zivotofsky
parents
guardians
zivotofsky
et
ux
clinton
secretary
state
argued
november
decided
march
petitioner
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
born
jerusalem
mother
requested
zivotofsky
place
birth
listed
israel
consular
report
birth
abroad
passport
pursuant
foreign
relations
authorization
act
fiscal
year
provision
purposes
registration
birth
certification
nationality
issuance
passport
citizen
born
city
jerusalem
secretary
shall
upon
request
citizen
citizen
legal
guardian
record
place
birth
israel
officials
refused
request
citing
state
department
policy
prohibits
recording
israel
place
birth
born
jerusalem
zivotofsky
parents
filed
suit
behalf
secretary
state
district
dismissed
case
holding
presented
nonjusticiable
political
question
regarding
jerusalem
political
status
circuit
affirmed
reasoning
constitution
gives
executive
exclusive
power
recognize
foreign
sovereigns
exercise
power
reviewed
courts
held
political
question
doctrine
bar
judicial
review
zivotofsky
claim
pp
said
controversy
involves
political
question
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
commitment
issue
coordinate
political
department
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
resolving
nixon
lower
courts
ruled
case
presents
political
question
misunderstood
issue
assuming
resolution
zivotofsky
claim
require
judiciary
define
policy
regarding
status
jerusalem
fact
case
asks
courts
determine
whether
zivotofsky
vindicate
statutory
right
choose
israel
recorded
place
birth
passport
making
determinations
familiar
judicial
exercise
moreover
parties
dispute
interpretation
real
question
courts
whether
statute
constitutional
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
commitment
question
another
branch
least
since
marbury
madison
cranch
recognized
emphatically
province
duty
judiciary
determine
constitutionality
statute
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
resolving
question
parties
offer
detailed
legal
arguments
concerning
whether
textual
structural
historical
evidence
supports
determination
constitutional
pp
lower
courts
erroneously
concluded
case
presents
political
question
reach
merits
zivotofsky
claim
final
review
first
view
adarand
constructors
mineta
ordinarily
es
decide
first
instance
issues
decided
national
collegiate
athletic
assn
smith
merits
case
therefore
left
lower
courts
consider
first
instance
vacated
remanded
roberts
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
kagan
joined
sotomayor
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
breyer
joined
part
alito
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
parents
guardians
ari
naomi
siegman
zivotofsky
petitioner
hillary
rodham
clinton
secretary
state
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
march
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
congress
enacted
statute
providing
americans
born
jerusalem
may
elect
israel
listed
place
birth
passports
state
department
declined
follow
law
citing
longstanding
policy
taking
position
political
status
jerusalem
sued
american
invoked
statute
secretary
state
argued
courts
lacked
authority
decide
case
presented
political
question
appeals
held
disagree
courts
fully
capable
determining
whether
statute
may
given
effect
instead
must
struck
light
authority
conferred
executive
constitution
congress
enacted
foreign
relations
authorization
act
fiscal
year
stat
section
act
entitled
policy
respect
jerusalem
capital
israel
first
two
subsections
express
congress
commitment
relocating
embassy
israel
jerusalem
third
bars
funding
publication
official
government
documents
list
jerusalem
capital
israel
fourth
final
provision
one
stake
case
entitled
record
place
birth
israel
passport
purposes
provides
purposes
registration
birth
certification
nationality
issuance
passport
citizen
born
city
jerusalem
secretary
shall
upon
request
citizen
citizen
legal
guardian
record
place
birth
israel
ibid
state
department
foreign
affairs
manual
birthplace
applicant
located
territory
disputed
another
country
city
area
birth
may
written
passport
foreign
affairs
manual
app
manual
specifically
directs
passport
officials
enter
jerusalem
write
israel
jordan
recording
birthplace
person
born
jerusalem
passport
exh
app
see
also
app
section
sought
override
instruction
allowing
citizens
born
jerusalem
israel
recorded
passports
wish
signing
foreign
relations
authorization
act
law
president
george
bush
stated
belief
impermissibly
interferes
president
constitutional
authority
conduct
nation
foreign
affairs
supervise
unitary
executive
branch
statement
signing
foreign
relations
authorization
act
fiscal
year
public
papers
presidents
george
bush
vol
added
section
construed
mandatory
interfere
president
constitutional
authority
formulate
position
speak
nation
international
affairs
determine
terms
recognition
given
foreign
ibid
concluded
emphasizing
policy
regarding
jerusalem
changed
ibid
president
made
specific
reference
passport
mandate
petitioner
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
born
jerusalem
october
shortly
enacted
zivotofsky
parents
american
citizens
accordingly
well
virtue
congressional
enactment
see
rogers
bellei
children
american
citizens
acquire
citizenship
birth
congressional
generosity
zivotofsky
mother
