smith
warden
robbins
argued
october
decided
january
attorney
appointed
represent
indigent
defendant
appeal
may
conclude
appeal
frivolous
request
appellate
allow
withdraw
dispose
case
without
filing
merits
briefs
anders
california
found
order
protect
defendant
constitutional
right
appellate
counsel
courts
must
safeguard
risk
granting
requests
appeal
actually
frivolous
found
california
procedure
evaluating
requests
inadequate
set
forth
acceptable
procedure
california
adopted
new
procedure
people
wende
cal
unlike
anders
procedure
counsel
wende
neither
explicitly
review
led
conclude
appeal
frivolous
requests
withdraw
instead
silent
merits
case
offers
brief
issues
direction
california
jury
convicted
respondent
robbins
murder
grand
theft
appointed
counsel
appeal
concluded
appeal
frivolous
filed
state
appeal
brief
complied
wende
procedure
agreeing
counsel
assessment
appeal
affirmed
california
denied
review
exhausting
state
postconviction
remedies
robbins
sought
federal
habeas
relief
arguing
inter
alia
denied
effective
assistance
appellate
counsel
counsel
wende
brief
comply
anders
requirement
brief
refer
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
district
agreed
concluding
least
two
issues
might
arguably
supported
robbins
appeal
finding
counsel
failure
include
brief
deviated
anders
procedure
thus
amounted
deficient
performance
counsel
rather
requiring
robbins
prove
prejudice
deficiency
applied
presumption
prejudice
ninth
circuit
agreed
concluding
anders
together
douglas
california
held
must
provide
appointed
counsel
indigent
criminal
defendants
appeal
set
forth
exclusive
procedure
appointed
counsel
performance
constitutional
counsel
brief
failed
comply
procedure
however
remanded
case
district
consider
trial
errors
raised
robbins
held
anders
procedure
one
method
satisfying
constitution
requirements
indigent
criminal
appeals
free
adopt
different
procedures
long
procedures
adequately
safeguard
defendant
right
appellate
counsel
pp
finding
california
procedure
issue
anders
permitted
appellate
counsel
withdraw
upon
filing
conclusory
letter
stating
appeal
merit
permitted
appellate
affirm
conviction
upon
reaching
conclusion
following
review
record
comport
fair
procedure
lacked
equality
fourteenth
amendment
requires
placed
case
within
line
precedent
beginning
griffin
illinois
continuing
douglas
california
imposed
constitutional
constraints
choosing
create
appellate
review
comparing
california
procedure
procedures
found
invalid
statutory
requirements
federal
courts
governing
appeals
indigents
appointed
counsel
concluded
finding
appeal
merit
inadequate
mean
appeal
lacking
prospects
frivolous
final
separate
section
set
acceptable
procedure
treating
frivolous
appeals
pp
ninth
circuit
erred
finding
anders
final
section
though
unnecessary
holding
case
obligatory
upon
never
held
precedents
suggest
otherwise
ninth
circuit
view
runs
contrary
established
practice
mccoy
appeals
dist
rejected
challenge
wisconsin
variation
anders
procedure
even
though
variation
least
one
respect
provided
less
effective
advocacy
indigent
pennsylvania
finley
explained
anders
procedure
independent
constitutional
command
rather
prophylactic
framework
say
framework
adequately
vindicate
right
appellate
counsel
announced
douglas
similarly
penson
ohio
described
anders
simply
erecting
safeguards
finally
view
procedure
described
anders
last
section
converted
suggestion
straitjacket
contravene
established
practice
allowing
wide
discretion
subject
minimum
requirements
fourteenth
amendment
experiment
solutions
difficult
policy
problems
see
griffin
supra
status
particularly
federal
system
avoids
imposing
single
solution
top
instead
evaluates
state
procedures
one
time
leaving
challenging
task
crafting
appropriate
procedures
laboratory
first
instance
cruzan
director
mo
dept
health
concurring
pp
california
wende
procedure
violate
fourteenth
amendment
pp
precise
rationale
griffin
douglas
line
cases
never
explicitly
stated
case
law
reveals
equal
protection
due
process
clauses
fourteenth
amendment
largely
converge
require
state
procedure
afford
adequate
effective
appellate
review
indigent
defendants
griffin
supra
plurality
opinion
state
procedure
provides
review
long
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
merit
appeal
determining
whether
particular
procedure
satisfies
standard
important
focus
underlying
goals
procedure
serve
ensure
indigents
whose
appeals
frivolous
receive
counsel
merits
brief
required
douglas
also
enable
state
protect
frivolous
appeals
subsidized
public
moneys
needlessly
spent
griffin
supra
frankfurter
concurring
judgment
indigent
right
counsel
direct
appeal
include
right
bring
frivolous
appeal
concomitantly
include
right
counsel
bringing
frivolous
appeal
anders
obvious
goal
prevent
limitation
right
appellate
counsel
swallowing
right
retreat
goal
pp
wende
procedure
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
appeal
merit
comparison
procedure
evaluated
chief
cases
demonstrates
affords
indigents
adequate
effective
appellate
review
required
fourteenth
amendment
wende
procedure
undoubtedly
far
better
procedures
found
inadequate
significant
fact
finding
old
california
procedure
inadequate
anders
also
finding
inadequate
procedures
reviewed
eskridge
washington
bd
prison
terms
paroles
lane
brown
two
precedents
anders
relied
procedures
required
determination
defendant
unlikely
prevail
appeal
appeal
frivolous
wende
contrast
requires
counsel
find
appeal
lacking
arguable
issues
frivolous
additional
problem
old
california
procedure
apparently
permitted
appellate
allow
counsel
withdraw
decide
appeal
without
appointing
new
counsel
procedure
struck
penson
ohio
permitted
basic
violation
douglas
right
counsel
case
determined
frivolous
receive
merits
brief
nonfrivolous
appeal
wende
contrast
douglas
violations
occur
counsel
move
withdraw
orders
briefing
finds
arguable
issues
procedure
disapproved
anders
also
required
counsel
file
bare
conclusion
appeal
merit
wende
requires
counsel
provide
summary
case
procedural
factual
history
citations
record
order
ensure
trained
legal
eye
searched
record
arguable
issues
assist
reviewing
evaluation
finally
providing
least
two
tiers
review
wende
procedure
avoids
additional
flaw
found
eskridge
lane
douglas
procedures
one
tier
pp
wende
procedure
also
least
comparable
procedures
approved
neither
requiring
wende
brief
raise
legal
issues
requiring
counsel
explicitly
describe
case
frivolous
california
made
effort
mitigate
one
problems
critics
found
anders
namely
requirement
counsel
violate
ethical
duty
officer
presenting
frivolous
arguments
well
duty
client
interests
characterizing
client
claims
frivolous
wende
also
attempts
resolve
another
anders
problem
apparently
adopts
gradations
frivolity
uses
two
different
meanings
phrase
arguable
issue
drawing
line
frivolity
defining
arguable
issues
frivolous
finally
wende
procedure
appears
ways
better
one
approved
mccoy
ways
worse
balance
say
latter
assuming
arguendo
outweigh
former
sufficiently
make
wende
procedure
unconstitutional
purpose
constitution
resolve
arguments
addresses
prudent
appropriate
constitutionally
compelled
cronic
enough
say
wende
procedure
like
anders
mccoy
procedures
unlike
ones
douglas
penson
affords
adequate
effective
appellate
review
criminal
indigents
pp
case
remanded
ninth
circuit
evaluate
robbins
claim
may
appeal
frivolous
thus
entitled
merits
brief
district
ninth
circuit
found
two
arguable
issues
direct
appeal
unclear
used
phrase
arguable
issues
