alvarez
argued
february
decided
june
stolen
valor
act
makes
crime
falsely
claim
receipt
military
decorations
medals
provides
enhanced
penalty
congressional
medal
honor
involved
respondent
pleaded
guilty
charge
falsely
claiming
received
medal
honor
reserved
right
appeal
claim
act
unconstitutional
ninth
circuit
reversed
finding
act
invalid
first
amendment
held
judgment
affirmed
pp
affirmed
justice
kennedy
joined
chief
justice
justice
ginsburg
justice
sotomayor
concluded
act
infringes
upon
speech
protected
first
amendment
pp
constitution
demands
restrictions
speech
presumed
invalid
government
bear
burden
showing
constitutionality
ashcroft
american
civil
liberties
union
restrictions
speech
permitted
historic
categories
speech
including
incitement
obscenity
defamation
speech
integral
criminal
conduct
fighting
words
child
pornography
fraud
true
threats
speech
presenting
grave
imminent
threat
government
power
prevent
absent
categories
general
exception
false
statements
government
argues
cases
hustler
magazine
falwell
support
claim
false
statements
value
hence
first
amendment
protection
government
quotations
derive
cases
discussing
defamation
fraud
legally
cognizable
harm
associated
false
statement
decisions
falsity
speech
issue
irrelevant
analysis
neither
determinative
prior
decisions
confronted
measure
like
stolen
valor
act
targets
falsity
nothing
even
considering
instances
defamation
fraud
instructed
falsity
alone
may
suffice
bring
speech
outside
first
amendment
statement
must
knowing
reckless
falsehood
see
new
york
times
sullivan
government
seeks
convert
rule
limits
liability
even
defamation
cases
law
permits
recovery
tortious
wrongs
rule
expands
liability
different
far
greater
realm
discourse
expression
government
three
examples
regulation
courts
generally
found
permissible
establish
principle
proscriptions
false
statements
exempt
rigorous
first
amendment
scrutiny
criminal
prohibition
false
statement
made
government
officials
communications
concerning
official
matters
lead
broader
proposition
false
statements
unprotected
made
person
time
context
perjury
statutes
perjured
statements
lack
first
amendment
protection
simply
false
perjury
undermines
function
province
law
threatens
integrity
judgments
finally
statutes
prohibit
falsely
representing
one
speaking
behalf
government
prohibit
impersonating
government
officer
examples
extent
implicate
fraud
speech
integral
criminal
conduct
inapplicable
may
exist
categories
speech
historically
unprotected
yet
specifically
identified
discussed
stevens
government
demonstrated
false
statements
constitute
new
category
pp
act
seeks
control
suppress
false
statements
one
subject
almost
limitless
times
settings
without
regard
whether
lie
made
purpose
material
gain
permitting
government
decree
speech
criminal
offense
endorse
government
authority
compile
list
subjects
false
statements
punishable
governmental
power
clear
limiting
principle
pp
applies
exacting
scrutiny
assessing
restrictions
protected
speech
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
act
satisfy
scrutiny
government
interest
protecting
integrity
medal
honor
beyond
question
first
amendment
requires
direct
causal
link
restriction
imposed
injury
prevented
link
shown
government
points
evidence
supporting
claim
public
general
perception
military
awards
diluted
false
claims
made
respondent
shown
show
counterspeech
ridicule
respondent
received
online
press
suffice
achieve
interest
addition
government
seeks
regulate
protected
speech
restriction
must
least
restrictive
means
among
available
effective
alternatives
ashcroft
government
likely
protect
integrity
military
awards
system
creating
database
medal
winners
accessible
searchable
internet
private
individuals
already
done
pp
justice
breyer
joined
justice
kagan
concluded
stolen
valor
act
presently
drafted
works
disproportionate
constitutional
harm
fails
intermediate
scrutiny
thus
violates
first
amendment
pp
determining
whether
statute
violates
first
amendment
often
found
appropriate
examine
fit
statutory
ends
means
taking
account
seriousness
harm
provision
likely
cause
nature
importance
provision
countervailing
objectives
extent
statute
tend
achieve
objectives
whether
less
restrictive
alternatives
intermediate
scrutiny
describes
approach
since
false
factual
statements
less
likely
true
factual
statements
make
valuable
contribution
marketplace
ideas
government
often
good
reason
prohibit
false
speech
regulation
threaten
harm
approach
applied
pp
act
read
criminalizing
false
factual
statements
made
knowledge
falsity
intent
taken
true
although
frequently
said
implied
false
factual
statements
enjoy
little
first
amendment
protection
see
gertz
robert
welch
statements
read
mean
protection
false
factual
statements
serve
useful
human
objectives
many
contexts
moreover
threat
criminal
prosecution
making
false
statement
inhibit
speaker
making
true
statements
thereby
chilling
kind
speech
lies
first
amendment
heart
see
pervasiveness
false
factual
statements
provides
weapon
government
broadly
empowered
prosecute
falsity
without
unpopular
may
fear
government
use
weapon
selectively
although
many
statutes
doctrines
making
utterance
certain
kinds
false
statements
unlawful
tend
narrower
act
limit
scope
application
various
ways
example
requiring
proof
specific
harm
identifiable
victims
act
lacks
limiting
features
although
prohibits
knowing
intentional
falsehoods
readily
verifiable
facts
within
personal
knowledge
speaker
otherwise
ranges
broadly
breadth
means
creates
significant
risk
first
amendment
harm
pp
act
nonetheless
substantial
justification
seeks
protect
interests
sacrificed
health
life
country
seeking
preserve
intact
country
recognition
sacrifice
form
military
honors
may
however
possible
substantially
achieve
government
objective
less
burdensome
ways
first
amendment
risks
flowing
act
breadth
coverage
diminished
eliminated
finely
tailored
statute
example
statute
requires
showing
false
statement
caused
specific
harm
focused
lies
likely
harmful
contexts
lies
likely
cause
harm
pp
kennedy
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
roberts
ginsburg
sotomayor
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
kagan
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
joined
opinion
kennedy
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
petitioner
xavier
alvarez
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
chief
justice
justice
ginsburg
justice
sotomayor
join
lying
habit
xavier
alvarez
respondent
lied
said
played
hockey
detroit
red
wings
married
starlet
mexico
lied
announcing
held
medal
honor
respondent
ventured
onto
new
ground
lie
violates
federal
criminal
statute
stolen
valor
act
respondent
attended
first
public
meeting
board
member
three
valley
water
district
board
board
governmental
entity
headquarters
claremont
california
introduced
follows
retired
marine
years
retired
year
back
awarded
congressional
medal
honor
got
wounded
many
times
guy
none
true
record
shows
respondent
statements
pathetic
attempt
gain
respect
eluded
statements
seem
made
secure
employment
financial
benefits
admission
privileges
reserved
earned
medal
respondent
indicted
stolen
valor
act
lying
congressional
medal
honor
meeting
district
central
district
california
rejected
claim
statute
invalid
first
amendment
respondent
pleaded
guilty
one
count
reserving
right
appeal
first
amendment
claim
appeals
ninth
circuit
decision
divided
panel
found
act
invalid
first
amendment
reversed
conviction
opinions
issue
dissent
seven
judges
rehearing
en
banc
denied
granted
certiorari
certiorari
