salinas
texas
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
without
placed
custody
receiving
miranda
warnings
voluntarily
answered
police
officer
questions
murder
fell
silent
asked
whether
ballistics
testing
match
shotgun
shell
casings
found
scene
crime
petitioner
murder
trial
texas
state
objection
prosecution
used
failure
answer
question
evidence
guilt
convicted
state
appeals
criminal
appeals
affirmed
rejecting
claim
prosecution
use
silence
case
chief
violated
fifth
amendment
held
judgment
affirmed
affirmed
justice
alito
joined
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
concluded
petitioner
fifth
amendment
claim
fails
expressly
invoke
privilege
response
officer
question
pp
prevent
privilege
shielding
information
properly
within
scope
witness
protection
privilege
must
claim
time
relies
minnesota
murphy
recognized
two
exceptions
requirement
first
criminal
defendant
need
take
stand
assert
privilege
trial
griffin
california
petitioner
silence
falls
outside
exception
comparable
unqualified
right
speak
police
interview
second
witness
failure
invoke
privilege
must
excused
governmental
coercion
makes
forfeiture
privilege
involuntary
see
miranda
arizona
petitioner
benefit
principle
undisputed
agreed
accompany
officers
station
free
leave
time
pp
petitioner
seeks
third
exception
express
invocation
requirement
cases
witness
chooses
stand
mute
rather
give
answer
officials
suspect
incriminating
cases
foreclose
argument
defendant
normally
invoke
privilege
remaining
silent
see
roberts
express
invocation
requirement
applies
even
official
reason
suspect
answer
question
incriminate
witness
see
murphy
supra
reasons
neither
witness
silence
official
suspicion
sufficient
relieve
witness
obligation
expressly
invoke
privilege
together
proposed
exception
also
difficult
reconcile
berghuis
thompkins
held
closely
related
context
silence
defendant
failed
invoke
right
cut
police
questioning
remained
silent
hours
minutes
petitioner
claims
reliance
fifth
amendment
privilege
likely
explanation
silence
case
like
silence
insolubly
ambiguous
see
doyle
ohio
sure
petitioner
might
declined
answer
officer
question
reliance
constitutional
privilege
also
might
done
trying
think
good
lie
embarrassed
protecting
someone
else
every
possible
explanation
silence
probative
guilt
neither
every
possible
explanation
protected
fifth
amendment
petitioner
also
suggests
unfair
require
suspect
unschooled
particulars
legal
doctrine
anything
remain
silent
order
invoke
right
remain
silent
fifth
amendment
guarantees
one
may
compelled
criminal
case
witness
unqualified
right
remain
silent
event
settled
forfeiture
privilege
need
knowing
murphy
pp
petitioner
argument
applying
express
invocation
requirement
context
unworkable
also
unpersuasive
long
required
defendants
assert
privilege
order
subsequently
benefit
rule
proved
difficult
apply
practice
pp
justice
thomas
joined
justice
scalia
concluded
petitioner
claim
fail
even
invoked
privilege
prosecutor
comments
regarding
precustodial
silence
compel
give
testimony
griffin
california
held
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecutor
judge
commenting
defendant
failure
testify
extended
defendant
silence
precustodial
interview
griffin
lacks
foundation
constitution
text
history
logic
see
mitchell
thomas
dissenting
pp
alito
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
joined
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
scalia
joined
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
sotomayor
kagan
joined
opinion
alito
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
genovevo
salinas
petitioner
texas
writ
certiorari
criminal
appeals
texas
june
justice
alito
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
join
without
placed
custody
receiving
miranda
warnings
petitioner
voluntarily
answered
questions
police
officer
investigating
murder
petitioner
balked
officer
asked
whether
ballistics
test
show
shell
casings
found
crime
scene
match
petitioner
shotgun
petitioner
subsequently
charged
murder
trial
prosecutors
argued
