school
district
schempp
respondents
apparently
construe
language
mean
person
asserting
establishment
clause
violation
possesses
spiritual
stake
sufficient
confer
standing
language
bear
weight
first
language
read
apart
context
accompanying
reference
abington
school
district
schempp
schempp
invalidated
laws
required
bible
reading
public
schools
plaintiffs
children
attended
schools
question
parents
noted
goes
without
saying
laws
practices
involved
challenged
persons
standing
complain
parties
school
children
parents
directly
affected
laws
practices
complaints
directed
interests
surely
suffice
give
parties
standing
complain
respondent
americans
claims
certain
unidentified
members
reside
pennsylvania
explain
however
fact
establishes
cognizable
injury
none
existed
respondent
still
obligated
allege
facts
sufficient
establish
one
members
suffered
threatened
injury
belief
transfer
violated
constitution
respondents
also
claim
standing
reference
administrative
procedure
act
authorizes
judicial
review
instance
person
adversely
affected
aggrieved
agency
action
within
meaning
relevant
statute
neither
administrative
procedure
act
congressional
enactment
lower
threshold
requirements
standing
art
iii
see
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
warth
seldin
respondents
allege
act
creates
legal
right
invasion
creates
standing
linda
richard
basis
arguing
existence
alters
rules
standing
otherwise
applicable
case
majority
believed
thing
prevented
openly
acknowledging
position
fact
complaint
flast
alleged
basis
standing
plaintiffs
taxpayer
status
dissent
pointed
view
simply
accord
facts
see
flast
plaintiffs
several
amici
strongly
urged
adopt
view
standing
respondents
argue
case
plainly
chose
even
respondents
correct
arguing
flast
bound
perceived
limitation
pleadings
bound
case
find
merit
respondents
vision
standing
recognize
standing
premised
injury
consisting
solely
alleged
violation
personal
constitutional
right
government
establish
religion
principled
consistency
dictate
recognition
respondents
standing
challenge
execution
every
capital
sentence
basis
personal
right
government
impose
cruel
unusual
punishment
standing
challenge
every
program
basis
personal
right
government
deny
equal
protection
laws
choose
two
among
many
possible
examples
commands
constitution
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
blackmun
join
dissenting
plaintiff
standing
jurisdictional
matter
art
iii
courts
thus
threshold
question
resolved
turning
attention
substantive
issues
see
linda
richard
consequence
impulse
decide
difficult
questions
substantive
law
obliquely
course
opinions
purporting
nothing
determine
labels
standing
accounts
phenomenon
opinions
one
today
tend
merely
obfuscate
rather
inform
understanding
meaning
rights
law
serious
practice
disregards
constitutional
responsibility
failing
acknowledge
protections
afforded
constitution
uses
standing
slam
courthouse
door
plaintiffs
entitled
full
consideration
claims
merits
opinion
stark
example
unfortunate
trend
resolving
cases
threshold
obscuring
nature
underlying
rights
interests
stake
waxes
eloquent
blend
prudential
constitutional
considerations
combine
create
misguided
standing
jurisprudence
one
word
said
establishment
clause
right
plaintiff
seeks
enforce
despite
pat
recitation
standing
decisions
opinion
utterly
fails
except
sheerest
form
ipse
dixit
explain
case
unlike
flast
cohen
controlled
instead
frothingham
mellon
much
way
settled
doctrine
understanding
requirement
art
iii
core
irreducible
minimum
persons
seeking
judicial
relief
art
iii
personal
stake
outcome
controversy
assure
concrete
adverseness
sharpens
presentation
issues
upon
largely
depends
baker
carr
see
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
cases
identified
two
essential
components
personal
stake
requirement
plaintiff
must
suffered
threatened
distinct
palpable
injury
warth
seldin
addition
must
causal
connection
plaintiff
asserted
injury
defendant
challenged
action
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
arlington
heights
metropolitan
