groh
ramirez
et
argued
november
decided
february
petitioner
bureau
alcohol
tobacco
firearms
agent
prepared
signed
application
warrant
search
respondents
montana
ranch
stated
search
specified
weapons
explosives
records
application
supported
petitioner
detailed
affidavit
setting
forth
basis
believing
items
ranch
accompanied
warrant
form
completed
magistrate
judge
magistrate
signed
warrant
form
even
though
identify
items
petitioner
intended
seize
portion
calling
description
person
property
described
respondents
house
alleged
weapons
warrant
incorporate
reference
application
itemized
list
petitioner
led
federal
local
law
enforcement
officers
ranch
next
day
found
illegal
weapons
explosives
petitioner
left
copy
warrant
application
respondents
respondents
sued
petitioner
others
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
claiming
inter
alia
fourth
amendment
violation
district
granted
defendants
summary
judgment
finding
fourth
amendment
violation
finding
even
violation
occurred
defendants
entitled
qualified
immunity
ninth
circuit
affirmed
except
fourth
amendment
claim
petitioner
holding
warrant
invalid
describe
particularity
place
searched
items
seized
also
concluded
leon
precluded
qualified
immunity
petitioner
leader
search
read
warrant
satisfy
understood
scope
limitations
obviously
defective
held
search
clearly
unreasonable
fourth
amendment
pp
warrant
plainly
invalid
meet
fourth
amendment
unambiguous
requirement
warrant
particularly
describ
persons
things
seized
fact
application
adequately
described
things
save
warrant
fourth
amendment
interests
necessarily
vindicated
another
document
says
something
objects
search
document
contents
neither
known
person
whose
home
searched
available
inspection
necessary
decide
whether
amendment
permits
warrant
documents
incorporation
occur
pp
petitioner
argument
search
nonetheless
reasonable
rejected
warrant
describe
items
obviously
deficient
search
must
regarded
warrantless
thus
presumptively
unreasonable
presumptive
rule
applies
searches
whose
defect
lack
particularity
warrant
petitioner
errs
arguing
searches
exempt
presumption
otherwise
satisfy
particularity
requirement
goals
unless
items
affidavit
set
forth
warrant
written
assurance
magistrate
actually
found
probable
cause
search
broad
affiant
requested
restraint
petitioner
showed
conducting
instant
search
imposed
agent
judicial
officer
moreover
particularity
requirement
purpose
limited
preventing
general
searches
also
assures
individual
whose
property
searched
seized
executing
officer
legal
authority
need
search
limits
power
case
presents
occasion
reach
petitioner
argument
particularity
requirements
goals
served
orally
described
items
respondents
respondents
dispute
account
pp
petitioner
entitled
qualified
immunity
despite
constitutional
violation
clear
reasonable
officer
conduct
unlawful
situation
confronted
saucier
katz
given
particularity
requirement
stated
constitution
text
reasonable
officer
believe
warrant
comply
requirement
valid
moreover
petitioner
prepared
warrant
may
argue
reasonably
relied
magistrate
assurance
contained
adequate
description
valid
reasonable
officer
claim
unaware
basic
rule
absent
consent
exigency
warrantless
search
home
presumptively
unconstitutional
warrant
may
facially
deficient
executing
officers
reasonably
presume
valid
leon
case
pp
affirmed
stevens
delivered
opinion
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
joined
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
joined
rehnquist
joined
part
iii
jeff
groh
petitioner
joseph
ramirez
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
february
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
petitioner
conducted
search
respondents
home
pursuant
warrant
failed
describe
persons
things
seized
amdt
questions
presented
whether
search
violated
fourth
amendment
whether
petitioner
nevertheless
entitled
qualified
immunity
given
magistrate
judge
magistrate
relying
affidavit
particularly
described
items
question
found
probable
cause
conduct
search
respondents
joseph
ramirez
members
family
live
large
ranch
bow
county
montana
petitioner
jeff
groh
special
agent
bureau
alcohol
tobacco
firearms
atf
since
february
concerned
citizen
informed
petitioner
number
visits
respondents
ranch
visitor
seen
large
stock
weaponry
including
automatic
rifle
grenades
grenade
launcher
rocket
based
information
petitioner
prepared
signed
application
warrant
search
ranch
application
stated
search
automatic
firearms
parts
automatic
weapons
destructive
devices
include
limited
grenades
grenade
launchers
rocket
launchers
receipts
pertaining
purchase
manufacture
automatic
weapons
explosive
devices
launchers
app
pet
cert
petitioner
supported
application
detailed
affidavit
also
prepared
executed
set
forth
basis
