pickering
board
education
argued
march
decided
june
appellee
board
education
dismissed
appellant
teacher
writing
publishing
newspaper
letter
criticizing
board
allocation
school
funds
educational
athletic
programs
board
superintendent
methods
informing
preventing
informing
school
district
taxpayers
real
reasons
additional
tax
revenues
sought
schools
hearing
board
charged
numerous
statements
letter
false
publication
statements
unjustifiably
impugned
board
school
administration
board
found
statements
false
charged
concluded
publication
letter
detrimental
efficient
operation
administration
schools
district
interests
school
require
appellant
dismissal
applicable
statute
evidence
hearing
effect
appellant
statements
community
school
administration
illinois
courts
reviewing
proceedings
solely
determine
whether
board
findings
supported
substantial
evidence
whether
board
reasonably
conclude
publication
detrimental
best
interests
schools
upheld
dismissal
rejecting
appellant
claim
letter
protected
first
fourteenth
amendments
ground
teacher
refrain
making
statements
schools
operation
absence
position
undoubted
right
engage
held
theory
public
employment
may
denied
altogether
may
subjected
conditions
regardless
unreasonable
uniformly
rejected
keyishian
board
regents
teacher
interest
citizen
making
public
comment
must
balanced
state
interest
promoting
efficiency
employees
public
services
statements
appellant
substantially
correct
regarded
matters
public
concern
presented
questions
faculty
discipline
harmony
hence
statements
afforded
proper
basis
board
action
dismissing
appellant
pp
appellant
statements
false
likewise
concerned
issues
currently
subject
public
attention
neither
shown
presumed
interfered
appellant
performance
teaching
duties
schools
general
operation
thus
entitled
protection
made
member
general
public
absent
proof
false
statements
knowingly
recklessly
made
justify
board
dismissing
appellant
public
employment
new
york
times
sullivan
pp
john
ligtenberg
argued
cause
appellant
briefs
andrew
leahy
john
cirricione
argued
cause
filed
brief
appellee
milton
shadur
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
illinois
division
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
appellant
marvin
pickering
teacher
township
high
school
district
county
illinois
dismissed
position
appellee
board
education
sending
letter
local
newspaper
connection
recently
proposed
tax
increase
critical
way
board
district
superintendent
schools
handled
past
proposals
raise
new
revenue
schools
appellant
dismissal
resulted
determination
board
full
hearing
publication
letter
detrimental
efficient
operation
administration
schools
district
hence
relevant
illinois
statute
rev
interests
school
require
dismissal
appellant
claim
writing
letter
protected
first
fourteenth
amendments
rejected
appellant
sought
review
board
action
circuit
county
affirmed
dismissal
ground
determination
appellant
letter
detrimental
interests
school
system
supported
substantial
evidence
interests
schools
overrode
appellant
first
amendment
rights
appeal
illinois
two
justices
dissenting
affirmed
judgment
circuit
noted
probable
jurisdiction
appellant
claim
illinois
statute
permitting
dismissal
facts
case
unconstitutional
applied
first
fourteenth
amendments
reasons
detailed
agree
appellant
rights
freedom
speech
violated
reverse
prior
vote
second
tax
increase
proposal
variety
articles
attributed
district
teachers
organization
appeared
local
paper
articles
urged
passage
tax
increase
stated
failure
pass
increase
result
decline
quality
education
afforded
children
district
schools
letter
superintendent
schools
making
point
published
paper
two
days
election
submitted
voters
mimeographed
form
following
day
response
foregoing
material
together
failure
tax
increase
pass
appellant
submitted
letter
question
editor
local
paper
letter
constituted
basically
attack
school
board
handling
bond
issue
proposals
subsequent
allocation
financial
resources
schools
educational
athletic
programs
also
charged
superintendent
schools
attempting
prevent
teachers
district
opposing
criticizing
proposed
bond
issue
board
dismissed
pickering
writing
publishing
letter
pursuant
illinois
law
board
required
hold
hearing
dismissal
hearing
board
charged
numerous
statements
letter
false
publication
statements
unjustifiably
impugned
motives
honesty
integrity
truthfulness
responsibility
competence
board
school
administration
board
also
charged
false
statements
damaged
professional
reputations
members
school
administrators
disruptive
faculty
discipline
tend
foment
controversy
conflict
dissension
among
teachers
administrators
board