granted
unrelated
case
appeals
tenth
circuit
also
decision
divided
panel
found
act
constitutional
strandlof
conflict
courts
appeals
question
act
validity
second
case
two
terms
requiring
consider
speech
disparage
attempt
steal
honor
belongs
fought
nation
battle
see
snyder
phelps
hateful
protests
directed
funeral
serviceman
died
iraq
statement
speaker
held
medal
intended
undoubted
lie
right
proper
congress
century
ago
established
award
nation
hold
highest
respect
esteem
course
carrying
noble
duty
contributing
defense
rights
honor
nation
selective
draft
law
cases
acted
extraordinary
honor
uncontested
legitimate
government
objective
indeed
valued
national
aspiration
purpose
end
inquiry
however
fundamental
constitutional
principles
require
laws
enacted
honor
brave
must
consistent
precepts
constitution
fought
government
contends
criminal
prohibition
proper
means
purpose
creating
awarding
medal
speech
regulation
question
however
exacting
scrutiny
required
statutes
suppressing
restricting
speech
must
judged
sometimes
inconvenient
principles
first
amendment
measure
statutory
provisions
respondent
convicted
must
held
invalid
conviction
must
set
aside
respondent
claim
hold
congressional
medal
honor
false
room
argue
shades
meaning
premise
respondent
violated
lie
concerned
congressional
medal
honor
subject
enhanced
penalty
subsection
statutory
provisions
follows
false
claims
receipt
military
decorations
whoever
falsely
represents
verbally
writing
awarded
decoration
medal
authorized
congress
armed
forces
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
six
months
enhanced
penalty
offenses
involving
congressional
medal
decoration
medal
involved
offense
subsection
congressional
medal
honor
lieu
punishment
provided
subsection
offender
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
year
respondent
challenges
statute
suppression
pure
speech
speech
falling
within
categories
expression
regulation
permissible
government
defends
statute
necessary
preserve
integrity
purpose
medal
integrity
purpose
contends
compromised
frustrated
false
statements
statute
prohibits
argues
false
statements
first
amendment
value
thus
protected
extent
needed
avoid
chilling
fully
protected
speech
brief
statute
covers
respondent
speech
government
argues
leaves
breathing
room
speech
example
speech
might
criticize
idea
medal
importance
military
government
arguments
suffice
save
statute
ii
general
matter
first
amendment
means
government
power
restrict
expression
message
ideas
subject
matter
content
ashcroft
american
civil
liberties
union
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
result
constitution
demands
restrictions
speech
presumed
invalid
government
bear
burden
showing
constitutionality
ashcroft
american
civil
liberties
union
light
substantial
expansive
threats
free
expression
posed
restrictions
rejected
startling
dangerous
test
first
amendment
coverage
based
ad
hoc
balancing
relative
social
costs
benefits
stevens
slip
instead
restrictions
speech
permitted
general
matter
confined
traditional
categories
expression
long
familiar
bar
slip
quoting
simon
schuster
members
state
crime
victims
kennedy
concurring
judgment
among
categories
advocacy
intended
likely
incite
imminent
lawless
action
see
brandenburg
ohio
per
curiam
obscenity
see
miller
california
defamation
see
new
york
times
sullivan
providing
substantial
protection
speech
public
figures
gertz
robert
welch
imposing
limits
liability
defaming
private
figure
speech
integral
criminal
conduct
see
giboney
empire
storage
ice
fighting
words
see
chaplinsky
new
hampshire
child
pornography
see
new
york
ferber
fraud
see
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
true
threats
see
watts
per
curiam
speech
presenting
grave
imminent
threat
government
power
prevent
see
near
minnesota
ex
rel
olson
although
restriction
last
category
difficult
sustain
see
new
york
times
per
curiam
categories
historical
foundation
free
speech
tradition
vast
realm
free
speech
thought
always
protected
tradition
still
thrive
even
furthered
adherence
categories
rules
absent
categories
law
allows
regulation
speech
general
exception
first
amendment
false
statements
comports
common
understanding
false
statements
inevitable
open
vigorous
expression
views
public
private
expression
first
amendment
seeks
guarantee
see
sullivan
supra
th
erroneous
statement
inevitable
free
debate
government
disagrees
proposition
cites
language
precedents
support
contention
false
statements
value
hence
first
amendment
protection
see
also
brief
eugene
volokh
et
al
amici
curiae
isolated
statements
earlier
decisions
support
government
submission
false
statements
general
rule
beyond
constitutional
protection
conclusion
take
quoted
language
far
proper
context
instance
stated
alse
statements
fact
particularly
valueless
interfere
function
marketplace
ideas
hustler
magazine
falwell
false
statements
protected
first
amendment
manner
truthful
statements
brown
hartlage
see
also
virginia
bd
pharmacy
supra
untruthful
speech
commercial
otherwise
never
protected
sake
herbert
lando
spreading
false
information
carries
first
amendment
credentials
gertz
supra
constitutional
value
false
statements
fact
garrison
louisiana
knowingly
false
statement
false
statement
made
reckless
disregard
truth
enjoy
constitutional
protection
quotations
derive
cases
discussing
fraud
legally
cognizable
harm
associated
false
statement
invasion
privacy
costs
vexatious
litigation
see
brief
decisions
falsity
speech
issue
irrelevant
analysis
neither
determinative
never
endorsed
categorical
rule
government
advances
false
statements
receive
first
amendment
protection
prior
decisions
confronted
measure
like
stolen
valor
act
targets
falsity
nothing
even
considering
instances
defamation
fraud
moreover
careful
instruct
falsity
alone
may
suffice
bring
speech
outside
first
amendment
statement
must
knowing
reckless
falsehood
see
sullivan
supra
prohibiting
recovery
damages
defamatory
falsehood
made
public
official
unless
statement
made
knowledge
false
reckless
disregard
whether
false
see
also
garrison
supra
ven
utterance
false
great
principles
constitution
secure
freedom
expression
preclude
attaching
adverse
consequences
except
knowing
reckless
falsehood
illinois
ex
rel
madigan
telemarketing
associates
false
statement
alone
subject
fundraiser
fraud
liability
government
thus
seeks
use
principle
new
purpose
seeks
convert
rule
limits
liability
even
defamation
cases
law
permits
recovery
tortious
wrongs
rule
expands
liability
different
far
greater
realm
discourse
expression
inverts
rationale
exception
requirements
knowing
falsehood
reckless
disregard
truth
condition
recovery
certain
defamation
cases
exists
allow
speech
less
rule
designed
tolerate
certain
speech
blossom
become
rationale
rule
restricting
government
gives
three
examples
regulations
false
speech
courts
generally
found
first
criminal
prohibition
false
statement
made
government
official
second
laws
punishing
perjury
third
false
representation
one
speaking
government
official
behalf
government
see
restrictions
however
establish
principle
proscriptions
false
statements
exempt
exacting
first
amendment
scrutiny
federal
statute
prohibiting
false
statements
government
officials
punishes
whoever
matter
within
jurisdiction
executive
legislative
judicial
branch
government
makes
false
fictitious
fraudulent
statement
section
prohibition
false
statements
made
government
officials
communications
concerning
official
matters
lead
broader
proposition
false
statements
unprotected
made
person
time
context
point
made
confirmed
