maryland
shatzer
argued
october
decided
february
police
detective
tried
question
respondent
shatzer
incarcerated
maryland
prison
pursuant
prior
conviction
allegations
sexually
abused
son
shatzer
invoked
miranda
right
counsel
present
interrogation
detective
terminated
interview
shatzer
released
back
general
prison
population
investigation
closed
another
detective
reopened
investigation
attempted
interrogate
shatzer
still
incarcerated
shatzer
waived
miranda
rights
made
inculpatory
statements
trial
refused
suppress
statements
reasoning
edwards
arizona
apply
shatzer
experienced
break
miranda
custody
prior
interrogation
shatzer
convicted
sexual
child
abuse
appeals
maryland
reversed
holding
mere
passage
time
end
edwards
protections
assuming
arguendo
exception
edwards
existed
shatzer
release
back
general
prison
population
constitute
break
held
shatzer
experienced
break
miranda
custody
lasting
two
weeks
first
second
attempts
interrogation
edwards
mandate
suppression
statements
pp
edwards
created
presumption
suspect
invokes
miranda
right
presence
counsel
waiver
right
response
subsequent
police
attempt
custodial
interrogation
involuntary
edwards
fundamental
purpose
reserv
integrity
accused
choice
communicate
police
counsel
patterson
illinois
prevent
ing
police
badgering
waiving
previously
asserted
miranda
rights
michigan
harvey
easy
believe
suspect
later
waiver
coerced
badgered
held
uninterrupted
miranda
custody
since
first
refusal
waive
remains
cut
normal
life
isolated
atmosphere
miranda
arizona
captors
appear
control
fate
illinois
perkins
suspect
released
custody
returned
normal
life
time
later
attempted
interrogation
little
reason
think
change
heart
coerced
edwards
presumption
established
opinion
appropriate
specify
period
release
custody
terminate
application
see
county
riverside
mclaughlin
concludes
appropriate
period
days
provides
ample
time
suspect
get
reacclimated
normal
life
consult
friends
counsel
shake
residual
coercive
effects
prior
custody
pp
shatzer
release
back
general
prison
population
constitutes
break
miranda
custody
lawful
imprisonment
imposed
upon
conviction
create
coercive
pressures
produced
investigative
custody
justify
edwards
previously
incarcerated
suspects
released
back
general
prison
population
return
accustomed
surroundings
daily
routine
regain
degree
control
lives
attempted
interrogation
continued
detention
relatively
disconnected
prior
unwillingness
cooperate
investigation
inherently
compelling
pressures
custodial
interrogation
ended
shatzer
returned
normal
life
pp
md
reversed
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
alito
sotomayor
joined
thomas
joined
part
iii
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
maryland
petitioner
michael
blaine
shatzer
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
february
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
consider
whether
break
custody
ends
presumption
involuntariness
established
edwards
arizona
august
social
worker
assigned
child
advocacy
center
criminal
investigation
division
hagerstown
police
department
referred
department
allegations
respondent
michael
shatzer
sexually
abused
son
time
shatzer
incarcerated
maryland
correctional
serving
sentence
unrelated
offense
detective
shane
blankenship
assigned
investigation
interviewed
shatzer
correctional
institution
august
asking
questions
blankenship
reviewed
shatzer
miranda
rights
obtained
written
waiver
rights
blankenship
explained
question
shatzer
sexually
abusing
son
shatzer
expressed
confusion
thought
blankenship
attorney
discuss
prior
crime
incarcerated
blankenship
clarified
purpose
visit
shatzer
declined
speak
without
attorney
accordingly
blankenship
ended
interview
shatzer
released
back
general
prison
population
shortly
thereafter
blankenship
closed
investigation
two
years
six
months
later
social
worker
referred
specific
allegations
department
incident
involving
shatzer
detective
paul
hoover
division
assigned
investigation
social
worker
interviewed
victim
eight
years
old
described
incident
detail
new
information
hand
march
went
roxbury
correctional
institute
shatzer
since
transferred
interviewed
shatzer
maintenance
room
outfitted
desk
three
chairs
hoover
explained
wanted
ask
shatzer
alleged
incident
involving
shatzer
son
shatzer
surprised
thought
investigation
closed
hoover
explained
opened
new
file
hoover
read
shatzer
miranda
rights
obtained
written
waiver
standard
department
form
hoover
interrogated
shatzer
incident
approximately
minutes
shatzer
denied
ordering
son
perform
fellatio
admitted
masturbating
front
son
distance
less
three
feet
interview
ended
shatzer
agreed
hoover
request
submit
polygraph
examination
point
interrogation
shatzer
request
speak
attorney
refer
prior
refusal
answer
questions
without
one
five
days
later
march
hoover
another
detective
met
shatzer
correctional
facility
administer
polygraph
examination
reading
shatzer
miranda
rights
obtaining
written
waiver
detective
administered
test
concluded
shatzer
failed
detectives
questioned
shatzer
became
upset
started
cry
incriminated
saying
force
force
md
making
inculpatory
statement
shatzer
requested
attorney
hoover
promptly
ended
interrogation
state
attorney
washington
county
charged
shatzer
sexual
offense
sexual
child
abuse
assault
contributing
conditions
rendering
child
need
assistance
shatzer
moved
suppress
march
statements
pursuant
edwards
trial
held
suppression