education
residents
district
testimony
introduced
variety
witnesses
truth
falsity
particular
statements
letter
board
took
issue
board
found
statements
false
charged
evidence
introduced
point
proceedings
effect
publication
letter
community
whole
administration
school
system
particular
specific
findings
along
lines
made
illinois
courts
reviewed
proceedings
solely
determine
whether
board
findings
supported
substantial
evidence
whether
facts
found
board
reasonably
conclude
appellant
publication
letter
detrimental
best
interests
schools
pickering
claim
letter
protected
first
amendment
rejected
ground
acceptance
teaching
position
public
schools
obliged
refrain
making
statements
operation
schools
absence
position
undoubted
right
engage
altogether
clear
whether
illinois
held
first
amendment
applicability
appellant
dismissal
writing
letter
question
whether
determined
particular
statements
made
letter
entitled
first
amendment
protection
event
clearly
rejected
pickering
claim
facts
case
constitutionally
dismissed
teaching
position
ii
iii
examination
statements
appellant
letter
objected
board
reveals
like
letter
whole
consist
essentially
criticism
board
allocation
school
funds
educational
athletic
programs
board
superintendent
methods
informing
preventing
informing
district
taxpayers
real
reasons
additional
tax
revenues
sought
schools
statements
way
directed
towards
person
appellant
normally
contact
course
daily
work
teacher
thus
question
maintaining
either
discipline
immediate
superiors
harmony
among
coworkers
presented
appellant
employment
relationships
board
somewhat
lesser
extent
superintendent
kind
close
working
relationships
persuasively
claimed
personal
loyalty
confidence
necessary
proper
functioning
accordingly
extent
board
position
taken
suggest
even
comments
matters
public
concern
substantially
correct
statements
appellant
letter
see
appendix
infra
may
furnish
grounds
dismissal
sufficiently
critical
tone
unequivocally
reject
next
consider
statements
appellant
letter
agree
false
board
original
charges
included
allegations
publication
letter
damaged
professional
reputations
board
superintendent
foment
controversy
conflict
among
board
teachers
administrators
residents
district
however
evidence
support
allegations
introduced
hearing
far
record
reveals
pickering
letter
greeted
everyone
main
target
board
massive
apathy
total
disbelief
board
must
therefore
decided
perhaps
analogy
law
libel
statements
per
se
harmful
operation
schools
however
way
board
conclude
absent
evidence
actual
effect
letter
statements
contained
therein
per
se
detrimental
interest
schools
equate
board
members
interests
schools
certainly
accusation
much
money
spent
athletics
administrators
school
system
precisely
import
portion
appellant
letter
containing
statements
found
false
see
appendix
infra
reasonably
regarded
per
se
detrimental
district
schools
accusation
reflects
rather
difference
opinion
pickering
board
preferable
manner
operating
school
system
difference
opinion
clearly
concerns
issue
general
public
interest
addition
fact
particular
illustrations
board
claimed
undesirable
emphasis
athletic
programs
false
normally
necessary
impact
actual
operation
schools
beyond
tendency
anger
board
example
pickering
letter
written
defeat
polls
second
proposed
tax
increase
therefore
effect
ability
school
district
raise
necessary
revenue
since
showing
proposal
increase
taxes
pending
letter
written
importantly
question
whether
school
system
requires
additional
funds
matter
legitimate
public
concern
judgment
school
administration
including
school
board
society
leaves
questions
popular
vote
taken
conclusive
question
free
open
debate
vital
informed
electorate
teachers
class
members
community
likely
informed
definite
opinions
funds
allotted
operation
schools
spent
accordingly
essential
able
speak
freely
questions
without
fear
retaliatory
dismissal
addition
amounts
expended
athletics
pickering
reported
erroneously
matters
public
record
position
teacher
district
qualify
speak
greater
authority
taxpayer
board
easily
rebutted
appellant
errors
publishing
accurate
figures
either
via
letter
newspaper
otherwise
thus
presented
situation
teacher
carelessly
made
false
statements
matters
closely
related
operations
schools
harmful
impact
public
difficult
counter
teacher
presumed
greater
access
real
facts
accordingly
occasion
consider
time
whether
circumstances
school
board
reasonably
require
teacher
make
substantial
efforts
verify
accuracy
charges
publishing
us
case
teacher
made
erroneous
public
statements
upon
issues
currently
subject
public
attention
critical
ultimate
employer
neither
shown