unquestioned
constitutionality
perjury
statutes
federal
statute
equivalents
grayson
see
also
konigsberg
state
bar
simply
perjured
statements
false
lack
first
amendment
protection
perjured
testimony
war
justice
cause
render
judgment
resting
truth
michael
perjury
undermines
function
province
law
threatens
integrity
judgments
basis
legal
system
see
dunnigan
uphold
integrity
trial
system
constitutionality
perjury
statutes
unquestioned
unlike
speech
contexts
oath
formality
gravity
necessary
remind
witness
statements
basis
official
governmental
action
action
often
affects
rights
liberties
others
sworn
testimony
quite
distinct
lies
spoken
oath
intended
puff
oneself
statutes
prohibit
falsely
representing
one
speaking
behalf
government
prohibit
government
officer
also
protect
integrity
government
processes
quite
apart
merely
restricting
false
speech
title
prohibits
impersonating
officer
employee
even
statute
may
require
proving
actual
financial
property
loss
resulting
deception
statute
confined
maintain
ing
general
good
repute
dignity
government
service
lepowitch
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
said
prohibitions
unauthorized
use
names
federal
agencies
federal
bureau
investigation
manner
calculated
convey
communication
approved
see
using
words
federal
collection
private
debts
order
convey
communication
official
authorization
see
examples
extent
implicate
fraud
speech
integral
criminal
conduct
inapplicable
law
tradition
show
instances
falsity
speech
bears
upon
whether
protected
false
speech
may
prohibited
even
analogous
true
speech
opinion
imply
targeted
prohibitions
somehow
vulnerable
also
rejects
notion
false
speech
general
category
presumptively
unprotected
although
first
amendment
stands
freewheeling
authority
declare
new
categories
speech
outside
scope
first
amendment
stevens
slip
acknowledged
perhaps
exist
categories
speech
historically
unprotected
yet
specifically
identified
discussed
case
law
ibid
exempting
category
speech
normal
prohibition
however
must
presented
evidence
novel
restriction
content
part
long
heretofore
unrecognized
tradition
proscription
brown
entertainment
merchants
slip
government
demonstrated
false
statements
generally
constitute
new
category
unprotected
speech
basis
iii
probable
adverse
effect
act
freedom
expression
illustrates
fundamental
way
reasons
law
distrust
speech
prohibitions
act
plain
terms
applies
false
statement
made
time
place
person
assumed
apply
say
theatrical
performance
see
milkovich
lorain
journal
recognizing
statements
nominally
purporting
contain
false
facts
reality
reasonably
interpreted
stating
actual
facts
individual
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
still
sweeping
quite
unprecedented
reach
statute
puts
conflict
first
amendment
lie
made
public
meeting
statute
apply
equal
force
personal
whispered
conversations
within
home
statute
seeks
control
suppress
false
statements
one
subject
almost
limitless
times
settings
without
regard
whether
lie
made
purpose
material
gain
see
san
francisco
arts
athletics
olympic
prohibiting
nonprofit
corporation
exploiting
commercial
magnetism
word
organizing
athletic
competition
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
permitting
government
decree
speech
criminal
offense
whether
shouted
rooftops
made
barely
audible
whisper
endorse
government
authority
compile
list
subjects
false
statements
punishable
governmental
power
clear
limiting
principle
constitutional
tradition
stands
idea
need
oceania
ministry
truth
see
orwell
nineteen
centennial
ed
law
sustained
endless
list
subjects
national
government
single
false
claims
made
effect
fraud
secure
moneys
valuable
considerations
say
offers
employment
well
established
government
may
restrict
speech
without
affronting
first
amendment
see
virginia
bd
pharmacy
noting
fraudulent
speech
generally
falls
outside
protections
first
amendment
stolen
valor
act
limited
reach
hold
interest
truthful
discourse
alone
sufficient
sustain
ban
speech
absent
evidence
speech
used
gain
material
advantage
give
government
broad
censorial
power
unprecedented
cases
constitutional
tradition
mere
potential
exercise
power
casts
chill
chill
first
amendment
permit
free
speech
thought
discourse
remain
foundation
freedom
iv
previous
discussion
suffices
show
act
conflicts
free
speech
principles
even
examined
within
narrow
sphere
operation
act
survive
assessing
restrictions
protected
speech
adopted
approach
see
stevens
slip
first
amendment
guarantee
free
speech
extend
categories
speech
survive
ad
hoc
balancing
relative
social
costs
benefits
rather
applied
exacting
scrutiny
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
although
objectives
government
seeks
statute
without
significance
must
find
act
satisfy
exacting
scrutiny
government
correct
military
medals
serve
important
public
function
recognizing
expressing
gratitude
acts
heroism
sacrifice
military
service
also
morale
mission
accomplishment
esprit
de
corps
among
service
members
brief
general
george
washington
observed
award
valor
cherish
virtuous
ambition
soldiers
well
foster
encourage
every
species
military
merit
general
orders
george
washington
issued
newburgh
hudson
boynton
ed
time
diminished
idea
periods
war
peace
alike
public
recognition
valor
noble
sacrifice
men
women
uniform
reinforces
pride
national
resolve
military
relies
upon
fulfill
mission
interests
related
integrity
military
honors
system
general
congressional
medal
honor
particular
although
millions
served
brave
resolve
medal
highest
military
award
valor
enemy
force
given
times
established
medal
reserved
distinguished
conspicuously
gallantry
intrepidity
risk
life
beyond
call
duty
army
navy
marine
corps
air
force
coast
guard
stories
earned
medal
inspire
fascinate
dakota
meyer
drove
five
times
midst
taliban
ambush
save
lives
see
curtis
president
obama
awards
medal
honor
dakota
meyer
white
house
blog
internet
materials
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
desmond
doss
served
army
medic
okinawa
june
rescued
fellow
soldiers
wounded
gave
place
stretcher
others
taken
safety
see
america
heroes
willbanks
ed
william
carney
sustained
multiple
gunshot
wounds
head
chest
legs
arm
yet
carried
flag
ensure
touch
ground
union
army
assault
fort
wagner
july
rare
acts
courage
medal
celebrates
led
president
truman
say
rather
medal
round
neck
president
truman
gives
army
medal
heroes
washington
post
government
interest
protecting
integrity
medal
honor
beyond
question
recite
government
compelling
interests
end
matter
first
amendment
requires
government
chosen
restriction
speech
issue
actually
necessary
achieve
interest
merchants
slip
must
direct
causal
link
restriction
imposed
injury
prevented
see
ibid
link
government
interest
protecting
integrity
military
honors
system
act
restriction
false
claims
liars
like
respondent
shown
although
appearing
concede
isolated
misrepresentation
tarnish
meaning
military
honors
government
asserts
common
sense
false
representations
tendency
dilute
value
meaning
military
awards
brief
must
acknowledged
pretender
claims
medal
lie
might
harm
government
demeaning
high
purpose
award
diminishing
honor
confirms
creating
appearance
medal
awarded
often
true
furthermore
lie
may
offend
true
holders
medal
one
perspective
bravery
high
principles
falsehood
puts
unworthy
company
pretender
yet
interests
satisfy
government
heavy
burden
seeks
regulate
protected
speech
see
playboy
entertainment
group
government
points
evidence
support
claim
public
general
perception
military
awards
diluted
false
claims
made
alvarez
cf
entertainment
merchants