hearing
later
denied
shatzer
motion
edwards
protections
apply
reasoned
shatzer
experienced
break
custody
miranda
purposes
interrogations
cir
washington
app
shatzer
pleaded
guilty
waived
right
jury
trial
proceeded
bench
trial
based
agreed
statement
facts
accordance
agreement
state
described
interview
victim
shatzer
statements
detectives
based
proffered
testimony
victim
admission
defendant
act
masturbation
trial
found
shatzer
guilty
sexual
child
abuse
cir
washington
dissent
two
judges
appeals
maryland
reversed
remanded
held
passage
time
alone
insufficient
end
protections
afforded
edwards
assuming
arguendo
exception
edwards
existed
shatzer
release
back
general
prison
population
interrogations
constitute
break
custody
granted
certiorari
ii
fifth
amendment
applies
virtue
fourteenth
amendment
malloy
hogan
provides
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
amdt
miranda
arizona
adopted
set
prophylactic
measures
protect
suspect
fifth
amendment
right
inherently
compelling
pressures
custodial
interrogation
observed
incommunicado
interrogation
unfamiliar
atmosphere
involves
psychological
pressures
work
undermine
individual
resist
compel
speak
otherwise
freely
consequently
reasoned
nless
adequate
protective
devices
employed
dispel
compulsion
inherent
custodial
surroundings
statement
obtained
defendant
truly
product
free
choice
counteract
coercive
pressure
miranda
announced
police
officers
must
warn
suspect
prior
questioning
right
remain
silent
right
presence
attorney
warnings
given
suspect
indicates
wishes
remain
silent
interrogation
must
cease
similarly
suspect
wants
attorney
interrogation
must
cease
attorney
present
critically
however
suspect
waive
rights
establish
valid
waiver
state
must
show
waiver
knowing
intelligent
voluntary
high
standar
proof
waiver
constitutional
rights
set
forth
johnson
zerbst
edwards
determined
zerbst
traditional
standard
waiver
sufficient
protect
suspect
right
counsel
present
subsequent
interrogation
previously
requested
counsel
additional
safeguards
necessary
therefore
superimposed
second
layer
prophylaxis
mcneil
wisconsin
edwards
held
hen
accused
invoked
right
counsel
present
custodial
interrogation
valid
waiver
right
established
showing
responded
custodial
interrogation
even
advised
rights
subject
interrogation
authorities
counsel
made
available
unless
accused
initiates
communication
exchanges
conversations
police
rationale
edwards
suspect
indicates
capable
undergoing
custodial
questioning
without
advice
counsel
subsequent
waiver
come
authorities
behest
suspect
instigation
product
compelling
pressures
purely
voluntary
choice
suspect
arizona
roberson
rule
voluntary
miranda
waiver
sufficient
time
initial
attempted
interrogation
protect
suspect
right
counsel
present
sufficient
time
subsequent
attempts
suspect
initially
requested
presence
counsel
implicit
assumption
course
subsequent
requests
interrogation
pose
significantly
greater
risk
coercion
increased
risk
results
police
persistence
trying
get
suspect
talk
also
continued
pressure
begins
individual
taken
custody
suspect
sought
interrogated
pressure
likely
increase
custody
prolonged
minnick
mississippi
edwards
presumption
involuntariness
ensures
police
take
advantage
mounting
coercive
pressures
prolonged
police
custody
roberson
repeatedly
attempting
question
suspect
previously
requested
counsel
suspect
badgered
submission
kennedy
dissenting
frequently
emphasized
edwards
rule
constitutional
mandate
judicially
prescribed
prophylaxis
see
montejo
louisiana
slip
michigan
harvey
solem
stumes
edwards
rule
constitutional
command
obligation
justify
expansion
roberson
supra
kennedy
dissenting
lower
courts
uniformly
held
break
custody
ends
edwards
presumption
see
people
storm
cal
collecting
state
federal
cases
previously
addressed
issue
dicta
see
mcneil
supra
edwards
applies
assuming
break
custody
judicially
crafted
rule
justified
reference
prophylactic
purpose
davis
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
applies
benefits
outweigh
costs
montejo
supra
slip
begin
benefits
edwards
presumption
involuntariness
incidental
effect
conserv
ing
judicial
resources
otherwise
expended
making
difficult
determinations
voluntariness
minnick
supra
fundamental
purpose
however
reserv
integrity
accused
choice
communicate
police
counsel
patterson
illinois
prevent
ing
police
badgering
defendant
waiving
previously
asserted
miranda
rights
harvey
supra
thus
benefits
rule
measured
number
coerced
confessions
suppresses
otherwise
admitted
see
montejo
supra
slip
easy
believe
suspect
may
coerced
badgered
abandoning
earlier
refusal
questioned
without
counsel
paradigm
edwards
case
case
suspect
arrested
particular
crime
held
uninterrupted
pretrial
custody
crime
actively
investigated
initial
interrogation
including
second
one
remains
cut
normal
life
companions
thrust
isolated
unfamiliar
atmosphere
miranda
captors
appear
control
fate
illinois
perkins
situation
confronted
suspects
edwards
roberson
minnick
three
cases
held
edwards
rule
applicable
edwards
arrested
pursuant
warrant
taken
police
station
interrogated
requested
counsel
edwards
officer
ended
interrogation
took
county
next
morning
two
officer
colleagues
reinterrogated
edwards
jail
roberson
arrested
scene
burglary
interrogated
requested
lawyer
roberson
different
officer
interrogated
three
days
later
still
custody
pursuant
arrest
ibid
minnick
arrested
local
police
taken
san
diego