housing
dev
constitution
requires
art
iii
ascertain
requirements
met
proceeding
exercise
authority
behalf
plaintiff
whether
form
relief
requested
equitable
monetary
existence
art
iii
injury
often
turns
nature
source
claim
asserted
warth
seldin
supra
neither
palpable
injury
causation
term
unvarying
meaning
much
way
mutual
understandings
traditions
necessarily
guides
definitional
inquiry
addition
constitution
legislation
congress
may
impart
new
occasion
unique
meaning
terms
injury
causation
particular
statutory
constitutional
contexts
makes
fundamental
mistake
determines
plaintiff
failed
satisfy
test
indeed
test
standing
without
first
determining
whether
constitution
statute
defines
injury
creates
cause
action
redress
injury
precisely
circumstance
presented
may
course
happen
person
believing
injured
obscure
manner
government
action
held
legal
right
constitutional
statutory
provision
upon
relies
permitted
complain
invasion
another
person
rights
quite
another
matter
employ
rhetoric
standing
deprive
person
whose
interest
clearly
protected
law
opportunity
prove
rights
violated
precisely
dissembling
enterprise
indulges
today
case
controversy
limitation
art
iii
overrides
provision
constitution
construe
article
deny
standing
class
whose
sake
constitutional
protection
given
jones
quoting
new
york
ex
rel
hatch
reardon
simply
turns
constitution
head
article
iii
designed
provide
hospitable
forum
persons
enjoying
rights
constitution
assert
rights
discern
whether
particular
person
afforded
right
action
courts
framers
course
employ
modern
vocabulary
standing
much
clear
drafters
bill
rights
surely
intended
particular
beneficiaries
legacy
enjoy
rights
legally
enforceable
courts
law
see
west
virginia
bd
education
barnette
observations
mind
turn
problem
taxpayer
standing
general
case
particular
ii
frothingham
mellon
involved
challenge
maternity
act
stat
provided
financial
grants
agreed
cooperate
programs
designed
reduce
infant
maternal
mortality
appellant
contended
congress
enacting
program
exceeded
authority
art
intruded
authority
reserved
described
frothingham
claim
follows
plaintiff
alleges
taxpayer
contention
though
clear
seems
effect
appropriations
complained
increase
burden
future
taxation
thereby
take
property
without
due
process
law
right
taxpayer
enjoin
execution
federal
appropriation
act
ground
invalid
result
taxation
illegal
purposes
never
passed
upon
relation
taxpayer
federal
government
different
interest
moneys
treasury
partly
realized
taxation
partly
sources
shared
millions
others
comparatively
minute
indeterminable
effect
upon
future
taxation
payment
funds
remote
fluctuating
uncertain
basis
afforded
appeal
preventive
powers
equity
administration
statute
likely
produce
additional
taxation
imposed
upon
vast
number
taxpayers
extent
whose
several
liability
indefinite
constantly
changing
essentially
matter
public
individual
concern
party
invokes
judicial
power
must
able
show
statute
invalid
sustained
immediately
danger
sustaining
direct
injury
result
enforcement
merely
suffers
indefinite
way
common
people
generally
frothingham
also
stressed
indirectness
taxpayer
injury
matter
art
iii
standing
causal
relationship
sufficiently
certain
length
causal
chain
irrelevant
see
warth
seldin
financial
stake
federal
taxpayer
outcome
lawsuit
challenging
allegedly
unlawful
federal
expenditure
qualitatively
different
state
municipal
taxpayer
attacking
local
expenditure
importantly
injury
suffered
taxpayer
dependent
extent
tax
payment
concept
taxpayer
injury
necessarily
recognizes
continuing
stake
taxpayer
disposition
treasury
contributed
taxes
right
funds
put
lawful
uses
frothingham
nothing
precedents
indicate
concept
comfortably
applied
municipal
taxpayers
inconsistent
framework
rights
remedies
established
federal
constitution
explanation
limit
federal
taxpayer
standing
imposed
frothingham
must
sought
substantive
realms
justice
harlan
dissenting
flast
came
close
identifying
consider
unstated
premise
frothingham
rule
taxpayer
complaint
consist
allegation
public
funds
shortly
expended