reaction
officer
question
suggested
guilty
petitioner
claims
argument
violated
fifth
amendment
guarantees
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
petitioner
fifth
amendment
claim
fails
expressly
invoke
privilege
response
officer
question
long
settled
privilege
generally
witness
desires
protection
claim
minnesota
murphy
quoting
monia
although
ritualistic
formula
necessary
order
invoke
privilege
quinn
witness
simply
standing
mute
petitioner
required
assert
privilege
order
benefit
judgment
texas
criminal
appeals
rejecting
petitioner
fifth
amendment
claim
affirmed
morning
december
two
brothers
shot
killed
houston
home
witnesses
murders
neighbor
heard
gunshots
saw
someone
run
house
speed
away
car
police
recovered
six
shotgun
shell
casings
scene
investigation
led
police
petitioner
guest
party
victims
hosted
night
killed
police
visited
petitioner
home
saw
dark
blue
car
driveway
agreed
hand
shotgun
ballistics
testing
accompany
police
station
questioning
petitioner
interview
police
lasted
approximately
one
hour
agree
interview
noncustodial
parties
litigated
case
assumption
read
miranda
warnings
see
miranda
arizona
interview
petitioner
answered
officer
questions
asked
whether
shotgun
match
shells
recovered
scene
murder
app
petitioner
declined
answer
instead
petitioner
ooked
floor
shuffled
feet
bit
bottom
lip
cl
nched
hands
lap
began
tighten
moments
silence
officer
asked
additional
questions
petitioner
answered
ibid
following
interview
police
arrested
petitioner
outstanding
traffic
warrants
prosecutors
soon
concluded
insufficient
evidence
charge
murders
released
days
later
police
obtained
statement
man
said
heard
petitioner
confess
killings
strength
additional
evidence
prosecutors
decided
charge
petitioner
time
absconded
police
discovered
petitioner
living
houston
area
assumed
name
petitioner
testify
trial
objection
prosecutors
used
reaction
officer
question
interview
evidence
guilt
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
received
sentence
direct
appeal
appeals
texas
petitioner
argued
prosecutors
use
silence
part
case
chief
violated
fifth
amendment
appeals
rejected
argument
reasoning
petitioner
prearrest
silence
compelled
within
meaning
fifth
amendment
texas
criminal
appeals
took
case
affirmed
ground
granted
certiorari
resolve
division
authority
lower
courts
whether
prosecution
may
use
defendant
assertion
privilege
noncustodial
police
interview
part
case
chief
compare
rivera
moore
cadc
petitioner
invoke
privilege
interview
find
unnecessary
reach
question
ii
privilege
exception
general
principle
government
right
everyone
testimony
garner
prevent
privilege
shielding
information
properly
within
scope
long
held
witness
protection
privilege
must
claim
time
relies
murphy
quoting
monia
see
also
ex
rel
vajtauer
commissioner
immigration
requirement
ensures
government
put
notice
witness
intends
rely
privilege
may
either
argue
testimony
sought
see
hoffman
cure
potential
grant
immunity
see
kastigar
express
invocation
requirement
also
gives
courts
tasked
evaluating
fifth
amendment
claim
contemporaneous
record
establishing
witness
reasons
refusing
answer
see
roberts
witness
may
employ
privilege
avoid
giving
testimony
simply
prefer
give
hutcheson
declining
treat
invocation
due
process
proper
assertion
privilege
ways
insisting
witnesses
expressly
invoke
privilege
assures
government
obtains
information
entitled
garner
supra
previously
recognized
two
exceptions
requirement
witnesses
invoke
privilege
neither
applies
first
held
griffin
california
criminal
defendant
need
take
stand
assert
privilege
trial
exception
reflects
fact
criminal
defendant
absolute
right
testify
turner
black
dissenting
see
patane
plurality
opinion
since
defendant
reasons
remaining
silent
trial
irrelevant
constitutional
right
requiring
expressly
invoke
privilege
serve
purpose
neither
showing
testimony
grant
immunity
force
speak
petitioner
comparable
unqualified
right
interview
police
silence
falls
outside
griffin
exception
second
held
witness
failure
invoke
privilege
must
excused
