segura
argued
november
decided
july
acting
information
petitioners
probably
trafficking
cocaine
apartment
new
york
drug
enforcement
task
force
agents
began
surveillance
petitioners
thereafter
upon
observing
petitioner
colon
deliver
bulky
package
one
parra
restaurant
parking
lot
petitioner
segura
one
visited
inside
restaurant
agents
followed
parra
apartment
stopped
parra
found
possess
cocaine
immediately
arrested
advised
constitutional
rights
admitted
purchased
cocaine
petitioner
segura
confirmed
petitioner
colon
made
delivery
restaurant
task
force
agents
authorized
assistant
attorney
arrest
petitioners
advised
search
warrant
petitioners
apartment
probably
obtained
following
day
agent
secure
premises
prevent
destruction
evidence
later
evening
agents
arrested
petitioner
segura
lobby
petitioners
apartment
building
took
apartment
knocked
door
opened
petitioner
colon
entered
apartment
without
requesting
receiving
permission
agents
conducted
limited
security
check
apartment
process
observed
plain
view
various
drug
paraphernalia
petitioner
colon
arrested
petitioners
taken
custody
two
agents
remained
apartment
awaiting
warrant
administrative
delay
search
warrant
issued
hours
initial
entry
apartment
search
pursuant
warrant
agents
discovered
inter
alia
cocaine
records
narcotics
transactions
items
seized
together
observed
security
check
district
granted
petitioners
pretrial
motion
suppress
seized
evidence
appeals
held
evidence
discovered
plain
view
initial
entry
evidence
seized
warrant
search
must
suppressed
petitioners
subsequently
convicted
violating
federal
drug
laws
appeals
affirmed
held
exclusionary
rule
reaches
primary
evidence
obtained
direct
result
illegal
search
seizure
also
evidence
later
discovered
found
derivative
illegality
fruit
poisonous
tree
nardone
exclusionary
rule
apply
however
connection
illegal
police
conduct
discovery
seizure
evidence
attenuated
dissipate
taint
example
police
independent
source
discovery
evidence
silverthorne
lumber
pp
independent
source
challenged
evidence
evidence
discovered
search
petitioners
apartment
pursuant
valid
warrant
information
warrant
secured
came
sources
wholly
unconnected
initial
entry
known
agents
well
entry
hence
whether
initial
entry
illegal
irrelevant
admissibility
evidence
exclusion
evidence
warranted
derivative
fruit
poisonous
tree
pp
burger
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
iii
vi
white
powell
rehnquist
joined
opinion
respect
part
iv
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
blackmun
joined
post
peter
fabricant
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
paul
warburgh
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
lee
assistant
attorney
general
jensen
alan
horowitz
gene
reibman
filed
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
earlier
illegal
entry
fourth
amendment
requires
suppression
evidence
seized
later
private
residence
pursuant
valid
search
warrant
issued
information
obtained
police
entry
residence
resolution
issue
requires
us
consider
two
separate
questions
first
whether
entry
internal
securing
premises
constituted
impermissible
seizure
contents
apartment
seen
unseen
second
whether
evidence
first
discovered
search
apartment
pursuant
valid
warrant
issued
day
entry
suppressed
fruit
illegal
entry
disposition
questions
carefully
limited
appeals
affirmed
district
holding
exigent
circumstances
justify
warrantless
entry
petitioners
apartment
issue
us
reason
question
courts
holding
search
illegal
ensuing
interference
petitioners
possessory
interests
apartment
however
another
matter
first
question
conclude
assuming
seizure
contents
petitioners
apartment
agents
secured
premises
within
seizure
violate
fourth
amendment
specifically
hold
officers
probable
cause
enter
premises
probable
cause
arrest
occupants
legitimate
possessory
interests
contents
take
custody
period
involved
secure
premises
within
preserve
status
quo
others
good
faith
process
obtaining
warrant
violate
fourth
amendment
proscription
unreasonable
seizures
illegality
initial
entry
show
bearing
second
question
resolution
second
question
requires
determine
whether
initial
entry
tainted
discovery
evidence
challenged
issue
hold
evidence
discovered
subsequent
search
apartment
following
day
pursuant
valid
search
warrant
issued
wholly
information
known
officers
entry
apartment
need
suppressed
fruit
illegal
entry
warrant
information
based
unrelated
entry
therefore
constituted
independent
source
evidence
silverthorne
lumber
ii
january
new
york
drug
enforcement
task
force
received
information
indicating
petitioners
andres
segura
luz
marina
colon
probably
trafficking
cocaine
new
york
apartment
acting
information
task
force
agents
maintained
continuing
surveillance
petitioners
arrest
february
february
agents
observed
meeting
segura
enrique
later
developed
two
discussed
possible
sale
cocaine
segura
three
days
later
february
segura
telephoned
agreed
provide
cocaine
two
agreed
delivery
made
day
designated
restaurant
queens
one
esther
parra
arrived
restaurant
agreed
segura
visited
inside
restaurant
agents
observed
colon
deliver
bulky
package
parra
remained
car
restaurant
parking
lot
short
time
delivery
package
parra
left
restaurant
proceeded
apartment
task
force
agents
followed
agents
stopped
couple
enter
apartment
parra
found
possess
cocaine
parra
immediately
arrested
parra
advised
constitutional
rights
agreed
cooperate
agents
admitted
purchased
cocaine
segura
confirmed
colon
made
delivery
restaurant
earlier
day
agents
observed
informed
agents
segura
call
approximately
evening
learn
sold
cocaine
case
segura
deliver
additional
cocaine
day
task
force
agents
sought
received
authorization
assistant
attorney
arrest
segura
colon
agents
advised
assistant
attorney
lateness
hour
search
warrant
petitioners
apartment
probably
obtained
following
day
agents
proceed
secure
premises
prevent
destruction
evidence
agents
arrived
petitioners
apartment
established
external
surveillance
segura
alone
entered
lobby
apartment
building
immediately
arrested
agents
first
claimed
reside
building
agents
took
third
floor
apartment
knocked
apartment
door
woman
later
identified
colon
appeared
agents
entered
segura
without
requesting
receiving
permission
three
persons
living
room
apartment
addition
colon
present
informed
agents
segura
arrest
search
warrant
apartment
obtained
following
brief
exchange
living
room
agents
conducted
limited
security
check
apartment
ensure
one
else
might
pose
threat
safety
destroy
evidence
process
agents
observed
bedroom
plain
view
scale
jars
lactose
numerous
small
cellophane
bags
accouterments
drug
trafficking
none
items
disturbed
agents
limited
security
check
colon
arrested
search
incident
arrest
agents
found
purse
loaded
revolver