purposes
inconsistent
constitution
taxpayer
ask
return
portion
previous
tax
payments
prevent
collection
existing
tax
debt
demand
adjudication
propriety
particular
level
taxation
tax
payments
received
general
purposes
upon
proper
receipt
lost
general
revenues
frothingham
rule
may
seen
founded
solely
prudential
judgment
precipitate
unnecessary
interference
activities
coequal
branch
government
avoided
alternatively
frothingham
may
construed
resting
upon
unarticulated
constitutionally
established
barrier
congress
power
tax
power
spend
barrier
makes
analytically
impossible
mount
assault
former
challenge
latter
sufficient
present
purposes
say
frothingham
held
federal
taxpayer
continuing
legal
interest
affairs
treasury
analogous
shareholder
continuing
interest
conduct
corporation
whatever
provenance
general
rule
frothingham
displays
sound
judgment
courts
must
circumspect
dealing
taxing
power
order
avoid
unnecessary
intrusion
functions
legislative
executive
branches
congress
purpose
taxing
ordinarily
affect
validity
tax
unless
tax
operates
unconstitutionally
see
murdock
pennsylvania
taxpayer
may
object
use
funds
frothingham
argument
use
tax
funds
purposes
unauthorized
constitution
amounted
violation
due
process
provide
required
legal
interest
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
protect
taxpayers
increases
tax
liability
see
flast
cohen
frothingham
claim
thus
reduced
assertion
interest
legislative
prerogatives
claim
properly
barred
flast
faced
different
sort
constitutional
claim
found
compelled
retreat
general
assertion
frothingham
taxpayers
interest
disposition
tax
payments
understand
frothingham
bar
necessarily
gave
way
face
establishment
clause
claim
must
examine
right
asserted
taxpayer
making
claim
nine
justices
recognized
establishment
clause
impose
definite
restriction
power
tax
held
everson
board
education
establishment
religion
clause
first
amendment
means
least
tax
amount
large
small
levied
support
religious
activities
institutions
whatever
may
called
whatever
form
may
adopt
teach
practice
religion
determining
whether
law
challenged
everson
one
respecting
establishment
religion
fail
examine
historic
meaning
constitutional
language
particularly
respect
imposition
taxes
justice
rutledge
pointed
dissent
provision
constitution
closely
tied
given
content
generating
history
religious
clause
first
amendment
refined
product
terse
summation
history
history
bears
brief
repetition
present
context
many
early
settlers
nation
came
escape
tyranny
laws
compelled
support
churches
inflicted
punishments
failure
pay
establishment
taxes
tithes
inhabitants
various
colonies
soon
displayed
capacity
recreate
oppressive
practices
countries
fled
persons
minority
faiths
persecuted
persons
subjected
time
colonial
governments
tithes
taxes
support
religion
reynolds
practices
became
commonplace
shock
colonials
feeling
abhorrence
imposition
taxes
pay
ministers
salaries
build
maintain
churches
church
property
aroused
indignation
feelings
found
expression
first
amendment
everson
supra
footnotes
omitted
compel
man
furnish
contributions
money
propagation
opinions
disbelieves
sinful
tyrannical
even
forcing
support
teacher
religious
persuasion
depriving
comfortable
liberty
giving
contributions
particular
pastor
whose
morals
make
pattern
hening
stat
man
shall
compelled
frequent
support
religious
worship
place
ministry
whatsoever
shall
enforced
restrained
molested
burthened
body
goods
shall
otherwise
suffer
account
religious
opinions
belief
phase
unrelentingly
absolute
opposing
state
support
aid
taxation
even
three
pence
contribution
thus
exacted
citizen
purpose
tithes
establishment
compulsions
disappeared
madison
coworkers
made
exceptions
abridgments
complete
separation
church
state
created
objection
small
tithes
tithes
whatsoever
lawful
impose
small
tax
religion
admission
pave
way
oppressive
levies
amount
principle
assessment
wrong
everson
supra
citation
omitted
flast
cohen
federal
taxpayers
sought
challenge
department
health
education
welfare
administration
elementary
secondary
education