governmental
coercion
makes
forfeiture
privilege
involuntary
thus
miranda
said
suspect
subjected
inherently
compelling
pressures
unwarned
custodial
interrogation
need
invoke
privilege
due
uniquely
coercive
nature
custodial
interrogation
suspect
custody
said
voluntarily
forgone
privilege
unless
fails
claim
suitably
warned
murphy
supra
similar
reasons
held
threats
withdraw
governmental
benefit
public
employment
sometimes
make
exercise
privilege
costly
need
affirmatively
asserted
garrity
new
jersey
public
employment
see
also
lefkowitz
cunningham
public
office
lefkowitz
turley
public
contracts
assertion
privilege
tend
incriminate
allowed
witnesses
exercise
privilege
silence
see
leary
requirement
taxpayer
complete
tax
form
revealed
income
illegal
activities
albertson
subversive
activities
control
members
communist
party
required
complete
registration
form
response
form
questions
might
involve
admission
crucial
element
crime
principle
unites
cases
witness
need
expressly
invoke
privilege
form
official
compulsion
denies
choice
admit
deny
refuse
answer
garner
quoting
lisenba
california
petitioner
benefit
principle
undisputed
interview
police
voluntary
petitioner
acknowledges
agreed
accompany
officers
station
free
leave
time
interview
brief
petitioner
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
places
petitioner
situation
outside
scope
miranda
cases
held
various
forms
governmental
coercion
prevented
defendants
voluntarily
invoking
privilege
dissent
elides
point
cites
precedents
area
proposition
ircumstances
rather
explicit
invocation
trigger
protection
fifth
amendment
post
opinion
breyer
critical
question
whether
circumstances
case
petitioner
deprived
ability
voluntarily
invoke
fifth
amendment
us
allegation
petitioner
failure
assert
privilege
involuntary
simple
matter
say
answering
officer
question
fifth
amendment
grounds
failed
prosecution
use
noncustodial
silence
violate
fifth
amendment
petitioner
urges
us
adopt
third
exception
invocation
requirement
cases
witness
stands
mute
thereby
declines
give
answer
officials
suspect
incriminating
cases
foreclose
exception
needlessly
burden
government
interests
obtaining
testimony
prosecuting
criminal
activity
therefore
decline
petitioner
invitation
craft
new
exception
general
rule
witness
must
assert
privilege
subsequently
benefit
murphy
cases
establish
defendant
normally
invoke
privilege
remaining
silent
roberts
example
rejected
fifth
amendment
claim
defendant
remained
silent
throughout
police
investigation
received
harsher
sentence
failure
cooperate
ruling
explained
defendant
believed
failure
cooperate
privileged
said
time
sentencing
determined
whether
claim
legitimate
see
also
sullivan
vajtauer
witness
expressly
invoke
privilege
standing
mute
also
repeatedly
held
express
invocation
requirement
applies
even
official
reason
suspect
answer
question
incriminate
witness
thus
murphy
held
defendant
answers
probation
officer
properly
admitted
trial
failed
invoke
privilege
reaching
conclusion
rejected
notion
witness
must
government
notice
formally
availing
privilege
alone
reasonably
aware
incriminating
tendency
questions
quoting
roberts
supra
brennan
concurring
see
also
kordel
petitioner
dispute
vitality
either
lines
precedent
instead
argues
adopt
exception
cases
intersection
thus
petitioner
us
hold
although
neither
witness
silence
official
suspicions
enough
excuse
express
invocation
requirement
invocation
requirement
apply
witness
silent
face
official
suspicions
reasons
neither
factors
sufficient
relieve
witness
obligation
expressly
invoke
privilege
conclude
together
contrary
result
little
protect
genuinely
relying
fifth
amendment
privilege
placing
needless
new
burden
society
interest
admission
evidence
probative
criminal
defendant
guilt
petitioner
proposed
exception
also
difficult
reconcile
berghuis
thompkins
held
closely
related
context
silence
defendant
failed
invoke
privilege
refused
respond
police
questioning
hours
minutes
slip
extended
custodial
silence
case
invoke
privilege
surely
momentary
silence
case
either
petitioner
