kwai
fun
wong
argued
december
decided
april
federal
tort
claims
act
ftca
provides
tort
claim
shall
forever
barred
unless
claimant
meets
two
deadlines
first
claim
must
presented
appropriate
federal
agency
administrative
review
within
two
years
claim
accrues
second
agency
denies
claim
claimant
may
file
suit
federal
within
six
months
agency
denial
ibid
kwai
fun
wong
marlene
june
respondents
nos
respectively
missed
one
deadlines
wong
failed
file
ftca
claim
federal
within
months
argued
district
permitted
file
claim
period
expired
june
failed
present
ftca
claim
federal
agency
within
years
argued
untimely
filing
excused
government
view
concealed
facts
vital
claim
case
district
dismissed
ftca
claim
failure
satisfy
time
bars
holding
despite
justification
delay
time
bars
jurisdictional
subject
equitable
tolling
ninth
circuit
reversed
cases
concluding
time
bars
may
equitably
tolled
held
section
time
limits
subject
equitable
tolling
pp
irwin
department
veterans
affairs
provides
framework
deciding
applicability
equitable
tolling
statutes
limitations
suits
government
adopted
rebuttable
presumption
time
bars
may
equitably
tolled
irwin
presumption
may
course
rebutted
one
way
pursued
government
demonstrate
statute
limitations
issue
jurisdictional
statute
equitably
tolled
conclude
time
bar
jurisdictional
unless
congress
provides
clear
statement
effect
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
applying
clear
statement
rule
said
time
bars
even
mandatory
emphatic
nonjurisdictional
see
congress
thus
must
something
special
tag
statute
limitations
jurisdictional
prohibit
tolling
pp
congress
thing
enacting
text
provision
speaks
claim
timeliness
refer
jurisdiction
district
courts
address
courts
authority
hear
untimely
suits
see
arbaugh
instead
reads
like
ordinary
statute
limitations
holland
florida
statutory
context
confirms
reading
congress
separation
filing
deadline
jurisdictional
grant
often
indicates
deadline
jurisdictional
ftca
jurisdictional
grant
appears
another
section
title
jurisdictional
grant
expressly
conditioned
compliance
limitations
periods
finally
assuming
provide
clear
statement
cases
require
legislative
history
clearly
demonstrate
congress
intended
provision
impose
jurisdictional
bar
pp
government
two
principal
arguments
treating
jurisdictional
unpersuasive
foreclosed
precedents
pp
government
first
points
includes
shall
forever
barred
language
statute
limitations
governing
tucker
act
claims
held
jurisdictional
see
kendall
phrase
commonplace
statutes
limitations
enacted
around
time
ftca
carry
talismanic
jurisdictional
significance
indeed
construed
language
subject
tolling
clayton
act
statute
limitations
see
american
pipe
constr
utah
two
decisions
addressing
tucker
act
statute
limitations
dismissed
idea
language
jurisdictionally
significant
see
irwin
john
sand
gravel
shall
forever
barred
phrase
thus
nothing
ordinary
way
set
statutory
deadline
pp
government
next
argues
jurisdictional
condition
ftca
waiver
sovereign
immunity
argument
foreclosed
irwin
considered
identical
objection
concluded
even
time
limits
condition
waiver
immunity
may
equitably
tolled
see
government
invocation
sovereign
immunity
principles
also
peculiarly
inapt
unlike
waivers
sovereign
immunity
ftca
treats
government
much
like
private
party
accordingly
declined
construe
act
narrowly
merely
waives
government
immunity
suit
reason
differently
pp
fed
appx
affirmed
remanded
kagan
delivered
opinion
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
scalia
thomas
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
nos
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
federal
tort
claims
act
ftca
act
provides
tort
claim
shall
forever
barred
unless
presented
appropriate
federal
agency
within
two
years
claim
accrues
brought
federal
within
six
months
agency
acts
claim
two
cases
resolve
claimant
missed
one
deadlines
requested
equitable
tolling
ground
good
reason
filing
late
government
responded
time
limits
subject
tolling
jurisdictional
restrictions
today
reject
government
argument
conclude
courts
may
toll
ftca
limitations
periods
first
case
respondent
kwai
fun
wong
asserts
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
falsely
imprisoned
five
days
ftca
requires
wong
first
presented
claim
ins
within
two
years
alleged
unlawful
action
see
ins
denied
administrative
complaint
december
act
gave
wong
six
months
june
bring
tort
claim
federal
see
several
months
prior
ins
decision
wong
filed
suit
federal
district
asserting
various
claims
government
arising
alleged
misconduct
anticipating
ins
ruling
wong
moved
amend
complaint
suit
adding
tort
claim
april
magistrate
judge
recommended
granting
wong
leave
amend
district
finally
adopt
proposal
june
three
weeks
ftca
deadline
government
moved
dismiss
tort
claim
ground
filed
late
district