belief
listed
items
concealed
ranch
petitioner
presented
documents
magistrate
along
warrant
form
petitioner
also
completed
magistrate
signed
warrant
form
although
application
particularly
described
place
searched
contraband
petitioner
expected
find
warrant
less
specific
failed
identify
items
petitioner
intended
seize
portion
form
called
description
person
property
seized
petitioner
typed
description
respondents
blue
house
rather
alleged
stockpile
warrant
incorporate
reference
itemized
list
contained
application
however
recite
magistrate
satisfied
affidavit
established
probable
cause
believe
contraband
concealed
premises
sufficient
grounds
existed
warrant
day
magistrate
issued
warrant
petitioner
led
team
law
enforcement
officers
including
federal
agents
members
local
sheriff
department
search
respondents
premises
although
respondent
joseph
ramirez
home
wife
children
petitioner
orally
described
objects
search
ramirez
person
ramirez
telephone
according
ramirez
however
petitioner
explained
searching
explosive
device
box
ramirez
bow
county
rate
officers
search
uncovered
illegal
weapons
explosives
officers
left
petitioner
gave
ramirez
copy
search
warrant
copy
application
sealed
following
day
response
request
respondents
attorney
petitioner
faxed
attorney
copy
page
application
listed
items
seized
charges
filed
ramirezes
respondents
sued
petitioner
officers
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
rev
stat
raising
eight
claims
including
violation
fourth
amendment
app
district
entered
summary
judgment
defendants
found
fourth
amendment
violation
considered
case
comparable
one
warrant
contained
inaccurate
address
case
reasoned
warrant
sufficiently
detailed
executing
officers
locate
correct
house
app
pet
cert
added
even
constitutional
violation
occurred
defendants
entitled
qualified
immunity
failure
warrant
describe
objects
search
amounted
mere
typographical
error
appeals
affirmed
judgment
respect
defendants
claims
exception
respondents
fourth
amendment
claim
petitioner
claim
held
warrant
invalid
describe
particularity
place
searched
items
seized
oral
statements
petitioner
search
cure
omission
observed
warrant
facial
defect
increased
likelihood
degree
confrontation
ramirezes
police
deprived
respondents
means
challenge
officers
might
exceeded
limits
imposed
magistrate
also
expressed
concern
permitting
officers
expand
scope
warrant
oral
statements
broaden
area
dispute
parties
subsequent
litigation
ibid
nevertheless
concluded
officers
except
petitioner
protected
qualified
immunity
respect
petitioner
read
opinion
leon
precluding
qualified
immunity
leader
search
fails
read
warrant
satisfy
understand
scope
limitations
defective
obvious
way
added
leaders
search
team
must
also
make
sure
copy
warrant
available
give
person
whose
property
searched
commencement
search
copy
missing
pages
obvious
defects
ibid
omitted
granted
certiorari
ii
warrant
plainly
invalid
fourth
amendment
unambiguously
warrants
shall
issue
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
particularly
describing
place
searched
persons
things
seized
emphasis
added
warrant
case
complied
first
three
requirements
based
probable
cause
supported
sworn
affidavit
described
particularly
place
search
fourth
requirement
however
warrant
failed
altogether
indeed
petitioner
concedes
warrant
deficient
particularity
provided
description
type
evidence
sought
brief
petitioner
fact
application
adequately
described
things
seized
save
warrant
facial
invalidity
fourth
amendment
terms
requires
particularity
warrant
supporting
documents
see
massachusetts
sheppard
warrant
fails
conform
particularity
requirement
fourth
amendment
unconstitutional
see
also
stefonek
fourth
amendment
requires
warrant
particularly
describe
things
seized
papers
presented
judicial
officer
asked
issue
warrant
good
reason
presence
search
warrant
serves
high
function
mcdonald
high
function
necessarily
vindicated
document
somewhere
says
something
objects
search
contents
document
neither
known
person
whose
home
searched
available
inspection
say
fourth
amendment
forbids
warrant
documents
indeed
courts
appeals
held
may
construe
warrant
reference
supporting
application
affidavit
warrant
uses
appropriate
words
incorporation
supporting
document
accompanies
warrant
see
mcgrew
williamson
blakeney
maxwell
cadc
curry
roche
case
warrant
incorporate
documents
reference
either
affidavit
application
placed
seal
accompany
warrant
hence
need
explore
matter
incorporation
petitioner
argues
even
though
warrant
invalid
search
nevertheless
reasonable
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
notes
magistrate
authorized
search
basis
adequate
evidence
probable
cause
petitioner
orally
described
respondents
items
seized
search
exceed
limits
intended
magistrate
