jicarilla
apache
nation
argued
april
decided
june
respondent
jicarilla
apache
nation
tribe
reservation
contains
natural
resources
developed
pursuant
statutes
administered
interior
department
proceeds
resources
held
trust
tribe
tribe
filed
action
federal
claims
cfc
seeking
monetary
damages
government
alleged
mismanagement
tribe
trust
funds
violation
laws
discovery
tribe
moved
compel
production
certain
documents
government
agreed
release
documents
asserted
others
protected
inter
alia
privilege
cfc
granted
motion
part
holding
departmental
communications
relating
management
trust
funds
fall
within
fiduciary
exception
privilege
exception
courts
applied
trusts
trustee
obtains
legal
advice
related
trust
administration
precluded
asserting
privilege
trust
beneficiaries
denying
government
petition
writ
mandamus
directing
cfc
vacate
production
order
federal
circuit
agreed
cfc
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
sufficiently
similar
private
trust
justify
applying
fiduciary
exception
appeals
held
deny
tribe
request
discover
communications
government
attorneys
based
privilege
communications
concern
management
indian
trust
government
claimed
attorneys
considered
specific
competing
interest
communications
held
fiduciary
exception
privilege
apply
general
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
pp
considers
bounds
fiduciary
exception
nature
indian
trust
relationship
pp
english
common
law
trustee
obtained
legal
advice
guide
trust
administration
defense
litigation
beneficiaries
entitled
production
documents
related
advice
rationale
advice
sought
benefit
obtained
expense
trust
funds
used
pay
attorney
leading
american
case
riggs
nat
bank
washington
zimmer
delaware
chancery
applied
fiduciary
exception
hold
trust
beneficiaries
compel
trustees
produce
legal
memorandum
related
trust
administration
trustees
obtained
legal
advice
mere
representative
beneficiaries
real
clients
attorney
fiduciary
duty
furnish
information
beneficiaries
outweighed
trustees
interest
privilege
federal
courts
appeals
apply
fiduciary
exception
based
two
criteria
pp
federal
circuit
analogized
government
private
trustee
responsibilities
respect
management
tribal
funds
bear
resemblance
private
trustee
analogy
taken
far
government
trust
obligations
tribes
established
governed
statute
common
law
see
navajo
nation
navajo
fulfilling
statutory
duties
government
acts
private
trustee
pursuant
sovereign
interest
execution
federal
law
see
heckman
federal
law
imposes
fiduciary
obligations
government
common
law
play
role
navajo
nation
navajo
ii
inform
interpretation
statutes
see
white
mountain
apache
tribe
applicable
statutes
regulations
control
tribe
identify
specific
applicable
statute
regulation
government
violated
neither
government
indian
assets
trust
principles
matter
navajo
ii
supra
pp
two
criteria
justifying
fiduciary
exception
absent
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
pp
cases
applying
fiduciary
exception
courts
identify
real
client
based
whether
advice
bought
trust
corpus
whether
trustee
reason
seek
advice
personal
rather
fiduciary
capacity
whether
advice
intended
purpose
benefit
trust
riggs
applying
factors
concludes
obtain
legal
advice
mere
representative
tribe
tribe
real
client
advice
intended
see
government
attorneys
paid
congressional
appropriations
cost
tribe
government
also
seeks
legal
advice
sovereign
capacity
rather
conventional
fiduciary
tribe
sovereign
interest
distinct
beneficiaries
private
interests
government
seeks
legal
advice
personal
fiduciary
capacity
moreover
government
many
competing
legal
concerns
allow
inquiry
communication
purpose
addition
duty
tribe
government
may
need
comply
statutory
duties
environmental
conservation
obligations
may
also
face
conflicting
duties
different
tribes
individual
indians
may
seek
advice
counsel
guidance
balancing
competing
interests
help
determine
whether
conflicting
interests
privilege
effective
must
predictable
see
jaffee
redmond
government
always
able
predict
considerations
qualify
competing
interests
especially
receiving
counsel
advice
government
required
identify
specific
interests
considered
communication
ability
receive
confidential
legal
advice
substantially
compromised
see
upjohn
pp
federal
circuit
also
decided
fiduciary
exception
properly
applied
fiduciary
duty
disclose
information
beneficiary
government
however
disclosure
obligations
private
trustee
case
delineates
government
trust
responsibilities
identifies
interior
secretary
obligation
supply
tribal
account
holders
periodic
statements
account
performance
make
available
daily
basis
account
balances
secretary
complied
requirements
regulations
mandating
tribe
provided
detailed
quarterly
statement
performance
cfr
pt
common
law
trusts
override
specific
statutes
regulations
statutory
clause
labeling
enumerated
trust
responsibilities
nonexhaustive
see
read
include
general
duty
disclose
information
related
administration
indian
trusts
since
vitiate
congress
specification
narrowly
defined
disclosure
obligations
see
mackey
lanier
collection
riggs
agency
service
law
regulation
moreover
documents
issue
classed
property
records
property
tribe
cfr
considers
ownership
records
significant
factor
deciding
access
document
riggs
supra
privilege
belongs
pp
reversed
remanded
alito
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
breyer
joined
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
petitioner
jicarilla
apache
nation
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
justice
alito
delivered
opinion
privilege
ranks
among
oldest
established
evidentiary
privileges
known
law
common
law
however
recognized
exception
privilege
trustee
obtains
legal
advice
related
exercise
fiduciary
duties
cases
courts
held
trustee
withhold
communications
beneficiary
trust
case
consider
whether
fiduciary
exception
applies
general
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
hold
although
government
responsibilities
management
funds
belonging
indian
tribes
bear
resemblance
private
trustee
analogy
taken
far
trust
obligations
indian
tribes
established
governed
statute
rather
common
law
fulfilling
statutory
duties
government
acts
private
trustee
pursuant
sovereign
interest
execution
federal
law
reasons
fiduciary
exception
trustee
independent
interest
trust
administration
trustee
subject
general
duty
disclosure
apply
context
jicarilla
apache
nation
tribe
occupies
reservation
northern
new
mexico
established
executive
order
land
contains
timber
gravel
oil
gas
reserves
developed
pursuant
statutes
administered
department
interior
proceeds
derived
natural
resources
held
trust
tribe
pursuant
american
indian
trust
fund
management
reform
act
stat
statutes
tribe
commenced
action
federal
claims
cfc
tribe
sued
tucker
act
ed
supp
iii
indian
tucker
act
vest
cfc
jurisdiction
claims
government
founded
constitution
laws
treaties
contracts
complaint
seeks
monetary
damages
government
alleged
mismanagement
funds
held
trust
tribe
tribe
argues
government
violated
various
laws
including
govern
management
funds
held
trust
indian
tribes
see
fed
cl
december
june
government
tribe
participated
alternative
dispute
resolution
order
resolve
claim
time
government
turned
thousands
documents
withheld
potentially
relevant
documents
protected
privilege
attorney
doctrine
privilege
request
tribe
case
restored
active
litigation
docket
cfc
divided
case
phases
trial
set
discovery
schedule
first
phase
relevant
concerns
government
management
tribe
trust
accounts
tribe
alleges
period
government
failed
invest
trust
funds
properly
among
things
tribe
claims
government
failed
maximize
returns
trust
funds
invested
heavily
maturities
failed
pool
trust
funds
tribal
trusts
discovery
tribe
moved
compel
government
produce
withheld
documents
response
government
agreed
withdraw
claims
privilege
accordingly
produce
documents
government
continued
assert
privilege
attorney
doctrine
respect
remaining
documents
cfc
reviewed
documents
camera
classified
five
requests
legal