therefore
necessary
clarify
strong
issues
proper
standard
evaluating
robbins
claim
remand
enunciated
strickland
washington
must
first
show
counsel
objectively
unreasonable
failing
find
arguable
issues
appeal
robbins
succeeds
showing
burden
demonstrating
prejudice
must
satisfy
prongs
strickland
test
prevail
claim
warrant
presumption
prejudice
received
appellate
counsel
complied
valid
state
procedure
determining
whether
appeal
frivolous
state
left
without
counsel
appeal
thus
presumed
result
proceedings
reliable
robbins
must
prove
presumption
incorrect
claim
fall
within
three
categories
cases
prejudice
presumed
involve
complete
denial
counsel
appeal
state
interference
counsel
assistance
actual
conflict
interest
counsel
part
pp
reversed
remanded
homas
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
joined
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
ginsburg
breyer
joined
george
smith
warden
petitioner
lee
robbins
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
january
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
infrequently
attorney
appointed
represent
indigent
defendant
appeal
concludes
appeal
frivolous
requests
appellate
allow
withdraw
dispose
case
without
filing
merits
briefs
anders
california
held
order
protect
indigent
defendants
constitutional
right
appellate
counsel
courts
must
safeguard
risk
granting
requests
cases
appeal
actually
frivolous
found
inadequate
california
procedure
permitted
appellate
counsel
withdraw
upon
filing
conclusory
letter
stating
appeal
merit
permitted
appellate
affirm
conviction
upon
reaching
conclusion
following
review
record
went
set
forth
acceptable
procedure
california
since
adopted
new
procedure
departs
respects
one
delineated
anders
question
whether
departure
fatal
hold
procedure
sketched
anders
prophylactic
one
free
adopt
different
procedures
long
procedures
adequately
safeguard
defendant
right
appellate
counsel
california
new
procedure
established
people
wende
cal
followed
numerous
cases
since
see
people
rowland
cal
app
cal
rptr
counsel
upon
concluding
appeal
frivolous
files
brief
appellate
summarizes
procedural
factual
history
case
citations
record
also
attests
reviewed
record
explained
evaluation
case
client
provided
client
copy
brief
informed
client
right
file
pro
se
supplemental
brief
requests
independently
examine
record
arguable
issues
unlike
anders
procedure
counsel
following
wende
neither
explicitly
review
led
conclude
appeal
frivolous
although
considered
implicit
see
wende
cal
requests
leave
withdraw
instead
silent
merits
case
expresses
availability
brief
issues
might
desire
briefing
see
generally
id
appellate
upon
receiving
wende
brief
must
conduct
review
entire
record
regardless
whether
defendant
filed
pro
se
brief
id
california
wende
required
thorough
review
notwithstanding
dissenting
justice
argument
unnecessary
exceeded
review
performs
anders
see
cal
clark
concurring
judgment
dissenting
part
see
also
id
precise
holding
anders
merit
letter
enough
enough
clear
majority
case
require
appellate
function
cocounsel
appellate
review
record
pursuant
wende
also
finds
appeal
frivolous
may
affirm
see
id
majority
opinion
however
finds
arguable
nonfrivolous
issue
orders
briefing
issue
id
california
jury
convicted
respondent
lee
robbins
murder
fatally
shooting
former
roommate
grand
theft
automobile
stealing
truck
used
flee
state
committing
murder
robbins
sentenced
years
life
elected
represent
trial
appeal
received
appointed
counsel
appointed
counsel
concluding
appeal
frivolous
filed
california
appeal
brief
complied
wende
procedure
robbins
also
availed
right
wende
file
pro
se
supplemental
brief
filing
brief
contended
insufficient
evidence
support
conviction
prosecutor
violated
brady
maryland
failing
disclose
exculpatory
evidence
california
appeal
agreeing
counsel
assessment
case
affirmed
explained
examined
entire
record
result
concluded
counsel
fully
complied
responsibilities
wende
arguable
issues
exist
app
added
two
issues
robbins
raised
supplemental
brief
support
record
ibid
california
denied
robbins
petition
review
exhausting
state
postconviction
remedies
robbins
filed
district
central
district
california
instant
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
pursuant
robbins
renewed
brady
claim
argued
state
trial
erred
allowing
withdraw
waiver
right
trial
counsel
added
nine
claims
trial
error
addition
importantly
present
purposes
claimed
denied
effective
assistance
appellate
counsel
appellate
counsel
wende
brief
failed
comply
anders
california
anders
set
forth
procedure
appellate
counsel
follow
seeking
permission
withdraw
representation
concludes
appeal
frivolous
procedure
includes
requirement
counsel
file
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
ibid
district
agreed
robbins
last
claim
concluding
least
two
issues
pursuant
anders
counsel
raised
brief
wende
brief
noted
counsel
required
raise
issues
first
whether
prison
law
library
adequate
robbins
needs
preparing
defense
elected
dismiss
appointed
counsel
proceed
pro
se
trial
second
whether
trial
erred
refusing
allow
withdraw
waiver
counsel
district
attempt
determine
likelihood
either
two
issues
prevailed
appeal
rather
simply
concluded
language
anders
procedure
issues
might
arguably
support
ed
appeal
app
citing
anders
thus
robbins
appellate
counsel
including
brief
deviated
procedure
set
forth
anders
concluded
deviation
amounted
deficient
performance
counsel
addition
rather
requiring
robbins
show
suffered
prejudice
deficient
performance
district
applied
presumption
prejudice
app
thus
based
simply
finding
appellate
counsel
brief
inadequate
anders
district
ordered
california
grant
respondent
new
appeal
within
days
else
release
custody
appeals
ninth
circuit
agreed
district
anders
issue
ninth
circuit
view
anders
together
douglas
california
held
must
provide
appointed
counsel
indigent
criminal
defendants
appeal
set
forth
exclusive
procedure
appointed
counsel
performance
pass
constitutional
muster
rejecting
petitioner
argument
counsel
brief
sufficient
complied
wende
ninth
circuit
concluded
brief
deficient
anders
procedure
requires
identify
legal
issues
arguably
supported
appeal
decide
whether
counsel
deviation
anders
standing
alone
warrant
new
appeal
see
rather
concluded
district
award
relief
proper
counsel
failed
brief
two
arguable
issues
district
identified
ninth
circuit
remanded
however
district
consider
respondent
claims
trial
error
id
reasoned
robbins
prevailed
claims
unnecessary
order
california
appeal
grant
new
direct
appeal
granted
certiorari
ii
anders
reviewed
earlier
california
procedure
handling
appeals
convicted
indigents
pursuant
procedure
anders
appointed
appellate
counsel
filed
letter
stating
concluded
merit
appeal
anders
anders
response
sought
new
counsel
state
appeal
denied
request
anders
filed
pro
se
appellate
brief
issued
opinion
reviewed
four
claims
pro
se
brief
affirmed
finding
error
prejudicial
error
people
anders
cal
app
anders
thereafter
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
state
appeal
denied
relief
explaining
reviewed
record
found
appeal
without
merit
anders
quoting
unreported
memorandum
opinion
held
california
action
comport
fair
procedure
lacks
equality
required
fourteenth
amendment
placed
case
within
line
precedent
beginning
griffin
illinois
continuing
douglas
supra
imposed
constitutional
constraints
choose
create
appellate
review
finding
california
procedure
breached
constraints
compared
procedures
found
invalid
statutory
requirements
federal