filed
application
consular
report
birth
abroad
passport
requested
place
birth
listed
jerusalem
israel
documents
officials
informed
zivotofsky
mother
state
department
policy
prohibits
recording
israel
zivotofsky
place
birth
pursuant
policy
zivotofsky
issued
passport
consular
report
birth
abroad
listing
jerusalem
app
zivotofsky
parents
filed
complaint
behalf
secretary
state
zivotofsky
sought
declaratory
judgment
permanent
injunction
ordering
secretary
identify
place
birth
jerusalem
israel
official
documents
district
granted
secretary
motion
dismiss
complaint
grounds
zivotofsky
lacked
standing
complaint
presented
nonjusticiable
political
question
appeals
circuit
reversed
concluding
zivotofsky
standing
observed
zivotofsky
originally
asked
jerusalem
israel
recorded
passport
oth
sides
agree
question
whether
entitles
listed
place
birth
circuit
determined
additional
factual
development
might
helpful
deciding
whether
question
justiciable
parties
disagreed
foreign
policy
implications
listing
israel
alone
birthplace
passport
therefore
remanded
case
district
district
found
case
justiciable
explained
esolving
zivotofsky
claim
merits
necessarily
require
decide
political
status
jerusalem
supp
concluding
claim
therefore
presented
political
question
district
dismissed
case
lack
subject
matter
jurisdiction
circuit
affirmed
reasoned
constitution
gives
executive
exclusive
power
recognize
foreign
sovereigns
exercise
power
reviewed
courts
therefore
deciding
whether
secretary
state
must
mark
passport
zivotofsky
requests
necessarily
draw
area
decisionmaking
constitution
leaves
executive
alone
circuit
held
political
question
doctrine
prohibits
intrusion
courts
rejected
suggestion
congress
decision
take
position
status
jerusalem
change
analysis
judge
edwards
concurred
judgment
wrote
separately
express
view
political
question
doctrine
application
case
explained
issue
whether
impermissibly
intrude
president
exclusive
power
recognize
foreign
sovereigns
question
observed
involves
commonplace
issues
statutory
constitutional
interpretation
plainly
within
constitutional
authority
judiciary
decide
reaching
merits
judge
edwards
determined
designating
israel
place
birth
passport
policy
furtherance
recognition
power
view
constitution
gives
power
exclusively
president
judge
edwards
found
unconstitutional
reason
concluded
zivotofsky
viable
cause
action
concurred
affirming
dismissal
complaint
zivotofsky
petitioned
certiorari
granted
review
ii
lower
courts
concluded
zivotofsky
claim
presents
political
question
therefore
adjudicated
disagree
general
judiciary
responsibility
decide
cases
properly
even
gladly
avoid
cohens
virginia
wheat
precedents
identified
narrow
exception
rule
known
political
question
doctrine
see
japan
whaling
assn
american
cetacean
explained
controversy
involves
political
question
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
commitment
issue
coordinate
political
department
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
resolving
nixon
quoting
baker
carr
case
held
lacks
authority
decide
dispute
lower
courts
ruled
case
involves
political
question
deciding
zivotofsky
claim
force
judicial
branch
interfere
president
exercise
constitutional
power
committed
alone
district
understood
zivotofsky
ask
courts
decide
political
status
jerusalem
supp
misunderstands
issue
presented
zivotofsky
ask
courts
determine
whether
jerusalem
capital
israel
instead
seeks
determine
whether
may
vindicate
statutory
right
choose
israel
recorded
passport
place
birth
part
circuit
treated
two
questions
one
concluded
nly
executive
congress
courts
power
define
policy
regarding
israel
sovereignty
jerusalem
also
decide
best
implement
policy
department
passport
rule
adopted
implement
president
exclusive
unreviewable
constitutional
power
keep
debate
status
jerusalem
validity
rule
nonjusticiable
political
question
constitution
leaves
executive
alone
indeed
circuit
opinion
even
mention
fifth
six
paragraphs
analysis
dismiss
irrelevant
congress
took
position
status
jerusalem
gave
zivotofsky
statutory
cause
action
moment
whether
judiciary
authority
resolve
dispute
existence
statutory
right
however
certainly
relevant
judiciary
power
decide
zivotofsky
claim
federal
courts
asked
supplant
foreign
policy
decision
political
branches
courts
unmoored
determination
policy
toward
jerusalem
instead
zivotofsky
requests
courts
enforce
specific
statutory
right
resolve
claim
judiciary
must
decide
zivotofsky
interpretation
statute
correct
whether
statute
constitutional
familiar
judicial
exercise
moreover
parties
dispute
interpretation
real
question
courts
whether
statute
constitutional
least
since
marbury
madison
cranch
recognized
act
congress
alleged
conflict
constitution
emphatically
province
duty
judicial
department
say
law
duty
sometimes
involve
esolution
litigation
challenging
constitutional
authority
one
three
branches
courts
avoid
responsibility
merely
issues
political
implications
ins
chadha
case
determining
constitutionality
involves
deciding
whether
statute
impermissibly
intrudes
upon
presidential
powers
constitution
law
must
invalidated
zivotofsky
case
dismissed
failure
state
claim
hand
statute
trench
president
powers
secretary
must
ordered
issue
zivotofsky
passport
complies
either
way
political
question
doctrine