cash
colon
segura
occupants
apartment
taken
drug
enforcement
administration
headquarters
two
task
force
agents
remained
petitioners
apartment
awaiting
warrant
characterized
administrative
delay
warrant
application
presented
magistrate
next
day
warrant
issued
search
performed
approximately
hours
agents
initial
entry
apartment
search
pursuant
warrant
agents
discovered
almost
three
pounds
cocaine
rounds
ammunition
fitting
revolver
agents
found
colon
possession
time
arrest
cash
records
narcotics
transactions
agents
seized
items
together
observed
security
check
previous
night
trial
district
eastern
district
new
york
petitioners
moved
suppress
evidence
seized
apartment
items
discovered
plain
view
initial
security
check
plain
view
first
discovered
subsequent
warrant
search
full
evidentiary
hearing
district
granted
petitioners
motion
ruled
exigent
circumstances
justifying
initial
entry
apartment
accordingly
held
entry
arrest
colon
search
incident
arrest
effective
seizure
drug
paraphernalia
plain
view
illegal
district
ordered
evidence
suppressed
fruits
illegal
searches
district
held
warrant
later
issued
supported
information
sufficient
establish
probable
cause
however
read
griffin
cert
denied
requiring
suppression
evidence
seized
valid
warrant
district
reasoned
evidence
necessarily
discovered
absent
illegal
entry
occupation
apartment
colon
might
arranged
drugs
removed
destroyed
event
apartment
warrant
search
made
analysis
district
held
even
drugs
seized
valid
warrant
fruit
poisonous
tree
appeal
limited
admissibility
incriminating
evidence
appeals
affirmed
part
reversed
part
affirmed
district
holding
initial
warrantless
entry
justified
exigent
circumstances
evidence
discovered
plain
view
initial
entry
must
suppressed
appeals
rejected
argument
advanced
evidence
plain
view
excluded
actually
seized
search
warrant
secured
relying
upon
holding
agapito
cert
denied
appeals
reversed
district
holding
requiring
suppression
evidence
seized
valid
warrant
executed
day
following
initial
entry
appeals
described
prudentially
unsound
district
decision
suppress
evidence
simply
destroyed
agents
entered
petitioners
convicted
conspiring
distribute
cocaine
violation
distributing
possessing
intent
distribute
cocaine
violation
subsequent
review
convictions
second
circuit
affirmed
rejecting
claims
petitioners
search
warrant
procured
material
misrepresentations
evidence
trial
insufficient
matter
law
support
convictions
granted
certiorari
affirm
iii
outset
important
focus
narrow
precise
question
us
noted
appeals
agreed
district
initial
warrantless
entry
limited
security
search
justified
exigent
circumstances
therefore
illegal
review
aspect
case
sought
government
issue
concerning
items
observed
initial
entry
issue
whether
drugs
items
observed
initial
entry
first
discovered
agents
day
entry
admittedly
valid
search
warrant
suppressed
suppression
exclusionary
rule
judicially
prescribed
remedial
measure
remedial
device
application
rule
restricted
areas
remedial
objectives
thought
efficaciously
served
calandra
holdings
exclusionary
rule
reaches
primary
evidence
obtained
direct
result
illegal
search
seizure
weeks
also
evidence
later
discovered
found
derivative
illegality
fruit
poisonous
tree
nardone
extends
well
indirect
direct
products
unconstitutional
conduct
wong
sun
evidence
obtained
direct
result
unconstitutional
search
seizure
plainly
subject
exclusion
question
resolved
claimed
evidence
subsequently
obtained
tainted
fruit
prior
illegality
whether
challenged
evidence
come
exploitation
initial
illegality
instead
means
sufficiently
distinguishable
purged
primary
taint
citation
omitted
emphasis
added
essence
provision
forbidding
acquisition
evidence
certain
way
merely
evidence
acquired
shall
used
shall
used
course
mean
facts
thus
obtained
become
sacred
inaccessible
knowledge
gained
independent
source
may
proved
like
others
silverthorne
lumber
emphasis
added
iv
petitioners
argue
contents
apartment
seen
seen
including
evidence
question
seized
agents
entered
remained
premises
lawful
occupants
away
apartment
police
custody
essence
argument
contents
control
agents
one
permitted
remove
incriminating
evidence
premises
destroy
seizure
took
place
plainly
argument
advanced
avoid
silverthorne
independent
source
exception
contents
apartment
seized
time
illegal
entry
securing
presumably
evidence
challenged
suppressible
primary
evidence
obtained
direct
result
entry
need
decide
whether
agents
entered
apartment
secured
premises
effected
seizure
cocaine
cash
ammunition
narcotics
records
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
terms
fourth
amendment
forbids
unreasonable
searches
seizures
assuming
arguendo
agents
seized
entire
apartment
contents
petitioners
suggest
seizure
unreasonable
totality
circumstances
different
interests
implicated
seizure
search
jacobsen
texas
brown
stevens
concurring
judgment
chadwick
chambers
maroney
seizure
affects
person
possessory
interests
search
affects
person
privacy
interests
jacobsen
supra
chadwick
supra
see
generally
texas
brown
supra
stevens
concurring
judgment
recognizing
generally
less
intrusive
nature
seizure
chadwick
supra
chambers
maroney
supra
frequently
approved
warrantless
seizures
property
basis
probable
cause
time
necessary
secure
warrant
warrantless
search
either
held
likely
held
impermissible
chambers
maroney
supra
chadwick
supra
arkansas
sanders
focused
issue
notably
chambers
holding
reasonable
seize
impound
automobile
basis
probable
cause
whatever
period
necessary
obtain
warrant
search
omitted
acknowledged
chambers
following
car
warrant
obtained
alternative
impoundment
albeit
impractical
one
allowed
seizure
nonetheless
otherwise
occupants
car
removed
instruments
fruits
crime
search
allowed
warrantless
seizure
protect
evidence
destruction
even
though
immediate
fear
evidence
process
destroyed
otherwise
lost
chambers
declared
constitutional
purposes
see
difference
one
hand
seizing
holding
car
presenting
probable
cause
issue
magistrate
hand
carrying
immediate
search
without
warrant
given
probable
cause
search
either
course
reasonable
fourth
amendment
emphasis
added
underlying
decisions
belief
society
interest
discovery
protection
incriminating
evidence
removal
destruction
supersede
least
limited
period
person
possessory
interest
property
provided
probable
cause
believe
property
associated
criminal
activity
see
place
occasion
consider
whether
officers
probable
cause
believe
evidence
criminal
activity
premises
temporary
securing
dwelling
prevent
removal
destruction
evidence
violates
fourth
amendment
however
two
cases
suggested
securing
premises
circumstances
violate
fourth
amendment
least
undertaken
preserve
status
quo
search
warrant
sought
mincey
arizona
noted
approval