described
petitioner
thus
petitioner
maintains
search
respondents
ranch
functionally
equivalent
search
authorized
valid
warrant
disagree
warrant
simply
omit
items
list
many
seized
misdescribe
several
items
make
fairly
characterized
mere
technical
mistake
typographical
error
rather
space
set
aside
description
items
seized
warrant
stated
items
consisted
single
dwelling
residence
blue
color
words
warrant
describe
items
seized
respect
warrant
obviously
deficient
must
regard
search
warrantless
within
meaning
case
law
see
leon
steele
dealing
formalities
mcdonald
quoting
silverman
cases
firmly
established
principle
fourth
amendment
law
searches
seizures
inside
home
without
warrant
presumptively
unreasonable
payton
new
york
omitted
thus
absent
exigent
circumstances
warrantless
entry
search
weapons
contraband
unconstitutional
even
felony
committed
probable
cause
believe
incriminating
evidence
found
within
omitted
see
kyllo
chimel
california
mcdonald
clearly
stated
presumptive
rule
warrantless
searches
applies
equal
force
searches
whose
defect
lack
particularity
warrant
sheppard
instance
petitioner
argued
even
though
warrant
invalid
lack
particularity
search
constitutional
reasonable
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
squarely
rejecting
position
explained
uniformly
applied
rule
search
conducted
pursuant
warrant
fails
conform
particularity
requirement
fourth
amendment
unconstitutional
stanford
texas
cardwell
crozier
klein
gardner
marti
rule
keeping
principle
certain
carefully
defined
classes
cases
search
private
property
without
proper
consent
unreasonable
unless
authorized
valid
search
warrant
camara
municipal
see
steagald
jones
ibid
petitioner
asks
us
hold
search
conducted
pursuant
warrant
lacking
particularity
exempt
presumption
unreasonableness
goals
served
particularity
requirement
otherwise
satisfied
maintains
search
case
satisfied
goals
says
prevent
general
searches
prevent
seizure
one
thing
warrant
describing
another
prevent
warrants
issued
vague
dubious
information
brief
petitioner
scope
search
exceed
limits
set
forth
application
unless
particular
items
described
affidavit
also
set
forth
warrant
least
incorporated
reference
affidavit
present
search
written
assurance
magistrate
actually
found
probable
cause
search
seize
every
item
mentioned
affidavit
see
mcdonald
conceivably
magistrate
might
believed
weapons
mentioned
affidavit
lawfully
possessed
therefore
seized
see
requiring
registration
banning
possession
certain
firearms
mere
fact
magistrate
issued
warrant
necessarily
establish
agreed
scope
search
broad
affiant
request
even
though
petitioner
acted
restraint
conducting
search
inescapable
fact
restraint
imposed
agents
judicial
officer
katz
long
held
moreover
purpose
particularity
requirement
limited
prevention
general
searches
see
garrison
citing
camara
municipal
city
county
san
francisco
abrogated
grounds
california
acevedo
see
also
illinois
gates
ossession
warrant
officers
conducting
arrest
search
greatly
reduces
perception
unlawful
intrusive
police
conduct
petitioner
argues
even
goals
particularity
requirement
broader
acknowledges
goals
nevertheless
served
orally
described
respondents
items
searching
thus
submits
respondents
notice
proper
warrant
accorded
case
presents
occasion
even
reach
argument
since
respondents
noted
dispute
petitioner
account
according
ramirez
petitioner
stated
looking
device
box
dispute
us
petitioner
motion
summary
judgment
app
pet
cert
evidence
nonmovant
believed
justifiable
inferences
drawn
favor
anderson
liberty
lobby
citation
omitted
posture
case
therefore
obliges
us
credit
ramirez
account
find
petitioner
description
explosive
device
little
better
guidance
see
stefonek
holding
search
warrant
description
described
general
warrant
incumbent
officer
executing
search
warrant
ensure
search
lawfully
authorized
lawfully
petitioner
possession
warrant
particularly
describing
things
intended
seize
proceeding
search
clearly
unreasonable
fourth
amendment
appeals
correctly
held
search
unconstitutional
iii
concluded
constitutional
violation
occurred
turn
question
whether
petitioner
entitled
qualified
immunity
despite
violation
see
wilson
layne
answer
depends
whether
right
transgressed
whether
clear
reasonable
officer
conduct
unlawful
situation
confronted
saucier
katz
given
particularity
requirement
set
forth
text
constitution
reasonable
officer
believe
warrant
plainly
comply
requirement
valid
see
harlow
fitzgerald
law
clearly
established
immunity
defense
ordinarily
fail
since
reasonably
competent
public
official
know
law
governing
conduct
moreover
petitioner
prepared
invalid
warrant
may
argue
reasonably
relied
magistrate
assurance
warrant
contained
adequate
description
things
seized
therefore
valid
cf
sheppard
fact
guidelines