jail
two
fbi
agents
interrogated
next
morning
requested
counsel
minnick
two
days
later
mississippi
deputy
sheriff
reinterrogated
jail
none
suspects
regained
sense
control
normalcy
initially
taken
custody
crime
investigation
unlike
happened
three
cases
suspect
released
pretrial
custody
returned
normal
life
time
later
attempted
interrogation
little
reason
think
change
heart
regarding
interrogation
without
counsel
coerced
longer
isolated
likely
able
seek
advice
attorney
family
members
knows
earlier
experience
need
demand
counsel
bring
interrogation
halt
investigative
custody
last
indefinitely
circumstances
far
fetched
think
police
officer
asking
suspect
whether
like
waive
miranda
rights
wear
accused
smith
illinois
per
curiam
first
request
original
attempted
interrogation
course
deemed
coercive
change
heart
less
likely
attributable
badgering
fact
deliberation
familiar
surroundings
caused
believe
rightly
wrongly
cooperating
investigation
interest
uncritical
extension
edwards
situation
significantly
increase
number
genuinely
coerced
confessions
excluded
justification
conclusive
presumption
disappears
application
presumption
reach
correct
result
time
coleman
thompson
time
extending
edwards
rule
yields
diminished
benefits
extending
rule
also
increases
costs
voluntary
confessions
excludes
trial
voluntary
confessions
deters
law
enforcement
officers
even
trying
obtain
voluntary
confessions
merely
proper
element
law
enforcement
miranda
supra
unmitigated
good
mcneil
society
compelling
interest
finding
convicting
punishing
violate
law
ibid
quoting
moran
burbine
logical
endpoint
edwards
disability
termination
miranda
custody
lingering
effects
without
limitation
barring
purely
arbitrary
every
edwards
prohibition
custodial
interrogation
particular
suspect
eternal
prohibition
applies
course
subsequent
interrogation
pertains
different
crime
roberson
supra
conducted
different
law
enforcement
authority
minnick
even
suspect
met
attorney
first
interrogation
ibid
prevents
questioning
ex
ante
render
invalid
ex
post
confessions
invited
obtained
suspects
unbeknownst
interrogators
acquired
edwards
immunity
previously
connection
offense
country
harbors
large
number
repeat
consequence
disastrous
conclude
extension
edwards
justified
opened
protective
umbrella
solem
far
enough
protections
offered
miranda
deemed
sufficient
ensure
police
respect
suspect
desire
attorney
present
first
time
police
interrogate
adequately
ensure
result
suspect
initially
requested
counsel
reinterrogated
break
custody
sufficient
duration
dissipate
coercive
effects
shatzer
return
general
prison
population
qualified
break
custody
question
address
part
iii
infra
doubt
lasted
long
enough
years
meet
durational
requirement
break
lasted
one
year
one
week
impractical
leave
answer
question
clarification
future
adjudication
law
enforcement
officers
need
know
certainty
beforehand
renewed
interrogation
lawful
certainly
unusual
set
forth
precise
time
limits
governing
police
action
county
riverside
mclaughlin
specified
hours
time
within
police
must
comply
requirement
gerstein
pugh
person
arrested
without
warrant
brought
magistrate
establish
probable
cause
continued
detention
like
mclaughlin
case
requisite
police
action
presentation
magistrate
abstention
interrogation
prescribed
statute
established
opinion
think
appropriate
specify
period
time
avoid
consequence
continuation
edwards
presumption
reach
correct
result
time
coleman
supra
seems
us
period
days
provides
plenty
time
suspect
get
reacclimated
normal
life
consult
friends
counsel
shake
residual
coercive
effects
prior
custody
limitation
meets
shatzer
concern
rule
lends
police
abuse
envisions
suspect
invokes
miranda
right
counsel
police
release
suspect
briefly
end
edwards
presumption
promptly
bring
back
custody
reinterrogation
suspect
custody
long
enough
days
eliminate
coercive
effect
nothing
gain
gamesmanship
nothing
except
entirely
appropriate
gain
able
interrogate
suspect
made
valid
waiver
miranda
shatzer
argues
ending
edwards
protections
break
custody
undermine
edwards
purpose
conserve
judicial
resources
sure
said
merit
edwards
decision
lies
clarity
command
certainty
application
minnick
clarity
certainty
goals
valuable
reasonably
achievement
substantive
end
exclusion
compelled
confessions
confessions
obtained
break
custody
waiver
miranda
rights
unlikely
compelled
hence
unreasonably
excluded
case
exception
dim
marginally
nature
edwards
every
case
involving
edwards
courts
must
determine
whether
suspect
custody
requested
counsel
later
made
statements
seeks
suppress
cases
alleged
break
custody
simply
repeat
inquiry
time
initial
invocation
reinterrogation
cases
determination
easy
determined
defendant
pleading
edwards
custody
two
weeks
contested
interrogation
spared
inquiry
whether
ever
anywhere
asserted
miranda
right
counsel
iii
facts
case
present
additional
issue
one
questions
shatzer
custody
miranda
purposes
interviews
detective
blankenship
detective
hoover
likewise
one
questions
shatzer
triggered
edwards
protections
according
detective
blankenship
notes
interview
stated
talk
case
without
attorney
present
interview
shatzer
released
back
general
prison
population
serving
unrelated
sentence
issue
whether
constitutes
break
miranda
custody
never
decided
whether
incarceration
constitutes
custody
miranda
purposes
indeed
explicitly
declined
address
issue
see
perkins
see
also
bradley
ohio
marshall
dissenting
