frontiero
richardson
argued
january
decided
may
married
woman
air
force
officer
hereafter
appellant
sought
increased
benefits
husband
dependent
statutes
provide
solely
administrative
convenience
spouses
male
members
uniformed
services
dependents
purposes
obtaining
increased
quarters
allowances
medical
dental
benefits
spouses
female
members
dependents
unless
fact
dependent
support
application
denied
failure
satisfy
statutory
dependency
standard
appellant
husband
brought
suit
district
contending
statutes
deprived
servicewomen
due
process
adverse
ruling
took
direct
appeal
held
judgment
reversed
pp
supp
reversed
justice
brennan
joined
justice
douglas
justice
white
justice
marshall
concluded
inherently
suspect
statutory
classifications
based
sex
unjustifiably
discriminatory
violate
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
pp
justice
stewart
concluded
challenged
statutes
work
invidious
discrimination
violation
constitution
reed
reed
justice
powell
joined
chief
justice
justice
blackmun
agreeing
statutes
deprive
servicewomen
due
process
concluded
light
reed
reed
fact
equal
rights
amendment
submitted
ratification
inappropriate
decide
time
whether
sex
suspect
classification
pp
joseph
levin
argued
cause
appellants
brief
morris
dees
samuel
huntington
argued
cause
appellees
brief
solicitor
general
griswold
assistant
attorney
general
wood
mark
evans
ruth
bader
ginsburg
argued
cause
american
civil
liberties
union
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
melvin
wulf
justice
brennan
announced
judgment
opinion
justice
douglas
justice
white
justice
marshall
join
question
us
concerns
right
female
member
uniformed
services
claim
spouse
dependent
purposes
obtaining
increased
quarters
allowances
medical
dental
benefits
equal
footing
male
members
statutes
serviceman
may
claim
wife
dependent
without
regard
whether
fact
dependent
upon
part
support
servicewoman
hand
may
claim
husband
dependent
programs
unless
fact
dependent
upon
support
thus
question
decision
whether
difference
treatment
constitutes
unconstitutional
discrimination
servicewomen
violation
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
district
middle
district
alabama
one
judge
dissenting
rejected
contention
sustained
constitutionality
provisions
statutes
making
distinction
supp
noted
probable
jurisdiction
reverse
effort
attract
career
personnel
reenlistment
congress
established
et
et
scheme
provision
fringe
benefits
members
uniformed
services
competitive
basis
business
industry
thus
member
uniformed
services
dependents
entitled
increased
basic
allowance
quarters
member
dependents
provided
comprehensive
medical
dental
care
appellant
sharron
frontiero
lieutenant
air
force
sought
increased
quarters
allowances
housing
medical
benefits
husband
appellant
joseph
frontiero
ground
dependent
although
benefits
automatically
granted
respect
wife
male
member
uniformed
services
appellant
application
denied
failed
demonstrate
husband
dependent
support
appellants
commenced
suit
contending
making
distinction
statutes
unreasonably
discriminate
basis
sex
violation
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
essence
appellants
asserted
discriminatory
impact
statutes
twofold
first
procedural
matter
female
member
required
demonstrate
spouse
dependency
burden
imposed
upon
male
members
second
substantive
matter
male
member
provide
wife
support
receives
benefits
similarly
situated
female
member
denied
benefits
appellants
therefore
sought
permanent
injunction
continued
enforcement
statutes
order
directing
appellees
provide
lieutenant
frontiero
housing
medical
benefits
similarly
situated
male
member
receive
although
legislative
history
statutes
sheds
virtually
light
purposes
underlying
differential
treatment
accorded
male
female
members
majority
district
surmised
congress
might
reasonably
concluded
since
husband
society
generally
family
wife
typically
dependent
partner
economical
require
married
female
members
claiming
husbands
prove
actual
dependency
extend
presumption
dependency
members
indeed
given
fact
approximately
members
uniformed
services
male
district
speculated
differential
treatment
might
conceivably
lead
considerable
saving
administrative
expense
manpower
ibid
ii
outset
appellants
contend
classifications
based
upon
sex
like
classifications
based
upon
race
alienage
national
origin
inherently
suspect
must
therefore
subjected
close
judicial
scrutiny
agree
indeed
find
least
implicit
support
approach
unanimous
decision
last
term
reed
reed
reed
considered
constitutionality
idaho
statute
providing
two
individuals
otherwise
equally
entitled
appointment
administrator
estate
male
applicant
must
preferred
female
appellant