advice
relating
trust
administration
sent
personnel
department
interior
office
solicitor
directs
legal
affairs
department
legal
advice
sent
solicitor
office
personnel
interior
treasury
departments
documents
generated
contracts
interior
accounting
firm
interior
documents
concerning
litigation
tribes
miscellaneous
documents
falling
categories
cfc
granted
tribe
motion
compel
part
cfc
held
communications
relating
management
trust
funds
fall
within
fiduciary
exception
privilege
exception
courts
applied
context
trusts
trustee
obtains
legal
advice
related
execution
fiduciary
obligations
precluded
asserting
privilege
beneficiaries
trust
cfc
concluded
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
sufficiently
analogous
trust
relationship
exception
apply
accordingly
cfc
held
may
shield
tribe
communications
attorneys
relating
trust
matters
cfc
ordered
disclosure
almost
documents
first
two
categories
documents
involve
matters
regarding
administration
tribal
trusts
either
directly
indirectly
implicating
investments
benefit
jicarilla
contain
legal
advice
relating
trust
administration
cfc
allowed
government
withhold
documents
remaining
categories
attorney
work
identified
individual
documents
determined
also
subject
fiduciary
exception
government
sought
prevent
disclosure
documents
petitioning
appeals
federal
circuit
writ
mandamus
directing
cfc
vacate
production
order
appeals
denied
petition
view
cfc
correctly
applied
fiduciary
exception
held
deny
indian
tribe
request
discover
communications
attorneys
based
privilege
communications
concern
management
indian
trust
claimed
government
attorneys
considered
specific
interest
communications
ca
fed
qualifying
holding
recognized
sometimes
government
may
statutory
obligations
clash
fiduciary
duties
indian
tribes
government
alleged
legal
advice
case
related
conflicting
interests
reserved
judgment
fiduciary
exception
might
apply
situation
rejected
government
argument
duties
indian
tribes
governed
statute
rather
common
law
general
duty
disclosure
override
privilege
also
disagreed
government
contention
approach
made
privilege
unpredictable
impair
government
ability
obtain
confidential
legal
advice
granted
certiorari
reverse
remand
proceedings
ii
federal
rules
evidence
provide
evidentiary
privileges
shall
governed
principles
common
law
light
reason
experience
fed
rule
evid
privilege
oldest
privileges
confidential
communications
known
common
law
upjohn
citing
wigmore
evidence
mcnaughton
rev
aim
encourage
full
frank
communication
attorneys
clients
thereby
promote
broader
public
interests
observance
law
administration
justice
hunt
blackburn
objectives
privilege
apply
governmental
clients
privilege
aids
government
employees
obtaining
legal
advice
founded
complete
accurate
factual
picture
restatement
third
law
governing
lawyers
comment
pp
unless
applicable
law
provides
government
may
invoke
privilege
civil
litigation
protect
confidential
communications
government
officials
government
attorneys
overnmental
agencies
employees
enjoy
privilege
nongovernmental
counterparts
tribe
argues
however
common
law
also
recognizes
fiduciary
exception
privilege
virtue
trust
relationship
government
tribe
documents
otherwise
privileged
must
disclosed
preliminary
matters
consider
bounds
fiduciary
exception
nature
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
english
courts
first
developed
fiduciary
exception
principle
trust
law
century
rule
trustee
obtained
legal
advice
guide
administration
trust
trustee
defense
litigation
beneficiaries
entitled
production
documents
related
advice
wynne
humberston
beav
eng
talbot
marshfield
sm
eng
courts
reasoned
normal
privilege
apply
situation
legal
advice
sought
beneficiaries
benefit
obtained
beneficiaries
expense
using
trust
funds
pay
attorney
fees
ibid
wynne
supra
eng
fiduciary
exception
quickly
became
established
feature
english
common
law
see
mason
ch
appear
country
following
century
american
courts
seem
first
expressed
skepticism
see
supp
edny
declining
apply
fiduciary
exception
trustee
bondholding
corporation
important
right
corporate
trustee
seek
legal
advice
nevertheless
act
accordance
judgment
however
american
courts
began
adopt
english
rule
see
garner
wolfinbarger
allowing
shareholders
upon
showing
good
cause
discover
legal
advice
given
corporate
management
leading
american
case
fiduciary
exception
riggs
nat
bank
washington
zimmer
del
ch
case
beneficiaries
trust
estate
sought
compel
trustees
reimburse
estate
alleged
breaches
trust
beneficiaries
moved
compel
trustees
produce
legal
memorandum
related
administration
trust
trustees
withheld
basis
privilege
delaware
chancery
observing
american
case
law
practically
nonexistent
duty
trustee
context
looked
english
cases
applying
fiduciary
exception
held
memorandum
discoverable
identified
two
reasons
applying
exception
first
explained
trustees
obtained
legal
advice
mere
representative
beneficiaries
trustees
fiduciary
obligation
act
beneficiaries
interest
administering
trust
ibid
reason
beneficiaries
real
clients
attorney
advised
trustee
matters
therefore
privilege
properly
belonged
beneficiaries
rather
trustees
based
real
client
determination
several
factors
advice
sought
adversarial
proceedings
trustees
beneficiaries
pending
therefore
reason
trustees
seek
legal
advice
personal
rather
fiduciary
capacity
saw
indication
memorandum
intended
purpose
benefit
trust
law
firm
paid
trust
assets
advice
obtained
beneficiaries
expense
significant
factor
entitling
beneficiaries
see
document
also
strong
indication
precisely
real
clients
distinguished
legal
advice
procured
trustee
expense
protection
remain
privileged
situation
trust
assessed
obtaining
opinions
counsel
interests
beneficiaries
presently
stake
ibid
latter
case
fiduciary
exception
applied
trustees
withhold
communications
beneficiaries
second
concluded
trustees
fiduciary
duty
furnish
information
outweighed
interest
privilege
policy
preserving
full
disclosure
necessary
relationship
explained
ultimately
important
protection
trustees
confidence
attorney
trust
information
helped
beneficiaries
police
trustees
management
trust
disclosure
judgment
public
policy
preservation
confidential
communications
ibid
federal
courts
appeals
apply
fiduciary
exception
based
two
criteria
see
long
island
lighting
wachtel
health
net
solis
food
employers
labor
relations
app
lexis
may
wildbur
arco
chemical
evans
per
curiam
decision
federal
appellate
held
exception
apply
trustee
indian
tribes
order
apply
fiduciary
exception
case
appeals
analogized
government
private
trustee
applied
analogy
limited
contexts
see
mitchell
mitchell
ii
mean
government
resembles
private
trustee
every
respect
contrary
previously
noted
relationship
indian
tribes
distinctive
different
existing
individuals
whether
dealing
arm
length
trustees
beneficiaries
otherwise
klamath
moadoc
tribes
emphasis
added
general
relationship
indian
tribes
comparable
private
trust
relationship
cherokee
nation
cl
emphasis
added
government
course
private
trustee
though
relevant
statutes
denominate
relationship
government
indians
trust
see
trust
defined
governed
statutes
rather
common
law
see
navajo
nation
navajo
analysis
must
train
specific
statutory
regulatory
prescriptions
recognized
prior
cases
congress
may
style
relations
indians
trust
without
assuming
fiduciary
duties
private
trustee
creating
trust
relationship
limited
bare
compared
trust
relationship
private
parties
common
law
mitchell
mitchell
mitchell
ii
supra
difference
private
trust
statutory
indian
trust
follows
unique
position
government
sovereign
distinction
public
rights
government
private
rights
private
parties
well
established
government
consents
liable
private
parties
may
yield
consent
upon
terms
restrictions
may
think
murray
lessee
hoboken
land
improvement
creates
important
distinction
cases
private
right
arise
government
persons
subject
authority
connection
performance
constitutional
functions
executive
legislative
departments
crowell
benson
throughout
history