supra
slip
analyzing
rejecting
findings
research
psychologists
demonstrating
causal
link
violent
video
games
harmful
effects
children
one
government
amici
notes
nothing
charlatans
xavier
alvarez
stain
medal
winners
honor
brief
veterans
foreign
wars
et
al
amici
curiae
general
proposition
sound
even
true
holders
medal
might
experience
anger
frustration
lack
causal
link
government
stated
interest
act
way
act
actually
necessary
achieve
government
stated
interest
government
shown
show
counterspeech
suffice
achieve
interest
facts
case
indicate
dynamics
free
speech
counterspeech
refutation
overcome
lie
respondent
lied
public
meeting
even
fbi
began
investigating
false
statements
alvarez
perceived
phony
lie
made
public
ridiculed
online
see
brief
respondent
actions
reported
press
see
ortega
alvarez
denies
claim
ontario
ca
inland
valley
daily
bulletin
fellow
board
member
called
resignation
see
bigham
water
district
rep
requests
alvarez
resign
wake
false
medal
claim
san
bernardino
ca
sun
may
good
reason
believe
similar
fate
befall
false
claimants
see
brief
reporters
committee
freedom
press
et
al
amici
curiae
listing
numerous
examples
public
exposure
false
claimants
indeed
outrage
contempt
expressed
respondent
lies
serve
reawaken
reinforce
public
respect
medal
recipients
high
purpose
acclaim
recipients
congressional
medal
honor
receive
also
casts
doubt
proposition
public
misled
claims
charlatans
become
cynical
whose
heroic
deeds
earned
medal
right
see
well
done
washington
post
reporting
roosevelt
awarding
congressional
medal
honor
alexander
vandegrift
devroy
medal
honor
given
killed
somalia
washington
post
may
reporting
president
clinton
awarding
congressional
medal
honor
two
special
forces
soldiers
killed
operations
somalia
remedy
speech
false
speech
true
ordinary
course
free
society
response
unreasoned
rational
uninformed
enlightened
lie
simple
truth
see
whitney
california
brandeis
concurring
time
expose
discussion
falsehood
fallacies
avert
evil
processes
education
remedy
speech
enforced
silence
theory
constitution
best
test
truth
power
thought
get
accepted
competition
market
abrams
holmes
dissenting
first
amendment
ensures
right
respond
speech
like
good
reason
freedom
speech
thought
flows
beneficence
state
inalienable
rights
person
suppression
speech
government
make
exposure
falsity
difficult
less
society
right
civic
duty
engage
open
dynamic
rational
discourse
ends
well
served
government
seeks
orchestrate
public
discussion
mandates
expressing
concern
counterspeech
insufficient
government
responds
military
records
lost
claims
brief
proves
little
however
without
verifiable
records
successful
criminal
prosecution
act
difficult
event
cases
public
refutation
serve
government
interest
act
either
addition
government
claims
many
false
claims
remain
unchallenged
government
provides
support
contention
event
order
show
public
refutation
adequate
alternative
government
must
demonstrate
unchallenged
claims
undermine
public
perception
military
integrity
awards
system
showing
made
fair
assumption
true
holders
medal
heard
alvarez
false
claims
fully
vindicated
community
expression
outrage
showing
nation
high
regard
medal
said
government
interest
american
people
need
assistance
government
prosecution
express
high
regard
special
place
military
heroes
hold
weak
society
needs
government
protection
intervention
pursues
resolve
preserve
truth
truth
needs
neither
handcuffs
badge
vindication
addition
government
seeks
regulate
protected
speech
restriction
must
least
restrictive
means
among
available
effective
alternatives
ashcroft
however
least
one
less
means
government
likely
protect
integrity
military
awards
system
database
list
congressional
medal
honor
winners
database
accessible
internet
easy
verify
expose
false
claims
appears
private
individuals
already
created
databases
similar
see
brief
respondent
least
one
database
past
winners
online
fully
searchable
see
congressional
medal
honor
society
full
archive
http
solicitor
general
responds
although
congress
department
defense
investigated
feasibility
establishing
database
government
concluded
database
impracticable
comprehensive
brief
without
explanation
difficult
assess
claim
especially
least
one
database
congressional
medal
honor
winners
already
exists
government
may
responses
criticisms
clear
showing
necessity
statute
necessity
required
exacting
scrutiny
nation
well
knows
one
costs
first
amendment
protects
speech
detest
well
speech
embrace
though
might
find
respondent
statements
anything
contemptible
right
make
statements
protected
constitution
guarantee
freedom
speech
expression
stolen
valor
act
infringes
upon
speech
protected
first
amendment
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
breyer
concurring
judgment
petitioner
xavier
alvarez
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
kagan
joins
concurring
judgment
agree
plurality
stolen
valor
act
violates
first
amendment
rest
conclusion
upon
strict
categorical
analysis
ante
rather
base
conclusion
upon
fact
statute
works
first
amendment
harm
government
achieve
legitimate
objectives
less
restrictive
ways
determining
whether
statute
violates
first
amendment
often
found
appropriate
examine
fit
statutory
ends
means
examined
harms
justifications
potential
alternatives
particular
taken
account
seriousness
harm
provision
likely
cause
nature
importance
provision
countervailing
objectives
extent
provision
tend
achieve
objectives
whether
less
restrictive
ways
ultimately
determine
whether
statute
works
harm
proportion
justifications
sometimes
referred
approach
intermediate
scrutiny
sometimes
proportionality
review
sometimes
examination
fit
sometimes
avoided
application
label
see
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
intermediate
scrutiny
randall
sorrell
plurality
opinion
proportionality
board
trustees
state
univ
fox
requiring
fit
means
ends
proportion
interest
nterference
speech
must
proportion
substantial
governmental
interest
served
pickering
board
ed
township
high
school
dist
regardless
label
approach
necessary
first
amendment
offer
proper
protection
many
instances
statute
adversely
affects
constitutionally
protected
interests
warrants
neither
condemnation
strict
scrutiny
implies
approval
implicit
rational
basis
review
see
turner
broadcasting
system
supra
cable
regulations
central
hudson
gas
elec
public
serv
nonmisleading
commercial
speech
burdick
takushi
election
regulation
pickering
supra
government
employee
speech
application
generally
applicable
laws
expressive
conduct
used
term
proportionality
describe
approach
thompson
western
medical
center
dissenting
opinion
see
also
bartnicki
vopper
concurring
opinion
nixon
shrink
missouri
government
pac
concurring
opinion
case
term
intermediate
scrutiny
describes
think
dissent
points
broad
areas
attempt
state
penalize
purportedly
false
speech
present
grave
unacceptable
danger
suppressing
truthful
speech
post
laws
restricting
false
statements
philosophy
religion
history
social
sciences
arts
like
raise
concerns
many
contexts
called
strict
scrutiny
case
involve
law
dangers
suppressing
valuable
ideas
lower
regulations
concern
false
statements
easily
verifiable
facts
concern
subject
matter
false
factual
statements
less
likely
true
factual
statements
make
valuable
contribution
marketplace
ideas
government
often
good
reasons
prohibit
false
speech
see
infra
listing
examples
statutes
doctrines
regulating
false
factual
speech
regulation
nonetheless
threaten
harms
circumstances
lead
apply
termed
intermediate
scrutiny
ii
stolen
valor
act
makes
crime
falsely