dissent
attempt
distinguish
berghuis
observing
concern
admissibility
defendant
silence
instead
involved
admissibility
subsequent
statements
post
opinion
breyer
regardless
whether
prosecutors
seek
use
silence
confession
follows
logic
berghuis
applies
equal
force
suspect
stands
mute
done
enough
put
police
notice
relying
fifth
amendment
support
proposed
exception
invocation
requirement
petitioner
dissent
argue
reliance
fifth
amendment
privilege
likely
explanation
silence
case
one
reply
brief
see
post
breyer
dissenting
whatever
probable
explanation
silence
insolubly
ambiguous
see
doyle
ohio
sure
someone
might
decline
answer
police
officer
question
reliance
constitutional
privilege
also
might
trying
think
good
lie
embarrassed
protecting
someone
else
every
possible
explanation
silence
probative
guilt
neither
every
possible
explanation
protected
fifth
amendment
petitioner
alone
knew
answer
officer
question
therefore
burden
make
timely
assertion
privilege
garner
oral
argument
counsel
petitioner
suggested
unfair
require
suspect
unschooled
particulars
legal
doctrine
anything
remain
silent
order
invoke
right
remain
silent
tr
oral
arg
see
post
breyer
dissenting
michigan
tucker
observing
virtually
every
schoolboy
familiar
concept
language
fifth
amendment
popular
misconceptions
notwithstanding
fifth
amendment
guarantees
one
may
compelled
criminal
case
witness
establish
unqualified
right
remain
silent
witness
constitutional
right
refuse
answer
questions
depends
reasons
courts
need
know
reasons
evaluate
merits
fifth
amendment
claim
see
hoffman
event
settled
forfeiture
privilege
need
knowing
murphy
garner
supra
statements
interest
regularly
admitted
evidence
criminal
trials
see
fed
rule
evid
good
reason
approach
defendant
silence
differently
finally
persuaded
petitioner
arguments
applying
usual
express
invocation
requirement
witness
silent
noncustodial
police
interview
prove
unworkable
practice
petitioner
dissent
suggest
approach
unleash
complicated
persistent
litigation
suspect
must
say
invoke
privilege
reply
brief
see
post
opinion
breyer
cases
long
required
witness
assert
privilege
subsequently
benefit
rule
proved
difficult
apply
potential
close
cases
dissuade
us
adopting
similar
invocation
requirements
suspects
wish
assert
rights
cut
police
questioning
custodial
interviews
berghuis
slip
requiring
suspect
unambiguously
assert
privilege
cut
custodial
questioning
davis
standard
assertions
right
counsel
notably
petitioner
approach
produce
problems
case
vividly
illustrates
interviewing
officer
asked
petitioner
shotgun
match
shell
casings
found
crime
scene
petitioner
merely
remain
silent
made
movements
suggested
surprise
anxiety
precisely
point
reactions
transform
silence
expressive
conduct
difficult
recurring
question
decision
allows
us
avoid
also
reject
petitioner
argument
express
invocation
requirement
encourage
police
officers
tric
suspects
cooperating
reply
brief
quoting
south
dakota
neville
petitioner
worries
officers
unduly
pressure
suspects
talking
telling
silence
used
future
prosecution
petitioner
concedes
police
officers
done
nothing
wrong
accurately
stat
law
brief
petitioner
found
constitutional
infirmity
government
officials
telling
defendant
murphy
required
speak
truthfully
parole
officer
see
greater
danger
interview
tactics
petitioner
identifies
long
police
deprive
witness
ability
voluntarily
invoke
privilege
fifth
amendment
violation
petitioner
rely
privilege
required
invoke
failed
judgment
texas
criminal
appeals
affirmed
ordered
thomas
concurring
judgment
genovevo
salinas
petitioner
texas
writ
certiorari
criminal
appeals
texas
june
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
judgment
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
fifth
privilege
compulsory
prohibits
prosecutor
using
defendant
silence
evidence
guilt
plurality
avoids
reaching
question
instead
concludes
salinas
fifth
amendment
claim
fails
expressly
invoke
privilege
ante
think
simpler
way
resolve
case
view
salinas
claim
fail
even
invoked
privilege
prosecutor
comments
regarding