preserve
evidence
police
guard
stationed
entrance
apartment
homicide
committed
even
though
indication
evidence
lost
destroyed
removed
time
required
obtain
search
warrant
similarly
rawlings
kentucky
although
officers
secured
within
home
person
arrest
warrant
detained
occupants
officers
obtaining
search
warrant
question
admissibility
evidence
discovered
pursuant
warrant
later
issued
see
reason
mincey
rawlings
suggest
principle
applied
chambers
chadwick
sanders
apply
dwelling
involved
sanctity
home
disputed
home
sacred
fourth
amendment
terms
primarily
occupants
possessory
interests
premises
privacy
interests
activities
take
place
within
fourth
amendment
protects
people
places
katz
see
also
payton
new
york
white
dissenting
noted
however
seizure
affects
possessory
interests
privacy
interests
therefore
heightened
protection
accord
privacy
interests
simply
implicated
seizure
premises
search
issue
hold
therefore
securing
dwelling
basis
probable
cause
prevent
destruction
removal
evidence
search
warrant
sought
unreasonable
seizure
either
dwelling
contents
reaffirm
time
however
absent
exigent
circumstances
warrantless
search
invalidated
vale
louisiana
illegal
agents
abundant
probable
cause
advance
entry
believe
criminal
drug
operation
carried
petitioners
apartment
indeed
petitioners
dispute
determination
agents
maintained
surveillance
petitioners
weeks
observed
petitioners
leave
apartment
make
sales
cocaine
wholly
apart
observations
made
extended
surveillance
told
agents
arrest
february
petitioners
supplied
cocaine
earlier
day
purchased
cocaine
offered
segura
segura
probably
cocaine
apartment
basis
information
magistrate
duly
issued
search
warrant
validity
upheld
district
appeals
us
case
agents
entered
secured
apartment
within
arguably
wiser
course
depart
immediately
secure
premises
outside
stakeout
security
check
revealed
one
taken
custody
apartment
method
actually
employed
require
different
result
fourth
amendment
insofar
seizure
concerned
appeals
held
absent
exigent
circumstances
entry
may
constituted
illegal
search
interference
petitioners
privacy
interests
requiring
suppression
evidence
observed
entry
securing
premises
within
however
interference
petitioners
possessory
interests
contents
apartment
perimeter
stakeout
words
initial
entry
legal
affect
reasonableness
seizure
either
method
entry
securing
within
perimeter
stakeout
agents
control
apartment
pending
arrival
warrant
internal
securing
perimeter
stakeout
interfere
extent
possessory
interests
owners
petitioners
argue
heighten
possibility
illegal
entries
holding
illegal
entry
securing
premises
inside
render
seizure
unreasonable
agents
staked
apartment
outside
disagree
first
place
entry
absence
exigent
circumstances
illegal
unwilling
believe
officers
routinely
purposely
violate
law
matter
course
second
practical
matter
officers
probable
cause
process
obtaining
warrant
reason
enter
premises
warrant
issues
absent
exigent
circumstances
course
justify
entry
santana
johnson
third
officers
enter
illegally
recognize
whatever
evidence
discover
direct
result
entry
may
suppressed
appeals
case
finally
officers
enter
without
exigent
circumstances
justify
entry
expose
potential
civil
liability
bivens
six
unknown
federal
narcotics
agents
course
seizure
reasonable
inception
based
upon
probable
cause
may
become
unreasonable
result
duration
reasons
cf
place
delay
securing
warrant
occupation
apartment
continued
throughout
night
next
day
delay
securing
warrant
large
metropolitan
center
unfortunately
uncommon
evidence
bad
faith
suggestion
officers
bad
faith
purposely
delayed
obtaining
warrant
asserted
explanation
officers
focused
first
task
processing
arrested
turning
task
securing
warrant
unreasonable
officers
believe
former
take
priority
given
case
proprietors
apartment
custody
officers
throughout
period
question
evidence
agents
way
exploited
presence
apartment
simply
awaited
issuance
warrant
moreover
half
delay
following
day
reasonable
assume
judicial
officers
readily
available
consideration
warrant
requests
finally
important
observed
place
supra
intrusion
possessory
interests
occasioned
seizure
vary
nature
extent
seizure
may
made
owner
relinquished
control
property
third
party
immediate
custody
control
owner
petitioners
also
argue
even
evidence
subject
suppression
primary
evidence
seized
virtue
initial
illegal
entry
occupation
premises
excluded
fruit
derived
illegal
entry
whether
initial
entry
illegal
irrelevant
admissibility
challenged
evidence
independent
source
warrant
evidence
seized
exclusion
evidence
derivative
fruit
poisonous
tree
warranted
independent
source
none
information
warrant
secured
derived
related
way
initial
entry
petitioners
apartment
information
came
sources
wholly
unconnected
entry
known
agents
well
initial
entry
information
obtained
initial
entry
occupation
apartment
needed
used
agents
secure
warrant
therefore
beyond
dispute
information
possessed
agents
entered
apartment
constituted
independent
source
discovery
seizure
evidence
challenged
evidence
discovered
day
following
entry
search
conducted
valid
warrant
product
search
wholly
unrelated
prior
entry
valid
warrant
search
means
sufficiently
distinguishable
purge
evidence
taint
arising
entry
wong
sun
police
never
entered
apartment
instead
conducted
perimeter
stakeout
prevent
anyone
entering
apartment
destroying
evidence
contraband
challenged
discovered
seized
precisely
legality
initial
entry
thus
wholly
irrelevant
wong
sun
supra
silverthorne
lumber
conclusion
challenged
evidence
admissible
fully
supported
prior
cases
going
back
half
century
never
held
evidence
fruit
poisonous
tree
simply
come
light
illegal
actions
police
see
wong
sun
supra
rawlings
kentucky
brown
illinois
squarely
conflict
silverthorne
cases
allowing
admission
evidence
notwithstanding
prior
illegality
link
illegality
evidence
sufficiently
attenuated
dissipate
taint
token
cases
make
clear
evidence
excluded
fruit
unless
illegality
least
cause
discovery
evidence
suppression
justified
unless
challenged
evidence
sense
product
illegal
governmental
activity
crews
illegal
entry
petitioners
apartment
contribute
way
discovery
evidence
seized
warrant
clear
therefore
even
threshold
requirement
met
case
dissent
contends
initial
entry
securing
premises
causes
discovery
evidence
agents
entered
apartment
instead
secured
premises
outside
colon
friends
alerted
removed
destroyed
evidence
warrant
issued
dissent
embraces
reasoning
petitioners
press
argument
appeals
rejected
argument
prudentially
unsound
rested
wholly
speculative
assumptions
among
things
appeals
suggested
agents
waited
enter
apartment
warrant
issued
might
decided
take
segura
apartment
thereby
alert
colon
alerted
segura
failure
appear
colon
might
attempted
remove