represen
oneself
awarded
decoration
medal
authorized
congress
armed
forces
read
statute
favorably
government
criminalizing
false
factual
statements
made
knowledge
falsity
intent
taken
true
see
staples
courts
construe
statutes
light
background
rules
common
law
requirement
mens
rea
crime
firmly
embedded
cf
new
york
times
sullivan
first
amendment
allows
public
official
recover
defamation
upon
showing
interpreted
statute
covers
lies
although
interpretation
diminishes
extent
statute
endangers
first
amendment
values
eliminate
threat
must
concede
government
points
frequently
said
implied
false
factual
statements
enjoy
little
first
amendment
protection
see
constr
nlrb
alse
statements
may
unprotected
sake
hustler
magazine
falwell
false
statements
fact
particularly
valueless
gertz
robert
welch
erroneous
statement
fact
worthy
constitutional
protection
judicial
statements
read
mean
protection
false
factual
statements
serve
useful
human
objectives
example
social
contexts
may
prevent
embarrassment
protect
privacy
shield
person
prejudice
provide
sick
comfort
preserve
child
innocence
public
contexts
may
stop
panic
otherwise
preserve
calm
face
danger
even
technical
philosophical
scientific
contexts
socrates
methods
suggest
examination
false
statement
even
made
deliberately
mislead
promote
form
thought
ultimately
helps
realize
truth
see
kozinski
concurring
denial
rehearing
en
banc
providing
numerous
examples
bok
lying
moral
choice
public
private
life
new
york
times
supra
even
false
statement
may
deemed
make
valuable
contribution
public
debate
since
brings
clearer
perception
livelier
impression
truth
produced
collision
quoting
mill
liberty
blackwell
ed
moreover
often
said
threat
criminal
prosecution
making
false
statement
inhibit
speaker
making
true
statements
thereby
chilling
kind
speech
lies
first
amendment
heart
see
gertz
supra
hence
emphasizes
mens
rea
requirements
provide
breathing
room
valuable
speech
reducing
honest
speaker
fear
may
accidentally
incur
liability
speaking
pervasiveness
false
statements
made
better
worse
motives
made
thoughtlessly
deliberately
made
without
accompanying
harm
provides
weapon
government
broadly
empowered
prosecute
falsity
without
unpopular
may
fear
government
use
weapon
selectively
say
prosecuting
pacifist
supports
cause
falsely
claiming
war
hero
ignoring
members
political
groups
might
make
similar
false
claims
also
must
concede
many
statutes
doctrines
make
utterance
certain
kinds
false
statements
unlawful
prohibitions
however
tend
narrower
statute
us
limit
scope
application
sometimes
requiring
proof
specific
harm
identifiable
victims
sometimes
specifying
lies
made
contexts
tangible
harm
others
especially
likely
occur
sometimes
limiting
prohibited
lies
particularly
likely
produce
harm
fraud
statutes
example
typically
require
proof
misrepresentation
material
upon
victim
relied
caused
actual
injury
see
restatement
second
torts
defamation
statutes
focus
upon
statements
kind
harm
reputation
another
deter
third
parties
association
dealing
victim
see
torts
involving
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
like
torts
involving
placing
victim
false
light
concern
falsehoods
tend
cause
harm
specific
victim
kind
see
perjury
statutes
prohibit
particular
set
false
statements
made
oath
requiring
showing
materiality
see
statutes
forbidding
lying
government
official
oath
typically
limited
circumstances
lie
likely
work
particular
specific
harm
interfering
functioning
government
department
statutes
also
require
showing
materiality
see
statutes
prohibiting
false
claims
terrorist
attacks
lies
commission
crimes
catastrophes
require
proof
substantial
public
harm
directly
foreseeable
involve
false
statements
likely
bring
harm
see
cfr
requiring
showing
foreseeability
actual
substantial
harm
prohibiting
knowing
false
statements
claiming
terrorist
attacks
taken
taking
take
place
statutes
forbidding
impersonation
public
official
typically
focus
acts
impersonation
mere
speech
may
require
showing
example
someone
deceived
following
course
action
pursued
deceitful
conduct
lepowitch
see
liability
attaches
hoever
falsely
assumes
pretends
officer
employee
acting
authority
acts
emphasis
added
statutes
prohibiting
trademark
infringement
present
perhaps
closest
analogy
present
statute
trademarks
identify
source
good
infringement
causes
harm
causing
confusion
among
potential
customers
source
thereby
diluting
value
mark
owner
consumers
economy
similarly
false
claim
possession
medal
honor
creates
confusion
entitled
wear
thus
diluting
value
earned
families
country
trademark
statutes
focused
upon
commercial
promotional
activities
likely
dilute
value
mark
indeed
typically
require
showing
likely
confusion
showing
tends
assure
feared
harm
fact
take
place
see
kp
permanent
lasting
impression
see
also
san
francisco
arts
athletics
olympic
upholding
statute
giving
olympic
committee
right
prohibit
certain
commercial
promotional
uses
word
olympic
list
exhaustive
sufficient
show
statutes
simply
prohibit
without
limitation
telling
lie
even
lie
one
particular
matter
instead
virtually
instances
limitations
context
requirements
proof
injury
like
narrow
statute
subset
lies
specific
harm
likely
occur
limitations
help
make
certain
statute
allow
threat
liability
criminal
punishment
roam
large
discouraging
forbidding
telling
lie
contexts
harm
unlikely
need
prohibition
small
statute
us
lacks
limiting
features
may
construed
prohibit
knowing
intentional
acts
deception
readily
verifiable
facts
within
personal
knowledge
speaker
thus
reducing
risk
valuable
speech
chilled
supra
still
ranges
broadly
breadth
means
creates
significant
risk
first
amendment
harm
written
applies
family
social
private
contexts
lies
often
cause
little
harm
also
applies
political
contexts
although
lies
likely
cause
harm
risk
censorious
selectivity
prosecutors
also
high
given
potential
haziness
individual
memory
along
large
number
military
awards
covered
ranging
medals
rifle
marksmanship
congressional
medal
honor
remains
risk
chilling
completely
eliminated
mens
rea
requirements
speaker
might
still
worried
prosecuted
careless
false
statement
even
intent
required
render
liable
prohibition
may
applied
applied
example
bar
stool
braggadocio
political
arena
subtly
selectively
speakers
government
like
considerations
lead
believe
statute
written
risks
significant
first
amendment
harm
like
plurality
dissent
believe
statute
nonetheless
substantial
justification
seeks
protect
interests
sacrificed
health
life
country
statute
serves
interest
seeking
preserve
intact
country
recognition
sacrifice
form
military
honors
permit
earned
honors
claim
otherwise
dilutes
value
awards
indeed
nation
fully
honor
sacrificed
much
country
honor
unless
claim
received
military
awards
tell
truth
thus
statute
risks
harming
protected
interests
order
achieve
substantial
countervailing
objective
must
therefore
ask
whether
possible
substantially
achieve
government
objective
less
burdensome
ways
view
answer
question
yes
potential
first
amendment
threats
alleviated
interpreting
statute
require
knowledge
falsity
etc
supra
first
amendment
risks
primarily
risks
flowing
breadth
coverage
remain
supra
indicated
limitations
scope
many
kinds
statutes
regulating
false
factual
speech
supra
possible
significantly
diminish
eliminate
remaining
risks
enacting
similar
finely
tailored
statute
example
military
awards
alike
congress
might
determine
warrant
greater
protection
others
finely
tailored
statute
might
kinds
statutes
prohibiting
false
factual
statements
done
insist
upon
showing
false
statement
caused