denial
certiorari
whether
depends
upon
whether
exerts
coercive
pressure
miranda
designed
guard
danger
coercion
results
interaction
custody
official
interrogation
perkins
supra
emphasis
added
determine
whether
suspect
miranda
custody
asked
whether
arrest
restraint
freedom
movement
degree
associated
formal
arrest
new
york
quarles
see
also
stansbury
california
per
curiam
test
doubt
satisfied
forms
incarceration
cases
make
clear
however
test
identifies
necessary
sufficient
condition
miranda
custody
declined
accord
talismanic
power
miranda
enforced
types
situations
concerns
powered
decision
implicated
berkemer
mccarty
thus
temporary
relatively
nonthreatening
detention
involved
traffic
stop
terry
stop
see
terry
ohio
constitute
miranda
custody
mccarty
supra
see
also
perkins
supra
addressing
interim
period
suspect
interrogated
subject
baseline
set
restraints
imposed
pursuant
prior
conviction
without
minimizing
harsh
realities
incarceration
think
lawful
imprisonment
imposed
upon
conviction
crime
create
coercive
pressures
identified
miranda
interrogated
suspects
previously
convicted
crime
live
prison
released
back
general
prison
population
return
accustomed
surroundings
daily
routine
regain
degree
control
lives
prior
interrogation
sentenced
prisoners
contrast
miranda
paradigm
isolated
accusers
live
among
inmates
guards
workers
often
receive
visitors
communicate
people
outside
mail
telephone
detention
moreover
relatively
disconnected
prior
unwillingness
cooperate
investigation
former
interrogator
power
increase
duration
incarceration
determined
even
possibility
parole
exists
former
interrogator
apparent
power
decrease
time
served
stark
contrast
circumstances
faced
defendants
edwards
roberson
minnick
whose
continued
detention
suspects
rested
controlling
interrogation
confronted
uncertainties
final
charges
face
whether
convicted
sentence
receive
shatzer
experience
illustrates
vast
differences
miranda
custody
incarceration
pursuant
conviction
time
attempted
interrogation
shatzer
already
serving
sentence
prior
conviction
returned
general
prison
population
maryland
correctional
later
transferred
unrelated
reasons
street
roxbury
correctional
institute
state
correctional
facilities
see
maryland
div
correction
inmate
handbook
online
http
internet
materials
visited
available
clerk
case
file
inmates
facilities
generally
visit
library
week
regular
exercise
recreation
periods
participate
basic
adult
education
occupational
training
able
send
receive
mail
allowed
receive
visitors
twice
week
see
http
http
continued
detention
interrogation
depend
said
say
detective
blankenship
alleged
placed
higher
level
security
faced
continuing
restraints
result
interrogation
inherently
compelling
pressures
custodial
interrogation
ended
returned
normal
life
iv
words
response
justice
stevens
concurrence
claims
ignore
hen
police
tell
indigent
suspect
right
attorney
reinterrogate
without
providing
lawyer
suspect
likely
feel
police
lied
really
right
lawyer
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
hereinafter
concurrence
see
also
post
fallacy
talking
reinterrogating
suspect
talking
asking
permission
interrogated
officer
sense
lied
suspect
advising
miranda
requires
right
remain
silent
choose
speak
right
presence
attorney
promptly
ends
attempted
interrogation
suspect
declines
speak
without
counsel
present
two
weeks
later
reapproaches
suspect
asks
willing
speak
without
lawyer
present
concer
motivated
edwards
line
cases
post
suspect
coerced
saying
yes
concern
guides
decision
today
contrary
concurrence
conclusion
post
reason
believe
suspect
view
confession
way
end
interrogation
begins
told
avoid
simply
requesting
interrogated
without
counsel
present
option
worked
concurrence
argues
often
case
post
break
custody
change
suspect
mind
need
say
concurrence
also
accuses
ignor
ing
suspect
asks
counsel
request
answered
still
compelling
pressures
custodial
interrogation
miranda
line
cases
based
post
ignore
pressures
suggest
disappear
custody
recommenced
break
see
post
pressures
merely
miranda
provides
sufficient
protection
edwards
presumption
involuntariness
justified
circumstances
coercive
pressures
increased
much
suspects
waivers
miranda
rights
likely
involuntary
time
contrary
concurrence
suggestion
post
narrow
circumstances
custody
unbroken
concluded
fresh
se
miranda
warnings
sufficient
see
roberson
last
analysis
turns
concurrence
accepts
principal
points
agrees
edwards
prophylaxis
perpetual
agrees
break
custody
reduces
inherently
compelling
pressure
upon
edwards
based
agrees
shatzer
release
back
general
prison
population
constituted
break
custody
agrees
case
break
long
enough
render
edwards
inapplicable
post
differ
two
respects
instead
terminating
edwards
protection
custodial
pressures
basis
protection
dissipate
concurrence
terminate
suspect
longer
feel
denied
counsel
clearly
requested
post
entirely
unrelated
rationale
edwards
confidence
police
promise
provide
counsel
touchstone
edwards
applied
minnick
suspect
continuing
custody
actually
met
appointed
counsel
concurrence
rule
also
entirely
unrelated
existence
break
custody
may
relieve
accumulated
coercive
pressures
custody
foundation
edwards
hard
see
bolsters
suspect
confidence
asks
counsel
get
one
secondly
concurrence
differs
us
declining
say
long
break
custody
termination
edwards
protection
occurs
two
years
says
clearly
enough
gives
law
enforcement
authorities
guidance