courts
governing
appeals
indigents
appointed
counsel
anders
supra
relied
particular
ellis
per
curiam
case
involving
federal
statutory
requirements
quoted
following
passage
counsel
convinced
conscientious
investigation
appeal
frivolous
course
may
ask
withdraw
account
satisfied
counsel
diligently
investigated
possible
grounds
appeal
agrees
counsel
evaluation
case
leave
withdraw
may
allowed
leave
appeal
may
denied
anders
supra
quoting
ellis
supra
anders
neither
counsel
state
appellate
direct
appeal
state
habeas
courts
made
finding
frivolity
concluded
finding
appeal
merit
adequate
mean
appeal
lacking
prospects
frivolous
say
finding
frivolity
either
california
courts
counsel
acted
greater
capacity
merely
amicus
curiae
condemned
ellis
rejected
california
procedure
proceeded
final
separate
section
set
acceptable
procedure
treating
frivolous
appeals
counsel
finds
case
wholly
frivolous
conscientious
examination
advise
request
permission
withdraw
request
must
however
accompanied
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
copy
counsel
brief
furnished
indigent
time
allowed
raise
points
chooses
counsel
proceeds
full
examination
proceedings
decide
whether
case
wholly
frivolous
finds
may
grant
counsel
request
withdraw
dismiss
appeal
insofar
federal
requirements
concerned
proceed
decision
merits
state
law
requires
hand
finds
legal
points
arguable
merits
therefore
frivolous
must
prior
decision
afford
indigent
assistance
counsel
argue
appeal
id
concluded
explaining
procedure
better
california
one
found
deficient
among
things
thought
induce
pursue
vigorously
review
ready
references
record
also
legal
authorities
furnished
counsel
ninth
circuit
ruled
final
section
anders
even
though
unnecessary
holding
case
obligatory
upon
disagree
never
held
read
precedents
suggest
otherwise
ninth
circuit
view
runs
contrary
established
practice
permitting
within
broad
bounds
constitution
experiment
solutions
difficult
questions
policy
mccoy
appeals
dist
rejected
challenge
wisconsin
variation
anders
procedure
wisconsin
departed
anders
requiring
anders
briefs
discuss
issue
raised
lacked
merit
defendant
argued
rule
contrary
anders
forced
counsel
violate
ethical
obligations
client
however
emphasized
right
appellate
representation
include
right
present
frivolous
arguments
similarly
attorney
ethical
obligation
refuse
prosecute
frivolous
appeal
ibid
omitted
anders
explained
merely
aims
assure
indigent
defendant
constitutional
rights
violated
wisconsin
procedure
adequately
provided
assurance
found
constitutional
violation
notwithstanding
variance
anders
see
mccoy
describe
procedure
issue
going
one
step
anders
mccoy
supra
thus
suggesting
anders
might
set
mandatory
minimum
think
description
wisconsin
procedure
questionable
since
provided
less
effective
advocacy
indigent
least
one
respect
anders
procedure
wisconsin
procedure
providing
briefing
counsel
client
best
claims
probably
made
likely
rule
indigent
simply
received
anders
brief
pennsylvania
finley
explained
anders
procedure
independent
constitutional
command
rather
prophylactic
framework
established
vindicate
constitutional
right
appellate
counsel
announced
douglas
say
anders
procedure
prophylactic
framework
adequately
vindicate
right
instead
making
clear
constitution
compel
anders
procedure
suggested
otherwise
similarly
penson
ohio
described
anders
simply
erecting
safeguards
true
penson
used
language
suggesting
anders
mandatory
upon
see
language
necessary
decision
reached
reason
penson
determine
whether
anders
procedure
mandatory
procedure
issue
clearly
failed
douglas
see
infra
counsel
action
penson
closely
analogous
action
counsel
found
invalid
anders
see
penson
supra
need
rely
anders
procedure
opposed
anders
holding
find
counsel
action
improper
see
question
presented
case
remarkably
similar
one
presented
anders
therefore
requires
similar
answer
finally
view
procedure
described
last
section
anders
converted
suggestion
straitjacket
contravene
established
practice
rooted
federalism
allowing
wide
discretion
subject
minimum
requirements
fourteenth
amendment
experiment
solutions
difficult
problems
policy
griffin
illinois
invoked
foundational
case
holding
anders
see
anders
expressly
disclaimed
pretensions
rulemaking
authority
area
indigent
criminal
appeals
imposed
broad
rule
procedure
merely
held
unconstitutional
illinois
requirement
indigents
pay
fee
receive
trial
transcript
essential
bringing
appeal
justice
frankfurter
provided
necessary
fifth
vote
holding
griffin
emphasized
tell
illinois
means
open
indigent
must
chosen
illinois
may
prescribe
means
within
wide
area
constitutional
discretion
may
protect
frivolous
appeals
subsidized
public
moneys
needlessly
spent
griffin
opinion
concurring
judgment
added
state
bolt
door
equal
justice
also
obliged
support
wasteful
abuse
appellate
process
ibid
griffin
plurality
shared
view
explaining
holding
illinois
must
purchase
stenographer
transcript
every
case
defendant
buy
illinois
may
find
means
affording
adequate
effective
appellate
review
indigent
defendants
id
related
context
stated
basic
principle
federalism
term
decided
anders
emphatically
reaffirmed
constitution
never
thought
establish
organ
promulgation
state
rules
criminal
procedure
spencer
texas
citing
inter
alia
griffin
supra
accord
medina
california
justice
stewart
concurring
spencer
explained
constitution
gave
roving
commission
impose
upon
criminal
courts
texas
notions
enlightened
policy
join
opinion
question
whether
procedures
fall
minimum
level
fourteenth
amendment
tolerate
upon
question
constrained
join
opinion
judgment
concurring
opinion
continued
reiterate
principle
recent
years
see
finley
refusing
accept
premise
state
chooses
offer
help
seeking
relief
convictions
federal
constitution
dictates
exact
form
assistance
must
assume
ibid
explaining
substantial
discretion
develop
implement
programs
aid
prisoners
seeking
secure
postconviction
review
murray
giarratano
concurring
seem
constitution
requires
follow
particular
federal
model
postconviction
proceedings
considerable
discretion
id
kennedy
concurring
judgment
udicial
imposition
categorical
remedy
might
pretermit
responsible
solutions
considered
congress
state
legislatures
although
finley
murray
involved
postconviction
proceedings
constitutional
right
counsel
rather
direct
appeal
think
language
griffin
suggests
principle
contexts
griffin
underlying
constitutional
right
issue
short
keeping
status
particularly
status
federal
system
avoid
imposing
single
solution
top
evaluate
state
procedures
one
time
come
us
see
murray
supra
leaving
challenging
task
crafting
appropriate
procedures
laboratory
first
instance
cruzan
director
mo
dept
health
concurring
citation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
cavalierly
imped
ability
serve
laboratories
testing
solutions
novel
legal
problems
arizona
evans
ginsburg
dissenting
accordingly
hold
anders
procedure
merely
one
method
satisfying
requirements
constitution
indigent
criminal
appeals
may
confident
craft
procedures
terms
policy
superior
least
good
anders
constitution
erects
barrier
iii
determined
california
wende
procedure
unconstitutional
merely
diverges
anders
procedure
turn
consider
wende
procedure
merits
think
clear
california
system
violate
fourteenth
amendment
provides
criminal
appellant
pursuing
first
appeal
right
minimum
safeguards
necessary
make
appeal
adequate
effective
evitts
lucey
quoting
griffin
plurality
opinion
admitted
numerous
occasions
precise
rationale
griffin
douglas
lines
cases