first
rejected
motion
recognized
wong
managed
add
ftca
claim
time
period
expired
equitably
tolled
period
time
magistrate
judge
recommendation
order
allowing
amendment
thus
bringing
wong
ftca
claim
within
statutory
deadline
several
years
later
government
moved
reconsideration
ruling
based
intervening
ninth
circuit
decision
time
district
dismissed
wong
claim
reasoning
time
bar
jurisdictional
therefore
subject
equitable
tolling
appeal
ninth
circuit
agreed
hear
case
en
banc
address
conflict
issue
en
banc
held
limit
jurisdictional
equitable
tolling
available
kwai
fun
wong
beebe
confirmed
district
prior
ruling
circumstances
justify
tolling
wong
exercis
ed
due
diligence
attempting
amend
complaint
statutory
deadline
second
case
us
arises
deadly
highway
accident
andrew
booth
killed
car
riding
crossed
cable
median
barrier
crashed
oncoming
traffic
following
year
respondent
marlene
june
acting
behalf
booth
young
son
filed
wrongful
death
action
alleging
state
arizona
contractor
negligently
constructed
maintained
median
barrier
years
litigation
june
contends
discovered
federal
highway
administration
fhwa
approved
installation
barrier
knowing
properly
crash
tested
relying
new
information
june
presented
tort
claim
fhwa
five
years
accident
fhwa
denied
claim
june
promptly
filed
action
federal
district
dismissed
suit
june
failed
submit
claim
fhwa
within
two
years
collision
ftca
bar
ruled
jurisdictional
therefore
subject
equitable
tolling
accordingly
consider
june
contention
tolling
proper
government
concealed
failure
require
crash
testing
appeal
ninth
circuit
reversed
light
recent
decision
wong
thus
holding
deadline
like
counterpart
jurisdictional
may
tolled
fed
appx
granted
certiorari
cases
resolve
circuit
split
whether
courts
may
equitably
toll
two
time
limits
compare
fema
trailer
formaldehyde
prods
liability
litigation
per
curiam
tolling
available
arteaga
tolling
allowed
affirm
appeals
rulings
ii
irwin
department
veterans
affairs
sets
framework
deciding
applicability
equitable
tolling
suits
government
irwin
recognized
time
bars
suits
private
parties
presumptively
subject
equitable
tolling
see
means
usually
may
pause
running
limitations
statute
private
litigation
party
pursued
rights
diligently
extraordinary
circumstance
prevents
meeting
deadline
lozano
montoya
alvarez
slip
held
irwin
rebuttable
presumption
equitable
tolling
also
apply
suits
brought
statute
waiving
sovereign
immunity
old
ad
hoc
approach
determining
availability
tolling
suits
reasoned
produced
inconsistency
unpredictability
without
offsetting
virtue
enhanced
fidelity
intent
congress
adopting
general
rule
used
private
litigation
stated
amount
little
broadening
statutory
waiver
immunity
ibid
accordingly
thought
presumption
likely
realistic
assessment
legislative
intent
well
practically
useful
rule
interpretation
ibid
rebuttable
presumption
course
may
rebutted
irwin
end
matter
enacting
time
bar
suit
government
one
private
party
congress
may
reverse
usual
rule
chooses
see
government
may
therefore
attempt
establish
evidence
relating
particular
statute
limitations
congress
opted
forbid
equitable
tolling
one
way
meet
burden
way
government
pursues
show
congress
made
time
bar
issue
litigant
failure
comply
bar
deprives
authority
hear
case
hence
must
enforce
limitation
even
party
waived
timeliness
objection
see
gonzalez
thaler
slip
crucially
must
even
equitable
considerations
support
extending
prescribed
time
period
see
john
sand
gravel
given
harsh
consequences
government
must
clear
high
bar
establish
statute
limitations
jurisdictional
recent
years
repeatedly
held
procedural
rules
including
time
bars
cabin
power
congress
clearly
state
much
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
slip
quoting
arbaugh
see
gonzalez
slip
bsent
clear
statement
treat
restriction
nonjurisdictional
auburn
regional
slip
quoting
arbaugh
mean
congress
must
incant
magic
words
auburn
regional
slip
traditional
tools
statutory
construction
must
plainly
show
congress
imbued
procedural
bar
jurisdictional
consequences
applying
clear
statement
rule
made
plain
time
bars
nonjurisdictional
see
slip
noting
rarity
jurisdictional
time
limits
time
described
filing
deadlines
quintessential
rules
seek
promote
orderly
progress
litigation
deprive
authority
hear
case
henderson
shinseki
see
auburn
regional
slip
scarborough
principi
contrary
dissent
suggestion
see
post
even
time
limit
important
even
framed
mandatory
terms
indeed
however
emphatic
ally
expressed
terms
may
henderson
quoting
union
pacific
locomotive
engineers
congress
must
something
special
beyond
setting
deadline
tag
statute
limitations
jurisdictional
prohibit
tolling
enacting
ftca
congress
nothing
kind
provided
clear
statement
indicating
rare
statute
limitations
deprive
jurisdiction
neither
text
context
legislative
history
indicates