implicated
policy
underlying
political
question
doctrine
suggests
congress
executive
decide
constitutionality
statute
decision
courts
secretary
contends
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
president
sole
power
recognize
foreign
sovereigns
corollary
determine
whether
american
born
jerusalem
may
choose
israel
listed
place
birth
passport
nixon
quoting
baker
see
brief
respondent
perhaps
course
exclusive
commitment
executive
power
determine
constitutionality
statute
judicial
branch
appropriately
exercises
authority
including
case
question
whether
congress
executive
aggrandizing
power
expense
another
branch
freytag
commissioner
see
myers
finding
statute
unconstitutional
encroached
upon
president
removal
power
bowsher
synar
finding
statute
unconstitutional
intruded
executive
function
morrison
olson
upholding
statute
constitutionality
charge
impermissibly
interfere
president
exercise
constitutionally
appointed
functions
precedents
also
found
political
question
doctrine
implicated
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
question
nixon
supra
quoting
baker
supra
framing
issue
lower
courts
terms
whether
judiciary
may
decide
political
status
jerusalem
certainly
raises
concerns
dissipate
however
issue
recognized
focused
one
constitutionality
indeed
sides
offer
detailed
legal
arguments
regarding
whether
constitutional
light
powers
committed
executive
whether
congress
powers
respect
passports
must
weighed
analyzing
question
example
secretary
reprises
merits
argument
political
question
issue
claiming
constitution
gives
executive
exclusive
power
formulate
recognition
policy
roots
claim
constitution
declaration
president
shall
receive
ambassadors
public
ministers
art
ii
according
secretary
executive
branch
practice
congressional
acquiescence
decisions
confirm
receive
ambassadors
clause
confers
upon
executive
exclusive
power
recognition
brief
respondent
secretary
observes
president
washington
cabinet
unanimously
decided
president
receive
ambassador
new
government
france
without
first
consulting
congress
citing
letter
george
washington
cabinet
apr
reprinted
papers
thomas
jefferson
catanzariti
ed
thomas
jefferson
notes
washington
questions
neutrality
alliance
france
may
reprinted
notes
early
attempts
legislature
affect
recognition
policy
regularly
rejected
congress
inappropriate
incursions
executive
branch
constitutional
authority
brief
respondent
cites
precedents
stating
olitical
recognition
exclusively
function
executive
banco
nacional
de
cuba
sabbatino
see
brief
respondent
citing
pink
secretary
contends
constitutes
impermissible
exercise
recognition
power
decision
describe
place
birth
operates
official
statement
whether
recognizes
state
sovereignty
territorial
area
brief
respondent
secretary
list
place
birth
country
whose
sovereignty
relevant
territory
recognize
therefore
claims
listing
place
birth
constitute
official
decision
begin
treat
jerusalem
city
located
within
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
part
zivotofsky
argues
far
exercise
recognition
power
instead
legitimate
permissible
exercise
congress
authority
legislate
form
content
passport
brief
petitioner
points
professor
louis
henkin
observation
competition
power
foreign
relations
congress
impressive
array
powers
expressly
enumerated
constitution
quoting
henkin
foreign
affairs
constitution
ed
zivotofsky
suggests
congress
authority
enact
derives
specifically
powers
naturalization
art
cl
foreign
commerce
cl
according
zivotofsky
congress
used
powers
pass
laws
regulating
content
issuance
passports
since
see
brief
petitioner
citing
act
stat
zivotofsky
contends
fits
squarely
within
tradition
notes
state
department
designated
representative
stated
deposition
litigation
place
birth
entry
included
element
identification
app
deposition
catherine
barry
deputy
assistant
secretary
state
overseas
citizens
services
see
brief
petitioner
moreover
zivotofsky
argues
place
birth
entry
taken
means
recognizing
foreign
sovereigns
state
department
authorizes
recording
unrecognized
territories
gaza
strip
west
bank
places
birth
brief
petitioner
citing
foreign
affairs
manual
app
zivotofsky
claims
even
implicate
recognition
power
power
constitution
commits
exclusively
executive
zivotofsky
argues
secretary
overreading
authority
granted
president
receive
ambassadors
clause
observes
federalist
papers
alexander
hamilton
described
power
conferred
clause
matter
dignity
authority
called
circumstance
without
consequence
administration
government
federalist
cooke
ed
see
brief
petitioner
zivotofsky
also
points
clauses
constitution
congress
power
declare
war
suggest
congressional
role
recognition
reply
brief
petitioner
citing
art
cl
cites
example
message
president
jackson
congress
acknowledging
unclear
holds
authority
recognize
power
expressly
delegated
constitution
one
necessarily
involved
great
powers
given
congress
message
president
upon
subject
political
military
civil
condition
texas
doc
see
reply
brief
petitioner
zivotofsky
argues
language
precedents
suggesting
recognition
power
belongs
exclusively
president
inapplicable
claim
language
appeared
cases
asked
alter
recognition
policy
developed
executive
absence
congressional
opposition
see
brief
petitioner
reply
brief
petitioner
finally
zivotofsky