petitioner
department
placed
notice
might
liable
executing
manifestly
invalid
warrant
atf
directive
force
time
search
warned
special
agents
liable
exceed
authority
executing
search
warrant
must
sure
search
warrant
sufficient
face
even
issued
magistrate
searches
examinations
atf
order
see
also
error
deficiency
discovered
reasonable
probability
invalidate
warrant
warrant
shall
executed
search
shall
postponed
satisfactory
warrant
obtained
even
cursory
reading
warrant
case
perhaps
simple
glance
revealed
glaring
deficiency
reasonable
police
officer
known
constitutionally
fatal
reasonable
officer
claim
unaware
basic
rule
well
established
cases
absent
consent
exigency
warrantless
search
home
presumptively
unconstitutional
see
payton
indeed
noted
nearly
years
ago
sheppard
uniformly
applied
rule
search
conducted
pursuant
warrant
fails
conform
particularity
requirement
fourth
amendment
unconstitutional
word
cases
suggest
reasonable
officer
case
fits
within
exception
fundamental
tenet
petitioner
asking
us
effect
craft
new
exception
absent
support
exception
cases
reasonably
relied
expectation
petitioner
contends
search
case
product
worst
lack
due
care
case
law
requires
negligent
behavior
depriving
official
qualified
immunity
see
malley
briggs
observed
companion
case
sheppard
warrant
may
facially
deficient
failing
particularize
place
searched
things
seized
executing
officers
reasonably
presume
valid
leon
accordingly
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
jeff
groh
petitioner
joseph
ramirez
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
february
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
joins
dissenting
agree
fourth
amendment
violated
case
fourth
amendment
warrants
shall
issue
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
particularly
describing
place
searched
persons
things
seized
warrant
issued
case
particularly
describe
things
seized
comply
fourth
amendment
disagree
whether
officer
obtained
warrant
led
search
team
entitled
qualified
immunity
role
search
view
officer
receive
qualified
immunity
officer
conducting
search
entitled
qualified
immunity
reasonable
officer
believed
search
lawful
light
clearly
established
law
information
searching
officers
possessed
anderson
creighton
notes
objective
reasonableness
standard
applied
good
faith
exception
exclusionary
rule
see
ante
citing
malley
briggs
central
question
whether
someone
officer
position
reasonably
mistakenly
conclude
conduct
complied
fourth
amendment
creighton
supra
see
also
saucier
katz
hunter
bryant
per
curiam
officer
might
reach
mistaken
conclusion
several
reasons
may
unaware
existing
law
applied
see
saucier
supra
alternatively
may
misunderstand
important
facts
search
assess
legality
conduct
based
misunderstanding
see
arizona
evans
finally
officer
may
misunderstand
elements
facts
law
see
creighton
supra
qualified
immunity
doctrine
applies
regardless
whether
officer
error
mistake
law
mistake
fact
mistake
based
mixed
questions
law
fact
butz
economou
noting
qualified
immunity
covers
mere
mistakes
judgment
whether
mistake
one
fact
one
law
present
case
involves
straightforward
mistake
fact
although
acknowledge
directly
obvious
record
officer
simply
made
clerical
error
filled
proposed
warrant
offered
magistrate
judge
officer
used
proper
description
property
seized
completed
affidavit
also
used
proper
description
accompanying
application
typed
description
third
time
proposed
warrant
however
officer
accidentally
entered
description
place
searched
part
warrant
form
called
description
property
seized
one
noticed
error
search
executed
although
record
entirely
clear
point
mistake
apparently
remained
undiscovered
day
search
respondents
attorney
reviewed
warrant
defects
officer
unaware
mistake
rely
way
uncontested
officer
trained
search
team
executed
warrant
based
mistaken
belief
warrant
contained
proper
description
items
seized
question
whether
officer
mistaken
belief
warrant
contained
proper
language
reasonable
belief
view
law
enforcement
officer
charged
leading
team
execute
search
warrant
illegal
weapons
must
fulfill
number
serious
responsibilities
officer
must
establish
probable
cause
believe
crime
committed
evidence
likely
found
place
searched
must
articulate
specific
items
seized
specific
place
searched
must
obtain
warrant
magistrate
judge
must
instruct
search
team
execute
warrant
within
time
allowed
warrant
officer
must
also
oversee
execution
warrant
way
protects
officer
safety
directs
thorough
professional
search
evidence
avoids
unnecessary
destruction
property
difficult
important
tasks
demand
officer
full
attention
heat
ongoing
often
dangerous
criminal
investigation
officer
complies
fully
duties
excused
aware
made
clerical
error
course
filling
proposed
warrant
see
maryland
garrison