much
less
plainly
congress
meant
enact
something
standard
time
bar
important
text
speaks
claim
timeliness
power
tort
claim
shall
forever
barred
unless
presented
agency
within
two
years
unless
action
begun
within
six
months
agency
denial
claim
mundane
language
saying
every
time
bar
definition
must
certain
time
claim
barred
see
infra
citing
many
similarly
worded
limitations
statutes
language
mandatory
shall
barred
noted
true
statutes
consistently
found
consequence
see
gonzalez
slip
language
might
viewed
emphatic
forever
barred
often
held
matter
see
henderson
union
pacific
matters
instead
speak
jurisdictional
terms
refer
way
jurisdiction
district
courts
arbaugh
quoting
zipes
trans
world
airlines
define
federal
jurisdiction
tort
claims
generally
address
authority
hear
untimely
suits
way
cabin
usual
equitable
powers
section
short
reads
like
ordinary
statute
limitations
spelling
litigant
filing
obligations
without
restricting
authority
holland
ida
statutory
context
confirms
reading
often
explained
congress
separation
filing
deadline
jurisdictional
grant
indicates
time
bar
jurisdictional
see
henderson
reed
elsevier
muchnick
arbaugh
zipes
whereas
houses
ftca
time
limitations
different
section
title
confers
power
federal
district
courts
hear
ftca
claims
see
district
courts
shall
exclusive
jurisdiction
tort
claims
nothing
conditions
jurisdictional
grant
limitations
periods
otherwise
links
separate
provisions
treating
time
bars
jurisdictional
thus
disregard
structural
divide
built
statute
finally
even
assuming
legislative
history
alone
provide
clear
statement
doubt
none
report
accompanying
ftca
discuss
whether
time
limits
jurisdictional
see
amending
four
times
enactment
congress
declined
four
times
say
anything
specific
whether
statute
limitations
imposes
jurisdictional
bar
congress
thus
failed
provide
anything
like
clear
statement
demanded
deeming
statute
limitations
curtail
power
wind
back
started
irwin
general
rule
equitable
tolling
available
suits
government
justification
government
offers
departing
principle
fails
section
jurisdictional
requirement
time
limits
ftca
time
limits
nothing
even
though
govern
litigation
government
toll
equitable
grounds
iii
government
balks
straightforward
analysis
claiming
overlooks
two
reasons
thinking
jurisdictional
neither
reasons
persuasive
indeed
precedents
area
foreclose
government
principally
contends
jurisdictional
includes
language
statute
limitations
governing
contract
suits
brought
tucker
act
see
statute
long
provided
suits
shall
forever
barred
filed
within
six
years
act
mar
stat
see
act
mar
stat
repeatedly
held
limit
jurisdictional
thus
subject
equitable
tolling
see
kendall
finn
soriano
congress
drafted
ftca
time
bar
used
shall
forever
barred
language
though
selecting
shorter
limitations
period
circumstances
government
maintains
reasonable
conclusion
congress
intended
ftca
identically
worded
time
limit
jurisdictional
bar
brief
wong
according
government
congress
wanted
ftca
serve
analogue
tucker
act
incorporated
words
shall
forever
barred
similarly
preclude
equitable
tolling
reply
brief
wong
dissent
relies
heavily
argument
see
post
government
takes
much
congress
use
utterly
unremarkable
phrase
shall
forever
barred
formulation
commonplace
federal
limitations
statutes
many
decades
surrounding
congress
enactment
neither
accorded
words
talismanic
power
render
time
bars
jurisdictional
contrary
construed
shall
forever
barred
language
clayton
act
statute
limitations
subject
tolling
nothing
provision
found
restrict
power
federal
courts
extend
limitations
period
circumstances
warrant
american
pipe
constr
utah
see
hardin
city
title
escrow
cadc
calling
good
example
time
limitation
based
text
separation
clayton
act
jurisdictional
provisions
government
previously
acknowledged
referring
shall
forever
barred
locution
hat
type
language
legal
rhetoric
time
statute
passed
anything
else
make
difference
jurisdictional
analysis
tr
oral
arg
irwin
put
bit
differently
congress
inclusion
phrase
endemic
limitations
statutes
era
least
allow
tolling
provide
requisite
clear
statement
time
bar
curtails
authority
indeed
two
decisions
directly
addressing
tucker
act
statute
limitations
dismissed
idea
language
government
relies
jurisdictional
significance
twice
described
words
provision
meaningfully
different
nonjurisdictional
statute
limitations
twice
made
clear
jurisdictional
status
tucker
act
time
bar
precious
little
phrasing
first
irwin
using
newly
minted
presumption
see
supra
decided
limitations
period
governing
title
vii
suits
government
ed
allowed
equitable
tolling
reaching
conclusion
compared
text
stating
employee
may
file
civil
action
within
days
agency
denial
claim
language
tucker
act
time
bar
noted
formerly
held
tucker
act
limitations
statute
jurisdictionally
bar
late
claims
acknowledged