contends
even
receive
ambassadors
clause
confers
exclusive
recognition
power
president
simply
allowing
choice
place
birth
entry
passport
significantly
intrude
power
recitation
arguments
sound
familiar
principles
constitutional
interpretation
enough
establish
case
turn
standards
defy
judicial
application
baker
resolution
zivotofksy
claim
demands
careful
examination
textual
structural
historical
evidence
put
forward
parties
regarding
nature
statute
passport
recognition
powers
courts
political
question
doctrine
poses
bar
judicial
review
case
iii
say
zivotofsky
claim
presents
issues
judiciary
competent
resolve
say
reaching
decision
case
simple
district
circuit
believed
review
barred
political
question
doctrine
without
benefit
thorough
lower
opinions
guide
analysis
merits
final
review
first
view
adarand
constructors
mineta
per
curiam
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
ordinarily
decide
first
instance
issues
decided
national
collegiate
athletic
assn
smith
particular
reverse
threshold
question
typically
remand
resolution
claims
lower
courts
error
prevented
addressing
see
bond
slip
reversing
appeals
determination
standing
remanding
merits
petitioner
challenge
statute
validity
considered
first
instance
appeals
see
reason
depart
approach
case
determined
case
justiciable
leave
lower
courts
consider
merits
first
instance
judgment
appeals
circuit
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
opinion
sotomayor
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
parents
guardians
ari
naomi
siegman
zivotofsky
petitioner
hillary
rodham
clinton
secretary
state
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
march
justice
sotomayor
justice
breyer
joins
part
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
case
illustrates
proper
application
baker
six
factors
generated
substantial
confusion
lower
courts
concur
conclusion
case
present
political
question
write
separately
however
understand
inquiry
required
political
question
doctrine
demanding
suggested
political
question
doctrine
speaks
amalgam
circumstances
courts
properly
examine
whether
particular
suit
justiciable
whether
dispute
appropriate
resolution
courts
doctrine
essentially
function
separation
powers
baker
carr
recognizes
limits
article
iii
imposes
upon
courts
accords
appropriate
respect
branches
exercise
constitutional
powers
baker
identified
six
circumstances
issue
might
present
political
question
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
commitment
issue
coordinate
political
department
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
resolving
impossibility
deciding
without
initial
policy
determination
kind
clearly
nonjudicial
discretion
impossibility
undertaking
independent
resolution
without
expressing
lack
respect
due
coordinate
branches
government
unusual
need
unquestioning
adherence
political
decision
already
made
potentiality
embarrassment
multifarious
pronouncements
various
departments
one
question
baker
established
nless
one
formulations
inextricable
case
bar
dismissal
nonjusticiability
ibid
baker
left
unanswered
presence
one
factors
warrants
dismissal
well
interrelationship
six
factors
relative
importance
determining
whether
case
suitable
adjudication
view
baker
factors
reflect
three
distinct
justifications
withholding
judgment
merits
dispute
case
require
decide
issue
whose
resolution
textually
committed
coordinate
political
department
envisioned
baker
first
factor
abstention
warranted
lacks
authority
resolve
issue
see
nixon
holding
nonjusticiable
senate
impeachment
procedures
light
article
commitment
senate
power
try
see
also
marbury
madison
cranch
constitution
president
invested
certain
important
political
powers
exercise
use
discretion
accountable
country
political
character
conscience
cases
constitution
requires
another
branch
resolve
question
presented
second
third
baker
factors
reflect
circumstances
dispute
calls
decisionmaking
beyond
courts
judicial
power
created
article
iii
constitution
whatever
judges
choose
rather
power
act
manner
traditional
english
american
courts
vieth
jubelirer
plurality
opinion
traditional
role
involves
application
manageable
cognizable
standard
within
competence
judiciary
ascertain
employ
facts
concrete
case
given
standard
adjudicate
dispute
resolve
dispute
absence
policy
determination
charged
political
branch
resolution
suit
beyond
judicial
role
envisioned
article
iii
see
gilligan
morgan
difficult
conceive
area
governmental
activity
courts
less
competence
complex
subtle
professional
decisions
composition
training
equipping
control
military
force
vieth
one
obvious
limitations
imposed
article
iii
judicial
action
must
governed
standard
say
course
courts
incapable
interpreting
applying
somewhat
ambiguous
standards
using
familiar
tools
statutory
constitutional
interpretation
issue
leaves
courts
truly
rudderless
doubt
validity
decision
abstain
judgment
ibid
final
three
baker
factors
address
circumstances
prudence
may
counsel
resolution
issue
presented
courts
particularly
cautious
forgoing
adjudication
dispute
basis
judicial
intervention
risks
embarrassment
multifarious
pronouncements
various
departments
one
question
express
lack
respect
due
coordinate
branches
government
exists
unusual
need
unquestioning
adherence