recognizing
need
allow
latitude
honest
mistakes
made
officers
dangerous
difficult
process
making
arrests
executing
search
warrants
officer
drafts
affidavit
types
application
proposed
warrant
obtains
judge
approval
naturally
assumes
filled
warrant
form
correctly
even
officer
checks
warrant
may
well
miss
mistake
tend
toward
myopia
looking
errors
every
lawyer
every
judge
recite
examples
documents
wrote
checked
doublechecked
still
contained
glaring
errors
law
enforcement
officers
different
better
officer
recognizes
error
course
better
still
make
mistake
first
place
context
otherwise
proper
search
however
officer
failure
recognize
clerical
error
warrant
form
reasonable
mistake
reaches
different
result
construing
officer
error
mistake
law
rather
mistake
fact
according
officer
receive
qualified
immunity
reasonable
officer
believe
warrant
plainly
comply
particularity
requirement
valid
ante
majority
surely
right
reasonable
officer
must
know
defective
warrant
invalid
much
obvious
tautological
also
irrelevant
essential
question
whether
reasonable
officer
petitioner
position
necessarily
know
warrant
clerical
error
first
place
issue
case
whether
officer
reasonably
fail
recognize
clerical
error
whether
officer
recognizes
clerical
error
reasonably
conclude
defective
warrant
legally
valid
gives
little
attention
important
difficult
question
receives
two
sentences
end
opinion
first
sentence
quotes
dictum
leon
effect
warrant
may
facially
deficient
failing
particularize
place
searched
things
seized
executing
officers
reasonably
presume
valid
ante
second
sentence
informs
us
without
explanation
case
ante
reasoning
convincing
understand
passage
leon
relies
upon
helps
recognize
challenges
defective
search
warrants
arise
officers
rely
defect
conduct
search
occurred
target
improper
search
brings
civil
action
challenging
improper
search
charges
filed
moves
suppress
fruits
search
inquiry
instances
whether
officers
reliance
defect
reasonable
see
garrison
supra
apartment
wrongly
searched
searching
officers
realize
two
apartments
third
floor
obtained
warrant
search
entire
floor
arizona
evans
person
wrongly
arrested
searched
employee
clerical
error
led
officer
believe
warrant
existed
person
arrest
mcleary
navarro
white
dissenting
denial
certiorari
house
wrongly
searched
informant
told
officers
suspect
lived
second
house
right
suspect
lived
third
house
right
language
quotes
leon
comes
discussion
officer
obtained
defective
warrant
abided
terms
acted
reasonably
discussion
notes
cases
reasonably
well
trained
officer
rely
warrant
passage
also
includes
several
examples
among
one
relies
case
depending
circumstances
particular
case
warrant
may
facially
deficient
failing
particularize
place
searched
things
seized
executing
officers
reasonably
presume
valid
ibid
interprets
language
mean
clerical
mistake
obvious
officer
fails
recognize
mistake
receive
qualified
immunity
read
context
however
quoted
language
addressed
quite
different
issue
natural
interpretation
language
clerical
mistake
obvious
officer
reasonably
rely
mistake
course
executing
warrant
words
defect
clear
officer
reasonably
abid
terms
execute
warrant
written
confront
issue
course
one
suggests
officer
reasonably
relied
defective
language
warrant
case
officer
unaware
clerical
error
case
officer
relying
one
respondents
make
usual
claim
injured
defect
led
improper
search
rather
make
unusual
claim
injured
simply
warrant
form
contain
correct
description
property
seized
even
though
property
seized
language
leon
point
stressed
purpose
encouraging
recourse
warrant
procedure
served
best
rejecting
overly
technical
standards
courts
review
warrants
illinois
gates
also
stressed
qualified
immunity
provides
ample
protection
plainly
incompetent
knowingly
violate
law
malley
opinion
inconsistent
principles
analysis
requires
nation
police
officers
concentrate
correctness
paper
forms
substantive
rights
new
duty
ensure
warrant
conforms
constitutional
requirements
sounds
laudable
ante
home
regime
strict
liability
within
ample
room
mistaken
judgments
qualified
immunity
jurisprudence
traditionally
provides
malley
supra
reasons
dissent
jeff
groh
petitioner
joseph
ramirez
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
february
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
chief
justice
joins
part
iii
dissenting
fourth
amendment
provides
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
unreasonable
searches
seizures
shall
violated
warrants
shall
issue
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
particularly
describing
place
searched
persons
things
seized
precise
relationship
amendment
warrant
clause
unreasonableness
clause
unclear
neither
clause
explicitly
requires
warrant
course
textually
possible
consider
warrant
requirement
implicit