possibility
justifying
different
treatment
characterizing
language
stringent
irwin
rejected
reasoning
instead
finding
two
formulations
materially
alike
persuaded
stated
difference
enough
manifest
different
congressional
intent
respect
availability
equitable
tolling
leaving
another
day
question
account
jurisdictional
status
tucker
act
time
bar
thus
ruled
reliance
language
words
core
question
government
raises
whether
phrase
shall
forever
barred
used
tucker
act
ftca
manifests
congressional
decision
preclude
tolling
irwin
said
recently
john
sand
reaffirmed
conclusion
even
refused
overturn
view
tucker
act
time
bar
jurisdictional
less
three
times
john
sand
approvingly
repeated
irwin
statement
textual
differences
tucker
act
time
bar
insignificant
language
two
provisions
explain
former
jurisdictional
latter
see
calling
provisions
linguistically
similar
similar
language
similarly
worded
john
sand
asked
hold
tucker
act
time
limit
like
nonjurisdictional
answer
came
two
words
stare
decisis
tucker
act
bar
different
subject
definitive
earlier
interpretation
see
supra
reason
alone
john
sand
left
place
prior
construction
tucker
act
time
limit
see
observing
justice
brandeis
words
important
rule
settled
settled
right
quoting
burnet
coronado
oil
gas
dissenting
opinion
special
tucker
act
deadline
john
sand
recognized
comes
merely
prior
rulings
congress
choice
wording
government
thus
show
phrase
shall
forever
barred
plainly
signifies
jurisdictional
statute
decisions
require
see
supra
unlike
john
sand
stare
decisis
plays
role
previously
considered
whether
restricts
authority
done
say
core
language
provision
jurisdictional
significance
materially
indistinguishable
language
one
nonjurisdictional
time
bar
see
irwin
john
sand
identical
language
another
see
american
pipe
yes
held
tucker
act
time
bar
includes
words
constrains
power
hear
late
claims
explained
irwin
phrase
manifest
congressional
intent
respect
availability
equitable
tolling
words
government
pins
hopes
words
limitations
statute
particular
era
nothing
else
supports
government
claim
congress
enacting
ftca
wanted
incorporate
view
tucker
act
time
bar
much
less
congress
expressed
purported
intent
needed
clear
statement
government
next
contends
time
ftca
enactment
congress
thought
every
limitations
statute
applying
suits
however
framed
worded
cut
jurisdiction
untimely
claims
view
particular
language
statutes
makes
difference
matters
time
limits
function
conditions
government
waiver
sovereign
immunity
era
indeed
irwin
decided
conditions
generally
supposed
strictly
observed
soriano
meant
government
urges
time
limits
actions
carr
ied
jurisdictional
consequences
brief
wong
accordingly
government
concludes
congress
expected
courts
apply
jurisdictional
requirement
conditions
waivers
sovereign
immunity
always
applied
irwin
however
forecloses
argument
irwin
also
considered
time
bar
attached
waiver
sovereign
immunity
government
argued
anticipating
claim
statute
limitations
conditioned
waiver
must
jurisdictional
subject
equitable
tolling
see
brief
respondents
tr
oral
arg
irwin
irwin
disagreed
applying
opposite
presumption
time
limit
passed
two
decades
earlier
see
supra
justice
white
protested
much
government
time
enactment
limitations
statutes
suits
government
strictly
observed
amenable
tolling
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
quoting
soriano
see
earlier
congress
justice
white
asked
mind
present
departure
longstanding
rule
ibid
see
post
asking
variant
question
irwin
undeterred
noted
applied
former
rule
consistently
justice
white
suggested
see
doubted
former
approach
well
reflected
congressional
intent
contrary
equitable
tolling
amounts
little
broadening
congressional
waiver
thought
rule
generally
allowing
tolling
realistic
assessment
legislative
intent
see
supra
reasons
declined
count
time
bars
jurisdictional
merely
condition
waivers
immunity
even
congress
enacted
deadline
interpreted
limitations
statutes
differently
years
since
repeatedly
followed
irwin
lead
applied
irwin
statutes
statutes
followed
decision
wake
see
scarborough
franconia
associates
sure
irwin
presumption
rebuttable
rebuttal
rely
irwin
deemed
irrelevant
congress
passed
statute
earlier
era
often
attached
jurisdictional
consequence
conditions
waivers
sovereign
immunity
rather
rebuttal
must
identify
something
distinctive
time
limit
issue
whether
enacted
later
reason
thinking
congress
wanted
limitations
statute
statutes
passed
earlier
day
curtail
jurisdiction
government
contrary
view
irwin
effectively
become
prospective
decision
nothing
less
consonant
irwin
ambition
adopt
general
rule
govern
applicability
equitable
tolling
suits
government
government
claim
peculiarly
inapt
applied
special
ftca
cuts
favor
allowing
equitable
tolling
compared
waivers
immunity
prominently
including
tucker
act