political
decision
already
made
repeatedly
rejected
view
thresholds
met
whenever
called
upon
resolve
constitutionality
propriety
act
another
branch
government
see
powell
mccormack
may
refuse
adjudicate
dispute
merely
decision
may
significant
political
overtones
affect
conduct
nation
foreign
relations
japan
whaling
assn
american
cetacean
may
courts
decline
resolve
controversy
within
traditional
competence
proper
jurisdiction
simply
question
difficult
consequences
weighty
potential
real
conflict
policy
preferences
political
branches
exercise
authority
among
gravest
delicate
dut
ies
called
perform
blodgett
holden
holmes
concurring
role
assigned
courts
constitution
questions
may
occur
gladly
avoid
avoid
exercise
best
judgment
conscientiously
perform
duty
cohens
virginia
wheat
rare
occasions
implicating
baker
final
factors
however
may
present
unfit
judicial
disposition
quoting
argument
daniel
webster
luther
borden
respect
due
coequal
independent
department
instance
courts
properly
resist
calls
question
good
faith
another
branch
attests
authenticity
internal
acts
see
field
clark
deeming
forbidden
respect
due
coordinate
branch
government
udicial
action
requiring
belief
deliberate
conspiracy
senate
house
representatives
defeat
expression
popular
see
also
scalia
concurring
judgment
mutual
regard
coordinate
branches
interest
certainty
demand
official
representations
regarding
matters
internal
process
accepted
face
value
likewise
long
acknowledged
courts
particularly
ill
suited
intervening
exigent
disputes
necessitating
unusual
need
attributing
finality
action
political
departments
coleman
miller
creating
acute
risk
embarrassment
government
abroad
grave
disturbance
home
baker
see
luther
president
acted
called
militia
circuit
authorized
inquire
whether
decision
right
judicial
power
extends
far
guarantee
contained
constitution
guarantee
anarchy
order
finally
may
appropriate
courts
stay
hand
cases
implicating
delicate
questions
concerning
distribution
political
authority
coordinate
branches
dispute
ripe
intractable
incapable
resolution
political
process
see
goldwater
carter
powell
concurring
judgment
abstention
merely
reflects
judicial
intervention
cases
legitimate
last
resort
chicago
grand
trunk
wellman
disfavored
relative
prospect
accommodation
political
branches
unusual
cases
arise
abstention
accommodates
considerations
inherent
separation
powers
limitations
envisioned
article
iii
conferred
authority
federal
courts
backdrop
recognized
propriety
abstention
exceptional
cases
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
see
generally
shapiro
jurisdiction
discretion
rev
hereinafter
shapiro
political
questions
envisioned
baker
final
categories
find
common
ground
therefore
many
longstanding
doctrines
considerations
justiciability
comity
lead
courts
abstain
deciding
questions
whose
initial
resolution
better
suited
another
time
see
national
park
hospitality
assn
department
interior
ripeness
parole
geraghty
mootness
another
forum
see
gulf
oil
gilbert
forum
non
conveniens
railroad
tex
pullman
louisiana
power
light
city
thibodaux
burford
sun
oil
abstention
favor
state
forum
western
cific
primary
jurisdiction
doctrine
see
also
daimlerchrysler
cuno
doctrines
mootness
ripeness
political
question
originate
article
iii
language
shapiro
describing
practices
judicial
abstention
sounding
justiciability
comity
forum
non
conveniens
separation
powers
sure
rare
case
baker
final
factors
alone
render
case
long
historical
tradition
recognizes
exceptional
cases
arise
due
regard
separation
powers
judicial
role
envisioned
article
iii
confirms
abstention
may
appropriate
response
ii
held
case
presented
political
question
thought
petitioner
suit
asked
decide
issue
textually
committed
coordinate
branch
namely
review
policy
state
department
implementing
president
decision
keep
debate
status
jersualem
cadc
largely
reasons
set
agree
appeals
misapprehended
nature
task
two
respects
however
understanding
political
question
doctrine
might
require
engage
analysis
beyond
relied
upon
first
appropriately
recognizes
petitioner
claim
statutory
right
relevant
justiciability
inquiry
required
case
ante
order
evaluate
whether
case
presents
political
question
must
first
identify
precision
issue
asked
decide
petitioner
suit
claims
federal
statute
provides
right
israel
listed
place
birth
passport
related
documents
app
decide
question
must
determine
whether
statute
constitutional
therefore
mandates
secretary
state
issue
petitioner
desired
passport
unconstitutional
case
suit
end
resolution
issue
one
textually
committed
another
branch
contrary
committed
one
fashion
question
require
review
wisdom
president
policy
toward
jerusalem
decision
committed
discretion
coordinate
department
reason
agree
decision
reversed
say
however
statute
give
rise
political
question
impossible
imagine
case
involving
application
even
constitutionality
enactment
present
nonjusticiable
issue
indeed
refused
determine
whether
ohio
state
constitutional
provision
offended
republican
guarantee
clause
art
iv
holding
question
whether
guarantee
constitution
disregarded
presents
justiciable
controversy
ohio
ex
rel
davis
hildebrant
similar
result
follow
congress
passed
statute
instance
purporting
award
financial
relief
improperly
tried
impeachment