evidence
rather
destroy
event
agents
intercepted
evidence
agree
fully
appeals
district
suggestion
colon
cohorts
removed
destroyed
evidence
pure
speculation
even
important
however
decline
extend
exclusionary
rule
already
exacts
enormous
price
society
system
justice
protect
criminal
activity
dissent
us
may
agents
entered
apartment
petitioners
might
arranged
removal
destruction
evidence
sense
agents
actions
considered
cause
discovery
evidence
juncture
reminded
justice
frankfurter
warning
ophisticated
argument
may
prove
causal
connection
information
obtained
illegal
conduct
government
proof
admonition
courts
consider
whether
matter
good
sense
connection
may
become
attenuated
dissipate
taint
nardone
essence
dissent
constitutional
right
destroy
evidence
concept
defies
logic
common
sense
vi
agree
appeals
cocaine
cash
records
ammunition
properly
admitted
evidence
accordingly
judgment
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
parra
indicted
petitioners
charged
one
count
possession
intent
distribute
kilogram
cocaine
one
occasion
one
kilogram
another
occasion
pleaded
guilty
charges
moved
district
suppress
kilogram
cocaine
found
parra
person
time
arrests
ground
task
force
agents
stopped
violation
terry
ohio
denied
motion
parra
absconded
prior
sentencing
district
griffin
absent
exigent
circumstances
police
officers
forcibly
entered
apartment
discovered
plain
view
narcotics
related
paraphernalia
entry
took
place
officers
sought
search
warrant
appeals
sixth
circuit
affirmed
district
grant
defendant
suppression
motion
district
appeals
held
initial
entry
apartment
justified
exigent
circumstances
thus
items
discovered
plain
view
limited
security
check
suppressed
effect
purposes
fourth
amendment
although
concede
correctness
holding
contest
government
decided
press
argument
exigent
circumstances
existed
need
address
aspect
appeals
decision
concerned
whether
appeals
properly
determined
fourth
amendment
require
suppression
evidence
seized
execution
valid
warrant
agapito
dea
agents
following
surveillance
defendant
hotel
room
arrested
suspected
occupants
room
lobby
hotel
arrests
agents
entered
hotel
room
remained
within
exception
periodic
departures
almost
hours
search
warrant
issued
stay
room
agents
seized
open
suitcase
found
room
search
pursuant
warrant
agents
found
cocaine
suitcase
although
second
circuit
held
initial
entry
illegal
held
cocaine
need
suppressed
discovered
search
valid
warrant
two
instances
allowed
temporary
seizures
limited
detentions
property
based
upon
less
probable
cause
van
leeuwen
refused
invalidate
seizure
detention
basis
reasonable
suspicion
two
packages
delivered
post
office
mailing
one
packages
detained
mere
suspicion
hours
end
period
enough
information
obtained
establish
probable
cause
packages
contained
stolen
coins
package
detained
hours
search
warrant
finally
served
seizures
held
reasonable
fact
suggested
seizures
detentions
limited
times
prudent
circumstances
last
term
place
considered
validity
brief
seizure
detention
traveler
luggage
basis
reasonable
suspicion
luggage
contained
contraband
purpose
seizure
brief
detention
investigate
causes
suspicion
although
held
detention
luggage
airport
circumstances
unreasonable
held
rationale
terry
ohio
applies
permit
officer
basis
reasonable
suspicion
traveler
carrying
luggage
containing
contraband
seize
detain
luggage
briefly
investigate
circumstances
aroused
suspicion
distinguished
constitutional
scholar
raised
question
whether
seizure
premises
might
appropriate
preserve
status
quo
protect
valuable
evidence
police
officers
good
faith
seek
warrant
real
practical
problem
police
officer
power
maintain
status
quo
colleague
taking
time
necessary
draw
sufficient
affidavit
support
application
search
warrant
finding
magistrate
submitting
application
obtaining
search
warrant
issued
bringing
place
arrest
made
seems
inevitable
minimum
several
hours
required
process
best
unless
kind
power
prevent
removal
material
premises
destruction
material
time
search
warrant
almost
inevitably
fruitless
griswold
md
emphasis
added
case
raises
graphically
question
policeman
protect
evidence
necessary
state
must
leave
premises
get
warrant
allowing
evidence
seeks
destroyed
answer
question
makes
unnecessarily
difficult
conviction
prey
upon
society
decision
place
inconsistent
conclusion
found
unreasonable
detention
traveler
luggage
detention
based
suspicion
luggage
contained
contraband
probable
cause
probable
cause
established
authorities
held
unopened
luggage
almost
three
days
warrant
obtained
suggested
delay
presented
independent
basis
suppression
evidence
eventually
discovered
holding
respect
consistent
vast
majority
federal
courts
appeals
held
evidence
obtained
pursuant
valid
warrant
search
need
excluded
prior
illegal
entry
see
perez
kinney
cert
denied
fitzharris
cert
denied
agapito
bosby
dictum
federal
appeals
hold
otherwise
ninth
circuit
see
lomas
allard
important
note
dissent
stresses
legal
status
agents
initial
entry
occupation
apartment
however
case
involves
evidence
seized
search
made
subsequently
valid
warrant
implicit
dissent
agents
presence
apartment
denied
petitioners
legal
right
arrange
incriminating
evidence
concealed
destroyed
justice
stevens
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
blackmun
join
dissenting
correct
analysis
fourth
amendment
issues
raised
case
requires
first
precise
identification
two
constitutional
violations
occurred
second
explanation
remedy
appropriate
believe
current
record
justifies
suppression
challenged
evidence
neither
justify
affirmance
petitioners
convictions
must
consider
substantial
contention
supported
findings
district
left
unaddressed
opinion
authorities
access
evidence
introduced
petitioners
trial
made
possible
exploitation
constitutional
violations
believe
contention
must
addressed
petitioners
convictions
finally
affirmed
remand
proceedings
disposition
fear
provide
government
agents
affirmative
incentive
engage
unconstitutional
violations
privacy
home
disposition
therefore
inconsistent
primary
purpose
fourth
amendment
exclusionary
rule
ensure
private
citizens
petitioners
meaningful
protection
future
violations
rights
events
occurred
february
culmination
investigation
petitioners
way
two
weeks
evening
february
agents
new
york
drug
enforcement
task
force
arrested
parra
told
segura
probably
cocaine
apartment
point
agents
concluded
probable
cause
search
petitioners
apartment
contacted
attorney
office
assistant
attorney
informed
agents
hour
late
obtain
search
warrant
advised
instead
go
apartment
arrest
segura
secure
premises
pending
issuance
warrant
agents
arrived
apartment
hour
later
positioned
fire
escape
observe
anyone
entering
leaving
apartment
also
put
ears
door
heard
nothing
three
hours