indian
trust
relationship
recognized
organization
management
trust
sovereign
function
subject
plenary
authority
congress
see
merrion
jicarilla
apache
tribe
retains
plenary
authority
divest
tribes
attributes
sovereignty
wheeler
congress
plenary
authority
legislate
indian
tribes
matters
including
form
government
winton
amos
congress
plenary
authority
indians
tribal
relations
full
power
legislate
concerning
tribal
property
lone
wolf
hitchcock
plenary
authority
tribal
relations
indians
exercised
congress
beginning
power
always
deemed
political
one
subject
controlled
judicial
department
government
cherokee
nation
hitchcock
power
existing
congress
administer
upon
guard
tribal
property
power
political
administrative
nature
manner
exercise
question
within
province
legislative
branch
determine
one
courts
see
also
candelaria
tiger
western
investment
indian
trust
relationship
represents
exercise
authority
explained
government
real
direct
interest
guardianship
exercises
indian
tribes
interest
one
vested
sovereign
minnesota
especially
government
often
structured
trust
relationship
pursue
policy
goals
thus
trust
administration
relat
es
welfare
indians
maintenance
limitations
congress
prescribed
part
plan
distribution
distinctly
interest
heckman
see
also
candelaria
supra
heckman
government
brought
suit
cancel
certain
conveyances
allotted
lands
members
indian
tribe
conveyances
violated
restrictions
alienation
imposed
congress
explained
government
brought
suit
representative
indian
grantors
whose
conveyances
sought
cancel
indians
thereby
bound
judgment
formally
acting
trustee
government
fact
asserting
sovereign
interest
disposition
indian
lands
indians
precluded
intervening
litigation
advance
position
contrary
government
result
possible
government
assumed
fiduciary
role
indians
trustee
governing
authority
enforcing
statutory
law
question
undisputed
existence
general
trust
relationship
indian
people
mitchell
ii
government
following
humane
self
imposed
policy
charged
moral
obligations
highest
responsibility
trust
seminole
nation
obligations
fulfillment
national
honor
committed
heckman
supra
congress
expressed
policy
series
statutes
defined
redefined
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
cases
congress
established
limited
trust
relationship
serve
narrow
purpose
see
mitchell
congress
intended
hold
land
general
allotment
act
simply
wished
prevent
alienation
land
ensure
allottees
immune
state
taxation
navajo
indian
mineral
leasing
act
imposes
detailed
fiduciary
responsibilities
government
expressly
invested
responsibility
secure
needs
best
interests
indian
cases
found
particular
statutes
regulations
clearly
establish
fiduciary
obligations
government
areas
mitchell
ii
supra
see
also
white
mountain
apache
tribe
federal
law
imposes
duties
common
law
play
role
navajo
nation
navajo
ii
slip
looked
principles
inform
interpretation
statutes
determine
scope
liability
congress
imposed
see
white
mountain
apache
tribe
supra
applicable
statutes
regulations
establish
fiduciary
relationship
define
contours
fiduciary
responsibilities
mitchell
ii
supra
tribe
identify
specific
applicable
statute
regulation
government
violated
neither
government
indian
assets
trust
principles
matter
navajo
ii
supra
slip
government
assumes
indian
trust
responsibilities
extent
expressly
accepts
responsibilities
years
described
federal
relationship
indian
tribes
using
various
formulations
indian
tribes
called
domestic
dependent
nations
cherokee
nation
georgia
pet
tutelage
heckman
supra
subject
exercise
government
guardianship
affairs
sandoval
concepts
necessarily
correspond
trust
relationship
see
restatement
guardianship
trust
congress
chosen
structure
indian
trust
relationship
different
ways
apply
trust
principles
congress
indicated
appropriate
reason
tribe
must
point
right
conferred
statute
regulation
order
obtain
otherwise
privileged
information
government
wishes
iii
case
tribe
claim
arises
american
indian
trust
fund
management
reform
act
et
seq
define
trust
responsibilities
respect
tribal
funds
appeals
concluded
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
outlined
statutes
sufficiently
similar
private
trust
justify
applying
fiduciary
exception
disagree
discussed
government
exercises
carefully
delimited
trust
responsibilities
sovereign
capacity
implement
national
policy
respecting
indian
tribes
two
features
justifying
fiduciary
exception
beneficiary
status
real
client
trustee
duty
disclose
information
trust
notably
absent
trust
relationship
congress
established
tribe
appeals
applied
fiduciary
exception
based
determination
tribe
rather
government
real
client
respect
government
attorneys
advice
ibid
cases
applying
fiduciary
exception
courts
identify
real
client
based
whether
advice
bought
trust
corpus
whether
trustee
reason
seek
advice
personal
rather
fiduciary
capacity
whether
advice
intended
purpose
benefit
trust
riggs
applying
factors
conclude
obtain
legal
advice
mere
representative
tribe
tribe
real
client
advice
intended
see
ibid
government
attorneys
paid
congressional
appropriations
cost
tribe
courts
look
source
funds
strong
indicator
precisely
real
clients
significant
factor
determining
access
legal
advice
similarly
find
significant
attorneys
paid
government
advice
regarding
government
statutory
obligations
payment
structure
confirms
view
government
seeks
legal
advice
sovereign
capacity
rather
conventional
fiduciary
tribe
undoubtedly
congress
intends
indian
tribes
benefit
government
management
tribal
trusts
intention
represents
humane
self
imposed
policy
based
felt
moral
obligations
seminole
nation
statutory
purpose
imply
full
trust
however
cf
restatement
comment
trust
created
settlor
manifests
intention
impose
merely
moral
obligation
congress
makes
policy
judgments
pursuant
sovereign
governing
authority
implementation
federal
policy
remains
distinctly
interest
heckman
said
continue
trustee
active
interest
disposition
indian
assets
terms
trust
relationship
embody
policy
goals
mckay
kalyton
prior
cases
found
government
established
trust
relationship
order
impose
policy
indian
lands
see
mitchell
congress
intended
land
trust
wished
prevent
alienation
land
cases
government
invoked
trust
relationship
prevent
state
interference
policy
toward
indian
tribes
see
minnesota
candelaria
kagama
exercise
federal
authority
thereby
established
often
left
acts
congress
discretion
executive
department
heckman
supra
way
congress
designed
trust
relationship
serve
interests
well
benefit
indian
tribes
see
rickert
trust
relationship
adoption
part
policy
public
interests
may
quoting
choctaw
nation
agree
tribe
amici
government
officials
obtained
advice
stake
substance
advice
beyond
trustee
role
brief
respondent
interests
trust
administration
identical
interests
tribal
trust
fund
beneficiaries
brief
national
congress
american
indians
et
al
amici
curiae
sovereign
interest
administration
indian
trusts
distinct
private
interests
may
benefit
administration
courts
apply
fiduciary
exception
ground
management
manage
garner
wachtel
central
importance
garner
riggs
fiduciary
lack
legitimate
personal
interest
legal
advice
obtained
government
never
position
one
purpose
indian
trust
relationship
benefit
tribes
government
independent
interest
implementation
federal
indian
policy
reason
government
seeks
legal
advice
related
administration
tribal
trusts
establishes
relationship
related
sovereign
interest
execution
federal
law
words
government
seeks
legal
advice
personal
rather
fiduciary
capacity
see
riggs
moreover
government
many
competing
legal
concerns
allow
inquiry
purpose
communication
multiple
interests
involved
trust
relationship
equivalence
interests
beneficiary
trustee
breaks
principle
applies
particular
force
government
multiple
interests
must
represent
government
follow
fastidious
standards
private
fiduciary
breach
duties
single
beneficiary
solely
representing
potentially
conflicting
interests
without
beneficiary
consent
nevada
appeals
acknowledged
government
may