act
specifically
department
practice
allowing
funds
distributed
act
used
finance
instruction
religious
schools
appellants
urged
use
federal
funds
purpose
violated
establishment
free
exercise
clauses
first
amendment
sought
declaration
use
federal
funds
authorized
act
extent
use
authorized
act
unconstitutional
void
appellants
sought
injunction
bar
appellees
approving
expenditure
funds
allegedly
unconstitutional
purposes
frothingham
rule
stood
seemingly
absolute
barrier
maintenance
claim
held
however
frothingham
barrier
overcome
claim
met
requirements
nexus
test
justices
participated
flast
unaware
continued
recognition
federally
cognizable
case
controversy
local
taxpayer
seeks
challenge
unconstitutional
use
municipality
funds
propriety
course
gone
unquestioned
everson
aware
well
rule
stated
doremus
board
education
interest
taxpayer
even
one
raising
establishment
clause
claim
limited
actions
government
involving
expenditure
funds
reaching
holding
also
quite
clear
responding
everson
continued
acceptance
municipal
taxpayer
actions
also
everson
exposition
history
meaning
establishment
clause
see
flast
supra
apparent
test
standing
formulated
flast
sought
reconcile
developing
doctrine
taxpayer
standing
historical
understanding
establishment
clause
intended
prohibit
federal
government
using
tax
funds
advancement
religion
thus
constitutional
imperative
taxpayer
standing
certain
cases
brought
pursuant
establishment
clause
nexus
test
offered
despite
general
language
best
understood
determinant
standing
plaintiffs
alleging
injury
taxpayers
challenge
alleged
violations
establishment
free
exercise
clauses
first
amendment
general
statement
standing
principles
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
brennan
dissenting
flast
test
explains
forms
governmental
action
may
attacked
someone
alleging
taxpayer
status
without
ruling
possibility
history
might
reveal
another
similarly
founded
provision
explains
establishment
clause
claim
treated
differently
assertion
federal
government
exceeded
bounds
law
allocating
largesse
thus
consistent
doremus
flast
required
first
prong
test
taxpayer
demonstrate
logical
connection
taxpayer
status
type
legislation
attacked
flast
supra
appellants
challenge
program
grants
educational
institutions
clearly
satisfied
first
requirement
second
prong
consistent
prohibition
taxpayer
claims
kind
advanced
frothingham
appellants
required
show
connection
status
precise
nature
infringement
alleged
flast
difficulty
meeting
requirement
agreed
establishment
clause
jealously
protects
taxpayers
diversion
funds
support
religion
offices
federal
government
nexus
test
announced
sought
maintain
necessary
continuity
prior
cases
set
forth
principles
guide
future
cases
involving
taxpayer
standing
flast
depart
principle
judgment
standing
made
without
fundamental
understanding
rights
issue
flast
test
supply
rationale
decision
rather
exposition
rationale
supplied
understanding
nature
restrictions
government
power
imposed
constitution
intended
beneficiaries
restrictions
may
congress
tax
almost
reason
reason
far
able
discern
one
constitutionally
imposed
limit
authority
congress
use
tax
money
support
church
encourage
religion
forbidden
exaction
everson
board
education
rutledge
dissenting
emphasis
added
see
flast
supra
fortas
concurring
absolute
terms
history
establishment
clause
first
amendment
makes
clear
history
also
makes
clear
federal
taxpayer
singularly
proper
appropriate
party
invoke
federal
jurisdiction
challenge
federal
bestowal
largesse
violation
establishment
clause
indeed
every
federal
taxpayer
suffers
precisely
injury
establishment
clause
guards
federal
government
directs
funds
taken
pocketbooks
citizenry
placed
coffers
ministry
taxpayer
asked
raise
objection
use
funds
time
pays
tax
apart
unlikely
circumstance
government
announced
advance
particular
levy
used
religious
subsidies
taxpayers
hardly
assert
injured
government
actually
lent
support
religious
venture
reasonable
require
address
claim
officials
charged
collection
federal
taxes
officials
without
means