specific
harm
least
material
focus
coverage
lies
likely
harmful
contexts
lies
likely
cause
harm
recognize
contexts
particularly
political
contexts
narrowing
always
easy
achieve
political
arena
false
statement
likely
make
behavioral
difference
say
leading
listeners
vote
speaker
time
criminal
prosecution
particularly
dangerous
say
radically
changing
potential
election
result
consequently
easily
result
censorship
speakers
ideas
thus
statute
may
significantly
narrowed
applications
lower
courts
upheld
constitutionality
roughly
comparable
narrowly
tailored
statutes
political
contexts
see
stand
america
stand
america
new
york
upholding
first
amendment
challenge
application
lanham
act
political
organization
treasure
committee
elect
gerald
lostracco
fox
app
upholding
first
amendment
statute
prohibiting
campaign
material
falsely
claiming
one
incumbent
without
expressing
view
validity
cases
also
note
like
plurality
area
accurate
information
normally
counteract
lie
accurate
publicly
available
register
military
awards
easily
obtainable
political
opponents
may
well
adequately
protect
integrity
award
falsely
claim
earned
see
ante
likely
narrowly
tailored
statute
combined
devices
effectively
serve
congress
end
government
provided
convincing
explanation
finely
tailored
statute
work
view
statute
significantly
reduce
threat
first
amendment
harm
permitting
statute
achieve
important
protective
objective
find
statute
presently
drafted
works
disproportionate
constitutional
harm
consequently
fails
intermediate
scrutiny
violates
first
amendment
reasons
concur
judgment
alito
dissenting
petitioner
xavier
alvarez
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
alito
justice
scalia
tice
thomas
join
dissenting
bravest
brave
awarded
congressional
medal
honor
today
holds
every
american
constitutional
right
claim
received
singular
award
strikes
stolen
valor
act
enacted
stem
epidemic
false
claims
military
decorations
lies
congress
reasonably
concluded
undermining
country
system
military
honors
inflicting
real
harm
actual
medal
recipients
families
building
earlier
efforts
protect
military
awards
system
congress
responded
problem
crafting
narrow
statute
presents
threat
freedom
speech
statute
reaches
knowingly
false
statements
hard
facts
directly
within
speaker
personal
knowledge
lies
value
proscribing
chill
valuable
speech
holding
first
amendment
nevertheless
shields
lies
breaks
sharply
long
line
cases
recognizing
right
free
speech
protect
false
factual
statements
inflict
real
harm
serve
legitimate
interest
adhere
principle
thus
uphold
constitutionality
valuable
law
stolen
valor
act
makes
misdemeanor
falsely
represen
oneself
awarded
medal
decoration
badge
service
armed
forces
properly
construed
statute
limited
five
significant
respects
first
act
applies
narrow
category
false
representations
objective
facts
almost
always
proved
disproved
near
certainty
second
act
concerns
facts
squarely
within
speaker
personal
knowledge
third
government
maintains
see
brief
plurality
see
ante
concurrence
see
ante
breyer
concurring
judgment
seemingly
accept
conviction
act
requires
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
speaker
actually
knew
representation
fourth
act
applies
statements
reasonably
interpreted
communicating
actual
facts
reach
dramatic
performances
satire
parody
hyperbole
finally
act
strictly
viewpoint
neutral
false
statements
proscribed
act
highly
unlikely
tied
particular
political
ideological
message
rare
cases
act
applies
equally
false
statements
whether
tend
disparage
commend
government
military
system
military
honors
stolen
valor
act
follows
long
tradition
efforts
protect
country
system
military
honors
george
washington
commander
continental
army
created
first
honorary
badges
distinction
service
country
military
established
rigorous
system
ensure
awards
received
worn
truly
deserving
see
general
orders
george
washington
issued
newburgh
hudson
boynton
ed
reprint
requiring
submission
incontestible
proof
singularly
meritorious
action
commander
chief
washington
warned
anyone
insolence
assume
badge
actually
earned
severely
punished
building
tradition
congress
long
ago
made
federal
offense
anyone
wear
manufacture
sell
certain
military
decorations
without
authorization
see
act
ch
stat
codified
amended
although
never
opined
constitutionality
particular
provision
said
makes
crime
wear
military
uniform
without
authorization
valid
statute
face
schacht
congress
passed
stolen
valor
act
response
proliferation
false
claims
concerning
receipt
military
awards
example
single
year
virginia
residents
falsely
claimed
medal
investigation
people
listed
online
edition
received
top
military
award
revealed
fully
third
claims
library
congress
compiled
oral
histories
veterans
history
project
individuals
identified
medal
honor
recipients
actually
received
true
individuals
claimed
awarded
distinguished
service
cross
claimed
navy
notorious
cases
brought
congress
attention
included
case
judge
falsely
claimed
awarded
two
medals
honor
displayed
counterfeit
medals
courtroom
television
network
military
consultant
falsely
claimed
received
silver
star
former
judge
advocate
marine
corps
lied
receiving
bronze
star
purple
congress
recognized
lies
proscribed
stolen
valor
act
inflict
substantial
harm
many
instances
harm
tangible
nature
individuals
often
falsely
represent
award
recipients
order
obtain
financial
material
rewards
lucrative
contracts
government
investigation
false
claims
single
region
example
revealed
men
defrauded
department
veterans
affairs
million
veteran
cases
harm
less
tangible
nonetheless
significant
lies
proscribed
stolen
valor
act
tend
debase
distinctive
honor
military
awards
see
stolen
valor
act
stat
note
following
finding
raudulent
claims
surrounding
receipt
military
decorations
medals
damage
reputation
meaning
decorations
medals
legitimate
award
recipients
families
expressed
harm
endure
imposter
takes
credit
heroic
actions
never
performed
one
medal
honor
recipient
described
feeling
face
veterans
paid
price
earned
medals
well
recognized
trademark
law
proliferation
cheap
imitations
luxury
goods
blurs
given
purchasers
originals
landes
posner
trademark
law
economic
perspective
law
econ
much
way
proliferation
false
claims
military
awards
blurs
signal
given
actual
awards
making
seem
common
really
diluting
effect
harms
military
hampering
efforts
foster
morale
esprit
de
corps
surely
reasonable
congress
conclude
goal
preserving
integrity
country
top
military
honors
least
worthy
protecting
prestige
associated
fancy
watches
designer
handbags
cf
san
francisco
arts
athletics
olympic
rejecting
first
amendment
challenge
law
prohibiting
certain
unauthorized
uses
word
olympic
recognizing
uses
harm
olympic
committee
lessening
distinctiveness
term
plurality
justice
breyer
argue
congress
preserved
integrity
military
honors
means
criminal
prohibition
congress
ample
reason
believe
alternative
approaches
adequate
chief
alternative
recommended
compilation
release
comprehensive
list
database
actual
medal
recipients
public
readily
access
resource
argued
imposters
quickly
easily
exposed
proliferation
lies
military
honors
come
end
remedy
unfortunately
work
department
defense
explained
create
database
recipients
certain
top
military
honors
awarded
since
see
office
undersecretary
defense
report
senate
house
armed
services
committees
searchable
military
valor
decorations
database
sufficiently
comprehensive
database
practicable
lies
military
awards
remedied
plurality
calls
counterspeech
ante
without
requisite
database
many
efforts
refute
false
claims
may