mother
deceased
appellee
father
filed
competing
petitions
appointment
administrator
son
estate
since
parties
parents
deceased
members
entitlement
class
statutory
preference
invoked
father
petition
therefore
granted
appellant
claimed
statute
giving
mandatory
preference
males
females
without
regard
individual
qualifications
violated
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
noted
idaho
statute
provides
different
treatment
accorded
applicants
basis
sex
thus
establishes
classification
subject
scrutiny
equal
protection
clause
traditional
equal
protection
analysis
legislative
classification
must
sustained
unless
patently
arbitrary
bears
rational
relationship
legitimate
governmental
interest
see
jefferson
hackney
richardson
belcher
flemming
nestor
mcgowan
maryland
dandridge
williams
effort
meet
standard
appellee
contended
statutory
scheme
reasonable
measure
designed
reduce
workload
probate
courts
eliminating
one
class
contests
moreover
appellee
argued
mandatory
preference
male
applicants
reasonable
since
men
rule
conversant
business
affairs
women
indeed
appellee
maintained
matter
common
knowledge
women
still
engaged
politics
professions
business
industry
extent
men
idaho
upholding
constitutionality
statute
suggested
idaho
legislature
might
reasonably
concluded
general
men
better
qualified
act
administrator
women
despite
contentions
however
held
statutory
preference
male
applicants
unconstitutional
reaching
result
implicitly
rejected
appellee
apparently
rational
explanation
statutory
scheme
concluded
ignoring
individual
qualifications
particular
applicants
challenged
statute
provided
dissimilar
treatment
men
women
similarly
situated
therefore
held
even
though
state
interest
achieving
administrative
efficiency
without
legitimacy
give
mandatory
preference
members
either
sex
members
merely
accomplish
elimination
hearings
merits
make
kind
arbitrary
legislative
choice
forbidden
constitution
departure
traditional
analysis
respect
classifications
clearly
justified
doubt
nation
long
unfortunate
history
sex
discrimination
traditionally
discrimination
rationalized
attitude
romantic
paternalism
practical
effect
put
women
pedestal
cage
indeed
paternalistic
attitude
became
firmly
rooted
national
consciousness
years
ago
distinguished
member
able
proclaim
man
woman
protector
defender
natural
proper
timidity
delicacy
belongs
female
sex
evidently
unfits
many
occupations
civil
life
constitution
family
organization
founded
divine
ordinance
well
nature
things
indicates
domestic
sphere
properly
belongs
domain
functions
womanhood
harmony
say
identity
interests
views
belong
belong
family
institution
repugnant
idea
woman
adopting
distinct
independent
career
husband
paramount
destiny
mission
woman
fulfil
noble
benign
offices
wife
mother
law
creator
bradwell
state
wall
bradley
concurring
true
course
position
women
america
improved
markedly
recent
decades
nevertheless
hardly
doubted
part
high
visibility
sex
characteristic
women
still
face
pervasive
although
times
subtle
discrimination
educational
institutions
job
market
perhaps
conspicuously
political
arena
see
generally
amundsen
silenced
majority
women
american
democracy
president
task
force
women
rights
responsibilities
matter
simple
justice
moreover
since
sex
like
race
national
origin
immutable
characteristic
determined
solely
accident
birth
imposition
special
disabilities
upon
members
particular
sex
sex
seem
violate
basic
concept
system
legal
burdens
bear
relationship
individual
responsibility
weber
aetna
casualty
surety
differentiates
sex
nonsuspect
statuses
intelligence
physical
disability
aligns
recognized
suspect
criteria
sex
characteristic
frequently
bears
relation
ability
perform
contribute
society
result
statutory
distinctions
sexes
often
effect
invidiously
relegating
entire
class
females
inferior
legal
status
without
regard
actual
capabilities
individual
members
might
also
note
past
decade
congress
manifested
increasing
sensitivity
classifications
tit
vii
civil
rights
act
example
congress
expressly
declared
employer
labor
union
organization
subject
provisions
act
shall
discriminate
individual
basis
race
color
religion
sex
national
origin
similarly
equal
pay
act
provides
employer
covered
act
shall
discriminate
employees
basis
sex
equal
rights
amendment
passed
congress
march
submitted
legislatures
ratification
declares
quality
rights
law
shall
denied
abridged
state
account
sex
thus
congress
concluded
classifications
based
upon
sex
inherently
invidious
conclusion
coequal
branch
government
without
significance
question
presently
consideration
cf
oregon
mitchell
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
jj
katzenbach
morgan