provide
appropriate
redress
practical
way
segregate
complaining
taxpayer
money
devoted
religious
purpose
surely
taxpayer
must
standing
time
learns
government
alleged
establishment
clause
violation
seek
equitable
relief
order
halt
continuing
intolerable
burden
pocketbook
conscience
constitutional
rights
iii
blind
history
attempts
distinguish
case
flast
wrenching
snippets
language
opinions
perfunctorily
applying
language
color
first
prong
flast
nexus
test
tortuous
distinctions
thus
produced
specious
best
worst
pernicious
constitutional
heritage
first
finds
case
different
flast
source
plaintiffs
complaint
congressional
action
decision
hew
transfer
parcel
federal
property
ante
emphasis
added
attempt
distinction
withstand
scrutiny
flast
involved
challenge
actions
commissioner
education
officials
hew
disbursing
funds
elementary
secondary
education
act
religious
sectarian
schools
plaintiffs
disclaimed
intent
ion
challenge
programs
act
flast
supra
rather
claimed
approval
expenditures
authorized
act
alternatively
extent
expenditures
authorized
act
unconstitutional
void
ibid
present
case
respondents
challenge
hew
grant
property
pursuant
federal
property
administrative
services
act
seeking
enjoin
hew
making
grant
property
defendant
long
grant
violate
establishment
clause
app
may
concerned
adequacy
respondents
pleading
respondents
many
words
asked
declaration
federal
property
administrative
services
act
unconstitutional
void
extent
authorizes
hew
actions
construe
complaint
narrowly
fundamentally
clear
division
drawn
context
actions
legislative
branch
executive
branch
sure
first
amendment
phrased
restriction
congress
legislative
authority
natural
since
constitution
assigns
authority
legislate
appropriate
congress
difficult
conceive
expenditure
last
governmental
actor
either
implementing
directly
legislative
acting
within
scope
legislatively
delegated
authority
executive
branch
official
first
amendment
binds
government
whole
regardless
branch
work
particular
instance
second
purported
distinction
case
flast
equally
unavailing
majority
finds
decisive
federal
property
administrative
services
act
evident
exercise
congress
power
property
clause
art
iv
cl
ante
government
action
flast
taken
art
relies
richardson
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
support
distinction
two
clauses
nothing
cases
involved
alleged
deviations
requirements
art
cl
art
cl
respectively
standing
defect
case
however
failure
allege
violation
spending
clause
rather
taxpayers
cases
complained
distribution
government
largesse
thus
failed
meet
essential
requirement
taxpayer
standing
recognized
doremus
make
constitutional
difference
case
us
whether
donation
petitioner
form
cash
grant
build
facility
see
tilton
richardson
nature
gift
property
including
facility
already
built
meaningless
distinction
illustrated
tilton
case
taxpayers
afforded
standing
object
fact
government
received
adequate
assurance
property
financed
use
educational
facility
later
converted
religious
uses
receive
full
value
property
constitution
requires
complaint
precisely
although
property
issue
actually
used
sectarian
purpose
government
received
demanded
full
value
payment
whether
undertaken
pursuant
property
clause
spending
clause
breach
establishment
clause
relationship
taxpayer
breach
precisely
iv
plainly
hostile
framers
understanding
establishment
clause
flast
enforcement
understanding
vents
hostility
guise
standing
slam
courthouse
door
plaintiffs
framers
intended
entitled
full
consideration
establishment
clause
claims
merits
barlow
collins
brennan
concurring
result
dissenting
therefore
dissent
barlow
collins
brennan
concurring
result
dissenting
congress
may
enact
statutes
creating
legal
rights
invasion
creates
standing
even
though
injury
exist
without
statute
linda
richard
framers
constitution
course
exercise
power
justice
frankfurter
identified
two
sources
assist
definitional
inquiry
concerning
injury
litigant
ordinarily
standing
challenge
governmental
action
sort
taken
private
person
create
right
action
cognizable
courts