within
requirement
reasonableness
california
acevedo
scalia
concurring
judgment
text
fourth
amendment
certainly
mandate
result
amendment
history
clear
amendment
principal
target
general
warrants
clear
respect
warrants
required
ever
indeed
different
nature
scope
federal
authority
ability
conduct
searches
arrests
founding
possible
neither
history
fourth
amendment
common
law
provides
much
guidance
result
vacillated
imposing
categorical
warrant
requirement
applying
general
reasonableness
standard
compare
thompson
louisiana
per
curiam
rabinowitz
frequently
held
warrantless
searches
presumptively
unreasonable
see
katz
payton
new
york
also
found
plethora
exceptions
presumptive
unreasonableness
see
chimel
california
searches
incident
arrest
ross
automobile
searches
biswell
searches
pervasively
regulated
businesses
camara
municipal
city
county
san
francisco
administrative
searches
warden
md
penitentiary
hayden
exigent
circumstances
california
carney
mobile
home
searches
illinois
lafayette
inventory
searches
border
searches
cases
stand
illuminating
proposition
warrantless
searches
per
se
unreasonable
except
course
today
holds
warrant
case
obviously
deficient
ensuing
search
must
regarded
warrantless
search
thus
presumptively
unreasonable
ante
however
text
fourth
amendment
history
sheer
number
exceptions
categorical
warrant
requirement
seriously
undermine
bases
upon
today
rests
holding
instead
adding
confusing
jurisprudence
done
turn
first
principles
order
determine
relationship
warrant
clause
unreasonableness
clause
even
within
current
framework
search
conducted
pursuant
defective
warrant
constitutionally
different
warrantless
search
consequently
despite
defective
warrant
still
ask
whether
search
unreasonable
conclude
furthermore
even
correct
search
violated
constitution
particular
respondents
fourth
amendment
rights
given
confused
state
fourth
amendment
jurisprudence
reasonableness
petitioner
actions
agree
conclusion
petitioner
entitled
qualified
immunity
reasons
respectfully
dissent
ny
fourth
amendment
case
may
present
two
separate
questions
whether
search
conducted
pursuant
warrant
issued
accordance
second
clause
whether
nevertheless
within
meaning
first
leon
stevens
dissenting
categorizing
search
warrantless
one
declines
perform
reasonableness
inquiry
ignores
fact
search
quite
different
searches
considered
warrantless
past
cases
involving
warrantless
searches
generally
involve
situations
officer
obtained
warrant
later
determined
facially
defective
rather
involve
situations
officers
neither
sought
obtained
warrant
see
anderson
creighton
officer
entitled
qualified
immunity
despite
conducting
warrantless
search
respondents
home
mistaken
belief
robbery
suspect
hiding
payton
new
york
supra
striking
new
york
statute
authorizing
warrantless
entry
private
residence
make
routine
felony
arrest
simply
treating
case
warrant
even
sought
issued
glosses
key
inquiry
whether
always
appropriate
treat
search
made
pursuant
warrant
fails
describe
particularly
things
seized
presumptively
unreasonable
bases
holding
defect
particularity
warrant
renders
search
warrantless
citation
single
massachusetts
sheppard
sheppard
noting
sole
issue
th
case
whether
officers
reasonably
believed
search
conducted
authorized
valid
warrant
rejected
petitioner
argument
despite
invalid
warrant
otherwise
reasonable
search
constitutional
recognized
case
law
reasonableness
inquiry
appropriate
one
exceptions
warrant
requirement
applied
declined
consider
whether
exception
applied
whether
search
actually
violated
fourth
amendment
question
presented
merely
issue
little
importance
ibid
sheppard
conduct
sort
inquiry
whether
fourth
amendment
violation
actually
occurred
clear
assumed
violation
purposes
analysis
rather
rely
dicta
buried
sheppard
actually
analyze
arguably
dispositive
issue
case
also
rejects
argument
details
warrant
application
affidavit
save
warrant
presence
search
warrant
serves
high
function
ante
quoting
mcdonald
physical
existence
warrant
typewritten
contents
serve
high
function
warrant
clause
principal
protection
lies
fact
fourth
amendment
interposed
magistrate
citizen
police
objective
mind
might
weigh
need
invade
searchee
privacy
order
enforce
law
ibid
explained
point
fourth
amendment
denies
law
enforcement
support
usual
inferences
reasonable
men
draw
evidence
protection
consists
requiring
inferences
drawn
neutral
detached
magistrate
instead
judged
officer
engaged
often
competitive
enterprise
ferreting
crime
assumption
evidence
sufficient
support
magistrate
disinterested
determination
issue
search
warrant
justify
officers
making
search
without
warrant
reduce
amendment
nullity
leave
people
homes
secure
discretion
police
officers
right
privacy
must
reasonably
yield
right
search
rule
decided
judicial