never
explicitly
stated
support
derived
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
amendment
evitts
supra
quoting
ross
moffitt
omitted
case
law
reveals
practical
matter
two
clauses
largely
converge
require
state
procedure
afford
adequate
effective
appellate
review
indigent
defendants
griffin
plurality
opinion
state
procedure
provides
review
long
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
merit
appeal
see
id
plurality
opinion
state
law
regulating
indigents
appeals
bore
rational
relationship
defendant
guilt
innocence
id
frankfurter
concurring
judgment
law
imposed
differentiations
relation
rational
policy
criminal
appeal
douglas
decision
first
appeal
without
benefit
counsel
matter
meritorious
indigent
case
may
turn
discriminates
rich
poor
rather
possibly
good
obviously
bad
cases
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
rinaldi
yeager
state
appellate
system
must
free
unreasoned
distinctions
evitts
supra
law
griffin
decided
appeal
way
arbitrary
respect
issues
involved
compare
finley
equal
protection
guarantee
assure
indigent
defendant
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
context
state
appellate
process
quoting
ross
supra
evitts
supra
ue
process
requires
offer
defendant
fair
opportunity
obtain
adjudication
merits
appeal
discussing
griffin
douglas
determining
whether
particular
state
procedure
satisfies
standard
important
focus
underlying
goals
procedure
serve
ensure
indigents
whose
appeals
frivolous
receive
counsel
merits
brief
required
douglas
also
enable
state
protect
frivolous
appeals
subsidized
public
moneys
needlessly
spent
griffin
supra
frankfurter
concurring
judgment
although
douglas
indigents
generally
right
counsel
first
appeal
right
equally
true
right
include
right
bring
frivolous
appeal
concomitantly
include
right
counsel
bringing
frivolous
appeal
see
mccoy
douglas
supra
see
also
cronic
course
sixth
amendment
require
trial
counsel
impossible
unethical
cf
nix
whiteside
violation
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
counsel
refuses
violate
ethical
duty
assist
client
presenting
perjured
testimony
put
point
differently
indigent
defendant
appeal
dismissed
frivolous
deprived
fair
opportunity
bring
appeal
evitts
supra
see
finley
supra
fairness
require
either
counsel
full
appeal
properly
determined
appeal
frivolous
obvious
goal
anders
prevent
limitation
right
appellate
counsel
swallowing
right
see
penson
mccoy
supra
retreat
goal
today
think
wende
procedure
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
merit
appeal
whatever
strengths
weaknesses
matter
policy
say
fails
afford
indigents
adequate
effective
appellate
review
fourteenth
amendment
requires
comparison
wende
procedure
procedures
evaluated
chief
cases
area
makes
evident
wende
procedure
undoubtedly
far
better
procedures
found
inadequate
anders
disapproving
former
california
procedure
chiefly
relied
three
precedents
ellis
eskridge
washington
bd
prison
terms
paroles
per
curiam
lane
brown
see
anders
although
anders
explain
detail
california
procedure
inadequate
precedents
particularly
heavy
reliance
ellis
makes
clear
significant
factor
old
california
procedure
require
either
counsel
determine
appeal
frivolous
instead
procedure
required
determine
defendant
unlikely
prevail
appeal
compare
anders
supra
counsel
convinced
conscientious
investigation
appeal
frivolous
course
may
ask
withdraw
agrees
counsel
evaluation
case
leave
withdraw
may
allowed
leave
appeal
may
quoting
ellis
supra
anders
supra
say
finding
frivolity
see
also
mccoy
supra
quoting
passage
ellis
quoted
anders
problem
also
appears
one
flaws
procedures
issue
eskridge
lane
former
involved
finding
grave
prejudicial
trial
anders
supra
quoting
eskridge
supra
latter
finding
appeal
unsuccessful
anders
supra
quoting
lane
supra
wende
contrast
requires
counsel
find
appeal
lacking
arguable
issues
say
frivolous
see
cal
see
reading
anders
finding
old
california
procedure
deficient
largely
make
express
finding
appeal
frivolous
additional
problem
old
california
procedure
apparently
permitted
appellate
allow
counsel
withdraw
thereafter
decide
appeal
without
appointing
new
counsel
see
anders
supra
resolved
doubt
point
penson
struck
procedure
allowed
counsel
withdraw
determined
whether
counsel
evaluation
case
accurate
addition
allowed
decide
appeal
without
counsel
even
found
arguable
issues
id
stating
latter
flaw
ost
significan
one
thus
penson
procedure
permitted
basic
violation
douglas
right
counsel
case
determined
frivolous
receive
merits
brief
nonfrivolous
appeal
see
important
emphasize
denial
counsel
case
left
petitioner
completely
without
representation
appellate
actual
decisional
process
ibid
defendant
entirely
without
assistance
counsel
appeal
cf
mccoy
approving
procedure
appellate
first
finds
appeal
frivolous
affirms
relieves
counsel
wende
contrast
douglas
violations
occur
counsel
move
withdraw
orders
briefing
finds
arguable
issues
see
wende
supra
see
also
rowland
cal
app
cal
rptr
anders
also
disapproved
old
california
procedure
thought
one
paragraph
letter
counsel
stating
bare
conclusion
appeal
merit
insufficient
unclear
opinion
anders
much
objection
point
severable
objection
lack
finding
frivolity
immediately
followed
description
counsel
merit
letter
discussion
ellis
eskridge
lane
lack
finding
see
event
wende
brief
provides
bare
conclusion
counsel
summary
case
procedural
factual
history
citations
record
ensures
trained
legal
eye
searched
record
arguable
issues
assists
reviewing
evaluation
case
finally
additional
flaw
procedures
eskridge
lane
one
tier
review
trial
judge
eskridge
understandably
little
incentive
find
error
warranting
appeal
public
defender
lane
see
anders
supra
procedure
douglas
part
flawed
reason
see
douglas
wende
procedure
course
suffer
flaw
provides
least
two
tiers
review
wende
procedure
far
exceed
procedures
found
invalid
also
least
comparable
procedures
approved
turning
first
procedure
set
final
section
anders
note
beginning
faced
consistent
severe
criticism
sade
cal
quoting
note
texas
rev
one
consistent
criticisms
one
wrestled
mccoy
anders
tension
counsel
ethical
duty
officer
requires
present
frivolous
arguments
also
duty
client
interests
might
permit
counsel
characterize
client
claims
frivolous
california
wende
procedure
made
effort
mitigate
problem
requiring
wende
brief
raise
legal
issues
requiring
counsel
explicitly
describe
case
frivolous
see
wende
cal
another
criticism
anders
procedure
incoherent
thus
impossible
follow
making
criticism
point
language
anders
suggesting
appeal
wholly
frivolous
time
contain
arguable
issues
even
though
also
said
issue
arguable
therefore
frivolous
anders
supra
words
anders
procedure
appears
adopt
gradations
frivolity
use
two
different
meanings
phrase
arguable
issue
wende
procedure
attempts
resolve
problem
well
drawing
line
frivolity
defining
arguable
issues
frivolous
finally
wende
procedure
appears
ways
better
one
approved
mccoy
ways
worse
balance
say
latter
assuming
arguendo
outweigh
former
sufficiently
make
wende
procedure
unconstitutional
wisconsin
procedure
evaluated
mccoy
required
counsel
filing
anders
brief
explain
issues
raised
brief
lacked
merit
arguably
exacerbated
ethical
problem
already
present
anders
procedure
wende
procedure
explained
attempts
mitigate
problem
appears
mccoy
scheme
counsel
discussed
appellate
reviewed
parts
record
cited
counsel
support
arguable
issues
raised
see
wende
procedure
contrast
requires
thorough
treatment
record
counsel
see
wende
cal
id
clark
concurring