standing
may
based
interest
created
constitution
statute
joint
refugee
committee
mcgrath
concurring
opinion
citations
omitted
identifying
types
injuries
might
recognized
private
law
actions
basis
suits
government
justice
frankfurter
felt
free
draw
principles
common
law
course
generally
permit
persons
press
federal
suits
even
injury
complained
obviously
within
realm
injuries
particular
statutory
constitutional
provision
designed
guard
term
circumstance
one
standing
situations
constitution
requires
us
determine
whether
injury
alleged
sufficiently
palpable
fall
within
contemplation
art
iii
plaintiff
suffered
injury
fact
within
contemplation
art
iii
obviously
within
reach
particular
statutory
constitutional
provision
upon
plaintiff
founds
claim
bring
prudential
considerations
bear
determine
whether
plaintiff
allowed
maintain
action
see
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
evaluating
claim
standing
definition
without
specific
constitutional
congressional
direction
thus
free
draw
upon
wisdom
peculiarly
judicial
character
elaborate
upon
meaning
constitutionally
cognizable
injury
weigh
considerations
policy
along
gleanings
legislative
constitutional
intent
order
determine
whether
plaintiff
permitted
maintain
claim
understanding
basic
practical
prudential
concerns
underlying
standing
doctrine
generally
satisfied
constitutional
requisites
met
rarely
interposed
bar
standing
particularly
constitutional
violations
alleged
indeed
firm
exception
generally
permissive
attitude
toward
suits
restriction
taxpayer
suits
constitution
makes
clear
particular
person
protected
particular
form
government
action
person
right
free
action
right
infringed
injury
personal
stake
within
meaning
art
iii
james
madison
noted
bill
rights
incorporated
constitution
independent
tribunals
justice
consider
peculiar
manner
guardians
rights
impenetrable
bulwark
every
assumption
power
legislative
executive
naturally
led
resist
every
encroachment
upon
rights
expressly
stipulated
constitution
declaration
rights
annals
cong
attempt
afford
taxpayer
living
district
columbia
rights
taxpayer
living
municipality
treatment
bradfield
persuasive
force
ban
federal
taxpayer
standing
considered
constitutional
origin
analogy
sufficed
cure
jurisdictional
defect
appellant
alleged
taxpayer
district
columbia
rather
citizen
taxpayer
resident
district
columbia
emphasis
added
although
deemed
suit
ellis
roberts
treasurer
treasurer
district
columbia
roberts
bradfield
app
standing
plainly
rested
appellant
federal
taxpayer
status
question
apparently
remains
open
whether
frothingham
stated
prudential
limitation
identified
art
iii
barrier
see
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
richardson
powell
concurring
generally
agreed
time
flast
cohen
clearly
view
justice
harlan
dissent
rule
stated
reflected
prudential
policy
considerations
constitutional
limitations
perhaps
case
usefully
understood
substantive
declaration
legal
rights
taxpayer
respect
government
spending
coupled
prudential
restriction
taxpayer
ability
raise
claims
third
parties
construction
however
frothingham
must
give
way
taxpayer
suit
brought
establishment
clause
indeed
noted
flast
supra
stake
federal
treasury
major
corporate
taxpayers
sense
trivial
indeed
time
federal
program
involving
expenditure
treasury
billion
likely
result
increase
million
tax
bill
major
corporation
general
motors
see
hearings
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
pt
letter
davis
sam
ervin
note
yale
even
actual
impact
taxpayer
pocketbook
deemed
test
taxpayer
standing
cases
tenuous
causal
connection
injury
alleged
challenged
action
formed
basis
denying
plaintiffs
standing
control
case
taxpayer
challenging
government
expenditure
compare
simon
eastern
kentucky
welfare
rights
warth
seldin
linda
richard
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
supra
scrap
frothingham
obstacle
inability
show
alleged
injury
likely
redressed
favorable
decision
simon
supra
cases
standing
denied
difficulty
intermediate
link
causal
chain
third
party
beyond
control
might