precustodial
silence
compel
give
testimony
griffin
california
held
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecutor
judge
commenting
defendant
failure
testify
reasoned
comments
adverse
inferences
drawn
penalty
imposed
defendant
exercise
fifth
amendment
privilege
ibid
salinas
argues
extend
griffin
rule
defendant
silence
precustodial
interview
previously
explained
decision
griffin
lacks
foundation
constitution
text
history
logic
extended
see
mitchell
dissenting
opinion
adhere
view
today
griffin
impossible
square
text
fifth
amendment
provides
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
defendant
compelled
witness
simply
jury
told
may
draw
adverse
inference
silence
see
mitchell
supra
scalia
dissenting
threat
adverse
inference
anyone
testify
indeed
imagine
instances
guilty
defendant
choose
remain
silent
despite
adverse
inference
theory
less
damage
testimony
carter
kentucky
powell
concurring
othing
clause
requires
jurors
draw
logical
inferences
defendant
chooses
explain
incriminating
circumstances
history
fifth
amendment
support
griffin
time
founding
english
american
courts
strongly
encouraged
defendants
give
unsworn
statements
drew
adverse
inferences
failed
see
mitchell
supra
scalia
dissenting
alschuler
peculiar
privilege
historical
perspective
privilege
hemholz
et
al
eds
given
griffin
indefensible
foundation
extend
defendant
silence
precustodial
interview
agree
plurality
salinas
fifth
amendment
claim
fails
therefore
concur
judgment
breyer
dissenting
genovevo
salinas
petitioner
texas
writ
certiorari
criminal
appeals
texas
june
justice
breyer
justice
ginsburg
justice
sotomayor
justice
kagan
join
dissenting
view
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecution
commenting
petitioner
silence
response
police
questioning
dissent
contrary
conclusion
january
houston
police
began
suspect
petitioner
genovevo
salinas
committed
two
murders
previous
month
asked
salinas
come
police
station
take
photographs
clear
suspect
app
station
police
took
salinas
describes
interview
room
brief
petitioner
free
leave
time
app
give
miranda
warnings
police
asked
salinas
questions
salinas
answered
police
asked
whether
shotgun
home
match
shells
recovered
scene
murder
point
salinas
fell
silent
ibid
salinas
later
tried
convicted
murder
closing
argument
drawing
testimony
elicited
earlier
prosecutor
pointed
jury
salinas
earlier
questioning
police
station
remained
silent
asked
shotgun
prosecutor
told
jury
among
things
innocent
said
talking
tex
app
salinas
prosecutor
said
respond
way
ibid
rather
answer
question
ibid
ii
question
us
whether
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecutor
eliciting
commenting
upon
evidence
salinas
silence
plurality
believes
amendment
bar
evidence
comments
salinas
expressly
invoke
privilege
fell
silent
questioning
police
station
ante
view
conclusion
inconsistent
case
law
underlying
practical
rationale
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecutors
commenting
individual
silence
silence
amounts
effort
avoid
becoming
witness
specified
rule
evidence
permitting
commen
counsel
criminal
case
upon
defendant
failure
testify
violates
fifth
amendment
griffin
california
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
patane
plurality
opinion
turner
black
dissenting
since
impermissible
penalize
individual
exercising
fifth
amendment
privilege
police
custodial
interrogation
prosecution
may
use
trial
fact
stood
mute
claimed
privilege
face
accusation
miranda
arizona
emphasis
added
particularly
context
police
interrogation
contrary
rule
undermine
basic
protection
fifth
amendment
provides
cf
kastigar
privilege
usually
operates
allow
citizen
remain
silent
asked
question
requiring
incriminatory
answer
permit
prosecutor
comment
defendant
constitutionally
protected
silence
put
defendant
impossible
predicament
must
either
answer
question
remain
silent
answers
question
may
well
reveal
example
prejudicial
facts
disreputable
associates
suspicious
circumstances
even
innocent
see
griffin
supra
kassin
inside
interrogation
innocent