judgment
dissenting
part
hand
mccoy
procedure
unlike
wende
procedure
assist
reviewing
directing
particular
legal
issues
issues
presumably
good
thing
also
possible
bad
judgment
attorney
selecting
issues
raise
might
divert
attention
meritorious
unmentioned
issues
criticism
course
equally
applicable
anders
procedure
moreover
issues
counsel
raise
mccoy
brief
briefing
issues
frivolous
may
predispose
reach
conclusion
wende
procedure
reduces
risks
omitting
brief
signals
may
subtly
undermine
independence
thoroughness
second
review
indigent
case
purpose
resolve
arguments
constitution
resolve
require
us
address
prudent
appropriate
constitutionally
compelled
cronic
enough
say
wende
procedure
like
anders
mccoy
procedures
unlike
ones
ellis
eskridge
lane
douglas
penson
affords
adequate
effective
appellate
review
criminal
indigents
thus
constitutional
violation
case
simply
wende
procedure
used
iv
since
robbins
counsel
complied
valid
procedure
determining
indigent
direct
appeal
frivolous
reverse
ninth
circuit
judgment
wende
procedure
fails
adequately
serve
constitutional
principles
identified
anders
reversal
necessarily
mean
robbins
claim
appellate
counsel
rendered
constitutionally
ineffective
assistance
fails
may
robbins
argues
appeal
frivolous
thus
entitled
merits
brief
rather
wende
brief
indeed
district
ninth
circuit
found
two
arguable
issues
direct
appeal
meaning
arguable
issue
used
opinions
however
far
clear
courts
likely
used
phrase
unusual
way
used
anders
issue
arguably
supporting
appeal
even
though
appeal
wholly
frivolous
see
discussing
arguable
issues
context
requirements
anders
app
district
opinion
issue
warrant
merits
brief
courts
may
used
term
signify
issues
arguable
normal
sense
nonfrivolous
thus
warranting
merits
brief
see
app
district
considering
arguable
issues
determine
whether
anders
violated
also
defining
arguable
issue
one
counsel
argue
good
faith
potential
prevailing
courts
determining
whether
arguable
issues
address
petitioner
argument
least
regard
adequacy
prison
law
library
robbins
waived
issue
appeal
failing
object
trial
thus
necessary
remand
clarify
strong
two
issues
remand
proper
standard
evaluating
robbins
claim
appellate
counsel
ineffective
neglecting
file
merits
brief
enunciated
strickland
washington
see
smith
murray
applying
strickland
claim
attorney
error
appeal
respondent
must
first
show
counsel
objectively
unreasonable
see
strickland
failing
find
arguable
issues
appeal
counsel
unreasonably
failed
discover
nonfrivolous
issues
file
merits
brief
raising
robbins
succeeds
showing
burden
demonstrating
prejudice
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unreasonable
failure
file
merits
brief
prevailed
appeal
see
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
applicability
strickland
prong
robbins
claim
ineffective
assistance
follows
penson
distinguished
denial
counsel
altogether
appeal
warrants
presumption
prejudice
mere
ineffective
assistance
counsel
appeal
see
defendant
penson
faced
denial
counsel
discussed
supra
invalid
state
procedure
followed
procedure
clearly
invalid
insofar
denied
defendant
right
appellate
counsel
douglas
see
holding
penson
consistent
strickland
said
presume
prejudice
defendant
suffered
ctual
constructive
denial
assistance
counsel
altogether
see
also
cronic
supra
words
normally
apply
strong
presumption
reliability
judicial
proceedings
require
defendant
overcome
presumption
strickland
supra
penson
complete
denial
counsel
understandably
presume
opposite
see
strickland
supra
defendant
received
appellate
counsel
complied
valid
state
procedure
determining
whether
defendant
appeal
frivolous
state
time
left
defendant
without
counsel
appeal
reason
presume
defendant
prejudiced
penson
worried
requiring
defendant
establish
prejudice
leave
without
protections
afforded
anders
contrast
counsel
followed
procedure
constitutional
anders
precedents
area
robbins
therefore
received
procedural
protection
constitution
requires
thus
presume
result
proceedings
appeal
reliable
require
robbins
prove
presumption
incorrect
particular
case
see
strickland
claim
robbins
presses
fall
within
three
categories
cases
described
strickland
presume
prejudice
rather
require
defendant
demonstrate
first
noted
presume
prejudice
case
denial
counsel
second
various
kinds
state
interference
counsel
assistance
warrant
presumption
prejudice
id
see
cronic
third
prejudice
presumed
counsel
burdened
actual
conflict
interest
strickland
although
case
require
defendant
show
conflict
adversely
affected
counsel
performance
ibid
none
three
categories
applies
case
robbins
policy
reason
offered
strickland
first
two
categories
apply
case
attorney
unreasonably
chooses
follow
procedure
anders
wende
instead
filing
merits
brief
prejudice
likely
inquiry
prejudice
worth
cost
see
cronic
supra
contrary
cases
defendant
appeal
found
pursuant
valid
state
procedure
frivolous
fact
frivolous
harder
apply
strickland
area
defendant
claims
received
ineffective
assistance
appellate
counsel
counsel
although
filing
merits
brief
failed
raise
particular
claim
likely
easier
jones
barnes
held
appellate
counsel
files
merits
brief
need
raise
every
nonfrivolous
claim
rather
may
select
among
order
maximize
likelihood
success
appeal
notwithstanding
barnes
still
possible
bring
strickland
claim
based
counsel
failure
raise
particular
claim
difficult
demonstrate
counsel
incompetent
see
gray
greer
generally
ignored
issues
clearly
stronger
presented
presumption
effective
assistance
counsel
overcome
claim
counsel
erroneously
failed
file
merits
brief
easier
satisfy
first
part
strickland
test
necessary
show
reasonably
competent
attorney
found
one
nonfrivolous
issue
warranting
merits
brief
rather
showing
particular
nonfrivolous
issue
clearly
stronger
issues
counsel
present
cases
however
prejudice
analysis
sum
robbins
must
satisfy
prongs
strickland
test
order
prevail
claim
ineffective
assistance
appellate
counsel
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
george
smith
warden
petitioner
lee
robbins
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
january
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
joins
dissenting
join
justice
souter
cogent
dissent
without
qualification
write
separately
emphasize
two
points
obscured
somewhat
meandering
explanation
sharp
departure
settled
law
first
despite
failure
say
directly
effectively
overruled
anders
california
penson
ohio
second
unexplained
rejection
reasoning
underlying
decision
mccoy
appeals
dist
see
ante
illustrates
extent
today
majority
disregard
accepted
precedent
make
first
point
necessary
quote
new
standard
determining
whether
state
appellate
procedure
affords
adequate
review
indigent
defendants
state
procedure
provides
review
long
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
merit
appeal
ante
california
procedure
reviewed
anders
ohio
procedure
reviewed
penson
found
inadequate
easily
satisfied
standard
yet
today
accepts
california
current
procedure
requires
counsel
find
appeal
lacking
arguable
issues
ante
defense
position
anders
california
relied
heavily
requirements
additional
feature
state
system
also
reads
full
record
brief
respondent
anders
california
pp
see
also
anders
decision
held
however
additional
feature
insufficient
safeguard
indigent
appellant
rights
make
second
point
shall
draw
experience
practicing
lawyer
judge
good
many
occasions
found
task
writing
reasons
support
initial
opinion
question
law
whether
purpose
giving
advice
client
purpose
explaining
vote
appellate
judge