presumed
way
either
impeded
teacher
proper
performance
daily
duties
classroom
interfered
regular
operation
schools
generally
circumstances
conclude
interest
school
administration
limiting
teachers
opportunities
contribute
public
debate
significantly
greater
interest
limiting
similar
contribution
member
general
public
iv
also
indicated
general
terms
statements
public
officials
matters
public
concern
must
accorded
first
amendment
protection
despite
fact
statements
directed
nominal
superiors
garrison
louisiana
wood
georgia
garrison
new
york
times
test
specifically
applied
case
involving
criminal
defamation
conviction
stemming
statements
made
district
attorney
judges
regularly
appeared
criminal
sanctions
damage
awards
somewhat
different
impact
exercise
right
freedom
speech
dismissal
employment
apparent
threat
dismissal
public
employment
nonetheless
potent
means
inhibiting
speech
already
noted
disinclination
make
equation
dismissal
public
employment
remarks
critical
superiors
awarding
damages
libel
suit
public
official
similar
criticism
however
case
present
one
fact
employment
tangentially
insubstantially
involved
subject
matter
public
communication
made
teacher
conclude
necessary
regard
teacher
member
general
public
seeks
sum
hold
case
absent
proof
false
statements
knowingly
recklessly
made
teacher
exercise
right
speak
issues
public
importance
may
furnish
basis
dismissal
public
employment
since
showing
made
case
regarding
appellant
letter
see
appendix
infra
dismissal
writing
upheld
judgment
illinois
must
accordingly
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
appendix
opinion
appellant
letter
letters
editor
graphic
newspapers
thursday
september
enjoyed
reading
back
issues
paper
loaned
perhaps
others
enjoy
reading
order
see
far
two
new
high
schools
deviated
original
promises
board
education
first
let
state
referring
february
thru
november
issues
paper
checked
one
statement
paper
declared
swimming
pools
athletic
fields
auditoriums
left
program
may
left
got
put
back
quickly
lockport
west
auditorium
athletic
field
fact
lockport
west
better
athletic
field
lockport
central
track
quite
regulation
distance
even
though
board
spent
thousand
dollars
whose
fault
oh
forgot
supposed
first
place
must
fallen
sky
responsibility
touched
letters
seems
one
ca
help
noticing
saying
school
facilities
think
promises
promises
since
seems
problem
getting
facts
voter
twice
defeated
bond
issue
many
letters
written
paper
probably
follow
feel
must
say
something
letters
writers
many
letters
give
whole
story
letters
board
administration
stated
teachers
salaries
total
one
year
must
total
payroll
otherwise
teachers
getting
year
teach
high
school
know
case
however
shows
stop
nothing
attitude
illustrate
know
superintendent
told
teachers
quote
teacher
opposes
referendum
prepared
consequences
think
gets
reason
problems
passing
bond
issues
threats
take
something
away
insults
voters
free
society
try
sell
program
merits
remember
letters
entitled
district
teachers
speak
think
voters
know
letters
written
agreed
five
six
teachers
teachers
high
school
fact
many
teachers
even
know
writing
know
letters
approval
superintendent
put
paper
kind
totalitarianism
teachers
live
high
school
children
go
school
last
week
paper
letter
written
uninformed
teachers
threatened
close
school
cafeteria
fire
personnel
ridiculous
insults
intelligence
voter
properly
managed
school
cafeterias
cost
school
district
money
cafeteria
losing
money
board
packing
free
lunches
athletes
days
athletic
contests
whatever
case
taxpayer
child
pay
lunch
instead
pay
free
lunches
athletes
reply
letter
board
administration
probably
state
lunches
paid
receipts
games
receipts
pay
year
spending
varsity
sports
neglecting
wants
teachers
see
need
increase
transportation
tax
unless
voters
want
keep
paying
year
transport
athletes
home
practice
away
games
etc
rest
made
coaches
salaries
athletic
directors
salaries
baseball
pitching
machines
sodded
football
fields
thousands
dollars
sports
equipment
things
right
provided
enough
money
sod
football
fields
borrowed
money
able
pay
teachers
salaries
getting
cart
horse
things
enough
look
east
high
doors
many
classrooms
plant
room
without
sunlight
water
first
aid
treatment
room
many
things
taxpayers
really
taken
cleaners
part
sidewalk
front
building
already
collapsed
maybe
hess
interested
know
need
blinds
windows
building
also
board
must
forgotten
going
spend
west
building
east
building
see
bond
issue
fight
board
education
trying
push
athletics
throats
education
public
mixed
emotions
items
feel
already
paying
enough
taxes
simply
know
trust
tax
money
must
sign
letter
citizen
taxpayer