waiting
agents
left
perch
went
outside
building
continued
waiting
segura
show
district
described
followed
around
segura
appeared
began
enter
locked
door
lobby
apprehended
placed
handcuffs
arrest
agents
led
shea
informed
wanted
go
upstairs
segura
replied
live
building
apartment
forcibly
bringing
third
floor
agents
began
hallway
point
segura
resisted
shea
forced
hallway
door
apartment
located
rear
building
view
front
building
arrest
took
place
shea
knocked
door
segura
standing
handcuffed
front
luz
colon
unknown
shea
time
opened
door
detective
shea
without
walked
apartment
segura
custody
followed
two
agents
five
minutes
later
palumbo
neither
shea
agent
arrest
warrant
search
warrant
officers
ask
receive
consent
enter
apartment
app
least
two
agents
spent
night
apartment
remained
thoughout
following
day
colleagues
booked
arrestees
presumably
persevered
efforts
obtain
warrant
search
apartment
finally
february
remaining
agents
informed
search
warrant
issued
point
conducted
thorough
search
district
concluded
thus
lapse
hours
entry
apartment
execution
search
warrant
time
officers
remained
inside
apartment
complete
control
upon
searching
apartment
agents
found
one
kilo
cocaine
several
rounds
ammunition
records
narcotics
transactions
ii
frames
appropriate
inquiry
case
whether
evidence
obtained
search
warrant
executed
fruit
illegal
conduct
ante
predicate
inquiry
illegal
conduct
must
course
identified
district
found
exigent
circumstances
justified
agents
initial
warrantless
entry
petitioners
apartment
app
appeals
affirmed
finding
government
seek
review
thus
uncontested
warrantless
entry
petitioners
apartment
unconstitutional
equally
clear
subsequent
occupation
apartment
independently
unconstitutional
two
separate
reasons
first
occupation
unreasonable
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
search
purposes
fourth
amendment
occurs
reasonable
expectation
privacy
infringed
nowhere
expectations
privacy
greater
home
repeatedly
noted
physical
entry
home
chief
evil
wording
fourth
amendment
directed
district
course
invasion
privacy
occasioned
physical
entry
cease
initial
entry
mincey
arizona
held
although
police
lawfully
entered
mincey
home
arrest
constitution
forbade
remain
home
search
reasoned
despite
lawful
initial
entry
mincey
retained
constitutionally
protected
privacy
interest
home
infringed
without
warrant
see
similarly
chimel
california
see
reason
simply
interference
individual
privacy
freedom
movement
lawfully
taken
place
intrusions
automatically
allowed
despite
absence
warrant
fourth
amendment
otherwise
require
remaining
home
initial
entry
agents
exacerbated
invasion
petitioners
protected
privacy
interests
even
assuming
innocent
motives
agents
occupation
petitioners
living
quarters
inevitably
involved
scrutiny
variety
personal
effects
throughout
apartment
petitioners
privacy
interests
unreasonably
infringed
agents
prolonged
occupation
home
chief
justice
simply
ignores
point
assuming
constitutional
distinction
surveillance
home
outside
physical
occupation
inside
chief
justice
assumption
course
untenable
fundamental
difference
breach
entrance
individual
home
fourth
amendment
protects
individual
privacy
variety
settings
none
zone
privacy
clearly
defined
bounded
unambiguous
physical
dimensions
individual
home
zone
finds
roots
clear
specific
constitutional
terms
right
people
secure
houses
shall
violated
payton
new
york
seizure
constitutionally
unreasonable
even
seizure
reasonable
inception
become
unreasonable
duration
place
even
exigent
circumstances
justified
entry
impoundment
premises
pending
warrant
one
even
argues
circumstances
existed
duration
seizure
nevertheless
unreasonable
exigent
circumstances
may
justify
police
conduct
otherwise
unreasonable
undertaken
without
warrant
conduct
must
strictly
circumscribed
exigencies
justify
initiation
terry
ohio
cases
chief
justice
cites
ante
proposition
government
may
impound
premises
amount
time
necessary
procure
warrant
thus
application
case
whatsoever
contention
period
hours
even
remotely
necessary
procure
warrant
contrast
duration
seizure
piece
luggage
held
unreasonable
place
duration
seizure
apartment
contents
case
graphically
illustrates
unreasonable
character
agents
conduct
moreover
unlike
place
involved
seizure
lawful
inception
seizure
constitutionally
unreasonable
moment
began
conducted
without
warrant
absence
exigent
circumstances
clear
since
least
chimel
california
police
may
neither
search
seize
contents
home
without
warrant
simply
basis
concluding
warrantless
invasion
petitioners
home
complied
fourth
amendment
agents
unreasonably
delayed
seeking
judicial
authorization
seizure
petitioners
apartment
seizure
unreasonable
nevertheless
characterize
astonishing
holding
chief
justice
joined
justice
concludes
seizure
apartment
unreasonable
advances
three
reasons
conclusion
none
merit
first
seeks
justify
delay
officers
focused
first
task
processing
arrested
turning
task
securing
warrant
ante
evidence
task
presented
difficulties
indeed
since
arrest
occupants
unconstitutional
truly
ironic
chief
justice
uses
one
wrong
justify
another
greater
significance
district
expressly
found
length
delay
unreasonable
government
made
attempt
justify
finding
upheld
appeals
government
expressly
concedes
delay
unreasonable
second
chief
justice
suggests
relevant
officers
act
bad
faith
ante
done
despite
fact
finding
whether
agents
acted
good
bad
faith
reason
litigants
never
raised
issue
important
repeatedly
held
police
officer
good
bad
faith
undertaking
search
seizure
irrelevant
constitutional
reasonableness
today
finally
important
conclusion
chief
justice
suggests
significant
interference
petitioners
possessory
interests
apartment
custody
anyway
ante
cases
legion
holding
citizen
retains
protected
possessory
interest
home
effects
within
may
infringed
without
warrant
even
though
person
custody
mincey
chimel
two
instances
general
rule
defendants
cases
custody
yet
held
protected
possessory
interests
homes
effects
within
infringed
without
warrant
even
person
custody
arrest
based
probable
cause
still
course
owns
house
right
exclude
others
including
federal
narcotics
agents
remains
inviolate
even
strange
chief
justice
conclusion
permits
authorities
benefit
fact
unlawfully
arrested
colon
colon
home
arrested
without
warrant
unconstitutional
agents
decided
obey
constitution
arrest
colon
relinquished
control
property
presumably
unreasonable
agents
remained
premises
chief
justice
analysis
however
agents
conducted
unlawful
arrest
addition
previous
unlawful
entry
otherwise
unreasonable
occupation
becomes
reasonable
chief
justice
approach
reasonable
agents
conduct
sense
achieve
purpose
thus
basis
record
evidence
findings
district
clear
occupation
petitioners
apartment