people
confess
trial
advoc
remains
silent
prosecutor
may
well
use
silence
suggest
consciousness
guilt
defendant
takes
witness
stand
order
explain
either
speech
silence
prosecution
may
introduce
say
impeachment
purposes
prior
conviction
law
otherwise
make
inadmissible
thus
fifth
amendment
issue
allow
comment
silence
directly
indirectly
compel
individual
act
witness
much
fifth
amendment
forbids
cf
pennsylvania
muniz
definition
testimonial
includes
responses
questions
require
suspect
communicate
express
implied
assertion
fact
belief
similarly
whether
questioned
individual
part
decision
remain
silent
invokes
fifth
amendment
explicitly
implicitly
words
deeds
reference
surrounding
circumstances
consequently
surprising
half
century
ago
explained
ritualistic
formula
necessary
order
invoke
privilege
quinn
thus
prosecutor
may
comment
defendant
failure
testify
trial
even
neither
defendant
anyone
else
ever
mentions
fifth
amendment
right
circumstances
defendant
statement
tie
defendant
silence
right
similarly
prosecutor
may
comment
fact
defendant
custody
receiving
miranda
warnings
stood
mute
regardless
whether
claimed
privilege
many
words
miranda
supra
explicit
statement
instead
defendant
deeds
silence
circumstances
receipt
warnings
tie
together
silence
constitutional
right
lower
courts
construed
law
even
defendant
received
miranda
warnings
answers
questions
remaining
silent
others
see
hurd
terhune
may
scott
canterbury
grieco
hall
ghiz
see
harris
cases
insisted
defendant
expressly
mention
fifth
amendment
name
order
rely
privilege
protect
silence
cases
circumstances
surrounding
silence
unlike
present
case
give
rise
inference
defendant
intended
silence
exercise
fifth
amendment
rights
questioner
greeted
silence
unlike
present
case
special
need
know
whether
defendant
sought
rely
protections
fifth
amendment
see
ante
explaining
cases
government
needs
know
basis
refusing
answer
may
either
argue
testimony
sought
cure
potential
grant
immunity
citation
omitted
cases
include
roberts
rogers
sullivan
vajtauer
jenkins
least
involve
protection
silence
also
include
cases
emphasized
plurality
even
silence
namely
murphy
garner
roberts
rogers
individual
refused
answer
questions
government
investigators
roberts
grand
jury
rogers
asked
principally
individual
wanted
avoid
incriminating
persons
roberts
rogers
fifth
amendment
protect
someone
incriminating
others
protects
turn
neither
nature
questions
circumstances
refusal
answer
provided
basis
infer
tie
silence
fifth
amendment
knowledge
tie
proved
critical
questioner
determination
whether
defendant
proper
legal
basis
claiming
fifth
amendment
protection
sullivan
defendant
silence
consisted
failure
file
tax
return
return
later
claimed
revealed
illegal
activity
bootlegger
sullivan
circumstances
give
rise
inference
tie
silence
form
failing
file
tax
return
fifth
amendment
really
want
rely
fifth
amendment
government
special
need
know
tie
order
determine
whether
example
assertion
privilege
valid
perhaps
offer
immunity
appropriate
vajtauer
alien
refused
answer
questions
asked
immigration
official
deportation
proceeding
ex
rel
vajtauer
commissioner
immigration
circumstances
gave
rise
distinct
inference
alien
invoking
fifth
amendment
privilege
alien
lawyer
stated
quite
publicly
hearing
advised
client
remain
silent
fifth
amendment
grounds
rather
lawyer
alien
answer
questions
evidence
upon
warrant
based
presented
quoting
lawyer
statement
weakened
destroyed
possibility
amendment
linkage
government
challenge
right
invoke
fifth
amendment
described
later
invocation
evidently
afterthought
perhaps
illustrative
jenkins
case
upon
plurality
relies
ante
upon
texas
criminal
appeals
relied
almost
exclusively
jenkins
killed
someone
arrested
turned
two
weeks
later
jenkins
anderson
trial
jenkins
claimed
killing
attacked
prosecutor
asked
report
alleged
attack
closing
argument
suggested
jenkins
failure
cast
doubt
claim
acted
explained
unusual
form
prearrest
silence
constitutionally
protected
use
trial
perhaps
even
aptly
justice
stevens
concurrence
noted
privilege
compulsory