thwarted
legitimate
award
recipients
may
erroneously
attacked
addition
steady
stream
stories
media
exposure
imposters
tend
increase
skepticism
among
members
public
entire
awards
system
exacerbate
harm
stolen
valor
act
meant
prevent
plurality
concurrence
also
suggest
congress
protect
system
military
honors
enacting
narrower
statute
plurality
recommends
law
apply
lies
intended
secure
moneys
valuable
considerations
ante
similar
vein
concurrence
comments
finely
tailored
statute
might
insist
upon
showing
false
statement
caused
specific
harm
ante
opinion
breyer
much
damage
caused
real
award
recipients
system
military
honors
false
statements
linked
financial
tangible
reward
unless
even
small
financial
loss
say
dollar
given
homeless
man
falsely
claiming
decorated
veteran
important
eyes
first
amendment
damage
caused
integrity
military
awards
system
basis
distinguishing
stolen
valor
act
alternative
statutes
plurality
concurrence
appear
willing
sustain
justice
breyer
also
proposes
narrowing
statute
covers
shorter
list
military
awards
ante
opinion
concurring
judgment
provide
hint
thinks
line
must
drawn
perhaps
expects
congress
keep
trying
eventually
passes
law
draws
line
right
place
ii
time
recognized
general
matter
false
factual
statements
possess
intrinsic
first
amendment
value
see
illinois
ex
rel
madigan
telemarketing
associates
like
forms
public
deception
fraudulent
charitable
solicitation
unprotected
speech
constr
nlrb
alse
statements
may
unprotected
sake
hustler
magazine
falwell
false
statements
fact
particularly
valueless
interfere
function
marketplace
ideas
cause
damage
individual
reputation
easily
repaired
counterspeech
however
persuasive
effective
keeton
hustler
magazine
constitutional
value
false
statements
quoting
gertz
robert
welch
bill
son
restaurants
nlrb
alse
statements
immunized
first
amendment
right
freedom
speech
brown
hartlage
course
demonstrable
falsehoods
protected
first
amendment
manner
truthful
statements
herbert
lando
spreading
false
information
carries
first
amendment
credentials
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
untruthful
speech
commercial
otherwise
never
protected
sake
gertz
supra
erroneous
statement
fact
worthy
constitutional
protection
time
hill
constitutional
guarantees
first
amendment
tolerate
sanctions
calculated
falsehood
without
significant
impairment
essential
function
garrison
louisiana
knowingly
false
statement
false
statement
made
reckless
disregard
truth
enjoy
constitutional
protection
consistent
recognition
many
kinds
false
factual
statements
long
proscribed
without
ing
constitutional
problem
stevens
slip
quoting
chaplinsky
new
hampshire
laws
prohibiting
fraud
perjury
defamation
example
existence
first
amendment
adopted
constitutionality
beyond
question
see
donaldson
read
magazine
explaining
government
power
protect
people
fraud
always
recognized
country
firmly
established
dunnigan
observing
constitutionality
perjury
statutes
unquestioned
beauharnais
illinois
noting
prevention
punishment
libel
never
thought
raise
constitutional
problem
also
described
falling
outside
first
amendment
protective
shield
certain
false
factual
statements
neither
illegal
tortious
time
amendment
adoption
right
freedom
speech
held
permit
recovery
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
means
false
statement
see
falwell
supra
even
though
tort
enter
law
late
century
see
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
hereinafter
prosser
keeton
hill
supra
concluded
free
speech
right
allows
recovery
even
modern
tort
invasion
privacy
see
prosser
keeton
line
holdings
long
assumed
first
amendment
offended
prominent
criminal
statutes
close
analog
well
known
probably
makes
crime
knowingly
willfully
make
materially
false
fictitious
fraudulent
statement
representation
matter
within
jurisdiction
executive
legislative
judicial
branch
government
unlike
perjury
limited
statements
made
oath
official
government
tribunal
require
showing
pecuniary
property
loss
government
gilliland
instead
statute
based
need
protect
agencies
perversion
might
result
deceptive
practices
described
ibid
emphasis
added
still
statutes
make
crime
falsely
represent
one
speaking
behalf
approval
federal
government
see
making
crime
falsely
impersonate
federal
officer
making
crime
knowingly
use
without
authorization
names
enumerated
federal
agencies
federal
bureau
investigation
manner
reasonably
calculated
convey
impression
communication
approved
authorized
agency
recognized
like
require
showing
pecuniary
property
loss
purpose
general
good
repute
government
service
lepowitch
quoting
barnow
told
federal
criminal
statutes
punish
false
statements
made
connection
areas
federal
agency
concern
see
wells
nn
stevens
dissenting
citing
least
federal
false
statement
statutes
code
examples
amply
demonstrate
false
statements
fact
merit
first
amendment
protection
true
justice
breyer
notes
many
society
either
approve
condone
certain
discrete
categories
false
statements
including
false
statements
made
prevent
harm
innocent
victims
white
lies
see
ante
respondent
false
claim
received
medal
honor
fall
categories
lie
prevent
embarrassment
protect
privacy
shield
person
prejudice
provide
sick
comfort
preserve
child
innocence
ibid
lie
stop
panic
otherwise
preserve
calm
face
danger
philosophical
scientific
debate
ibid
respondent
claim
like
covered
stolen
valor
act
served
valid
purpose
respondent
others
join
attacking
stolen
valor
act
take
different
view
respondent
brief
features
veritable
paean
lying
according
respondent
lie
medal
honor
nothing
ordinary
americans
everyone
lies
says
brief
respondent
lie
time
ibid
uman
beings
constantly
forced
choose
persona
present
world
choices
nearly
always
involve
intentional
omissions
misrepresentations
outright
deception
academic
amicus
tells
us
first
amendment
protects
right
construct
fabrications
awarded
military
decoration
brief
jonathan
varat
amicus
curiae
radical
interpretation
first
amendment
supported
precedent
lies
covered
stolen
valor
act
intrinsic
value
thus
merit
first
amendment
protection
unless
prohibition
chill
expression
falls
within
amendment
scope
turn
question
repeatedly
endorsed
principle
false
statements
fact
merit
first
amendment
protection
sake
recognized
sometimes
necessary
exten
measure
strategic
protection
statements
order
ensure
sufficient
protected
speech
gertz
quoting
naacp
button
thus
order
prevent
chilling
truthful
speech
matters
public
concern
held
liability
defamation
public
official
figure
requires
proof
defamatory
statements
made
knowledge
reckless
disregard
falsity
see
new
york
times
sullivan
civil
liability
garrison
criminal
liability
requirement
applies
public
officials
figures
seek
recover
tort
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
see
falwell
imposed
xacting
proof
requirements
contexts
well
necessary
ensure
truthful
speech
chilled
madigan
complainant
fraud
action
must
show
defendant
made
knowingly
false
statement
material
fact
intent
mislead
listener
succeeded
see
also
regulation
baseless
lawsuits
limited
objectively
baseless
subjectively
motivated
unlawful
purpose
hartlage
sustaining
first
amendment
challenge
law
prohibiting
certain
factual
misstatements
course
political
debate
showing
disputed
statement
made
good
faith
without
knowledge
falsity
reckless
disregard
whether
false
proof
requirements
inevitably
effect
bringing
false
factual
statements
within
protection
first
amendment
justified
order
prevent
chilling
valuable
speech
examples
means
exhaust
circumstances
false
factual
statements
enjoy
degree
instrumental
constitutional