serve
bar
effective
relief
even
acceded
plaintiffs
view
law
decree
might
prove
ineffectual
relieve
plaintiffs
injury
independent
action
third
party
see
warth
seldin
supra
situation
taxpayer
comparable
problem
intervening
cause
defendant
full
power
correct
plaintiff
difficulty
concludes
matter
law
fact
plaintiff
indeed
required
provide
defendant
redress
power
provide
relief
factual
aspect
causal
connection
sure
respect
enforcement
constitutional
restrictions
overly
elegant
defining
class
persons
may
object
particular
forms
government
action
constitutional
minimum
injury
fact
required
recently
noted
accept
contention
outside
context
taxpayers
suits
litigant
must
demonstrate
something
injury
fact
substantial
likelihood
judicial
relief
requested
prevent
redress
claimed
injury
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
see
schlesinger
reservists
committee
stop
war
nevertheless
suggest
frothingham
limitation
federal
taxpayer
suits
abandoned
barrier
evinces
taxing
power
spending
power
whether
deemed
one
constitutional
construction
judicial
prudence
reflects
fundamental
conceptions
nature
legislative
process
event
firmly
embedded
cases
barrier
necessarily
pierced
however
establishment
clause
claim
justice
black
joined
chief
justice
vinson
justices
reed
douglas
murphy
wrote
majority
concluded
challenged
activity
support
religion
justice
jackson
wrote
one
dissent
joined
justice
frankfurter
justice
rutledge
also
authored
dissent
justices
jackson
frankfurter
burton
joined
dissents
clearly
affirmed
constitutional
restriction
power
tax
bill
madison
remonstrance
appended
dissenting
opinion
justice
rutledge
everson
although
bill
sense
merely
pronouncement
small
legislative
body
proscription
intended
transcend
temporal
bounds
enactment
concludes
though
well
know
assembly
enacted
people
ordinary
purposes
legislation
power
restrain
acts
succeeding
assemblies
constituted
powers
equal
therefore
declare
act
irrevocable
effect
law
yet
free
declare
declare
rights
hereby
asserted
natural
rights
mankind
act
shall
hereafter
passed
repeal
present
narrow
operation
act
infringement
natural
right
hening
stat
position
taxpayer
respect
government
grant
tax
exemption
religious
institution
qualitatively
different
position
taxpayer
objecting
subsidy
subsidy
involves
direct
transfer
public
monies
subsidized
enterprise
uses
resources
exacted
taxpayers
whole
exemption
hand
involves
transfer
assists
exempted
enterprise
passively
relieving
privately
funded
venture
burden
paying
taxes
words
case
direct
subsidy
state
forcibly
diverts
income
believers
nonbelievers
churches
case
exemption
state
merely
refrains
diverting
uses
income
independently
generated
churches
voluntary
contributions
walz
tax
new
york
city
brennan
concurring
omitted
quoting
gianella
religious
liberty
nonestablishment
doctrinal
development
pt
harv
rev
justice
jackson
writing
doremus
board
education
explored
limitations
taxpayer
standing
establishment
clause
case
two
new
jersey
taxpayers
challenged
new
jersey
law
directed
public
school
teachers
read
selected
passages
bible
seeking
declaratory
judgment
law
violated
establishment
clause
concluded
taxpayer
lacked
standing
allegation
activity
supported
separate
tax
paid
particular
appropriation
adds
sum
whatever
cost
conducting
school
information
given
kind
taxes
paid
appellants
averment
bible
reading
increases
tax
pay
taxpayers
possibly
pocket
everson
showed
measurable
appropriation
disbursement
funds
occasioned
solely
activities
complained
complaint
anomaly
allowing
municipality
actions
challenged
local
taxpayer
federal
violation
establishment
clause
made
applicable
virtue
fourteenth
amendment
exempting
federal
government
whose
use
taxing
power
aid
religion
target
framers
adoption
establishment
clause
also
must
apparent
test
formulated
establishment
clause
mind
wisely
sought
phrase
principle
stood
general
terms
noted
establishment
clause
first
amendment
specifically
limit
taxing
spending
power
conferred
art
whether
constitution
contains
specific
limitations
determined
context
future