second
independent
violation
fourth
amendment
fruit
initial
illegal
entry
apartment
also
constituted
unreasonable
search
seizure
apartment
district
concluded
violations
remedied
suppression
evidence
found
apartment
appeals
agreed
suppression
prewarrant
evidence
proper
remedy
first
violation
prescribed
remedy
second
chief
justice
agree
second
violation
concludes
unconstitutional
conduct
occur
neutralized
ultimate
issuance
valid
warrant
reaching
conclusion
correctly
recognizes
law
requires
suppression
evidence
come
exploitation
initial
illegality
instead
means
sufficiently
distinguishable
purged
primary
taint
ante
quoting
wong
sun
fails
however
discuss
reason
rule
apply
facts
case
iii
every
time
holds
unconstitutionally
obtained
evidence
may
used
criminal
trial
acutely
aware
social
costs
holding
entails
compelling
reason
justify
repeated
imposition
costs
society
reason
course
prevent
violations
constitution
occurring
repeatedly
stated
principal
purpose
exclusionary
rule
deter
violations
fourth
amendment
see
stone
powell
janis
peltier
calandra
rule
calculated
prevent
repair
purpose
deter
compel
respect
constitutional
guaranty
effectively
available
way
removing
incentive
disregard
elkins
however
mechanically
applied
rule
every
item
evidence
causal
connection
police
misconduct
notion
dissipation
taint
attempts
mark
point
detrimental
consequences
illegal
police
action
become
attenuated
deterrent
effect
exclusionary
rule
longer
justifies
cost
brown
illinois
powell
concurring
part
point
well
illustrated
cases
concerning
use
confessions
obtained
result
unlawful
arrests
wong
sun
rejected
rule
evidence
obtained
illegal
actions
police
suppressed
see
yet
brown
illinois
continuing
reject
rule
see
held
taint
unlawful
arrest
purged
merely
warning
arrestee
right
remain
silent
consult
counsel
required
miranda
arizona
explained
miranda
warnings
held
attenuate
taint
unconstitutional
arrest
regardless
wanton
purposeful
fourth
amendment
violation
effect
exclusionary
rule
substantially
diluted
arrests
made
without
warrant
without
probable
cause
questioning
investigation
encouraged
knowledge
evidence
derived
therefrom
well
made
admissible
trial
simple
expedient
giving
miranda
warnings
incentive
avoid
fourth
amendment
violations
eviscerated
making
warnings
effect
constitutional
guarantee
unlawful
searches
seizures
said
reduced
form
words
citation
omitted
iv
concludes
evidence
introduced
petitioners
trial
obtained
source
independent
prior
illegality
search
warrant
explains
since
police
legal
basis
obtaining
executing
search
warrant
fruits
authorized
search
produced
exploitation
prior
illegality
ante
significant
analytical
difficulties
lurking
approach
first
accepts
distinction
evidence
obtained
pursuant
warrant
evidence
obtained
initial
illegal
entry
ante
see
also
ante
opinion
burger
draw
distinction
prewarrant
evidence
evidence
warrant
embraced
categories
equally
unlawful
entry
reason
believe
evidence
plain
view
remained
apartment
obtained
warrant
executed
evidence
concealed
warrant
provided
independent
justification
seizing
evidence
apartment
plain
view
much
items
concealed
plain
view
items
actually
removed
apartment
warrant
executed
thus
interference
petitioners
possessory
interest
items
interest
concealed
items
execution
valid
warrant
takes
poison
hidden
fruit
think
also
remove
taint
fruit
plain
view
second
holding
inadequate
resolve
claims
raised
petitioners
fruits
judicially
authorized
search
untainted
information
obtained
initial
entry
occupation
apartment
needed
used
agents
secure
warrant
ante
sufficient
dispose
claim
petitioners
make
information
led
issuance
search
warrant
tainted
dispose
claim
petitioners
make
agents
access
fruits
authorized
search
rather
information
led
search
product
illegal
conduct
question
length
delay
obtaining
warrant
surely
relevant
segura
returned
home
night
next
day
probable
occupants
apartment
become
concerned
might
least
destroyed
records
illegal
transactions
removed
evidence
one
occupants
left
apartment
taken
evidence
period
prior
execution
search
warrant
obviously
evidence
accessible
agents
warrant
finally
executed
district
concluded
possibility
evidence
availability
warrant
executed
hinged
solely
illegal
impoundment
found
evidence
inevitably
discovered
fact
colon
might
well
destroyed
evidence
illegally
excluded
apartment
app
finding
indicates
substantial
doubt
whether
evidence
actually
seized
discovered
illegal
entry
occupation
majority
insists
idea
access
evidence
relevant
consideration
unsound
extend
exclusionary
rule
protect
criminal
activity
ante
however
point
far
novel
actually
rule
implicit
virtually
every
case
applied
exclusionary
rule
seminal
case
weeks
federal
agents
illegally
entered
weeks
house
seized
evidence
ordered
evidence
suppressed
precisely
absent
illegality
agents
never
obtained
access
evidence
see
recently
payton
new
york
held
suppression
required
agents
authorized
enter
house
fourth
amendment
violation
enabled
obtain
access
evidence
indeed
regularly
invoked
exclusionary
rule
evidence
eluded
police
absent
illegality
evidence
available
agents
time
finally
executed
warrant
illegally
entered
impounded
petitioners
apartment
said
agents
access
evidence
independent
prior
illegality
unlawful
delay
provides
justification
suppression
unlawful
entry
violations
precluded
possibility
evidence
moved
reach
agents
approved
exactly
principle
last
term
place
luggage
detained
minutes
trained
narcotics
detection
dog
arrived
dog
sniffed
luggage
signaled
presence
narcotics
warrant
obtained
strength
dog
reaction
warrant
executed
narcotics
discovered
held
initial
seizure
lawful
became
unreasonable
duration
thus
absent
illegality
authorities
give
luggage
back
place
taken
away
evidence
obtained
violation
fourth
amendment
unlawful
delay
prevented
evidence
disappearing
obtained
authorities
precisely
claim
made
petitioners
finally
confront
petitioners
claim
concerning
relationship
unlawful
occupation
apartment
evidence
obtained
conclusion
occupation
ante
rejects
two
reasons
first
finds
possibility
evidence
apartment
impounded
speculative
however
district
found
distinct
nonspeculative
possibility
evidence
available
police
entered
apartment
illegally
obligated
respect
finding
unless
found
clearly
erroneous
indeed
equally
speculative
assume
occupants
apartment
become
concerned
enough
take
action
segura
missing
hours
second
thinks
prudentially
unsound
suppress
evidence
noting
certain
irony
extending
protection
constitution
simply
criminals
may
destroy
evidence
given
chance
analysis
confuses
two
separate
issues
however
whether
initial
entry
justified
exigent
circumstances
whether
discovery
evidence
characterized
inevitable
notwithstanding
delay
dispute
risk
immediate