leads
conclusion
previously
apparent
colleagues
shared
view
importance
giving
reasons
opposed
merely
announcing
conclusions
joined
opinions
authored
mccoy
penson
nickols
gagnon
casual
rejection
reasoning
mccoy
simply
ignores
portion
opinion
wisconsin
rule
merely
requires
attorney
go
one
step
instead
relying
unexplained
assumption
attorney
discovered
law
facts
completely
refute
arguments
identified
brief
wisconsin
requires
additional
evidence
counsel
diligence
requirement
furthers
interests
served
minimum
requirements
anders
counsel
may
discover
previously
unrecognized
aspects
law
process
preparing
written
explanation
conclusion
discussion
requirement
provides
additional
safeguard
mistaken
conclusions
counsel
strongest
arguments
find
frivolous
like
references
favorable
aspects
record
required
anders
discussion
requirement
may
forestall
motions
withdraw
assist
passing
soundness
lawyer
conclusion
appeal
frivolous
mccoy
see
also
penson
short
simply
putting
pen
paper
often
shed
new
light
may
first
appear
issue
id
reason
quite
wrong
say
requiring
counsel
articulate
reasons
conclusion
results
less
effective
advocacy
ante
appellate
employed
law
clerk
review
trial
transcripts
indigent
appeals
search
arguable
error
reasonably
sure
resolved
appeals
way
related
merits
however
provide
indigent
appellant
anything
approaching
representation
paid
attorney
like
california
wende
procedure
violate
principle
substantial
equality
described
anders
mccoy
part
law
decades
mccoy
anders
george
smith
warden
petitioner
lee
robbins
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
january
justice
souter
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
defendant
right
representation
appeal
limited
prohibition
frivolous
litigation
realize
lawyer
corresponding
obligations
odds
perfect
place
draw
line
believe
procedure
adopted
people
wende
cal
fails
assure
representation
counsel
adversarial
character
demanded
constitution
respectfully
dissent
although
sixth
amendment
guarantees
trial
counsel
felony
defendant
see
gideon
wainwright
constitution
contains
similarly
freestanding
unconditional
right
counsel
appeal
obligation
provide
appellate
review
see
ross
moffitt
state
elects
provide
appellate
review
however
terms
subject
constitutional
notice
see
griffin
illinois
rinaldi
yeager
evitts
lucey
line
cases
beginning
griffin
examined
appellate
procedural
schemes
principle
justice
may
conditioned
ability
pay
see
generally
ross
supra
even
though
bsolute
equality
required
douglas
california
held
douglas
state
criminal
defendants
free
retain
counsel
first
appeal
right
fourteenth
amendment
requires
indigent
appellants
placed
substantially
equal
footing
appointment
counsel
state
expense
see
mccoy
appeals
dist
referring
principle
substantial
equality
two
services
appellate
counsel
point
appellate
counsel
examines
trial
record
advocate
eye
identifying
weighing
potential
issues
appeal
review
dispassionate
legal
mind
committed
representative
pledged
client
interests
primed
attack
conviction
ground
record
may
reveal
counsel
review
reveals
arguable
trial
error
prepares
submits
brief
merits
argues
appeal
right
first
services
partisan
scrutiny
record
assessment
potential
issues
goes
irreducible
core
lawyer
obligation
litigant
adversary
system
consistently
held
essential
substantial
equality
representation
assigned
counsel
paramount
importance
vigorous
representation
follows
nature
adversarial
system
justice
penson
ohio
see
ellis
per
curiam
douglas
supra
mccoy
supra
right
unqualified
defendant
retained
counsel
imagine
reason
counsel
appointed
right
second
service
merits
briefing
similarly
unqualified
however
issue
address
today
arises
limitation
right
merits
brief
one
right
wholly
frivolous
appeal
see
anders
california
judicial
system
first
line
defense
lawyers
officers
members
bar
bound
clog
courts
frivolous
motions
appeals
polk
county
dodson
see
also
mccoy
supra
course
true
regardless
lawyer
retained
appointed
status
given
case
problem
anders
responds
arises
counsel
views
client
appeal
frivolous
leaving
duty
barred
pressing
upon
rub
although
counsel
may
properly
refuse
brief
frivolous
issue
may
properly
deny
leave
take
frivolous
appeal
needs
reasonable
assurance
lawyer
relaxed
partisan
instinct
prior
refusing
case
review
never
compensate
lawyer
failure
advocacy
simple
statement
counsel
appeal
merit
coupled
appellate
endorsement
counsel
conclusion
gives
affirmative
indication
anyone
sought
appellant
best
arguments
championed
cause
degree
contemplated
adversary
system
conclusions
acquire
implicit
persuasiveness
exposure
interested
opponent
readiness
mount
challenge
government
unlikely
dispute
even
test
counsel
evaluation
one
berate
opponent
giving
guard
possibility
counsel
done
advocate
work
looking
hard
potential
issues
must
prod
find
reclusive
merit
ostensibly
unpromising
case
process
assess
lawyer
efforts
fact
judicial
process
renders
constitutional
error
invisible
affront
constitution
see
penson
supra
anders
devised
mechanism
ensure
respect
appellant
rights
see
penson
supra
lawyer
request
withdraw
ground
appeal
frivolous
must
accompanied
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
anders
simply
means
counsel
must
partisan
best
short
calling
black
white
flag
points
come
closest
appealable
lawyer
job
state
issues
give
defendant
best
chances
prevail
even
best
comes
short
rule
trifling
counsel
continued
proceeds
full
examination
proceedings
decide
whether
case
wholly
frivolous
ibid
anders
thus
contemplates
two
reviews
record
markedly
different
character
first
comes
review
advocate
defendant
interested
representative
job
identify
best
issues
partisan
eye
spot
comes
judicial
review
disinterested
judge
asks
two
questions
whether
lawyer
really
function
committed
advocate
whether
misjudged
legitimate
appealability
issue
reviewing
advocate
work
responsible
assuring
counsel
gone
far
advocacy
take
best
issues
undiscounted
repeatedly
described
task
appellate
terms
dual
first
must
satisfy
attorney
provided
client
diligent
thorough
search
record
arguable
claim
might
support
client
appeal
second
must
determine
whether
counsel
correctly
concluded
appeal
frivolous
penson
quoting
mccoy
griffin
anders
thus
require
significantly
abstract
evaluation
merits
conceivably
appealable
points
without
assurance
assigned
counsel
done
best
partisan
substantial
equality
lawyer
retained
defendant
expense
assumed
without
benefit
lawyer
statement
strongest
claims
appellate
panel
act
reviewing
relegated
inquisitorial
role
owing
importance
assuring
adversarial
inquisitorial
system
work
disagree
statement
today
cases
approve
state
procedure
reasonably
ensures
indigent
appeal
resolved
way
related
merit
appeal
ante
purely
inquisitorial
system
satisfy
criterion
one
appoints
counsel
appellate
deems
useful
rejected
former
explicitly
held
latter
unconstitutional
see
douglas
reason
case
constitution
looks
means
well
ends
see
singer
constitution
recognizes
adversary
system
proper
method
determining
guilt
see
also
penson
supra
criminal
appellant
entitled
advocacy
strickland
washington
sixth
amendment
recognizes
right
assistance
counsel
envisions
counsel
playing
role
critical
ability
adversarial
system
reach
results
cronic
thus
adversarial
process
protected
sixth
amendment
requires
accused
counsel
acting
role
advocate
quoting
anders
supra
ii
held
details
anders
exclusive
make
sense
read
case
exemplifying
substantial
equality
requires
behalf
indigent
appellants
entitled
advocate
review
reasonable