obliged
balance
competing
interests
administers
tribal
trust
government
may
need
comply
statutory
duties
environmental
conservation
obligations
appeals
discussed
see
government
may
also
face
conflicting
obligations
different
tribes
individual
indians
see
nance
epa
federal
government
conflicting
fiduciary
responsibilities
northern
cheyenne
crow
tribes
hoopa
valley
tribe
christie
trust
relation
exists
discharged
plaintiff
expense
indians
within
bounds
general
trust
relationship
indian
people
recognized
government
discretion
reorder
priorities
serving
subgroup
beneficiaries
serving
broader
class
indians
nationwide
lincoln
vigil
see
also
ibid
federal
government
fiduciary
obligation
indians
fiduciary
obligation
owed
indian
quoting
hoopa
valley
tribe
supra
sometimes
seen
government
enforced
trust
statutes
dispose
indian
property
contrary
wishes
nominally
kept
trust
government
may
seek
advice
counsel
guidance
balancing
competing
interests
indeed
point
consulting
counsel
may
determine
whether
conflicting
interests
stake
appeals
sought
accommodate
government
multiple
obligations
suggesting
government
may
invoke
privilege
identifies
specific
competing
interest
considered
particular
communications
seeks
withhold
conflicting
interests
government
must
consider
pervasive
approach
workable
said
privilege
effective
must
predictable
see
jaffee
redmond
upjohn
government
required
identify
specific
interests
considered
communication
ability
receive
confidential
legal
advice
substantially
compromised
government
always
able
predict
considerations
qualify
specific
competing
interest
especially
advance
receiving
counsel
advice
forcing
government
monitor
considerations
contained
communication
counsel
render
privilege
little
better
privilege
ibid
appeals
also
decided
fiduciary
exception
properly
applied
government
fiduciary
duty
disclose
information
related
trust
management
beneficiary
general
trustee
irrevocable
trust
must
produce
information
beneficiary
reasonable
basis
though
duty
sometimes
limited
may
modified
settlor
restatement
third
trusts
hereinafter
restatement
bogert
fiduciary
exception
applies
duty
disclosure
overrides
privilege
mett
fiduciary
exception
understood
instance
privilege
giving
way
face
competing
legal
principle
however
disclosure
obligations
private
trustee
previously
said
principles
relevant
applied
specific
applicable
statute
regulation
navajo
ii
slip
relevant
statute
case
delineates
trust
responsibilities
secretary
interior
must
discharge
enumerated
responsibilities
include
provision
identifying
secretary
obligation
provide
specific
information
tribal
account
holders
secretary
must
suppl
account
holders
periodic
statements
account
performance
must
make
available
daily
basis
balances
account
secretary
complied
requirements
adopting
regulations
instruct
office
trust
fund
management
provide
tribe
quarterly
statement
performance
cfr
identifies
source
type
status
trust
funds
deposited
held
trust
account
beginning
balance
gains
losses
receipts
disbursements
ending
account
balance
quarterly
statement
period
tribes
may
request
frequent
statements
information
account
transactions
balances
common
law
trusts
override
specific
statute
regulations
apply
provisions
define
government
disclosure
tribe
tribe
emphasizes
brief
respondent
statute
identifies
list
trust
responsibilities
nonexhaustive
see
trust
responsibilities
limited
enumerated
government
replies
clause
best
read
refer
statutory
regulatory
requirements
rather
duties
brief
whatever
congress
intended
read
clause
include
general
duty
disclose
information
related
administration
indian
trusts
congress
provides
specific
statutory
obligations
read
catchall
provision
impose
general
obligations
include
specifically
enumerated
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
cases
noted
past
hesitant
adopt
interpretation
congressional
enactment
renders
superfluous
another
portion
law
mackey
lanier
collection
agency
service
reading
statute
incorporate
full
duties
private
fiduciary
vitiate
congress
specification
narrowly
defined
disclosure
law
regulation
moreover
documents
issue
case
classed
property
records
property
tribe
cfr
see
also
source
funds
used
pay
legal
advice
highly
relevant
identifying
real
client
purposes
fiduciary
exception
consider
ownership
resulting
records
significant
factor
deciding
access
document
see
riggs
case
privilege
belongs
courts
commentators
long
recognized
ot
every
aspect
private
trust
law
properly
govern
unique
relationship
tribes
federal
government
cohen
fiduciary
exception
privilege
ranks
among
aspects
inapplicable
government
administration
indian
trusts
appeals
denied
government
petition
writ
mandamus
based
erroneous
view
contrary
leave
determine
whether
standards
granting
writ
met
light
therefore
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
petitioner
jicarilla
apache
nation
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
joins
concurring
judgment
agree
government
ordinary
trustee
see
ante
unlike
private
trustee
government
distinc
interest
faithful
carrying
laws
governing
conduct
tribal
affairs
heckman
unique
national
interest
obligates
government
attorneys
rendering
advice
make
independent
evaluation
law
facts
effort
arrive
single
position
app
pet
cert
letter
attorney
general
griffin
bell
secretary
interior
cecil
andrus
may
reason
explains
government
seeks
legal
advice
rather
fiduciary
capacity
ante
privilege
thus
protects
government
communications
attorneys
disclosure
going
beyond
communications
holds
government
assumes
indian
trust
responsibilities
extent
expressly
accepts
responsibilities
statute
ante
therefore
concludes
trust
relationship
described
include
usual
disclosure
obligations
ante
unnecessary
decide
information
communications
government
may
withhold
beneficiaries
tribal
trusts
concur
judgment
petitioner
jicarilla
apache
nation
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
justice
sotomayor
dissenting
federal
indian
policy
established
network
federal
statutes
requires
act
strictly
fiduciary
capacity
managing
indian
trust
fund
accounts
interests
federal
government
trustee
jicarilla
apache
nation
nation
beneficiary
thus
entirely
aligned
context
indian
trust
fund
management
governing
statutory
scheme
establishes
conventional
fiduciary
relationship
government
duties
include
fiduciary
obligations
derived
trust
principles
rationales
fiduciary
exception
fully
support
application
context
hold
government
may
rely
privilege
withhold
nation
communications
government
attorneys
relating
trust
fund
management
decision
contrary
rests
false
factual
legal
premises
deprives
nation
indian
tribes
highly
relevant
evidence
scores
pending
cases
seeking
relief
government
alleged
mismanagement
trust
funds
perhaps
troubling
majority
disregard
settled
precedent
looks
trust
principles
define
scope
government
fiduciary
obligations
indian
tribes
indeed
aspects
majority
opinion
suggest
principles
little
indian
trust
context
position
rejected
long
ago
although
today
holding
pertains
narrow
evidentiary
issue
fear
upshot
majority
opinion
may
well
dilution
government
fiduciary
obligations
broader
negative
repercussions
relationship
indian
tribes
federal
rule
evidence
provides
relevant
part
privilege
government
shall
governed
principles
common
law
may
interpreted
courts
light
reason
experience
rule
adopted
precisely
congress
wished
leave
privilege
questions
courts
rather
attempt
codify
weber
aircraft
majority
notes
purpose
privilege
encourage
full
frank
communication
attorneys
clients
thereby
promote
broader
public
interests
observance
law
administration
justice
upjohn
majority
neglects
explain
privilege
limited
exception
usual
rules
evidence
requiring
full
disclosure
relevant
information
see
wigmore
evidence
ed
common
law
recognizes
fundamental
maxim
public
right
every
man
evidence
exemptions
may
exist
distinctly
exceptional
many
derogations
positive
general
rule
effect
withholding
relevant
information
factfinder
courts
construe