offenses
adjudicate
claims
statute
require
resolve
issue
found
nonjusticiable
nixon
examples
atypical
suffice
show
foreclosure
altogether
political
question
analysis
statutory
cases
unwarranted
second
suggests
case
implicate
political
question
doctrine
concern
issues
exhibiting
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
ante
parties
arguments
rely
textual
structural
historical
evidence
kind
courts
routinely
consider
equally
true
nixon
case
found
use
word
first
sentence
impeachment
trial
clause
lacks
sufficient
precision
afford
judicially
manageable
standard
review
senate
actions
reached
conclusion
even
though
parties
briefs
focused
upon
text
impeachment
trial
clause
constitution
drafting
history
contemporaneous
commentary
unbroken
practice
senate
years
contemporary
dictionary
meanings
hamilton
federalist
essays
practice
house
lords
prior
ratification
evidence
less
unfamiliar
courts
parties
rely
view
whether
evidence
upon
litigants
rely
common
judicial
consideration
determines
whether
case
lacks
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
rather
whether
evidence
fact
provides
basis
adjudicate
meaningfully
issue
presented
answer
almost
always
yes
parties
textual
structural
historical
evidence
inapposite
wholly
unilluminating
rendering
judicial
decision
guesswork
case
relying
ordinary
kinds
arguments
offered
courts
might
well
still
present
justiciability
concerns
case
however
appeals
majority
found
political
question
solely
basis
case
required
resolution
issue
textually
committed
executive
branch
textual
commitment
respectfully
concur
decision
reverse
appeals
alito
concurring
judgment
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
parents
guardians
ari
naomi
siegman
zivotofsky
petitioner
hillary
rodham
clinton
secretary
state
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
march
justice
alito
concurring
judgment
case
presents
narrow
question
namely
whether
statutory
provision
issue
infringes
power
president
regulate
contents
passport
case
require
judiciary
decide
whether
power
recognize
foreign
governments
extent
territory
conferred
exclusively
president
shared
congress
petitioner
claim
statutory
provision
question
represents
attempt
congress
dictate
policy
regarding
status
jerusalem
instead
petitioner
contends
effect
congress
power
mandate
american
citizen
born
abroad
given
option
including
passport
consular
report
birth
abroad
crba
amounts
statement
personal
belief
status
jerusalem
powers
conferred
congress
constitution
certainly
give
congress
measure
authority
prescribe
contents
passports
crbas
constitution
gives
congress
power
regulate
foreign
commerce
art
cl
power
includes
power
regulate
entry
persons
country
see
henderson
mayor
new
york
constitution
also
gives
congress
power
make
uniform
rule
naturalization
art
cl
pursuant
power
congress
enacted
laws
concerning
citizenship
children
born
abroad
parents
citizens
country
see
wong
kim
ark
powers
allow
congress
mandate
identifying
information
included
passports
crbas
president
also
measure
authority
concerning
contents
passports
crbas
president
broad
authority
field
foreign
affairs
see
american
ins
assn
garamendi
historically
authority
included
power
issue
passports
even
absence
formal
congressional
conferral
authority
see
haig
agee
explaining
rior
statute
subject
common
perception
issuance
passport
committed
sole
discretion
executive
executive
exercise
power
interests
national
security
foreign
policy
described
passport
letter
introduction
issuing
sovereign
vouches
bearer
requests
sovereigns
aid
bearer
apparent
first
page
petitioner
passport
reads
follows
secretary
state
america
hereby
requests
may
concern
permit
citizen
national
named
herein
pass
without
delay
hindrance
case
need
give
lawful
aid
protection
app
similarly
crba
certification
made
consular
official
bearer
acquired
citizenship
birth
see
case
law
determining
constitutionality
act
congress
may
present
political
question
think
narrow
question
presented
falls
within
category
delineating
precise
dividing
line
powers
congress
president
respect
contents
passport
easy
matter
agree
constitute
political
question
judiciary
unable
decide
breyer
dissenting
menachem
binyamin
zivotofsky
parents
guardians
ari
naomi
siegman
zivotofsky
petitioner
hillary
rodham
clinton
secretary
state
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
march
justice
breyer
dissenting
join
part
justice
sotomayor
opinion
points
baker
carr
set
forth
several
categories
legal
questions
previously
held
political
questions
inappropriate
judicial
determination
categories
include
instances
constitution
clearly
commits
decisionmaking
power
another
branch
government
issues
lacking
judicially
manageable
standards
resolution
also
include
issues
courts
decide
without
making
initial
policy
determination
kind
clearly
nonjudicial
discretion
issues
independently
decide
without
expressing
lack
respect
due
coordinate
branches
government
cases
unusual
need
unquestioning
adherence
political
decision
already
made
cases
potential
embarrassment
multifarious
pronouncements
various
departments
one
question
ibid
justice
sotomayor
also
points
categories
view
particularly
last
four
embody
circumstances
prudence
may
counsel
resolution
issue
presented
ante