concurrence
criticizes
use
days
arbitrary
unexplained
post
fact
rests
upon
basis
concurrence
approval
break
custody
much
time
justify
treating
second
interrogation
coercive
first
post
failure
say
line
falls
short
years
leaving
future
determination
certainly
less
helpful
less
arbitrary
shatzer
experienced
break
miranda
custody
lasting
two
weeks
first
second
attempts
interrogation
edwards
mandate
suppression
march
statements
accordingly
reverse
judgment
appeals
maryland
remand
case
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
maryland
petitioner
michael
blaine
shatzer
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
february
justice
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
part
iii
opinion
holds
release
general
prison
population
constitutes
break
custody
join
decision
extend
presumption
involuntariness
established
edwards
arizona
days
custody
ends
apparent
presumption
involuntariness
recognized
edwards
justifiable
even
custodial
setting
edwards
applies
see
minnick
mississippi
scalia
dissenting
accordingly
extend
edwards
rule
beyond
circumstances
present
edwards
even
one
believes
obliged
apply
edwards
case
involving
continuing
custody
opinion
today
goes
well
beyond
extends
presumption
involuntariness
edwards
applies
custodial
settings
interrogations
occur
custody
ends
concedes
extension
like
edwards
presumption
constitutionally
required
nevertheless
defends
extension
judicially
created
prophylaxis
compelled
confessions
even
one
accepts
prophylaxis
permissible
generally
advisable
period
following
break
rule
fails
satisfy
criteria
precedents
establish
judicial
creation
safeguard
precedents
insist
judicially
created
prophylactic
rules
like
edwards
miranda
arizona
maintain
closest
possible
fit
rule
fifth
amendment
interests
seek
protect
patane
plurality
opinion
see
generally
montejo
louisiana
slip
chavez
martinez
plurality
opinion
rule
satisfy
test
relates
rule
fifth
amendment
simply
asserting
days
release
recapture
provide
plenty
time
suspect
shake
residual
coercive
effects
prior
custody
ante
ipse
dixit
explain
extending
edwards
presumption
days
following
break
custody
opposed
days
provides
closest
possible
fit
clause
patane
supra
see
ante
merely
stating
seems
us
appropriate
period
days
explain
benefits
prophylactic
rule
either
terms
compared
possible
rules
outweigh
costs
include
loss
law
enforcement
information
well
exclusion
confessions
fact
voluntary
ante
citing
montejo
supra
slip
sure
rule
benefit
providing
bright
line
ante
rules
necessary
prevent
fifth
amendment
violations
made
clear
refusing
adopt
rules
cases
involving
miranda
rights
see
michigan
mosley
otherwise
arbitrary
rule
justifiable
merely
gives
clear
instruction
law
enforcement
concedes
clarity
certainty
goals
valuable
reasonably
achievement
substantive
end
exclusion
compelled
confessions
fifth
amendment
prohibits
ante
arbitrary
rule
fails
test
even
relatively
permissive
criteria
set
forth
precedents
accordingly
join
portion
opinion
maryland
petitioner
michael
blaine
shatzer
writ
certiorari
appeals
maryland
february
justice
stevens
concurring
judgment
agree
presumption
edwards
arizona
eternal
ante
mandate
suppression
shatzer
statement
made
break
custody
agree
newly
announced
rule
edwards
always
ceases
apply
break
custody
ante
conducting
analysis
demeans
edwards
judicially
prescribed
prophylaxis
ante
see
also
ante
describing
edwards
rule
constitutional
quoting
arizona
roberson
kennedy
dissenting
source
holdings
long
line
cases
includes
edwards
miranda
however
fifth
amendment
protection
compelled
applied
compulsion
inherent
custodial
interrogation
miranda
arizona
significan
ce
assertion
right
counsel
edwards
analysis
today
insufficiently
sensitive
concerns
motivated
edwards
line
cases
troubling
aspect
rule
disregards
compulsion
caused
second
third
fourth
interrogation
indigent
suspect
told
requests
lawyer
one
provided
police
tell
indigent
suspect
right
attorney
required
speak
without
attorney
present
attorney
provided
cost
questioning
police
made
significant
promise
cease
questioning
reinterrogate
suspect
days
later
without
providing
lawyer
suspect
likely
feel
police
lied
really
right
officers
informed
shatzer
rights
first
interrogation
presumably
informed
requested
attorney
one
appointed
asked
questions
indigent
suspect
requests
lawyer
interrogation
even
days
later
without
counsel
provided
surely
exacerbate
whatever
compulsion
speak
suspect
may
feeling
roberson
police
honored
earlier
commitment
provide
detainee
lawyer
detainee
likely
understan
expressed
wishes
ignored
may
well
see
objection
futile
confession
true
way
end
interrogation
davis
souter
concurring
judgment
cf
cooper
dupnik
en
banc
describing
elaborate
police
task
force
plan
ignore
suspect
requests
counsel
theory
induce
hopelessness
thereby
elicit
admission
simply
giving
fresh
se
miranda
warnings
suspect
denied
counsel
clearly
requested
rights
remained
untrammeled
roberson
ii
never
explains
rule
depend
addition
break
custody
passage
time
concrete
event
state
affairs
police
honored
commitment
provide
counsel
instead
simply
decides
create
rule
disregards
much
analysis
upon
edwards
subsequent
decisions
based
assertion
right
counsel
significant
event
edwards
today
acknowledges
right
counsel
like
right
remain
silent
one
police
may
coerc
badge
ante
suspect
however
discussed
ignores
effects
badgering
reinterrogating
suspect
took
police
word
need
answer