ftca
treats
like
commoner
like
crown
ftca
jurisdictional
provision
courts
may
hear
suits
circumstances
private
person
liable
claimant
defining
substantive
liability
torts
act
reiterates
accountable
manner
extent
private
individual
keeping
provisions
often
rejected
government
calls
cabin
ftca
ground
waives
sovereign
immunity
indeed
years
immediately
act
passage
even
construing
waivers
immunity
narrowly
see
aetna
casualty
surety
indian
towing
rayonier
reason
differently
irwin
recognized
treating
government
like
private
person
means
among
things
permitting
equitable
tolling
see
stressing
government
equivalence
private
party
ftca
goes
typical
statute
waiving
sovereign
immunity
indicate
time
bar
allows
hear
late
claims
iv
precedents
make
case
irwin
requires
affirmative
indication
congress
intends
preclude
equitable
tolling
suit
government
see
congress
provide
signal
making
statute
limitations
jurisdictional
requires
plain
statement
otherwise
treat
time
bar
mere
rule
see
auburn
regional
slip
congress
supplied
statement
repeatedly
stated
nothing
core
language
special
shall
forever
barred
ordinary
albeit
way
setting
deadline
preclude
tolling
circumstances
warrant
see
irwin
john
sand
american
pipe
makes
difference
time
bar
conditions
waiver
sovereign
immunity
even
congress
enacted
measure
different
interpretive
conventions
applied
point
decision
treat
time
bars
suits
government
whenever
passed
litigation
private
parties
see
irwin
scarborough
franconia
accordingly
hold
ftca
time
bars
nonjurisdictional
subject
equitable
tolling
affirm
judgments
appeals
ninth
circuit
remand
cases
proceedings
consistent
opinion
remand
june
district
decide
whether
facts
case
june
entitled
equitable
tolling
ordered
alito
dissenting
nos
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
alito
chief
justice
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
task
cases
interpret
enforce
federal
statute
specifies
limits
waiver
sovereign
immunity
federal
tort
claims
act
ftca
ftca
waives
immunity
certain
tort
claims
provides
tort
claim
shall
forever
barred
unless
filed
appropriate
agency
within
two
years
claim
accrues
federal
within
six
months
agency
final
decision
statutory
text
historical
roots
century
precedents
show
absolute
bar
subject
equitable
tolling
enforce
statute
congress
intended
reverse
ftca
waiver
sovereign
immunity
must
understood
context
early
centuries
congress
reluctant
allow
individual
tort
claims
instead
granted
relief
individuals
private
laws
enacted
solely
individuals
benefit
waivers
sovereign
immunity
surgical
sporadic
notoriously
clumsy
congress
thought
better
adopt
simplified
approach
dalehite
ftca
thus
waived
sovereign
immunity
tort
claims
government
set
procedure
adjudicating
claims
waiver
sovereign
immunity
trivial
matter
long
ftca
congress
authorized
suits
government
contract
property
claims
tucker
act
number
predecessor
statutes
tucker
act
excluded
tort
claims
waiver
sovereign
immunity
concern
obvious
opposed
predictable
nature
contractual
property
claims
harms
sometimes
unperceived
even
frivolous
claims
require
federal
government
expend
administrative
litigation
costs
ultimately
fall
upon
society
every
dollar
spent
defend
satisfy
tort
claim
government
must
either
raise
taxes
shift
funds
originally
allocated
different
public
programs
reduce
risks
congress
placed
strict
limits
ftca
waiver
sovereign
immunity
statute
exempts
waiver
certain
categories
claims
ali
federal
bureau
prisons
includes
broad
exemption
claims
arising
assault
battery
false
imprisonment
false
arrest
malicious
prosecution
abuse
process
libel
slander
misrepresentation
deceit
interference
contract
rights
see
also
addition
order
limit
scope
unpredictability
government
potential
liability
act
exempts
waiver
sovereign
immunity
certain
types
recovery
prejudgment
interest
punitive
damages
see
relevant
ftca
condition
waiver
sovereign
immunity
strict
filing
deadlines
kubrick
enacted
act
granted
district
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
tort
claims
government
ubject
provisions
act
ftca
ch
stat
one
provisions
stated
claim
cognizable
title
shall
forever
barred
unless
within
one
year
claim
accrued
presented
writing
relevant
federal
agency
action
begun
federal
current
version
provides
full
follows
tort
claim
shall
forever
barred
unless
presented
writing
appropriate
federal
agency
within
two
years
claim
accrues
unless
action
begun
within
six
months
date
mailing
certified
registered
mail
notice
final
denial
claim
agency
presented
ii
question
presented
two
cases
whether
ftca
filing
deadlines
subject
equitable
tolling
must
therefore
decide
whether
deadlines
jurisdictional
nature
courts
without
power
adjudicate
claims
filed
outside
strict
limits
jurisdictional
whether
statute
nonetheless
prohibits
equitable
tolling
inquiries
require