certainty
arguable
issues
briefed
merits
anders
thus
benchmark
california
wende
procedure
fails
measure
primary
failing
permitting
counsel
refrain
matter
course
mentioning
possibly
arguable
issues
brief
second
deficiency
correlative
first
obliging
appellate
search
record
arguable
issues
without
benefit
brief
review
see
cal
although
wende
assumes
counsel
act
advocate
see
fails
assure
even
promote
partisan
attention
constitution
requires
lawyer
must
summarize
procedural
factual
history
case
citations
record
nothing
wende
scheme
requires
counsel
show
affirmatively
subject
evaluation
made
committed
search
issues
advocate
assessment
merits
go
heart
appellate
representation
adversary
system
begs
question
say
ounsel
inability
find
arguable
issues
may
readily
inferred
failure
raise
id
misses
point
argue
indigent
appellant
adequately
protected
lawyer
assigned
case
california
assigned
counsel
scheme
may
file
wende
brief
without
approval
supervisor
point
need
affirmative
express
indicator
advocate
work
form
product
appellate
specifically
review
thus
anders
requires
counsel
flag
best
issues
sake
keeping
counsel
toes
giving
focus
judicial
review
judgment
wende
hand
requires
indication
conceivable
issues
hence
nothing
specifically
reviewable
bound
preserve
system
adversary
character
wende
protect
indigent
right
advocacy
letter
condemned
anders
conclusory
statement
disapproved
penson
like
reasoning
wende
deficient
relying
judge
nonpartisan
review
assure
defendant
suffers
prejudice
hands
lawyer
failed
document
best
effort
partisan
review
exactly
system
assumes
lawyer
committed
client
dependable
guardian
client
interest
see
supra
consistently
rejected
procedures
leaving
determination
frivolousness
first
instance
see
douglas
supra
following
conclusory
declaration
counsel
see
penson
assisted
counsel
role
amicus
curiae
see
ellis
defect
procedures
entire
reliance
review
detached
magistrate
apply
partisan
scrutiny
first
instance
defendants
paid
lawyers
get
matter
course
goes
without
saying
wende
reliance
judges
start
scratch
seeking
arguable
issues
adds
substantially
burden
judicial
shoulders
need
decide
whether
drawback
wende
scheme
constitutional
significance
raises
questions
certainly
underscore
constitutional
failing
relying
judicial
scrutiny
uninformed
counsel
partisan
analysis
amicus
brief
filed
case
retired
justices
courts
appeal
california
pointed
risk
review
cold
record
wende
scheme
perfunctory
without
guidance
associated
record
citations
counsel
brief
retired
justice
armand
arabian
et
al
amici
curiae
amici
candidly
represented
hen
california
appellate
receives
wende
brief
assigns
case
staff
attorney
prepares
memorandum
analyzing
possible
legal
issues
case
typically
staff
attorney
makes
oral
presentation
appellate
panel
brief
retired
justice
arabian
supra
responsibility
counsel
thrown
onto
gives
way
staff
attorney
clearer
wende
seriously
odds
respective
obligations
counsel
courts
contemplated
constitution
iii
unlike
reach
question
appropriate
relief
respect
respondent
anders
claim
appeals
premised
disposition
finding
two
potentially
meritorious
issues
showed
robbins
prejudiced
failure
wende
scheme
result
litigation
think
unnecessary
invoke
findings
however
hold
robbins
simply
failure
provide
advocate
analysis
issues
predicate
review
without
effect
require
state
courts
reinstate
appeal
treatment
consistent
anders
application
griffin
true
course
relief
normally
granted
want
adequate
assistance
trial
counsel
defendant
must
show
lawyer
failure
represent
reasonable
competence
demonstrated
failure
file
advocate
brief
also
reasonable
probability
competent
representation
produced
different
result
case
see
strickland
assumption
behind
strickland
prejudice
requirement
defendant
lawyer
representing
advocate
least
level
whereas
premise
assumed
defendant
receives
benefit
nothing
wende
brief
wende
situation
nominal
counsel
functioning
merely
friend
helping
judge
grasp
structure
record
even
purporting
highlight
record
nearest
approach
supporting
client
hope
appeal
counsel
wende
less
judge
law
clerk
staff
attorney
might
nothing
way
advocacy
lawyer
abandons
role
advocate
adopts
amicus
curiae
longer
functioning
counsel
rendering
assistance
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
see
cronic
since
apparently
missing
ingredient
advocate
analysis
goes
essence
right
counsel
lawyer
nothing
file
wende
brief
closer
counsel
subpar
counsel
strickland
think
answer
suggestion
specific
assessment
prejudice
need
shown
order
get
relief
wende
complete
absence
counsel
reversible
violation
constitutional
right
representation
even
question
end
day
smartest
lawyer
world
watched
client
led
prison
see
cronic
supra
cf
rodriquez
ask
defendant
fared
given
counsel
look
sort
appeal
might
ensued
appellant
lawyer
flagged
points
came
closest
appealable
issues
result
equally
consistent
cases
holding
violation
due
process
complete
defendant
denied
right
appeal
otherwise
entitled
pursue
see
peguero
concurring
rodriquez
supra
conclusion
anticipated
penson
dealt
violation
anders
standards
counsel
allowed
withdraw
without
supplying
best
effort
identify
appealable
weaknesses
prior
judicial
determination
counsel
missed
nothing
finding
arguable
appellate
issues
record
appellate
penson
subsequently
identified
arguable
issues
thought
appointment
new
counsel
unnecessary
finding
legitimately
appealable
issues
losers
recognized
presumption
prejudice
without
purposes
strickland
chapman
california
see
penson
although
state
failure
appoint
counsel
identifying
issues
made
penson
egregious
case
failure
advocacy
consequent
constructive
absence
counsel
clear
even
point
lawyer
withdrew
presumption
prejudice
applicable
applicable
case
practical
sense
well
good
theory
behind
presumption
prejudice
requirement
demonstrate
prejudice
specifically
often
place
federal
judges
habeas
highly
precarious
positions
calling
judgments
state
judges
generally
better
qualified
make
since
advocate
help
analyzing
record
direct
state
appeal
since
counsel
may
well
absent
formally
well
constructively
state
proceedings
federal
judge
looking
among
things
previously
unidentified
state
law
issues
previously
waived
one
ask
certain
guarantee
inefficient
time
consuming
judicial
effort
remains
say
word
state
argument
relief
case
barred
teague
lane
requiring
application
new
rule
law
clearly
entailed
prior
holdings
argument
seems
california
relied
wende
long
disapproval
federal
juncture
sort
novelty
resulting
failure
state
defendants
reach
federal
courts
earlier
wende
objections
obvious
answer
application
douglas
griffin
standards
meritless
appeals
subject
repeated
explanation
starting
anders
echoed
mccoy
penson
general
rules
announced
become
new
every
particular
violation
may
subsequently
occur
see
saffle
parks
discussing
application
rule
jurek
texas
penry
lynaugh
point
course
answer
objection
aedpa
anders
petitioner
seeking
go
beyond
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
ed
supp
iii
wende
procedure
assure
even
minimal
assistance
counsel
adversarial
role
constitution
demands
assurances
hold
robbins
entitled
appeal
provides
footnotes
addition
double
review
double
determination
frivolity
california
affords
third
layer
review
california
appellate
projects
described
recent
opinion
california
appeal
first
district
appellate
projects
contract
contractual
duties
include
review
records
assist
counsel
identifying
issues
brief
counsel
find
meritorious
issues
raise
decides
file
wende
brief
appellate
project
staff