privilege
narrowly
fisher
applies
necessary
achieve
purpose
ibid
purpose
ends
protection
privilege
wachtel
health
net
fiduciary
exception
privilege
roots
english
cases
holding
trustee
obtained
legal
advice
relating
administration
trust
adversarial
legal
proceedings
beneficiaries
trust
right
production
advice
ibid
collecting
cases
fiduciary
exception
well
recognized
jurisprudence
federal
state
applied
wide
variety
contexts
including
litigation
involving
trusts
see
riggs
nat
bank
washington
zimmer
del
ch
disputes
corporations
shareholders
see
garner
wolfinbarger
erisa
enforcement
actions
see
doe
majority
correctly
identifies
two
rationales
courts
articulated
applying
fiduciary
exception
ante
description
rationales
omits
number
important
points
regard
first
rationale
courts
characterized
trust
beneficiary
real
client
legal
advice
relating
trust
administration
advice
provided
trustee
assist
management
trust
ultimately
benefit
trust
beneficiary
rather
trustee
personal
capacity
see
mett
representative
beneficiaries
trust
administering
trustee
real
client
sense
personally
quoting
evans
per
curiam
riggs
majority
places
heavy
emphasis
source
payment
legal
advice
see
ante
well
settled
pays
legal
advice
although
potentially
relevant
determinative
resolving
issues
privilege
restatement
third
trusts
comment
hereinafter
third
restatement
instead
lynchpin
real
client
inquiry
identity
ultimate
beneficiary
legal
advice
see
wachtel
central
importance
fiduciary
lack
legitimate
personal
interest
legal
advice
obtained
advice
rendered
benefit
beneficiary
trustee
personal
capacity
real
client
advice
beneficiary
second
rationale
fiduciary
exception
rooted
trustee
fiduciary
duty
disclose
information
related
trust
management
majority
glosses
fact
duty
disclosure
designed
enable
beneficiary
prevent
redress
breach
trust
otherwise
enforce
rights
trust
third
restatement
comment
leading
american
case
fiduciary
exception
explains
order
beneficiaries
hold
trustee
proper
standards
care
honesty
procure
benefits
entitled
knowledge
affairs
mechanics
trust
management
crucial
riggs
courts
justifying
fiduciary
exception
rationale
thus
concluded
policy
preserving
full
disclosure
necessary
relationship
ultimately
important
trustees
confidence
attorney
trust
see
mett
rationale
fiduciary
exception
understood
instance
privilege
giving
way
face
competing
legal
principle
majority
fails
appreciate
important
oversight
accountability
interests
underlie
rationale
fiduciary
explain
operate
less
force
indian
trust
context
question
case
whether
fiduciary
exception
applies
indian
trust
context
government
may
rely
privilege
withhold
nation
communications
government
attorneys
relating
administration
nation
trust
fund
accounts
answering
question
requires
proper
understanding
nature
government
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
particularly
regard
management
indian
trust
funds
since
recognized
existence
general
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
see
cherokee
nation
georgia
pet
marshall
decisions
past
century
repeatedly
reaffirmed
distinctive
obligation
trust
incumbent
upon
government
dealings
indians
seminole
nation
see
mitchell
mitchell
ii
collecting
cases
noting
undisputed
existence
general
trust
relationship
indian
people
congress
recognized
general
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
indeed
early
every
piece
modern
legislation
dealing
indian
tribes
contains
statement
reaffirming
trust
relationship
tribes
federal
government
cohen
handbook
federal
indian
law
pp
ed
hereinafter
cohen
backdrop
congress
enacted
federal
statutes
define
contours
fiduciary
responsibilities
regard
management
indian
tribal
property
trust
assets
mitchell
ii
nation
claims
relevant
case
concern
government
alleged
mismanagement
tribal
trust
fund
accounts
see
ante
system
trusteeship
federal
management
indian
funds
originated
congressional
enactments
century
directing
government
hold
manage
indian
tribal
funds
trust
see
act
june
stat
see
also
misplaced
trust
bureau
indian
affairs
mismanagement
indian
trust
fund
hereinafter
misplaced
trust
later
congressional
enactments
come
manage
almost
billion
tribal
funds
collects
close
million
per
year
behalf
tribes
cohen
today
numerous
statutes
outline
federal
government
obligations
trustee
managing
indian
trust
funds
particular
secretary
treasury
request
secretary
interior
must
invest
funds
held
trust
credit
indian
tribes
certain
securities
suitable
needs
fund
involved
secretary
interior
may
deposit
treasury
pay
mandatory
interest
indian
trust
funds
best
interests
indians
promoted
deposits
lieu
investments
similarly
secretary
interior
may
invest
tribal
trust
funds
certain
public
debt
instruments
deems
advisable
best
interest
indians
congress
set
forth
nonexhaustive
list
secretary
interior
trust
responsibilities
respect
indian
trust
funds
include
series
accounting
auditing
management
disclosure
obligations
statutory
give
full
responsibility
manage
indian
trust
fund
accounts
benefit
indians
mitchell
ii
fiduciary
relationship
necessarily
arises
government
assumes
elaborate
control
trust
assets
belonging
indians
statutory
regime
described
government
extensive
managerial
control
indian
trust
funds
exercises
considerable
discretion
respect
assumed
significant
responsibilities
account
tribal
beneficiaries
result
necessary
elements
trust
present
trustee
beneficiary
indian
tribe
trust
corpus
indian
funds
ibid
unlike
contexts
statutory
scheme
creates
bare
trust
entailing
limited
responsibilities
navajo
nation
navajo
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
statutory
regime
governing
obligations
regard
indian
trust
funds
bears
hallmarks
conventional
fiduciary
relationship
navajo
nation
navajo
ii
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
lincoln
vigil
law
established
government
dealings
indian
tribal
property
acts
fiduciary
quoting
cherokee
nation
ii
light
federal
rule
evidence
government
role
conventional
fiduciary
managing
indian
trust
fund
accounts
hold
matter
federal
common
law
fiduciary
exception
applicable
indian
trust
context
thus
government
may
rely
privilege
withhold
communications
related
trust
management
explained
twin
rationales
fiduciary
exception
fully
support
application
context
majority
conclusion
contrary
rests
flawed
factual
legal
premises
government
seeks
legal
advice
government
attorney
matters
relating
management
nation
trust
funds
real
client
advice
purposes
fiduciary
exception
nation
government
majority
rejection
conclusion
premised
erroneous
view
government
managing
nation
trust
funds
independent
interest
implementation
federal
indian
policy
diverges
interest
nation
beneficiary
ante
see
also
ante
ginsburg
concurring
judgment
majority
correctly
notes
general
matter
government
sovereign
interests
managing
indian
trusts
distinguish
private
trustee
see
minnesota
throughout
history
federal
government
dealings
indian
tribes
congress
altered
administered
trust
relationship
instrument
federal
policy
ante
detailing
shifts
policy
see
generally
cobell
norton
cadc
describing
history
contentious
tragic
specific
context
indian
trust
fund
management
however
federal
indian
policy
entirely
aligns
interests
government
trustee
indian
tribe
beneficiary
explained
congress
enacted
extensive
network
statutes
regulating
government
management
indian
trust
fund
accounts
statutory
framework
establishes
conventional
fiduciary
context
indian
trust
fund
navajo
nation
ii
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
supra
conventional
fiduciary
government
management
indian
trust
funds
must
judged
exacting
fiduciary
standards
seminole
nation
among
fundamental
fiduciary
obligations
trustee
administer
trust
solely
interest
beneficiaries
scott
fratcher
law
trusts
ed
see
meinhard
salmon
cardozo
honesty
alone
punctilio
honor
sensitive
standard
behavior
trustees
bound
fiduciary
ties
although
indian
trust
funds
deposited
treasury
part
federal
government
general
funds
used
benefit
tribe
cohen