close
attention
text
context
history
act
lead
conclusion
ftca
allows
equitable
tolling
ftca
filing
deadlines
jurisdictional
statute
plain
text
prohibits
adjudication
untimely
claims
act
filing
deadlines
run
untimely
claims
shall
forever
barred
ibid
words
qualified
aspirational
absolute
filed
agency
within
two
years
federal
within
six
months
claim
shall
barred
forever
shall
forever
barred
generally
understood
mean
allowed
sometimes
statute
brooks
exceptions
filing
deadlines
restrict
ftca
waiver
sovereign
immunity
impose
limit
courts
jurisdiction
take
upon
extend
kubrick
supra
years
understood
terms
jurisdictional
crafting
ftca
limitations
provision
congress
write
clean
slate
rather
borrowed
language
limitations
provisions
tucker
act
predecessor
statutes
version
tucker
act
included
language
nearly
identical
version
ftca
every
claim
cognizable
claims
shall
forever
barred
unless
petition
setting
forth
statement
thereof
filed
within
six
years
claim
first
accrues
stat
statutory
language
came
turn
predecessor
tucker
act
see
stat
early
interpreted
precise
terms
impose
jurisdiction
al
requirement
may
disregard
kendall
emphasized
waiving
sovereign
immunity
congress
may
restrict
jurisdiction
courts
certain
classes
demands
ibid
held
express
words
statute
leave
room
contention
ibid
thus
authority
engraft
equitable
tolling
provision
congress
clearly
constrained
judiciary
authority
ibid
ensuing
decades
repeatedly
reaffirmed
interpretation
phrase
finn
held
government
waive
jurisdictional
time
bar
thus
duty
dismiss
petition
plaintiff
raised
untimely
claim
reached
conclusion
de
arnaud
reaffirmed
rule
new
york
holding
jurisdiction
plaintiff
presented
claim
statutory
deadline
munro
held
district
lacked
jurisdiction
resolve
untimely
claims
even
government
waived
objection
different
statute
incorporated
tucker
act
time
limits
lower
courts
similarly
enforced
deadline
jurisdictional
requirement
compliance
necessary
enable
suit
maintained
sovereign
compagnie
generale
transatlantique
thus
phrase
shall
forever
barred
well
understood
deprive
federal
courts
jurisdiction
untimely
ftca
statutory
terms
must
understood
context
congress
crafted
ftca
analogue
tucker
act
consciously
borrowed
wording
tucker
act
filing
deadline
settled
adopting
language
used
earlier
act
congress
must
considered
adopted
also
construction
given
language
made
part
enactment
hecht
malley
see
also
shapiro
sekhar
slip
word
obviously
transplanted
another
legal
source
whether
common
law
legislation
brings
old
soil
quoting
frankfurter
reflections
reading
statutes
colum
rev
indeed
congress
considered
departing
tucker
act
prohibition
equitable
tolling
decided
proposals
include
equitable
tolling
provision
included
nine
bills
prior
enactment
ftca
act
passed
congress
provide
equitable
tolling
limitations
periods
colella
bain
revisiting
equitable
tolling
federal
tort
claims
act
seton
hall
rev
instead
understood
individuals
claims
outside
deadlines
turn
congress
relief
private
bills
ftca
enactment
see
evidence
statutory
meaning
end
reaffirmed
phase
jurisdictional
nature
decades
following
ftca
enactment
soriano
rejected
request
allow
equitable
tolling
tucker
act
confirming
connection
tucker
act
ftca
noted
statutes
permitting
suits
tax
refunds
tort
actions
alien
property
litigation
patent
cases
claims
government
affected
allowed
equitable
tolling
tucker
act
emphasis
added
kubrick
cited
soriano
warning
emphasizing
ftca
time
limits
condition
act
waiver
sovereign
immunity
lower
courts
also
quickly
recognized
statutes
common
heritage
enforced
jurisdictional
requirement
anderegg
per
curiam
fourth
circuit
cited
finn
munro
holding
ftca
filing
deadline
jurisdictional
limit
government
waive
fifth
circuit
simon
held
ftca
deadline
jurisdictional
condition
act
waiver
sovereign
immunity
cited
carpenter
tucker
act
case
support
holding
humphreys
ninth
circuit
similarly
relied
tucker
act
precedents
hold
district
jurisdiction
untimely
ftca
action
waiver
sovereign
immunity
exists
filing
deadline
run
citing
edwards
turn
citing
finn
munro
congress
amended
ftca
readopted
forever
barred
language
backdrop
soriano
lower
courts
interpretation
phrase
must
therefore
assume
congress
meant
keep
universally
recognized
meaning
words
see
general
dynamics
land
systems
cline
meaning
course
change
time
even
doubt
recently
reaffirmed
view
john
sand
gravel
explained
unlike
statutes
limitation
jurisdictional
time
limits
seek
achieve
broader
goal
facilitating
administration
claims
limiting
scope
governmental
waiver
sovereign
immunity
promoting
judicial
efficiency
citations
omitted
recounting
decisions
kendall
finn
de
arnaud
new
york
soriano
reiterated
understanding
absolute
nature
claims
limitations
statute
rejected
invitation
abandon
interpretation
noting
congress
long
accepted
interpretation
statute
must