protection
contrary
broad
areas
attempt
state
penalize
purportedly
false
speech
present
grave
unacceptable
danger
suppressing
truthful
speech
laws
restricting
false
statements
philosophy
religion
history
social
sciences
arts
matters
public
concern
present
threat
point
thing
truth
falsity
areas
truth
always
impossible
ascertain
rather
perilous
permit
state
arbiter
truth
even
wide
scholarly
consensus
concerning
particular
matter
truth
served
allowing
consensus
challenged
without
fear
reprisal
today
accepted
wisdom
sometimes
turns
mistaken
contexts
ven
false
statement
may
deemed
make
valuable
contribution
public
debate
since
brings
clearer
perception
livelier
impression
truth
produced
collision
error
sullivan
supra
quoting
mill
liberty
mccallum
ed
allowing
state
proscribe
false
statements
areas
also
opens
door
state
use
power
political
ends
statements
history
illustrate
point
false
statements
historical
events
may
banned
certain
must
statement
false
ban
may
upheld
make
calculation
cases
prohibiting
viewpoint
discrimination
fetter
state
power
degree
see
paul
explaining
first
amendment
permit
government
engage
viewpoint
discrimination
guise
regulating
unprotected
speech
potential
abuse
power
areas
simply
great
stark
contrast
hypothetical
laws
prohibiting
false
statements
history
science
similar
matters
stolen
valor
act
presents
risk
valuable
speech
suppressed
speech
punished
act
verifiably
false
entirely
lacking
intrinsic
value
also
fails
serve
instrumental
purpose
first
amendment
might
protect
tellingly
asked
oral
argument
truthful
speech
stolen
valor
act
might
chill
even
respondent
counsel
conceded
answer
none
tr
oral
arg
neither
two
opinions
endorsed
justices
majority
claims
false
statements
covered
stolen
valor
act
possess
either
intrinsic
instrumental
value
instead
opinions
appear
based
distinct
concern
act
suffers
overbreadth
see
ante
plurality
opinion
act
applies
personal
whispered
conversations
within
home
ante
breyer
concurring
judgment
act
applies
family
social
private
contexts
political
contexts
strike
statute
basis
overbroad
necessary
show
statute
overbreadth
substantial
absolute
sense
also
relative
plainly
legitimate
sweep
williams
see
also
ibid
noting
requirement
vigorously
enforced
plurality
concurrence
even
attempt
make
showing
plurality
additionally
worries
decision
sustaining
stolen
valor
act
might
prompt
congress
state
legislatures
enact
laws
criminalizing
lies
endless
list
subjects
ante
plurality
apparently
fears
see
laws
making
crime
lie
civilian
awards
college
degrees
certificates
achievement
arts
sports
concern
likely
unfounded
good
reason
military
honors
traditionally
regarded
quite
different
civilian
awards
nearly
century
ago
congress
made
crime
wear
military
medal
without
authorization
comparable
tradition
regarding
things
super
bowl
rings
oscars
phi
beta
kappa
keys
event
plurality
concern
entirely
fanciful
falls
outside
purview
first
amendment
problem
plurality
foresees
legislative
bodies
enact
unnecessary
overly
intrusive
criminal
laws
applies
regardless
whether
laws
question
involve
speech
nonexpressive
conduct
problem
let
us
say
law
making
criminal
offense
falsely
claim
high
school
valedictorian
problem
suppression
speech
misuse
criminal
law
reserved
conduct
inflicts
threatens
truly
serious
societal
harm
objection
hypothetical
law
objection
law
making
crime
eat
potato
chips
graduation
ceremony
high
school
valedictorian
recognized
safeguard
laws
democracy
first
amendment
every
foolish
law
unconstitutional
stolen
valor
act
represents
judgment
people
elected
representatives
false
statements
military
awards
different
false
statements
civilian
awards
certainly
true
respect
high
honor
respondent
misappropriated
respondent
claimed
awarded
medal
honor
bravery
iran
hostage
crisis
singular
award
however
bestowed
members
armed
forces
distinguis
conspicuously
gallantry
intrepidity
risk
lives
beyond
call
duty
see
also
half
heroic
individuals
awarded
medal
honor
world
war
received
congress
entitled
conclude
falsely
claiming
medal
honor
qualitatively
different
even
prestigious
civilian
awards
misappropriation
honor
warrants
criminal
sanction
stolen
valor
act
narrow
law
enacted
address
important
problem
presents
threat
freedom
expression
sustain
constitutionality
act
therefore
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
although
act
use
term
knowing
knowingly
explained
criminal
statutes
must
construed
light
background
rules
common
law
requirement
mens
rea
crime
firmly
embedded
staples
act
use
phrase
falsely
represents
moreover
connotes
knowledge
requirement
see
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
misrepresentation
false
representation
mean
act
making
false
misleading
assertion
something
usu
intent
deceive
emphasis
added
see
black
law
dictionary
supra
defining
representation
mean
presentation
fact
see
also
milkovich
lorain
journal
explaining
protected
statements
interpreted
stating
actual
facts
individual
public
debate
suffer
lack
expression
hyperbole
traditionally
added
much
discourse
nation
quoting
hustler
magazine
falwell
alteration
original
colimore
pinning
crime
fake
heroes
agent
helps
expose
convict
bogus
medals
philadelphia
inquirer
http
internet
materials
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
crewdson
claims
medals
amount
stolen
valor
chicago
tribune
http
half
moh
entries
oral
history
project
incorrect
marine
corps
times
wlnr
ibid
young
honor
get
medal
honor
chicago
tribune
http
rutenberg
fox
news
colonel
times
apr
http
burkett
whitley
stolen
valor
vietnam
generation
robbed
heroes
history
indeed
first
person
prosecuted
stolen
valor
act
apparently
parlayed
medals
lucrative
security
consulting
contracts
zambito
war
crime
fbi
targets
fake
heroes
new
york
daily
news
may
http
dept
justice
northwest
crackdown
fake
veterans
operation
stolen
valor
http
cato
high
tussles
false
heroics
free
speech
felony
pittsburg
tribune
review
http
addition
since
department
may
disclose
social
security
numbers
birthdates
recipients
database
limited
use
ascertaining
veracity
claim
involving
person
common
name
office
undersecretary
defense
report
plurality
rejects
rule
although
made
clear
ntruthful
speech
never
protected
sake
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
plurality
willing
concede
falsity
speech
bears
upon
whether
protected
ante
represents
dramatic
entirely
unjustified
departure
sound
approach
taken
past
cases
respondent
supporting
amici
attempt
limit
rule
certain
subsets
false
statements
see
brief
respondent
asserting
falsity
proved
cause
specific
harm
stripped
first
amendment
protection
examples
described
belie
attempt
examples
show
rule
least
applies
specific
types
false
statements
neither
illegal
tortious
torts
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
invasion
privacy
exist
first
amendment
adopted
false
speech
cause
pecuniary
harm
harm
remedied
torts
defamation
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
invasion
privacy
often
nonpecuniary
nature
harm
inflicted
statements
illegal
false
speech
cause
detrimental
reliance
neither
perjury
laws
many
federal
false
statement
statutes
require
anyone
actually
rely
false
statement
particular
false
statements
shown
caused
specific
harm
damages
presumed
defamation
actions
involving
knowing
reckless
falsehoods
showing
specific
harm
required
prosecutions
many
federal
false
statement
statutes
false
speech
cause
harm
specific
individual
purpose
many
federal
false
statement
statutes
protect
government
processes
see
army
center
military
history
medal
honor
statistics
http