citing
quick
bear
leupp
federal
indian
policy
requires
government
act
strictly
conventional
fiduciary
managing
nation
trust
funds
government
acts
representative
rather
persona
capacity
managing
nation
trust
funds
riggs
law
government
pursue
independent
interest
ante
distinct
responsibilities
fiduciary
see
cohen
federal
statutes
forbid
use
indian
tribal
funds
manner
authorized
treaty
express
provisions
law
citing
words
uniquely
sovereign
interest
government
may
contexts
trust
relationship
indian
tribes
exist
specific
context
indian
trust
fund
administration
naturally
follows
government
seeks
legal
advice
government
attorneys
relating
management
nation
trust
funds
real
client
advice
purposes
fiduciary
exception
nation
government
conclusion
holds
true
even
though
government
attorneys
paid
congressional
appropriations
cost
nation
ante
noted
although
source
funding
legal
advice
may
relevant
ultimate
inquiry
whose
benefit
legal
advice
rendered
see
supra
emphasis
majority
places
funding
source
see
ante
majority
never
suggests
fiduciary
exception
apply
congress
amended
federal
law
permit
indian
tribes
pay
government
attorneys
trust
majority
also
suggests
even
interests
indian
tribes
may
equivalent
contexts
equivalence
breaks
multiple
interests
involved
trust
relationship
ante
according
majority
government
many
competing
legal
concerns
allow
inquiry
purpose
communication
ibid
result
majority
concludes
fiduciary
exception
applied
indian
trust
context
ibid
preliminarily
government
certain
circumstances
may
sovereign
obligations
conflict
duties
fiduciary
indian
tribes
see
nevada
existence
competing
interests
unique
government
trustee
indeed
issue
competing
interests
arises
frequently
private
trust
context
see
third
restatement
comment
describing
duties
trustee
respect
transactions
involve
conflicting
fiduciary
personal
interests
comment
describing
trustee
duty
impartiality
balancing
competing
interests
multiple
beneficiaries
circumstances
trustee
ultimately
may
need
provide
response
offers
compromise
confidentiality
privacy
concerns
needs
others
comment
majority
provides
reason
federal
courts
applying
fiduciary
exception
indian
trust
context
similarly
adopt
workable
framework
adequately
takes
account
unique
governmental
interests
bear
application
fiduciary
exception
given
circumstance
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
authorizing
courts
set
limits
discovery
based
equitable
concerns
majority
categorical
rejection
fiduciary
exception
indian
trust
context
sweeps
far
broader
necessary
case
involves
government
alleged
mismanagement
nation
trust
fund
accounts
government
claim
communications
issue
relate
competing
governmental
obligations
see
app
pet
cert
extent
contexts
competing
interests
government
attorneys
already
identify
interests
determining
balance
obligations
indian
tribes
communications
relating
interests
may
properly
withheld
redacted
consistent
application
fiduciary
exception
see
fed
cl
observing
redactions
allo
privilege
exception
reign
within
respective
spheres
majority
categorical
approach
fails
appreciate
privilege
determinations
nature
made
indeed
basis
government
attorneys
like
private
counsel
must
review
requested
document
make
individualized
assessment
privilege
courts
reviewing
privilege
logs
challenges
must
basis
may
slight
extent
undermine
desirable
certainty
boundaries
privilege
obeys
spirit
rule
upjohn
courts
flexibility
develop
rules
privilege
basis
trammel
quoting
cong
rec
statement
hungate
see
recognition
privilege
based
confidential
relationship
determined
basis
rather
fashioning
blanket
rule
application
fiduciary
exception
indian
trust
context
consistent
rule
principles
judicial
restraint
decide
question
solely
facts
us
see
upjohn
noting
sit
decide
concrete
cases
abstract
propositions
law
declin
ing
lay
broad
rule
series
rules
govern
conceivable
future
questions
area
facts
fiduciary
exception
applies
communications
case
like
real
client
rationale
second
rationale
fiduciary
exception
rooted
trustee
fiduciary
duty
disclose
matters
relevant
trust
administration
beneficiary
fully
supports
disclosure
communications
case
explained
courts
relying
second
rationale
recognized
policy
preserving
full
disclosure
necessary
relationship
ultimately
important
protection
trustees
confidence
attorney
trust
riggs
statutory
scheme
requires
government
act
conventional
fiduciary
managing
nation
trust
funds
government
fiduciary
duty
keep
nation
informed
matters
relating
trust
administration
includes
concomitant
duty
disclose
communications
relating
trust
fund
management
see
third
restatement
comment
restatement
law
third
governing
lawyers
pp
notably
majority
suggest
nation
needs
less
information
private
beneficiary
exercise
effective
oversight
government
trustee
instead
majority
contends
nation
entitled
less
disclosure
government
disclosure
obligations
limited
private
trustee
particular
majority
government
assumes
indian
trust
responsibilities
extent
expressly
accepts
responsibilities
statute
thus
nation
must
point
right
conferred
statute
regulation
order
obtain
otherwise
privileged
information
government
wishes
ante
majority
cites
single
statutory
provision
implementing
regulations
defin
ing
government
disclosure
obligation
nation
ante
see
ante
citing
cfr
narrowly
defined
disclosure
obligations
provide
indian
tribes
specific
statutory
right
disclosure
communications
relating
trust
administration
ante
majority
concludes
government
duty
disclose
communications
nation
majority
conclusion
employs
fundamentally
flawed
legal
premise
never
held
government
trust
responsibilities
indians
must
set
forth
expressly
specific
statute
regulation
contrary
statutory
framework
establishes
relationship
government
indian
tribe
bears
hallmarks
conventional
fiduciary
relationship
navajo
ii
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
consistently
looked
general
trust
principles
flesh
government
fiduciary
obligations
example
white
mountain
apache
tribe
construed
statute
vested
government
discretionary
authority
use
trust
property
certain
purposes
imposing
concomitant
duty
preserve
improvements
previously
made
land
quoting
stat
even
though
statute
expressly
subject
government
duties
management
conservation
construed
government
obligations
statute
reference
elementary
trust
law
confirm
ed
commonsense
assumption
fiduciary
actually
administering
trust
property
may
allow
fall
ruin
watch
similarly
seminole
nation
relied
general
trust
principles
conclude
government
fiduciary
duty
prevent
misappropriation
tribal
trust
funds
corrupt
members
tribe
even
though
specific
statutory
treaty
provision
expressly
imposed
duty
see
accordingly
although
general
government
obligations
defined
statute
must
filled
reference
general
trust
law
cobell
quoting
mitchell
ii
approach
accords
recognition
trust
contexts
primary
function
fiduciary
duty
constrain
exercise
discretionary
powers
controlled
specific
duty
imposed
trust
instrument
legal
regime
varity
howe
emphasis
deleted
cf
central
southeast
southwest
areas
pension
fund
central
transport
ather
explicitly
enumerating
powers
duties
trustees
fiduciaries
congress
invoked
common
law
trusts
define
general
scope
authority
responsibility
indeed
fiduciary
duty
applied
nothing
activities
already
controlled
specific
legal
duties
serve
purpose
howe
majority
pays
lip
service
precedents
acknowledging
looked
principles
inform
interpretation
statutes
determine
scope
liability
congress
imposed
ante
despite
assurance
apply
trust
principles
congress
indicated
appropriate
ante
majority
inexplicably
rejects
application
trust
principles
case
majority
common
law
trusts
override
specific
statute
regulations
apply
ante
referring
cfr
statement
evidences
majority
fundamental
misunderstanding
way
principles
operate
context
conventional
fiduciary
relationship
contrary
majority
view
government
disclosure
obligations
limited
solely
narrowly
defined
disclosure
obligations
set
forth
implementing
regulations