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
see
nixon
souter
concurring
judgment
doctrine
deriv
es
large
part
prudential
concerns
respect
owe
political
departments
goldwater
carter
powell
concurring
judgment
doctrine
rests
part
prudential
concerns
calling
mutual
respect
among
three
branches
government
see
also
jaffe
standing
secure
judicial
review
public
actions
harv
rev
prudence
counsels
hesitation
legal
issue
felt
closely
related
complex
decisions
within
jurisdiction
resolution
either
poor
jeopardize
sound
decisions
larger
complex
justice
sotomayor
adds
circumstances
prudential
considerations
lead
decide
case
otherwise
properly
rare
ante
agree
view
nonetheless
us
case
four
sets
prudential
considerations
taken
together
lead
conclusion
first
issue
us
arises
field
foreign
affairs
indeed
statutory
provision
us
subsection
section
concerns
relation
jerusalem
state
israel
see
foreign
relations
authorization
act
fiscal
year
stat
policy
respect
jerusalem
capital
israel
constitution
primarily
delegates
foreign
affairs
powers
political
departments
government
executive
legislative
judiciary
chicago
southern
air
lines
waterman
see
also
marbury
madison
cranch
noting
discretionary
foreign
affairs
functions
secretary
state
beyond
power
judiciary
review
fact
surprising
decisionmaking
area
typically
highly
political
delicate
complex
chicago
southern
air
lines
often
rests
upon
information
readily
available
executive
branch
intelligence
committees
congress
readily
available
courts
ibid
frequently
highly
dependent
upon
justice
jackson
called
prophecy
ibid
creation
wise
foreign
policy
typically
lies
well
beyond
experience
professional
capacity
judge
ibid
time
foreign
affairs
issue
practical
need
speak
one
voice
ac
one
particularly
important
see
pink
frankfurter
concurring
see
also
fallon
manning
meltzer
shapiro
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
ed
result
judicial
hesitancy
make
decisions
significant
foreign
policy
implications
reflected
fact
many
cases
invoked
doctrine
arisen
area
cases
validity
treaty
depended
upon
partner
state
constitutional
authority
doe
braden
upon
continuing
existence
terlinden
ames
cases
concerning
existence
foreign
governments
belligerents
insurgents
oetjen
central
leather
klintock
wheat
mer
wheat
cases
concerning
territorial
boundaries
foreign
williams
suffolk
ins
pet
foster
neilson
pet
see
baker
supra
citing
cases
principal
cases
see
also
fallon
supra
second
courts
must
answer
constitutional
question
us
may
well
evaluate
foreign
policy
implications
foreign
policy
decisions
constitutional
question
focuses
upon
statutory
provision
says
secretary
state
upon
request
citizen
born
jerusalem
upon
request
citizen
legal
guardian
shall
record
citizen
passport
consular
birth
report
place
birth
israel
stat
question
whether
statute
unconstitutionally
seeks
limit
president
inherent
constitutional
authority
make
certain
kinds
foreign
policy
decisions
see
american
ins
assn
garamendi
citing
cases
clinton
city
new
york
recognized
foreign
affairs
arena
president
degree
discretion
freedom
statutory
restriction
admissible
domestic
affairs
alone
quoting
export
cf
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
jackson
concurring
secretary
state
argues
president
constitutional
authority
determine
foreign
policy
includes
power
recognize
foreign
governments
long
recognized
latter
power
belongs
president
exclusively
power
includes
power
determine
claims
disputed
territory
well
policy
governing
recognition
decisions
statute
unconstitutionally
limits
president
exclusive
authority
exercise
powers
see
art
ii
cl
art
ii
kennett
chambers
recognition
williams
supra
disputed
territory
pink
supra
recognition
policy
see
also
haig
agee
executive
passport
authority
zivotofsky
supported
several
members
congress
points
constitution
also
grants
congress
powers
related
foreign
affairs
powers
declare
war
regulate
foreign
commerce
regulate
naturalization
see
art
cls
see
also
american
ins
supra
add
congress
may
share
recognition
power
attendant
power
determining
claims
disputed
territory
palmer
supra
recognition
jones
disputed
territory
add
congress
may
enact
laws
concerning
travel
country
concerning
citizenship
children
born
abroad
citizens
see
henderson
mayor
new
york
travel
fong
yue
ting
immigration
wong
kim
ark
citizenship
argue
powers
include
power
specify
content
passport
consular
birth
report
specification
takes
form
statutory
law
say
constitution
requires
president
secretary
state
execute
statute
see
art
ii
statutory
provision
undisputedly
concerned
purely
administrative
matters
enforcement
undisputedly
involve
major
foreign
policy
matters
judicial
efforts
answer
constitutional
question
might
involve
judges
trying
answer
questions
foreign
policy
middle
east
administrative
matters
implications
extend
far
beyond
purely
administrative
political
reactions
region
prove
uncertain
context
may
well
turn
resolution
constitutional
argument
require
decide
far
statute
practice
reaches
beyond
purely
administrative
determining
whether
also
extent
enforcement
interfere
president
ability
make
significant
foreign
policy
decisions
certainly
parties
argue
zivotofsky
example
argues
replacing
jerusalem
passport
israel
serious
foreign
policy
significance
see
brief
petitioner
reply
brief