considerations
mind
conclude
classifications
based
upon
sex
like
classifications
based
upon
race
alienage
national
origin
inherently
suspect
must
therefore
subjected
strict
judicial
scrutiny
applying
analysis
mandated
stricter
standard
review
clear
statutory
scheme
us
constitutionally
invalid
iii
sole
basis
classification
established
challenged
statutes
sex
individuals
involved
thus
female
member
uniformed
services
seeking
obtain
housing
medical
benefits
spouse
must
prove
dependency
fact
whereas
burden
imposed
upon
male
members
addition
statutes
operate
deny
benefits
female
member
appellant
sharron
frontiero
provides
less
spouse
support
time
granting
benefits
male
member
likewise
provides
less
spouse
support
thus
extent
least
may
fairly
said
statutes
command
dissimilar
treatment
men
women
similarly
situated
reed
reed
moreover
government
concedes
differential
treatment
accorded
men
women
statutes
serves
purpose
mere
administrative
convenience
essence
government
maintains
empirical
matter
wives
society
frequently
dependent
upon
husbands
husbands
rarely
dependent
upon
wives
thus
government
argues
congress
might
reasonably
concluded
cheaper
easier
simply
conclusively
presume
wives
male
members
financially
dependent
upon
husbands
burdening
female
members
task
establishing
dependency
fact
government
offers
concrete
evidence
however
tending
support
view
differential
treatment
fact
saves
government
money
order
satisfy
demands
strict
judicial
scrutiny
government
must
demonstrate
example
actually
cheaper
grant
increased
benefits
respect
male
members
determine
male
members
fact
entitled
benefits
grant
increased
benefits
members
whose
wives
actually
meet
dependency
requirement
however
substantial
evidence
put
test
many
wives
male
members
fail
qualify
benefits
light
fact
dependency
determination
respect
husbands
female
members
presently
made
solely
basis
affidavits
rather
costly
hearing
process
government
explanation
statutory
scheme
say
least
questionable
case
prior
decisions
make
clear
although
efficacious
administration
governmental
programs
without
importance
constitution
recognizes
higher
values
speed
efficiency
stanley
illinois
enter
realm
strict
judicial
scrutiny
doubt
administrative
convenience
shibboleth
mere
recitation
dictates
constitutionality
see
shapiro
thompson
carrington
rash
contrary
statutory
scheme
draws
sharp
line
sexes
solely
purpose
achieving
administrative
convenience
necessarily
commands
dissimilar
treatment
men
women
similarly
situated
therefore
involves
kind
arbitrary
legislative
choice
forbidden
constitution
reed
reed
therefore
conclude
according
differential
treatment
male
female
members
uniformed
services
sole
purpose
achieving
administrative
convenience
challenged
statutes
violate
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
insofar
require
female
member
prove
dependency
husband
reversed
justice
rehnquist
dissents
reasons
stated
judge
rives
opinion
district
frontiero
laird
supp
footnotes
title
provides
pertinent
part
chapter
dependent
respect
member
uniformed
service
means
spouse
however
person
dependent
female
member
unless
fact
dependent
support
dependent
respect
member
uniformed
service
means
wife
husband
fact
dependent
member
support
see
cong
rec
cong
kilday
saltonstall
cong
rec
cong
kilday
cong
short
cong
havenner
cong
bates
cong
price
see
also
appellant
joseph
frontiero
student
huntingdon
college
montgomery
alabama
according
agreed
stipulation
facts
living
expenses
including
share
household
expenses
total
approximately
per
month
since
receives
per
month
veterans
benefits
clear
dependent
upon
appellant
sharron
frontiero
support
hile
fifth
amendment
contains
equal
protection
clause
forbid
discrimination
unjustifiable
violative
due
process
schneider
rusk
see
shapiro
thompson
bolling
sharpe
housing
provisions
set
forth
et
enacted
part
career
compensation
act
established
uniform
pattern
military
pay
allowances
consolidating
revising
piecemeal
legislation
developed
previous
years
see
sess
sess
act
apparently
retained
substance
dependency
definitions
pay
readjustment
act
stat
amended
act
september
stat
required
female
member
service
demonstrate
spouse
dependency
appears
provision
derived
unspecified
earlier
enactments
see
medical
benefits
legislation
et
enacted
dependents
medical
care
act
designed
revise
make
uniform
existing
law
relating
medical
services
military
personnel
appears
carried
forward
without
explanation
dependency
provisions
found
military
pay
allowance
legislation
see
sess
sess
see
loving
virginia
mclaughlin
florida
bolling
sharpe
supra
see
graham
richardson
see
oyama
california
korematsu
hirabayashi
brief
appellee
reed
reed
reed
reed