questions
without
attorney
present
see
roberson
moreover
ignores
suspect
asks
counsel
request
answered
still
inherently
compelling
pressures
custodial
interrogation
miranda
line
cases
based
see
concern
compulsion
especially
serious
detainee
requested
lawyer
act
signals
inability
cope
pressures
custodial
interrogation
instead
deferring
understandings
edwards
rule
engages
speculation
break
custody
eliminates
compulsion
animated
edwards
opinion
gives
strong
basis
believing
break
custody
eliminate
rationale
initial
edwards
rule
detainee
told
may
remain
silent
speak
lawyer
afford
attorney
one
provided
asked
lawyer
one
custody
police
still
questioning
break
custody
change
fact
custodial
interrogation
inherently
compelling
unlikely
change
fact
detainee
considers
unable
deal
pressures
custodial
interrogation
without
legal
assistance
roberson
instances
break
custody
may
make
matters
worse
hen
suspect
understands
expressed
wishes
ignored
thus
may
well
see
objection
futile
confession
true
way
end
interrogation
davis
souter
concurring
judgment
ignores
understandings
edwards
line
cases
instead
speculates
suspect
reinterrogated
eventually
talks
must
deliberation
familiar
surroundings
caused
believe
rightly
wrongly
cooperating
investigation
interest
ante
apparent
case
answer
told
suspect
miranda
custody
days
likely
able
seek
advice
attorney
family
members
friends
ante
speculation
however
overconfident
questionably
relevant
factual
matter
know
whether
defendant
able
seek
advice
first
suspects
told
afford
lawyer
one
provided
yet
majority
rule
indigent
suspect
took
police
word
asked
lawyer
nonetheless
assumed
able
seek
advice
attorney
second
even
suspects
indigent
necessarily
access
legal
advice
social
advice
presumes
within
days
third
suspects
may
realize
need
seek
advice
attorney
unless
police
warn
suspects
interrogation
resume
days
contact
lawyer
suspect
let
go
may
assume
police
satisfied
event
apparent
interim
advice
minnick
mississippi
held
sufficient
detainee
happened
speak
point
lawyer
see
ibid
noting
consultation
attorney
prevent
persistent
attempts
officials
persuade
suspect
waive
rights
shield
coercive
pressures
accompany
custody
actual
interim
advice
attorney
sufficient
hypothetical
interim
advice
attorney
family
members
friends
ante
enough
many
problems
new
rule
exacerbated
situation
case
suspect
prison
even
assumes
trip
one
home
significantly
changes
edwards
calculus
trip
one
prison
cell
prisoner
freedom
severely
limited
entire
life
remains
subject
government
control
environment
conducive
shak
ing
residual
coercive
effects
prior
custody
ante
prisoner
easily
seek
advice
attorney
family
members
friends
ante
especially
within
days
prisoners
frequently
subject
restrictions
communications
cases
live
comfortably
knowing
badgered
police
prison
like
normal
situation
suspect
control
need
shut
door
walk
away
avoid
police
badgering
montejo
louisiana
slip
indeed
person
whose
every
move
controlled
state
likely
sense
dependence
trust
counsel
guardian
interests
dealing
government
officials
intensified
green
cf
minnick
explaining
coercive
pressures
may
increase
custody
prolonged
ignores
realities
prison
instead
rests
argument
supposition
prisoner
detention
relatively
disconnected
prior
unwillingness
cooperate
investigation
ante
necessarily
case
prisoners
uniquely
vulnerable
officials
control
every
aspect
lives
prison
guards
may
look
kindly
upon
prisoner
refuses
cooperate
police
cooperation
frequently
relevant
whether
prisoner
obtain
parole
see
code
md
tit
moreover
even
true
factual
matter
prisoner
fate
controlled
police
come
interrogate
prisoner
supposed
know
admits
compulsion
likely
suspect
captors
appear
control
fate
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
guard
informs
suspect
must
go
speak
police
appear
prisoner
guard
police
independent
questioning
captors
appear
control
suspect
fate
may
create
mutually
reinforcing
pressures
assumed
weaken
suspect
illinois
perkins
emphasis
added
iii
least
know
whether
shatzer
obtain
lawyer
thus
felt
police
lied
providing
one
join
opinion
concur
today
judgment
however
another
ground
even
shatzer
consult
lawyer
police
never
provided
one
break
custody
basis
treating
second
interrogation
coercive
first
neither
break
custody
passage
time
inherent
curative
power
certain
things
change
time
indigent
suspect
took
police
word
provide
attorney
probably
feel
denied
counsel
clearly
requested
roberson
police
begin
question
without
lawyer
days
suspect
left
alone
significant
period
time
likely
draw
conclusions
police
interrogate
concededly
impossible
determine
precision
draw
line
barker
wingo
case
us
however
suspect
returned
general
prison
population
years
convinced
period
time
sufficient
therefore
concur
judgment
footnotes
state
filed
nolle
prosequi
sexual
offense
charge
consented
dismissal
misdemeanor
charges
barred
statute
limitations
jail
local
government
detention
center
persons
awaiting
trial
convicted
misdemeanors
confined
black
law
dictionary
ed
prison
contrast
state
federal
facility
confinement
convicted
criminals
esp
felons
justice
stevens
points
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
minnick
actual
consultation
attorney
continued
custody
suffice
avoid
application
edwards
mean
ability
consult
freely
attorneys
others
reduce
level
coercion
questionably
relevant
post
whether
termination
custody
reduces
coercive
pressure
basis
edwards
rule
state