destruction
justify
entry
argument
petitioners
make
immediate
threat
destruction
evidence
substantial
possibility
course
hours
least
evidence
removed
destroyed
however
controlling
question
answered
merely
basis
speculation
rather
asking
whether
deterrent
purposes
exclusionary
rule
served
undermined
suppression
evidence
appropriate
prudential
consideration
identified
exclusionary
rule
cases
district
found
distinct
possibility
evidence
preserved
illegal
occupation
petitioners
apartment
possibility
provides
sufficient
reason
asking
whether
deterrent
rationale
exclusionary
rule
applicable
second
constitutional
violation
committed
police
case
importance
applying
exclusionary
rule
police
conduct
case
underscored
facts
occupation
petitioners
home
blatantly
unconstitutional
time
law
enforcement
justification
engaging
conduct
exceedingly
weak
justification
inordinate
delay
securing
warrant
thus
applying
exclusionary
rule
conduct
impair
legitimate
interest
law
enforcement
moreover
deterrence
rationale
rule
plainly
applicable
agents
impounded
apartment
precisely
wished
avoid
risking
loss
access
evidence
within
thus
unlawful
benefit
acquired
impoundment
attenuated
make
unlikely
deprivation
benefit
exclusionary
rule
deterrent
effect
contrary
exactly
benefit
identified
district
avoiding
risk
loss
evidence
motivated
agents
case
violate
constitution
thus
policies
underlying
exclusionary
rule
demand
deterrent
created
kind
unconstitutional
conduct
yet
majority
disposition
case
creates
none
majority
approach
agents
remained
indefinitely
impounding
apartment
week
month
without
deprived
advantage
derived
unlawful
impoundment
expect
approach
prevent
similar
violations
fourth
amendment
future
opinion
exclusionary
rule
applied
constitutional
violations
deprive
authorities
advantage
gained
result
unconstitutional
entry
impoundment
petitioners
apartment
deterrence
rationale
exclusionary
rule
requires
suppression
unless
government
prove
evidence
fact
remained
apartment
unlawfully
impounded
risk
uncertainty
happened
absent
illegal
conduct
posed
facts
case
borne
party
created
uncertainty
government
teaching
exclusionary
rule
cases
see
taylor
alabama
dunaway
new
york
brown
illinois
proceedings
necessary
case
petitioners
claim
properly
evaluated
district
found
demonstrable
possibility
evidence
obtained
execution
search
warrant
destroyed
absent
illegal
entry
impoundment
finding
sufficient
establish
prima
facie
government
exploited
illegality
avoiding
risk
losing
evidence
apartment
existence
mere
possibility
equated
ultimate
finding
exploitation
fact
occur
district
made
specific
finding
whether
government
demonstrated
evidence
obtained
pursuant
search
warrant
remained
apartment
agents
illegally
entered
impounded
may
evidentiary
hearing
necessary
supplement
record
point
accordingly
remand
case
appeals
instructions
remanded
district
proceedings
vi
government
contest
blatant
unconstitutionality
agents
conduct
case
nevertheless
today
holding
permits
federal
agents
benefit
conduct
avoiding
risk
evidence
unavailable
search
warrant
finally
executed
majority
invocation
enormous
price
exclusionary
rule
stated
unwillingness
protect
criminal
activity
ante
persuasive
support
provides
holding
course
quite
right
ever
mindful
cost
excessive
attention
procedural
safeguards
evenhanded
approach
difficult
cases
like
requires
attention
countervailing
considerations
well
two
stress
first
consider
impact
holding
leaders
law
enforcement
community
achieved
great
success
creating
kind
trained
professional
officers
deservedly
command
respect
communities
serve
image
keystone
cop
whose
skills
seldom
transcended
employment
third
degree
largely
matter
memory
us
lived
congeries
reasons
among
unquestionably
added
respect
constitutional
rights
individual
engendered
cases
like
miranda
arizona
mapp
ohio
professionalism
always
characterized
federal
bureau
investigation
typical
police
forces
throughout
land
rule
law
predicated
absurd
notion
police
officer
skill
required
obtain
valid
search
warrant
less
hours
fails
deter
authorities
delaying
unreasonably
attempt
obtain
warrant
entered
home
demeaning
law
enforcement
encourage
sloppy
undisciplined
procedures
second
rhetoric
disguise
fact
tolerates
also
provides
affirmative
incentive
warrantless
plainly
unreasonable
unnecessary
intrusions
home
resulting
erosion
sanctity
home
price
paid
innocent
guilty
alike
half
century
ago
justice
holmes
explained
government
permitted
benefit
violations
constitution
government
form
repudiating
condemning
illegal
seizure
seeks
maintain
right
avail
knowledge
obtained
means
otherwise
proposition
presented
nakedly
although
course
seizure
outrage
government
regrets
protection
constitution
covers
physical
possession
advantages
government
gain
object
pursuit
forbidden
act
opinion
law
reduces
fourth
amendment
form
words
essence
provision
forbidding
acquisition
evidence
certain
way
merely
evidence
acquired
shall
used
shall
used
silverthorne
lumber
citation
omitted
respectfully
dissent
chief
justice
seems
think
problem
caused
unavailability
magistrate
issue
warrant
hour
ante
however
government
candidly
admits
fault
lies
judiciary
attorney
office
failing
exercise
due
diligence
attempting
procure
warrant
one
agents
testified
assistant
attorney
told
perhaps
magistrate
found
particular
time
evening
tr
emphasis
supplied
assistant
attorney
testified
even
attempt
locate
magistrate
obtain
search
warrant
government
concedes
brief
clear
greater
effort
made
obtain
search
warrant
officers
first
sought
one
condone
failure
note
subsequent
events
case
attorney
circulated
internal
memorandum
reemphasizing
search
warrants
sought
possible
regardless
hour
order
avoid
need
warrantless
entries
secure
premises
brief
based
information
given
prior
arrival
apartment
agents
believed
correctly
turned
segura
apartment
tr
however
none
evidence
seen
agents
entered
apartment
vale
louisiana
held
absent
demonstrable
threat
imminent
destruction
evidence
authorities
may
enter
residence
order
preserve
evidence
without
warrant
see
also
jeffers
mcdonald
johnson
illegality
even
plain
case
entry
effected
force
late
night
see
oliver
illinois
andreas
knotts
smith
maryland
terry
ohio
see
also
welsh
wisconsin
michigan
clifford
plurality
opinion
steagald
payton
new
york
coolidge
new
hampshire
mcdonald
johnson
see
also
argued
present
case
reasonable
search
man
house
arrested
argument
founded
little
subjective
view
regarding
acceptability
certain
sorts
police
conduct
considerations
relevant
fourth
amendment
interests
unconfined
analysis
fourth
amendment
protection
area
approach
evaporation
point
easy
explain
instance
less
subjectively
reasonable
search
man
house
arrested
front
lawn
street
happens
house
time
arrest
oral