voter
teacher
since
freedom
taken
teachers
administration
really
know
goes
behind
stone
walls
high
school
respectfully
marvin
pickering
analysis
sum
board
first
stated
certain
facilities
included
new
high
schools
economy
measure
changed
mind
defeat
first
bond
issue
decided
include
facilities
previously
omitted
never
specifically
even
generally
indicated
taxpayers
change
appellant
claim
original
plans
disclosed
public
deviated
buildings
actually
constructed
thus
substantially
correct
characterization
board
prior
statement
promise
fair
matter
opinion
board
conclusion
contrary
based
determination
appellant
statement
referred
literature
distributed
second
bond
issue
campaign
unreasonable
ignores
word
original
modifies
promises
appellant
letter
appellant
stated
board
incorrectly
informed
public
teachers
salaries
total
per
year
board
found
statement
false
however
superintendent
schools
admitted
way
board
figure
regarded
accurate
change
word
teachers
instructional
whereby
salaries
deans
principals
librarians
counselors
four
secretaries
district
three
high
schools
included
total
appellant
characterization
board
figure
incorrect
thus
clearly
accurate
pickering
claimed
superintendent
said
teacher
support
bond
issue
referendum
prepared
consequences
board
found
claim
false
however
statement
corroborated
testimony
two
teachers
although
superintendent
denied
making
remark
attributed
illinois
appears
agreed
something
along
lines
stated
appellant
said
since
relied
upholding
board
finding
appellant
version
remark
false
testimony
one
two
teachers
interpreted
remark
prediction
adverse
consequences
schools
referendum
pass
rather
threat
noncooperation
teachers
however
teacher
testified
know
interpret
remark
accordingly
appellant
may
misinterpreted
meaning
remark
misreport
appellant
letter
stated
letters
teachers
newspapers
approval
superintendent
submitted
publication
board
relied
finding
statement
false
testimony
superintendent
approval
required
however
handbook
teachers
district
specifically
stated
time
material
submitted
local
papers
checked
building
principal
submitted
triplicate
publicity
coordinator
particular
teachers
letters
appellant
specifically
referring
letter
fact
submitted
superintendent
prior
publication
thus
statement
substantially
correct
four
statements
challenged
board
factually
incorrect
varying
degrees
appellant
letter
implied
providing
athletes
schools
free
lunches
meant
students
must
pay
instead
lunches
statement
erroneous
discontinuing
free
lunches
athletes
permitted
small
decrease
charge
lunch
students
decrease
brought
price
appellant
claimed
board
spending
year
athletics
neglecting
wants
teachers
claim
incorrect
per
year
figure
included
nonrecurring
capital
expenditures
appellant
also
claimed
board
spending
year
transportation
athletes
claim
completely
false
expenditures
travel
athletes
per
year
finally
appellant
stated
football
fields
sodded
borrowed
money
board
unable
pay
teachers
salaries
statement
substantially
correct
football
fields
sodded
borrowed
money
money
spent
proceeds
part
bond
issue
fairly
characterized
borrowed
incorrect
insofar
suggests
district
teachers
actually
paid
upon
occasion
correct
taken
mean
board
times
difficulty
obtaining
funds
pay
teachers
manner
last
four
statements
false
perfectly
consistent
error
evidence
record
show
anything
carelessness
insufficient
information
responsible
made
footnotes
set
appendix
detailed
analysis
specific
statements
appellant
letter
board
found
false
together
reasons
concluding
several
statements
contrary
findings
board
substantially
correct
possible
conceive
positions
public
employment
need
confidentiality
great
even
completely
correct
public
statements
might
furnish
permissible
ground
dismissal
likewise
positions
public
employment
relationship
superior
subordinate
personal
intimate
nature
certain
forms
public
criticism
superior
subordinate
seriously
undermine
effectiveness
working
relationship
also
imagined
intimate
views
resolve
specific
instances
situations
merely
note
significantly
different
considerations
involved
cases
likewise
occasion
furnished
case
consideration
extent
teachers
required
narrowly
drawn
grievance
procedures
submit
complaints
operation
schools
superiors
action
thereon
prior
bringing
complaints
public
also
note
case
present
situation
teacher
public
statements
without
foundation
call
question
fitness
perform
duties
classroom
case
course
statements
merely
evidence
teacher
general
competence
lack
thereof
independent
basis
dismissal
conclude
appellant
statements
knowingly
recklessly
false
occasion
pass
upon
additional
question
whether
statement