simply
irrelevant
circumstances
omitted
anyone
known
jenkins
failing
report
attack
relying
fifth
amendment
government
way
determining
whether
claim
valid
jenkins
roberts
rogers
sullivan
vajtauer
one
reason
connect
silence
fifth
amendment
government
opportunity
contest
alleged
connection
still
afield
today
case
murphy
garner
neither
involved
silence
rather
cases
defendant
earlier
answered
questions
posed
government
murphy
speaking
probation
officer
garner
completing
tax
return
minnesota
murphy
garner
time
providing
answers
neither
circumstances
deeds
words
suggested
reliance
fifth
amendment
murphy
simply
answered
questions
posed
probation
officer
garner
simply
filled
tax
return
argue
statements
compelled
violation
fifth
amendment
later
trial
murphy
supra
garner
supra
held
statements
compelled
murphy
supra
garner
supra
circumstances
indicated
defendants
affirmatively
chosen
speak
write
thus
two
sets
cases
one
express
invocation
fifth
amendment
required
tie
one
silence
protections
another
something
like
express
invocation
required
circumstances
demanded
explanation
silence
statements
order
indicate
fifth
amendment
issue
also
third
set
cases
cases
may
well
fit
second
category
held
fifth
amendment
applies
require
express
invocation
despite
ambiguous
circumstances
cases
made
clear
individual
silent
need
expressly
invoke
fifth
amendment
inherently
compelling
pressures
miranda
thus
garrity
new
jersey
held
explicit
assertion
fifth
amendment
required
course
investigation
assertion
law
cost
police
officers
jobs
similarly
require
explicit
assertion
response
grand
jury
subpoena
assertion
cost
two
architects
public
contracts
political
official
job
lefkowitz
turley
lefkowitz
cunningham
leary
held
fifth
amendment
require
explicit
assertion
privilege
context
marihuana
tax
act
assertion
inherently
incriminating
albertson
subversive
activities
control
held
explicit
assertion
fifth
amendment
required
first
step
potentially
incriminating
admission
membership
communist
party
also
held
gamblers
without
explicitly
invoking
fifth
amendment
need
comply
tax
requirements
inherently
directly
lead
marchetti
grosso
told
third
category
cases
receives
treatment
first
circumstances
rather
explicit
invocation
trigger
protection
fifth
amendment
today
case
plurality
refers
one
additional
case
namely
berghuis
thompkins
see
ante
case
beside
point
berghuis
defendant
custody
informed
miranda
rights
subsequently
silent
face
hours
minutes
questioning
offered
substantive
answers
slip
held
waived
fifth
amendment
rights
respect
later
speech
said
nothing
prosecutor
right
comment
preceding
silence
prosecutor
sought
indeed
prosecutor
lawfully
tried
given
statement
randa
prosecutor
comment
fact
receiving
miranda
warnings
suspect
stood
mute
end
began
ritualistic
formula
necessary
order
invoke
privilege
quinn
much
depends
circumstances
particular
case
important
circumstances
whether
one
fairly
infer
individual
questioned
invoking
amendment
protection
unclear
whether
particularly
important
questioner
know
whether
individual
even
whether
event
good
reason
excusing
individual
referring
fifth
amendment
inherent
penalization
simply
answering
applying
principles
present
case
hold
salinas
need
expressly
invoked
fifth
amendment
context
criminal
investigation
police
told
salinas
made
clear
suspect
interrogation
took
place
police
station
salinas
represented
counsel
relevant
question
whether
shotgun
salinas
home
incriminate
amounted
switch
subject
matter
obvious
new
question
sought
ferret
whether
salinas
guilty
murder
see
circumstances
give
rise
reasonable
inference
salinas
silence
derived
exercise
fifth
amendment
rights
recognized
repeatedly
many
indeed
americans
aware
constitutional
right
incriminate
answering
questions
posed
police
interrogation
conducted
order
figure
perpetrator
crime
see
dickerson
brogan
michigan
tucker
nature
surroundings
switch
topic
particular
question
suggested
right
generally
know
issue
critical
moment
salinas
represented
counsel
likely
used
precise
words
fifth
amendment
invoke
rights
likely