officer
policeman
government
enforcement
agent
johnson
footnotes
omitted
actual
contents
warrant
simply
manifestations
protection
hence
contrast
case
truly
warrantless
search
warrant
due
mistake
specify
face
particular
items
seized
warrant
application
passed
magistrate
judge
contains
details
searchee
still
benefit
determination
neutral
magistrate
probable
cause
search
particular
place
seize
particular
items
circumstance
principal
justification
applying
rule
presumptive
unreasonableness
falls
away
instant
case
items
seized
clearly
specified
warrant
application
set
forth
affidavit
given
judge
magistrate
magistrate
reviewed
documents
signed
warrant
application
made
adjustment
correction
application
clear
respondents
received
protection
warrant
clause
described
johnson
mcdonald
circumstances
hold
ensuing
search
constitutes
presumptively
unreasonable
warrantless
search
instead
determine
whether
despite
invalid
warrant
resulting
search
reasonable
hence
constitutional
ii
search
unreasonable
conclude
constitutional
prior
execution
warrant
petitioner
briefed
search
team
provided
copy
search
warrant
application
supporting
affidavit
warrant
officers
review
petitioner
orally
reviewed
terms
warrant
officers
including
specific
items
officers
authorized
search
petitioner
search
team
conducted
search
entirely
within
scope
warrant
application
warrant
within
scope
magistrate
authorized
finding
illegal
weapons
explosives
search
team
seized
nothing
ramirez
bow
county
petitioner
left
gave
respondents
copy
search
warrant
upon
request
next
day
petitioner
faxed
respondent
copy
detailed
warrant
application
indeed
putting
aside
technical
defect
warrant
hard
imagine
actual
search
carried
reasonably
argues
eminently
reasonable
search
nonetheless
unreasonable
written
assurance
magistrate
actually
found
probable
cause
search
seize
every
item
mentioned
affidavit
unless
particular
items
described
affidavit
also
set
forth
warrant
ante
argues
least
possible
magistrate
intended
authorize
much
limited
search
one
petitioner
requested
ibid
theoretical
matter
may
true
reasonable
inference
magistrate
intended
authorize
everything
warrant
application
signed
application
make
written
adjustments
application
warrant
also
attempts
bolster
focus
faulty
warrant
arguing
purpose
particularity
requirement
prevent
general
searches
also
assure
searchee
lawful
authority
search
ante
recognizes
neither
fourth
amendment
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
requires
officer
serve
warrant
searchee
search
ante
thus
search
considered
per
se
unreasonable
failing
apprise
searchee
lawful
authority
prior
search
especially
officer
promptly
provides
requisite
information
defect
papers
detected
additionally
unless
adopts
appeals
view
constitution
protects
searchee
ability
lookout
challenge
officers
officers
actually
carrying
search
petitioner
provision
requisite
information
following
day
sufficient
satisfy
interest
iii
even
assuming
constitutional
violation
find
petitioner
entitled
qualified
immunity
qualified
immunity
inquiry
rests
legal
reasonableness
action
harlow
fitzgerald
assessed
light
legal
rules
established
time
taken
anderson
creighton
outcome
inquiry
depends
substantially
upon
level
generality
relevant
rule
identified
example
right
due
process
law
quite
clearly
established
due
process
clause
thus
sense
action
violates
clause
violates
clearly
established
right
ibid
apply
standard
high
level
generality
allow
plaintiffs
convert
rule
qualified
immunity
rule
virtually
unqualified
liability
simply
alleging
violation
extremely
abstract
rights
ibid
anderson
criticized
appeals
considering
qualified
immunity
question
terms
petitioner
right
free
warrantless
searches
one
home
unless
searching
officers
probable
cause
exigent
circumstances
appeals
instead
considered
objective
albeit
question
whether
reasonable
officer
believed
anderson
warrantless
search
lawful
light
clearly
established
law
information
searching
officers
possessed
errs
defining
question
high
level
generality
also
assessing
question
without
regard
relevant
circumstances
even
true
reasonable
officer
believe
search
home
pursuant
warrant
fails
particularity
requirement
lawful
absent
exigent
circumstances
proposition
apparently
established
dicta
buried
sheppard
petitioner
know
carried
search
search
warrant
invalid
let
alone
legally
nonexistent
petitioner
entitlement
qualified
immunity
turns
whether
belief
search
warrant
valid
objectively
reasonable
petitioner
belief
surely
reasonable
stated
depending
circumstances
particular
case
warrant
may
facially
deficient
executing
officers
reasonably
presume
valid
leon
language
makes
clear
exception
leon
exception
apply
every
circumstance
explain
apply
initial
matter
even
argue
fact
petitioner
made
mistake
preparing