cases
however
whenever
specific
limitations
found
believe
taxpayer
clear
stake
taxpayer
assuring
breached
congress
consequently
hold
taxpayer
standing
consistent
article
iii
invoke
federal
judicial
power
alleges
congressional
action
taxing
spending
clause
derogation
constitutional
provision
operate
restrict
exercise
taxing
spending
power
taxpayer
allegation
cases
tax
money
extracted
spent
violation
specific
constitutional
protections
abuses
legislative
power
uncontested
property
issue
initially
purchased
tax
funds
bears
mark
million
federal
improvements
time
transfer
petitioner
fair
market
value
approximately
million
americans
dept
hew
federal
property
administrative
services
act
clearly
requires
whenever
possible
fair
market
value
received
property
transferred
pursuant
provisions
see
proceeds
sale
lease
disposition
surplus
property
shall
covered
treasury
miscellaneous
receipts
act
provides
however
surplus
real
property
including
buildings
fixtures
equipment
situated
thereon
may
designated
hew
necessary
school
classroom
educational
use
property
may
transferred
nonprofit
educational
institution
fixing
price
property
secretary
required
consider
benefit
may
accrue
use
property
failing
require
payment
petitioner
college
secretary
apparently
determined
benefit
exceeded
fair
market
value
entirely
clear
tilton
facility
used
sectarian
purposes
government
required
obtain
full
market
value
time
use
commences
framers
first
amendment
viewed
less
objectionable
taxpayer
learn
tax
funds
used
government
purchase
property
construct
church
deed
property
religious
order
find
government
providing
funds
church
undertake
construction
far
establishment
clause
position
taxpayer
concerned
situations
interchangeable
surely
james
madison
perceived
nice
distinction
grant
land
grant
funds
vetoed
bill
providing
certain
land
church
bill
reserving
certain
parcel
land
use
said
church
comprises
principle
precedent
appropriation
funds
use
support
religious
societies
contrary
article
constitution
declares
congress
shall
make
law
respecting
religious
establishment
richardson
messages
papers
presidents
justice
stevens
dissenting
parts
ii
iii
dissenting
opinion
justice
brennan
demonstrates
respondent
taxpayers
standing
mount
establishment
clause
challenge
federal
government
transfer
property
worth
assemblies
god
hold
plaintiffs
standing
depends
whether
government
transfer
exercise
power
spend
money
one
hand
power
dispose
tangible
property
trivialize
standing
doctrine
one
read
opinion
concurring
opinions
justice
stewart
justice
fortas
flast
cohen
without
forming
firm
conclusion
plaintiffs
invocation
establishment
clause
decisive
importance
resolving
standing
issue
case
justice
fortas
made
point
directly
agree
congressional
powers
tax
spend
limited
prohibition
upon
congress
enact
laws
respecting
establishment
religion
thesis
slender
basis
provides
direct
nexus
puts
use
collection
taxes
congressional
action
unique
nexus
judgment
recognize
taxpayer
special
claim
status
litigant
case
raising
establishment
issue
special
claim
enough
think
permit
us
allow
suit
coupled
interest
taxpayer
citizens
issue
terms
structure
basic
philosophy
constitutional
government
difficult
point
issue
intimate
pervasive
fundamental
impact
upon
life
taxpayer
upon
life
citizens
perhaps
vital
interest
citizen
establishment
issue
without
reference
taxpayer
status
acceptable
basis
challenge
need
decide
certainly
believe
must
recognize
principle
judicial
scrutiny
legislative
acts
raise
important
constitutional
questions
requires
issue
presented
separation
state
church
founding
fathers
regarded
fundamental
constitutional
system
subjected
judicial
testing
question
faithful
trust
consign
limbo
unacknowledged
unresolved
undecided
hand
urgent
necessities
case
precarious
opening
find
way
confront
demand
open
door
general
assault
upon
exercises
spending
power
status
taxpayer
accepted
launching
pad
attack
upon
target
legislation
affecting
establishment
clause
reason
reasons
stated
parts
ii
iii
justice
brennan
opinion
affirm
judgment
appeals