knowingly
recklessly
false
neither
shown
reasonably
presumed
harmful
effects
still
protected
first
amendment
see
also
supra
shall
bother
enumerate
statements
board
found
false
triviality
readily
apparent
board
rationally
considered
detrimental
interests
schools
regardless
truth
falsity
regularly
held
constitutional
rights
issue
independent
examination
record
made
order
controlling
legal
principles
may
applied
actual
facts
case
norris
alabama
pennekamp
florida
new
york
times
sullivan
however
even
cases
upholding
rejection
constitutional
claim
turns
resolution
factual
questions
also
consistently
give
great
controlling
weight
findings
state
courts
present
case
trier
fact
body
also
victim
appellant
statements
prosecutor
brought
charges
aimed
securing
dismissal
state
courts
made
independent
review
record
simply
contented
ascertaining
accordance
statute
whether
substantial
evidence
support
board
findings
appellant
requests
us
reverse
state
courts
decisions
upholding
dismissal
independent
ground
procedure
followed
deprived
due
process
afforded
impartial
tribunal
however
appellant
makes
contention
first
time
raised
point
state
proceedings
decline
treat
appellant
claim
independent
ground
decision
case
hand
propose
blind
obvious
defects
process
occasioned
board
multiple
functioning
appellant
compare
tumey
ohio
murchison
accordingly
since
state
courts
time
given
de
novo
consideration
statements
letter
feel
free
examine
evidence
case
completely
independently
afford
little
weight
factual
determinations
made
board
justice
white
concurring
part
dissenting
part
holds
truthful
statements
school
teacher
critical
school
board
within
ambit
first
amendment
also
false
statements
innocently
negligently
made
state
may
fire
teacher
making
either
unless
gather
special
circumstances
present
case
demonstrating
overriding
state
interest
need
confidentiality
special
obligations
teacher
particular
position
may
owe
superiors
core
today
decision
holding
pickering
discharge
must
tested
standard
new
york
times
sullivan
extent
agreement
goes
however
reopen
question
thought
settled
new
york
times
cases
followed
particularly
garrison
louisiana
devotes
several
pages
facts
order
reject
determination
pickering
statements
harmed
school
system
ante
question
harm
clearly
irrelevant
given
determination
pickering
statements
neither
knowingly
recklessly
false
ruling
circumstances
teacher
may
fired
even
statements
injurious
gratuitously
suggests
statements
found
knowingly
recklessly
false
open
question
whether
first
amendment
still
protects
unless
shown
presumed
caused
harm
ante
deliberate
reckless
falsehoods
serve
first
amendment
ends
deserve
protection
amendment
unequivocally
recognized
garrison
reargument
said
knowingly
false
statement
false
statement
made
reckless
disregard
truth
enjoy
constitutional
protection
today
neither
explains
justifies
withdrawal
firm
stand
taken
garrison
see
teacher
may
fired
without
violation
first
amendment
knowingly
recklessly
making
false
statements
regardless
harmful
impact
schools
holds
however
absence
special
circumstances
may
fired
statements
true
negligently
false
even
harm
school
system
therefore
see
basis
necessity
foray
respect
whether
record
supports
finding
injury
pickering
false
statements
either
knowingly
recklessly
made
injury
school
system
becomes
irrelevant
first
amendment
prevent
discharge
state
constitutionally
precluded
terminating
employment
reliance
constitutional
provision
required
join
findings
regard
whether
pickering
knowingly
recklessly
published
false
statements
neither
state
presenting
evidence
state
tribunals
arriving
findings
conclusions
law
addressed
elements
new
standard
holds
first
amendment
require
circumstances
case
indeed
state
courts
expressly
rejected
applicability
new
york
times
garrison
find
wholly
unsatisfactory
make
initial
determination
knowing
reckless
falsehood
cold
record
us
far
appropriate
remand
case
state
courts
proceedings
light
constitutional
standard
deems
applicable
case
relevant
facts
ascertained
appropriate
proceedings
see
ante
nn
elaborate
upon
suggestion
may
situations
reference
certain
areas
public
comment
teacher
may
special
obligations
superiors
simply
holds
case
respect
particular
public
comment
made
pickering
like
member
general
public
apparently
remote
school
board
require
placing
special
category
read
opinion
foreclose
possibility
first
amendment
school
system
may
enforceable
rule
applicable
teachers
public
statements
school
business
must
first
submitted
authorities
check
accuracy
even
consideration
harm
necessary
case
join
concluding
record
harm
school
administration
proved
presumed