aware
technical
legal
requirements
need
identify
fifth
amendment
name
time
need
categorize
salinas
silence
based
fifth
amendment
supported
presence
full
force
predicament
discussed
earlier
namely
forcing
salinas
choose
incrimination
speech
incrimination
silence
need
also
supported
absence
special
reason
police
know
certainty
whether
salinas
fact
relying
fifth
amendment
whether
doubt
really
risk
see
hoffman
whether
grant
immunity
see
kastigar
given
circumstances
salinas
silence
sufficient
put
government
notice
apparent
claim
privilege
quinn
supra
reasons
similar
given
griffin
fifth
amendment
bars
evidence
silence
admitted
salinas
mentioned
prosecutor
see
recognize
cases
may
arise
facts
circumstances
surrounding
individual
silence
present
closer
question
critical
question
whether
circumstances
give
rise
fair
inference
silence
rests
fifth
amendment
always
prove
easy
administer
consideration
support
plurality
approach
administrative
problems
accompanying
plurality
approach
even
worse
plurality
says
suspect
must
expressly
invoke
privilege
ante
really
mean
suspect
must
use
exact
words
fifth
amendment
individual
lawyer
know
particular
words
legally
magic
solicitor
general
help
adds
suspect
may
mak
claim
language
questioner
may
reasonably
expected
understand
attempt
invoke
privilege
brief
amicus
curiae
quoting
quinn
supra
alteration
original
counts
making
claim
suppose
individual
says
let
discuss
something
else
sure
want
answer
suppose
gets
leaves
room
cf
davis
mississippi
affirming
settled
principle
police
right
request
citizens
answer
voluntarily
questions
concerning
unsolved
crimes
right
compel
answer
berkemer
mccarty
noting
even
someone
detained
terry
stop
obliged
respond
police
questions
florida
royer
plurality
opinion
simple
silence
present
context
different
basic
problem
plurality
effort
simple
clear
explicit
statement
rule
poses
serious
obstacle
like
salinas
seek
assert
basic
fifth
amendment
right
remain
silent
likely
unaware
linguistic
detail
time
acknowledging
case
law
require
use
specific
words
see
ante
leaves
plurality
without
administrative
benefits
might
hope
find
requiring
detail
far
better
view
pose
relevant
question
directly
one
fairly
infer
individual
silence
surrounding
circumstances
exercise
fifth
amendment
privilege
need
simplicity
constitutional
importance
applying
fifth
amendment
seek
protection
case
law
suggest
right
question
ask
answer
question
circumstances
today
case
clearly
yes
reasons
believe
fifth
amendment
prohibits
prosecutor
commenting
salinas
silence
respectfully
dissent
contrary
conclusion
footnotes
dissent
argues
cases
neither
nature
questions
circumstances
refusal
answer
provided
basis
infer
tie
silence
fifth
amendment
post
opinion
breyer
none
precedents
suggests
governmental
officials
obliged
guess
meaning
witness
unexplained
silence
implicit
reliance
fifth
amendment
seems
probable
roberts
say
much
despite
holding
defendant
case
required
explain
fifth
amendment
basis
failure
cooperate
investigation
led
prosecution
cases
support
distinction
dissent
draws
silence
failure
invoke
privilege
making
incriminating
statements
see
post
breyer
dissenting
example
murphy
case
witness
made
incriminating
statements
failing
invoke
privilege
repeatedly
relied
roberts
vajtauer
two
cases
witnesses
remained
silent
make
incriminating
statements
similarly
kordel
cited
vajtauer
among
cases
proposition
defendant
failure
time
assert
constitutional
privilege
leaves
position
complain
compelled
give
testimony
petitioner
correct
due
process
prohibits
prosecutors
pointing
fact
defendant
silent
heard
miranda
warnings
doyle
ohio
rule
apply
suspect
received
warnings
implicit
promise
silence
used
jenkins
anderson
dissent
suggests
officials
case
special
need
know
whether
defendant
sought
rely
protections
fifth
amendment
post
opinion
breyer
never
said
government
must
demonstrate
need
basis
invocation
requirement
apply
rule
require
judicial
hypothesizing
probable
strategic
choices
prosecutors
often
use
immunity
compel
testimony
witnesses
invoke
fifth
amendment