idaho
indeed
position
women
country
inception
reflected
view
expressed
thomas
jefferson
women
neither
seen
heard
society
decisionmaking
councils
see
gruberg
women
american
politics
see
also
de
tocqueville
democracy
america
reeves
trans
reynolds
sims
see
dunn
blumstein
kramer
union
free
school
district
yick
wo
hopkins
see
generally
president
task
force
women
rights
responsibilities
matter
simple
justice
kanowitz
women
law
unfinished
revolution
montagu
man
dangerous
myth
ed
president
commission
status
women
american
women
see
note
sex
discrimination
equal
protection
need
constitutional
amendment
harv
rev
true
course
viewed
abstract
women
constitute
small
powerless
minority
nevertheless
part
past
discrimination
women
vastly
underrepresented
nation
decisionmaking
councils
never
female
president
female
member
single
woman
presently
sits
senate
women
hold
seats
house
representatives
appellants
point
underrepresentation
present
throughout
levels
state
federal
government
see
joint
reply
brief
appellants
american
civil
liberties
union
amicus
curiae
see
developments
law
equal
protection
harv
rev
emphasis
added
see
generally
sape
hart
title
vii
reconsidered
equal
employment
opportunity
act
geo
rev
developments
law
employment
discrimination
title
vii
civil
rights
act
harv
rev
emphasis
added
see
generally
murphy
female
wage
discrimination
study
equal
pay
act
cin
rev
res
sess
conformity
principles
congress
recent
years
amended
various
statutory
schemes
similar
presently
consideration
eliminate
differential
treatment
men
women
see
amended
stat
amended
stat
amended
stat
amended
stat
noted
statutes
sense
designed
rectify
effects
past
discrimination
women
see
gruenwald
gardner
cert
denied
cf
jones
alfred
mayer
south
carolina
katzenbach
contrary
statutes
seize
upon
group
women
historically
suffered
discrimination
employment
rely
effects
past
discrimination
justification
heaping
additional
economic
disadvantages
cf
gaston
county
women
age
labor
force
women
worked
full
time
months
per
year
see
women
bureau
dept
labor
highlights
women
employment
education
pub
mar
moreover
married
women
employed
see
bureau
labor
statistics
dept
labor
work
experience
population
summary
special
labor
force
report
also
noteworthy
median
income
male
member
armed
forces
approximately
see
report
president
commission
armed
force
median
income
women
age
including
employed
approximately
see
statistical
abstract
table
source
bureau
census
current
population
reports
series
applying
statutory
definition
dependency
statistics
appears
median
family
wife
male
member
must
personal
expenses
approximately
total
family
income
order
qualify
dependent
tr
oral
arg
noted
earlier
basic
purpose
statutes
provide
fringe
benefits
members
uniformed
services
order
establish
compensation
pattern
attract
career
personnel
see
supra
accompanying
text
conclusion
wise
invalidates
statutory
schemes
except
insofar
require
female
member
prove
dependency
spouse
see
weber
aetna
casualty
surety
levy
louisiana
moritz
commissioner
internal
revenue
see
also
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
blackmun
join
concurring
judgment
agree
challenged
statutes
constitute
unconstitutional
discrimination
servicewomen
violation
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
join
opinion
justice
brennan
hold
classifications
based
upon
sex
like
classifications
based
upon
race
alienage
national
origin
inherently
suspect
must
therefore
subjected
close
judicial
scrutiny
ante
unnecessary
case
characterize
sex
suspect
classification
implications
holding
reed
reed
abundantly
supports
decision
today
add
sex
narrowly
limited
group
classifications
inherently
suspect
view
decide
case
authority
reed
reserve
future
expansion
rationale
another
find
compelling
reason
deferring
general
categorizing
sex
classifications
invoking
strictest
test
judicial
scrutiny
equal
rights
amendment
adopted
resolve
substance
precise
question
approved
congress
submitted
ratification
amendment
duly
adopted
represent
people
accomplished
manner
prescribed
constitution
acting
prematurely
unnecessarily
view
assumed
decisional
responsibility
time
state
legislatures
functioning
within
traditional
democratic
process
debating
proposed
amendment
seems
reaching
judicial
action
major
political
decision
currently
process
resolution
reflect
appropriate
respect
duly
prescribed
legislative
processes
times
system
avoid
constitutional
decision
issues
normally
resolved
elected
representatives
people
democratic
institutions
weakened
confidence
restraint
impaired
appear
unnecessarily
decide
sensitive
issues
broad
social
political
importance
time
consideration
within
prescribed
constitutional
processes