attorney
reviews
record
determine
whether
wende
brief
appropriate
thus
time
wende
brief
filed
appeal
record
case
reviewed
counsel
presumably
well
qualified
handle
case
experienced
attorney
staff
appellate
project
people
hackett
cal
app
cal
rptr
filing
wende
brief
counsel
consulted
california
appellate
project
second
district
appeal
received
permission
file
brief
app
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
stat
amended
related
provisions
apply
respondent
habeas
petition
since
filed
petition
act
effective
date
april
see
lindh
murphy
subsequent
cases
ninth
circuit
reiterated
view
wende
procedure
unconstitutional
differs
anders
procedure
see
delgado
lewis
cert
pending
davis
kramer
stay
granted
pending
disposition
pet
constitution
however
require
create
appellate
review
first
place
see
ross
moffitt
citing
mckane
durston
true
ellis
see
ellis
cadc
washington
dissenting
counsel
concluded
rulings
district
clearly
erroneous
constitute
probable
error
fairly
arguable
question
counsel
proceeded
present
argument
vacated
remanded
per
curiam
fact
already
degree
see
warner
anders
fifty
appellants
equal
protection
equal
others
rev
arizona
clark
wl
ariz
course
procedure
eliminate
risk
error
walters
national
assn
radiation
survivors
although
said
indigent
must
receive
substantial
equality
compared
legal
assistance
defendant
paid
counsel
receive
mccoy
appeals
dist
also
emphasized
bsolute
equality
required
lines
drawn
often
sustain
douglas
california
distinction
gives
meaning
previous
emphasis
indigent
appellant
right
advocacy
although
indigent
whose
appeal
frivolous
right
advocate
make
case
appellate
indigent
cases
right
attorney
zealous
indigent
interests
evaluate
case
attempt
discern
nonfrivolous
arguments
see
ellis
anders
california
one
former
public
defender
explained
attorney
confronted
anders
situation
something
code
professional
responsibility
describes
unethical
choice
canon
prefers
violate
pengilly
never
cry
anders
ethical
dilemma
counsel
appointed
pursue
frivolous
criminal
appeal
crim
justice
see
also
commonwealth
moffett
mass
anders
requires
approach
counsel
hermann
frivolous
criminal
appeals
rev
justice
stewart
dissent
anders
first
make
criticism
procedure
set
anders
majority
record
present
arguable
issues
appeal
frivolous
see
id
see
also
wolfram
modern
legal
ethics
anders
directives
confusing
contradictory
see
supra
criticism
anders
unjust
particularly
critics
claimed
setting
anders
procedure
oblivious
problem
scarce
resources
regard
counsel
courts
result
crafted
rule
diverts
attention
meritorious
appeals
indigents
ensures
poor
representation
indigents
see
pritchard
auctioning
justice
legal
market
mechanisms
allocating
criminal
appellate
counsel
crim
rev
anders
created
tragedy
commons
far
guaranteeing
adequate
appellate
representation
criminal
defendants
instead
ensures
indigent
criminal
defendants
receive
mediocre
appellate
representation
whether
claims
good
bad
omitted
pritchard
supra
noting
anders
similar
effect
appellate
courts
pritchard
supra
udicial
fiat
cure
scarcity
merely
disguises
symptoms
disease
doherty
wolf
wolf
ramifications
frivolous
appeals
crim
people
suffer
indigent
prisoners
unjustly
convicted
languish
prison
lawyers
devote
time
energy
hopeless
causes
first
served
basis
omitted
say
whether
wende
procedure
better
worse
anders
procedure
regard
although
aware
arguments
worse
appellate
courts
see
people
williams
cal
app
cal
rptr
brief
retired
justice
armand
arabian
et
al
amici
curiae
clear
extent
criticism
merit
holding
today
anders
procedure
exclusive
enable
continue
experiment
solutions
problem
performance
component
need
addressed
first
easier
dispose
ineffectiveness
claim
ground
lack
sufficient
prejudice
expect
often
course
followed
strickland
washington
moreover
error
counsel
neither
easy
identify
since
necessary
evaluate
defendant
case
order
find
error
attributable
prosecution
see
strickland
supra
federal
judges
course
fully
capable
assessing
prejudice
area
including
sorts
claims
robbins
raised
see
duhamel
collins
defendant
prejudiced
appellate
counsel
failure
challenge
sufficiency
evidence
banks
reynolds
finding
parts
strickland
test
satisfied
appellate
counsel
failed
raise
claim
violation
brady
maryland
cross
rejecting
challenge
appellate
counsel
failure
raise
claim
violation
faretta
california
determining
prejudice
cert
denied
since
robbins
convicted
state
occasion
consider
whether
per
se
prejudice
approach
lieu
strickland
requirement
might
appropriate
context
challenges
federal
convictions
counsel
deficient
failing
file
merits
brief
direct
appeal
see
goeke
branch
per
curiam
distinguishing
rules
established
pursuant
supervisory
power
administer
federal
system
constitutional
rules
applicable
cronic
footnotes
danger
busy
inexperienced
lawyer
might
opt
favor
one
sentence
letter
instead
effective
brief
individual
marginal
case
real
notwithstanding
dedication
typifies
profession
however
counsel
ultimate
evaluation
case
must
supported
written
opinion
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
temptation
discharge
obligation
summary
fashion
avoided
reviewing
provided
meaningful
assistance
nickols
citation
footnotes
omitted
quoting
anders
california
wende
procedure
issue
case
requires
summary
proceedings
facts
require
counsel
raise
legal
issues
people
wende
cal
see
also
ante
procedure
plainly
serve
purpose
since
force
counsel
put
pen
paper
regarding
things
relevant
appeal
legal
issues
accordingly
contrary
assertion
ante
summary
improve
upon
procedure
rejected
anders
bare
conclusion
attorney
appeal
without
merit
footnotes
griffin
line
cases
roots
due
process
equal
protection
see
noted
ost
decisions
area
rested
equal
protection
framework
bearden
georgia
see
also
ross
moffitt
noting
right
appellate
counsel
profitably
considered
equal
protection
analysis
anders
addressed
problem
confronted
assigned
counsel
though
theory
equally
acute
counsel
retained
unlikely
show
practice
however
paying
clients
generally
fire
lawyer
expressing
unsatisfying
conclusions
often
find
replacement
keener
eye
arguable
issues
duller
nose
frivolous
ones
practical
matter
may
find
difficult
costly
prevent
monied
appellants
wasting
resources
judicial
system
bringing
frivolous
appeals
mean
however
obligated
subsidize
efforts
indigents
assurance
become
known
around
los
angeles
county
jail
dumptruck
reply
brief
petitioner
course
appellate
review
constitutionally
required
may
well
able
impose
nonadversarial
review
appellants
may
however
reserve
adversary
system
able
afford
counsel
since
state
petitioner
claims
lawyer
unrevealing
conclusory
certification
approved
superior
neither
analysis
need
evaluate
assertions
amicus
delgado
scheme
assigned
representation
uniform
throughout
state
see
brief
jesus
garcia
delgado
amicus
curiae
although
habeas
proceeding
began
february
therefore
governed
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
see
lindh
murphy
result
different
case
see
infra
since
wende
case
like
denial
counsel
make
sense
give
state
option
demonstrate
prejudice
chapman
calfornia
brecht
abrahamson
require
defendant
show
strickland
washington
presumption
prejudice
however
promise
relief
every
california
defendant
whose
appeal
dismissed
frivolous
statute
limitations
run
see
supp
iii
one
submission
us
claims
wende
scheme
supplanted
anders
california
throughout
california
see
brief
jesus
garcia
delgado
amicus
curiae
briefs
measure
according
standards
adumbrated
anders
course
receive
standard
strickland
analysis