argument
government
conceded
agents
occupation
apartment
constituted
continuing
search
exactly
reason
tr
oral
arg
see
karo
ante
jacobsen
place
brennan
concurring
result
texas
brown
stevens
concurring
judgment
segura
lawfully
custody
period
colon
three
companions
unknown
agents
prior
illegal
entry
district
noted
able
remain
apartment
free
governmental
interference
unlawful
entry
occurred
chief
justice
parsimonious
approach
fourth
amendment
rights
vividly
illustrated
fact
though
preparing
adversary
brief
unwilling
even
acknowledge
explicitly
apartment
contents
seized
assum
es
case
ante
see
mincey
arizona
leasing
vale
louisiana
chimel
california
chief
justice
misuse
place
ante
quite
remarkable
suggests
place
approved
almost
detention
place
luggage
warrant
obtained
fact
occasion
reach
issue
held
initial
detention
luggage
pending
sniff
test
using
trained
dog
unreasonable
see
reference
place
chief
justice
diligent
search
support
holding
produced
nothing
dissenting
opinions
law
review
article
see
ante
dean
griswold
article
however
even
purport
answer
question
presented
case
see
griswold
criminal
procedure
means
end
md
rev
since
premises
impounded
inside
assume
impoundment
permissible
even
absent
exigent
circumstances
occurs
outside
authorities
merely
seal
premises
pending
issuance
warrant
enter
see
also
steagald
payton
new
york
mincey
arizona
vale
louisiana
fact
except
aberrational
warrantless
search
incident
arrest
exception
recognized
rabinowitz
repudiated
chimel
rule
settled
since
agnello
see
also
trupiano
explanation
government
offered
delay
february
taken
processing
arrests
brief
oral
argument
government
conceded
delay
unreasonable
tr
oral
arg
suppression
hearing
district
one
agents
testified
warrant
application
even
presented
magistrate
february
explained
well
hard
get
secretarial
services
today
tr
assistant
attorney
responsible
procuring
warrant
testified
similarly
attorney
explain
simply
write
application
hand
seek
telephonic
warrant
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
district
found
delay
unreasonable
app
finding
appeals
disturb
government
challenge
finding
see
terry
ohio
beck
ohio
henry
leon
post
welsh
wisconsin
payton
new
york
justice
holmes
commented
dilemma
must
consider
two
objects
desire
make
minds
choose
desirable
criminals
detected
end
available
evidence
used
also
desirable
government
foster
pay
crimes
means
evidence
obtained
pays
officers
got
evidence
crime
see
may
well
pay
getting
way
attach
importance
protestations
disapproval
knowingly
accepts
pays
announces
future
pay
fruits
choose
part
think
less
evil
criminals
escape
government
play
ignoble
part
olmstead
dissenting
opinion
justice
stewart
written
framers
intend
bill
rights
unenforceable
guiding
principles
code
ethics
honor
system
proscriptions
guarantees
amendments
intended
create
legal
rights
duties
bill
rights
one
component
legal
system
one
limits
government
reach
primary
responsibility
enforcing
constitution
limits
government
least
since
time
marbury
madison
vested
judicial
branch
general
law
enforcement
officials
violate
person
fourth
amendment
rights
attempting
obtain
evidence
use
criminal
proceedings
give
effect
constitution
prohibition
illegal
searches
seizures
may
necessary
judiciary
remove
incentive
violating
thus
may
argued
although
constitution
explicitly
provide
exclusion
need
enforce
constitution
limits
government
preserve
rule
law
requires
exclusionary
rule
stewart
road
mapp
ohio
beyond
origins
development
future
exclusionary
rule
colum
rev
footnotes
omitted
see
lafave
search
seizure
amsterdam
search
seizure
section
comment
rev
pitler
fruit
poisonous
tree
revisited
shepardized
rev
tr
recognize
legality
seizure
evidence
plain
view
officers
entered
us
find
necessary
discuss
since
affects
analysis
issue
dispute
chief
justice
well
relies
deterrent
effect
suppression
evidence
found
plain
view
responding
petitioners
argument
appeals
decision
encourage
illegal
entries
course
securing
premises
inside
ante
means
impossible
least
one
occupants
might
able
leave
apartment
none
known
agents
agents
located
outside
apartment
building
known
person
leaving
building
come
petitioners
apartment
quite
apartments
floor
apartment
building
tr
moreover
district
noted
agents
see
petitioners
apartment
position
front
building
element
access
rather
information
central
virtually
whole
jurisprudence
warrant
clause
fourth
amendment
cases
suppressing
evidence
obtained
pursuant
warrantless
search
focused
authorities
lack
appropriate
information
authorize
search
rather
fact
information
presented
magistrate
thus
suppression
consequence
lack
information
fact
authorities
access
evidence
question
properly
authorized
hence
unconstitutional
even
recently
welsh
wisconsin
employed
concept
held
police
justify
fourth
amendment
warrantless
arrest
welsh
suspected
drunken
driving
home
simply
evidence
petitioner
level
might
dissipated
police
obtained
warrant
omitted
appeals
agrees
noted
district
ruling
depended
speculative
assumptions
agents
kept
apartment
surveillance
segura
arrest
illegally
entered
colon
destroyed
evidence
rather
merely
removed
apartment
evidence
destroyed
unobtrusively
however
assumptions
supported
evidence
first
agents
reason
keep
apartment
surveillance
subsequent
arrests
persons
surveilled
parra
segura
second
even
colon
merely
removed
evidence
apartment
reason
believe
agents
intercepted
see
supra
third
since
agents
outside
apartment
reason
remain
scene
segura
arrest
around
notice
evidence
removed
destroyed
unobtrusively
moreover
even
difficult
remove
destroy
evidence
scale
petitioners
owned
mean
evidence
remained
apartment
course
period
appeals
assumptions
contrary
speculative
finding
district
cases
lower
courts
majority
cites
support
holding
ante
plainly
distinguishable
perez
remanded
hearing
whether
search
seizure
authorized
warrant
tainted
prior
illegality
kinney
cert
denied
found
taint
case
occupation
searched
premises
prior
obtaining
warrant
hence
claim
type
made
true
cases
cites
bosby
fitzharris
cert
denied
agapito
cert
denied
concedes
lomas
allard
contrary
holding
words
case
calls
mind
nardone
ante
rather
two
justice
jackson
dissents
respect
claim
fourth
amendment
protect
criminal
activity
wrote
occasional
flagrant
abuses
come
attention
courts
search
seizure
yields
incriminating
evidence
defendant
least
sufficiently
compromised
indicted
courts
protect
innocent
invasions
indirectly
medium
excluding
evidence
obtained
frequently
guilty
search
brinegar
car
must
regarded
search
car
everyman
brinegar
respect
price
exacted
exclusionary
rule
wrote
forefathers
thought
great
price
pay
decent
privacy
home
papers
effects
indispensable
individual
dignity
may
overvalued
privacy
disposed
set
command
naught
harris