alternative
argument
present
case
substantial
lapse
time
attempts
interrogation
independently
ended
edwards
presumption
disposition
makes
unnecessary
address
argument
assumes
roberson
extension
edwards
subsequent
interrogation
different
crime
minnick
extension
edwards
subsequent
interrogation
different
law
enforcement
agency
apply
even
place
custody
identity
custodial
agency
roberson
minnick
original
interrogation
assumption
seem
reasonable
effect
termination
custody
rejected
reinterrogation
different
custody
different
interrogating
agency
seem
anything
less
likely
termination
custody
reduce
coercive
pressures
original
site
respect
original
interrogating
agency
suspect
already
experienced
cessation
interrogation
demands
counsel
may
reason
expect
elsewhere
according
recent
study
prisoners
released
rearrested
within
three
years
see
dept
justice
bureau
justice
statistics
special
report
recidivism
prisoners
released
ncj
defendant
experiences
break
custody
invoking
miranda
right
counsel
left
without
protection
edwards
establishes
presumption
suspect
waiver
miranda
rights
involuntary
see
arizona
roberson
even
without
second
layer
prophylaxis
mcneil
wisconsin
defendant
still
free
claim
prophylactic
protection
miranda
arguing
waiver
miranda
rights
fact
involuntary
johnson
zerbst
see
miranda
distinguish
duration
incarceration
duration
might
termed
interrogative
custody
prisoner
removed
general
prison
population
taken
separate
location
questioning
duration
separation
assuredly
dependent
upon
interrogators
reason
asserted
refusal
speak
without
assistance
counsel
edwards
prevents
efforts
get
change
mind
interrogative
custody
footnotes
minimum
latter
proposition
questionable
concede
police
officers
might
badger
suspect
subsequent
interrogation
break
custody
might
use
tactics
suggest
take
answer
suspect
reenters
custody
questioned
released
need
invoke
right
counsel
ensure
edwards
protection
duration
subsequent
detention
law
enforcement
officers
repeatedly
release
recapture
suspect
wear
participation
subsequent
interrogation
longer
truly
voluntary
high
standar
proof
waiver
constitutional
rights
set
forth
johnson
zerbst
protect
admission
suspect
statements
miranda
arizona
zerbst
inquiry
takes
account
totality
circumstances
surrounding
waiver
including
improper
pressures
police
see
cf
ante
stating
ven
without
edwards
second
layer
prophylaxis
defendant
still
free
claim
prophylactic
protection
miranda
arguing
waiver
miranda
rights
fact
involuntary
johnson
zerbst
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
though
asserts
rule
tell
law
enforcement
officers
certainty
beforehand
renewed
interrogation
lawful
ante
clear
determining
whether
suspect
previously
custody
suspect
released
may
difficult
without
questioning
suspect
especially
state
federal
authorities
conducting
simultaneous
investigations
footnotes
see
dickerson
holding
protections
announced
miranda
constitutionally
required
shea
louisiana
edwards
ruled
criminal
defendant
rights
fifth
fourteenth
amendments
violated
use
confession
obtained
interrogation
without
counsel
present
requested
attorney
oregon
bradshaw
plurality
opinion
subsequent
incriminating
statements
made
without
attorney
present
violated
rights
secured
defendant
fifth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
miranda
examining
history
precedent
underlying
clause
determine
applicability
situation
argument
rests
fallacy
talking
suspect
talking
asking
permission
interrogated
ante
emphasis
deleted
however
suspect
always
right
remain
silent
distinction
without
difference
time
police
interrogate
reinterrogate
read
suspect
miranda
rights
suspect
may
decline
speak
fallacy
fallacy
upon
relied
edwards
line
cases
held
police
may
continue
interrogate
suspect
requested
lawyer
police
may
continue
ask
suspect
whether
may
interrogate
suspect
lawyer
present
apparent
belief
fallacy
underscores
concern
analysis
insufficiently
sensitive
concerns
motivated
edwards
line
cases
indeed
lawyer
unique
ability
protect
fifth
amendment
rights
client
undergoing
custodial
interrogation
fare
michael
counsel
curb
officer
overbearing
conduct
advise
suspect
rights
ensure
accurate
record
interrogation
special
ability
lawyer
help
client
preserve
fifth
amendment
rights
client
becomes
enmeshed
adversary
process
found
right
counsel
present
interrogation
indispensible
protection
fifth
amendment
privilege
arizona
roberson
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
thus
accused
requested
counsel
courts
must
especially
wary
coercive
form
custodial
interrogation
bradshaw
powell
concurring
judgment
see
michigan
harvey
subsequent
confession
suggests
police
badger
ed
defendant
waiving
previously
asserted
miranda
rights
see
minnick
mississippi
either
admissions
waivers
effective
unless
particular
systemic
assurances
coercive
pressures
custody
inducing
cause
cf
smith
illinois
per
curiam
authorities
ing
explicit
subtle
deliberate
unintentional
might
otherwise
wear
accused
persuade
incriminate
notwithstanding
earlier
request
counsel
assistance
see
roberson
suspect
believes
capable
undergoing
questioning
without
advice
counsel
presumed
subsequent
waiver
come
authorities
behest
suspect
instigation
product
compelling
michigan
mosley
white
concurring
result
accused
expressed
view
competent
deal
authorities
without
legal
advice
later
decision
authorities
insistence
make
statement
without
counsel
presence
may