said
ftca
often
explained
hen
long
line
decisions
left
undisturbed
congress
treated
similar
requirement
presume
congress
intended
follow
course
henderson
shinseki
citation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
reed
elsevier
muchnick
union
pacific
locomotive
engineers
every
single
decision
interpreting
tucker
act
similar
requirement
treated
jurisdictional
strong
historical
evidence
congress
intended
follow
course
end
matter
section
filing
deadlines
jurisdictional
limits
subject
equitable
tolling
even
ftca
filing
deadlines
jurisdictional
still
prohibit
equitable
tolling
sure
recent
years
grown
reluctant
affix
jurisdictional
label
see
arbaugh
henderson
supra
calling
rule
nonjurisdictional
mean
mandatory
gonzalez
thaler
slip
congress
imposes
inflexible
claims
processing
rule
duty
enforce
law
prohibit
equitable
tolling
whether
jurisdictional
congress
intent
clear
words
statute
leave
doubt
untimely
claims
never
allowed
forever
barred
command
history
underlying
text
bolsters
apparent
meaning
repeated
reaffirmation
phrase
meaning
remove
doubt
congress
never
meant
equitable
tolling
available
ftca
factor
pointing
opposite
direction
suggestion
irwin
department
veterans
affairs
thenceforth
apply
rebuttable
presumption
favor
equitable
tolling
suits
government
beyond
irwin
presumption
announced
trump
obvious
meaning
statute
enacted
many
decades
earlier
cf
cannon
university
chicago
rehnquist
concurring
event
irwin
rebuttable
presumption
overcome
case
well
century
recognized
inflexible
nature
tucker
act
provision
since
adoption
recognized
ftca
language
bears
meaning
tucker
act
companion
see
soriano
supra
kubrick
supra
john
sand
gravel
held
definitive
earlier
interpretation
tucker
act
sufficient
rebuttal
irwin
presumption
principled
way
distinguish
case
section
allows
equitable
tolling
iii
contrary
conclusion
wrong
every
step
view
statutory
text
mundane
language
like
ordinary
statute
limitations
ante
ordinary
nonjurisdictional
time
limits
typically
directed
claimants
deadline
henderson
example
required
person
adversely
affected
board
veterans
appeals
decision
shall
file
notice
appeal
within
days
decision
emphasis
added
limitations
provision
holland
florida
likewise
applied
person
responsible
filing
period
limitation
shall
apply
application
writ
habeas
corpus
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
emphasis
added
provision
issue
irwin
similar
even
weaker
command
provided
ithin
thirty
days
receipt
notice
final
action
taken
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
employee
applicant
employment
may
file
civil
action
quoting
ed
emphasis
added
section
contrast
never
mentions
claimant
phrased
emphatically
absolute
terms
says
unequivocally
untimely
tort
claims
shall
forever
barred
although
use
word
jurisdiction
speaks
least
much
courts
forever
barred
considering
untimely
claims
claimants
forever
barred
bringing
stale
claims
important
though
words
meaning
ipse
dixit
labels
majority
tells
us
old
hoc
approach
also
known
statutory
interpretation
replaced
broad
presumption
favor
equitable
tolling
judicial
preference
jurisdictional
labels
ante
dispute
premise
event
explained
six
members
current
held
john
sand
gravel
overwhelming
evidence
congressional
intent
easily
overtakes
irwin
rebuttable
presumption
even
rather
call
deadlines
jurisdictional
label
entails
must
nonetheless
recognize
congress
never
meant
allow
equitable
tolling
majority
avoids
latter
point
declining
give
separate
attention
see
ante
conflate
two
questions
though
relevant
evidence
analysis
different
particular
majority
wrong
rely
irwin
assessing
jurisdictional
question
question
really
decides
indulge
irwin
presumption
determining
whether
requirement
jurisdictional
instead
typically
invoke
irwin
finding
requirement
jurisdictional
decide
whether
congress
nonetheless
intended
prohibit
equitable
tolling
henderson
instance
never
mentioned
irwin
parties
ask
us
address
whether
rule
subject
equitable
tolling
jurisdictional
likewise
bowles
russell
held
deadline
filing
notice
appeal
jurisdictional
without
word
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
slip
considered
irwin
deciding
deadline
jurisdictional
holland
held
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
time
limits
jurisdictional
without
relying
irwin
stated
previously
made
clear
nonjurisdictional
federal
statute
limitations
normally
subject
presumption
favor
equitable
tolling
quoting
irwin
supra
emphasis
deleted
cf
young
invoking
irwin
concluding
limitations
period
substantive
component
bankruptcy
code
error
matters
majority
jurisdictional
analysis
literally
begins
ends
irwin
see
ante
thus
relies
presumption
bearing
question
without
presumption
majority
readily
ignore
unmistakable
evidence
limits
jurisdictional
reasons
hold
allow
equitable
tolling