ante
rather
given
statutory
regime
requires
government
act
conventional
fiduciary
managing
indian
trust
funds
government
disclosure
obligations
include
fiduciary
trust
principles
see
supra
instead
overrid
ing
specific
disclosure
duty
set
forth
implementing
regulations
general
trust
principles
flesh
government
disclosure
obligations
broader
statutory
regime
consistent
role
conventional
fiduciary
context
conclusion
moreover
supported
plain
text
statute
cited
majority
section
enacted
part
american
indian
trust
fund
management
reform
act
act
stat
sets
forth
eight
trust
responsibilities
provision
also
specifically
secretary
interior
proper
discharge
trust
responsibilities
shall
include
limited
specified
duties
emphasis
added
expressly
including
italicized
language
congress
recognized
government
trust
responsibilities
arise
broader
statutory
scheme
governing
management
indian
trust
indeed
title
act
entitled
recognition
trust
responsibility
stat
emphasis
added
courts
similarly
observed
act
recognized
reaffirmed
government
longstanding
substantial
trust
obligations
indians
cobell
see
also
responsibility
management
indian
trust
funds
government
determined
series
decisions
treaties
statutes
conclusion
accords
common
sense
even
government
argues
disclosure
obligations
respect
indian
trust
funds
prior
enactment
majority
requires
nation
point
right
conferred
statute
communications
issue
ante
finding
none
denies
nation
access
communications
upshot
decision
fear
may
well
reinvigorate
position
dissenting
justices
white
mountain
apache
mitchell
ii
rejected
use
principles
inform
scope
government
fiduciary
obligations
indian
tribes
see
white
mountain
apache
thomas
dissenting
mitchell
ii
powell
dissenting
approach
wrong
mitchell
ii
decided
nearly
years
ago
wrong
today
governing
precedents
trust
principles
play
important
role
defining
government
fiduciary
duties
statutory
scheme
establishes
conventional
fiduciary
relationship
applying
principles
context
hold
fiduciary
exception
fully
applicable
communications
iii
described
federal
government
fiduciary
duties
toward
indian
tribes
consisting
moral
obligations
highest
responsibility
trust
fulfilled
conduct
judged
exacting
fiduciary
standards
seminole
nation
see
also
mitchell
ii
collecting
cases
sad
truth
however
government
failed
live
fiduciary
obligations
managing
indian
trust
fund
accounts
see
cobell
general
accounting
office
interior
department
inspector
general
office
management
budget
among
others
condemned
mismanagement
indian
trust
accounts
past
twenty
years
misplaced
trust
government
indifferent
supervision
control
indian
trust
funds
consistently
resulted
failure
exercise
responsibility
meet
reasonable
expectations
tribal
individual
accountholders
congress
taxpayers
ad
type
mismanagement
taken
place
trust
arrangements
social
security
war
congress
recognized
indian
trust
fund
balance
sheets
accounting
procedures
moneys
crucial
daily
operations
native
american
tribes
source
income
tens
thousands
native
americans
given
history
governmental
mismanagement
indian
trust
funds
application
fiduciary
exception
anything
even
important
context
private
trustee
context
majority
refusal
apply
fiduciary
exception
case
deprives
nation
well
indian
tribes
cases
currently
pending
federal
courts
involving
claims
tribal
trust
mismanagement
app
pet
cert
highly
relevant
information
going
directly
merits
whether
government
properly
fulfilled
fiduciary
duties
holding
exacerbates
concerns
expressed
many
lack
adequate
oversight
accountability
marked
government
handling
indian
trust
fund
accounts
decades
perhaps
even
troubling
majority
refusal
apply
fiduciary
exception
case
disregard
established
precedents
affirm
central
role
trust
principles
play
defining
government
fiduciary
obligations
indian
tribes
rejecting
nation
claim
ground
fails
identify
specific
statutory
right
communications
issue
majority
effectively
embraces
approach
espoused
prior
dissents
rejects
role
principles
altogether
indian
trust
context
decision
case
involving
narrow
evidentiary
issue
wholly
unnecessary
worse
yet
risks
diluting
government
fiduciary
obligations
manner
congress
clearly
intend
inflict
serious
harm
relationship
indian
tribes
warrant
precedent
reason
reaching
result
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
cfc
held
fiduciary
exception
doctrine
fed
cl
appeals
address
issue
ca
fed
us
federal
circuit
denied
government
mandamus
petition
government
produced
documents
protective
order
prevents
disclosure
third
parties
case
resolved
app
pet
cert
government
compliance
production
order
affect
review
decision
may
still
provide
effective
relief
preventing
disclosure
excluding
evidence
trial
see
mohawk
industries
carpenter
slip
today
ourts
differ
whether
privilege
available
communications
trustee
counsel
regarding
administration
trust
newman
bogert
bogert
law
trusts
trustees
ed
hereinafter
bogert
state
courts
altogether
rejected
notion
privilege
subject
fiduciary
exception
see
huie
deshazo
tex
privilege
serves
important
purpose
relationship
relationships
wells
fargo
bank
superior
cal
attorney
trustee
trust
virtue
relationship
also
attorney
beneficiaries
trust
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
neither
party
disputes
existence
fiduciary
exception
however
deciding
case
assume
exception
exists
number
widely
varying
relationships
less
closely
resemble
trusts
trusts
although
term
sometimes
used
loosely
cover
relationships
important
differentiate
trusts
relationships
since
many
rules
applicable
trusts
applicable
restatement
second
trusts
introductory
note
hereinafter
restatement
see
also
begay
cl
provisions
relating
private
trustees
fiduciaries
useful
analogies
regarded
finally
dispositive
relationship
thus
dissent
reliance
government
managerial
control
post
opinion
sotomayor
misplaced
cf
restatement
comment
lthough
settlor
called
transaction
trust
trust
created
unless
manifests
intention
impose
duties
enforceable
courts
chief
justice
hughes
writing
unanimous
insisted
national
interest
management
indian
affairs
expressed
terms
property
limited
assertion
rights
incident
ownership
reversion
holding
technical
title
trust
heckman
congress
structured
trust
relationship
reflect
considered
judgment
indians
governed
example
indian
general
allotment
act
stat
comprehensive
congressional
attempt
change
role
indians
american
society
cohen
handbook
federal
indian
law
hereinafter
cohen
congress
aimed
promote
assimilation
indians
dividing
indian
lands
individually
owned
allotments
federal
policy
aimed
substitute
new
way
life
older
indian
communal
way
indian
reorganization
act
stat
marked
shift
away
assimilation
policies
toward
tolerance
respect
traditional
aspects
indian
culture
cohen
act
prohibited
allotment
restored
tribal
ownership
indian
education
assistance
act
stat
tribal
act
stat
enabled
tribes
run
health
education
economic
development
social
programs
cohen
strengthened
supported
congress
decision
authorize
tribes
withdraw
trust
funds
federal
government
control
place
funds
tribal
control
american
indian
trust
fund
management
reform
act
stat
see
ed
supp
iii
control
indian
tribes
exercised
pursuant
trust
relationship
forcing
division
tribal
lands
restraining
alienation
correspond
fiduciary
duties
trustee
rather
trust
relationship
altered
administered
instrument
federal
policy
assume
sake
argument
indian
trust
properly
analogized
irrevocable
trust
rather
revocable
trust
revocable
trust
imposes
duty
trustee
disclose
information
beneficiary
hile
trust
revocable
person
may
revoke
entitled
receive
information
trustee
bogert
restatement
comment
trustee
revocable
trust
provide
reports
accountings
information
concerning
terms
administration
trust
beneficiaries
without
authorization
either
settlor
terms
trust
statute
many
respects
indian
trusts
resemble
revocable
trusts
common
law
congress
acted
settlor
establishing
trust
retains
right
alter
terms
trust
statute
even
derogation
tribal
property
interests
see
winton
amos