properly
viewed
skepticism
today
decision
moreover
offers
reason
time
period
sure
may
difficult
marshal
conclusive
evidence
setting
arbitrary
time
period
light
basis
edwards
tread
carefully
instead
reason
choosing
time
period
tells
us
seems
us
period
days
ante
time
period
plenty
time
suspect
get
reacclimated
normal
life
consult
friends
counsel
shake
residual
coercive
effects
prior
custody
ibid
gives
reason
speculation
may
well
prove
inaccurate
many
circumstances
roberson
example
observed
suspect
asserted
right
attorney
courts
must
presume
feel
sufficiently
comfortable
pressures
custodial
interrogation
answer
questions
without
attorney
discomfort
precisely
state
mind
edwards
presumes
persist
held
roberson
different
police
come
speak
different
investigation
presumption
change
reason
assume
suspect
state
mind
way
ibid
reason
believe
arrest
specific
compulsion
heightened
fact
uncertainty
fate
released
custody
reapprehended
entails
circumstances
coercive
continual
custody
strauss
reinterrogation
hastings
const
likely
effect
reinterrogation
police
may
use
effect
advantage
indeed
rule
creates
strange
incentive
delay
formal
proceedings
order
gain
additional
information
way
interrogation
time
limit
lapses
justification
fifth
amendment
rules
must
consistent
practical
realities
roberson
kennedy
dissenting
reality
police
may
operate
within
confines
fifth
amendment
order
extract
many
confessions
possible
see
leo
white
adapting
miranda
modern
interrogators
strategies
dealing
obstacles
posed
miranda
rev
time
limit
short
days
police
hope
eventually
extract
confession
may
feel
comfortable
releasing
suspect
short
period
time
resulting
delay
increase
compelling
pressures
suspect
important
distinguish
point
make
indigent
suspects
police
promise
provide
lawyer
never
sends
message
suspect
police
lied
rights
read
hollow
mere
fact
suspect
consulted
lawyer
reduce
compulsion
police
reinterrogate
cf
orozco
texas
holding
suspect
custody
held
home
despite
comfort
familiarity
surroundings
mathis
holding
person
serving
prison
sentence
one
crime
custody
interrogated
prison
another
unrelated
crime
miranda
arizona
hen
individual
deprived
freedom
authorities
significant
way
subjected
questioning
privilege
jeopardized
prison
also
presents
troubling
set
incentives
police
first
investigators
know
suspect
also
prisoner
need
formally
place
arrest
thus
police
generally
interview
prisoners
even
without
probable
cause
hold
means
police
interrogate
suspects
little
evidence
guilt
police
time
time
without
fear
sued
wrongful
arrest
second
police
know
suspect
otherwise
detained
need
necessarily
resolve
case
quickly
police
comfortably
bide
time
interrogating
reinterrogating
suspect
slips
third
police
need
hold
suspect
need
arraign
otherwise
initiate
formal
legal
proceedings
trigger
various
protections
attempts
distinguish
detention
prison
paradigm
edwards
case
ante
clear
difference
simply
convicted
prisoners
detention
relatively
disconnected
prior
unwillingness
cooperate
investigation
ante
many
instances
pretrial
custody
custody
continue
regardless
whether
detainee
answers
questions
take
roberson
example
roberson
arrested
held
one
crime
days
later
different
officer
interrogated
different
crime
regardless
whether
cooperated
second
investigation
still
held
first
crime
yet
analysis
roberson
held
long
enough
become
accustomed
detention
facility
ante
break
custody
interrogation
thus
despite
fact
coercive
pressures
may
increase
custody
prolonged
minnick
real
problem
roberson
may
police
leave
sitting
jail
long
enough
problem
pretrial
custody
also
highlights
tension
decision
last
term
montejo
louisiana
montejo
overturned
michigan
jackson
protected
accused
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
forbidding
police
initiate
interrogation
criminal
defendant
requested
counsel
arraignment
similar
proceeding
slip
emphasized
edwards
regime
suffices
protect
integrity
suspect
voluntary
choice
speak
outside
lawyer
presence
arraignment
hard
see
also
suffice
protect
choice
arraignment
slip
quoting
texas
cobb
kennedy
concurring
citation
omitted
typically
arraignment
defendants
released
bail
placed
detention
facilities
according
majority
logic
sometimes
constitute
breaks
custody
decision
today
edwards
serve
role
placed
montejo
responds
confidence
police
promise
provide
counsel
touchstone
edwards
applied
minnick
suspect
continuing
custody
actually
met
appointed
counsel
ante
view
confidence
police
promise
provide
counsel
touchtone
ante
rather
view
although
appropriate
break
custody
mitigate
many
reasons
custodial
reinterrogation
suspect
requested
counsel
inherently
compelling
mitigate
effect
indigent
detainee
believing
denied
counsel
clearly
requested
roberson
police
tell
indigent
suspect
required
speak
without
attorney
provide
attorney
suspect
asserts
right
attorney
police
nonetheless
provide
attorney
reinterrogate
even
break
custody
interrogations
indigent
suspect
likely
feel
police
lied
ignoring
rights
view
tension
minnick
minnick
holds
consultation
attorney
interrogations
sufficient
end
edwards
presumption
therefore
break
custody
counsel
presence
interrogation
necessary
address
compulsion
edwards
line
cases
concerned
doubt
compulsion
caused
reinterrogating
indigent
suspect
without
providing
lawyer
may
survive
even
break
custody
long
passage
time
relevant
point
limited
long
break
time
far
longer
days
diminishes
rather
eliminates
compulsion