therefore
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
together
june
conservator
also
certiorari
footnotes
although
consolidate
cases
address
together
everyone
agrees
core
arguments
equitable
tolling
apply
equally
deadlines
see
brief
june
nothing
text
relevant
legislative
history
suggests
respective
time
bars
interpreted
differently
respect
whether
jurisdictional
subject
equitable
tolling
government
notes
agree
congress
may
preclude
equitable
tolling
even
nonjurisdictional
statute
limitations
see
brief
wong
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
slip
finding
nonjurisdictional
time
limit
amenable
tolling
government
contends
passing
even
nonjurisdictional
prohibits
equitable
tolling
see
brief
wong
government
makes
independent
arguments
support
position
instead
relies
even
implicitly
indicia
congressional
intent
view
show
time
limits
jurisdictional
see
infra
addressing
government
predominant
jurisdictional
claim
therefore
also
deal
subsidiary
one
dissent
takes
issue
sequence
decide
jurisdictional
question
contending
must
prior
mentioning
irwin
presumption
see
post
opinion
alito
understand
point
precisely
dissent
thinks
ordering
matters
congress
makes
time
bar
suit
government
jurisdictional
one
say
dissent
irwin
apply
one
say
irwin
presumption
conclusively
rebutted
bottom
line
tolling
available
frame
inquiry
part
government
presented
issue
see
brief
wong
one
way
show
irwin
presumption
rebutted
establish
statutory
time
limit
restriction
think
choice
makes
especially
good
sense
cases
various
aspects
irwin
reasoning
central
considering
parties
positions
whether
jurisdictional
see
infra
dissent
argues
nonjurisdictional
time
limits
typically
mention
claimants
whereas
see
post
none
precedents
either
said
suggested
difference
matters
example
statute
barring
tort
claim
jurisdictional
one
barring
person
tort
claim
see
zipes
concluding
time
limit
speak
jurisdictional
terms
even
though
refer
claimant
rather
case
case
emphasized
another
distinction
jurisdictional
statutes
speak
jurisdiction
generally
phrased
powers
see
auburn
regional
slip
reed
elsevier
muchnick
arbaugh
tucker
act
ch
stat
enlarged
claims
jurisdiction
contract
actions
government
statute
limitations
applying
suits
tucker
act
two
decades
recodification
occurring
two
years
passage
ftca
congress
omitted
word
forever
tucker
act
statute
limitations
since
provided
simply
untimely
claims
shall
barred
see
stat
party
contends
change
makes
difference
resolution
cases
see
act
stat
ed
automobile
dealers
day
act
stat
ed
national
traffic
motor
vehicle
safety
act
stat
ed
age
discrimination
employment
act
adea
stat
ed
agricultural
fair
practices
act
stat
ed
national
manufactured
housing
construction
safety
standards
act
stat
even
decision
american
pipe
courts
appeals
unanimously
construed
clayton
act
statute
limitations
allow
equitable
tolling
see
general
elec
san
antonio
joining
six
circuits
reaching
conclusion
similarly
every
appeals
considered
issue
found
act
contains
shall
forever
barred
phrase
permits
hearing
late
claims
see
hodgson
humphries
ott
partlow
jewish
orphans
home
southern
abrogated
grounds
roche
sperling
courts
appeals
unanimously
found
adea
longtime
though
current
time
bar
containing
language
subject
tolling
see
vance
whirlpool
callowhill
footnotes
times
past
loosely
conferred
jurisdictional
label
see
steel
citizens
better
environment
use
term
context
conscious
recognized
john
sand
gravel
justice
harlan
writing
said
statute
al
duty
raise
timeliness
question
whether
done
plea
quoting
kendall
correct
congress
occasionally
modified
ftca
limitations
provision
initially
act
required
plaintiffs
file
suit
within
one
year
claim
accrual
claim
less
present
claim
appropriate
agency
within
one
year
accrual
ftca
stat
relieve
hardship
deadline
congress
enlarged
filing
deadline
two
years
act
apr
ch
stat
made
filing
administrative
claim
appropriate
agency
prerequisite
filing
suit
shortened
litigation
filing
deadline
six
months
agency
denial
claim
act
july
stat
congress
never
suggested
deadlines
excused
enlarged
courts
majority
relies
fact
allowed
equitable
tolling
forever
barred
language
clayton
act
see
ante
evidence
congress
meant
import
statute
terms
ftca
clayton
act
involve
waiver
sovereign
immunity
money
damages
government
tucker
act
contrast
clearly
blueprint
ftca
time
bar
involve
waiver
sovereign
immunity
cases
uniformly
held
language
subject
equitable
tolling
even
dissent
bowles
recognized
irwin
irrelevance
cited
decision
discussing
equitable
exceptions
nonjurisdictional
statutes
limitations
opinion
souter
considered
irwin
john
sand
gravel
holding
time
limits
jurisdictional
reject
suggestion
irwin
compelled
contrary
result
irwin
presumption
influence
jurisdictional
question
influence
outcome
irwin
held
equitable
tolling
available
see