thoroughly
established
congress
plenary
authority
indians
full
power
legislate
concerning
tribal
property
cohen
government
advanced
argument
relationship
similar
revocable
trust
point
need
addressed
resolve
case
reading
receives
additional
support
another
statute
congress
expressed
understanding
government
retains
evidentiary
privileges
allowing
withhold
information
related
trust
property
indian
tribes
indian
claims
limitation
act
stat
addressed
indian
claims
claimants
desired
litigated
secretary
interior
decided
reject
claim
litigation
required
furnish
report
affected
indian
claimants
upon
request
provide
nonprivileged
research
materials
evidence
gathered
documentation
claim
congress
authorized
withholding
information
grounds
privilege
makes
us
doubt
congress
understood
government
trust
obligations
override
basic
privilege
attorney
client
dissent
tells
us
applying
fiduciary
exception
even
important
government
private
trustee
history
governmental
mismanagement
post
necessary
decision
note
indian
tribes
required
keep
funds
federal
trust
see
authorizing
tribes
withdraw
funds
held
trust
cfr
pt
tribe
wishes
funds
managed
conventional
fiduciary
post
may
seek
appeals
declines
issue
writ
assume
cfc
remand
follow
holding
regarding
applicability
fiduciary
exception
present
context
footnotes
see
solis
food
employers
labor
relations
wl
wachtel
health
net
bland
fiatallis
north
america
mett
long
island
lighting
wildbur
arco
chemical
fausek
white
see
also
restatement
third
trusts
comment
reporter
notes
pp
restatement
law
third
governing
lawyers
see
directing
secretary
interior
enter
funding
agreements
indian
tribes
manner
consistent
federal
government
laws
trust
relationship
responsibility
indian
people
finding
government
trust
responsibility
protect
conserve
utilize
manage
indian
agricultural
lands
consistent
fiduciary
obligation
unique
relationship
indian
tribes
policy
fulfill
federal
government
unique
continuing
trust
relationship
responsibility
indian
people
education
indian
children
trust
fund
accounts
comprised
mainly
money
received
sale
lease
trust
lands
include
timber
stumpage
oil
gas
royalties
agriculture
fees
well
judgment
funds
awarded
tribes
nation
claims
involve
proceeds
derived
government
management
nation
timber
gravel
resources
leases
reservation
lands
government
held
funds
trust
nation
since
late
see
app
pet
cert
see
requiring
secretary
interior
account
daily
annual
balance
funds
held
trust
benefit
indian
tribe
creating
office
special
trustee
american
indians
provide
effective
management
accountability
proper
discharge
secretary
trust
responsibilities
indian
tribes
example
mitchell
mitchell
held
federal
statute
authorized
president
allot
specified
number
acres
individual
indians
residing
reservation
lands
provide
undertaken
full
fiduciary
responsibilities
management
allotted
lands
statute
indian
allottee
representative
responsible
using
land
agricultural
grazing
purposes
accordingly
concluded
congress
intend
impose
upon
government
fiduciary
duties
ordinarily
placed
equity
upon
trustee
statute
created
limited
trust
relationship
allottee
see
also
navajo
concluding
secretary
interior
assume
fiduciary
duties
relevant
statutory
scheme
secretary
neither
assigned
comprehensive
managerial
role
expressly
invested
responsibility
secure
needs
best
interests
indian
owner
heirs
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
majority
also
ownership
requested
documents
significant
factor
deciding
whether
fiduciary
exception
applies
ante
case
cites
support
deals
source
payment
legal
advice
ownership
documents
see
ibid
citing
riggs
nat
bank
washington
zimmer
del
ch
nevada
government
represented
certain
tribes
litigation
involving
water
rights
even
though
also
required
statute
represent
water
rights
reclamation
project
see
noting
congress
delegated
secretary
interior
responsibility
supervision
indian
tribes
commencement
reclamation
projects
areas
adjacent
reservation
lands
dual
litigating
responsibility
noted
simply
unrealistic
suggest
government
may
perform
obligation
represent
indian
tribes
litigation
congress
obliged
represent
interests
well
ibid
thus
observed
context
case
government
follow
fastidious
standards
private
fiduciary
breach
duties
single
beneficiary
solely
representing
potentially
conflicting
interests
without
beneficiary
consent
ibid
expressly
distinguished
context
relationship
government
tribe
involved
context
acknowledged
law
respecting
obligations
trustee
beneficiary
private
litigation
many
respects
adequately
describe
duty
ibid
sure
decisions
involving
jurisdiction
federal
claims
tucker
act
explained
jurisdictional
analysis
must
train
specific
statutory
regulatory
prescriptions
navajo
even
assuming
arguendo
jurisdictional
decisions
relevance
stand
proposition
government
fiduciary
duties
defined
exclusively
express
statutory
provisions
indeed
decisions
relied
specifically
general
trust
principles
determine
whether
relevant
statutory
scheme
permitted
damages
remedy
prerequisite
jurisdiction
tucker
act
see
mitchell
ii
noting
trust
sources
establish
trustee
accountable
damages
breaches
trust
iven
existence
trust
relationship
naturally
follows
government
liable
damages
breach
fiduciary
duties
see
also
navajo
ii
slip
affirming
general
trust
principles
play
role
inferring
trust
obligation
enforceable
damages
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
majority
invokes
canon
superfluity
argues
catchall
phrase
means
shall
include
limited
language
read
include
general
duty
disclose
information
related
administration
indian
trusts
impose
general
obligations
include
specifically
enumerated
ante
flaw
majority
argument
misperceives
function
relevant
language
rather
serving
catchall
provision
affirmatively
incorporate
trust
duties
ante
language
simply
makes
clear
set
forth
exhaustive
list
government
trust
responsibilities
managing
indian
trust
funds
nothing
language
imports
substantive
obligations
statute
majority
also
contends
reading
supported
provision
indian
claims
limitation
act
icla
stat
provided
secretary
interior
rejected
claim
litigation
indian
claimant
required
provide
upon
request
nonprivileged
research
materials
evidence
gathered
documentation
claim
according
majority
provision
reflected
congress
understanding
government
retains
evidentiary
privileges
allowing
withhold
information
related
trust
property
indian
tribes
ante
provision
bear
weight
majority
places
even
putting
aside
undisputed
fact
icla
inapplicable
claims
case
majority
reliance
icla
provision
fails
recognize
documents
subject
fiduciary
exception
real
client
rationale
per
se
nonprivileged
see
mett
accordingly
anything
icla
requirement
government
disclose
nonprivileged
materials
indian
claimants
supports
conclusion
congress
intended
communications
related
trust
fund
management
disclosed
indian
tribes
majority
errors
compounded
failure
accord
proper
consideration
mandamus
posture
case
repeatedly
observed
writ
mandamus
extraordinary
remedy
reserved
extraordinary
situations
gulfstream
aerospace
mayacamas
writ
one
potent
weapons
judicial
arsenal
three
conditions
must
satisfied
may
issue
cheney
dist
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
first
party
seeking
issuance
writ
must
adequate
means
attain
relief
desires
condition
designed
ensure
writ
used
substitute
regular
appeals
process
second
petitioner
must
satisfy
burden
showing
right
issuance
writ
clear
indisputable
third
even
first
two
prerequisites
met
issuing
exercise
discretion
must
satisfied
writ
appropriate
circumstances
internal
quotation
marks
citations
omitted
alterations
deleted
majority
purports
leave
decision
whether
grant
mandamus
relief
federal
circuit
simultaneously
drops
stating
assume
federal
claims
remand
follow
holding
fiduciary
exception
inapplicable
ante
majority
virtually
assures
nation
able
use
communications
issue
litigation
thereby
effectively
granting
extraordinary
relief
government
upon
showing
whatsoever
stringent
conditions
mandamus
met