petitioner
support
points
state
department
official
statement
birthplace
designation
serves
primarily
element
identification
omitting
mention
recognition
fact
state
department
recorded
births
unrecognized
territories
region
gaza
strip
west
bank
apparently
without
adverse
effect
fact
sometimes
jerusalem
government
calls
clerical
errors
carry
name
israel
certain
official
documents
apparently
without
seriously
adverse
effect
see
brief
petitioner
app
moreover
zivotofsky
says
unfair
allow
americans
born
cities
recognizes
israeli
sovereignty
tel
aviv
haifa
right
record
mentions
israel
denying
privilege
americans
born
jerusalem
see
brief
petitioner
app
time
secretary
argues
listing
israel
passports
consular
birth
reports
americans
born
jerusalem
significantly
adverse
foreign
policy
effects
see
brief
respondent
says
represent
official
decision
begin
treat
jerusalem
city
located
within
israel
interpreted
official
act
recognizing
jerusalem
israeli
sovereignty
app
national
security
interests
consequently
significantly
harmed
action
says
signal
symbolically
concretely
jerusalem
city
located
within
sovereign
territory
israel
critically
compromise
ability
work
israelis
palestinians
others
region
peace
process
brief
respondent
app
adds
enactment
statutory
provision
produced
headlines
middle
east
stating
recognizes
jerusalem
israel
capital
brief
respondent
see
also
app
judge
ability
evaluate
opposing
claims
kind
minimal
time
judicial
effort
risks
inadvertently
jeopardizing
sound
foreign
policy
decisionmaking
branches
government
example
determine
whether
extent
continuation
adjudication
orders
foreign
policy
effect
third
countervailing
interests
obtaining
judicial
resolution
constitutional
determination
particularly
strong
ones
zivotofsky
assert
kind
interest
interest
property
bodily
integrity
courts
traditionally
sought
protect
see
ingraham
wright
enduring
commitment
legal
protection
bodily
integrity
importantly
assert
interest
vindicating
basic
right
kind
constitution
grants
individuals
courts
traditionally
protected
invasion
branches
government
emphasize
fact
need
judicial
action
cases
trump
foreign
policy
concerns
mentioned
professor
jaffe
pointed
many
years
ago
courts
refuse
entertain
habeas
corpus
test
constitutionality
imprisonment
alleged
chinese
agent
even
clear
imprisonment
closely
bound
relations
chinese
government
harv
see
also
franck
political
judicial
answers
cf
boumediene
bush
interest
zivotofsky
asserts
however
akin
ideological
interest
see
brief
petitioner
citizen
born
jerusalem
unlike
citizen
born
tel
aviv
haifa
option
specify
suppress
name
country
accords
ideology
see
also
state
department
policy
bars
citizens
born
jerusalem
identifying
birthplace
manner
conforms
convictions
insofar
individual
suffers
injury
purely
ideological
courts
often
refused
consider
matter
leaving
injured
party
look
political
branches
protection
diamond
charles
sierra
club
morton
say
zivotofsky
claim
unimportant
injury
serious
even
purely
ideological
point
suffering
somewhat
similar
harms
sometimes
look
political
branches
resolution
relevant
legal
issues
cf
richardson
laird
tatum
fourth
insofar
controversy
reflects
different
foreign
policy
views
among
political
branches
government
branches
nonjudicial
methods
working
differences
cf
goldwater
rehnquist
joined
burger
stewart
stevens
concurring
judgment
finding
similar
fact
strong
reason
judiciary
decide
treaty
power
question
executive
legislative
branches
frequently
work
disagreements
ongoing
contacts
relationships
involving
example
budget
authorizations
confirmation
personnel
committee
hearings
host
informal
contacts
taken
together
ensure
practice
members
congress
well
president
play
important
role
shaping
foreign
policy
indeed
legislative
branch
executive
branch
typically
understand
need
work
order
create
effective
foreign
policy
understanding
related
contacts
continuous
foreign
relationship
lies
possibility
working
kind
disagreement
see
us
moreover
application
doctrine
ultimately
turns
learned
hand
put
importunately
occasion
demands
answer
nixon
souter
concurring
judgment
quoting
hand
bill
rights
ability
political
branches
work
differences
minimizes
need
judicial
intervention
upshot
case
unusual
minimal
need
judicial
intervention
serious
risk
intervention
bring
embarrassment
show
lack
respect
branches
potentially
disrupt
sound
foreign
policy
decisionmaking
prudential
reasons
hold
doctrine
bars
judicial
consideration
case
affirm
appeals
similar
conclusion
respect
dissent
footnotes
see
also
martin
mott
wheat
story
declining
review
president
determination
exigency
arisen
necessitating
call
militia
actual
service
recognizing
need
prompt
unhesitating
obedience
orders
indispensable
ware
hylton
dall
iredell
concurring
declare
treaty
great
britain
void
turn
considerations
policy
considerations
extreme
magnitude
certainly
entirely
incompetent
examination
decision
justice
often
factors
implicated
case
presenting
political
question
factors
identified
baker
likewise
apparent
see
nixon
addition
textual
commitment
argument
finding
persuasive
opening
door
judicial
review
impeachment
procedures
political
life
country
months
perhaps
years
baker
explaining
luther
borden
found
present
features
associated
three
rationales
underlying
baker
factors