warrant
objectively
unreasonable
given
sheer
number
warrants
prepared
executed
officers
year
combined
fact
officers
also
prepare
detailed
sometimes
somewhat
comprehensive
documents
supporting
warrant
applications
inevitable
officers
acting
reasonably
entirely
good
faith
occasionally
make
errors
remaining
question
whether
petitioner
failure
notice
defect
objectively
unreasonable
today
points
cases
directing
officer
proofread
warrant
passed
neutral
magistrate
officer
already
fully
aware
scope
intended
search
magistrate
gives
reason
believe
authorized
anything
requested
search
point
case
suggesting
officer
prepares
executes
invalid
warrant
never
rely
magistrate
assurance
warrant
proper
indeed
massachusetts
sheppard
suggested
although
officer
involved
warrant
application
process
normally
read
issued
warrant
determine
object
search
executing
officer
also
affiant
might
need
although
contends
impose
proofreading
requirement
upon
officers
executing
warrants
ante
see
way
read
decision
particularly
petitioner
done
nothing
ensure
reasonableness
actions
proofread
warrant
receiving
several
allegations
respondents
possessed
illegal
firearms
explosives
petitioner
prepared
application
warrant
search
respondents
ranch
along
supporting
affidavit
detailing
history
allegations
respondents
petitioner
investigation
allegations
petitioner
verification
sources
allegations
petitioner
properly
filled
warrant
application
described
place
searched
things
seized
obtained
magistrate
signature
warrant
application
warrant
prior
execution
warrant
petitioner
briefed
search
team
ensure
officer
understood
limits
search
petitioner
search
team
executed
warrant
within
limits
error
search
warrant
discovered
petitioner
promptly
faxed
missing
information
respondents
view
petitioner
actions
objectively
reasonable
thus
entitled
qualified
immunity
foregoing
reasons
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
possession
items
unregistered
violate
warrant
stated
concealed
specified
premises
certain
person
property
namely
single
dwelling
residence
two
story
height
blue
color
two
additions
attached
east
front
entrance
residence
faces
southerly
direction
app
pet
cert
affidavit
sealed
sufficiency
disputed
reason
petitioner
argument
constitutional
error
committed
magistrate
petitioner
misplaced
massachusetts
sheppard
suggested
judge
police
officers
may
committed
error
constitutional
dimension
judge
assured
officers
requesting
warrant
take
steps
necessary
conform
warrant
constitutional
requirements
thus
unreasonable
police
case
rely
judge
assurances
warrant
authorized
search
requested
case
contrast
petitioner
alert
magistrate
defect
warrant
petitioner
drafted
therefore
know
whether
magistrate
aware
scope
search
authorizing
reasonable
petitioner
rely
warrant
patently
defective
even
magistrate
aware
deficiency
see
leon
true
petitioner
points
neither
fourth
amendment
rule
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
requires
executing
officer
serve
warrant
owner
commencing
search
rule
provides
officer
executing
warrant
must
give
copy
warrant
receipt
property
taken
person
whose
premises
property
taken
leave
copy
warrant
receipt
place
officer
took
property
quite
obviously
circumstances
surreptitious
search
means
wiretap
example
search
empty
abandoned
premises
impracticable
imprudent
officers
show
warrant
advance
see
katz
ker
california
whether
unreasonable
refuse
request
furnish
warrant
outset
search
case
occupant
premises
present
poses
threat
officers
safe
effective
performance
mission
question
case
present
appeals
decision
consistent
principle
petitioner
mischaracterizes
decision
contends
imposed
novel
proofreading
requirement
officers
executing
warrants
held
officers
leading
search
team
must
mak
sure
proper
warrant
fact
authorizes
search
seizure
conduct
duty
proofread
rather
duty
ensure
warrant
conforms
constitutional
requirements
suggest
official
deprived
qualified
immunity
whenever
violates
internal
guideline
refer
atf
order
underscore
petitioner
known
execute
patently
defective
warrant
although
sheppard
leon
involved
application
good
faith
exception
fourth
amendment
general
exclusionary
rule
explained
standard
objective
reasonableness
applied
context
suppression
hearing
leon
defines
qualified
immunity
accorded
officer
malley
briggs
citation
omitted
justice
kennedy
argues
dissent
allowed
room
mistaken
judgments
post
quoting
malley
according
correctness
paper
forms
higher
status
substantive
rights
post
explained
fourth
amendment
particularity
requirement
assures
subject
search
magistrate
duly
authorized
officer
conduct
search
limited
scope
substantive
right
protected
officer
fails
take
time
glance
authorizing
document
detect
glaring
defect
justice
kennedy
agrees
constitutional
magnitude
post